TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Phr0ztByte Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Phr0ztByte on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I live in Denmark. So financially no one is that much better off than another. Here we are talking mutually owned assets and primarily.. the kids. Also, you have to pay as the spouse who has the kids the least, each month, for each child. Clothing, toys and the like. As the primary caregiver you also god a lot of government help if you are not married and living by yourself. As a friend was told by his lawyer "She will try to get the kids at least 10 days every 14 days. She thinks you are as goo…
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:57 AM
1

Sure they can, and they have. Not saying that at all. Just saying there is a lot more risk involved in relationships for a guy than for woman.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 05:55 PM
1

All the relationships in my friend circle that ended in divorce was loving and peaceful until they weren't. The moment the wives saw the relationship ended they turned to "I will take everything I can", and this has been without exception. Separate living situations, economies are the way to go. And if you don't mind paying for spending time with your children if your relationship fails, then by all means do that too. Until something in the courts changes dramatically I am not going down that ro…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:34 AM
1

Look. This sub aggregates from all over the world, the cases look many but are few. Are there discrimination, sure. Are there problems sure, but you are looking through a very narrow lense, designed to spot problems. You are aware of these things and notice them when they appear in front of you. But usually, the degree to what you experience something isn't the same, but you equate to what you read. And it is normal. I have a fear of really deep, dark water. I grew up watching Jaws and have some…
/r/MensRights19/06/20 03:24 AM
1

My take has always been that we are risk takers. Some times it works out other times not so much. We dare to ask for more salary at the risk of angering our boss, we dare to leave the job to find better salary working conditions elsewhere. We jump across buildings, try to fly in improvised flying machines and a myriad of stupid shit to see what happens. We are allowed to take risks, society depends on it. Firemen, police officers people fixing giant wind turbines, construction and so on. In comp…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 06:09 AM
8

You are right. But not constructive in your wording. Infighting should be reserved for prison inmates and Lord of The Flies.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:43 AM
1

I don't think they hate men. I am actually quite convinced of it. They care about the bottom line. They thought creating a "woke" ad would help said bottom line, it didn't so they pivot. It was a stupid ad and they should get backlash for it. But "Man hate" was not a motivation for the ad. Money was.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:52 AM
1

Well the image says "When the truth.. the feminists remain silent", well.. we don't know the truth, so the image is wrong and idiotic. Wait until the trial is over to pass any judgement. Because it seems like this is non news, posted a 1000 times, with not a single fact in it. And the idea is to be better than the woke, not equally "outraged" about "alternative facts"
/r/MensRights20/08/19 08:42 PM
1

I don't think there is. And even if there was, doesn't mean he wasn't equally abusive. All I saying is. Let the courts do their thing.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:09 AM
1

I think Amber Heard is one abusive woman. Nevertheless, I believe the court case is February 3, 2020. So instead of doing the exact same thing as the feminists did, why don't people wait until they had their day in court. We, and I mean people appalled by the "court of public opinion", should not adjourn before then. Right now no one knows anything other than "He said, she said", I believe the case will end up him being vindicated. But what currently believe, and what ends up being the truth is …
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:43 AM
2

The header of this post is wrong, which conflates the two things.The title should read, case resolved after 27 years. Nothing you could do :D
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:03 AM
3

It is another person. Clarence Shipley is another man from Baltimore, not the man from in this post. You took the top comment as being the same guy, which it isn't. This guy's name is John Bunn. Not Clarence Shipley. Though the cases sound similar. Clarence served 27 years and was arrested at 20. Bunn served 17 years, arrested at 14. Bunn was released on parole in 2007. He then went to court to prove his innocence. That case is now concluded 27 years later. But he still only served 17, and... wa…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:38 AM
1

Well. No it's not. But is is proportional? Is "Male toxicity in gaming" just aimed at woman? Or are gamers to all gamers. Is violence against woman such a problem that the media has zero discussion about violence against men? Why is there a need to make the issue one-sided. And, since the discussion is almost always aimed at "Why are men" instead of "Why is there a small minority of men" doing so and so, then the large majority at some point get defensive. There is also a small minority of woman…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 07:19 AM
1

CNN says 14 CNN youtube video also says 14, where they interview him Article from may And finally from The National Registry of Exonerations Where is your source for 20 years old?
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:18 PM
6

He was 14. They said in the video. He was released in 2007 in parole. He served 17 years in prison.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:52 AM
2

Oh I completely agree, I hope I didn't convey otherwise. I am just stating why it wont pass. Denmark is not a great country when it comes to introduce controversial laws. We are too small, to easily squashed by foreign opposition. I think the majority of politicians want's to ban, and once others do, and the world accepts that this kind of thing won't fly anymore, we will join. But being the first and taking the initial hit. I think they will pass.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:20 PM
1

Yeah, no. It wont pass. I am from Denmark. The Jewish community, is the ones getting hurt here, as it is part of their religion, in muslim society it is mostly cultural, if I remember correctly. The Jewish community in Denmark has said that will leave them unable to stay in Denmark. I am not really sure the Danish politicians, even though it's the right thing to do will be the first to say "Well, people of the Jewish faith. If you don't like the way we structure our society, you can just leave".
/r/MensRights06/06/18 04:34 AM
5

There are severe social consequences of even being accused of rape, so it is not the same as swatting. The moment you accuse someone, the damage is done to them
/r/MensRights02/06/18 07:19 AM
14

My thoughts on Peterson is. He is competent enough to handle most propagandist journalists, eg. Cathy Newman. And while I won't agree with some of his thoughts on philosphy, that does not mean I will declare him incompetent on everything. I think some people will point and say "Look, he is wrong on his positions on Foucault and Marxism, that means he is a fraud and everything he says should be dismissed". If I took that position at face value though, I would have to dismiss every position of eve…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:42 AM
0

I really shouldn't care, because it seems stupid to do so. But I just know, once they remake "Saving Private Rihanna" and "DunGirlish", then I have to explain to a woman that it didn't happen the way she think it did.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:21 PM
1

That is simply not true. Girls care. Heightism
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:53 PM
1

The majority of girls are shorter than most guys.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:39 AM
1

It is when there is a much larger support network for one gender, you yourself agreed that we maybe it was okay we protected our woman better than we did our men. And it is a gendered issue, unless men can receive the same help from society, and people are just as willing to help a man in need as a woman. I have not known this to be the case, ever.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:04 PM
1

Am I? I meant to point out, that while men holds positions of power, a vast majority is on the other end, at the bottom of society. How does that go against anything?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:23 AM
1

That is true, but does it matter to you and me? We hold no power. Are the people in power bickering among themselves about which genders control what, or is that an exercise for those who holds no power at all. If almost no people holds power, but we pretend half the population does, and we are willing to skew the rules to accommodate for those we perceive to have less. Then are we not just hurting half the population because of rare instances? I am putting aside that males are outliers in both …
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:43 AM
1

Almost all men have little to no power. Yet the western media treats us all like we do.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:51 AM
1

I don't think there is anything nefarious going on. It is just to make sure that her family has no recourse in case she dies, and he has no proof he is the father.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 12:05 PM
1

Link to full panel discussion
/r/MensRights15/01/18 04:03 PM
2

I think we are arguing the same point. I agree, that no settlements should be paid at all. I disagree that cheating, specifically, should invalidate situations where money IS somehow involved. My hypothetical was about "wanting to leave with money", and how there is plenty of ways to get out with them, if that is your primary goal. I totally agree that money should always be kept separate between spouses, unless otherwise agreed upon when in the marriage. "I work, you mind house and kids, you ge…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 12:48 PM
3

Why is seeing another woman grounds for not getting a settlement? What is he, stopped talking to her, stopped having sex with her, started sleeping in another room. Just to get a divorse. Would that change things. I don't see how cheating is a "settlement free card". I don't understand settlements at all, but since that is what the article is about, I am interested in the logic behind the cheating thing.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 08:05 AM
0

Boys don't give a shit because the material does not interest them, which boils down to the way you teach it. I learned to read when I was 5-6 due to wanting to read about Zombies.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:00 AM
1

Well. Let's say that is true. Then society must take extra care of males, to make sure their life will not be impacted by their biological makeup. Otherwise, why would I care about maternity leave?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:20 AM
1

I kinda agree with you. You are trying to determine the cause of the crime, which is good. But unless you think some people are born evil, you will be able to find a cause for every crime. Abusive parents, lack of parents, childhood abuse by others, mental disorders, substans abuse brought on by on of the above. By and large most people would be able to have their sentence reduced. Sure we could do more to prevent in from happening. Just like after school programs in poor areas. But once it happ…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:57 AM
1

A friend of mine is having a kid. Their Doctor told them to get a paternity test. But for a different reason. If she would suddenly die, then there would be a possibility that her family would get custody. This is in Denmark.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:32 AM
2

well. If you create a company that is successful enough, you will have to hire 50% woman or suffer the backlash.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:14 PM
1

Why would anyone hire a man for a job if he could get the exact same work done by a woman for less?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/17 11:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter