TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PE_Journey2024 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by PE_Journey2024 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Just head over to one of the PE (e=enlargement) to witness the deep insecurities first hand!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 12:03 PM
1

'... ease in the dating market?... Married men'. <------- you mean divorced men right? Or are you trying to wedge in affair seekers on this list?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 07:27 PM
1

Simple, at that age I think I could have made a better career decision. As relates to relationships, age gaps are much riskier for the 21yo, despite being of legal age. I feel less of an age gap is a safety mechanism. But your counter argument that anything can happen isn't wrong - it's that were arguing percentages not possibilities here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:26 AM
1

Certainly people in my state voted, drove, and could be drafted. Not certain what the connection is. Certainly making a marriage decision when very young has much longer personal implications.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:05 PM
1

But let’s consider a scenario where a 21-year-old woman marries a 35-year-old man and is diligently trying to make the marriage work. Despite her efforts, she could still be exploited if he has cynically manipulated her into a position of financial and social dependence. This often occurs in certain societies where the woman moves in with the man’s family, becoming a free household laborer. It’s important to note that each case is unique. Furthermore, it’s undeniable that many young individuals …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 09:03 PM
1

you could check out r/gettingbigger to look into PE. There is probably someone out there right now. The problem is how to find her without your ego getting crushed. Also, the maxim: 'Be the best version of yourself that you can be' is always a good guide to not over-focus on one aspect of your total person.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 08:54 PM
1

The formula was meant a means of society thinking about non-productive age gaps. And to especially take into account the vast maturation from 18 to say 25yo, and how to protect the younger partner from being manipulated/groomed/etc. I'm merely presenting my sliding age-gap theory. And your response that people should just know sides-steps the whole conversation. People make bad decisions or are groomed all the time. (But to your college-aged point; I do remember my high school friend and I, when…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 04:49 AM
3

I think this can certainly be true, although the risk is huge that it's a temporary situation-ship for mostly sex. With the right mature younger man - he could really be attracted to her ability to nest for him. Be fit, dress great all the time (even when around the house), be a great cook. My brother married a women in her late 30's (IIR) at about this age. She was established, had her own house, was very calm and collected. Also they met over the same sport activity. Still together over 20 yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 04:03 AM
3

^^^^^ You heard it here first guys! Stop obsessing and get your tongue game on fleek!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:57 AM
3

Studies have shown that this is in fact not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:44 AM
7

Women in their 60+ 's do complain that many men (their age) are looking for a 'purse and a nurse'. But, yes very true!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:42 AM
3

...you tried to get everyone to feel bad for men who are well endowed by pretending that they struggle as much as men who aren't. I never took this position. I few have pointed out that being on the larger/-est end of the distribution can prevent some pairings from occurring. I think this position is correct too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:41 AM
2

I mean, everything is optimized against the downside, right? 🤣 We need to get a grant to get this theory published!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:37 AM
1

I disagree. I don't feel I wasn't still growing at that age (entering grad school too). I'd say she should be about 35+ yo -- at that point its her life and her decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:29 AM
5

At 35+ yrs most women have enough life experience to fully weigh the pros and cons of their choices (as well as any of us, I'd say). A 40yo women can certainly marry an 80yo man for love - realizing she will be single again in the near future.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:28 AM
2

With possibly an indication of grooming maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:24 AM
7

I was no dummy but I don't think I had the best information at 21, and didn't know what I didn't know to ask (or who to ask - my parents were the silent generation and had a lot different experiences coming up).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:23 AM
1

Women also rate emotional maturity, respectability, and being able to provision highly as well? I think men (in general) are hard coded to appreciate a woman's biological fertility signals (maximum at near 25yo), even if he isn't seeking offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:22 AM
1

OK I agree with you. So here is my idea that an age gap (in general, outliers always exist) should be on a sliding scale. And we'll assume the female is the younger as the older man tends to have certain advantages. Is she? Gap around ____ years is acceptable: Oldest age man ideally: 18 -----> 3yr -----> 21yrs 24 yrs ---------? 5yr -----> 29 yrs 25/26 yrs (out of college a year+). 7yrs -----> 32yrs 35 yrs ----------> Any age, she'll not naive anymore. -----> upto 85yrs ( <--- very unlikely, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:15 AM
2

I read one post somewhere to support the idea that women had more selection ability in these tribal groups (unpaired women obviously). So she would be the one who picks who she would sleep next is the argument. I really don't know. I'm not too persuaded by the Evo Psych field myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:06 AM
3

My theory is that those that migrated to COLD climates had to become growers to avoid having it frost-bitten off! 😬 At least that's the explanation that I'm going with for my 'grower'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 03:03 AM
2

Then stake your flag in the sand. What do you mean by “well-endowed”? The study I’m quoting essentially answers the general question of whether size matters for many women and provides a breakdown of what might be the ideal size. [However, it does seem to have some flaws.] Since you haven’t committed to a specific length or percentage, your statement is unfalsifiable. So far, the best scientific studies seem to provide an answer and a range for what might be the general preference. I never said …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 02:04 AM
3

I see what you did there :D Can I say I don't appreciate you trying to extend her comment, by raising the spectre of Punnery! Oh, wait... Dammit!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:53 AM
5

Can I express thanks for vocalizing this - soooo many men have been damaged by unrealistic expectations. Between porn and all the other noise on social media it's almost like a concerted propaganda campaign is being waged on their self-confidence. Really they need hear from a range of female experiences to fix their brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:28 AM
3

Furthermore this ignores the less noisy women for whom an average size D is perfectly sufficient for a long term relationship. (Guys a LTR depends on more then just your D!)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:25 AM
7

The preference range doesn't line up with men's beliefs. Sure larger can be preferred in general but not to the huge extent mentioned online and in porn. Prause, et al [2015], one of the better efforts to study the ideal preferred size found: 6.3" x 4.8" for BF penis. -and- 6.4" x 5.0" for one-time penis for the women surveyed with the aid of 3D plastic cylinders of various shapes. This is large (some 1.8? standard deviations above the average of 5.1" to 5.5" inches). But not the crazy 9" to 10"…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:24 AM
1

Ha! Go back to dirtycode.io ho. Be gone!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:18 AM
1

CalcSD.info guys (better to get the most realistic data from Scientific studies rather then P*rn or your ex. Oh, and the Western Ave number is very likely highly skewed on the high side by some bad surveys being incorporated recently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i7D4AQffkA
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:16 AM
6

Aaaand the data is highly skewed by P*rn, plus those most likely to show pics of their junk (so skewed also), and those with a preference (as one woman said on this forum Size Queens are LOUD).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:13 AM
3

The evo psychology field really likes weighing in on this (women picking mates based on visual cues). I think their arguments are doubtful. For one, how do you explain 'growers' if humans were essentially naked for most of their development? Humans they argue already have the the biggest phallus to body mass of any mammal. But why aren't men crowded around the upper ranges?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 01:09 AM
1

That was my understanding in some of these better outcomes. The receptors and downstream signaling apparatus works just fine - but the hormonal signals were sent out at the proper time for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 11:05 PM
0

' ... I mean, you know if you got a small dick.' Actually an amazing number of average and above average men had no realization they were thus - and instead felt they were small. Even the literature shows a fair percentage of above average men seeking penile surgery as they felt they were small. {Causes?: Porn, a bitter ex-, bad information (ie lengths being tossed around - see CalcSD.info for better facts}. (But, your point, I think, is more the perceived need for some men to seek out humiliati…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:48 PM
1

I just want to editorialize (not withstanding u/MongoBobalossus 's pushback). That I think u/reddit_is_geh is expressing the pretty standard mindset for those men frustrated with trying to understand the true 'woman's' position on 'Does Size Matter?' (a terribly phrased question ).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:44 PM
6

You're right in that infancy is absolutely the time to detect and treat the underlying conditions causing Micropenis. the Cleveland clinics has this to say: 'The most common micropenis treatments include testosterone therapy and surgery. People of all ages can benefit from micropenis treatment. But the chances of success are greater if a healthcare provider diagnoses and treats the condition in infancy.' So are the **all ages** including hormones AND surgery or just surgery, the site doesn't say…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:31 PM
5

It's amazing the number of men that have this self-sabotaging body dysmorphia. There really should be support for men to seek therapy to deal with these beliefs. It doesn't help that penis shaming is one of the socially acceptable body shaming avenues left in general conversation. I think this and feeling that their lover is just trying to placate them (while secretly desiring someone else) causes this anger to 'just be told the truth'. But they can't accept that for women arousal and satisfacti…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:52 PM
14

This is a very reasonable comment. So many men seem unable to recognize that a large size can cause micro-tearing for their partner - and hence the need for recovery. For some women they just aren't comfortable continuing. Also there is a reason for the phrase 'husband-dick', meaning being able to have fun times without being sore or in pain.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:43 PM
7

But if you are in microphallus territory you may respond very well to hormone treatment (meaning your body missed a growth phase). These men need to seek out guidance from a medical doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:39 PM
1

I agree on the first numbers. And now with the internet SQ's and BD having people can find each other fairly easily (I still think chance encounters are nearly impossible - perhaps why it seems large dudes are spoken about amoung close friend circles). I give you: dirtycode.io
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:27 PM
1

Certainly those with a preference for massive sizes exist. But the numbers you're throwing out are beyond the sizes of many o the biggest C*rn starts. Look the study above, for the 'one-time encounter' of 6.4"x5.0" cicum, is already at the 90th percentile. Meaning only 1 in 10 men are likely to meet these dimension.(and for the study this would be non-bone pressed so add to that for a modest fat pad of 0.5" - so now that man is at 93rd percentile or 0.7 men out of 100). You're throwing out a num…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:17 PM
1

Or your 'trust-me' bro numbers are just wack. All 75 women, some bi- and lesbian, weren't virtual signalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:49 PM
1

I signed up a long time ago out of curiosity. You should see women then. Still not very encouraging for the average sized D guys. The site is kind of for size queens or sex workers who will take anyone's money.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:32 AM
1

People don't know what they don't know. So the first way to help is to provide accurate resources to push back on P*rn-ified propaganda. Once these young mend find themselves a community of support they then will have the tools to start overcoming these insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:30 AM
2

My younger brothers were making fun of my newly emergent pubic hair in the car once. My mom was cackling. That was weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:09 AM
1

I think you're leaving out cock sleeves and toys. But yes, if the ground rules are it had to be a body part only that stimulates the A or P fornices, and that's what does it for me... then yes the larger guy is the clear better lover - I think we call women who seek out these men exclusively Size Queens.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:05 AM
1

"Girls routinely share intimate details about their partner with their friends, including dick sizes and sexual performance. Men do not." I do think this needs to be amplified. Somehow many women are fine with size shaming (but only if average/small). The fact that some men (usually young, I'd think) say horrible thinkgs doesn't justify male body shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:48 AM
3

Hurt people hurt. At times the most injured somehow think it's OK to injure others.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:43 AM
1

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 Maybe the best in person survey of size preference (as opposed to 'an acceptable range') bf D: 6.3" long x 4.8" circumference one-time: 6.4" long x 5.0" circ. in this study.of female preference with physical 3D cylinder models.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:32 AM
1

https://calcsd.info/chart is probably the best set of Data. There is a world-wide and a Western (and other settings) Typically 5.5" long and 4.8" in circumference. Nice thing about the chart is one can check one's length AND girth - so the overall volume, like you say, matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:29 AM
1

I think men want a bracket around the vague “ size matters” statement. This puts forth what the size is that seems most generally (let S.Q.'s S.Q.) preferred. This is the best one I know of for women's (average) _preference_ (not what's a workable range), but at least a pretty realistic target. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 3D printed models in person survey. It (indirectly) acknowledges there is a biological floor, while defeating these 'all women wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:25 AM
2

Some young men have actually committed suicide over their supposed life of impending loneliness. Doctors report all sorts of well above-average men seeking penile implants (which carry real risks) because they are anxious about ever finding a partner. Ignoring men's anxieties isn't the answer - especially when so much is triggered by bad information and public shame. We need to ask for compassion for all members of our society. Hurt people hurt. So the fewer hurt people we can create, the better…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:20 AM
2

Anxious guys should read your posts. I think some anxiety is the feeling that women are telling each other that only large guys can provide truly satisfying sex. You didn't eliminate your ex before you started and it paid off for you. Furthermore these average guys really do need to develop all kinds of skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:14 AM
2

Guys should look here: https://calcsd.info/chart
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:10 AM
1

The A and P fornices seem to come into play with satisfaction from longer menbers. Likely the reason some women require a certain length in their mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:09 AM
2

It would seem that a minimal length is needed to stimulate the G-spot/clittoral stucture.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:07 AM
1

And apparently a true micro-penis can be the most amenable to hormone treatment and regain a missed growth phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:05 AM
0

This study mentions women stating a preference for bf versus 'one-time' size preference: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 basically; 6.3x4.8" versus 6.4x5.0" -- so the girth requires a longer recovery time (ie not everyday bf fun-times).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:03 AM
1

This is a great post. And some men may have to accept that some women want "the real thing" (I guess that might make them size queens). But most people take their partners qualities in toto, leaving a lot of chances to be not only to be a High Value mate but also a skilled, attentive lover as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 01:00 AM
1

The body dysmorphism in the Penis Extension subgroups that has 7" guys chasing 8" lengths and 8" guys chasing 9" lengths is unreal. It's a bell curve (with a floor for functionality)- but some of these guys are going to completely eliminate their dating pool. Maybe P*rn is producing this wounded dysmorphic version of masculinity? Doesn't help though that we use penis shaming (short) as code for unmasculine maleness. _Any_ body shaming removes the average humanity of all of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:55 AM
1

I don't think it's as simple as women who have a preferrence for those men with severe body dysmorphia (and into suprisingly high size ranges), it's that these men may feel that _all_ women have this preference (P*rn ain't helping them, true) and thus the one part of their body that they have zero control over will prevent them from having a long-term partner. Characterizing as a 'fragile male ego' those that are highly anxious about being forever alone is unfair I think. The anxiety has some me…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:50 AM
0

Actual study of preferred partner sizes (and by bf versus one-night-stand dick): https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 Boyfriend: 6.3" x 4.8" circumference. One-time: 6.4" x 5.0" circumference. <-- hence where the idea of girth mattering more plays out. Pp size ranges for those playing at home: https://calcsd.info/chart
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:30 AM
2

Do they? That seems beyond ridiculous. Could some women be getting visually acceptable signals from somewhere other than the men they encounter (maybe porn)? As far as size, this seems to be the best study done on _preferred_ size (not workable, or acceptable size ranges). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 And the average size from calcsd.info/chart
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:24 AM
2

Completely reasonable way of stating the premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:19 AM
2

Apparently there is a website to put everything into a profile: dirtycode.ie
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 12:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter