On Shit Testing: Society simply cannot survive the current model whereby most men are slaves with every action monitored, controlled, and swiftly punished while every whim of the female is considered a legal ‘right.’

rantgrrl · 2011-04-06T16:48:51+00:00

I can agree that women testing men and being put off by sensitivity and devotion is bad. But the rest is a bunch of wooly-headed nonsense. Why do people keep linking to this blog? Everything about it including the font of the title makes me think of insecure, psychotic douchebags wearing Affliction shirts.

Somehow he appears to be legitimately concerned that a woman will call 911 any time he refuses to fall for some bullshit scheme of hers. That doesn't follow unless he really is psychotic, or only associates with psychotic women. Did I miss something here?

spagma · 2011-04-06T15:43:02+00:00

He lost me at "knock em around"

fondueguy · 2011-04-06T14:22:54+00:00

While some might make false rape accusations or battery charges, that's about the only real truth to the entire article. The rest is just hateful spew that landed on a blog and speaks the worst of both sexes.

Oh yeah... fact: fact: fact:.

Edit: He argues that males should be "alpha" then comes back with this gem...

It is hard to get more alpha and dominant than forcible rape

Fuck this guy.

ignatiusloyola · 2011-04-06T13:26:41+00:00

Yay for a call for regressing society!

Clearly the author isn't a thinker, just a talker.

2011-04-06T15:56:52+00:00

This guy is a retard.

eulerup · 2011-04-06T14:35:08+00:00

Any woman in America knows that all she has to do to turn the tables is dial 911 and make up whatever story she wants. Not only will she be believed, but she will likely benefit very handsomely from the system as it prepares to steamroll the chum.

As a female: Just because we can doesn't mean we will. I don't see myself ever being in a position where I would do that to a man, much less a man I supposedly (had) loved. Yet I'm lumped in with the small portion of bitches who would do this. That isn't any different from lumping any man in with rapists.

Men get fucked over on custody rights. I get that. It sucks. It is an important issue. It needs to be fixed, immediately. However, I don't think grouping all women as crazy bitches will help the cause.

I consider myself a pretty dominant female. However, I try to make a point not to be manipulative. I definitely have the mom/leader role in my group of (somehow mostly female :( ) friends. Yet when I am with guys, I no longer have that role. I'm not sure men have fallen as much in the beta role as some seem to think. (Only one data point, I could be totally wrong on a bigger scale.)

pvtshoebox · 2011-04-06T16:16:22+00:00

This problem is not so much a problem with law, but law enforcement. It is not women's fault that their claims are believed more easily than men's. The laws (for the most part) are gender neutral.

The problem lies squarely on the shoulders of cops. Most police officers are men. Particularly, they are men who see themselves as protectors. Call it male instinct, cultural bias, or misandry, many of these men feel more compelled to protect a woman from a man than vice versa. That translates into an overly aggressive reactionary stance when confronted with the possibility of male-on-female crime. The few female cops out there are also more likely to relate to the female.

The problem is the same with divorce courts. It is not the laws that are at fault. The fault lies with judges that are not objective, and the potential for women to capitalize on their advantage in non-objective credibility. Again, most judges are men.

It would be of some service to men, though, if this cultural anomaly were publicly defined and protested. However, as we all know here, women see little advantage to this, and most men still hold the antiquated view that women need male protection, and will hence see no issue.

Before we could expect law enforcement to view the sexes equally, we need to combat the popular opinion that women hold a monopoly on victim-hood, that men should individually be indifferent to the abuse of other men, that women need the protection of men, and that manliness is measured by a man's willingness to protect women.

In summary, fuck the pigs.

Seiesnalli · 2011-04-08T04:15:13+00:00

As an interesting aside to this discussion, I know an entire department [and their ancillaries] of behavioral psychologists who believe this kind of stuff religiously.

Even the females who are ardent feminists concede they believe it's scientifically sound.

crystall · 2011-04-06T15:27:37+00:00

Yup. I'm done. Unsubscribing now.

Ma99ie · 2011-04-06T15:11:23+00:00

It is true that obsticles to women's behaviors have been systematically removed, while manhood is definately legislated into criminality.

mehr_bluebeard · 2011-04-06T15:53:20+00:00

I think 'game' is 'needed' because many men did not learn from other men how to act around women. Schools here have mainly female teachers, men are at work and mommy raises you most of the time.

And we all know mommy isn't going to give you tips on how to get laid.

2011-04-06T20:29:10+00:00

Hahaha this article is awful reddit is awful

Comments