| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I was a juror in a case where the prosecutor admitted that he prosecuted a man because he is a manthe defense attorney used all of her challenges on older people (for some reason I can't wrap my head around) It seems reasonable to believe that older people, raised in more sexist times, might walk into a trial with a mindset of "he should have kept out of trouble, he wouldn't be here unless he did something wrong". Sure, there are sexist young women too, but it's likely the attorney did her homework and found out that older people have a higher rate of prejudice. As you saw, the plan worked. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/22 06:32 PM |
| 2 | Woman spends 20+ years as a SAHM, after divorce is 'owed' a $150 per week 'maintenance' payment from ex husband for life. Is now upset he isn't paying due to employment issues. Can someone ELI5 how and why you can be obligated to financially support another capable adult for life?“Patriarchy” is not a pet name. It kind of is. It’s the proper term for a real system that has oppressed people for thousands of years. Patriarchy accurately describes most of human history, where it means that a man is almost always the head of each family, and he holds the power and makes decisions within the family. It similarly means that the highest ranking male rules in each group of neighboring families, or town, or region. Women did not hold power over men. "The Patriarchy", as a name fo… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/21 04:32 PM |
| 3 | Woman spends 20+ years as a SAHM, after divorce is 'owed' a $150 per week 'maintenance' payment from ex husband for life. Is now upset he isn't paying due to employment issues. Can someone ELI5 how and why you can be obligated to financially support another capable adult for life?While I agree that alimony is necessary sometimes I'm going to disagree with how you're framing some of this. the system is called the PATRIARCHY It doesn't matter what your pet name for an unfair discriminatory system is, what matters is that the system is unfair. Men don't appreciate that you'd give this system that discriminates against both sexes a masculine term for a name, which carries the implication that men in general are at fault for their own unfair treatment. There are plenty of fem… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/21 12:41 PM |
| 3 | Woman spends 20+ years as a SAHM, after divorce is 'owed' a $150 per week 'maintenance' payment from ex husband for life. Is now upset he isn't paying due to employment issues. Can someone ELI5 how and why you can be obligated to financially support another capable adult for life?She says she's living "check to check", I assume those are paychecks she he's not sending her anything. Sounds like she is working, but couldn't find a decent paying job given her situation. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/21 12:20 PM |
| 34 | Woman spends 20+ years as a SAHM, after divorce is 'owed' a $150 per week 'maintenance' payment from ex husband for life. Is now upset he isn't paying due to employment issues. Can someone ELI5 how and why you can be obligated to financially support another capable adult for life?She will, and she'll win. It's not crazy, this is what happens when a man chooses to be solely financial responsible for his family. He made a mistake by choosing that when he doesn't have the income to make that happen, and she made a mistake by choosing it when her outcome is being middle aged with no savings or retirement and no work history, having to take whatever work she can find. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/21 09:41 AM |
| 8 | Woman spends 20+ years as a SAHM, after divorce is 'owed' a $150 per week 'maintenance' payment from ex husband for life. Is now upset he isn't paying due to employment issues. Can someone ELI5 how and why you can be obligated to financially support another capable adult for life?She is working now, barely getting by (not surprising for a middle aged woman who hasn't worked in 20 years). She shouldn't have been a SAHM knowing it could end up this for her, he shouldn't have been married to a SAHM knowing it could end up with his wages garnished to help support her. The SAHM situation is for people who make a lot of money and can afford it if the relationship ends, they both made a foolish choice to try it when the current situation is a possible outcome (which isn't good … | /r/MensRights | 16/08/21 09:38 AM |
| -15 | Woman spends 20+ years as a SAHM, after divorce is 'owed' a $150 per week 'maintenance' payment from ex husband for life. Is now upset he isn't paying due to employment issues. Can someone ELI5 how and why you can be obligated to financially support another capable adult for life?Too many men in here fail to understand that, like in the recent discussion about Dr. Dre's alimony payments. When he's making millions and she's making $35k it doesn't make sense for her to work full time and spend most of it to hire a nanny to look after the kids, just to add an insignificant tiny percentage to their total combined income. It makes far more sense for her to be the nanny, and raise the children and take care of the home by herself. It's what's best for the whole family - much b… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/21 09:34 AM |
| 3 | Detained by police for "Man with child"Any "feminist" who doesn't understand intersectionality (e.g. a poor white male can still get fucked by society real hard) is probably just a dick and not actually a feminist. So like... the majority of them, then. Sorry, there are only so many dozens of times I can see groups of feminists either deny men have problems, or pretend the problems don't matter because other men cause other problems, before I can stop believing the feminists as a whole care about men, or care about equality in situat… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/21 09:53 AM |
| 3 | Video shows family and health workers laughing their asses off as crying boy shouts "I'm still a virgin!" during his "circumcision".Maybe not amputated, but people do all kinds of weird shit with their face and ears with tattoos and piercings and other body modification stuff. Seems insane to me but I say it's their body, their choice. But maybe you're right, the line has to be drawn somewhere. If someone wants their legs amputated because they feel like the wheelchair life is right for them, we don't that. We don't help people blind themselves to be part of the blind community. Where exactly is the line? You could say "do n… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/21 07:00 AM |
| 48 | Video shows family and health workers laughing their asses off as crying boy shouts "I'm still a virgin!" during his "circumcision".Non-medically required cosmetic surgery is fine too, as long as it's a legal adult requesting it to be done to himself. The problem with circumcision is not that it exists, but that it's done to people without their consent. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/21 01:58 AM |
| 5 | If you believe a liar, doesn't that mean there was no rape!?I think there are a lot of men, and a lot of feminists (including the one in OP's photo), who don't understand that you don't have to (and shouldn't) decide if you think someone is guilty or innocent based on what they tell you. The girl in the photo is saying she'd rather believe all women and make the mistake of trusting a false accuser, than believe all men and make the mistake of trusting a rapist. Given those two options, I would agree with her. But those aren't the only two options! And ne… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/21 01:17 AM |
| 1 | An umnarried man had to pay 50 000$ of support to a woman with whom he did not have children nor a house. People defend the woman and blame him !She is to find time for the kid and for career, and for everything else, same as men. But he isn't. He's relying on her to take care of the whole home/kids side of things so he doesn't have to lift a finger when he gets home from work. It sounds like you still haven't comprehended the situation and you think she's doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the family, and that she still expects him to do half the cooking/cleaning/housework and half the work of taking care of the children. You res… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/21 07:29 PM |
| 1 | An umnarried man had to pay 50 000$ of support to a woman with whom he did not have children nor a house. People defend the woman and blame him !Did you read anything I wrote? Tell me why it is a positive thing in your eyes for the woman to work a job and then use most of that salary to pay for daycare and babysitters etc, but it's a negative thing for that woman to BE the daycare/babysitter/tutor/cook/maid? Why is it so important to have the extra step of working somewhere else and paying someone else to take care of your family and home? Why not just take care of the family and home directly? If the woman needs to have a job, and her f… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 07:49 PM |
| 0 | An umnarried man had to pay 50 000$ of support to a woman with whom he did not have children nor a house. People defend the woman and blame him !Her stupid choice of having no career is on her alone. You don't understand why the housewife/stay-at-home parent situation exists when one spouse is wealthy and the other isn't. It's not "lol don't wanna work, gonna lounge around on your dime". At least, not usually. Look at the situation from the couple's point of view. He's worth millions, she's working full time for 35k/year. When they have a family together there are going to be a bunch of expenses with two working parents. Daycare, babysit… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 10:08 AM |
| 1 | When keeping it real goes wrongI think you interpret things in a bizarre way if you're not seeing this. Just picture yourself having a conversation with some random guy and you mention you're a fan of Leonardo DiCaprio. He agrees, saying "oh yeah I just saw Django Unchained, he stole the scenes he was in". Do you think it would be a normal thing for you to respond by telling him "he played Calvin Candie in that movie, he was a slave owner. He was also in Titanic which was one of the biggest movies ever, as well as Wolf of Wal… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/07/21 05:33 AM |
| 1 | When keeping it real goes wrong? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 26/07/21 03:25 AM |
| 7 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menA lot of people don't expect they will need to use a gun in self defense, but they own one anyway just in case. A lot of men don't expect the draft will ever be used again, but they want equal rights just in case. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:43 AM |
| 3 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menThere's nothing inherently wrong with drafting both sexes, as long as you still assign people into roles they're best suited to. Men mostly on the front lines, women mostly in the supporting roles where physical strength isn't relevant. The problem occurs when gender communists come along and demand a 50/50 split in every area, and when the people in charge are stupid enough to give in to those demands. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:42 AM |
| 2 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menI'll give her the benefit of the doubt and believe that she's just saying whatever it takes to get people to support equality under the law. I care a lot less about the "men dead, women most affected" language than I care about achieving the goal of ending sex-based discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:39 AM |
| 13 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menI'll gladly fight to protect America. Haven't seen too many invading armies around here recently though. I will not gladly be part of the process of overthrowing leaders halfway across the world and destablizing countries and hoping things turn out for the best, and then watching as it never turns out well and creates more terrorists and dictators. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:37 AM |
| 1 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menThey think that being a real man is someone who willingly becomes a woman's slave. Feminists and conservatives agree on this. You're leaving out half of it though. Tradcons believe that the man has to be the provider and take care of everything for her, but also believes she has to be submissive and provide him with whatever he wants at home. They want everyone to be a slave in a certain way. And yes of course marriages are about taking care of each other and helping the other and doing what's i… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:34 AM |
| 6 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menThere's definitely a mix of opinions on both sides. Plenty of conservatives and liberals are opposed to stereotypes and gender roles. And then plenty of conservatives think women belong in the kitchen being housewives and raising children, while men are supposed to be the providers... while plenty of liberals think anyone who wants to raise children and be a homemaker must be a woman, and anyone who wants to be a provider must be a man. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:30 AM |
| 2 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menIn my experience, Conservatives tend to enforce and treasure gender roles, whether they are healthy or unhealthy. Historically that's true but now the liberals are behind that view more than ever. The progressives think that gender roles are so important that if a boy doesn't fit into gender stereotypes very well then he might be a girl, and vice versa. They love stereotypes and want to categorize every individual according to stereotypes, and get angry when someone doesn't fit in ("if you don't… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:27 AM |
| 8 | 'America's daughters shouldn't be drafted against their will': Conservatives blast proposal that would require women to register for the military draft alongside menI honestly think half the conservatives against this proposed bill are only doing it because they always take the side of "Democrats bad". If the Democrats started supporting the health insurance companies the Republicans would call for universal healthcare. None of these politicians care about what's right, it's only about taking any opportunity to bash your political opponents, and right now all they see is a chance to say "Democrats don't care about your daughters". And don't think I'm saying… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/21 12:22 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Forget 100 years ago, I'll keep it simple. Suppose a couple chooses to enter a relationship where one pays for everything in exchange for the other taking care of the housework, cleaning, child raising, cooking, etc. Suppose they also agree that it would be unfair if they happen to have a long marriage that ends in divorce, leaving her with absolutely nothing, so they agree that if that happens she will get spousal support payments. Who are you to tell them they can't enter an agreement like thi… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/21 09:53 AM |
| 49 | She almost got the pass. But nope, she was sentenced to 16 years in the joint for hiring a hitman to kill husband.She also tried to poison him and frame him before resorting to a hitman. Tons of respect for her ex-boyfriend who she asked to find a hitman for her... he went straight to the police with that info and saved the husband's life. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/07/21 05:57 AM |
| 16 | She almost got the pass. But nope, she was sentenced to 16 years in the joint for hiring a hitman to kill husband.She was an escort, he was an ex-con who filed for divorce from his wife after falling in love with an escort and married her just days after the divorce went through. These don't seem like people know for making great decisions. Maybe he somehow had enough money that she thought killing him was worth it to get the money. Her parents are religious Muslims, maybe a dead husband is easier to explain to them than wanting a divorce. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/07/21 05:56 AM |
| 12 | She almost got the pass. But nope, she was sentenced to 16 years in the joint for hiring a hitman to kill husband.No. She's seeking a new trial, without any success so far. She's locked up until 2032. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/07/21 05:49 AM |
| 5 | An umnarried man had to pay 50 000$ of support to a woman with whom he did not have children nor a house. People defend the woman and blame him !I support the idea of common law marriage in certain cases. And I think spousal support is appropriate in some places too. Imagine a wealthy man and woman who live together, have children together, and have essentially lived the life of a married couple for 30 years. They both just don't like the idea of a marriage contract. He wanted her to be a stay at home mom and housewife rather than work, and she agreed to do that and gave their whole family (particularly the kids) the best life they could… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/21 11:20 PM |
| 2 | An umnarried man had to pay 50 000$ of support to a woman with whom he did not have children nor a house. People defend the woman and blame him !If you're just dating, sure. If you're married, well spousal support exists for a reason. But spousal support is supposed to be for... you know... spouses. Plus it's meant to be a replacement for the money she'd have from working a job, while instead she's taking care of his house and raising their children. But in this case she never lived with him and there are no children. Completely inexplicable why the court would think she deserved anything at all. I wouldn't be too upset if it was a one t… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/21 11:13 PM |
| 6 | 18 year old girl cries loudly when she's sentenced to death in Tennessee's Electric ChairI'll summarize this article: Christa Pike and two friends wrongly accused a girl of trying to steal her boyfriend, and started stabbing the victim with a boxcutter. They made her strip naked, the victim begged for her life while Pike carved Satanic symbols into her. Pike later admitted to being frustrated that the victim kept talking because it's harder to hurt someone who reminds you they're a person, and being frustrated that the victim wasn't dying fast enough from her wounds. Pike picked up … | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/07/21 09:39 PM |
| 0 | When keeping it real goes wrongMansplaining is an idiotic term that should never be used again. BUT, the dude was kind of condescending. He told her that Glover played Lando, which she obviously knows because she literally just saw the movie. Then he felt the need to inform her that Glover is the performer Childish Gambino, which everybody knows if they know who Donald Glover is to begin with. I don't think you'd see a guy make "let me inform you" comments like those to another guy. He didn't intend to be rude there but he wa… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/07/21 09:05 PM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.100 years ago, the majority of women in my country, the UK, had jobs themselves There have always been some employed women throughout history, but you know what I'm talking about here. Historically there have been a large percentage of women who worked around the home and raised the children, without having an outside job that they get paid for. divorce was rare It wasn't even legal a lot of the time. The man was forced to support his spouse for life, and this applied to everyone. if a woman was… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/21 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.She could have chosen to earn her own money and not rely on another to always feel the way that they did when they chose to marry. She is responsible for her own choices. And she chose a path that was offered to her by the man. Share in his life of luxury as his wife, and be guaranteed of spousal support of the marriage lasts a long time but ends in divorce. She chose to accept this option that was offered to her that ensure her financial security, and the fact that you don't like that it was of… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/21 02:40 AM |
| 2 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.So you think that even if the husband and wife agree that one of them should be a stay at home parent because working adds almost nothing to their total income and it would be really convenient (and especially great for the children) to have a parent raising them full time, never needing babysitters or daycare.... you think this situation shouldn't be able to exist despite the fact it's what they both want and that it's beneficial to themselves and their children. If spousal support doesn't exis… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 08:35 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Nothing legally stopped her from working, but she and her husband agreed that it made no sense for their family for her to work. This is common in marriages where one or both people are very wealthy. It doesn't make sense to work 40 or more hours per week to increase your yearly income by less than 1%. It's more valuable to the family to have a stay at home parent taking care of the house and raising the child. It's OK for families to make a decision like this, there's nothing wrong with it. It'… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 08:25 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Oh no! She only got 200k/month?? She's gonna die!! /s Don't play that game. I'm obviously talking about before any money was sent her way. She has no money and no income of her own, and no career options. Apparently some people in this sub thinks she deserves to be left penniless because she didn't have a job during the marriage, despite the fact that it makes no financial sense for the family and would leave the family worse off if she did have one (kids spending lots of time with babysitters o… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 08:15 AM |
| 2 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Obviously it does make sense to still have a job. Why? If one person is worth $100 million what is the point of the spouse working 40 hours a week to add $40k/year to that? Especially if they're raising kids, now she's tired from work and less has time and energy to devote to raising the kids, and half her salary is going to go to babysitters and daycare? It makes zero financial sense in their situation for her to work rather than be a stay at home parent. Do you think a lower-earning spouse in … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 07:58 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.I never said anything about sex. I know, I just wanted to point out this isn't about "men are the provider" stereotypes. According to the law this should work both ways, and rich women would have to support their stay at home husbands if the situation is reversed. And unless she helped him build his wealth she should have no access to it. She doesn't deserve his massive wealth, but she doesn't deserve to be left penniless and with no ability to get a decent job in her 50s. Do you think that woul… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 06:13 AM |
| 2 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.She's lived the high life on his money for two and a half decades. Because he chose to provide that for her. She has no income, savings, or retirement account of her own. If there was no spousal support as some people here would want, she could have been a poor housewife who is left penniless. Why he's obligated to keep the champagne and caviar flowing while she gets to leave with no obligations and do whatever the fuck she wants for the rest of her life I didn't say that. I said he's obligated … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 05:59 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Look at the end results. He came out financially ahead because of her efforts, and had the freedom to focus on his work as much as he wanted to, enabling him to become even more financially successful. She came out financially behind, with no job no savings no retirement and no employability. It isn't right for one spouse to come out ahead and for one spouse to be screwed, especially when the one coming out ahead is already massively wealthy. If you insist on spousal support not existing, then y… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:57 AM |
| -1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.So has he. No doubt. Which is why he's keeping the vast majority of his wealth, as he deserves to. Don't you mean "they"..? Well sure, but if you split the cost according to each of their income, he'd be paying 99.99% of it. Situations like this are why it doesn't make sense for the spouse to have a job, it adds almost nothing to their combined wealth. And what does he get in return? He already got it. He had his house kept clean, his home life managed, his children raised, with zero requirement… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:32 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Yeah, this was what he and his lawyers were hoping for... this was the good outcome. It's crazy that it's still so much money going to her, but his net worth is even crazier so I guess there's some sense to it. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:25 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.He should be responsible for the fact that she's in her 50s with no career, savings, or retirement... especially when he legally agreed to it by including spousal support in the prenup, by his own choice. It's not about being in the contract of marriage, it's about the fact that she gave up the opportunity to make her own way for the past 24 years and he agreed to be responsible for her. She deserves something, even if that something shouldn't be 300k/month for life. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:23 AM |
| 0 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.He's worth well over half a billion and for extreme cases like that I can see raising the cap higher. It's not quite right if she can't afford to live anywhere near her friends anymore, if the family regularly goes on trips and now he and the children get to but she can't do that with the kids anymore, and things like that. There's a reasonable argument for maintaining a high end lifestyle to some extent, when it's something he can very easily afford. But there has to be a reasonable limit. $300… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:20 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.So I understand the idea of support for a limited time while the ex-spouse gets back on their feet. Limited time and getting back on their feet being the key parts of that. Permanent support makes sense in some situations. Suppose it's a 35-40 year marriage and she's a senior citizen now. She's not going to get "back on her feet" and get a career going at that age. He supported her for all these decades and can easily afford to keep supporting her now, and that outcome makes more sense than expe… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 03:05 AM |
| 0 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.She is owed something (though it shouldn't be millions every year). She has no career, no savings, no retirement fund. She gave up those things to raise a family with him, she deserves to be compensated for it. And he agreed, which is why spousal support was part of the prenup. Sex should have nothing to do with it, the same should be true for a wealthy woman who married a stay at home dad. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.First, because he agreed to it, and included it in their prenup. He chose this situation for himself. Second, she gave up her career, her income, her ability to build up a retirement fund, etc. by agreeing to be a housewife and stay at home mom. If she had kept working, he would have had to pay for babysitters/maids/etc. so if you look at this from her position, surely she doesn't deserve to be left on the street with nothing. She deserves some level of financial support. But she shouldn't be en… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:55 AM |
| 3 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Why is the lower income partner entitled to a lavish lifestyle for the rest of their lives? Because he chose it. He included it in their prenup. He agreed to it, it's just a matter of what the amount ought to be. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:51 AM |
| 3 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Suppose a wealthy man marries a teacher. They agree that he will support the family and she won't work anymore, because it doesn't make sense for her to work when it will only increase their combined income by 0.1%. It's much more valuable to the family for her to be a homemaker and raise the children. 10 years later they get divorced. He decides he wants to pay $0 in child support. She has no job, no income, no savings, and no way to pay for herself much less the cost of raising the children. S… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:50 AM |
| -1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.But she's been giving something for the past 24 years. She's been the housewife, taking care of the kids and the house full time. If she had been working he would have had to pay for babysitters and tutors and a maid etc. She gave up having a regular income, a 401k, and job skills in order to make that happen. At the very least she deserves a lump sum for her contributions. As for what she deserves... they both signed a prenup, which was his own decision, that included the fact that she would ge… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:45 AM |
| 1 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Something that a lot of people in here were unaware of (or overlooked)... Dr. Dre had a prenup. The prenup specified that she would get spousal support in the event of a divorce (rather than her receiving half of everything). This was an arrangement that he chose for himself, and was not forced on him. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:41 AM |
| 2 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Define "the area". Lawyers seem to have successfully argued that it means that particular neighborhood full of very wealthy people, where maintaining that lifestyle (with security, maids, etc.) costs a huge amount of money. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:39 AM |
| 12 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.He had a pre-nup and it seems the courts have adhered to it. He keeps all property owned before the marriage, she gets things that were bought for her during the course of the marriage. The prenup included that she would get spousal support instead of half his wealth. She tried to throw out the prenup and it failed, then she demanded a gigantic amount of spousal support which also failed. Dre's lawyers proved that she had been spending an average of $293k per month (which includes a lot of rich … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:36 AM |
| -2 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.That is true. She has no career, no 401k, no savings that she would have if they were never married. He's responsible for making up for that. But that amount shouldn't be 300k/month. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:30 AM |
| -2 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Spousal support exists for a reason. Dre and his wife both agreed that she would forego having a career and income of her own, because her income would add nothing significant to his huge income. It was much more valuable to both of them and to the children for her to be a housewife and stay at home mom. This is the arrangement they chose, and choosing this arrangement means he is responsible for her financially. Equality means agreements like this can work both ways, a wealthy woman with a stay… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:28 AM |
| 5 | Dr. Dre Ordered To Pay Over $3.5 Million Per Year In Spousal Support.Spousal support exists for a reason. When they married 24 years ago, they agreed that she would be a housewife and stay at home mom, and devote her time to raising the children. It wouldn't make any sense for her to go out and work 40 hours a week and use most of that money to pay babysitters and a maid and order takeout, especially when her salary would only increase their combined income by less than 1%. When a husband and wife make this kind of arrangement, he is agreeing to provide financial… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/21 02:20 AM |
| -20 | 15yo boy forced to pay child support after being raped by 34yo teacherDo you truly believe he won't be forced to pay child support right away? Yes. I could be wrong, but I don't see how a court can expect a child with no income to make payments. His projected earnings are zero. There are far too many cases where the "child support" (it's not used on the child btw) exceeds the man's take-home pay every month. Yes, but that's a separate issue. This happens when the man has an unusually good year or two right as a business owner (or occasionally as a famous actor/per… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/21 12:52 AM |
| 10 | Why the fuck is body shaming men okay?Right, but it's still a double standard. You don't see people using "fat woman energy" to describe negative behavior in a woman, that would be unacceptable and offensive. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/21 08:35 PM |
| -94 | 15yo boy forced to pay child support after being raped by 34yo teacherCorrect me if I'm wrong, but I believe child support would be a percentage of his income. And while child support can ignore unemployment periods in an adult (a non disabled man would be expecting to continue payments out of his savings or whatever, if he was out of work for a month or two) I think it would acknowledge that with no income, and especially with no possible income at that age, he would owe nothing. If I was this kid, I would spend the next 3 years finishing high school, then take m… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/21 08:26 PM |
| 65 | 15yo boy forced to pay child support after being raped by 34yo teacherhe is not an innocent victim of Jones`s criminal acts Literal victim blaming. He is not an innocent victim, this rape victim is guilty. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/21 08:18 PM |
| 2 | Girl accuses her father of raping her. After he spends 10 years in prison, she admits she had made it up. But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward."She was a child at the time, and we don't know the full situation. We know the parents had a messy divorce, and she felt it was the dad's fault and that he didn't love her. Maybe the mom repeatedly taught her that idea and made her believe it, and that's why she thought he deserves to be punished. Something else was going wrong in the girl's life too, as she said she had been sexually active for years already at age 11. Either another adult was harming her, or a classmate (most likely a victim o… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/21 06:08 AM |
| 2 | Girl accuses her father of raping her. After he spends 10 years in prison, she admits she had made it up. But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward."Make her do community service at the very least. Something that actually punishes her, not just a full acquittal. Exactly... she was young and did something really stupid. Kids do stupid stuff, and unfortunately her mistake had some big consequences. She did the right thing by coming forward, and I'm fine with there being a minimal punishment. What I'm not fine with is setting a standard of "it's OK to send men to prison with false accusations, you'll never be punished for it". If they didn't wa… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/21 05:51 AM |
| 7 | Girl accuses her father of raping her. After he spends 10 years in prison, she admits she had made it up. But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward."The standard is whether the jury believes he is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". Most people think there is no reason to doubt a woman's rape accusation is the true, and no reason to believe a man's claim to be innocent. An accusation is enough to believe he's guilty but still have a little doubt... and if he can't prove his innocence and she sounds remotely credible in court, they think it's reasonable to have no more doubt. On the other hand, it's really hard to prove rape and sexual abuse.… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/21 05:46 AM |
| 20 | Girl accuses her father of raping her. After he spends 10 years in prison, she admits she had made it up. But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward."Fraud, then. Or theft or assault or any other crime. Since when do we let people get away with crimes because prosecuting them might prevent others from admitting their crimes? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/21 05:19 AM |
| 4 | Girl accuses her father of raping her. After he spends 10 years in prison, she admits she had made it up. But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward."Let me know when they stop prosecuting other types of fraud because prosecuting someone could mean other fraudsters won't admit to their lies. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/21 05:18 AM |
| 71 | Girl accuses her father of raping her. After he spends 10 years in prison, she admits she had made it up. But police will not prosecute her as 'it may keep others from coming forward."BRB, off to commit insurance fraud and then admit I did it 10 years later. They won't punish me and I'll get away with it, because punishing me would prevent other frauds and scammers from coming forward. Right? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/21 05:16 AM |
| 4 | Feminists hysteria is causing problems for both gendersYou're right, I hadn't looked at murder rate stats in years. In the US the murder rate fell by almost 60% between 1991 and 2013. It was consistently and steadily falling over time, and I believe it has something to do with the ease of access to all kinds of different forms of entertainment (some people can get up to trouble when they have nothing to do), and also that people with violent urges can satisfy them with violent video games and movies which didn't exist in the past. But this trend tur… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/21 06:35 PM |
| 2 | Feminists hysteria is causing problems for both gendersSeems to be accurate. I found an article with data from 2017 showing that 1,948 women were killed by men that year. It does specify that this is referring to "single victim, single offender" incidents so victims of a mass shooting would not be counted in those numbers. Most of them were done by a husband or boyfriend. I think you may be overestimating the number of murder victims per year in the US. In 2018 there were a total of 15,498 murders and 21% were female, which is about 3,250 female vic… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/21 06:23 PM |
| 3 | Feminists hysteria is causing problems for both gendersYeah, murder is not the only negative outcome of rejecting a date. Non-deadly violence, harrassment, stalking etc. are things that happen too. There shouldn't be fear mongering to blow this out of proportion and teach women that turning down a date is likely to put them in danger. Still, it is a thing that happens and people should be aware of it and be cautious as you said. It's a good idea for women to be prepared with some white lies to use if they think the situation calls for it (say you ha… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/21 06:01 PM |
| 4 | Feminists hysteria is causing problems for both gendersI mean, I'd say it requires mental illness to want to murder a woman you don't know. Rejection is just the trigger that set him off. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/21 05:55 PM |
| 12 | I am sick of hearing women wanting a “traditional man” when they aren’t willing to be traditional woman.There's nothing mythical about not wanting to do all of the housework in addition to your job while your SO does none of it. Neither men or women are OK with that. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 05:12 AM |
| 4 | I am sick of hearing women wanting a “traditional man” when they aren’t willing to be traditional woman.Some of them are out there, I don't think it's too common though | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 01:10 AM |
| 53 | I am sick of hearing women wanting a “traditional man” when they aren’t willing to be traditional woman.Upper middle class women didn't work. You know, the ones everyone saw on TV, so they assume the whole world is like that. Similar to how some people see upper class white people on TV and assume all white people have multimillionaire parents with connections that can get them a six figure job out of college guaranteed, regardless of how competent they are. Modern women just got lazier and lazier and don't want to do the duties of past women. Eh, I don't know about the lazy part. They're working … | /r/MensRights | 05/07/21 01:09 AM |
| -1 | Why are so many women unaware of the emotional weight of actual labor. You know the type that built the world around them.That's not right either, because it either allows women on steroids to compete in the women's division, or bans them from competition entirely. The solution is that trans people of either sex should have to compete in the open division that allows anyone of either sex to compete (typically referred to as the men's division). The women's division is for women only. Just like how any boxer can compete at heavyweight if they want to, but the welterweight division is only for people under 147 lbs. A… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/21 06:52 PM |
| 0 | "Emotional labour" is the term women use when they emotionally abuse men.I don't have a link to a specific example of it on hand. But I've seen stories of boyfriends or husbands who do nothing but play video games when they're at home and expect the woman to take care of a lot of things for them, just like their moms used to. She has to remember all the birthdays and upcoming events, she has to plan anything they're doing that requires planning, if they have a kid she does most of the child care. She will ask him to help sometimes, but she has to bother asking him an… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/21 06:49 PM |
| 8 | "Emotional labour" is the term women use when they emotionally abuse men.I'm not defending emotionally abusive women here. But just as TwoX seems to be full of bitter women, it seems some of the comments here are bitter as well. There are women complaining that their spouses are lazy, and thinking that applies to all men. There are men complaining that their spouses are abusive, and thinking that applies to all women. Can we just acknowledge that a certain percentage of people in general suck, and that this isn't a male or female thing? The emotional labor argument c… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/21 03:52 PM |
| 1 | Lmao. You have to be oppressed to participate. No fun allowed, only victim olympics.Most women's and LGBT subreddits actually are modded by males. They are quick to ban women who have any objection to any part of trans ideology, like rape victims losing the right to request a female doctor, or female athletes having to compete against males. In a subreddit specifically for lesbians, lesbians frustrated with being insulted and shamed for their refusal to date a man have been banned by a MtF mod who considers it bigotry to exclude anyone from your dating preferences. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 08:53 PM |
| 1 | Johnny Depp and Alec Baldwin slam 'inhumane' court system and 'gender bias'If your car is stolen and you report it to the police, it's a true statement for them to say "if your car isn't really stolen and you're just making up a story, it's not just a waste of our time but it's actually illegal and you could get in trouble for it." But that would be incredibly unprofessional for them to say that, implying that you're just making this up, and giving you the impression that they won't even try to find your car because they don't seem to believe it ever existed. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 06:50 AM |
| 4 | If a woman wants a financially stable man who can provide for her while she does nothing, it's considered empowering.It has nothing to do with the price of the game, and everything to do with him playing it. the real reason is not that they think video games are bad for you. Well... I think that can be a part of it, that and the stereotype of video games being associated with do-nothing losers. A lot of people would not even think to say anything if a guy spent a few hours hanging out and talking with friends, or reading a book, pursuing a hobby or sport, etc. But if it's a video game, she thinks he's addicted… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 01:59 AM |
| 8 | After reading CRT...Yes, but the people teaching this always propose that the solution to these problems is more discrimination and more racism. Rather than fight to eliminate unfairness, they try to ensure that everyone has equal chances of being treated like shit because of their physical features. They fight directly against equality, and take offense at the idea of a world where no one cares about your physical features and everyone gets the same treatment. They want everyone to see race constantly, and treat p… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/21 12:28 PM |
| 5 | Johnny Depp and Alec Baldwin slam 'inhumane' court system and 'gender bias'Only the extremists made it happen, but absolutely there were many people just turning a blind eye. We're at the point where a Yale professor thought it would be OK to give a speech about fantasizing about killing people based on their skin color. So many people (especially on the left) will refuse to criticize someone who's on their side, or are afraid of being labeled as racist/sexist if they do it. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/21 07:33 AM |
| 10 | Johnny Depp and Alec Baldwin slam 'inhumane' court system and 'gender bias'That is where the idea originated. Women who reported their rapes were being told "you sure you didn't want it? are you sure you weren't drunk and forgot the details or something? look, you shouldn't press charges if this is just a night that you regretted or something" and so on. Rape reports need to be taken seriously, and people should assume the truth unless there's evidence it may not be. That's a completely reasonable position, but then extremists took the idea and insisted it must mean th… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/21 05:51 AM |
| 7 | A group of female friends last night told me they genuinely feel entitled to be bought drinks at the bar by men.I'm not the one trying to tell another man how to spend his time. If you think every stupid opinion out there deserves your time and attention and requires a confrontation, then that's fine. But there are other people who agree with the saying "a lion doesn't concern himself over the opinions of sheep". There will always be idiots out there who think they are entitled or superior. I'd rather spend my time with decent people, or doing something I enjoy, and not waste any of it trying to teach a f… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/21 01:11 AM |
| 10 | A group of female friends last night told me they genuinely feel entitled to be bought drinks at the bar by men.While I agree that being honest and confronting bad behavior is a good thing in general, OP knows the situation best and can choose how to best spend his time. If he thinks that direct honesty will be as pointless as telling a religious fundamentalist that God isn't real, and will only result in them getting angry and throwing out random insults and spreading gossip about him, he shouldn't waste his time. Sometimes it is best to just cut negative people out of your life and not waste another sec… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/21 10:22 PM |
| 14 | A group of female friends last night told me they genuinely feel entitled to be bought drinks at the bar by men.Their response was that I’m just cheap. Any chance you asked them something like "do you routinely buy drinks for strangers? no, in fact you don't even pay for your own, and feel entitled to have yours paid for by strangers. if I'm cheap, than what are you?" | /r/MensRights | 13/06/21 10:16 PM |
| 3 | Yes Toxic masculinityI don't know about "hate speech" but it's certainly a stupid term. No one says it's "toxic femininity" when a man tells a woman she's less capable than men. So when a woman tells a man his issues don't matter and he needs to man up, why is that "toxic masculinity"? It's just called sexism, in both cases. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/21 10:29 AM |
| 13 | The implication that "if you're not a feminist, you're a misogynist"Same thing happens with most belief systems. There are always certain Christians who think if you aren't Christian you're waging a spiritual war against them, and the same with Muslims as well. Republicans and Democrats are heading down the same path, you're with us or you support evil. Everyone wants to be the moral authority and not allow anyone else to have a different opinion without being hated for it. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/21 06:28 PM |
| 1 | I hate what feminism has done to this societyOP said standard "I'm sick of the harm done by feminism" stuff which is fine. Other guy's top level response was I get called a misogynist and an incel for saying that a woman's value decreases with age and her body count. Just straight into saying a woman's value is based on her suitability as a romantic partner to him personally. In the future just argue that is not gender specific literally what I did | /r/MensRights | 10/06/21 05:26 AM |
| 1 | I hate what feminism has done to this societythe topic is clearly not about the person's value as a human that's not how it sounded at first Most men and women aren't interested in dating fuck boys or sluts seriously. It's really not that difficult to imagine. I know, and it's an issue with both sexes, so why make it about only one sex? Doing that is like a white person saying drug abuse is a black issue, when in fact the rate of abuse is similar. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/21 06:47 PM |
| 2 | I hate what feminism has done to this societythat isn't what was originally said | /r/MensRights | 09/06/21 06:44 PM |
| 0 | I hate what feminism has done to this societyHow the fuck does anything I said sound like desperation to have sex? No one wants a life partner that's a risk. Get over it. Did I disagree with that? No. But it's true for both sexes, and a person's value (of either sex) isn't determined entirely by how good of a life partner other people think they would be. Your value as a human being isn't all about how highly others would rate you as a partner. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/21 08:34 AM |
| -6 | I hate what feminism has done to this societyNo offense but I don't think many people do understand it, including you. "Radical" doesn't mean "the crazy extremist man hating ones". Mainstream liberal feminism tends to address the symptoms of inequality rather than the cause. It finds inequality and demands to be given things to make up for the unfairness. Radical feminism tends to look for the cause of the inequality and try to eliminate it. We won't need to keep using fixes like women-only scholarships and special programs for women in ST… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/21 07:54 AM |
| -2 | I hate what feminism has done to this societyEven if there's truth to that it's fucked up to say a woman's value as a human being is dependent on that. Any person's value includes a lot of factors beyond how attractive they are to the opposite sex. And do you say that about men as well? Promiscuous men also are less likely to stay loyal in a marriage, wouldn't they have decreased value as well? This doesn't seem like something that needs to be about one sex or the other to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/21 07:39 AM |
| -2 | I hate what feminism has done to this societyBecause that is a misogynist view. You're saying that her value as a person is dependent on how high you rank her as a potential mate. Do you hold the same view about men? Does a man's value decrease with age and body count? Shouldn't decreased physical attractiveness and inability to commit to lasting relationships lower the value of anyone of either sex? Or do you have a double standard where what's OK for men isn't for women? Because that's misogynist. A woman might have a high body count and… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/21 07:36 AM |
| 1 | Just a shower thought: Doesn't giving women a shorter sentence means that courts think they are weaker than men and not equal to them?Absolutely true. Just as white people are given shorter sentences than black people for the same crime. White people on average are more able to afford a better lawyer which is also a factor in the situation, but still there shouldn't be a large disparity like there is. Judges in America are simply more willing to see someone as a good hearted person who fell in with the wrong crowd or made a one-time mistake, if that person is female or has light skin. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/21 01:21 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)You are ignoring my already made explanations to why this is a fallacy, so i just won't bother again with this Men and women being different is not a fallacy. As I said earlier, our views are just too far apart from each other to have any kind of discussion on this topic. I never said that if we can't have "perfect equality" like you say, then we can have slaves. That was exactly the point you were making. My position is that perfect equality is impossible due to differences in biology. Your res… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/21 07:05 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Also, Biology doesn't prevent her in any way from getting a presex contract like he would do in order to exercise his rights. But yeah, keep making dumb biology claims. Yes it does. Because of the biological differences in the situation, she already has the right to her own body and the right to determine whether to have the baby. I don't know why you think a woman would seek out a contract for rights she already has by default. If someone visits your home, do you get them to sign a contract sta… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/21 08:39 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)You seem insistent on not understanding any of this at all. I'll just say this one more time. Men and women aren't the same, so the exact same identical situations can't be applied to both equally. Perfect equality is not possible, so we have to settle for the closest thing to equality that we can achieve. You are a very confused person if your reaction to this is "if we can't have perfect equality, we might as well bring back slavery." Sorry pal, but you being angry about the fact that men and … | /r/MensRights | 29/05/21 08:00 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)you said it. HER CHOICE, if she "pays the consequences" is because she choose to. The man has no responsibility with what SHE DECIDES to do with her pregnancy. Her decision is going to be based on his decision. If he takes forever and won't make up his mind, it takes a toll on her physical body. She is paying the price for his indecision, and that's why there needs to be a sensible time limit on it. It seems like you're getting confused because of the man vs woman perspective on this. Suppose tw… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/21 01:52 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)no, he doesn't make her do shit. If she remains pregnant is because of her own choice. Her choice is "I want this child if you're in it with me, if not then I don't". I'm far from being a feminist but if you think it's ok for him to take forever to decide while she has to pay physical consequences for his inability to figure out what he wants, that's pretty fucked up. And if you want any legislation to ever become popular enough to make your version of equal rights a reality, and all you can def… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/21 05:45 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)He deserves time to think about a life change decision Yes, but it needs to be kept to a reasonable time period. If she decides to wait for his decision knowing he can opt out at the last moment that her problem. Sounds like you're just choosing not to give a shit about what's fair to her, and only caring about his choice. I think it's better to respect both people and treat them as fairly as possible. If the woman is ready to choose abortion if he's not going to opt in, but he makes her remain … | /r/MensRights | 28/05/21 02:26 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)So he would renounce in the same (actually a bit less, so he doesn't do it in the last day) time frame that she has to abort. It could be done that way, but I think it'd need to be pretty strict on getting a quick answer from him. I think there would be many cases where the woman only wants the child if he'll be helping to support it, and she knows this immediately. It's not fair if he screws around and waits a long time and won't make up his mind, while she starts to undergo physical consequenc… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/21 05:44 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)No, my point is that if we follow your presex contract position, and she wants him to forbid his right to male abortion then she's the one that needs to bring the contract, if she doesn't need to sign anything before having sex stating that she will abort, then neither does he. That doesn't mean all men opt out by default. It just means that in order to opt out you don't need to sign presex contracts, just that. So your solution is that men are opted in by default, but can opt out... when? Whene… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/21 01:14 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)It's exactly what you're saying. That for men to have bodily autonomy they'd need the right to force women to abort, which would mean women would lose bodily autonomy. You directly said it's impossible for both sides to have bodily autonomy for that reason. That means you consider the baby in the woman's womb to be part of the man's body. Either that, or you're just mixing up "bodily autonomy" with being treated fairly by the legal system. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 07:50 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)If you think that a baby is a part of a man's body then our viewpoints are too different to debate this situation. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 06:34 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)I never said that abortion requires a pre-emptive contract. If you want the situations to be completely identical, that's just not going to happen. Men and women have different bodies and only women can get pregnant. You can't have the exact same situation for both sexes, but you can get as close to equality as possible under the law. Just imagine after metting and talking for a while with some1 that wants to have sex with you: "Please can you accompany me to the court and take 2 hours in line t… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 06:20 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)It is not impossible for everyone to have control over their own bodies, and I don't know why you think this can't happen. Everyone owns their own body, nobody owns anyone else's. That's all there is to it. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 06:05 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Pretty sure she needs to sign some forms to do that, yes. Anyway, it's particularly necessary for men to do it because the woman's decision on whether to have the child may depend on whether the man will be there to help contribute. She needs to be able to know the answer to that question. The legal system needs to know that too, if she pursues child support should they go after him for it or not. It has to be documented. The situation isn't quite the same for men, they're not waiting on her dec… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 01:03 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)If one of the parties has bodily autonomy in reproduction we have to limit the other party in their bodily autonomy. No, that's not how that works. Everyone can have bodily autonomy, and no one gets to control anyone else's bodies. No one is entitled to control anyone else's body, and no one has to surrender rights to their own body for anyone else to have their own bodily autonomy. Right now men don't have bodily autonomy Yes they do. What they don't have is equal rights. Different topics. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 01:00 PM |
| 0 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Nothing wrong with being blunt. But she needs to know what his position will be because it could affect her decision whether or not to have the child, and she needs to know it in a timely manner. And there are a lot of ways that can go wrong... unless she's already informed of his decision ahead of time with a pre-emptive agreement. if she suddenly couldn't get a hold of her bf upon learning she is pregnant she'd know the answer anyway. Why, if she couldn't figure out the father's decision from … | /r/MensRights | 26/05/21 12:39 AM |
| -1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)That solution has a ton of flaws. How does the woman find out what his decision is? If he waits long enough, she might not find out if she'll have his support or not, and her decision on whether to abort may depend on that. Totally unfair to her. Does he have to notify her personally? If so we'd need legal documentation to prove it. If not then we're relying on the government to relay his response to her quickly enough for her to decide, and I wouldn't trust that to work effectively. What happen… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 09:07 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)thoroughly depressing A lot better than the current situation of rape victims paying child support. easily abused How could it possibly be abused? The woman should be legally compelled to inform the potential father[s] (this could include some kind of legal notification You'd need proof, so we're back to legal paperwork again. And what if she can't find him? How much time does he get to respond? When he does respond we'll need more officially stamped and dated legal paperwork to prove his respon… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 09:00 PM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)You are mistaken. The law does not say that all children are entitled to be raised on two incomes. The law is completely fine with a child being raised on a single income when the other parent is deceased or imprisoned or disabled and unable to work. The law doesn't require a second income when a single adult adopts a child. Some children don't even get to be raised by a parent at all, and are brought up in a group home. The law doesn't say that any of these children are entitled to anything. An… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 10:40 AM |
| 2 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Who said anything about compensation? Everyone deserves the same rights. No one should be forced into legal parenthood against their will. No one should be held financially responsible for being raped. There should not be different rules for different people based on their sex. Discrimination based on race, sex, etc. is a bad thing. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 10:26 AM |
| -1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Give me a better solution then. Most of the other solutions I've seen aren't reasonable or workable. They'd allow men to change their mind and opt out at the last minute, leaving the woman unable to choose abortion at that late stage. Or they'd have problems if the woman hides the pregnancy and doesn't inform the man, or if either party is unable to find or contact the other one to inform them of their status of being opted in or out. The only solution that would actually function is "men are op… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 01:46 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)And that argument only holds true for women, men do not get this bodily autonomy as their sperm can be used against their will. Both sexes should have bodily autonomy and the right to not be forced into parenthood against their will. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 01:41 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)If you believe this, you should also believe that a woman should be free to get an abortion at any stage of pregnancy. Due to the unique circumstances of this situation, that isn't true. My position is that the woman must have the right to choose, because it involves her own body. But 20 weeks is more than enough time to make that choice. Abortion becomes illegal when the child becomes viable (capable of living outside the womb) which happens around the 20-24 week mark. If we were going to take … | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 01:39 AM |
| 1 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Apart from that there's the welfare of the child to consider (which no one here has). Plenty of children are being raised by single parents. Why aren't they entitled to someone else's income to help support them? How can you argue that some children are legally entitled to the income of two people but others aren't? | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 01:21 AM |
| 2 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)likewise a woman is responsible for providing for her child even if she herself is a victim of rape or another violent act. This is not true at all. Why would you lie? She has the option to abort, or to have the child and give it up to the state or give it up for adoption. There is no way she can be compelled to take care of a child unless she chooses to become the parent of the child. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/21 01:18 AM |
| 1 | Prostitution and rightsI agree with radfems on many things. They're the ones who want women to step up and become scientists and CEOs, not complain about unequal pay... they are rational and pro equality and opposed to SJW feminism most of the time. But what I don't understand is why they are strongly against women having the right to choose to be a sex worker. They openly mock women having the ability to choose that for themselves rather than spend far more hours making far less money at a low level job. I have tried… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/21 02:31 AM |
| 9 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)It doesn't matter if the general public agrees that rape victims shouldn't be held responsible for child support. The legal system says they are, and that's fucked up. If 99% of the country supported gay marriage but the legal system disallowed it, it wouldn't be a "strawman" if someone demanded gay marriage be legalized, just because most people agree with it. When the legal system denies people rights, it's a problem. What you're doing is using a strawman to argue on behalf of men that don't c… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/21 02:19 AM |
| 10 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)You seem to believe this is about men wanting to abandon children that they chose to have, and refusing to be responsible for the outcome of their own choices. You are mistaken. This is about men not getting any choice in the first place. All women have the right to choose to never become a legal parent of a child, and no men do. Women should and must always have that right, but it is immoral to one sex to have that right while at the same time a court system says a child rape victim is responsi… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/21 02:14 AM |
| 4 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)After the child is born is obviously too late, anyone could agree with that. Most people would agree that he should have to decide within the timeframe where abortion is still an option for her, with plenty of time to spare so she can still make up her mind what to do about it. I think the best solution is for him to make up his mind before conception. There should be a contract that works like a prenup, stating that in the event of an accidental pregnancy, she has 100% of rights and responsibil… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/21 02:09 AM |
| 9 | The pro-choice crowd "suddenly" becomes anti-choice the second anyone dares try to advocate for the male right to choose (to not pay child support)Firstly, abortion concerns not just the mother's body. What about the fetus's body? And consequently its life? You're misunderstanding the bodily integrity argument. The argument is "I own my body, not anyone else. No one can use it without my consent. I make the decisions and those choices belong to me, not the government or anyone else." If a fetus is inside the woman's body without her consent, she has the right to remove it. She is not compelled to carry it to term and go through childbirth,… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/21 02:06 AM |
| 11 | Feminists shutting down a men's suicide awareness event.This is absurd.That's the problem with a lot of ideological groups. They have completely contradictory factions within the group and whatever you do is going to make members of that group angry with you. As you said, some feminists insist you join them and others insist you don't. Some progressives call for tolerance to the point of accepting violence and property damage from others, while showing zero tolerance or understanding of people with different views. Some Christians insist their religion only teaches… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/21 04:29 PM |
| 15 | Some people will never see the sexism against men no matter how many times you explain it to them. (context on final slide)I think you're being a little too wordy, and need to make her address the main point. Just ask her if "not all ____ are dangerous criminals but enough of them are" is wrong when you fill in the blank with a race or religion, then how is she any different from the people who say those things? | /r/MensRights | 02/05/21 02:55 PM |
| 2 | /TwoXChromosomes is very toxic, hateful towards men, and full of misandristsA month ago that sub's users all started posting photos of themselves. It all looked like this. Some women who questioned why the entire subreddit for twoxchromosomes was filled with people with one x chromosome were criticized or banned by mods who are known to have one x chromosome. Of course there are some hateful female feminists in there too... there are some shitty people in almost any sub. But the male feminists seem more angry and hateful. It's just a fact that a large part of that subre… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/21 05:33 AM |
| -2 | /TwoXChromosomes is very toxic, hateful towards men, and full of misandristsIt's not. A huge portion of the sub, including the mods, are men. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/21 12:39 AM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneIt is evil to force people to speak support for your political beliefs and against their own, under threat of punishment by law. It's evil when it happens in North Korea, it's evil when it happens in Russia, and it's evil when it happens in Canada. Can we agree that we both think the First Amendment is awesome, but it has practical limitations? I think that’s obvious to most Americans that have thought a bit past the idealism they learned in grade school, right? Yes. The limitation is that you c… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/21 03:15 PM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneDoesn’t that disregarding the mental illness aspect though? Yes, it does. But there's only so far that I'm willing to go to accommodate other people's personal issues. Having to agree with their beliefs crosses the line for me, I have my own beliefs about what is fair and unfair and I am not going to change that to protect someone's feelings. You are causing the person psychological harm by not accommodating their unique complications that come with their dysphoria So do you have to agree that R… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/21 07:27 AM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneIf you scroll up you’ll find you’ve been doing just that and no one has stopped you. Right, and that's what I have an objection when there are people who want to change this. It's hard to believe that a country like Canada already has. Why does it bother you so much? Freedom of speech matters, and legally compelling people to follow a belief system they find to be wrong is kind of evil. And I'm interested enough in the issue to waste some of my time commenting about it on the internet, just like… | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 08:14 PM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneBy definition though, not affirming their identity by accepting their gender identity isn’t being sympathetic or accepting. It’s being unnecessarily confrontational, dismissive, at best maybe just rude I view gender ideology as a set of beliefs no different from a religion. If someone finds it confrontational or rude that I don't share their beliefs about Jesus and Heaven and that I won't pray with them, that is their problem and not mine. I am not being rude by not sharing their belief system, … | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 02:29 AM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneJust don’t be surprised when you get labelled as an asshole for being intolerant If a Christian labels me intolerant for refusing to praise Jesus with him, it doesn't bother me. If a conservative labels me intolerant for refusing to wear a red hat, or a liberal does so for refusing to wear a pink one, it doesn't bother me. Tolerance does not require compliance with other people's demands that go against my own values. Like, do we remove places of worship for religious people because we don’t per… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 09:16 PM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneso in that context, yes you are legally required to use that form of address. No you're not. You can be silent. You can say "sir" or "ma'am" or some other polite term. You can politely be direct and not use any particular term at all, and a judge will never force anyone to say a particular term under threat of punishment (they might say "call me your honor if you're going to address me". You can choose to withdraw those forms of respect but you will find it does not exempt you from the consequen… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 08:43 PM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneYou might be under some circumstances compelled to do so. The judge example, in particular. Not in the United States. You cannot be compelled to speak in any particular way, or compelled to speak at all. Either way, all of those titles aren't something someone just "identifies" as and that's it. Of course not. Everything you said there is true. But there is nothing compelling people to address others as "doctor", "professor", or any other earned term like that. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 01:17 PM |
| 1 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneWhy not acknowledge that Jesus Christ is your lord and savior? Why not just be a nice person and agree with whatever everyone else is saying, even if you think it's wrong? I'm sorry, but it's not necessary to do this. Society does not demand agreement with everyone's belief systems in order to really work. Should trans people have to agree with my beliefs too? Should you have to agree with antivaxxers or flat earthers? It's impossible for people to agree on everything. What’s to gain from disreg… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 01:04 PM |
| 5 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneYou can reject the idea of transgender and being able to change your gender, but that does make you discriminatory against trans individuals. No. I can reject the idea of deities and being able to live forever in Heaven. Does that mean I am discriminatory against Christians or Muslims? No. I reject the idea of trickle down economics. Does this mean I am hateful and discriminatory towards Reagan Republicans? No. Having an opinion that differs from someone else is not "phobia" or discrimination. I… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 12:04 PM |
| 4 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneI am not compelled by the force of law to address anyone as sir, doctor, or your honor. I can choose to use those terms when I believe they are appropriate, or choose to not use them at all. I find it particularly absurd that someone can be sent to jail for calling an human female a woman or a human male a man. Do you think anyone would ever be convicted of a crime for referring to a biological female as "him" or "sir" or referring to a biological male as "her" or "ma'am"? It has never happened … | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 11:54 AM |
| 4 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteroneIn contrast, trans people don't hurt anyone MOST do not. There are exceptions, and those shouldn't be allowed to cause problems for others. There are male athletes who spent 30+ years as a man and fathered children, then took pills for a year and became the world champion in a women's sport. There are rapists applying to be sent to women's prisons. Teenage girls are being expected to change clothes in front of the opposite sex and are being called phobic if they aren't OK with that. There are ha… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 10:01 AM |
| 9 | Dad sentenced to 6 months for breaking gag order, objecting to daughter taking testosteronethen that person deserves to be referred to their preferred gender. No one should be legally entitled to be referred to as whatever they claim to be. No one should have the power to control another person's words that they speak. If what the father says is true, and the child was convinced and pushed into this mind set then it's wrong, but the father may have no idea what's going on and could be transphobic. It doesn't matter which situation it is. People in countries that have a shred of respec… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 09:58 AM |
| -1 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesThis case has nothing to do with that, and neither does the ruling. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 04:58 PM |
| 3 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexeshttps://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/minnesota-man-cant-be-charged-with-rape-because-the-woman-chose-to-drink-beforehand-court-rules/ They charged him with the wrong crime. A conviction requires proving that the rapist intentionally got the victim drunk in order to rape them. They didn't prove that because he didn't do that, she was already drunk when they met. Somehow he was convicted anyway, and his lawyer has now gotten the case thrown out. There will now be a second trial, and I … | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 04:13 PM |
| 1 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesDouble jeopardy is when you get brought up on the same charges after being found innocent. This person was found guilty. That conviction has been thrown out and he's getting a new trial. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:58 PM |
| 3 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesThe information in OP's screenshot is wrong. It's a complete misunderstanding of what happened in the courtroom. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:56 PM |
| 1 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesit isn't true | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:21 PM |
| 1 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesit isn't true | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:21 PM |
| -5 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesThat is not the ruling at all, and in fact such a ruling would legalize the rape of any drunk person so it wouldn't be good if it was true. This is nothing but a situation of incompetence in the legal system. The defendant is an actual rapist who deserves prison and will be going there, they just made a mistake with the charges and accidentally convicted him of the wrong crime. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:20 PM |
| 1 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesThat's true, but that situation has nothing to do with this particular case. This was a drunk woman who was raped against her will. They charged the man incorrectly, trying to prosecute him of a crime where finding him guilty requires proving that he got her drunk on purpose in order to rape her. He had nothing to do with her getting drunk. They somehow found him guilty of that anyway, so the whole case was thrown out. They're going to re-do the entire trial correctly this time, and find him gui… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:18 PM |
| 10 | [Instagram] Minnesota Supreme Court rules it’s not rape if victim voluntarily intoxicated | This is hugely problematic for both sexesMany words are banned on social media sites now. "Dead" or "murder" are frequently replaced with "unalive" on Tiktok. Other things are referred to with sound alike names... suicide is "sewer slide" for instance. I've seen independent news channels on Youtube refer to guns as "projectile firing devices" because you can't say gun or bullet without having your content taken down. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/21 03:14 PM |
| 2 | Anyone notice the "date rape" issue in Coming 2 America?Obviously the first movie was far better and the second movie had a lot of stupid things in it (which you pointed out) that make no sense. However... it's a comedy. It's also incredibly stupid for Adam Sandler to have to attend grade school again in Billy Madison, and the plot of Happy Gilmore is just as absurd and unrealistic. But those movies work, because they're funny and that's all they were ever trying to be. The story really isn't important. The original Coming To America was great becaus… | /r/MensRights | 25/03/21 03:10 PM |
| 3 | Anyone notice the "date rape" issue in Coming 2 America?You should absolutely watch the first one. I actually liked the second one... the story was completely idiotic and impossible to care about, but the throwaway lines still were making me laugh often enough that it was worth seeing the movie in the end. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/21 03:01 PM |
| 5 | High-school boys made to stand and apologise for being maleSame here. I wouldn't have obeyed... not because I would have cared about the issue at all, but because I hated school and refused to participate in anything. There must have been a couple of kids who just sat there, I would think. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/21 02:58 PM |
| 2 | I was refused service today in the U.K. because I’m a manThey will try again and probably pass I don't know, over 57% of the vote was against them. The bill lost by 14.5 points in the most liberal state in the country, with full support of all of its political leaders, in a year with record high turnout by liberal voters. It was the absolute ideal circumstance to pass a far-left bill as they'll ever get, and it still lost by a wide margin. There is a lot of stupid in this country, but the majority of people do still think civil rights are a good thing… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/21 02:33 AM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportthe parent is obligated Why? Why is someone obligated to do something because they were raped? Your previous statements talked about how the child exists and needs support, implying that the child is entitled to have two incomes raising it. So if the child is not entitled to that, why would it be a problem if the child does not receive that? It is always child abandonment as well as abhorrent behaviour for any parent to abandon their child. How can you say that it's immoral for a FOURTEEN YEAR O… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/21 03:24 AM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportThere's no logical consistency to your argument. Why is the child entitled to a second income providing for it... but not if it's in foster care? Why aren't all other children of single parents entitled to part of a second person's income? Why is it OK for a parent who gives up a child for adoption to not he held responsible for the costs, but not OK for a rape victim to not be held responsible? There's no consistency. You call it "child abandonment" if the kid has to be raised on a single incom… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/21 05:41 PM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportIf someone who gives up their child for adoption is allowed to not be held responsible for the costs of raising their biological child, it would be insane not to extend that same courtesy to a rape victim. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/21 12:53 AM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportNo one should have parenthood forced on them against their will. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/21 09:16 PM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportWhy does a sperm donor not have to pay, but a rape victim does? Why is it OK for single parents to raise a child on one income, but not OK for the person raising this baby to do it on one income? | /r/MensRights | 23/02/21 12:53 AM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportCauses and circumstances aside, there is a child in this world now that needs support. But fuck all the other babies who have only one parent, or who are in foster care. They don't deserve to get anything. And all the other biological parents of foster kids and adopted kids? They don't have to pay anything... ONLY the victims of child rape should have to pay? Do you not see how insane this is? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/21 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportDid you read the rest of what I wrote? Yes I'm aware that the baby exists. But why is the baby born of rape entitled to be supported by two incomes when no other children are? Explain why that particular child HAS to have two incomes to raise it, but not the children of single parents. Explain why being biologically related means that rape victim has to pay, but if you gave a child up for adoption then being biologically related doesn't mean anything. It's inconsistent. It doesn't make sense. Wh… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/21 03:16 PM |
| 12 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportCan issues like this not go higher, up to the Supreme Court? And maybe my question shouldn't be about why it isn't going higher up... but how the lower courts are getting it so completely wrong in the first place. If biological relation isn't a reason to pay, and if not every child is entitled to two incomes supporting them, then what is the basis for insisting that it has to work that way after a child has been raped? | /r/MensRights | 21/02/21 05:12 PM |
| 8 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportNo. We don't force rape victims to do things they don't want to do. Forcing him into something he didn't want is how the rape happened in the first place. Forcing him to raise a child is also evil. Stop trying to force rape victims to do things. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/21 04:07 PM |
| 5 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportYou think a woman should be able to choose to have a child, change her mind, and give it up for adoption and have no further obligation to raise or pay for the child... but you think a RAPE VICTIM has obligations? Please try to realize how little sense that makes. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/21 04:05 PM |
| 6 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportPlease explain why you think the rape victim should be responsible for paying for the cost of this child for the next 18 years. Is it because he's biologically the father? Because we don't make sperm donors and couples who give up a child for adoption pay. Is it because all children are entitled to have two people providing income towards raising them? Because we don't make them happen for kids in foster care, or children of single parents. Why should we go against all existing rules for what mu… | /r/MensRights | 21/02/21 04:02 PM |
| 59 | Rape victim forced to pay child supportI would love to know why this hasn't been challenged and appealed to higher courts. "The best interest of the child" does not trump other people's rights. If I rob a bank to provide a better life for my child, it's still illegal. There are many children who have no parents to support them, we could violate random people's rights and assign them the cost of paying for the kids to have a better life, but we don't do that. But... we WILL do it if the person is a rape victim, for no sensible reason … | /r/MensRights | 21/02/21 03:56 PM |
| 2 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.The whole point of it is stupid. Why should there be two bathrooms for the tiny percentage of the students that are gender nonconforming, and two for the entire rest of the school? It doesn't matter if people are gender nonconforming. You don't stop being male or female if you change your clothes or your hair. This would harm other people No it wouldn't. It's not harmful to piss in a bathroom where the other people don't share the same sense of style as you. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 09:24 PM |
| 2 | Mom bought a house for her son but now his wife is divorcing him and wants half of itThere's no way to know until it plays out in court. Does the law in that state care who paid for it or whose name it was in, is she guaranteed half of everything no matter what or do certain circumstances apply, can it be proven that she planned to file for divorce all along and did this just to get more money out of the divorce, and so on. It'll be a huge unpredictable mess, and the results could be anything from she gets the house + kids + alimony + support, to she gets no custody and only a p… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 08:07 PM |
| 7 | Rant about the military system in my countryAnd I get it, they're trying to figure out if you're just lying to get out of service. I wonder what happens if someone says they're gay. Does the doctor ask him to suck a dick to prove it? | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 12:54 PM |
| 6 | Mom bought a house for her son but now his wife is divorcing him and wants half of itHere's a working link. Mom gets an unexpected inheritance, immediately the daughter in law comes begging for money and saying she should buy them a house. Daughter in law doesn't work, and on a single income they haven't been able to afford a house. Mom buys them a house, daughter in law has no contact with the mom for the next six months, then informs her that she's filing for divorce and wants half the house. It was gifted during the marriage, it's easily provable that Mom paid for 100% of it,… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 12:51 PM |
| 1 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.The comment I responded to was saying "1 exclusive bathroom out of 4 is good enough, the girls' complaint holds no water". I said that both the boys and the girls have a valid complaint. But apparently a lot of people think only the boys should be allowed to complain about having 1 out of 4 bathrooms. If the argument was sexism, it's invalid because both sides were being treated perfectly fairly before the change. Which is what I said in the second sentence of my comment. What OP is doing is not… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 11:56 AM |
| -1 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.This sub has gotten ridiculous lately. BOTH the boys and girls had only 1/4 of the bathrooms exclusive to their own sex. BOTH sides want to have privacy in the bathroom, it's not just the boys. Denying privacy to everyone is bad for BOTH sexes, not just the boys. The OP is complaining about the boys only having privacy in 1 out of 4 bathrooms, and everyone correctly supports that. But when the girls did the EXACT SAME THING you can't understand how it's valid? | /r/MensRights | 16/02/21 11:15 AM |
| -2 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.Don't blame them, blame the principal. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:39 PM |
| 5 | There's a "Hit him in the balls" challenge on TikTok. Can't believe this is a trendThis trend is really stupid, but if you watch the video there are guys doing it to girls. And none of them are putting any real force into it, it's mostly just to get a reaction out of the other person. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:36 PM |
| 2 | What woman don't understand, and I'm in high school, is that men have feelingsThe context of that message is pretty important. "All the guys want is sex, they don't actually care about the girls at all" is wrong. "Be careful, they all want sex" is fairly accurate, though exceptions exist. On average, guys have a higher libido and are much more ready to rush into sex earlier in a relationship, and it's much more likely that a guy will pressure a girl into having sex before she's ready for it than the other way around. It's good to inform girls about this and teach them to … | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:32 PM |
| 7 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.That may be true in a perfect world. In our imperfect one, the vast majority of people prefer separate facilities for each sex. Maybe one day it will be different. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:16 PM |
| -14 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.I agree the complaint of sexism isn't valid, because both sexes were being treated equally. But the complaint of "girls can only have privacy from boys in 1/4 of the bathrooms" is a valid one. Thus, there are two bathrooms that do not discriminate. There could be 20 bathrooms that don't discriminate. The majority of girls and boys will still want to use a bathroom that excludes the opposite sex. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:11 PM |
| 3 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.GN is not something anyone needs to care about. It doesn't matter what clothes people wear or how they style their hair or affect their appearance. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:01 PM |
| 5 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.That's a really stupid way to handle it, and would just give them a reason to punish the boys. Best way to handle it is to file a complaint and remind them of Title IX laws that ban discrimination based on sex. Involving a lawyer would get it fixed in a hurry. And the simplest solution, which I expect probably happened at this school, is that all of the students just treated it as a second boys room. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 03:00 PM |
| 8 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.It's not shitting on anyone to disagree with the political opinion that male and female should be defined by stereotypes instead of by biology. I wish trans people nothing but happiness and success in life and oppose all discrimination and especially violence against them. We need to promote tolerance and acceptance of others, there is nothing at all wrong with a dude in a skirt wearing makeup or a girl with short hair in a suit. But stereotypes are garbage, and I oppose defining male and female… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:56 PM |
| 6 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.Their own place to hang out? What do you think it is, some private lounge? It's a place to take a shit. Why are you acting like if a boy wears a skirt he deserves his own private bathroom and it's a problem if another boy is in there? | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:49 PM |
| 2 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.How is it being shitty to use a neutral bathroom? It's for either boys or girls. It's not a private place that's supposed to exclude anyone for your benefit. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:46 PM |
| 3 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.No one is stopping them from using the bathroom, so I'm not sure what you're complaining about. But if there are two girls bathrooms and one boys bathroom and one neutral, it seems pretty likely that boys are going to treat the neutral one as a second boys' bathroom. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:44 PM |
| 11 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.It is human nature to want privacy from the opposite sex. Maybe you don't feel that way, but the vast majority of people do. It's not hard to cater to this need by having separate bathrooms for each sex. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:42 PM |
| -37 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.Because they can only have privacy from the opposite sex in 1 out of 4 bathrooms. It's not sexist since the boys were treated the same way, but it's still a problem for them and their complaint is valid. It's a shame the solution was discriminatory. The boys should have complained too. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:41 PM |
| -1 | In 9th grade they installed two gender neutral restrooms at my school. The girls complained that is was Sexist, and Within 2 hours they changed the sign on one door to female only, and left the other one gender neutral. We now have 2 girls restrooms, one boys and one gender neutral restroom.I don't blame the girls for this. They could only have privacy from the opposite sex in 1 out of 4 bathrooms. The boys should have complained back though. Then you'd end up with two bathrooms for each sex, like there should have been. I hope that the boys regularly used the gender neutral one, and that the girls kept out of it because there were always boys in there, effectively making it another boys bathroom. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/21 02:40 PM |
| 7 | Baby dies in circumcision surgery in CuernavacaI hope it was your choice. Anyway you're mistaken, nearly all circumcision is done to babies, when they're too young to consent to it. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/21 10:10 AM |
| 6 | Baby dies in circumcision surgery in CuernavacaIf you have so much trouble washing yourself that you rely on medical procedures to remove body parts instead of washing them... well then you're free to choose that life I guess. But you should let other people get a choice too, because most of us find it pretty easy to wash. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/21 10:08 AM |
| 8 | Baby dies in circumcision surgery in CuernavacaWhy do people hate it so much? Like whats bad about it? No one has the right to carve pieces off of someone else's body without consent. It's incredibly immoral. Do you understand why it's illegal to carve off pieces of female genitals? Do you understand why it's illegal to give a baby a tattoo? Circumcision should be illegal for the same reason. It's permanent body modification done for no medical reason, without consent. I'm not sure how you can ask "what's bad about it" in a thread with the t… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/21 10:07 AM |
| 11 | Harvard University Bans Single-Gender Clubs — Unless They’re Women-OnlyThis is the first I've heard of that. But of course we'd never be taught about him if it meant some important people have to lose something prestigious of theirs. "If the whites maintain their position as the supreme race, the day may come when we shall all be thankful that we have the natives in their proper place." - Cecil Rhodes Honestly, how did modern day progressives miss this one? They're always looking for things that ought to be cancelled or renamed, this is a prime target for it. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/21 08:03 PM |
| 1 | Women are as of February 24th allowed to wear makeup, ponytails, earrings, lipstick, and colored nail polish in uniform in U.S. army.High heels? Those are mandatory. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/21 06:40 AM |
| 2 | Women are as of February 24th allowed to wear makeup, ponytails, earrings, lipstick, and colored nail polish in uniform in U.S. army.it wasn't voluntary | /r/MensRights | 07/02/21 06:38 AM |
| 2 | “Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life,” according to really stupid people. Remember guys, it’s only “reproductive rights” when women do it.Like I said in the comment you replied to, both are wrong. If someone steals from you, are you going to become a thief too, and tell yourself it's fine because everyone does it? I would hope not. The right response is to want to crack down on crime. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/21 03:07 AM |
| 1 | “Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life,” according to really stupid people. Remember guys, it’s only “reproductive rights” when women do it.If you think hating women is the answer you've come to the wrong conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/21 03:04 AM |
| -3 | “Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life,” according to really stupid people. Remember guys, it’s only “reproductive rights” when women do it."women are all into sucking dicks while they're young, then when they're over 30 it's too late to start a family, women are scumbags" Don't go around spewing shit like that towards an entire class of people and say that's just the reality of the world. It's the exact same nonsense that man-hating female supremacists do, is that something worth emulating? As for the equality thing, men and women, in my personal opinion, will never be equal. You can disagree with me all you want, but that's just h… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/21 09:21 PM |
| 8 | “Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life,” according to really stupid people. Remember guys, it’s only “reproductive rights” when women do it.You don't know any men who switched to a job that pays half as much in order to help them find a wife? That's how it works, right? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/21 07:17 PM |
| -4 | “Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life,” according to really stupid people. Remember guys, it’s only “reproductive rights” when women do it.I'm not a fan of that Red Pill bullshit and I'm surprised it's upvoted in here. People can be single and suck whatever they want for whatever portion of their life that they want, and it doesn't matter if they're male or female. It's not too late to have a family in your 30s, and a woman can easily do it if she wants to. But it's absurd if she expects men to make significantly more money than her in a world where men and women are equals, and insane if she blames men for that. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/21 07:15 PM |
| 57 | “Childish men are to blame for women having kids late in life,” according to really stupid people. Remember guys, it’s only “reproductive rights” when women do it.Imagine men in the 60s complaining they can't find a good woman to marry because the women don't make as much money as they do. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/21 07:09 PM |
| 6 | So apparently (in the usa) only men have to register in the draft and somehow the initial (obviously correct) ruling got overturned. What the fuck is this shitThe solution is not to ban women from the military. It's to kick out the incompetent and incapable ones just as they do with the men. The military is failing at that task. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/21 09:37 PM |
| 2 | "men only bring up men's issues to undermine women's issues, you don't actually care about men"This is standard procedure for hateful bigots who pretend to care about social justice. It's pure projection, it's exactly what they are doing themselves. If you stand up for women's rights like having their own sports leagues where biological males aren't allowed to compete, they'll say "you only bring up women's issues to undermine trans people, you don't actually care about women." If you make a statement opposing both FGM and MGM? They'll say you're only opposing FGM because you want to bash… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/20 01:35 AM |
| 5 | Presidential debate moderator says women hit hardest by Covid, despite fact that more men have died from it and continue to be at higher risk of death.As someone who didn't pay much attention to her for a while, I had a vaguely positive impression of her for a long time. When I heard that quote I assumed that it had to be taken out of context, because most of the embarrassing quotes from politicians are. They did it to Obama and they did it to Trump, cherrypicking some words that sound like BS but in context you see that they meant something else. But there wasn't much context for Hillary. She really was saying women being harmed or inconvenie… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/20 09:59 AM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.you think that a man who was accused of rape (guilty or not) and declared not guilty will not do the same thing? How? He has absolutely no proof. There's no way to press charges without any proof of fraud. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/20 05:01 PM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.She will not get convicted? ok maybe not but she will still be questioned, she will maybe have to go through another trial. This could be really frightening for a rape victim don't you agree? How could she possibly be charged with a fraudulent accusation when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support that idea? Again, if someone files an insurance claim and the claim gets rejected, are they immediately charged with insurance fraud? That's just not how it works. Inability to provide c… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/20 03:58 PM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.Man it's different in an insurance fraud case you do not have PTSD or general trauma! It's absolutely different in that way, and many others. But it's the same in the way that a legitimate report will never, ever result in being prosecuted for a fraudulent report. You can't prove fraud when it never happened, and no one would even suspect fraud unless there was evidence... and there can't be evidence when there is no fraud. This will happen and victim will report less am I wrong? This might happ… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/20 03:00 PM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.Exactly my point! Your point seemed to be that rape victims would be afraid to press charges out of fear that they could be convicted of false accusations. If you agree with me that this is as impossible as being jailed for insurance fraud for filing a legitimate claim, then good. This will never happen if we criminalise false accusation, if someone it's shitty enough to lie about something like rape they will not risk going to jail or a fine, ever Well... we still get confessions to crimes like… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/20 12:54 PM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.How do you prove that someone intentionally lied in a rape case? It's pretty difficult and is rarely possible, which is why there are almost never any legal consequences for false accusations. You would either need a full confession from the false accuser, or you would need concrete evidence that the accused couldn't possibly have raped her (like video evidence of being at a different location) along with solid evidence that her accusation was intentionally fraudulent and not just a mistake (lik… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/20 01:46 AM |
| 0 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.There is nothing wrong with comparing the similar aspects of two very different situations. In both situations, no one should ever (or would ever) end up being convicted of a crime because they made a complaint but didn't have enough evidence to conclusively prove it. The only way a conviction occurs if it is discovered that they intentionally lied in order to get something that they want, and if there's conclusive evidence to prove that they intentionally lied. Acknowledging that similarity is … | /r/MensRights | 15/10/20 12:48 AM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.Suppose a man's house is flooded. He waits too long to file an insurance claim, and there is a lack of evidence to prove that the damage took place and should be covered under his insurance policy. He files a lawsuit over their inaction, and the court says due to lack of evidence the insurance company is not responsible for paying for the insurance claim. Does this mean he would go straight to prison for committing insurance fraud? Of course not. We don't throw people in jail every time there's … | /r/MensRights | 14/10/20 07:51 PM |
| 12 | "The Oscars have gone insane": just the latest anti-male dogma to come out of HollywoodIt would. These idiotic rules are surprisingly easy to adhere to, just hire a couple of token POC or women on the production or marketing side of things. Most movies would already meet these standards without even having to try, and for a Hollywood studio they can easily afford to hire a couple of extra people without a second thought. These rules will only harm low budget filmmakers who can't afford token diversity hires... but only if they're straight white men. Fortunately, even they can stil… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/20 08:26 AM |
| 12 | I’m worried about my futureYou're probably going to be insignificant to society no matter what (fame/popularity are the only exception). Since you don't matter to them, you don't have to care about any expectations you think they might have. But you will be significant to your friends, and especially to your family (hopefully). Don't worry about what car you drive or how you look to random strangers, build your relationships with your friends and family. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/20 08:17 AM |
| 3 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.My question is what would be the sentence of a man who locked up a woman in his basement for a year and abused her? My guess is that it would be life. I can't seem to find any difference under the law between kidnapping or imprisoning someone for a day, and doing it for years. There are different degrees of the crime - a desperate parent taking their child away for two hours when the other parent has legal custody can result in a lighter sentence, while a more dangerous kidnapper who holds someo… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/20 08:09 AM |
| 1 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.I’ve never seen a case for an attempted rape resulting in a life sentence (not saying your wrong). In the past, it could result in the death penalty, especially if the accused was black and in a southern state... even if there was no evidence because he was innocent. But under modern day laws, you're right. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/20 08:02 AM |
| 6 | Women who make false rape allegations should be sent to prison. For life.It's definitely too much. The crime is essentially kidnapping and false imprisonment, using the police as a proxy (so add wasting police resources to the list). These are serious crimes that should carry a serious punishment. But a life sentence? That's too much. And of course, people could only be convicted of this crime when it can be proved that they did this intentionally. No one's going to jail because of a rare case of accidental mistaken identity that leads to conviction, and certainly ne… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/20 07:58 AM |
| 1 | Teacher told us women can't rapeSo if a man (or a woman) were to attack a woman and penetrate her with something other than a penis, that isn't rape? She isn't a rape victim because her horrible experience forced on her by a violent and evil person involved an object instead of a penis? It's good to see that the US has gotten this figured out, and calls it rape regardless of what is used to do it. But it's crazy to learn that it was only 2015 when the legal definition was updated to not require use of force, meaning that befor… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/20 04:33 AM |
| 20 | I spent about 40 hours doing extreme amounts of research and prep for this 3200 word essay for my year 10 social studies class about the discrimination men face. I got an F. Did I do a shit job or is my teacher being sus?There are also some run on sentences with a lot of commas. They should have been broken up into separate sentences. School essays tend to frown on the frequent references to "I" and "me", and he might see better results if he talked about how the issues affect men in general. Write it like a news report about other people. "Home life." is not a sentence, and don't include things like "I'll go into this more in my next paragraph". This looks like the first page of several, so I'd need to see the … | /r/MensRights | 21/09/20 05:28 AM |
| 4 | Boy Suspended From School After Fighting Back Against Girl Bully Who Kept Hitting HimYou saw how hard it was, and it still wasn't enough to make her stop attacking him. How can you say it was way too much, when the evidence shows it wasn't enough? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/20 06:48 PM |
| 5 | Boy Suspended From School After Fighting Back Against Girl Bully Who Kept Hitting HimHe tried to walk away. She followed him. I suppose maybe he could have run away (maybe, he looks a bit out of shape and she looks like she could keep up with him). But is it his job to sprint away from anyone who who takes issue with him? If you were looking at racism in the 1950s would you try to solve it by telling black people "if a white person has a problem with you, just run away as fast as you can"? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/20 06:47 PM |
| 9 | "Toxic masculinity" is thinly veiled misandry and we should stop using the term.Identity politics poisons people's minds. I don't understand how it happens, but people lose the ability to recognize others as individuals. They only see a group called "men", and if the group does something that hurts itself, then they just shouldn't have done that thing. They've lost the ability to see the difference between "I got myself into debt, and I'm unhappy about having to face the consequence of my actions" and "someone stole all of my property and I've lost everything". The bizarre … | /r/MensRights | 13/09/20 02:31 PM |
| 11 | "Toxic masculinity" is thinly veiled misandry and we should stop using the term.It's actually pretty useful to have a term for "when men feel like they have to live up to some outdated macho stereotype of what a man is supposed to be, and does harm to himself or others in the effort to try to achieve that reputation". But toxic masculinity can't be that term anymore, because the majority of people who use it are just like "lol men are toxic, am I right girls?" Once a term is consistently misused it becomes useless. It's like if people started using the word "cheese" to desc… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/20 02:23 PM |
| 1 | Blatant sexism in our public education system. No wonder misandry is so commonplace these days.I don't think anyone is legitimately outraged over something like this, obviously it's just one tiny little thing in comparison to large scale problems that are widespread. But that doesn't mean only the biggest issues can ever be talked about. It's OK to mention the small stuff too, and point out the examples of things that would never be tolerated (and possibly deemed hate speech) if used towards another group, but treated as harmless when aimed at men. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/20 07:23 AM |
| 7 | Blatant sexism in our public education system. No wonder misandry is so commonplace these days.Maybe sexism doesn't matter TO YOU, but it does to other people. And you're the one coming to this forum and whining and moaning about what other people are choosing to say in a comment section on the internet. And you're talking about people getting mad over nothing and being crybabies? Sounds like a bit of projection there. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/20 03:04 AM |
| 2 | Blatant sexism in our public education system. No wonder misandry is so commonplace these days.It is intended a a silly joke but that doesn't mean it's right. How would you feel about a school that was teaching kids to follow W.H.I.T.E. and stay away from B.L.A.C.K.? | /r/MensRights | 04/09/20 03:01 AM |
| 2 | Blatant sexism in our public education system. No wonder misandry is so commonplace these days.Would you feel the same way if a school in a southern state was teaching kids to follow W.H.I.T.E. and stay away from B.L.A.C.K.? | /r/MensRights | 04/09/20 02:59 AM |
| 1 | "If rape laws were gender neutral then men would falsely accuse women of rape" -- a discussion I had with a feminist.Damn... she actually cut herself? That's seriously insane. Thank god your neighbors were there, I agree you'd be in prison without them if the police showed up and saw her with cuts in her arms. Sorry to hear your charges weren't dropped once the real story got out, that's some BS. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/20 10:24 AM |
| 2 | "If rape laws were gender neutral then men would falsely accuse women of rape" -- a discussion I had with a feminist.I see your point, but this is the internet and sometimes people will have different opinions about things. I don't think men's rights issues are going to be successfully addressed until the MRM gets away from its negative public image that was created by feminist lies. If terms like "feminazi" and "financial abortion" and "divorce rape" are common then that won't happen. This is just one person's opinion and everyone has the right to disagree or not give a shit about it. I'm sorry to hear that y… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/20 10:19 AM |
| 2 | "If rape laws were gender neutral then men would falsely accuse women of rape" -- a discussion I had with a feminist.It's evil, I completely oppose it, and I want laws to be reformed to prevent anyone from being screwed over in a divorce - especially when it comes to family courts and the effectiveness of telling lies in order to deny men the right to see their children. If you think that's a total lack of empathy just because I don't like to use the word "rape" to describe anything negative, that's your problem. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/20 07:39 AM |
| 2 | "If rape laws were gender neutral then men would falsely accuse women of rape" -- a discussion I had with a feminist.Screwing people over in divorce is evil, but I don't think using the word rape to describe it is necessary. Those are two completely different kinds of evil behavior, they don't need to be compared. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/20 05:22 AM |
| 4 | "If rape laws were gender neutral then men would falsely accuse women of rape" -- a discussion I had with a feminist.I can almost understand (not excuse, but understand) a certain level of female violence against males. They're not taught that it's equally wrong, and yes there is an imbalance of strength so the typical stuff (punches, throwing things) wouldn't usually do much damage. And I can see why police wouldn't always know who to believe. But a knife attack with witnesses? Actual attempted murder, and the police couldn't sort out whether the knife attacker or the person being chased with the knife should… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/20 05:18 AM |
| 2 | "If rape laws were gender neutral then men would falsely accuse women of rape" -- a discussion I had with a feminist.Playing devil's advocate here for a minute... if rape laws were changed to be gender neutral nothing would change. But if society's values were changed to that the current "listen and believe" standard applied to everyone? Then yes, there would be some assholes who would make false accusations just to ruin someone's life, just because they dislike someone and have the power to harm them. Did the feminist you were talking to agree that false rape accusations are a legitimate problem and that men … | /r/MensRights | 03/09/20 05:10 AM |
| 0 | That look of disgust by the father. Subtle gesture to calm his son. We all know who the good parent is and who the failure is.Like I said, it isn't a nice thing to do. But at least the candy isn't gone, everything is made right a few seconds later. The woman in the video can't suddenly reveal the structure is fine and it was never actually harmed. She actually ruined it. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/20 11:01 PM |
| 7 | A female friend I know is adopting a child and suggested that she please not do this to him. I failed.Ask how she would feel about a man adopting a baby girl and having FGM done to her because he thinks it's more visually pleasing. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/20 08:45 AM |
| 0 | How do I debunk people who are like "the all men are trash people are an extreme minority, you can't even call them actual feminists. True feminism is about equality."Ask them to consider how Christian groups fight to treat women and LGBT people like second class citizens, trying to control women's reproductive choices, fighting to keep gay marriage illegal, labelling LGBT people as sinners and discriminating against them, etc. Then ask how they should respond to someone who says "anyone doing those things isn't a real Christian, true Christianity is about kindness and love". Demonstrate the fact that even if a group is only supposed to be about positive thin… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/20 08:41 AM |
| -2 | That look of disgust by the father. Subtle gesture to calm his son. We all know who the good parent is and who the failure is.The Halloween prank Kimmel encourages isn't very nice, but there's no real harm done. It's just a joke, the kid finds out the candy is still there and the parents were just messing with him, it's all OK in the end. What the woman in this video did was like actually eating the candy. Just straight up ruining something for her child and laughing about it. I hope this was just one thoughtless moment from an otherwise decent parent. But unfortunately I think that's unlikely, I think a parent has to … | /r/MensRights | 27/08/20 08:27 AM |
| 5 | Australian mother who for nearly a year dressed her 9 year old daughter in "Playboy" bunny ears costumes and held her down while male paedophiles raped her, has been jailed 10 years and is eligible for parole. During the trial, the girl was on suicide watch at a hospital in Brisbane.That's why I'm against the death penalty too, because mistakes have been made. But ideally I'd like to see it used in cases where we can set a higher standard than finding someone guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt". Allow prosecutors to request the death penalty in cases where there is literally zero doubt. Video evidence or some other undeniable rock solid proof of guilt. But we definitely shouldn't have the death penalty when innocent men are being convicted "beyond a reasonable doubt" just be… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/20 07:04 AM |
| 17 | Ontario newborn bleeds to death after family doctor persuades parents to get him circumcisedHe was referring to the circumcision of other people (such a babies) without their consent. Of course circumcision or any other body modification should be available to those who choose to have it done to themselves. But it should be criminal to do it to another person without them choosing it. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/20 12:55 AM |
| 2 | Made my sister cry by arguing that not all men are rapistsis that how you feel about black and hispanic people who stand up and say something when they hear someone say all of their people are criminals? | /r/MensRights | 02/08/20 01:01 AM |
| 3 | Made my sister cry by arguing that not all men are rapistsfemale driving instructor: when I say boom boom boom you say bam bam bam, no pause in between come on let's jam | /r/MensRights | 02/08/20 12:58 AM |
| 16 | Holy shit the comments on this post, another reason MRAs are necessary.As if FGM wasn't done for those reasons. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 06:14 AM |
| 8 | Holy shit the comments on this post, another reason MRAs are necessary.A few children die from botched circumcision each year. Some other botched cases lead to sexual dysfunction or other problems. For the vast majority of cases there's no significant damage, but that doesn't make it OK. People should get to choose what happens with their own bodies. No one has the right to cut off part of anyone else's body without consent. It is wrong to circumcise a baby for the same reason it's wrong to give a baby tattoos. It's not your body, it's theirs, and they should get t… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/20 06:13 AM |
| 1 | UK ARMY: People are starting to realise that women can be sexual abusers too ?!Why is Big E Langston in this ad? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/20 03:46 AM |
| 6 | This video breaks my heart. A pro gamer (who is on the spectrum) was falsely accused of sexually assaulting a girl. Turns out he can’t have an orgasm and is severely depressed because of a botched childhood circumcision. Enough is enough with false accusations and genital mutilation.TIL thinking it should be illegal to cut off parts of other people's bodies is "whining" | /r/MensRights | 05/07/20 04:46 PM |
| 3 | This video breaks my heart. A pro gamer (who is on the spectrum) was falsely accused of sexually assaulting a girl. Turns out he can’t have an orgasm and is severely depressed because of a botched childhood circumcision. Enough is enough with false accusations and genital mutilation.The man in the video has a non-functional penis and can never enjoy sex because someone carved off part of his penis without his consent. I don't know how you can see this as being perfectly fine, and not something that ought to be a crime. Cutting people's genitals is fucked up behavior and should not be allowed. You're so used to thinking that it's normal that you never stopped to think how messed up it really is. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/20 04:45 PM |
| 3 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.I know that most trans people just want to live their lives in a way that is not typical of what people expect of someone of their biological sex. Most don't want to infringe on other people and treat anyone unfairly. But... a small percentage do want this, and are being allowed to do it. We don't want to come off as male or female or neutral to get into any 'restricted' areas or 'take over' women's sports and spaces just because. There are biological males who had no athletic accomplishments in… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 04:36 PM |
| 2 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.I am not claiming there is no man-hating at all among gender critical feminists. But the core reason they exist as a group is not for the purpose of hating men, it's for protecting women's rights. They care because women are being directly affected by unfair situations that arise when males are allowed to be counted as female. I am certainly not defending everything they say. But I support the idea that "gender" is ridiculous and should not allow people of the opposite sex to enter spaces that w… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 04:11 PM |
| 3 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.Physical threat is not the only reason to not want the opposite sex in the same sports leagues, locker rooms, prisons, etc. Some men would not be comfortable changing clothes in front of a member of the opposite sex, or might have concerns of being accused of inappropriate behavior if they're undressed around a member of the opposite sex. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 04:06 PM |
| 3 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.And what about men's rights to sex-segregated spaces? Those matter too. But you shouldn't be surprised the feminists are more concerned about men invading women's spaces, just as a MRA is more concerned about men's spaces not being private. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 04:04 PM |
| 15 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.You're right that it would be utterly absurd if that's what people thought so please give us the credit of understanding that that's not actually what most trans people actually believe. It actually is what a lot of people think. Of course, not all trans people see it that way, and not all people who think that way are trans themselves. I have seen so many stories of trans people discussing how they came to know they were trans, where it's all completely about stereotypes. They always liked pink… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 03:57 AM |
| 46 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.A so called "terf" is anyone who thinks that male and female are biological terms, instead of something you can become by dressing and acting according to outdated stereotypes. Trans people should be free to dress and act however they want to, pursue whatever hobbies they want, and call themselves whatever they want. I wish them nothing but the best in life. But a man does not become a woman if he adheres to stereotypes, and I do not want men in women's sports or women's prisons. I don't want gi… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 12:47 AM |
| 7 | Reddit has just classified radical feminism as hate speech. I fully agree, but I also have to say: this is getting **wild**.gender critical feminists aren't the ones labelling everything hate speech... they're opposed to left wing though police and censorship because the "woke" crowd wants men in women's sports and male rapists sent to women's prisons, and GC feminists have a real problem with that | /r/MensRights | 01/07/20 12:41 AM |
| 39 | 97% of people killed by police are men AND TGEY HAVE TO MAKE IT ABOUT THEM!In a perfect world, it would make no sense. In the real world, it's because the public will have a stronger reaction to women being harmed by police than men being harmed by police. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 01:45 PM |
| -4 | 97% of people killed by police are men AND TGEY HAVE TO MAKE IT ABOUT THEM!Also, you can't blame them for featuring the names of women who have been harmed by the police - everyone knows the public doesn't care nearly as much if a man is hurt or killed. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 01:43 PM |
| 3 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMI dont see where you're coming from. Why is it such a bad thing? Some women support FGM and think it's a good thing. Does that mean it should be legal? I'm glad my parents circumcised me. Good for you. Other people aren't glad, and would have liked to choose for themselves. Some of them have erectile dysfunction or other damage caused by the circumcision. And a few babies die every year from a botched circumcision... a procedure which is completely medically unnecessary. Everyone should be allow… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 12:52 AM |
| 3 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMWhat's your point? Amputating a leg is probably more dangerous to do on an adult than a child too, but that doesn't mean we should do it unnecessarily. There's nothing "barbaric" about not amputating anything unless it needs to be done, it's the opposite that's barbaric. My son will either get circumcised at birth or never honestly. What's wrong with "never"? There's no medical need for it whatsoever. There's nothing wrong with leaving your child's body intact. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 12:48 AM |
| 2 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMFGM was never a part of a Western religion | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 12:44 AM |
| 4 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMExactly. If any man wants to have himself circumcised I couldn't care less. If every man in the world wants to do it that's fine. But it should be his choice, because it's his body. It's no different than if parents wanted to give their infant a tattoo. They're not allowed to make a choice like that, because it's not their body. It's the infant's body, and he or she should get to grow up and make choices like that for themselves. Same thing for FGM (female genital mutilation). Everyone seems to … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 12:43 AM |
| 2 | Boy raped at 14yo is forced to pay child support to his rapistHoly shit, those examples are disgusting. I'd hardly give the courts "credit" for being absolutely horrible to people of both sexes, this stuff is unbelievable. I can only guess that they're regretfully following the letter of the law, but how have these laws not been changed? How in the world is it acceptable for rapists to be given privileges and money as a result of their rape? There are laws against making a profit from telling the story of a crime you've been convicted of (OJ Simpson doesn'… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/20 08:58 PM |
| 4 | Boy raped at 14yo is forced to pay child support to his rapistIt's outrageous that the court can tell a rape victim that they have a legal responsibility because of their rape. It's comparable to a woman being forced to raise her rapist's child, or prosecuted for failing to report her rape. You cannot assign responsibility for the crime to the victim of the crime and I can't understand how this hasn't been successfully challenged in court. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/20 06:13 PM |
| 6 | Boy raped at 14yo is forced to pay child support to his rapistThere is no logic, the system is just screwed up. In this particular situation only, they insist on disallowing taxpayer-funded support and forcing the biological father to pay, as if no other option were possible. They disregard the unfairness and say "this is just how it has to be". But biological fathers don't have to pay for a child that's given up for adoption. Biological fathers don't have to pay if they're a sperm donor. The system clearly allows exceptions for sensible reasons, but simpl… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/20 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.I'm not a lawyer, I'm just going by what I remember reading. I don't know what case it was, just that prosecutors intended to charge him with murder, realized they couldn't since a fetus isn't technically a person under the law, and went with something else. I just found this case from 2019 plead guilty to assault and to inflicting injury on a spouse. This man tricked a woman into taking an abortion pill and he was convicted of product tampering. It looks like the law varies depending on state. … | /r/MensRights | 01/03/20 02:01 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Those questions aren't easy to answer. Bodily autonomy means the woman has the right to remove it from her body, but I suppose the father would have the right to transplant it to an artificial womb and raise it. If neither parent wants it then I suppose we would let it die... but what if a religious group offers to pay for the artificial womb? Do they have a right to keep the unwanted fetus alive? Maybe it would come to be seen as necessary medical treatment that would be offered to any fully gr… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 07:59 PM |
| 0 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.So using tactics like denying benefits and opportunities does not amount to a violation of bodily autonomy, but prison does? None of those do. Prison doesn't. So where is the cutoff? What if we were to fine women who abort? What if we were to deport them? At some point you definitely reach the label of "having shitty laws" and it could move on to "human rights violation", but none of those are a violation of bodily autonomy because the person is never denied the right to make choices about their… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 05:27 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.The situations are different because the fetus can't survive outside of the womb. Denying it access to the womb means it will die, just as a patient with severe kidney disease will die without a transplant. But it isn't murder to refuse to help someone continue their life. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Pro-choice people often use terms like "just a clump of cells" and compare it to having a mole removed, because it's an effective and convincing tactic. But the legal reason why abortion is allowable is not about the size of the embryo/fetus or about denying that it is a human life... it's about bodily autonomy and the woman's right to control the use of her own body. She is the owner of the womb with 100% rights to it, and the fetus has none. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 04:12 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.So, we do violate bodily autonomy for the good of the general population. No, we don't. We do not force vaccinations into people's bodies against their will. They have a choice. So, if we requested that a woman not abort, and if she did, we denied benefits and opportunities to her, we would not be violating her bodily autonomy because she still had the choice to say no. Correct. Of course, people can debate over whether it's right to use tactics like this to encourage the choice that you want ou… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 04:02 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Yes, I view it that way. I think that anyone has the right to deny another person access to their own body. A woman denying a fetus access to her womb is like a man denying a request for a kidney donation from someone who will die without it. Neither person is required to give up the use of their body, or part of their body, even if it means someone else will die. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 04:00 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Equality means that they both get to choose if they want to become a parent or not. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 03:58 AM |
| -3 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Every man should be forced to pay child support for any child that he chose to have. If you make the choice to have a child, you're responsible for paying for it for 18 years. The man doesn't get to change his mind a few years into it, because the child still exists and someone still has to pay for it... he doesn't get to shirk the responsibility of his own choice. But he should be always be able to make that choice, and never be forced into it against his will. edit: to those downvoting this, w… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:41 AM |
| 0 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Getting married should not violate your right to bodily autonomy. If it did, women would just start refusing the legal contract of marriage in order to protect their legal rights... just as some men currently do to avoid alimony or split assets if the relationship ever ends. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:39 AM |
| -1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.I disagree. That saying does not imply that the fetus is part of the woman's body. It is accurately pointing out that the woman has full control over whether someone else accesses her body, and has every right to deny access to her body to anyone (including a fetus). | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:37 AM |
| 0 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.It absolutely needs legal notice. The most fair and functional way would be a contract that works like a prenup. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:36 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.While it's certainly a terrible idea and possibly should be illegal... under current law "her body her choice" still applies, and it is not illegal to smoke or drink while pregnant. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:35 AM |
| -1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.If you have problems late-term, tell me the exact moment that you have a problem with it? When does killing a child become unacceptable to you? When is the exact moment that you say that the line has been crossed? When the fetus becomes viable. Denying a fetus access to a womb at 10 weeks means it will die without question. But at 28 weeks removing the child means it will live, but will likely have developmental issues. A woman loses the right to deny a child access to her womb at the point of v… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:34 AM |
| -3 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Yes it is a separate human being, but it does not have the right to access her body without her permission. Forcing her to use her body to keep it alive against her will is equivalent to forcing a man to donate a kidney to someone who will die without it. Everyone owns their own body. No one should ever be forced to use theirs against their will for someone else's benefit. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:28 AM |
| 4 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.That is factually inaccurate. You are mistaken. People wouldn't complain about this issue if there was a choice. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:26 AM |
| 0 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.Bodily autonomy should be the end of the debate, 100%. No one ever, in any situation, EVER has the right to control what happens inside of another person's body more than the person who owns that body. Certainly we do it in extreme cases, such as when we incarcerate people. That's not a bodily autonomy issue. We punish criminals by keeping them in prison, but we do not force anything into their bodies or control what happens inside of their body. Bodily autonomy is about what's inside of your bo… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:25 AM |
| 1 | Guy's kid gets aborted, the lack of empathy is deafening.I posted exactly that question in Twox a while back, if artificial wombs were available, and transplanting a fetus was the same procedure as an abortion, would you support abortion being banned? No offense but that isn't worded very well and doesn't account for situations like both the mother and father wanting the abortion. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/20 02:17 AM |
| 2 | Society makes me feel like a pedophile just for being a manDon't let it make you afraid to say "no" to people though, especially if they're doing something to make the situation uncomfortable. You have every right to get away situations that you don't want to be in, and you don't owe strangers anything. But it's pretty easy to do all of this and keep safe, without assuming that every man you see is a sex offender. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/20 01:59 AM |
| 7 | Society makes me feel like a pedophile just for being a manYou're right, but people need to be sensible about it. The guy delivering packages to the school is just doing his job, he's not there to harm the children. Another single father in this thread faced accusations for checking into a hotel room with his daughter. It's not right to assume someone is out to harm people when they've done absolutely nothing out of the ordinary. It's no different than assuming that a black family moving into your neighborhood are criminals. It's making assumptions base… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/20 01:46 AM |
| -2 | In New Zealand, it is illegal to this day for a single male to adopt a female child.True, and things like that should be taken into consideration as well. Though it would only be reasonable to note that women being 20% more likely to physically abuse a child isn't in the same league as being 900% more likely to sexually abuse a child, and many people would argue sexual abuse is worse. I think adoption agencies have to have the children's best interests in mind. It would also be discrimination if they refused to allow children to be adopted by Jehovah's Witnesses, and no doubt t… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/20 07:33 PM |
| 2 | In New Zealand, it is illegal to this day for a single male to adopt a female child.Yes, it is an imperfect analogy, I agree the situations are not exactly alike. We cannot test potential adoptive parents for their potential to sexually abuse a child in the same way we can test a firefighter applicant's physical strength. Given that we can't test, there's a choice to make on what's more important - the right of the adult to not face discrimination, or lowering children's risk of being sexually abused. It is also discrimination when airport security looks more closely at single … | /r/MensRights | 05/02/20 07:25 PM |
| -24 | In New Zealand, it is illegal to this day for a single male to adopt a female child.Approximately 90% of perpetrators of child sexual abuse are male. Most perpetrators are straight, therefore a large majority of victims are female. Let's just be realistic here. What's more important, the safety of girls or a man's right to adopt a child of either sex? I believe people's safety has to come first. If you believe physical standards shouldn't be lowered for female firefighters or soldiers because people's safety matters more than having every job be accessible to women (and I certa… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/20 11:54 AM |
| 1 | You should not have to pay child support to a kid that isn't yoursDue to the way that rights work, there is no form of agreement that can be made to circumvent that kid's civil right. Except for all the other cases where it can. The child can be given up for adoption (even to a single parent with one income). Or the child can be given up to the state. Or the child can be given up as part of a surrogacy contract. And of course, the state takes no action to disallow parenthood for couples where only one parent provides income... or even for couples where neither… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/20 07:50 AM |
| 2 | You should not have to pay child support to a kid that isn't yoursBecause if a man chooses to have a child, he should bear the responsibility of his choice. The responsibility is his, and he doesn't get to pass it off to taxpayers. The problem is that the legal system assumes the man always chose to have the child, and does not account for men being forced into parenthood against their will. It makes no exceptions ever, not even for underage rape victims. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 08:46 AM |
| 1 | You should not have to pay child support to a kid that isn't yoursIf you chose to have a child, it is not slavery, it is responsibility. You do not get to bring a human being into this world and then decide you're not going to pay for the cost of raising it, and that someone else should have to do it. If you chose to not have children, but this was forced on you anyway, then that's very different. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 08:43 AM |
| 1 | This movie theater has a women’s restroom an a gender neutral one, no men’sAnd is the janitor the right person to get revenge on? Still no. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/20 12:02 PM |
| 7 | This movie theater has a women’s restroom an a gender neutral one, no men’sBut gender is a psychological and social construct. Yes, it is a social construct based entirely on stereotypes. It is grounded in the outdated and oppressive ideas that men belong with a certain set of stereotypes (appearance, personality, clothing, etc.) and women belong with another set of stereotypes, and that anyone who strays too far from those stereotypes is less of a man, or not really a woman. This social construct is so strongly believed in and adhered to that some parents are declarin… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/20 07:06 AM |
| 0 | This movie theater has a women’s restroom an a gender neutral one, no men’sThat's been tried before, and they received a lot of complaints from both men and women who want a sex-segregated bathroom. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/20 04:24 AM |
| 3 | This movie theater has a women’s restroom an a gender neutral one, no men’sThe women in the bathroom aren't the ones who made the stupid "all gender restroom" decision. You'd be getting back at the wrong people. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/20 04:23 AM |
| 0 | This movie theater has a women’s restroom an a gender neutral one, no men’sThis is not at ALL because of so called "TERFs". They are completely opposed to the idea of gender neutral bathrooms, because they don't believe "gender" is a thing. That's my opinion as well. There is only biological sex. Your personality, clothing choices, etc. are not a "gender" and don't make you change from male to female. BTW there are a ton of examples of "male bathroom on the left, all gender bathroom on the right, no female bathroom" out there too. Businesses are desperate to comply wit… | /r/MensRights | 02/01/20 04:21 AM |
| 1 | Two-tiered justice system in the UK- Men are sent to prison for being homeless and asking for food, while women are exempt from many crimes, including assault and theft.I'm not saying US citizens are never treated unfairly. Just that European countries take it to another level, prosecuting people for making jokes or criticizing government policy. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 08:36 PM |
| 3 | Two-tiered justice system in the UK- Men are sent to prison for being homeless and asking for food, while women are exempt from many crimes, including assault and theft.Excellent point. UK law enforcement loves discriminating based on race and country of origin even more than they love discriminating on sex. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:17 AM |
| 3 | Two-tiered justice system in the UK- Men are sent to prison for being homeless and asking for food, while women are exempt from many crimes, including assault and theft.The US government behaves in a fascistic way, But not towards its own citizens, which is what the UK is doing (while also supporting the US invasions into other countries.) Your whole political system is bought and paid for by lobbyists acting on behalf of corporations Unlike the UK or any other western country? Though I guess I can admit, the US is more corporate-owned than most countries. Ask why you can't have decent, free healthcare like other industrialised countries do. always a valid poin… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 06:59 AM |
| 2 | Female allies?Insults and "you just want male attention" are the regular response to any statement Typical response from people who want to justify their hate. The same situation occurred for men supporting women's rights, whites supporting minority rights and opposing racism, etc. Their opponents have no logical argument, so they resort to personal insults and implying that there's something wrong with you if you care about "those people". | /r/MensRights | 29/12/19 07:50 AM |
| 6 | Apparently being a white male is major points against your resume. My friend is now going to sueAssuming that positive discrimination exists... how would this be considered a case of that? His fake Latina persona didn't lose a job despite having more merit. "She" was not denied advancement... "she" received extra. If positive discrimination awards jobs and promotions to those who were unfairly denied opportunities, then should it be awarding those to whites and males in spite of merit? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/19 02:06 AM |
| 4 | Elizabeth Banks blames men for Charlies Angels failing before it even happens.It is out already, today was the first full day of showtimes, with a few late showtimes last night. Rottentomatoes critics, who are known for loving any movie that supports left wing political views, only gave it a 59%. Interestingly, the audience score is an 80. Though the people who vote in the audience polls are willing to give a thumbs up to pretty much any movie that isn't a complete failure... Joker, Terminator Dark Fate, The Lion King, Hobbs and Shaw, and Dora the Explorer all scored with… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/19 01:53 AM |
| 3 | We should just let feminists decide what “actual men’s issues” are, because they care more about men than men care about themselves. Or something.I recently read about a group of feminists discussing what men's issues are. They acknowledged circumcision... and were unaware of anything else. That was the whole list for them, just circumcision. Even if they would gladly support equality between men and women in other issues, they haven't bothered to find out what any of the other issues are. I don't call that "caring". | /r/MensRights | 13/11/19 02:57 AM |
| 3 | Sarah Conner's feminist rant from the new Terminator movie, YIKES 😱 No wonder this film flopped hard!The idea that our judgement day is inevitable no matter what we do, even if it is slightly different (aka legion) is actually an interesting concept. It also makes me care less about the outcome. What's the point of even saving the world then? Hooray, you defeated Legion... and that just means a slightly different AI-controlled world will appear a decade or so later. If the world is never actually saved and the bad future can never be prevented, then the whole series is pointless. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/19 11:10 AM |
| -1 | This case was all the rage back in 2015, today the court declares him innocent. Even the bystanders supported his case but social media trials already declared him guilty in the first week of the incident itself.You handwaved away false accusations as a problem. How is recognizing something as a problem "handwaving" it? That doesn't make sense, that's what you do to something that ISN'T a problem. It's unfortunate that you have to reframe any mention of a men's issue as an attack on women. The comment I responded to brought up the issue of Indian women publicly shaming men online (over actual attacks.) I responded by saying that false accusations are completely inexcusable, but it's a complicated situat… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/19 05:42 PM |
| -8 | This case was all the rage back in 2015, today the court declares him innocent. Even the bystanders supported his case but social media trials already declared him guilty in the first week of the incident itself.I didn't say there are no problems for men in India. It's unfortunate that a lot of people here seem to think that noticing a women's issue is the same thing as insisting that men have no issues that need solving. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/19 02:46 AM |
| -42 | This case was all the rage back in 2015, today the court declares him innocent. Even the bystanders supported his case but social media trials already declared him guilty in the first week of the incident itself.To be fair to the other Indian women, there are a lot of situations over there where the accusations are not false. "Don't grope random women you meet in public" seems to be a lesson that wasn't learned by a significant number of men in India. Some of them seem to think it's no big deal just to grab at a woman's body and give a squeeze and then keep walking on to your destination. It's a real issue in India, where the offenders ought to be publicly shamed. But it's hard to understand why anyone … | /r/MensRights | 26/10/19 08:33 PM |
| 28 | A professor in Pakistan was falsely accused of sexual harrasment. His wife left him. After it being proven wrong in court. He asked the college to take action against the student but they did not. Yes he commited suicide.I dunno man that sounds pretty extreme. So does holding the position of "I am aware that you did nothing wrong, but I think less of you anyway. Because I believe people who face false accusations probably did something to deserve it." Imagine a woman telling a male friend of her that she was once raped, and his response was "I wish I didn't know that, it makes me look at you differently even though you didn't do anything wrong, sorry." Don't you think that would be pretty screwed up for him to s… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/19 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Wait till she gets condemned on TwitterThere may have been bush and slight slit visible but not once have we ever seen pussy lips on a cinema screen. Ever wonder why? Exactly. The nude men and women are being filmed in the same way... the reason you can see the penis is because it's an external organ, but the vulva is not so easily seen. Nudity is allowed, but sexual nudity is not. The reason why you didn't see a vagina in Game of Thrones is the same reason why you didn't see an erect penis. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/19 05:23 PM |
| 9 | Woman takes boy to get circumcised against his parents' wishes, is convicted of causing grievous bodily harm, but gets no jail timewhy are YOU ok with cutting people's genitals without permission? also, why do you think "dick cheese" is a thing in the modern world? it says something about your hygiene if you've ever had a problem with it | /r/MensRights | 06/09/19 04:20 PM |
| 49 | Woman takes boy to get circumcised against his parents' wishes, is convicted of causing grievous bodily harm, but gets no jail timeI really hope there are further lawsuits against the other people involved. Obi-Uzom is 70 years old. Her visibly advanced age should have at least rung alarm bells for the mohel because it would be highly unlikely for a woman of her age to have had a baby. Why did he accept her as the mother with no questions asked? In addition, we do not know any further details of the man Obi-Uzom recruited to pose as the father. In doing so, he too was party to the non-consensual cutting of a healthy baby's … | /r/MensRights | 06/09/19 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Women-only STEM college programs under attack for male discriminationI don't mean to make a joke out of it, but I wonder how they kept track of who's a slave or not in a world where slavery was so common and widely accepted. Any escaped slave could claim to be a free man, and say there's a case of mistaken identity if someone claimed he's a slave. And anyone could point at a free man and say "he's my escaped slave, help me capture him". How would anyone be able to verify or disprove these things? | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 01:29 PM |
| 32 | The whole anti-male movement has finally reached the overload stage.how do you know there isn't? | /r/MensRights | 22/08/19 03:42 AM |
| 1 | When a certain demographic suffers from mental illness, a poster like this person makes life more appreciative.Hah. Got to give them a little credit for knowing how to get your attention, though. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/19 02:33 PM |
| 2 | When a certain demographic suffers from mental illness, a poster like this person makes life more appreciative.It's been decades since the first time a girl gave me a compliment, and I never forgot it. It was a completely blatant signal too, she stood close to me and told me I smelled nice. But I was totally oblivious and just thought that was a weird thing for her to say. I don't feel too badly about it because I wasn't interested in her at all, it's not like I had a perfect chance with a girl I had a crush on and missed it. But I still clearly remember being confused by the compliment, and then months … | /r/MensRights | 17/08/19 02:31 PM |
| 2 | When a certain demographic suffers from mental illness, a poster like this person makes life more appreciative.A male cashier complimented my new shoes once. I just said "thanks" and didn't know how to react to it. I can only make a total guess that he might be gay, and that comments like that are a signal of "I'm gay and I think you might be too, signal back if you're interested." He might have just been a friendly straight guy, but compliments like that are so unexpected I don't know what to do with them. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/19 02:24 PM |
| 1 | When a certain demographic suffers from mental illness, a poster like this person makes life more appreciative.Understandable, and so will some other men. Some will ask her out, and most will be fine with it when she says no. But after one or two assholes don't want to take no for an answer and cause problems for her, she's going to change her mind and realize it isn't worth it to try to say nice things. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/19 02:18 PM |
| 2 | Female Harvey Weinstein is proud.She was a small child at the time and that was harmless childhood curiosity. That's excusable, the rest is not. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 10:50 PM |
| 3 | Female Harvey Weinstein is proud.She's an awful human being outside of this. But yes, admitting to molesting your sister and acting like a sexual predator does make her even more terrible in my book. I find it very strange that you act like it isn't a big deal and that I should find nothing wrong with it. Even when her sister says otherwise Guess what, not all victims want to talk openly about being molested as a child. It's not surprising that she pretends nothing bad happened and that she wants to defend her sister. But you'r… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 04:47 AM |
| 4 | Female Harvey Weinstein is proud.Lena's own words say otherwise. Straight from her book: As she grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motorcycle chick.” Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just “relax on me.” Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying. and I shared a bed with my sister, Grace, until I was seventeen years old. S… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 02:00 AM |
| 4 | Female Harvey Weinstein is proud.She created and starred in the moderately successful HBO show "Girls", and received two Emmy nominations. Like her or not, that counts for something. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 01:59 AM |
| 81 | Female Harvey Weinstein is proud.For anyone who hasn't followed Lena's other controversies, these quotes are from her book: As she grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motorcycle chick.” Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just “relax on me.” Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying. and I shared a bed with my sister, Grace,… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/19 01:53 AM |
| 5 | Imagine being this deluded...fairly compensating them With what money? Where do you propose to get the money to pay them more? Do you plan to contribute to this fund? | /r/MensRights | 12/06/19 06:47 PM |
| 22 | Imagine being this deluded...Ronda Rousey was inferior to the UFC's male fighters, but made considerably more money than most of them. Funny how that works... if you're popular and you sell tickets and generate revenue, you make a lot of money. But if you're the star of a sport that is much less popular, you make less money. Gillibrand's argument makes as much sense as demanding that a pro bowler should make as much as Tom Brady. It's an embarrassment to the country that someone who is a US senator and is running for presid… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/19 06:46 PM |
| 3 | School proposes punishing boys by taking away part of their recess on International Women's DaySo the best way to combat 'injustice' is by doing something you admit to be unjust to a person who had nothing to do with the injustice you're claiming to be against, but you'll do it to them anyway on the basis of their appearance? Social justice makes my head hurt. That's identity politics for you. Followers of identity politics don't recognize that individuals exist, only the groups that they belong to. Identity politics is the foundation of sexism and racism. "I don't know any athletic women… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/19 01:19 AM |
| 25 | Reddit is sometimes very redpilled... We celebrate a all-female flight crew as being diverse (no blacks, no asians, no hispanics on board)...Exactly. If there are 10 jobs available, and there are 10 female applicants and 90 male applicants, equality would mean that everyone has a 10% chance of being hired, and likely results in hiring 1 woman and 9 men. But under Social Justice, it means that 5 women and 5 men are hired, as women have a 50% chance of being hired and men have a 5.5% chance. In some areas, the reverse is happening for teaching jobs - qualified women losing jobs and promotions because they need to get more men into the … | /r/MensRights | 21/04/19 06:55 PM |
| 5 | So this is how they treat American parents at Ascension Genesys Hospital in Michigan who dont want to circumcise their boys? (Review on their facebook page).There's nothing weird about it, some people just like being prepared, especially if it's not their first child and they know what helps them and what doesn't. It's nothing more than being prepared with a list of what you want and how you want things to go. Things like who will be in the room during the birth, maybe one of them will be taking pictures or something, maybe she wants the lights dimmed or wants relaxing music playing during labor, does she want the umbilical cord cut by the husband o… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/19 12:57 AM |
| 11 | Boycott Man-Hating Captain MarvelWe're about 20 movies and 11 years into a Marvel storyline that's all coming to a conclusion with Avengers Endgame in April. For political reasons, Disney insisted on having a Marvel movie with a female lead character first, and then inserting her into the Avengers storyline at the last minute. They start marketing the new female character as being more powerful than any of the other previous heroes, and it sounds like there's potential that Endgame will be ruined by having this last minute addi… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/19 06:10 AM |
| 13 | Boycott Man-Hating Captain MarvelAlien, Silence of the Lambs, Million Dollar Baby, Kill Bill, Three Billboards, Fargo, Titanic, V for Vendetta, I Tonya, Carrie, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, Zero Dark Thirty... | /r/MensRights | 07/03/19 06:02 AM |
| 3 | Woman taking boyfriend sperm from condom without consent and pouring it into her vagina.. thoughts and comments please.. can find more information on r/legaladvice on a reddit group, please re share this on social media and stuff as it could happen elsewhere also...In a perfectly logical and sensible world, that would be the way to do things. In the real world, it's unworkable. What if the dad would want to be involved, but mom hides the pregnancy? All kinds of problems come up if one person is hard to find or being secretive. The real world solution is a contract that works like a prenup. The man tells the woman of his intention to remain child free, and asks her to sign a contract that acknowledges in the case of accidental pregnancy, she has 100% of the… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/19 05:26 AM |
| 5 | "I was told it would ruin my brand" - Egard is back-ordered after their response video to Gillette went viralThe far left is the most prominent and noticeable group of people with this kind of behavior, because businesses and institutions have for some reason decided that complaints from the far left about any sort of political incorrectness are super important, must be listened to, and things must be changed to please them. Nobody cares about the complaints coming from the Christian groups (for example), because those complaints aren't affecting anything. People aren't being made to sit through prayer… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/19 02:41 AM |
| 7 | "I was told it would ruin my brand" - Egard is back-ordered after their response video to Gillette went viralNot just the far right. It describes people who believe and support certain things because they were taught (or "programmed") that those views are correct, but have never actually thought about those issues and have no ability to explain why they hold those beliefs or why those views are the correct ones. They act like an NPC in a video game, they seem to only be able to voice the opinion they were told to have, while being unable to think or have any sort of deeper conversation about the topic.… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/19 01:42 AM |
| 0 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthI literally argued the opposite of that, what are you even trying to say | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 06:25 PM |
| 0 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthThere's still a place for it. If one spouse is making $250k/yr and the other one makes $30k/yr it often doesn't make any sense for the lower income spouse (for this example I'll say it's the wife, though it isn't always) to keep working. The value of not having to work, being able to parent the children instead of leaving them at a daycare, cooking nice meals instead of picking up takeout on the way home, etc. is worth more than that $30k of extra income when they already have a significant amou… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 06:24 PM |
| 8 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthThe problem isn't her getting a massive amount of money from him. But it seems questionable that anyone should get over 50 billion dollars just from being married. The intent of the law was so that a wealthy spouse couldn't screw over the other spouse by leaving them in the poor house after the divorce. Marriage was seen as a promise from a husband to take care of his wife financially for the rest of his life, at least that was true when the laws were written. She is fully entitled to continue l… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 07:28 AM |
| 15 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthThese laws were written at a time when women were housewives and could have been kicked out into the street penniless, and it was seen as the man's responsibility to take care of his wife for the rest of her life. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 07:21 AM |
| 6 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthI think almost anyone would agree that she is entitled to a very large amount of money so that she can live the rest of her life in luxury. The question is whether it makes sense for that amount to be a full 50 billion dollars. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 07:19 AM |
| 15 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthAnd if a woman earned $100 billion and her husband filed for divorce and was expected to take half of her money, most would oppose that. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 07:17 AM |
| -2 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthMaybe there should be, but there isn't. It is absurd that there's no maximum limit... while she certainly is entitled to continue to live a life of extreme luxury, no one deserves 50 billion dollars just for being married to someone. On the other hand, I'm not about to feel sorry for Bezos. He had more money than he could ever spend, and he still will have more than he could ever spend. He's far past the level where having more money matters, at this point his bank balance is just a method of ke… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 07:15 AM |
| 23 | Richest Woman on Earth Did Nothing but Marry the Richest Man on EarthThe law was a good idea at the time. When these laws were written, men were the breadwinners and women were housewives. A marriage was meant to be a promise to take care of the woman for the rest of his life. Without a law like this, divorced women would have been screwed. The man would be able to kick her out when she's middle aged with no money and no property of her own, little chance of remarrying, and if she could find work the pay would be next to nothing. Society has dramatically changed … | /r/MensRights | 10/01/19 07:00 AM |
| 5 | Being “creepy” is an inevitable part of young men learning to speak to women they’re interested in. Young men shouldn’t allow women who’ve never had to be the pursuer shame them for trying and not being perfect at it on their first tries.You read into it way more than the author was actually saying. He said it's inevitable that an inexperienced non-charming guy will seem "creepy" to some girls, and that he shouldn't be ashamed of being bad at being charming. He didn't say no one is allowed to call anyone creepy, or that no men are ever actually creepy (as opposed to awkward), or that women are wrong for feeling creeped out by a guy's advances. He simply said that for well-intentioned guys, they should be aware that it's likely t… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/19 10:26 PM |
| 8 | 9 Female Empowerment Quotes with Genders ReveresedIn what way does "here's an example of women saying shitty things about men" translate into "men should have all the power and women shouldn't even have the right to vote"? I'm curious how you leapt to that conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/18 05:44 PM |
| 1 | Female YouTuber with millions of dollars complaining about not getting paid enough even though her videos are either not interesting or ad hominem attacks towards men, White people, or Americans.If PDP were to do the same shit, he'd get destroyed. I haven't seen her videos, but Pewdiepie plugs his merch all the time now. He went from mocking other people who did it "as a joke" to simply mentioning his shirts or hats or chair or whatever in every video, not to mention the game ad at the end of every video. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/18 02:15 AM |
| 5 | Female YouTuber with millions of dollars complaining about not getting paid enough even though her videos are either not interesting or ad hominem attacks towards men, White people, or Americans."Brutal" is a pretty excessive word to use there. But it is unusual that instead of mocking her and making jokes like he does to everyone, he directly called her a crybaby and an idiot, and then moved on. But she does deserve the backlash. There is no "representation", no one chose who the top 10 earners were going to be and deliberately chose not to include women. It's silly to complain about the results of something that has no gender bias whatsoever. It is unexpected that there are no women i… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/18 02:13 AM |
| 4 | Misandrist feminist Claire McCaskill booted out of office by voters!No one said this is hate speech and deserves censorship or punishment. It's just stupid speech that has no place in the US Senate. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/18 12:58 PM |
| 6 | Misandrist feminist Claire McCaskill booted out of office by voters!From what I've seen there's a lot of quick mentions of the record number of women winning, but nothing about "vindication for feminism" or any rhetoric like that. Most of the women winning are qualified and well deserving, including the former narcotics officer and CIA agent I voted for. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/18 12:55 PM |
| 0 | CNN is late stage cancerI watched it. My point stands. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/18 03:17 AM |
| 1 | CNN is late stage cancerThat one qualifier at the end doesn't change it much. Would you say someone in 1940s Germany isn't doing nothing wrong if they said "the problem with society is Jews, most of them radicalized into an ideology that changes this country for the worse"? | /r/MensRights | 02/11/18 11:48 PM |
| 6 | The Kavanaugh Smears Broke My Decades-Long Support For FeminismFirst link: A Democrat "feels he has" lied and would like a further investigation to find out if he did or not. Second link: doesn't work. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 08:05 PM |
| 1 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!You didn't get molested by a priest, so it doesn't happen to anyone? OK then. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 07:39 PM |
| 1 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!You asked for the examples, so I mentioned them. As I said earlier, I'm aware of what Muslims do. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 06:50 PM |
| 0 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!A few posts up, my comment there had plenty of examples. Parents disowning kids for being gay or atheist, conversion therapy, teachers refusing to teach evolution, kids in schools being punished for not praying or refusing to say "under God" in the pledge, and many more things. Most of this stuff happens in areas with religious fundamentalists in the Bible Belt. I don't live there, so my personal experiences with religious nuts have been minimal (I had a couple of encounters with crazy "all of y… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 06:28 PM |
| 0 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!The top post was about Islamists killing a boy because of his appearance, and another frontpage post is about a Pakistani atheist who is on the run and needs help because if he's captured he will be beheaded. And it was his own mother who contacted authorities and asked for her son to be beheaded. Some of the comments are mocking the "religion of peace". I'm not really seeing Islam being coddled or ignored here. The only thing is that Islam's cruelty is less talked about than Christianity's prob… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 04:20 AM |
| 1 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!Then watch all hell break loose as they attack you for your racism, bigotry, and xenophobia. That's why they banned me over there. If you're banned it's probably because that kind of thing is not what the sub is for. Most people realize that beheadings and stonings are worse than teachers who get pissy if a student won't say "under God" in the pledge of allegiance. But the place is for posting stories of religious intolerance and venting frustration with it... it's not for debating which religio… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/18 03:57 AM |
| 1 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!Just because Christians haven't bothered you, that doesn't mean no one else has ever had to deal with a Christian trying to force rules onto them. Thank you for that example, but if you have to look back a decade to find one lunatic SJW I think it looks like there is no current SJW activity on that sub. Hardly the same as looking at SJW-run places where there's nonsense to find every day. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 10:15 PM |
| 0 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!The top post in there right now is criticizing Islam. Where did you get the idea that atheists defend Islam? Yes there are more posts criticizing Christians, but that's because in Western countries it's Christians trying to force their religion on others. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 06:57 PM |
| 3 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!Got an example of that? The top post in there right now is criticizing Islamic culture that murdered a 14 year old because he "looked gay". The rest of the posts are objecting to meddling Christians who try to make other follow their rules. I don't see any SJW stuff at all. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 06:56 PM |
| 3 | Men are routinely jailed pending investigations especially for rape charges or required to post excessive bail. 4 women beat man unconscious. One assaults arresting police. 2 have no fixed address. “All four have since been released under investigation while enquiries continue.”. There is no meAnother article said that the suspects are trans women, and Twitter comments (if those are worth anything) were saying the same thing. The suspects are also fairly tall and have masculine looking faces when you get a glimpse of them in the video. But I can't personally guarantee that they're men. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/18 05:01 PM |
| 8 | Men are routinely jailed pending investigations especially for rape charges or required to post excessive bail. 4 women beat man unconscious. One assaults arresting police. 2 have no fixed address. “All four have since been released under investigation while enquiries continue.”. There is no meIt's worth noting that none of the four attackers are women. All four of them are males with dresses and wigs. It's interesting how they were being treated by the police - light touches and gentle restraint, like they might use to separate a woman and her boyfriend who are screaming at each other. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/18 10:28 AM |
| 22 | Men are routinely jailed pending investigations especially for rape charges or required to post excessive bail. 4 women beat man unconscious. One assaults arresting police. 2 have no fixed address. “All four have since been released under investigation while enquiries continue.”. There is no meno one is letting “Muslim rape gangs run amok” because of political correctness. Wrong. And I can give you plenty more articles that are discussing this problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banbury_child_sex_abuse_ring https://en.wiki… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/18 10:21 AM |
| 2 | "Male privilege is foreskin advocacy groups. The fact that you think your circumcision is somehow on par with female genital mutilation is so gross."I don't expect change to happen quickly. When it eventually does happen, it'll be in Europe first and will happen later in the US. It's true that it's a touchy issue for politicians so there needs to be strong support for outlawing it. We need to make a large enough percentage of the population to realize "this thing we just assumed is normal is actually pretty messed up, it's time to get rid of it" so that it gets to the point where religious people complain and the response is "yeah we don't r… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/18 03:16 PM |
| 2 | "Male privilege is foreskin advocacy groups. The fact that you think your circumcision is somehow on par with female genital mutilation is so gross."Yes. That is what we should be saying, and that is all. It's not all, because we need to make an argument for why the law needs to be changed. Part of that argument is "everyone recognizes FGM as terrible and it is outlawed in Western countries, and there is a blatant double standard when all of those countries don't make it illegal to cut the genitals of males." That argument does not claim that FGM is no more damaging than a typical circumcision, and I don't know why so many people seem to thi… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/18 12:16 AM |
| 81 | "Male privilege is foreskin advocacy groups. The fact that you think your circumcision is somehow on par with female genital mutilation is so gross."Just stop for a second and think about just how privileged and sexist this person has to be in order to think this way. First, she's so sexist that she thinks male bodily integrity is meaningless while female bodily integrity is incredibly important. Second, she's privileged enough to have female bodily integrity protected by the law. Third, she's oblivious enough to believe that men demanding equal legal rights is an attack against women. It's so ingrained into her mind that female bodies have … | /r/MensRights | 29/08/18 03:35 PM |
| 15 | "Male privilege is foreskin advocacy groups. The fact that you think your circumcision is somehow on par with female genital mutilation is so gross."The attraction of the MRM to denialism about the severity of FGM practices "All involuntary genital cutting should be outlawed" is not denying that FGM is bad. whining about a relatively minor problem Name a current feminist issue in America that's more important than legally allowing genital mutilation of babies. Feminist theory already contains 100% of the ammunition needed to get feminist support for ending circumcision. Then tell me why zero feminists try to do anything about ending male cir… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/18 03:27 PM |
| 1 | ‘I don't come to work to be sexually assaulted': Police inspector boasts of arresting woman who 'thought it was funny to slap his bum' at Notting Hill Carnival.First, it's not like she's going to prison for this. It'll be the slightest slap on the wrist that the law allows. Just enough to make her recognize what she did isn't OK. Second, regardless of whether you think that kind of behavior is harmless... how stupid is she for doing that to a cop? There were plenty of random guys around to play grab-ass with and she goes for the police officer who can arrest her for breaking the law? | /r/MensRights | 29/08/18 12:49 AM |
| 5 | ‘I don't come to work to be sexually assaulted': Police inspector boasts of arresting woman who 'thought it was funny to slap his bum' at Notting Hill Carnival.I lost count of the number of times I got groped by women who then lost their shit when I asked them to stop or when I said I had a girlfriend. I can understand them getting a little too friendly and hands-on, especially if they've been taught all their lives that women's advances are never unwanted, and that nothing they do is crossing a line. I can't even begin to understand them getting upset about being told to stop. What would they even be thinking? "How dare you say you have more rights to… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/18 12:44 AM |
| 27 | Sarah Jeong is lying, her "cruel to old white men" wasn't a response to anything, she said it first.It gets really absurd when you follow their definitions to their logical conclusions. According to them, racism is determined by geography, because the dominant group in one country can't be racist. That means a white man and a black man yelling slurs at each other on a flight from the US to South Africa begins with the white man being racist, and ends with the black man being racist. Who knows if it counts as racism mid-flight. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/18 06:03 AM |
| 5 | Sarah Jeong is lying, her "cruel to old white men" wasn't a response to anything, she said it first.from The Mary Sue: Alt-Right Trolls Accuse Her Of "Racist" Tweets Of course, "that's not how racism works, you guys" and hating white people isn't racist. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/18 06:00 AM |
| 1 | Feminist economics fellow at Cambridge repeatedly strips naked to make her arguments. Perfect example of why feminism has both credibility and innumeracy problems.This economics professor is a very unusual example. There are a lot of feminist women who have absolutely no interest in making themselves look feminine or attractive to men. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/18 05:54 PM |
| 2 | My state is trying to ban "female genital mutilation" but no word mentioned about literally the same procedure being done to the males.I'm not talking about the removal of a diseased tooth. A parent cannot go to a dentist and have all their children's teeth removed just because they want it done. You cannot have children's teeth removed for no reason or have any other unnecessary body modification surgery anywhere on a female child's body, or anywhere on a male child's body except for the penis. It's completely absurd that there is an exception like that. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/18 05:25 PM |
| 5 | My state is trying to ban "female genital mutilation" but no word mentioned about literally the same procedure being done to the males.There are less-damaging forms of FGM where they only cut off a tiny part of the clitoris instead of removing the entirety of it. Should that be allowed then? Is it OK to cut up the genitals of baby girls as long as you don't cut too much? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/18 02:39 PM |
| 3 | My state is trying to ban "female genital mutilation" but no word mentioned about literally the same procedure being done to the males.an you perform a circumcision without the consent of the guardian or tutor? hmmm? Can you perform a completely unnecessary tooth extraction just because a guardian asks for it? hmmm? Circumcision is an unnecessary medical procedure for almost every child who undergoes it. It is plastic surgery done for cosmetic reasons, it is nothing like extracting a rotten tooth where there is an actual medical need for it. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/18 02:38 PM |
| 1 | Feminist economics fellow at Cambridge repeatedly strips naked to make her arguments. Perfect example of why feminism has both credibility and innumeracy problems.That's a pretty wide generalization right there. I would agree that women care more about their looks than men do because society values a woman's appearance more than other factors, while appearance is of lower importance for men. But there are still plenty of men obsessed with their appearance as well, including a significant portion of gay men, and the guys who spend all their time in gyms and clubs and dedicate their lives to picking up girls. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/18 02:27 PM |
| 7 | Consent?This is the definition of the appeal to authority fallacy. Our previous president claimed we have a serious problem due to a gender wage gap. Our current one thinks climate change is a conspiracy created by China. A lot of people are "pretty sure he knows more than some random guy on Reddit" but it turns out that successful people can be dead wrong on certain topics. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/18 10:23 AM |
| 17 | Consent?It's not bad to be circumcised. It's bad to circumcise another person without their consent. It should be a choice that every man should be able to make for himself. Circumcising infants is a barbaric outdated tradition. And it's not harmless either... most circumcisions turn out just fine but a few babies are killed by it and others have too much cut off and suffer other problems later in life. Infant circumcision inflicts harm to people just for the sake of tradition, and denies them the right… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/18 10:18 AM |
| 45 | Lmk if it’s already been postedCharlotte Clymer certainly isn't waking up. Even after those responses two days ago pointed out that her argument makes no sense, she's making new posts just hours ago about how the men's teams get $8 million just for qualifying and the women get $2 million for winning. On the bright side, all of the same responses are being posted once again in case any of her followers missed it the first time. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/18 07:22 PM |
| 19 | FIFYDoesn't mean they aren't telling the truth. It means exactly that. They're prosecuted because there's hard evidence that proves their rape accusations aren't true. If men can deny sexual assault & remain innocent until proven guilty, shouldn't the same apply to women?? Yes. And it does apply to them. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/18 09:10 AM |
| 1 | Male privilege shown here.... from r/jordanpetersonIf you're going to make an argument like that, bring some examples to support your point next time. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/18 12:46 AM |
| 1 | Male privilege shown here.... from r/jordanpetersonSpreading this information and changing the public narrative is part of the solution. People still laugh when they hear the term "men's rights" and act like there are no circumstances when men ever get treated worse than women. They believe the narrative that women are always oppressed and men are always empowered and have never been taught otherwise. Men are treated worse in the legal system and are shown less sympathy and offered less support when they're in need of help. This inequality will … | /r/MensRights | 25/06/18 12:44 AM |
| 3 | Male privilege shown here.... from r/jordanpetersonthere is nothing about fining him if he uses the wrong pronoun Bill C-16 adds "gender identity or expression" to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian Human Rights Act. In Ontario, refusing to refer to a trans person by their chosen name and a personal pronoun that matches their gender identity, or purposely misgendering, will likely be discrimination when it takes place in a social area covered by the Code, including employment. Other cities are following Ontario's ex… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/18 12:39 AM |
| 2 | Male privilege shown here.... from r/jordanpetersonRefusing to call people by their proper names When does he refuse to call someone by their name? I'm not aware of him doing that. or using the right pronoun for someone. He is against people being allowed to make up any pronouns they wish, and the government forcing people to use those under penalty of imprisonment. If I tell you my pronouns are "Hitlerdidnothingwrong" instead of he and "Womenbelonginthekitchen" instead of him, should you be forced by the government to use my made-up pronouns or… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/18 12:25 AM |
| 0 | Happy Father’s Day! Thought you all would like this.lol you edited your post to hide your embarrassing opinion, that's funny | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 04:53 PM |
| 4 | Happy Father’s Day! Thought you all would like this.Either both agree to give it up for adoption or they both take responsibility and pay for it. Or one person chooses to be a parent and the other one doesn't. That's not such a crazy idea, is it? A single parent should be able to have government assistance if they need it. Makes sense. You’re asking why we should force fathers to support their child. No, I'm asking why we're forcing men to be fathers when they don't want to be. If a woman has a child and gives it up for adoption, she doesn't pay … | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 02:50 AM |
| 12 | Happy Father’s Day! Thought you all would like this.A CHILD has a mother and father. Not all children do. Should we legally mandate that all single women who adopt, or all women whose husbands died, are entitled to be given the income of some other man selected by random? It makes just as much sense. Why are we forcing men who never chose to become a parent into the legal responsibility of parenthood against their will? | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 12:53 AM |
| 7 | Happy Father’s Day! Thought you all would like this.You can think whatever you want, but almost everyone disagrees with you. Forcing a woman to undergo abortion against her will is pretty messed up. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 12:51 AM |
| 15 | Happy Father’s Day! Thought you all would like this.Of course there is. A man who CHOOSES to become a parent is choosing to bring a life into this world and choosing to be responsible for raising it. If he abandons it, he's abandoning his responsibility and trying to shirk the outcome of his choice. A man who was forced into parenthood against his will is an entirely different situation. He had no choice. If you don't choose parenthood, you shouldn't have the responsibility. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 12:50 AM |
| 14 | Happy Father’s Day! Thought you all would like this.I think the issue with the male decision here is that it doesnt resolve the real "problem," that being there is still a child. Why do you see it as a problem? Are all single parents households a problem? Should we ban single people from adopting, or from raising children on their own if a spouse dies? Somehow it's only a "problem" if there's a man around who could legally be forced to provide additional income towards raising the child. There is nothing wrong with raising a child on your own. Th… | /r/MensRights | 18/06/18 12:47 AM |
| 12 | I just finished “The Red Pill” and I just want to post this to solidify that I am no longer a feminist.Don't feel so guilty about what you didn't know. You heard about unfair things happening due to sex-based discrimination, went to the group that's supposed to be against all of that, and they lied and misinformed you that it only goes one way and that an MRA is like a king complaining that his life is harder than a peasant's. When you’re 15 years old of course you’re gonna be like “HELL YEAH VALIDATE ME, NOTHING IS MY FAULT”. It’s a security blanket. Almost all identity groups have some of that … | /r/MensRights | 16/06/18 02:44 PM |
| 1 | Anthony Bourdain has died in an apparent suicide by hanging at 61 - male suicide continues to riseI didn't say things aren't polarized, I said the "holy shit the country is going to fall apart, this is really really bad" panicking wore off. | /r/MensRights | 09/06/18 09:04 AM |
| 2 | Anthony Bourdain has died in an apparent suicide by hanging at 61 - male suicide continues to riseA lot of people did, but that wore off after a week when people realized the world isn't going to end and it's still business as usual for most aspects of life for most of the country. I doubt a political disappointment was a factor today. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 07:23 PM |
| 9 | Anthony Bourdain has died in an apparent suicide by hanging at 61 - male suicide continues to riseI don't know... that never struck me as depression. That can just come with age and maturity, you can really enjoy something without getting an excited-little-kid expression on your face, and you can hate something and just try to calmly let it slide and move on. And he would get genuinely excited once about something interesting to see or good to eat once in a while, it just wasn't common. I never got that "dead inside" feeling from him, he was just mature enough to not care about some of the f… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 07:22 PM |
| 3 | Anthony Bourdain has died in an apparent suicide by hanging at 61 - male suicide continues to riseCan you show me an example of it? This is the first I've heard. I know that he has a dark sense of humor and sometimes jokes around with a "we're all gonna die in the end so none of this matters" kind of attitude, but I would hardly say that anyone who makes an occasional comment like that is depressed and considering suicide. He was a drug abuser for many years but stopped when he became famous, which was quite a while ago at this point. He seemed to be enjoying his life and doing what he loves… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 07:17 PM |
| 3 | Welp! We're all sexist.By the quote it's clear that she just heard about feminism for the first time and just thought "why would anyone be opposed to equality". This isn't some brainwashed SJW who has campaigned against equality in the name of social justice. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 09:55 AM |
| 0 | Welp! We're all sexist.This quote is from a teenage girl who is rich and famous who has just been taught "feminism is equal rights for everyone" and thought "why would anyone be opposed to that?" Cut her some slack. Save your outrage for people for adults who have spent years studying the topic and still advocate for inequality, not a teenager who just learned the word feminism for the first time. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/18 09:52 AM |
| 2 | Female drivers get their own special bays in Perth (Australia) city car parking - directly next to the entranceFree speech does not mean everyone has to agree with it and see it as a valuable contribution to the discussion. (I gave him an upvote because it is on topic discussion and too many people think downvotes mean they disagree.) But now you start a sit out like a bunch if Millenials and cry about it. Discussing something isn't crying about it. You're 0 for 2 so far. Act like a men and rip the sign of if it bothers you that much. If I saw this and it would trigger me enought to open a post about it … | /r/MensRights | 02/06/18 01:06 AM |
| 9 | Men should work less to close gender paygapMore productive per hour... I'm not sure if it was more productive entirely. Anyway I was mostly thinking of all the issues with training two people to do one job, having a job be done half by an expert and half by someone not quite as good instead of the expert doing the entire thing, and other inefficiencies like that. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/18 05:17 PM |
| 6 | Men should work less to close gender paygapIt's gender communism. Everything must be equal or else it's objectionable and must be changed. Any differences in preferences, choices, ability, or accomplishments is not allow... everyone must have the same outcome. BTW I think it's interesting that the SJWs focus on identical outcomes by gender, and not identical outcomes by race. First, in a perfectly fair world the racial earnings gap should be close to zero. Men of different racial backgrounds don't make considerably different choices with… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/18 05:15 PM |
| 9 | Men should work less to close gender paygapNo, it's still unfair because men control all of the hiring and they keep hiring only men to work the jobs with longer hours. (what's that? HR departments are 3/4 female, and fewer women than men are applying for jobs with longer hours? I can't hear you...) | /r/MensRights | 13/05/18 04:54 PM |
| 5 | Men should work less to close gender paygappraise be to Thanos | /r/MensRights | 13/05/18 04:49 PM |
| 19 | Men should work less to close gender paygapIf you want an actual answer that only works in theory... you regulate the number of hours that people can legally work per week. If men can only work 38 hours per week then it frees up more hours that will be available for women to work. This can also solve the future problem of high unemployment due to automation. You have 50% unemployment? No problem, just legally mandate that no one can work more than 20 hours per week. Now you have no unemployment. These are stupid, clunky solutions that ki… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/18 04:48 PM |
| 8 | Cause anyone who fights for men's rights is automatically Republican. This made me want to switch partiesJust because many women aren't interested in that type of guy, it doesn't mean no women are. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/18 09:56 PM |
| 7 | Cause anyone who fights for men's rights is automatically Republican. This made me want to switch partiesThat sub was once kind of interesting, making a display out of the extreme example of valuing profit above anything else. Now it's just communists bashing everything and pretending communism would be better. Capitalism is the best economic system, and nearly all attempts at non-capitalist societies have failed badly. But it needs to be regulated and overseen so that it functions well. It's like if you have a corrupt and violent police force that's causing a lot of problems. The solution isn't to… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/18 09:55 PM |
| 4 | Cause anyone who fights for men's rights is automatically Republican. This made me want to switch partiesThe terminology is so inconsistent, the same labels don't mean the same things to other people. For a while I would use "liberal" the way you use "leftist", and I would use "progressive" to mean the crazies. I've pretty much given up on using labels and just have to describe the group that I mean if I don't want to be constantly misunderstood by people who have their own idea of what "liberal" means. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/18 09:49 PM |
| 2 | These double standards are in most TV shows nowadaysHe isn't rich, though he makes a comfortable living. He doesn't have that much confidence, he just isn't the nervous mess he used to be. Yes video games and scifi are much more accepted than they used to be, but they're not exactly the kind of hobbies women find interesting in a man. He's not a fat slob, but his looks are nothing special either. He's a pretty average guy with an above average job. Not many people like him are dating women who look like this and are making six figures. Women like… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/18 08:58 AM |
| 4 | These double standards are in most TV shows nowadaysWhat part are you saying "really?" to, and why? The last part? Leonard isn't conventionally attractive, is out of shape, is socially awkward, and has some aspects of his personality that would be described as a manchild. He's almost 40 and he loves comic books and attends sci-fi conventions. He does work hard and earn a decent living and is kind, so he would certainly be able to find someone else. Probably someone who physically resembles Amy, unless he's willing to severely lower his standards … | /r/MensRights | 14/04/18 01:07 AM |
| 6 | These double standards are in most TV shows nowadaysEh... this is pretty weak content. It's just a fact that most humans happen to place a premium on having a partner who is physically attractive. When you see a beautiful person going out with someone with average-at-best looks and an uncharismatic personality, it seems weird at first. This is because you're judging them on your first impression and not from knowing them and their relationship. I don't think it would be too different if the character of Amy was going out with a male model. People… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/18 11:03 PM |
| 0 | A common narrativeThat is all true, but I don't believe removing that sexism would bring things to 50/50. Men are more willing to take risks and more willing to resort to violence. In poor neighborhoods men are the ones who might be pressured into illegal activities to make money. The biological differences between men and women have real world effects, both positive and negative. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/18 12:46 PM |
| 0 | A common narrativeAgreed. We can't just ignore the biological differences between men and women, and the effect that testosterone has. In general, men tend to have a wider bell curve than women when looking at many different topics. A higher percentage of men have genius IQs, and a higher percentage have very low IQ. A higher percentage of men than women are violent criminals, and a higher percentage are high-achieving workaholics. It's perfectly normal to expect to see more men in prison than women. But there is… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/18 12:42 PM |
| 2 | A clear example of how feminism infantilizes women and excuses sexism faced by menIt's confusing to create a new term for something that already exists, and there's nothing "reverse" about it just because it's not the stereotypical version of the event. If you saw a rich person steal from a poor person, would you call it reverse stealing? If you saw a short and thin person beat up a tall and muscular person, would you call it reverse fighting? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/18 05:07 AM |
| 8 | The hard naked truth about marriageman, no | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 04:10 AM |
| 2 | More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitterThere's no perfect solution that accounts for every situation. Complaining about an opt-out legal agreement not covering one night stands is like women complaining that when an accidental pregnancy happens, they have to be the one to get the abortion, and not the man. It just can't be helped. If you're serious about wanting to be child free, you have to give up one night stands or be extremely careful about having them. Or figure out a way to bring up the contract in a way that doesn't totally k… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 03:30 PM |
| 36 | More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitterThe best solution that's actually workable and is fair to both sides is a legal contract that works like a prenuptial agreement. The man tells the woman that he plans to remain childfree and wants her to respect that and waive her right to force him into legal parenthood against his will. He presents her with the document to sign that states in the event of an accidental pregnancy, she has 100% of the rights and 100% of the responsibilities if she chooses to have the child, and he has 0 parental… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/18 03:04 AM |
| 1 | Man on r/relationships allows his girlfriend to treat him like garbage because he thinks he is "progressive". Is this the future that feminism is creating?Sorry to hear that. Everyone wants to believe these stories will have a happy ending, that she has really changed and you'll have a great family life from now on if you just see her again, so I bet you've been advised often to give her another chance. And while that's not impossible, in my experience the odds are higher that she misses having control over her family members, instead of missing the family members themselves. There are plenty of stories like this in /r/raisedbynarcissists. Anyway,… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 08:31 AM |
| 15 | Man on r/relationships allows his girlfriend to treat him like garbage because he thinks he is "progressive". Is this the future that feminism is creating?I wouldn't be so harsh... some people are raised to see themselves as second class citizens and were taught all their lives that having self respect is immoral. Of course he needs to make changes in his life but some guys don't choose to be subservient, they have it beaten into them as kids. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/18 04:06 AM |
| 5 | Liberal feminist professors are decidedly illiberal with students whose opinion differs from theirs.To think you can become a college professor without ever learning that stopping Hitler was worth the cost. To be that unaware that your freedom and safety exists because people fought for this country, and police fight crime every day. To be that ignorant that you think what you imagined or what you read in a book gives you more experience than someone who has actually done the things you've only heard about. I bet she would never dare to claim any knowledge about Mexico over someone who has bro… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/18 12:33 PM |
| 3 | Liberal feminist professors are decidedly illiberal with students whose opinion differs from theirs.Just curious, what was her opinion about it, and what is yours? I don't suppose you mentioned your service and then asked where she was deployed to? Probably smarter not to do that since she's going to be grading you though. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/18 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Mother 'poisoned son to avoid trip to Syria with jihadi husband'She didn't do it to protect her son obviously. You can't just stick "obviously" onto the end of your opinion. If you didn't notice, I'm not supporting her actions or saying that what happened to the son was harmless. He was sick and suffering for weeks. But the woman and the son having to move to Syria to be part of an violent Islamic extremist group is a worse situation. She turned a terrible situation into a less terrible one. Her son was sick for 6 weeks instead of becoming forced to become a… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/17 09:10 AM |
| 2 | Mother 'poisoned son to avoid trip to Syria with jihadi husband'I don't know, I think they have a point. They aren't saying that she did the right thing, but they understand that she was desperate to avoid herself and her son becoming part of ISIS. Obviously the right move is to go to the police. She fucked up by not doing this. She deserves punishment for her crime. I don't know why she didn't choose this option, maybe she believed the police in England would be as cruel and uncaring as her husband. There are sensible explanations for why she might not be i… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/17 10:47 PM |
| 13 | Ben Affleck says men need to "do better"Typical follower of identity politics. He has lost the ability to see individual people, all he sees are groups. Rape exists, so it's the fault of all men and all men need to be reprimanded for it. Someone tell me how that's any different from the old white racist who thinks all black people are criminals and gang members, and that all black people need to "do better". | /r/MensRights | 17/11/17 06:28 PM |
| 8 | Im working on a project advocating for Mens Rights. The catch is, I go to an all-girl libral art school.1) no 2) I saw a link to a discussion here from another Reddit thread 3) I've always opposed gender discrimination and supported equality. I used to label myself a feminist when I still bought into the idea of "the word feminist just means you support equality" 4) There's plenty of information about the problems men face in the sidebar. In general I would say that male disposability is the biggest core problem... people just don't have sympathy for homeless men, sick men, and men who are denied … | /r/MensRights | 17/11/17 03:48 PM |
| 4 | Watchdog: American Troops say they were told to ignore Afghan child sex abuse if it was a boy being abused. "Bacha bazi" Deemed to "cultural".We shouldn't be there. We're not going to fix a violent backwards country with bombs and bullets. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/17 03:38 PM |
| 0 | Watchdog: American Troops say they were told to ignore Afghan child sex abuse if it was a boy being abused. "Bacha bazi" Deemed to "cultural".What the fuck were we supposed to do? Leave the country and never come back. Of course, the troops who were deployed there and having to deal with this shit aren't the ones who get to make that decision. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/17 03:34 PM |
| 3 | Watchdog: American Troops say they were told to ignore Afghan child sex abuse if it was a boy being abused. "Bacha bazi" Deemed to "cultural".It's not the job of the US military to give their lives to police sex crimes in backwards countries. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/17 03:32 PM |
| 6 | Oh just a slide from a presentation in my Psychology classSo why is it ok to label men as aggressive when it works for your argument but it is feminist propaganda when it proves one of their points. It's wrong when you only point out the negative aspects of masculine behavior, and only point out the positive aspects of feminine behavior. Of course it is true that on average, men are more aggressive and commit more violence. It is not forbidden to discuss this fact. But if you're taking a one-sided approach that seems to set out to demonize men and glor… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/17 09:45 PM |
| 11 | Oh just a slide from a presentation in my Psychology classIt's a little more than nitpicking. Try going into class with a slideshow that points out how black people commit violent crime at higher rates than whites and see how far it gets you. Someone would disconnect the projector after about two seconds, call you a racist for presenting one-sided info, and start pointing out all of the reasons why skin color has nothing to do with it (most black people have considerably less money, which stems from historical oppression of blacks... poverty leads to m… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/17 09:41 PM |
| 1 | Man in /r/legaladvice forces his ex-girlfriend into legal parenthood against her willYou're engaging in identity politics. This is one individual woman who wanted to opt out of parenthood. She is not a representative of all women and she is not personally responsible for men having no reproductive rights. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/17 07:51 PM |
| 1 | "This is what a war on women looks like."I thought this was t_d at first too. Not that surprising though since both subs have a lot of posts that are reactions to far left nonsense. In this case it isn't far left BS though, no one should have their employer's preferences affect their own health care, and taking away women's rights doesn't help fix anything for men. | /r/MensRights | 10/10/17 07:49 PM |
| 1 | "This is what a war on women looks like."Pointing it out isn't toxic. The problem is when rights are taken away from women instead of giving the same rights to men. You don't fix slavery by making everyone a slave and saying "there, it's fair now". | /r/MensRights | 10/10/17 07:41 PM |
| 2 | As a female who is subbed here...For the most part I'd agree. Completely leaving the Middle East alone would be a much better choice than what we've been doing over there for decades. The problem is that the only tools that are used regularly over there are guns and bombs, and that's no way to change Islamic culture. But we could end all military action and still try to help them. We can provide books and teaching materials, we can use financial incentives to get them to build more schools and teach more children (including gir… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 04:05 PM |
| 3 | As a female who is subbed here...Give me a break with the Islam apologist nonsense. What do you think life is like for women in Afghanistan? Half of girls are married off (usually against their will) before age 16, most of them get no education and are illiterate. They have to wear Islamic dress at all times or else someone will rape them, and if they get raped they'll be stoned to death afterwards if anyone finds out about it. Wife-beating is part of the culture there, and if a woman is widowed the odds are good that she'll be… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 03:57 PM |
| 6 | The problem with how men perceive rape | Professional victim explains how her saying "yes" to sex and regretting it later is all men's fault because she has no agency and can't make decisions for herself. Thanks feminism.I strongly believe that sex ed classes should be changed so that an entire chapter of the class is dedicated to clear communication. People (girls especially) need to be taught to say "no" if that's what they want. They should be taught to be ready for a situation where your partner wants to go too far before you're ready, how it might be a natural reaction to freeze up and not know how to react... and that as soon as you feel this happening you need to start speaking, and say "no, I don't want … | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 03:11 PM |
| 0 | As a female who is subbed here...On the issue of these 'rape' kits - they don't prove anything by themselves. All they test is bodily fluids. It's evidence in an important case, and it can be used to help catch serial rapists. Seems like something that shouldn't sit on a shelf for months, and should be a higher priority. What if all these tests were done and thousands of convictions were reversed? Another reason to get them done quickly! | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 02:51 PM |
| 3 | As a female who is subbed here...I wasn't referring to defunding Planned Parenthood, I meant how they're passing specific laws that only apply to abortion clinics that are purposely designed to put them out of business and have nothing to do with keeping things safe. I agree that it's wrong to to make you pay for women's health clinics while being unable to get enough health coverage for yourself. That's one of a hundred reasons I support universal healthcare, but that's another topic. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 02:49 PM |
| 6 | As a female who is subbed here...The middle east doesn't need Feminism, it needs humanism. It needs a lot of things. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 02:45 PM |
| 1 | As a female who is subbed here...Those privileges comes with heavy penalties. Wives have all of their needs paid for by husbands, but it comes at the price of becoming the husband's property and having her actions severely limited (where she can go, what she can do, what she can wear). Maybe a few lazy people would see that as a sweet deal but most people absolutely do not want it, and they aren't given a choice in the matter. Most people don't consider it a privilege to be someone else's property. I mean, slaves in America got… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 02:44 PM |
| 6 | As a female who is subbed here...There are real villains for modern feminism to fight against. Women are controlled and oppressed to the point of literally being treated like property, all across the Middle East and Africa. Women in America are losing the ability to access safe and legal abortions as Republican politicians are illegally targeting clinics with punitive laws to shut them down. Rape kits are going untested for disgustingly long periods of time in certain cities... apparently catching rapists isn't as important as … | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 04:20 AM |
| 14 | As a female who is subbed here...Equality, when referred to by reasonable people, means equality of opportunity. It means a lack of discrimination based on irrelevant factors like race/gender/sexual orientation. Equality of outcome (what SJWs support) is a ridiculous fantasy world where women are just as tall and just as strong as men, and men get to have babies too. It also has magical communism where everyone can afford everything they want and no one ever runs out of money. Equality of opportunity just means no discriminatio… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/17 04:06 AM |
| 1 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.SIR YES SIR! | /r/MensRights | 13/09/17 12:38 PM |
| 1 | Is this what you would call a plus size model..?Strangely, you'll never find the two dating each other. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/17 12:24 PM |
| 3 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.Both opinions are correct depending on perspective. Her perspective is complete garbage, though. What kind of perspective does a person have if they said the reason black people get longer prison sentences is toxic blackness, and that these longer prison sentences are racist against whites because it assumes that white people are too fragile for prison? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/17 09:04 AM |
| 15 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.Or is it the idea that whites are weaker than blacks and therefore "need lesser punishment"? It's both, of course. When black people get longer prison sentences, this is racism against white people because it assumes white people aren't as tough as black people. Isn't professional victimhood fun? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/17 09:02 AM |
| 12 | SJWs Using "Selfie" Wikipedia Page to spread extreme feminist ideology to the unsuspecting masses - They're Watching Edits Like Hawks and Reverting All Changes"the male gaze gone viral" TIL women pointing a camera at themselves = "the male gaze" | /r/MensRights | 03/09/17 04:51 AM |
| 1 | Feminism so fragile: Fathers day ad 'too political' for feminists. See what you think...There is literally nothing political in this video at all. All it shows is a display of humans caring for their offspring. Is there a political group that stands against that now, too? At least with the usual professional victims, I can comprehend their twisted logic and egotistical motives. For this video to be controversial? I have absolutely no idea. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/17 01:46 AM |
| 3 | Judge says Sofia Vergara's frozen embryos are 'citizens of California'That's par for the course these days from the far left. "Agree with me or you're a Nazi!" All right then, I guess that makes me the first pro-equality anti-discrimination Democrat-voting gay-rights-supporting liberal Nazi. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/17 01:41 AM |
| 1 | Feminist tries to justify why women and children first should still be validTechnically, only one is absolutely necessary. Lots of incest and inbreeding and birth defects, but there would still be healthy humans too and the species would live on. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/17 01:38 AM |
| 4 | "Not going to jump to conclusions"I doubt it. Few people has a problem with feminism when it's calling out legitimate sexism and discrimination. The complaints about feminism are typically for spreading false information, playing the victim, and engaging in sexism. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 08:30 AM |
| 4 | "Not going to jump to conclusions"Do you have a link to that study? I would be shocked if that's true that women commit the majority of felonies. This wikipedia article lists men as the majority of offenders in a wide variety of serious crimes. Due to the differences in the genders, men are far more likely to commit violent crimes (and are far more likely to be victims of violence). | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 02:28 AM |
| 3 | "Not going to jump to conclusions"More women are psychotic, but more men kill people (especially with guns). You shouldn't rule out that the father was involved before looking into it... but it's messed up to assume it must have been him due to his gender alone. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 02:22 AM |
| 6 | "Not going to jump to conclusions"The innocent children being killed by their mother is not the men's rights issue. It's the fact that people's first response to seeing this story is "a man must have done this, a woman is incapable of harming children, only men are evil and dangerous". Obviously the lost lives of the children are about ten billion times more important than the casual anti-male sexism on display here, but the point of this post was never to compare the importance of those two things. It was only to call out the s… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 02:17 AM |
| 15 | "Not going to jump to conclusions"Typical example of the "women are wonderful" effect. A woman couldn't have done something like this, it must have been a dirty evil man. But to play devil's advocate for a moment... she technically isn't wrong. The police will investigate the husband, and any other close family members who live nearby. It's in their interest to make sure that this was actually a suicide and not a well-covered-up murder. But it's pretty messed up if the first thought on this Facebook person's mind after reading t… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 02:14 AM |
| 2 | Feminists literally believe men's stricter gender role is misogynySomehow, this is still evidence of women being oppressed worse by society than men according to the feminists. Until women have completely freedom to choose any form of self expression without a single person in the entire world criticizing it, it's worse than men being strictly forced into their gender role. Women matter, and men don't. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 08:41 PM |
| 2 | Feminists literally believe men's stricter gender role is misogynyAnd the reason is a constant "grass is always greener on the other side of the fence" viewpoint. Women being stereotypically seen as caregivers is worse than men being denied access to their children by sexist family courts. Women criminals being seen as easily misguided simpletons is worse than men receiving prisons sentences that are twice as long for the same crimes. A single rape victim failing to successfully see her rapist prosecuted and imprisoned is worse than multiple men having their l… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 08:37 PM |
| 20 | A small victoryIt's the most effective lesson that teacher could have taught the class that day. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/17 08:53 AM |
| 1 | Lesbian Couple in California Chemically Altering Their 11-year-old Boy to Prep For Sex-change Surgeryas for the child you mention I do not know the segment. Without sounding too shallow it's entirely possible a male to female trans candidate had low testosterone to begin with / was predisposed to being less gifted in the penis department. I suppose this is possible. In my completely uneducated view though it seems more likely that the years of puberty blocking drugs are the cause though. The video also shows the doctor and the family discussing how 16 year old Jazz is like a young child in that… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/17 02:48 AM |
| 8 | Lesbian Couple in California Chemically Altering Their 11-year-old Boy to Prep For Sex-change SurgeryHow do they work, then? BTW I recently saw that clip of Jazz Jennings' TV show where a doctor discusses bottom surgery and says "there isn't enough to work with", implying that Jazz has something close to child genitalia. Did I misinterpret this? | /r/MensRights | 26/07/17 10:19 PM |
| 8 | Mcfeminism which is the feminism we have right nowAsk any young girl or women (generalising for simplicity) and they'll tell you objectification of women is bad but they won't explain why. There's a lot of this going around, and it really boils down to just shaming men's sexuality. I agree that it's more noble and more fair to be attracted to someone for their personality, their accomplishments in life, their empathy for you etc. the way that women are attracted to men. It would be nice if looks really didn't matter for anyone, and both women a… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/17 06:47 AM |
| 7 | MSN cries Ninja Warrior is sexist because it favors those with strength and agility.They already give women disproportional TV time, showing part or all of their runs more often than the average man. And the American show has created a new rule where the top 5 women automatically advance, so that there are more than just a couple of women in the later rounds of competition. I agree with both of these btw, they are in the entertainment business and viewers like to see women out there competing alongside the men. And it helps make up for the physical disadvantage the women are at… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/17 06:35 AM |
| 7 | MSN cries Ninja Warrior is sexist because it favors those with strength and agility.I still wish they'd make a separate course for a women's competition, like they did in Japan. Not some wimpy course full of nothing but balance obstacles like in Kunoichi... but a toned down version of the current course where maybe more than 1 woman has a chance in hell of finishing stage 1, let alone the whole course. It would be cool if a course could be designed that challenges both sexes equally, but it just isn't realistically possible. Every other obstacle would have to be a flexibility t… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/17 06:28 AM |
| 1 | How to tilt a wage gap believerbecause i am literally being paid less, and treated differently then the men i work with. Sue your boss. It has been illegal for this to happen for 53 years and any lawyer would love to take a case like this. It's good publicity for a lawyer to take on an anti-sexism case like this, and lawyers also enjoy cases they know they are going to win. i wouldnt sue my boss because how exactly am i going to be able to win any kind of lawsuit without proof How do you know the guys are getting paid more fo… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/17 03:20 AM |
| 1 | How to tilt a wage gap believerFeminists point to movies and say "look men are getting paid more, must be a wage gap due to rampant sexism". MRAs are showing how poor that argument is by pointing at modeling and saying "look women are getting paid more, must be a wage gap due to rampant sexism against men." so not only do i know for a fact the wage gap exisists How? Where are the examples of it? It is been completely illegal to pay women less than men for the same work since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It is blatantly illeg… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 10:32 PM |
| 2 | How to tilt a wage gap believerBecause after failing to find a gender pay gap in the traditional working world, feminists have turned to pointing at the entertainment industry because it's the only place they can find where men actually are paid more sometimes. They think this proves that a wage gap exists. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 07:22 PM |
| 4 | How to tilt a wage gap believerDo you think there is some boss of the sports world who hates women and decides to pay them less than men? There isn't. Athlete pay is based on how many tickets they sell. Demanding equal pay for women is about as effective as demanding that professional bowlers be paid equally with professional basketball players. There is no money in bowling to pay them the same amounts. You can stand there and demand all you want, but you might as well stand in the rain and demand to not get wet. The entertai… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 10:27 AM |
| 4 | How to tilt a wage gap believerthey are paid more because they sell alot of tickets. women have little to no value in hollywood, especially as she ages, but a males value steady increases as they age. sexisim its finest . "women are paid more to model because they sell a lot of advertising. men have little to no value in modeling. sexism at its finest" Can you really not see the difference here? There is a preference towards men in some areas, and a preference towards women in others. (In the majority of careers there is no p… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 10:23 AM |
| 4 | Just a reminder that this is the top post of r/feminism...Feminists have said similar things before, but that exact quote is from an interview Maisie did last year. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/17 04:53 AM |
| 1 | I'm SorryInterestingly stay at home moms have the highest happiness rate of any female demographic. This is true, but a couple of things are worth pointing out - 1) this is probably due more to financial well-being than anything else, and 2) stay at home moms today all CHOSE to be stay at home moms, they're aren't being forced into it when they'd rather have a career. Being a stay at home parent is great for some people but others would hate it, it's definitely not for everyone. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 10:40 AM |
| 3 | I'm SorryAnd honestly, I've identified myself as a feminist. There are plenty of people in this subreddit who used to call themselves feminist, when all they knew is "feminist means you support equality for everyone". I used to be one, and I complained that it was unfair that a few bad apples were ruining the name of feminism for all of the equality-supporters out there. In time I realized that most of the apples were bad. How can they be happy in life when they harbor so much hate? They're not. Racists,… | /r/MensRights | 19/07/17 10:36 AM |
| 6 | Husband working 16 hours shifts for 7 days was told by his wife to sleep on the couch, then finds him dead the next morning.I'm gonna make this match... a TAG TEAM match! | /r/MensRights | 11/07/17 10:43 PM |
| 1 | If You Say SoI am simply pointing out the fact that SJWs demand racial diversity (mass importation of immigrants) in only the majority-white countries. They never complain about lack of diversity in other countries, it is only the majority white ones that need to be changed in their eyes. Noticing that they do this does not give me a "hyper focus on whiteness". I never said a single thing about white people being the only moral people or anything like that, you are imagining racism where there is none. This … | /r/MensRights | 10/07/17 02:48 PM |
| 28 | If You Say Sothe whole migrant crisis thing on the right wing parts of Reddit is WAYY overblown. It's not that all of Europe is an unliveable shithole, but it's the incredible speed at which Europe is heading in that direction that is concerning. It is not a permanent disaster yet but it is like watching a car full of people start to accelerate towards a cliff... I really hope someone hits the brakes and that this current pattern isn't going to continue. It's kind of amazing what has happened in just 20 year… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/17 06:42 AM |
| 6 | A man I work with is a transsexual which got me thinking....I'd say that most men generally don't care if some random woman they don't know is overweight and wouldn't say anything to her. But when it comes to dating, her weight and appearance is a top priority. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 09:01 PM |
| 3 | A man I work with is a transsexual which got me thinking....I've read a lot of trans people's stories and that is true sometimes, but not true for a lot of people too. There is a fair amount of "I thought I'd be getting all of these benefits but I had no idea about the negatives that go with it". And then for the people who don't pass easily, they're getting the negatives but still don't get all of the benefits either. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 05:08 PM |
| 8 | A man I work with is a transsexual which got me thinking....He said he is body shamed for being overweight more than he ever was as an overweight woman. This was interesting for me to hear. Society is more critical of a woman's weight and appearance, but also much more willing to openly criticize a man than a woman. I would have guessed that an overweight woman might have faced more criticism but it seems I was wrong. When it comes to dating... that's got to be rough. Like he said, there just aren't many people interested in dating a trans person. I woul… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 05:03 PM |
| 2 | Why is it "sexist" when Trump bashes Mika for her facelift but it isn't sexist when Trump's physical appearance is mocked?I understand that you like Trump. Some of his troll-ish activity sends his opponents into an embarrassing fit of whining and does far more damage to them than it does to himself. But that's not the case for his tweet about Mika. He comes off like a childish bully who has nothing to say but mean names, and the people criticizing him for it aren't looking bad. Trump shot himself in the foot on this one... and it was something he really didn't need, after the health care bill failed again and he em… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 06:48 PM |
| 4 | Why is it "sexist" when Trump bashes Mika for her facelift but it isn't sexist when Trump's physical appearance is mocked?You see, Asians are financially successful on average (mostly in America, but America is the only place that counts obviously), and money makes people white (as well as straight and male). And, for magical and unknown reasons, it's perfectly fine to be rude and insulting towards anyone who appears that they might potentially have more money or privilege than you. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 06:40 PM |
| 1 | The hard naked truth about double standardsLogically that would make sense. In practical use, it doesn't work. Most fathers expect that they will be opted in by default, and want to be opted in. There would be guys who didn't know they had to opt in, and then would be denied custody of their children. It's simpler and easier to make it an opt-out for the men who want to make sure fatherhood isn't something that happens to them unexpectedly. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 06:36 PM |
| 1 | The hard naked truth about double standardsno, you must be thinking of atheism | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 01:27 AM |
| 5 | The hard naked truth about double standardsWomen will argue that they are putting their body through 9 months of hell. BY THEIR OWN CHOICE. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 01:27 AM |
| 13 | The hard naked truth about double standardsIt's a stupid term and it's easily ridiculed. Legal Parental Surrender is the most common term for it that I've seen. IMO it should work like a pre-nup, where the man states his intention to not become a father and in the event of a pregnancy, the rights and responsibilities are 100% on her. It's only valid if she signs it (if she won't waive that power over him, he's better off knowing that and leaving her). This is not a perfect solution but it's the only workable one. Any other version I've s… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 01:26 AM |
| 28 | YouTubers ask for removal of feminist Anita Sarkeesian from cyberbullying panel, after she publicly calls man "disgusting garbage human"This happened a week ago, the panel was the next day and she was not removed from it. Vidcon owners gave her a short "don't do that again" talk, and then apologized to her for them failing to ban Sargon (a critic of hers) from the event and provide her with a safe space. Media sources covering the event afterwards reported that Sargon, by virtue of existing in the same room as her, was "intimidating" and "harrassing" her with his presence. He was simply sitting there in a chair listen to her spe… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 01:14 AM |
| 14 | Question for you guys, why is this sub so against circumcision?Cutting parts off of people without their informed consent is pretty barbaric. FGM is banned and nobody questions it, everybody agrees it's a terrible practice that has no place in the modern Western world. It seems odd to me that when someone wants the male version banned, not only is there a lack of agreement that this practice is wrong, but they act like it's not a big deal or anything to cut the genitals of a baby... just as long as the baby is male. The double standard is a big part of why … | /r/MensRights | 29/06/17 10:24 PM |
| 8 | John McEnroe: Serena Williams would be "like 700" in the world tennis rankings if she played on the men's tour.So what? Floyd Mayweather would never win a fight if he had to box with heavyweights. The Little League baseball world champs would get destroyed by the Yankees. There are different divisions for a reason. It doesn't matter if Mayweather can't beat a heavyweight or if Serena can't beat the men's champ. They're competing in separate divisions. | /r/MensRights | 27/06/17 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Daisy Cousens on leaving feminism, feminist misandry and why we should all take the threat that feminism represents seriouslyThat's why women are massively subsidized (women-owned small business programs, female-only scholarships, affirmative action) and why there are a hundred federal agencies devoted to improving women's work life. This is discriminatory and unequal treatment, so we should get rid of it. "Equality" is a religion. It's hardly a religion, any more than things like justice and helpfulness are. They're ideals that we should work towards. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 06:03 PM |
| 1 | Daisy Cousens on leaving feminism, feminist misandry and why we should all take the threat that feminism represents seriouslyThere is no such thing as objective fairness or "irrelevant" factors. People decide whether or not things are fair and whether or not things are "irrelevant." End of story. I don't understand what kind of point you're trying to make here. If you're hiring to fill an open position, what's relevant is the applicant's ability to perform the job. Their gender is irrelevant, and so is their skin color (and eye color, favorite food, favorite movie genre, etc.) You judge them on their merit and ignore … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 03:21 PM |
| 8 | My experience50/50 custody and they still made you hand over half your paycheck to her each month? How can a court be so incompetent? It's ridiculous that you require a lawyer just to not be completely screwed over in family court. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 01:13 AM |
| 1 | Daisy Cousens on leaving feminism, feminist misandry and why we should all take the threat that feminism represents seriouslyIs it "equal" when women pay the same health insurance premiums as men? Or is it "equal" when they pay according to the burden they place on the healthcare system. Only 12-year-olds and feminists believe there is an objective answer to a question like this. That's an interesting question. For the vast majority of situations, equality is easy to define... simply a lack of discrimination on irrelevant factors like skin color or genitals, and judging people on their merits and flaws instead of phys… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/17 01:07 AM |
| 1 | Why does the Left want to ban everything it disagrees with - including The Red Pill?That's an important point to recognize, and I am a liberal leftist myself. But when a group becomes heavily infested with people with terrible ideas, it's only natural that others start referring to the entire group that way. It happens all the time... "feminists don't care about fathers' rights" or "Muslims want to destroy Israel". Of course it's not all feminists and not all Muslims, and maybe not even the majority. But all of these groups have been too tolerant of bad ideas and haven't condem… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 01:09 PM |
| 3 | Daisy Cousens on leaving feminism, feminist misandry and why we should all take the threat that feminism represents seriouslyEquality refers to a lack of discrimination on irrelevant factors, and a lack of special treatment. It does not mean believing "everyone is exactly the same, and a 5 foot tall woman is every bit as physically capable as a 6 foot tall man". There are anti-SJW conservatives who believe men should be financially responsible for women, that women should get always get custody of children in a divorce, etc. They are not allies of the MRM. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 11:39 AM |
| 6 | Daisy Cousens on leaving feminism, feminist misandry and why we should all take the threat that feminism represents seriouslyLibertarianism is an ideal system if you live in a fair world where everyone's competing on a level playing field. So many libertarians fail to recognize that we need to fix the system first (restore sane levels of wealth inequality and income inequality) and THEN put libertarian rules in place. If you do it right now, all you get is "you're free to live in poverty any way that you want to". | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 11:32 AM |
| 4 | The Huffington Post thinks all MRAs are Alt-Right supporters.SJWs now use "alt right" to describe any people they disagree with. Just like how all opinions they disagree with are "gross". You can be a Hillary-voting progressive who donates to anti-discrimination groups, but the moment you think a 6 foot tall heavily muscled biological male shouldn't be competing in women's sports leagues, they consider you to be "alt right". | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 11:27 AM |
| 1 | Male Transgender Sprinter Wins Girls State Championship — as a Freshman. How do you like them apples, feminists?Not really a solution since there aren't enough trans people to have a competition. MtF people must compete in the male league, or not at all. You don't get to use your biologically male body in a women's league, just like 20 year olds don't get to compete in a league for 10 year old children. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 11:18 AM |
| 1 | Male Transgender Sprinter Wins Girls State Championship — as a Freshman. How do you like them apples, feminists?Fuck everything about this. SJW nonsense is going to destroy the positive things that feminism has accomplished, like women's sports leagues. But they don't care... the real world harm they're causing isn't important to them, all that matters is their virtue signalling. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/17 11:16 AM |
| 5 | Just realized that The Patriarchy is Original Sin to feminists.A Westboro Baptist Church member screaming about homosexuals deserving damnation and a modern egalitarian who hasn't been to church in 20 years but likes the idea of Heaven both call themselves a Christian. There are a lot of feminists who are great people, love and respect men, and focus on issues of real oppression (like forced marriage and lack of education for women in the Middle East) rather than perpetually finding ways to make themselves the victim. And there are a lot who are not, includ… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 03:12 AM |
| 1 | He heard his photo was posted on Facebook. He says the reason is ‘bull----”This is literally the only time I've ever seen this done. Men are always referred to as "man" or "men"... usually you will see the equivalent "woman" or "women", but occasionally you'll see "female" which sounds awkward and demonstrates the writer is seeing women as an Other. It's not an issue worth caring about much but feminists are correct that it shouldn't be normal to call men what they are but to use an awkwardly-scientific sounding adjective for women (instead of just saying women). I tho… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 02:31 AM |
| 5 | Just realized that The Patriarchy is Original Sin to feminists.In religious feminism, women are the deities and men are the flawed and sinful worshipers. Nonbelievers are deemed to be immoral and selfish and unable to be enlightened, and the only hope is to convert them. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 02:22 AM |
| 27 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Did you know rich women sometimes pay over $100,000 in income tax and homeless men don't pay any at all? Patriarchy strikes again! | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 02:19 AM |
| 62 | Huffpost is pure feminist cancer.Reminds me of Mitt Romney complaining about how rich people pay more taxes than the poor. No shit you pay more taxes, you're making millions of dollars. There are tens of millions of people who would LOVE to start paying taxes regularly... because that means they would have found a full time job that pays a living wage. I swear within 2 elections we're going to have some rich asshole candidate complaining about how the cost of private jets and vacation homes disproportionately affects the rich. … | /r/MensRights | 03/06/17 02:15 AM |
| 6 | I'm back in school to be a nurse, and was confronted by this shit todayGood for you, especially with filing the complaint anyway at the end of the day. That helps protect all the men who come after you that would be in a similar position. If I was caught off guard by that situation I probably would have backed down and let her get her way, but filed the complaint afterward once I had enough time to realize how unfair it was. I'm glad you stood up for yourself right away and didn't have to miss out. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/17 02:46 AM |
| 3 | How Is Stuff Like This Still Legal?Women aren't the customer, they're the product. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 08:56 AM |
| 1 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Are you seriously implying that the baby kidnaps and holds hostage the woman? If that's your level of reading comprehension, I guess that explains how you can think forcing women to give birth against their will is nothing more than an inconvenience. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 10:44 AM |
| 1 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Except babies, they have no right not to be killed as far as you're concerned. ANYONE who will die without the use of someone else's body has no right to make use of someone's body against their will. Whether it's an unborn baby or a person dying of kidney disease or any other possibility, I believe a person should always have the right to own their own body, which includes the right to deny someone else access to their body parts. I am not making any special circumstance for babies, as you keep… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 06:26 AM |
| 2 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Women do not intentionally get pregnant and then get an abortion. Your inability to see the situation for what it is (whether someone needing help to survive is legally entitled to it) is leading you to a poor judgment of the situation. Of course you're going to be opposed to the pro-choice position if you see it as a senseless and unnecessary murder just to avoid an inconvenience so small it can be compared to a 9 hour wait. When you're able to understand that this is about whether people have … | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 05:30 AM |
| 2 | [x-post from r/funny and probably r/prequelmemes?]I saw that this idea has been discussed among Star Wars fans on other forums too. Assuming that Luke gets captured and thinks to send a recorded message in R2D2 just like Leia did, the plot would be fairly similar I think. The question of where the plot would start to change depends on what you think the Tatooine version of Leia would be like. Would she be athletic and courageous like Rey from the new movies? If so, the movies stay pretty similar. If not, the rescue of Luke on the Death Star wou… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 05:13 AM |
| 1 | [x-post from r/funny and probably r/prequelmemes?]According to the Star Wars info and fan theories I found while searching for answers, it sort of makes sense. Tatooine is a very remote place, and it's where Vader's mother died. He's very unlikely to ever want to visit there. Luke also has some relatives by marriage (Owen and Beru) who could take care of him. It makes perfect sense to send Luke here and that's why Yoda suggests it to Obi-wan. The only question is why wasn't Leia sent there too. And there aren't any good answers, because the fac… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 04:56 AM |
| 1 | Son, Don’t Marry a FeministTrue, but that means it's that much more painful if things go wrong in the marriage and you're denied access to seeing your own children. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 04:19 AM |
| 3 | I am so fucking angry. They've decided to push this narrative despite multiple men having been confirmed among the dead - "Manchester was an attack on girls and women"I thought the Salon article was just fine. When I read the headline I thought "wtf, what kind of BS are they trying to pull here" but after reading the article I completely understood their point. Like you said, this attack was about Islamic extremists who hate how women dress and act, and this was an attempt to put some women and girls in their place. The bomber intended to use violence to show women and girls that this kind of activity will make them a target of Islamists. Yes, some of the vic… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 04:12 AM |
| 1 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.You continue to ignore the fact that you are giving the woman the right to use the baby's body against his will. No. Refusing the use of your body to someone does not equal "using their body against their will". Someone who will die without your help is not automatically entitled to your help, and you are not killing them by refusing their request. Your analogy is completely off base, this is not a contest between two fully grown adults on equal standing. This is a case where one person will cer… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/17 04:03 AM |
| 1 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.the baby (and I'll note that you avoid using the term, which is what people do who wish to dehumanize those whom they wish to subjugate Not really, I'm just being accurate. I have no problem with considering the unborn baby as a person. But no person, including an unborn person, is entitled to have the government force another person to give up the use of their body against their will. He is being forced to donate his entire life so the mother can have a less inconvenient 9 months. He is not all… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 06:34 PM |
| 2 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.The fetus owns his/her own body, but the fetus is not entitled to make use of someone else's. Unfortunately there is no way for a fetus to survive without doing this, but this does not make the fetus entitled to the mother's body any more than a person dying of kidney disease is entitled to someone else's kidney. A mother denying use of her body to a fetus is exerting control over the fetus's body in the same way that someone refusing to donate a kidney is controlling the life of someone who wil… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 02:50 PM |
| 2 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Then what about the baby's right to ownership of his or her body? The fetus owns his own body, but it is not entitled to make use of someone else's. Unfortunately there is no way for a fetus to survive without doing this, but this does not make him entitled to the mother's body any more than a person dying of kidney disease is entitled to someone else's kidney. Do you feel that the mother's right to not be inconvenienced for 9 months (due to her own decisions, in the vast majority of cases) is m… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 02:30 PM |
| 1 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Proper sex ed would rectify a lot of this. I'm strongly in favor of this, it would reduce abortions more than anything else. It's sad that many pro-life people either don't care about it or even oppose it. When a baby is forming in the mother, that's it. That's the person that it is attached to. You're not ending someone's life by not giving blood that one time at your school/work, but you're doing it with an abortion. You are choosing for someone's life to end if you refuse to donate a kidney t… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 02:24 PM |
| 3 | Australian parliament inquiry hears about fathers' rights to see their children, and a feminist cunt reporter skews and dishonest media portrays it as watering down child safety.Is this woman not a cunt? If one woman is, does that mean all women are? Fuck off with the tone policing; being nice and quiet hasn't got us jack shit in decades. Yes I'm sure that being obnoxious and hateful is going to get you a lot of public support. Stereotyping half the population and using hateful slurs against them will surely work! That's why Martin Luther King was a failure and BLM is a huge success, right! Oh, wait. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 05:59 PM |
| 2 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Assuming she wasn't raped, she consented to sex, of which pregnancy is a possible consequence. Which in turn means she consented to pregnancy. A high speed wreck that leaves you paralyzed and in a wheelchair is a possible consequence of driving a car. Are all drivers consenting to being paralyzed? Anyway, I don't think a debate over consent and consequences even matters. Pro-life still means that the government is using force to make someone give up the use of their body against their will in or… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 03:44 PM |
| 7 | I am a High School student taking a Social Justice course, the next unit is on Gender. How do i go about convincing my teacher to show The Red PillYou will never, ever accomplish this. The unit is called women's issues, not gender issues, and a teacher who wanted to teach that course is never going to support a view that both genders face discrimination. The best you can hope for is to be allowed to pick out 5-10 minutes of the movie show in order to demonstrate that "the patriarchy hurts men too". Honestly, wanting to show the full movie seems like a lot to ask anyway. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 03:09 PM |
| 11 | Australian parliament inquiry hears about fathers' rights to see their children, and a feminist cunt reporter skews and dishonest media portrays it as watering down child safety.Interesting how she says women inventing domestic violence is a myth !!! We're at the point where divorce lawyers routinely encourage women to come up with something they use in court to portray the husband as abusive or violent so they can steal more custody time for the mother. She actually thinks people will believe her calling it a total myth that a woman would ever be dishonest when someone as important as custody of her children is on the line, even when lawyers are encouraging her to do i… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 03:02 PM |
| -3 | Australian parliament inquiry hears about fathers' rights to see their children, and a feminist cunt reporter skews and dishonest media portrays it as watering down child safety.The article itself doesn't seem that bad, it's simply reporting the facts. Though of course it's like writing an article that says "some people believe that evolution is real, while others wave it off as fantasy"... it's not getting into the fact that one side is right and the other side is desperately grabbing for excuses to support their position. But that headline is just dirty. Whoever wrote that line has no business being a journalist of any kind. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 02:55 PM |
| 13 | Australian parliament inquiry hears about fathers' rights to see their children, and a feminist cunt reporter skews and dishonest media portrays it as watering down child safety.Yes. And shit comments like this shouldn't be upvoted, the bad reputation from this kind of shit holds back the MRM. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 02:52 PM |
| 3 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.Sorry but I can't resist going off topic with you here on this for a minute. We both agree that abortion is a very unfortunate and unpleasant thing and ideally we should create a situation where no one ever wants or needs an abortion. But in the case of an immature 17 year old who made a mistake and got pregnant and is terrified of having a child she's not anywhere close to being emotionally or financially ready for... do you really think that the force of the government should be used to make h… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 06:06 AM |
| 2 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.If there are any MRAs who think men should have the right to opt out of parenthood but want to refuse that right to women (who have to actually go through the physical pregnancy if denied that right), they can go fuck themselves. No one, male or female, should ever be forced to become a parent against their will. I understand that many people find the concept of abortion repulsive btw, but it is far more repulsive and outright evil to force someone to use their body for something against their w… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 05:55 AM |
| 5 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.after all, wealth, capital and political power remain concentrated among, and monopolized by, old, rich (mostly white) men Generally true. But take note of how the far left and MRA-bashers act like it's all men who get to share in this wealth and power and privilege, and not just a handful at the top. The regressive left always refuses to acknowledge the biggest and most important privilege of all, which is wealth privilege. They'll insist that whites and men have it so much better than everyone… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 05:49 AM |
| 1 | Hi MRAs. I am a woman in the process of learning about the men's rights movement, and would like to lay out my current positions for you. Please feel free to pick them a part - I am willing to consider everything you say carefully, and of course to change my mind.As for reproductive rights: Legally it's too messy to grant men a certain time period to waive parental rights and responsibilities. What if she hides the pregnancy, what if she can't find him to notify him, what if he says he wants the child and changes his mind on the last day legally possible, it's a totally unworkable mess. The solution to men's reproductive rights is a contract that works like a pre-nup. It states the man's wish to not become a parent, and must be signed by the woman to be … | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 05:41 AM |
| 2 | Please Lena... tell us more...There's already problems black men are very violent towards white men according to crime statistics. This is largely a rich vs poor thing, not a white vs black thing. Poor uneducated whites from broken families have high rates of violence too. Also, the vast majority of violence done by black people is done to other black people. Just as the majority of violence by whites is done to whites. Despite society's views changing, people still mostly hang around with (and develop conflicts with) their … | /r/MensRights | 14/05/17 05:30 PM |
| 1 | Please Lena... tell us more...Completely agreed. Lena should be shamed for the terrible things she has actually said and done... it's counterproductive to make up fake things. Still, if anyone deserves this kind of bullshit treatment it's Lena. She admits to sexually abusing her sister and spews all kinds of lies and bullshit and still gets invited onto the Tonight Show and gets an interview with Hillary Clinton during the presidential campaign. What the hell would it take for her to actually be socially rejected in the cele… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/17 05:26 PM |
| 7 | Please Lena... tell us more...Lena Dunham achieved fame as the writer and star of the HBO series called Girls. Before that, in college and the years after she made a lot of weird feminist artsy films where she's in her underwear a lot of the time. Somehow people in the art world liked it, Judd Apatow and some other important people took notice of her, and she got a deal to do an HBO show. Her show was about self-centered immature girls living in New York and their sex lives. Lena got a lot of "body positive" type of attentio… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/17 05:12 PM |
| 3 | I spoke with CPS about my step mother attempting to drown my 13 year old step brother and I just gotta fucking vent.It's a shame the call wasn't recorded. Think of the media attention it would get, and how much help your brother would instantly be offered. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/17 08:38 AM |
| 1 | Feminism in the film industry, and being an MRA in hollywood.Good luck, but I wouldn't risk a career that's so hard to come by just for the right to talk about my political views in public. Doesn't seem worth it. And if you really are about to hit the next level in Hollywood, this seems like the worst possible time to shoot yourself in the foot over politics. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 10:33 AM |
| 10 | Thanks, came to a realization.I can appreciate where you're coming from, but I think the bad eggs have won this battle. There are just too many man-bashing special treatment-demanding female supremacists out there calling themselves feminists, and those types seem to be the most active and most vocal which just amplifies the problem. When average people hear "feminist", a lot of them think of the angry man-hating stereotype. Many others think "it could be that or it could be an awesome equality supporting person or something… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 10:26 AM |
| 2 | Men: I need help with a conflictIt is her body, and her choice whether to go through pregnancy or not. He cannot ever have the right to control her body. She always gets to make that choice on her own. But if it is solely her choice, it should be solely her responsibility. She has an undeniable right to choose what happens inside her own body, but this should not automatically include the right to force the man to pay the costs related to her choice. All men who choose to have children must pay for them. Child support is a sys… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 10:15 AM |
| 4 | 'Sickening moment bouncer punches woman in the face' - Woman throws 1st punch bouncer defends himself.Let me guess, you're one of those people who complain when an violent man attacks the police with a weapon because "couldn't they have just shot him in the foot or something?" You're ridiculous. She initiated the violence and he didn't even hit hard enough to knock over an off-balance girl wearing high heels, and you're still complaining he used too much force? What did you expect from him if that wasn't good enough for you? | /r/MensRights | 19/04/17 11:04 AM |
| 2 | I backed myself in a corner with a school project on men's rights.I can't tell you how to do your school project, but I can tell you how to deal with the opposition: ignore them. They want to drag you into arguments where they can all attack you 6-on-1, take every opportunity to lie about your positions and take your words out of context, and shout you down with their superior numbers. They want you to yell at them and insult them, so they can play the victim and "feel unsafe around you" and act like you're a rapist or woman-beater who's about to snap. Don't i… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/17 02:03 AM |
| 0 | Stalker on 2XCI would hope that a textbook example of a false accusation actually includes some evidence of the accusation being false. You and the guy with the top voted comment in here are just assuming it's all false, based on zero evidence. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/17 01:51 AM |
| 1 | N.J. woman enraged by 'fancy white people' attacks man, Porsche with hammerComplain if and when it happens. It's pointless to complain about something that might happen, probably, maybe, sometime in the future. On a positive note, this was correctly described as a hate crime in the article. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/17 03:45 AM |
| 0 | Stalker on 2XCfull stop. The guy is a STEM beta and doesn't do it for OP. How dare he speak to her? Eh, she doesn't deserve criticism for that. She didn't see he doesn't have the right to speak to her, just that she's not having it and is choosing to ignore him, which is her right. HOWEVER, this isn't sexual assault. At worse it is attempted sexual assault Seems like you're nitpicking and criticizing her more than necessary tbh. beta attempts to grab girl's boobs = every man is a rapist. Like this. She didn't… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/17 03:32 AM |
| 11 | Marvel, explaining their collapsing sales: "People don't want anymore strong female characters"She doesn't sound like that bad of a character. A genius girl inspired by Iron Man to build a suit of her own, it works and he takes notice of her. She has her own background and her own personality, it's not like they just said "Tony Stark's a woman now". I don't think many people would complain except that her introduction comes in the middle of an effort to replace so many other iconic characters with non-white or female versions of the character. X-23 has been around over a decade and has be… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/17 02:45 PM |
| 9 | Marvel, explaining their collapsing sales: "People don't want anymore strong female characters"Why create Sailor Moon? Just turn all the Dragon Ball Z characters into women! | /r/MensRights | 05/04/17 02:24 PM |
| 1 | 'Big Bang Theory' Star Calls Out Feminist Hypocrites: STOP Ignoring Islam's Abuse of Women"don't recall any domestic violence in the show"?? really?....we've obviously seen different episodes. Such as? these two sentences are, watchamacalit again?.....Contradictory, yeah that's the word. The show has never mentioned the wage gap. SJWs have. This isn't contradictory, unless you believe that people are somehow responsible for what their crazy fans say. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/17 10:48 AM |
| 2 | 'Big Bang Theory' Star Calls Out Feminist Hypocrites: STOP Ignoring Islam's Abuse of WomenI don't recall any domestic violence in the show. Not even the overplayed "husband says something inappropriate, wife smacks him in the back of the head" stuff. When I search for info on the show mentioning the wage gap, I can't find anything. All I see are SJWs complaining about Mayim Bialik and Melissa Rauch being paid less than the mostly-male main cast, and then claiming it's gender discrimination. Which is nonsense of course. Kaley Cuoco is making a million dollars an episode, I guess they … | /r/MensRights | 21/03/17 03:32 AM |
| 5 | Do women's issues exist?There are various different levels of catcalling, and I think people discussing it often forget that. It's the middle of the day, plenty of people around, guy is at a safe distance, he whistles or yells "hey there good lookin" or something simple like that, no big deal. But how about in the evening, it's getting dark, not many people outside. A guy yells "hey there" and gets really explicit and rude in describing the sexual acts he plans to do. She ignores him and keeps on walking... he gets ang… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/17 03:16 AM |
| 4 | Feminist Amy Schumer gets trashed in reviews: she's horribly unfunny and her jokes are stolen"And this is why we need feminism - even the women reviewers are so full of internalized misogyny that they'll join the men in bashing this show instead of striking a blow against the patriarchy by supporting a woman in a heavily male field." | /r/MensRights | 17/03/17 09:08 AM |
| 22 | Pregnant 19 year old woman charged with rapeWhat the hell kind of argument is that? Tall people and short people are different too. Should there be legal double standards where tall people get less of a punishment for their crimes? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/17 05:55 AM |
| 1 | Tired of seeing this poster plastered around my campus.I told you that to illustrate even further how stupid and frivolous your ridiculous definition of 'feminism' is. I never said anything about the definition of feminism. because the implication you are making is that we need to FORCE fire departments to lower their standards for blacks and women Not only did I not say this, I literally said the exact opposite: "pass the same test to qualify for the job" You're having a conversation with straw men inside your head. You're arguing against things th… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/17 02:10 AM |
| 1 | Gender is not a social construct: study from 2000 shows sexual dimorphism exists in 1-day old babiesbecause men and women are different. Of course they're different, but that doesn't explain why men stopped wearing their hair long. (Men and women were still different in civilizations of the past, and in some of them men had long hair too.) you found a single example and think that disproves everything? I'm not "disproving everything" (whatever that means), I provided an example of how the social construct of an idealized male used to be very different from what it is now. This demonstrates tha… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 05:21 PM |
| 2 | Gender is not a social construct: study from 2000 shows sexual dimorphism exists in 1-day old babiessexual ideals. that's what attracts a male for sexual activity. this is biological. our lizard brains equate this with sexuality in that she is being attractive because she wants to mate. Right, but why are those the ideals? You could argue that long hair signifies her health and reproductive capability, and that makeup works the same way (hides flaws and makes her look younger/prettier/healthier). But then why isn't it standard for the men too? And this still doesn't explain the clothing. Why d… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 04:09 PM |
| 20 | Gender is not a social construct: study from 2000 shows sexual dimorphism exists in 1-day old babies"Gender is a social construct" might be the most misunderstood and misinterpreted sentence in all of gender politics. The original intended meaning of that phrase is "the EXPRESSION OF GENDER is a social construct". And that's true. The idea that long hair and makeup and dresses and high heels all belongs to women, and that short hair and suits and appreciation of competition and sports all belongs to men, is purely a social construct. There is no necessary reason for it to be this way, and it c… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 01:25 PM |
| 51 | Gender is not a social construct: study from 2000 shows sexual dimorphism exists in 1-day old babies"Men are pigs, they're sex-crazed and immature and annoying, sometimes I can't stand to be around them and can only be around other women" "There are literally no differences between men and women other than their genitals" Pick one. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 01:15 PM |
| 1 | Tired of seeing this poster plastered around my campus.So.. you're saying that now ALL of feminism is now reduced to.. firefighter positions. I didn't say anything like that. Most women don't even want to be firefighters anyway. I never said they did. Not to even mention that the fact that women not being as strong physically or that blacks on average don't have as high of IQs isn't 'discrimination,' that's not anyone's 'fault' except mother nature's. I didn't say anything about that. We have standards for those jobs because they are extremely diffi… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 05:52 AM |
| 2 | Tired of seeing this poster plastered around my campus.What does that even mean, 'Equality?' No two MEN are even 'equal,' because no 2 men are the same, much less men and women. It doesn't mean believing that everyone is literally identical. It means equal rights and equal treatment without discrimination. It doesn't mean doctors and janitors must be paid the same or deserve the same level of respect. It means that if a white man, a black man, a gay man, and a woman all apply for a job as a firefighter that they all get an equal chance to prove them… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/17 12:38 AM |
| 5 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'I sincerely hope that any doctor in training with a strong moral objection to vasectomies would be smart enough to choose a field other than urology, so that it doesn't become a problem for him. A doctor dumb enough to choose a field where he won't perform some of the duties of that position is someone who isn't smart enough to be a doctor in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 02:03 PM |
| 12 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'The article isn't satire, but the bill itself is. It's a literal joke of a bill that's meant to demonstrate how crazy the anti-abortion legislation has become. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 01:57 PM |
| 23 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'The bill is ridiculous, and that's the point of it. It is nothing but a demonstration of how absurd the anti-choice legislation has gotten lately, and an attempt to get media attention on this issue. It is not an actual attack on men. The bill is the equivalent of someone in a thread on circumcision saying "if male genital cutting is legal, then we should change the law to make the female version legal too". It's a joke about treating both genders the same way, not an actual call to pass a terri… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 01:56 PM |
| 23 | Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'I'm pretty sure she knows this. The bill is a symbolic gesture meant only to get media attention, it will never pass and it is not an attempt to screw over anyone. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Re: The Red Pill Movie.. Do men need shelters though?Violence solely refers to physical attacks. If it is not physical, the word to use is abuse. And yes, emotional abuse is terrible. It ruins people's lives, and leads them into living a slave-like existence full of depression, or to strike out in violence just to make it stop. But emotional abuse can be avoided. Simply remove the person from your life. Violence is not a legal solution to abusive language. (Note that emotional abuse is a crime when the person is unable to leave the relationship, s… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 05:47 AM |
| 1 | Re: The Red Pill Movie.. Do men need shelters though?There's no such thing as verbal violence. By definition, violence is physical. Verbal and emotional abuse are terrible things and can be extremely frustrating, but they do not justify violence. It is a person's duty to remove verbally abusive people from their lives, or else learn to address the abuse in legal ways if they won't leave the abusive person. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 05:07 AM |
| 0 | r/mensrights and r/feminism taking the high roadAnd yet, women were given the vote as soon as they actually decided that they wanted it with no resistance. No resistance. It was just given right to them without any trouble at all. It's not like there were stories so noteworthy that they made Hollywood movies about them. Do you also think that black people were given equal rights just as soon as they decided they wanted it, with no resistance? If women were truly oppressed, the suffragettes would have been executed. It only counts as oppressio… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 04:53 AM |
| 1 | Re: The Red Pill Movie.. Do men need shelters though?Men's shelters are certainly necessary, for a variety of reasons that others have pointed out. But yes you are correct that the need of a shelter for reasons of domestic violence is something that happens mostly to women. Not exclusively though, as not all men could easily overpower and restrain their girlfriend or wife. Some women are pretty strong, some men are weak or disabled or old, and some women use weapons. And it is a myth that men can always shut down a woman's violence without being h… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 02:38 AM |
| -2 | r/mensrights and r/feminism taking the high roadI don't believe this at all, and I think it's sad that so many MRAs do. Early feminists lived in a world where they couldn't vote, and were effectively banned from many occupations and hobbies because of their gender. Rape victims were often shamed for letting themselves be put into that situation (much like in the modern day Middle East), and it was still not a crime for a man to rape his wife until 1993. If you think the early feminists weren't concerned with equal rights and protections for w… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/17 02:22 AM |
| 1 | CNN: 19 Female Residence And 10 'Others' Killed In House fireHow do you know it was a home for girls only? | /r/MensRights | 10/03/17 06:37 AM |
| 1 | How Men vs. Women See the World: Apparently, it's much easier to be a man, and there are no disadvantages. Thanks College Humor!Does "what rhymes with orange?" still work? I haven't kept up on all of the advances in robotics in the past 30 years... | /r/MensRights | 09/03/17 04:30 AM |
| 4 | Men who say they are "happy" to be circumcised sound exactly like the women who say they are happy to be circumcised. So why the double standard? Either it's ok for both genders or it's not okay at all.Is it OK if I assault you and rob your home? Don't worry, I'll just beat you up a little bit and only take a few things. It won't have as many complications as a serious beating or a home robbery where they take everything. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 06:23 AM |
| 1 | Is porn offensive?Are sports offensive? They encourage people to objectify others based on their physical capabilities. Anything can be offensive if you're searching to be offended, or if you've made yourself overly sensitive to every little imperfection of the human species. People like to look at attractive bodies, get over it. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/17 04:54 AM |
| 1 | Halifax Taxi Driver Found Not Guilty Of Sexual Assault Of Woman Who Was Drunk. Judge: "“a lack of memory does not equate to a lack of consent.”"His own zipper was undone and his pants were partly pulled down | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 09:55 AM |
| 2 | Circumcised man sues and wins.Murder is worse than assault, but they're both illegal. And no one is arguing to legalize assault because murder is worse, or telling assault victims it's no big deal because at least they weren't murdered. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 07:27 AM |
| 2 | Halifax Taxi Driver Found Not Guilty Of Sexual Assault Of Woman Who Was Drunk. Judge: "“a lack of memory does not equate to a lack of consent.”"Only if you chose it before you fell asleep though. If someone dumps in you the driver's seat while you're unconscious and starts the engine, you don't deserve to face DUI charges. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 05:45 AM |
| 2 | Ontario court: Father can't sue mother for lying about being on the pillThat's different because it technically fits the definition of an assault. He did something to her body without her permission. The same kind of reasoning is noted in the article... he wasn't physically affected, so it's harder to rule that she harmed him and is liable. I wonder if the case would be treated differently if it could be proven that she intended to cause a pregnancy (like the man in your article). The woman in this case simply lied in order to get him to have sex. If it could be pro… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 03:36 AM |
| 5 | I guess I have to make this post... about circumcisionAnyone who insults someone for being circumcised or says other stupid shit like that is a moron and their opinion is not worth caring about. Try not to let the opinions of morons bother you. But there are some people in this sub who are upset about being circumcised and don't want to see any kind of discussion that defends or excuses the continued practice of it. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 02:48 AM |
| 1 | I need helpYou did the right thing. The wrong thing would be to fight back and get yourself arrested when the police show up... or to just sit there and let her get away with beating you. You had no choice. Of course you didn't want to get her into legal trouble... she got herself into this mess by choosing to become violent. And it's her problem to deal with now. It's a confusing situation because you loved her until recently, and probably still do to some extent. But she needs to be held accountable for … | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 02:45 AM |
| 6 | Circumcised man sues and wins.Do you support FGM too? It's only a little bit of tissue they're cutting off, so that makes it OK, right? Oh wait, you only think genital cutting is wrong when it happens to girls. Just fine to do it to boys though! Equality, bodily integrity... these things only matter when the victim is female! | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 02:38 AM |
| 5 | Ontario court: Father can't sue mother for lying about being on the pillIn defense of the court, the father was suing for millions in damages due to the emotional distress of being forced to become a parent against his will. Seems correct to deny this. I wish he had just sued to not be held legally liable for paying the costs of her deception. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 02:23 AM |
| 4 | Halifax Taxi Driver Found Not Guilty Of Sexual Assault Of Woman Who Was Drunk. Judge: "“a lack of memory does not equate to a lack of consent.”"I have to say this is a pretty damn questionable case of "consent". I don't believe for a second that a passing-out drunk woman really wanted to get it on with a random cab driver. And this part of the article is important too: MacKay said the cases in Halifax and St. John’s both involve people in positions of trust, which makes the issue of consent more complex. “Even if there was factual consent, if you’re a police officer giving someone a drive home or you’re a taxi driver giving a young woma… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/17 02:17 AM |
| 2 | Asking for a bit of advice.Anthony Bourdain's book Kitchen Confidential mentions a situation like this. Maybe it's not an uncommon thing to find people playing grab-ass in restaurant kitchens just to fuck with other people. Bourdain waited for the ass-grabber to come around for another attempt, and grabbed a fork and stabbed it into the offender's hand. The guy left Bourdain alone afterwards and the other cooks respected him more afterwards. This was in the 80s though, back when people worked out their own problems and di… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/17 03:43 AM |
| 1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerCollege degrees in certain fields (such as medical) are an even more scare resource. And those fields have even higher female dropout rates. True, education in certain fields like medicine is a limited resource sometimes. So again, find a solution - create financial incentives to stay in the field, and disincentives to take up a spot and then quit after a year. Not "people"... Women. This is not a problem with the job, this is a problem of women not wanting to stay working. So you want to just b… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/17 03:04 AM |
| 1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerCollege education is not a scarce resource. Anyone who wants one and can afford it can acquire one. We have built more colleges and universities to meet the rising demand for higher education... if no women attended college, we would have only half as many colleges. Jobs are a limited resource. If a certain field is suffering from shortages due to a high rate of people quitting after a few years, they should restructure the jobs in a way that incentivizes people to stay longer, or to not take th… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 09:01 PM |
| 1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerLiterally what is the cost. Say it please, don't act like it's some top secret info. The only thing you mentioned is women dropping out of the workforce. It's not like there would be more of them working if they're discouraged from working in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 02:15 PM |
| 1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerAnd yet, people still behave along gender roles Some do, yes. So what? Forcing people to follow gender roles isn't somehow a good idea because a lot of people would follow them anyway. It makes as much sense as outlawing homosexuality and forcing heterosexuality on people just because most people are hetero anyway. There's a significant opportunity cost in ignoring gender roles. How long can our society afford to pay it? What cost? There is no cost at all. If there was some significant cost then… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/17 05:53 AM |
| 1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerYou do realize that gender roles are a manifestation of our biological inclinations. That's where the idea for them came from, yes. In historic times, it was necessary to have the stronger men do the physical work and have the women do the child-raising and cooking etc. Smaller groups of people needed to maximize their productivity at all times, or else the group might starve. The roles enforced by society, the actions of which is also a result of our biology, is just a survival mechanism. No, n… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 09:14 PM |
| -1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerDon't get me wrong, it's not like conservatives are out there thinking "let's do terrible things to women to screw them over" like they're some evil woman-haters. I'm talking about the bad ideas that are propagated by social conservatives, especially gender roles. In pro-gender role social conservatism, people won't hire women to do a "man's job", don't trust women to handle science or tech jobs, encourage their daughters to be teachers and discourage them from trying to compete with men by aimi… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 04:17 PM |
| 2 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerDo you think being trans-racial is a real thing? Do you think Rachel Dolezal was treated unfairly? Is she actually a black person just because she thinks she is? Are people guilty of being full of hatred towards transracial people when they say "this women is clearly a white person"? Do you think there is no rational, non-hate-filled reason for someone to make that statement? | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 02:19 AM |
| -1 | Men are losing equal rights, and conservatism is not the answerConservatism = let's make sure women get fucked over just as badly as men do. Liberalism in theory = let's make sure no one gets fucked over. Liberalism in practice = let's make sure no women get fucked over. No one's doing anything to help men, but I think the answer is to slowly work on fixing liberalism. Though I have to say that there are quite a few Trump followers who are solidly pro-equality when it comes to gender issues. Sadly, the solid majority of conservatives still seem to be in fav… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/17 02:15 AM |
| 4 | How it's "sexy" when women post body-positive pics on dating sites/apps, but "disgusting" when men do.Like not having to commit to marriage if they want to have sex. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 03:12 AM |
| 1 | No more Game of Thrones: Why I've banned TV shows featuring violence against womenExactly. And what's her solution? "I'm going to stop watching shows with violence against white people. Violence against black people is fine though." | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 03:11 AM |
| 6 | No more Game of Thrones: Why I've banned TV shows featuring violence against womenBREAKING NEWS: Some person decides to stop watching some television show they don't enjoy. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 03:09 AM |
| 3 | I'm lost for words here, men should NEVER hit women? Even under threat of lethal force acted upon him?This is literally what some of these feminists believe. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/17 03:07 AM |
| 1 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeOn the single issue of life expectancy, you're right. But life expectancy is just one of hundreds of issues where men and women either have different outcomes or are treated differently. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 09:08 AM |
| 1 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeI just assumed your friend was part of it... it stands for Health At Every Size, and the group teaches all the "obesity isn't unhealthy, doctors are lying when they say you need to lose weight, society is oppressing fat people, refusing to date us is fat-hate" and so on. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 08:13 AM |
| 3 | Why The Progressive Left Keeps Sticking Up For Pedophiles: Anti men's rights Guardian “not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm.”: We fight for justice for UK child victims, including those of Jimmy Savile (pictured)First, this article is old and has been discussed repeatedly. Second, I don't see what this has to do with men's rights or this subreddit. Third, it isn't "sticking up for pedophiles" to discuss the topic without constantly saying "they're all evil and I want to kill them all" in every paragraph. Fourth, and most importantly, it protects children and rescues them from being molested if society would adjust their approach towards the situation. Saying "fuck you, I want you to die" accomplishes no… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 05:47 AM |
| 2 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeSince when is "both sides have bullshit to deal with" controversial? This sounds like some Oppression Olympics stuff. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 05:36 AM |
| 2 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeI don't see where you're getting that from. I think any couple (whether it's two men or two women or one of each) should consist of two people who treasure and respect each other. It should be two people who can help make up for each others' weaknesses, and not one person who is reliant on the other and is totally submissive and unable to help with anything. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 05:31 AM |
| 3 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeStop policing your friend and just enjoy her company on neutral topics. This is good advice for OP's personal life, to just not give a shit and not be affected by it. But she actually cares about her friend and wants her friend to live a better, healthier life and this isn't happening because SJW propaganda is compelling the friend to do harmful things. Honestly your response seems a little weird to me... when a man posts "feminism is ruining my sister's life" or something, I don't see anyone te… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 05:25 AM |
| 1 | Yale female students are trying to force fraternities to accept them. Can you imagine if it was the other way around?Male-bodied people are free to join female-only groups as long as they put on women's clothing and call themselves trans. And some women (with some valid reasons) complain about that. Simplying allowing cis men into sororities and taking away female-only spaces? A lot of women would be outraged and call it an attack on women's rights. But taking away male-only spaces is of course "empowering" and "progressive" and the very idea of male-only spaces is somehow evil and wrong. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 05:03 AM |
| 3 | What Are A Father’s Rights To Prevent An Abortion?The unborn child doesn't need a representative. First of all, in most cases of abortion the father is completely on board with it. Second, we can assume by default that the preference of the fetus would be to get to be born and live a full life. But this does not mean it is entitled to make use of the woman's body against her will, or that this preference should be forced upon the woman by the power of the government. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 04:58 AM |
| 10 | What Are A Father’s Rights To Prevent An Abortion?There are none, and there shouldn't be. No one other than the woman gets to decide whether the woman goes through pregnancy and gives birth. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/17 09:14 PM |
| 7 | No more Game of Thrones: Why I've banned TV shows featuring violence against women: "The difference, though, is that men are often victims of violence because they choose to put themselves in violent situations."I'm sick of all of these shows that contain violence against white people. From now on, I'm only watching shows that have violence against black people. Hooray for "progressive" identity politics. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/17 10:20 PM |
| 3 | Political centrist in a hard left family. How to deal with this stuff?I decided last night I would no longer discuss politics with my family. This is the correct move. Smile and nod and let them repeat their talking points. You tried using logic, they're not having it, it's time to move on. They might try to bait you into the discussion, asking for your opinions or asking why you're so quiet during political discussions. Don't take the bait. If you say "because you act like I'm some far-right ultraconservative if I disagree with anything", they'll promise not to, … | /r/MensRights | 18/02/17 04:43 AM |
| 10 | Emma Watson's role as self-appointed global feminist is getting a bit too much. She got upset by the backlash so fellow feminist sent her a care package of sequins and glitter, notes of encouragement and chocolate.Third-wave feminism is now about treating women like weak and fragile children, apparently. I mean I get that they were trying to do something nice, but that's kind of a silly way to offer support to her... well then again, now I'm not so sure. I bet Milo would enjoy a gift package of sequins and glitter and chocolate. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/17 04:47 AM |
| 8 | Boyfriend is cleared of raping a woman he met on Match.com after a jury hears she made up the attacks because she hated his sisterI just looked again... and lol, neither of us were right. It's the accused guy's sister who has the low IQ. But Leacock, who has a low IQ, insisted she was a willing participant. The awkwardly written article doesn't make it clear who the pronouns are referring to at times. But it was just talking about the sister both before and after this sentence. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 10:45 PM |
| 25 | Boyfriend is cleared of raping a woman he met on Match.com after a jury hears she made up the attacks because she hated his sisterJust a hint towards the "she's just a misguided woman who didn't know any better, it's not her fault" excuse. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 07:47 PM |
| 6 | Was filling out an pre-assessment for a job when this showed up...The correct answer is #4 because it makes no argument. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/17 07:44 PM |
| 4 | I circumcised my baby boy.I upvoted you for contributing to the discussion. And it's true that there are more important issues for the MRM... the widespread problem of male disposability and bias against men in the legal system and in family courts affects far more people in a far more serious way. But circumcision is a highlighted topic because it's such an obviously immoral and wrong thing that's still allowed in modern society, and because everyone sees the female version as an awful crime while accepting the male ver… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/17 03:11 AM |
| 21 | I circumcised my baby boy.I think that circumcision is a terrible and barbaric ritual that needs to be abandoned... but what's done is done. I assume there were no complications with the procedure or else you would have mentioned it... chances are that your son will be just fine. You can't undo it, so just chalk this up as a learning experience... in the future, make sure you have all the facts and are sure of your opinion before making permanent unchangeable decisions like this. Your son isn't going to hate you. I'm mil… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/17 03:06 AM |
| -1 | My professor brought up the wage gap today.. in a totally irrelevant class.They might not have been laughing for the reason you think. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 06:43 PM |
| 2 | I need to help my brother. Any advice appreciated.Sounds like the typical divorce story. Either a friend or a lawyer got in her ear and told her to throw out random accusations, because it's a completely risk-free tactic that might give her what she wants (more custody time, more of his money). Now he can either let her win, or get into a legal fight where both of them blow tons of cash on lawyers leaving them both poor and the children worse off for it. Total lose-lose situation. On a side note, I'd think that some of these family courts would… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 06:41 PM |
| 0 | This was shared on LinkedIn todayThere's more to it than that. Plenty of young girls like to try on their mom's shoes with heels, or get excited to be allowed to have their first pair of shoes with a small heel to them. They aren't thinking one bit about looking good for the boys... it's all about them becoming part of society's weird set of ideas about what's girly and cute and fashionable. It makes them feel good to dress up and make themselves look more like a movie star or some other celebrity. Of course the original reason… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 06:29 PM |
| 3 | This was shared on LinkedIn todayNot only does it look decent, it also doesn't contain any blatant lies. I'd much rather see SJWs post material like this than "we're the victim of everything" propaganda. It doesn't even promote a victim narrative. It's fine with me if people enjoy stuff like this... personally I think it's a little condescending towards women, treating them like children who need constant reassurance that they're good enough and smart enough to compete with others. I mean, you never see stuff like this for raci… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 06:22 PM |
| 1 | This is how much a woman earns for each dollar a man makesThat's not a male/female thing though, it's a high-earner/lower-earner thing. A high-income woman pays a high rate and a lower-income man pays a low rate. But every individual is being treated fairly. Just because other individuals who have penises are paying high rates doesn't mean an entire gender is being treated unfairly. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 06:09 PM |
| 3 | This is how much a woman earns for each dollar a man makesMen pay higher taxes on average because men earn more on average. Nothing is unfair about that. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 02:29 AM |
| 3 | This is how much a woman earns for each dollar a man makesThe coins add up a dollar. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 02:29 AM |
| 1 | Is the definition of sexism sexist?today | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 06:30 PM |
| 2 | I just had a discussion on whether men have the right to their unborn child. It didn't go well. TL;DR in commentsI'm sorry but I think you did a very poor job of arguing in favor of men's rights. First of all, you start with a link to an article about idiotic lawmakers in Arkansas trying to give men the right to control women's bodies. Any rational discussion was doomed to fail from the beginning, people will assume you support this incredibly immoral idea and fail to understand that the MRM wants men to have reproductive rights for THEMSELVES, not control over women. You also complain about child support … | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 06:20 PM |
| 1 | Is the definition of sexism sexist?The "typically against men" part is certainly accurate, but it does not belong in the definition. Even the definition of "suicide bombing" makes no mention of Islam or Muslims, even though today it's something that happens exclusively in Islamic culture. And the definition is correct not to include that, because the definition is the thing itself, not commentary about who is most likely to do it. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 06:07 PM |
| 1 | Is the definition of sexism sexist?Even though it's true, the "typically" part has no business being there. Imagine seeing a definition for gang violence that says it is "criminal acts of violence, typically committed by black people, committed by an organized group." Do you think that definition would be allowed to stand? And does that definition require the "typically" section at all in order to convey the meaning of the words? Where's the "typically committed by Muslims" part of the definition of terrorism? Or the "typically c… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 06:02 PM |
| 2 | Justice Democrats respond to my email about men's rights issues in their platformAs someone who fully supports nearly all of the official positions of the Democratic Party, it felt pretty bad to see them lose badly this year and 2018 is going to be no better. Even if the country is in an anti-Republican mood, the Democrats are trying to hold onto positions in red states they were lucky to acquire in the first place. But this has to happen, they have to learn their lesson. They will continue to lose if they keep focusing their efforts on supporting far left nonsense, keep pus… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/17 01:21 AM |
| 2 | Can We "Cure" the Men Who Pay for Sex? | WTF happened to GQ magazine? Why would any man pay to read this crap about "rehabilitating men" and "dismantling patriarchy"?Can we "cure" the women who accept money for sex? | /r/MensRights | 04/02/17 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Have you ever noticed there is never a male 'fat acceptance' movement, because women and society do not care about you.This is a good observation, the male version of fat acceptance would be underachiever acceptance. Heh, that's a pretty good comparison. It's fun to picture what their meetings might be like. And no doubt you could put them in the same room with the fat-acceptance women and nobody there would want to date each other. A woman can do little to improve her attractiveness to men outside physical attractiveness, there are not many dudes who will fall for an fat and ugly woman even though she can suppo… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/17 01:07 AM |
| -2 | Have you ever noticed there is never a male 'fat acceptance' movement, because women and society do not care about you.I hate to defend the SJWs, but there actually is less of demand for a male fat acceptance movement. Fat men have a somewhat easier time finding dates than fat women. First, on average men are more interested in a potential mate's looks than women are. Unless you're a male model or a disgusting slob, looks aren't as important to women. They care more about a man's personality, whether she thinks he is interesting, if he can make her laugh, and his ability to provide a good life for her. Men care … | /r/MensRights | 03/02/17 08:48 PM |
| 5 | In French, powerful stuff: Marion Maréchal-Le Pen Slams Feminists over Banning of Pro Life Websites. She slammed feminists’ views of the “patriarchy” and their placing blame on “heterosexual white men”.French person wants French policies to benefit French citizens = a racist and fascist who deserves death, somehow. No, these policies must instead benefit the sexist and homophobic economic migrants. No one is allowed to complain when women can't go out in public in their own country without being harrassed by immigrants who demand they dress differently and shouldn't go outside without a man. Unless you obey the immigrants every demand, you are Hitler. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/17 05:44 PM |
| 2 | Why is it when Men do it it's called molestation, but when a woman does it it's called "engaged in sexual contact." Call Breitbart out on this!!Accountable for what? Finding anyone attractive is not, nor should it become, a crime. She's not charged with finding him attractive. She sent sexually explicit texts to a 14 year old, pressured him to get in her car, then she drove to a secluded area and started to perform a sex act on him. He was repulsed by all of this and jumped out of the car and walked 2 miles back to his home. Flip the genders and tell me that's OK and doesn't deserve prosecution. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/17 08:28 AM |
| 2 | Why is it when Men do it it's called molestation, but when a woman does it it's called "engaged in sexual contact." Call Breitbart out on this!!It's a conservative mindset that says men always want sex, and that teenage boys are smarter and more mature and capable of having a sexual relationship while teenage girls are helpless victims. Just because feminists are on the far left doesn't mean that all opinions that treat men unfairly are left-wing. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/17 08:25 AM |
| 25 | It's called child support.Honestly I wonder if Maddow really said that. She is extremely biased, but she is also smart and I haven't seen her spew out fact-free bullshit like this before. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 03:37 PM |
| 57 | It's called child support.Of course I agree with it. But the post is pointing out the ignorance of feminists and their blindness towards any view other than "how does this affect women". She's acting like it's somehow legal for men to stop paying child support, and doesn't even recognize that we have inequality right now (choice for women, no choice for men). | /r/MensRights | 25/01/17 03:34 PM |
| 2 | My first assignment of the semester at my extremely liberal universityI disagree. I think in first world countries there is very little privilege that exists. It is very subtle and really barely matters. I agree, it's mostly small stuff. No one has different legal rights or is banned from places for being the wrong color or anything. But the small stuff is still a form of privilege, and some might argue that the small stuff adds up. But any tiny amount of privilege, even if it's insignificant, still technically qualifies as a privilege and there's nothing wrong wi… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 02:58 AM |
| 2 | My first assignment of the semester at my extremely liberal universityI don't think this is too bad. All groups of people have certain privileges and lack other ones, and all kinds of privilege exists. The fact that certain types of white privilege exist (like being able to walk around a store without an employee keeping an eye on you to make sure you're not stealing, which he might do for a non-white person) doesn't mean "whites always have it easier and get a free ride", or that anyone should be treated any differently from another person. SJWs are completely wr… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/17 06:08 PM |
| 5 | What's everyone's thoughts on the Women's March?It's all fine with me. They're out there making their voices heard. There's some justification to be upset, with the Republicans planning to shut down even more abortion clinics and to defund Planned Parenthood, while the ignorant politicans voting on these laws don't even know how birth control works and haven't considered why a woman would even want an abortion. I support their right to go out there and peacefully protest. They seem to be mostly talking about reproductive rights and women's he… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 08:54 PM |
| 1 | Trump to scrap "Violence Against Women" grants. He can't scrap "Violence Against Men" grants, because there aren't any.Obama didn't hit the brakes Under Bush, the yearly deficit went from $0 to $1.4 trillion. Under Obama, the deficit went from $1.4 trillion to $439 billion. Who is hitting the gas, and who is hitting the brakes? The answer is clear. Comparatively I would have given Clinton a D Really, the guy with the first surplus since the 60s? I mean, he had the easiest 8 years in US history, but he made sure not to screw things up in those years. Reagan an A- The guy who tripled the deficit and started the bi… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 08:44 PM |
| 4 | University of Kansas maintains women's-only lunchroom for Muslims - The College FixLast I checked it was 58/42 which is 38% more women than men. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 04:06 AM |
| 0 | Trump to scrap "Violence Against Women" grants. He can't scrap "Violence Against Men" grants, because there aren't any.I didn't say that Obama personally did all of these things alone. He did make the call to take out Bin Laden, which some presidents might not have made. He didn't personally change our laws, but his administration created an environment where it's politically acceptable to question and re-evaluate our positions on gay marriage and the useless war on drugs. Stock prices certainly don't translate to a better economy, you're right about that without a doubt. Still, stocks doing well during his pres… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 03:22 AM |
| -2 | Trump to scrap "Violence Against Women" grants. He can't scrap "Violence Against Men" grants, because there aren't any.Under Obama's term our country saved the American auto industry, killed Bin Laden, avoided financial disaster, saw stock values nearly triple, legalized gay marriage and weed, cut the yearly spending deficit from 1.3 trillion to 440 billion (still way too high, but it's a hell of a lot better than before). And even though Obamacare failed I appreciate that he took action and actually made something happen, we have to make changes in our health care system until we get it right. Of course there a… | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 01:26 PM |
| 3 | Why are MRA's labeled as misogynists?It's not the genetics, it's the culture. People of any genetic background thrive as part of a healthy culture that discourages violence and encourages learning and largely keeps away from backwards behavior that inhibits societal progress. Western countries and east Asian countries have these cultures and are doing well. Other countries, not as much. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/17 01:14 PM |
| 2 | These are posted in a Hooters women's bathroom. Who cares if men are on an uncomfortable date?These are fair points. But I'd also say that this poster is pretty harmless, it's nothing like the blatant "men are evil and are out to get you" propaganda pushed by SJWs. It doesn't say anyone's at high risk of being harmed by a man, or anyone else. It just mentions that help is available just in case it's needed, and it doesn't cost anything. If volcano insurance was completely free, I'd probably take some because why not. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 09:26 PM |
| -2 | These are posted in a Hooters women's bathroom. Who cares if men are on an uncomfortable date?Guys are almost never the ones being pursued, which makes it so rare. And when there is an overly aggressive woman, he'll usually be larger than her and not feel that he needs assistance in getting away from her safely. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 10:58 AM |
| 3 | Am i wrong? All the writing i see at TwoXChromosomes seems made up ?Just because a situation is unusual enough to sound like it could be fiction, that doesn't mean it is fiction. There are plenty of idiots in the world, I don't find it hard to believe that an anti-vaxxer neighbor could cause someone else's kid to get sick and die. There's no way to prove if the story is true or false, but I wouldn't just accuse someone of making things up, especially if it's a story about losing their child. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 08:45 AM |
| 66 | These are posted in a Hooters women's bathroom. Who cares if men are on an uncomfortable date?Honest answer? Maybe the kind of guy who would cause women to make use of a poster like that. It takes some serious lack of understanding of social norms to take a date to Hooters, and a guy like that might not understand that his date is trying to get him to leave her alone (and probably never expected to find herself at Hooters on this date). | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 08:40 AM |
| 21 | These are posted in a Hooters women's bathroom. Who cares if men are on an uncomfortable date?The poster doesn't vilify men, or even mention them at all. A lesbian might need to place an order like this. The only issue here is "why post this in the women's bathroom and not the men's". Maybe it should be in both, but let's be real here. How often do you hear about men feeling uncomfortable on a date and in need of someone to help them escape this situation? Virtually never. How often do you hear of a woman feeling that way? Hopefully not too often, but it happens often enough that you hea… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/17 08:37 AM |
| 2 | Feminists are furious at Chris Pratt and his new SF movie "Passengers", claim it's "rape culture" because the main characters are good and human to eachother and together they save the lives of all 5259 passengers at the endBut the happy ending was bullshit, and the situation was weakly resolved. "Oh some crazy shit happened and we have to work together" and afterwards suddenly it's no big deal that he stole her future from her, and in fact she's now totally fine with it. Lame. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 06:16 AM |
| 4 | Feminists are furious at Chris Pratt and his new SF movie "Passengers", claim it's "rape culture" because the main characters are good and human to eachother and together they save the lives of all 5259 passengers at the endI don't really call it misogynist, I just call it bad writing. Imagine a similar type of story. A white cop is in a black neighborhood investigating a crime, he misreads a situation and fucks up by killing a black man who it turns out was not a threat to him. The brother of the dead man is furious with the cop... and suddenly some new situation appears that forces them to work together, let's say some gang violence type of situation breaks out. The two men work together and save each other's liv… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 06:14 AM |
| 2 | Male nerd shaming as reddit's go-to sneeringWomen seem to like to use "neckbeard"... I've seen men going with the variation of "goony beard-man" lately. No idea where that came from. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 09:06 AM |
| 2 | Male nerd shaming as reddit's go-to sneeringalthough "cuck" is arguably a sexist term Hmm, it could be... but really you just never hear about women having a fetish of seeing another woman have sex with their husband, it's so rare. Apparently it exists though, and hey it starts with the first four letters. So maybe it's a gender neutral insult after all? and (it's possible I'm mistaken about this) it's use seems to have been popularized early on in white supremacist circles and often still carries racial overtones. It doesn't necessarily … | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 09:04 AM |
| 4 | Male nerd shaming as reddit's go-to sneeringNo one over the mental age of 18 uses that word. So in other words, millions of adults in America do. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:55 AM |
| 3 | Male nerd shaming as reddit's go-to sneeringIt doesn't really bother me, and it's not exclusively a male thing. Lots of people attack and make fun of people who belong to groups they disagree with, and they resort to generic insults about the person being a loser - they're fat, stupid, unattractive, whatever. On the internet people tend to default to assuming their opponents are male, so you do see more "neckbeard virgin loser" stuff. But there's also a significant amount of "crazy fat entitled princess with a degree in feminist poetry" o… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:54 AM |
| 1 | Mother thinks that Male Genital Mutilation — circumcision — is "anti-feminist", because of all the attention and "fuss" that is being made over a boy. "...none of it would be relevant if we had a girl".His whole life, he's bought into the idea that circumcision is a necessary part of being Jewish (and the fact that he's circumcised is no doubt related to that). It feels wrong to him to circumcise, but he still buys the religious nonsense that "it's a test". He still felt wrong about it, and disliked the idea that his son's penis is relevant to his religious beliefs... and he wanted to be convinced that all the religious bullshit is important and worth following, but the rabbi let him down and … | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:42 AM |
| 6 | Woman records herself sexually assaulting men in JapanLOL, are women the equivalent of children now? Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense. Women are responsible for their actions just the same as men are. Yes, it's not a completely identical situation because men are more likely to be OK with having a strange woman kiss them, and men are more likely to be able to physically overpower her and escape if they need to. But the fact that the situation isn't 100% identical doesn't mean that this isn't sexual assault, you dimwit. Some men don't wan… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:36 AM |
| 6 | Woman records herself sexually assaulting men in JapanButterface? To me, her face was her only attractive feature. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:20 AM |
| 1 | Mother thinks that Male Genital Mutilation — circumcision — is "anti-feminist", because of all the attention and "fuss" that is being made over a boy. "...none of it would be relevant if we had a girl".To his credit, he seemed to be looking for an excuse not to go through with it. So that's something. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:17 AM |
| 2 | Mother thinks that Male Genital Mutilation — circumcision — is "anti-feminist", because of all the attention and "fuss" that is being made over a boy. "...none of it would be relevant if we had a girl".Is there anything these people can't twist to make themselves the victims? Does she WANT a special genital cutting ceremony for baby girls? Still, I'll look at the bright side here. The couple had a girl, so it ended up being irrelevant. The wife was opposed to circumcision (at least to the level of "let's just not bother with it"), and the husband found himself doubting whether it makes sense to circumcise and was looking for excuses not to do it. And this is a man who's so close with his Jewis… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/17 08:09 AM |
| 1 | That's 7665 days.you should be something like 95% sure someone did something to convict them. It's the "women are wonderful" effect. Everyone in the system is thinking "why would an innocent child ever make up a lie like that? she would never do that!" and so they don't have any reasonable doubt in their minds about his guilt. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/17 02:21 AM |
| 2 | Fox Sports’ Clay Travis: Ronda Rousey a ‘Fraudulent Creation’ of Liberal Sports Media -It's like how SJWs would love to see an LGBT Muslim woman become famous and successful, and there would be media coverage about how great it is that she can succeed as an underdog in the evil white patriarchal world or whatever. It tells the story of "minority group outperforms majority group". But Clay Travis is dead wrong. Rousey's win streak had nothing to do with liberal opinions, and her popularity wasn't a media creation. People became huge fans and wanted to see her dominate her opponents… | /r/MensRights | 04/01/17 08:50 PM |
| 1 | Fox Sports’ Clay Travis: Ronda Rousey a ‘Fraudulent Creation’ of Liberal Sports Media -this article has nothing to do with that... | /r/MensRights | 04/01/17 08:46 PM |
| 7 | Fox Sports’ Clay Travis: Ronda Rousey a ‘Fraudulent Creation’ of Liberal Sports Media -Sorry, Clay. Maybe that was a small aspect of her success, but there was far more to it then some liberal "women are just as strong as men!" mindset. Rousey won 15 fights in a row, all in a completely dominant fashion. The first 11 were by first round armbar, then in fight #13 she set the record for fastest KO in a title fight (16 seconds), and fight #14 set the record for fastest submission in a title fight (14 seconds) and followed that with a 34 second KO. She was competing in a brutal sport … | /r/MensRights | 04/01/17 08:45 PM |
| 4 | How can MRAs invoke change? It seems like a lot of people are recognizing the validity of the arguments presented, but how do we go about introducing fair policies and persuading politicians to codify them in legal terms?This really is the key. Social change isn't something that you build brick by brick, changing local laws one county at a time or something like that. It takes years of building up public awareness and understanding of the issues, and then suddenly there's a tipping point where action will be taken that affects people in a state or the entire country. Look at women's rights, or civil rights, or the legalization of gay marriage and marijuana for examples of this. Discussing the issues and pointing… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/17 01:56 AM |
| 22 | I bought a positive pregnancy test off Craigslist and scared my man awayThis woman was in a relationship where they have never considered having a baby together, and where they clearly have both decided to avoid pregnancy by using both condoms and the pill. What in the world did she think would happen? He doesn't want to become a father, of course he'll be upset. He knows he's been using condoms, of course wonder if the pregnancy occured some other way. He's facing being unexpectedly forced into 18 years of having to pay for a child, of course he's going to suggest … | /r/MensRights | 31/12/16 04:04 AM |
| 9 | Angry feminists universally attack new movie "Passengers" calling it "sexist" because a woman repeatedly saves the life of a man and stays faithful to himIt's bad. The title of this post is also bad, because the SJWs aren't upset about Jennifer Lawrence's character being heroic. They're upset that Chris Pratt's character does something very selfish, and that the movie barely addresses it. Honestly, it's just bad writing for his character to perform that action (I'm avoiding spoilers just in case) and then nothing really comes of it... the SJWs do have a point here. Just have the story play out in a different way so that his character isn't selfis… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 06:34 PM |
| 10 | Angry feminists universally attack new movie "Passengers" calling it "sexist" because a woman repeatedly saves the life of a man and stays faithful to himYou just came up with a much better movie than what Hollywood created. It appears that "Aurora" is probably a reference to Sleeping Beauty. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 06:26 PM |
| 1 | Angry feminists universally attack new movie "Passengers" calling it "sexist" because a woman repeatedly saves the life of a man and stays faithful to himYou're exactly right, that is what they did. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/16 06:23 PM |
| 8 | Chancellor steps down after sexism comments: Women make different choices than men, but discussing those choices in any way is sexist.He did nothing wrong. I wonder why he chose to step down. Giving into SJWs complaints just encourages and empowers them, I wish he had held his ground and refused to give into this nonsense. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/16 02:33 AM |
| 8 | US median pre-tax income for men hasn't gone up in 50 years. (Piketty, Saez and Zucman 2016)This is a much better graph to use. We've grown the wealth of America dramatically, but none of it is going to the working class. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/16 02:29 AM |
| 1 | Children as young as 9 months-old prefer to play with toys specific to their own gender, according to a new study. Stop telling boys they can't like boy things!I've talked to some people who believe this... I'm still not sure I understand their position. They acknowledge that hormones affect behavior and mood, especially that testosterone causes males to be aggressive and impulsive. But then they deny that this different brain chemistry could be responsible for men showing far more interest than women show for engineering or programming or video game competitions. They insist that all of that must only be due to societal influence. I think this positio… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/16 02:17 AM |
| 0 | Brad Pitt finally hits back at estranged wife Angelina Jolie's parenting skills as he describes her as having 'no self-regulating mechanism'He can afford it. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/16 11:21 PM |
| 3 | You know why male suicide rates are much higher than women's?I don't think they're fucking it up. I think they know that a failed suicide attempt will result in a lot of people trying to help them and care about them and give them the attention and support they're in need of. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/16 11:20 PM |
| 2 | You know why male suicide rates are much higher than women's?When men fall into despair, they see no hope and no help available to them, so they kill themselves. When women fall into despair, they know that people will help them if they appear to be in desperate need, because society cares for women more than men. Even if they're not thinking about it, maybe in the back of their mind they know that if they take a few too many pills they might survive a half-hearted suicide attempt and then have help showered on them. Men will swallow the whole bottle of p… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/16 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Male disposability is human nature and will never changeThe problem isn't public views, the problem is biology. Nothing will change the fact that a society that's cut down to 100 females and 10 males will have a brighter future than a society that's cut down to 100 males and 10 females. But that isn't the kind of situation that men are complaining about today... it's about the treatment they receive from other people. So the problem IS public views. No, it's getting worse. Right now women don't need to be provided for by a man, because they are getti… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 12:20 PM |
| 2 | Male disposability is human nature and will never changeThis is why "end male disposability" is an impossible goal for the MRM. You're free to think that, but I don't think changing public views on things is impossible. No doubt there were slaves who saw the evil that white people were doing to them and said it was impossible that whites and blacks could ever see each other as equals. Today the majority of the country isn't racist and people get socially rejected and shunned for having racist views. If that kind of change can happen, then I think we … | /r/MensRights | 17/12/16 07:39 PM |
| 5 | Just started binging Parks and Recreation. Love the show but I just watched season 7 and I'm disgusted how they portrayed Men's Rights Activists.Maybe you could show your friend this, link him to some articles about the famous life-ruining false rape accusations in the media, and link the story about a mother who went to jail because the court was ordering her to agree to let her son's genitals be cut. Chances are pretty good that your friend has no idea what an MRA is, and have just heard from friends that "this is the term for someone who hates when women are treated equally with men" or "pickup artist douchebag who thinks he's oppress… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/16 06:24 PM |
| 3 | Combat Rape With Affirmative Consent. Women No Longer Like Affirmative Consent.Just don't burn the popcorn! | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 05:44 PM |
| 2 | Another teenage boy going on the sex offender list and facing 20 years in prison because of another teenage girl crying rape because she is afraid of her motherStone Cold knew best... DTA | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 05:41 PM |
| 16 | The fuck is this dribble? Saw this post claiming MRA's are flocking to the alt-right."Alt right" is the new code word for "whoever we in the media don't like". If you didn't vote Hillary, doubt that the college rape rate is 50 times higher than the rest of the country, or refuse to memorize a Tumblrina's made-up pronouns, you are now a proud member of the racist and sexist alt right. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/16 05:43 AM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionYour responses are quite verbose Haha yeah, I am guilty of that sometimes, I appreciate the "keep it simple, stupid" concept but I'm not always so great at it. Actually, most do get names. It might not be on paper, but mothers who miscarry often do commit a name, or discard a prospective name out of respect for the loss. Some women do give the lost child a name, but I don't believe they're in the majority. Most miscarriages happen in the first trimester, sometimes before the woman knows she is p… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 06:42 PM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionMiscarriages are no different; They are very unfortunate, but they are normal occurrences. Right, but I'm talking about how we don't treat them as human lives in any other way. They don't get names, or birth certificates or death certificates, or social security numbers. There aren't laws about reporting a death or disposing of the body in a certain way. And most pro-life people are fine with all this. They also don't object to birth control that kills a fertilized egg. They're fine with in-vitr… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/16 07:27 AM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionThere's a difference between taking action to save someone you owe nothing to, and remaining inactive to spare someone who's life you are responsible for the creation of. But are you responsible for creating it if you did everything you could to avoid causing a pregnancy? I think you're not. (Now I'm imagining a broken condom leading to a pregnancy, and the legal system deciding that the condom company is responsible and forces them to pay child support... anyway...) If you believe that the peop… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 08:00 PM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionGiving up a kidney and carrying a child to term are certainly not the same experience, I agree. While I think you are vastly underestimating the cost to the woman (pregnancy causes permanent changes to the body, and the 9 month burden that restricts your life and causes a lot of inconvenience is nothing like a quick and easy kidney removal), that really isn't even the point here. The two situations are comparable in that both of them are a violation of the person's body if done without their con… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 08:50 AM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionI would ask what those sound arguments are, because I have yet to hear of any. Abortion boils down "who has more of a right to someone's body, the person who will die without the use of it, or the person who lives in that body?" I think that every person owns their own body and has every right to choose whether it is used by someone else. I see no moral difference between forcing a woman to carry a fetus to term because it will die if she refuses, and forcing a man to donate a kidney to a sick p… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/16 08:02 AM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionI never claimed otherwise. Though I guess my earlier post makes it sound like I'm talking about the general public voting, sorry my words were unclear about that. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/16 10:02 PM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionTrue. But when it comes to elected officials who are trying to get abortion clinics shut down, they're virtually all men. I've never heard of a female politician being part of this. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/16 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Anti male abortion questionWhile their reasoning is garbage, it is true that we'd be better off if only women were allowed to vote on abortion laws. There are a lot of idiotic bible-thumping male politicians who don't know the first thing about abortion and have never even considered how incredibly fucked it is to force a woman to carry a child to term against her will. Because of this, I wouldn't bother to argue against them. Arguing over some bad reasoning isn't worth standing in the way of people who are trying to keep… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/16 07:40 PM |
| 9 | Feminists are Sending Used Tampons To Governor Of Texas: Likely a violation of postal codes, and a crime if any have blood born illnessesI know that feminists blatantly breaking the law is a great opportunity to make fun of them, but consider the situation going on here. This isn't a temper tantrum being thrown because air conditioning is sexist or some nonsense. Denying women access to abortion is the moral equivalent of having government agents show up at your door to kidnap you and force you to donate a kidney to save a stranger's life. It is a case of the government forcing someone to surrender the use of their own body again… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/16 05:39 PM |
| 2 | ‘Baby It’s Cold Outside’ Triggers Feminists! | Louder With CrowderAs the video points out, the song was never about a lack of consent. You have to consider the cultural context of the time the song was written. Society was much more uptight and strict, and it could be considered scandalous if an unescorted woman stayed at a man's house for too long. In the song, both the man and the woman want to spend some intimate time together (exactly how intimate is left up to the imagination). She was worried about being shamed for her choices, she was concerned her pare… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/16 01:45 PM |
| 2 | The Real Goal Of Sexbots And Artificial Reproduction Is Making Women Obsolete: All of these marvelous advancements in femme-engineering can only mean one thing: it’s time to admit that the planned obsolescence of the female on Earth is nearly complete: The author probably could use a hug.the cum and joke mines are a serious threat, don't let it happen to us | /r/MensRights | 10/12/16 11:52 PM |
| 2 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".1) The case with the teacher was for two people above the age of consent. Doesn't seem like you've noticed that part yet. 2) right 3) also correct The age of consent for sex between a teacher and student is 18, which is why she was charged. No. Read section 21.12 of the Texas Penal Code. Here, I'll make it easy and quote it for you. IMPROPER RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATOR AND STUDENT. (a) An employee of a public or private primary or secondary school commits an offense if the employee: (1) engage… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 05:02 PM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".i assume you think like that because you americans have such a stoic outlook on sexuality. in the town where i went to school there's a brothel in the next street. that's completely normal here I wouldn't think it's a big deal, though it probably should be out of the way of where kids would be if possible. maybe it would be easier for them to react to those situtations if they'd be allowed to collect experience And experience comes with time. a 13 year old who doesn't know about birth control, S… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 01:24 PM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".The law should be consistent throughout the US, but the fact it isn't doesn't mean that consent laws are BS. A line has to be drawn somewhere in order to protect minors from making bad decisions, just like there's a minimum age for driving, drinking alcohol, etc. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 12:23 PM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".But you're fine with female teacher abusing boys. Show me where I said that. Teachers cant have sex with students in Texas No kidding, I literally said that in the post you just responded to. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 10:41 AM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".in my country (austria) for example it's legal for 12/13 year olds to have sex with under 18 year olds Call me old fashioned, but I think that's pretty screwed up. Someone just entering puberty, who relies on their parents for everything and was probably watching cartoons just a year or two ago (or maybe still does), having sex with someone old enough to live on his own, drive a car, drink alcohol, etc. These different ages are part of two different worlds and two entirely different maturity lev… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 10:17 AM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".The correct term in both cases is statutory rape. No, statutory rape refers to cases where one person is under the age of consent. The teacher was charged with an improper relationship between an educator and a student, which you can see at Section 21.12 of the Texas Penal Code. No it isn't, if you are having sex with your teacher. http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/statutory-rape-the-age-of-consent.html says 17. I'd love for you to enlighten me on how it's supposed to be sexist to po… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 09:43 AM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".I don't think it should be. You can make an argument in favor of tweaking the existing laws.. a 19 year old having sex with a 16 year old probably doesn't need to be illegal. In fact in certain areas, it's legal for an 18 year old to have with sex a 16 year old but then the same relationship can become illegal later, if the 18 year old turns 19 before the younger person turns 17... so that doesn't make a lot of sense. Some consent laws need to take more consideration of the age of the older pers… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 02:00 AM |
| 0 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".It's not the gap that's the problem. I don't care if an 80 year old dates a 20 year old. This is about the fact that one of the people is a minor, and is too young and immature to handle things being pressured into having sex by someone older (as well as things like signing up for a credit card, and joining the military.) A 20 year is mature enough to stand up for themselves and make their own decision. But a 14 year old is still a child, and still used to doing whatever an adult tells them. Eit… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/16 01:42 AM |
| 2 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".both are wrong but i think one is far wrongerer than the other, and the distinction ought to be made AFAIK this distinction is usually made during the sentencing. The sentence for a violent attack should be longer than one where the child was OK with it. Much like how someone will get a shorter sentence for a first offense where their friends pressured them into doing something wrong, than the same crime being done by a repeat offender who breaks the law all the time and just doesn't care. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 06:32 PM |
| 1 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".Sure, but it's for a good reason. It's the same reason why 14 year olds can't sign up to join the military, or sign up for a credit card, or be part of other legal contracts that apply to adults in this country. The law correctly recognizes that underage kids are generally not mature enough to understand all of the consequences of these contracts, might not be able to hold up their part of the bargain, and most importantly - they can easily be pressured into doing things that aren't in their bes… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 06:27 PM |
| 634 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".OP has a weird definition of consensual. Sorry but I don't think a 19 year old pressuring an eighth-grader into having sex with him is consensual in any way. I'm tired of the crap where words like "inappropriate relationship" are used for female rapists too, but that doesn't mean every use of the word "rape" against a male criminal is uncalled for. Also, the 28 year old teacher is accused of having sex with a student just before he graduated high school, and the age of consent is Texas is 17. He… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 08:17 AM |
| 3 | Danish doctors want to ban male genital mutilation for males under 18Religion does not give you the right to perform cosmetic surgery on people without their consent. If you are religious then YOU are free to get a circumcision done to YOURSELF. Everyone gets to choose for themselves, no one gets to choose for other people. Newborns are unable to decide for themselves. Wait until they are old enough to decide for themselves, and if they feel it's an important part of their religious identity, then they can have the procedure done. But by having it done to infants… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 02:51 AM |
| 8 | Danish doctors want to ban male genital mutilation for males under 18Good for you! No here is calling for all circumcision to be banned. Everyone who thinks it looks better is completely free to get a circumcision. We are against people not having a CHOICE about circumcision. No one should be forced into it, or banned from getting it. Every person should get to choose for themselves. People who like circumcision can have it done, and people who don't like it can stay natural. Can you think of any reason it shouldn't be done this way? You're perfectly happy with b… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 02:48 AM |
| 11 | Danish doctors want to ban male genital mutilation for males under 18I'm glad that you stand up for male DV victims, but that does not give you or anyone else the right to do cosmetic surgery on people without their informed consent. It is not anti-Semitic or anti-Islamic to oppose circumcision. It has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with the individual's right to bodily integrity. Just like how our laws against polygamy are not based on hatred of Mormons, and our laws allowing the consumption of pork are not based on hatred of Muslims. Just bec… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 02:45 AM |
| 9 | Apparently I have the mind of a Rapist. NSFWIt's really unlikely that you are at risk here... false accusations are terrible but they're also not very common. They're mentioned a lot in this sub just like murders are always mentioned on the news... if you watch the news you might think the murder rate has skyrocketed and that you're in danger all the time, when the truth is that murder rates as as low as they have ever been. But still, there is nothing to gain and a lot to risk by not saving your past conversations. No reason not to play … | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 02:39 AM |
| 2 | Apparently I have the mind of a Rapist. NSFWDid you make the explanation clear to her? I mean it's kind of a huge difference between "he heard my abuse story and instantly wanted to make out with me, as if it turned him on or something" and "he heard my abuse story and wanted to demonstrate that he'll never do anything to me without my consent because he cares about me". If she knows the explanation and is pissed off at you anyway, well, not much you can do about it. It's a strange thing to hear about someone else's past of abuse, it can … | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 02:33 AM |
| 15 | Apparently I have the mind of a Rapist. NSFWYou're thinking too logically here. When someone is a victim of sexual assault or other forms of abuse, they can get freaked out by seemingly normal things if it happens to somehow remind them of their abuse. Sometimes any consensual sex at all is enough to remind them of their past and put them in a mood of "don't touch me, leave me alone". These reactions are totally illogical but victims of abuse don't have a choice in the matter, the mental scarring caused by the abuse force them to have bad… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 12:03 AM |
| 2 | "Financial abortion: Should men be able to 'opt out' of parenthood?" asks some feminist at the ABC. Surprisingly, her answer seems to be "yes."society just needs to step up and say no more It's an easy thing to say "no more". Enforcing it is a different issue. Which way would you enforce it? Send government agents to arrest a citizen and bring him or her to a hospital to be forcibly sterilized against their will? Or deny food and shelter to starving children because their parents went past the limit? Both of those options are choices that most of society really does not want to make, and this is why it will never say "no more". Even in… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/16 02:29 AM |
| 2 | "Financial abortion: Should men be able to 'opt out' of parenthood?" asks some feminist at the ABC. Surprisingly, her answer seems to be "yes."I'd be fine with a reasonable level of population control. You can't realistically have the government decide who is and isn't allowed to breed (nevermind the morality of it), but I think we can do better than allowing situations like this. When a guy is on the hook for child support for multiple children with multiple mothers on welfare and his name gets put down on yet another birth certificate, a flag should be raised and someone should visit him and have a talk with him about getting a vasec… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 03:49 AM |
| 2 | "Financial abortion: Should men be able to 'opt out' of parenthood?" asks some feminist at the ABC. Surprisingly, her answer seems to be "yes."All parents are treated like adults who are obligated to provide for their offspring. Are you advocating for the elimination of a social safety net for parents who fall on hard financial times? I would never advocate for that, but it's fine if you do. But it's not fine to advocate it only for the specific situation of a woman whose boyfriend opted out of parenthood, and insisting that the woman's taxpayer funded assistance is replaced by forcing him to pay for it all without his consent. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/16 03:13 AM |
| 3 | Another story on financial abortion, by Australian women's website | Men are requesting a new type of abortion, and some women think it’s ‘fair enough.’ - mamamia.com.auIt will almost necessarily create loopholes easily exploitable for one party I agree completely So why not do the sane thing, and require that men opt in Two major issues for this one. First, the vast majority of fathers want to be fathers, so the default option being "out" will be unpopular and require extra effort and paperwork. Second, you still have some of the same issues... how long does the man have to make his decision of in or out? What if she hides the pregnancy from him until it's too… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/16 09:02 PM |
| 3 | "Financial abortion: Should men be able to 'opt out' of parenthood?" asks some feminist at the ABC. Surprisingly, her answer seems to be "yes."Is it fair to make the taxpayer bear the burden of the decisions of a kid's parents to procreate but not parent? We already do. Single people are allowed to adopt, single women can use in-vitro, and there are single mothers whose spouse has passed away. If any of them become unable to financially take care of themselves and their children, the government helps provide the basic necessities. Why should we make an exception for single women who choose to have a child but the father didn't consent?… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 10:57 PM |
| 2 | If there's going to be "Women in Business" scholarships, "Men in Nursing" doesn't seem completely out of the question.Over 80% of teachers are female, as are 92% of nurses and 98% of dental hygienists. This isn't biology alone, this is gender roles. Men are either discouraged from getting those jobs, embarrassed to try for them because "those are for women", or in the case of teachers they're sometimes actively discriminated against and treated as a threat to children and a PR risk for the school. I am not at all saying it should be 50/50 in all jobs. But there should be somewhat more women in certain male-domi… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 09:29 AM |
| 2 | If there's going to be "Women in Business" scholarships, "Men in Nursing" doesn't seem completely out of the question.I disagree. In a perfect world, both would be wrong. But there's an argument to be made in favor of both of them... women are underrepresented in business and men are underrepresented in nursing, both because of the dumb idea that certain jobs are for certain genders. By providing these scholarships and achieving a more reasonable gender balance in those careers, that dumb idea will be wiped out and then the scholarships can be removed. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 08:22 AM |
| 6 | If there's going to be "Women in Business" scholarships, "Men in Nursing" doesn't seem completely out of the question.Can't wait for the complaints of "men are taking OUR jobs". | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 08:19 AM |
| 2 | This is a perfect example of the double standard.Good to see that the majority of them are supporting gender equality in there. One person opposed equal responsibility for women, and the response was Interesting, so everyone is equal until it's time to defend the country, then it's the duty of white men to protect you. and this response was upvoted. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 08:17 AM |
| 7 | Australian feminist supports "financial abortion" for unwilling fathers.If you want to see what most feminists think of the idea, go to her Facebook page. "what if he's rich? If he is then it's a hell of a lot better to be supported by him than the government." About what I expected. That and a lot of "sex is consent to parenthood, but only for men". Though it was nice to see there were a handful of people supporting the author's position as well. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 04:54 AM |
| 9 | "Financial abortion: Should men be able to 'opt out' of parenthood?" asks some feminist at the ABC. Surprisingly, her answer seems to be "yes.""if need be. " She's not saying the government is supposed to providing for your family, she's saying it's there to provide help if needed (which will hopefully be uncommon). And the government actually is there to provide a social safety net for people who fall on hard financial times. And her point is that it is far more fair and reasonable to have the taxpayer bear the burden of providing for someone in need, instead of assigning that burden to someone they once had sex with. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/16 04:42 AM |
| 9 | My terms for a 'truce' with feministsStop punishing insurance fraud. People with real insurance claims might be afraid to file for them! | /r/MensRights | 01/12/16 05:15 PM |
| 1 | How do I argue against "male privelege"?I agree with people in this sub that the concept of male privilege is so mis-used and abused that it's rarely worth discussing with a feminist. These days it's used more often just to say "shut up because you're male and we don't want to hear what men have to say" and "everything is your fault because penis", than it is used to discuss actual privilege. You're wasting your time arguing with hateful people like that, you might as well try to convince the KKK that racism is bad. But if you think y… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/16 02:50 AM |
| 6 | Anon nails it!I don't degrade anyone else's beliefs for being different from mine. I do degrade them if they are immoral beliefs no matter what country you are in. All countries have a lot of pleasant and unique cultural beliefs and traditions. But I will judge and look down on countries where homosexuals are commonly murdered, countries where people who criticize the government are imprisoned or killed, and countries where women are punished by the law if they are the victim of rape. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 04:26 AM |
| 6 | Anon nails it!Skin color is nothing to be proud of, I agree. But I am proud of my nationality. America is a great country that provides some of the best quality of life and best opportunities out of anywhere in the world. (Germany is also a great country worth being proud of). I am glad to have been born in America and proud to be a part of a nation that is very just and fair to its people. I'm proud to be part of a culture that has freedom of speech and freedom of the press. I like being part of a country wh… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/16 03:26 AM |
| 2 | Better check your privilege assbagsLGBT centers aren't segregation. Segregation would be LGBT-only colleges, or LGBT-only dorms. They're usually just a few rooms in one building where they hold meetings every once in a while, and these groups are treated similarly to any other student organization or club. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/16 02:21 AM |
| 2 | Better check your privilege assbagsThis is all true... but note that the Tumblr post wasn't about individuals. It was about things existing for minority groups, like BET, that broadcasts content that wouldn't otherwise be found anywhere. I have to admit that this Tumblr post actually isn't full of utter bullshit like most of them are. There's no need for a white-focused TV network, because there's white-friendly content on most channels. Whites are in first place there. There's no demand for men-only gyms because men don't care. … | /r/MensRights | 26/11/16 07:15 PM |
| 4 | Talking about banning people from conferences for wrongthink - "I have a friend with MRA views who keeps them to himself, is that ok?" "No, I want to feel safe, ban him"I recently had a discussion with a couple of "TERFs" and they were far more reasonable than I thought. I was embarrassed that I bought into the bullshit that TERFs are just even-worse feminists that irrationally hate trans people.... because the same kind of bullshit is spread around about MRAs, and people believe it instead of talking to MRAs themselves. TERFs are opposed to SJW nonsense and hate that they can't speak their opinions without being accused of hate speech and sexism. They hate whi… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/16 08:18 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men also get reproductive rights?It's obviously fair to argue that government isn't the way that these places should be funded. I'm kind of a socialist by necessity. Basically "if the government is going to keep fucking us by giving favorable tax laws to billionaires and sending jobs overseas and prioritizing Wall Street profit margins over the American people... they can at least provide us with some decent social benefits." If we could go back to Reagan-era wealth inequality levels, stop outsourcing jobs, have pay rates where… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/16 03:46 AM |
| 2 | Shouldn't men also get reproductive rights?(look it up, it ain't pretty) yeah, no doubt about that. I don't want abortion to be illegal Well um... doesn't that mean that you're pro choice then? One of the two choices is "I would choose not to have an abortion", or "I would want my wife or girlfriend to have the child and not abort it". But by not making it illegal, you're allowing other people to choose differently if they feel it's right for them. I certainly don't recommend abortion to anyone but I think either choice should be availab… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 09:30 PM |
| 1 | Shouldn't men also get reproductive rights?Do you mind if I ask why you're pro life? I'd love to live in a world where everyone is responsible and there's no need for abortion. I support sex ed programs and making contraception more accessible so that fewer abortions take place... abortions are a bad thing. But it's a worse thing to force someone to give up the use of their body, without their consent, for someone else's benefit. Even if that someone else is a fetus. In my view there's little difference between forcing women to stay preg… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 06:13 PM |
| 2 | Shouldn't men also get reproductive rights?Absolutely. There have been a lot of discussion in here about legal parental surrender, where a father could be allowed to opt out of parenthood. No woman can ever be forced into parenthood against her will, and the same should be true for men. The question is how to do it. Some MRAs think he should be able to opt out during the pregnancy, but that's a very messy solution. What if he can't find the mother to tell her? What if he waits until the last minute to tell her? What if she hides the preg… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/16 05:07 PM |
| 10 | Question about circumcisionIt is not an exception. No one has the right to perform cosmetic body modification on another person without their consent, and small children are unable to give legal consent. I see it no differently than you would see parents who want to cover their child in tattoos. You can't tattoo your child, regardless of whether it's part of your religion. People should get to decide for themselves if their body is going to be cosmetically altered or not. No one should get to choose for someone else. Pare… | /r/MensRights | 23/11/16 06:14 PM |
| 2 | False accusations against Brad Pitt are exposed with concrete evidenceFuck that nonsense. There are assholes and crazy people of every gender, color, and nationality. That does not mean all ____ are like that. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/16 06:47 PM |
| 10 | Put These Up Around My SchoolShouldn't be long before feminists complain that suicide isn't gendered and we should be helping to stop all suicides, not just male suicide. Then they'll go back to working on their campaigns to stop violence against women and to help encourage girls to enter tech fields. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/16 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Sexism Against Men is Rule of LandI agree with that, but we live in an imperfect world where we're forced to compromise or choose the lesser of two evils sometimes. The price of making a mistake with who we let in is too high. If a terrible person gets in and rapes a woman or beats the hell out of a gay man, it's no consolation to say "well at least we didn't discriminate". One solution would be to severely curtail all immigration from the Middle East. It wouldn't be gender-discriminatory, but it wouldn't be helping very many pe… | /r/MensRights | 15/11/16 06:04 AM |
| 1 | Hillary Supporters Still Calling Liberals Sexist!If you're a conservative Republican, right now you should be hoping for Democrats to stand their ground and not make any changes at a ll, because then Democrats would never win another major election. Left-wing infighting doesn't matter right now, because Republicans already have control of everything. Many liberals are hopeful that the infighting will result in the Democratic party clearing out the garbage and becoming much stronger in the years to come. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/16 08:37 PM |
| 3 | Hillary Supporters Still Calling Liberals Sexist!If Bernie was 60, I'd say it would be almost certain that he'd win the presidency in 2020. But he's 75 and will not be running again. The next election will depend entirely on whether Democrats fall back into the pattern of supporting corporate-funded quasi-Republicans like Hillary, or whether they support people who want to make real change like Bernie. And they'll need another charismatic candidate with a respectable past... I don't know if they'll find someone half as good as Bernie Sanders n… | /r/MensRights | 14/11/16 08:34 PM |
| 49 | CNN's Sanders Mocks Chicago Man Beaten for Trump Support: 'Poor White People'Damn, listen to the rest of her speech. "We can’t call for people to be peaceful when the rhetoric that has been used is not peaceful, when people don’t feel peaceful in their home." She's justifying the use of violence when people's feelings are hurt by opinions they don't like. Disgusting regressive bullshit. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/16 08:28 PM |
| 3 | Sexism Against Men is Rule of LandLet's not ignore the rational aspect to it as well. The concern about taking in refugees is that they might commit crimes and do harm to people. The vast majority of this activity is being done by adult males. There is no "rape game" being carried out by women, and only a tiny fraction of terrorist attacks are done by women. This is because they come from a culture where actual patriarchy exists. Women learn to shut up and follow the rules or else face the consequences, and excuses are made for … | /r/MensRights | 14/11/16 08:23 PM |
| 1 | Obesity: Poor dietary habits among men are influenced by lack of control over diet and long or unsociable working hours, in particular for men who work shift hours and/or commute long distances, who tend to have an increased reliance on convenience foods, snacking and eating out.Yeah I dunno about this one. Men worked long hours in the past too, and they didn't get fat as hell. | /r/MensRights | 14/11/16 08:13 PM |
| 3 | On Star Trek and the radical feminism of believing womenThe TNG finale had some of that. Also the one where Barclay saw images in the transporter. In all of these cases, the characters trusted the person who was making unusual claims. Not because of their gender or victimhood ranking or anything like that... but because they recognize that all of them are trained professionals, and because they are friends. They did not automatically believe the stories though. They trusted the person enough to launch a full investigation in order to find out the tru… | /r/MensRights | 13/11/16 03:38 AM |
| 1 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?That's the point. "Things would be easier if we didn't have enemies" does not mean "we should bow down to our enemies." | /r/MensRights | 09/11/16 02:53 AM |
| 0 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?No we wouldn't, because the only way that would happen is if MRAs operated within the feminist framework, admitting that "patriarchy" was the problem, and that mens problems would be solved if we put women first. Again. What? No one's advocating for that. Saying "civil rights activists in the 60s would have been better off if racist Southerners could have respected their desire for equal treatment instead of treating them like an enemy" is not implying that Martin Luther King should have bowed d… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 11:00 PM |
| 0 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?Why would you give a shit if feminists - people who hate you for being male - respect you? Because feminist lies and misinformation, and especially the way that the media automatically agrees with whatever they see, is a huge problem in the fight for equal rights for men. If feminists respected MRAs and their views instead of acting like everyone upset about fathers' rights and circumcision is the same group of people as the woman-bashing TRP members and the socially conservative male supremacis… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 10:21 PM |
| 120 | Rolling Stone's False Rape Story Will End The MagazineI want to see someone try that in a murder trial. "Yes, I shot and killed my husband while he was asleep in bed. But other women have been attacked by their husbands and needed to fight back in self-defense, so I'm going to claim that this was self-defense too!" This is more evidence of the mental poison that is identity politics. They have lost the ability to see women or men as individual human beings. All they see is Team Women and Team Men. They saw that a member of Team Women got raped, so … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 10:04 PM |
| 9 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?OP is saying that he realizes why feminists don't respect MRAs, and it's because of comments like that. And I agree. OP is asking why MRAs have a bad reputation - and this guy brings up TRP and "female sexual strategy", and then randomly accuses OP of only voting for Hillary in order to prove to women that he doesn't hate them. What a load of shit. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 09:55 PM |
| 10 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?There are a lot of liberals in this sub (including myself). But first, even liberals are having a hard time really supporting Clinton for president, it's just that Trump would be slightly worse, maybe. Second, Clinton has said some pretty frustrating things for MRAs to hear. She said women are the primary victims of war, because they lose their husbands and brothers. She said that being a woman is one of the reasons that she should be president, as if vagina ownership is as important as the actu… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 09:50 PM |
| 2 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?I don't think anyone here is arguing with your opinions, just the semantics. In this sub when people say "feminism" they mean modern third wave feminism that only cares about scoring victimhood points and cares nothing about equality. You are taking the effort to divide the two groups into feminism (the good ones) and "neofeminism" (the female supremacists), and maybe it's a good idea to use two different terms to identify the two very different types of people calling themselves "feminist". But… | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 09:38 PM |
| 8 | why do we keep being thrown in with redpillers and the_donald?Some MRAs believe that the original feminists also wanted the benefits of equal rights while still maintaining the benefits of not having equal responsibilities (such as only men being employed while women could be housewives). I don't agree with that viewpoint at all, and I think feminism was certainly originally about equality. But as feminism achieved most of its goals, many of the equality-minded people stopped participating because there was no need to anymore. It is a relatively new thing … | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 09:33 PM |
| 9 | What changes would it take to kill the MRM?I think it's inevitable. When the issues are solved the majority of men in the MRM will stop bothering to be a part of it. The only people left will be self-centered whiners (there are some in every group) who still feel victimized and cheated whenever things don't go their way. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/16 02:29 AM |
| 2 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Is it OK that I think Harvard should have higher standards than other schools? If you go to Harvard and you're publishing all of this stuff online where any member of the public might be able to find it, you're not bright enough to deserve to be at Harvard. I'm sure there are some very family-friendly public figures who have some odd sexual fetishes or other things that would ruin their public reputation. These Harvard kids need to learn the lesson that you don't put your private personal shit o… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 12:54 AM |
| 31 | These comments on Zarna Joshi's YouCaring fund raiser are absolutely hilarious.Hugh Mungus what? Hugh Mungus how many? | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 06:26 AM |
| 6 | Looks like not all feminists want equal everything only what's convenient for them.it's not like the leading presidential candidate wants war with Russia or anything | /r/MensRights | 29/10/16 07:15 PM |
| 0 | Posted by a young lady with a fitness IG. I wonder how she would feel if roles were reversed. This, ladies and gentlemen, is called rape.The joke wouldn't make sense if reversed, since it plays on the expectation that women can't overpower men. There's no expectation that men can't overpower women. Anyway, the joke is fine and it does not benefit the MRM to moan and complain about something written purely for comedy. The image creator is not actually advocating rape or anything. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/16 04:33 AM |
| 1 | The elephant in the room: election reveals massive gender divideThe US coasts are as far apart as Texas and Colombia are. Or Ireland and Syria. Or South Sudan and India. Or if you just want to talk about the central US vs the coast, there's Switzerland and Libya, or Japan and North Korea. The US is a big ass place, and sharing the same language and TV shows only makes us so much alike. I think the rich hipster kids in San Francisco just might be voting for different reasons than the rancher in Montana, the truck driver in Tennessee, or the investment banker … | /r/MensRights | 26/10/16 04:03 AM |
| 2 | The elephant in the room: election reveals massive gender divideIf you ever bothered to read further into the issue, you'd know that the more variables you have, the harder it is to make an accurate prediction. You had 17 - 22 candidates running at the beginning of the GOP primary, and that prediction was made before the first GOP debate. Of course it's hard to be accurate that early, especially with so many variables. But at the time, the polls showed Trump 23%, Bush 13%, Walker 11%, Rubio 5%. It is the exact opposite of a fairly decent estimate if your odd… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/16 07:55 AM |
| 3 | The elephant in the room: election reveals massive gender divideI have no reason to believe he won't be again this time around. There is one reason - he gave Trump a 2% chance to win the Republican nomination. But that estimate was based on the idea that the early polls are inaccurate and that most of the Republican voters would stick to a Republican establishment candidate and wouldn't get aboard the Trump Train. His current estimates are based on poll numbers alone, so they're much more accurate. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/16 10:43 PM |
| 1 | The elephant in the room: election reveals massive gender divideGee, it's almost like people in different parts of the world have different political views. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/16 10:40 PM |
| 0 | The elephant in the room: election reveals massive gender divideI'm voting for a woman to be the President. I want to see the first female leader of the United States. Stein 2016. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/16 10:39 PM |
| 6 | If a woman wants a baby from you, she is free to have it.Reminds me of "we're going to build a wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it". | /r/MensRights | 23/10/16 09:57 AM |
| 2 | Girl attacks boy. Boy defends himself. Boy is ridiculed on Social Media for putting hands on a girl.Pretty unlikely that someone with the mentality of a child throwing a tantrum is going to think that quickly in a situation like that. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/16 09:26 AM |
| 6 | Father rescues his son from an infant male genital mutilation party in Israel. Refuses to have him circumcised. Media says he "kidnapped" his own child.There's always gotta be one of you in each discussion on circumcision. Always someone who wants to make excuses for cutting other people's genitals instead of letting people decide for themselves. Ever stop and think about your own position? Why is cutting people's genitals without consent not a big deal and something not to be cared about? Why is someone strange and "damaged goods" if they take the position of insisting that everyone should choose for themselves whether to have their genitals m… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/16 01:14 AM |
| 3 | Local PA School admission statisticsA bright spot indeed. It's almost completely (genetically) cleansed! | /r/MensRights | 19/10/16 01:08 AM |
| 2 | "Eco Femenism"She's a lost cause. Ignore her bullshit and just try to get a good grade in the class. Check out some of these charts. There is a clear correlation between the divorce rate in Maine and the US consumption of margarine. Your teacher is about as sensible as someone who fights for family values by passing around a petition to gain support to ban margarine in order to keep families intact. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/16 01:06 AM |
| 4 | 9th Grade P.E. Teacher shows favoritism for female classmatesI have never heard of anyone receiving grades in school based on their athletic ability. OP, what kind of school is this? Now, we did have things like what is now called the President's Challenge, where students try to reach certain goals (such as running a mile in 7:30, or doing a certain number of pullups). It only makes sense to have different standards for males and females, as we have significantly different body types with different innate athletic ability. It wouldn't make sense to have a… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/16 01:01 AM |
| 1 | How working retail transformed this college girl into an anti-feminist.Treated like children? Yes. Women sometimes aren't held responsible for their actions in the same way that adult men are. They're given a pass, much as children are. Would a father be attacked for reprimanding a child who was flipping out and screaming in a shop? No, he would not. I think I committed a cardinal sin in that post by using the words "agree with feminists", I think some downvoters didn't read past that part, lol. The fact that misogyny can lead to problems for men certainly doesn't … | /r/MensRights | 19/10/16 12:38 AM |
| 1 | Why is 'boy' and 'masculine' associated with 'bad' and 'war'? This is in the main hallway of my high school.I don't want to sink to their level. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 07:38 AM |
| 1 | Millions of Men Are Missing From the Job Market4 or 5 toe amputations, I'm guessing | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:27 AM |
| 3 | Millions of Men Are Missing From the Job MarketThe fact that there are a lot of idiots and addicts making bad decisions doesn't mean that all people who take painkillers regularly are idiots or addicts. I'm sorry that this situation happened to you and it's a damn shame and an embarrassment to this country that there isn't better treatment available to those who served in the military. Vets deserve top notch medical care, but instead are getting treated like they're a nuisance and a drain on resources. Meanwhile Congress is still funding bil… | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:25 AM |
| 2 | Millions of Men Are Missing From the Job MarketIt's OK though. If you ignore all of the men who are out of work, we're at 100% employment! | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:15 AM |
| 3 | Why is 'boy' and 'masculine' associated with 'bad' and 'war'? This is in the main hallway of my high school.Oh, and dishonor isn't the opposite of respect. Playing devil's advocate... I'd say it's close enough. Respect is something that has to be earned, but being respectful to those who deserve respect is something that's generally considered the right thing to do. Someone who refuses to show respect to others would be viewed poorly, and "dishonorable" is a close enough word to describe them. Not that this matters of course. Just arguing semantics over a piece of hate speech. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:14 AM |
| 1 | Why is 'boy' and 'masculine' associated with 'bad' and 'war'? This is in the main hallway of my high school.I'm surprised they didn't broadcast their cluelessness by putting up white....black. Haha, I wonder. Did they begin to do that, but then realize how racist that would look? Or perhaps did they consider putting "black" on the white side? | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:12 AM |
| 2 | Why is 'boy' and 'masculine' associated with 'bad' and 'war'? This is in the main hallway of my high school.I completely disagree with ripping it off the wall. It should be protested against using proper channels, and we don't need any more people believing the proper response to seeing a poster you don't like is to destroy it. There are already far too many people like that. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:11 AM |
| 12 | Why is 'boy' and 'masculine' associated with 'bad' and 'war'? This is in the main hallway of my high school.That thing is blatant hate speech. While I agree with you on the idea of "let art be art", I'm still not sure if the hallway of a public school is a place where art like this ought to be displayed. And you can bet your bottom dollar that some Muslim-bashing or feminist-bashing art would never be tolerated in those hallways, by either the students or the administration. | /r/MensRights | 18/10/16 03:08 AM |
| 1 | How working retail transformed this college girl into an anti-feminist.What part is twisted? And who said women act like children because of men? I think you may have misread something. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/16 03:26 AM |
| 0 | How working retail transformed this college girl into an anti-feminist.Would you call it misandry if men were banned from taking care of children? Do you call it misandry when colleges use the standard of "guilty until proven innocent" when investigating a rape claim, or when feminist groups teach female students to fear men because many of them are dangerous rapists? Any one of those groups would argue "look, we don't hate men, we just think they're unable to understand things like consent and they're too weak-willed and immoral to control their sexual urges." So … | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 07:01 AM |
| 3 | ...wherein a die-hard feminist vomits red pills everywhere...I can only say that we have different opinions. I think that love exists and there's more to life than getting laid, and that there isn't something wrong with you if you want a lasting monogamous relationship spending your life trying to fuck as many girls as possible. That doesn't mean that men who want a relationship should lower themselves to getting trampled by manipulative women, or that they should tolerate marriage to a wife that cheats, or raise some other man's son if he doesn't want to… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 06:49 AM |
| 5 | ...wherein a die-hard feminist vomits red pills everywhere...It's a shame because "The Red Pill" is so commonly associated with the TRP subreddit, which has nothing to do with men's rights or gender equality. That place has the mindset of "equality will never happen, things will always be unfair and it isn't fixable... so let's focus our time and effort on how to get laid by as many hot girls as possible instead of caring about social issues". They treat sex as a prize to be won, and share strategies on how to play mind games on women to make her more att… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 04:25 AM |
| -1 | How working retail transformed this college girl into an anti-feminist.The modern use of the word is not about angry, bitter hatred for women and the desire to see bad things happen to them. I think the definition of misogyny includes that, but also includes disregard for women and apathy towards their problems. Treating women like they're inferior to men, and not smart enough or mature enough to handle themselves like adults, falls under that umbrella. The fact that it has a side effect of giving special treatment to certain shitty women doesn't change the fact th… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 04:17 AM |
| -2 | How working retail transformed this college girl into an anti-feminist.This is one of the few situations where I agree with feminists that misogyny is part of what's causing men's problems. The public doesn't always view women as fully capable adults who are responsible for their actions. At times they treat women like children, making excuses for a temper tantrum like that, or thinking that someone else is responsible for making her act like that. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 01:18 AM |
| 6 | [Trend] Women physically dominating men?I think this trend has been happening since the 90s, and has just been slowly progressing. It's actually not entirely bad, though some of it is stupid. Many TV writers have stopped assigning personality traits to their characters based on gender, and this overall is a positive thing. The heroes don't necessarily have to be the men, and the secretaries/kidnapping victims/etc. don't have to always be women. It's good to have more female characters in charge of investigative teams, or sharing in th… | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 01:14 AM |
| 57 | TIL the first female carrier-based fighter pilot in the U.S. Navy died just months after she was certified for combat because instructors overlooked her poor performance in training so they could beat the Air Force to having the first female fighter pilot.Physics are oppressive that way. Is that actually the argument that these people are trying to make? I assumed they were some kind of religious group that believes in faith healing and voodoo or something. Were they actually trying to argue that science is racist because it gave so many important discoveries to white men and barely gives any to Africans anymore? | /r/MensRights | 16/10/16 12:41 AM |
| 9 | The South Park Boys are standing up for Men's Rights #WeinersOutI don't think it's a parody of the MRM, it's a parody of feminism and "Free the Nipple". South Park often mocks things by reversing the situation, like when Native Americans tried to take the land away from the South Park townspeople using disease-ridden blankets, or when Canada built a wall to keep Americans out. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/16 06:44 AM |
| 10 | I just started a Men's Rights club at my high school. Any suggestions?Sounds like you kind of know what to do already if you're organized things like a scouting group before. I wish I could offer you more useful advice... you might consider looking into how other similar groups are being run, and copy some of their ideas. The bake sale sounds like a tried and true option to include for the group. You're right to be wary of doing anything perceived as aggressive... make sure to keep the feminist-bashing to a minimum and focus on the men's issues themselves. I have … | /r/MensRights | 13/10/16 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Hero or bully? Male McDonald's customer pours his drink over woman who was 'fat shaming' another man waiting to orderWhen the "act of violence" is something so tame and harmless as liquid poured on someone's head, and when the speech is so blatantly a case of hateful unwarranted bullying, and when the offending person has proven to be unresponsive when being told to stop it... yes, I think this response was perfectly appropriate. I would not have done that to her personally. But I agree with the idea that assholes need to face consequences for their shitty actions, so that they are incentivized to stop acting … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/16 08:04 AM |
| 5 | Southpark subtly joining in with Portlandia to lampoon MR. it's getting spooky in hereYeah, this is what they always do. They had Native Americans come in and try to take the land away from the peaceful South Park townspeople, including handing out blankets covered with disease to make everyone sick. They had Canada build a wall to keep Americans out. If they mock a group directly there's a lot of butthurt and crying, so instead they mock the bad ideas and bad tactics used by that group but have a different group employing them. It also points out clearly how stupid and laughable… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/16 04:21 PM |
| 2 | Men’s Rights Activists Finally Have Their Own Righteous Rock Anthem Thanks To ‘Portlandia’https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RinjWQQ-8s | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 04:48 AM |
| 4 | Men’s Rights Activists Finally Have Their Own Righteous Rock Anthem Thanks To ‘Portlandia’Kinda sucks that they had to include the line about MRAs wanting to return to the past where men had all the political power. MRAs want equality, and it's not like men in the past had reproductive rights, weren't shamed for being gay, or had fewer responsibilities (not too many women fighting for the right to join the frontlines in 1943 or 1970). At the most you might see someone say "at least back then women weren't advantaged over men" but I sure as hell don't want to go back to the past. It's… | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 04:47 AM |
| 3 | if it was a white man, feminists would be going insane right nowIt's about Muslims treating her like trash that they can't be next to, and the airlines supporting this behavior. Maybe this will make it clearer. How would you feel if a white man complained "I don't want to sit next to any black people" and the airline made black people change their seats to accommodate him? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 05:22 PM |
| 1 | I got called "entitled" and pretty much told to shut up for being a white male when explaining why MGM is an issueIt isn't illegal in our eyes, but we work to discourage people from doing it. Doctors actively try to persuade parents to not do it to their infants. That's really good to hear. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 02:05 PM |
| 1 | I got called "entitled" and pretty much told to shut up for being a white male when explaining why MGM is an issueA man's right to circumcise his daughter would be the appropriate analogy. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 02:05 PM |
| 5 | What could possibly go wrong with an Oceans 11 Female-Only Reboot?Her top two songs on Youtube are "My Vag" and "Queef". Women are funny, guys. Get over it. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/16 02:45 AM |
| 7 | KU bars gorillas from jungle-theme decoration due to 'masculine image'too many dicks out for Harambe, it's a real crisis | /r/MensRights | 26/09/16 11:11 PM |
| 12 | Tokyo restaurant refuses service to all-male groups of customersNo one claimed they give a shit, and no one is contacting them to make them change their rules. But this is another example of society heading down the path of treating men like second class citizens. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/16 08:46 PM |
| 14 | I'm Tired of Being Ashamed of My MicropenisYeah... it definitely is rough for that guy, but I think he's got to be upfront about it. In a way it's like a physical disability. He needs to tell the woman something like "look, this is how it is, I was born like this, but I want to do everything possible for us to enjoy sex together. There's oral sex, or we can use sex toys, or whatever you think would work best." He's right about how unfair it is that society mocks people who were born a certain way. It's not like anyone chose to have a mic… | /r/MensRights | 24/09/16 06:31 PM |
| 8 | "For those who don't believe rape culture exists, psychology professor Ryan McKelley used a sports analogy. He said that merchandise celebrating the Green Bay Packers is evidence of a sports culture. Likewise, pornography and consumer goods that promote sexist messages are evidence of rape culture.""Women's choices that I don't agree with = rape. Sex is terrible and everyone should be afraid of it like I am" | /r/MensRights | 24/09/16 06:20 PM |
| 3 | Emma Watson launches initiative to stop campus sexual assaultEveryone remembers the best actors/music/movies/TV from the past, and forgets all of the junk that existed then. Who knows which of today's young stars will be the ones people look back to in 20 years, but there are a lot more than those three. Emma Stone, Saoirse Ronan, Emilia Clarke, and a lot more. And I happen to think Jennifer Lawrence is really good... just not deserving of the completely unrelenting hype and praise that was dumped everywhere constantly when she first appeared. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 12:17 PM |
| 4 | Emma Watson launches initiative to stop campus sexual assaultDisney hired her for the starring role in the live action remake of Beauty and the Beast, which they're sinking tons of money into. She's a decent enough actor. I think movie studios overestimated her star power and hope her name alone could sell movies, and her follow up movies after Harry Potter struggled to make their money back. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 11:27 AM |
| 4 | Emma Watson launches initiative to stop campus sexual assaultShe has $70 million, I think she'll be fine. That Harry Potter money is no joke. Rupert Grint got $50 million and Daniel Radcliffe got over $100m. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/16 11:25 AM |
| 3 | Feminists have already begun defending the 'Bowl of M&M's' analogy and declaring it different "for reasons" to the refugee 'Bowl of Skittles' analogyAlso, what about the fact that we're supposed to be judging these refugees? I don't want any innocent people to die, but there are only so many refugees we can take in. We have a duty to our citizens to make sure the Syrian refugees we do accept are not a group of people who are 50% not from Syria, 80% males in their 20s, with the majority of them holding the opinion that the proper course of action when discovering a homosexual person is to attack them. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 04:08 PM |
| 1 | Naturally, it's outrageous when he says it: Donald Trump Jr.’s Skittles Comparison Used to Be a Feminist MemeIt also depends on what your response to the metaphor is. The M&M poster is right - there are some men who are evil and will commit rape if given an opportunity. It is true that women don't know which men are the decent humans and which ones are the monsters. So how do you react to that situation? If you're reasonable, it's something like "don't trust anyone too much until they prove themselves trustworthy, don't put yourself in high risk situations, if a man is acting strange around you and it … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 05:12 AM |
| 0 | Naturally, it's outrageous when he says it: Donald Trump Jr.’s Skittles Comparison Used to Be a Feminist Memethat was actually a pretty good joke, one of the few good ones Colbert has had lately | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 04:41 AM |
| 3 | Naturally, it's outrageous when he says it: Donald Trump Jr.’s Skittles Comparison Used to Be a Feminist Memeyou racist | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 04:40 AM |
| 1 | I’m Sick of Having to Reassure Men That Feminism Isn’t About Hating Them: " Marginalized groups have to answer for every single one of their members when straight, white men get away with mass-murder unscathed." How reassuring.If I was going to respond to the woman in OP's article, I'd go with something that connects with her on a more personal level. Something like "Republicans have no interest in shutting down abortion clinics." | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 04:37 AM |
| 0 | "Me [31M] with my wife [32F], poly couple, we were preparing to start trying for kids, she's now pregnant for her boyfriend"This has nothing to do with men's rights. They chose a certain lifestyle, and that's one of the risks that can go along with it. If she values their relationship, hopefully she'll get an abortion and have a child with her husband later. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 02:42 AM |
| 4 | » Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Addicted BoysI don't think this has anything to do with men's rights, or gender equality issues of any kind. This article is just discussing the impact that widely available porn is having on modern society. 100 years ago and earlier, a lot of men never saw a naked woman until they were married. 30 years ago, porn existed but teenagers had limited access to it. You might catch a quick scene with a topless woman in a movie, or maybe one guy's cousin gave him some Playboys and they got passed around to his fri… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/16 02:40 AM |
| 9 | AskReddit is ABSOLUTELY NOT OKAY with the idea of a man not having to be involved with a child he did not want to have.if someone says "One parent shouldn't have to pay if they don't want to", they're advocating for a child to go starving instead. Because all children of single parents starve to death? Men should be able to opt out of parenthood. The cleanest way legally is to use a contract that functions like a prenup... the man declares his intent to remain child free, if the woman signs it she accepts 100% rights and responsibility if any accidental pregnancy should take place. If she gets pregnant, it's 100… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 07:51 PM |
| 3 | Huffington Post: In Defense of Gold DiggersNope. She married and divorced a rich guy, is enjoying steady alimony payments, and is complaining that she's unable to date an average-income man because if they got married, his income couldn't support her and her kids as well as her current alimony checks can. She does not work, and has never worked. She complains that her husband was a workaholic and never lent a hand at home. And now she thinks it's unfair that she has to limit herself to only dating rich men - few of whom are looking for s… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 08:56 AM |
| 2 | "Poverty is sexist." Justin Trudeau - PM of CanadaCouldn't agree more. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 03:58 PM |
| 1 | "Poverty is sexist." Justin Trudeau - PM of CanadaThis is actually not the dumbest thing he's said. While poverty itself isn't sexist (it isn't a living thing), our human reactions to it can be. In third world countries, the reaction is "no one's going to help you, it's everyone out for themselves". Men go out and do what they can to take care of themselves, but women are stuck with the children and don't have as many options or as much time available to find a way to provide for herself and the kids. Women and children suffer more than men do.… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 01:16 AM |
| 1 | German school segregates boys and girls in physics class. Result: girls still aren't as interested in physics as boys are.Not everything is a social construct. Atoms aren't, and neither are any physical objects (horses, computers) or non-social actions (geology, breathing). A social construct is something where humans have decided "this is how we're going to interact with each other", like waving your hand to say goodbye to someone, or shaking hands with someone you're being introduced to. Fashion and religion are part of this too... but not everything in the world is. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 03:58 PM |
| 1 | Is the tide turning among young women, or did Gen Y have a lucky escape?that's a great story! thanks for sharing it. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 07:09 AM |
| 1 | 17-Year-Old Faces Child Porn, Assault Charges for Consensual Sex with GirlfriendEventually she played crazy and decided that she wanted to be "right with the lord" and opted for some mental counseling from a church group to get out of any charges. Smart girl. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 03:22 AM |
| 0 | German school segregates boys and girls in physics class. Result: girls still aren't as interested in physics as boys are.Well, that's pretty much it but there's more to gender than just the roles men and women are expected to play. A lot of people treat men and women differently regardless of whether they're following the roles that society expects them to play. People who are able to successfully pass themselves off as either gender have tried it and reported a world of difference in how they're treated. In sociology, the word "gender" encompasses all of that stuff. Gender roles, the differences in how people are… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 01:00 AM |
| 1 | German school segregates boys and girls in physics class. Result: girls still aren't as interested in physics as boys are."Gender is a social construct" doesn't mean there are no innate differences between males and females. It is referring to the social idea of what male is and what female is - long hair, dresses, and high heels for women and short hair, pants, and normal shoes for men. There's no reason those things have to belong to those genders in everyone's mind, it's all just a social construct that "girls are like this, men dress like that" and so on. This doesn't mean you believe that women and men are phy… | /r/MensRights | 16/09/16 10:11 PM |
| 2 | Why is it more acceptable for women to explore their sexuality?Because the majority of people think lesbian sex is hot, and gay sex is gross. Seriously, that's really what it all boils down to. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/16 10:06 PM |
| 1 | Is the tide turning among young women, or did Gen Y have a lucky escape?thanks, you too! | /r/MensRights | 16/09/16 03:10 PM |
| 3 | Is the tide turning among young women, or did Gen Y have a lucky escape?Yes the tide is turning... we are approaching peak SJW levels. SJW activity has grown and gotten in the way of so many people that the general public is starting to take notice, and they're starting to get sick of the nonsense. With every video like Hugh Mungus we're getting one step closer to being done with this plague of political correctness. Before long it will stop being so trendy to be an SJW and these people will find other hobbies. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 07:08 PM |
| 1 | ex post from r/Publicfreakout. Girl spits beer at guy for mentioning violence against menThere's nothing inherently wrong with your position on this and you are free to feel that way, but I hope you realize you're on the far end of the scale on the "nonviolent" side of things. I mean, I'm not a violent person at all, I've never been in a real fight, I hardly live in a world where violence is seen as the answer to a lot of problems. (And I'm certainly not a feminist who thinks it's OK to hit someone who has an anti-feminist opinion.) But I wouldn't lose any respect for attacking some… | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 06:28 PM |
| 2 | ex post from r/Publicfreakout. Girl spits beer at guy for mentioning violence against menSorry, but you're in the wrong place if you think that people here care more about what's socially acceptable than they care about equal treatment. And believe it or not, when men discuss men's rights it isn't done for the purpose of finding "wet pussy". | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 12:29 PM |
| 5 | ex post from r/Publicfreakout. Girl spits beer at guy for mentioning violence against menAggressively spitting in someone's face is not "tiny shit". People should not be allowed to get away with stuff like that without any consequences. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 11:58 AM |
| 1 | Amy Schumer said a thing again...Exactly. If this was an important issue that they felt desperately needs to change, they'd be doing everything possible to change people's minds and earn their sympathy. Martin Luther King gave speeches all around the country about why black people should have equal rights... he didn't sit there and wait for a white person to ask about his position and then say "it's not my job to explain it to you, go research it yourself". | /r/MensRights | 08/09/16 11:05 PM |
| 2 | Mum convinces husband to Pay £6,000 for Boob Job Then Dumps HimYes, because I don't watch Entertainment Tonight or other shows that investigate the personal lives of celebrities. I know about Stephanie's because they made it part of the show. Maybe half the actresses in Hollywood have had theirs done but I don't keep track of that shit. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/16 11:01 PM |
| 5 | Mum convinces husband to Pay £6,000 for Boob Job Then Dumps HimI can see how that could be common. Who is she trying to impress by getting a boob job? In cases like hers, it's because she wants more public attention... and it sounds like she got the attention she was after, from men who aren't her husband. Though obviously there are plenty of married couples who turn out fine afterwards. One of the only famous people who I know had a boob job was Stephanie McMahon, and she's still happily married many years later. Her situation is a little different though,… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/16 09:02 PM |
| 2 | Amy Schumer said a thing again...So let's get this straight. Amy recognizes that the word "feminist" means different things to different people. She understands that a lot of people want nothing to do with the label because they think it means something other than equality. Her reaction to this is not to ask why they have a negative view of feminism. She doesn't even view them as misinformed people who just need to have the "right" definition of feminism explained to them. Nope - everyone who doesn't label themselves the same w… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/16 08:48 PM |
| 3 | "How common sense shows gender pay gap is a myth" The mainstream media in Australia is starting to report both sides of the story.Earnings in professional sports have absolutely no relation to salaries for everyday jobs. Pro athletes are part of the entertainment industry, just like actors and singers. They are not paid based on how many hours they put in, or how long their public performance lasts. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/16 08:38 PM |
| 2 | "How common sense shows gender pay gap is a myth" The mainstream media in Australia is starting to report both sides of the story.Common sense? In the media? Only in an upside-down country like Australia. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/16 08:36 PM |
| 7 | Violent racist & homophobic attack on intactivist protesters at UC Berkeley: "You know what matters - female genital mutilation, male rights don't matter"I could be wrong but it seems to me that the whole "it looks weird" thing comes straight from TV and movies. Do any women actually think it looks weird (or any weirder than a penis already looks) to see an intact penis? I really do think that anytime a woman says "it looks weird" it's nothing more than an attempt to make a fun joke and raise her own social standing, because that's what she has seen happen on TV before. "Eww it's weird" and everyone has a good laugh. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 04:37 PM |
| 2 | According to Breitbart, control of the Internet itself will move into the hands of the UN this October. Youtube is currently getting made 'advertiser-friendly' (read; PC.) What's the future of this sub?This intrigues me. You're saying that the sub has survived precisely because it's stayed small? I believe it. FPH wasn't found guilty of breaking any rules until it became popular. The_Donald was left alone until it became popular, at which point Reddit suddenly found a need to "change the algorithms" in a way that somehow only keeps posts from that sub from reaching the front page. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/16 02:29 AM |
| 2 | political correctness?There is a time and a place for a certain level of political correctness... what is just called "professionalism" and "respectability" these days. Obviously we don't want a President who will go on TV say "those fuckin Chinks are screwing us right up the ass in these trade deals, it's time we show them who has a bigger dick". And of course it just makes sense for the leaders of a large company to be sensitive to their customers' opinions and not risk offending or excluding any of their customers… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 08:13 PM |
| 1 | New to MRA issues, wondering what the concensus is on gender roles, gender differences, and gender equality?I can't speak for the entire MRM but these are my views. Gender roles: Completely outdated idea that has no place in modern society. People should do whatever works for them and whatever makes them happy, it makes no sense to insist that things like "primary earner in the family" or "huge NFL fan" belong only to males and "primary caregiver" or "romantic comedy fan" must belong only to females. Let people do whatever they want to do as long as it doesn't hurt anyone. Gender differences: Of cours… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 07:54 PM |
| 1 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?What kind of argument are you making? That egalitarianism is a bad thing because it will be a long and difficult road to reach that goal? Black people and white people aren't physically identical, and overall they're also unequal in total wealth, social empathy, control of mass media, etc. So by your logic we should say "fuck it, might as well just have racism"? There's no point in opposing racism if the entire world doesn't instantly hop on board with that idea, right? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 06:10 PM |
| 0 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?Not really seeing how "treat everyone the same and don't discriminate in any way at all" is the same as "treat everyone the same only when it benefits women, and men are evil dangerous criminals who are magically responsible for every shortcoming in a woman's life". You don't seem to understand that if it is treating men as second class citizens, it is not egalitarianism, it is something else (like feminism). You might as well argue against the concept of free speech is worthless because some co… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 03:21 PM |
| 2 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsyou mad about something? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 03:18 PM |
| 13 | Lena Dunham is saying sorry to Odell Beckham Jr. after facing criticism for reverse-sexist, racist commentsit's hard not to feel like a sack of flaming garbage Interesting... Lena let down her guard and let some actual truth out about how she feels about herself. If I could give Lena some advice... I'd tell her that it's a lot easier to not feel like garbage if you take better care of yourself physically and mentally. Hire a personal trainer and get on a diet and exercise plan... you don't need to become a fitness model, just a more fit version of yourself is enough to make you feel good. Then see a … | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 01:23 AM |
| 0 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?I don't give a shit what it's claimed goal is much like I don't give a shit what feminism's claimed goal is. This is the correct stance to take. What I care about is their actions and the expected outcomes of their actions. And the expected outcome of arguing for equality between men and women before the social value of each is equalize is the creation of a system where women are above men. There isn't much of an organized egalitarian movement. It's just the general idea that everyone should be … | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 01:12 AM |
| 2 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?Just because the candidate you voted for doesn't win doesn't necessarily mean you "wasted" your vote. That's not what I'm saying. I'm talking about how people are afraid to vote third party because of the expectation that only a Republican or Democrat will win. Suppose half of the Democrats would be willing to vote for Gary Johnson... but they don't dare to do it, out of fear it will divide the vote and help Trump win. And half of the Republicans might vote Johnson, except they don't dare risk h… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/16 01:04 AM |
| 1 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?I wish I could vote for a human embodiment of /r/The_Donald... in other words, a flawless version of Trump. Unfortunately, the actual Trump is ignorant about so many things, and constantly lies to cover up any mistakes he has made or to distract people from noticing he's unable to discuss a topic he knows nothing about. He lies like an elementary school kid who's trying to impress all of his classmates. Of course, Hillary lies just as much, though not in such a childish way. But Hillary is a kno… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 01:12 PM |
| 0 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?In our current broken voting system, only 2 candidates are viable and voting for someone else just wastes your vote. This nonsense will never end until we change to an instant runoff voting system where your vote is not wasted if you prefer a third party candidate. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 01:01 PM |
| 2 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?That's not what egalitarian means. When all people are treated equally, no one gets special favors or has less responsibility. It isn't just about equal legal rights. Your argument is like saying "I oppose ending racial discrimination, because if no one discriminates against black people but they keep getting benefits like affirmative action and black-only scholarships, it won't be fair to everyone." But racial discrimination includes those things that were put in place to try to balance the sca… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 12:59 PM |
| 3 | MRAs, what common MRA point/argument do you disagree with, and why?I've seen a couple of those ideas, they're usually downvoted. There are a handful of MRAs who seem to support gender roles and the gender discrimination that accompanies it, apparently just to be on the opposite side from the SJWs. And I have seen someone argue that as long as men don't have reproductive rights, then women shouldn't either (and should require a man's permission to get an abortion). Obviously this is a terrible way to argue for legal parental surrender. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 12:54 PM |
| 2 | Almost got creep shamed for hanging out with my brother's 5 year old daughter in a public parkIt's also the far left SJW mentality of "all men are dangerous rapists who could strike at any time". This is another example of horseshoe theory, where you can't tell the far left apart from the far right. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 12:47 PM |
| 2126 | York U gender neutral toilet... except..."I identify as someone who needs to take a dump." | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 12:44 PM |
| 2 | How and why is this radical new SJW feminism happening?It feels good to blame all of your failures and shortcomings on others. It's not your fault that you aren't good at math and science, it was the Patriarchy that somehow prevented you from learning! It's not your fault that you work at Subway and your gender studies degree it's worthless! If you were a man you would be hugely success in life, but you're not because the world is oppressing you! Modern feminism is just one category of the SJW pity party. On Tumblr, everyone blames their lack of suc… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/16 08:22 PM |
| 7 | TIL a 1993 Kansas Court case set the precedent that any man is liable to pay child support even if he was raped/forced to impregnateSuppose I'm a single mother with a child, and somehow I managed to get the government to decide that you personally are now required to pay me $1000 per month for the next 18 years. Would you object to this? Hey, the money is for the child, right? That means you shouldn't have any objection to sending me a check every month, right? Somehow I suspect you'll say "I never chose to become the father of that child, so I shouldn't have to pay for it". Am I right? I bet YOU wouldn't want to have to pay… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 03:54 PM |
| 8 | Why do women wear high heels and other impractical clothes? To show that they don't have to work, thought Thorstein Veblain in the 19th century.I happened to read an article about this a while back, and basically the answer is yes. The first high heels were worn by men because they were useful - they were worn to give help a man on horseback to brace himself while shooting a bow and arrow. But after a while they were a fashion statement for royalty and other wealthy men. The peasants had to wear regular shoes so they could do all of their farm work, only a rich man could wear fancy shoes that are hard to walk in, because he didn't need … | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 03:44 PM |
| 10 | Questions about Men's Rights and feminism - from a man.IMHO, the battlefield isn't so much constitutional rights anymore (in the first world, and excepting issues like RTL/prochoice), it's always been and definitely continues to be how we view each other, how we value each other. This is basically true... but it's worth noting that there are no legal rights that men have and women don't. All of the legal disparities belong to men - the right to vote without registering for selective service, the right to choose not to be a parent, the right to be tr… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/16 01:59 PM |
| 7 | Can anyone explain to me why the US Olympic team had 61% women instead of a 50/50 split?Almost always? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/16 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Can anyone explain to me why the US Olympic team had 61% women instead of a 50/50 split?Oh, I should have realized that would be the reason for them to bring up a news story that isn't about women being the victim of something. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/16 10:46 PM |
| 25 | Can anyone explain to me why the US Olympic team had 61% women instead of a 50/50 split?US women are more competitive on the world stage than the US men are. This is because most countries take men's sports seriously and fund it well, but many of them don't do the same for women's sports. The US women are facing an overall weaker field of opponents, so they qualify for more events and win more medals. This is actually something American feminists should be proud about. It demonstrates that the US is #1 when it comes to equal opportunity in sports. TBH I'm a little surprised they wo… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/16 10:43 PM |
| 0 | Apologists argue that the lopsided coverage of female Olympic events by NBC is "smart" since women are better athletes - oh, and also the result of Title IX activismThe number of medals earned per sex is irrelevant. It's extremely relevant. All over the world, people want to watch athletes from their own country doing well and winning medals. Every country's TV coverage puts a special focus on the events in which their own athletes do well. Do you think that if the men earned more medals we would have seen less women’s events than men’s this year? Yes, I am saying exactly that. Men make up half the viewing audience and they are not the slightest bit interes… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 04:52 PM |
| 4 | Apologists argue that the lopsided coverage of female Olympic events by NBC is "smart" since women are better athletes - oh, and also the result of Title IX activismDon't underestimate how much people like looking at the male athletes. There's been plenty of coverage of men's diving and gymnastics as well. The main reason women are getting more coverage is that they're winning more often than the men, due to many countries not having any serious female athletes while most of their male athletes are serious competitors. But it's still definitely true that looking at attractive women is a factor. Women's beach volleyball gets a whole lot of TV time... women's… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 09:28 AM |
| 10 | Apologists argue that the lopsided coverage of female Olympic events by NBC is "smart" since women are better athletes - oh, and also the result of Title IX activismYou're missing the point. Every country's TV coverage focuses on its own athletes, especially in events where they're expected to do well and win medals. The US women are much better athletes in relation to their competition than the US men are. This is because in much of the world, women's sports are not taken seriously and not funded well. The US men are up against the entire world... the US women are up against a much softer field of opponents where only a few of them are world class athletes… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 09:23 AM |
| 2 | SJW: Just because Bill Clinton is a rapist doesn't make him a bad feministIt's mostly because Clinton agrees with them and is on their side. Everything is forgiven or ignored, if you're someone with some power/influence who can help the SJWs get what they want. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 09:11 AM |
| 3 | Three things that need to happen before I defend men from Olympic sexismWhen sexualised analysis of men’s bodies begins to obscure men’s achievements and negatively affect their careers. Who has this happened to? Which of the female athletes have had their achievements overlooked or their career harmed? When the objectification of men’s bodies begins to make their lives unsafe. Which athletes lives are unsafe? Who is in danger? When I hear men bring up their own objectification as anything other than a disingenuous attempt to undermine women advocating for themselve… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/16 09:04 AM |
| 1 | Canadian Women Winning Most Olympic Medals Was Done by Strategic DesignFloyd Mayweather can't eat himself up to 6 feet tall and a fit 230 pounds... just as women can't eat and work out until they've matched the muscle mass of a man. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/16 09:29 AM |
| 0 | Canadian Women Winning Most Olympic Medals Was Done by Strategic DesignHe can't fight at heavyweight, any more than a woman can compete with men. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/16 04:19 PM |
| 6 | Canadian Women Winning Most Olympic Medals Was Done by Strategic DesignIsn't the point of gender segregation in the Olympics by it's very definition sexist? It's no more discriminatory than having weight classes in wrestling or boxing. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/16 09:16 AM |
| 5 | My mom's thoughts on this "safe space" nonsense.Professional victimhood is trendy these days, and nowhere is it more trendy than modern feminism. They'll complain until they have gender-segregated schools, and then complain about segregation until they're re-unified again, and it'll never end. The grass is always greener on the other side, in the eyes of the professional victim. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/16 03:30 AM |
| 8 | Serial domestic abuser Hope Solo accuses the Swedish football team of being "cowards" because in addition to being a horrible person, she hates it when people outplay her.I was a fan of Rousey for a while and appreciated her confidence and her refusing to respect her trash-talking opponents who have done nothing to earn her respect. When someone like Bethe Correira has never beaten a quality opponent and starts talking shit the moment the fight is announced, she deserves nothing from Rousey, and I'm glad Ronda knocked her out in seconds. But Ronda started acting like EVERY opponent was a scumbag. Holly Holm was friendly and polite, and Rousey made up some lies ab… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/16 03:27 AM |
| 0 | Serial domestic abuser Hope Solo accuses the Swedish football team of being "cowards" because in addition to being a horrible person, she hates it when people outplay her.That's not cheating... it's doing whatever is allowed within the rules to try to win the game. Just like how Sweden did by playing for the tie. Both teams played to win, and there was nothing disrespectful about anything that happened during the field. Solo's whiny complaints about the other team not playing into USA's strengths is pathetic though. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/16 03:16 AM |
| 2 | Do women have the right to get really drunk and have sex?It's crazy how widespread and well-embedded that mindset is. I've seen sex-positive feminists suddenly reverse positions and spew out a version of "don't have sex unless you're willing to pay the price if she gets pregnant". They're all about loving who you want to love, and having as many partners as you want, and living whatever kind of sex life that you want as long as everything's consensual... until a condom breaks, then it's "you did this to me, this is your fault, I'm going to make you pa… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/16 05:35 AM |
| 3 | Do women have the right to get really drunk and have sex?I would change it slightly. First, remove the free birth control one, because that idea was never about "let's give free stuff to women". It's about reducing unwanted pregnancies, which is very beneficial to both men and women. It's also cost efficient for taxpayers - would you rather pay for someone's birth control, or pay for their child? Second, change the pregnancy one to "abortion, or keep it and force the man to pay for it, her choice only". Obviously it must be the woman's choice about wh… | /r/MensRights | 10/08/16 05:28 AM |
| 8 | I'm a feminist and I just got banned from r/feminism by expressing concern over free speechI was banned from /r/askfeminists too. My crime was asking a question to feminists about a situation where men face discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 05:53 PM |
| 5 | I'm a feminist and I just got banned from r/feminism by expressing concern over free speechThe whole point of feminism is about achieving equal rights for women. This is what I used to think too, and why I used to call myself a feminist. Who wouldn't want to support equal rights? But as you've found out, if you question any feminist position (no matter how stupid or inaccurate it is) you will be attacked, insulted, and banned. If you point out any situation of inequality where men have it worse (less likely to attend college, longer prison sentences for the same crime) then you're a "… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/16 05:52 PM |
| 10 | I made this to rebut one of the dumbest & most common feminist claims: "If you believe in equality, you're a feminist". [Edited & reposted]They're not the only religion to do this. There are plenty of Christians out there who think "the bible says don't kill, don't steal, love thy neighbor, etc. and anyone who has these moral values must be a Christian". And if they hear someone say they're not a Christian, they assume "this person thinks stealing and killing and mistreating people is fine, what's wrong with them". Just like how feminists think "why would you be against equality, what's wrong with you?" when they hear someone say t… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/16 05:13 PM |
| 5 | Why all rape victims do NOT deserved to be believed.Just to respond to how you worded the title... all rape victims (as in actual victims, not just people who claim to be) do deserve to be believed, and do deserve to be supported and helped. Unfortunately we can't automatically believe everything because there exist people who will lie about this. Rape victims get treated worse than they deserve because of this. The best we can do is to offer some help and investigate the rape claim, because to automatically trust every word means to ruin the liv… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/16 05:08 PM |
| 30 | While passing out drunk, my friend (who is a girl) pulled down my pants, took a picture, and sent it to someone after I explicitly told her not to.she said that was a different situation Of course. She might as well come right out and say "Girls actually matter and their privacy is important. Guys have no value and nothing that harms them matters or anything." | /r/MensRights | 01/08/16 04:55 AM |
| 1 | AEI: Does welfare policy discourage marriage?I'm all for it | /r/MensRights | 31/07/16 03:46 PM |
| 0 | AEI: Does welfare policy discourage marriage?I'm aware there are negatives to welfare, but it's better than the alternative. Without welfare, poor people would be turn to desperate measures in order to support themselves, and loveless marriages are the least of those problems. Prostitution, theft, and other crime rises, and society spends more on law enforcement and jails than the welfare payments would have cost. You can moan about "lazy freeloaders" or whatever as much as you want, but welfare is the cheapest and most effective solution … | /r/MensRights | 31/07/16 04:56 AM |
| 0 | AEI: Does welfare policy discourage marriage?There's a time and a place for alimony as well, it just needs to be reformed. If a man chooses to be the sole provider for his family, he can't just leave his wife at age 60 and abandon her with no career, no income, and no retirement savings. Alimony just needs reform so that men aren't stuck with a monthly bill for certain situations - like if they marry a woman who suddenly decides to stop work and pursue a degree (which he pays for), then she doesn't use it and takes some low paying part tim… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/16 03:05 AM |
| 2 | AEI: Does welfare policy discourage marriage?It discourages loveless marriages out of desperation for financial support. This is a good thing. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/16 09:22 PM |
| 3 | Whoopi: 'I Can't Get Mad That The System Is Rigged Against The White Guy'Yeah, I was disappointed to hear this stuff coming from her. Sadly she's gotten sucked into the world of identity politics... Bernie being screwed out of the nomination doesn't matter because of his physical characteristics, but it would have mattered if he was black or female. Identity politics is poison to the mind. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/16 06:37 PM |
| 1 | Why most women secretly want a stereotypical breadwinner. I think it may be too late to change your mind now. No man should put up with a stay at home wife.Well, who doesn't want a spouse who brings in a lot of money, so that you can work in whatever field you want at whatever level you want without having to worry about money... or simply not work at all? It's not "most women" who would want that situation, it's "most people". | /r/MensRights | 30/07/16 02:47 AM |
| 2 | What do we think of this?It's also ignoring the specifics of these situations. Most of these drunken encounters that are later called rape are from situations where both the man and the woman had been drinking. Both of them end up doing things they might not normally do, and both of them might regret it later. But these rape-hysteria-fearmongers lie about the situation. They act like every instance of drunk sex is a case of a stone cold sober man taking advantage of a woman who is passing-out drunk and has no idea what … | /r/MensRights | 30/07/16 02:40 AM |
| 1 | Women as Pokemonagreed, this shit doesn't belong here. downvote it | /r/MensRights | 30/07/16 02:32 AM |
| 12 | Thought cry bullies would save movie now don't want Clinton associated with a bust. Sony deletes controversial tweet.The marketing team for this movie is completely abysmal. You've got a mediocre SNL quality movie with the public perception that it might be some lame forced-diversity "girl power" movie... here's a list of everything you SHOULDN'T do: Release a trailer that shows all the worst parts of the movie, focusing on the angry black stereotype and the bad special effects Mention the "all female" thing as often as possible, talk about how great it is to have more roles for women instead of talking about … | /r/MensRights | 30/07/16 02:30 AM |
| 5 | Woman made two 999 false rape call to get a lift home from the policeWhat kind of point are you even trying to make here? VanishingZero is pointing out the BS narrative that false rape accusations are incredibly rare because women supposedly have no reason to ever make one. How is it an incongruity that he didn't bother to point out that women almost always get away with false accusations, even when the accusation can be proven false and when harm has already been done to the victim of the lie? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/16 10:14 PM |
| 1 | X-post from /r/privacy. WikiLeaks Has Officially Lost the Moral High Ground | WIRED. They bash MRAs while whining about wikileaks insulting others.Thanks for the free advertising, feminists. You don't know how many men there are who have never heard of the MRM, see this MRA-bashing and go online to see just how pathetic and backwards the MRM is, and discover a pro-equality group that cares about fathers' rights and bodily integrity and the end of unequal treatment by the law. On a side note, think about how far into your religious cult you would have to be in order to throw in references to your enemies anytime you see something you dislik… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/16 10:04 PM |
| 3 | Whoopi Can't Get Mad That System Is Rigged Against Men.I'm disappointed, Whoopi has been a voice on reason on the political left for a long time. She made sure to point out violence against men is just as unacceptable as violence against women, and she didn't automatically believe the Bill Cosby accusations without any evidence, questioning why it took decades for the initial accusations to take place. But now she's been corrupted by the poison of identity politics. Bernie Sanders being screwed out of the Democratic nomination doesn't matter, becaus… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/16 11:18 PM |
| 0 | Hillary VP is Feminist-ApprovedI like Tim Kaine. It's a shame we can't throw out the top two candidates and have Kaine vs Pence. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/16 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Which countries are the best to live as a modern day man?I'd recommend trying a different part of the US. It's still the best country to live in, even despite the BS like what you had to face. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/16 08:35 PM |
| 3 | I feel that this subreddit along with some of the very small ones are the only good subs on reddit. Anyone want to change my mind?Censorship in TiA and KiA? I'm unaware of that. But yeah, Reddit's gone downhill, and most of it was inevitable. The voting system is designed to send the fluff and easily digestable content to the top (memes, etc.) and actual content that takes more than 3 seconds to read and comprehend is overlooked. SJWs control and censor a lot of subs to the point where they no longer function... for fuck's sake, the top news sub is /r/The_Donald and the discussion threads for breaking news events are poste… | /r/MensRights | 19/07/16 04:44 PM |
| 3 | Please explain this astounding reaction to the new Ghostbusters to me.However I can't for the life of me understand this reaction to a simple movie reboot. The reaction exists because of the feminist professional victimhood narrative. If this was a shitty unfunny reboot with male characters (or a mix of male and female), none of this hysteria would have happened. It would just be "ugh another shitty remake" like TMNT and all the other lazy cashgrabs that Hollywood is pumping out these days. But feminists saw an opportunity to play the victim, by claiming everyone … | /r/MensRights | 19/07/16 04:33 PM |
| 5 | Show of Hands - Who Here is NOT Anti-Marriage?Your reasoning in the OP is odd because it's not a pro-marriage position. If someone tells you "I jumped into the tiger habitat at the zoo and I didn't get bitten", does that mean it's a good idea to jump in there with the tigers? Like the guy who doesn't get bitten, you were somewhat lucky. She didn't get angry and try to punish you, or take your money. Sounds like you didn't have children to fight over, so there were no custody issues. As for other reasons...wanting a family like the one I gre… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/16 01:38 PM |
| 1 | Is a lot of the misandry that's in society nowadays due to evolutionary adaptions and biology?Some part of it is, particularly the things relating to male disposability as you mentioned. People will always choose to help the woman in need before the man in need, and that isn't going to change. But the majority of the misandry, I'd say no. This level of "men suck, men cause all the problems, discriminating against men is fine because fuck them, who cares" didn't exist until a decade or so ago. Biology isn't responsible for this, or else it would have existed all along. It's largely a nega… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/16 10:31 AM |
| 2 | Andrea Leadsom suggests men should not be nannies because they may be paedophiles45.3% of the perpetrators were male and 53.5% were female and the other 1.2% were? | /r/MensRights | 15/07/16 03:54 PM |
| 13 | Andrea Leadsom suggests men should not be nannies because they may be paedophilesAs an employer we're not, let's face it, most of us don't employ black people as salesmen, most of us don't. Now you can call that racist, I call that cautious and very sensible when you look at the stats. Your odds are stacked against you if you employ a black person. We know thieves are attracted to working with valuable retail products. I'm sorry but they're the facts. Suddenly it's not so acceptable is it? But the original version is fine, because LOL it's just men so who cares. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/16 03:52 PM |
| 3 | The Times: Leadsom: male carers might be paedophilesAs an employer we're not, let's face it, most of us don't employ black people as salesmen, most of us don't. Now you can call that racist, I call that cautious and very sensible when you look at the stats. Your odds are stacked against you if you employ a black person. We know thieves are attracted to working with valuable retail products. I'm sorry but they're the facts. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/16 03:51 PM |
| 7 | Nine out of ten Danes would ban ritual circumcision of boys. It would be “an undemocratic and anti-Semitic act”, claims the chief rabbi of the Jewish Society in Denmark.Frankly, who gives a shit if it's democratic or not? Murder is illegal, regardless of how many people out of 10 think it should be a crime. Cutting off part of someone's genitals without their consent is immoral and it should be considered a crime. You know, like how it works if the baby is female. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/16 06:20 PM |
| 3 | “Being wrongly accused of rape is no minor slight”.It's one of the most disgusting things about modern society. Destroying a man's reputation, costing him his career and all of his friends, potentially breaking up his marriage, possibly sending him to prison and having him put on a sex offender list for the rest of his life.... if this plot is discovered, everyone sees it as a little "oopsie" moment from some silly little girl. She can't possibly be held responsible for it, it was all an accident, she was just confused! And then since it's virtu… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/16 06:52 PM |
| 1 | Is heightism (against men) sexism?Of course this is all true. Men aren't complaining about women having preferences... the complaint is about the hypocrisy of feminists who shame men for having preferences, claim that obesity is beautiful and you should only judge people by their personality... and then they still look for a tall and confident man themselves, and complain "where have the REAL men gone?" if they're not able to find one. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/16 08:05 AM |
| 1 | Is heightism (against men) sexism?Most of men's preferences that make a woman "undateable" are things that she can control. Don't be too fat, don't be controlling, don't be rude, don't be an alcoholic. Certain men will rule out certain things (small boobs, being too tall) but other men will be fine with it or even prefer it. There isn't anything like women's widespread dislike for short men. A very small percentage of women won't care, but otherwise the man has to be very charming or very successful to stand the same chance as a… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/16 08:00 AM |
| 32 | Prostate cancer is a male privilegeSuppose you actually agreed with the nonsense that men have easier lives and all of this wonderful privilege everywhere they go. The quote is still disgusting, because who the hell tells someone with cancer "deal with it you whiner, most people have tougher lives than you used to have". I'd love to see a source on her bullshit stats. Really, women are more likely to be killed than men? Men are 77% of murder victims and 99% of soldiers killed in war. Preventable diseases? Sure seems to be a lot m… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/16 07:51 AM |
| 3 | A letter to … my wife, who won’t get a job while I work myself to death | Life and styleI don't think the Brexit vote suddenly revealed that the UK has gone right wing all of a sudden. I believe there are plenty of Leave voters who are left wing and support the concept of the EU, but they saw how badly the EU is being run and watched all efforts to improve it fail miserably, so they chose to abandon ship. When the EU started costing Britain significantly more than it helps, made financial and political decisions that disadvantage Britain, and demanded that the member countries keep… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/16 03:12 AM |
| 1 | "Ghostbusters backlash is about reboots, NOT women', ADMITS PRODUCER, 'people who were complaining were NOT haters of women". Finally!Probably a mistake on his part. Now he's pissed off the only people who were still considering going to see the movie. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/16 11:01 PM |
| -1 | Lena Dunham's hypocrisy knows no bounds, complains that Kanye's new video makes her feel unsafe.Lena's complaints are ridiculous of course, there is nothing to fear from a music video. You aren't in danger because you watched a recorded video that you don't like. What Kanye did is fucked up, but that's par for the course for him. He's an immature jackass. First he jumps on stage and grabs the microphone out of the hands of a teenage girl who has won the biggest award of her life so far, then later he claims to be responsible for her continued success... and now he makes a realistic wax fig… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/16 03:03 AM |
| 1 | I'm wondering about something recently: If women are slowly replacing men in white collar jobs and men are also dropping out of blue collar jobs, what exactly will men be able to do in the future?What are you talking about? | /r/MensRights | 29/06/16 02:44 AM |
| 2 | Feminist thoughts regarding MRAsModern feminism is about equal rights FOR WOMEN ONLY. It does nothing about any situation where men are getting the short end of the stick. It never "helps men too", except as a side effect of women getting something they want. It pushes for "guilty until proven innocent" standards in rape cases, and cares nothing for the lives of men being ruined by false accusations. I'm well aware that "feminism is about equality" and that the dictionary definition say it's about equality. But if you look at … | /r/MensRights | 27/06/16 06:53 AM |
| 2 | Feminist thoughts regarding MRAsWomen's rights are valid. Women have had to struggle. Women still struggle. I completely agree. I think most of the men on this sub would agree. Both genders have their own crap to deal with, both face discrimination in certain areas and are privileged in others. Feminists are all branded as "feminazis" and - well, that isn't true. I agree. But when feminists are mentioned in this sub, it's usually a reference to the "do things my way or else you're a hateful evil sexist misogynist" types... whi… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/16 06:51 AM |
| 3 | Yet another Cosmopolitan article that blames men for our countries problemsIt's hard to understand how twisted these people's minds must be, to actually believe that it's "men" that want to kill gay people, and not "radicalized Muslims". | /r/MensRights | 15/06/16 02:47 AM |
| 2 | I'm seriously about to lose my mind right nowYou need to go no-contact with her. Block her ability to send you messages of any kind on any social media. And if she manages to sneak anything by, DO NOT RESPOND. She lives for this shit. She gets so much pleasure out of it when you respond to her, and it makes her want to continue. She wants the drama. Don't give it to her. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/16 08:03 PM |
| 43 | I'm a woman who was expelled from college with no actual proofI'm sorry to hear this happened to you. It's an absolute joke that these "college courtrooms" are allowed to affect people's lives like this, with their standards of guilty until proven innocent. No one should ever have their life screwed up by a false accusation. Would I be incorrect in guessing that your accuser was a woman? People in general have so much empathy towards a victimized woman and so much anger towards someone who could hurt a woman, that sometimes they fail to stop and look at th… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/16 10:23 AM |
| 2 | Campus rapist given lenient sentence to avoid "severe impact on him". I think it's important that we every once and a while recognize the scum and bullshit coming from the other side.It absolutely goes both ways. There is plenty of sexism against women, and plenty of it against men. I just want society to acknowledge that there's unfair treatment on both sides, instead of pretending that half of it doesn't exist. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/16 10:12 AM |
| 6 | Trump's popularity is sign of the backlash against feminism, politcal correctness, and SJWsIt's absolutely true. People are sick of the nonsense and will rally behind whoever's opposed to, even if it's a candidate who isn't ideal. I read another similar article about how there's a rise in people identifying themselves as white, and feeling like they belong to the group known as white people. In recent years, there was very little of that going on. People just called themselves Americans, or maybe identified with their specific backgrounds a little bit (like having Irish ancestry). But… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/16 01:25 AM |
| 0 | Young Men Are Facing a Masculinity CrisisWhy is there an assumption that these changes are going to result in a downward death spiral? Society is changing, there's no doubt about that. People are no longer reproducing like rabbits, having 8 kids and 60 grandkids by the time they're 60 years old. We're moving away from gender roles, and moving towards gender equality. OK, so the economy isn't booming quite the way it did back when there was a constantly increasing number of potential customers and potential workers. But the end of this … | /r/MensRights | 27/05/16 07:18 PM |
| 2 | Prime Example of Why Female Athletes Don't Make as Much Money as Men.It does happen sometimes. Women's soccer does about as well as men's soccer in the US alone (not anywhere else though). Women's beach volleyball actually surpasses them (I wonder why). And they're not far behind in tennis. In general though, people do tend to prefer seeing the best players in the world in the highest level leagues over watching minor league play, college, or women's sports. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/16 01:50 PM |
| 7 | Prime Example of Why Female Athletes Don't Make as Much Money as Men.Exactly. It doesn't matter who can beat who, because pro athletes aren't paid on merit... they're paid on how much money they generate. Merit is a factor in that, but it's far from everything. The world's greatest bowler makes next to nothing compared to a third rate NFL pro. He's a world champion, but it doesn't matter - he doesn't generate revenue, he doesn't sell tickets. For some reason, a lot of people don't seem to understand that it's part of the entertainment industry, just like acting. … | /r/MensRights | 27/05/16 01:44 PM |
| 2 | I was banned from r/feminism for posting a link to the dictionaryI was banned from /r/feminism despite never once posting there, because I asked a question in /r/askfeminists about whether they'd support women being given the power to waive their ability to force a man into parenthood against his will. | /r/MensRights | 27/05/16 05:36 AM |
| 1 | Universal basic income; becouse the majority of homeless are men, and $50k is less then $400k.I answered your question. Not sure where the problem is, whatever. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/16 03:08 AM |
| 2 | Universal basic income; becouse the majority of homeless are men, and $50k is less then $400k.I never claimed otherwise. We all benefit from the advantages of having the internet, modern phones, advanced medical technology, etc. We can find information in the palms of our hands in a minute that would have taken hours of effort (including a trip to the library) just a couple of decades ago. But we still need the basics to live. The ability to Skype with someone on the other side of the planet isn't too useful to someone who isn't able to earn food, shelter, and clothing even though he's w… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/16 09:59 PM |
| 2 | Universal basic income; becouse the majority of homeless are men, and $50k is less then $400k.Use fingerprints and photo ID, I don't know. Make sure valid social security numbers are tied to the accounts. The potential for fraud doesn't mean you throw out the whole idea. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/16 11:42 AM |
| 1 | Universal basic income; becouse the majority of homeless are men, and $50k is less then $400k.Since people tend to like money, they will put themselves onto the grid. I guess the simplest way is to hook up everyone who needs one with a basic free checking account and a debit card, and the UBI money is deposited once a week. The debit card would be designed to reject any transactions that would go over the limit. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/16 09:54 AM |
| 2 | Universal basic income; becouse the majority of homeless are men, and $50k is less then $400k.Imagine a future where fully half of the jobs are automated. Technology has advanced so far that there just isn't enough employment available for all of the people who want to work. How would you manage the economy? There are a limited number of options. 1) UBI (which replaces welfare and food stamps). The advancement of society shouldn't mean that half of the population is doomed to poverty just because there aren't a lot of jobs anymore. 2) Keep the current system. Half the country is in pover… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/16 09:50 AM |
| 4 | Universal basic income; becouse the majority of homeless are men, and $50k is less then $400k.I agree that it SHOULD not. It's not ideal at all. However, it looks like it may become necessary. How does a world with 20% unemployment function? 30%, 40%, 50%? Do we doom half of humanity to poverty just because technology has advanced so far that we can automate half of the jobs? The advancement of society is something that should benefit everyone, not ruin the lives of half the country just because we need fewer workers than we did before. Therefore we may have to assign this role to the go… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/16 09:42 AM |
| 2 | What is the "Well, actually" joke even supposed to be mocking?And it's the same situation with other phrases like "not all men". They say all this sexist crap against men and bait someone into pointing out that not all men are the evil monsters that they're describing... at which point they point and laugh because he said the phrase, and that magically proves that he's wrong and they're right. The absolute lunacy of this situation isn't always apparent to everyone. I mean, imagine if someone went out and ranted about aliens using mind control to affect the… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/16 08:49 AM |
| 4 | Why is circumcision still legal and how can that be changed?It's a messy situation, that will require Judges to basically trump religious grounds. A lot of other things that are recommended by religion are already illegal. It shouldn't be anything special to add one more barbaric practice to that list... though of course the religious people will act like it is. Previously I would have thought a circumcision ban in Europe is inevitable. However at this point I honestly wonder if they'd refuse to pass it because it would offend Muslims. If it comes down t… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/16 03:02 PM |
| 10 | MGTOW supports the Men's Rights MovementMGTOW is "fuck it, we're not going to play this rigged game". TRP is "this game is rigged and unfixable, but we're going to win anyway, here's a strategy guide and some cheat codes". MRA is "let's fix the game so it's fair". Some MGTOWs meet women and have relationships, if they can find women who don't play games or try to take advantage of him, and just want to be equal partners with a man. Many just don't bother to search anymore. TRP is all about playing to win when it comes to the dating sc… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/16 10:27 AM |
| 7 | Feminist publicly claims that all men sentenced for rapes they didn't commit, is justice...That's identity politics in a nutshell, it's intellectual poison. It doesn't matter if you are wronged, because people who physically resemble you are doing well. It doesn't matter if you're good or evil, it doesn't matter if you're innocent or guilty. All that matters to these people is skin color and gender. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/16 02:07 AM |
| 1 | Girls born this year will be '75% more likely to go to university' than boysCheck out the related article on the side... "Blind admissions could harm diversity, universities warn". They were considering evaluating students on their merit instead of their skin color and their genitals, but they can't do that because muh diversity. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 07:12 AM |
| 1 | Girls born this year will be '75% more likely to go to university' than boysNo no, don't you see? Feminism Helps Men Too™! Men no longer have to struggle with the high costs of college, and won't be saddled with student loans. It's making men's lives better! | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 07:10 AM |
| 2 | Why do women get more university places? [BBC actually being fairly balanced shocker!]The only time feminism "helps men too" is when there's some side effect to helping women that could possibly be spun as a positive for men. No doubt feminists would tell you that this situation is helping men, because it's removing their burden to be successful in life. You see, eventually women will be the only ones allowed in colleges and will hold all the top paying jobs, and men will have the freedom to take easier jobs and work fewer hours. Feminism "helps men too" is the same kind of argum… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 01:59 AM |
| 3 | Why do women get more university places? [BBC actually being fairly balanced shocker!]but in general the response was ‘Yeah, but white men own everything’ Identity politics is intellectual poison. It doesn't matter if some people get screwed over, because other people who physically resemble them are doing well! How twisted does your mind have to be to think like that? Fairness doesn't matter, equal opportunity doesn't matter... all that matters is meeting the quotas for skin colors and genitals. Absolute lunacy. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 01:54 AM |
| 6 | I thought I was safe from this garbage where I work but the wage gap myth has come knocking...Why would you bother? If your company held an optional lunch to discuss alien abductions and how we can stop their relentless anal probes by the year 2025, would you bother to attend and ask for proof of these alien probes? This is an optional event for delusional people, there's no reason to pay any attention to it. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/16 01:42 AM |
| 2 | Charging rent to the live-in mother of his child?Sounds like Jerry's a dumbass, and this isn't going to end up well for him one way or another. If you want to help Jerry, work on him and convince him that his current situation costs him less than child support would cost. Maybe find out what matters to him. Maybe he'd like to have her move out and have his home all to himself again, and it would be worth it to pay the child support checks. Is she working and paying for all of the groceries, clothes, etc. herself? If so then he's really getting… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/16 03:10 AM |
| 2 | Thoughts on this quote? I'm having trouble putting my criticism of this into words.My first thought is "this is a person who thinks that everyone else is just like them". Betty Friedan was a strong and independent person who had absolutely no interest in being a housewife. She was a writer and political activist, she wanted to be involved in shaping the world. She would have hated the simpler life of being a housewife. All of that is well and good, until she decides that no one else should be a housewife either. She's telling women that their choices are wrong and that they're… | /r/MensRights | 11/05/16 03:00 AM |
| 5 | 39 Things Women Will Just NEVER Understand About Being A ManIt depends on the circumstance. If someone forms a pattern of crying and whining, freaking out and becoming useless every time they suffer any inconvenience in life... it's not good for them or for the people around them. People should be able to be stoic when the situation calls for it (all relatively unimportant situations, and sometimes an important situation where it's not the right time or place for a breakdown), but should be able to let out their emotions when the situation is appropriate… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 01:44 AM |
| 1 | 39 Things Women Will Just NEVER Understand About Being A ManI agree, but it depends on the circumstances. Kids shouldn't cry when they fall down or when they can't quite accomplish a task they want to finish... but we shouldn't go so far as to teach them it's wrong to show any emotion ever. There's nothing wrong with getting a little emotional over a really good movie, or crying over a death in the family. In today's world, stoicism is good for people when they need to be able to handle frustration without getting whiny, or for maintaining composure when… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 01:40 AM |
| 10 | Feminists buttmad over "bones" pro-MRA episodeRoosh is not an MRA, and has clearly stated he is not one. But yes, he's considered an MRA by many people, because many people are idiots. Some feminists have been taught that "MRA" is the term you use for any man who disagrees with any feminist ideas, and that all of those men are evil sexist rape supporters, or something. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 01:29 AM |
| 4 | Feminists buttmad over "bones" pro-MRA episodeI guess the writing staff should be commended for doing their research on this topic. The last time I heard about this show, it was because of an episode where someone hand-carved a computer virus into a bone (knowing the researchers would scan an image of it into her computer), and then this scanned-image virus instantly set the computer on fire. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 01:28 AM |
| 3 | Teacher and Student Recall Night They Slept Together - Flip the genders and let's see if the audience is still laughing."it's OK to have sex with children if they end up liking it" | /r/MensRights | 19/04/16 09:16 AM |
| 13 | Hillary campaign blames the ‘sexism’ of Democrat voters for her high unfavorable ratingsHow can you aspire to be the leader of the free world if you won't take any responsibility for your shortcomings? Is this actually going to happen, are we going to have a President who claims any criticism over her choices is irrelevant because of her gender? Most of the Sanders fans who oppose her would vote for Elizabeth Warren in a heartbeat, if she was the nominee. I certainly would. There are a number of female celebrities I'd vote for before I'd cast a vote for Hillary or any of the Republ… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/16 11:25 PM |
| 1 | #If I were a boy - I'd be able to make choices about my own bodyReally? I never knew that... wow, fuck Ireland then. Looks like they can't even pass legislation to change it to allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest, even though the voters are solidly behind it. Apparently there's no urgent demand to change the law and no public outrage, because all the Irish women just take a short vacation to England and have it done there. Turns out Poland also has an abortion ban... and unlike Ireland, the public likes it that way. No doubt the women who want one… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/16 02:02 PM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardLet me try this another way. Please answer these questions, if you don't mind. 1) Should Caitlyn Jenner be identified as a man, and should Chaz Bono be identified as a woman? 2) Should this person be in the women's bathroom, and should he be arrested for using the men's bathroom? 3) If this person commits a serious crime, do you send this person to a men's prison with a male cellmate? 4) Are dresses, shaved legs, and longer/fancier hairstyles an inherent part of being a woman? | /r/MensRights | 17/04/16 08:05 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardRight about here: Nowhere in that quote do I claim that there aren't biological differences between men and women. "You can't always identify trans people just by looking at them" does not imply "men and women are literally identical except for their genitals". Pro tip: If you're claiming I need biological intervention to present as a different gender, then it's a biological construct. A person doesn't require biological intervention to present as a different gender. I said that you in particula… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 10:43 PM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardIt's because I'm 6'3", have the skeletal structure of a linebacker, and have a 5 o'clock shadow two minutes after I shave. Like I said, you look male. I didn't say you could put on a dress and high heels and instantly be recognized as a woman. No amount of non-biological attempts to hide my sex would make people think I was a woman. Right. But if you had been taking hormones since a young age, getting surgery, etc. then maybe you could be seen as a woman... and that's just what trans people do. … | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 07:19 PM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardWhat other delusional states do you feel society should accommodate and feed? I don't know of any comparable ones. Anything that requires no effort or inconvenience on society's part, beyond "don't be a dick". If you see a woman wearing feminine clothing and upon closer inspection she seems a bit masculine, don't start calling her male and using "he" and "him" to refer to her. It's not hard to do this. BTW I can't help but wonder how many butch-looking women or babyfaced men have been accused of… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 05:39 PM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardThat is not what all those propagandists in "gender studies" believe. They think little girls like barbies instead of math is because oppression. Yeah, most people in gender studies classes are there to learn different ways to spin any situation into something that oppresses them. In all seriousness, it is very likely that your interests, inclinations, and identity come from myriad of factors including both nature and nurture. Agreed. Disorder is one thing, delusion is much more specific. If a p… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 03:50 PM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardIt probably shouldn't matter what people wear, ever. If a lawyer wants to wear a Hawaiian shirt and shorts to court, people shouldn't care. If a man wants to wear a dress and high heels out in public, it doesn't need to matter. We've just arbitrarily decided that certain clothes belong in certain places or on a certain gender. It doesn't have to be objectionable. But society DOES have these social constructs about what's appropriate and what's strange or unacceptable... so the trans people follo… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 12:20 PM |
| 2 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardI don't think I've ever heard of that, but that shouldn't be allowed either. Parents have the right to do many things with their children, but permanent body modifications are not one of them. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 12:11 PM |
| 4 | The US Marines tested all-male squads against mixed-gender ones, and the results were pretty bleakWhy would exceptional women be pursuing these jobs, but only average men? I didn't claim this is always the case. And, if we're looking at graduation rates, 99% of men who attend SOI pass. Women have a 34% passing rate right now. Clearly, there's a discrepancy in physical capability here. Of course. In general, men are more suited to this kind of task. But that in no way justifies banning women from it. It makes as much sense as banning men from being teachers or single parents, because taking c… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 11:56 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardThey dress as the gender that they claim to be. Just like cis people do. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 11:20 AM |
| 4 | Like we were expecting folks: Gov. Scott Vetoes Alimony & Custody Reform BillIn his veto message, Scott said he struck down SB 668 because of his concerns over how it would change child custody. The bill would have required judges to presume that an equal timesharing arrangement between parents was best for the child Rick Scott vetoed a bill solely because it didn't go out of its way to presume that women are superior to men. Unbelievable. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 11:05 AM |
| 14 | I feel like a terrible person for not stopping to give someone a lift homeI get out and catch up to her, make sure she isn't on the road and ask if she wants a lift home. Good, you did the right thing. I get hounded with abuse. "You don't know me, what gives you the right to ask me this." OK, she's an asshole. Not your problem. Time to leave and never think of her again. my mind all night has been focused on the fact that if she gets raped or attacked is it my fault Of course not. You did everything right, even offering to go out of your way to make her feel safer. Yo… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 11:01 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardTrans men do exactly that. They cut their hair short and wear suits, because the social construct of presenting yourself as the male gender involves doing that. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 10:53 AM |
| 1 | The US Marines tested all-male squads against mixed-gender ones, and the results were pretty bleakThe problem here that the exceptional woman will be pursuing these jobs alongside....the average man. How is that a problem? That doesn't make sense. Why not? There's a reason MMA has men's and women's divisions, and it's purely based on physical make up and capability. Of course. It wouldn't be fair otherwise. Same reason the heavyweights don't fight the welterweights. Then suppose your superiors decided to add people who are statistically worse in every category Then let's not do this part! Ev… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardThey are. In our culture, men tend to have certain hairstyles (mostly short ones) and women have longer, more styled ones. There are different styles of clothing worn by men and women (more variety for women, tighter fitting clothes with more skin showing or cleavage, more decorative shoes with high heels, etc.). A trans woman chooses to present herself as a woman to other people. Nearly always, trans women go along with the social construct that women have hair like this, clothes like that, wea… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 09:40 AM |
| 0 | The US Marines tested all-male squads against mixed-gender ones, and the results were pretty bleakIndividual women are not automatically weaker and slower than the individual men who are also looking for a combat role. It might be a woman comparable to Ronda Rousey, up against men with previous injuries, or a weight problem, or an inability to focus when under pressure. Suppose you tested people of all kinds of different backgrounds, and found that brown-haired people do very slightly worse than blond haired people do. Should brown haired people be banned from combat roles then? Of course no… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 09:28 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardHow so? Please explain. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 09:12 AM |
| 2 | Gender pay gap solution: Ban stay-at-home momsThis article makes a good point, but SJWs are stupid enough to take it at face value and actually believe that MRAs want to ban people from making the choice to be a stay at home parent. Roosh V wrote a similar article suggesting that rape should be legalized, because that's the only way to get feminists to realize it's a good idea to teach people how to stay safe (the same way you don't leave a pile of cash sitting on the seat in your unlocked car, or how you lock the door when you leave your h… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 07:01 AM |
| 2 | Would you all agree with the statement that women are valued in society solely for existing while men are valued based on what they can do to help others?Good point. Women in general are seen as more valuable than men, or at least certainly less disposable than men. But elderly women, or morbidly obese women, or severely handicapped women? They tend to get equal treatment with comparable men. They don't display the same values that society sees in typical women... being pretty, being a potential partner for a man, being needed to help raise the next generation of children, etc. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 06:50 AM |
| 1 | College Freshman Accused of RapeGet a lawyer. Did you do it yet? Do it. Get a lawyer now. If you're still reading this and don't have a lawyer, you're doing it wrong. I wouldn't count on it being productive, but I would also try to talk with the people in charge of the fraternity. I would point at the cases of the Duke lacrosse team and Brian Banks, point out how screwed up it is that everyone treats them as guilty until proven innocent, and for women to have the power to screw up a man's life like that just because they're up… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 06:37 AM |
| 134 | Matched a girl on Tinder and had a debate for over an hour. I finally unmatched her after this.I would have said "You could be a pathological liar and not even realize it. I know this because you're a woman, and that's a thing that happens to women sometimes." and then asked her just how idiotic and offensive it looks when the same kind of argument is aimed in her direction. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 06:22 AM |
| 9 | The US Marines tested all-male squads against mixed-gender ones, and the results were pretty bleakThis doesn't mean that women shouldn't be allowed in combat. It means that unqualified women shouldn't be allowed. If you're significantly slower, weaker, and less competent than everyone else, you shouldn't be in combat role. Gender is irrelevant, ability is all that matters. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 06:16 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardI have no idea what you're trying to say here. No, trans people are not just trolling. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 06:13 AM |
| 0 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardYou know your argument is shit, when you have to use the 00.1%-00.01% intersex population to try and prove your point. How does the fact that intersex people exist disprove my point? My argument is shit because I can provide evidence of how it makes sense? That's not how this works at all. When you walk down the street and see me, you do not need to see my genitals to notice that I am biologically male. That's because you present yourself as a male. You dress male, you look male, you act male. B… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 06:04 AM |
| 1 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateI think a society is better off lacking the freedom to allow that kind of discrimination, than it is having entire geographical areas where non-whites or homosexuals or non-Christians are banned from every place of business. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 05:55 AM |
| 2 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.Straw men and professional level offense-taking. You'd make a very good feminist. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 05:52 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardThey were demonstrating that they have more in common with other girls than other boys. This alone doesn't make someone trans at all, but it can be one piece of evidence that points towards a trend. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 05:51 AM |
| 2 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardAnd that's because we make exceptions for things that are medically necessary. If someone's in a car wreck we don't wait for them to sign a form before helping them, because they need medical treatment now. Circumcision is not a medical necessity. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 05:50 AM |
| 1 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardThe question the comic is showing both sides of is "is gender innate or socialized" That's not what it looks like to me. Gender is innate, no one is told "you are a boy" and they they suddenly start liking sports and trucks and puzzles and disliking dolls and fashion. I read the comic as saying "some people are have body dysmorphia and feel they have the wrong kind of body" and "the way you present yourself to society as a male or as a female is a set of social constructs", and those aren't mutu… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/16 05:48 AM |
| 0 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardIt's not mutually exclusive though. It is not contradictory to say "your gender is the way you present yourself to the world as either a male or a female" and "some people present themselves as female even though their biological sex is not female". | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 03:13 PM |
| -6 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardI think there's a lot of confusion or misunderstanding over the definitions of the terms. The fact that gender is a social construct doesn't mean there aren't physical/mental/hormonal differences between men and women. It doesn't mean that a trans man who works out a lot will be able to get as buff as a male bodybuilder, or will be able to compete against men in sports. And obviously, trans women can't get pregnant. Transitioning doesn't erase the changes. There are a couple of trans women in th… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 02:41 PM |
| -5 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardI like those comics, but that one doesn't work. Having body dysmorphia and feeling that your biological sex doesn't match your gender isn't "being born as the wrong gender". The way they present themselves is the expression of their gender, it's always a social construct. Seems like there's some anti trans sentiment in this sub... odd, I've usually seen people be completely supportive of trans people in here. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 02:30 PM |
| 20 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardThe whole issue is beside the point, anyway. Suppose it was a completely scientifically valid study and it conclusively proved that circumcision doesn't result in any loss of sensitivity at all. Well, so what? That still doesn't give anyone the right to do permanent body modification to another person without their consent. Even if circumcision had health benefits (it doesn't), even if it didn't harm anyone (it kills people every year), you STILL don't have the right to make that choice for anot… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 11:22 AM |
| -12 | Top Hot in /science now, with almost 4000 upvotes, a pseudoscience study that falsely claims that male circumcision is good. It makes my blood boil so hardGender roles are retarded. The concept that your work, hobbies, and other activities should be decided for you based on your genitals is complete nonsense. And gender (not biological sex, but gender) is a social construct. Walk around in public and you'll see a bunch of men and women out there. But how do you know which are male and which are female? You're not examining their genitals. You're judging them by their appearance, and how they act. That's a social construct. If a man gets a terrible… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 11:14 AM |
| 1 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateAn analogy that compares something to itself? That's not how analogies work. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 08:13 AM |
| 1 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateThere's a reason the Civil Rights Act was passed. Without a ban on discrimination and refusing service to people, there would be entire sections of America where black people, homosexuals, and non Christians would be banned from every store. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 07:39 AM |
| 1 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateWould you say the same for a store that won't allow black people to shop there? "There are plenty of other places black people can shop at, it's OK to ban them" would you support this? | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:54 AM |
| 0 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateI'm not aware of any female-only hair salons that ban men with long hair from going there if they want to. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:52 AM |
| -1 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateDo you not see a problem with this? Do you think a store should be able to refuse service to black people too, and make them feel like second class citizens? | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:51 AM |
| 1 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateA gym like that is perfectly legal. Few exist because there isn't enough customer demand for them, while there is plenty of demand for women-only gyms. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:50 AM |
| 3 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateDid you read the article? It was a trans man who wanted a male haircut. There is no fundamental difference between men's and women's hair and you don't need different tools or techniques to give this person a typical male haircut. There was no call for discrimination and no reason to refuse service. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:49 AM |
| 3 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateIt's embarrassing that anti-trans bullshit is being upvoted in here. Gender (not biological sex, but gender) is a social construct. Your genitalia don't define who you are - for instance, a man who loses his penis in an injury doesn't stop being a man. And some people are born intersex, and they have to choose which gender to present themselves as. No one's making you "glorify" a damn thing. But there's no reason to insist that someone who doesn't look typically male must be a woman when they're… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:46 AM |
| 6 | 'We don't cut women's hair,' barbershop allegedly says; Gloria Allred retained to sue shop on the basis of gender discrimination, and yet somehow women-only gyms are permitted to operateNo. We have anti-discrimination laws for a reason. If you allow people to ban whoever they want from their stores, there will be large areas of America where black people, homosexuals, and non-Christians will be unable to enter any places of business. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 05:35 AM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.You advocate taking a properly deferential tone to our betters. You still haven't gotten my point. Let me spell it out for you. Discussing something is NOT the same as advocating it. You seem to be going out of your way to find something to get your panties in a bunch. But nobody is telling you what kind of discussions you should participate in, or that anyone is your better, or that you need to be deferential to anyone. You seem to think you know a lot about me, and you seem to think I'm tellin… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 07:06 PM |
| 1 | USWNT considers boycotting Olympics because the men make more.Will the fencers and the table tennis players also boycott the Olympics because fellow Olympian Steph Curry makes more than them? | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 09:31 AM |
| 0 | Too much ragebait. Not enough action.Trolling and #Netopathic idiocy is nothing new to me Well, that much is obvious. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 09:27 AM |
| 2 | The reason white men are blamed for everythingThis video should be getting more attention, it's really well done. I've never seen it explained so succinctly why feminists and SJWs only show outrage over issues when it's profitable. They'll spend all countless hours complaining about video games, because it's very profitable. Pay us to research this! Fund us to make videos to spread the word (you do know it costs $100k to make each video on the internet, right?) Oh, those arranged marriages in the Middle East? Yeah I guess that's bad, but di… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 03:34 AM |
| 2 | Too much ragebait. Not enough action.You know what I meant. I've never seen an accusation of concern trolling aimed at an actual troll, it's always a well intentioned person. The accusation is almost always thrown out as a way of saying "shut up, we'll be angry and childish if we want to, so fuck off". | /r/MensRights | 14/04/16 01:34 AM |
| 2 | Too much ragebait. Not enough action.An actual concern troll is someone who opposes an idea and is intentionally trying to derail and sidetrack the people supporting that idea. 99% of people accused of being concern trolls actually care about the issue and want it to be presented in a positive way. Angry or immature people are extremely quick to pull out the "concern troll" accusation anytime someone mentions that issues get taken more seriously when they're not presented as angry yelling or childish whining. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 08:53 PM |
| 3 | Women only carparks being praised on Australian TV tonight. But its not sexist because it assumes men are violent, its apparently sexist because its pink. Incredible!These professional victims are absolute children. They're crying about how their special treatment doesn't work exactly the way that they hoped for. It reminds me of that Sweet Sixteen TV show where some spoiled rich girl was throwing a fit at her parents for buying her a car. "You got me what I wanted BUT IT'S THE WRONG COLORRRRR, GOD THIS IS SO UNFAIRRRRRR" (though to be fair, some of the people are complaining about the stupidity of the concept, so they might be opposed to having these parkin… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 08:06 PM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.Thanks for informing me of what I think, I had no idea what I'm in favor of until you told me. Please allow me to return that favor for you. I see that you discussed here what the definition of cuckoldry is. That means that you're in favor of it. You should probably stop being in favor of being a man who raises other men's children, it doesn't look very good. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 07:55 PM |
| 2 | Jimmy kimmel pushing the wage gap myth as a fact to kids. The lefts attempt to brainwash kids is real.I really hope (but seriously doubt) that the real reasons for the earnings gap is explained to these children afterwards. These kids didn't know that women bring in less money. When told about this, all they can do is guess at the reason for it. Kids think the world is a fair and equal place, so all they can assume is that if women are earning less money, it must be because they suck at their jobs. They don't understand the complexity of the situation - that women take time off after having chil… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 07:47 PM |
| 1 | Too much ragebait. Not enough action.I never saw anything wrong with being a so-called concern troll. It's important for an equality movement to portray itself in a mature and serious way, instead of being full of childish anger, otherwise the movement won't be taken seriously. Complaints about "concern trolling", in my experience, tend to come from people who want to be part of an echo chamber where differing opinions aren't allowed. It's very common to see this in feminist and SJW circles. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 07:41 PM |
| 1 | ** An apology, I'm sorry**The first one is equality of opportunity. That means that gender is completely ignored. All men and all women are judged by their merit, and companies hire the best person for the job regardless of what's in their pants. The second one is equality of outcome. That means "this job has to have 50% men and 50% women in it", which is a common position of modern feminists. They demand that if there are 20 jobs available and there are 100 male applicants and 10 female applicants, you have to hire 10% … | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 07:38 PM |
| 1 | ** An apology, I'm sorry**It's not the most important issue that humanity has ever faced or anything, but it matters. It's an issue of consent. Everyone has the right to make choices regarding their own body - it doesn't matter that most circumcisions do no real harm, because everyone should get the right to choose. Circumcision is permanent body modification in a very sensitive place. Doing that to an infant is about as fucked up as giving an infant a tattoo... you just don't do that, it's not OK. Everyone should get to… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 07:35 PM |
| 2 | Are women and/or feminists welcome here?You're definitely welcome here, and it's hard to get banned here unless you're outright trolling. I'm guessing if you're interested enough to post on here, you're probably one of the pro-equality feminists, and not one of the "women should get special treatment, men are the enemy and all of them are guilty of oppressing you" types. There are plenty of people in here who used to label themselves as a feminist because they were taught that's the word you use if you support equality, but they dropp… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 07:28 PM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.You say that a person pointing out an overabundance of women is sexist. Uh, no I don't. I said the post is hateful crap. Saying that a disproportionate number of women "pollute" something, calling journalism nothing but keyboard bashing, calling feminists "harpies". There's no need to word it that way, it sounds like an angry troll trying to start an flamewar. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 10:09 AM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.Uh, its a newspaper, not a 'feminist site'. You think there's a difference between a media website and a feminist website? And im calling you an SJW. So your fee-fees get hurt when someone's opinion is different, so you called me the meanest name you know. Got it. while advocating we adopt a deferential tone when addressing our better Explaining what something is, is not the same as advocating for it. No one's making you participate in a moderated discussion, and I didn't say anything about a de… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 10:05 AM |
| 3 | "Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth" - even Forbes agrees!It's been a while since we needed unions, and the still-powerful teachers' union reminds us of everything that's wrong about them. America could definitely use more unions today. The problem is that they need to operate in a sensible way, and it just seems that people today aren't capable of that. It has to be an eternal power struggle over who gets more stuff, where one side is trying to "win" and defeat the other side. Either the companies win and get to exploit the workers with low wages and … | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 04:18 AM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.You don't understand how moderated discussions work. You're acting like anything other than completely unregulated speech means that someone is pushing a narrative. Yes that is the case in feminist forums, they just "regulate" out any facts they don't want to hear. But it doesn't make someone an SJW because they understand the concept of moderation WITHOUT narrative-pushing. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 03:55 AM |
| 8 | "Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth" - even Forbes agrees!I don't see why he couldn't just stick to what he did early on and say "everyone should get paid equally for equal work" like he did at the beginning. It's pandering enough just to mention that, since we've already guaranteed this right for 52 years. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 02:51 AM |
| 5 | "Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth" - even Forbes agrees!It's unfair to have a low minimum wage (or none) in a situation when the workers are facing "you'll take what we'll give you, or you'll get nothing". Employers can afford to take temporary losses and fire workers who want higher wages and replace them, but employees without savings can't afford to fight back on what the wages should be. You can have no minimum wage in a country full of unionized workers, where there's an organized group fighting on behalf of the workers. We don't have that now, … | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 02:50 AM |
| 8 | I am glad to see other people getting annoyed by changing men's restrooms to anyone's restroomsThe comments on that photo are wrong, WA law does not require this. As you said, the business chose to do this. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 02:00 AM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.Tone obviously does matter, or else this topic wouldn't have even been posted. The point of moderated forums is to have discussions there the tone is calm and respectful, and the discussion sticks to relevant facts instead of devolving into a men vs women flamewar. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 01:56 AM |
| 10 | "Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth" - even Forbes agrees!It wouldn't come without any problems attached to it, but I think the current situation is much worse. People are doing the best they can and working full time jobs, but aren't able to afford the necessities because they're not receiving a living wage. Corporate profits are at all time highs and so is the income of the top 1%. Meanwhile they're teaching their employees where to sign up for welfare and other taxpayer-funded benefits. We've basically got taxpayer-funded subsidies for corporate pro… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 01:54 AM |
| 12 | "Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth" - even Forbes agrees!Regardless of who he panders to, I think Bernie has by far the best ideas on how to run the country. At first he was paying service to that nonsense by mentioning that everyone deserves equal pay for equal work, which is clearly true and no one can object to that. But it was disappointing when he later joined Hillary and started acting like women don't currently receive equal pay. For someone who was pretty involved in political issues leading up to the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, y… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 01:47 AM |
| 4 | "Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth" - even Forbes agrees!It's nice to see that at least a few places still care about facts more than attention-grabbing false narratives. (clicks CNN story) Women are likely to be paid less than men hired for the exact same role. Well, make that one place anyway. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 01:40 AM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.It's hard to tell without the context of the article. But yes, in moderated places, the tone does matter. Mods don't want the discussion to turn into a flamewar. It's clearly written in angry way, and praises men in general while calling women "harpies", and that just isn't necessary. The second post has no such tone. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 09:26 PM |
| 1 | The Guardian gives insight into how it moderates comments and opinions.The first comment is just a load of hateful crap, and the response is about right. The second one is just factual, and the response makes no sense. There is no "what about" in that comment at all. And I have no idea what could possibly be considered sexist about it, since it doesn't disparage women or compare men and women in any way. On the other hand, I wonder if that comment is relevant to the article, which was apparently about Hillary Clinton. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 05:21 PM |
| 54 | Facebook has now banned A Voice for MenHaha, how appropriate that she posted an image with the caption "I have the privilege of being unaware of my own privilege." She can point to things on the internet that she doesn't like and have the authorities shut it down for her... and she thinks it's the people getting silenced that have privilege. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 06:36 AM |
| 3 | Are 1 in 5 women raped in college? Not even close.That's not a good comparison at all, because no one consents to being robbed. We shouldn't allow men or women to engage in predatory behavior and take advantage of people when they're drunk. It's wrong for someone to target a drunk woman, lead her into the bedroom, and pressure her repeatedly into having sex when she doesn't want to. And it's obviously incredibly fucked up for someone to have sex with a passing-out drunk person without asking, and then just claiming there was consent the next da… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 06:30 AM |
| 7 | Men Are Creepy, New Study Confirms"Blacks Are Scary, New Study Confirms" oh wait sorry that's the 1960 version of this | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 06:15 AM |
| 14 | Why are gamers being targeted?Yes. The answer is because of the lack of mainstream public acceptance and awareness of gaming. Feminism never gets anywhere attacking TV and movies. Everyone loves TV and movies, and is well aware of them. Accuse the movie industry of rampant woman-hating and the public will laugh, because everyone knows it isn't true. But accuse the gaming industry, and some people will buy into it. "Oh yeah, a bunch of teenage guys playing killing simulators? Yeah I can see how that became a hotbed of sexism.… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/16 06:11 AM |
| 4 | Women-only Uber set to open in Boston. Isn't that illegal?Sounds pretty illegal to me. If law enforcement doesn't shut this down in a hurry, I look forward to when a competitor opens up a "whites only" driver service. It should be quite a show. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/16 01:55 AM |
| 2 | Women only ride sharing service for "safety".There are likely legal difficulties ahead for a service that states outright that it will not serve men. That doesn’t worry Pelletz. “We look forward to legal challenges." LOL, his tune is going to change in a hurry. If he manages to win (0% chance of this), I look forward to the public reaction when the whites-only ride sharing service is launched. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 02:27 AM |
| 7 | The PowerPuff Girls new villain is a "terrifying" Men's Rights ActivistThis isn't much of a story. The show has bad guys that are unlikeable in a variety of ways, including a woman who hates men and tries to convince the girls that women are superior and it's ok to commit crimes against men. This new character is of the "girls suck, they can't do anything right" variety which is something that has been on the show before, and is a perfectly good design for a bad guy. The only issue is that this so-called journalist, author of such in-depth articles as "11 Songs Gua… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/16 02:21 AM |
| 8 | Why France Is Adopting A New Law That Criminalizes The Clients, Not ProstitutesOther members of parliament considered that the presence of money is irrefutable proof of the lack of free will of one of the parties involved. “Prostitution is, in reality, very simple. It’s sex between two people — between one person who wants it and one person who doesn’t. And since the desire is absent, payment is there to replace it,” they said. Always the "women are wonderful" effect. I have no doubt that the day a woman is arrested with a male prostitute, they'll claim that the man is ste… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/16 01:23 PM |
| 1 | Maisie Williams on feminism: "I sometimes really worry about speaking up about feminist subjects out of fear of being bashed by women on social media. And there’s something not right there. Yeah, sometimes it’s men too. But there are women who are just nasty. I’m trying to do the best I can."You can't perfectly define every term, you just have to use common sense. Who decides exactly what qualifies a person as rude, or stubborn, or obnoxious? We just have to do the best we can to be accurate with words. The point remains, people don't go around labeling themselves as non-rude or non-obnoxious. It's just considered to be normal. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/16 12:55 PM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsThe PGA Senior tour is a professional league. Nearly all women understand they aren't physically equal to men. It's literally the entire reason that women's leagues exist in the first place. Only a handful of lunatics claim that women are as capable as men, and since when did a league's justification to exist depend on what crazy people say? The purpose of weight classes in boxing is to create a level playing field. A 140 lb boxer doesn't stand a chance against a 200 lb boxer... just as a 190 lb… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/16 02:25 AM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsDo you have equal objections to the PGA Senior Tour, high school football, Little League baseball, and weight classes in boxing? Floyd Mayweather wouldn't be a professional boxer if he had to compete with the best boxers in the world (the heavyweights). Do you look at him with contempt too, undeserving of success because he couldn't beat any of the top heavyweight contenders who are much taller and stronger than him? The best that a Little League baseball player is nothing compared to what a MLB… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 07:14 PM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsWhen it comes to jobs, college opportunities, and almost anything other than sports, there must be equality of opportunity. That means a complete lack of discrimination, equal standards for everyone, gender is completely irrelevant. Everyone passes or fails based on their merit, and their gender or race have nothing to do with anything. I assume we're agreed on this, right? But sports are different. Women are not capable of competing with men. It's physically impossible, due to biological reason… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 05:35 PM |
| 1 | Maisie Williams on feminism: "I sometimes really worry about speaking up about feminist subjects out of fear of being bashed by women on social media. And there’s something not right there. Yeah, sometimes it’s men too. But there are women who are just nasty. I’m trying to do the best I can."Equality of opportunity. Lack of discrimination. The same standards for everyone. NOT equality of outcome. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 04:34 PM |
| 1 | Maisie Williams on feminism: "I sometimes really worry about speaking up about feminist subjects out of fear of being bashed by women on social media. And there’s something not right there. Yeah, sometimes it’s men too. But there are women who are just nasty. I’m trying to do the best I can."By that I mean the actual definition of sexist... where you discriminate against people based on gender in a harmful way. Not the feminist usage, which is "anything that we don't like, or anything that harms our argument". | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 04:33 PM |
| 2 | Maisie Williams on feminism: "I sometimes really worry about speaking up about feminist subjects out of fear of being bashed by women on social media. And there’s something not right there. Yeah, sometimes it’s men too. But there are women who are just nasty. I’m trying to do the best I can."She's describing how things should ideally work. Ideally, it would be normal for most people to not be sexist, and the few who aren't normal get hit with the label of "sexist". Just like how it's normal for most people to not be a criminal, but you get that name if you're convicted of a crime. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 12:31 PM |
| 2 | Maisie Williams on feminism: "I sometimes really worry about speaking up about feminist subjects out of fear of being bashed by women on social media. And there’s something not right there. Yeah, sometimes it’s men too. But there are women who are just nasty. I’m trying to do the best I can."I think she's making a good point here. Nobody identifies as a non-thief or a non-murderer. No one is called a non-racist or a non-rapist. It's normal to be those things, and you only get a label like "murderer" when you do something bad. She's right, we shouldn't have a word for being anti-sexism. It should be normal these days to support gender equality. You should only have a label if you break from that norm. The only problem here is that she has been taught that the word for being pro-equal… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 12:29 PM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsIf a group of janitors at a hospital demanded to be paid as much as the top surgeons, you laugh at them and mock them and debunk their nonsense, but you don't stop having janitors. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 09:38 AM |
| 3 | How long do you think it takes men?God I hate identity politics. Everything has to be about what group you belong to. It would be a nice quote if it said "It takes years to unlearn what you have been taught to be sorry about." But no, it has to be about what gender you are, or what category you belong to. And apparently only YOUR category of people has ever been told to be sorry about things. It's all got to be about one category of people vs another. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 08:34 AM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsFuck that. But WHY. What are you objecting to? What is the problem? What is unfair? Why is it bad when there is any sports league other than the elite level one where only men in their 20s and 30s are capable of competing? "under represented in a field?" Affirmative action. "Under represented in STEM?" Free University Education. "Physically Weaker then males?" Lower requirements for women. These aren't jobs! No man is losing something to a less qualified woman. No critical job (like a firefighte… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 09:42 PM |
| 1 | De-segregate Sportswhy are we segregating people based on gender and not ability? Because it's the simplest and easiest way to create a level playing field. Men over here, women over there is easy. It just works, and it's reasonably fair. But how do you judge someone's ability? How do you know just how good someone is? Give people a test and they might sandbag it just so they can dominate in a lower league. We do still separate people by skill level sometimes. In high school there are varsity and JV sports. There … | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 07:41 PM |
| 3 | Divorced man to keep entire lotto win despite decade long marriageHeh, of course not. It's a total coincidence that she leaves the relationship as soon as it becomes something other than free money with no effort required. Her appeal also included claims her ex-husband was financially responsible for the support and wellbeing of her three children. At this rate it won't be long before charities start suing people who send in a donation, but don't keep donating to them regularly. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 07:21 PM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsSegregation is not always a problem. The purpose of it in these instances is to create a level playing field for those who physically and biologically cannot possibly compete with the dominant group (typically men in their 20s and 30s). If not for segregation, there would be zero sports leagues for women, seniors, children, or the disabled. There would be no weight classes in boxing, eliminating anyone who isn't a natural 200+ pound fighter from having a chance in the sport. That situation sucks… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 07:16 PM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsSo? Welterweight boxing only exists because heavyweights are excluded. High school soccer exists because non-high-schoolers are excluded. Wheelchair basketball leagues don't allow players who aren't in wheelchairs. What's your point? | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 11:03 AM |
| 1 | De-segregate SportsNone of the things I mentioned are the problem. Stupid people being stupid are the problem. Some people with extremely high skill in things people don't care about (such as bowling) would like to make NFL money too. Doesn't mean we should get rid of bowling. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 10:45 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter