TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

closetedapostate Archive

View 0 posts and 138 comments by closetedapostate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

I’m happy that more guys who are suffering from male pattern baldness / androgenic alopecia are becoming more aware of medications like finasteride, minoxidil, and dutasteride to stop further hair loss and sometimes have some hair regrowth, but what does this post about a famous politician admitting to using minoxidil have to do with men’s rights?
/r/MensRights19/06/26 07:40 PM
1

Absolutely. Frankly, even in US states where it became legal for women to be topless in public, they still choose not to anyway because of either norms or not wanting to draw attention from men. It’s absolutely a biological difference. Straight men tend to get turned on by seeing women’s breasts, and since men don’t have breast tissue like that that women are as attracted to, it follows that the laws and cultural norms would be what they are. In America, the two biggest men’s rights issues to me…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 05:45 PM
1

Yeah, and in the Western world, like some states in America, it’s not legal for women to be topless, whereas it is for men. Hence, the one example of a right that men have that women don’t. If this is going to become an argument that isn’t going to be productive, I can stop talking now. I just wanted you to know we still both agree that men have way fewer rights than women, and that the toplessness example goes to show the kinds of things feminists would have to stretch to find something to comp…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 05:38 PM
-3

Not to be that guy, but depending on what part of the world we’re talking about, there are technically places where it’s legal for men to be topless in public but not women. However, it’s such a minor issue and pales in comparison to the myriad rights women have that men don’t. When you consider men having to sign up for the draft or be drafted and it being legal for men to have their genitals mutilated at birth or as minors without their consent but women are protected from both and about being…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 04:52 PM
11

Yeah, you’re absolutely right. Like, when politicians have the power to change the law, instead of making it so men are automatically registered, they should change the law to include women, too, or, better yet, abolish the requirement for anyone to register altogether.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 04:15 AM
7

I’m not trying to downplay how terrible the double standard is in the US for men being required to register for the Selective Service System (the draft), but I heard a new law passed that at the end of this year, men will automatically be enrolled in the draft without having to sign up or have the option to be fined a quarter million or sent to prison because the sign up will become automatic. It still is unfair that, in theory anyway, men are supposed to be willing to risk their lives for the r…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 04:08 AM
1

Yeah, like being falsely accused and doxed are dangers in dating and online dating in and of themselves, but I’ll bet the people behind the Tea app who sent you that dismissive statement don’t take that into account or care about it.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 07:58 PM
8

I hate the mindset of people who use and operate the Tea app. They brazenly claim that dating, especially online dating, is more harmful and riskier for women because they say so and expect us to accept statements like that as incontrovertible facts. They provide no citations or sources, no specific ways it is more harmful, and merely offer anecdotal statements. Anyway, their statement that they won’t be taking those photos down despite concern about being talked about behind your back, where it…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:02 PM
2

Hey, I agree with you. She got a happy ending she didn’t deserve. I don’t know if the movie’s creative directors decided to pander to women in the audience by ending the way they did, or if the aim was to lean into horror and show that an evil character got away with what they did without being held accountable or brought to justice. All I’m saying is that even though it isn’t satisfying, some movies end with the bad guy winning, and this movie is one of them. Believe me, I would have preferred …
/r/MensRights16/02/26 04:48 AM
4

You saw the movie, and you think the female character was portrayed as a good person?
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:56 AM
9

I don’t want to spoil the plot on the off chance someone in the comment section wants to watch Send Help anyway, but despite the trailers, at least with the two main cast members, it is not a man-bad, woman-good movie.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 11:12 PM
6

True. To be honest, it wasn't until I read the Wikipedia article about that song that I knew the song was applicable to this post. If someone just read the lyrics without doing further research, they wouldn't know it was gendered.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:31 AM
7

Push - Matchbox Twenty
/r/MensRights21/05/24 05:59 AM
3

It means you shouldn't prioritize the wants and needs of others over your happiness and well-being.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 06:30 PM
3

This phrase seems relevant: “Don’t set yourself on fire to keep others warm.”
/r/MensRights28/09/23 03:10 PM
11

I liked and saved your comment because it all resonated with me. I was just wondering if you knew which states women aren’t legally allowed to drop off an unwanted baby at a hospital or fire station and absolve themselves of parental responsibility.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:40 PM
1

Same. I like rock in general, too. I mentioned heavy metal specifically because it’s considered music that pretty much only guys like.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 03:17 AM
2

For me, it’s action movies and heavy metal music.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:54 AM
2

I was surprised neither he nor anyone else on that panel brought up infant circumcision as an example of the government having power to make a decision about the male body. Conscription and child support are the two examples they used.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:15 AM
54

Videos like that are part of the reason why YouTube made the dislike count on videos invisible.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:57 AM
12

There are no words to describe how negative I feel about being mutilated below the belt as a baby. The only thing that moves me in the direction of “getting over it,” if only slightly, is r/Foregen. Foregen gives me hope that I may one day get back what was stolen from me.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 10:26 PM
16

I think mutilating the genitals of baby boys without their consent is a terrible thing to do. To say that I am upset about having that done to me as a baby would be a monumental understatement. I also frequent r/Foregen and await the time when I may get back what was stolen from me.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:28 PM
18

In case no one’s mentioned it yet, you can check out r/Foregen, which is a nonprofit company whose goal is to regenerate the foreskin with nerve endings and all of its functions with the use of adult stem cells and human regenerative research.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:29 PM
8

If anyone’s interested, there are comments criticizing the video to be read on Gab/Dissenter. That web browser/extension allows fellow users to comment on all videos and webpages still up.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 06:29 PM
4

I noticed comments were disabled on that YouTube video. Are they worried about us having a discussion about how unfair alimony laws are and how men almost always suffer the brunt of them?
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:24 PM
3

I wanted to mention two things that might help as they have for me. What helps with irritation of exposed glans on boxers is a thing I wear called a “manhood.” It’s a leather thing with Velcro you can wear around your penis so that you won’t feel friction anymore, and it even helps with de-keratinization so that the glans will get less and less dry over time. You can also check out r/Foregen if you haven’t already, which is an organization that seeks to give men who wish they were intact the cha…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:20 PM
6

If you don’t mind, I’d also like to add r/Foregen to the list because there are men who were mutilated without their consent and want to experience sexual pleasure as if they had never been circumcised in the first place badly enough that they’re willing to fund that company in their efforts in finding a way to regenerate the foreskin and the other parts stolen from boys and men who so desire it.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:04 AM
4

Good bot.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 07:25 AM
3

While I respect your response, I would still be bothered if your doubts turn out true. My hope for Foregen was that it could reverse all the damage done. If it doesn’t work for all the structures as you mentioned, then there’s no point in supporting it if it wouldn’t be any different from restoring, which also only just stretches the remaining skin to cover the glans and doesn’t restore structures like the frenulum and dartos muscle as you pointed out.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 04:38 PM
3

Out of curiosity, what’s your opinion on Foregen? Their mission may not be to directly protect boys from ever having their genitals mutilated in the first place, but they do want to advance in the field of regenerative science to give circumcised men a chance to get back what was stolen from them.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:18 PM
1

Does the trailer prove they aren’t anymore?
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:37 PM
4

I’m confused. How is this James Bond trailer progress?
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:51 PM
5

And sometimes both.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:01 PM
1

I know this is just one example, and it’s anecdotal at that, but I know a guy who’s really into feminism, and he’s gay. I don’t know what his reasons are, but it can’t be because he’s worried he won’t be able to be romantically involved with a woman. It’s either because he wants nonsexual approval from women or something else.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:04 PM
4

I know an easy way to debunk the wage gap myth is by asking, “If a business owner could get away with paying women less money for the same work, why wouldn’t they hire only women?” It would only make economic sense.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:06 PM
1

Do feminists honestly have any proof whatsoever for such claims that men are more likely to reoffend or are legal systems just taking what they say at face value as dogma?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:02 PM
1

Isn’t that part of the Duluth Model of domestic violence?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 02:36 PM
46

Real and decent doctors also don’t recommend routine infant circumcision of newborn boys, but take a look at how rampant that disgusting practice is in America.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:35 PM
4

Oh, I didn’t realize the list was longer when you click on the imgur link. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 12:33 PM
9

How about either abolishing the draft/conscription for men or make it gender neutral? The former is preferable to me.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 04:57 AM
1

r/Foregen
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:18 PM
3

There is no right way to do a wrong thing.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:08 PM
1

Whoops. I suppose you could always set your safe search option to strict, but oh well. No search engine is perfect. That’s an amusing fact, though.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 07:43 PM
13

Just another reason to use a different search engine such as DuckDuckGo for instance.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:19 PM
4

Assuming he still holds the same view he did a few years ago, the answer would be an unfortunate yes that he is a hypocritical scumbag who does think it’s different when it’s a girl. Here’s a video of him sharing his opinion that it should only be considered a crime when it’s a male adult and an underage female: https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2014/06/05/to-foxs-tucker-carlson-reporting-statutory-rape/199616
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:40 PM
7

This is a stretch, but in some places, like states in the US for example, it is legal for men to be topless in public, but illegal for women.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 07:20 AM
2

I couldn’t get the link to work on my iPhone, but you might have better luck. http://stadium-arcadium.com/08-04-2012/anthony-kiedis-flair-magazine-italy-march-2012-interview-transcript/red-hot-chili-peppers-news/article17583
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:03 AM
10

I read that she did. Though I’d say “statutorily rape” instead of “have sex with.”
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:56 PM
13

It’s discrimination against men because, in many places, it’s illegal to surgically remove healthy tissue from girls, but not boys unless they’re over 18 and choose it for themselves for their own bodies.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:59 PM
10

Me four.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:44 AM
9

r/Foregen is a sub you can check out if you’re interested. It’s not currently possible to regenerate the foreskin with the frenulum, nerves, and everything else, but that company intends to rectify that problem with adult stem cell research and regenerative medicine.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:33 PM
1

Do you mean like every time you visit Amazon, it’s automatically Amazon Smile?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:43 PM
6

You can also donate to Foregen on Amazon Smile.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:03 AM
7

The only one I can possibly think of in certain states in America is the fact that it’s legal for men to be topless in public, but not women. I know it’s a stretch and nowhere near as important as the myriad of legal discrimination and inequalities men face, but I was able to come up with one by stretching.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 08:16 PM
4

I guess it depends on where it’s done. I mean, in America anyway, it’s perfectly legal and commonplace to have ladies night at bars and clubs where women can get in and have drinks for free or for a discounted price that doesn’t apply to men.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:27 PM
9

If Sandra Bullock is on the list for using face cream from baby foreskins, then Oprah Winfrey deserves to be on that list as well, as she endorsed the product on her show. Bill Gates is also worth mentioning because he funded some charity or something to promote circumcising boys and men in Africa for the BS reason that it supposedly reduces the likelihood of contracting HIV.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:42 AM
4

I’ve been a Simpsons fan for a long time and have seen every episode, but that stupid episode has to be my least favorite by far. The episode made me ask myself: Do women truly have any legitimate disadvantages in the Western World in this day and age? I mean, the petty stuff they complain about is ridiculous like manspreading or unconscious biases that they tell us we can’t prove doesn’t exist.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:40 PM
3

I also think you should check out r/Foregen.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 06:33 AM
5

Thanks for sharing this. By the way, does anyone know whatever happened to the content creator? The YouTube channel of the same name and “HumanityBites” I believe are no longer active, and I don’t recall seeing any new videos of his since the Boko Haram video on his HumanityBites channel.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:34 PM
11

I just wanted to throw this out there in case anyone reading the comments of this post hasn't heard of it already. There is an organization by the name of Foregen that hopes to use regenerative medical technology with adult stem cells to regenerate the foreskin for men who are circumcised, but don't want to be. I just hope not all circumcised men are living in despair that they'll never be able to fully experience the pleasures of sex in their lifetimes.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:27 PM
11

If you haven’t heard of them already, there’s a company by the name of Foregen whose main goal is to incorporate the use of adult stem cells with the study of regenerative medicine to hopefully have the ability to regenerate the foreskin for men like us who are circumcised but don’t want to be.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:16 AM
2

While we’re on the subject of MPAA ratings, does anyone remember a few years ago when they specified “male nudity” as a reason a movie was rated what it was, but they never specified “female nudity”. They would just use the gender-neutral term “nudity”. Some have said people are okay with seeing a woman’s breasts on screen, but don’t expect to see her genitalia, so the label “make nudity” is to warn people they might see a man’s penis on screen, but I’ll counter with the example of the movie “Gr…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 07:36 PM
3

Is Foregen an option? I know it is on Amazon Smile.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:50 PM
16

That circumcision (male genital mutilation) is harmless or even medically beneficial, and that FGM (female genital mutilation), by contrast, is among the worst of human rights violations/atrocities ever.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 11:35 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:24 AM
9

If she knows that, then why on Earth does she think mutilating baby boys like that is an acceptable practice?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:30 PM
1

I’ve heard it posted on this sub before, and I think it rings true, that whenever anyone tells a man to “man up”, they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 06:45 AM
6

Did you mean “elaborate” instead of “exaggerate”?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:05 PM
11

That’s the thing, hospitals may not perform circumcisions on newborns without the parents’ consent, but all circumcisions of newborns are done without the consent of the baby boys on whom the unnecessary surgery is being carried out.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 11:24 PM
170

How about male genital mutilation (circumcision) of baby boys without the consent of the people the unnecessary surgery is being inflicted upon. The parents or quack doctors may have decided to circumcise the boy, but the boy did not consent.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 09:44 PM
1

Foregen is another charity you can support with Amazon Smile. For those of whom are unfamiliar, Foregen is an organization with the goal of using the science of regenerative medicine and adult stem cell research to regenerate the foreskin for circumcised men who don’t want to be circumcised.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:34 PM
5

You and me both. I donate to Foregen monthly, made them my Amazon Smile charity of choice, and even signed up for the possibility of being part of the human clinical trials.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:11 PM
8

Plus, you can have tattoos removed with lasers and whatnot if you grow up and don’t want to be tattooed like your parents wanted you to be before you could choose for yourself in this hypothetical situation. If you were circumcised in infancy or childhood and grow up ending up not wanting to be circumcised, like in my case, you’re currently screwed unless Foregen succeeds in the future.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 04:54 PM
18

If your good friend hates being intact so much, why doesn't he go and have himself circumcised? There's nothing and no one preventing him from doing so. Also, anyone who is intact but doesn't want to be can get circumcised if they want to, but guys like me who were circumcised at birth and don't want to be are SOL unless Foregen succeeds.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:56 AM
1

I know this same guy had a video pointing out the empathy gap during the Boko Haram/#BringBackOurGirls incident under the username HumanityBites. Does anyone know why both his original official accounts disappeared?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 06:43 PM
92

My best guess is that most people have more empathy for girls and women than they do boys and men, so if that book/TV series wanted to get the biggest emotional reaction possible to raise awareness/make more money, it would be in their best interest to showcase the victim character as female. If you’ve seen The Red Pill by Cassie Jay, there’s a whole section on Boko Haram in which they explain that boys being killed didn’t receive significant media attention but as soon as they started kidnappin…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:46 PM
8

I agree. I love David Bowie’s music. Out of curiosity, why do you say, “Especially for gay men”?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:37 PM
2

I agree. Having been raised Mormon in Utah, I can’t tell you how often I’ve heard of Mormon LGBT suicides. Almost all of them were of gay men, though. I haven’t heard of lesbians committing suicide anywhere near the same rate. For those of you who don’t know, the LDS church is more outspoken against the LGBT community than most other denominations as far as I know.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:18 PM
1

Ladies’ night and lower membership prices for women in certain gyms, not to mention some gyms have women only hours even if they have to pay the same amount as men, they have more time to access the gym than men for the same price. I’m sure there are others, but those are two others I just thought of off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:44 PM
1

I’m interested to read this when it’s done, too.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:37 PM
1

I did and just corrected my post with an edit. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 06:21 PM
7

Spoilers One thing I noticed was the double standard with Finn and Holdo. Why is it that when Holdo destroyed the enemy ships by crashing into them at light speed, it was supposed to be a moment where the audience is on her side and views her sacrifice as noble and honorable, but when Finn was about to do a similar kamikaze act by flying into the big cannon thing, he was stopped by Rose who told him in a very condescending way that they don’t win by fighting what they hate, but protecting what t…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:09 PM
23

If we’re lucky, Foregen will be able to do human clinical trials next year. They have said it might be possible in 2019. I’m looking forward to eventually getting back what was stolen!
/r/MensRights01/01/18 08:23 PM
1

I’m still not convinced all his views are beneficial to men. Remember when he practically said statutory rape is only harmful when the victims are girls and the perpetrators are men? https://www.salon.com/2014/05/06/tucker_carlson_being_sexually_assaulted_by_female_teachers_is_the_greatest_thing_that_ever_happened_to_teenage_boys/
/r/MensRights12/11/17 02:24 AM
3

I'm surprised no one brought up the fact that gay men are forbidden from donating blood in many countries. The deferral period can range from a year to indefinitely. There is also the matter of Leviticus in the Old Testament, which many religious people believe in, that only condemns male homosexuality as an abominable sin.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:39 PM
3

Foregen: https://foregen.nationbuilder.com/donate
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:16 PM
–

I can't wait until Foregen succeeds! I want to be regenerated asap. I agree that male genital mutilation (circumcision) is the most important men's rights issue to be addressed. Another law that must be confronted is the male-only draft and the selective service system. It is beyond pale that it is legal to mutilate and draft only males when we have the equal protection under the law clause in the Fourteenth Amendment.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:19 AM
1

Foregen
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:15 AM
4

I want a refund, too! Have you guys checked out the organization, Foregen (http://www.foregen.org)? If anything can give us a refund, they can through regenerative medicine; they also strive to regenerate all of the missing parts, including the 20,000 plus erotogenic nerve endings with the use of the patient's own adult stem cells on a scaffold. The clinical trials are expected in 2019 and public availability is expected in 2020.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:50 AM
1

I'm not sure if you want to write about men's rights in general or one particular area the movement is concerned with, but I once wrote a college paper arguing against infant circumcision and cited numerous sources that supported my point of view. My professor was, as far as I know, neutral and did not give her own opinion on the matter. I got a pretty high grade, even though I was worried she might give me a bad grade if she was supportive of male genital mutilation. I would suggest either writ…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 02:41 AM
1

It's awesome that you know about the regenerative possibilities! Are you referring to Foregen specifically?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:58 AM
2

Hey guys, you're right that restoring won't bring back the nerve endings, regenerating on the other hand hopefully will in the near future. If any of you aren't familiar, there's an organization by the name of Foregen (http://www.foregen.org) that hopes to remedy all that was taken from mutilated men as a result of their infant circumcision. The earliest expected availability of this procedure is 2019.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:55 AM
3

Thanks for speaking the truth. I'm mutilated and hate it, too. I'm just throwing this out there, but have you or any other guys here on this sub Reddit heard about an organization known as Foregen? http://www.foregen.org I'm hoping that we mutilated men may finally be able to feel what it's like to be intact in the near future provided they succeed
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:43 AM
3

In my opinion, yes. My parents allowed a doctor to mutilate my genitals when I was a baby for religious reasons. They really didn't know better. They were misled by the hospital into thinking it was healthier, etc. I confronted them about it and they both said they would not do it again if they knew all they do now about me being upset about it, among other things. I actually hold far more bitterness towards the doctor who encouraged it just so he could get more money. I'm sure that was the reas…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:36 AM
2

So true! I only talked about this issue with my dad and brother, who are both circumcised as well, and they said they're fine being circumcised and wouldn't reverse it even if they could. I'm very sure they're just being willfully ignorant and blind to all the damage done. As long as I can safe up enough money, I would love to participate in the human clinical trials. I heard it might initially cost around $10,000 to have your foreskin regenerated so I intend to try and save at least that much b…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:04 AM
2

You're right, the clitoral hood is homologous to the foreskin. You could call the clitoral hood the female prepuce and the foreskin the male prepuce. Of course, it's only illegal to cut that healthy body from a minor girl for some sickening reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:14 AM
2

We'll both be here for you. Hopefully others who read these posts will be as well. Feel free to message me, too; guys like we need to support one other. You can also check out Foregen on Facebook. I seem to find updates posted almost once a week by them. The future looks bright for those of us who want our birthrights back. I like to think that we live in an age where we are technologically advanced enough to make this a reality. If I were born in an earlier time, I never would have been able to…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:08 AM
2

Don't be so sure. Believe me, I was mutilated as a newborn baby as well and to say that I am upset about it would be a monumental understatement. Having said that, there is hope. Foregen: http://www.foregen.org is an organization that seeks to find a way using stem cell research to regenerate the foreskin, as well as other tissue removed along with circumcision, in men who wish to be intact again. According to this, http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/5951870?fb_action_ids=882834578407011&fb_action_t…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:27 PM
5

Yes, I'm upset about being mutilated. I also donate monthly to Foregen. I would also recommend people to like Foregen and their posts on Facebook. If donations continue to grow, it may only take a few years for men to get their birthright back.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:32 AM
7

Don't forget that it's legal to mutilate a baby boy's penis, but so much as pinpricking a girl's vagina is not.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:57 PM
1

You're right. There must be more than one reason; I once knew a guy who was a SJW and was gay so there was no way he was in it to get with a girl or anything, but for some reason, he seemed to accept ridiculous SJW/feminism mantra as dogma. He would go on about how "we live in a rape culture" and "telling women how to take precautions against being raped is victim-blaming." I just couldn't understand it. He wasn't into women but he seemed like a guy desperate for the slightest bit of female appr…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 11:05 PM
3

After skimming through this post and the comments, I don't think I've seen one mention of the Selective Service System and that we want to remove the requirement for only men to sign to get the same rights that women get handed to them no strings attached. Just so you know, I'm sure most would agree that it would be ideal to do away with the SSS altogether rather than force women to register alongside men.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:30 PM
17

Yeah, I'm so sure they'd say the same thing and treat the case just as flippantly if it was a male teacher assaulting a female student. /s
/r/MensRights23/04/16 04:13 PM
1

Point taken, I was just hoping that there would be more commenters who were as interested in truth and justice as we were and also had insightful things to say. I guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 04:08 PM
14

Frankly, all doctors who are willing to inflict mutilation on defenseless newborns don't deserve to be doctors. Since it is illegal to so much as pinprick the genitals of an underage girl without her consent, it is beyond pale that this disgusting practice is still legally permissible at all.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 03:59 PM
5

You really don't. Why not?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 11:08 PM
67

I love this video and the fact that it raises awareness to the hidden trauma regarding statutory rape of boys; I just wish comments were enabled on the YouTube video.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:50 PM
8

As others have pointed out, she signed a consent form for herself about her own body. Part of my penis was cut off as a newborn baby; I don't recall signing anything allowing myself to be mutilated and neither has any man who was as a baby either.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:42 PM
5

Good list, but I would like to add to the legal part that women are also more likely to receive plea bargains and the fact that girls and women have a right to full bodily integrity. What I mean by that is that it's legal to mutilate the genitals of baby boys (euphemistically called "circumcision"), but not baby girls. Girls are legally protected from any form of genital cutting, even a pinprick, boys are not. When baby girls have their genitals non-therapeutically cut, it is called "female geni…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 03:07 PM
16

The fact that it is legal to mutilate the genitals of newborn males while girls are protected from any form of genital cutting, even a tiny pinprick, which is undeniably far less invasive than the abuse inflicted on baby boys everyday. The reason it bugs me the most was because I was sliced up down there as a newborn and wish I wasn't. I'd give almost anything to have the sensitivity and bodily integrity that is my birthright back. I really hope Foregen succeeds in making foreskin regeneration a…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:34 PM
3

Someone on the YouTube comments section beat me to it, but the only example I can think of that could support her "rape culture" argument of slaps on the wrists given to rapists, etc. would be female teachers who statutorily rape their male students. Of course I can't see one such as she caring since it's a boy, not a girl or a woman being victimized which to her presumably, isn't as bad for some reason.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:08 PM
7

I think one of the big things you missed in the physical section is, particularly in America, Male genital mutilation (MGM) or, as it is more commonly euphemistically referred to as, circumcision. Society in the first world apparently views the human right to bodily integrity as more important for girls than for boys. There are people that get all up in arms about female genital mutilation (FGM) and condemn the cultures that practice it as evil savage barbarism, etc. All the while they either su…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:12 AM
4

For an example, replace gender with race and see if it sounds racist. Even if there were a significant difference for number of accidents on average with different races, it would absolutely be racist to charge every member of one race more than another just because of the actions of others in the demographic they belong to so it is undoubtedly sexist to charge all men more than all women starting out with insurance for the same reasons.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:25 PM
3

I think what first brought my attention to the MRM was when I was in my eighth grade history class and I heard about selective service (the draft) and I seriously wondered why only men are legally required to sign up for that so that we could be forced to risk our lives against our will. I knew women are allowed in the army so it was mind-boggling to me that only men were singled out for that crap. I also became more interested in the MRM after I found out about my infant genital mutilation (cir…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 02:16 AM
20

She covered just about every single one of men's rights issues. I'm surprised I didn't see anything mentioned about infant genital mutilation and how it's not only allowed, but also encouraged to "circumcise" (mutilate) baby boys, but ALL forms of female genital mutilation are prohibited, even the types that are on par or less severe than male genital mutilation practiced en masse in America daily.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:36 AM
0

I absolutely am disgusted. If you replace gender with ethnicity, hopefully people will see the ethical problem. If one race of people ON AVERAGE got into more accidents than another, it would not be fair in the least bit to charge ALL members of said race because other people in their demographic cause more accidents than another. In short, it's wrong to punish everyone in a group because of the actions of others. Not to mention that exceptions can and do exist. In gender for example, even if a …
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:52 PM
3

While I do share your sentiment as a man who was mutilated as a newborn, I wouldn't fall into despair just yet. Currently, you are correct that there are no methods of restoring your foreskin with the tens of thousands of specialized nerve endings and all; however, a company by the name of Foregen is trying to restore what was stolen from us through regenerative medicine. I even heard that they are planning on working with human foreskin (from a consenting man, NOT a baby) this September to get …
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:33 AM
1

I like to donate to Foregen. I know it is not officially MRA and can only tackle one issue, but I think it's important to raise awareness for what they want to do. Mutilated men like I and (probably) others here, would finally be able to have an intact body; which all women and girls are legally entitled to regardless of parental preference, etc.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:09 AM
2

This is from an Air Force survey that Warren Farrell presented in his book, The Myth of male power, but the most common reasons according to the study are as follows: 1.) Spite or revenge, 2.) To compensate for feelings of guilt or shame, 3.) Thought she might be pregnant, 4.) To conceal an affair, 5.) To test husband's love, 6.) Mental/emotional disorder, 7.) To avoid personal responsibility, 8.) Failure to pay, or extortion, 9.) Thought she might have caught VD, 10.) Other.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:52 PM
14

Exactly. I even remember a video where Tucker Carlson said that a 15-year-old boy was wrong to "tattle" to the police about a teacher who statutorily raped him and ruined her life. Can you imagine the outrage of such a statement if the genders were reversed? I am afraid that at every age, boys and men are far less protected than girls and women. Even when it comes to infant genital mutilation (circumcision). So much as a tiny pinprick on the female genitalia is considered severe sexual assault, …
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:43 PM
3

Well then I am proud to say that I will hopefully be the first in my family to break the cycle of abuse. If I ever have a son, I will never allow him to be mutilated in the name of pseudoscience or religious dogmatic tradition. Now that I know the truth about male genital mutilation, allowing my possible future son to be mutilated just because I am would be so petty. Just because I was deprived of the ability to live life to the fullest in the body I was born in doesn't mean I would ever do that…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:44 PM
6

I find it odd that people consider calling it "mutilation" to be body-shaming. I was mutilated (circumcised) as a newborn without my consent (obviously); you can tell by my choice of worlds that just because I was cut as a newborn doesn't mean I don't consider what was done to me to be mutilation. In my case, id anything, it seemed to offend my parents when I referred to it that way; who knows? Maybe mutilated fathers of mutilated sons have the hardest time (like my dad). They not only have to l…
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:53 AM
6

Well said. I'm glad more men are speaking out against this disgusting misandrist practice. I know that my parents were misled by America's corrupt medical profession who promote pseudoscience as a means of keeping this multimillion dollar a year industry alive. All I ever wanted was for my parents to, at the very least, apologize for what they allowed to happen to me; instead all they did was try to justify by comparing it to vaccinations. They tried to convince me that they did it to protect me…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 10:59 PM
2

If there was a way to take this to court, we should definitely bring up the fact that allowing non therapeutic genital cutting of baby boys, but not baby girls, without the consent of the person who's actually receiving the unnecessary surgery is blatantly unconstitutional. We have the 14th Amendment that clearly states that all citizens receive equal protection under the law regardless of race or gender. It's disgusting that we consider so much as inflicting a tiny pinprick on a baby girl's gen…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:49 PM
27

Is he going to be forced to pay child support to her in 6 years when he turns 18?
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:45 PM
3

Wow... Just wow. Assuming she's from America, what could she possibly mean by saying that women don't have all the rights they need? Seriously, in America and other countries, women have MORE rights than men do, like the right to genital integrity in infancy regardless of the parents' religious or cultural preferences. They also get ALL of the rights for free that men have to earn by, in theory anyway, being willing to die in warfare if they are enslaved via the draft. The draft is considered "o…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:11 PM
2

As someone else already mentioned the book, The Myth of Male Power, Warren Farrell said that one of the general rules of thumb is that a woman will not be killed in a film unless it is a horror movie because killing a man is not enough to make it a horror movie.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:49 PM
1

Beat me to it.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:42 PM
5

The following story must be a rare case because I read that adult men choosing for themselves to get mutilated, I mean uh...circumcised, is rare. I have two neighbors who felt uncomfortable in high school because they were the only ones in the locker room who were intact. They decided to get cut up down there for the sake of conformity. I wish I knew they were planning the procedure before they had it done. I would have tried to talk them out of it by letting them know that they don't know how l…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:45 PM
2

As I stated above. That quote above was from Dr. Warren Farrell, not me. I personally do not know why he included Indian men, but if I were to take a guess, it probably has to do with the idea that racial minority groups are, generally, not as financially secure as the "majority group" (white people).
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:02 AM
6

Feminists are constantly telling gay and black men that they don't count as men. Well, if I may quote Warren Farrell from his book: The Myth of Male Power, "Black men, Indian men, and gay men have the toughest time among American males. And they all have something in common: they do not provide an economic security blanket for women."
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:27 PM
2

Then presumably, by her logic, she must think that all Holocaust deniers are Nazis.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:17 PM
3

You are correct that, in practice, (for now) "it is just a form with your info" and that no one is risking anything by signing up; however, men ARE risking numerous things by NOT signing up. If a man fails to register for the draft by his 26th birthday, he can no longer renew his drivers' license in some states, attend a state college, receive federal aid for college, work for the government, etc. (You know, the same rights and privileges women receive without having to do anything besides exist…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:58 AM
14

As I recall, Warren Farrell said in his book: "The Myth of Male Power", that lawyers like Attorney David D. Butler report that a woman is so unlikely to be convicted of drunk driving by a jury that police don't even bother arresting her. I'm so sick of double standards like this! I had an uncle who was arrested for D.U.I., he had to stand trial, was convicted and had to spend a day behind bars. I know this is nothing compared to what the South African men in prisons go through, but I firmly beli…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:08 PM
1

LOL, I suppose feminists think that women who knowingly make false accusation with malevolent intent are the real victims, not the men who could actually go to prison for years and have their lives ruined. It'd be truly disturbing if anyone else besides these craphead feminists actually believe that women who make false accusations are the real victims. The amount of mental gymnastics you'd have to do to believe that nonsense is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 08:03 AM
1

Perhaps we should also assume women can't consent to choosing to drive a car while drunk. If she does damage to people or property while driving under the influence, we shouldn't hold her responsible at all. /s
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:06 AM
1

I think that a positive reason for legalizing gay marriage and adoption is that there are so many orphaned children in foster care and it's obvious from the way there are still numerous children in foster centers. There aren't enough straight couples, or anyone else for that matter, who are interesting in adoption. If we make gay right a legal reality, we as a society will have fewer orphans and other neglected children in foster centers. I mean, who's gonna suggest that those children would be …
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:58 AM
5

Excellent point! I also wanted to mention that vasopressin is also a powerful bonding neurochemical released in copious amounts in men after sex. Also, I haven't personally noticed women being more monogamous than men. If someone wanted to, they could try to argue that women aren't inherently monogamous on the basis of sperm competition. Religiously speaking, I was falsely brought up to believe that women are the civilizing force behind men and that we as men had a duty to marry a woman a.s.a.p.…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter