TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PeruvianRug Archive

View 3 posts and 240 comments by PeruvianRug on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

If the guys in here just knew how the companies exploiting "men's issues" actually regarded them ... well, they probably wouldn't want to buy their shit either. These companies align their messaging with their market, not with any higher ideals or values. They're whores.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:16 PM
-17

Coming from the guy who talks of little girls with dicks on their shoulder. But we both know that we were trying to make points, not delve into fucked up fantasy. And you went ahead and played the victim, trying to turn everything around on me for having 'personal issues'. Just like a lot of women would, hilariously enough. That's such a common bitch tactic.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:06 PM
-24

Bare titty next to a face is the same as a dick on the shoulder where you're from? What, did your parents try some gender role reversal and daddy give you a good dick feeding?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 01:33 PM
1

Which will get spun into an argument for greater government intervention through laws and subsidies supporting women in the workplace. They truly do want it all. They want all the perks of motherhood and fatherhood. Primary attachment to the kids while maintaining a strong career track. Oh, and they want a top flight man who's willing to somehow support that while keeping his balls firmly attached.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:18 PM
-10

Probably not. Hot men get a pretty big pass as well.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:15 PM
188

They abandoned one market to grab a larger stake in what's probably a more lucrative market. Women already spend more on consumer goods, both in volume and in price (the 'pink tax'), and I'd be surprised if they didn't have stats on how many razors a fatty goes through per month. This beached whale has a lot more surface area to cover than a man's face & neck.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:14 PM
-12

No. Deep down many see men as superior. Those who see other men as inferior are projecting their own inadequacies. It's an inescapable reality for anyone who's been engaged with this world for long enough. While there are many competent, intelligent and innovative women out there, there will always be men who outclass them. She may be on the far end of the bell curve for women, and well beyond many men, but there are always at least some men who are even better. Women have evolved to be Grade A …
/r/MensRights08/04/19 11:54 AM
2

If you’re a woman and want to be on an equal footing with men, it’s best to live and work in Belgium, Denmark, France, Latvia, Luxembourg or Sweden. These countries are in another Top 10: Divorce rates 3 times as many women than men in France are on anti-depressants and mood-treating drugs. You'll find similar stats for these other 'equal' countries. Luxembourg and Latvia are basically city-states (<2M population) Women's happiness levels - both absolute and relative - across Western countries h…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:40 PM
8

That's fantastic! They're already seeing the next generation of young women spurn them and nothing will add more distance than the wonderful news that they've lost yet another privilege. There's no shortage of women out there wondering "where are all the men?" or "why is my career so unfulfilling" and "will I ever even have kids?!?". The strongest backlash against feminism won't come from men. It will come from the legions of women realizing they've gotten a bum deal that men can't fix for them.…
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:32 PM
-1

Gilette probably took notes and found that men who shave were far more likely to be within the demographic that found their message appealing. In their notes is also the understanding that these kinds of 'scandals' blow over after about a year. They, and all these other companies, are milking their customer base by branding themselves as ideological allies. Meanwhile, their board of directors, management and employees couldn't give 2 shits about one set of ideals or the other. They make consumer…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:48 PM
2

It got to the front page with over 100k+ upvotes. The tide is turning and their old tricks aren't working anymore. You can only shame, ridicule, brigade, ostracize and denounce so many people before you essentially create your own organized opposition.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 12:36 PM
2

When social progressives decided to go Rambo on white men, like me, was when I decided to cease all support for their social movement. How the fuck can you expect me to give buy-in to your notion of "equality" when blatant racism and sexism against me are not only tolerated, but printed in major publications to much fanfare?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:27 PM
5

If you can't beat 'em, emasculate the younger ones and kill 'em with time.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:15 PM
1

Yes. But it's not sex they're after. It's a loving partner with whom to conceive offspring and help in their rearing. And lots and lots of women aren't getting that. What we're experiencing right now is the collective hissy fits of men and women who are deprived of their most basic natural urges. That is the basis of these turbulent times. Men say "I never wanted to be with a woman anyhow!" while the women scream "Fuck men! They're not worth an ounce of my time!" And then they both go on to dedi…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:13 PM
3

Desperate times call for desperate measures. When I was working in northern Alberta during its boom years there were huge workforce shortages in the lumber industry. Oil & gas would show up, offer all the truck drivers three times what they made hauling wood, and before long the mills would be close to shutting down because all timber was rotting on the cut blocks. These Aussies are trying a strategy to get a viable workforce during a major labor crunch. They're probably just making the usual fe…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 12:09 PM
2

Women venting buried frustration at having married a simp to get the children and social validation they crave. Or more likely, unwed and childless women complaining about something they think is unfair about the situation they secretly wish they were in. It's like dudes who go far out of their way to bash on gay men. We know that type is a deeply closeted homo. In this case, it's women trying to find flaws in pair-bonding so as to excuse their inability to get that themselves. Healthy partnersh…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:53 AM
2

There are enough situations in my life where men have leverage over me — at work, in legislating what I can do with my reproductive organs, in any instance where size and physical intimidation matter — and if I can get a leg up in the confidence department, I’ll take it. Much like the article OP is referencing, the one you linked has its rationale proudly displayed for all to see: sour grapes They put men down any chance they get because they feel that men have put them down. This goes both ways…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:43 AM
7

Was she satirizing an article from an earlier time period? Like some Jim Crow era bit on following black men around to monitor their behavior. The racism and sexism in her piece are so blatant you don't even need to do the 'if the races/genders were reversed' test to feel the sting.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:28 AM
3

We pay the better looking ones a lot of money to do it. As she saw it, however, “the relevant question is not ‘Why use your naked body?’ but ‘Why not use your naked body?’ Reversing the question in this way helps to reveal people’s inner thoughts or presumptions about women’s bodies: that when a woman shows her body it devalues her worth or decreases the respect people have for her.” Yes, because it's needlessly distracting regardless of the person doing it. It's seen as a cheap stunt to help dr…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 05:48 PM
1

Can also be used to indicate "chance a man finds you even remotely attractive". Very popular for Vice's female readership.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 05:36 PM
5

The other headlines don't cause national outrage either. That's largely manufactured by stitching together social media statements, cherry-picking statistics and repeating mantra/slogans. We get the impression that a lot of people are riled up by such-and-such an event, but most people just don't give a shit and if they do, it's far less than we'd ever be led to believe. The recent culling of 'news' site opinion writers might help restore some sanity to public discourse. People are getting tired…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 05:22 PM
3

There's a reason many private schools segregate the sexes. This is where the elite send their children. The wealthiest, most knowledgeable and best connected members of our society know that when it comes to the formal education of children, segregation is a fruitful policy. What's most toxic to our society is the notion that all people are equal. They are not. We're not talking about rights here, but aptitude, capability, personality and so on. Boys and girls exhibit markedly different behavior…
/r/MensRights08/02/19 12:10 PM
5

It'll all come out in the wash. Minority and 'marginalized' groups who've turned to open racism and sexism are inviting their own downfall. Egalitarianism worked when it applied to all groups, regardless of which had more power. Now that the 'little guy' feels empowered enough to start taking swings at the big guy it's only a matter of time before big boy hits back. With feminists now taking aim at the top brass, the men who used to pay little mind to the movement and even championed it (hurray …
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:09 PM
2

All of these super agreeable, nice, wonderful feminist men should start their own companies and lead by example. They can hire other nice men and women and strive together in a nice work environment creating nice things or offering nice services. After all, if these traits are conducive to success and the way businesses are going about it is backwards, then a business model centered around 'niceness' should rocket past the Neanderthals in suits. I would be very much interested in reading cast st…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:44 PM
-7

It wouldn't to any man at that level of competition. If an older woman (and their coach) walking around their changing room is enough to phase them then they've got no chance in professional sport to begin with and wouldn't even be there. Coaches can be ferocious, relentless, domineering assholes. Fans, and the other teams' fans, can be way worse. The people they're playing with are all gunning to be at the top and so are the people they're up against. I'm pretty sure they've developed the menta…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:50 PM
1

The only thing more stupid than that statement is giving it a second of thought or energy.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:17 PM
1

The burden of proof is paperwork? Which states?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:12 PM
2

They want more power. We don't want them to have a lot of that power. We want to have some of the power they've gotten to be rescinded (e.g. overhaul marital laws). Clashes ensue.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:05 PM
1

My point was that the while, yes, going onto a lifelong regimen of powerful hormones & blockers may bring about some benefits, the downsides are so ridiculously obvious that very, very few men would ever conceive of the idea, let alone consider it. Something men have done in times of uncertainty, oppression, insecurity (the actual kind) and so on is fight for their rights and ideals. Even if that means death. the truth is 95% of men don't care about other men They don't care as much about weak m…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:48 PM
1

Becoming "trans" is one of the best defenses men have against system-wide discrimination. Going to prison is one of the best defenses men have against system-wide discrimination. They get to exit broader society, join a diverse fraternity, have all their housing and meals paid for and learn valuable skills.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:32 PM
1

So are money, laws and rights.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:10 PM
3

Being an object is kind of the norm for a lot men (and working women). Not sex objects, but functional objects who perform tasks for pay. When a guy shows up to a job site or wherever he works his foremost value is in the function he serves. How competent is he? How expedient? How communicative? etc. If he malfunctions efforts are made to repair him, but if it's too big an issue he may very well be discarded. This is our reality. How nice it would be to also be a sex object who can leverage that…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:09 PM
218

The only offensive thing about that ad is the design. As per the twitter comment, I love how a handful of women still try to take back 'slut'. They can't. It's about as much of an achievement as a dude buying sex. There's no pride in that. No achievement. Everyone recognizes this. The shaming comes, by and large, from other women who know damned well that the more easily (the) men (they're attracted to) can come by sex, the less likely they are to commit to a relationship. They're like the OPEC …
/r/MensRights04/02/19 01:00 PM
1

Where did I say all feminists are social outcasts? I said that feminism attracts them, just as I said gaming attracts male social outcasts. That doesn't mean all gamers are social outcasts. As many guys who are members of this “elite” you speak of will tell you, cheap sex gets old quick, and by their 20s most are seeking actual (monogamous) relationships. And as a guy who's actually part of that elite I can tell you for myself and a lot of peers, cheap sex doesn't get old when it's plentiful and…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:29 PM
1

Women's online communities are unbelievably toxic, and they constantly reinforce negative stereotypes about men. Yet nobody bats an eye at them. Makes sense they exist. There's an rapidly growing segment of the male population which has retreated from social life either due to very real rejection, the perceived threat of it, or a host of other issues they're facing in modern society. They don't have the tools or guidance to push through. This means there has to be a corresponding female populati…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 01:13 AM
3

I wonder how much they're playing on the idea that a lot of free bad publicity is better than no publicity. I've heard the word "Gilette" more times in the past 10 days than I have in the past 10 years. The fiasco will blow over quickly, as these things always do, and in the meantime P&G will have put their brand name into tens of millions of ears for nothing more than the commercial production costs. They're cashing in on a moral panic. That's what I hate about this. They don't give a flying fu…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:52 AM
7

Yes, the women's washroom discriminates against men.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:46 AM
3

Does this include trades or other technical jobs that require specialty training offered only in part by tertiary education (i.e. university and college)?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:17 PM
16

That's just proof of hypersensitivity and victimhood culture. Functional adults make male/female jokes all the time without collapsing into hysterics. The 'backlash' always comes from hypocritical zealots who use defense of their ideology as the basis for cry bullying. They don't actually care about higher ideals, they're just looking for an angle to attack and vent their anger. Today's progressives are eerily similar to Christian fundamentalists. "Be more compassionate you fucking asshole."
/r/MensRights04/01/19 07:51 PM
4

This is also jealousy behavior. Older women are vicious in this regard because they know deep down inside that men are far more sexually attracted to younger women. They pretend it's their virtue that's talking. "Oh, I'm only doing it to look out for younger women" when the reality is they're driven by a primal fear - being swept aside for a newer version. Men don't give two shits about older women hitting on younger men because a) significant others' aside, older women are invisible to us and b…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:36 PM
2

Is she a regular survivor or a cyber survivor?
/r/MensRights02/01/19 12:11 PM
1

Looks reasonable to me.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:36 PM
1

We're fine with empathy, but since we're not as neurotic we can't relate to a lot of women. In order to empathize we need to be able to put ourselves in their position. Fine. But what we can't do is transfer ourselves into that level of emotional fragility. That's all there is to it. The goal posts have shifted from "women are hysterical" to "men are toxic".
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:34 PM
23

I'm also a single mom in my 30s. It's like a car dealer at some nondescript lot on the wrong side of the tracks complaining that he never gets any wealthy, classy customers. These women just don't get it. They think they're still offering what they had in their early 20's. Some even naively believe their 'career' is an enhancer. I didn't read the article and just scanned down until I found her self-description, or at least the most relevant part. Once you see how little they have to offer and ho…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:16 PM
3

I had only one male elementary school teacher. He was great. Every weekend he'd take a couple of students on an excursion - canoe trip, forest hike, etc. - and would base his selection on 'merit'. Class was fun and engaging. We even had student elections. The female teachers I had were wonderful, too. In today's climate he'd be burned at the stake for even conceiving of the idea of taking kids on trips, but back then it was a fantastic way to hang out with a man who wasn't family but still treat…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:07 PM
8

It's always been about power. Women's socio-economic and political power. What do people think is being brought to 'equal'? Love and gingersnaps?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:58 PM
3

The further down the path we go of social anarchy, the more clearly I understand why every single successful society actively promoted marriage and family. We tend to think that's just the way things end up naturally, when in reality it's survivorship bias at play. All the societies that behaved the way ours is beginning to were wiped out by the far more stable ones that pinned immense importance on long-term partnership - not for looooove, but out of economic & social necessity. Right now we're…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 02:36 PM
2

Wood burned in a stone designed & built by men. In a home designed, constructed and maintained by men. Made from materials extracted, processed and transported by men. Distributed, accounted for and protected by economic, financial and legal systems devised, implemented and maintained by men. On infrastructure engineered, built by and serviced by men. In countries with freedoms and rights that were thought by and fought for by men. These little stories are nice and it's heartwarming to see peopl…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 02:31 PM
1

He'll never please her since deep down inside she feels a resentment towards her weak spouse. There's no rationale behind what she does and doesn't find upsetting. What matters is the primal disappointment/anger/fear at her partner's impotence. He's weak and her monkey brain recognizes that. She's reminded of it every time they see each other, every time she thinks of him. And so she lashes out as she does. He can't win. The nicer he acts, the more bitter she becomes. He's following the feminist…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 02:23 PM
12

A lot of men are open, it's just we're not neurotic or hypersensitive either so you don't see us making grand displays of our feelings or getting our feathers ruffled by what we consider to be minor nuisances. We also tend to work many jobs where emotional openness runs counter to job performance. In some case, it's either stow that shit or risk the lives and limbs of others. Men don't have a monthly hormonal cycle. That kind of experience likely requires a person to be more 'in tune' with their…
/r/MensRights25/12/18 02:13 PM
9

Write letters complaining that the sign is pink and the woman represented is wearing a skirt/dress. Throw in the usual buzzwords. Then, once the sign is changed, complain about how that one is somehow not entirely inclusive.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 01:58 PM
4

But the people who set this up is the same who still don't understand why Trump won, so not really surprising they don't understand how it can backfire. When a populist far right-winger wins during times of unprecedented peace and prosperity the only other factor that could have contributed so greatly to his success is massive social unrest. And that's what it's all about. Our social systems are a complete mess - in part to various social movements, but in larger part due to technological advanc…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:17 PM
1

There were some academics who went about writing a few 'research' papers comprised of mostly gibberish. They submitted these to Gender Studies journals and their ilk for consideration. Several of them passed peer review and were published, later to be retracted when the authors wrote an actual research paper showing how easy it was to get bullshit published in peer reviewed social studies journals. This article reminds me of their work.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:47 PM
1

Women should've been drafted in WW2 and Vietnam or they never should've been able to vote, men paid in blood so that these lazy pieces of garbage could sit around and scream about the patriarchy while cowering like pathetic children. No no no and for fucks sake no. Know how many women magically get pregnant before a deployment? Or how poorly all-female units and mixed units perform compared to male-only units? Or how much damage they could do to morale as draftees? I don't want women in places t…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 12:36 PM
33

Agreed. I'd say it's also why we're seeing a 'sexodus', with large numbers of young men checking out of adult life to spend their time in the digital world playing games. They don't believe they even have a chance with women thus don't bother with pursuing a career and self-betterment. What's the point when they're convinced they won't get a mate? For a guy in his late teens and early twenties, getting women is a centerpiece focus. Meanwhile, women chase careers well into their 30's before the h…
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:29 PM
19

There's something delightful in watching radical LGBT proponents and feminists clash over unbridled inclusiveness.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:17 PM
89

The highest paying nursing specializations are already male dominated, despite the entire nursing field being heavily (80%+) female. Women just don't have the same competitive pressures men do. Our primal demands haven't changed. Women, regardless of how financially secure they become, still want the higher status man. Men still want the prettiest, sweetest woman. She doesn't have to do anything career-related to be what men want, while he needs to chase the higher earning jobs to gain the statu…
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:08 PM
5

The intelligent, ambitious and productive women got what they wanted out of the movement. They moved on. What's left are political aspirants looking to gain power and prestige by egging the rabble on. Believing in equal rights and opportunity for all people doesn't makes someone a feminist in the modern world. It makes them a part of the status quo. Today's feminists like to hide behind that definition to throw tired accusations of misogyny and sexism to anyone who dare question their 'movement'…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:38 PM
9

Gingerbread person? What a disgusting promotion of cannibalism. Is this what we want to be teaching our children? That eating a person, regardless of how delicious they may be, is acceptable behavior?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:54 PM
1

Part of the devolution of male-centered subs as Reddit clamps down on the fringes. When they get lopped off the margins don't move away, they move inward. Ultimately we end up with what you see here: a circle jerk over a random comment on the Internet hitting top of the sub. It's pathetic. I saw this happen in MGTOW and now it's happening here. These kinds of posts are especially grating because so many of the guys commenting have probably never actually worked one of these dangerous jobs and fe…
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:39 PM
2

Young men who go work in booming resource sectors can end up earning six figures before they hit 20. They come into a lot of wealth very quickly and most don't have the upbringing or support to help them manage it properly. They blow all their money on drugs, toys and women. By the time they hit their 30s they have nothing to show for it. The better prepared ones invest and buy property. They liver within their means and put the remainder of their earnings into savings. While they work their way…
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:28 PM
2

Please! It's like putting plastic spinning rims on a Ferrari. Just let the damned Ferrari speak for itself.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:08 PM
1

In addition to this, you may choose to be whatever GENDER you want to be, Apache attack helicopter to a trans-fluid walrus if you so desire. Then I get to choose, with full impunity, whether or not to accept that self-identification and default to relying upon the person's sex to ID their gender. Additionally, if gender is to be so liberally used, then new terms must be developed to describe 'male' and 'female' counterparts as not to confuse them with their sexual describers. Boy, man, male, gir…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:43 PM
2

when the stories they tell feel inconvenient or surprising Ok when they tell stories about people you love or trust Uh huh when they tell stories about people whose politics or philosophies align with yours Go on. I'm following regardless of their experience with addiction, criminal conviction, or sexual behavior ROFL
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:30 PM
1

At least you'd get a great opportunity to throw in a 'just the tip' joke before starting your 20 year term.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:27 PM
2

Genuine question: What happens to female sex offenders in prison? How are they received by the general inmate populace? Is it similar to male prisons or do they get a 'pass'?
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:15 PM
2

Women often kill against a backdrop of victimisation and hopelessness – not because they are angry or revengeful" Hmmm. How would I feel if someone victimized me and had thrown me into a pit of despair? Angry, perhaps? Maybe I'd seek revenge against such a person? No, no. It would be a compassionate murder.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:13 PM
9

It's actually incredibly common. I'm pretty sure almost all of my drinks were spiked. After a few hours I'd find myself less inhibited, dizzy, drowsy and slurring my speech. This is a widespread problem that deserves every bit of attention it's getting. People are putting stuff in our drinks that inebriate us and leave us victim to impaired judgement. Tragic.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:05 PM
1

We've got our 'divide by 2 and add 7' rule. Drives older women nuts. Just like shorter, 'smaller' men feel incensed by 666, as do older women become enraged by a rule that excludes them for a feature they have no control over. And the /2+7 rule allows for a much wider demographic. Men who follow that don't limit themselves by much. 666? That's probably not even 1-3% of men, and an even smaller proportion of the available ones. In the end they're more like jokes that hinge on exaggeration to outl…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 12:02 PM
1

Either that or a technological proxy that's almost as good as the real thing. VR with sensory stimulation is becoming less sci-fi and more reality with each passing year.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:24 AM
73

In a weird and twisted way, a woman who agrees to film a consent video gives a potential assailant a potent tool of coercion. "You did the video, now do whatever the fuck I want" The whole modern consent model feels like it was concocted by people who've never even had sex, let alone flirted.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:21 AM
10

Male core biological craving is to have sex. This kicks into high gear during adolescence and early 20s then starts to taper off going into their 30s onward. Female core biological craving is birthing and care for infant offspring. This kicks into high gear in their 30s and only falls off at menopause. Failure for either gender to sate their craving leads to compensatory behavior that can include, but is not limited to: surrogates, hostility towards their deepest desire, depression, anxiety and …
/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:15 AM
15

I've worked across the breadth of management - business, operations, project, logistics, etc. I play a lot of economy, simulation and management style video games in my downtime. These have, without a doubt, augmented my career in ways I never imagined they would. It's not as if I could do what I do now with just video game experience, just that the logic behind them so neatly mirrors those behind real world decision-making. It's like how dribbling a soccer ball alone won't make me a soccer star…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:54 PM
1

'As men lose status and social status over women they are driven to assert their masculinity physically, to strive to look like real men even if they don't always feel like them' You, and every single woman, should feel overjoyed that this is the direction men are taking. An alternative would be for them to focus instead on actually feeling and behaving like dominant men, which often means putting into subservience those weaker than they are. For the rest of the video she acts as if social hiera…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:10 PM
1

The bigger double standard is that he couldn't belt her across the face or respond with aggression of his own kind. The limitations men set between themselves for how far 'horseplay' can go is set by a measured understanding that if someone takes it too far, especially by laying hands, things can escalate to a violent conclusion. It's just how we regulate our own behavior, and while it may seem brutish to some, it's a lot simpler and more effective than tying up thousands of manhours for a legal…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 01:50 PM
1

Good opportunity to rename the product to CNT
/r/MensRights26/11/18 09:03 PM
2

They are also the reproductive bottleneck. Lose 100 men to battle, so what. Lose 100 women and your population takes a huge hit. We talk a lot about overpopulation today and how we need to slow down. It was only a few generations ago that countries gave out medals and awards to families who could pop out the most babies. Population meant manpower, which meant factory workers and soldiers for the state. Manpower was state power. That's still the case today, just not to the same extent it once was…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:26 PM
93

That would make it easier for the qualified men to get in. "So you wrote down that you're non-binary, correct?" "Yes" "And can you prove that" "Yes, of course. I, so-and-so, identify as non-binary." "Congratulations and welcome to our shitty college!"
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:23 PM
1

Who is this person?
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:20 PM
4

I hate how women pressure me into feeling sexually attracted to them by looking the way they do.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:39 PM
6

I was pressured into eating that Big Mac because it smelled so good. That's why I'm fat.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:38 PM
8

Yes. Just like there's an age pay gap. Older people tend to earn more than younger people. Clearly, that must be because older people are unfairly paid more for the same value of labor.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:49 AM
3

Women have already borne the brunt of austerity, with 86% of cuts since 2010 having fallen on our shoulders, according to figures published by the House of Commons. How much government spending was allocated to women?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:34 AM
3

It's bound to happen. If you get a large enough group of men assembled around a central ideology at least some of them will advocate violence as a viable tactic to have their ideals realized.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:25 AM
1

Unfortunately, that'll just make things worse for him.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:18 AM
7

Fair point. We don't. But don't write an article as a 37 year old woman complaining about the difficulties of pregnancy when you waited as long as you did to conceive. It's like a 37 year old man lamenting about the difficulties of finding employment after spending the past 20 years playing video games in his parent's basement. Yeah, no shit. Maybe you should've gotten to it sooner?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:06 AM
3

Feminist false sense of security vs realities of male destructive potential
/r/MensRights24/11/18 10:48 PM
1

We've been winning more than we lose. Equality demands that our win/loss ratio hit 50:50.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 06:51 PM
12

Male self-help books can be summarized as such: Take responsibility for yourself and your actions. You get out of life what you put into it. Nothing in this life is free and you have to fight for what you get. Never give up. Female self-help books: You're wonderful and amazing no matter who you are. You get out of life what you can extract from men. Anything in this life that you don't have is the fault of men. Never stop whining.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 06:49 PM
3

That's a lot closer to 50/50 than I've ever seen it. Looks like we're quickly approaching equality on this front, guys!
/r/MensRights24/11/18 06:20 PM
6

it is not inconsistent with the principle of non-discrimination that limited discriminatory measures should be adopted to correct historic discrimination Actually, it is inconsistent to to uphold a principle by directly contradicting it. How do you remove inequality without even knowing where the equilibrium lies? By forcing the line they're only going to increase the rate of adoption for populism and authoritarianism. That seems like a long stretch, but it's the crux of how these regimes come i…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 06:16 PM
2

Pretty common to have multiple accounts on Reddit. You have your "Everything is rosey, I'm so positive and thoughtful" account to avoid the shadow bans. Then you have your "This is reflective of my actual thoughts and opinions" account to share your genuine & controversial views. It would be nice to have just one account, but when your words can be deleted and your presence banned then you just gotta make do with what you've got. I've had views that I thought were entirely innocuous, polite and …
/r/MensRights24/11/18 02:43 PM
154

Only 3 upvotes in 10 hours. What were the top comments saying? What did the OP say? Were there replies countering this one that got much higher upvotes? At least link the whole post to give us the broader context. I'm no fan of 2x, but anyone could come in here and cherry pick low-upvote, poorly thought out posts and project them as 'proof' of MRA depravity. One person advocating nonsense in a community is not a reflection of the broader community's sentiments.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 02:33 PM
1

Create a female-only combat unit. Send them in at a ratio of one female unit to every nine male units. You'll get to 50/50 casualties pretty quick. You'll also need a lot of reserve female units.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 12:27 PM
10

It's more because men don't have the structure and meaning in life to guide them through the rough spots. When you have those things it's not really something anyone can shame you for - or at least not effectively. There are thousands of groups throughout the world and history who have been persecuted and shamed to the most vicious extent imaginable and still held strong. The 'shaming' is nothing. If someone feels external shaming to be disruptive, it's just a symptom of not having the proper fo…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:07 PM
15

I think it's deeper than that. They want female validation. The sex is a nice addition, though it's doubtful he gets much of that. Women don't find kowtowing all that arousing. He should know that, being a therapist. These are the kinds of men we'd say have "mommy issues".
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:01 PM
2

Frankly, if you think I'm part of the problem then you just try and change me. It's funny how it shows her using violence to take control of the situation and get her point across. Maybe one day men will do the same. I hear we have a bit more experience in that arena.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 04:53 PM
8

Amen. I'm a left-of-center liberal in a liberal country. I support strong public institutions & infrastructure, meritocratic ideals and the strength of diversity as it applies to thought/ideas/expertise. And I despise progressivism. To me it's cut from the same cloth as far right Christian Evangelism; moral grandstanding on a pile of stinking hypocrisy. It's the "be more compassionate you fucking asshole" or "intolerance towards opinions I disagree with isn't bigotry" kind of bullshit that I can…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 12:05 PM
7

We wouldn't be where we are now if men like those in menslibs didn't exist in significant numbers. I can fully believe that all the posters there who claim to be male are indeed male.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:56 AM
2

As someone who's attempted it and dealt with the thoughts for a long time (not for the last several years) I fucking hate how suicide his presented as the core issue. It. Is. Not. Suicide is the terminus of a disease in the same way organ failure is the terminus of cancer. We don't go around looking for a cure for organ failure and we sure as hell shouldn't be focusing so much effort on suicide itself. No healthy person wakes up one day then later on decides to kill themselves. The seeds for tha…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 10:02 PM
1

Jenny Hoople is a work-at-home mom raising a sweet little boy who is currently 4 years old. Her business is Authentic Arts for which she creates handmade men’s beaded jewelry and ceramic sculptures. Jenny is passionate about helping people realize more authentic life experiences. k
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:48 PM
11

More and more young men are being raised by single mothers in an environment that stifles their masculinity and sows confusion that can take decades to untangle, if they ever get it untangled. Their social growth is stunted. Fewer and fewer young men are finding a regular sexual partner. Regardless of how much that has to do with their own flaws, those failings themselves are largely a result of an incomplete upbringing. Boys aren't born failures. Fewer and fewer men are having children. This, o…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:40 PM
1

Mandatory service (aka conscription) for a couple of years once they hit a certain age. Other countries with hostile neighbors have similar policies. Israel is one example. Israel has universal conscription. Something like 2/3 of Israeli women have served in its armed forces.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 07:16 PM
18

Cheeky way of giving women the door out. For those who didn't read the article, the double time refers to enlistment time for combat soldiers. Face it, few men want to serve in combat roles alongside women, especially when those women got into their roles through gimped standards. The sooner they can leave, the better. The argument isn't that all men are better suited for combat than all women. It's that, proportionally, the number of suitable men so far outnumbers those of women that it's not e…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 06:31 PM
1

CNN targets women and progressives. That's their audience. News organizations are now all about infotainment. Their stories are less about unbiased fact conveyance and more about crafting stories that massage the sensibilities of their target audience. We don't want to have their thinking challenged, even lightly, but rather would prefer to have our beliefs vindicated. All people are like that, it's how we're wired. That doesn't mean we don't step out of our comfort zone to do that challenging w…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 12:42 PM
1

Is QQ a word?
/r/MensRights18/11/18 12:30 PM
25

It's perfectly normal and acceptable in some work cultures to do that. I can't imagine that ever happening on say, a construction site, but in other jobs where carrying a good appearance matters it would practically be a compliment on their job performance.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 12:26 PM
23

Value/wealth are not zero sum. Power is. Overhauling marriage/divorce laws to balance them will disempower women. They will have less power in the divorce court. Men will have more. This is intended to achieve fairness, not dominance. In other words, it's intended to knock down women's dominance in that arena. Regardless, power shifts. It has to. Conversely, shifting the status quo to allow for a woman's accusation to be sufficient to destroy a man greatly empowers women while disempowering men.…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 12:19 PM
3

Cowan-Wilson was a teacher with the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board in 2016 when she was charged for the encounters with the boy She bought him alcohol, sent him photos of her in lingerie and told him she was unhappy in her marriage and that she loved him. She is still married and is the mother of a six-month-old daughter. Shit, I'd better lock this cuck down and get a bun in the oven.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:22 PM
6

It'll sell. Something to read while finishing a second bottle of wine and stroking a cat.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:11 PM
177

He actually said that he wouldn't run for office because he's such a swell guy and wouldn't want to take the spot of a woman. That's his line of reasoning. He won't stand up for what he believes in to allow someone who believes in anything else to stand in for him. All this so long as she has a vagina (or claims to desperately want one).
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:04 PM
6

From the earliest age, girls need to be taught that every male is a potential predator. Yes, Hugh, let's teach young girls to fear and distrust all men. Brilliant. Men, try to understand that your advances are NOT FUCKING WANTED Ooooh, he swore and used upper case wording. HOW THREATENING! Do not trust those in power. You're in a position of power, Hugh. You're an influential person. You've gathered an audience around your sci-fi writings. Should I distrust you? How is your power any less threat…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 12:49 PM
13

But I was told women didn't abuse power! That was something only men did! The only solution to this is more feminism.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 12:00 AM
11

Both kinds of sexist. Sexist against men. Benevolent sexism towards women (which is often also sexist towards men, as in this case). It could also be sexist in the assumption that you, as a man, will be sexist in your selection. Overall it's just a stupid thing for him to say, but who knows what kind of ass covering he has to deal with in his world. I have family and friends in academia - the politics of universities are fucked up, as I'm sure you're discovering.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:52 PM
6

Feminists and loud progressives groan about the increases in misogyny and racism but aren't able to draw the line between those observations and their absurd policies. It's like champagne socialists who advocate for open borders because they know poor, unskilled foreigners aren't going to be moving into their gated community. Being unwavering in your acceptance and 'compassion' became such a cornerstone of social status that even a lot of the elites who knew better had to agree grudgingly with t…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:18 PM
6

Painful to read, but helpful for the uninitiated to take a look at what major, international publications are putting out there. It's an opinion piece, but more and more of them have this perspective with hardly any ever offering a counterpoint. The narrative has been gradually shifting and women are feeling more empowered in lashing out angrily towards not just terrible men, not just the average man, but to the men they purport to love. And what are we to do? Take it? Oh no, we have to do more.…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:29 PM
52

Same. I came to resent it not from the MRM or anything within the 'manosphere' but from reading feminist material in The Guardian, the NYTimes, HuffPo and WaPo. The disingenuous arguments behind the 'wage' gap are revolting. The moral hazard of #BelieveWomen and #metoo is extremely dangerous. Sexism has been normalized. It's perfectly fine, even expected, for a female politician to extol virtue through her womanhood. 'Vote for me, because I'll take care of women and their interests'. Today's fem…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:46 PM
2

Who is she? I went 5 pages into a Google search before giving up.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:27 PM
-1

A day without women is like a kidney deciding to take a break for a while. A day without men is like the heart and lungs stopping.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 02:00 PM
7

Even if the actual figure were only 2%, the moral hazard that accompanies the principle of "believe anything a woman says" would cause that number to shoot through the roof.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:44 PM
1

The best way to generate resentment in a workplace is to treat groups differently. Rather than erasing boundaries and fostering an environment of "we're all in this together" these kinds of policies create distinct advantages for specific parties and further alienate them regardless of their actual merits. It's also a ridiculous way of going around it. I doubt many women are going to suddenly change their career choices because they can pocket a whopping extra $4k over 4 years. If the government…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:40 PM
1

JFC I thought you were joking.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:32 PM
10

Other men have always been the biggest threat to men. We didn't create standing militaries, laws, prisons, police forces and political systems to keep women in check. Probably the biggest reason we have allowed feminism to take hold is because, deep down inside, we don't actually feel all that threatened by women. If push ever comes to shove we have that instinctual understanding that we could knock them right back down again. But when other men pose even a marginal threat to our dominance? We t…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:24 PM
138

Where did you get the 75% figure from?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 01:08 PM
15

Very few men in the modern world can look at the women in their lives and seriously think to themselves "Wow, she's so oppressed!" There was a time not long ago when we could think that, but things have changed and on just about every metric women are on par with men; same rights, same opportunities. That there are predators out there who prey on the vulnerable is nothing new and won't go away no matter how many hashtag movements spring up to denounce their behavior. Wolves are equal opportunity…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 02:16 PM
1

It's the knock on effect of banning the incel subs and those like it. They don't die off, they migrate. Funny enough, feminism is facing the same issue. A lot of the key feminist battles have been won and there's not much left to rail against, but you wouldn't think so based on how vocal they've become. Women have their own versions of incels and they constitute a rapidly growing segment of that movement. We'd be better off merging the saner parts of the MRM and feminism to tackle all of the iss…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 04:30 PM
2

Hatred for what they can't have. They're like incels, except for them it's not about sex but partnership and bearing of offspring. It's what women are biologically wired to crave. Someone to provide and protect and little someones to nurture. Deep down they wanted a white, attractive and resourced man to be their husband and the father to their children. But for a multitude of reasons that didn't pan out and they were left either single, or settled for a man they're not attracted to. And their n…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:59 PM
14

Moral panics, mass hysteria and crocodile tears are nothing new. These types of events cycle and were around when this Simpsons episode was written. They weren't predicting anything; just calling it as it was even back then. What's different now is social media. It's taken everything and turbocharged it.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:41 PM
3

Because we complain with our voices, directly to our bosses. And if that doesn't work, we complain with our feet and either go find another employer or upgrade our skills to increase our value. In times past, when things were really dire we formed into large groups to leverage the power of collective bargaining. And as usual, power corrupts. But that's another story. With over 40% of mothers now being single it's no surprise that an increasing number of women do the only thing they know how to d…
/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:37 PM
1

They'll identify it as a transwall then turn around to keep arguing with you.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:29 AM
20

I'd be fine with this if it were socially acceptable for any of the guys on the field to belt her across the face.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:27 AM
1

Here are the next 3 Bustle stories you'll find as you scroll down past the linked one: "11 Running Playlists For When You're Bored Of All Your Workout Music" "20 New Beauty Products That Came Out In September 2018 We’re Still Swooning Over" "The Best K-Beauty Must-Haves You Can Find At Walmart.com For Under $30"
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:13 AM
12

Since feminism purports to fight for equality one would assume that equal weight should be given to #BelieveMen, in which case we end up back to where we were in a world where accusers must provide credible evidence to support their claims.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 09:37 PM
4

Helps to explain the current state of feminism and its most ardent/militant supporters. Childless women well past their prime angry at the world for denying them their one true biological duty - carrying, birthing and nurturing of their offspring. They're like female incels in the sense that they never got what their most primal instinct is practically screaming at them to chase. Over and over the older crop of feminists told them: "You can have it all!" and "Baby-fever is just a myth made up by…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 09:31 PM
6

There's a rapidly growing number of women who went for the 'career first, family later' strategy and found themselves entering their 40's alone and childless (oh, sorry, child-free). They've become the female version of incels. A woman's drive to birth and nurture is as undeniable as a man's drive to spread his seed. When denied that natural right - be it through their action or not - bitterness and resentment are quick to develop. The elements of feminism that contained compassion and empathy (…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:33 PM
2

It'll have tectonic repercussions. Whether it's sex robots or some kind of VR paired with sensory stimulation, the technological conquest of sex will be rapid and thunderous. 'Biological' sex with a woman will pale in comparison to what'll be on offer from technological 'solutions'. It'll be like going from plain rice to having the world's cuisines delivered to your doorstep. That's terrifying to women: losing the entire value of their sexuality almost overnight. You'd think they' be pleased to …
/r/MensRights26/09/18 12:36 PM
6

Grabs a young Tinder hot bod, invites him over to her place on their first date and shortly after they go straight to fucking. And she wonders why she's still single. She wonders why guys are so quick to bail. You can't say it anymore because it's become taboo. But the truth of it hasn't gone away: Men are romantically repulsed by promiscuous women. They'll fuck them, but they won't commit to them. Yes, it's a double standard. What a shocker - men and women are different.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:33 PM
13

His departure has been welcomed by South Africa's Commission for Gender Equality, saying that it would help the fight against sexism. No, it won't. This just adds more heat to a rolling simmer that will eventually boil over.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 01:42 PM
1

But what if I need a better understanding of 16th Century Moroccan finger chimes and their rhythmic association with the proto-cultural development of indigenous urban communities?!? Sometimes I need to know that shit outside of working hours.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 08:30 PM
1

For a lot of the people opposed to 'objectification' it's for them - deep down inside - about not being attractive enough to be 'objectified' in the first place. Don't think I'm sexy? Well you're not allowed to think anyone else is sexy either. Just sour grapes draped with a thin veil of self-righteousness.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:32 PM
1

Part of me feels like it's not really necessary. I just need to look around my room to see but a tiny representation of everything men have innovated, built and continue to maintain. We don't need a special university program dedicated to scraping through every single history text, desperate to find any mention of our sex's relevance to humanity's progress. Our laws, ideas, technologies, structures, infrastructure, philosophies, ideologies and artwork are pretty much entire manmade. It's only fa…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:22 PM
3

Smart enough to get the job done, but not smart enough to see through their games. A lot of women communicate primarily through subtext (whereas most men are direct). If a guy is clever enough to understand what's actually being said and can even catch the underlying intentions then she loses a lot of leverage in the relationship. Very few will ever admit it, but power balance plays a big role in anyone's comfort with a relationship. No one wants to be the 'little guy'.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:31 PM
2

My guess is that it's partly due to how gender dysphoria is outwardly manifested through treatment. People taking hormones and undergoing surgery to change part of their sex is bizarre, and that draws a lot of views. Because there's also some controversy surrounding integration in places such as washrooms and sports, trans people have become a media darling. Schizophrenia may spur some strange and even destructive behaviors, but not to anywhere near the same level of raw reaction and interest as…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:10 PM
3

Same. I've visited a lot of big cities over the course of my life and not once have I heard any kind of catcalling. The only mild exception is a time I was in Paris and watched a couple of younger guys following a woman around a bus stop trying to get her number. Once she got on her bus they left. It's definitely cultural and it wouldn't surprise me at all if the areas in France with major catcalling issues are cities such as Marseilles and Nice. Lots of young guys there coming from countries wh…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:50 PM
6

Unashamedly so.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:38 PM
5

After reading the story and seeing how many guys actually stayed behind to 'compete' for her love I assumed she must be a major bombshell. Even her professional glamour shot can't hide how painfully below average she is. Great tits, though. Lots of thirsty lads out there.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:07 PM
8

Or say you identify as a mop and shimmy around the floor for a bit.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:52 PM
13

Is there a UN Men?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:51 PM
1

If Elana Musk had been a co-founder of PayPal and the founder of Tesla, SpaceX and others major tech companies then they'd probably cut her some slack. Making comparisons to Elon Musk would be apt if there was a woman close to his equal that far up the food chain. Before asking if a female CEO would have been treated differently, this article's author could start by finding a corporate leader of Musk's caliber so we can compare apples to apples. Is there any woman who's even close? Thanks for Ti…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:24 PM
-1

I've got no beef with transmen since they're not impactful in any harmful way. They're around and in very small numbers doing their own thing. Reading this makes my eyes roll into the back of my skull. No, buddy, you are not a man. You are a woman on HRT who would give that up in a split second if faced with a draft, jail time or any other severe repercussion for being a man. You are as much a man as an Irish guy taking melanin injections is black. Be whoever you want to be and live that life, b…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:24 PM
23

I know a lot of guys who went in to become firefighters. A few of them made it and those who didn't went on to become paramedics or other emergency services personnel. The standards are very high across the board. Right now firehouses can support one or two female firefighters since there are enough men to do the heavy lifting and carrying in general and during critical situations. But just the thought of me having to do extra work because another person there got a free ride based on "positive"…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:05 PM
6

I'm not a lawyer, but I'd imagine most guys in that situation are protected because her primary residence will be listed in institutional records. Unless she's getting her mail delivered to your place, has her drivers license and other government ID's under your address then it would be easily argued that she does not actually live with you, regardless of what she claims. Common-law varies from province to province in Canada. It's 3 years of conjugal cohabitation or after having a child together…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:28 PM
4

Whether displaying awards you got in high school, college, or even a team trophy from winning your local softball league, just don’t. Unless your life’s work merited a Nobel Peace Prize or maybe even an Emmy or Oscar, nobody gives a hoot about your past glories on the field. Maybe I give a hoot you pompous cunt. Having fake plants around your house means you’ve basically given up at adulting. If you can’t take care of a real plant and water it properly and give it the proper amount of light so i…
/r/MGTOW20/08/18 04:25 PM
2

Veganism really helps connect me to my male ancestor days of hunting wild soy on the savanna.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:42 PM
4

The suggested stories at the bottom are what got me laughing and crying: "Why good men need to reclaim masculinity from the toxic cliche of power and aggression" right beside "All hail the rise of cat men, an antidote to toxic masculinity" A lot of people seem to forget that we are but one society in a world of many, including a couple that are going to be economic behemoths in the near future. One of them is already starting to flex its muscle and believes that its dominance is a matter of mani…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:14 PM
132

Cohabitation is becoming more and more common as men choose to avoid the trappings of marriage while retaining the benefits of a long-term partnership. After all, the woman always has the option to refuse this type of pairing and splinter off. She could always chase and date men seeking marriage. But no! Many cohabiting women are apparently unaware of the benefits they lose when opting out of a common-law partnership. Rather than rely on women's agency and simply informing everyone about the dif…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:51 PM
4

From the article and from what I know about medicine, the bigger issues doctors face are: -steadily increasing demand from an ageing population and a younger one that takes generally very poor care of their health -a dysfunctional bureaucracy that works in opposition to patient care -information overload that's made even more frustrating by every patient bringing challenges to their diagnosis from Dr. Google's second opinion -frequent long hours that can be made even more taxing by a work schedu…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:58 PM
5

I'd be really curious to know how societies were formed before the family, headed by a monogamous couple, became the core social unit. It's by no accident that every single successful civilization has been built around this social construct. If there are any exceptions I'd love to read about them. We switched to that model for some reason and my guess would be that it had a widespread placating effect on both men and women. Men got sexual security, women got resource security and protection for …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:18 PM
5

Why rely on anonymous rubbish when every single day there are countless feminist articles being published across the world? They're everywhere. Some newspapers have entire sections devoted to 'Women'. They're real pieces written by real feminists who are the vanguard of the movement. Taking these unverified, anonymous internet paragraphs and using them as the basis for your arguments is like picking a fight with a shadow. Why even bother? It just shows how easily you can be fooled and that you a…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:03 PM
7

They're pretty well fucked already. The only successful partnerships of professionals I know of are from couples who met in school during their mid-20's. They could build a life together since neither of them was settling into a career. A lot of women have been duped into believing they can follow the male career track while maintaining a typical female reproductive strategy. They're wrong, but will desperately cling to anyone, anywhere who will produce a piece of research that holds an iota of …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:44 PM
1

At a social level I'd describe it as the practice of sacrificing structure & function for satisfying emotional sensitivities. It's setting the bar for social expectation not within the ranks of your high achievers, but alongside your weakest and least effective members. Toxic femininity coddles, nurtures and protects the vulnerable to the point where the vulnerable are kept in a constant state of need. They are not properly tested, blooded or challenged as toxic femininity would consider such tr…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:20 PM
3

Throws her husband under the bus so she doesn't have to be held accountable for the people she threw under her van.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:53 PM
3

I've worked in forestry, construction and a bit of O&G. There are women in some of the dirty, difficult and dangerous jobs. They were as competent as the men. Some weren't so great, some were pretty damned good at their job. They were there because they wanted to be, not because of diversity requirements. Maybe that's changed, I'm now in a different industry and haven't been in resources for over five years. It wouldn't surprise me at all if some of those women were in those jobs to find a man. …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:37 PM
5

It's interesting to watch progressivism unwittingly destroy itself.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:19 PM
1

I had a great boss for a while who was (and still is) a successful business owner. Millions in the bank, well raised children and a large group of people who enjoy working for his organization. He's done well for himself, his family, his employees and his community. He was always a real go-getter, filled with energy and drive. He made things happen. Then, at some point in his mid-50's he began to fall ill. Within a year he became a shadow of his former self and a year later his wife kicked him o…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:09 PM
8

But this anonymous piece of spoon-fed satire from some far corner of the internet confirms my beliefs so I'm going to assume it's genuine and ascribable to a high status feminist. Then I'll argue against it.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:37 PM
0

Is there any actual research to back this claim? Opening up Netflix and browsing through pages of titles most of what I found included plenty of strong male leads and support. What proportion of shows include a lopsided number of weak men? How does that relate to viewership numbers and demographics? Also, how much does this actually matter? We could say we have a much bigger issue if our entertainment programming is emasculating young men. It could be the other way around. Pop culture is reflect…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:34 PM
15

Killed it for me. Not long ago I would've and had taken the chance. There were always other risks involved, but those usually amounted to a worst case scenario of an unpleasant work environment for a few weeks. Now that my entire life and livelihood are on the line I don't care if it's only 15%, 5% or <1% of women who may lash out with false accusations to get their revenge. It's not worth the risk. The higher up the food chain I move, the higher the risk. The only women who'll say "Good! Keep t…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 04:07 PM
2

Yep. These posts scream "daddy issues".
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 03:34 PM
11

He shouldn't have had such a hot best friend
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 03:11 PM
13

Or his Libra ways made him incompatible at the last full moon and he didn't notice
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 03:11 PM
2

From the April 2017 article titled "Google is accused of underpaying women" The full quote: "A study in 2014 that tracked women in jobs related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) found that half of women had left their professions after 12 years. By comparison, only a fifth of women who work in non-STEM fields leave within 30 years." Of course, feminists will claim that it's purely an issue of sexism and misogyny holding back the reams of young women who are dying to get …
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 03:09 PM
3

They despise weak(ened) men. A lot of men aren't all that charitable towards weak men, either. It's not as if London is run by women. There just isn't much political will to help men in that situation. Something deep inside our monkey brain stirs up more sympathy for women in distress than for men. Feminists, and a lot of women before that movement, have been pumping that well for all it's worth.
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 02:47 PM
16

Apparently it's news to feminists that men select for youthfulness and beauty. That they're being passed up is not a sign that their mating strategy is defective, but that men's primal triggers are flawed.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 02:22 PM
2

Are you her granddaughter or something? Putting women into combat roles is scraping the bottom. The vast majority aren't fit for it. Most men aren't properly suited for combat and need to be conditioned to kill other people. There were probably some geezers who fought valiantly, but that doesn't mean their conscription wasn't a last ditch resort. If anything ever kicks off you're more than welcome to join the Women's Corp to show them your respect and admiration.
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 09:46 PM
0

It's nice to see Reese Witherspoon and Goldie Hawn have moved from acting roles into overseeing the defense of major European countries.
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 09:31 PM
2

Not surprising when you couldn't find a single Russian male born in 1924 because all of them had been killed in the fighting. The Red Army were scraping the bottom of the barrel to put any and all physically fit persons into the war effort. Their lives depended on it. I'd also expect women born into peasant families back then would be much tougher than even most men in our contemporary society. Parts of WWII Russia were still very much in the Dark Ages and for a person, man or woman, to survive …
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 09:25 PM
16

When men need something done they launch thousands of enterprises and shape the world to suit their needs. Women are still struggling to get pockets in their jeans while men are busying away finding practical solutions to their sexual desires and frustrations among the millions of other ventures they're undertaking. And all of this is happening silently, under the surface. No 'masculinist' movement, no marching and shouting, no shaming other women over social media. Just taking direct action and…
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 09:15 PM
2

A bit Machiavellian of me to say, but it's nice to see the competition get this fierce because it makes young, supple and sexy women easier to casually date.
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 06:28 PM
3

You know this sub has been infested by incels when there are posts complaining about anything to do with r/IncelTears. The only thing "lower" than whatever it is they're crowing about is browsing their subreddit. Even lower is actually having your cage rattled by whatever they're saying. And the lowest is bringing their drama here as if it merits discussion. This is basic bitch level shit.
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 06:07 PM
43

Oh come on now. What man isn't into a dwindling batch of rotten eggs, a casket for a womb that only the best doctors could hope to pry open, and the ravaging effects of menopause just around the corner? Autism seems to be all the rage these days so why give up on the chance of having your own mentally challenged child? And that body. Woo! Saggy tits, cellulite, vast networks of wrinkles spreading out across her body and face, thinning hair, enough bingo wing to get decent air, fading and illegib…
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 05:48 PM
12

Still not fair. 3 and 5 (good looking) matter. 1,2 and 4 could be heavily downgraded for all I care. Does she complement my nature and my skills with her own? That's what matters. There are a lot of women out there who confuse what they find attractive in a man with what men find attractive in a woman.
/r/MGTOW29/07/18 04:33 PM
5

I agree with the sentiment, but would ask: Why does it need to be with only one woman? Why should I sign a legally binding contract at any point? How would you know you can find happiness only in a monogamous relationship when you haven't explored other options? Why would I want to willingly tie my self-worth, happiness and emotional security to one person? How is that a rational choice? What if I can find acceptance, intimacy, companionship and affection through friends, family, community, pers…
/r/MGTOW28/07/18 05:22 PM
1

Sensory-tied VR technology has captured the majority of the population's leisure time. They go to wherever the most imaginative minds can offer, which includes an endless parade of options for sexual exploration and gratification. Men no longer pursue women at all except for the odd adventurous type who want to try out 'organic'. Birth rates have collapsed and governments are scrambling to deal with the looming demographic time bomb.
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 08:49 PM
6

Chads want a loving partner in a stable relationship, too. It takes a particular personality to be satisfied playing the field indefinitely and that's not tied to looks or appeal. Doesn't matter how attractive a guy is when there are always better options out there chasing her. I had a girlfriend who'd be asked out several times each week (that she even told me about). She was faithful until she wasn't. Women are only as faithful as their options and even for a guy like me, who hit all the marke…
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 08:38 PM
7

Men are natural born killers. Women are natural born manipulators. We control the physical realm. They control the mental game. There's a reason women are always looking for innuendo behind everything a man says - their world revolves around hidden meanings and conniving. Ours is built on building things like houses, infrastructure and systems of order. To do what we do we usually need to be straight with each other. For women to do what they do they need to be everything but straight. A lot of …
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 11:21 PM
2

He's off to collect to 100% more than what he needs since 50% of that will go to her in alimony.
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 10:31 PM
17

I've got family members who've done this. Smart, competent and very driven. They got into the best schools and sub-specialized into areas that required over 16 years of schooling and training all to give it all away to have kids. And of course we have a shortage for those kinds of specialists. Guess fucking why. These women go the distance to prove it to themselves then realize "Oh shit! I can't have it all and really want kids more!" so they ditch what amounts to millions of dollars in social v…
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 10:27 PM
10

Guys need to start looking at marriages the same way they would a business partnership. Put all the feelings aside: Is this investment worth it? Am I partnering with the right person? What is the worst case scenario? What is the best case scenario and how does it compare to if I were to remain single? This is a very, very common situation when two professionals get together. The woman realizes that no, she can't have it all, so the man is left to put in work while she gets to enjoy the fruits of…
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 10:15 PM
4

I agree. Societies that are too masculine become hostile, brutal, rigid and cold. Examples of these include northern Mexico under cartel 'rule', Middle East hot spots and a lot of areas during industrial revolutions. Violence is the primary means of control. Conversely, societies that become too feminized are structurally loosened to the point of placing the feelings of marginal groups over the general functioning and well being of the whole. Nurturing becomes coddling creating weakened members …
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 02:58 PM
1

How is that a sign of abuse? It can be invasive, a breech of privacy, annoying, paranoid and downright rude - but abusive? "Signs I'm being abused" should be read directly as "Signs I'm a fragile doormat" so that the real issue can be addressed. It's not that she's abusing the guy so much as he's susceptible to it. I doubt women are the only ones taking advantage of his naivety and low self-esteem. I've met guys like this who are with abusive partners. The best workers you could ever dream of wh…
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 01:38 PM
8

The future will be more like this: Top tier men (whether that's 5% or 25%, it'll be a gradient of men who have the highest immediate sexual value) will maintain a harem of women on their phone - many already do. Most women will be satisfied fucking bulls who willingly dip well below their league for ease of access and thirst Women will focus on their career aspirations to ensure they can be financially independent. This will occupy their 20s until they hit the wall around their 30s when Maternal…
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 11:42 AM
121

So is the present. So was the past.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 10:57 PM
16

Makes sense. Almost 90% of them claim to be unhappy with their body.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 07:35 PM
1

Have we really reached a point where we have to tell each other this? This reads like something you'd find on a Tumblrina's blog except substituted for a male audience. Who apologizes for being a man? A guy who is lost enough to see this and feel any kind of resistance to such a basic, "no shit" message is going to need a lot more than affirmations to even start getting back on track.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 03:57 PM
3

When we can't protect, provide and guide then what's the point? We all know that sex is one of the first things to go after we commit so that's the last primal consideration out the window. This idea of a 50/50 partnership built on romance is ridiculous. A lot of men are beginning to realize that sometimes the best move is to not even play the game. It's rigged against us and our most basic needs. There will always be a steady supply of guys who go through their younger years sexually frustrated…
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 03:45 PM
3

What turned me against modern feminism (I was mostly indifferent to it before) was reading the articles and pieces written by feminists for women. No wonder they're always so quick to scream "misogyny!". They're just projecting their own misandry. "He must hate women (because deep down inside I hate men)"
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 03:29 PM
3

J) Rates of female infidelity have sky rocketed and are continuing to climb. The chances of being betrayed are getting realer by the day. Hypergamy has been unleashed. K) Men (and women) used to feel immense social pressure to be married and have a family. These were considered imperative for any kind of career and even basic social acceptance. Those pressures have largely evaporated. L) Unattached men are now seen very favorably by businesses and institutions because they are free to move and t…
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 03:27 PM
3

It'll just send demand to the black market. Nothing of substance will change. Strip clubs are on a sharp decline now anyhow with a lot of former and potential clients opting for online porn and cam shows. With a lot of "talent" moving to those venues the strip clubs ends up with lower quality service that only hasten their demise. Offering prostitution (on the down low, of course) is one of their only remaining competitive advantages.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 03:08 PM
73

They wanted to be equal to men so they behaved like men. Now a lot of them follow male rituals and rites of passage while expecting their female privileges to remain fully intact. Instead, they are finding themselves going into their 30s with the things any ordinary man would be expected to have - a decent job with the associated skills, financial solvency and independence - while having slowly lost what all men expect in a mating partner: youthfulness, fertility and femininity. These women conf…
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 03:01 PM
16

It goes deeper than that. The bonding and fraternizing of men is a serious threat to their autonomy and livelihood. For them, it brings the fear of subjugation, which has been the norm across the world for all but ~50-100 years ago. When all the men are together doing their own thing two fears pop up in women's heads: they might decide to do something to us and there's no one around to protect us.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 02:35 PM
6

It's because many of the British colonies became very successful while the spawn of Spain and Portugal are mostly shit-shows. People hating on whitey need to spend some time in other countries to get a real taste of just how 'awful' northern European countries' focus on law, order, structure, work ethic and morality really is. Other countries that started getting their shit together did so by borrowing ideas from the awful white man. We were a lot more utilitarian back then. It was more about "h…
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 05:05 PM
2

Isn't the whole point of TRP to pump and dump thus avoiding the whole 'female entrapment' issue? Or have they changed course? I haven't paid attention to their stuff for years, but back when I did it was all about spinning plates and keeping out of relationships.
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 04:55 PM
5

There is no war on pronouns. Transgender issues are about as serious as all those Nazis running through the streets of America. They're minuscule minority media darlings who bring in tons of viewership over non-existent conflicts. Trannies make up around 0.3% of the population. Most of them are doing their own thing. It's the crazy ones who draw attention, not because their 'cause' matters but because seeing men in drag being dramatic is entertaining and outrageous. Many people tune in to see th…
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 01:17 PM
1

I remember reading somewhere that ~10% of men are undiscerning in their sexual tastes in women (or people, animals and things). They're attracted to just about anything and will fuck it as happily as the rest of us would fuck a gorgeous model. She's after that 10%.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 12:56 PM
3

They'll be really fucked when CGTOW hits.
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 02:34 PM
3

But but it's natural! It's how humans orginally were intended! What are they even basing this on? Bonobo monkeys?
/r/MGTOW13/07/18 10:25 AM
12

Depends on where you live. This would be considered fat across a lot of Asia and many large metropolitan areas in the West. For places in South America, Africa and areas in Western countries she'd be seen as top of the line.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 11:26 PM
1

Relationships are fine so long as the guy keeps her accountable and is always ready to step out if she crosses the line. There are a lot of women out there who yearn for a man who will keep her in line and be the dominant force in their relationship. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Too many people read dominance as abuse or possessiveness, which it can be but certainly does not have to be. A good example is dogs. A man is obviously in the dominant position in that relationship an…
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 11:20 PM
40

It's funny how back in the '90s and before there were a lot of muffled warnings from men regarding marriage. They knew they were pretty much fucked but had to choose between accepting their fate and endless misery - so they just chose the former and expressed their sorrow through comedy. I can't recall ever reading about a man's happy marriage. She ruled the roost, knew that she did and lorded over him. He kept on trucking because that's what a "man has to do". Now we know how it was and is. Men…
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 11:08 PM
3

Meanwhile Chad only sees her for Uranus.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 09:16 PM
12

I think these mini-tantrums are less of a shit test and more the way she expresses her deep resentment of the guy. The culture and social dialogue all say "you should keep seeing this great guy for x, y and z reasons!" while her primal instincts are screaming "get away from this weakling!". The frustration always finds its way out. If she's already shit-testing a guy well into the date - or relationship - then he's already lost.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 09:05 PM
5

It's more market driven than agenda driven. There is an increasing number of women pushing themselves into careers and a lot of them, involuntarily, are also finding themselves single. Single women spend a lot of money on themselves. Fortunately, they're spending their own money. And this is the kind of stuff that can sell. Men want programming that displays male figures in acts of heroism, bravery, courage under fire and feats of extraordinary strength or discipline. We want fierce competition …
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 08:51 PM
2

I never really had much of an opinion on modern feminism until I started reading the Women's section of The Guardian, where this particular "journalist" writes for. Holy shit. You'd think it's satire. If you hired a team of writers and tasked them with discrediting feminism while still maintaining the appearance of fully supporting it you'd get The Guardian.
/r/MGTOW09/07/18 07:55 PM
3

Swipe apps and online digital media (e.g. Netflix) killed bars. The meet market has moved online. Bars and clubs have been pandering to women for decades. The difference today is a lot of people are using Tinder et al. for their hook-up needs and skipping the bar/club scene all together. Easier, far less expensive, far greater chance of success (for some), no risk of fights and other bullshit, no hangover, no sticky shoes, etc.. So bars are now more likely to end up with the kind of women who ca…
/r/MGTOW09/07/18 07:49 PM
1

What I can't stand are sport cyclists who cause backups during rush hour. What makes this even more infuriating is that they do this on 2-lane parkways that have a paved and well-maintained bike lane sitting off to the side. But they don't like having to go around the pedestrians who also use the bike lane (because it might slow them down) so instead they slow down 1,000 drivers and create traffic backups. And as someone else mentioned, fuel taxes are what pay for most road construction and main…
/r/MGTOW09/07/18 07:16 PM
4

"Are you sure you put gas in this? It smells like diesel." "Well if I put diesel in it why it no sound like big truck? You so stupid, Khoa! Why you no be real man and fix motorbike?"
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 03:23 PM
1

Not shown in this picture is the guy to the right on a bigger boat. There are people who feel like the destination but are just the next stage in the journey to the real destination Then she comes across a guy with an even bigger boat There are people who confuse us to where the true destination lies until our hearts lead us there
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 01:07 AM
28

It's ok. We've erected numerous institutions and law that encourage this kind of behavior and will ensure its continuation for decades to come. Hardworking, conscientious, moral and forwardthinking people are having fewer and fewer children while their tax dollars go towards incentivizing every deadbeat, moron and fuck up to crank out the next generation of delinquents.
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 12:39 AM
8

Women don't care about sex the same way men do. A man who went his whole life being sexually 'secure' - always having a readily available source of decent sex - would be quite contented. A woman, on the other hand, would be more likely to want more. Commitment is to women what sex is to men. A lot of feminists may not be incels, but many are insings (involuntarily single). They hate on men for the same reason incels hate on women - each is denying the other of a powerful primal craving. Incels c…
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 12:04 AM
2

Personally, I wouldn't enjoy a woman just 'giving' me sex she wasn't into. I'd rather just fuck a doll or my own hand at that point. What I see happen to a lot of women after their first child is them just giving up on themselves. Long before stumbling across MGTOW I noticed how often it was that I'd see a decently handsome, fit man with his whale of a wife pushing a pram. She had just let herself go. So many of them let themselves go. Then, of course, she feels less sexy and there's no way he h…
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 11:48 PM
4

I love watching transwomen tear apart the LGBT and feminist movements. The tyranny of inclusion is finally turning on itself. The funny thing is how chill transmen seem to be. They don't make a peep and just seem to be doing their own thing. It's the transwomen who are batshit crazy and stirring up all the drama. I'm looking forward to watching them compete in the 2020 Olympics.
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 11:34 PM
5

I care about them because I'm biologically programmed to desire their company, affections and sex with them. I'm also programmed to desire food. If something was making all the food unpalatable and rancid I'd grudgingly eat it, but I'd be damn angry with whatever was causing it to be bad. Perhaps after a while I'd start to hate the food as well, since I would forget how the good stuff had tasted. Imagine dogs stopped being loyal and friendly. Caninism had told them their salvation lay in being b…
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 11:30 PM
2

Doesn't that go against the only piece of moral code our society has left: "Don't be a dick"? I suppose in times of such distress one can turn to the only remaining prescription for a fulfilling life: YOLO!
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 11:10 PM
14

Male sexual independence from women is terrifying to them. It would have the same impact that female financial independence had, but the other way around. If men can have their sexual needs met by technology then a woman's value will become closer to that of any other man's. Men will no longer fight, work and better themselves for the sake of a woman's approval. Why bother? Why clear a plot of land, till the field, sow the seeds and harvest the crop when technology has made it so you can just tr…
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 11:06 PM
4

Get a dog.
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 09:21 PM
1

Can't fight biology. Women are programmed to seek out resourced men and will begin to feel resentful of a partner who they out-earn. It's no different than a man beginning to resent his partner when she completely lets her looks go. There are primal points of attraction that should never go ignored, yet many believe they can think and analyze their way around them or end up concocting some fabulous narrative, as this author did, OKing the situation and shifting responsibility. By hiding her fina…
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 07:04 PM
1

Bottom lion is just as deadly as top lion.
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 06:37 PM
2

Imagine men were so insecure that rather than forging our own stories we felt compelled to just borrow women's. The Handbeta's Tale Little Men Pride and Prejudicial
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 05:30 PM
2

These past couple of decades will become known as the Great Nag, only to be corrected when an actual crisis hits that requires a re-ordering of society. Part of that effort will be known as the Great Bitch Slap.
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 02:02 PM
2

Part of going our own way should include not even paying this kind of bullshit the slightest bit of attention. Women are going to be coming up with all sorts of terms and ideas to help cope with a new narrative that spites their most basic instincts. "I never wanted children!" "I never wanted to settle down with a partner!" Women are in for a much harsher ride than men. We're very practiced hands when it comes to solitude and childless lives. They're not. And they're going to be all sorts of ups…
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 11:30 PM
2

And who the fuck brings a baby to the movies?
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 11:16 PM
19

They're caught between what they want to fuck and what they want to control.
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 11:07 PM
10

Invest in robotics, human-assistant AI and anything to do with pets. Basically, anything that will provide a substitute for women's innate urge to birth and nurture infants. There are going to be a lot of lonely, childless (oh, I'm sorry, child*free* haha) women in the coming next few decades. Anything that soothes their primal urges while also pitching a narrative that validates their "choice" will be worth big bucks.
/r/MGTOW02/07/18 07:05 PM
4

Aye. A lot of celebrity partnerships are business partnerships. They do support each other, just not in the way that's portrayed.
/r/MGTOW02/07/18 06:55 PM
3

It's a way of feeling in control. Since they're often the one who started the drama, they have the power to end it. Once they've calmed the situation, often by just quitting their bullshit, they feel as though they've accomplished something of note. Drama that affects them in any negative way is also very valuable to many women since humans are genetically coded to feel sympathy for a struggling woman. While young boys are often (less often these days) discouraged from wallowing in self-pity, th…
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 11:51 PM
10

Still don't care. Either 'rope' or find another way that doesn't involve rolling around on the ground clutching your wounded ego. Women get the privilege of playing the victim; it's practically baked into us to feel sympathy for distressed women. Men don't have that luxury. It's a shame to see so much talent and potential wasted in young men who have genuinely deluded themselves into believing their life is over because they can't get their dick wet. The ones going out of their way to knock them…
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 11:32 PM
3

And yet an even better analogy would be that once cancer is gone you have to keep taking the chemo pills. The cancer is gone, but you're left anemic, bald and severely nauseated.
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 10:51 PM
5

But enough of them get the top 5% at least once in their lives when he's feeling thirsty, lazy and maybe a bit drunk. He gets a quick lay and she walks away believing she's haute cuisine when in reality she was just a lukewarm 7-11 cheeseburger. When it comes to sex, a lot of us - not just the top 5 - will reach way below our bar for commitment. Easy sex with a 6 can be better than putting in tons of effort and resources into pulling a 9. Once it's game time and you're both next to each other wi…
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 10:41 PM
13

Is cancer the cure for AIDS?
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 10:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter