TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Perspective133 Archive

View 0 posts and 519 comments by Perspective133 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Are you a dog?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/15 12:54 AM
2

Since we aren't talking about dogs any more... As far as I am aware, dogs don't play in the NFL, except Air Bud in "Air Bud: Golden Reciever," and I'm not sure we should let our attitudes about aggression be shaped by this movie. It's not even as good as Air Bud. Actually, you have a good point. I've never thought about it that way. Fixed it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 09:00 PM
2

So all forms of aggressive behavior are universally bad and should be eliminated? Okay. Let's do this. Better do away with sports then. Be it boxing, NFL football, hockey, even racing of any kind really... have you seen how aggressive those drivers can be at a race track? Violent video games and movies, as well. In fact, just ban competitive games altogether. Me any my little brother used to get pretty heated playing Mario Kart against one another when we were kids, and we can't have that. Too a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 04:47 AM
2

The whole damned dog conversation is digression. I've already given multiple empirically observable examples of how aggression is not limited to mere violence and can be used as a positive force. If you disagree, you are wrong. Plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 02:48 AM
2

Look... if like u/taiboworks, you also need a team of researchers to figure out what a dog looks like... Then you have issues. I'm beginning to suspect people like you all are the reason they have to put instructions on shampoo bottles.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 01:22 AM
3

^ Translation: ROFL WUT R U A BOT NOW FAGET LOL FUCK U LOL LOL !!!!!!1
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 11:18 PM
3

^ Translation: ROFL ROFL LOL HOW U ND UP LIEK TIHS ROFL LOL LOL !!!!!1
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 11:15 PM
3

^ Translation: LOL HURR DURR U CNFIRMED MUH SUSPISUNS ROFL LOL FAG FAG UR MOMS A FAG FAGS TEH ONLY WRD I KNOW ROFL ROFL ROFL!!!!1
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 11:11 PM
5

Since you insist on harassing me, I'm just going to bring the conversation down to your level of maturity and imitate what you sound like to me: HURR DURR WE NEED STUDYS TO PROVE ERTH ISNT FLAT WHY U THINK WE DNT FOR DOGS ROFL ROFL OOH U GOT PWNED AGRESSIN IZ ALWAYS VIOLENT ROFL LOL LOL LOL !!!!!!1
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 11:05 PM
3

Oh good god. I started the conversation quite civilly and you proceeded to act like an argumentative jackass to me the entire time. let's restart this debate if you ever decide to rejoin reality. How about let's not have a debate at all because you clearly don't know how to have a conversation like an adult. Go to hell, I'm done.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 10:59 PM
12

Before you go trying to insult me based on my position, let's remember that I'm not the one who insists they need a scientific study to figure out that this is a dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 10:49 PM
12

because common sense said the earth was flat, the sun revolved around the earth, etc.. common sense is impaired by human self delusion, selection bias, stupidity. If you really need a scientific research study to conclude that a friend's pet which you are petting who's panting and wagging it's tail playfully is a dog, then you probably have worse problems to deal with than debating the finer points of aggression. it seems like you are trying to 'negotiate' the meaning of the word aggression. i d…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 10:13 PM
11

then there must be tons of research which shows aggression is positive. Why do you need research? If you see a four-legged creature which barks, do you need research studies to conclude that the creature is a dog? No, it's just common sense. And why do you think that aggression requires violence? If you see a real barracuda of a lawyer go to town on a lying witness in the courtroom on behalf of their client, wouldn't you call that 'aggressive'?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 10:03 PM
10

can you show me any research that aggression is a positive trait? You don't need research to see how aggression can be positive. Police, CEOs, salesmen, lawyers, military, athletes, and generally anyone working in a highly competitive field as well as many others frequently implement aggression in a positive form in some degree or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 09:47 PM
3

seems a bit crazy to judge your whole life off something so simple though.. Oh sure, of course the person with the slut finger would say something like that...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 06:08 PM
13

Relationships themselves and the skill one has in being successful in picking up women are two different things entirely. Besides, it's just a harmless analogy. Ever hear that phrase for women, "You have to kiss a few frogs before you find a prince"? That's comparing men to animals as well, yet nobody objects to it because we all know such a saying isn't in the context of bashing on guys. Same concept.
/r/seduction21/01/15 04:13 AM
10

"Stereotypes" have nothing to do with it. Women have -zero- experience in the field of "dating as a single guy". The rules are completely different for them. This is just fact.
/r/seduction21/01/15 03:35 AM
1

Granted, I should have probably specified that I'm referring to marriage in the context of marrying American women. When you date out of the country it's an entirely different ball game, there's a much higher quality of women who are actually dateable and some are even actually marriage-worthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 08:56 PM
1

Are you really trying to tell me that "You might be physically healthier when you are a senior!" is a good incentive to try to talk men in to considering marriage? How is that relevant to a 20 or 30 something year old man of marrying age? Also, the idea that "men rely on women for their social lives" is ridiculous. Men are not socially inept morons who have to rely on women just to have friends. In fact, we've all seen situations where a guy gets with a woman and gradually stops socializing with…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 08:40 PM
1

I'm sure there's also plenty of conservatives say they "LOL" at jokes against liberals, even when those jokes are incoherent, rambling, have horrible grammar and structure, and overall are rather not funny, simply because they're jokes against liberals. You can apply the same bias here with BP'ers and RP'ers. He could have literally said anything and you'd find it funny as long as you can remotely get the idea of "RP'ers suck" out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 07:56 PM
1

I'm glad that your friend didn't get screwed, however he is in the minority. Some feminists and BP'ers are quick to say "custody only goes to the wife if x, y, and z nowadays! It's not like it used to be!". However, 83% of the time, custody goes to the mother. And very often, men receive less child support than the mother when they are awarded custody(source: census.gov). There is also plenty of anecdotal evidence citing situations where mothers were awarded custody in spite of fathers demonstra…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 07:49 PM
2

If that was your goal you did a terrible job of it. Your post was rambling and incoherent. The attempt at offensive humor was noted but it seemed odd and out of place. No clear point was established in the post whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 01:39 AM
6

Being robbed of custody of your children, denied visitation, etc. is actually worse than being robbed of money. Regardless, we're digressing here. I feel my point is quite correct. Feel free to challenge it: Aside from perhaps if a guy is rather traditional and wants an old fashioned/religious family situation, what incentive is there for a man to marry nowadays? The deal for men is pretty much "Agree to try and keep her happy for the rest of his life and if it doesn't work out (which could real…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 12:49 AM
2

Tries to sound offensive and edgy against RP'ers but sounds confusing and incoherent. References heroin and bestiality in an odd attempt at sarcasm but just comes off as awkward. 2/10, poor job at trolling, would not recommend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 11:16 PM
5

OP... marriage is an absolutely horrible deal for men regardless of "pill color". Unless the guy wants to do a very traditional religious family thing (and he'd better hope to god his choice of a woman doesn't rob him fucking blind) there's absolutely no incentive for a man to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 11:07 PM
2

It's really not that bad. Are you telling that to us, or are you telling that to yourself? If you were truly content and happy, you would not be posting this in the first place. It's amazing how people can rationalize and convince themselves of anything. Most TRP'ers will say this is specifically a woman thing (hamstering) but as you've shown, men are just as capable of it as well.
/r/askTRP03/01/15 11:45 PM
1

This is the correct answer. This woman has zero respect for the OP, and I have a feeling OP has very little respect for himself if he has allowed himself to be treated this way for so long. Cut her off like a gangrenous limb which needs to be amputated.
/r/askTRP03/01/15 11:43 PM
5

Suuuuure it was.
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:54 PM
4

Yeah they do. That's what the whole Sexodus thing was about. No. They don't. East Asian herbivores are not the same as Western MGTOWs. You have no idea what you are talking about and are making biased and uneducated assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 09:12 PM
11

That's a response a frustrated beta male would make to a woman which would in no way get you laid. If you're going to play asshole game you want to be a playful asshole, not a bitter asshole.
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:01 PM
1

Men don't look for money, power, or status in a partner at all. They honestly don't give a fuck about such things. Sure, there might be the occasional gigolo who looks for a sugar mama to keep food in their stomach and a roof over their heads, but they care about the money and not the woman. You will never hear a bunch of guys saying "Man, check out the car she drives. I bet she makes a CEO's salary... I'd totally get with her." So yes, women are attracted to money/power/status more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 02:04 AM
1

Joke about it. Remind people that fat/ugly girls are like mopeds: they're fun to ride, but you just wouldn't want your friends to know you're riding one. Especially if you're having a dry spell with the ladies, or something... Sailors have a phrase, "any port in a storm"... it also applies here.
/r/askTRP30/12/14 09:54 PM
3

No, atheists are just the ones who act like smug little fucking arrogant annoying Dawkins drones who like to think they're so much more enlightened than everyone else. I get being "not religious" or not believing in a god, but self-declared atheists tend to thrive off of nothing but talking shit on other people's beliefs and are generally annoying as shit. In their arrogance, they're kind of like BP'ers. After all, the entire concept of BP came in to existence just to talk shit on RP'ers and act…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 09:33 AM
3

Yep... And usually those atheists are the first to spout some smug, smart ass comment like "You know it says in Deuteronomy that you're not allowed to cut your hair, right?" to a Christian just to be a jackass... yep, sounds exactly like how the typical BP'ers attitude is!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/14 12:53 AM
4

We've already established that you don't mind having your loved ones' bodies defiled and/or posted naked as masturbation material online. I don't believe there's a lot to talk about past that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 09:15 PM
3

I'm calling it right now: The honest answer from the vast majority of BP'ers will be "no". Maybe we'll get a "Yes" here and there, but overwhelmingly it'll be "no" for the majority of them. And of course, I'll get downvoted for this post, which will make it extra hilarious when it turns out that I was right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 09:05 PM
6

What's so strange to you about the concept of having respect for the dead? Furthermore, those women also probably has friends and family who do very much experience offense at something like that... If you don't mind that your mother, sister, or daughter's corpse is being diddled by some creepy necrophiliacs and posted online as wank material that's your business, but I can assure you a lot of people don't feel the same. You have a very odd set of morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:52 PM
2

no that's offensive to the women ... so what, r u scared of their ghosts haunting you? durr -__- So defiling a woman's corpse isn't offensive to her at all... right...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:42 PM
4

So with that in mind, those "revenge porn" sites where angry ex boyfriends post nudes of women aren't as bad as TRP either, then? After all, pretty sure those dead women didn't give consent to have their dead bodies posted nude on a necro porn subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:35 PM
5

Would you have that same opinion if someone at CuteFemaleCorpses somehow got a hold of pictures of one of your deceased relatives and posted them for necrophiliacs to jerk it to?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/14 08:31 PM
1

Yes, but that's not the only way women use manipulation by far. How many times have you seen a woman turn on the tear factory and start crying to elicit empathy in order to swing a situation in her favor?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 04:36 AM
2

You do realize that for every guy like you who will tell a girl "no" there's ten who won't, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 03:53 AM
2

...Which is an example of manipulation that they get a pass on. See?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 03:45 AM
2

Hah, bars and clubs are the worst places to pick up on women. All women there have their defenses and anti-slut barriers on high gear 98% of the time and there's a load of guys competing for all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 02:40 AM
2

It boggles my mind that instead of putting an end to behavior they don't like, Y'know, that almost sounds sort of like a PC version of when RP'ers talk about "training" a woman... Is it really that hard to find a woman who's not just trying to use you? In the US? Yes. I gave up on US women. In my experience many of them are exceedingly manipulative, outlandishly entitled, and impossible to please... they're just not worth the effort. Currently I'm dating a woman from outside the country and coul…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 02:21 AM
2

I can only go on the behaviors listed No, you choose to only go on the behaviors listed - which is ignoring the point which the OP is trying to make. I understand that the average BP'er seems to believe that overall both genders are exactly the same and any difference therein is simply a "social construct", so the first instinct is to say "No way, that never happens, men and women are the same in that aspect!". However, it's simply naive to try and deny that women attempt to use manipulation - a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 08:21 PM
2

Manipulative behavior, sure. That's what he's referring to - manipulative behavior in general which women get a pass on. Do you expect the OP to list every single form of manipulative behavior there is? That'd be one hell of a long post.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 07:31 PM
2

First, that anyone would deny the fact women get more of a pass for physically striking men. I've had BP'ers argue that "No, that doesn't happen, women don't get a pass on it at all, I've never seen it happen, etc"... Kinda like what you're saying right now about women and manipulative behavior. As I said, just because you willfully choose to ignore something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. How removed from reality must you think BP men are? Pretty damn far removed, on average. To be fair, RP typ…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 06:10 PM
7

Women do not generally get a pass for that behavior Yes they do. It is a societal double standard, just like how women get a pass for physically abusing a man. I'm sure you'll deny that happens as well, so here's a video showing exactly what I'm talking about. The fact that you willfully choose to ignore something does not mean it doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 05:17 PM
3

Then you are disagreeing, which is not the same as blatantly dodging the question. In that case, I'm not referring to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:26 PM
3

I find it amusing how BP'ers are dodging the question(i.e. saying "Both genders do that!" or "It's shitty for both of them!"). Yes BP'ers, both do it and it's shitty for both to do it, we've established that. He's referring to the fact that women generally get a pass on it when they do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/14 03:11 PM
5

You can apply that to a lot of people nowadays, just look at how many people out there argue and hurl insults at one another over politics/religion/RP-vs-BP stuff on the internet because they have nothing better to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 07:29 AM
1

What if he's a leg man?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/14 07:27 AM
3

You can pick and choose your examples, but both are clear. The first example is a clear-cut case of feminists and SJWs doxxing a critic of theirs and causing life-altering damage to that person simply for their beliefs. The second example is a feminist saying "it's okay to doxx sometimes!" and trying to defend the practice. Regardless of how much you choose to focus on the latter example to justify doxxing, the former is very much a valid criticism of the acts of feminists and SJWs. So let me as…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 10:34 AM
1

The first example I gave was not a "counter attack". Writing a web comic which criticizes SJWs and feminists is a far cry from doxxing or sending death and rape threats. What I can surmise is that you believe behavior such as doxxing and getting someone fired from their job IRL is acceptable from yourself and other feminists. Why is that? Do you believe the ends justify the means, and that opposition to feminism must be silenced?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 06:11 AM
4

So it's a "counter attack" when feminists and SJWs do it (and therefore completely justified), but completely unacceptable and horrible when anyone else does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 06:01 AM
4

Actually, it would appear that the feminist mentality is "doxxing is okay as long as the target is someone I don't like". http://skepchick.org/2014/12/why-im-okay-with-doxing/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 05:40 AM
6

Yes, because feminists never resort to doxxing or harassing anyone ever, right? Oh, wait...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 05:28 AM
1

No. She doesn't. She shuts it down because she sees it as a personal win for her point of view and the side she aligns with - and moreover, herself. Ego and the gratification it brings is not limited to gender by any means. The feeling of "winning" and shutting someone out as if you were a boxer delivering a knockout punch is like a sweet siren's call, no matter what gender you are. The feeling is just as satisfying, and so very appealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 01:45 PM
1

I'll even reply twice, since you're bringing up the "gender based". That argument of gender or race works well when you're referring to the elite 1% of the wealthiest out there. I'll definitely give you that. However, those of us men who aren't so blessed to be one of the Romneys? It's not so great for us. I get that as a woman you have unique challenges that I as a man will never face, but that goes both ways. Both genders have very unique challenges in life that, while we may never experience …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 03:07 PM
1

Why are you willfully capable of acting condescending towards those who may or may not have different beliefs than yourself? I don't believe I've stated anything gender based in this "equation". Do you not see how your attitude may drive away those who might relate to your cause in some way? No matter what my beliefs are, you are already attempting to shut me down. Do you really think that helps your cause?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 12:48 PM
1

Oh, it's not affecting me personally. I'm actually in a very good situation as opposed to most others, part by luck and part by my own efforts. I just have a special disdain for those who look down on others who are in a specific lower class when those people are in it by no fault of their own. If you want my pure opinion on the matter, it's a two-part situation: On one hand, it is "crony capitalism" where world leaders look only to their own short-term success and business moguls look to short-…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 10:06 AM
1

I haven't stated any preference as of yet. I actually didn't list my position. I just wanted to point out that you could be a tad more compassionate to those suffering the economic effects of this downturn.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 09:50 AM
1

who do you think caused this GFC? Pick your poison: -"It's Obama and his communist dictatorship!" -"It's the Republicans and the 1 percent!" -"It's the government, this has been the plan all along!" -"It's capitalists and their oppression of the proletariat!" -"It's men and their patriarchal old boys club!" -"It's the illuminati and their secret banking elites!" -"It's whites in their old rich country clubs!" -"It's the jews and their control over the banks!" -"IT'S FUCKING ALIEN LIZARD PEOPLE!"…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 08:44 AM
1

Now you're just giving cop-out answers because you know you said something stupid and indefensible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 03:03 AM
2

Fuck who's "fault" it is, because if you ask 100 people you'll get 100 different answers. Face facts: when you have to worry about putting a roof over your head and food in your stomach, saying "lol just get another job rofl!" in a shit economy is simply ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 11:00 PM
3

Of course. Because this economy is just overflowing with good jobs that pay a living wage right now. rolls eyes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 11:47 AM
1

So what you're saying is, "I think TRP'ers are belligerent so I'm going to act like a little belligerent shit as well"? Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/14 10:00 AM
3

Walk up to him and say "Your girlfriend is on Tinder". Problem solved.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 09:48 AM
4

If you want, I can go through the mod log and show you. I second this. Do it. In my experience, BP is basically SRS lite and about half of them only seem to want to troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 09:37 AM
4

I was going to say "Because of limp-wristed chalkie white liberal SWPL types", but yeah this suffices.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 09:57 AM
3

I notice BP'ers tend to think that in order for the two genders to be "equal" they have to be looked at as "the same". Sure, men and women are equal. That doesn't mean they're the same at all, however. That's probably why they try to explain away any difference between men and women by saying everything's a "social construct" - the idea of men and women not being exactly the same strikes them as somehow discriminatory or "not fair".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/14 10:43 PM
4

Do you disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 10:05 AM
1

ROFL ROFL U SOOOOO MAD RPER SHITLORD LOLZ CUZ U GOT PWNED ND U KNOW IT Y U NO TELL ME Y U HAET WIMMENZ????? Y U HAET WIMMENZ Y U NO TELL ME I KNOW Y BECAUSE U RNT ALPHA RIGHT LOLOLOLOLOL FUKKIN RP BET U BETA HUH
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 10:30 AM
1

LOLOLOLOLOL U MAD RPER Y U SLUT SHAMIN FOR WOMENZ WHO LIKE EATIN DICK GUES U RNT ALPHA ENOUGH BETTER GO LIFT SOEM WEIGHTS AT TEH GYM ROFL U GOT TOLD TOTLLY PWNED U RPER FUKKIN PWNED U Y U HAET ALL WIMMENZ? Y U HAT WIMMENZ??????/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 10:00 AM
1

Yes. You are completely immature, and both of the threads you started prove as much. You aren't here for conversation - you're a worthless troll who's the type which does nothing but bring down this sub and I will treat you accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 09:58 AM
5

DURRRRRRR MEN N WOMEN ARE EXACTLY SAEM ONLY DIFFRENCE IS BCAUSE SOCIAL CONSTRUCT EVERYTHIN SOCIAL CONSTRUC U MAD RPER LOLZ MYBE U RNT ALPHA ENUFF ROFL ROFL JUST PWNED U HARD RPER
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 06:33 AM
7

You are obviously an idiot so I'm just going to talk on your level to you from here on out. HURR DURR IM RLLY PURPLEPILLPERSON WHY R RPERS HAET WIMMENZ LOL ROFL RPERS R STUPID THINK THAY R ALPHA LOLZ ROFL!!!!1
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 05:26 AM
7

Do you have the brain cells to figure out that I'm not an RP'er? I don't agree with either side, but at least RP'ers don't act like blatant trolling shitheads on a regular basis. This sub has a good premise behind it: debating the issues intelligently between RP'ers and those who disagree, seeing if there can be some sort of open-minded discussion and compromise on the issues or at least agreeing to disagree. However, most of the BP'ers act like pompous trolling jackasses here (including you wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 05:07 AM
8

Yes, because of course no BP'er has ever said anything which is stupid, ever. Right. GTFO and go back to the /r/TheBluePill circlejerk until you want to have an actual discussion instead of asking bullshit like "WHY DO ALL RP'ERS HAET WIMMENZ ROFL LOL LOL?????". And feel free to downvote this post as well, because god knows BP'ers don't know how to follow forum rules, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:44 AM
12

The name "PurplePillPerson8" is bullshit, OP is a blatant BP troll. I mean, for fuck sake, their last post was "To red pillers: Men are better at everything than women. True or false?". Nothing but loaded questions. Shit like this is why, although I don't agree with everything RP'ers say or believe in, I absolutely can't stand BP'ers. They rarely want to have an actual conversation and are basically a combination of SRS and Tumblr SJW activism mixed with idiotic and very blatant trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/14 09:39 PM
1

I can't really see any bad coming out of a CMV type topic, and it would certainly add a very different dynamic to the conversation if people knew coming in to the post that the OP legitimately is open to change their belief on a given subject, and not just rub talking points or personal experiences in an RP'er or BP'ers face. So... sure, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/14 02:58 AM
8

This. Dead on. Sure, RP'ers can be misogynistic, even downright hateful and nonsensical sometimes... but they'll usually at least try to have an intelligent discussion. BP'ers, on the other hand? I've met a few BP'ers here and there who are willing to have a conversation over the issues, but in my experience the majority of them throw out blatant logical fallacies and insults for the sake of trolling with no intention of even discussing a topic if you aren't in lock step agreement with what they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 08:47 AM
1

Actually, looking at your post history, it's pretty clear you're a man-hating sexist. I'm sorry, but I don't associate with sexists.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 05:33 AM
1

Aww damn, I didn't play with my reddit settings enough for your BS to come through. However, I will say this: When BP'ers like yourself decide to just troll instead of actually try to have a conversation about an issue, you don't change anyone's minds about anything. Rather, you strengthen the stereotypes that RP'ers already have: that women are unreasonable, BP'ers are either tumblr feminists or white knights, etc... and you also show Purple pill-ish types that, "Damn, maybe RP has a point... t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/14 09:46 AM
1

"I guarantee if we did the experiment for both men and women using money instead of looks, you'd see an opposite effect" Refer back to the concept of human expectations. "financial success is a prime value to a woman" You know the difference between the word "a" and "the", correct? "A" indicates one value among multiple values, and "the" indicates only one. I'd go on, but it's obvious that common sense doesn't register for you, only batshit crazy ideology does. It's like you have an extremely da…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 12:02 PM
1

Yes, I know. You're confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 04:38 AM
1

Aww, how cute. You're so confused you can't think up new posts so you're just going to repeat the same one over and over.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 10:34 PM
1

Perhaps I should have tried explaining things in shorter sentences to you? I know how you get confused easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 09:51 PM
1

it's monumentally precious how yocontradictive biases even marginally make sense. I know, I know... what I'm saying might be hard for you to understand because your mind doesn't process new ideas very quickly or effectively. I get that, and it's not entirely your fault you aren't the brightest of the bunch. me no care. Yes, yes. You dumb, me smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 09:30 PM
1

It's kind of cute watching you pout after you've been shown that you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 09:13 PM
1

Don't get frustrated! I know, trying to comprehend concepts which are above your intelligence level can be frustrating, but don't give up!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 09:06 PM
1

"all she cared about was money" Please scroll up and cite exactly where I said "all women care about is money". (Hint: I know you're a bit "slow", to put it politely... but I never said that.)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 08:16 PM
33

You don't pay the prostitute for sex. You pay her to leave afterwards.
/r/askTRP07/10/14 11:17 AM
1

I take it the information is finally sinking in? Wonderful! Don't be angry! This is a good thing; it shows you're able to comprehend some key concepts in human behavior and might be intelligent enough to break free of the BP politically correct status quo which teaches that men and women are exactly the same aside from men perhaps having a little more body hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/14 08:22 AM
1

The legal system which is totally biased in favor of women in many, many ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/14 07:39 PM
0

Here's my response when people ask me what religion I follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/14 07:47 AM
0

Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I know you must have a lot of questions since you're having trouble understanding the subject, but let's start with the basics, okay? Now, number two is key here... women want different things in a partner than men do. Men typically place a high importance on physical attractiveness and beauty when looking for a partner. Whereas, women typically place a high importance on stability and success in a partner - this includes having money. Of course, all people look…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/14 01:53 AM
2

Does the mother have it out for you? That's a situation which can bite you in the ass. Women never drop a grudge, and if the mother has a thing against you and your girl is close with her mother, that's easily three times as bad as her having some cockblocking BFF of hers who hates your guts, since the mother will always be around to try and talk her in to how you're no good, she deserves better, whatever... and if you aren't careful, she'll start to believe it.
/r/askTRP04/10/14 09:29 AM
1

In the video, the men meeting the "fat" girl had a high expectation for her looks, something which men overwhelmingly value - then were disappointed to find that she did not look like that in real life. Although physical attractiveness does count to a woman, it is not as much of a huge deciding factor in a woman's preference in a mate as it is to men. Instead, I'd contest that riches and power be used in place of looks. The point would be to have the women have a very high expectation that the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 07:52 AM
-1

Nothing says distortion like direct quotes. You claim something, I ask for more detail, you say some nebulous shit and then throw a fit when I call it bull. But you're the matyr. Lol, no I'd have to be stupid to understand the bullshit you're mad about because you can't explain it. Maybe you have some point. My means of explaining my beliefs might be an issue for you. I suppose it's difficult to grasp some concepts when your intelligence is at a low level. Maybe you're taking my words out of con…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 06:29 AM
-1

Nope I called you a redpiller because you're talking like one. Hence the duck statement. So you are saying guys are going to start a relationship with homeless women living in a box in the gutter. Sure thing, buddy. More like you made a claim, couldn't back it up and instead made a lame attempt at deflecting by asking me to give you figures on a stance I never made. I'll get right on that as soon as you digging around your ass and trying to pass what comes out as absolutes. See this is the probl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 05:00 AM
-1

There you go again making ridiculous presumptions and letting your imagination go wild. You're the one who is labeling me as "RP" just because my beliefs aren't in complete lock step with the BP mindset. You're presuming to know my beliefs better than I do, which is the definition of "making ridiculous presumptions and letting your imagination go wild". Fun fact: I intentionally don't give myself a flair for the specific purpose of seeing how many idiots will presume that I'm something I'm not j…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 04:28 AM
-1

If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck... Glad to know you are the authority on who's an RP'er and who's a BP'er! Maybe /r/TheRedPill should make you a moderator and let you and you alone solely decide who gets to post, since you seem to know so much more about people's personal beliefs than even they do! Take your own advice first. I did answer. I'll even repeat it for you. Some women are dead set on a guy making six figures and driving a Benz. Others will go for a guy who makes $40,000 …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 03:50 AM
-1

You're the redpiller sweetie, I am? Interesting. I said something you disagree with so I'm instantly a redpiller. Funny how that works. But you're not getting out of it that easy. You've being "vague". C'mon, where's the exact cutoff of attractiveness where women are officially not dateable to a guy anymore? After all, you expect me to give an exact figure for a bank account in regards to a guy being dateable, so clearly you must be able to point out an exact level of attractiveness for women. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 03:21 AM
0

I don't know about how you do things but that is certainly not what I call a peck on the cheek. I don't "peck family members on the cheek" like that. They sure as hell weren't making out, that's for sure. As for your prediction for about the results of a test about money instead of looks, I simply disagree. Most men want a woman who has her shit together so income is important to them also Yeah... because guys the world over check out women and say to each other, "Damn bro, check out the respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/14 12:38 AM
0

We don't know enough about the video to make any of these assumptions you're making. We don't know if he was able to get second dates or not. At most, the video shows him getting basically a peck on the cheek from one woman. It's not at all uncommon for women to hang out with a guy while having absolutely no intention of getting with that guy. Some TRP'ers call these men "orbiters" or "friend zoned" or what have you. That's precisely my point - income was never mentioned. What I'm saying is ment…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 10:07 PM
-1

And it's apparent you are acting as if money doesn't matter at all to women... which is either a naive or a dishonest approach. Money matters to women similar to how looks matter to guys. It's not the only thing that matters, but it certainly plays a huge part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 09:47 PM
-3

So you think money is the most important thing to women? Oh, how silly of me. Of course. No woman has ever been interested in a man's bank account at all. That never happens!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 09:24 PM
11

A more accurate test would be to have the guy's profile with him driving a high-end Mercedes, wearing a business suit, and generally giving off a vibe that he makes a high six figure salary a year and has a vacation home in Prague... ...Then when he shows up for the date he looks and acts more like a blue-collar construction worker who makes perhaps $40,000, maybe driving up in a compact Toyota or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/14 04:18 AM
1

How is this "MRA"? Unless you know her well... having her stay with you is a huge liability. You could come home one day and find half of your shit gone and never hear from her again. This goes for literally anyone, not just beautiful women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/14 07:43 PM
1

She is goddess hot. Probably the most beautiful woman I've ever seen. Even if she was a complete stranger, I can't imagine a guy turning her away. I can. Get a hold of your fucking balls already, she's not anything special just for being "goddess hot" in your opinion. I'll repeat myself: consider the situation as if she were a dude. Doing so will prevent you from potentially having to deal with princess entitlement, drama, lies, and stolen shit of yours that she gets away with from most guys bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/14 08:18 AM
1

Consider the situation as if she was a dude. Toss her looks aside. Is she an old friend that you've known for a while? Then yes, that's fine and it's not "white knighting" at all. Is she a complete stranger or just someone who is barely an acquaintance? Not your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/14 07:26 AM
2

Nobody hates any group of people simply because they're a specific religion, or skin color, or a specific sex, or anything like that. They hate those groups of people because of the way those groups behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 09:44 PM
8

Don't act like a jackass. I'm not discrediting your example at all but it's very apparent that this law is aimed at sexual encounters in general and not specifically at video recorded gang rapes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 11:15 PM
3

Steubenville was a very rare situation where the sex acts were both recorded and witnessed by more than one person. The vast majority of sex takes place with two people in a private setting. Maybe this law might be effective with people throwing orgies or people making personal amateur porn where one can actually witness a "yes" being said, but for the vast majority of people this simply devolves in to a "he said she said" argument which isn't at all provable by either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 10:51 PM
11

Nope. How is anyone going to know whether she said "yes" unless the event is recorded or witnessed by someone else? Very vague question. What qualifies as an "epidemic"? The law is useless due to my point in rule #1. This is a feel-good law which is ultimately unenforceable. Furthermore, colleges shouldn't have any place in this matter - rape should be reported to the police, not the college. It should not be up to colleges with a board of faculty and students who have little to no knowledge of …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/14 07:20 PM
5

Pick up artists like Owen Cook or Roosh V (seriously, these guy look like they have diagnosable genetic diseases, they are so ugly) -- tell FOB Asians and autistic basement weirdos that LOOKS don't matter and all you need is TIGHT GAME...but anyone who has spent even five minutes out in the real world knows that is masturbatory fantasy. Seeing as how they get laid quite a bit and you yourself admit that they're ugly as sin, it certainly suggests that their view of looks not mattering has some cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/14 04:15 AM
2

Quit fat shaming him, he should be able to eat a hamburger if he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/14 10:18 PM
1

Tell her something similar to, "You going around posting half-naked pictures everywhere tells me you aren't ready for a relationship, so I'm ending it. No hard feelings, I'm still down to shoot the shit or whatnot". Then next her as far as relationships go. She pretty clearly isn't ready to handle one if she's pulling shit like that.
/r/askTRP24/09/14 12:19 PM
1

Yes, when it comes to dating both genders are shallow. However, BP'ers tend to reject and deny this, saying "not all women are like that!" and whatnot... unless it comes to men, in which case it's okay to make generalizations like "all men are dogs", etc. RP'ers generally are more at ease with the realization that men and women are shallow when it comes to the dating market. They realize that they are shallow due to survival instincts which are inherent in humans since the days when we were all …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/14 12:11 AM
3

Not my preference of music, but I'm sure many women have this one on their playlists. Bad boys ain't no good... good boys ain't no fun Speaks volumes.
/r/seduction22/09/14 12:16 PM
-5

If a woman's answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions.
/r/askTRP16/09/14 04:55 AM
1

Let's find out. Or not. Frankly, I could care less if we do or not.
/r/askTRP16/09/14 03:20 AM
10

Dude... you need therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 02:54 PM
7

Pretty clear that this guy is batshit crazy and that has fuckall to do with RP or BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/14 02:46 PM
17

I imagine they are watching me, thinking "Yes, that's right. Enjoy my pussy, because I fucking own you; you are now mine." Many women love dominant men who will totally take them over in bed, so she may be thinking the exact opposite. Oh, and if nothing else works... doggystyle. Problem solved.
/r/askTRP13/09/14 02:49 AM
22

EDIT: inb4 BP claims social construct. :/ This gave me a chuckle. I've never understood BP'ers near total investment in pseudo psychology and sociology to try and explain away any and all differences between the sexes as a "social construct" as if deep down all men are basically just hairy women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/14 09:56 AM
3

I vote /u/Skratt and her emoticons for moderatorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 05:49 AM
10

Why do you insist on saying "you are everything an RP guy would want" and writing such a large post about it? No offense, but is this some form of seeking validation? I'm sure the BP'ers here are more than willing to upvote and shout "You go girl!" and basically be cheerleaders for you here, after all. First off, a famous RP expression is "Don't listen to what women say, watch what they do". And really that should apply to anyone and not just relations with the opposite sex, but come on... this …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 05:43 AM
7

Funny article... Japan appears to be the opposite of America in many respects for the average American, i.e. American men are the ones getting attention from the women and American women are more or less ignored or overlooked by Japanese men. I don't know how many remember that OKCupid study where it said that Western women rate 80 percent of men as "below average"... but in Japan the opposite seems true for American immigrants and tourists. http://zoomingjapan.com/life-in-japan/about-dating-in-…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 09:26 AM
3

First off, mandatory NAWALT disclaimer... I realize not ALL American women are like this. There's quite a few whom I have known for years and have a lot of respect for as both friends and family. But really... they are on average, spoiled, entitled princesses because our society puts them on a pedestal both legally and ideologically. Since feminism has focused on teaching them that they can "have it all", they feel entitled to "have it all" without earning it. They "deserve" it, after all... for…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 09:12 AM
-2

It seems so completely obvious to me why people, feminists in particular, are upset about these photos; because they were stolen. Feminists and feminist groups are only pissed about these photos in particular because they are pictures of women. If Brad Pitt or Leonardo DiCaprio nudes got leaked you would not hear a peep out of the feminists. Guaranteed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/14 11:32 PM
1

Are you saying that women never go for beefed-up ex-cons? Because women never go for bad boys, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 06:26 PM
1

Yes, because all dangerous sexy guys have to lie to get laid. Totally nailed it. rolls eyes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 06:03 PM
2

At least not without concealing their history. Yes, because as we all know no man has ever, ever lied in order to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 04:05 AM
3

Okay, well, to be fair, most women would consider previous criminal records to be a dealbreaker, myself included. I'm not saying you are being dishonest, perhaps you are an exception... but that sounds very much like one of those things where women say one thing yet do another. Almost any woman you ask will say being a felon or an ex-con is a dealbreaker for them, yet at the same time those types of guys have absolutely no problem pulling loads of women. That all goes back to paying attention to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 01:01 AM
5

I don't mean to be rude, but do you really think women sleep with men based on how losery they were? The qualifier wasn't the guy being "losery". The qualifier was that the guy gives her the tingles. There's plenty of loser guys who give many women the tingles. Ex cons are a great example: Many women find a rugged, dangerous felon fresh out of the pen who's built because he's been working out the whole time he's been locked up to be sexy as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/14 12:42 AM
0

If you believe that, you haven't been paying attention. I hear "Men and women are the same on every level and if you disagree it's because you're some RP sexist neckbeard!" crap from BP'ers all the time. They always come back to trying to explain away any and all differences between the sexes as a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 06:54 PM
2

Of course. Because throwing the baby out with the bath water is a perfectly rational decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 06:47 PM
-1

You do understand he's using an analogy, right? Or are you saying that because you believe in the ol' BP-ish belief that "men are just hairy women, we're all 100% the same, and any difference at all is just a social construct"?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 11:28 AM
2

As I said, women are more detail oriented. The little things matter to them a lot more, and they're far better at "reading between the lines" and seeing the subtleties of what is going on around them... which is why women's "lists" are so much more intricate. What really bothers me about the standard BP mindset is that they frequently believe men are just hairy women, we're all 100% the same, and every difference between the genders is a "social construct". The thing I like about RP is that it e…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 08:56 AM
1

Like I replied to this one already, yes it's vague but it's also difficult to put in to words. You know when you 'click' with someone and when you don't, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 07:08 AM
2

For example, you say "personality" which is pretty vague. It's hard to put in to words. You know when you 'click' with someone and when you don't, let's put it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 07:08 AM
1

I find it hard to believe, that even if a woman exceeded your expectations for all four of those aspects on your list, that she would still be date-able regardless of her other personality flaws. What if she's obsessive? Clingy? Emotional, likes to spend a lot of money? What if she's lazy, doesn't like to do the dishes or whines about chores? What if she's arrogant or selfish, cocky or even uneducated, certainly there's many intelligent people out there who are ignorant. Trust me, I'm no fucking…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 07:06 AM
1

See here's the thing- men's lists are shorter because (at least in my estimation, feel free to correct me) about 90% of it is appearance-based, and so it's just listed as one thing: "be hot" Definitely a big factor, but not the only one. It can be a deal breaker - I'm not going to spend the rest of my life with someone I'm not sexually attracted to that's for sure, but she doesn't have to be a 9 - a 7 in the looks department is acceptable if she has everything else on my list, which for me is in…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 12:15 AM
4

That's a fair point, although I'd wager that men have just as many bizarre standards and lists, they just don't verbalize them the way women do We really don't. We have three, maybe four things on a "list" on average - really not even enough to make a list over. Men are basic like that. Women, on the other hand, have much larger lists on average, because women tend to pay attention to the little details a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 11:59 PM
8

Paying attention to what people do rather than what they say should apply to everyone, period. That being said, TRP'ers apply the concept especially to what women say they want because women are much more fickle and complex in what they really want out of a partner than a man is. When it comes to romance, I've noticed women quite often say one thing then do another. For example, I've seen countless times where women will have a huge list of "musts" that a guy has to have before she says she'll d…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 11:51 PM
22

First off, stop looking at it as an all-or-nothing absolute. It's perfectly fine to accept some parts and reject others. There's aspects of TRP which I agree with and other parts which I don't. I take what I agree with and find useful and apply it to my life, and disregard that which I don't particularly care for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 07:34 AM
1

I would say there are so many variables driving our behavior that even if human behavior is completely deterministic, our behavior still can't be predicted from "biological urges." It's certainly not an absolute guide for prediction's sake - you're correct in saying that biological urges are only one factor among many. However, to completely disregard biological urges and say that they have little to no influence at all in our behavior as BP'ers frequently do is extremely short sighted in my opi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/14 11:29 PM
1

We need to make it universal first. Otherwise, when the time comes for war, they will simply dust off the male-only draft and put that into place. I admire your foresight, however when it comes to conventional warfare we have by far the world's most powerful military on the planet. Selective service and the draft in this nation is by and large an outdated and unnecessary concept when we can more or less level any nation's military with minimal effort.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:43 PM
2

I've lived in both the South and the Midwest. Can't say I've been to New York, but I'm currently in California and I can imagine the LA hookup scene is similar. Rural areas can be much more traditional than urban areas... trust me. as a general rule, we treat women like people, not children or dogs. Y'see, that's the part which is amusing about the BP folks. Do a google search on "how to train your man" and you'll get loads of blog entries, and overall no one takes offense or bats an eye to a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/14 02:10 AM
5

To some extent, I do believe that we're all "biological automatons" - every living being on this planet has an inner urge to survive and reproduce. Many people like to think humanity is somehow better or different than all life on the planet and that somehow those base biological urges don't apply to us as a species, but they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 09:21 PM
5

Again, it depends on whether we're talking about the subreddit or about mainstream western sexuality, which TRP often v describes as 'blue pill' in contrast to the v red pill ideology You never specified a difference between BP the subreddit and BP the "mainstream Western sexuality". The use of "again" is therefore inaccurate. The very term "mainstream Western sexuality" is an extremely broad term. What is "mainstream" in the West? Is it NYC club hookup culture? Or perhaps more traditional marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 07:00 PM
5

The subreddit itself is a response to /r/theredpill[1] . RP and mainstream western sex attitudes are at odds. Most people reject the red pill. Yours is a very circular logic. Technically RP is just a rejection of BP. You are assuming that BP is the "mainstream attitude toward sex"... it isn't. Although many BP'ers lean very liberal and feminist in their views on sexuality, BP itself doesn't take any specific stance on sexuality nor does it really espouse anything aside from "RP is wrong". For it…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 03:59 PM
8

like it or not, it's the mainstream attitude towards sex Not really. Technically BP is just a rejection of RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/14 02:15 PM
1

Meh... a reality TV show isn't a terribly great example of anything. 90% of the crap on these shows is scripted or heavily influenced by the producers in some form or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 11:07 PM
1

First off, we can eliminate replies from RP'ers who are agreeing with the poster in question. On a guess, that eliminates half the posts. Second, I'm only counting 1st posts/replies by people. Successive posts are not counted. So that gets rid of 2 to 3 posts per person counted. Third, we can eliminate bullshit posts that really aren't on topic, of which I alone have made 7 if you count this post in there. So, cutting away all the fluff, and mind you this is just an educated guess, that'd leave …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 07:18 PM
2

Actually counting through it I counted 5 instances, though to be fair one of them was from a purple pill-ish type.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 07:01 PM
1

Plenty of people of all beliefs do it, it's not a tactic which is confined to a specific ideology. BP'ers are using it quite a bit in this thread, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 06:51 PM
1

It seems you're really stretching for similarities to fit your agenda, OP. Just as "not all (men/women) are like that", not all RP'ers are misogynist woman haters and not all RP women are fragile weak-willed codependents. And as an aside, "benevolent sexism" is typically a code-word for "you might have a point regarding differences between men and women but I'm going to call it sexism so that it's easily dismissed".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 06:27 PM
0

NUH UH IM RIGHT ROFL LOL UR WRONG IM RIGHT U TRPERS RE SO PATHETIC BET UR JUS NOT ALPHA ENUFF KEEP HAETING SOMETHING SOMETHINH FEMINISMS LOL U GOT PWNED!!!!1
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 06:10 PM
0

HURR DURR DONT BELEIVE U MUS NOT BE TRUE CAUSE I DONT LIEK IT!!!!11
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 06:05 PM
1

LOL I DONT BELEIVE U MUST BE A LIE ROFL ROFL YAH SURE ND I HAVE A CAR TAHT RUNS ON WATER 2 SELL U LOL!!!!1 ...Sound familiar?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 05:52 PM
4

Based on the maturity level of your replies and blatant bias to the far BP side of the spectrum, and lack of either desire or ability to attempt intelligent discussion of a subject, I'm assuming junior high schooler with maybe a man-hating single mother who's taught you to be a white knight or something. Stay in school, do your homework, drink your milk, and take your vitamins, kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 05:42 PM
3

Playing copycat, now? What grade are you in?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 05:21 PM
4

Translation: The post goes against my world view and I don't feel comfortable with that, therefore I'm going to dismiss it as false so that I can bury my head in the sand. Hell, I could even get the "That's just one woman" argument. Flat-out denial with no reason for doing so, however, is just a sign of a fragile outlook on life which is so easily shattered that it's laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 05:11 PM
2

Alright. So you move in together and start to share all your stuff. What happens now, if you break up? Does the larger spouse just push the smaller spouse out onto the street? Interesting how you use "larger spouse" and "smaller spouse" as code for "man" and "woman". If some woman makes a bad decision and decides to move in with a guy she doesn't know well enough and gets fucked over, that's unfortunate but she probably should have thought about that before making a huge life-changing decision. …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 04:18 PM
4

I find it very amusing that many BP'ers are instantly jumping to either "But that's just one woman!" or even worse, flat out denial coupled with angry insults - "LOL DIDN'T HAPPEN IN REAL LIFE RP IS SO PATHETIC ROFL ROFL!!!1" without any proof that it didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 04:06 PM
1

Here's an idea: Separate the government from marriage. They don't need to be involved anyhow, the real marriage happens before you, your fiancee, your friends, your family, and your god. If you want to marry a woman, buy a couple of rings, have a little ceremony with your friends and family, never file marriage paperwork with the state, and then just consider yourselves married. Unless there's some fucked-off commonlaw marriage law in your state, problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/14 07:22 AM
1

You are dead wrong. There is no "victim". That's like saying someone who chooses to enjoy a drink every now and then is a "victim of alcohol abuse". The fact that you don't approve of what someone does with their body doesn't make them a victim. Pack up your sword and shield, white knight, because these women don't need you to "rescue" them from their own decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 05:59 PM
1

Well that's the thing the victim is the sex worker. And you seem to have no problem with the sex worker being the victim. Sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 06:32 AM
1

Well it's proven the article I submit to my post. The opposite is true. Keeping prostitution illegal slows human trafficking. AKA: One random internet article proves my point. Okay. It's not fantasy land It is fantasy land. What brand of tin foil is your hat made out of again? You mean criminals? Lives ruined? Career criminals must learn something very simple, laws are written. Know the rules before you play. Glad to know you're willing to throw away people and label them as human trash because …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 05:41 AM
1

I explained the ambiguity of the situation. The fact that sex work is in fact violence on services. Plus the implications of the government literally being involved sex lives of people, make it something that's difficult legalize. Plus,(if you look at the edits, there are also graphs) it can be known increase human trafficking. And legality doesn't necessarily decrease run of the mill violence on sex workers. These things considered, among many other ideas, means the government should stay out, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 05:20 AM
1

In order for a sting to happen there must be a warrant. So there must be proof that people are exchanging money for sex, or whatever the laws allow in the jurisdiction. In other words, someone fucked up. Love how you put your faith in how "fairly" the government works after a long anti-government argument. In reality, it doesn't work that way. And to answer your snarky question... there's simply no good reason it should be illegal at all. None of your arguments are practical nor applicable. If a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 04:46 AM
1

Undercover sting operations happen all the time, on both clients and providers. That makes the entire "right to privacy" part invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 04:35 AM
1

Prostitution laws are pretty lenient. As I said before, that all depends on where you live.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 04:26 AM
1

And you don't see the folly in that stance, in that prostitution is already regulated in the harshest of ways due to the fact that it is banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 03:56 AM
1

Regardless, your writings definitely have at minimum a right-wing quasi-libertarian anti-government slant to it, proposing that due to the free market nature of underground businesses it is better to keep prostitution illegal than have it be regulated by a government.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 03:51 AM
1

So far you pretty much sound like one of those anarcho-capitalist types who believe the world will be a free market utopia if only government were abolished.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 03:15 AM
1

Yeah, and your theories applied to prostitution totally work on paper. You know what else works on paper? Communism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 03:07 AM
1

That's only the grows to big. Regulation would mean they are in the bedroom all the time. Like how they're in my liquor cabinet all the time since they legalized alcohol, and how they're all over Colorado since they legalized pot? Oh, wait... they aren't. Looks like your fears are a bit unfounded. Nothing that I'm saying requires scholarly work. Correct, since it's all assumption and theory which isn't applicable in practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/14 02:39 AM
1

Value is the most important part trade. It's perceived value actually, that's how prices are made. No, price/value is set where supply and demand intersect. You might want to read up on economics for someone who says I "don't understand capitalist theory". I'm saying that keeping prostitution illegal is better for everyone. That means the government is out of the bedroom. The government literally comes in to the bedroom and start busting people in sting operations. If the goal is keeping governm…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 10:14 PM
1

It's capitalist theory. I know. Most of what you've said is "theory" that doesn't work in reality. Well you could say value. Value isn't the only factor either. No I just think keeps the government out the bedroom. You are advocating having the government in the bedroom to keep government out of the bedroom. That's a total contradiction. Prostitutes have to learn how navigate there own business. Except the ones who have their freedoms taken away by jail sentences. But fuck them, they don't matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 10:03 PM
1

To say a drug dealer doesn't care about his customers, would mean you've never known drug dealer. Ha, ha... at this point you are just making shit up on blatant assumption. There is no soft spot in a drug dealer's heart for his customers unless those customers are his personal friends. He doesn't give a shit about the meth addict who just broke in to a house to get money for more meth. He just cares about making money. You have an odd assumption that drug dealers and pimps are noble, honest busi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 09:49 PM
1

You don't know many drug dealers. A pretty bold assumption seeing as how you don't know me or who I've known in the past. Maybe you're unfamiliar with popularized "Blue magic" version of heroin of the 60-70s. That has nothing to do with how a drug dealer conducts business. They do because the market requires it. I don't think you believe in market forces. At this point I'd contest that you don't know many drug dealers. It's not like drug dealers can advertise effectively - most customers only kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 09:26 PM
1

Noble I never said that? A pimp is no more loyal than drug dealer. if you're a good customer a drug dealer isn't' going to spike your stuff, his job is to keep you hooked. Again, an example of how what you are saying sounds good on paper but doesn't work in reality. A drug dealer isn't going to decide to not cut his shit just because someone's a "good customer". They don't give a shit about the customer, frankly. They'll save the uncut shit for their personal friends, the customers don't matter …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 08:57 PM
5

Emotions... that's those things women have, right? Kidding...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 08:38 PM
1

Nothing sells it self. That's why some sex workers get more than others...Well if you believe in market forces, there are plenty of requirements. I believe that pimps, hoes, pushers have a responsibility to their business. They will produce the best product that will gather the best rate. Which means resale, and word of mouth. This alone forces pimps to take care of girls that produce, and also their customers. You may have heard the term "bottom bitch". This would be true for any business. I be…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 08:32 PM
1

You can't throw out data. It's very relevant. It means testing isn't important for prostitution to exist. Then how far back do we go? Do you think data about prostitution from the 1800s is also relevant? How about prostitution in ancient times(Greece, Rome, etc)? Is that still relevant to the society we live in today as well? I don't think it's on their radar. The the story Marry Magdalene would kind of throw a wrench in christian detractor of prostitution. It most definitely will be if there's …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 07:54 PM
3

Oh wow, I haven't played that in years. A friend of mine once built a black/artifact deck which was never defeated in battle. Also, it used absolutely no creatures (though it did have an epic shit ton of banned and restricted cards)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 07:32 PM
2

Screw that. Have this instead!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 07:28 PM
1

Besides, if disease were such a problem, then they would not have waited 50 years to enact mandatory testing. And that was about 30 years ago that they enacted mandatory testing. Let's stay relevant to present times. You realize that Marry Magdalene was a prostitute? So your concept of religious morality is over stated. You're seriously going to try and tell me that the same people who want to ban abortions, birth control, and gay marriage don't have an interest in keeping prostitution illegal? …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 07:11 PM
1

OP, let's apply your theories to Nevada, where prostitution is legal. So far, no one has ever voted on which sex acts are allowed and which aren't, and there is no legal challenges in the courts about the rape of prostitutes whatsoever as all brothels have a very strict rule that if the woman doesn't want to do something, she doesn't have to and how much was allegedly paid doesn't matter. As for diseases, it's state law that all working women are tested for them twice a week, as a requirement to…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 06:36 PM
7

I've never understood when people say they're "proud to be (insert sex/race/nationality/whatever here)". It literally took zero effort on your part to be what you were born as. There's nothing to be proud of whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 05:43 AM
2

I read the title of the post in the voice of Seinfeld, and now I wonder what quality of airline food they serve en route to sex tourism spots.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/14 05:40 AM
5

The only one I have a problem with is polygamy. (And heeeeere's where people start going "OMG U TRPER SEXIST LOL NAWALT ROFL ROFL ROFL"...) I believe that, while not -all- women would be interested in a polygamous situation (nor even would most women be), there's a big enough chunk of women who would go for being a harem girl for some ultra-rich 1 percenter or a gang leader or whoever that it'd skew the male-female ratios and disenfranchise a lot of males out of having a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/14 08:30 PM
1

Sweet, I'm making the first posts!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 10:29 PM
1

No... I'm saying that when women do it no one cares, but when men do it everyone flips out and cries sexism. I'm pointing out the societal double standard. At no point did I say it's okay for anyone to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 04:23 PM
2

The threat of being socially ostracized is extremely scary for a lot of men. That can really be said of both genders, however. Hell, back in tribal times if someone was ostracized from the tribe it was almost certainly a death sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 07:37 AM
6

How the hell did you even remotely get that out of what I wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 07:24 AM
4

Please. The woman would either have to be incredibly stupid or incredibly naive to believe that a man who's a total stranger asking her to take a ride in his Lambo doesn't have sex on his mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 06:36 AM
1

Bitch about women being wary but then blame them for not being wary enough when something bad DOES happen. Why do the men doing the rape not get any of the blame here? I don't believe anyone is saying rapists should be blameless in rapes. That being said, crime of any sort requires two things: opportunity and desire. Nobody can eliminate the desire, but we can eliminate the opportunity. In the case of rape, that falls mostly on the woman to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 06:04 AM
1

Yeah kinda, only mixed in to one big shit fest.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 05:28 AM
3

Someone should make an /r/ShittyPurplePillDebate where straw men and insults are not only allowed, but encouraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 12:09 AM
1

That doesn't even make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/14 12:04 AM
1

No worries.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 10:30 PM
0

It'd probably be easier if you just threw in an edit to your original comment denoting that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 09:23 PM
0

Noted, but no need to go getting angry and using all caps.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 09:02 PM
2

Where is this at? I haven't really seen any resources like that myself. The closest I've seen is PUA forums and blogs, and though there's some similarities PUA stuff isn't the same thing at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 05:53 PM
0

Oh, I totally agree. There's a load of blatant misogynists in TRP and I don't care for that aspect - however, that doesn't invalidate the mindset for me. A comparison for my thoughts on the matter is how a person can appreciate a particular religious faith yet still think some of that religion's followers are assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 05:44 PM
0

I disagree. tool to͞ol noun 1. a device or implement, especially one held in the hand, used to carry out a particular function. By definition, TRP can be considered a tool to be used, if the function you wish to carry out is to gain a better understanding of the behavior of the sexes, especially in sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 05:37 PM
0

I notice that BP'ers also tend to believe that men and women are the same; i.e. that men are pretty much just women with more body hair and different genitals. After all, a popular BP belief is that every difference between men and women are merely "social constructs". So, it may not be a matter of TRP being more generous to women than TBP being less so to men, insomuch that TBP does not recognize biological differences between the sexes as legitimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 05:19 PM
1

Like I said, the asset protection attitude starts earlier in dating, with the man having an obviously stingy attitude and "making her earn" things like gifts/flowers. I believe you're looking at this from a solely female perspective. Try to look at it from a man's: Are women therefore "stingy" in the same way, "making him earn" everything from affection and attention all the way up to sex, when meanwhile the man is expected to pay for dates, give her gifts/flowers, etc? Both genders do this, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 04:11 PM
3

Not even close to a similar comparison. Sure it is. Cars: Tools for transportation, not death. TRP: Tools for better understanding of sexual strategy and the behavior of the sexes, not abuse. Both can be abused, of course. You can intentionally run over someone with a car. You can also use TRP to be a manipulative, abusive jackass. However, my point I was trying to highlight was that the poster had an emotional argument which is not rooted in logic or rationality. One person using TRP to become …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 03:59 PM
1

How about instead of asking "if I see a woman on the side of the road with a flat tire, why should I stop to help her instead of driving off?", you should be thinking "If I see anyone on the side of the road with a flat tire, I should help them instead of driving off because I'm not a worthless piece of shit."?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 04:58 AM
1

It's still more to lose on the man's end, however, and much harder to recover from. If a woman gets used in a pump-and-dump, she's still attractive and she might be hurt but she loses relatively little in the long run. If a man gets put through the ringer by the court system, he loses a -lot-. To him it's not just 'getting hurt' - it's potentially losing his livelihood, family, and everything he's worked so hard to get. It can take him years to recover and he may never fully recover. A man has a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 04:49 AM
16

A while ago, a friend of mine got hit by a car and died. Therefore, no matter what people say about how useful and good cars are, someone I was very close to ended up dead because of one and therefore I'll never like cars.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/14 01:48 AM
1

It's almost never brought up that men are polygamous (I'd guess because it's just accepted as fact); and I find it very amusing that BP'ers are perfectly okay with the social stereotype of "men are dogs who will fuck anything" but when hypergamy is brought up, instantly BP'ers lose their minds and say "women aren't like that, that's sexist!" On that note, hypergamy is highly overrated on TRP. It's a simple concept: Women typically go for quality over quantity, whereas men being polygamous genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 09:25 AM
2

On the other hand, if they didn't delete comments and ban people the sub would be raided by BP'ers and SRS on a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/14 09:15 AM
1

Ever hear the phrase, "Treat your man right or another woman will"? Dread game is simply the idea of applying that phrase to real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/14 06:16 PM
4

OP... you have already made up your mind. You aren't genuinely curious about the "motives" of TRP. You wanna play "gotcha" and word games so you can twist someone's words around and circlejerk about how TRP is bad. Still, I am loving some of the comments here. Lots of positive examples and analogies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/14 05:34 AM
–

Shit man, have you seen House of Cards at all? Spacey can TOTALLY pull off evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 10:30 PM
1

He claims extremist RDP is more moderate than moderate feminism. How is that not claiming it as moderate? Because "more moderate" isn't "moderate". If you compare someone who killed 10 people with someone who killed 100 people, you can make a case that the guy who killed 10 people isn't as bad as the guy who killed 100 people without saying he's "good" at the same time. (Yes, it's kind of a sloppy analogy but bear with me) And he's correct - feminism in the Western world is a very recent ideolog…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 12:02 AM
1

The only part I'm seeing regarding the history of gender roles is in the last paragraph, and he's technically correct about feminism being a recent ideology and societies tending to leave gender roles behind only when they are stable and prosperous. I believe the comparison he was trying to make is that "TRP is going to seem quite insane when viewed from a diametrically opposed philosophy". I don't think he was trying to promote TRP as moderate or normal in that context.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 11:17 PM
3

He is looking at it being "not extremist" I think you're reading too far in to it. "Less extreme" is not the same as "moderate". He just views the extreme side of TRP to be less batshit insane than the extreme side of feminism... which is debatable, I can say that. Besides, there's a moderate side of TRP just as there is a moderate side of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 10:52 PM
0

Any of those options beat trying to twist other's words and put words in peoples mouths then throwing a temper tantrum and resorting to petty insults when it doesn't work, as you do on a consistent basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 10:39 PM
0

And I'm still waiting for you to grow the hell up and act like an adult, but I'm not holding my breath.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 10:04 PM
0

Did I say you were wrong specifically about your experiences? You sure love putting words in people's mouths, don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 09:06 PM
0

That you're wrong. Being wrong about something doesn't mean you are a liar. Granted, I've called you immature, childish, foolish, a troll, and numerous other things... but I have yet to call you a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 07:21 PM
1

Please, tell me where in that quote you posted that I said the words "DocileBanalBovine is a liar".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 06:48 PM
5

/u/Denswend wasn't trying to define any radical beliefs as moderate. Just because he states something is "more moderate" does not mean it is moderate in and of itself. He's basically comparing radical RP beliefs and radical feminist beliefs and commenting on their level of acceptance in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 06:20 PM
1

Ah yeah, I noticed you twisted around my words to completely misinterpret them earlier. I've come to accept that's just what you do on a regular basis, which is why I never treat any of your posts remotely seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:59 PM
2

A leash? Sounds kinky.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:57 PM
0

Tell you what. I'll let you have the last word you so desperately want. Now go on, post yet another one of your boring and predictably childish replies so I can go on discussing the topic with people who are capable of mature conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:48 PM
0

Adults are talking here, Bovine. It's not polite to interrupt.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:40 PM
0

It's useless to talk with even the most intelligent person when that person insists on behaving like an immature child, which is why I don't typically expect much of substance out of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:37 PM
1

There you go with the "I know you are but what am I?" again. At this point I don't believe you're remotely capable of having an intelligent debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:17 PM
1

I think while it's going to vary from region to region I'd venture to guess that regional differences may account for a good portion of our difference of opinion and life experiences. For example, you might find the entire "men need to be taught not to rape" idea to be promoted by only the most radical of feminists, but college campuses in many areas also promote and endorse this line of thought. By extension, that may be why in your experience you've seen both subtle and blatant sexism against …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:16 PM
1

Aww, you're so cute when you get mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 05:05 PM
0

Yawn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 04:46 PM
2

She may have been under the belief Thank you for at least admitting that much. I think there's more people under that belief than you notice. because even when genders are reversed the idea of training people like dogs is a problem. At the risk of digressing, tell that to the people who believe that men need to be "taught not to rape" as if men are dogs that need to be taught not to piss on the carpet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 04:39 PM
2

Your point was that her statement would have been socially acceptable. She certainly was of the belief that it was socially acceptable, otherwise she wouldn't have said it. (Unless your friend is a pretty blatant man-hater of course, but from what you've said I don't see that to be the case.) I can agree with what some of what you are saying in this last post, but I believe you might be the one wearing blinders here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 04:29 PM
0

Come back to me when your level of maturity in a discussion surpasses saying "I know you are but what am I?" in so many words.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 04:24 PM
2

What about all those sexist themes against women? Ditsy girls, dumb blondes, ect. Sexism goes both ways. Ditsy blonde stereotypes apply to blondes. On the male end, we also have the ditsy blond surfer stereotype which is just as apparent. That's really a stereotype of hair color more so than gender. Like, totally, bro! I presented evidence otherwise. You presented an exception. Exceptions to a rule do not mean that the rule itself is somehow invalid. But they were fucking wrong. Their phones and…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 04:19 PM
2

Isn't that pretty much what you just said about me a few posts up? Fine, enjoy whatever complex describes someone who wants to believe nobody else cares about the issue they care about Hypocritical? Yeah, just a bit. Practice what you preach.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 03:54 PM
3

First off, many of instances you refer to are said in jest, not seriousness. Try saying an instance like that geared against women instead of men (even in jest) and see how quickly you get labeled a sexist - it'll happen so fast your head will spin. The other day one of my girl friends said the same thing about the guy she was dating Not surprising. Many women believe the concept is socially acceptable and pretty much just standard fare. I'm guessing that she was probably very surprised to hear …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 03:52 PM
3

More than "a few" execs make the regular assumption that sexist themes and ideas targeted against men are quite acceptable - and for the most part, they are correct. Here's a few great examples of that in action. As I said... swap the genders and see how quickly those execs go from thinking it's a great idea for a show/commercial/whatever to shying away from it like a vampire to garlic. They know damn well their phones would be blowing up with phone calls from every angry feminist and feminist o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 03:48 PM
11

The fact that BBC invested time and money in to creating a show like that and believed it would be appealing to audiences in the first place speaks volumes about society. Swap the genders and I guarantee no television production company would want to touch it with a 10 foot pole.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 03:27 PM
3

And you enjoy living in your constant bubble of denial. Surely those thinly-veiled insults you spew at anyone who thinks differently than you will keep you safe from having to think outside of said bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 03:24 PM
13

Horseshit. The only type of people who will even bother to say anything about that societal double standard are MRAs, and that's in between going on about foreskins, the draft, and other non-issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 02:46 PM
10

Yet nobody so much as bats an eye at it when it happens. Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:57 PM
1

I'll accept laziness as a proper excuse for contributing nothing of value whatsoever. If that's the case, however, your time would probably be spent more productively looking at cat pictures or whatever the hell else the internet has to offer instead of spewing uncreative drivel and simply saying "I'm lazy" to get out of the debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:40 PM
7

So according to you, basically any view which you don't agree with must be "radical"? Sounds like you're projecting a fair amount in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:36 PM
3

Not sure why you're being downvoted, that's a statement which I can certainly relate to. On the extreme side of TRP there's loads of blatant misogynists, while on the extreme of BP there's typically radical feminists and white knights.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:32 PM
3

In other words, you're admitting that you are either not creative or not intelligent enough to come up with a well thought out argument so you're going to sling insults like a child. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:23 PM
14

What I find funny is that I've heard women say shit like "You need to train your boyfriend/husband/etc" on television shows, in real life, and in all sorts of other mediums and nobody gives a fuck, but reverse the genders and suddenly some people start throwing a shit-fit and crying sexism. Hell, just google "train your man" and see how many blog results show up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/14 01:20 PM
2

I can agree with that. Granted, there are some justified reasons for keylogging/snooping on shit, but that's only if you're seeing some pretty clear red flags of cheating and whatnot. It's an extreme measure to be used in extreme situations. I will say, though, you have to be perceptive... women are better liars than men, due to the fact that they're just plain better on average at conversation and reading between the lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 06:23 AM
1

Of course. Because TRP is all about gyms and evolutionary psychology. And frame. And alpha. Beefcake. BEEFCAAAAAKE!</cartman>
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 06:01 AM
1

I'm a cold blooded lizard though. I blame your hypergamy. If I were more alpha you'd totally do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 05:57 AM
1

And sexy if you can get with 50 cent apparently! Can you use your lizard brain to score me his autograph? Promise it won't be on eBay.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 05:51 AM
1

"Lizard brain"? Not sure what that is... And yes, women are typically more emotional but one can rationalize cheating as well. As for honor, I wouldn't say they don't have it insomuch as they embody the virtue in a different manner than men do. Keep in mind there's no shortage of men with no honor as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 05:29 AM
3

It's not difficult. Watch how the person acts with others, see how they behave... over time if they prove themselves to be worthwhile, you can slowly invest more and more trust in them. There's also little tricks you can do as well to see how people are. For example, at my house I commonly leave a few dollars in plain sight somewhere - on a table, by my dresser, wherever. If those few dollars are ever missing, for any reason... I know someone whom I've invited in to my house is a thief.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 05:24 AM
4

Get this through your head: You are friend-zoned. You will NEVER get with her. Ever. Not in a billion years. Drill that in to your mind. Accept it. And then, deal with it and get over her. I'd advise cutting her off for a while to let your feelings for her cool off, and down the road if you want to keep her around as a platonic friend? That's fine, whatever - key word, platonic. Remember - you will NEVER be with her. She's made up her mind. What you NEED to be doing is looking elsewhere for sex …
/r/askTRP31/07/14 01:27 AM
12

Plenty of RP'ers here are offering enough evidence that the school system is rather hostile to boys and young men. The sad part is, nobody gives a flying fuck about it. You won't ever hear about it on TV, or in any sort of news report. If you try and bring this or any other men's issue up in conversation it will usually be denied or brushed aside.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 01:04 AM
1

Wait... you're having sex with a celebrity?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/14 12:30 AM
4

Men are polygamous creatures by our nature. If a guy has sufficient SMV to obtain sex easily enough, how is he somehow less likely to cheat than a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 10:38 PM
1

If you're smart, you won't trust anyone until they've damn well earned it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 10:34 PM
1

If that's the case, I find it strange that you can't understand the basic fact that men are generally more attracted to younger women. It's not exactly rocket science, it's common sense. Perhaps you have some sort of oedipus complex and you're projecting that on to other guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 02:44 AM
1

It is common knowledge that every new sexual partner you have stretches the vagina If by "common knowledge" you mean "urban myth", perhaps. The vagina is very elastic-like and is meant to be stretched out then return to it's original shape. If what you said were true, then any woman who has ever had a kid would have a vagina the size of a baby... but that's obviously not the case. http://www.sharecare.com/health/womens-health/too-much-sex-vagina-stretch
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 02:06 AM
1

You didn't destroy my argument at all. Yeah, I did. Not just a river in Egypt, and all... I love when TRPers ad hominem people as if it validates their stereotypes. Even if I fit your naive stereotypes it wouldn't have anything to do with this argument. I'm mid 20's dude. I see my guess has been validated. I suppose if you count 28 or so as "mid 20s" You seem passive aggressive for someone that "destroyed" an argument. Those bars are usually in college towns. Most college towns are gasp filled w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 04:42 PM
5

Who cares about TRP's definition? That's just one of many definitions of real feminists. I take it you're a feminist? Honestly you can be snide all you want about it, I have no problem watching your movement eat itself from within. Some 'feminists' will go on about how if you don't toe the line and stand against glass ceilings and patriarchy and oppression and attend 'slut walks', you aren't a 'real' feminist. Some other 'feminists' will go on about how a woman's body should never be objectified…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 09:00 AM
2

Like I said, I really cannot give any detailed or "good" advice or tips seeing as how I'll never be a woman trying to land a man... but I might be able to bounce ideas off you. Have you tried dating sites like OkCupid or PlentyOfFish? If you are a reasonably attractive girl you'll get an inbox overflowing with guys who may be looking for anything from a one night stand to a relationship to anything in between, including the casual fling/fwb deal, and you basically will have your pick. You might …
/r/seduction29/07/14 08:14 AM
1

Feminism was never about equality. It was, in it's most pure form, a movement about equal rights. Semantics. You get my general point. ... while at the same time ignoring that women had less responsibilities and less disposablity. Yes, but back then it was slightly similar to a caste system in that respect with (aside from hoping to marry rich) no social mobility for women whatsoever, and I'm not a huge fan of such scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 06:33 AM
3

Young attractive women are a standard in Hollywood - they're in almost every movie. Also, middle-aged men don't typically show up solely for the young attractive women in a movie. You don't see guys lining up to go to a movie for the romantic interest/sex scene in it. Come on, now... if you take the blatant sexual/romantic overtones out of the Twilight series, do you really think it would have the following it has with middle-aged women? Do you really think they're watching those movies because …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 05:18 AM
1

Guess you don't read your own sources I'll repeat it for you: It’s youth by a wide margin, like cheerleaders. Wide. Margin. You do understand what the term "wide margin" means, right? Should I point you to a dictionary? Also, with every other genre of niche porn out there (girl on girl, foot fetish, BDSM, etc.)... how old are the average women in those scenes? Almost all younger women, if you'll notice. Sure, milf porn may be a niche with a healthy following, but if the vast majority of men want…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 04:46 AM
1

Am I? Let's ask computational neuroscientists Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam, who thoroughly researched and compiled data on over 400 million online searches for porn. What types of porn are most popular for men? It’s youth by a wide margin, like cheerleaders. http://healthland.time.com/2011/05/19/mind-reading-the-researchers-who-analyzed-all-the-porn-on-the-internet/ Maybe you're just bitter because in reality, most men don't like what you want them to like?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 01:15 AM
2

I never said they didn't. However, there's a lot more porn sites which feature younger women than sites which feature 40+ women...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:56 AM
6

Let's say you don't like Republicans - and let's face it, many BP'ers and feminists generally don't. I can also show you many dictionary and encyclopedia entries stating that the Republican party is just a political party founded by anti-slavery activists which supports small government and personal rights. Would you reconsider your view of the Republican party if I did so, based on just those encyclopedia entries? Of course you wouldn't. Because you've seen how Republicans behave. Feminism used…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:53 AM
2

Yeah! Because the vast majority of porn sites feature lots of 40+ year old women and only a small, niche handful of them have college-aged girls and DEFINITELY not the other way around, right? Oh, wait...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:41 AM
2

Pretty sure OP is referring to 40+ year old guys being attracted to women in their early-mid 20's and being called creepy perverts for it. Let's face it, there's a social stigma there. Also a double-standard, too... look at how many middle-aged women lined up to the theaters for the premieres of all those Twilight movies and no one batted an eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:35 AM
1

Whoa, when did they open a snack bar here?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:24 AM
3

That's why I view feminists and MRAs as basically two sides of the same coin... both of them insisting on paper that they're about "equality" while constantly playing oppression olympics against one another and acting misandrist/misogynist as fuck the whole time. If feminists and MRAs were really about equality, you both would be playing on the same team, not warring against one another and by extension anyone who doesn't have the proper set of genitalia.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:21 AM
5

May I have your attention please... Will the real feminists please stand up? I repeat, will the real feminists please stand up? ...we're gonna have a problem here...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:14 AM
4

Ah! The ol' "Those aren't REAL feminists!" line, eh? (And ironically enough, you know those types are saying the exact same thing about you, right?)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/14 12:02 AM
1

Damn, beat me to it. But yes... LOADS of examples of "bad" feminists there. Have an upvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/14 11:59 PM
2

So which gender should have less respect for the other, then? Should men treat women shittier than women treat men, or vice versa?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/14 05:22 PM
1

Opposite gender advice is generally completely useless. But then so is a lot of "cosmo" style advice. This. No matter how good his game is, not even the best PUA here has any experience whatsoever in trying to land a guy while being the owner of a vagina. Totally different ball game. Also, avoid the hell out of Cosmo for any sort of advice on anything at all - that magazine is trash. If you're looking for advice in finding man long-term, your best bet would probably be asking any friends of your…
/r/seduction27/07/14 09:45 AM
3

At the risk of digressing... On one one hand, TRP and to an extent PUA is full of misogynist bullshit. Throw that shit out. On the other hand, the conventional BP/feminist mindset is that women are basically exactly like men with less hair on their bodies and curvier figures. They definitely aren't so throw that shit out too. If you can apply TRP philosophies and PUA strategies while having a healthy respect for women, you won't damage a damn thing - if anything, you might even make a relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/14 09:24 AM
-1

Able but not willing. With how left-wing and multicultural the vast majority of colleges are, there's no excuse for a "glass ceiling" or any other feminist nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/14 09:07 AM
9

Fuck it, I'll bite. Let's point out a few things - "No" doesn't necessarily mean "Not ever" - it can also mean "Not now", "not yet" or "not tonight". Also... I have heard "We're not having sex tonight" and then later had CONSENSUAL sex with a woman. It is a woman's prerogative to change her mind on a moment's notice about pretty much anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 08:16 PM
0

Seems to me that you've already made up your mind. You're looking for ways to say "AHA! SEE EVERYONE! RP'ERS THINK RAPE IS OKAY!" in a "gotcha" move, and that was pretty much the point of posting this in the first place. And for the record? The majority of RPers who read the thread itself would leave with a worse idea of what rape is than when they came in. That's like saying you think RP'ers would have a worse idea of what murder is if they watched an action movie. Contrary to feminist teaching…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 08:08 PM
1

The article also says "no one is condoning rape". I'll give you the fact that the piece is not very well written and can read somewhat contradictory at times, however it's pretty damned clear to me that the author is talking about rape fantasy. He isn't saying "If you are a Fortune 500 muscular guy, women want you to stop what you are doing, get up, right now, and go out and rape them. Tonight." like you seem to be reading about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 07:29 PM
1

So, if she's conscious, you haven't drugged her, then it's not a legitimate rape, it's the okay kind of rape. As long as you're good-looking. Or something. That's what OP was saying, right? ...Yes. That's exactly what OP was saying. -rolls eyes- Seems to me that you're one of those types who will read rape in to just about anything so at this point there's no sense in talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 06:34 PM
1

As I said to another poster... it's well implied that it's a fantasy by the part that read no one is condoning rape and by the comparison to 50 Shades of Grey.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 05:54 PM
4

Lack of respect for the opposite sex on both sides, hands down. If men and women respected one another most of the issues that both RP'ers and BP'ers complain about would not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 04:09 PM
1

He's talking about whether or not it's a fantasy for women. Some women do find that type of thing a turn on, and it doesn't matter whether or not you are comfortable with the idea of rape fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 03:47 PM
2

Yes, but did they consent to it? Yes. If so, that changes the quote from 'women can't be raped by a succesful man' (This came from the link the OP gave) to 'some women like to be kinky with their partners'. The words "women can't be raped by a successful man" do not appear in the post which OP linked to. Look for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 05:59 AM
2

What he was describing wasn't rape. It was "being forcefully held down in bed"... aka kinky sex. I've forcefully held down many women in bed and even acted out full-on rape fantasy scenarios with women and I can guarantee you they enjoyed it and wanted it. I swear, the posts in this thread are leading me to believe that some BP'ers think the only acceptable form of sex is in the missionary position, and only in a "loving, committed relationship", otherwise it's rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 05:33 AM
0

4's and 5's are going to have trouble regardless of their gender. However, a woman who's in the 6-10 range finding someone is easy and takes relatively little effort. The same isn't true for men unless they're in the 9 to 10 range.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 05:30 AM
2

Playing hard to get almost always works with men When women play that with me I just go off and try to find another woman. "Playing hard to get" = playing mind games.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 05:27 AM
7

Nope. Straight men have absolutely no experience with trying to find a man while having a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 05:22 AM
4

How about we look at the actual quote instead of "how you read it"? Being forcefully held down in bed by the muscular CEO of a Fortune 500 company does not evoke this fear. That in no way says "a woman can't be raped by a Fortune 500 guy with muscles". It would seem that according to you, no woman on this planet has ever been turned on at the thought of someone like Christian Grey holding them down and having his way with them... yet, all those women who bought the book seem to disagree with you…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 04:18 AM
-1

That's not advocating rape at all. That's discussing consentual rape/ravishment play in the bedroom. Ever hear of BDSM play, OP? Along the same lines. Apparently, OP has a problem with other people's sexual preferences and doesn't like what two consenting adults decide to do in their bedrooms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 03:12 AM
2

If you really loved someone and you knew they wanted sex somehow but you were not physically able to give it to them, would you expect them to be chaste and celibate for the rest of their lives for you? I realize some of the more extreme BP'ers don't believe a man's sex drive is at all important and that a dead bedroom is just fine as long as that's what the woman wants, but sex is a very natural and healthy part of a relationship. Without it, a couple is basically the equivalent of very good pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/14 02:49 PM
2

Your statement is so stupid its hard to argue against. Right off the bat you're acting like an insulting jackass. That basically reads to me like "LOL ROFL U R STUPID CUS U DNT THINK LIEK ME LOL LOL LOL!!!!11"... so I just stopped reading. Try rephrasing your post in a manner which is respectful if you want a real response, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/14 01:23 PM
3

Also, I love the idea that all a relationship is about is sex. None of that other stuff. This invalidates getting married. What is the basic difference between a romantic relationship and a friendship? Hint: it's sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/14 02:37 AM
2

Half of it is on the right track... I can definitely agree with you that empathy is more of a feminine trait. However, the feminist influence on society teaches that women should be proud of being women ("Girl power!" "Strong, independent woman!" etc) Now, there's nothing wrong with that per se, but at the same time it teaches men that there's nothing to be proud of in being a man ("Patriarchy!" "It's easy for you in life, you're a man and don't have the challenges a woman has!" etc). So, I can …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/14 04:48 PM
22

Make a spreadsheet of all the times she's denied you for sex then send it to her next time she has to go out of town for a work meeting. Kidding...
/r/askTRP23/07/14 04:42 PM
0

That's NOT what society says. I mean hell, look at the r/relationships thread. Uhh.... yeah, it IS what society says. The views of a few redditors on /r/relationships is sure as hell not the same as what mainstream media, our overall society, and the latest episode of Dr Phil says to women, which is that because a woman's body is her own that justifies her not having sex with her husband if she doesn't want to and the husband should just shut up and deal with it, even if he never has sex for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/14 01:29 AM
0

Cheat and donate to a sperm bank. Best of both worlds.
/r/askTRP19/07/14 02:48 AM
1

Red pill, blue pill, doesn't matter... anyone who doesn't approve of the dating decisions of two other grown adults can go fuck themselves. It's none of their business.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/14 02:33 AM
3

When I was in the midwest I found the women much more welcoming and respectful. They appreciated manners out of men and you could actually take them out and have them appreciate the time and sentiment of being a gentleman. Currently I reside in a major city in Southern California which is also one of the largest in the country... and I've found every stereotype about California women to be true. Entitled, snobby, fake, conceited, gold-digging, appreciative of nothing and typically obsessed with …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/14 01:46 AM
2

This may also be cultural and depend on where you live. If you're in the country or the midwest where there's more traditional values, then being "nice" may very well work. In urban or city areas? Not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 10:41 PM
8

"What the hell am I supposed to do?" Have sex with your husband more often, that's what. So often we hear about "compromise" in a relationship, how regarding everything... "you have to work together, you're in a relationship and things are 50/50 now..." UNLESS it comes to sex, of course, then society entirely tells the woman "it's your body, you don't have to do anything you don't want, etc..." That whole "compromise" thing? Totally out the window on that issue. For fuck sake, he didn't sign on …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 10:24 PM
1

I can see where you're coming from, I'll give you that. It's the same as why I don't think of feminists in a good light - there's quite a few man-hating angry vindictive types in their ranks yet they'll go on about "feminism is about equality!" just as quick as TRP'ers will go on about "TRP is about self improvement!" I just find it amusing that the second anyone agrees with a point or two which either RP or BP tends to believe, everyone is quick to jump on the "OMG U (RP/BP)'ER CULT MEMBER LOL …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 09:29 PM
2

"Cult member"? Hah hah... and let me guess, you think yourself to be so much more enlightened and smarter than any one of these "cult members"(i.e. anyone who doesn't think exactly the same way you do), right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/14 05:27 PM
2

My bad, I thought you were being 100% serious. I've heard that whole "women are crazy because of their periods" by people who weren't being purposefully hyperbolic plenty of times. Naah. I make "women are crazy" jokes from time to time but bear in mind I freely make "men are stupid" jokes as well. I'm an equal opportunity sexist. laughs Really, it seems to me that when taken to their extremes the whole BP mentality tends to ignore the differences in the sexes altogether, seeing them as discrimin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 11:02 PM
2

I recommend those truths to be taken whit a giant grain of salt. Well let's not throw out the baby with the bath water either. Okay, I don't know what kind of women you're dating but that sounds like a full blown case of bipolar disorder. Most women just tend to get moody and irritable during their period and then go back to normal once their hormones are balanced. Let's not take things to extremes, I tried to pepper that response with a dash of humor. But the menstrual cycle is a bit more compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 10:22 PM
2

I never said that. My point is that TRP highlights these differences and paints women out to be from a different planet. They are not so foreign. You can talk to them and listen to their words. Are there women that will say one thing and do another? Of course! It's not something that is exclusive to women though. Oh for sure, TRP can go overboard. That doesn't mean there's not an element of truth in some of the things they say, however. That whole "Women from Venus and men from Mars" thing does …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 09:55 PM
1

Enh... sure, why not? There's plenty of idiots in the "outside world" too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 08:56 PM
2

Well we actually notice and question these differences. We have the capacity to change ideas, perspectives, beliefs, etc. Besides there are more differences between individuals than there are between sexes. Nobody's arguing that there isn't more differences between individuals than between sexes. Also, just because we have the capacity to change ideas, perspectives, and beliefs doesn't somehow make the sexes one and the same. I thought this had been debunked. How is this "debunked"? I'm not crit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 08:48 PM
5

Perhaps you should try reading your own post history some time. That's a good way to find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 06:57 PM
1

Your experience is different than mine as to be expected. I think the sexes are more alike than they are different, we are part of the same species after all. I believe that would all depend on what we measure the differences by. In nature, males and females of the same species act and behave very differently on average. From that perspective I see no reason to believe we would be any different. I don't think deceptive is the right word. Not being physically imposing has been a disadvantage, so …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 06:54 PM
5

Come now. Surely someone as smart as you profess to be can figure it out. (HINT: it's a group that is dedicated solely to rejection of RP beliefs and tenets)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 06:35 PM
1

Now there I can come to an agreement. Forgive me, the typical BP reply usually reads like a lecture from a very liberal sociology professor who's also a massive feminist - perhaps I'm too used to that and was putting words in your mouth. In my opinion, it's natural for women to be more typically more deceptive than men. Over history, men have always used their muscles as their weapons; Women have learned to use their words.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 06:09 PM
4

...Says the guy who's part of an internet group who's actively trying to tell people what to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 05:53 PM
2

One thing RP gets right: If you are a guy, never take dating advice from women. Not a single one of them have ever tried to pick up on a woman while being the owner of a penis. (and that last part is key - the dynamics between bisexual and gay women trying to land a date is much different from a straight guy trying to land a date) You don't ask a fish how to catch a fish - you ask a fisherman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 05:49 PM
4

But... but... social constructs! Every difference is a social construct, right? Seriously, though - which one of the three are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 05:35 PM
-1

Yep, using the exact same logic is only trolling when BPers do it. Actually, I've had some great discussions and debates with BP men and women - same with RP men and women. I've just never had one with you because you prefer to act like a jackass and troll anything that isn't total BP mentality instead of try to have a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 05:51 AM
0

Case in point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 05:46 AM
2

Yes, yes, there's the typical BP mindset of rationalizing all differences between the genders away. If you don't notice that women are pretty notorious for saying one thing and doing another, you are either blind, foolish, or naive. As some other TRP posts have said in this thread, don't pay attention to what a woman says - pay attention to what she does.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 04:48 AM
4

Except for the fact that women have a habit of saying one thing then doing another, of course...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/14 04:11 AM
14

Having a different set of standards is not the same thing as having no standards. Don't naively confuse the two. If a woman is moderately attractive, she can easily find a man who will have sex with her with almost no effort put in on her part. Finding a relationship, on the other hand? That's a different story altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 04:51 AM
7

The same way some women can get hundreds of men to sleep with them. Hint: It doesn't take a lot for most women to get a man to sleep with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/14 02:42 AM
2

Oh, like what is between your legs suddenly matters now, all of a sudden... OMG HOW SEXIST YOU THINK WOMEN CANT BE JUST AS HUGE OF HUMAN TRASH AS YOU? FUCKING SEXIST RP PIG! FUCK YOU FOR THINKING WOMEN CAN'T BE JUST AS BIG OF A PIECE OF SHIT AS YOU ARE!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/14 01:51 PM
1

You think I don't have just as much disgust for MRAs as I do for feminists? AWWWWWW, how CUUUUUUTE! Go on and continue to hate all men as a feminist just as MRAS continue to hate all women. Both of you disgust me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/14 09:12 AM
2

Yes, because a credentialed professional talking about his findings is "hearsay". We probably shouldn't listen to those scientists who talk about all this crap about climate change or the safety of vaccines, either. Total hearsay.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 08:14 PM
1

They are. How many middle-class white dudes do you see waiting tables at diners? More like "how many middle-class white dudes do you see in the first place" in this horrible economy, but that is another argument altogether... You don't see a lot of women doing manual labor doing construction or climbing utility poles, either. Why? Because women don't choose those kinds of jobs. Women have always preferred comfort, safety, and flexibility over good pay when it comes to employment. Not so with men…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 08:05 PM
1

I don't bite! Liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 06:21 PM
7

How many damsels in distress have had sex with you in all the time you have been an internet white knight? ...Naah, just kidding, but seriously there's absolutely nothing which TRP says that you agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 06:19 PM
2

Naah, you're right. If you ask most people "Are you red pill or blue pill?", they will think you are inquiring about any form of medication they may be taking.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 06:13 PM
1

I, too, will, take some beer and chips.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 06:11 PM
2

So far it sounds like you're going to stick with your opinion and criticize any and all sort of evidence produced.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 06:06 PM
1

Okay you got me, I couldn't resist making the joke. I'm not a white, male middle-class New Englander; Rather, I am in fact a white, male middle-class Californian. AMA.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 04:53 PM
1

Party with them, just do it sober. Besides, you have no -idea- how many friends you can meet being the guy who can always be a sober ride. Probably make some money doing it, too.
/r/askTRP14/07/14 05:58 AM
1

Are you horny? Lawl xD Not at the moment, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 02:28 AM
0

Dude, that's like saying that racism is over, and Nazis are the same as anti-racist activists. Not comparable whatsoever. I don't even see how you got that out of anything I said. And for your information, for older women, poor women and for many women of colour the wage gap is certainly a real thing If that's the case, why aren't businesses hiring older women, poor women, and minority women in droves? If they get the same work for way less pay out of those women, that's a great way to cut labor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 02:16 AM
3

Do you consider underrepresentation of women in leadership roles and STEM an evidence of discrimination against women? Yes. The vast majority of college campuses are very liberally biased so there is no "glass ceiling" or "patriarchy" holding women back from choosing STEM majors... hell, many colleges actively encourage women to join STEM fields and some even have programs catered specifically to women in STEM... yet we still do not see women in STEM at any sort of high number. So, given all of …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 02:00 AM
1

I am a white, male, middle class New Englander. AMA.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 01:51 AM
0

Feminism is the elaboration of the idea that society is ordered along gendered lines and that the end result of this order historically has been and continues to be a patriarchy. It used to be a philosophy about equal rights for women, perhaps... but in Western civilized nations the feminist movement won long ago. Women nowadays can vote, hold political office, own land, hold jobs, and do all the same shit that men can. Without a fight, there is no movement. So, nowadays it's a philosophy which …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 01:41 AM
0

lol jesus I love when people make up false oppression to justify their victim complex. (And yes, MRAs do it too. I don't know why you're talking shit on MRAs either, feminists and MRAs are basically the same thing, just swap the genders around.)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/14 10:04 PM
-2

Two questions: Are you also a feminist? If so, how have you been oppressed by the patriarchy lately? Do you believe that literally every difference between men and women aside from maybe the ability to give birth is a social construct and that equality mostly means we should all believe that we are all "the same"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/14 09:43 PM
2

And I've noticed that any and all differences between the genders is 100% written-in-stone biological truth according to most RP'ers, with the exception of... hmm...erm...huh. You have some point there... it is a mix of the two. However, I've noticed RP'ers are slightly better at admitting that it isn't 100% one way or the other on the issue of nature vs. nurture. BP'ers, on the other hand, pretty much ignore the fact that it's entirely observable in almost every species on the planet that males…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/14 09:17 PM
2

Not surprising. I've noticed that any and all differences between any two people is a social construct according to most BP'ers, with perhaps the exception of being able to give birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/14 09:02 PM
8

I always find it amusing when someone points out -one- exception and then acts as if the exception is the norm. Face it, there's a reason why Harlequin Publishing's target audience is women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/14 08:51 PM
4

Also, how many men jack off to romance novels?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/14 08:39 PM
1

It's not too far to venture that if someone would buy a vibrator they would buy a sexbot. And, just like how few would admit to owning a vibrator... few would admit to owning a sexbot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/14 02:35 AM
1

why do feminists turn a blind eye to the hate that a decent amount of it supporters get behind? Think about this question for a second. You are asking people who turn a blind eye to hate to explain why they are turning a blind eye to that hate. The only answer you will get from those people is denial - i.e. "feminism isn't about hate!" "we just want equality!" etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/14 01:59 AM
2

I can't think of anyone I know that would purchase one of those things. None that would admit to it, anyhow. Think about it... I guarantee that you know someone who owns a vibrator which is basically a crude form of "sexbot".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/14 01:55 AM
-1

Saying everything is entirely instinctual is equally as unhelpful. True. Yet I don't believe I ever professed that. Some that do exist are: pain, eye-watering, hunger, need to excrete. The urge to reproduce is also one of the greatest ingrained instincts which human beings (and all life) have. In my mind, to say that the differences between men and women aren't very heavily guided by instinct is absurd. In my opinion, what may BP'ers don't get is that men and women approach sexuality very differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/14 07:44 AM
1

Or Leaving Las Vegas.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/14 03:31 AM
0

Hah! I was waiting for someone to say "LOL social construct". It seems that according to the vast majority of BP'ers, any and all differences in the genders aside from the ability to give birth is a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/14 03:29 AM
0

Now all you have to do is pick a religion (or lack thereof) and shove it down people's throats and you'd pretty much be the worst person ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/14 08:10 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with respect being earned and not freely given, per se. What is freely given is often cheap or worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 07:41 PM
1

How about this - I don't like feminists because they annoy me with their bullshit. Kinda like how overbearing vegetarians and overly vocal religious/atheistic people annoy me with their bullshit as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 07:38 PM
-1

This site reeks of being a blatant advertisement.
/r/seduction07/07/14 07:06 PM
-3

So cheating makes a guy an "alpha"?
/r/askTRP06/07/14 11:06 PM
-3

If the men were alpha enough to cheat on their wifes, then they wouldn't be leaving them. That's a fairly ridiculous assumption and has nothing to do with RP. Most women will leave their men for cheating on them I'd wager, the ones who would not typically have codependency issues.
/r/askTRP06/07/14 09:09 PM
7

That's as simplistic and inaccurate as saying "Blue pillers are white knight nice-guys". I guarantee that there are blue pillers out there that do not love their partners despite railing on against RP thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 08:57 PM
2

I've noticed that it's not the color of the pillar that affects how well the pillar supports things, insomuch the size and shape. Y'see, the first pillars were probably nothing more than hewn logs of wood. It is thanks to Greek advancements in mathematics that pillars not only became more ornate, but were also designed to support much more than the simple pillars of the past. Not only that, but they were also made of stronger materials as well which further enhanced their ability to support almo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 08:49 PM
1

Only somewhat related, but has anyone else ever noticed that they always try and make chocolate advertisements which are geared towards women very subtly sexual? I offer this as an example
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/14 10:07 PM
7

Women tend to believe that men think like women do. It's projection. Women like men who are taken. It's pre-selection: if he's taken, they think there must be something good about him for a woman to want him. Plus, women want what they can't have. Thus, they assume men are the same way.
/r/askTRP05/07/14 09:27 PM
2

Naah, naah, you're talkin' about the big guy all wrong, that's the wrong tone. Do it again... I'll stab you in the face with a soldering iron.
/r/askTRP02/07/14 10:15 PM
2

You don't become the head of the Luciano crime family by being a chickenshit. Or by dancing.
/r/askTRP02/07/14 09:36 PM
1

‘One night Frank Costello was sitting in a night club with his blonde, a nice broad, and at the table he’s got Rocky Marciano, Tony Canzoneri, and Two-Ton Tony Galente. It’s a guinea party,’ my father said. ‘The orchestra is playing. So Frank says to Galente, “Hey, Two-Ton, I want you to dance with Gloria.” That makes Galente nervous. Who wants to dance with the big man’s girl? What if she likes him? “Hey, Mr. Costello,” says Two-Ton Tony, “you know I’m no dancer.” “Put down your beer,” says Fra…
/r/askTRP02/07/14 03:34 AM
1

Wouldn't work out for a healthy society at all. A sizable chunk of women will flock to be in the harems of the top 10 percent of guys, which would leave the bottom 40 to 50 percent or so of guys without anyone.
/r/askTRP26/06/14 03:35 AM
2

It's a bit disconcerting that many states have trigger laws in prep to subvert it. Birth control is still a battlefield. It's only a battlefield if you live in Jesusland. I don't know why anyone would want to live in an area of the country where one might hear banjos playing, personally. the point is still that feminists are more likely to understand what they need to fight for Women are more likely to know the needs of women but that has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 07:20 PM
0

abortion/emergency contraception, HBC, health, social engineering Abortion isn't going anywhere, neither is planned parenthood where you can pick up condoms and get all that shit done for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 06:52 PM
5

And the loudest of RP men have proven they dislike a relationship where they are not the most important element. The loudest of RP men are the ones spewing sexist bullshit while the loudest of BP people in general are the ones blatantly trolling RP people and acting like retarded SRS'ers... both of those types are largely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 02:52 AM
2

Comparing people who make a conscious decision to adopt children with people who believe they are raising their own children then later find out they are raising someone else's kids because the woman is a cheater is the epitome of comparing apples to oranges. I can't even see how you can compare the two, really. It's not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/14 01:45 PM
3

You're listing white-collar office jobs - A nation's economy isn't run purely on Dilberts sitting in an office cubicle shuffling paperwork around all day. The physical advantages of men are very applicable in just about all of the construction trades and blue-collar work. When it comes time to lift stacks of rebar, climb a utility pole, or start swinging away with a welder's hammer, those physical advantages of men are very relevant... this is one reason why you see very few women in those field…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 10:33 PM
4

Manners, bub. Minding them will help you not look like a jackass.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 01:21 PM
0

Culture is responsible for gender roles While it may be debatable how much truth there is to that regarding our modern society, culture definitely has not always been responsible for gender roles. For example, one reason why the men nearly always had the roles of hunter or warrior in a society is because men are, for the most part, physically stronger than women. Let's face it, when it comes to primal warfare or hunting, how hard you can throw a spear or how fast you can run really counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/14 01:19 PM
-5

Depends on who you ask. If you ask a feminist, almost every woman on the planet has been raped some way, some how, and if you ask an MRA then 95% of all rape allegations are false.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 05:25 PM
1

Only to those who deserve it. I can have an intelligent and lovely discussion with someone and respect their views even if I don't agree with them, or engage in a typical reddit insult fest. Which way it goes depends on the attitude of the person I'm talking to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/14 05:05 PM
1

Actually, I'll reply to this twice. In the West, whites are not permitted to have a unified culture. Why do you think so many white Americans of vaguely Irish descent say "I'm Irish", or of vaguely Scottish descent say "I'm Scottish", or of vaguely French descent say "I'm French"? They NEVER say "I'm white" with any sense of pride in "white" culture - they always say it with a sense of shame, or as a means of mocking other whites. And there's a reason for that. It's because whites as a group are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 05:23 AM
1

Cool, you still are. Why would I need to? I can let you keep running your mouth and have you do the work for me. You're doing a great job of it. Keep going. Quote it Okay. "my response is 'you can't show all people from Nigeria are email scammers'" Sound familiar? Feel free to try and bullshit your way out of it. You've been trying this whole time, after all. And making yourself look like an ass in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 01:46 AM
1

I didn't realize the topic was 'make a ridiculous caricature to attack DocileBanalBovine' I don't need to attack you, you're doing a good enough job of making an ass of yourself on your own. You'll also notice I never said you made a claim about all Nigerians, No. You just assumed I did due to your poor reading skills, and tried to frame your argument around that. which it seems you're too beta to do. Awww, you're so cute!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/14 12:39 AM
1

I was quite on topic. You, on the other hand, were busy trying to pull excuses out of your ass to save face from trying to say that I said something so ridiculous as "All Nigerians are email scammers". In fact, you still are. Keep going, though, I'm enjoying you making a fool of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 11:06 PM
2

This conversation began with redpill4lyfe's insistence that his personal experience is sufficient to judge a group that numbers in the billions. Then, blalala, bullshit bullshit bullshit, (insert moronic excuse as to why I can't cite you claiming that all Nigerians are email scammers here) Of course you can't cite where I said "All Nigerians are email scammers". Because I never said that. What was that about reading comprehension skills again? Because yours are terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 10:07 PM
2

Reading my post might help, nimrod Can you do me a favor and cite where exactly in my post that I stated "all people from Nigeria are email scammers", junior? At any rate, Have fun explaining your theories to your bank's fraud department one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 08:44 PM
3

So your response is basically, "You can't prove that all letters from people claiming to be Nigerian princes and asking for your bank account information are scams"? I can't tell whether you're trolling or whether you really are that dense. But thanks for the laugh at your expense. Someone's going to make a lot of money off of you one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 07:46 PM
2

I'm sorry that I don't trust a group of like minded people on the internet to have figured out human behavior through idle observation. Get your head out of your ass, nitwit. If you get an email from someone who says they're a prince from Nigeria with a very special offer for you, are you going to tell me you need teams of sociologists and psychologists to study everything about the email before you can deduce that it's a scam? I bet sales people absolutely love you. "A sucker is born every minu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 06:37 PM
1

White "culture" for the most part consists of eating frankenfood from a drive thru or out of a can, watching reality TV shows, playing x-box, and tapping away at a smartphone or using facebook for the majority of social interactions. That's not any sort of culture to me. The closest you will get to a white culture would be in select rural areas of the Midwest, the South, and the Appalachians.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 06:30 PM
2

What were you bitching about earlier? Something about lack of tact? You get what you give, shitbag, and you've shown me no respect so I feel no need to show you any. You appear to be so dense and naive to the ways of the world that you feel you need a team of scientists to hold your hand and verify even the most basic and observable truths about human behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 10:09 AM
2

It seems that according to DocileBanalBovine, unless we have scores of academics scratching their beards over a subject and performing hundreds or even thousands of clinical studies on a matter we can't make a wise or accurate judgment about anything. Common sense? Life experience? Useless, apparently. That's okay, when a rattlesnake bites him he can go on about how not all rattlesnakes bite and that we need clinical studies to prove that all rattlesnakes bite before we can assume to judge all r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 02:11 AM
1

It was the delivery, not the message. Perhaps I didn't explain it well, yes, but I would have clarified if he didn't come off to me as having a bad attitude. Are you and him both aspies who don't understand basic social etiquette?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 11:51 PM
0

That sounds pretty sexist and misogynist of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 04:33 PM
1

I'm sorry No you aren't. for disagreeing with you and your interpretation of someone else's post. You lack tact in your disagreement and are focusing on nitpicking over minor details in the presentation of my argument instead of focusing on the subject matter itself, which comes off as you just trying to act smarter than people. There's another poster who disagreed with my sentiment in a much more polite and engaging manner, maybe you could learn a thing or two from reading that post. You sound …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 04:11 PM
1

I don't believe any RP'er that's worth paying attention to has ever said "women are incapable of love". I've heard RP'ers say "Women are incapable of loving in the same way a man does", but that's not the same thing as not being capable to love by a long shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 04:00 PM
1

From what I've noticed, RP tends to lean towards biological or evolutionary reasons for the differences in behavior between the sexes, whereas BP tends to rely more on the idea that differences in behavior are learned, and are social constructs. To put it crudely, RP leans heavily towards nature and BP leans heavily towards nurture, though that's not entirely accurate. In my honest opinion, when you go too far to either extreme, you end up with an inaccurate perception. It's just which flavor of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 03:57 PM
1

Great. Then go discuss something else in another thread, problem solved. At this point it seems like you're just trying to make yourself look enlightened and intelligent and instead you're just coming off as pretentious and smarmy and I'm too tired to deal with it right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 03:52 PM
1

Over this past week of non-moderation I've noticed that while some BP'ers tend to say how horrible and awful RP'ers are, BP'ers have been by far been more likely to blatantly make troll threads and troll posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 03:45 PM
0

We can circlejerk about the terminology all day, but that doesn't sound like a productive conversation to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 03:41 PM
1

When you get down to the core of it, evo psych as the TRP mindset looks at it is essentially about the difference in behavior between men and women, especially from a reproductive standpoint. By stating it is "completely inapplicable to individual situations - not to mention not fully validated yet, in the scholarly sphere.", that's essentially a rejection of evolutionary psychology. By rejecting the idea that men and women behave differently, one is essentially led to believe that gender differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 03:27 PM
1

In the vast majority of mammals on this planet (if not nearly all species of animal in general), the males and the females of any species behave distinctly and noticeably differently, particularly when it comes to mating habits. Why would humans, then, be pretty much the only species on the planet to behave 100% "the same" across genders, as some BP'ers would have us believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 08:17 AM
7

I've noticed that BP'ers usually base their views of how people behave on the select few individuals who are an exception to a rule, and use that small handful of people as an excuse to disregard any rules or generalities there are regarding how people behave. When that belief is taken to an extreme, it's like saying "Not all rattlesnakes bite people, you shouldn't generalize rattlesnakes like that". Granted, I'm sure there's some rattlesnakes out there who don't bite people - however, bet your …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 08:04 AM
4

Of course. OkCupid surveys only mean anything when they support the notion that men and women are all 100% equal and 100% the same and behave exactly the same way, much like my Womyn's Studies professor tells me. It's utterly obvious that surveys like this are blatant, sexist RP misogynistic propaganda. Just because a ridiculous amount of porn sites advertise "barely legal 18 year olds" doesn't mean that men prefer younger women at all - I'm sure sites like 50andupcougars.com and the like are JU…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 07:28 AM
6

This is just what I've noticed in real life. TRP (and by extension much of the "manosphere" in general) started as a bunch of men who discuss politically incorrect concepts of masculinity and sexuality, but that group has presently been invaded and overrun by a lot of blatant misogynists. From my point of view, it isn't representative of average people outside of reddit or the manosphere. When it actually comes to observing who's really doing the slut shaming in real life, women take the cake. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 12:54 AM
3

An interesting thing to note is that American whites lack any sense of culture. Hispanics, blacks, Asians, all of them have their own distinct culture within America, whereas unless they come from a European immigrant family (which is exceedingly rare), American whites have none. Also, in my experience, white girls can be the rudest dates ever. They are flaky and unreliable, regularly rescheduling and showing up late to dates or intentionally just don't reply to text messages, they bring out cel…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 12:45 AM
7

The biggest perpetrators of "slut shaming" are women, hands down. Men on average enjoy the company of loose women - after all, they're getting sex from them. Women, on the other hand, will group together and tear another woman apart with an insane sense of cattiness if that woman is perceived as "slutty".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 12:30 AM
0

Interesting quote... Y'know, the idea that women are more specific and detailed doesn't just stop with the difference between what men and women are looking for in someone. It's pretty noticeable in many areas. Go to the supermarket in the frozen food section, and look at the foods obviously marketed to women. They'll have names like "Zesty sun-dried tomato pesto penne chicken parmesan"... Now, when you look at food marketed towards men, what are they named? "Beef flavor". Colors, too. Women hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 03:13 AM
0

Hah, yeah, a lot like that. Absolutely hilarious link, by the way. And honestly I don't believe this thread alone is a good indicator of what I'm talking about. Dating site profiles, on the other hand? Maybe that might be a better place to compare the difference. On reddit, people typically just make a passing comment of a paragraph or two about a given subject but often times people take a lot more time to make dating site profiles. I'd theorize the differences there would be a lot more noticea…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 07:58 PM
1

Isn't looking for a submissive mate. This is another glaring sign of a weak ego. There's nothing wrong with people acting submissive, but seeking it out is a red flag of some psychological issues. As a side comment, I disagree that seeking it out is a red flag in and of itself. That would necessitate that people who look for a dominant mate somehow have strong egos and a healthy mental profile, which is a false assumption. People define dominant or submissive "personalities" differently. Some wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 07:54 PM
1

I'd say the format is fairly unique to women. If you ask a guy what he's looking for in a woman there will typically be only three or four things on the list, and they will all typically be basic things like "funny", "attractive", or "smart", etc. If you ask a woman? She'll be WAY more specific and in-depth, and there will be a lot more on the list. "Well, I want him to be tall, at least six foot tall, dark hair, has to have a decent job... I don't expect him to be a millionaire but he can't wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 07:17 PM
1

Might as well make the most of the "no moderation" deal... but I'm betting this result in some highly inaccurate answers. I can't count the number of times female friends will say "Well, he has to be x, has to do y, and I could never date a guy who is z, etc..." with a list as long as my arm, but then she ends up dating a guy who has less than half of what's on her "checklist". Then when you ask her about it, she'll give some answer like "I dunno! I just like him!" or something equally as uninfo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 06:38 PM
1

That's the spirit! I can tell I'm dealing with a pro here. Practice up, brother, we have ourselves a war to win!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 08:50 AM
1

Skillfully avoiding the subject while condescendingly trying to act smarter than me! See? That is the type of trollish bullshit that can save the internet right there!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 01:40 AM
1

Actually, I'm hoping you heed John Oliver's call and use your trolling talents to help swamp the FCC. Use your powers for good and not evil, friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:02 PM
1

Proving sh1v's point.... It is kinda amusing how quickly you took this whole conversation to troll levels, however. I mean, dayyum, yo, sh1v didn't even say anything insulting to you and you went mega-troll pretty quickly. sh1v: "In retrospect, I think the moderation in this sub is a good and needed thing" Rorshach_Fu: "LOL U R JUST ETRNALY BUTTHURT MANOSPERE AND TRP CANT HAEV RESPECFUL DEBATS WHINEY PUSSEYS U GOT PWNED LOL ROFL ROLFL!!!!!!1"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:24 AM
1

I won't beat around the bush about it: attention. Women love attention and suicide threats grab attention, for sure. Mind you, I'm not saying all women are drama whores making fake suicide threats for attention. It could be that once they get the attention that comes with the threat they become more passive and think twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 07:22 AM
6

There's a certain irony in that nearly every one who's commented thus far has ignored the main point of the article - the fact that nobody cares about powerless males in our society - and drifted off to the less relevant aspects of the article, like how the media works or Muslims or violence in African nations. At the risk of digressing and making a similar move, I'd estimate that one reason why the suicide rate is so much higher for men than women is because nobody gives a fuck about the men. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 03:21 AM
8

Great way to kick off the moderator free weekend - with a blatant troll thread from a butthurt BP'er.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 09:14 PM
1

It was at the same meeting where all the men decided to implement patriarchy. Yeah, like I said you may not be conscious of your true motivations, but what I said describes the majority of blue pillers - you believe in the blank slate. You are offended by biological explanations of behavior. You reveal yourselves when you issue the sarcastic retort, "biotruths!" So I'm a BP'er now? That's kooky, because the BP'ers always instantly assume I'm a RP'er when I'm debating with them. It's amusing when…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 07:10 PM
0

Regardless, that is the blue pill stance, whether you admit it or not. So, when did all the BP'ers get together and decide on that? Because I'm looking at the sidebar in /r/TheBluePill and there's nothing of any unified stance there, as far as I notice the "blue pill stance" is nothing more than a rejection of TRP along with a shit-flinging fest about how horrible they all are. Now don't get me wrong, RP'ers get just as bad with the shit-flinging fest and they have their share of total misogynis…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 05:57 AM
3

Oh, no worries. Personally I quite believe the social and biological differences between the sexes exist for a healthy reason, but not to the point that they are all-encompassing and dictate human behavior in an absolute form. Besides, there are always exceptions to the rule. Many RP'ers take the concept too far in my opinion, almost to the point that it is gospel among them, plus there's just too many RP'ers who are openly spiteful of women for me to claim myself as one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 05:42 AM
3

Naah. I'm on neither side, really, RP and BP both have their valid points as well as their flaws in their philosophies. I don't use a flair because I like to see who just assumes I'm either one side or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 03:25 AM
3

Ahaha, sorry no way this is true. Guys totally care about what people think of their dates/SOs, that's why they always want to "show them off". I've heard guys say plenty of times it is a compliment to them when another guy hits on their girl. Sort of... but not quite the same. Let's say three guys go out with their dates. Two of the guys are dating solid 9's, and one of them is dating Taylor Swift. Neither of those other two guys are going to be jealous of the guy who's dating Taylor Swift. May…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 11:00 PM
2

How would you expect that scenario to play out? Depends on how you play it. If you do it in the manner I described, don't blatantly flirt, and do it right in front of the girl you are with, you can easily diffuse any negative reaction from the girl you are with by shooting her a confident, playful smile and saying "Jeez, don't be so insecure, we were just talking". Correspondingly, how would you react to her using DG on you? DG doesn't work quite the same the other way around. Women want a parti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 07:51 PM
2

you would take your SO out for a night on the town, then leave her to go talk to other girls? Leaving her to do so isn't necessary. Hell, it's better to talk to other women right in front of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 06:45 PM
2

Anything which will show the girl you are with that other women are interested in you and that she isn't the only girl in town who wants to get with you. Out for a night on the town? Talk with other girls at the bar. Hell, you don't even need to flirt with them if you feel guilty about doing so, just the fact that you can hold an engaging conversation and keep the other girl's interest may be enough to do the trick.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 05:48 PM
7

There's an old adage, "actions speak louder than words"... it's a saying which is almost as old as the meme of the woman who tells her man that they should communicate more and the man who feels hen-pecked when she goes about saying that. In my personal opinion, whenever a guy does try the communication method, he goes in out-gunned. Women are by far the better communicators, hands down. It's my belief that in many situations, a man is better off proving his position and intentions by his action…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 05:40 PM
1

I'm going to go on a limb and say that dread game is one of the most misunderstood RP concepts for BP'ers. I've heard BP'ers say it's everything from cheating to being openly misogynistic, which is all highly wrong. Dread game is basically communicating to a woman through your actions that you have options and that if you are not getting your needs met from her, you are not afraid to walk and get your needs met elsewhere. Think of it this way: it's like when you go on to the lot to buy a new car…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 05:21 PM
3

A friend of mine recently flew in from Russia for a visit last year. She had a flip phone. I guess over there they are pretty common and smartphones are comparatively rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 10:54 PM
1

I feel your rebuttal is very well written, although I disagree with it on certain points. However, I'm going to focus on what gender roles mean to men. A role is very important to a man. It's a purpose to us. Men define themselves by what they do much more than women do. For even the most career-oriented successful woman, her job is what she succeeds at; for many men, it is what he is. The best way I can describe it is a very strong sense of personal pride, but even that doesn't really scratch t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 11:43 AM
2

Obviously, there are biological differences between the sexes, but one must ask, are these biological differences deterministic? By and large, widely accepted biological differences can be overcome through the proper nurturing. Ultimately, allowing yourself and others to be restricted by biological differences--when those differences have little impact on what someone can/cannot do in the long run--seems silly. That would heavily depend upon which particular biological difference we are referrin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/14 11:24 PM
3

This. Unless a man plans on having kids and raising a family with the woman, with very, VERY few exceptions there is absolutely no reason for a man to get married ever.
/r/askTRP19/05/14 08:03 PM
6

I think what /u/smallpoxinLA is trying to say (without all the crazy and mudslinging) is that there are inherent biological differences between the genders which on average do dictate what people can and cannot do or what they can and cannot be. For example, a 100lb woman may have a dream of being the NFL's first female linebacker... but even if the NFL were co-ed, sorry, it's just not going to ever happen. And she shouldn't feel bad about that - hell, most men's bodies aren't made for that eith…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/14 07:37 AM
4

Depends on the society. I'd theorize that as survival becomes less and less of a critical issue, gender roles become less and less emphasized.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/14 01:42 AM
1

Clearly evolutionary instinct is so strong and unsuppressible that we can't actually be here and argue about it because we're still sitting in trees and wanking off each other. "Stop straw manning me, you sexist TRP'er! All you are talking about is pseudo-science, both my sociology professor AND my womyn's studies professor agree!"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/14 01:32 AM
1

Again, you're not even bothering to read what I write, and I have to make my points again and again: I've read every bit of what you posted. For example, as you said, fight of flight behavior: We don't see people automatically run away when they hear police sirens all the time (no determination), we don't see an internalized culture of running away from police sirens (no long-term effect). Running away from a police siren out of shock is impulsive short term behavior. Irrelevant, and I've alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/14 01:06 AM
1

What I'm asking is why there should be a evolutionary urge to not help a man There is none. Perhaps you misunderstood me, as I never intended to convey that that there is absolutely no urge to help a man at all. Can you tell me how evolutionary urges, which always manifest in impulsive behavior can create a consistent belief system that is normally assumed to come from the non-instinct-driven parts of our brains? The flaw in your question has been put in bold for you. I am not stating that evolu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 10:17 PM
1

To your woman you should have no fears and weaknesses. Showing no fears or weaknesses can make you seem inaccessible and cold to a woman. Showing just a little bit can be a good thing - however, it's always better to err on the side of showing not enough weakness than showing too much weakness if you have to choose one or the other. See also: vulnerability game
/r/askTRP18/05/14 09:36 PM
1

It is thus a straw man, since right now you're arguing that I could have said or meant x when I clearly said something else. You can easily look it up above. This part of the conversation is quickly turning in to irrelevant accusations on both sides. Let's move on. Why should this urge lead us to not help the man? Because men are more expendable within a society. Note that I'm not saying that's a good or a bad thing, it's simply a fact. I now ask you if you really believe that evolutionary urges…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 09:27 PM
1

I'm saying "Treat women like men" Then telling a woman who's injured "Suck it up and walk it off." would be a perfectly rational response for anyone, with that logic. I'm not attempting to make a straw man in any way by noticing this. how men would benefit from not helping other men The question is out of context; rather, it should be "how men would benefit from helping a woman over a man". I've already described how women are a more valuable reproductively than men are, the benefit to the tribe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 08:56 PM
1

See, again, you're mixing up cultural upbringing and evolutionary urges. No, I'm not. You are seeing what you would like to believe instead of actually listening to what I am trying to say, much like the type of person who, when in conversation, is busy thinking of what they will say when it's their turn to talk instead of actually listening to the other person. We don't have an evolutionary urge to run away from police, but an urge to run away from danger. The association police=danger is cultu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 08:18 PM
1

Of course they don't, but as so often, I see a overestimation of the influence of evolutionary instincts. The frontal cortex of the brain itself has developed in such a way that it can specifically suppress evolutionary urges. They do exist, that's not what we discuss here, evolutionary psychology has a factual basis, but when used in pop-science, it's often overblown into some kind of determination to do specific action X. And I believe you underestimate evolutionary instincts. Have you ever no…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 07:28 PM
1

What you say is correct in a tribal context. Sadly, or luckily, depending on your personal politics, we don't live in a tribal society though. Thousands of years worth of evolutionary survival instinct don't just go away overnight (or in a couple centuries even) because you drop a species in to a "civilized" society. And trying to assert "worth" or "value" in a general sense instead of just a reproductive sense from that is idiotic anyway. The reproductive difference in value still affects our b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 05:59 PM
1

I hope you're aware that you still marginalizing them by pedestalizing them. That has fuck all to do with pedestalizing them. If we're in a tribal village and you have one man and a bunch of healthy women, that one man can sire many kids and repopulate the tribe. If you have a bunch of healthy men and one healthy woman, that tribe is going to die out. Period. There's no way in fuck that one woman is going to make enough offspring to continue the tribe. Women are factually more valuable then men …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 12:50 AM
1

Example from OP: "A bluepill man can have a very fairytale idea of love. He thinks he will find his true love [...]" "Can have" does not mean "has". Unless you are trying to say that it is absolutely impossible for any bp man to ever have a fairy-tale idea of love, his statement is 100% accurate. Yeah, how naughty of me to dismiss this out of hand. I should have taken seriously the idea that he knows better what I think. He never stated anywhere in that example that he was trying to explain spec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/14 12:46 AM
1

But, you do in fact smoke marihuana and can obtain some if I were to pay you to do so? Oh, and could you speak up? Preferably talking directly to my chest, where there is absolutely not a wire located?
/r/askTRP15/05/14 10:18 PM
1

I'm not defensive! I was just... err... curious on if you might be able to obtain me some marihuana. "The bomb stuff". Since I am also one who smokes the marihuana and would never be affiliated with law enforcement. You know, right?
/r/askTRP15/05/14 09:58 PM
1

The risk depends on how you handle the situation. It's key that while she's assaulting you, do NOT defend yourself in any way. Let her have at it. She must have NO MARKS on her person which can signify that you had tried to defend yourself in any way. Afterwards, quietly leave the area and call the police. Be polite and respectful when they arrive, and explain the situation. If there are absolutely no marks on her and there are marks on you, in many areas the police are required to take her in t…
/r/askTRP15/05/14 09:55 PM
1

Uhhh... no?
/r/askTRP15/05/14 08:48 PM
1

You're right, I shouldn't. Y'know, I really ought to just find something I could use to relax, man. ...You holding, bro?
/r/askTRP15/05/14 08:43 PM
3

With a name like "smokingmonkey420", I can understand why.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 08:22 PM
1

Not only will the police likely take the woman's side, even if they don't they will be irritated by your calling and try to get you for some nonsense charge. What do you base this on? Obviously you should look up the laws on domestic abuse in your area if you intend on calling the police, but as I said my experience in calling the police on such a matter must be very different than yours. I've seen two cases where women were arrested for domestic violence.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 08:21 PM
1

I thought we were only discussing how we all define rape in this thread. Hence that's not rape. The problem with that logic is that if a situation goes to court your definition of "rape" no longer matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 08:15 PM
1

If it happens to you, don't defend yourself at all. Rather, when she is done, call the police and have her arrested. There is a misconception that the police won't do anything or that they will laugh at you, but in my experience the police treat such matters very seriously. It is the only thing you have in your arsenal to rectify the problem and teach a woman that putting your hands on a partner is NOT acceptable.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 09:23 AM
6

Tell that to the judge and hope the court sides with you then.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 04:03 AM
0

But if more people leave the workforce than those who join it, that ultimately leads to fewer workers. I don't see the distinction. I'll break it down this way: The American economy started to have women entering the workforce as the norm in the 60's and 70's when the baby boomer generation was coming in to the work force. At first, it was pretty good for the average family: a woman working meant more disposable income for the average family, so more and more women entered the workforce. After s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 06:54 PM
1

What does that have to do with the workforce as a whole though? Because statistics on their own to make blanket statements can be very misleading. (From the link) But averages can be misleading when a distribution is heavily skewed at one end, with a small number of unrepresentative outliers pulling the average in their direction. In 2011, for example, the average income of the 7,878 households in Steubenville, Ohio, was $46,341. But if just two people, Warren Buffett and Oprah Winfrey, relocate…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 06:39 PM
0

To an extent, yes, but maternity leave makes this almost a non-issue nowadays, because once the kid is a toddler they'll be off to school and the mum can get back to work again. That's not the case in some parts of the world. In the US, federally mandated maternity leave is only 3 months. But on the other hand, a smaller workforce means higher wages and more job opportunities for each individual, which means less unemployment and a stronger economy. Not necessarily. That would be the case if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 06:32 PM
1

Nope, average inflation adjusted incomes have increased in the past few decades. I always question the use of statistics and graphs to make such a blanket claim. For example, which areas of the country is the graph specifically referring to? The US is much more economically diverse than other nations. The cost of living and average wage in Kansas or Nebraska for example (where one can consider around $20,000 a living wage), is clearly going to be much different than in New York or California (wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 06:20 PM
0

(and I see no actual data to support it, you're literally just guessing) Women have about a 20 year window to have children. Men can have kids at any age and also don't have to take nearly a year off of work to have a kid. Going to college and juggling a career along are naturally going to get in the way of a woman's family planning in ways that wouldn't affect a man, that's just simple fact. why is it a bad thing? We live on a planet that's already overpopulated with limited space and resources…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 05:53 PM
2

I don't really consider myself a "TRP'er"... I'm not really anything, in my opinion TRP and TBP both have some valid points here and there. That being said, feminism was once a positive force in the advancement of individual liberty and opportunity for women... however, for all intents and purposes nowadays, feminism is really just the MRA movement's angry female counter-part. Feminist claim to be about equality for men as well, but I have never seen a single feminist pay anything but lip servic…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 05:40 PM
2

Let's face it, for the sake of political correctness no journalist is going to list women entering the workplace and gaining careers as a factor for the decline in families. Clearly it's not the only factor but it is certainly a contributing one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 05:35 PM
1

One thing that can be stated about the effects of women in the workplace is that it has driven down the price of labor. While it is by no means the only factor involved, the entrance of women in the workplace has effectively doubled the labor force, thus driving down wages. The labor market has adapted to this and now for most people a dual income family is necessary just to get by. I would say earning your own living instead of changing nappies and cleaning all day is the more rewarding option,…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 05:29 PM
-1

But if this was true then surely the norm in society would no longer be to have a family? Right now birth rates are below replacement levels and at their lowest rate since 1920 and it's a rather common fact that the divorce rate is much higher than it used to be... so it can definitely be argued that having a family is becoming "no longer the norm". Not taking one side or the other in the debate between you two, just figured I'd throw that in.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/14 05:16 PM
1

Have you ever seen the sex scene in "300: Rise Of An Empire"? Do that.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 01:42 AM
1

Do you believe that every other guy you work with is wise enough to not sleep with their coworkers as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 11:14 PM
1

Well, I can't say I can relate to your plight myself as I've never personally seen such reactions from people towards a woman who is rather masculine. Then again, I live in a very liberal/progressive state and I'd imagine such treatment would be more common elsewhere in America(like, say, the South). Since I don't have a basis of seeing such a social stigma myself, that may be why I don't personally associate it with feminism in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 01:16 AM
4

Redpillers are rather frequently lamenting over how "feminism" is causing women to erroneously change their priorities and escape the fact that women have differing roles to fill. I don't believe that's the case with many who have a distaste for feminism. I personally don't care for feminism myself. Although feminists claim they want "equality", they don't - in some cases, they want preferential treatment for women at the expense of men. If they truly wanted equality, they would pay just as much…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/14 12:47 AM
1

While you're getting the number, ask them how it's spelled. Usually you can tease them about it while doing it and make a little bit of banter out of the moment as well.
/r/askTRP24/04/14 04:46 AM
15

Personally, I never let her enter the number in to my phone. When you get a girl's number, enter it in to your phone yourself. Then, repeat the number back to her, but intentionally get one digit wrong. If she doesn't correct you on the wrong digit, then that means she's giving you a fake number. It's a great way to weed out the girls who are serious from the ones playing childish games. Plus, you get the fun of watching her jaw drop to the floor if you call her out on giving you a fake number.
/r/askTRP24/04/14 12:59 AM
1

Fake numbers are not so frequent that I need a method to separate them from the rest. Perhaps the women in your area are less prone to playing games than the women in my area.
/r/seduction19/04/14 11:11 PM
1

If you use this technique it's best to enter her number in yourself then read it back to her. If you have questions about how she spells her name just ask her in a witty and banter-ish manner. Maybe playfully tease her a bit if the spelling is unique or the name is uncommon.
/r/seduction19/04/14 10:24 PM
3

It's a good way to know if you are wasting your time or not before you text her. Plus, if you call her out on it in the right way her jaw will drop to the floor. The expression on their face afterwards is priceless.
/r/seduction19/04/14 09:27 PM
1

"Doing all that"? You make it sound as if there's a large amount of effort involved. It takes about five more seconds of conversation to pull off and it lets you know right away whether you should bother calling her in the first place.
/r/seduction19/04/14 09:25 PM
2

It's an easy indicator of whether or not I've been wasting my time. Also, I find it much more satisfying to be able to turn the tables on a girl and say something like "You know, you could be a lady and turn a guy down gracefully instead of leading them on and then giving a fake number", then watch her jaw drop to the floor before walking away rather than needlessly getting my hopes up over texting a girl only to learn that it's a fake number and that I've been made a fool of.
/r/seduction19/04/14 09:22 PM
7

There's an easy way to make sure a girl is giving you a legitimate number: Whenever you get a girl's number, repeat it back to her with one digit being incorrect. If she corrects you, she's legitimately interested. If she doesn't, she's giving you a fake number.
/r/seduction19/04/14 09:00 PM
4

You were the definition of snide. I've told you already, I wasn't being snide. We can play the whole "Nuh-uh! Yes-huh!" game all day but that's the very opposite of mature discussion. You say you want an intelligent conversation yet you're being extremely defensive right off the bat and are ready to take offense at anything I say. That's no way to start an intelligent conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 08:08 PM
0

Is there a point you are trying to make? At this point I'm really not going to even bother. You've made it clear that your ability to grasp certain concepts is rather limited. The whole flailing around trying to sound clever and insulting me is sort of failing. Actually if you compare the amount of upvotes our posts have accrued, they seem to be working better than yours. (Also since we're on the subject, I've noticed that right before every reply you give, my post gets a downvote. I can safely …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 07:51 PM
5

Calm down. I wasn't being snide or smug. Based on your original post, It is very easy to surmise that your belief on the subject is something along the lines of "The only reason women aren't joining STEM fields nearly as much as men is because of stereotypes perpetuated by the patriarchy". Not only that, but you made no attempt in your original post to state that you believe any differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 07:35 PM
0

Yes, you were! Good job on pointing out something that's been established twelve posts ago! (Oh, not literally twelve posts ago, that was sarcasm. I know you get easily confused so I figured I'd clarify that for you.)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 07:14 PM
11

I find it amusing that feminists will go to great lengths to try and explain that the reason why men and women behave differently and have different interests is because men are somehow oppressing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 07:05 PM
0

Who cares if you state I have a boyfriend? What you said that was my boyfriend was a felon. First off, in order for me to state "your boyfriend is a felon", I'd have to state that you have a boyfriend in the first place. Logic might be a good subject for you to study up on after reading comprehension. Second, have you ever considered that perhaps you took the complete wrong meaning from my original post, and have been making false assumptions over what I'd posted this whole time? Should I type s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 06:51 PM
1

They typically come out of prison with more muscle on them than they had going in on account of there being nothing to do in prison aside from work out and try to avoid being stabbed, so there's that as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 12:05 AM
1

This is what I said. You assumed my boyfriend is a felon. I think the reading comprehension might be your issue, why would I accuse you of saying I have a boyfriend? that makes no sense. Oh, bless your little heart. Let's try this again. Yes, even though that "kind badass" you're attracted to has a list of felonies as long as his arm and has been in and out of prison repeatedly but "he's really a great guy deep down", right? Can you please highlight the part of this sentence which you believe st…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 07:14 PM
1

Nothing in that sentence you've quoted states (nor even implies) that you have a boyfriend. Does it insinuate that you may be attracted to men who have felonies? Yes. Does it state that you have a boyfriend? No. Perhaps you would benefit from some lessons in reading comprehension?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 05:58 PM
2

You literally assumed my boyfriend is a felon Can you please cite for me where exactly in my original post that I said you had a boyfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 05:28 PM
-3

Was that a "straight enough" answer for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 05:16 PM
-1

Doesn't that go against TRP though I don't associate myself as either a "TRPer" or a "TBPer". I believe both are vague philosophies which are correct in some areas and incorrect in others, so it makes no difference to me if something I say goes against either point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 05:14 PM
2

Yes. Well, because you assume dating guys with felonies is actually a thing. It is a "thing". Women being attracted to dangerous men is nothing new. I just assume maybe the people you surround yourself with are trashy since you seem this is normal. It's common for fools to make blind assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 05:11 PM
4

All men pay for sex in one way or another.
/r/askTRP18/04/14 04:17 AM
6

Have you ever noticed that you'll see lots of "father's rights" attorneys in the yellow pages but you never see any "mother's rights" attorneys? That's because women don't need "mother's rights" attorneys. They overwhelmingly have the edge in the court room. Sure, once in a while a guy might come out on top in a legal divorce battle but it certainly isn't the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 04:02 AM
2

Care to try and provide a more accurate statistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 03:57 AM
-1

I'm 19 and I could never see myself dating, let alone having sex with a guy in his 30s. You don't speak for all 19 year olds. I've noticed that women are much more diverse in what they're attracted to than men are. A guy which is totally unattractive to one woman can be totally attractive to another woman. It's why women are much more likely to say "I just don't know what she sees in him" than men are to say the same about each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 03:50 AM
2

I've literally never dated a dude with felonies and you sound skeezy if you think that's normal. So because I've noticed that many women are attracted to bad boys, that somehow makes me "skeezy". Right.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/14 03:39 AM
5

Yes, even though that "kind badass" you're attracted to has a list of felonies as long as his arm and has been in and out of prison repeatedly but "he's really a great guy deep down", right? You apparently have no idea how stereotypical your post sounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 07:28 PM
1

Were we talking about family? Does that make a difference if every interaction is "sexually based"? Even if we aren't talking about blood relation, what about your best friend's wife, or your boss's wife? Would you fuck her? I can understand that you may not be able to relate if you are mentally wired in such a way that you are incapable of having platonic relationships with women, but believe it or not some guys are able to have women as friends and associates without having an overwhelming urg…
/r/askTRP14/04/14 10:52 PM
1

Because there is no such thing as a platonic friendship between a man and a woman So you'd have sex with your sister or cousin, since there's "no such thing as a platonic relationship between a man and a woman"? Sorry, as a guy who has a couple female friends whom I have no interest in banging, this just doesn't register for me.
/r/askTRP14/04/14 07:54 PM
1

Can you see how guys would find your sister, cousin, etc. to be hot yet how you wouldn't want to bang her? Is that fishy as well?
/r/askTRP14/04/14 07:51 PM
4

Here's the deal, OP. You come off like a smug jackass who thinks you're better than everyone else. If you are six-figure rich like you say, you can pick up a gold-digging whore who will love you for every cent you are worth. They'll stick around for a little while... However... you aren't multi-millionaire rich. You're just a six-figure little nobody. That won't even get a girl in to the Upper East Side of Manhattan, for crying out loud. And your physique? Are you kidding me? If you expect a gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/14 06:14 AM
4

Those women eventually realize they can't fake the lust/physical attraction aspect anymore... and the relationship either dissolves or it it becomes a terrible lifelong marriage. I've noticed that the issue with that (according to TRP at any rate) is that women typically only 'lust' after the top 10 percent of men(i.e. the 'alpha men'). Very few of these men are really after relationships - they have their pick of women so they can go through a new woman every few days. Eventually they get older…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/14 08:15 PM
2

What if the genders are reversed? It's my experience that BP'ers and feminists loved the whole "Ashton and Demi" relationship as an example of how it's okay to be a "cougar", and the premier of every single Twilight movie had loads of 30-40+ year old women in the audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/14 02:39 AM
1

I disagree. If you'll notice, women simply do not choose the same occupations as men on average. Right now, there are more women in college than ever before, even outnumbering men. However, you still don't see many women at all choosing STEM majors. Any sort of "glass ceiling" or "gender discrimination" argument can be thrown out due to the fact that colleges are more or less progressive, left-wing environments which have no tolerance for such things. If women chose the same jobs as men, we'd se…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 04:21 PM
3

This is a common flaw in the "white privilege" argument. People constantly point out that CEOs, Western world leaders, and "The One Percent" are mostly white males. The common denominator between them isn't race or gender, insomuch as class. There are many, many white males who are in the lower or middle class who's lives bear absolutely no resemblance to someone with "privilege". To take such a very small group of the most powerful people in the world and hold them up and say "See these people?…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/14 04:46 PM
5

"No" can also sometimes mean "not yet" or "not right now" if she's interested in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/14 05:55 PM
1

This is a rather childish view. Kinda like saying "I believe most feminists would have all men relegated to slaves if they knew they could get away with it".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 03:31 PM
3

Yeah, I can tell. I read about 1/3 of this before I started skimming to find the relevant points and then realized this is one giant text-wall tangent of gobbledygook. The topic is interesting but your presentation is horrible. Revise this shit and stick to what's relevant, bro, no one wants to read a novel's worth of sidebar BS which has little to do with the topic you've presented.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 08:29 AM
3

As far as I can tell, "holding frame" basically seems like simply remaining confident in the face of any situation which pops up. And women always say confidence is a turn on...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 12:38 AM
6

So, the red pillers finally found their unicorn...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/14 12:36 AM
1

A NEW CHALLENGER APPEARS!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/14 10:04 PM
3

Seriously? Because it's not possible to examine every single person on the planet you think that all research is useless? 67% of statistics are inaccurate or misleading 89% of the time depending on the phrasing of the question and how the data is gathered. Lol yeah I lose because you don't believe in science. That makes a lot of sense. So because you don't understand how statistics work, somehow I "don't believe in science"? Hahahaha! Oh... you're cute! But you are WRONG again! Sorry!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/14 11:24 AM
3

So they went to your house and asked you how you and your significant other divide household work? Because they never went to my house and asked, I can assure you that. They're taking a small sample of people from specific demographics... basically they're making a guess. The only way to quantify it would be to go to every single person's house and measure the difference in work. Get back to me when you are aware of how statistics work and how inaccurate they can be. Sorry! You lose again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/14 02:30 AM
5

As for the division of labor among household chores, that's nearly impossible to quantify due to the diversity of households out there. The only example you may have had is the stay-at-home mom, and if you haven't noticed, it is not the 1950s anymore and that is a dying breed. Even in many modern examples of stay-at-home moms, they also may be in charge of the household finances... so while the man is technically "paid more", of what value is that when the money goes straight to the woman? Try a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/14 01:19 AM
12

Women work more than men. They just don't get paid for as much of their work as men do. That is BS. The "wage gap" does not exist; the fact of the matter is that women choose lower paying yet safer, more flexible, and more comfortable jobs. Women are graduating college at a higher rate than men are currently. Yet, how many women choose majors in the hard sciences or STEM fields? Very few. And there is no "patriarchy" going on within college campuses that is keeping women from majoring in these f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/14 11:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter