TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Onebeat21 Archive

View 1 post and 111 comments by Onebeat21 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social IssuesOnebeat21/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:04 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So men taking time off to be with the newborns and their families is still treated as a negative by business. It's like you're almost being treated as badly as men treat women in business.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 10:48 AM
-6

It's like you really didn't read the first sentence.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 12:32 AM
-10

Men are at both the supply and demand side of sex work since most prostitutes are trafficked by men. By your logic, men should be punished from both sides. Feminists have long argued for legalized venues as you suggested which have long been opposed by conservative, mostly male anti feminists.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:58 PM
3

I think we can all agree here, regardless of stance on toxic masculinity, that young people are not to be blamed for what they are taught by supposedly responsible people. I could agree with that much. The author interestingly points out that, "Portraying toxic masculinity as a problem that can be solved through early intervention by parents, caregivers and teachers sublimates a series of institutional and political contests into the ‘private’ realm of choice and childrearing. Ironically, this t…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:02 PM
6

It's not exactly dismissing toxic masculinity as a "feminist narrative" "It is probably true that some men act out in harmful ways in part because they are isolated, alone, insecure and fearful. But these psychological states offer little help explaining system-level inequalities such as the gender wage gap, the undervaluation of feminised domestic and care labour, or access to reproductive health services." The author is saying that we shouldn't look exclusively at gender but race, class and so…
/r/MensRights15/07/21 10:40 PM
1

There's no evidence against him but he said she guessed. Not even he said she said. In his testimony, Cosby admitted to casual sex involving recreational use of the sedative-hypnotic methaqualone (Quaaludes) with a series of young women, and he acknowledged that his dispensing the prescription drug was illegal.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 05:04 AM
-93

So go get pregnant and celebrate your choice or tough luck buddy.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:18 PM
-95

So what? Child support isn't just for poor people. If the custodial parent earns enough money to donate to charity that in no way means that non custodial parents aren't responsible for providing for their children. Just because I have enough money to provide for my child and donate to charity doesn't mean I should be covering the other parent's child support payments. Two people make a baby.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 07:29 PM
-15

Claiming feminism as your biggest problem makes it sound like you don't have real problems.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:20 AM
-4

There's never been a civil rights movement where conservatives haven't argued that the group in question sought power to the detriment of straight white men. Similar arguments were used to justify slavery.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:31 PM
-3

You're beef with feminism amounts to, they just don't do enough for men. When they're probably the last people you should be asking to do stuff for you.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:52 AM
-5

Feminism is a supremacy movement with the goals of benefiting women to the detriment of men. Conservatives make this argument about every civil rights movement. There's not one group who's sought equality that hasn't been accused of benefitting themselves to the detriment of straight white men. Similar arguments were used to justify slavery.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:29 AM
-33

It's an anti feminist message that women are not adequate candidates for selective service It's not actually an anti male message that men are disposable as this was largely decided by men for men in the first place. So gratz, you're all feminists now.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 01:49 AM
3

Did you know that women ordered to pay support are far less likely to pay it than men? And despite that women are far less likely to actually be punished for it. There'd certainly be less support as well if there was more shared custody (not to mention children do better when they have time with both parents). Unfortunately feminists fight hard against this and have successfully gotten quite a few equal custody bills veto'd despite public support. Nowhere in there is a compelling reason as to wh…
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:57 PM
2

As to the "suffering" of children, that would be the mothers choice once the father has said he doesn't want to suffer as a wage slave to support her choice. Unless the mother chooses to kill the fetus or adopt, there's suffering either way. There's less suffering if you pay your child support instead of being a deadbeat
/r/MensRights04/06/21 09:34 PM
4

Oh well, feelings. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Others feel that children of unwanted pregnancy suffer enough. Only 44 percent of custodial parents actually receive their full child support. Though they don't quite suffer as much as the MRA "feels" is fair to them I suppose. Is it both male and female children that should suffer?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 08:14 PM
3

So I guess when you say that "womens rights to abortion are largely fine" you mean not fine at all?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 07:27 PM
5

Have MRAs come up with any solutions that don't directly hurt children?
/r/MensRights04/06/21 07:11 PM
0

If you want me to defend my position then contradict it. You didn't answer my question either so by your logic "you'd have no way to answer the question... and still sound even remotely intelligent."
/r/MensRights28/05/21 05:26 PM
0

OK. My answer is no. Satisfied? You're digressing to something completely off topic and your opinion is of little interest to me.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 04:36 PM
-7

If you need to ask for things you already have, maybe you don't actually need things.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 02:33 PM
-6

Perhaps male being the default is enough?
/r/MensRights28/05/21 02:38 AM
-15

Yes well that can't happen if they don't try the cases now can it? You know like...the whole point of the article.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:21 AM
-50

Let's just change the name of this community to "A Feminist said something I Don't Like" There's nothing else going on here.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:04 AM
-14

Well if convictions have fallen that means rapes have fallen No, it doesn't mean that.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:55 AM
-17

Had you read the article you'd see it clearly states that while rapes are on the rise convictions have fallen to a record low.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:50 AM
-82

This post serves no other purpose other than to stigmatize rape victims.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:45 AM
1

You're not deserving of some type of compensation like a child support waiver due to your inability to become impregnated as a male. You're being ludicrous.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:39 AM
1

Plenty of children are being raised by single parents. Why aren't they entitled to someone else's income to help support them? They are entitled, that's why you have to pay child support. get it?
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:34 AM
1

Stating the fact that the father's role is biologically unique only evidences my point that men and women are not similarly situated on this issue, therefore they're not actually entitled to the exact same treatment under the law. Apart from that there's the welfare of the child to consider (which no one here has).
/r/MensRights24/05/21 11:18 PM
1

The point she's trying to make (and is largely being ignored here) is that paying for illegal sex work supports sex trafficking and abuse of women (and by pimps and other dangerous criminals). While thousands of males are victimized as well women represent a clear majority of these victims.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:10 PM
1

That's not correct, most feminists support sex workers and would prefer legalized prostitution so it can be regulated and women can be kept safer from pimps or potentially violent customers and receive health care benefits. Slut shaming is anti feminist, not feminist.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:00 PM
-5

likewise a woman is responsible for providing for her child even if she herself is a victim of rape or another violent act. Again your perceived double standard is bogus.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 04:19 AM
-15

It's not your inalienable right to leave fatherless children behind for women to look after for you. sorry. It also shouldn't be your privilege to ignore laws you don't like.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 08:17 PM
-19

Men and women are not similarly situated on this issue (men don't get pregnant) therefore your ill conceived double standard is bogus on it's face. If you're going to make this argument, you can't completely ignore the unique state of pregnancy which can only be experienced by the pregnant individual. It's also worth mentioning that only 44 percent of custodial parents actually receive their full child support.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 06:32 PM
7

While we're discussing propaganda: RT America is a U.S.-based pay television and internet-based news channel which is part of the RT network, a global multilingual television news network based in Moscow, Russia, funded and controlled by the Russian government.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 01:16 AM
-1

This guy claims in his second paragraph that it's women who benefit most from harems and male land ownership because they get to be "passive" and you think this is a smart person who knows things????
/r/MensRights30/04/21 05:53 AM
–

Uh oh, you said some true stuff and got downvoted a lot.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:44 AM
-2

I don't and I don't have to, I don't care about your opinions. So what?
/r/MensRights28/01/21 04:49 AM
-15

Where do people get this idea that they have the right to have their opinions liked by others, well received or even respected? You have the right to an opinion, you don't have the right to have your opinions appreciated.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 09:25 AM
-6

If this is our biggest problem when there hasn't been a draft in 50 years then I think we can all go home now.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:20 AM
1

Unless the change is agreed upon by both parents the court will likely rule that no name change is in the best interests of the child.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:13 PM
0

You know what's actually disingenuous? Claiming to denounce the domestic terrorism that occurred at the Capitol and then support violence in the same breath. Then denying it was even terrorism at all...then pathetically scapegoating black people to deflect and avoid accountability. No one here could bring themselves to denounce domestic terrorism and I said it. So what?
/r/MensRights18/01/21 09:28 AM
0

Those traits aren't exclusively masculine, they're learned behaviors. The point is to stop teaching them. Most people male or female are generally good people.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 09:24 AM
0

I'm not sure what characteristics, if any, are gender exclusive.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:34 AM
0

I'm disappointed that you associate only 'toxic' characteristics with men. As everyone can see, I clearly stated " Certainly many men have many admirable traits. " in my first sentence. If you're not going to read i'm not going to respond to you.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:02 AM
2

modern day feminists seriously lack basic common sense and are full of hypocrisy and are deluded man-hating degenerates Not sure you know what generalizing means.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 03:12 AM
1

Certainly many men have many admirable traits. Masculinity means the characteristics we attribute to them. First we'd have to figure out what characteristics are exclusively make or female. All of which would probably be debatable. Characteristics we perceive to be masculine are more cultural than biological. Hence why "Toxic Masculinity" doesn't mean "all men are Toxic", that's why it's an adjective. Many men are unfairly and sometimes abusively conditioned to inherit psychologically harmful tr…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 03:11 AM
3

You mean like the way you just generalized feminists?
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:57 PM
1

Disingenuous my foot. I mean what I say, and not one person here could bring themselves to denounce violence, insurrection or domestic terrorism.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:16 PM
-2

Yes, far too often the term Toxic Masculinity is spun by conservatives to mean "all men are toxic" when it doesn't mean that at all. Of course, not all masculinity is “toxic”. That’s why it’s an adjective.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:05 PM
0

As if I didn't know this this group was just a guise for white supremacist right wing extremist groups and potential domestic terrorist threats.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:54 PM
1

I think the people who were shot and killed might disagree with you
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:42 AM
-2

The image you posted doesn't show any violence or terrorism. Now you're just playing dumb.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:34 AM
0

You're basically writing up quotes and arguing with yourself. It's a bit looney.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:29 AM
-1

A woman tolerating your molestation is not consent. Sorry buddy.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:28 AM
1

​ The fact that police may have aided and abetted isn't anything to brag about. It's not just a protest when Right wing extremist groups show up fully armed in a premeditated attack in a pathetic attempt to overturn an election by force.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:34 AM
-2

I see you like making quotes of things I didn't say and arguing against them. Why don't you try responding to something I actually said.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:27 AM
0

You're wrong, the quote is "I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. "
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:25 AM
-1

If violence and acts of domestic terrorism are how you express yourself then call me a critic.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:08 AM
1

when you said " Given that both feminism and Republicanism are broad diverse groups " i assumed you didn't mean diverse exclusively in gender, it confused me as well. My point still stands that Trump does (or did) have supporters from various demographics and to condemn the actions of the minority of his supporters as being the result of toxic masculinity seems a bit wide of the mark. It's certainly not solely the result of toxic masculinity despite violence and aggression being the primary symp…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:50 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/26/what-the-2020-electorate-looks-like-by-party-race-and-ethnicity-age-education-and-religion/ This was where I got the original number from, I also did a lazy google search and found a more recent article that said it was closer to 1/4 either way i don't consider that "remarkably diverse" which was what I originally stated and if you disagree that's fine. ​ I'm not asking you to validate my beliefs. I'm asking you to provide evidence to support your…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 05:38 AM
-2

Let's say your allegations against Biden are true. If Biden's behavior is bad then you share feminist ideas.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 05:22 AM
-4

You know who else thinks they're part of a revolution? ISIS.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 05:19 AM
0

Saying that Trump won 57% of white votes doesn't mean he won 43% of nonwhite votes. You're simply interpreting this incorrectly. Secondly I thought you would like my bicycle joke. Your last paragraph...oh boy lol. You're the one who wanted to talk about Republican identifying feminists so if there is a "massive point" then you can make it. I could care less. Feminism is theory it's not a club you toss people out of. There's nothing wrong with dismissing or discrediting views you don't agree with…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 04:22 AM
-2

It would simply be dishonest to say that the Republican party is remarkably diverse. By "not remarkably diverse" i say that considering the fact that less than a fifth of Republican voters are nonwhite. You can technically be a Republican and call yourself a feminist in the sense that if my grandmother had wheels she could call herself a bicycle. To your point yes it is possible that some feminists disregard the historically and routinely anti feminist ideology of conservatives because they supp…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 03:34 AM
-4

No self respecting feminist aligns herself with the Pu$$y Grabber in Chief. Nor is the Republican party remarkably diverse.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:51 AM
-3

Trump supporters are great at making claims, not so great at supporting evidence.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:48 AM
-1

Continuous calls for domestic terrorism by Trump supporters and those who incite them probably doesn't sit well with a lot of people, not just feminists.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:46 AM
0

I can rely on myself to make a cup of coffee, doesn't mean the two are synonymous
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:23 AM
-5

Trump supporters stormed the Capitol and I said it. I said they were all Trump supporters, I didn't say all Trump supporters were in attendance. But we can't say that this ideology doesn't breed terrorism (something conservatives used to have zero tolerance for).
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:20 AM
-5

Not every woman is a feminist, that's correct. Still, Trump maintains a base of primarily white American men — similar to the one we saw storming the Capitol building who share the same views.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:15 AM
1

I agree, certainly not everyone who bottles their emotions become a domestic terrorist or a violent abuser. Toxic masculinity is produced by a set of patriarchal norms that perpetuate the notion that being a “man” means to be dominant, aggressive, violent, and very often misogynist, homophobic, and an array of other -isms. It’s a combination of “locker room talk,” “boys will be boys,” and all of the other phrases we bandy about to excuse behaviors that are unacceptable and harmful — not just to …
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:12 AM
-10

Then you support domestic terrorism.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:06 AM
-7

Comparing race riots and BLM protests for racial justice to the disgusting display of domestic terrorism committed by Trump supporters at the State Capitol is not apples to apples. Scapegoating black people for crimes committed by white supremacist Trump supporters isn't going to work this time.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:05 AM
0

Emotional suppression is not really synonymous with self reliance even if you're relying on yourself to deal with emotional issues.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:03 AM
0

To suggest that "self reliance" is what feminists mean when they speak of toxic masculinity is dishonest. I've never heard "self reliance" associated with "Toxic Masculinity" though it's possible someone somewhere wrote that it was. Either way, you're overstating the relationship between the two. Toxic masculinity is a fairly new buzz word and doesn't necessarily have a solidified Dogma. So what does “toxic masculinity,” or “traditional masculinity ideology,” mean? Researchers have defined it, i…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:55 AM
4

cool fake story
/r/MensRights22/11/20 04:00 AM
1

Ok you've made a claim, now evidence it. How is this not natural even if unique to the human species? Humans have three distinct types of tears: basal tears, reflex tears and emotional tears. The "crying" tears even contain a natural painkiller, called leucine enkephalin When your body makes emotional tears, your limbic system (the part of your brain associated with emotional arousal) signals your Pons (the brain’s “message station”), which then relays a signal to your lacrimal system to produce…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 09:08 PM
0

So what? It's still natural.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 08:49 PM
1

If tear ducts weren't natural you wouldn't have them.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 08:25 PM
1

crying itself for emotional reasons isn't natural in the first place Except that it is...it is natural in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:24 PM
1

Accept it, men will always be expected to be strong and don't cry, that's just the natural protector role of the males Suppressing your natural instinct to cry is not actually natural at all.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:43 AM
1

They’re using crimes that are typically committed by men to prove “men are bad” You mean like...most crimes?
/r/MensRights29/10/20 02:28 AM
0

That's not shaming anyone's gender role (I have no idea what you perceive your gender role to be), that's just dismissing your self pitying nonsense.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:09 PM
0

Which quote exactly did you consider "gender role shaming" I really have no what i said specifically to make you feel that way.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:35 AM
0

Has nothing to do with gender roles or shaming anyone. I see it in echoing in every thread here. Screaming into the void disposable disposable disposable ! I have no idea what that's all about but it's not doing anything good for you.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 12:33 AM
1

Stupid logic. If i'm a sales manager, I don't deserve more money than a female sales manager just because some men are coal miners. You want the freedom to go be a florist? You have it! I don't see any militant feminists lining up in front of your hypothetical flower shop and standing in the way of that dream. Feminism is not to blame for any of the problems you listed. If men want better health services they can vote to fund healthcare. Theirs costs significantly more than women's. Men should p…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 10:56 PM
0

you guys love this word disposable, that's just self loathing incel talk.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 10:23 PM
1

As a king I may pander to my subjects, including females, to secure my position of power but i'm still running a patriarchy. Men and women both seek validation from the opposite sex at times...so what? It's not as if woman who don't meet male approval are on a permanent holiday in Palm Springs.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:02 AM
1

If Facts matter so much to you then how about evidencing your claims?
/r/MensRights27/10/20 01:27 AM
0

but I will say we are much closer to a matriarchy than a patriarchy. That is your feeling and you could say that. There's no truth to it or evidence to support it, but you can say it. If Men feel so burdened by their leadership roles then they can stop right now. There are no laws stopping them and certainly no feminists getting in the way of that. If male politicians or corporate leaders find benefit in pandering to women the male does that for his own benefit. That's his privilege.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 12:39 AM
1

The ratio of Wall Street workers to roofers in New York State is completely irrelevant to anything. Just because some men are roofers doesn't mean feminism need be thrown out the window.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 12:26 AM
-2

More women should keep their legs shut and have better standards. Sexist slut shaming bs like this is exactly why people don't take Men's Rights groups seriously. Now you're saying that non custodial parents shouldn't be required to pay child support and then in the same breath complaining that these dead beats don't get custody. Boo Hoo Women gets preferred custody because Judges and Lawmakers perceive that to be in the child's best interest (it typically is) which then trumps the equal protect…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 12:16 AM
1

Men holding positions of power while pandering to women does not make a Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 12:04 AM
0

Yes, the rate of single motherhood is a problem and for the most part it is the woman's fault. Poor choice in 'men' and lower, loose standards and opinion of self and not being chaste. So not being chaste is an exclusive male privilege? A U.S. Census report estimates that just 43.5 percent of custodial parents get the full amount of support they're entitled to. And more than 30 percent don't receive anything at all. Blaming women for men not fathering or parenting their children is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 10:04 PM
2

LOL but most people who work on Wall Street are MEN! What do you expect Feminists to do for you!? Men would do better in education if father's taught their sons that their worth is not measured by how well they throw a ball around.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:49 PM
0

As I said, the author of the article described masculinity as including "service to the disadvantaged" he didn't mean "service to themselves" nor does he imply that men themselves are actually the disadvantaged members of society. His idea of Masculinity includes qualities like compassion, tenderness empathy and love. That's not the message we send to our sons when we tell them to "man up" That sounds great and lovely on paper though no one actually teaches boys or men that these are the primary…
/r/MensRights26/10/20 05:34 PM
-1

This woman did not lead a happy life of privilege, I promise you.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 04:50 AM
-1

The women was certifiably insane, that's why they cut her a break in sentencing, they had bigger fish to fry in 1968 New York City.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 04:16 AM
-2

If high status men ignore your issues and refuse to represent you in government then why make feminists the enemy?
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:57 AM
-2

Oh really? Do prostitutes fall under a category of women you think you're allowed to rape? I could care less about these stupid propaganda videos where young conservatives instigate people and then film them reacting badly, your anecdotes don't prove any larger point. There's also absolutely no evidence to support a claim that women or even feminists in particular are more violent then men. If you're upset about government policy which you view as unfair to men, you're in luck because you're a m…
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:23 AM
1

Because men are victims of their own internalized homophobia.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 01:36 AM
3

That's definitely not a true thing. 70 million WWII fatalities says you're wrong.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 01:11 AM
-1

Looks like you found a Feminist who committed a crime over 50 years ago! Gratz! Andy famously forgave her for this. She was feminist partly because she'd been repeatedly raped by various men. Maybe she had her reasons. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Shooting Andy had little to do with her feminism, he'd stolen or "misplaced" something she'd written which was important to her.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 01:00 AM
0

You just broke your own rule about the gay thing.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 09:19 PM
-5

The author's idea of masculinity doesn't correspond with the ideology of the group, and I said it. I have no idea why you're listing things that have nothing to do with what i said. I don't even know why you're responding to me.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 09:15 PM
-5

The author of the article described masculinity as including "service to the disadvantaged" he didn't mean "service to themselves"
/r/MensRights25/10/20 08:56 PM
-7

Males do not need nurturing in male-specific ways because men have it all in our society anyway I don't think either side makes the claim that Males do not need nurturing. The author bases his opinion on his idea of masculinity which includes compassion, love, service to the disadvantaged, but that isn't really what we mean when we tell our sons to "Man up". ​ This group isn't about service to the disadvantaged at all, the message is more like "no one is really disadvantaged except for us"
/r/MensRights25/10/20 08:42 PM
0

So all Men can post here as long as they don't bring up issues that effect them which you don't care about.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 08:27 PM
1

"Mens rights doesn't exclude any other identifiers outright. " Ok then maybe we should call it "Some Men's rights" or "Rights for Men I like" Why would a Men's rights group ignore issues like hate crimes committed against Men for any reason?
/r/MensRights24/10/20 11:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter