Parmeniooo Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Can someone explain why some pre-nups get thrown out in court? And they basically boil down to the same things that make a normal contract valid. This isn't rocket science. It's just law.	/r/TheRedPill	26/07/13 06:38 PM
-5	Saw this Norman Rockwell illustration and I thought: If the black eye were on the girl would the picture be considered folksy and funny? And, to be honest, at this time a husband could 'discipline' his wife and it be considered a natural part of a marriage.	/r/MensRights	10/09/11 11:53 PM
0	Why don't men have any rights with regards to unplanned pregnancy? This is the only stance that has made any sense to me as well. Would we not be able to add the option of a "legal" abortion for the father? Meaning that he could forgo any parental rights to the child and avoid child support? Even immediately after writing that the consequences of the law are too obvious to ignore. I think status quo is the best quo. :/	/r/MensRights	20/04/11 03:53 PM
1	On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’ I just argue that we treat both genders absolutely equally. All Heinlen Starship Troopers style. Granted that women give birth, but I don't think that having the womb will always entitle them to more "worth".	/r/MensRights	07/04/11 04:31 AM
1	On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’ No. My point is that history is a great teacher and if we're able to learn from the mistakes of the past we should be able to progress past them. We shouldn't be beholden to an idea from the past just because "it's always worked.". We should always be striving to do better.	/r/MensRights	07/04/11 02:52 AM
1	On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’ Your only academic link proposes a reasonable and fairly thought out hypothesis on why patriarchy was a natural societal structure for early man. That's great. His premises explicitly include the need for the survival of the species that the woman stay home. This is no longer the case. With the advances in technological abilities that our society has gained it is no longer absolutely necessary that the woman stay home to take care of the child and home as her exclusive domain. This is simply a f…	/r/MensRights	06/04/11 10:43 PM
2	On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’ This is such a silly line of reasoning. Past societies have always been patriarchal and therefore they always should be. Herp. Derp. You've got to give reasons for why the benefits of patriarchy outweigh the rights of 51% of the population. And some diffuse statement about how "successful" civilizations of the past were all patriarchal is not an effective argument.	/r/MensRights	06/04/11 09:45 PM
2	On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’ Ok then. My perception of what feminism should be and what our society should strive towards is gender equality. This article strives for something that I see as being the antithesis of a just society. He strives for a return to the old ways of true patriarchy, and such striving only takes us backwards a society.	/r/MensRights	06/04/11 08:15 PM
2	On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’ Eh, feminism in its original form is simply a call for equality. The pedelum has swung past the mark, but that isn't a good reason to call for a return to the disenfranchisement of women.	/r/MensRights	06/04/11 06:45 PM
-5	Did I call it or what. Guy get's banned from feminisms for not "checking his privilege" - what ever the hell that is supposed to mean, and I get banned for telling him he's gonna get banned. Hilarious. So what we saw was a guy being an asshole and then I'm supposed to be shocked when he gets banned in a subreddit that specifically states that they don't tolerate shit like that? Or am I supposed to be all supportive of my fellow man even when he decides to make points in the most offensive manner possible?	/r/MensRights	30/10/10 03:28 PM
4	oopsie daisy - my dad didnt REALLY diddle me - oh well ill write a book and make MORE money off of my lie. I'll call it "my lie". She used to claim that 1 in 3 girls was molested. I haven't read the book, but I've read a bit about the "false memory" shit that went down during this time. She did it as a child under then strong influences of adults coercing her into accusing her father of molesting her. It is hard to blame a child for doing something that they don't understand with consequences that they can't comprehend. Blame the assholes who implanted the false memories, but don't blame a child.	/r/MensRights	23/09/10 02:38 PM