TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Quazz Archive

View 7 posts and 1,354 comments by Quazz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,354 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

If you're actually in the programming business then you know just how much bull shit it is. Developers need to stick really close to the specification of the client and, if the dead line is met and the client is not satisfied they need to modify it again. They're being held hostage by clients, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:46 AM
5

Besides, there's no way anyone feels held hostage by developers, considering they pretty much have to do exactly the client asks or they get shit for it
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:43 AM
1

Sure, but aside from all that, I don't understand why people who steal sperm to impregnate themselves are not being declared unfit for parenting. (Well I do, it's about money (as the state makes money of child support and loses it of orphanages))
/r/MensRights25/11/12 12:55 PM
1

He supposedly lives in Torronto, would this still hold? And, if it's income-differential, how could it be crippling?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 11:08 AM
26

Wait. If you get drunk and have sex you're still the rapist? What the fuck
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:31 PM
2

Some here don't necessarily hate women, they were just incredibly hurt because of (some of) them. It's not fair, but it is what it is.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:09 PM
12

At the cost of how men feel. You can't fight sexism with sexism, it does not work.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:59 PM
2

There are tons of t-shirts without a cut and tons with. There is a choice to be made there. No such choice is available for pants.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:50 PM
1

The principle is the same. Blaming others for seeing something you pretty much throw in their face.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:33 PM
2

It reminds me of women who wear clothes that show off all of their cleavage and then get mad when people happen to notice.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:33 PM
2

And that's because the company itself also looks down on them. Holding their hand and making it easier for them is basically saying: We know you can't actually meet our standards, so here's the kids version. It doesn't help equality, it only makes numbers look pretty.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:20 PM
10

To be fair, in presedential debates, the truth matters little. It's about what people perceive as the truth.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:34 AM
1

Ehh, it's just what I remember from high school biology, so.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:28 AM
1

Sure, it isn't a major thing, but it's a factor all the same.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 09:27 AM
1

Well...I don't think that would last long.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:28 AM
3

All parts produce more males. 51% of all children born are male. The spermcells with the Y chromosome, while less durable, are also faster. It gives them a slight edge (as time might actually be against you, making speed a preferable trait) Problem is that more men die over the course of a life time. I do think those gaps will close over time automatically. As both women and men now work and hard physical labour has become a minority, I believe this was a major factor. Hopefully, wars can be dim…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:22 AM
3

Sounds more like girls are slaves in certain countries FORCED to give all their money up to their family. What a load of wankers to try and portray that as a good thing.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:43 PM
3

They get money from the government to combat it.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:38 AM
1

Manning up is just a bullshit phrase people use to get you to behave the way THEY want. Don't fall for it, act the way YOU want. Who do YOU want to be and what do YOU want to do?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:12 PM
0

Unfortunately, this is far from the truth.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:39 PM
2

I'm from Europe and unisex bathrooms are rare here. As far as I know. In fact, I've never actually seen one. And I've been in quite a few European countries over the years.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:35 PM
8

He was kind of rude for not apologizing for being late, but taking 'revenge' like that is just cruel. Usually when people don't like others on dates, they just don't see each other anymore, not be dicks to each other. I guess her immaturity is why she is single.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:29 AM
1

Toilets are there to make lives more comfortable, yet you argue not to use them? What kind of madness is that, exactly?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:28 PM
1

Indeed. And I shouldn't have to either.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:53 AM
1

For me personally, and I doubt I'm alone, holding poop makes me sick after a while.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 07:39 PM
1

Not sure what that has to do with poop.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:43 PM
6

So... If man = hold poop If woman = Royal Flush Yeah... Don't think so bud
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:54 AM
72

TIL Men never poop.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:48 AM
2

I've only seen the opposite personally.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:38 PM
8

Which is the far less likely answer to this riddle. The chances that, with two different fathers, both kids STILL look like the mother is pretty small.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:23 PM
22

Yeah, they look so much like each other, I would actually be surprised he wasn't the father.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:56 AM
1

Is murder still murder if it is not recognized as such? Reality doesn't give a rat's ass about what anyone perceives or recognizes.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:42 AM
6

True scottsman fallacy
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:28 AM
3

I noticed they're more inclined to tell women to break up rather than men.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:40 PM
7

Indeed, this way women don't need to take pregnancy leave, which would eliminate that as a factor. Plus, a lot of women have a destroyed self image after pregnancy, this too could be prevented.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:33 AM
29

Yeah, the notion that, if they can't have the sole key to popping out babies makes them obsolete is inherently sexist in nature. The irony is truly juicy in this one.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:32 AM
9

This confirms it: They really do believe we are capable of reading minds.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:27 PM
0

Where are they calling up people to beat women? Where are they promoting it? Discussing things and posting pictures is quite different from promoting.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:11 PM
1

Exactly. It reminds me of branding the Jews with David Stars. We don't have a thief list or murderer list or anything of the sort. I feel the USA is so overly obsesses with sexual crimes that it has lost perspective on what is right.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:05 AM
2

Depending on where it happened it could be considered illegal, although by any and all definitions used, it certainly isn't rape. The laws suck and so does the culture that thinks this kind of shit is alright. There's a justice system for a reason, if everyone were allowed to just execute justice as they saw fit we would all end up dead in under a century time.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 09:03 AM
-2

Not that much in pubs, although I do from time to time with some mates, but parties, festivals, etc. tons of times.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:11 PM
1

Why care about the guy though in that circumstance? Just go in reverse, he'll get the fucking message to back off. When you're left with no room to maneuver, the smartest way to go is through your enemy.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:17 AM
-2

I've never seen people be aggressive on just alcohol, unless they would otherwise also be aggressive. It's always drugs alone or drugs + alcohol
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:14 AM
1

Depends entirely on the build.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:13 AM
1

TIL American cars don't have reverse.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 10:11 AM
2

I must remember to clean the body when I kill someone in order to reduce my sentencing.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:59 AM
2

More media attention.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:59 AM
4

That's because British people know how terrifying screwdrivers can be in the right hands.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:58 AM
0

And it would be irresponsible to allow them to work and vote too.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:57 AM
0

Yeah chromosome, my bad. Basically, men and women have the same chromosomes. The only difference is the Y chromosome vs X chromosome. This accounts for about 0.75% of the genetic data in humans. Which is huge (difference between humans and chimps is about 1%) Couple that with statistical data about variations in several areas such as height, IQ, and so on. Then finally add a dash of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome#High_mutation_rate And you got your answer. High mutation rate automati…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:27 AM
0

Source: basic biology
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:05 AM
2

And girls suck at math amirite!
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:26 PM
9

Incorrect, males have a wider variance in IQ amongst other things due to more intense mutations in the Y gene. This means most geniuses will be male, but most retarded people will be male as well; the average pans out at about the same in the end though.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:25 PM
5

but if something did happen, and I was raped, given all the weird political things surrounding rape (Like how some politician's believe a woman can force her body to not get pregnant if she is 'truly raped') I don't want someone to say that I should have seen it coming and I could have prevented it. Instead of dealing with any of that, or having to worry about it, I was just hoping to hire some girl. What if you get raped by a girl? Much harder to get anyone to believe that, as well unfortunatel…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:13 PM
4

Meh, weapons are all around us now, physical strength means very little compared to what it used to.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:10 PM
-1

Keep dreaming.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:08 PM
0

That would still leave DNA traces. Hairs, skinflakes and so on. Especially if you have sex, dear god, the amount of DNA that leaves behind is staggering.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:46 AM
1

I think the only way to not find DNA in a condom is for that condom to not actually have been used.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 10:07 PM
2

To be honest, the second one, keeping it away from your ex isn't a bad title in itself, seeing as you should keep it away from her and make sure it goes towards the child after all.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:10 PM
1

Sigh, miss the point more why don't you.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:49 PM
1

I think the main issue here is that it looks like she's encouraging mothers to get that money for themselves, rather than for the child. I mean, it is child support after all....
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:43 PM
2

What kind of logic is that? If I create a new car tomorrow, but refuse to be further involved with that car, am I suddenly being unreasonable? Or maybe I have a good reason for it, for example, I might not have a drivers license. Or I need money so I sell it. And so on. People often have very rational reasons (even if they're emotional ones) for doing what they do.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:41 PM
5

I'll agree to that if the same can be said for zygotes and embryos. Otherwise both go out the window.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:44 PM
17

Agreed, context is key here. They were talking about women getting raped by men (as they were discussing 'body shutting down pregnancy while being raped') so ofc the man is the aggressor and woman the victim in this given scenario.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 11:20 AM
2

Quite, everyone knows there are omega-males too.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:50 PM
7

Freud would have something to say here.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:48 PM
3

Agree, although DerpaNerb did ask about rights.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:48 PM
2

There wouldn't be a MRM if feminism wasn't so one-sided.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:12 PM
1

Globally speaking, there's actually slightly more men now due to the explosive growths in several Asian and African countries. But historically speaking, there have been more women than men. Of course, minority is no longer defined purely mathematical. Which makes no sense, but hey.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:42 PM
2

I don't take the bus personally, but the train is close enough and while most people prefer to get a space to themselves (for obvious reasons) I've never seen someone really avoid having to sit opposite/next to me or anyone, really. Then again, I'm not from the US, but I doubt it would be much different there. People just keep to themselves. Although, this probably is different in the US on the other hand.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:41 PM
6

But don't you see! They don't have white privilege so it doesn't count! /feministlogic It's not even parody, she literally said this, except instead of black men it was about middle-eastern people.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:38 PM
6

They use it to justify whatever sexist rules are in place that aren't detrimental to their cause.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:31 PM
10

Edit: Katie J.M. Baker is a writer for the feminist magazine Jezebel. writer for the feminist magazine Jezebel. Jezebel.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 10:40 PM
9

Well, to be honest, you can't fake an erection. There is nothing false about this statement technically speaking. Of course, they mean that 'if you have an erection you want sex' which is wrong obviously.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:07 PM
2

Implying that would actually happen. Unless you got an actual example of the reverse occurring then all you can do is speculate. And as a European I can tell you your speculations are way off.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:37 PM
5

You realize that was said by a guy about a girl apparently? Sure, a lot of those people are dicks, what else is new?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:10 PM
1

You think they married for the wedding and then divorce straight after because they had their fun? You're really broken mate.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:48 PM
2

All that tells you is that women typically are more involved in weddings than men. You think they'd go for a lifetime commitment just to get a party? Get some perspective.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:40 PM
0

I realize you may have been hurt in the past and this has given you a warped perspective... Please do not let it consume you. If you look at history, you'll find you're wrong for various reasons. But even now, it's not about a party either, I mean, you can organize a party for your birthday to that end...
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:14 PM
1

I don't really keep links to everything I know. But here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome#High_mutation_rate It talks about chromosomes in general rather than just sex chromosomes, but it does give the reason as to why this is. Basically it comes down to the difference in cell reproduction. Spermcells undergo a lot more stages than eggcells do. (meiosis -> several mitosis) vs (meiosis)
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:03 PM
3

I thought the point was that NONE of the statements are scientifically accurate...
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:07 PM
8

More evolved is a nonsense phrasing. It mutates 50% faster than other sex chromosomes though. Which gives rise to a wider spectrum for men compared to women. (more geniuses and more dumbasses, averaging out at the same, for example)
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:06 PM
8

Wait, what?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:05 PM
3

Considering most of the atheist and skeptic communities are male, I think they'd have a hard time making it stick.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:01 PM
0

Definitely not an expert, but I believe you need more distinct and more differences in order to have such a thing as breed or race. The differences for humans in comparison are really very tiny.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:00 PM
3

Conceived would still not be entirely correct. You don't start off as a fully developed female only then to start removing your vagina and shit.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:57 AM
5

Plus, being born means coming out of the womb... Pretty sure the development is supposed to be done at that stage. It's a claim that's wrong on several levels.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:55 AM
2

My point with the last line is actually that it highlights how silly the notion of patriarchies and matriarchies is. If you can spin it any way you like, then of course you'll always be right. It tells you nothing about what is actually true though.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 02:33 PM
3

That's the entire difference between patriarchal modelling and the alternative presented here, "traditional gender roles"--one (the former) holds that there can only ever be one truly ideal human being (and this ideal human being is ideally masculinized); the other (the latter) holds that there are at least two distinct but equal gender roles. I disagree with that assertion. It seems overly simplistic for the sake of finding a scapegoat. There are plenty of examples where the feminine aspect is …
/r/MensRights03/08/12 02:09 PM
2

I kind of disagree with the assesment that femininity is further removed from it. Further removed from the male ideal, yes. But that's the thing, there's also a female ideal and it's closer to that than masculinity. If a woman goes into engineering/mechanics or something of the like, then she'll also be looked down upon. Is this then Matriarchy? Or is it just gender roles being gender roles being stupid... Quazz out
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:47 AM
1

It's more poweriarchy than anything else.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:43 AM
3

Durable? What exactly do you mean with durable? Given that women live longer. And men are biologically speaking more susceptible to a variety of genetic diseases.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 09:30 AM
15

The study they're talking about was trash too. It used primarily teenagers for example. And women's brains happen to end development earlier (women's brains stop developing at 21, men's at 27 plus they start puberty earlier) in other words it would be shocking if they didn't get better results. The real question is, how did they only get such measily better score despite their opponents being at a rather large handicap.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:43 AM
0

No where does it say or has it been said that Patricia Legarreta immediately took both kids and scrambled around the theater. The story suggests the opposite; that for the most part, once the shooting started she stayed put. That being said, I find it hard to believe that he "lost" them seeing as they were all sitting together and he was holding his son during the movie. Well, if he said he lost them, when he didn't, then she would know and would never agreed to marry him... There's clearly part…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:26 PM
1

He wasn't trying to find them. He knew exactly where his son was-- in his arms before he put him on the floor, jumped the balcony and ran out, then got in the car and drove off. Eh, no? He was thinking about jumping down and wondering if he could take his kid with him and if he'd survive or not. But that wasn't relevant as he looked around and couldn't find them so he jumped down. I agree driving off seems strange, although considering you're filled with fear and unable to think straight maybe n…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:23 AM
1

I guess it kind of explains how they got seperated too.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:18 AM
4

Paralyzed with fear, yeah, didn't really think of that.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:18 AM
1

So wondering exactly what happened to them is judging them?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 08:17 AM
1

Now that's a good example of how in fact we apply value. We aren't seeing the genetics of the person, we can't interpret their propensity towards disease, we can see only the surface and we subconsciously assign value to what we see. This is again an example of not how we are interpreting genetics, but the way in which our brain behaves in regards to assigned value. No, sorry, I'm talking about something completely different. Sure, we technically don't 'see' the genetics; but we do pick them up,…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:30 PM
2

Just saying, if you're trying to use this argument in favor of procreation then it doesn't really work out.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:17 PM
1

People do weird things when they're scared/panic. Thinking straight isn't exactly the first thing you'll be doing.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:16 PM
21

He was trying to find them, but couldn't. What then? Stay there in the dark, in a room filled with teargass where every second could be your last and you're practically pissing your pants?
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:15 PM
26

I suppose. Judging from the video he didn't really abandon them, he just couldn't find them so got out of there, doesn't seem cowardly or weird to me. It's hard to imagine such a situation, but I feel like I'd think or at least hope they already got safe/out.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:11 PM
1

It has no way to tell that It does, actually. In fact, we are so good at it (on a subconcious level at least) that women use this all the time to select a suitable mate.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:04 PM
9

Ahh, gotcha :)
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:03 PM
6

Wait, if you agree with me, then why can't you upvote me? :P
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:59 PM
1

They are different. One side has a genetic component, the other really doesn't. You don't gain anything evolutionary speaking by protecting someone outside of your genepool. Yes, both sides have an emotional component, I never refuted that though. But only one of them relies on instinct. A lot of people don't even have a bond with their kids until they're a certain age. Although most do, of course.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:44 PM
1

No, I'm not saying there is NO imperative to save someone that isn't genetically related you. I'm saying there's no GENETIC imperative to do so. Is it really that hard to understand? There is no instinct to do this. It's emotion.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:18 PM
-1

Unless you're some helpless child or something, then I will expect you to be able to actually be able to leave at the same time as myself. The question is: Would you really need someone in that situation? The way you are currently? And if so, what for? And if not, what's your point? And he wasn't just like WELP IM OUT OF HERE. He was trying to find his son but couldn't, so he ran out. Seems perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:15 PM
212

I wouldn't even call him a coward. Nor the others who ran away. It's just common sense to do so; regardless of how disorienteted and scared you are. What bothers me most about this story, how were they not able to follow him? Why did they decide to stick around until someone else practically dragged them out?
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:12 PM
1

No? You drew that conclusion, but that's not what I meant at all. How quaint.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:08 PM
0

Sorry, what? I was the one saying it was genetic from the start, stop trying to twist it lmao.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:53 PM
1

Inherent means it's always been there and always will be. In short: it's genetic Oh would you look at that
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:57 PM
1

Apparently someone didn't pay attention in biology class as to what an instinct is...
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:41 PM
0

I'm not going to have the same discussion with every yokel that wants to spit off a few words. Paternal Instinct. Google it. Educate yourself. Did you fail reading comprehension in elementary school? I said exactly that parents have a genetic imperative to protect their offspring. But partners aren't your offspring, so it doesn't count for them. Also stop with the woman bashing, you sound like an idiot. Mens Rights does not equal Woman Bashing. You don't get what you want by saying "Lookey me I …
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:21 PM
1

As if communism was theoretically defined as being under the power of a dictator... Theory and practice have a world of difference between them. Who cares about the theory when it doesn't work in practice? EDIT: In fact, you should know this by now, given that feminism in theory is about equality... Give me an example of this "socialism" as it is practiced in a country. Socialism will be partially applied in several aspects of countries. For example, where I live, Belgium, you got social welfare…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 02:23 PM
-4

First off, the obvious: No dictator. Secondly: No forceful taking of property so it can be used for the nation/redistributed or whatever. (in short, far less nationalism/patriotism) Socialism is more an economic and cultural system; Communism is more a political, economic and cultural system. Communism wants to basically tear society down and rebuild it without classes and so on; making everyone the exact same in essence. Socialism wants to build on current societies, they recognize there are di…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:38 PM
1

Socialism =/= Communism Seriously guys, stop doing that.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:52 PM
1

So could you.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:27 AM
2

The world would go on without procreation too.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:25 AM
1

It's actually worse, since you have to die for this one. As opposed to getting kids. Kind of a big difference there.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:25 AM
2

We have a genetic imperative to protect our offspring. We have no such imperative for a partner. And if we protect what we value, then what does that tell you about no women trying to protect their partner? They don't value their partner? Or does it only count for men? Either way it falls apart. The cause root is found in society, not in nature.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:22 AM
0

Good job at missing the point of my statement, like most here did, apparently. The point is that they function as meatshields; that's the issue and hence it's not better.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:16 AM
1

Implying that's any better.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:32 PM
-8

It doesn't matter if you didn't say it. People only get marked hero when they're dead.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:16 PM
-6

Your reflex when your life is in danger is to jump infront of someone else? Rather then run the fuck away? Seems more like something that's taught/trained rather than innate. Unless you're protecting your kids, but that's genetics at play.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:58 PM
-9

I really think is a beautiful act of love and admire these guys You admire them for having watched too many action movies and being dumbasses? If someone barges in a crowded place and starts shooting, then keep low. He'll try to aim for what he can see. Stay low until you're out of sight. Oh look, that's something everyone can do without the need of sacrifice.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:35 PM
2

Dying for your kids, on the other hand.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:34 PM
4

TL;DR All heroes are dead. Do you want to be a hero son? You'll notice they won't call anyone who did these exact same acts; yet lived, heroes. That's because they try to make death appealing for specific situations. Kind of like they do for the military.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:32 PM
11

Chivalry is sexist in nature. And sexism is always doublesided.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:31 PM
6

This is quite ennerving. Why are men always expected to sacrifice themselves? And why are you only good when you sacrifice yourself? This reminds me of the fact that all the heroes are all dead. That's the one thing they all have in common. It's this sort of honortrip to try and make it seem appealing for people to do so.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:30 PM
0

She could have made it work if she extended it to being nice to all and not just women. But she failed. Typical.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:21 PM
3

Hitler killed jews and niggers, but niggerjews? Most of them were in Africa; beyond his reach.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:01 PM
14

Doesn't matter; get life destroyed. It honestly doesn't matter if you get convicted or not, your life will be in ruins regardless.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 04:25 PM
2

With happened to the 943 other NiggerJews?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 04:25 PM
3

Education matters a lot. But also nutrition. And of course age. Boys' brains are fully developed far later than girls' brains.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:50 PM
4

when a study about men being fast and stronger than women comes out everyone jumps on how great a study it is and how that evidence is amazing wat When? 1423? Why is it such a terrible threat to men that women's IQ is growing faster? As usual, the study is flawed. Very few adults participated in the test. (what kind of adult would bust their ass for a tenner anyway). It's well established the boys lag behind in puberty.(in fact brains are only fully developed for boys at 30 as opposed to 21 for …
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:45 PM
15

Never understood why people didn't get that games are all about fantasy and pretending to be someone you're not.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:40 PM
3

Ah, and yours did add? Let's be fair here, this entire conversation didn't add anything. We should all downvote all the posts now amirite
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:32 AM
0

You don't need to able to read minds to see the obvious.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 11:28 AM
8

I'm not here to educate people on socialism, look it up if you wish to learn something. And I didn't downvote you; which is what you assumed and you therefore downvoted me. Entitlement much?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:39 AM
12

And with that, everyone now knows you know nothing about socialism.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:31 AM
16

Why would that be a problem? Are you confused about what socialism actually is or what?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:39 AM
8

Done.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:14 PM
4

According to /r/autism the original source is from a news site located in Australia.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:14 PM
4

Media attention is important to get people to think about certain issues and perhaps change their mind on it. If the media keeps on hiding these cases all the time, then of course there will be idiots, even here on reddit, who truly believe a man cannot be raped by women. To change the world, you need to change the minds of people. And the media has a lot of control in that area.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:10 PM
4

Pretty sure it's satire. The poll kind of confirms it. It's too troll, not to be satire.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:00 PM
1

I think the point is everyone who can should learn to cook; not just 'regular' people.
/r/seduction12/07/12 03:48 PM
1

Eh, England is actually the odd one in the group for welfare states They got major problems with their youth and younger adults (bingedrinking, teen mums, etc) which most other countries don't have such problems with. In fact, here in Belgium (arguably an even bigger welfare state), teenage pregnancies went down (and it was already low compared to others). Plus there is no bingedrinking problem (not that it doesn't occur, but it's not a problem like in the UK) And I mean, the US isn't a welfare …
/r/MensRights11/07/12 01:18 PM
2

I wish people understood taxes are simply payment for services executed by the government. Such as maintaining roads and buildings and all that nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:21 PM
7

In that case, feminism means female supremacy. And they cannot deny it using a dictionary.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:17 PM
2

These power structures with male leaders certainly don't act on behalf of or in the interests of men as a group, either. Correct, they only act on behalf of their own interest.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 01:17 PM
1

Not sure, I'm not even from the US, but I know they exist.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:33 PM
3

Arrest records aren't really that accurate, for reasons stated above.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:30 PM
3

Stats are 50/50 last time I checked. In a lot of states they're required to arrest the men regardless of who was injured. It's a stupid law, but it exists. I guess the only exception would be if you were dying or some shit, then they'd probably send you to the hospital and arrest you afterwards.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:45 PM
19

At 11-12 (probably about the age these kids are), girls are usually stronger because they have a year up on puberty and guys usually haven't even started or barely.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:41 PM
20

Perhaps we should try to get everyone to use safewords instead.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 11:01 PM
10

I used to rape all day long, but then I saw this poster and it blew my mind. From that day onward I said: no more! Mind you, it was a struggle, I relapsed several times, but eventually I was able to overcome it.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 10:55 PM
14

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/vz13z/dads_of_reddit_how_has_having_daughters_changed/c58vml5 Look at this fucker.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:13 PM
15

I approve of this behavior. I like sending criminals to jail/prison.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 10:57 PM
1

Not really angry, no. Just think the author is pretty misguided. All of those can be truths as well, but now that won't matter because everyone who has read this will think it's a lie every single time. Besides that, there's plenty of generalizations and stereotypes to be found of course.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:53 PM
2

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:25 PM
6

Because if we get rid off that vision, they lose part of their power and I'd imagine funding. Plus, fears are irrational at their core anyway.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:24 PM
5

No, it doesn't depend on sex, it depends on context.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:52 PM
0

Pay in sports is something that can be debated about until the end of days so it's rather pointless to engage in. On one hand, men do play longer so should earn more as they worked longer. On the other hand, they both worked just as hard so should earn the same. The only solution is to make the duration the same.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:07 PM
8

Religion: Opposing basic human rights since the dawn of humanity
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:03 PM
7

Seriously. That's the king of all red flags.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 12:31 PM
2

All the women put together had 25 partners. There's 25 of them. That means on average, each girl had 1 partner. All the men put together had 25 partners. There's 25 of them. That means on average, each guy had 1 partner. Thus 1:1 ratio. Math, it's easy, really.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:22 PM
2

And men lie in the opposite direction on average.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:20 PM
2

But that's the point they're trying to make; either put no one on it, or both. Right now it's disproportionate.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:26 PM
1

I don't consider that hitting on, I consider that creeping on.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:52 PM
1

Has the definition of 'hitting on' changed in the last few hours?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:37 PM
1

Who the hell goes on a dating site without expecting to get hit on?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:34 PM
13

TIL people like attractive people more than unattractive people
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:29 PM
21

Not before downvote bombing you of course.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:28 PM
1

Go back about 10 years in Europe and you hear nothing but good about the US. The last decade changed a lot. For many, all those wars were the straw that broke the camels back.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:52 PM
1

Actually, police can detain anyone without evidence for 24hours. I suppose it's mostly a 'just-in-case' kind of policy.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:49 PM
18

Yeah, not sure how OP failed to pick up on that.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:04 PM
7

Where the Jersey Shore takes place It all makes sense now.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:53 PM
4

Oh look, more /r/atheism bashing, how very new and hilarious.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:50 PM
-7

It's still a stupid thing to do imo. I get that it's frustrating having these jackasses trying to impede on your rights the entire time, but it's still politics and these kind of games are childish and don't belong there.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 04:45 PM
10

Everyone was limited in their choices as you mentioned earlier. Try to find a single man from that time that was unemployed and not homeless.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:37 PM
5

I'm offended for being expected to be responsible for the actions of a few assholes as I said at the very beginning; that is what this pamphlet is alluding to.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:32 PM
3

Is the pamphlet saying that women don't abuse? NO. It is notifying people of a problem - the problem being 'men abuse women'. Do we need a 'women abuse men' pamphlet targeting women for every 'men abuse women' pamphlet? If so - go do it. Go chase that target demographic. This pamphlet targets violence against women by men. It is not sexist - this pamphlet is raising awareness to a legitimate problem - it does not mean the opposite does not exist...if you think it's sexist - go join SRS or the gi…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:02 PM
54

I hate these kinds of things because it implies I'm somehow responsible for the work of some assholes.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:15 PM
7

Implying everyone can start at any job they like. Implying they want to do this over other jobs. Some people are left with no choice and treating them any different isn't fair.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:30 PM
12

So...You get shit on when you don't have a job and when you do. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:36 PM
25

Agreed, there should be 100% on both endings because certain circumstances is so vague it could mean anything. Unless they meant jealousy or things similar to it, then it should be 0 tl;dr the study is shit with shit parameters and shit questions Still interesting though
/r/MensRights07/06/12 09:56 PM
26

Even if the number is only 1% it's a 1% too much and people should know about it.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 01:09 PM
3

As the article says, you need to do a 'proper' one for family courts anyway, so that's automatically taken care off if needed anyway.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 01:08 PM
0

I know what he meant and I simply disagree.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:55 PM
0

Yes, if. A lot of people are actually siding with Barnes and Noble on this case... And a lot of people simply won't care.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:31 PM
1

Sorry, but this campaign has a horrible slogan. If it said also get raped, then sure. But now it implies you're only a real man if you get raped, how fucked up is that.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 12:26 AM
2

If you can't take criticism, then perhaps you should just pull the plug on the internet all together. There were some valid points brought up and although everyone here agrees with the sentiment, it's also hard to relate for a lot of people because of the arguments used in it.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 12:22 PM
1

I'm not sure, it's possible, I'm not from the US so no idea.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:31 PM
2

You can't legally or socially?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:03 PM
2

I believe the argument is that private organizations can impose whatever rules they desire. A lot don't since they would lose a bunch of customers, but I guess some manage to survive despite this bullshit
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:16 PM
2

He isn't suggesting that at all. He's merely saying that sending a female rapist to female prison has a lot different consequences than sanding a male rapist to male prison. It's not an eye for an eye in that sense.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:15 PM
-1

Google shows different stuff depending on your search history if I remember correctly. Therefore, if you search for controversial definitions like OP, you will get such results too. But for those that don't, like us, we get a normal page.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:58 AM
1

You're supposed to ignore everyone else and just be yourself. Who cares what anyone else has to say about who or what you should be.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 06:55 PM
7

Supreme arrogance would do that to you
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:49 PM
22

You're amazing :) Not many people can remain so just after such an experience.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 11:42 AM
3

It's similar, yet fundamentally different. Mostly in the way it's viewed though. When people think of true they think of false, hence it creates a dichotomy. This doesn't really happen with pure, even though you'd think it would. When people think of pure, they don't really think of impure. Pure more or less means original or classical really. Untempered with, unmeddled with.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:23 AM
2

It would be wrong if he called himself a true libertarian. A classical or pure libertarian perhaps. But once you classify one as true, it means the others are false, in other words you wouldn't be able to call them that anymore. But there's also language to consider, definitions of words shift all the time.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:55 AM
2

Except we don't. Most of the time they get away with this easily.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:54 AM
6

True scottsman fallacy. Official definitions mean little when they're not in actual practice.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:48 AM
6

You are clueless on the workings of the human body. Read up on your biology, honestly.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:40 AM
9

So, if you can get a woman wet and have sex with her even if she says no it's not rape either right? You should understand the difference between a physiological response to a stimuli as opposed to what the person actually wants. Never had random boners? How about, such as in the story being discussed, get tied up and given viagra? According to you, dick is hard therefore not rape. tl;dr You're an idiot with a moral compass that doesn't point north
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:18 AM
3

It's actually very easy to say it's rape if he didn't consent.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:05 AM
11

Sites have iplogs. They can't just disappear, once you visit this site, people can track you down if they really have to.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:13 AM
8

I'm not even sure it's fair to call them trolls at this point. To trolls that is.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:09 AM
10

There's a difference between definitions and connotations. What they mean and what is meant can be two different things.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 03:32 PM
7

Injuries arent that rare even in consensual sex
/r/MensRights30/03/12 04:39 PM
3

No, what he's saying it would probably come out evenly.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:59 PM
1

No, that singleparent families are bad.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 11:02 AM
1

If there still was legal recourse for the jilted spouse, would the victims of infidelity choose that option, and would it result in fewer instances of domestic violence? No, it's obvious that said violence weren't planned ones, it's a burst of aggression caused by heavy emotions. It disables any logical thinking.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:19 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:45 AM
1

If you cant sue for damages after a broken contract then your contract wasn't that good bro. But I hope you realize relationships are nothing like that, you have no ownership over your partner and therefore there is no law to take in your hands.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:37 AM
3

Weird, seeing as it's one of the more popular magazines.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:33 AM
1

If you're used to doing interviews then you should really be able to realize that you should avoid certain expressions.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:31 AM
3

How is that in any way sexism?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:23 AM
2

It's not PC, it's thinking before opening your goddamn trap.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:20 AM
1

That's an outdated idea. The females would sort of hard the animals into position so they'd be more easy to kill. The numbers of tribes were too small for only males to hunt, considering how ineffective those hunts usually turned out.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 04:58 PM
1

So the war on terrorism is only to stop one group of terrorists? Of course not. It's quite clear what is meant.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:35 PM
1

Can you tell me how? It certainly doesn't seem that way to me, at all. And I'm a dude who looks for reasons to be critical of shit. "Men can stop rape", followed by every day situations where, surprise surprise, they don't rape! (wonderful right). Perhaps an example can make it more clear. "Women can now vote!". Do you deny that there is some agency involved in rape? We may just be talking past one another. Agency? Not sure if I'm following. As though such a thing could be shown, I will neverthe…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:29 PM
1

If you stop one rape haven't you stopped rape? Then you stopped one rape, not rape in general.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:25 PM
1

Men(more than one man) can stop rape(at least one rape). That's all there is to it. Is it true? Yes; you can stop at least one rape by not raping at least one person. Then you've stopped rape. You can be a man who's a serial rapist and still prove the statement right by not raping at least one person. It doesn't say 'one rape', it says 'rape', in other words: all rape. This implies that any and every man can be a rapist in specific situations and has to suppress it in order to not rape. This is …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:06 PM
0

These posters imply that all men are rapists. Besides that, why would these posters change a rapists mind? It's not like you chose to become one, you're either one or you're not. In other words, these campaigns are useless. In fact, all anti-rape campaigns have shown to have no effect at all.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:01 PM
4

I like good trolls. They're funny. Which is why I'm downvoting and reporting you.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 08:02 PM
2

Except that the turning point of WW2 was at Stalingrad, not Normandy.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 04:26 PM
1

I think it would be pretty hard to find a middle ground between a site called 'ihatemen.com' and r/mensrights....
/r/MensRights05/06/11 08:10 PM
1

Why take the chance? It's like saying: 'Yeah I may get cancer during my liftetime but the chance is so small it's not worth getting a checkup for it.' Then it's too late and you're terminal.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:58 AM
1

So, why wear a helmet when riding your motorcycle right? The chances of getting in accident are small enough anyway..
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:36 AM
1

Comes down to how the story is told.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:34 AM
1

I hope she gets the life she deserves. Really? I hope she doesn't get one at all personally.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:24 PM
1

Except that extreme muslims are fundamentalists. If anything, they follow their holy book to the letter and thus are a better representative than the moderate ones. Then again, I'm against all organized religions so maybe I'm biased. But extreme anything is still anything. Besides, if they're extreme feminists, it basically means they take the original idea one step further. Meaning that the original idea most feminists would want us to believe is just plain wrong. Have you ever heard a feminist…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 03:23 PM
-1

I'm not denying or refuting that, I'm just explaining that's not where the appeal lies.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 11:25 PM
-1

It is, but that's not where the appeal lies, the appeal lies in the clear 'superiority' of the woman in the ad.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 10:53 AM
-2

I don't think they want to see misandry per say, in most cases; just the vilification and 'inferiority' of men. (by casting them off as incompetent, lazy, fat, etc in sharp contrast with the beautiful, smart, 'savestheday' woman)
/r/MensRights15/05/11 10:38 AM
1

I don't think anyone is good. Seeing as how EVERYONE does good and bad things. So who's to say one of those bad things won't happen to you, who's to say the majority of them won't do any of those bad things...
/r/MensRights14/05/11 06:14 AM
1

Yeah but it's not socially awkward to wear skirts as girls is it. Therefore, not really an alternative for the average boy. So it pretty much still is discrimination, even if it's indirect.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 06:54 PM
8

This is not relevant to MR. Nor does it matter. I don't care if you're interested in it, but this subreddit is reserved to discuss Men's rights, not to discuss anything you'd like to know. (only 'anythings' that are related to MR) Besides all that, generalizing things you like and don't like based on gender is inherently sexist and silly. Seeing as there's a vast difference between individuals regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 06:27 AM
1

It's a joke, a horrible unfunny one, but a joke. Unless you were surprised at their lack of humor that is.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 08:54 PM
3

I downvoted it for what he wrote as message. I agree with the message that announcing your gender every thread you make is unnecessary and quite annoying after a while. However, I disagree with his sexist generalization of women, which is why I downvoted this.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:35 AM
-6

Ever since the pill got on the market estrogen levels of boys have been going up tremendously. aka, women on the pill piss out those hormones and they don't get filtered and end up in girls and boys. For girls that's not an issue, but for boys it is for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 12:31 AM
0

I guess we should also ask if people are on the sexual assault list, happen to like small children, like to eat other humans, are free on probation and all that stuff. Face it, some people simply have different standards and to trick them into having sex with them by not telling them is just wrong. Would you like to have that happen to you? Whichever standard you go by being lied about or not told at all? And then find out later...how would you feel? Don't be a hypocrite just because it makes th…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:55 PM
1

Got any numbers on the chance you get murdered just for informing someone you're trans?
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:52 PM
-3

Not always. Just like being transgender doesn't always harm someone emotionally. (there are many std's that have no harmful effect on men)
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:50 AM
12

Except that asking someone if they're trans when they're not can be taken pretty offensively, not to mention that it might send the wrong message. I think it's silly you should ask your date if he/she is a trans just on the offchance that they might. It's easy to decide on who lies the responsibility, it's the minority. Social convention is dictated by the majority or average people. You can disagree with it all you want, but that won't change it. And not telling you're a trans and still have se…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:40 AM
38

If they want to know, then they should ask. Simple as that. There's nothing more romantic then asking if someone used to be off the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 12:31 AM
1

The reason is probably because they'll have the possibility to take advantage of the current system, while men wearing pink and all that wouldn't get in the way of that being possible. I'm not saying all women or the majority set out do just that, it's just that I feel they like the comfort of knowing that if they want to do it that they could. Even more so, they want to feel the security of knowing that even if the marriage fails they'll still rake in more than enough cash so they won't have to…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 10:35 PM
1

She shouldn't have cheated in the first place then.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:23 PM
1

If a person is a fireman it can be a woman as well. His point was that there are feminists suing people over the use of such words.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 10:49 AM
3

So you're the person that comes in here telling us all about the definition of feminism and then when I tell you about the definition off lobying you tell me it works differently for you. ok
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:17 AM
2

Regardless if one of the reasons given was "female representatives are few and far between", there is no reason to believe this woman is any less qualified than the other students who applied. If she was the best candidate they would have told her that and just that. Since they didn't I feel pretty darn safe to assume that she wasn't the best candidate. Which makes it sexism, which is still wrong no matter which way you turn it. At any given point in this woman's career, there is going to be som…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:06 AM
1

Riiight, I hope you are not blind, because this thread has 0 points. Which means it received at least as many downvotes as upvotes.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:01 AM
5

I downvoted you for your last line in the title. Should be obvious why.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:01 AM
3

So you don't know what lobby means. You could at least look it up before trying to decide for yourself what it would mean in Sweden.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:58 AM
-1

Once again, as I mentioned, it does not matter how small they are or what they do or don't represent. It's the simple undeniable fact that in Sweden a party existed that proposed a man tax. Don't you find it the least bit strange that in one of the 'most gender equal' countries where 'everyone defines themselves as feminists' this occurs yet in no other country has this happened?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:58 AM
2

So you really are that naive. Nothing more to say.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:56 AM
2

FEMINist. How does that NOT ascribe gender? Furthermore, you still missed the point.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:32 AM
2

And this. This is primarily why so many people are able to get away with cheating. Because they think it's none of their business.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:30 AM
3

Not to mention if that other guy has an STD he could get it as well.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:28 AM
4

Not sure if you know what lobby means... From the looks of it you don't.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:26 AM
-2

Doesn't matter if few people voted for it, the fact that such a political party exists and proposed that tax within their own party was more than enough. Do notice how that has only occurred in Sweden and nowhere else.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:25 AM
2

Riiiight. Because everyone does exactly like they say they would and will. Give me a break, are you really that naive?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:24 AM
5

None of the non-feministic ones receive funding so not relevant.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 08:24 AM
3

Give me a break, I've never seen a single feminist organization or anything affiliated with feminism lobby for men's rights ever.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:50 AM
2

You missed his point.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:48 AM
1

The fact that a party actually came up with that idea speaks more words than you could ever imagine.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:45 AM
1

If you have the government constantly giving funding to women's rights groups and all that, but none to address men's issues... If you have the government maintaining laws that no longer fit in our current society and have a negative impact on men, but not women... Then in my opinion men have it worse on average. Having the laws/government against you is worse than society against you (which both men and women have, in different ways) To say one is more discriminated against than the other is po…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:43 AM
6

And who did those gender equality rankings I wonder? Wouldn't by any chance be a feminist organization would it?!?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:35 AM
1

So how about those man tax then?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:34 AM
2

So you believe everything what anyone says to you? Words are irrelevant, it's actions that define.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:33 AM
1

Perhaps the only thing that could be (debatably) worse is that if you are married and it is not the father's child. How would that be worse? How would that even be as bad? The first one is abortion for reason of sexism. The second one is abortion for reason of cheating and the father not being the father. Would you feel comfortable raising someone else's child?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:31 AM
1

I doubt you'll find a significant amount of more women working in those 'dirty' jobs.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:26 AM
1

Discussions of men's rights. Not random stuff.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 09:39 PM
4

Not saying it doesn't deserve attention, it just doesn't belong here. And your argumentation is the same as saying that giving women the right to vote affects men as well. And yes, it does, but that's not relevant either way as that's not the main issue.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 09:32 PM
0

This is a place where we discuss men's rights and all that stuff, not where we will answer any random questions because people like to compare their own opinion to what certain readers here may have.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 09:31 PM
3

This has nothing to do with men's rights, but rather women's rights. children's rights or even humanitarian rights if you will.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 09:25 PM
3

It's sad because it mostly has a bad rep.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 06:40 PM
5

Austral- oh wait..;hmmm I think the best solution is to send the noncriminals back home and free up space that way. But of course, the government will lose a bunch of money doing that and we don't want that do we now..
/r/MensRights04/05/11 06:38 PM
2

Wait. How do prisons make women unsafe?
/r/MensRights04/05/11 06:30 PM
5

No, the majority of the blame lies in the perpetrator, that's how it's always been and that's how it'll always be, there are NO exceptions. Do you think the exact same situation would happen if that person wasn't there or made a different choice? No. Do you think a similar situation would happen if that person wasn't there or made a different choice? Perhaps. So, with absolute certainty this situation happens because of the perpetrator. There may be similar cases even if this one doesn't do it, …
/r/MensRights04/05/11 06:29 PM
1

Intent rarely matters, even when we want it to.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 02:31 AM
2

You can't do with man up as it contains the word man which is inevitably tied to gender roles.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 01:46 AM
-1

Because now they hire/persuade/trick people to kill them for them.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 05:35 PM
-5

Must be genetic or their own fault. Those are the usual explanations of brainlessness.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 05:30 PM
5

Most redditors are male, so yeah.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 05:28 PM
2

Well, this just about destroyed my last hope that there are reasonable feminists somewhere out there.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 07:02 AM
2

How about neither? Or we could just not care about hillbilly singers.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 05:57 PM
1

I already said it was a direct battle earlier on. And it also rests on the false dichotomy between conscription and occupation, in that both theoretically negate individual rights. It's what you value most that makes up your mind I guess. As in... If you value not being occupied more but lose the right to choose to participate in the war more. Or vica versa.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 05:39 PM
1

I'm saying that you sometimes don't have the choice, as I've put it 2 times before now, it's the choice between doing conscription and getting occupied. Most would agree to the first. I realize some would do it willingly, but alas, in a lot of direct fights like that, it wouldn't be nearly enough.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 05:38 PM
1

Would you rather be occupied or resort to drastic measures? It's what you value most that makes up your mind I guess.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 03:57 PM
0

What? It's just common sense to do so unless you enjoy being occupied or know you won't win anyway even with all that.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 03:44 PM
1

I think he meant feminism.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 08:01 AM
1

Don't you think the phrasing 'equal rights for women' is silly and inherently sexist to boot? After all, if you wish for equal rights between the genders you shouldn't be picking sides at all, you should just aid those that are behind. Equal rights for women sounds like: 'We'll keep everything the same, just get use more rights' which doesn't really work out as the system was balanced although in a different way (society would never have sustained if it didn't). If you want equal rights you must…
/r/MensRights29/04/11 08:00 AM
1

The UK, did, however, conscript women. But never to fight. Rather to make uniforms and all that.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 07:55 AM
1

You would, if you were in direct war.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 07:54 AM
2

A choice? They are obligated to do so. It's not a choice.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 07:52 AM
1

So in summation you're not a feminist or mra, just an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 07:50 AM
2

If you don't tell us what type of business you're in we can't really say.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 02:07 PM
1

Not at all, as you can see in the story, she ended up in a safe place.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 01:22 AM
1

Why is this here?
/r/MensRights26/04/11 04:54 PM
1

I don't believe you know Belgium very well. In fact I have never even seen a cab here. There's probably a handful of them in Brussels but that's about it. And that's mostly for travelling businessmen I'd wager.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 02:50 PM
1

As far as I got from the story, she wasn't drunk they found her. In fact, from what I gathered they were all drunk, albeit some more than others.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 02:49 PM
2

It makes you wonder just how delusional they really are. Unless it's plainly obvious that the story is fake, the cops will always investigate it. However, when they find no evidence they will not pursue it any further. And if you have no lead to give, then they can't investigate it either. That is all there is to it really.
/r/MensRights22/04/11 10:06 PM
2

Definitions... Look up the definition for any name ascribed to a certain ideology and I can assure you that you will find plenty of people that don't fit into that window, assuming it's not a vague definition. Furthermore, it's actions that define one, not words or definitions. Definitions are nice for things that are static, not for ideological groups or any groups that involves living creatures really. If we define the word cockroach as supreme ruler of the universe, does that mean that they t…
/r/MensRights22/04/11 09:53 PM
5

I think it's fairly optimistic to refer to it as logic.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 09:21 PM
3

I was going to comment about where she was wrong, how and why and what you could have added, but after reading the entire thing it turned out to be way too much effort. tl;dr it's pointless to argue with feminists, logic is devoid from their brains
/r/MensRights20/04/11 09:20 PM
2

Why be against it? I'm personally for it, although, only on the condition that they're subject to the same standards and requirements as the men, and have to fight as frequently as well. I think it's quite ridiculous that in specifically in the army they'd suddenly be more lenient with their requirements and standards. This isn't sport where you are separated, no, you fight side by side and I would not want to be a soldier having to worry not only about my own life but that of the person next to…
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:23 PM
1

It doesn't have to be sound, built on facts or be logical. As long as it sounds that way they'll convince people, which is the point of debates/arguments usually anyway. Sadly enough it works. Furthermore, reason and logic for some people are unfortunately enough just not that important. I guess some people just care more about how they feel, their state of mind, feeling comfortable over knowing the truth.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:16 PM
1

That's how that word came to be, not saying I agree with it.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 04:22 AM
4

She probably has the mindset that sex is something she gives in exchange (aka a prostitute)
/r/MensRights20/04/11 02:19 AM
0

'Pussy' implies weakness. All women have pussies. Therefore, all women are weak Circular logic. (hint, why does pussy imply weakness in the first place?) Should've just told her to man-up, get some balls and lift it. That's sexist too, swinging to the other extreme. At any case, he treated her like he would his friends and she got mad over it.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 02:18 AM
2

I don't care either way, it's their child and their choice.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 11:39 PM
1

As far as I'm aware it depends from case to case. Depending on lifestyle, amount of children and how the court case goes.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 09:52 AM
1

if you really want to hear me bitch, we can talk about how lazy and entitled the females are in the army! Try not to generalize, although on average I'd see that to be true. But I think that's only partially to blame on society. The other part comes (imo) mainly from the fact they have to meet substandard requirements to get in AND then have to do less afterwards as well. It's like saying 'oh you're female? We'll make it easier for you then, you deserve it.'
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:03 PM
3

Blindly believing people on certain subjects is a double-edged sword. On one hand, a lot of rapists will definitely go to jail, on the other hand, so will a lot of innocent people. The same goes for religion really.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 07:47 PM
2

We often opted for egalitarianism tbf.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 04:20 PM
2

I reread your post, you still say it's sexism. And ehh, women and men ARE different, but that does not mean we cannot be EQUAL. Some issues women face in society: the battle over abortion and contraception rights, That's only in the US really, western europe has been over that for quite a few years. the idolizing of men who sleep casually with women but the shaming of women who sleep casually with men, Must be another US issue, here both get shamed. and your standard sexual and physical abuse. I…
/r/MensRights16/04/11 04:07 PM
2

The question I want to ask today is how exactly the people in this subreddit are different from feminists when so many of your comments come off as misogynistic Anything that goes against the social norm or 'hivemind' is easily seen as wrong or offensive. Seeing as we often talk about women, the line is easily drawn. There sometimes are a few real mysoginistic comments, yes, but they quickly get downvoted all the way, unless it was a clear joke or sarcasm or something of that order, which, the g…
/r/MensRights16/04/11 03:40 PM
1

Set clear goals, that once achieved, the movement will die out.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 12:46 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 08:31 AM
3

Break contact and change country.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 07:52 AM
9

Coal creates more nuclear waste than nuclear reactors. A lot more. That's all I had to say really. Blazing took care of the rest.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 07:12 AM
4

That's a definition often used. However, I believe the 3rd wave tried to get it changed and partially succeeded in that.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 11:50 PM
2

It's kind of the same like the people that insist that gay means joyful or whatever.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 11:49 PM
1

I agree. I was just being realistic in terms of punishment. I mean it's obvious that she shouldn't have walked free at any rate, but in an abusive environment, I do understand why a reducement in punishment would be fit. However, there should still be a punishment, especially for a planned murder like this like you said.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 02:51 PM
1

Yeah, but we (not you) were talking about this case and then that guy came in with personal experience and then we agreed that that doesn't count for everyone and then you came in with what you said. So the whole thing is kind of messed up now and I'm gonna go.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 02:37 AM
1

Where does it say the kids were abused?
/r/MensRights14/04/11 01:50 AM
1

I pity your belief.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 10:03 PM
1

Seriously? A kid just like that lighting on of their parents on firing knowing that parent would die?
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:59 PM
1

They have the possibility is all I'm saying, I don't care for what reasons they stay, that's their choice - or not. It's not part of my point, which was that, no matter what about everything else, they have that option; you do not and never will when you're on fire.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:11 PM
2

I never said he was innocent, I said I had reason to doubt, don't put words in my mouth. Protip: A lot of things cause scars btw
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:09 PM
1

Not saying that, just saying it doesn't justify murder. You can just walk away at any time, unlike when you're on fire...
/r/MensRights13/04/11 08:12 PM
-2

Lighting someone on fire is hardly self defense. And if 'psychological distress' is a freecard to commit murder and stay out of jail then I finally get why so many women stay in abusive relationships...
/r/MensRights13/04/11 07:57 PM
1

Creating life from sperm and sperm alone. Or artificial wombs.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 07:52 PM
1

Explained to the other guy why I doubt that testimony.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 07:50 PM
1

Well it sounds like a summary, thus the media is able to put bias in. There's what you said, along with them being children and easily misinterpretating stuff, not to mention that mothers (and children) are rarely doubted when they say their father was abusive.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:46 PM
2

What's this winning you speak of?
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:33 PM
0

I doubt the validity of that claim for many reasons.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:31 PM
4

Ok, so murderers stay in society and abusers get murdered from now on. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 04:41 PM
2

The problem is: was he really abusive? I mean the only real other witness was the husband himself and since he's dead...
/r/MensRights13/04/11 04:40 PM
0

They'd probably say something along the lines of how they are superior when not held down and how the oppression is still clearly visible in the older generations...
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:58 AM
1

That doesn't prove anything, merely means that every scientific statement is one where you can say true or false on.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:24 AM
1

Which isn't the same as trying to falsify it. If you try to falsify something, you assume it's wrong to begin with.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 01:27 AM
2

This. I personally always sucked at writing and was always jealous of nice handwriting so I really hate when people purposefully mess their own up because of what others think.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 11:51 PM
1

Falsifying hypotheses, yes. No. (see below) A) that's a hypothesis. B) If it's falsifiable and it's not prohibitively difficult to research, there's a damn good chance someone has or will do a study on it. Then they wouldn't be trying to prove it wrong, they would be trying to see whether it's true or not.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 11:50 PM
2

Falsifying scientific theories, yes. Falsifying every random statement, no.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 10:42 PM
2

Science does not look for what's wrong, only for what's right. And it's not in there.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 09:16 PM
3

The brain has a billion chemical states, doesn't mean that each one of them gives you depression. It's silly to draw such conclusions, especially when they're not in the slightest bit supported by medical evidence and reasoning. Here's a link for you, scientific book about it : http://books.google.be/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=nUx91-LBzLkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR17&dq=what+causes+clinical+depression&ots=DO1s-iGPbi&sig=Ty0c4anOUjOcLcWGGSGNqzZoQBs#v=onepage&q=what%20causes%20clinical%20depression&f=false And just an…
/r/MensRights12/04/11 08:56 PM
17

Clinical depression is something quite different...
/r/MensRights12/04/11 06:43 PM
1

Possibly in the long run, but if we have the people behind us, then that's inevitable as well.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:24 AM
0

Hitting a ball with a golfstick promotes sexual violence against men. See how silly that sounds? That's because it is.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:11 AM
1

Hmmm, but if we just show everyone we don't care what they have to say, we'll rally more support and more support will inevitably lead to fulfilling the goals.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:08 AM
1

The problem is, how can we know someone was sent to jail by a false accusation? Unless we have some private investigator going through all the rape reports..
/r/MensRights11/04/11 08:13 PM
1

We're both arguing from a position of unproved assumptions, sad to say. My belief is that there are men who are going to commit rape no matter what, and that their target is not determined by scanning a crowd for the best-looking woman. And I'm not denying it, I'm just saying that clothes help them determine their target... That's the thing. Even if everyone did it, some women are going to be victimized. Plus, as above, I think that rapists are deciding based on opportunity, not on "who's dresse…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 03:49 PM
1

You won't succeed. :) People have tried to pull shit when I was drunk as shit before, never succeeded. Probably because I'm one of the few people who's close (closer than others anyway) to being myself all the time anyway, so getting drunk doesn't change one bit.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 02:15 PM
1

Right, but the fact that I have a laptop in my car is only evident if it's out in the open. Same thing with a big flat-screen-TV. It's only obvious that it even exists on the premises if it's visible. Vaginas are kind of ubiquitous in the female population. As I explained in the first part, vaginas aren't the target. And you only know that particular person exists until you see them as well. The problem still comes down to the fact that (if we accept that some men are simply evil enough to rape,…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 02:13 PM
2

And that's the kind of stuff I find bullshit. Alcohol does not take away the ability to consent one bit (unless you pass out). It might remove some of your boundaries. Which basically means you'll be doing what you really wanted to do anyway.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:56 PM
1

But, unless you're saying that rapists are men who were simply overcome with lust and lost control of themselves (which implies that all men could be so overcome, which would be a disturbing notion), all rape is caused by an aberrant man doing something horrific I'm not sure why it can't be the latter and them liking attractive people.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:53 PM
2

Laptops may also be always a target, it's just easier to take them when they're out in the open. Same with this, a rapists won't try to rape someone when that person is surrounded by friends or family. Besides, how do you think rapists decide their target? They don't think 'hmmm that woman is bound to have a vagina, let's go for it'. No, first they notice someone (in which clothes do play a part) and if they also notice that person is going to be alone somewhere for some time, they got their tar…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:50 PM
0

They're not misandrists, just indoctrinated by hypergamy.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 09:38 PM
2

I know that, but I don't think people who didn't actually fight should have the right to call themselves veterans. When people think of veterans they think of people who fought in the war.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 09:07 PM
1

It's not contrarian at all. Please enlighten me with a good way to deal with a stranger dealing out abuse to another stranger.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:14 PM
1

It's not contrarian at all. Please enlighten me with a good way to deal with a stranger dealing out abuse to another stranger.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:13 PM
1

There are always ways... doesn't mean they're good.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:00 PM
3

Angry women’s groups said last night that it would be the children at the centre of the disputes who would suffer most if money were paid back. Should have thought about that before you cheated, got pregnant while doing it and then told the wrong guy he was the father and kept that lie going and draining him financially. It's not his child, YOU are responsible for that child, he shouldn't give a single fuck about it. (what if he has a kid of his own and can't take care of it properly due to payi…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:39 PM
1

I don't think most of them would cheat per se, but I do think they want to have that option and of course while getting away with it. This would make that a bit harder.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:36 PM
-1

Yeah I meant it's bs they get called veterans when they didn't actually fight.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 03:52 AM
1

That's kinda bs tbh :c
/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:56 AM
2

Then how come there are female 'veterans'?
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:54 AM
1

I recall there being recruitment posts for women (for WW2). Nothing on the frontlines though, if that's what you mean.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:10 AM
1

If you have a boss you're a subordinate as well. Go protest against that.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:08 AM
3

Indeed, look at them and shrug in indifference, their personal attacks on the MRM or specific MRA's just shows how petty and pathetic they truly are. Ad hominem is not an argument and it never is, it's just shows you don't have a real argument.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 08:44 PM
5

Wtf at that article. First she argues that's it's okay for there to be misandry because there's misogyny and then goes on to say it can only be equality if it's not anti-woman. I stopped reading after that...
/r/MensRights09/04/11 08:38 PM
1

5 comments here (6 now) and two of them are trolls.. seriously? Anyway, it may just be that they're completely ignorant about it. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:40 PM
-1

Just like I said. Explain, how that's not possible?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:39 PM
1

Why should I risk my own safety for someone I don't even know? And how am I to know which one is on the 'right side' anyway, wouldn't be the first time that the person under attack did something horrible and they're getting revenge for that. I once did intervene, in a peaceful calm matter. You know what happened? We didn't have a nice chat about it, they punched me in the face, three times, then my glasses flew off and they ran away, I never found them again btw. That 'doing the right thing' did…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:58 AM
-1

You can return to the patriarchy, the model, while keeping the rights intact.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:56 AM
2

There's mostly a competition among boys to do as less schoolwork as possible, if we can change that in to as much as possible, through losing the stigma of 'nerd, geek' and the like and turn it into positive words, then perhaps competition will arise to do well. Of course, society doesn't help one bit in this case and there's little you can do if they're already messed up once they come under your wing.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:39 AM
2

Not me and maybe I'm warped, but don't see why anyone else either.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:36 AM
3

I'm more worried about the fact that the book actually got published. Not to mention, some people might read it and actually believe it.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:35 AM
2

Digital world, digital rules.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:33 AM
0

And why do you assume he promotes the old one rather than a new one, one with the same rights, but the old model?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:28 AM
-1

What rights would they exactly take away? Why do you assume there needs to be less rights in order for that system to operate?
/r/MensRights09/04/11 02:10 AM
3

Rather, they were forced to follow it, unless they had the money to do otherwise of course.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 01:26 AM
4

Of course, but why take the chance? It's like driving a motorcycle without a helmet, it doesn't mean you'll die when you get into an accident, but it's far more likely.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 01:15 AM
2

No, because we were talking about the title of this thread. And that clearly states to confront them.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 01:10 AM
2

No, but it's always a possibility and why take the risk? Besides, you're assuming that everyone can be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:55 AM
0

I never argued any point, just pointed out what the OP was talking about.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:55 AM
0

He's not talking about when the child is born, before that, when the woman is still pregnant.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 12:11 AM
2

Yes, because getting beaten up/killed by strangers for standing up for strangers is what everyone should be doing. /s
/r/MensRights08/04/11 09:36 PM
1

There are two options: They believe it has to do with discrimination, in which case they're willfully ignorant and deluded. Or they don't believe that, but want to force everyone to get paid the same. Basically comes down to, they don't care what you want in live and what choices you want to make, they'll do it for you...
/r/MensRights08/04/11 03:43 PM
2

Against better judgement I responded in the thread. If it's interesting I might inform you about it.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 12:11 AM
0

Perhaps the Egyptians weren't a good example since they were known to have had female pharaos as well.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:49 PM
0

Words cannot explain..
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:39 PM
2

At least you realize that now.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:25 PM
2

Apparently the concept of humor is lost on you. Note how I never even mentioned misogyny in my argument, only in my summation. Don't read things that aren't there.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:55 PM
8

I personally experienced something similar. They kept going on about how we should spend more attention on rape issues, right? So I then struck up a conversation with that feminist about it and eventually she just said 'If you haven't been raped then you can't talk about this'
/r/MensRights07/04/11 02:15 PM
3

Excuse me, but before the first serious civilizations (eg Egyptians), women were worshiped, as displayed in their sculptures (venus statues). As nomads, women were probably the dominant ones at the time. It was only when civilizations were built that (a very small fraction of) men became dominant. Furthermore, in those civilizations, the common man, aka 99.999999% of all men had it just as bad as women. (If you bring up the vote argument in Greece you're just being silly as that was only for the…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 02:13 PM
3

ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:34 AM
1

How did I attack you exactly? I merely informed you that I disagreed with your opinion and gave my own.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:27 AM
0

If you're not a troll then I advise you to lock yourself up in your room for a couple of weeks and review your life. Where did it go wrong?
/r/seduction07/04/11 11:25 AM
1

I took your wording of male space as a sign of 'women not allowed here' I agree with the second notion, although you should change women to people to be fair imo.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:22 AM
2

This sounds strange, but makes sense when you think about it. Although it's not really the good answer to give regarding the topic. Think about it this way, if you want to slap one specific man, does this mean you hate all men? Of course not, just means you don't like/hate that man.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:21 AM
3

You're wrong. Both men and women are welcome here, we are just focused on discussing the rights of men and the view on men in society.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:19 AM
3

Reality can't believe anything, it's a concept. There are people within the reality who bought into it, yes. But there's a nice word for that, actually several. Gullible, ignorant, deluded. Take your pick. Right, so if enough people believe something, it's totally okay. Like at the time of integration, the majority of people were against it, that must mean that integration was wrong too. This doesn't and never will mean that the opposite is true though. This doesn't mean that you are right. Othe…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:15 AM
3

Again this? So what you're suggesting that no one should ever make any jokes ever in the history of ever seeing as it may offend someone or a group of people. Even though humor is not intended to offend anyone. Quite the contrary, humor is intended to make people laugh. Usually the one making such jokes doesn't even support the notion of the joke (if you take it without humor). Furthermore so, often such jokes are designed to intend to opposite of the way in which you take it. That is to say, si…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:10 AM
1

Isn't the clothes you choose to wear part of your behavior though?
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:33 PM
-1

At least not about things like these.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:31 PM
1

Interesting links, unfortunately there are so many different studies sprouting so many different numbers it's hard to trust any of them anymore. Not to discredit your links of course, just saying it's difficult to know what's true and what's not. It could just be as wrong as the next one and there's rarely a solid way to tell.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:29 PM
1

Hrm, I do appreciate your answer and I find it very reasonable, but isn't that also assuming that once a rapist always a rapist - in saying that rapists are "fundamentally different from regular men"? This is budding away from the original question, but I am still interested. If this is the case, should rapists be punished more diligently than they are now? Yes. To all of it. Besides why take the risk of trusting that such people rehabilitate? The main issue with all this though is that it's har…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:23 PM
1

A troll duo... Been done before, bro, more successfully even I might add.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:19 PM
3

No, we hate feminists.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:13 PM
2

There's this thing called, you know, private message. But maybe you never heard of it. You can't actually view that you see. It's why they're called private messages. If you want me to explain in greater depth don't be shy to ask, I know there are some challenged people everywhere.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:11 PM
1

I was unaware random users had access to private mails of moderators of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:34 PM
17

An erection CAN be forced, it's just a physical process after all. And even if you don't know that, there's this thing called viagra and equivalents of it.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 06:47 PM
3

I believe Kansas was proposing that law...That's all I know about it though, not mandatory anywhere as far as I know.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 02:02 AM
1

Too bad the 'beauty standards' aren't that beautiful at all. Otherwise their argument might have held some water.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 11:13 PM
1

That site is satire.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 10:07 AM
2

Where did he mock exactly? Oh you mean he had a view that goes against the general notion of the sheep. Right, gotcha. PS: This is sarcastic mocking, take notes.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 07:21 PM
25

That's not totalitarian in the slightest. /s :3
/r/MensRights03/04/11 07:20 PM
9

It's bullshit. They just want to be able to justify mutilating young children's genitals with reasons other than 'religion' or 'culture'.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 07:48 PM
2

I know, I was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 01:48 PM
1

Although the steady rise in reported rapes over the past 20 years is sometimes seen as a good thing (evidence of a concurrent swell of trust in the police's handling of rape It obviously has nothing at all to do with their government paying for each reported rape. Oh no, nothing at all.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 08:19 AM
7

First she claims we're fighting for the same things and then goes on to insult the MRM. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights01/04/11 08:37 PM
1

Only a very small percentage of people became professional anythings 150 years ago. Sure, men more than women, because that's how gender roles were defined. Things changed, feminism played a part in that sure. However, they start from the viewpoint that they are right and everyone else who tries to debate a different viewpoint is wrong and probably conspiring against them/brainwashed by media. So, the feminist movement has become a closed one and as such people are unable to reason with it. With…
/r/MensRights01/04/11 11:58 AM
1

I don't think he deserves financial ruin for his dated beliefs and closed mind Yes he does, it seems to be the only thing he cares about, so it may be the only thing that will make him see how wrong he is.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 05:27 PM
1

Not quite, the idea behind women and children first is because of the population. A population with many women and few men can still grow rapidly, but vica versa can't. Back in the day, population meant quite a lot for production and all that.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 12:31 PM
1

The issue is the underlying power dynamic. If you look at the advantages that women have, they are rooted in paternalism. "Women and children first," for example is an advantage, but it's not privilege because it reinforces women's subordinate status. How exactly? Seems to me it's more the expendable status of men rather than what you suggest...
/r/MensRights30/03/11 12:12 PM
1

Good luck finding someone like that who actually knows anything about it.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:22 AM
1

Most people supported the system, and those who didn't were punished for standing up to it. Care to back that up with some facts?
/r/MensRights30/03/11 06:32 AM
3

Why did they get a biased moron to comment on the MRM? Why not get a representative of the MRM itself? It's like getting a republican to comment on the democrats.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 06:24 AM
1

Sorry, but I fail to see what appearance has to do with...anything really. That's neither here or there, just a personal attack and that's just petty.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 06:07 AM
1

Doesn't really imply the first if you follow the rules of logic, but certainly the second one, yes.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 06:03 AM
1

The irony is that the old feminist movement was firmly against women being portrayed as victims and weak. It shows just how much it changed.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 05:59 AM
1

Misinformed or uninformed is not the same as what you claim. You may be correct, you may not be, but judging right now is a bit silly.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 05:53 AM
1

Also, feminist did not create the idea of patriarchy, the word itself it over 400 years old and the concept is biblical. Not what I meant, I meant that's what they chose to target. I agree on parts, but still feel that, even if feminism is not the main problem, that it is standing in the way and most likely pushing against us. There are necessary labels or groups if you like. Like male, female, for obvious reasons. But beyond that, who really cares? I don't really group people as far as I'm awar…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 07:01 PM
2

I define patriarchy as systemic social domination of men over women. Does this imply that all men dominated all women? Furthermore, why do you believe little to none (men and women alike) stood up to this system? I don't believe there's something essential to men that gives rise to patriarchy -- it's just a bad idea that out-competed egalitarian ideas. It's not inevitable either, as proven by the progress we've seen over the last century. When would it be egalitarian and not patriarchal? When th…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 06:49 PM
1

We say "Boys will be boys" then are suprised when they get violent. Since when is that a surprise? We say all men care about is sex. That's a fairly recent thing as far as I'm aware. We say "man up" and "don't be a pussy" and don't let men express their feelings. True, yet at the same time society demands men to be sensitive.. Hmm We put new born baby boys through a completly pointless and painful procedure every day. That has religious roots, even if it may not have invented it, it carried it. …
/r/MensRights29/03/11 06:44 PM
0

The rich leech of of the poor.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 06:20 PM
0

such as unfair gender roles that make men sexual perverts bent on destruction, have been around for much longer than feminist. Citation needed And even if you say feminst lobby to make laws, first off, I think you are giving feminst a lot more power than they really have. The movement does not have that much money in it, at least not when you compare it to other groups You're forgetting there are also a bunch of feminists in politics pushing their views. Not to mention, if politicians don't appr…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 06:18 PM
1

Kinda my point.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:55 PM
2

The sad part is that this is one of the more sane feminists out there.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:01 PM
3

How can you say there's a power inequality when you admit females also having advantages? In fact, how can you even speak of privileges at all if both sides have alleged advantages? Either admit both have them or claim neither have them. What you're trying, is taking your worldview and trying to fit the definitions in. It doesn't work that way I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:00 PM
2

The 1200's called. They want their list back.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:57 PM
19

'Look at this letter here, it says something different than we were led on to believe!!! ZOMG HATESPEECH, MYSOGYNY, HATE HATE!!one/!!'
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:49 PM
1

Exactly, I always found the notion that somehow all men were conspiring against women to be silly and you'd have to be pretty crazy to believe in it.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:14 PM
4

This is true, I often have the feeling I'm debating a religious person when I debate feminists, even when they're not religious.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:12 PM
5

Usually so the person holding the door can go in and the person going in after can hold it open for the people coming in after that person. At least that's what I usually do when the door is held for me. I don't usually hold doors, unless I see someone definitely going to go through it, regardless of gender I may add.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:10 PM
4

I've often heard of this, but I've not once in my entire life actually seen it (in real life) But hey, don't want to doubt an expert
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:38 PM
5

How do you define patriarchy and what do you think caused it to occur?
/r/MensRights29/03/11 02:25 PM
1

Which may offend others in the process.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 12:29 PM
4

None of them will openly admit to it for obvious reasons (bar a few weirdo individuals). But NOW for example, has continuously opposed father's rights in the UK, while everyone knows that the court is biased against them.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 09:54 AM
1

I don't believe she's an angel, I believe she's a human being and I see no reason to automatically distrust her, just like I don't automatically distrust anyone else. Call me naive as you wish. That is your right. However, consider the alternative for a moment, what if she's genuine? And so what if she's not? Sure, that's a petty thing to do then, but this thread does not help. If you wish to call her out on it, then message her or whatever, but I don't see why this subreddit should play host to…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 09:52 AM
1

What happened then and what's happening now are two very different things. And when we discuss feminism here, we speak of feminist organizations with power and influence. Not one of them is interested in equality, they oppose the proposal of new laws to make things more equal in court for fathers for example and continue to push to get new laws in that would grant women more power. They wish for dominance, not equality and believing otherwise is just childish.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:15 AM
-12

Except that we actually strive for equality and they don't. Just saying.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:03 AM
4

Cheating is very similar, regardless of sex. So are its reasons, the reasonings she listed are bullshit however. We are all, men and women alike, biologically hardwired to have as much sex as possible (hence why it feels good). Men, to spread their genes as much as possible and women for genetic diversity and to produce the best possible offspring. While there may also be other reasons, like sex addiction or whatever more, there are also people who are in perfectly stable relationships cheating.…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 07:02 AM
1

Not really, no.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 06:56 AM
2

Unless perhaps it's sexist propaganda?
/r/MensRights28/03/11 05:57 AM
5

No, but expecting to be the one that has the choice does.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 03:22 AM
2

Nor this thread or the other comment in here were necessary or helpful. Removing it would be wise.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:26 AM
1

It could be women. I've had classmates exclaim 'I love you' over trivial matters before, apparently it's 'hip'
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:22 AM
1

For the one I have in mind, no such thing would be needed. Although I will be alert.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 11:00 PM
8

It's not a vacation, but you're not working at your job either. Which was the point.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:58 PM
1

Breastfeeding during the first six months is better for the child at any rate. Since he'll be able to use the antibodies in it for its own protection.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:56 PM
1

I'm a 'college kid' and have no such expectations. Perhaps I'm the exception, wouldn't be the first time. I think "the choice to stay home or work after kids" is open to interpretation. I initially took it as financial, as in they were expecting to be financially stable enough to have a one income home by the time they reproduce. But I don't think a woman saying she expects to have a choice is equivalent to saying she expects her spouse to not have one. If a couple sit down and discuss what they…
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:40 PM
2

There's a difference between children and grown people though...
/r/MensRights27/03/11 08:03 PM
8

Really? I don't want to leech of of anyone.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:49 PM
3

It's a nice dream, sure. But a dream is something different than an expectation. Finding a good job is more difficult than most people think. Also, since women in their twenties are earning more than men, having the expectation for their husband to earn the same or more than them... Is rather unreasonable. I never understood why this is even an issue. As long as that person has a job/is actively looking for one, then where's the problem? In his post, below the title, he added some more. If retur…
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:39 PM
25

They want their husbands to make more than them so they'll have less responsibility and will be able to work parttime or even quit whenever they want to.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:30 PM
3

This is a lot more common than you may believe.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:30 PM
8

And we shall not feed him.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:19 PM
0

Yes, but in the western world, I personally feel they experience less inequality than men. It depends greatly on the area. So to give a global answer is pretty difficult. And I also feel that many may have a very skewed view of this. We have become fine-tuned to spot sexism against women, but we often overlook that against men. I'd say it's about equal though, although as I said, geography is important. Yes, but I think the notion 'equal rights for..' is silly in itself. Why not just make it equ…
/r/MensRights27/03/11 07:15 PM
-1

Yet the sarcasm eluded many because this medium lacks the proper means to convey it through convential means. Which has nothing at all to doe with poe.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 05:18 PM
-1

Well, sarcasm/irony is difficult to transfer online, remember that
/r/MensRights26/03/11 05:04 PM
11

It's not only discriminating against men, but offensive to women. In fact, it's the ultimate insult. With women being empowered as they are...we offer them female only scholarships. Once more we decide what's best for them, once more we give them a pedestal instead of judging them by their merit.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 04:37 PM
3

What's that you say? The reported number isn't even close to our fabricated number? It must be vastly underreported then, there's no way our fabricated numbers would be off.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 01:58 PM
1

I feel the same way in public and for some reason children, especially very young ones always stare at me for some reason. It makes me feel uncomfortable as hell. I'm lucky I don't look 'cool' so I don't get approached by older kids. :P
/r/MensRights26/03/11 06:42 AM
1

That wasn't the point of my argument. The point of my argument that putting women in charge won't change a thing. I don't mind them having a representational number in office as long as it's not forced upon.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 06:37 AM
2

Pretty much, yeah, the only reason the people sometimes get what they want is that they'll gain more support and votes.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 05:57 AM
1

Wait what? I think the point of the article eluded you, FRS was making the point that it's not the case.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 03:37 AM
2

They'd probably argue that Palin isn't a true woman ;)
/r/MensRights26/03/11 03:36 AM
7

Power corrupts across race, gender, religion, and age - anyone who thinks women would be immune is so ridiculously ignorant that discussing it with them is an exercise in futility. Furthermore, those that want to rule are never those that should and for that reason, anyone who becomes a leader of a country or whatever, would still give the world the same shit as before. (just look at the female leaders throughout history, not one of them hesitated to send men into war.)
/r/MensRights25/03/11 10:07 PM
0

I see, yeah I guess so. The title just seemed to go for some different point.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:58 PM
2

Yes? you may have chosen the wrong tab and thus didn't link to any site at all
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:52 PM
1

It's often person A saying X and later on, usually on a different subject saying Y.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:51 PM
2

Trollé durement.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:48 PM
-1

Ok? What does this have to do with men's rights may I ask?
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:46 PM
2

Always when it's this kind of article it displays both sides of why it is this way and then concludes that men and men alone should do something about it. How about women collectively start with not ignoring it? I'm not saying you have to be a moron like the one in the anecdote and start being physically aggressive, but assertiveness at the very least. And I honestly don't see how the men who don't do this can stop those that do. For example, I don't shout in public at all and as far as I know, …
/r/MensRights25/03/11 04:13 PM
1

Or you could argue there are more women abusers, but that they only do it when they have ample time to plan it. There are so many ways to approach it... These kind of things have to be approached case by case.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 03:25 PM
1

I know about the study in question, it's about 10 years old if that helps. The definition was so broad that the majority of the 'rape victims' didn't even know they were raped...
/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:49 AM
0

I believe someone debunked it and came up with some estimate of a rate, being about 4-8% if I remember correctly. Unfortunately I don't remember where I saw it, nor how he get those numbers, so that's not much help I guess. However, I'm 100% certain, that these numbers are crap. Seriously...1 in 6? Have they even thought about that? You know why they choose such numbers like 1 in 4 or 1 in 6? It's because they know people will picture 4 or 6 women in their head and think one of them was raped. T…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:48 AM
5

I hate articles like this. They take a fraction of a whole and then make a conclusion that if a group is dominant in that fraction, they're dominant in the whole. When it comes to multiplayer games, whether it be shooters, roleplay, strategy or whatever, the majority are still male. I'm not sure why they refuse to see those as social games. After all, you're continuously playing with real people and likely to converse with them. In fact, teamwork is often required in those games, unlike the 'soc…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:44 AM
2

unwed != single
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:52 PM
2

No worries, I'll just draw a protective anti-bear circle.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:12 PM
0

They would have to make it a daily chore, since it happens to pretty much every thread. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that it's someone with an inherent bone to pick. From there it's a short road to r/feminisms. edit: ohai feminazis
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:11 PM
2

It's not so much about the loudness, but about actions. Any feminist organization with even the slightest bit of power is out there discriminating against men and trying to get women on top.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:09 PM
2

He claims that father only families are rare, thus fathers are more violent. Bullshit knowing that most family have both a mother and father still.. As far as I'm aware, these statistics only discuss the perpetrators, not the family status. So his argument doesn't hold much water. Mothers have more opportunity, much more time to be violent with the child. I always found it ironic how people tried to use that as an excuse. Especially when they try to argue men are more violent. Yet then they set …
/r/MensRights24/03/11 04:00 PM
1

Hahaha I'm guessing I'm the only one who noticed the inherent sexism of the article. He only speaks of men paying child support and men having to pay it. Also: You really haven’t got this right in regards to who’s fault it is. The reason there is so much discrimination against men isn’t simply the fault of chivalrous conservatives (or democrats for that matter) and it isn’t simply the fault of feminists either. These groups do not exist in a vacuum - they all work against men’s equality simultan…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:39 AM
1

Let's see, he permits them from having sex, they're obviously brainwashed, they're trained to offer their own lives for him at any given moment, they have to be around him all the time. How do you know they volunteered though? At any rate, I was exaggerating a bit, but couldn't quite find the word I was looking for.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 11:22 AM
4

What's the point of these kind of threads anyway? What's that you say? You're childish and got too much time on your hands? Not surprised.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 10:32 AM
2

Emotionally and physically it's the same while living with the abuse. No it's not. While it's both horrible and shouldn't happen, it's not the same and it never will be. In fact, every situation is vastly different and should be judged individually. It's stuff like this that make it clear that MRA and feminists are truly fighting for the same cause, just for different genders. Is that why feminist organizations do everything within their power to create women-only DV shelters on one side and try…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:28 AM
1

Helping emancipation by surrounding himself with an army of virgin slaves. Wait, wat?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:48 PM
1

No, victims of domestic violence don't always act in self defense. Wasn't talking specifically about DV and there obviously are exceptions as usual.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:17 PM
1

Page not found.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:35 PM
3

It annoys me when some games focus too much on it, it usually tells me the content has little worth so I won't play it. However, attractive females do exist, so if one or a few feature in a game, well, not sure how anyone would have anything against that. You don't see them complaining about the buff handsome men, do you now? As for characteristics, it's usually pretty balanced. But the bottom line of games is the following, something people often seem to forget, perhaps willingly. Games aren't …
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:29 PM
4

Win.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:24 PM
2

Hmmm?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:57 PM
0

Ah, but the thing is, there are plenty of men who would never hit a women, even when being hit on themselves. So a woman could beat up even the biggest men, even to death, because of that. But if a woman gets hit, she'll fight back. To make matters worse, when you fight back as a man, you're automatically assumed guilty. Sometimes the cases are even worse, in domestic areas for example, the bigger person will always be arrested, even if its the victim. Also, since we have a lot of objects in our…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 05:57 PM
5

Nothing is creepier! LOL! So glad im married, i couldnt imagine being single and trying to impress brainwashed douchebags like this feminist cunt. Barf. Not to mention, a bit later she mentions that she's disappointed and feels unvalidated and unattractive when a guy doesn't make the first move. Basically, she's the perfect feminist, no matter what a man does, he'll always be wrong and she'll always be angry.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:58 PM
5

Some bits have to do with equalilty, but overall it has more to do with the effect of feminism on society. Guys aren't coming on to girls there anymore because they'd often get labelled as creeps or predators. Not to mention the amount of innocent men being sent to prison for rape. So, they wait for girls to come on to them. Girls aren't conditioned to make the first move, so they believe that if they have to make the first move all the time that they're unattractive and undesirable. Because of …
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:57 PM
6

That's reinstating chivalry. Rather, say you were raised to be kind to people.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 04:51 PM
2

While I think teachers should be more appreciated, I don't think it will lead to more studying. I always valued the teachers and had respect for them, yet never learned. I lacked the challenge and competition and because of that wasn't motivated to study. Bring back challenges, competition and perhaps more movement during school hours and the numbers will change. (I remember always getting incredibly uncomfortable and irritated by sitting on that same chair for hours)
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:47 PM
6

Why would companies care about who 'supports the family'? Don't they just look for the best person for the job (or should at least)? I love how they were first gloating over how men lost more jobs and now they're whining and even blaming men for getting more jobs back.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:41 PM
-1

Would be great. BUT it will never happen. They, like you said, want to artificially balance it. They have the childish believe that if you have as many women as men working at your company that you support equality. Furthermore, the government wishes to socially engineer some more.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 01:28 PM
1

Interesting, though some links to studies on the subject would be appreciated.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 03:54 AM
2

I don't think he's completely clean & sober The question remains, can anyone claim to be so at any rate?
/r/MensRights22/03/11 08:13 AM
4

I fear your wit may be lost on the masses, but you certainly had me entertained :)
/r/MensRights21/03/11 01:11 AM
2

They're probably just teens who want to look cool. I ignore them for that reason. Or flame to the hell. Whichever I feel like.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 12:59 AM
1

True, but there are also a lot of lurkers and they reflect in the upvotes/downvotes.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 11:54 PM
1

Amusing.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:46 PM
1

I love how you just copied with some other guy commented on the link I posted. It was a test. Needless to say you failed.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:11 PM
4

Which only makes her more dangerous sadly.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:13 PM
8

When women want to start a family, feminists call them out and boo them. When they don't, they're cheered on. When men don't want to start a family, or want to take their time, they're called losers.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:09 PM
1

Your characterization of the Koss study is incorrect too, by the way. Why don't you go to your local university library and read the initial survey and it's reliability and validity study yourself. Because I don't live in the US. And yes, I over exaggerated. But basically, she was trying to sell off unwanted contact as rape if I'm not mistaken. At any rate, this guy wrote it down already, so i won't have to : http://aspiringeconomist.com/index.php/2009/09/11/rape-statistics-1-in-4/ The fact is t…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 06:52 PM
3

I saw, I was disgusted. As far as the reddit comments go, the top rated comments are alright to be honest.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:33 PM
0

I was going to leave a comment on what's wrong with this and what isn't being told, but it's so much that it would be almost as long as the article itself.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:22 PM
5

But men's rights isn't about a global scale, so that argument is irrelevant here. Furthermore, the reasons why men are currently earning more on average have been explained over and over again.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:07 PM
7

It says 1 in 4 on the link you provided. A number that has been continiously refuted because the study it was based on was...well crap. Basically if one of you had even a drop of alcohol, apparently the woman was raped. If the woman regretted it, rape. Sadly, most articles base them on that 'study'. If you can find an actual study about the subject it would be nice. Also, apart from all that, you didn't give any study on the subject of false rape claims, mostly because you won't be able to find …
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:04 PM
5

only a tiny fraction controls most of the world's wealth Meanwhile, misandry is directed against all men.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:00 PM
5

Find me legit studies that claim that. Other than that, even if it were true, that's irrelevant. I don't see why we shouldn't fight all injustice.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 01:56 PM
8

Are you denying that false rape claims occur in our society? Are you denying it is a problem? Not sure what you're getting at.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 01:53 PM
5

Are you that blind to all the injustices in the world and how men are also victims of that? (also, the belief all evil is cause by men and men alone is sexist and bullshit) And we aren't complaining about oppression, read our god damn faq, it's there for a reason.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 01:50 PM
4

Judging a movement over the troll stance of another movement... Shoo troll, shoo
/r/MensRights20/03/11 01:44 PM
3

Go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 11:56 AM
7

It twists my insides. So annoying. It's basically saying 'I don't care and I won't help you, do it yourself'
/r/MensRights20/03/11 05:34 AM
1

Too bad for her I was able to be an unbiased spectator. I'm very observant and wanted to investigate this. Since I didn't fancy anyone at the time, I could be as unbiased as possible. Guess what, on average, they do like 'bad boys' and 'assholes'. Then again, those are subjective terms. Furthermore, the relationships with the 'bad boys' and 'assholes' always ended eventually. The others are all still together amazingly enough. I realize my sample may be small...but seeing that so many others cla…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 04:57 AM
3

I thought bolding the whole text would kinda make bolding it lose its purpose.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 04:25 AM
2

If women are the ones cleaning up the human wreckage, how come they sent in men and men alone to deal with the reactors? (of which several have died already and many others severely ill) Where does he suggest putting the nuclear reactors? Fact of the matter is, nuclear energy is the most efficient one we have right now. Seeing as the power consumption only goes upwards, energy must be created somehow. Fusion is still too far away unfortunately. Sure there's green energy, but they take up far too…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 04:17 AM
1

You are absolutely correct. Feminism is a self-centered movement. All they care about is their own little world, they couldn't give a rat's ass about the rest. But guess what, any impact on either gender will always have some sort of backlash on the other.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 03:04 AM
5

Did it happen to you personally? If so, what did you do when society failed on you?
/r/MensRights20/03/11 03:02 AM
3

The difference is that you can get thin in your own time, but you need to build that sort of confidence around women in that context, but they don't want to be near you in that context because of your lack of confidence. And so the circle continues.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:54 AM
6

Did anyone else get the strong feeling that she's a sexist after reading it? I also found one very deluded comment HUFFPOST SUPER USER pennywhite 12:08 PM on 3/10/2011 38 Fans I love this article. And praising the feminine is NOT the equivalent of denigratin­g the masculine. We are a hyper-masc­uline culture, celebratin­g competitio­n and aggression in both men and women.It's gotten pretty disgusting­. Feminine traits such as nurturing and cooperatio­n have been classified as weak for most of ma…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:52 AM
4

So you need a girlfriend to get a girlfriend. Cool story
/r/MensRights20/03/11 02:47 AM
1

It's kind of the equivalent of saying rape only happens because of the way women dress.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 02:37 PM
0

So if you ask "You don't want to have sex with me?" when they're asleep and they won't answer, that means they said no and therefore, they agreed to sex. Cool...
/r/MensRights19/03/11 02:12 PM
3

Exactly. One one side, they keep on trying to empower women and on the other side, they try to destroy the definition of man.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 02:06 PM
1

Perhaps for the time being. But don't forget, science doesn't wait for political agendas. They're already working on artificial wombs. I'm sure an "egg bank" will follow shortly after. If not, using stem cells, they could create them anyway. And even if they succeed in only getting single moms, society would crumble instantaneously for several reasons.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 02:05 PM
1

I know, but it would be one bitch of a task to keep track of all the crazies of all groups :P
/r/MensRights18/03/11 10:11 PM
0

I'm not personally familiar with them. It's quite possible they had non-vocal crazies though. :)
/r/MensRights18/03/11 10:04 PM
1

Fact of life: If there is a movement, group or organization with a clear goal or central belief, there will always be crazies in it.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 08:54 PM
0

The ideas that that may just be feminist propaganda or common misconceptions?
/r/MensRights18/03/11 08:51 PM
1

Ehhh maybe, but I don't live in the US or UK and I never heard of pledging in school in my country at all :)
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:21 PM
1

What the fuck?
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:53 PM
1

You made assumptions about my knowledge of the US' market and my intentions. hint: I do not live in the US.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:47 PM
2

What? I'm sorry I don't know everything there is to know about the job market and the US in specific... But I assumed the days weren't paid, hence my post. I think it's pretty ridiculous you accuse me of assuming so much while you're also making assumptions of your own.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:28 PM
1

I see your point, but it's because of feminism's propaganda, lies and deceit that those people even have those opinions in the first place. Take out the source, not what it produces I say.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:59 PM
0

Well, either that fact makes the 'fact' that women have better immune systems laughable or it indicates that the 'weaker sex' who, as often stereotyped by women 'are babies when sick' apparently are less of babies than they are themselves. Alternatively, if it's neither, it could also be that women fake being ill more when they've become mothers. Which is it going to be, I wonder... :)
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:26 PM
1

Never had to pledge anything over here.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 04:38 PM
1

Well yeah, my point was that while mutations happen on an individual level, it won't really affect much on population level.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 02:49 PM
2

I don't think too timid is the right phrase here. It's rather that most men are conditioned to 'just take it like a man'...
/r/MensRights18/03/11 01:27 PM
6

Society is the reason they exist. While you may argue with their methods and morals all you want, at least they succeed in getting the message out there. It's easy to try and disregard them as pathetic (personally I feel they're not), but in the end... He first mentions how they have no skills/success in life and then complains that they don't try to fix the problem.. Ehh? What? I see anonymous get mentioned more than men's rights in mainstream news. While they're radical, and one could argue an…
/r/MensRights18/03/11 01:03 AM
5

I'd like to add something to the last bit. I was unaware wikipedia asked you for your gender in order to submit or alter articles. So how exactly would sexism even work in that case? But yeah, it's the same old feminist tune : 'If the numbers are against us it's because of sexism and external factors. If they're positive for us, it's because we fought for it' It's that thought, that appears to be central in feminism, which is causing most of the damage.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 10:57 PM
1

Wow. I had a similar image in my mind when I read the title. Spooky.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 04:35 PM
3

Evolution is not always possible and because of our socialization, natural selection is basically thrown out of the way. We're allowing and even promoting to let 'bad' genes live. I can somewhat see how that might be a problem... But it doesn't have to be. Since we also 'allow' the good genes to live (as if they can't fight for themselves) and luckily, thanks to how biology functions, the 'good' genes should get more offspring anyway. So, 'the end of the Y chromosome' is indeed complete bullshit…
/r/MensRights17/03/11 06:47 AM
4

I've personally been turned off of marriage, but in case I'd see marriage as a possibility, then why not? Would find it quite odd if anyone said plain out no here.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 06:43 AM
1

There's only a difference if you allow there to be one.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 06:38 AM
0

Manipulation reached a new level. Not that I'd even want sex with any one of them at any rate. Interesting to see they use an old feminist favorite tactic. Imply that because you don't support what they support that you must be a sexist and misogynist.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 11:58 PM
1

Tell her to clean, for that is a 'girl job' If she declines, throw garbage in her face.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 02:53 PM
2

While everyone could do with some improvement, I don't see the merit in creating a subreddit specific for men and I also believe it sends the exact wrong message out there.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 11:33 AM
0

Not giving traffic to that s(h)it(e)
/r/MensRights15/03/11 07:11 PM
1

Heh, I know that, but since feminists always give that argument, I decided to use it against them. :)
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:11 PM
1

Ironically it's mainly because of feminism there are so many divorces now... There are several studies out there showing that there's a correlation between criminals and the like and people growing up without a father. (there aren't for the other side of the spectrum due to a too low sample) That's personally why I think sole custody is a bad idea. (I have no doubt that growing up without a mother has a negative impact as well). At any rate, it would probably reduce rape numbers and other crimes…
/r/MensRights15/03/11 03:08 PM
1

I've seen lots of MRA comments get deleted over there, yes. It's not as much annoying as it is pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 09:57 PM
1

I'm sorry if it seemed like I implied there was, what I did say though was that there were feminists with power, influence and money trying to dismiss the proposals altogether - and succeeded to do so. While we can argue about their validity and value for a long time to come that's not what I'm interested in. I hope I'm correct to assume that feminism, while obviously there are differences of opinion within, has at least one central thought or definition if you will that binds it all together, i…
/r/MensRights14/03/11 06:21 PM
1

although I hope it's because you don't want to see ONLY women offered humane rehabilitation and privacy in sexual assault cases. Not sure what you're implying. That each gender should only look after itself? That's a bit selfish don't you think? Where does that leave equality at? While everything you mentioned is a problem, it is not something we can easily or fast change. We can change what is listed there in the blink of the eye - if noone opposed it that is. I don't see why we should let one …
/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:45 AM
1

Almost threw up.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 12:21 AM
9

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/ Feminists have continually fought against proposals for equality in court. MRM has existed for quite a while now, did you miss out? We have people trying to accomplish equality, but every step of the way there are feminists with power, influence and money trying to keep us down. So yes, if you wish for feminism to have a positive face, you SHOULD do something about it. But you won't. And neither will …
/r/MensRights13/03/11 08:17 PM
1

Feminists fought heavily against law proposals from the MRM side. Someone made a post about that a bit earlier in a thread, but I can't remember which one. At any rate, it comes down to the fact that feminists are not seeking for equality, they wish for supremacy. edit: found it : http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/
/r/MensRights13/03/11 08:11 PM
3

This reminds me of parents living their dreams through their children, although this is quite an extreme case.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 08:08 PM
3

I hope she doesn't get any children at all to be fair.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 08:07 PM
4

Logic...It's not for everyone.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 05:02 PM
7

Glass ceiling is just another myth. Women are less likely to ask for promotions than men. If you ask less, then you expect to get the same results. Why they ask less is interesting, possibly to do with wishes to get a family and they probably figure they'll need the time. At any rate, it's their choice and I really don't see any social pressure anywhere that would keep women from asking for promotions or going into high-paying industries. Sure, we are all taught that men should be scientists and…
/r/MensRights13/03/11 01:08 PM
2

Followed by some woman writing an article : 'where have all the good men gone?'
/r/MensRights12/03/11 05:20 PM
6

Feminists are feeling threatened by the MRM. More and more people are seeing the hypocrosy and lies of feminism. While the numbers of feminists are dropping, the number of MRA's are going up. Naturally they try and snatch some people away from the MRM. Ah feminists, how low will you go? It hardly gets more desperate than this.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:29 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:24 AM
1

Wait, are there actually people who believe such arguments will work?
/r/MensRights12/03/11 12:04 AM
7

Wat A schedule is the fastest way to get enjoyment out of any sexual act really. Not to mention what if they don't feel it? Or feel like doing more? Ridiculous. Also lol'd at their theory that porn would cause erectile dysfunction and such.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 10:20 PM
4

I have asked several people who claim this subreddit is misogynistic to come up with examples. Haven't had any replies... Oh well :)
/r/MensRights11/03/11 03:16 PM
4

Calling women more fragile? Lol and you come in here calling us sexist. Great job. Also, you're an idiot if you think that because you can't prove that it was rape that you'll get punished for a supposed false rape claim. There's a huge difference between being unable to prove it was rape and being able to prove it's a false claim.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 03:13 PM
4

People standing up for their rights are getting hated on? Different day, same story. Nothing new, move along now.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 03:12 PM
4

Don't know about over there, but peeing in public is forbidden here. Other than that, quite ridiculous they'd write him up as sex offender.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 02:40 AM
0

Earnings =/= Rights I hope you realize there are tons and tons of factors influencing salary, discrimination being an exception?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 10:21 PM
1

... We are not against women's rights. We are not against women. We do not hate women. We are against feminism. We are against feminists. We do not like feminists. There can be no equality as long as there is feminism trying their ultimate best to do otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 10:20 PM
2

True, most guys I knew prefer a 'bit of flesh on the bones' :)
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:47 PM
1

I've been doing your last part ever since I could talk. Praise to my stubbornness and believe that I'm nearly always right.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 11:17 AM
2

I'd just tell them fuck off and remind them that if they really want equality, you just demonstrated it. Everyone has the right to defend themselves when under attack.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 11:15 AM
2

Feminism has developed in such a way that they're now inclined to believe that any choice made that doesn't follow their specific agenda must therefore be evil/bad/wrong. In a certain sense, at least in my point of view, it has become similar to fundamentalists. (who also fabricate and manipulate statistics to serve their agenda) The reason people don't have to step against religious fundamentalists is because people know it's bullshit, so they get little money and power; feminist organizations …
/r/MensRights10/03/11 11:00 AM
1

My my, is taking everything literal the new 'thing' online? I'm from Europe if you must know, won't go into details.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:16 AM
1

not from the US :)
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:04 AM
1

I guess the mentality is different over there then.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:18 AM
2

So you don't like the raw power it possesses? At any rate, I was talking in general, not sports :)
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:50 AM
6

Do not feed trolls.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:52 PM
-4

A gun is about power, anything else is just seeing what you want to see.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:49 PM
1

Not minding something that doesn't affect you, oh dear. I guess empathy isn't popular anymore.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:22 PM
1

I don't think there are many feminists who actually knows anything about the MRM or has even spoken to an MRA and just write down what they believe an MRA would say... Anyway, he basically proposed what many MRA's have proposed before, albeit I disagree with his proposed timelimit. 48 hours after given knowledge? Seriously? 48hours to make a decision that will hugely impact your life for at least 18 years?
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:04 PM
1

Sorry but if you believe women are not being taken seriously on rape matters then you're either a troll or living under a rock.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 03:13 AM
1

Using /s is popular.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 12:32 AM
1

? That's what the Dillbert author said.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 12:14 AM
1

Hello concern troll, please leave. :) Example : When it comes to rape, they still aren't. Excuse me? People wrongly accused of rape have been murdered by boyfriends of the false accuser. Yeah they're not taken seriously at all...
/r/MensRights08/03/11 08:03 PM
1

Not really :)
/r/MensRights08/03/11 07:58 PM
1

And they'd tell you the truth or even know why themselves why exactly?
/r/MensRights08/03/11 06:22 PM
2

Considering that in many countries they're still bound to the kitchen it seems highly unlikely that they perform 66% of the world's work. Not to mention that a lot of them work part-time in western countries as compared to men. Since the first statistic is obviously flawed, it only leaves to question the other two... Not to mention the criteria they used for this 'research' (how do you define property, on who's name does it go when married, etc)
/r/MensRights08/03/11 06:08 PM
4

Talk to her about it. Explain how you'll run out of money if things keep going like they are now and ask if she'd mind splitting the bill. If she declines, I'd decline the relationship (personal opinion). Seeing as she wouldn't care if you got broke at her expense in that case. (which is a red flag) She might tell you to get a job, in which case, tell her you'll get one if she does. She'll refuse and you can go back to situation 1. Good luck :)
/r/MensRights08/03/11 06:00 PM
1

Nice try Amanda, nice try...
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:56 PM
1

Nice try Amanda, nice try...
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:55 PM
1

Tried to show you the results for my country, but nothing came up. Guess people don't really use google for relationships here :)
/r/MensRights08/03/11 02:28 PM
5

Tell people who want equality to man up Get scared and delete post ??? Get caught anyway
/r/MensRights08/03/11 02:24 AM
1

Thought the same.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 02:22 AM
-4

Experience told my otherwise. And so has other's. Sorry :)
/r/seduction08/03/11 02:04 AM
0

Not sure why you're being downvoted, this is usually very true.
/r/seduction08/03/11 01:01 AM
-3

Actually, they like assholes because they don't care. Nice guys will always gave the care vibe off, which means they'll know when the nice guy likes them which puts them off.
/r/seduction08/03/11 01:00 AM
1

He seems very deluded. Ignoring is the best course of action. It actually usually is with these kind of people. I often have the feeling they make such provocative articles to receive more attention. Just like with trolls, feeding it makes it stronger, ignoring it makes it die.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:04 PM
1

Why do you think the majority of them are unhappy then?
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:25 PM
1

Not in general per say, just when they are unhappy I find it's usually connected to that.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:56 PM
2

Women also had the ability to vote in Germany at the time... There is no way they would have gotten so many votes if all women didn't vote for them. So yeah :)
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:13 PM
1

That as well :)
/r/MensRights07/03/11 03:33 PM
0

I think they're unhappy because of their impossible expectations of life, men, romance and pretty much everything else.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 02:47 PM
0

The fact that you don't even know what female hypergamy means, indicates you're out of place in this particular context. Also... Micro≠Macro. In addition, not every relationship is like that. You're sounding like a creationist now. Saying micro is possible, but macro is not. Micro leads to macro. When the majority of micro (if not all) occurs then macro is a natural consequence. And we honestly don't care that the minority may not be like that, because they aren't the once with influence. So the…
/r/MensRights07/03/11 02:46 PM
1

How exactly would you know they don't take it out on others though? Unless you're around them 24/7 it's pretty hard to check..
/r/MensRights07/03/11 02:40 PM
8

For evolutionary reasons, almost all wars are started and waged by men. Would like to see his studies about that. A much more simpler answer is that more men have been leaders of some sort in countries or the like and thus the chance of war being initiated by a man was far greater, therefore, most wars being initiated by men is a natural consequence. I could make a similar statement (which would actually be closer to the truth) "For evolutionary reasons, more men have invented things useful to t…
/r/MensRights07/03/11 02:38 PM
3

It says men are more oriented to the future and you say it's better for the child's future to not invest in the future? wat
/r/MensRights06/03/11 03:08 PM
6

"Money safer in women's hands" Narrator is a woman... Anyone else see anything suspicious about this?
/r/MensRights06/03/11 01:49 PM
13

Wasn't because you made a mistake, but your attitude.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 12:13 AM
16

Don't dare tell me what to do when you're the one that's mistaken.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:48 PM
4

This is why I don't have pajamas. That way, I have to get dressed as soon as I get up.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:40 PM
15

I'm sorry? The author of the article only explained why men don't need women and why men are doing what they are. How is he saying women are bad exactly? His point was that we have different criteria and trying to conform the other group to yours is just pathetic, childish and bound to fail.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:37 PM
12

I'm just so disgusted and discouraged by the entire 'game' and dating scene that I just decide not to play, grab a beer and fire up some games. Less stressful, more fun and better rate of success. Why would I spend time and money to even get a woman's approval to talk to her? No thanks.
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:34 PM
-1

lies
/r/MensRights04/03/11 11:58 PM
0

wtf... Can you even read?
/r/MensRights04/03/11 11:58 PM
-1

I said the articles were posted here. Articles written by feminists on the matter. If that isn't a source, I don't know what is...
/r/MensRights04/03/11 08:20 PM
2

You don't need marriage to have a family. But I agree, that society needs families.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 05:52 PM
-3

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:57 PM
-2

There were some articles posted in this subreddit about it a week or so ago.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:21 PM
-2

I know that, but feminists ARE saying that it IS, which was the point of this thread.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:07 PM
2

Sudz94 (_) [+1] [S] 4 punten 9 uur geleden[-] (8|4) I can live with that but she when I told her I was studying to be a games designer she said "You should get a real job that won't help support me and our kids" so yea.... fuck that Personally, I would have gotten out of her after the OP, but after this additional info... Yes, leaving is the best option. There are people who think views on life aren't important in relationships... Those know little about it then. If something goes wrong with thi…
/r/MensRights04/03/11 01:21 PM
2

'True Scottsman'
/r/MensRights04/03/11 01:18 PM
1

With actual view I mean... you can't say that that's the norm for all women.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:35 AM
5

Run, run like hell.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:49 AM
0

Gotta love the few sane people trying to convince others that this is bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:48 AM
1

Invertebrates.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:40 AM
1

Personally I rather avoid them as well, but if they're in my room or something, I hunt them down. You should make her do the dishes next time. Just leave after dinner and don't come back.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:38 AM
-1

Suicide isn't a cry for help. An attempt at suicide which you know will fail, is.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:36 AM
-2

The only way they keep getting money is because of statistics; therefore they skew and twist them, usually leaving out essential information or using flawed studies.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:34 AM
-3

Which is something completely different and doesn't give us an actual view of the state in the army.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:33 AM
2

How so... It just illustrates that things are more equal than feminists want us to believe.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 07:25 PM
2

The problem is that there isn't a half-assed decent way to screen people for being rapists... (unless you want to remove all 'potential ones' which would bring a lot of collateral damage with it) We have a very sophisticated way to check for paternity, we do not have that for someone to be a rapist. There isn't a rapist gene.. and if there was, then they haven't found it yet. Assuming there isn't one, how do you suggest we go about the screening? What criteria should be used? How should the stud…
/r/MensRights03/03/11 02:41 PM
1

I thought they already did maternity tests at birth...? So what's so different about it? :3
/r/MensRights03/03/11 02:33 PM
2

Women are not better at tolerating pain. I wonder who the hell came up with that myth. There's only a handful of studies claiming that and that's because they're crap. The majority of the studies claim the opposite. I'd also like to see his studies and compare them to others. Many of these things sound like they can be skewed either way...
/r/MensRights01/03/11 11:23 PM
7

I'd go for Douchebag.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 06:28 PM
1

It does tbh :)
/r/MensRights01/03/11 05:17 PM
1

I'm also statistically more likely to die, doesn't that mean I should pay less since I'll have less years and therefore will have less need of their service?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 05:16 PM
0

First of all, I don't live in the US, so that doesn't account for me at all. :) Secondly, that sucks and while you may think it has a reasoning it still sucks, because you might be paying more you're entire life because of something you might get when you may never get it all...
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:31 PM
3

You'd still marry her knowing she'd cheat on you, not work, screw you over, leave you and still try to leech all the money you own or don't own out of you? wat...
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:29 PM
6

Stop calling him Dr. He doesn't have any degree at all. :3 I never played with 'girl toys' myself, not because of my parents but because I was more interested in 'boy toys' myself.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:25 PM
2

Sir, if you have no knowledge of how things work in Europe, please do not be so bold to make such assumptions knowing that they're likely to be wrong :)
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:21 PM
14

The difference is that you choose to smoke or not, you can't choose your gender.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:20 PM
4

Why should I pay more because some assholes that happen to be in some sort of the same group as me are assholes?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:19 PM
1

Europe... Fuck yeah
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:18 PM
-3

He links it as it serves for proof. Otherwise people would think he's paranoid ... Besides, doesn't hurt alerting everyone what's up.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:17 PM
7

Wow... How can they even get away with all that?
/r/MensRights27/02/11 10:52 PM
4

That's not the point the OP was trying to get across I think. I mean, how many people have a phobia of some sort? A lot right? Yet these stories are rare. Which means that her reaction is rare, which means she's either aggressive by nature or it's just part of the condition, a rare one though. Anyway, it's clear that she knew about her condition, there's plenty of evidence about that, yet she didn't tell her boyfriend about it. Now, if such rage is normal for her because of her condition, then a…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 10:49 PM
3

Why she didn't tell him when she knew how she'd react is beyond me...
/r/MensRights27/02/11 10:43 PM
1

:| Have they stopped to wonder why there are so many women compared to men coming to them? Perhaps it has something to do with all DV campaings being directed for women against men? Perhaps because a lot of the DV shelters are for women only? While you can't deny the facts they presented, you must be careful to draw conclusions from them. If the statistics were, in any case at all, reversed, then feminists would be all over it, protesting, etc... No company would publish such numbers and say : '…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 01:39 AM
5

Superbowl should give you all you need... And there was another one with an oven cleaner or something I believe... The slogan was :' So easy even a man can do it' ...
/r/MensRights24/02/11 11:42 PM
1

So you pick your job because of what it gets it you instead of you enjoying it?
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:57 AM
1

If you're in it for getting hit on then you really shouldn't be in it in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 09:29 PM
1

Men need more energy than women => more carbs More men need to travel for work => more travelling Explained. Conclusion, worthless stats.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 04:21 PM
1

I'm shocked he doesn't see one huge obstacle: How many (or rather few) would be willing to wear this?
/r/MensRights23/02/11 04:12 PM
1

Well.. If you're dealing with some personal issues you'll be less able to focus. There's a lot more support to help girls deal with them than for boys. Other than that, teachers are rather biased against boys, punishing them for being themselves. Of course they can improve on their own, but so can girls. So you're saying girls are helpless creatures? I know that's not what you're getting at, but arguing that girls need help and boys don't is going to be an uphill battle.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 03:59 PM
2

What a lot of people fail to realize is that being an adult does not require marriage or children. And some people also don't get that some people might be going to college or being unemployed but looking for jobs. I recommend ignoring these people, they never even heard of the word empathy.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 09:35 PM
5

the people most likely to be charged under the SCAN statute are women engaged in survival sex and street economies More commonly known as prostitutes.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 03:35 PM
9

Mazel tov in either case.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 03:33 PM
1

I scrolled down to the bottom on the BBC site... No link to any source whatsoever unless I'm missing something.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:08 PM
1

And where exactly did the BBC give a link to the source?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 12:29 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 12:28 PM
2

Regardless of that truth... People are selfish, when presented with the opportunity they will do what's best for them. Being selfish is a great evolutionary treat; just a crappy societal one.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:18 AM
1

Care to mention how you came to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:14 AM
1

I hope you realize that most papers don't give any link to a source... And I hope you realize that most people simply don't bother looking it up because they trust they gave all the info of the study anyway?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:12 AM
1

Sometimes I think the world can only function because of fear. You're only stopped from doing things because of fear. When a group people loses a fear for certain things...you'll notice in increase in execution. We must ask ourselves...How did they lose their fear? Easy. There are no bad consequences. No punishment whatsoever. In fact, it might even be condoned and supported. So. What must be done is make that group afraid again. How? By punishing them for what they think is the norm. Show them …
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:44 AM
3

I love how feminists can spin any and every argument into 'men did it' And when someone makes a good argument the response is : 'you don't know what it's like' You know what? We don't know what it's like, but guess what...it cuts both ways. You don't know what it's like to be a man either, so stop pretending you have it so hard when you admitted yourself you can't really know ever anyway.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:37 AM
3

From what I heard, most women prefer an average sized one. Size does matter, whether we like it or not.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:27 AM
2

He meant that there are men laughing at certain women who have small breasts...and there are women laughing at certain men who have small penises.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:26 AM
2

Kinda funny how he thinks to win this argument against you.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:24 AM
3

The first. Any decent reader can weed out the second, but no one can magically see the first.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 01:22 AM
-2

hurr hurrr.. But seriously though, it's obvious they left out crucial information
/r/MensRights22/02/11 12:24 AM
0

You're saying it's not important? It shows, with raw statistics, that there is a glass ceiling, it's located in the mind.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 08:17 PM
4

only 12% of FTSE 100 directors are female, according to a report by the Cranfield School of Management. Because you don't get a director job straight out of college you morons. This glass ceiling bullshit has to die, along with the wage gap. Seriously, just die already. There is not a single logical reason why there would be one other than 'men are evil' which isn't a logical reason either at any rate. Die bullshit die.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 12:44 PM
1

Antidepressants.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 12:22 PM
2

Actually, I thought the 'Think before you post' thingy was a good argument. However, I think the argument on the other side is better. I'm not a high-up person or anything, more an observer.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 12:09 AM
-1

I'm saying that it was explained why The think before you link argument isn't satisfactory. There is a clear, distinct purpose for why things are being done the way they are. If you can come up with an argument better than theirs, go ahead and give it a shot, but don't expect everyone to rally behind you just because you don't agree with it. Change isn't always progress or innovation. Remember that.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 10:55 PM
-3

There is a reason why things are the way they are.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 10:39 PM
2

And stay out.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 09:08 PM
2

But 3 times on the same day? Nah.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 12:01 AM
3

Feminist brainwash deleted.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:53 PM
3

I made more money, he paid the bills. wait wat
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:49 PM
2

Has been posted twice already today.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:48 PM
1

Did that make it more difficult for boys to graduate? My understanding of the complaint is that we think boys are now dropping out in greater numbers, not simply that there are more female graduates. Even if the WEEA accomplished every one of its goals, how would it make more boys drop out? Easy enough. You see, they have to set standards. But times change, so every once in a while, those standards are reviewed. By helping girls significantly more than boys, girls will get better grades than boy…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:45 PM
1

That, at least, is an interesting question. Is there a plight to men, and (if so) is it really institutional, or simply a difference in outcome? To wit, does the fact that men don't go to college (or drop out) reflect a reality that somewhere there is systematic discrimination, or just that men are being less responsible? When even really intelligent people just give up and fail to see to the point and thus get worse jobs than they could have, then is the time we should say: Yes god damnit! I be…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:39 PM
2

You're trying to pull the conversation away from the actual point. The point was that, when disagreeing with their beliefs they'll call you an asshole/misogynist.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:58 PM
2

Feminists believing the stereotypes they helped to build. Oh the irony. Men have always wanted commitment and kids eventually. It's just that throughout time, showing that usually didn't give the outcome they'd hoped for, so they hid it and pretended they hated it.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:34 PM
2

So in your opinion, do you and every other person who identifies as a MRA hold identical beliefs about every subject, issue and situation? No, but feminism does have a centralized belief system in place. Common beliefs include, but aren't limited to: patriarchy, wage gap, brainwashing kids from birth, glass ceiling,...
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:25 PM
1

Issues =/= beliefs.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:14 PM
1

I'm not saying that they don't, just that it's more easily and faster believed if a woman pleads for insanity. (why else would they harm a living creature?)
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:44 PM
0

So you have no clue what feminism is about? Awesome. Why are you posting here again?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:43 PM
0

You disagreed with her post ... not with what that person believes in. I think you can see the difference in that matter.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:12 PM
0

Okay... But how often do you hear someone say a man is insane for committing murder? Only in special cases as far as I'm aware.. Like some mass murder or something like that.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:08 PM
2

That's not the point here though. We can be as civilized and polite as possible, it won't matter, they'll still label us as assholes for disagreeing with them.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:52 PM
-2

As for your first point... Lol, then no feminist would think we'd be talking about them and nothing would change at all. So, no thank you. As for your second point, classically, society was set up to strongly favor men, the ladies didn't have suffrage anywhere in the world until 1893. But they had less responsibilities and more privileges. Which is what always seems to be forgotten... As to your final point, I know several women who consider themselves feminists, who aren't misandrists, who don'…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:24 PM
1

Except she calls it progress. How is it progress exactly? It's a change, sure...but progress?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:55 AM
1

James Cabeen : Wise men have shared this bit of knowledge w/ younger fellows for hundreds of years: "If you think you'll advantage yourself by marrying for money, keep in mind that you will earn every penny."
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:54 AM
-2

Troll trying to make someone look like a troll. Funny.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:47 AM
2

Where are the comments? Are they disabled for unregistered users?
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:45 AM
5

Indeed. I hate it when people try to act that things like Star Wars are meant for a younger age. Hell, I even hate it now when they try to say Harry Potter is for nerds only. I also hate it when they try to imply gaming is for little kids only. Oh well, fuck them.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:42 AM
5

See, within your post lies a common thinking problem within society. If a women kills her own child or does something really bad, she's labeled insane. If a man does something similar, he's called a murderer and sent to prison.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:24 AM
0

His said misrepresent which means that they say they're for equality when they're not
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:20 AM
-3

We've been over this... We acknowledge the fact there are feminists that want gender equality, but it doesn't matter one bit, because the feminists who have even an ounce of power at their disposal are not When we say feminists we mean them, because the others aren't doing anything anyway. Other than that Even the most of the feminists that are "moderate" can still be considered misandrist. This stems from the central feminist thought : 'Throughout history men have conspired against women by cre…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 09:13 AM
1

Of course the parents of those girl wrestlers are supportive of Joel's convictions, after all, that's one less competitor every time their daughter's have to wrestle with him.. Their beliefs don't even say he can't do that, he just thinks it does, kinda sad to see him give up a dream over nothing... It says wives, not women. Oh well...I don't think I'll ever show much sympathy for religious people like this anyway.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 06:11 PM
1

So... how they explain it when men get raped? I don't see how that fits at all.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:01 PM
0

It just shows how much of a slave the government is to the feminists.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 03:21 PM
1

Just further demonstration the feminists really can't care less about people in other countries, they only care about women in the country they live.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 11:50 PM
5

What if you just want to be absolutely sure the child is yours but don't want to bring it up because it could cause a breach in trust?
/r/MensRights16/02/11 11:48 PM
-4

India...are you serious? It's easily the most matriarchal country in the world.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 11:37 PM
19

Don't care as long as the unwritten laws of urinals are respected.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 09:37 PM
0

Evolutionary biologically speaking... A man is here to spread his genes around. A women is here to receive the best genes possible to create the best offspring possible. This explains this case. Since the man can't spread his genes around, he certainly doesn't want someone else to do it to his wife as that would add further insult to his own inability to create offspring together with her. Raising an adopted child is on the other hand acceptable. Although not usually the first choice. But adopti…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 04:12 PM
2

These are well known numbers and there are plenty of sources for it. The ratio I remembered is for an IQ of 140+ which is the genius threshold so to speak... It's 10:1 But like Demonspawn said, this means that at the bottom of the IQ-pit you'll also find more men than women. But since the topic is being the best, discussing the high numbers is what this is about. The reason there are more male doctors and scientists isn't because of sexism, but because there are more men with a higher IQ out the…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 02:01 PM
0

The first source said 11%
/r/MensRights16/02/11 01:09 PM
4

humans are fearful and insecure by default. And so it was; religion was created.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 12:16 AM
1

True...BUT, if more and more start doing so, the women side will cave in and abide. That's the nature of the game. They claim they don't need and want us, but once we have the ball in our court, we'll see who'll come crawling to who :) And no, this is not misogynous, just complete disgust for 'the game'
/r/MensRights16/02/11 12:15 AM
-1

Now, you're going to say that the high number of reports and low number of convictions shows a high number of false reports No I wasn't. For the first source, I'd like you to note the definitions, while the one for rape is clear and strict, the others are not. Sexual trauma is defined as : >Harassment, assault, rape and other violence. So, apparently, any harassment (ok you can claim this is sexual harassment) would count. But it clearly says: other violence. Which, I can only assume, since it c…
/r/MensRights16/02/11 12:12 AM
3

I was thinking more that, because men have to give before they are even given a chance to talk to women. And then they have go give more to get a date. And they have to give even more to get married. Hmm :)
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:52 PM
6

In my experience "strong woman" is a euphemism for a bitch.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:43 PM
3

Anyone else? ...No?...Please? sigh Fine, the hyperventilating kid in the back there, you may answer.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:40 PM
1

Not to mention that they often dare/mock/harass the man into getting violent. Also, there's this thing called self-defense, it's rather popular. So, like you said, they didn't say anything worthwhile.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:10 PM
0

So you do believe there's a lot more rape in the military than in civilian life then? The article doesn't like to any study at all, it just names some numbers, why should we believe that? We know nothing about the sample size and their criteria. On the other hand, we do have those things for circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 11:09 PM
1

Yes, because the military hands out free statistics like this at your local grocery shop. Please, obviously someone just came up with a random number that would shock. +1 Tiffany January 30, 2010 - 2:04 pm Some of the posts are completely OUTRAGEOUS,ignorant and inaccurate. I proudly served 9 years and would do it again ANY DAMN DAY! Yeah thats right- I m a FEMALE, recruited from Americas “bottom of the barrell, scum” and proudly married to a NAVY CHIEF- who also was recruited from the same barr…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 10:33 PM
2

If she gets elected in 2012 then Western civilization will soon after collapse. No, this is not fear-mongering.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 07:17 PM
4

Indeed, she isn't a whore, because whores give you something in return.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:22 PM
1

whether there is a minority of male victims Would just like to say, that DV is about 50/50.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 02:35 PM
-2

when you hear an opinion, ask yourself "is this person getting paid to say this?". if the answer is "yes", then you might as well stop listening. they are there to sell a product, not better anyone's life. You do realize that, while this is true, there are many, many feminists and feminist organizations getting paid and funded right? And guess what... they got the power and are making things worse. So yeah, when we say feminism is our enemy, that's exactly what we mean. Other than that, like klo…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 02:32 PM
2

Good read.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:27 PM
1

It is. Unless the man has some sort of alibi or recording to prove otherwise that is... Or of the story is so blatantly false that even the jury can't be convinced. But believable false stories and real stories? Yeah, that's exactly how it works.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:19 PM
2

This. Although I'd tone it down a notch. Like 99% some people die very young you know..
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:13 PM
1

Newsflash: Live in 3rd world countries is even shitter and unfairer. I wonder what she would say if she read the title of this thread though. I'm not sure whether she'd blame men or society...women crossed my mind, but then I realized how feminists argue. They'll say: 'they're not the ones buying the majority of the flowers...they're not asking for it ...etc' And then, when you don't buy flowers, you get called an asshole and possibly a misogynist. That's why I simply abstain from V-Day altogeth…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:12 PM
1

Yep :P
/r/MensRights13/02/11 08:40 PM
2

I'm not gonna spend that much time and effort into finding someone like that if I can spend all that time on just enjoying my life.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 08:22 PM
11

I think she's mostly complaining because she realizes that men are becoming a lot more independent which is shifting the dating game in such a way that men no longer 'hunt' for women. And this scares the shit out of her. She might even have to ask for a date herself now, oh my!
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:57 PM
11

Louts travel in packs or just hang out with one another. Louts dress in T-shirts and jeans and eschew fashion. Louts guzzle beer rather than sip wine, and they are most likely to be spotted in bars or lounging on living room couches watching football. Louts don't talk feelings; they talk sports and beer. Louts have few needs and no shackles. Above all, louts may ogle women and snicker about them, but women are pointedly never their top priority. At most, women are objects, just like in the old d…
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:48 PM
4

Question of the ages! It's like 'what's the purpose of life' :) Protip: Different person, different answer
/r/MensRights13/02/11 12:59 PM
1

I probably would actually, personally. But then again, I might have too much faith that news writers actually do their research...
/r/MensRights13/02/11 04:06 AM
2

Somehow I doubt the latter. Not because that would 'fit' this thread, but because that's usually the way things go. 'Suddenly' when something goes wrong, only then does slander come from the accused. That always seems suspicious to me. But I suppose you're right, we'll see - or not.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 03:40 AM
3

Granted. It's not a requirement for her to dislike/hate men for her to say that. But it doesn't mean that, because she's a junkie, that she doesn't hate men or isn't sexist. Have you read the original article I wonder? It came off as very sexist in that one. Of course..this one favors the woman in contrast with the original one. Point is, I guess we won't know what her actual intentions were, especially since she suddenly start slandering everything in sight.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 02:28 AM
0

No idea actually. I guess it's never accepted as a possible truth when men do it... So probably why I didn't think of it when I wrote it.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 12:16 AM
1

Yep, but like many others here I thought you were sarcastic as it seemed like the kind of thing that would sarcastic.
/r/MensRights13/02/11 12:13 AM
1

More or less.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 11:58 PM
11

Withholding pain meds and then telling the patient 'to man up and take the pain' sounds rather sexist to me.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 10:40 PM
2

This is what happens when women like her are pushed into the corner, they throw mud at everyone in range hoping some of it sticks so they can sneak out of the back door.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 10:38 PM
3

My point is that you're being unfair if you only do nice things for women. On top of that, women don't stand up for men, so I don't really see why men should stand up for women. And my phone number comment was more directed to a post in the original thread where a guy explained why he did it.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:24 PM
5

What I find interesting is that, while she bashes him for apparently being an asshole for wanting to spend the rest of his life with someone and willing to change for that, that it actually worked. So her calling him all those things means women are attracted to all those things. So she's basically arguing against herself and losing.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 05:08 PM
1

Only a small fraction of people are redittors, only a smaller portion make AMA's and even fewer people actually find that kind of stuff out.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 04:52 PM
2

I meant yours in the sense of biologically.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 04:51 PM
0

Seen it before, it's part of a longer video.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 03:28 PM
5

Feminism exposed, finally. Also, I found one sensible comment: Jay Black July 7, 2009 at 7:12 PM # If masculinity is bad, why are most women attracted to it. I was a very efeminent male growing up, artist and all that, and no girl would give me the time of day, and it wasn’t something else about my personality or looks either, as I was actually always pretty popular. I’m an Apha male jerk now (with a bit of a wink and nudge so people don’t take it so seriously), but I had to learn to be one so t…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 03:07 PM
1

Argue that everyone is a potential murderer, pedophile, retard, commie, cat, dog, tree, pebble, etc...
/r/MensRights12/02/11 12:44 PM
4

So you're saying men should give up their seat to women because they're women? Could you explain why? If it's just a 'nice thing to do', why not do it for other men? Oh right...that won't get you a phone number.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 12:41 PM
3

Because he heard some other people do it and he wants to be a part of the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 12:38 PM
8

Paternity tests are like really cheap tbh. Cheaper than maternity tests, which would then become obsolete and can be thrown out of the window. Bottom line: Save money and both parents will be (or not) assured the child is theirs.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 12:24 AM
18

I'm assuming you were trying to be sarcastic. I'm here to inform you that your sarcasm went lost. It's not because you spent an x amount of time with someone that the children are automatically yours. Just a fyi.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 12:19 AM
3

Hilarious, you think I only reply to people that 'upset' me? Also, just fyi, you lost time of your life as well, so I guess we're even concerning time :/ And bravo, making assumptions about people. Also, since when are 12 year olds allowed to go out at this hour? (see what I did there?)
/r/MensRights11/02/11 11:23 PM
2

At least I don't act like some little kid. awaits a 'this is the internet' sorta comment Seriously though... what did you gain by posting something that lame?
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:43 PM
1

Shoo.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:39 PM
1

That was my thought when I just read the title here, before even opening the article. :3
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:38 PM
2

Games kinda lost their nerdy look around where I live and are now popular among my age to my greatest delight :3 We even game during breaks with our entire class lul :)
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:37 PM
2

Why do you even come here? Go back to youtube/digg
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:35 PM
1

Was to be expected, first they tried to blame regular violence and shootings on videogames (despite there being a lot more violence on TV) and now rape... Neither have been proven and both are bullshit. I'm sorry, but if you're unable to separate games/virtual reality with reality than you should go see a therapist. And wtf is that bullshit? There has been no study supporting this ridiculous statement yet she claims it's logical, lmao.. Let me tell you something, people are no more violent than …
/r/MensRights11/02/11 10:28 PM
1

I do those things for someone else though, not for myself. And about your last line, silly, yes, but it would be a clear statement.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 11:32 PM
1

Odd, since the majority here is from the US, yet you're the only one making this kind of comment. Would you agree it happens less frequent or not in your experience?
/r/MensRights10/02/11 11:24 PM
1

To be fair, I never heard a man say that to a woman. Not on TV, not irl, nowhere, sooo, where do you live? o.O
/r/MensRights10/02/11 11:00 PM
1

I think immediately dropping everything you're holding when they say it is pretty much acting when it happens :P
/r/MensRights10/02/11 10:59 PM
4

Whenever someone would ever dare say that to me I'd just stop doing whatever they said it about until they get the message. Actions > words
/r/MensRights10/02/11 09:10 PM
1

Sick..
/r/MensRights10/02/11 07:31 PM
0

It felt unnecessary for me to watch the video as I could already answer the question :P
/r/MensRights10/02/11 07:29 PM
5

Things that have real consequences, like how they were raised, where they grew up, what kind of life they were given. These are true for both male and female. But nothing you said are permanent changes to one's body... Circumcision only for males. (since female ones are banned) I think the additional rage stems from the fact that fat toads like Oprah buy the foreskins cheap and use it to make skin products...
/r/MensRights10/02/11 05:25 PM
0

There is no patriarchy, so no.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 05:23 PM
2

Just read his post about pensions...wow They're really gonna pass that bill? Seriously, I thought there were smart people leading stuff, but apparently they're too scared to not do it or something like that :/
/r/MensRights09/02/11 10:55 PM
1

I was under the impression I was in the men's rights subreddit, apparently not then?
/r/MensRights09/02/11 09:05 PM
1

So..how about a situation where the mother doesn't want it to be aborted but the father does?
/r/MensRights09/02/11 08:59 PM
2

Again, you missed the point. You're suggesting if only the father wants the fetus to be aborted, then it shall be done. Yet a bit later you said that if the mother doesn't want the abortion that it does not happen... It sounds rather invasive having a fetus removed to be honest, so yes, the mother should have at least a say in the matter to say the least.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 08:12 PM
16

Surprise surprise, feminisms is a dictatorship.
/r/MensRights09/02/11 08:07 PM
2

So your point is that the man has no say? wait...what is this thread about then?
/r/MensRights09/02/11 08:03 PM
2

His point was that the fetus is inside of the woman's body and would have to be transfered. Which does involve her body, don't you think?
/r/MensRights09/02/11 07:53 PM
0

Speak for yourself will you, most people here don't hate women.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:49 PM
1

Sadly, this happens quite often, just look at celebrity divorces and such.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:48 PM
1

I doubt even they could give this story a feminist spin.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:46 PM
3

sigh Gotta hate when people with not even a basic understanding of economics try to say the economy is being sexist. It's basic supply and demand. There's a high demand for engineers => they get hired quickly and get paid well. There's a low demand for social workers => they get hired here and there and get paid less. Demanding everyone getting paid the same is insanity and would make the global market crash even faster than it already did not so long ago.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:42 PM
2

How about option nr 3? A relationship without marriage. (your title suggests marriage vs staying single)
/r/MensRights08/02/11 01:09 PM
1

I don't see why we should condone stereotype-reinforcing ads and such. After all, people do get influenced by it, whether they want it or not and whether they know it or not.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:57 AM
1

You seem to be more informed than the OP himself and seem to assume there were no witnesses, you assume he didn't tell what happened and you forgot all about the women merely saying :'he made me feel uncomfortable'
/r/MensRights08/02/11 11:49 AM
0

This is reminding me of religion vs atheism. You shouldn't try to combat silly statements with logic, facts and history, that has no effect on such people. Instead, coming up with an equally silly statement makes them go quiet (or rage)
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:59 AM
1

And the manager would know that the woman's complaint wasn't serious how? Emm... He said hi and she calls him a pedo. Yeah... That seems perfectly normal and serious :|
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:56 AM
0

Your point is? I was just pulling your comment on topic.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:56 AM
1

Unless he's not handsome, attractive or not not attractive. Then he'd get slapped, get called a creep and potentially get on the sex offenders register.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:25 AM
1

Statistically speaking, most child abuse is done by close relatives, more particularly the mothers.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:22 AM
1

This needs more upvotes.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:19 AM
1

You should only take serious what really is serious. If you start taking bullshit seriously then something is seriously wrong.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:17 AM
1

I have to look and smile at them, because they always stare at me for some reason D: At least it saves me from the pedo window
/r/MensRights08/02/11 12:14 AM
3

All over the place meaning? Got bikers living in every country and you guys take plane flights to meet up? Seems highly unlikely.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 01:31 PM
3

Sure. I have buddies all over the place. We all tend to look like bikers. .... You seem to be confusing your general area and the general type of people you're with with the world and all men. Please don't do that.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 12:51 PM
4

Ever stopped to wonder people react differently in different places to different people?
/r/MensRights07/02/11 12:42 PM
1

Just put a symbol down for equality. Or something like : http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumb_213/1196278050SuFlpT.jpg
/r/MensRights07/02/11 11:52 AM
0

She broke copyright though, she'll have to cough up money for that regardless.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 11:51 AM
2

I think most men are simply more realistic than most women these days.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 10:40 PM
1

You can't just cast commonly accepted views aside without giving a proper alternative is all I'm saying. Besides, I'd find it interesting.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 04:40 PM
1

They only just figured out that when you tell someone they can do something and not get punished there is a high risk that they'll do it? STOP THE PRESSES
/r/MensRights06/02/11 04:39 PM
6

The guy would get fired instantly.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 04:36 PM
1

The choices are called dumb, not the gender.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 04:30 PM
1

Yeah, there is an explanation for why they act that way, but not why it is that way, which is kinda my point.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 04:30 PM
1

Sure, but the only way you can say what he said and get away with it is to give a possible alternate theory for what happened in the biological evolutionary aspect.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 12:04 PM
6

Seems to clash a bit with a biological evolutionary view to be honest.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:03 PM
3

By that logic, we should also ban all animals from having sex for a having an IQ that is too low.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:01 PM
2

Not to mention, feminists constantly say 'male privilege' as an excuse to organize women-only stuff. When the tables are turned they get pissed off.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 03:59 PM
3

So... basically men are getting screwed further? Great! No..wait, what was that word again? Horrible? Yeah that's the one.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 03:49 PM
1

I'm saying you can't know what's better, I personally think neither is, both have perks and disadvantages and no one can experience having been both. Other than that, I don't think that the difference would be that big and in the end it all comes down to the person. Some may prefer being male, others female.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 11:12 AM
0

The statistics listed on the linked blog do not necessarily imply that a given woman is any more or less predisposed towards abusing her child with respect to her gender than that child's father is with respect to his gender. That wasn't the point of the study though.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 09:35 PM
1

And you know that how? Have you been a woman sir?
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:29 PM
2

I bet they feel the same way about them being more awesome. So, no, fuck that, inequality is wrong and they know it and so do we.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:20 AM
1

Isn't the female contraception pill just a bunch of hormones as well? How come they can patent that?
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:10 AM
2

wat :|
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:10 AM
2

I'm wondering why they can't patent it though.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 10:23 PM
3

To be fair, that was quite disgusting. Also, did anyone notice how female gamers are almost instantly labeled as hawt while male gamers get labeled as nerd? Although I must admit that in my area gaming is quite acceptable since a lot of people do it. (ftw)
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:26 PM
42

Ehhh, how about don't ever make anyone pay for rapists? Why would it be more acceptable for a grown man who got raped to have to pay?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:25 PM
1

You mean your experience in society? Aka society tells what you experience. Doesn't mean it makes it true
/r/MensRights03/02/11 07:41 PM
1

Lol, you're the kind of person that believes because society says so that it's true?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 06:23 PM
1

wat... In what kind of deluded world do you live?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 05:35 PM
1

He was referring to an article about Sweden. It had to do with sex-based reasons for abortions, where, in most cases they'd abort when it was a boy but not when a girl.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 04:04 PM
1

Too bad society would crumble in an instant without men. I guess they forgot to think about that...oh well.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 04:02 PM
1

How about you don't slap us either? Seriously :/
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:55 PM
1

Hello 5th millionth thread with the exact same content from another 'true feminist' (see true Scotsman) I'm honestly to tired of seeing all these threads that add nothing new and always end up having the same responses. Read the other ones if you wish.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:52 PM
1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:48 PM
2

The problem with your 'explanation' is that women can still go when there are guys around. Also...what? Why isn't this sexist? And why would the reverse magically be ?
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:47 PM
3

Generally girls look better with their hair done. And guys with short, well-kept hair. It's the de facto of hairstyle. Wrong, it's the culturally subjected norm. Every culture has it's own beauty standards, it's all fabricated.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:46 PM
7

Sorry, but instead of asking for a guy's only night, he should ask to get this night removed instead. Those women need to get the fuck over themselves.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:45 PM
2

Both cases are sexists. And any pokerplayer that gets distracted because there are women around is a bad one to begin with anyway.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 03:43 PM
2

Where's the list for women then?
/r/MensRights02/02/11 11:10 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 11:05 PM
1

VDay is bs anyway...
/r/MensRights02/02/11 11:04 PM
5

Wear condoms.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 10:27 PM
1

Like I said before, we'll never agree because we're discussing different ethos, not sure why you keep trying though. I just have to repeat myself over and over, which only further illustrates how this won't be resolved.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 07:32 PM
1

I wasn't making excuses, I was giving possible scenarios, you were immediatly convinced that she was a horrible person, you maybe right, you maybe wrong. My point was, as stated earlier, we do not know and never will so once again, we can't judge......
/r/MensRights01/02/11 05:13 PM
1

Which is what would happen if she, thanks to House, were able to continue deceiving him that long. Only if, as I stated earlier, they don't tell anyone who informs the media about the 'miracle'... Whether she intended to hurt him is irrelevant-- Ehh, if you think so, I disagree though what she did is get pregnant by cheating on him with another man, then, instead of coming clean, try to deceive him into marrying her anyway. Which is wrong, but she might love him, you know.. Afraid of losing some…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:15 PM
2

Better than what we had, but not sure if it's the best way to go with this.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 03:25 PM
1

When the lie is the difference between marrying someone or not, yes. They were already married, so you're wrong there. The effects of marrying someone and adopting their child as your own are also permanent, as even in divorce he'd have to pay child support, lose half his stuff, go through massive pain, etc. Only if he signs the papers and doesn't terminate it within a year Also, the guy misses out on a whole different life, instead being tied to someone who would betray, deceive and exploit him…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:59 PM
1

Lol, surgergy IS permanent, but such a lie? Do you really think that makes things permanent? If they even tell 1 other person who then informs the media for that miracle then the tests will be redone and the truth will out anyway. Other than that, the guy's a moron for believing the story anyway, although I do have to say few people doubt a doctor's word anyway...
/r/MensRights01/02/11 11:54 AM
1

Hmm, I remember at least one ep where there was told on the woman :3 By thirteen though :? and mostly because the woman was a psychopath and thirteen and her were fighting... But still xd
/r/MensRights31/01/11 10:19 PM
1

Thanks for providing an example of the kind of response that I think the writers were expecting. Helping a woman is "nice" and...let's not bother thinking much beyond that. The important thing is that House showed Wilson that he can be nice. Helping a man in a similar fashion wouldn't have done that, because... I think you're trying to see more into it than there really is. If you know House, then you know he couldn't care less who he helped as long as it fits his scheme. I am curious to hear yo…
/r/MensRights31/01/11 10:11 PM
1

It's nice in the sense that he didn't tell on the woman cheating (although he mentioned it) What you propose is something completely different...
/r/MensRights31/01/11 07:26 PM
1

Ehh, House was just trying to prove to Wilson that he can do something nice. Nothing to do with the issue at hand directly.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 06:36 PM
6

That simpsons episode was a parody based on some thriller movie though... Besides, that's a cartoon, can't expect much realism from them at any rate.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:58 PM
7

Yeah, but that had little to do with House wanting to help her, or sending a message that's okay, he just wanted to prove Wilson wrong.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:55 PM
1

Yeah, had the same thoughts, but I just figured 'meh, all shows come up with this kind of bs' A bit disappointed House MD fell victim to this, but there's no way around it apparently. Bitchy women everywhere?
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:54 PM
0

If you're wondering why you have downvotes, I'd like to refer you to wavevector's comment.
/r/MensRights30/01/11 02:29 AM
2

And men are competitive so try to call each other gay as much as possible which leads to men trying to prove they're not gay as much possible.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 07:23 PM
1

It's more than just that and I'm confused as why you don't know that.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 02:56 PM
2

And think about it. Why would straight men be bothered about gay men at all? Gay men arnt competing for women, so why are some straight men homophobic? Because they don't want to be called gay or seen as gay because in our society it's viewed as unmanly. And both men and women uphold that view.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 01:05 PM
5

No, it's society.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 12:20 PM
3

Why did she marry him if he isn't a 'real' man? Same for those other guys...? Btw, why is this article even here?
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:19 PM
4

Was a nice read, until : Husbands, for example, are more likely than wives to have problems with drinking, drug abuse, and infidelity." Alcohol, maybe? Statistics would have been nice. Drugs? Doubt it tbh Infidelity? That's about 50/50 :/
/r/MensRights26/01/11 11:23 AM
2

Neither? Or both.. They're both psychologically and emotionally devastating that's for sure.. Then again, when falsely accused you can lose your job, family and so on :/
/r/MensRights26/01/11 11:09 AM
1

Not really. I'm annoyed by the term and total disregard for one's integrity.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 11:33 PM
1

Yeah... I know how a therapist can help with that. But my point was that such memories (when stored away so deep that you can't retrieve them by yourself) can't just suddenly pop into your mind. Let alone the fact that people are able to use this in court. Memories change over time. That's also known. Or maybe people's view change? Or conclusions? Either way, it doesn't matter, one day you might be really mad about something that happened. Later you might feel perfectly fine about it and are abl…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 11:02 PM
-1

But that's the point... Do they know when it's wrong at that age? I don't think so..
/r/MensRights25/01/11 10:57 PM
1

People would laugh and ignore you if you told them I was a pussy. Begone internet troll
/r/MensRights25/01/11 10:56 PM
0

There are idiots, trolls and possibly both posting here yes, doesn't mean you should pay attention or be insulted by them.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 10:51 PM
1

Kinda my point?
/r/MensRights25/01/11 09:48 PM
-2

Yeah, because kids of 3 year old know when they're being emotionally traumatized...
/r/MensRights25/01/11 08:02 PM
3

I ignore and avoid anyone (women and men alike) who dares use those words.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 05:47 PM
1

to women's rights issues. Such as?
/r/MensRights25/01/11 05:43 PM
1

Their increased rate of suicides could be completely natural, such as their increased rate of schizophrenia and autism. I'm sorry, but I haven't heard of a lot of causes where the men committing suicide was autistic. There are few, but a minority... just like autistic people are a minority in society. Schizophrenia is treatable...and I fail to see how that would push one to the edge to want to kill themselves. I can see how it might for autism, not because of the disorder itself, but because how…
/r/MensRights25/01/11 05:42 PM
4

... Yes, because people, after 20 years suddenly remember something when you were THREE years old... Does anyone REALLY buy this shit? Sometimes I worry about the average intelligence of the human race... I also don't see why men should be the one suffering because women are the ones having these problems.. Oh wait, that's what feminism does right?
/r/MensRights25/01/11 05:35 PM
5

Also funny how they didn't investigate the impact of attractive males would have on women...
/r/MensRights25/01/11 05:30 PM
5

Not to mention more and more teens are reporting being in abusive relationships, which means the woman has even less control over what goes down Why does she assume it are women being abused and not men or both? Also, does anyone else find it ironic how she wants women to be treated 'as first class citizens' and 'don't need protection', yet automatically assumes that women and only women can be victims?
/r/MensRights25/01/11 04:26 PM
16

Too bad the vast majority of homeless people are men... Too bad that men also need preventive care for their reproductive health.. When I was reading that article I was thinking: "She's describing every homeless person on the planet... I don't get why men are being excluded"
/r/MensRights25/01/11 12:27 AM
-2

Oh please... People betray and deceive each other all the time. Almost the entire dating game is made up of deceit and betrayal to get sex...
/r/MensRights25/01/11 12:24 AM
1

Women get away with that way easier...
/r/MensRights24/01/11 05:51 PM
8

Just read an interview with the author Roy Baumeister in a magazine. He basically says pretty much everything MR has said. That feminism is no longer needed in our culture, that most feminists these days see men as their enemy, that men are viewed as disposable by our culture, that it's pointless to argue with feminists, that there is no patriarchy and never was, etc... And he used to be a feminist in the seventies...when feminism was needed, so yeah :) edit: Just noticed this has been posted be…
/r/MensRights24/01/11 05:47 PM
7

They try to imply stuff though... By saying porn and strip clubs promote rape and saying that mostly men do that stuff, they are implying all men are rapists...
/r/MensRights24/01/11 05:01 PM
1

Meanwhile, young girls lack access to an “ism” that involves smart, engaging, sexy and celebrated female leaders who relish the pleasures of a career and/or the satisfaction of a happy family and supportive motherhood experience Neither do young boys... I find such articles are always one-sided...
/r/MensRights23/01/11 12:45 AM
1

A comment on the article... Instead of worrying that some jerk is going to get hurt for saying nasty things to a lady, maybe you should be concerned over the fact that these "men" think it's OK to act this way. I think someone feeling sexually harassed is way lower on the painscale than getting your genitals mutilated... Mr Mahmoud Hanfy Mahmoud has clearly nothing to do in his life...The head of the complaints department at the Association for Human rights is complaining about a film that adres…
/r/MensRights23/01/11 12:34 AM
2

I don't know any funny female comedian where I live.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 02:30 PM
4

They're whiteknights.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 05:26 PM
1

Both. Feminists make the nurture part out to be more than it is though.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 11:10 PM
1

Of course they can do evil. Without women capable of evil, Hitler would never had gotten a majority in Germany.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:29 AM
1

Has anyone else noticed how feminists never mention India? ...Wonder why...?
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:24 AM
1

I'd be happiest to have one to spend my life with, too... But if not, so be it. I got suicidal when I thought I'd never find someone like that, but hey, things change...
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:17 AM
3

You have friends who like to throw big words around to impress people then.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 09:27 PM
1

It's actually quite common in some places depending on country. Stop being so narrowminded.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 05:17 PM
1

And yes, it is unlikely that someone in management receives significantly different "perks" or benefits such as medical insurance. Additional compensation is really only seen in high-ranking executives/board members, unless you're talking performance-based bonuses, commissions, etc., No, I'm talking about getting less paid, but having such perks instead.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:56 PM
0

For asking a question? lol... In what world do you live exactly? This is really unlikely. Not really.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:31 PM
0

Still no explanation as how just asking her employer why she's being paid less could backfire. If you ask for a raise 12 times, I'd get annoyed btw if I was an employer xd But she clearly never asked, which, in worst case scenario could always have helped her fight her case... It's possible she had certain perks (like medical insurance) that the others didn't. Not saying it is, just saying it's possible and not informing about it seems like a lack in communication and business skills. I'm now st…
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:10 PM
1

No, but I'm a bit young altogether for one anyway, so yeah.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:08 PM
1

Cool, I edited the intro alone now and made it less obvious.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:30 PM
4

Don't try to look for a wife/woman. Just be happy and live your life. If someone happens to come along like you want, then so be it, if not, then so be it. Take life as it comes, not as everyone else wants you to take it.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:22 PM
0

Well the thing is...Since he tried to kiss her and didn't actually do it... The train of thoughts goes in the direction 'Would he have done more if he had kissed her?' Just sayin'
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:19 PM
1

Could you explain why asking for the reasoning behind your lower payrate could backfire?
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:18 PM
5

Did anyone else get the vague impression that this just had to be written down by a woman? edit: If anyone opens the link now and gets confused then it's because I altered it a bit. Darnit, it restored itself already :<
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:13 PM
0

Not sure if that was sarcastic..?
/r/MensRights19/01/11 01:59 PM
2

I doubt you'll get far with that approach sadly :(
/r/MensRights19/01/11 12:10 PM
2

The defining of him allegedly kissing her, is not.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 12:09 PM
2

It says he tried to kiss her... Suspicious.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 11:32 AM
1

I don't see why we should assume they're not lying just because they're physically weaker.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 06:46 AM
1

He'll probably get raped in prison for starters...
/r/MensRights19/01/11 06:43 AM
1

What lingoi said + Right now, innocent men are being sent to jail for being falsely accused. That's hardly fair either... Something has got to change either way.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 06:41 AM
4

Wait, we are being blamed for: Researchers found that since women in the 18- to 23-year-old group feel they don't need men for financial dependence, many of them feel they can play around with multiple partners without consequence, and that the early 20s isn't the time to have a serious relationship. But eventually, they do come to want a real, lasting relationship. The problem is that there will still be women who will have sex readily without commitment, and since men know this, fewer of them …
/r/MensRights19/01/11 06:30 AM
0

She never asked her boss why she was paid less. She didn't give any examples of harassment (which in my eyes always makes a story more shaky) Imo, she should have first asked her boss about the pay.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 06:27 AM
-4

Feminst trolls stalking and downvoting...
/r/MensRights18/01/11 03:54 PM
2

I don't want to be treated like a rapist because a very small percentage of my sex has done it...
/r/MensRights18/01/11 03:05 PM
3

And this is why non-smokers try to get smokers to quit. But whenever we do, they come up with some lame excuse like :'it's my choice' or 'you gotta die of something'
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:19 AM
1

Then again, if she had lost weight she wouldn't have gotten in that situation... Although I agree that they should have handled it better.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:16 AM
3

It's pretty insane to survey the mothers and what they do and then blame both the people. If the justice system would work like that then half the population would be in jail.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:33 PM
5

How does he explain it for people that don't believe in God?
/r/MensRights17/01/11 03:33 PM
6

Interesting how they do a survey of the mothers and then blame the 'parents'
/r/MensRights17/01/11 12:16 PM
1

That's what I've wondered for some time as well... But it doesn't stop there, whenever men are being discusses, all the psychologists are women.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 08:07 AM
1

I think this comment is very important and should be taken in mind. You don't go to a hospital to get your symptoms changed, you go there to get rid off your disease.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 08:06 AM
2

This sounds more like some sort of poetry than something that would belong here..
/r/MensRights17/01/11 08:02 AM
1

And lastly do you not feel that in all of your empowering glory you could stop shitting on women who desire to experience their sexuality without marking them off as traitorous? I personally shit on anyone who does those, male and female alike... But that's just me. As for the rest, yes we are aware.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 07:58 AM
0

Even if most women were saints, the statistics would still be skewed by the still primarily traditional patriarchal society in which we live where women care for children and men bring home the bacon.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 07:53 AM
1

I'm just tired of 'true feminists' coming to post here saying that they don't believe it's men's fault an then later make a statement where they say the opposite. It gets old.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 05:36 AM
1

Not to mention, the men often only hits as to response of the woman verbally attacking him.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 04:51 AM
1

Right, it's men's fault... Seriously, just don't post here...
/r/MensRights17/01/11 04:50 AM
2

I want equality. That is all.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 04:46 AM
2

That sucks, we really need more male teachers :(
/r/MensRights17/01/11 04:46 AM
2

rantgrrl was making a remark at your spelling mistake. You meant manners, but wrote manors. A manor is like... a big house.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 07:13 AM
2

You make a few logical errors though. There are quite a lot of cases were women do not get convicted or reported, despite committing a crime. And not just sexual offenses... But pretty much all crimes. That just proves my point. That's like saying that gang members are more likely to be the victim of violent crimes. So yeah... Quite right. Except that all gang members are violent and not all men are violent. So no, bad analogy. Perhaps. I'd love to have a discussion on what we can do about that …
/r/MensRights16/01/11 07:08 AM
3

Men are significantly more likely to commit crimes Really... Care to provide the numbers on that one? Oh wait those are all skewed because of 'paternity fraud', sending men to jail who simply cannot pay alimony. Also, men are more likely to be the victim of violent crimes. So yeah... men are generally more violent Women are generally more mentally and verbally violent. a good proportion of men want to have sex with underage drug addicts Don't project. Show me the statistics for this one... They …
/r/MensRights16/01/11 04:36 AM
1

That was before this one, but yeah kinda like that one.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 04:30 AM
1

Most of these threads link to other posts/articles...All of which I mentioned are such threads. Those articles were not biased against women...on the contrary.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 04:29 AM
-1

Distort? Sorry, but no, the articles I'm talking about aren't MR articles, they're actual news articles.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 04:17 AM
-3

Well, Sweden for example is allowing abortion based on the sex. If you combine that knowledge with the knowledge that some women (don't have the number on that) are disappointed when they get a boy instead of a girl (sometimes so much even as that even years later she's still hurt over it) Not to mention, unless I heard it incorrectly I thought that in China the trend was changing and that girls were favored over boys... Seems weird to me, but I'll check it out Sources are from this subreddit...
/r/MensRights16/01/11 03:06 AM
1

Did you even read what he said? Women have to meet lower standards in order to get in. If they pass the 'tests' then it means nothing because it aren't the same standards... It's like asking one candidate to lift a bag of 10kg and then ask someone else to lift up a pebble and call them just as strong because they were both able to lift what was asked. And "Deal with it" is what men are constantly being told. Why do you think MRM exists? We're dealing with it...
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:59 AM
-3

Yeah... And we're starting to see the opposite of that right about now. Sooo.... Bad stuff happens.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:40 AM
0

That's kinda bittersweet. Kinda comforting knowing I'm not alone; yet at the same time it's clear it's a problem that needs dressing, yet few seem to even care and draw moronic conclusions like 'girls are smarter' (which is only more moronic knowing that men have an average IQ of 3 higher than women) Oh well... fuck it all I say. I hope I can finish college somehow and then get a job..Then again, that may be worse...
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:30 AM
0

The only 'biological' reasons are that medical companies invest more money and time in solving medical issues for women than for men; yet the ratio of diseases for men only are higher (genetic disorders) Oh wait... That's also a social reason, oh well.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:25 AM
1

I think many people missed the intended irony of this post.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:20 AM
-2

Show me anything like male slavery or a holocaust at the hands of women. Better yet, go out and ask some blacks and jews if they think its a fair comparison. Show me anything like female slavery or a holocaust at the hands of men.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:17 AM
0

If anyone dares to make a thread within the next few days claiming to be a 'true feminist' is going to a shitstorm along with a link to this article.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 02:01 AM
2

You must be trolling...
/r/MensRights16/01/11 01:58 AM
0

Problem wasn't interest for me, but doing such tasks <.< I prefer just not doing anything for 5months and then have exams. I think most guys do... And most girls I know prefer having monthly or bimonthly evaluations... Guess who won that battle, huh? Even at my college we gotta do such lame tasks, really annoying.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 02:42 PM
0

Yeah, but the thing is that not wanting to do those tasks lowers your grades D;
/r/MensRights15/01/11 01:33 PM
6

Had exactly the same, you can see my grades decline as the amount of tasks increased so clearly. Which is fucking bullshit because I was one of the more intelligent people of my classes at all time, yet even those asking moronic questions were able to get better grades because the system fits for them.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 01:02 PM
1

http://www.the-spearhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Gender-Wage-Gap-Final-Report.pdf
/r/MensRights15/01/11 03:41 AM
1

or men who lacked a strong male role model growing up. lolwat...
/r/MensRights14/01/11 09:26 PM
3

Well, it should be noted that pretty much every sentence in human existence has been said at least once before and thus that every sentence is in a sense a quote. I'm now wondering whether that's a quote or not. :3
/r/MensRights14/01/11 08:53 PM
0

I've never participated in V-Day and never will. It used to be just because I thought it was capitalist bs, a waste of money, but this just makes that day worse.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:31 PM
0

I usually just upvote every MR article because I know there are anti-MRA's out there downvoting every MR article. I just try to even the odds a bit.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:30 PM
2

What? Are you saying we can judge society, entire genders, entire races, based on some experience we had with one or a handful of them?
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:29 PM
2

? I wasn't quoting anything.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:39 PM
5

Actions define us, not about me's
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:34 PM
1

It's kinda tiresome seeing the same thing over and over again with always the same responses and same reactions.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:14 PM
-1

Don't you dare patronize him.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:06 PM
7

I do not believe the vast majority of women that claimed to be raped are lying. He never said that. I do not believe less than 5% of women are raped. So you choose to believe things...You're not critical. You pick your own stats that fit your own agenda, like feminists often do. Men in prison should not be compared to men by and large, nor to women by and large. So you're saying people in prison aren't really people, great equal thinking there. If I base the percentage of women who are raped to …
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:03 PM
8

And I'm saying that the opposite also exists and that neither of those in any possible way are viable to draw conclusions on society as a whole.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:51 PM
5

I experience women oppressing men, that's how I get treated. You see how that doesn't work?
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:35 PM
10

Again, this really isn't a war and it's sad that people see it this way As long as feminism sees men as oppressors (and thus kinda like dictators) then we shall continue to consider this a war. Good luck.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:26 PM
3

He's not trolling and I'm sure if you ask he'll provide you the data.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:24 PM
4

Actually, we blame feminism on the large part, not society.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:20 PM
4

I experience God. So I can conclude God exists. It does NOT work that way, regardless of what you think.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:18 PM
2

Wait... He specifically says that it wasn't about her, yet she still thinks he's blaming her? Self-centered bitch. Maybe he's mad at himself? Or the situation? Seriously... Why are some men so cruel? It's all about neediness. He needs you to admire and approve of him, but hates himself for having these unacceptable, "unmanly" needs. Men see us on some level as their mothers and when mommy lets them down they get mad, especially if their actual mommies let them down when they were kids. Thank you…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:08 PM
7

Globally - sure But over here? Are you kidding me? How do you know we haven't already hit the turning point hmm? How do you know that we haven't already equality?
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:04 PM
11

A real feminist wants to empower women, not dis-empower men If you're for equality and only want to empower women, then yes, you are against men, because you don't seem to want to empower men and thus as you keep on empowering women, eventually (or it has already) women have more power than men thus creating inequality. Hence men's rights was born to even out the odds. edit: not sure why i'm being downvoted for using pure logic based on what she said
/r/MensRights14/01/11 01:40 PM
1

I know, just saying that there are at least a handful of sensible people there.
/r/MensRights13/01/11 02:54 AM
2

Right, because everyone wants their parents to tell them when they've grown up that they would have never been born if they had a different sex.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 10:12 PM
0

So basically women can't rape men? Wtf
/r/MensRights12/01/11 10:01 PM
2

No, you got it wrong. They base whether or not it WILL exist based on sex.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 09:53 PM
1

Because society is mostly compromised of idiots.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 08:55 PM
1

He didn't die a man. He died when he was a teenager. He's 13.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 08:53 PM
12

Pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 08:51 PM
1

If you're going to decide whether or not to keep that 'lump of cells' based on what sex it is and thus will later become, then yes it is a big deal.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 08:47 PM
1

No my point was that it's a double-edge cutting blade.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 07:16 AM
0

receipts...Does it print the name of the parents on it? school documents? Lolwat medical records...as far as I know this doesn't print the parent who was there's name either. Witnesses are about as reliable as those people themselfs and are even greater subject of bias prejudice and fast assumptions and conclusions.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 06:23 AM
1

empirically proven based on their words, which aren't true per se, thus it comes down to bias again.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 05:30 AM
1

No, but that wasn't the point.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 05:29 AM
1

They're allowed to vote though. And sign petitions.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 05:06 AM
1

It's a good thing unless when some people take it seriously and think it's good advice, like some people do, because, as House would say: THEYRE IDIOTS
/r/MensRights12/01/11 04:39 AM
1

Not over here :3
/r/MensRights12/01/11 03:55 AM
1

I can assure that's only a small percentage, quite frankly the majority of the population is disgusted by it, which is only normal I think.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 01:33 AM
0

I love how people try to blame porn, it's ridiculous. You might as well ban prostitutes and anything that has to do with sex.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 01:21 AM
2

No we're not ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights12/01/11 01:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter