TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Panel2468975 Archive

View 2 posts and 254 comments by Panel2468975 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It seems to me, you are the frickin' weak one here.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:38 PM
20

That sounds like textbook abuse. They hit you, made everything your fault, and tried to convince you that it was for your own good.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:18 AM
3

It is considered rape because he is a minor and therefore considered unable to consent.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:42 PM
3

Did you just copy and paste the bot and alter the footer?
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:35 PM
105

It's not reverse discrimination, it is just discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:18 PM
1

Less important, but look at the best comment on this and although it is more rhetorical, it is worth looking at this Edit: PS. Remember to assert a reason why feminism doesn't just handle all the problems.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 08:37 PM
4

Could you link to some examples of what you think is trans-phobic which is happening in this community?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:40 PM
63

Yup, If you think the book should not be followed then the book should be rewritten, not ignored. Ignoring it only invite corruption.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:36 AM
3

Your funeral...?? Hello zombie.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 03:44 AM
10

I gotchu fam
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:52 PM
2

Eh, I would say it is worth trying him out. Here is a link to his channel.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 05:06 PM
1

I agree, and would like to make clear that I do not think that we have currently or sry immediately at risk of losing our free speech, however I think that there are proponents of doing away with free speech which if left unchecked may prove problematic.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:20 AM
1

I agree, I do not mean currently, I mean in the future.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:20 AM
1

Not disagreeing, but I want to drop this link by and see if anyone notices.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:17 AM
0

Where did you leave the starting tag, is it in another comment? Are whole swathes of Reddit sarcastic now due to intra-thread sarcasm tags?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:15 AM
1

Because someone is trying to figure out whether or not something that is said to not be a disability should be treated as a disability or not? That doesn't seem like an unreasonable thing to be confused about.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:12 AM
1

Okay, question, what do you think about people who block people based on things like race, sexual orientation, or gender orientation from their private establishments. For example, not allowing black people in their restaurants or gay people to buy their wedding cakes?
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:08 AM
1

"That would never happen in the US." I hope you are right, but I fear that you may not be.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:01 AM
0

r/nocontext
/r/MensRights09/03/18 03:55 AM
2

Mess up the link
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:51 PM
13

There is a whole discussion to have here, but might I suggest that those running the machine are not those that benefit from the machine. They run congress for the benefit, many would argue, of primarily women. Also might I suggest you read this.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 03:47 PM
2

Does it give any benefits other than higher taxes? Also, sauce?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:48 PM
2

I used a thing to turn off their styling, and it appears you are right. They seem to have something extending their subscriber listing so that it is higher than in reality.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:32 AM
2

Personally, I am an egalitarian. I do not even consider myself an MRA. I do to little in the way of advocating to claim to be one. I think the question comes down to which definition. There Are two main ones: 1. Feminism is an ideology that seeks to obtain equality between the sexes. In which case I would argue that it is a poor mode to do so as it is innately biased towards women with inborn hostilities towards women. 2. Feminism is an ideology seeking to further the rights and quality of life …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:26 PM
2

So I looked at it on both my app and my computer. My app shows 3013 subs. My computer shows 3,013,743 subs. I am hoping the problem is with my computer. PS. Looking at it in incognito mode still shows 3,013,743. So not cookies or something.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:19 PM
9

How in the world does the sub-reddit have almost 3 million subs?
/r/MensRights24/02/18 10:52 PM
15

They just focus on their passions, friends, and other sorts of fulfillment that often go by the way side when you have a family.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:57 AM
3

While I get your point, I think them introducing such a category is a far larger problem.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:53 PM
9

While I certainly do not know what I would actually do in a dangerous situation, I would hope I would do as much for a woman as I would a man.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:45 AM
1

Who would fire her? Is she not elected?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:25 AM
3

Um, I looked at the thread and none of your comments or post had a negative score. Maybe it changed, we might have accidentally brigaded r/canada...
/r/MensRights02/02/18 07:33 PM
4

...Agreed. Might I suggest if you feel unable to talk to them directly, that you put it on hold for now and instead try to build up your social skills and confidence. Try some D&D, the role-playing might help you.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:58 PM
5

Nay, they be news giants!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:30 PM
2

There is a Piracy Party in Iceland?
/r/MensRights30/01/18 11:31 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1jt1u5/cmv_i_think_that_mens_rights_issues_are_the/cbi2m7a/?sh=6861b57e&st=J2Z0RRBW
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:44 PM
1

According to urban diction, you have apple butter. Hand it over.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:55 AM
1

yarp?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:45 AM
-6

Well they are helping them the same amount, the amount that the help affect them is different. Like giving a dollar to a beggar vs a millionaire. You are giving 1 dollars worth of help either way, it just has a larger effect on one vs the other.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:32 AM
1

I don't like caramel. Got any apple butter?
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:29 AM
4

sauce? Also it just says it is in the school, not school sanctioned.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:26 AM
31

This https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women%27s_March. A quick google search of the image shows that the image matches with the time of the march so that is probably the one. By "pussy" they are referring to the hats, aka pussyhats.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:14 AM
2

Many SJWs are liberal, however they are an extreme version. Many MRAs are also liberal. Liberal in the end, as I understand it, basically means using the government against social ills like poverty. The problem is that SJWs attempt to use the government against racism and sexism and the such, while defining it in such a way to benefit them which results in corruption and ingrained bigotry against groups they do not recognize as needing help.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 12:35 AM
2

Why not adopt?
/r/MensRights06/01/18 04:40 PM
2

Depends on where you are for legality.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:02 PM
3

"The Dustin…"
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:55 PM
1

Take the classes, they are annoying, but help you from a legal stand point. And you are screwed on the DVPO because they have a "rather safe than sorry" attitude.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:59 PM
19

Why is it called SATIREaid...?
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:01 AM
1

Wait, what is below Handgun? That is like the lowest in the rankings of firearms...
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:53 PM
4

Do stuff online, school probably has computers and she would not have access. Make sure he did the FASFA yesterday, and also one thing worth considering is if he declares a degree with lots of scholarships (eg. Entomology) then takes classes in his preferred major he can get extra scholarships.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:34 PM
8

Revenge porn for the blind…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:05 AM
2

Well to point out two: Restriction on free speech under hate speech laws And a shift away from assumption of innocence under "believe the victim" rhetoric
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:01 AM
3

Agreeable
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:23 AM
2

I agree, irregardless of moral equivalency, a wrong is a wrong,
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:05 AM
2

True
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:51 AM
6

Okay so by non consensual, you don't be not consensual but instead implied consent?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:50 AM
2

I mainly care about NN because of freedom of speech concerns. If a providers wants to virtue signal it is as simple as throttling every group they consider unfavorable. This ranges from the controversial (Pro Life or Pro choice), to the obvious ( Hate groups) to anything they please. And just a reminder, some erroneously think the MRM is a hate group.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:47 AM
2

Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't part of the reason MLK's movement succeeded be cuss people were afraid of X?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:37 AM
1

I would argue the primary purpose of jail is to increase the cost of criminal actions, and I would argue that is part of the reason it fails, since the first offense causes various social stigmas that the following ones do not.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:24 AM
13

What exactly is the difference between non-consensual sex and rape? It seems to be the same thing said two different ways and hence carries the same implication.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:19 AM
7

Well that sucks. Just a thought, but you may be able to get a reconsideration on the restraining order based on inadequate legal aide, however no clue if that would apply.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 05:43 AM
5

I have a short attention span
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:08 PM
1

Um, if you refuse to hire the other gender won't you get a civil rights discrimination suit?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:52 PM
8

If you can consult a lawyer, do so.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:49 PM
2

No. That is sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:38 PM
0

Nah, this seems like a dick move.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:22 PM
14

Actually, after seconding, you are supposed to put it to a vote.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:16 PM
3

Well also you could go at it from an angle similar to the Justic/Law paradigm. If they know you will fight back they are less likely to attack you in the future since it adds an additional cost to the action.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:29 PM
5

I actually do not think it is fair to characterize any group by cases like this. They are seeing a therapist. They have a slew of problems with their identity. They have problems with attraction. In general, they have problems and judging a group by their mentally-ill is rarely a good act.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:21 PM
1

Part of the problem is whenever a group attempts to help men, eg. against domestic violence, they tend to get called out as sexist and taking resources from women.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:51 AM
2

Wait, why are you paying child support. Did she somehow get any kids after making child pornography?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:49 AM
25

The idea of herd immunity is like so, person A cannot get vaccinated due to something, eg. an auto-immune disorder. Disease B is less likely to reach person A as the number of people who are immune to disease B, and as such are less likely to carry it. People who are immune are less likely to transmit a disease due to it not only not proliferating within them, but also not transmitting through methods like vomit or coughing. It is functionally similar to putting the person in isolation from the …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 11:36 AM
1

The pseudo courts. These courts are a twisted interpretation of what title 9 original was.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 09:14 PM
10

Honestly I think removing it without replacing would be better than keeping it in place since even without the school intervening there is still the actual police. If there is a better replacement then I am all for it but I fail to see a good possible replacement.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:49 AM
3

42?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 07:26 PM
-2

You're welcome, random citizen.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:34 AM
5

Also consider affirmative action making it easier for women to get in and acquire scholarships.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 01:02 AM
-4

I cannot see anything wrong with it.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 02:33 PM
2

It was national news…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 09:19 PM
3

"The Norwegian Association for Women’s Rights (NKF) considers female conscription as a misunderstanding of the concept of gender equality and the intentions of the Law on Equality. Gender equality implies first and foremost that women and men should have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms. Women should be valued and allocated power and resources on equal terms with men. But women and men do not have to be alike or do the same things to be equal." ...
/r/MensRights20/08/17 11:49 PM
2

Except, those degrees are their qualifications and their being better at their jobs is shown through their experiences.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:01 PM
3

The differences in biology do not matter. Simply treat race/sex as nothing and allow people's credentials, experience, and qualifications speak for them.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:03 PM
42

Groups, especially Feminism, seem to think we are some kind of 'male superiority' group. Anyone who spends time here knows we are not.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:18 AM
12

To be fair, that would still be 'almost all'.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 10:27 PM
1

Yes?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:21 PM
1

That things are not equal. That everyone gets screwed in their own unique ways. That some people get screwed more, and some less. That you can fight inequality, or at the very less recognize it for what it is.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:23 AM
1

I think we are more into mental diversity here than demographics diversity. I think most minorities end up in whatever minority civil rights group, and women in feminism, so we get the leftover white men.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:02 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:40 AM
26

A guy put out an internal memo criticizing Google for their diversity choices creating a hostile environment and suffocating creativity in the company. They fired him.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:21 PM
1

Sauce on the isis ban.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:58 PM
2

I mean, arguably, 9/11...
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:45 PM
3

I think it is more a matter of civility and politeness. The reason to call a MtF a women is similar to the reason that you call a cis-gender man a man, it would simply be pointless not to. I can understand boundaries such as refusing to use terms like Xer though.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:42 PM
5

Why not? As I understand it, did he not get fired for speaking his mind about an oppressive work place climate?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:28 AM
3

This is why we archive.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:03 PM
1

Roe V. Wade, right to privacy.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:13 AM
1

Alright, still weird, but alright. Also, potentially painful.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:06 AM
1

Is infanticide really a lesser offense?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:10 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:04 AM
1

How is this MR?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:44 AM
1

At least for the first part I would bet the following: Female starts in the 100k area more due to the higher attainment in education however drops in the 200k+ area since that requires more risk such as entrepreneurship.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:34 PM
1

A person is considered raped, legally, if below a certain age an adult has sex with them since they are considered too immature to consent.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:15 PM
3

No, we just need everyone that rapes children to be punished accordingly, which is more than one or two years.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:49 AM
19

They are talking about statutory rape which differs from state to state, but as a rule of thumb: If you are an adult don't have sex wth a minor.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:54 AM
3

It's over 9000!
/r/MensRights23/07/17 11:32 PM
2

Does not really seem like men's rights?
/r/MensRights23/07/17 03:33 PM
8

Well one big problem, as an computer engineer, is that whenever I see a woman or a minority I am concerned if they actually know their stuff or are there to fill a quota. I give them the benefit of believing, but I am still on guard at the start.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 04:12 PM
3

While I do dislike the uneven affect, minimizing the dependents is a good idea. The problem with permanently sterilizing women is that it takes a significantly more invasive procedure to do so.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:00 AM
-4

I approve of the program?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:15 PM
3

Just for the slow, they are referring to the dominance of women in education.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:10 AM
0

I have only one opinion on this matter: Do not object to science with anything but science.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:10 AM
17

Our main problem with it is that it is literally genital mutilation. I see nothing wrong with a child, iff they have circumstances that are dangerous to their future health in a significant manner, or a consenting adult being circumcised. That goes for both genders. Often the health benefits are too minute to seriously benefit the child or are for matters that could easily be taken care of when presenting signs. Lastly, ~80% of US men are circumcised however men don't tend to ostracize each othe…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:07 PM
3

It's called equity and it's annoying. Basically the idea is instead of equality of opportunity, they want equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:45 PM
1

I do not have enough internet to read the article, it might of been a no men's classes thing.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:50 PM
4

Not really a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:01 PM
153

Actually, it does not say women are a minority. On the other hand, they are probably discriminating by preferring women.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 02:37 PM
10

Killing people is rarely an acceptable solution to a sex issue.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:53 PM
1

I think standing back up, albeit with a crutch, is badass.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:05 PM
8

Paper abortion.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:22 AM
3

Yes, they know both sides and liberals are less likely to dismiss them due to being lower down the privilege hierarchy.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:29 PM
2

You know, at this point we should stop banning this guy so that we can know who he is by his username. Then we can ignore him easily.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 10:24 PM
2

What a dick!
/r/MensRights08/07/17 01:28 PM
2

Because this people are big into minorities for some reason and want to ethnic wash whatever they can get their hands on.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:12 AM
1

I think you'll find it impossible to find something that no-one finds problematic because any attempt to fix it tends to create its own problems and diminish the quality of the problem. So, yes problem abound but in general it does not matter and they don't need to be fixed. Worse comes to worse, find something else to watch.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:07 AM
2

I think non therapeutic on a minor should be illegal, do what you want as an adult. Same for FGM. Also, there is currently someone spamming the Reddit about it. He is hardcore anti-MGM.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:02 AM
-3

I actually agree with everything she said, of course the reason it is very straight and white is due to them being British children, but all the same do not like ideologies get in the way of entertainment unless it is excessive. E. Just did the math, based on the U.K. demo, 66% of the trio being white and ~ 94.5% being straight for a total of 62.5% of a trio of 2 boys and a girl being both straight and white.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:01 PM
3

And that kids, is why we archive.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:52 PM
4

If you call them on it you will hear the old "Sexism requires political, economic, and institutional power" smuck.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:20 PM
2

Plus, I think the male form of contraceptive would have less side effects since the ones they are currently developing are protein based instead of hormone based.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:06 PM
1

Yeah, but getting the legislature to doing anything that benefit pedophiles would nearly impossible meanwhile under the there are very barriers against them making things like simulated pornography illegal.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:49 AM
2

My 128 Kbps internet hates you for allowing for me to try to open those. So, do male perpetration rates drop accordingly? Also, why do you think this is happening?
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:27 AM
1

Yeah, but we don't have to normalize it. Make it taboo, but not illegal. Studies show that ways to release decrease the rate of crimes like rape including that of children.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:59 PM
1

I would assume the threats of false accusation and stalking.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:49 AM
3

Get a restraining order.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:20 AM
79

Torture, Assault, and Attempted Murder. They only got 28 months?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:15 PM
22

I would prefer someone use an artificial child than a real one.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:45 PM
2

Me? Probably, but what specifically?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:12 PM
21

I guess it would be dystopian… An end to abuse -> Do not recognize FoM abuse and believe all women's claims. An end to mansplaining -> Lock up any guy who talks to you in a way you dislike. Reparations -> Literal institutional sexism punishing people for perceived acts against their ancestors
/r/MensRights05/07/17 06:41 PM
3

Seems a petty complaint, we have bigger differences.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 05:10 PM
3

We have an anti-MRM tag? Wow, we really are into discussion. On GM my thoughts are: Thou shall not mutilate the genitals of a minor except therapeutically and do note that does not include cosmetic or preventative If thou are an adult do whatever you wish, I don't care.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:49 AM
1

Link? I hate people that say things like "who hurt you" because it insinuates that somehow being harmed invalidates your argument. If some girl got raped and started an anti-rape group, people would not invalidate her cause because she was hurt.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:43 AM
1

And why? For example, if it was simulated she should not (nor should men) be charged like alone convicted. Not saying it was, we just don't know since there is no sauce.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 12:39 AM
3

Yeah. We don't generally like feminism here, if you clarify what type you are you will be fine, eg. We like Christina Hoff Sommers. Honestly, you would be best off just stating your stance in relation to the topic instead of stating being a feminist to prevent being dismissed out of hand, you still have valid opinions regardless of your affiliation after all. We try to encourage discussion, but there is resentment since often we are either being blocked by feminist, or trying to undue something …
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:41 PM
1

While to a certain extent it is a response to feminism, it has genuine issues that need to be addressed such as rape, false rape, paternity fraud, corrupt court practices including divorce and custody law, male disposability and other similar concerns. For a strict response to feminist group, look to the anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:21 PM
16

Not to be that guy, but he should get a paternity test just in case.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:59 PM
4

PUA = Pick Up Artist. The only relation between the PUA's and the MRM are that both groups are red-pilled meaning they have accepted the idea that men have problems and feminism is not the answer. MGTOW and most Anti-Feminism groups belong with the red pilled too. However, I will say that false rape concerns them (them being a group primarily concerned with sex and all), but I have not heard of them fighting it.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:02 PM
10

The red pill subreddit is not for Men's Rights, it is for PUA's
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:07 PM
1

How is this MR?
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:48 PM
16

Feminism is strong in teaching, in-part since it is a low-paying college-required female dominated field. To make it worse you went to Canada, Australia, and film school which are all notorious for feminism.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:31 AM
1

I must say, at times British law is terrifying… being able to increase sentences like that…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:18 AM
2

As I understand it (note I do not watch him so it is hearsay) that the anti-Semitic stuff was a character assassination based on some satire he has put out following him pointing out some stuff that does not follow the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:51 PM
1

Someone whom is against homo, hetero, and bi at the same time would be interesting… post the results when you are done.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:53 PM
1

I haven't heard of any. Announcing yourself is a good way to make a lot of enemies and lose a lot of friends. Ps. There was that thing with PewDiePie awhile back.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 05:35 PM
2

I support the trans people being in this movement. They are useful because they are harder to discriminate against or dismiss when dealing with SJW's and most liberals.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 12:01 PM
6

Well, while anorexia is probably a poor analog, they do need to be treated as a sub-class of mental-illness. I have no problems with trans people living as trans people do, however classifying them as this would allow us to give them preventative care against depression and protect them from discrimination under the ADA.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:56 AM
13

Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:48 AM
5

To be fair, trans people have an atrocious suicide rate, so at the very least it is a huge risk factor.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:46 AM
56

I guess on IWD, they ask when is IMD. On IMD, no one mentions it. Literally I have not heard anyone outside of here talk about it.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:14 AM
20

Well, yes you do have to clean them, but you should not pull the foreskin back since it is fused to the shaft and can cause damage.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 09:35 PM
11

"It raises profound ethical and moral issues that will have an impact on women’s rights." Called it.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:32 PM
7

I do. It is. Also I mainly like statistics from authority, let others do the arguing. The gov does not need a position itself.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:59 PM
1

Trench coats are cool. Fedoras or lame. Duster-coats are [Redacted].
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:30 PM
1

Answer: Yes, but only if there is no way it could be construed as sexual. E.g. Grandmother.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:23 PM
0

Answer: No.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:23 PM
4

Answer: Yes.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:23 PM
4

I like government sources.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:18 PM
19

I assume his parents were not being paid either… I think his point was the idea of forcing men and boys to be useful while not having the same expectations on women and girls.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:58 PM
1

Oh my…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 08:54 PM
2

That would work. Love to see that passed, but I fear that it is impossible in America.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:36 PM
5

It is legal in Nevada. I actually approve of their system. It has the prostitutes as members of stationary brothels with strict health codes. They do keep it out of Las Vegas though.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:26 PM
2

The problem in this case though is to grant privileges to the dis-privileged would require one of two things: Reduce number of men working in dangerous fields. Problem: The work needs to be done and the guys need the money to support their families Reduce danger of dangerous jobs Problem: Not enough reason under the theory of male disposability and the best way to do this would be automation rendering many guys unemployed.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:22 PM
1

None taken. However if it works, by our theories, it would also decrease work-place death rates. One of the common concepts in the MRM is the idea of male disposability, or in other words the tendency of society to devalue male life and encourage the sacrifice of men. Therefore, many of us think if women suffered equally the situation would improve to protect their lives.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 07:03 PM
5

If you want to argue with people, it is best to be familiar with their arguments before hand.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:37 PM
8

Ah, okay.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:36 PM
1

Our solution is a little stupid, but it would work. What we want is not to decrease the number of work-place deaths, although that would be nice, but instead to equalize the number of male and female work-place deaths.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:02 PM
6

How is this Men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:57 PM
-1

For those who are curious, look up Postpartum Depression.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:57 PM
2

Eh, people are combative. A lot of people here assume everything is obvious, but people do not always understand and that is alright.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 03:54 PM
1

Why now?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:03 PM
2

The boardroom is typically a feminist cause and argument, however we get dragged into it a lot since we are the other gender equality group.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 02:02 PM
20

If done on an infant, we tend to consider it MGM and similar to FGM. So just apply every reason FGMis wrong to MGM and that is why.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:59 PM
1

What is the problem here? Men need belts too.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:48 PM
1

I just find his obsession with coal weird, but I am all for giving the little guy a chance.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:44 PM
3

A 'Man-Card' represents his utility and reliability and is taken if he is useless or unwilling to be useful.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:07 PM
7

This is the problem. It started as a problem of ethics in journalism however to protect themselves the journalist turned it into a matter of sexism in gaming which in turn angered the gamers. Ps. Look up Vivian James, she is a cute little insult to every opponent of gamers.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:03 PM
4

Yeah, but part of the problem is we tell men they should be proud about it. If we told women they should proud about it, they would probably act like they were. They would still have been raped though and have to deal with whatever mental trauma that leaves them with.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:00 PM
40

I love how at the end they say there need to be more training and flexible hours for equality. If they are equal, why do they need accommodations?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:48 AM
2

While the goal of objectifying men is horrible, as an engineer I cannot help but love it. Turning major life decisions into a game and holding the person's hand throughout the process in such a way is just skillful.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:18 AM
0

Why not just adopt?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:20 PM
4

I think you are auto banned from it if you post here…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:22 AM
0

I actually have to call bs on this one. The stats are from the 2010-2012 survey. I believe they use the same definition as the FBI, which until 2013 did not include 'made to penetrate' as rape. The guidelines were stupid, but the CDC has to follow the rules. At least, they gathered data about FoM rape.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:08 AM
1

One commonly heard thing is that it requires institutional, economic, or political advantage, however women arguably have those. Institutional: Tons of laws and gov funded organizations to help them. Economic: Majority of spending power Political: Majority of the electorate Ps. My definition is 'Sex based bigotry'
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:40 AM
1

I actually don't think there is anything wrong with the ad. She may have done extraordinarily, but that does not reflect poorly on men nor well upon women. It just means she is extraordinary, each sex has some extraordinary people.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:36 AM
1

Yes, however remember that while the sane are in the middle, so are the insane. The insane are everywhere… including right behind you.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:30 AM
1

Look, I can understand colorful language, but comparisons like that to a terrorist organization need to mean something. Things need to mean something, and we need to avoid devaluing the language. ISIS should refer to terrorism. We hate how feminist have destroyed the meaning of 'Rape,' let us not engage in such behaviors either.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:13 PM
2

It is actually a valid question though. If you removed crime and accident related deaths I wonder how they compare?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:15 PM
7

Virginia is a single party recording state, record everything including phone calls. You do not have to tell her.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:12 PM
1

Women tend to be in force in any group involving care, including education, child care, human and animal medicine. I would assume also retail customer services, welfare workers (especially cps), advertising, modeling, and cosmetics in general. Cannot think of more off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:08 PM
2

Location?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:02 PM
8

A man is more likely to kill a man than a woman. A woman is more likely to kill a man than a woman.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:58 PM
2

I agree. I was not making or taking it as a personal attack. I think protests like that are only minor, pardon the pun, to the situation at hand. The three main reasons I think men do not maker up a larger percentage of teachers is: Men are expected to provide for their families and teaching does not earn enough for that. Being a male teacher is dangerous due to the stigma around male sexuality. There is a significant chance of being accused of pedophilia. Men are rejected from the community. Th…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:36 PM
4

MRAParenting would be more apt?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:23 PM
1

Firstly, women rape men all the time. The argument is just stereotyping, If someone said we should not allow black people into education because they might shoot someone, we would call that racism. Secondly, there are a plethora of clear studies showing the lack of male role models negatively affect children, especially boys, and that the school system discriminates against men, both in being educated and employment practices. Thirdly, it is arguable that women are more dangerous around children…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:19 PM
4

Um, no. We find it exacerbates the problem. If you find yourself apologizing for doing nothing wrong, consider growing a backbone. If you are dismissed for being emotional, consider actually doing science. Many of these problems are simple. If A, then consider growing up and conforming to the standards or improve them.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:23 PM
3

Depends on your definition if "beat." If "beat" means there are more of them than men, I think they also outnumber men in medicine (both normal and veterinarian), and education among others. If out earn on average, that is harder. The only field I can think of for that is modeling. Ps. A mind flayed ate my thoughts.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 06:16 PM
24

No one should be better than jokes about tits.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:54 PM
1

If he left his stuff to the state, so what if she is his daughter? Just being his daughter should not override his will.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:59 PM
5

That seems too far, last I checked she has not directly killed anyone.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:53 PM
2

Well completely unrelated to MRM stuff, but the Xanth series is a good read and Everyone Else Is A Returnee is nice if you want something light.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 10:53 AM
3

One thing we can do is try to help those in trouble. Provide aid for the falsely accused, those whom have lost their children, their careers, and their homes.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:51 AM
12

It really should be noted that traditional circumcision differs significantly from the modern practice. The circumcision practiced traditionally by the Jews removes a significantly smaller portion of the foreskin, limiting the loss of nerves and not exposing the glands. While there is still moral objections, it is still worth noting. Plus, it gives persons who point out religion as a reason pause. On a side note, Christians really should not practice circumcisions since the idea is that it signi…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:46 AM
3

One big difference is the idealized male body type is strong unlike the idealized female body type. You can starve yourself to lose weight however that will not allow you to gain muscles therefore it makes less sense for men to become anorexic or bulimic. Additionally, it helps that men are judged my on capacity (e.g. Ability to earn and provide) versus the female judgment of reproduction (e.g. Create and rear)
/r/MensRights26/06/17 09:57 PM
16

He was being sarcastic… probably.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:39 PM
1

Yes, but it is medically relevant. It is the single most used tool for suicide in men and it makes sense to scan for it even just as a preliminary.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:23 PM
1

Depends on your location. Find out your states single recording laws. Just google works fine.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:47 AM
2

Yeah, don't you know all sex is rape. Your very being is intimidation and she should fear for her safety should she refuse you. /s
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:22 PM
1

That is why there is such a big range, groups like the DoJ typically operate strictly under legal actions, such as convictions. On the other-hand, groups like the CDC work with surveys, these surveys typically do not outright ask if you are raped, but instead ask if you had sex due to a lie or out of pity. Then using these answers they sort people into groups and classify certain groups as 'Raped' to add to their statistics. E. It should be noted that this is intentional, since they would rather…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 06:38 PM
4

CDC Survey: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf (Yeah, shouldn't include male rape by envelopment if running off the FBI definition, since it was 2010-2012 and the FBI male inclusive definition only went into effect in 2013.) Worth Looking At: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6fxang/are_more_men_raped_in_the_us_than_women/ DoJ: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv15.pdf (Seems rape has up-ticked, I assume due to now including male victims.) FBI Rape…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 06:34 PM
6

Nah, cancer is more egalitarian.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:18 PM
1

I think r/fem is more focused. We end up being split between stopping feminism harm us more, clarify our position, organize, talk to trolls, go on a Segway, and whatever that one guy throws in. I do not think this is something we can rectify though. To fix this there would have to be a huge unilateral move by the mods and one of the MRM is the free speech and thought, I mean the first step is even called 'Red Pilling' referring to the process of breaking out of a fake controlled world.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:17 PM
1

I can get sexes and cultures being different, but how are races differential?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:03 PM
10

1/6 is an exaggeration. The most common large number you see was 1/5, I think, which is from the CDC's Intimate Partner Violence Survey. You will also see 1/50, which is from the DoJ. (Both US) The stat is hard to figure out due to non-report, false accusation, and lack of understanding of what construes rape. Most genuine surveys that get large numbers do so by having a wide definition resulting in those whom do not consider themselves rape being counted, e.g. Guy lied about being rich. Ps. For…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 04:57 PM
4

Um, in the way this is presented this is not Men's Rights. Though I will note that lying to your doctor is amoral and that ~60% of male suicides are with firearms.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:42 PM
2

They aren't judging the truthfulness, they are judging the merit of feminism. You may judge an ideology or belief's merit based on the actions of those who hold it. Anti-feminist claim demise hold little to negative merit citing the function of groups under its banner often being hateful in nature and discriminatory in effect.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:35 PM
8

I think we all know the whole ~93% of violent crime is both committed by and upon men, the thing is we have no clue how to fix M on M violence. We believe that we can fix the stuff people ignore by making it noticed, because we assume that people will fix it. Only way I think we can fix M on M violence is by breaking down the devaluation of male life in our culture so that the risk of committing crime (and losing your life as you know it) along with the morale burden (of harming a man) increases…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:17 AM
1

I see, I understand the interest in deconstructing gender roles, but personally I prefer that as long as they are not restrictive or derogatory we keep them to a certain extent. Like a guide line, so that you know what to expect and what people expect however you can go around them if they are obstructive. Edit: Apparently mobile is hard for me.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:22 PM
1

This is kinda hilarious. I mean, it actually was accidental and would have no actual effect, but still…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:15 PM
3

Wow, that is ~11.4 years of payments. That is really stretched out so that it does not burden her at all
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:11 PM
7

I think that patriarchy theory is wrong, but would it not actually just require that the patriarchy be a social construct too? Since if genders are social constructs -> oppression based on gender is a social construct -> patriarchy is a social construct.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:08 PM
3

Like location, I think in the US this would be illegal (albeit since it is a good and not a service).
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:05 PM
6

Meh, seems to be she can have her own likes. Seems a she is a bit of a trad-con, but unless she talked about being oppressed a lot it seems abut jerking to just call her tastes self-oppressive. Maybe I am misunderstanding though.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:03 PM
1

Having a sword decoration in that house seems dangerous…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:13 AM
2

You should also take care to avoid leading questions and observation bías.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:05 AM
1

While the weightlifting one seems fair enough, the chess one seems to be contesting that the reason for low numbers at the top is due to stereotypes and sexism. Might not be understanding it though.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:03 AM
2

Consider contacting a group like FIRE.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:36 PM
1

Actually, feminist are a partial sub-group of SJWs. While rare, some who identify as 'feminist' are fair about it. Likewise you can be a SJW about other things, like transgenderism or homosexuality.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 01:08 AM
33

Isn't there actually a correlation between an increase in porn and a decrease in rape?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:10 AM
-10

I don't know. I cannot read the fine print, but except for the "respect women" part it seems fair. I mean they can only have one parent on the poster after all. I do wish they found a gender neutral version of "respect women" though
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:14 AM
2

Not me personally, but just FYI, there are females whom are MRA's. They are commonly called honeybadgers after the video a couple of years ago. Plus, there are just general people whom just watch us out of curiosity.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:11 AM
24

They are probably required to use the Duluth model by law, nothing they can do about it. Call your congressman instead.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:49 PM
1

Yeah, I am having internet issues. Technically difficulties for the win.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:06 PM
1

While arguably rape itself is not gendered, rape is overwhelmingly prosecuted on the behalf of women against men. While violent crime is overwhelmingly man on man, that does not mean each part is the same. Additionally, rape is oft seen as worse than murder. In murder there is a societal doubt not really seen in rape. Also, the reason rape is not a death penalty crime is so that rapist do not silence their victims after the deed, although this is based on the stereotype that many rapists are vio…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:02 PM
–

Rape does not always require violence or drugs. Many people seems to think it does, however all it requires is that the person does not consent or is unable to consent. Many of us worry about "retroactive" retraction of consent, meaning that even though it was consensual, if you are accused there is very little proof. After-all, the penetration happened either way, therefore it is hard to prove your innocence beyond a 50-50 standard.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:48 PM
1

Rape does not always require violence or drugs. Many people seems to think it does, however all it requires is that the person does not consent or is unable to consent. Many of us worry about "retroactive" retraction of consent, meaning that even though it was consensual, if you are accused there is very little proof. After-all, the penetration happened either way, therefore it is hard to prove your innocence beyond a 50-50 standard.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:47 PM
1

Firstly, we focus on things like false rape since it is such a gendered issue. Secondly, rape is special since not only does it carry such a stigma, outweighing even murder, but also in striving to support rape victims we establish a societal assumption of guilt meaning even being accused bring reprucussions such as expulsion from college, termination from employ, and loss of assets. Additionally, there is little reprucussion to the accuser since it most be proven malicious and little protection…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:28 PM
0

My post was gender-neutral. I actually have no clue what would happen if a man tried to enact the safe haven laws, but all the same a reform that requires the enact-er to pay would be shot down by concerns for the child's safety. On the other-hand, I think that abandoning a child in an unsafe place should be considered attempted murder and even in the case of mental issues (eg. postpartum depression) should require the person never be allowed to be the guardian of a child again.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:15 AM
2

I am going to say resoundingly no, especially in the case of the safe haven laws. The purpose of the safe haven laws was to prevent people from simply leaving the child in a dumpster, or some other equally horribly unsafe place, and imposing a burden on the abandon-er would place children at risk of befalling such straits again.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:39 PM
3

It should be noted, one things many people advocate for is that alimony be limited. This would mean after five to ten years the alimony would cease. The thought process behind this is that it would allow the partner whom is less prepared to make enough to make ends meet time to get back on their feet.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:53 PM
4

There are a bunch of watches that allow discrete recording of conversations eg. https://spycentre.com/products/wrist-band-mini-voice-recorder?utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=googlepla&variant=24463501379&gclid=CjwKEAjwse7JBRCJ576SqoD7lCkSJABF-bKubQJ5TAZNf0uOQCMeo7YDiEISECqewPrsEPH3tUKI8xoC4krw_wcB
/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:22 AM
3

When I was looking at the stats provided in the Faqs, it was between 25% (US), 40% (UK), and 50% (Canada). Do you have a source, preferably governmental, for 53%?
/r/MensRights23/05/17 04:36 AM
1

I love how the girl's example is $15 while the guy's example is $95. There is a pink tax for ya.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:10 AM
6

Source?
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:16 PM
10

Morale of the story, get a vasectomy and if you really want to be a father in the future, adopt.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 01:07 AM
3

legitamate You could say, you are not sure it is a legitimate word... Also, why? Legitamate doesn't show up on this page except here and you.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 01:06 AM
8

I am pretty sure that is what he is trying to do. He is saying that by going on strike many crucial jobs will be harder to complete such as sewage and construction. Additionally, tax revenue will drop from these men since they are earning less hence there is less to tax. Overall, it will put a strain on the government and society.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 06:51 PM
5

If you are talking about the statistic I think you are, keep in mind two things. They win some level of access, that sometimes being as low as remote only contacts through phones or Skype. Secondly, that is for the ones who fight for it, meaning many have stronger cases and the funds to hire proper lawyers (unlike many women whom can take advantage of groups aiming to help them). PS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXspAWjtbv8
/r/MensRights12/05/17 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter