So, english is not my first language, i' try to be clear, and i'll try to understand the explanations.

So, like many of you, i believe circumcision is genital mutilation.

I was banned on reddit r/sex when i said i don't see why non mutilated penis should be judged, culturally, in usa, because i don't have this at all in canada.

So i was banned for body shaming, i guess for saying mutilated.

Anyway, can you guys explain how it can be expressed that it's genital mutilation without implying the result is mutilation, therefore that a part is mutilated?

I know mutilated sound arsh and all, but i think circumcision is the bad thing, not talking about it.

Also, i'm sure that if it was fgm, we could say the vaginas had been mutilated