TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

P_o_D Archive

View 5 posts and 92 comments by P_o_D on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

All I get is a garbled mess on my end :( https://imgur.com/a/rZ4BG
/r/MensRights16/09/17 10:20 PM
5

You think it looks better because its what you're used to seeing. Nothing more. Amputation in general makes things easier to clean. Don't like brushing your teeth? Pull your teeth out. Don't like cleaning your ears? Lop em off too. Frankly, the "maintenance" idea is insulting to men. Its not complicated or difficult. If you're capable of wiping your ass or brushing your teeth, I assure you you can rub a little water on your dick, it isn't hard. The "parent's choice" bit is blissfully stupid. It …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:40 PM
1

What the fuck do you know about MY dick. I know a printer without ink doesn't print. I know an car without breaks doesn't stop too well. I know a dick without a foreskin doesn't glide. A dick that doesn't glide isn't much more than a fleshy broom stick. A diagram if you have no idea how a penis works. But right now, what you need more than a foreskin is some chill. Keep it together babe.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:22 PM
1

There is plenty to bitch and moan about in this world, one doesn't need to go searching for it. The fact your penis doesn't function properly is something you should give a shit about, but that's really up to you.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:29 PM
5

Hey look, I found one. No, a harmful procedure done to a child that will impact the function of that person's penis for the rest of their lives is a problem. In fact, its more of a problem than most of the things that go are complained about in this subreddit (OMG this feminist said something that upsets me!). As a guy who's been restoring for the past four years, I have actually experienced some of the differences between the two (naturally I can't repair it completely). But if you're happy wit…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:14 AM
7

There's a large collection of cut men who refuse to see circumcision as wrong or harmful because they'd have to do some introspection that could potentially harm their egos (ie potentially seeing something wrong with their genitals). Some of those people visit this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:15 PM
6

Backed. Thanks for the reminder, almost forgot!
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:29 PM
13

Well, its often hard for circumcised men to understand what they are missing. As a somewhat hyperbolic analogy, consider a clan of deaf people, who deafen their children as infants. They see nothing wrong with what they are doing, as they cannot understand what they are destroying as they have never experienced it. But you, as an outsider, understand the damage that is being caused and you feel compelled to protect those children from this damage. Men don't often talk about the functions of thei…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:42 PM
10

You're not even trying are you? Lets go over what I said: Keep in mind, not a single major health organization recommends newborn circumcision. A very few state the "benefits" outweigh the "risks", most state they do not, and some overwhelmingly recommend against circumcision. That "very few" I mentioned is the CDC. They are almost the only major organization that claims this. Where other countries, such and Denmark and Finland have moved to ban the procedure. Very few countries actually attempt…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:34 PM
11

The reason that voluntarily circumcised number is so low is because most Americans have it done as an infant You're confused about the statistic. First off, circumcision rates are down to nearly 50% in the US now (56% as of 2012 if I'm not mistaken), and about 70ish% of adult American men are circumcised as of now, leaving it to about 3/10 chance they are not. Its not that uncommon. And that 1 in 10,000 statistic was 1 in 10,000 uncut men, not men in total. If the parents wait to let the kid dec…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:25 PM
15

They should be able to decide when they are able to understand what it is they are losing. There is no reason a parent should be able to decide this unless its somehow a guaranteed certainty that the boy would want to be circumcised (which is practically impossible). Also, to refute your "the kid will want it done eventually too" is utter non-sense. In the US, the rate of elective circumcision is about 1 in 10,000 men. That number includes doing it for health issues that warrant it. What tiny mi…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:01 PM
18

If you follow through with those resources, they are resource for men who are or may become perpetrators of domestic abuse, not victims. There doesn't seem to be any assistance listed for male victims.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:10 AM
9

It really comes from the concept of consent. If you went in for a sex change operation, you'd likely not think you mutilated your genitals because you willingly agreed to the operation as its something you contemplated and wanted. You experienced life as a male and you chose to change your genitals to something more female. By contrast, if I strapped you down and performed sex change operation on you, you would very likely and rightly state that I mutilated your genitals. It was forced upon you …
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:05 AM
3

We are already forced into one damaging sexual modification, why not throw another one on the list, right?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:57 PM
4

Well, those are American doctors, which are pretty much at odds with the rest of the developed world when it comes to this topic. Most medical professional in the developed world see it as non-beneficial or straight up harmful.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:04 PM
3

It was a large scale study that found a correlation with circumcised boys having higher rates of autism. A few possible reasons were discussed but it really came down to the fact it needs more research. If there is any direct causes, it would be likely the trauma of the operation altering the way the brain develops, but its just speculation until more data is found.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:01 PM
33

Don't worry, if we go to Kenya and just circumcise all the men they'll be immune to it! Right guys?... Right?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:12 AM
8

I have read before that it has a lot to do with how the different predators target their victims. Male pedos are much more likely to seek out a child they wish to abuse. Female pedos tend to abuse those who are close to them and whom trust them, such as students, children of friends and family members.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:07 PM
4

You're right about one thing, the terminology probably doesn't win over too many people, it more likely than anything makes them defensive. I use the word sparingly around those uncomfortable about the topic, taking a more calm, statistical and ethics based approach. But this is a label I apply to the procedure, its a label I apply to myself. I do see it as a disfigurement, even if at one point it was all that I knew. I bet some people attack people about the topic, one way or the other, but I d…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:39 PM
8

I have to work tomorrow, so I can't waste my time here right now, (hopefully someone else will for me), but I assure you, I've studied the anatomy, statistics, and I assure you, I've read several hundred times more literature on the topic than you have. I have been studying the topic for roughly 7 years and its a lot more than a couple google searches trying to reinforce some narrative I have. I have read all of what you posted, I understand the methods, motives and stances of those involved. It…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:11 AM
22

You miss the point. Sure you can like what you have, realistically you'd probably like what you had if you were left intact. And if you didn't, you could go get the surgery done yourself. By contrast, I and many other men, don't like what was done to us. We'd prefer if our genitals functioned they way they are supposed to. We'd prefer to keep the protective (and functional) tissue instead of the scars and the cracks and the dried out tissue. But of course, we can't undo an amputation. A function…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:24 AM
4

The humor is OK, but he has an agenda and a message he is trying to carry, he isn't louis ck.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:28 PM
27

Ugh, this guy is far too inconsistent about far too many things to take his opinion too seriously. I've agreed with him on a few topic before, but agreeing with him on anything feels like your associating yourself with a bit of loony dice roll. Overall though, I generally distance myself from anyone who is strongly tied to US politics. That shit is red vs blue non-sense for the most part. At some point they adopted sports team level fandom where seeming extremely left or right became something a…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 02:24 PM
6

This is some of the most powerful cognitive dissonance I've ever seen. You could power cities with this. EDIT: upon reading his other comments, I'm almost sure I fell for a troll. That was a waste of time >_>
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:50 PM
3

No, we want to give the right to choose to the person it belongs to. Convert your argument to any other situation and you'll find how foolish it is. You don't think molesting your child is good? Well then fine, don't molest your child, but don't infringe on my rights to molest my child.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:46 PM
2

I hate the fact you're probably right. It doesn't matter what we say, they'll just tl;dr and pass it unchanged.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 05:53 PM
8

You may be missing the point. The point is this shouldn't be the parent's choice. The choice to circumcise a young girl, the choice to castrate a child, the choice to reassign a child's gender with no medical reason, the choice to surgically alter other parts of a child for your own personal preference are not an option to parents, neither should how much of a boy's genitals the boy gets to keep. This isn't about controlling parents, this is about protecting boys and men. You don't think a large…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 05:52 PM
9

Why the downvotes? Its a new study that just recently released its findings. It does nothing but merely state an observed correlation between circumcised boys and an increase in autism. It does not state Circumcision causes autism, but states more research should be done in the area. I'd say this a much more modest conclusion than that of the HIV African study. That study (which was rife with issues and inaccuracies) found a casual correlation between circumcision and a decrease in HIV contracti…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:39 AM
3

Well, to be fair that was based off one doctor who admitted to forging the study. This is a new study coming based on 360,000 boys and its found a correlation between the two.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:31 AM
5

This is simply because you've been normalized to it. Women from cultures that circumcise women make the same arguments. Humans have been normalized to many atrocious things in the past, this isn't really any different. I'd tell you to do some research into the functions and anatomy of the penis so you can actually understand what you're talking about, but you've likely already cemented your opinion sheerly based off emotion, so I guess it would be a waste of your time trying to intrude your emot…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:30 AM
13

I've always found this the oddest argument. Its like we act like a penis is strictly something we urinate from, that the functions and benefits of the foreskin can simply be ignored. Yes, old peoples bodies break down, what else would you like to deprive them of for the entirety of their existence simply so your job is a bit easier?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:20 PM
20

That didn't really bother me much. She seems to think the whole damn world is out to get her and its all at the fault of men, which is somewhat delusional, sure. But her point about not having anything to do with men is fine, if she wants to isolate herself that's fine. She doesn't have to open up to it if she doesn't want to. Hopefully, if she succeeds in isolating herself in her own world where men don't exist, then she won't end up polluting others with her hatred.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:48 PM
44

Why are acid attacks a fucking thing to begin with?! I'm dumbstruck that this occurs frequently enough to get its own category and stats...
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:52 PM
2

If you've read a lot of the way the WHO handles situations and the politics that pollute their decisions, non of this would surprise you.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 07:37 AM
5

Its a two fold problem, but basically by being a "circumcision advocate", you have a "reason" to have access to pictures of young boys genitals. So this guy uses his "advocacy" to disguise his pedophilia. So its a bit of a double abuse situation, he advocates for the forced amputation of parts of boy's penises and partially does it so to drive his own fetishes. Everyone has fetishes, his are just disgustingly damaging and worse of all he actively acts upon them. This is an MRA issue because gene…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 07:34 AM
1

Can we give this guy some upvotes. He deserves it, that was a lot of text to copy!
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:13 AM
1

Naturally.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:03 AM
1

Just because its incorrect, doesn't mean they won't use it to justify it.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:02 AM
1

If you mean suffering as in immediate suffering, that will be fluffed off by most "he doesn't remember it". It has its merits but is too easily dismissed. Longer term suffering comes from the loss of bodily integrity. The problem of loss of sensation and alteration of appearance and function could be met with the resolution of becoming uncircumcised, but this isn't a choice the male can make at the age where this kind of suffering is experienced. So, if your argument is for immediate suffering, …
/r/MensRights27/09/14 12:54 AM
1

Lets take a quick look at the definition. Bodily integrity is the inviolability of the physical body and emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy and the self-determination of human beings over their own bodies. self-determination So lets take a simple example of a circumcised adult male and a uncircumcised adult male. If both would like to be circumcised, the cut male is good, and the uncut male can simple book the surgery and become circumcised. Now instead, lets say they both want to be…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 12:21 AM
4

Thats ridiculous. To believe that you'd have to be completely ignorant of the functions and purposes of the foreskin (as many are, its not like its taught in American schools). You understand what your eyes do, but hell, if there were removed while you were an infant, doesn't matter, your autonomy is virtually meaningless at this stage, morally speaking. Just a bit of undue suffering, clearly no ramifications on your adult life.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:42 PM
3

Heh, I got a laugh out of this, have an upvote.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 09:49 AM
3

Heh, as a developer, that is quite a funny coincidence that'd you come across one of your own projects in such a light. What role did you have on the site's creation?
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:11 PM
8

Circumcision has almost always been about profit in the US and this isn't anything new. If you'd like to buy some baby foreskin you should check out this site: http://www.atcc.org/Products/All/PCS-200-010.aspx You get quite a bit of dough for healthy human tissue, especially when its from an infant.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:51 PM
7

To understand why circumcision is a big deal first you need to research the function and structure of the foreskin and the roles it plays in intercourse for both men and women. Its not a mere flap of skin, its about 15 square inches of skin (for an average adult male) full of specialized nerve endings, various receptors and sub-systems that make the penis as healthy and functional as possible. I leave you to do the in-depth research, just stay weary of your sources, nut jobs like Brian Morris wi…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:07 AM
16

Amputation of a functional, healthy, erogenous component of an person's genitals. vs. Some ink underneath the skin. The scary part of this world is that there are people who might argue the second one is the worse of the two.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:39 PM
12

In many religions, it is the parent's right to kill the child if they believe the child is disrespectful or sinful. Murder is religious freedom. And your a fucking twat.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:34 PM
6

I swear to god, you fucking morons that equate vaccination with circumcision only strengthen the anti-vaccine brigade out there. Your ignorance is directly contributing to a growing problem. Do you know of countries that don't do vaccination? Do you know their mortality rate from these diseases? In case you don't, they are much much higher than countries that vaccinate (ya know, pretty much all first world countries). In contrast, do you know of countries that don't circumcise? Do you know their…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:21 AM
4

Whats wrong with pets?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 04:26 AM
4

So, yeah, she seems like a cunt and deserves to be treated like one. But honestly, if I see someone struggling, male or female, I ask if they need assistance. Not because of gender, but because there is no reason to leave someone struggling when you can help.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 11:32 AM
1

I must concede, you clearly know more about myself than I do. Would you like to be my knew therapist? My current one is clearly incompetent.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 11:17 AM
1

Whats so unbelievable? The fact I'm aware and honest on reddit where my identity would be hard-pressed to actually figure out? Yeah, real risky move on my part.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:40 AM
7

I read this and thought "meh, most of these aren't that bad, I do similar things". Then I remembered I'm a sociopath, so to some people this kind of shit is scary. Oh well :-\ EDIT: scratch that, I don't do these kinds of things. But I do do things to intentionally manipulate people and see what makes em tick. But for the most part, I don't make up fake drama about shit to see how people react.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:02 PM
5

You can checkout /r/intactivists they got some decent info there, but its a bit slow at times. There is also http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org which is made up of physicians who are against the operation, so probably a decent place for non-sensationalized information. If your interested in firing off any random questions you can contact me directly. I'm fairly well educated about the topic and can back up my statements with reasonable sources.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:46 PM
1

Reading through that, it seems like they have one or two decent pieces of data then proceed to make a fucking mass of assumptions. The raw data means something, the rest of the article is worthless.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:36 AM
7

Those of you questioning these results, chances are you are misreading them. The legend at the bottom indicates the number of grams of pressure required to facilitate of response. Just because part of your penis "feels better" than another part doesn't directly relate to its ability to sense things more accurately. Different nerves induce different reactions, regardless of their actual sensitivity.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:14 AM
3

Am I the only one off-put by this title? This concept even? I'm glad to hear men's life expectancies increasing, thats great news, but why do we have to compare it women's? Why is this how the news is framed? IMO, it takes a good thing and sours it. I love the men and women in my life, I don't want the "great news" that my son will outlive my daughter, nor the other way around. Obviously, this will of course come to bite MRAs in the ass as feminists will use it to fuel some of their claims of in…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 07:59 AM
2

You can check site like this: http://www.circumcisionmanitoba.ca/
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:26 AM
2

Two things here. a) A removing the citoral glans isn't as damaging as remove the glans of the penis and foreskin as the body of the clitoris is still buried in the pubic region and still has some sensitivity. In terms of nerve density, the male foreskin itself has more nerve endings than the clitoral glans. So to attempt to compare either of the operations you were mentioning is physiologically inaccurate and intellectually dishonest. b) Women without clitorises are still capable of reaching org…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 01:25 AM
1

Well, first off, circumcision should pretty much never be done. Its "benefits" match up pretty much with most amputations. You can remove a person's stomach (in case you don't know, yes you can live without a stomach) and now they have severely reduced chances of stomach cancer, acid reflux is prevented, stomach ulcers are prevented etc etc etc. But of course we don't, because it reduces quality of life. This is pretty common when removing body parts. Circumcision would only be "required" for ro…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:13 AM
1

Its half of the skin of your cock... But here, I answer it in decent detail in this post http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1u4oxs/im_a_bit_angry_need_you_to_be_my_rock/ceh1rz0?context=3 If you want more info feel free to ask, I don't mind talking about it.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:55 AM
1

This isn't about the trauma, can't do shit about that. This is about men who want their foreskins but had it taken from them. This may lead to a chance to get it back. I'm restoring at the moment (nearly 2 years) and really hate the fact I was cut... but I don't talk to just anyone about it. I have a close circle of friends whom I do talk to about it, of those who are cut are all are resentful about having it done, but to varying degrees. From "thats fucked up but w/e I'll live with it" to being…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:17 AM
2

From an ethical perspective, sure. I don't know about you, but I want mine back damn it. I'm all for this.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:11 AM
0

genetical huh?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:49 AM
2

Pretty ridiculous shit on both sides of the fence there. But lets be real, I promise you that 90% of those votes are by men defending whatever position they are in, posing as women.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 04:24 AM
6

Just wanted to point out, many of the most passionate anti-circumcision redditors are not intact. Their circumcisions are the reason for their hatred of the operation.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:51 PM
7

He did point out the different types, but I'll give you a link to the image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/FGC_Types.svg It does come in different types, you're only referencing the worst of the three, at which point I won't disagree. But if I remember my sources correctly, that form has become the least common and the most ferociously fought against. The other types start matching up more similarly; you may want to read his entire post first. But from an ethical standpoint…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:44 PM
7

This kind of positive action is really important IMO. Males are often lacking and discriminated against in the educational field, one of the many reasons boys struggle in education. To be blunt, boys usually want to grow up to be men, not women. When their educational environment is utter lacking in men, these boys don't find any positive role models they can follow, and end up seeking them outside of school, making education a lot less important to them.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:36 AM
7

Uh... This is stupid, but you should have used a double quote, the apostrophe looks like it ends the quotation. As a programmer, this bugs me. This shit makes me mad scared to have kids, I'll do my best to avoid the crazies but some of em are sleeper cells.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:13 PM
3

I also have a damaged ear drum from an accident when I was a kid. Like my penis, it still works for the most part, just not as sensitive as its supposed to be. I'd get my ear repaired if I could as well. Knowing your body's flaws isn't insecure dood. I'm not gonna pretend to myself that my hearing isn't slightly hampered, its not like it'll make it better. I put my dick in the same category. (Kids don't play with explosives, they are very loud)
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:08 PM
3

As a circumcised guy myself, fuck right off. This doesn't have anything to do with shaming. I pointed out that once we can regrow foreskins, that makes circumcision no longer permanent. The operation's permanence is one of the biggest issues here, once cut it can't be undone. If you're a cut guy who doesn't want to get the reparative surgery, that's you choice, no one is forcing you to do it. But those of us who want to repair the damage will hopefully be able to. That's important, and to help e…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 02:49 PM
3

You should consider restoration. Its not gonna bring back the nerves and complex components, but it will get you back the appearance and some of the function and sensitivity. Be sure your ready for it though, I'm a year and a half into mine and I imagine I'll be going for another 2 years. Find things that help you cope with it, sometimes you'll just have a bad day and have no choice but to dwell on it. Things I've found help: Restoration - Makes you feel like your making progress away from the d…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:50 AM
26

Heh, well, live and learn. While I despise being circumcised, having a good dad is infinity more important than having a foreskin. So concentrate on that. Plus, if it was done recently, by the time he is an adult there is a decent possibility there will be major advances by organizations like foregen and you can literally grow it back. Mistakes are made everyday, at least this will fuel you to stop other from doing the same. Stay strong and positive bro.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:31 AM
1

Ah, thats OK, thanks. Sounds like he has a... problematic mother. He just needs to remember that its your kid, she doesn't have any authority over the situation.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 01:41 AM
10

Well, you may be on the sensitive side, some of us (like me) are not. Circumcision may work for you, and if it does, you should consider doing it as a consenting adult (Surgeons can also do a much better job on a fully grown penis). If you got to keep yours, you can get rid of it at any time. I, on the other hand, wasn't given the chance to keep mine. I have had difficulty reaching climax and generally don't feel much when being stimulated. Had I been able to keep mine, this may not be as bad of…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:52 AM
2

Thanks for publicizing this. You're doing some good work!
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:46 AM
5

Well, at first it was a combination of curiosity and resentment. I've always been mad about it, it was something of mine that was taken from me. I've always loved my body, and I knew an important part was taken from me. When it comes to growing it back, I've never been overly sensitive, it wasn't infrequent that climax could take an hour or more, sometimes I'd just give up after a while and go to sleep, for most of my life I just accepted it as something I could do nothing about. So when I read …
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:41 AM
1

Yeah, its a little infuriating. I think this is more of a thing with younger women, older women who've been around are little less childish about it.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:30 AM
1

It is a bit depressing that so little interest is given by the women, especially when its their own children.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:29 AM
1

Thanks for the reply. Being neutral when you don't know much about it is OK in my book, glad you did the research you did. Your in a powerful position, you may be able to communicate with women on a level that can be difficult for men, having a unique perspective of the situation. Really, thank you for caring :D On a side note, do you think you would be able to get your boyfriend to be willing to post about his experiences? Its always helpful having men who've been on both sides of the fence giv…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:27 AM
3

I find it quite interesting that there are so many people in the comments trying to defend... pot. The idea that something negative could happen while on pot seems to really rile them up. Other than that, yeah this is pretty fucked up, little surprised at the lack circumcision jokes on their part. For some reason male genital damaging is both OK and sometimes funny to a large swath of people.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:58 AM
3

Heh thanks. Its not particularly well written or anything but you can use it however you like.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:45 AM
3

No contact is not an option. I don't intend on distancing myself from my family.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:05 AM
3

No, I still love and care for my siblings and my parents. I think she made a very uneducated, careless, damaging decision. While I haven't forgiven her for it (not that I think she cares), I'm not going to hold this against her.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:01 AM
3

To be honest, I didn't try hard enough. I was busy at the time and I honestly didn't think she would do it. By the time I heard she was planning on going through with it I was already miles away back at work and could do little to stop it. I will be a lot more proactive if I have another nephew coming, and now I finally have backup with my younger brother.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:57 AM
29

Yeah its helped, I've been more or less off the topic for the past few hours (obviously not completely, since I'm here now). I've found what you say depends on who your talking to. Men around your own age that trust you are the easiest to explain things to. I've found discussing damages from circumcision is the best course of action, you don't have to lament but be all encompassing in your description. It doesn't take them too long to start connecting the dots with what you've said and oddities …
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:54 AM
3

This doesn't usually happen to me, just a really bad day I suppose. I'll need a few other things wrong with me before I jump to that, though it isn't indefinitely out of the question.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:15 AM
3

Thanks bub, can always count on you. <3
/r/MensRights01/01/14 03:07 AM
3

Thanks, I'm sure I won't feel as shitty about this soon enough, perhaps its just the holidays. On ending the cycle... I already failed to prevent it from happening to my nephew as my sister didn't much care for my opinions or concerns and went with my dad's archaic and fucking blood boiling "reasons".
/r/MensRights01/01/14 03:06 AM
3

I know I got people here to back me up, but it seems like the bulk of NA parents are in this fucking bubble where they can't hear (or choose to ignore) that there are men that hate what was done to them. Probably doesn't help that most of us stay quiet about it...
/r/MensRights01/01/14 03:02 AM
6

Thanks. I think I did make an account there but I often forget it exists. I'll try to make a point of heading there instead, this was more of a quick desperate place to blow off steam before I started attacking my wall.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 02:59 AM
5

I live in Canada where it is less common, had friends both cut and uncut so I knew there was a difference early on. I'm with you on the exercise, I was in damn good shape in the middle of the year but I've been working so much that I haven't touched my weights in over a month now. I really want to get back to it.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 02:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter