TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pilliam66 Archive

View 0 posts and 527 comments by Pilliam66 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You know what you need to do right?
/r/TheRedPill11/02/19 10:24 PM
1

True, it's a case by case kind of thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/19 11:31 PM
1

Make the leap bro. Just make sure if you fail you fall far enough to kill yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 10:04 PM
1

The bully becomes the bullied
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 10:03 PM
1

Damn man, it must suck having an ugly wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:58 PM
1

Rungs missing near the top of the ladder? Or random rungs missing which you've climbed over?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:53 PM
2

I do not get the connection between arguing men are more likely to do dangerous job to explain why CEOs are more likely to be men. That's not why they were doing. Like I say, read it properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:51 PM
1

It sounds like you are saying because a very small group of men are fishing and most women are not fishermen that explains why they do not achieve executive level positions. Can you read? Genuinely wondering.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:38 PM
1

Kind of sounds like you're just a bitter girl who's spent too much time riding the cock carousel
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 08:50 PM
2

That's a very common conclusion. The majority of guys just want to fuck girls with no commitment. You just don't realise that that's not actually easy for a guy to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 08:46 PM
3

It's called solipsism
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 08:42 PM
6

Wow, five straw men for the price of one. Nice 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 08:41 PM
1

Sometimes yeah, depends how pussy whipped they are
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/19 06:13 PM
3

No one mentioned proposing...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/19 05:54 PM
15

Who the fuck said anything about proposing. No, it's not unusual to go for dinner on a first date.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/19 05:50 PM
1

Lmao it's a joke you fucking autist
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 04:31 PM
1

Pretty sure it's a joke
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 04:31 PM
2

Yeah I think you're replying to the wrong person because that has no relevance to anything I said
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 08:29 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 08:25 PM
1

From reading your replies it seems like you're just a massively butthurt male feminist tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 07:24 PM
1

Do you even have a single argument? This entire thread is just you giving up as soon as anyone makes a decent point
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 07:19 PM
1

TBP literally only exists to create a circle jerk where they can reassure each other that the nasty red pill people are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 07:03 PM
1

TBP literally only exists to create a circle jerk where they can reassure each other that the nasty red pill people are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 07:03 PM
1

TBP was literally invented to create a circle jerk where they can encourage each other that the nasty red pill people are wrong. TRP exists with or without TBP.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 06:59 PM
2

Unoriginal reply proves my point
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 06:04 PM
3

Just because you accept that something is a possibility doesn't mean you live in fear of it. Your argument seems to be that we should pretend the risk doesn't exist because it will lead to fear. I'm simply saying the risk exists - what I do with that information is an entirely different question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:49 PM
3

Women follow the crowd. Men think for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:45 PM
5

You haven't grown up in a society that routinely villifies you based on gender, just saying. People become more sensitive about things when they're routinely attacked for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:40 PM
4

why is this such damning information? Because a woman's accusation is enough to ruin your career. If a woman feeeeels uncomfortable it's a matter of national importance
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:38 PM
2

It more just shows the thought process of women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:30 PM
3

It's kind of like someone who was born with a silver spoon in their mouth complaining when someone from a poor background gets more respect when they go a long way in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:08 PM
4

Men are physically stronger, and are generally a much harder target when it comes to being a random victim crime This would make sense if it weren't for the fact that men are more likely to be victims of violent crime
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 04:01 PM
1

Takes two to tango sweety
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:48 PM
1

Such a cop out lmao. "But it's my opinion" is basically just what people fall back on when they don't want to admit they're wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:44 PM
1

That's nice honey, clearly actual psychologists disagree but you're entitled to your 'opinion'
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:30 PM
1

Just save both of us time and Google "physical changes to the brain" and you'll see that it's a very common phrase used in scientific communities. So you're basically just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:27 PM
1

This is literally all just semantics. Physical changes to the heart don't have to be described as cardiac in the same way that physical changes to the brain don't have to be described as psychological. It's all just deflection from the point and a complete waste of time when, if you'd just read the comment, you would've known exactly what I meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:22 PM
1

So basically, it was your failure to read my comment properly. You literally just said that you "100% agree" that "physical changes to the brain" is a perfectly acceptable phrase. Yet when I say "physical changes to the body and brain" you suddenly want to throw a hissy fit because I didn't use the word you wanted me to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:11 PM
1

So if it's a totally acceptable phrase, and "physical changes to the brain" are, by definition, psychological, where exactly did your confusion arise? Like I say, you brought us into semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 06:58 PM
1

I never said physical Vs psychological. Plus no one has ever called a disease "physical". "Physical changes to the brain" is a perfectly acceptable phrase.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 06:48 PM
1

It is a physical change... It's a physical change on a microscopic level, not a macroscopic one. I guess you think quantum physics isn't physical because you can't see it with your eyes lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 06:35 PM
1

mm, no, your point was i was contradicting myself and i was explaining why i was not. That was like 10 posts ago. You're the one who is bogging us down in semantics. But oh well
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 05:33 PM
1

Use whatever word you want, the point is that I was using the word physical (insert whatever word you want in here since you're so easily confused) to describe changes to the brain and body. Seems like you're deflecting from the point which is this: maturity in a biological sense does not relate to maturity in the "that boy is mature for his age" sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 05:26 PM
1

No, I'm describing physical maturity as things that you can measure scientifically. So development in your body AND brain (I did specify earlier body AND brain). These are all physical changes. As opposed to qualitative traits of maturity that I described earlier. I never once used the word "psychological".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 05:21 PM
1

I wouldn't call it a "defining factor". Anyway, the source of our disagreement might simply be the fact that we are using different definitions of the word "mature". You seem to be talking more about the physical changes in the body ie the point at which you are fully mature is when the brain and body have stopped developing. Is that right? Whereas I am more meaning mature in the sense that people would usually use to describe someone's personality. Such as "that boy is very mature for his age".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 05:04 PM
1

no, i accept that it isn't THE defining factor of maturity as maturity is something that grows over time, but rather ONE factor of maturity So the evidence you've provided doesn't actually support the claim you've made.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 04:51 PM
1

on average a 10 year old girl is more mature than a 10 year old boy, a 15 year old girl is more mature than a 15 year old boy, a 25 year old woman is more mature than a 25 year old man. These are just unsubstantiated claims that's my point. You provided a study that shows female brains start selecting which pieces of information to remember/ignore earlier. But this doesn't indicate that they mature earlier, because, as you just admitted, this point of development does not define "maturity". Henc…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 04:39 PM
1

no one is saying it defines it as a whole but it is in fact proven by science that women mature faster. You don't see how these are conflicting statements?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 02:59 PM
2

Yes he is, his bar is just higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 02:52 PM
1

Blatant lying doesn't really help debate
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 02:50 PM
1

Well it's one aspect of maturity, it doesn't define it as a whole. The collection of that information is also important. Men do that bit for longer. Generally the "women mature faster" trope just refers to the fact that young men like sleeping around. Basically equating male maturity with the desire to provide women with what they want I.e. commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 02:45 PM
1

Oh yeah I've seen this before. Calling the process itself maturing seems wrong though. The process of maturing occurs before this as well... And actually this states that girls start earlier, not that they do it faster. Still interesting though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 02:23 PM
1

Except that's not what that quote says. You've turned "women get offers of sex regularly" into "women must value offers of casual sex". You're either dishonest or stupid. Or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 02:20 PM
2

You were average overall, but not necessarily average at serving or whatever you called it
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 09:59 PM
3

You're comparing a large sample with a small sample. You need to compare a large sample with a large sample. There's nothing to say that your team didn't have unusually poor fine motor skills, because it's a small sample. Plus this entire thing is based on your subjective opinion of "fine motor skills".
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 09:37 PM
1

Can you link the study please
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 09:35 PM
6

But you're only comparing the players from those teams you ONE particular team ie yours. So your sample size is still atrocious.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 09:31 PM
8

You can assure me that it was at that particular time, in that particular province of that particular (rather small) country. I think your sample size is pretty atrociously small. Table tennis is largely fine motor skills. Guess what gender all the best table tennis players are? Same goes for golf.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 09:16 PM
6

That's definitely absolute bollocks
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 09:10 PM
1

Except it was by "up to" 10 years, which means the average is necessarily less than 10 years. I would like to see the study because defining "maturity" seems like something rather less than scientific. Boys definitely aren't 10 years behind in terms of intelligence, so makes me wonder what they're really basing this on. Human beings start developing when (or even before) they're born so if men finish developing later then they develop for longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 08:59 PM
2

So it basically depends on how old you are. Women develop faster, men develop for longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 08:39 PM
1

Irrelevant to the point. Men are more likely to be victims of violent crime. Women have no reason to be more nervous around men than men are, other than that they are .ore prone to anxiety
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:57 PM
1

If he stayed for a few years he probably wasn't acting
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:47 PM
0

Strange that you're the one acting like a child here though 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:36 PM
1

Usually the root of the problem is the woman thinking she has the right to decide what the man should do with his time
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:32 PM
1

Literally about 50% of girls think they're a 9
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 11:22 PM
2

Also depends on what you consider successful. Being someone's beta doormat bf doesn't really sound like a win.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 09:12 PM
3

There's more variability between cars in F1 than eg Indycars. Even with regulations F1 cars are comfortably the fastest cars in any racing series.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/19 02:38 PM
1

Definition of verb form of love: "feel deep affection or sexual love for (someone)." End of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:14 PM
1

Blah blah blah, mental gymnastics, redefining words to make your point make any kind of sense blah blah blah
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 06:06 PM
1

Happy is a feeling. Happy is not a verb. Feelings, generally are nouns or can be used as adverbs. E.g. I did z happily. Love is not a feeling. Love is an action. It's a choice. This is why people say "I love you". It's a verb. Your understanding of the English language is lacking. Just because love is a verb doesn't mean it involves anything more than a feeling. In the same way I can say "I love carrots". It doesn't mean I need to treat carrots a certain way, it just describes the way I feel abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:19 PM
0

Sure, but they won't want to stay around you once they've nutted
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:17 PM
1

Low value men
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:15 PM
1

People seeing women as have more positive traits means that we are biologically programmed to not care about men? Well yeah. It's all relative. Seeing positive traits in women is the same as seeing more negative traits in men. Plus, we are programmed to protect women and not men. So many examples of this being demonstrated in real life where women are routinely given protection and help where men aren't. Men choose these jobs. No one is forcing these men to chose these jobs Ok that's fine. As lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 12:12 PM
2

The women are wonderful effect is evidence of this. Plus the fact that women feeling insecure about being fat is seen as a matter of public interest. While the suicide rate of men being 3-4 times higher than women is pretty much ignored. Women not getting high paid positions is a problem. But men working the vast majority of dirty, unpleasant, dangerous jobs isn't. I could go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 11:48 AM
3

That’s... not how biology works. Dying for someone you impregnate doesn’t create biology to change and suddenly people don’t care about men I never said it did. Men being the ones that were expected to die is a result of them being less valuable, not a cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 11:01 AM
4

It's pretty obvious that feminism is past the point of being useful when "mansplaining" and "manspreading" are made to seem like legitimate concerns. Not to mention feminists crying about having to shave in order for men to want to fuck them. Just because the term was coined after the release of two papers doesn't mean those are the only papers to make such findings. Additionally: how are we biologically programmed not to care about men? That’s an interesting one Men's role in tribes was to die …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 10:43 AM
136

"Imagine if men only served to please me and acted exactly how I wanted them to act all the time" - women
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/19 10:39 AM
18

I like your style
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/19 10:36 AM
2

Well initially there was a need for feminism. I'm just talking about why it still exists. The women are wonderful effect is much more than 2 papers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 10:35 AM
1

Chocolate milf = black and post wall I can see why you're so angry about preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 10:04 AM
1

"Let me use circular reasoning to justify my outrage because I'm a total failure" - you
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 10:03 AM
1

You calling it pathetic isn't going to make you any more desirable when you're past the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 10:00 AM
3

Sure, we will fuck some fat girl if we're horny and no one else will know about it. But when it comes to relationships it's a whole different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:57 AM
4

You sound like a femcel
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:56 AM
2

Doesn't work because people are biologically programmed not to care about men. The only reason feminism exists is because of the women are wonderful effect
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:54 AM
1

Love is a feeling, not an action. If you feel like you love someone, you do. And here you go talking about "true love" like this is a fairytale. Your idealised version of love might be one thing, but the reality can be very different. "Love isn't a feeling it's a verb". This is just a failure in understanding what a verb is. Feelings can be verbs. That's why the word "feel" is a verb.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:28 AM
1

Is reading a bit difficult for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 12:45 AM
1

You're making a different argument here. You're saying it's not "right" to love without respect. That's a moral argument, not an argument about the nature of reality. Your rather shit definition of "not being an asshat" clearly doesn't work as people can obviously be "asshats" to people they love. Again, you're talking about what you want love to be, not what it actually is (which is a diverse range of things).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 12:40 AM
1

Yeah, competition with other men, not with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 11:49 PM
1

Winning is a pretty general term for doing well at something. You're inventing meaning that doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 11:09 PM
2

Of course you can. If you're a man you can love a woman without necessarily respecting her. You just think you can't love without respect because for you, as a woman, you wouldn't be able to love a man you didn't respect. You're applying a female perspective and assuming that it's the correct and only way to love.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 09:53 PM
1

10% of cases and "almost abolished" are not the same thing at all
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 09:09 PM
1

Difference is that alimony is 10 times more brutal in the USA
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:55 PM
1

Errrrm no
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:32 PM
2

I'm one of those fairly ugly guys. Not that hard to get girls. But for girls to get dick, it's several levels easier. So it's probably not as easy as you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:27 PM
1

The US isn't any better
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:24 PM
1

Sure, he will get back half of the value of the house once the children move out. But in the meantime he has to live somewhere else, so either rent or take out a mortgage depending on his situation. On top of paying his wife child support that will far exceed 50% of the cost of the children. All the while the woman is the one who cashes in, doesn't have to pay rent, and gets to spend valuable time with her children. So fair!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:19 PM
1

Interestingly, from reading the comments it seems that both men and women would prefer to be treated the way that they would treat the person they care for. Men are more likely to love/cherish their woman and would generally prefer the same in return. Women are more likely to understand/respect their man and would generally prefer the same in return. All comes down to men and women having different ideas of what "love" is I reckon.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:11 PM
1

For women it is. For men it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/19 08:09 PM
6

You're not "merely wondering", you're being intentionally provocative. You're acting in a way that would suggest that it is wrong for men to feel attacked when people such as yourself attack their behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 01:51 PM
5

It's always like "shaming men for expressing feelings is toxic masculinity" and they are like "that's misandry. That's a horrible attack on all men. You can't just claim that I'm toxic for having control over my feelings" Aren't you just perpetuating toxic masculinity here? You're basically attacking men for taking things personally, and speaking out about how they feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 12:58 PM
5

Maybe you should've thought about whether you cared before you started arguing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 06:34 PM
5

What do you mean "so"? You were arguing that it's not a gendered statement. It is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 05:49 PM
2

So it's worth letting the courts and law enforcement actually do their thing. Which is what happens... Where exactly is the problem? Seems like another non-issue that feminists have blown out of proportion to justify their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 05:09 PM
6

The mental gymnastics are strong with you. The statement refers to one gender. It's a gendered statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 05:07 PM
7

I agree with you, I just found it funny
/r/TheRedPill29/01/19 06:10 PM
2

Are we being dumb right now? Who know’s Puts an apostrophe in "knows" "Are we being dumb?" Lmao
/r/TheRedPill29/01/19 05:46 PM
3

Women have to live with the fact that any time they travel from home to work to home again without being raped, that only happened because every man they crossed decided to behave well today. Yeah because every man is a potential rapist, who just happened not to rape anyone today. The argument of women being weaker is just pathetic. I'm a fairly strong guy, but if a girl half my size comes along with a knife or a gun, or just attacks from behind I'm still just as fucked as if I was smaller
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 07:25 PM
2

So if the amount of sex people have when young doesn't affect the amount they have older, then your comment does not relate to the part of my comment that you put in bold. So it's irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 05:31 PM
3

You say "had its sex" as if sex is something you use up. Having sex when younger doesn't make you less likely to have sex when you're older.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 05:20 PM
3

No I just thought it was irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 05:08 PM
3

Good for you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 04:41 PM
1

You're so sexy when you move those goalposts bby
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 03:37 PM
2

Ah ok thanks. That's what I was missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 02:34 PM
1

How can you have free will but no choice? "Free will" is just your brain's output for a given input.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 02:33 PM
2

Whereas Gen X are 38-58. So they've had another 20 years to gain on average 2 additional sexual partners. Doesn't seem unreasonable at all
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 02:07 PM
2

Actually the key word is "sex ratio", and I looked it up a few days ago. Sex ratio at birth: 1.05 (UK), 1.05 (US) Sex ratio in entire population: 0.99 (UK), 0.97 (US) (Sex ratio is the ratio of males to females). I will accept an apology.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 01:38 PM
1

Are you sure this isn't just because Millennials are younger? The article doesn't seem to explain how they accounted for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 01:30 PM
4

Most autistic brag ever
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 01:27 PM
1

Not really. Free will is an illusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 01:26 PM
1

That's 4-7% higher at birth, not in the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/19 01:26 PM
3

Chasing power and wealth is normal but obtaining it isn't. Wanting different things from other people is a good path to happiness because it's easier to achieve than trying to beat the masses at something. And happiness is the end goal. I was just clarifying that your route to happiness doesn't apply to most people, not that it is in any way inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:40 PM
6

Some kind of exceptional achievement in your career, exceptional wealth or something like that. I don’t care about money, or a legacy or fame or anything like that. Kind of my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:21 PM
4

There's no reason you "should" do anything. I'm simply pointing out that your life is easy because you're happy with mediocrity. Not everyone is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 11:17 PM
1

In your example, empowerment comes from yourself. You're asking for empowerment from an external source ie unfair advantage
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:27 PM
1

Unfair advantage
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:17 PM
3

If you're privileged, you don't need to be empowered. Women are just as empowered as men, there's no need to constantly try to give them unfair advantages
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:13 PM
1

I mean that does kind of sound mediocre. None of those things are special for someone your age
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:06 PM
3

Women are already privileged enough as it is
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:06 PM
3

One of two things is true then. Either: 1) you have a very easy life or 2) you are satisfied with a mediocre life
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 10:01 PM
11

You shouldn't believe either. The op has no idea if they're happy or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 09:40 PM
2

Being a man wouldn't have helped you
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 06:06 PM
1

Particularly if you have a high metabolism and high muscle mass. Ripped guys walking round in t shirts in cold weather aren't doing it to show off their arms, they're just not cold.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 05:58 PM
1

Unless you're an extreme manlet, you can quite easily get to a point where you look stronger than your average 6' tall guy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 12:22 AM
1

Women in general are shorter than men. Yeah no shit. We evolved that way for a reason. Because there is benefit to being shorter as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 11:15 AM
1

If there was no selection preference for shorter women, men and women would be the same height.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 11:12 AM
3

They will disproportionately choose shorter girls. That's the point. As if you just quoted bodybuilding forum as a citation LMFAO
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 11:07 AM
1

You're not as attractive as you think. Simple as that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 10:54 AM
4

No it isn't, taller men who have the option of dating tall or short women more often choose shorter women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 10:49 AM
5

I have a theory about why suffering is almost inevitable. Think of it like this. Our emotions from an evolutionary point of view are a way to guide our actions. If I'm hungry, it means I need to get food. If I'm horny, I need to find someone to have sex with. If I'm sad, I need to find a way to be happy. All the negative emotions are calls to action. All the positive emotions are calls to keep doing what you're doing. So I think it's inevitable that you're going to have more negative emotions th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 10:19 AM
4

You are possibly the most autistic person I've encountered on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 10:06 AM
2

Chill out you autist, they just want a citation
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:42 AM
1

They actually have done studies on this and perceived physical strength plays a greater factor in attraction than height alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:41 AM
2

Acouple of two tall people could be screwing their daughter over though. Not many guys want a 6' tall girl
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:40 AM
1

Sure, but nutrition reaches a point where it can't get any better. People are eating too much food nowadays so it's clearly not the limiting factor
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 09:39 AM
2

Nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 06:44 AM
1

Of course it impacts sexual success. The only reason you think it doesn't is because you define sexual success as "how many holes can I put my dick inside" and completely ignore how attractive that hole actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/19 05:56 PM
1

I looked at your link and I looked at the one he posted. They aren't mutually exclusive. What reality do you live in where height doesn't matter? I doubt I'm going to get banned for disagreeing with something so retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 10:29 PM
1

You seem to be thinking emotionally. You want him to be wrong more than you actually believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 07:27 PM
1

Says nothing about the quality of the sexual partners though. Being short is a massive disadvantage if you're a guy (I'm 6' before you try and discredit me as a "heightcel" or some other shit). Yeah maybe you do know short guys who are married, doesn't invalidate his point though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 07:18 PM
1

You seem to be a bit hormonal
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 07:11 PM
1

Definitely the other way round. Women are more likely to accept what they're told to do and go and do it. Men are more likely to think "fuck this I don't like doing this anyway". Men are nature's experiment, hence why they undertake the majority of risky and explorative behaviour
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 06:22 PM
3

I'm 14 and this is deep
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:28 PM
1

Sure, but just because you're ugly doesn't mean you are any more attracted to other ugly people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:00 PM
2

What do you mean? On a moral level, no. In reality, being ugly is going to make it very hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 07:03 PM
1

Sociology is a laughing stock
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:42 PM
1

You mean like how women go round pretending they're men? Trying to do well in their careers and such like
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:24 PM
1

Upvoted, but please look up the difference between "whom" and "who".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:21 PM
1

There are some people that are literally just fuck ugly, and there's not much they can do about it. Until you see a picture of an incel you can't really say whether it's just an excuse or if they were actually fucked over genetically.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 04:10 PM
1

Which is why I said "to an extent". Found the girl that can't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 03:33 PM
3

I consider myself below average facially and have had success off tinder
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:14 AM
1

Agreed about Hinge. I get wayyyy more matches than I do on tinder. I probably match with 5% of girls on tinder whereas on Hinge it's more like a third
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 10:13 AM
1

I agree with you. I think placing the blame on women comes from the subconscious belief that there should be an equal number of men and women who are considered attractive in a fair world. But the world isn't fair - that's why there are people who are attractive and people who are unattractive. It doesn't matter whether the unattractive are 50/50 male/female or 80/20 male female. You're born with genetics that determine to an extent how attractive you are. Just because being male makes you more …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:35 AM
1

That's a total straw man. People advise women not to wear certain clothes in certain areas because it does increase the chance of attracting a rapists. That's not the same as blaming women when they're raped
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:16 AM
1

It doesn't mean they're not responsible for it. I'm simply saying that they can't be blamed for cheating in a game that was rigged against them. I would do the same. Survival of the fittest.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 09:15 AM
1

If you take a step back, you could argue that it is actually hard for women. Put it this way: a success in dating is getting what you want with someone you're attracted to. For men, this is hard because for the average guy, a low percentage of women are attracted to him. For women, this is hard because they're attracted to a low percentage of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:41 PM
1

Chad isn't a mythical guy who every single woman wants to fuck. He's just an attractive guy that the majority of women want to fuck. Whether 90%, 95% or 100% of women want to fuck him is irrelevant to the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:39 PM
1

The op is wrong for blaming women, but right to take the blame away from the low SMV men who resort to manipulation. In essence we are all in a game which is unfair from the outset. You can't blame a guy who's been given a shit hand for trying to cheat a little bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:36 PM
1

When are men not held accountable for their actions? Usually it's women who aren't held accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 10:32 PM
10

It's like this: someone says your food is poisonous. It's safer to assume it is and throw it out rather than eat it and assume they're lying. Food is inanimate. Men are fucking people. You can't just "throw them out" because someone said they did something.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/18 08:58 PM
-1

Awwww she got all dressed to go rioting now she's gonna be disfigured
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/18 11:53 PM
1

A well structured argument indeed. I can see you've put a lot of thought into this.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/18 11:40 PM
1

they can simply contact the irs, pay the tax and a late fee Good. So everyone wins. Remind me what your problem is again?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/18 11:32 PM
0

Dude stop crying you can find pictures of naked women on the internet even if your favourite Thot gets patrolled
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/18 11:27 PM
1

Surely the victims are the American tax payers? If these women are making a living through selling nudes, they're not contributing to society in other ways. Why should they get a free ride while everyone else pays to maintain the country?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/18 11:23 PM
1

I mean, do you know they arent paying taxes? No, but the IRS can easily find out.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/18 11:22 PM
21

Girls that age tend to care more about looks than personality so it's a good insult
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/18 07:45 AM
3

There are a lot of areas where being a woman is a massive advantage. You can't quantify "privilege" so don't really see why you think you know men are more "privileged" than women. People who think men are privileged are the same ones who go on about "historical oppression" i.e oppression that doesn't exist anymore. We live in the present, not the past.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/18 10:45 AM
12

It's just an annoying phrase because the clear implication is that they think they're victims and men have it easy. Which isn't the case.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 08:23 AM
10

I am male but I don't think "female privilege" would be an attack either, as long as it's not coming from someone who thinks that female privilege is larger/more impactful than male privilege This is exactly the problem. Every time women say shit like this they are implying that male privilege is larger/ more impactful than female privilege.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 08:21 AM
9

Petition to have her removed: https://www.change.org/p/southampton-university-student-union-president-of-the-southampton-student-union-to-stand-down-immediately
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/18 07:07 PM
5

https://www.change.org/p/southampton-university-student-union-president-of-the-southampton-student-union-to-stand-down-immediately
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/18 07:04 PM
30

It may as well be the same thing because it's sure as hell not going to be able to fund itself.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/18 11:29 PM
3

And as always the article just has to state that the real victim isn't the man who's had his recent life ruined by the false accusation, the real victims are women who are less likely to be believed. Because men aren't important.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/18 08:51 AM
1

And that's your greatest achievement
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/18 09:20 PM
19

Average sentence for rape convictions in various western countries: UK (95.7 months ~= 8 years): https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm101108/text/101108w0003.htm#10110832001246 Victoria, Australia (5 years): https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/publications/sentencing-snapshots/207-rape-higher-courts-victoria-2011-12-2015-16 USA (11 years): https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/wonk/wp/2016/06/06/what-makes-the-stanford-sex-offenders-six-mont…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/18 09:56 PM
6939

I love how he's just casually standing there while she tries to hurt him for a bit then he just thinks "fuck it"
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 09:01 AM
-6

Definitely American
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 11:55 AM
124

This Mustaka fella loves sucking himself off. Can anyone say "self esteem issues"?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 08:39 AM
2

Go ahead
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 08:32 AM
3

The whole "everyone is stupid" thing is itself pretty short sighted. Think about what stupid means. It's all relative. Something is only stupid if it's stupid compared to something else. And the "something else" depends on context. Usually when someone asks "are you stupid", the "someone else" is assumed to be an average person. Your paragraph comes off as a stupid person trying to sound clever.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 10:13 PM
5

I disagree with him too. But discounting something on account of it sounding weird is not really a rational response
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 10:07 PM
0

I wasn't saying that, although it definitely can be a problem. But mainly because it's easy to abuse dopamine rather than the effect it has on the preferential treatment women get
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 10:04 PM
0

People probably said the same thing about internet porn when it first came out. If it doesn't directly replace women it's not gonna make a difference to the dynamic between sexes
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 09:52 PM
0

The only reason it's stupid is that a sex robot is never going to replace an actual woman
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 06:59 PM
9

That's not red pill at all
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/18 05:51 PM
202

Serena Williams is certainly helping with that shift in attitudes
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/18 05:07 PM
30

The article isn't really fine in my opinion. If you read the first sentence, it's intentionally deceptive in the same way as the headline. The way it reads is that women work more than men. But the meaning is that women work more than they used to and men work less than they used to. And yes, it is definitely economic. They want to pander to people's current beliefs because it's a lot easier to sell papers to people if you're not triggering their cognitive dissonance.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 10:27 PM
141

Glad to see they're not giving in to the whimps
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 10:05 PM
18

They're saying that women deserve to be paid for work that they willingly do for free... I think
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 09:07 PM
12

She didn't really have a choice in the matter
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 07:46 PM
315

But I feeeel like I work really hard
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 07:43 PM
500

This would be funny if it wasn't representative of a larger theme of the media telling lies/intentionally misleading people.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 07:20 PM
8

Well you're contradicting yourself so I thought I'd point it out. No harm done.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 10:24 AM
36

Bell curves for IQ are the same. Women are just more clustered around the average while men have a higher chance of either being a genius or dumb as rocks. This means the bell curves are not the same. The mean is the same, not the bell curve.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 09:10 AM
1

10 one night stands over the course of 36 years is "a la DiCaprio" now?
/r/TheRedPill10/09/18 10:35 PM
3

You only get escalated into sex once or twice when young to learn casual sex as disappointment Is that sentence worded correctly? I can't understand it.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/18 09:28 PM
2

I feel this is a common problem growing up with a lack of male influence. The females in my family loved putting me down (especially my older sister) for being a guy and not liking the same pointless shit as them/being masculine/any excuse they could come up with. That shit has an effect on you as an adult but once you've recognised it it's easier to overcome.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/18 02:32 PM
1

Completely agree with this. You achieve a long term goal and you get a huge release of dopamine. This then motivates you to seek out more long term goals without you needing to try to motivate yourself to do it.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/18 10:57 AM
11

Women aren't capable of lying. If they try their voiceboxes actually cease to function
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/18 05:23 PM
5

Breaks the rules Abuses the umpire Gets punished "Muh sexism"
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/18 03:40 PM
16

No he isn't he's saying that it's less to do with society and more to do with intrinsic differences between men and women.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/18 10:04 AM
12

Hold this L
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/18 09:47 AM
20

You are aware firefighters aren't even on the list in the article right? And like I say, the question still remains of why they are male dominated.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/18 11:33 PM
25

Why would they be any more likely to get raped? Sounds like you're pulling stats out of your arse. If you think rape is more likely because they're male dominated, the question still remains of why they are male dominated to start with.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/18 02:37 PM
50

All of those jobs are hostile to everyone. That's kind of the entire point of the article.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/18 07:16 AM
4

Yeah that's definitely fake. Girls never call themselves average. And it just doesn't seem true at all
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/18 09:30 PM
2

We are taught to let our desires rule us because it is a useful marketing lever It's not taught, it's innate. The entire reason desires exist is to make you act on them.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/18 08:30 PM
1

What makes sugar good? It's a dense source of quick release energy
/r/TheRedPill03/09/18 07:51 PM
1

Bröther may I have some common sense?
/r/TheRedPill03/09/18 10:14 AM
34

Pussy pass not only denied but rammed up their arse
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/18 10:21 PM
1

You're looking at it far too simplisticly. It's about supply and demand. Women have high supply of guys willing to fuck but low demand for it. Guys have low supply of women willing to fuck but high demand for it. This creates the dynamic where women have the power when it comes to sex. This is why men chase. This is why a 5/10 woman can easily fuck an 8. Supply and demand. Just think of it the same way as you would economics. And because women get pregnant, even a guy who's a 7/10 will have to "…
/r/seduction27/08/18 10:00 PM
2

Go and talk to a guy and make excessive amounts of eye contact.
/r/seduction27/08/18 06:12 PM
1

Due you're just ignoring biological facts here. Women are wayyy pickier than men because they get pregnant. I can go into more detail on why that's the case if you want.
/r/seduction27/08/18 06:09 PM
1

Christ almighty I feel bad for him now
/r/TheRedPill14/08/18 03:23 PM
1

Nah I wouldn't say it's social pressure.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/18 06:54 AM
7

That's true, that's basically what motivated me to hit the gym so hard. I inherited my Dad's skinny genetics and he said to me "people like us will never gain muscle". Now every time I see him he's amazed how big I am. That said, this won't happen every time. Studies have been done on this and they found that on average it's better not to tell people if you want to actually achieve it.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 10:36 PM
44

I'm glad that this is on film for everyone to see. If a feminist watches this maybe she'll finally realise that men are basically expected to be fucking mind readers when it comes to sexual consent. On second thoughts, what am I talking about? No feminist would ever look at this situation logically. It's all about feelz.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 09:55 PM
300

I've also heard that telling people your goals makes you less likely to achieve them as it activates your reward centres prematurely
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 05:16 PM
3

Sure that's why they go to clubs. But they don't leave with two strangers of the opposite sex at 1am because "they like to dance".
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 02:20 PM
1

No one is saying she deserved it
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 02:16 PM
2

It's the whole key Vs lock analogy that explains this.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/18 11:56 AM
2

My IQ is in the 135-140 range and I do struggle to find topics to talk about with people. Very rarely do my interests align with theirs. On top of that, school was so easy for me that I haven't developed a decent work ethic which is fucking me now that I've left education.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 10:29 PM
79

A boy being raised by only a mother is fucked because women have no idea what men go through in life and therefore have no idea how to prepare a boy for that
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 09:43 PM
13

Bahaha there's no hope for her
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 06:02 PM
45

So you’re implying that it was fine to rape her. Wrong. You inferred it, but I never implied it. You're probably inventing hidden meanings behind my words to protect yourself from the truth they hold. I said she was presumably hoping for something sexual, which if we are honest, she probably was. I only mentioned that fact because it seems likely that she intended to cheat, making the break up even more justifiable. If it's prosecutable, prosecute me.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 05:12 PM
10

Of course it's temporary. But it's not actually short lived because when you're working towards a long term goal, activation happens in anticipation of the reward, increasing with your perceived proximity to the reward. Plus hard earned reward conditions people to seek out more long term goals. And long term goals are what make your life fulfilling. More likely what happens is that Adam becomes lazy, and achieves nothing meaningful in his life because he never had to work for anything, and his b…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 01:55 PM
373

No one is entitled to anyone's sympathy. When you go against someone's advice and end up worse off for it, you are even less entitled to their sympathy. There's no reason that he should have to deal with the consequences of her bad decisions. He said he'd leave her if she went. She went. She left with two guys she doesn't know, presumably hoping for something sexual. Something sexual happened, just not the sexual thing she wanted. He left her. Perfectly fair.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 01:11 PM
5

It's not a fetish you fool. It's backed up by years of psychological analysis. Things that are harder to earn activate the reward centres in your brain much more than things that are easy.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 01:02 PM
29

I ask pretty girls would they rather be pretty or smart and their answer is always smart And you actually believe them?
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 11:54 AM
9

It has value, but little value. You ever noticed that things that are easy to get aren't anywhere near as rewarding as those that take time and effort?
/r/TheRedPill11/07/18 11:49 AM
6

It implies abundance and status
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 07:43 PM
2

It's called setting the scene. Do you also think he's glamourising highschool, anime and dating people for one and a half years?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 07:04 PM
4

Seemed like a minor irrelevant detail in the story, and the op didn't describe it either positively or negatively. It was a statement of fact, not a glamourisation.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 04:35 PM
186

You're bang on with what you say about the power dynamic in a relationship. There's always one person with more power, the red pill teaches you how to become that person. Most people seem to think that a woman who holds the power is a Strong Independent Woman™ while a man who holds the power is abusive. I think this is the source of a lot of the hatred for this subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 11:48 AM
1

This is the most blue pill bullshit I've seen in a while. What about this is related to the subreddit in any way?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/18 04:05 PM
2

I had a different experience with psychedelics. Acid made me feel like more of a man than ever every time I took it. I could feel the power of my legs with every step. I would walk past men and imagine how it would feel to collide with them in a fight. It's not that I felt any dislike for them - I just felt that I had this power within me that I didn't use. I respected them, but wanted to fight them nonetheless. I would look at animals no longer as sentient beings, but lumps of meat to be hunted…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/18 02:47 AM
1

Yeah no. Islam is red pill as fuck
/r/TheRedPill06/07/18 05:14 PM
5

People who hate the red pill always misunderstand what it's about. Cognitive dissonance 101. It's also funny that he brings up group mentality influencing your opinion without considering that that could be the exact reason that he holds his blue pill opinions. After all, the blue pill group is a lot larger than the red pill one.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/18 11:12 AM
3

Not in the studies I've seen. Emotional intelligence is a factor, but not as much as regular iq
/r/TheRedPill02/07/18 11:53 AM
1

I've faced a similar problem. People used to see me as a walkover. I lifted and have gained a lot of muscle. Now guys treat me with respect, joke about being scared of me and women are 10x more receptive TLDR: Lift
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 04:55 PM
3

Please learn how to construct a sentence and punctuate it. This was slightly painful to read
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 01:05 AM
31

People aren't saying that they definitely cheated on you, only that you have no way of knowing if they did or not.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/18 08:08 AM
32

It's amazing that these same people that think women should get paid the same for less work also ask "omg why are men threatened by feminism?". Maybe we don't like feminism because you want unfair bloody advantages over us in the name of "equality".
/r/TheRedPill26/06/18 10:38 PM
2

Nah I actually just misunderstood the comment
/r/TheRedPill25/06/18 10:09 PM
2

It's because they put no effort in. Anyone with an average or above intelligence can become adept at maths, but they just assume "I can't do maths" and never bother trying. Probably doesn't help that people see it as cool to be shit at it
/r/TheRedPill25/06/18 09:16 AM
-71

You must be really stupid to think that makes any kind of sense
/r/TheRedPill24/06/18 06:54 AM
2

I'm the same, 3,700 calorie maintenance. Eating has become such a chore in my life that every mouthful is a struggle
/r/TheRedPill23/06/18 08:55 PM
3

Advice usually takes the form of a imperative. And I'm pretty sure that advice is a fairly important aspect of this sub.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/18 08:17 PM
4

Dude that's high school maths
/r/TheRedPill23/06/18 10:41 AM
5

I don't know why women/feminists think everyday life is all about men when it's mostly not gendered. Because they are obsessed with being the victim
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:53 AM
6

Fixed
/r/MensRights21/06/18 06:57 PM
29

Repeat after me: POINTING 👏 OUT 👏 SYSTEMATIC 👏 SEXISM 👏 AGAINST 👏 MEN 👏 ISN'T 👏 A 👏 SEXIST 👏 ACT
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:33 PM
1

Apologies in using the wrong term. Thought it was obvious though that I was talking about spending by members of the public from my initial comment.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 03:09 PM
1

Public spending and government spending are not the same at all. You're confused.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:01 PM
0

Public spending doesn't increase debt
/r/MensRights21/06/18 01:36 PM
10

But the person only got angry, pretended they didn't understand, and then said they didn't want to talk about it anymore. Do you want to play "cognitive dissonance"?
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:29 AM
7

Conspiracy time: if women earn more money and men earn less, that increases public spending which is good for the economy. I think this is likely just a happy side effect of fucking men over though.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:14 AM
37

"We'll admit men are mistreated as long as we don't have to do anything about it."
/r/MensRights21/06/18 09:13 AM
5

I don't think it was a very rational shooting
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:27 PM
4

My guess was that he turned up to buy the air conditioner
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:08 PM
13

It's so unusual to hear a women say positive things about men.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:50 PM
3

I wouldn't use either of those terms either. But you've got to admit, it is closer to privilege than it is to oppression
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:54 PM
4

Sounds more like privilege than oppression when you put it that way
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:47 PM
20

You're right it's so stupid to call someone out for expressing a desire to murder people who are paying women for a consensual service. If the job is so degrading, the women are more than welcome to quit the job. But of course personal responsibility only applies to men in the eyes of a feminist. Let's restrict the jobs women can do to further increase their empowerment! They don't realise they hate the job! /s
/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:44 PM
4

It must be convenient being a woman. Every time your work is below standard or just straight up shit you can just blame it on sexism. Yay!
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:46 PM
6

True, but they want the "non-males" to actually be non-males, not males who claim to be non-males in order to avoid blatant discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:40 PM
1

How dare men be less lazy and more motivated to improve themselves than women
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:26 PM
8

Don't be stupid. There obviously needs to be one rule for men and another for women so that men are NEVER the victim. That's equality for you. Hooray feminism.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:18 AM
59

If women are living in constant fear of attack I'd say that's more indicative of mental illness than it is of how horrible men are. Seriously, I'm not making fun of mental illnesses, that is genuinely neurotic.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 10:06 AM
12

"I'm oppressed because my employer doesn't like me as much as a man who actually puts effort into his work while I sit around on my fat arse" - feminists
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:28 AM
3

Who cares, they "invade" then invariably produce a shit film that no one wants to watch anyway.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:20 AM
2

It's definitely satire
/r/MensRights19/06/18 09:09 PM
2

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 08:57 PM
6

And just like that no one was ever raped again.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 08:02 PM
1

How does anyone not realise this is satire
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:59 PM
3

It's got to get worse before it gets better. It might be only when it gets bad enough that the majority see through the bullshit that the pendulum will swing the other way. At that point speaking about this stuff will be socially acceptable and a reasonable debate will be able to take place without the feminists being able to use smear tactics.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:25 PM
2

That's how it is at the moment, but as they keep pushing to silence, people will start to get sick of the ever increasing absurdity until it swings back like a pendulum. It's just unstable at the moment, we will get to an equilibrium
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:21 PM
1

Haven't watched it yet (I will) as I'm on mobile data, but how was it received?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:16 PM
2

Hey, all you can do is try, friend You're absolutely right. We mustn't be disheartened.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:00 PM
9

I will bring it up, but no doubt it'll hit the brick wall of "muh imaginery oppression".
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:52 PM
17

Thing is, this isn't even an unusual thing for feminists to think. I've been talking to someone on here about it and she swears that saying "I hate men" is better than saying "I hate women", quoting "the political and social climate" as the reason. Basically she's saying "I can hate men because it's socially acceptable to do so". If men were even a tenth as bad as feminists like to believe, we would've committed atrocities for all the shit feminists slander us over.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:54 PM
13

Fuck knows. We can only hope that it's soon. It's fucking absurd to silence half of the population while actively helping the other.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:01 PM
1

If you actually read my comments you'll see I never implied otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:49 PM
4

Many of us are here because we want to be better men who have a more realistic grasp on the world This right here is why people see us as a hate group. The reality of the world is not pleasant. We don't live in some imaginery utopia where no wrong occurs and everything is just, but most people want to believe that we do. So when these people see red pill truths they think "wow that's such a negative view of the world". They then assume that this "negative" (i.e. realistic) world view must be roo…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/18 12:39 PM
1

For the sake of an analogy, I wanted to say, “should you be responsible for telling your friends and family not to blow people up?”. Is this a sound analogy? The analogy is logically sound, as in both cases you are saying "should you be responsible for telling members of your group not to do a bad thing that the group is known for doing". However, in reality logic would go out of the window if you ever brought this up because Muslims are Approved VictimsTM while men are filthy oppressors. SJWs l…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:18 PM
12

Women are never responsible for their actions. They are Approved VictimsTM
/r/MensRights19/06/18 09:34 AM
0

I'm British and it's still not funny
/r/MensRights19/06/18 09:08 AM
19

While we are at it, let's put murderers in the naughty corner and ask them why they're being so mean to people 😢
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:27 AM
0

Do what you want mate
/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:57 PM
0

Why the fuck do you think you get a say Depends what you mean by "get a say". If you mean "why do I think I have the right to speak up", then I think that because I have the right to free speech. If by "get a say" you mean "actually have control over what treatment they use", then I know I don't have that right. I wouldn't try to force them. Likewise, I'm not forcing you to do anything. I'm just telling you why the idea is shit.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:14 PM
8

I guess anyone who fully identify as an MRA might be weird, I've never met one myself. I'm more talking about people who don't buy into the feminist narrative and toxic masculinity etc. I've met plenty of them, and they're all normal people.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:53 PM
6

I feel like in 20 years time men's rights activists will be the only manly people left on the planet
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:50 PM
-1

Wrong, I have every right to criticise your idea. If someone thought jumping off a cliff would help cure their dementia would you try to stop them? Or just think "fuck it I don't have a better idea".
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:20 PM
0

Is this the only way you can think of promoting men's rights? Just do anything other than this.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:00 PM
-1

Doing nothing is a better idea. This is damaging to our movement.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:58 PM
0

Don't listen to what I'm basically saying (ie not what I'm saying). Listen to what I'm actually saying. Using a political party that is widely associated with bigotry (whether correctly or not) to promote a movement whose main opposition is those who incorrectly call them bigots is straight up stupid.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:54 PM
1

Yes, trying to better the position of men will always cause feminists to attack male rights activists. Which is why we need to actually think about it before recklessly doing something that could be harmful to what we are trying to achieve. That does not mean we should do nothing. In this case, I genuinely think doing nothing would be better for men's rights. Also, please explain how "taking over" a fringe political party which holds precisely zero seats in parliament is going to mean that "femi…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:17 PM
1

Feminists attempt to end conflicting views using attacks on reputation/character. This seems to be just giving them more ammunition to do so.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:57 PM
71

As if Obama never existed
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:27 PM
4

Sounds like a good idea but not sure about the choice of party. Given UKIP's reputation this is just another chance for feminists to start a smear campaign claiming people who care about men are bigots.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:26 PM
84

How long before feminists start demanding we stunt men's growth so that women can catch up physically? (I'm joking)
/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:23 PM
8

I have a very serious professional job I do not want to complicate with a sexual affair Then don't. Think with your brain not your dick.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/18 11:28 AM
5

Because they're an idiot. Idiots are best ignored. I would've commented saying "there's a reason your father doesn't love you, and it's not because he's a bad person"
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:25 PM
5

You seem mentally unstable
/r/TheRedPill16/06/18 08:16 AM
1

Why don't you go and exercise so you don't have to hate those that do?
/r/MensRights16/06/18 08:00 AM
289

The victim card is so strong throughout. If you can't make your argument without bringing up the fact that you have a vagina, then your argument is shit.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 07:03 PM
3

Very true, I hadn't considered this aspect of it with regards to people using it to create misleading statistics.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:18 PM
25

We brought this concern to HR (which has been amazing here, really trying to make the place a welcoming one for all people...) All people except those who care about men's rights. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:00 PM
3

That's a fair point.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:45 PM
5

Either that or it just doesn't matter when we are. Pick one feminists.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:35 PM
8

It also makes the assumption that we don't already tell people not to drug and rape people. If you're convicted of rape you will most likely go to prison. I'd say that sends a pretty strong message that rape is wrong.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:27 PM
19

Viewers were outraged over the show saying it was 'incoherent' Incoherent in this context means "it doesn't fit my feminist narrative".
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:18 PM
3

I haven't heard his opinions on the matter but I will say this: If he is talking about the legal definition of rape then he is correct, men can't legally be raped. Instead it is called sexual assault. As long as the sentences are the same, I don't see the problem in having different names for it depending on gender. Although it would make sense to include male rape as rape in the future.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:06 PM
2

meat head content. You think you're above it all? He's a guy who likes fitness and fighting and even made his career from it. Using derogatory terms for people who enjoy those things is just judgemental.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:01 PM
159

This stuff is so unbelievably stupid. We don't teach people "don't drug people" because everyone already knows it's wrong. The person going round drugging and raping people is under no impression that it's a good thing to do. They just don't care. Bad people will always exist. The way to minimise their effect on you is to take precautions to ensure that they can't do bad things to you.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 02:21 PM
67

They know it's increased. But you're a man. Your financial situation only matters because it allows you to pay for women and children.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:04 PM
0

The whole reason behind this board is we shouldn't have to self sacrifice for someone who wants equality and hates us. Seems fair. They want equality, but don't know what it means.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:54 PM
1

Did I find a unicorn No. I haven't read your post, but the answer is no.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 12:37 PM
23

"it's not the same when women do it, because social dynamics and cultural context and power imbalance" This is one of the stupidest arguments feminists make. And that's saying a lot. "Damn it sucks that I got raped but I guess it doesn't matter because patriarchy". This is the kind of person we are up against.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:50 PM
5

You’re entitled to NOTHING I find it funny that this is such an obvious thing to guys. We all understand that we are entitled to nothing because it's been consistently reinforced throughout our lives. But say it to women and suddenly you're a monster.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/18 03:25 PM
1

That bitch gonna be shredded as fuck
/r/TheRedPill14/06/18 02:00 PM
1

Turns out the big leagues aren't as big as I thought
/r/TheRedPill14/06/18 01:57 PM
11

"OMG muh objectification"
/r/MensRights14/06/18 12:19 PM
9

Also don't say "I thought I said something". You should give no indication that you care whether or not she replies
/r/TheRedPill14/06/18 11:50 AM
1

Women have no idea that men want to protect and help women on an innate level. I think this is why feminist issues get so much publicity - because everyone cares about women. Only men (and not even all men) care about men.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 10:31 AM
10

Atoms are patriarchal
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:44 AM
1

This is the feminist narrative used to silence men's issues
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:43 AM
1

That's not true.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:42 AM
1

If I take you out alpine rock climbing without a rope you won't be interested in my claim that you just need to control your fear. We aren't talking about rock climbing without ropes. We are talking about cycling, something which is pretty safe if you take care of your equipment and don't ride like an idiot. The level of safety is determined by your own actions. Each person sets their own safety limits and makes their own judgements. EXACTLY. It's personal choice. This is not a gendered issue. R…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:19 AM
2

Some do, some don't.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 08:10 AM
3

Not really
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:56 PM
1

There's a balance to be struck I think. You have to process your emotions without acting emotionally. Acting emotionally means acting without logic.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:17 PM
93

They have a higher salary because they actually go and negotiate their salary. Shocking.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:05 PM
237

"All of these things are due to misogyny. WE are the REAL victims" - feminists
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:04 PM
5

Emotions are important; they influence our thought processes, so shouldn't be disregarded I disagree on this point. Emotions do affect your thought process and therefore actions. And that's exactly why they SHOULD be disregarded.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:51 PM
3

To be fair, even if it is just confirmation bias etc, if it makes you overcome some hurdle, that means it works.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/18 05:35 PM
1

Good. We can now end this discussion.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:33 PM
1

Dear God you actually are just stupid. Everyone gets the point you just made, it's not a difficult one to understand. The fact is that, in the case of circumcision, the wholeness DID ONCE EXIST. It's not a case of perceived loss of something, it's a case of ACTUAL loss of something.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:22 PM
1

Well if that's what you're trying to point out, would it not be more helpful to actually say what you think they mean? Here is the quote for you: The term ‘intactivist’ invites psychoanalytic criticism, as it references that wish for ‘intactness’ that psychoanalysis alleges to be a defensive fantasy against the subject’s foundational fracture — the wish to ‘restore’ a prelapsarian wholeness that never actually existed. The problem is the "never actually existed" part. At least that's the problem…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:53 PM
7

This has happened to me at clubs as well (it wasn't quite like this, but twice girls have grabbed and squeezed my crotch then looked at me). It's not all that uncommon.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:48 AM
0

If roads are not safe enough for young children and frail old people to use, let alone women, then those roads are forcing us into cars. They are safe enough, it's just that women are too scared. Maybe it's the responsibility of women to overcome their fear rather than society doing everything for them? When old you have failing eyesight and hearing If your eyesight and hearing are failing, you shouldn't be controlling any kind of vehicle on the road.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:16 AM
3

Dude you're being stupid. I can't tell if it's intentional or not, but you really are.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:06 AM
1

I mean I'm tall myself but it hardly seems to do me that many favours How are you judging how many favours it does you? I think it's more likely that you just don't realise that it's doing you favours.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/18 12:58 PM
2

People will very rarely OPENLY question it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't affect how they perceive you.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/18 12:52 PM
1

True. I'm not particularly big at all (5'11 80kg/176lb at 12% bf) but people constantly comment on how big I look. All because I have good back genetics.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/18 12:50 PM
4

It is simple for most people. But nothing is simple for feminists. Everything is "problematic" and "important"
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:18 AM
6

Had this discussion the other day with a male friend who wears an earring. No one has mentioned any problem with it, so it's fine as far as I'm concerned. At least there is consistency.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:00 AM
9

Wow, a rare piece where the author accepts that women's actions actually have consequences
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:20 AM
19

Once again we have to cater to women in order to get them to do something they don't want to do, just because men happen to like it more.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:52 AM
1

No, they BOTH have evidence that sex occurred. NEITHER of them have evidence that it was unwanted. And yet for some reason in your head this automatically means "the man must be guilty". Just listen to yourself.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:28 AM
1

There is evidence that his penis was in a vagina with the device in it. There is no evidence that his penis got there due to sexual assault/rape
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:27 AM
9

Men are known to negotiate their pay more often than women, and have bigger networks to check if they are underpaid. Pay transparency gives men a leg up in a game that already favours them. It's a woman's own fault if she doesn't negotiate her own pay, not anyone else's. The game is fair, women just don't want to play it.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:53 AM
1

*general idea
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:41 AM
-4

Is this how an autistic person thinks?
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:12 PM
38

Both have the potential to ruin lives
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:17 PM
1

That may be true. At the end of the day, it's actually impossible to decipher which are more biassed than others because when doing so, you're applying your own biases. But from a survey of a large number of people, the BBC came out on top in terms of how unbiased people see it.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:12 AM
1

Yeah moaning = complaining/whining
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:47 AM
1

Every media outlet is biassed. The BBC is among the least biassed
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:47 AM
28

They're going out with rich guys while fucking ripped guys behind their back. Simple.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/18 08:19 PM
4

A fistful of equality right there
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:16 PM
7

She's just a presenter
/r/MensRights09/06/18 08:18 AM
29

Men do something they've been doing for centuries without praise and now suddenly some woman wants to act like it's something new. No doubt she thinks this is a result of feminism
/r/MensRights09/06/18 08:05 AM
8

More like they've hit the wall and now they want an excuse for their reproductive failure.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:47 AM
-2

Prison isn't too much worse than your average full time job, so he's basically retiring early with $10m which isn't too bad
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:45 AM
8

Not saying he should or shouldn't do that, but it's a free country. It can be annoying when people not only disagree with you, but do it in a way that completely alienates you. No point spending time with people that have such a different point of view in life.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 09:38 AM
1

Sure, but it just seems strange you've picked up on this one weird piece of advice and not all the other weird pieces of advice that medical professionals give
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 08:20 PM
62

"Life is too hard for all the poor, innocent, perfect women so let's make it easier for them"
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:13 PM
1

I apologize. You are forgiven. you claimed that it is not okay to judge someone based on a statistic No I didn't. But feel free to quote where I said that. YES, TECHNICALLY IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE ODDS TO NEVER BE WEIGHTED CORRECTLY, AFTER AROUND 1 MILLION TRIALS IT BECOMES A MATHMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY Oh my sweet summer child you are so painfully wrong. The larger the sample size, the lower the probability of variation from the expected result (ie true probability). But after 1 million it is stil…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:53 PM
1

First off, I don’t know how you came to the conclusion that I said it is okay to judge people due to height You've misunderstood completely. I never said it was or was not ok. I'm simply saying this: imagine a scenario where height is, for any reason, relevant. It's just an example. Anything will do. Let's imagine that it is a job where being tall is a disadvantage. You have 50 male applicants, and 50 female. A stupid person would immediately eliminate the 50 males on the assumption that they ar…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 03:08 PM
0

Using numbers like 1 and 4 to represent the whole population is a disgusting use of numbers. It's called an example. He's using small numbers of people to demonstrate a point. If we put all of the women together and all the men together, the woman will be 5’4 and the man will be 5’9. The woman will be weaker, and the man will be stronger. Yes, but the point is that if height is some factor that we care about (for whatever reason), we should judge people based on just that - height. It would be s…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:27 PM
1

If you listened to the advice of every doctor and dentist in the world you'd never live your life because you'd constantly be protecting your body from negligible harm.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 11:48 AM
1

Of course they don't disappear, that would be a completely ridiculous thing to think. While this may cause some damage, it's negligible. Dermatologists may say you should wear sunscreen all year round but their perspective is that of protecting skin at all costs. That is their profession. Dermatologists also say that your skin should remain the same colour all year round, which, while that may be true in order to maintain maximum skin health, it's not really practical. Likewise, you should also …
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 10:43 AM
1

Depends where you live. Here in the UK the sun is so weak during most months that you couldn't get a tan even if you sat outside all day
/r/TheRedPill06/06/18 05:15 PM
12

What rape?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 12:21 PM
4

You don't know me wanker 😜
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:05 PM
6

I didn't have to dig through anything, it seems to be most of what you do on reddit. Go back to furiously masturbating, loser.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:00 PM
6

Says the guy who comments on NSFW videos asking for the names of various pornstars... I'm sure you've got a fulfilling sex life. Just a bit of advice: no girl will fuck you for being a white knight.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:37 AM
3

Swedes are descended from Vikings so yeah I'd say that's pretty masculine
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:20 AM
1

It's totally acceptable to stay fat for years on end, as long as your gaining muscle
/r/TheRedPill01/06/18 02:00 PM
2

I find it fun to take it too far though. Even if they never talk to you again there's something satisfying about knowing you got under their skin
/r/TheRedPill30/05/18 01:01 PM
10

If there's anyone who won't put up with this nonsense it's Kimi Raikkonen. This woman doesn't know what she's got herself into
/r/MensRights30/05/18 10:45 AM
2

They don't sell juice at any clubs I go to
/r/MensRights29/05/18 05:47 PM
2

Yeah that's my preferred method as well
/r/MensRights29/05/18 03:46 PM
2

MDMA and 2cb
/r/MensRights29/05/18 03:32 PM
21

Fair enough, if you've ever tasted MDMA, you'll know it has a really strong bitter chemical taste. But dissolve 120mg in 500ml of water and you can't taste it.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:12 PM
52

Nah not really. I've mixed stuff into my own water before, you can't taste it. You've got to consider that 1) the concentration of the drug could be extremely low and 2) the drug might not even have a taste
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:56 PM
1

Am I doomed to having to be a pansy? No, don't change for anyone.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:50 PM
3

You can argue that every human act is selfish. That's more of a philosophical debate than a practical one.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:42 PM
2

For all it’s warts, good ol USA is still the finest place in the world to live and raise a family - decline and all other things considered. Spoken like someone who has never lived outside the USA
/r/TheRedPill29/05/18 12:10 PM
2

Ahhh nothing like a good old fashioned gullible American idiot who thinks the USA is the best place in the world
/r/TheRedPill29/05/18 12:09 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:00 PM
12

Yes
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:11 PM
11

No point being pedantic, we all know what he meant
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:02 PM
1

Just because they see results doesn't mean it's the most effective way of doing it
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 09:24 PM
1

It's also whatever-ist because you're denying a man/white person something purely because they aren't the "correct" sex/race
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 04:30 PM
1

Sure buddy. Bye now
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:53 PM
1

Just out of interest, when you told your nerdy joke about running out of the door, did you actually think you were being funny?
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:50 PM
1

Unintelligent, low value and about the same level of wit as a damp tissue
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:45 PM
1

Dear God you are the the most stereotypical white knight I've ever encountered
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:35 PM
54

Legal costs
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:02 AM
1

So what's your point then? Seems you've got nothing of value to add here.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:32 AM
1

The flaw is very simple: with the information given, the only difference between the scenarios is gender. And you view the two cases differently. That's called discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:31 AM
1

No it really doesn't. Same as the analogy I've used before, studying engines doesn't help you identify a ford focus. Just because the subjects are related doesn't make you an expert.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:53 PM
1

Like I've said before, I'm going of the pictures in the post. I don't even like superhero movies so I haven't seen these transformations you're describing. All I'm saying is that the people in the pictures above could definitely have achieved their physique without steroids. Also lol at 200lb 8% bf. Link me a picture of that.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:42 PM
0

That's a very extreme view of what might happen. It's much more likely that as things get more extreme, more people will start to realise that we are going wrong (like the op has) until those people become the majority. At which point we will see a correction.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:57 PM
1

Yup, basically scientific people are much more likely to be "thinking" people (or logical thought process) whereas others are more likely to be "feeling" (thinking with emotions). See MBTI personality types.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:52 PM
2

This just shows its all about "winning" for you. You'd rather have your ideology "win" than actually apply logic to the situation. Sad.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 12:58 PM
2

You're basically discriminating against men and coming up with ludicrous explanations of why you think it's ok. If reading one version first somehow does change your opinion of what happened in each scenario as you claim, that's on YOU. It's not our fault that you're too fucking special to look at the scenario objectively.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 12:46 PM
4

Christ the mental gymnastics here are unbelievable. Both people do the same thing yet you think the man is committing a crime and the woman is doing nothing wrong. Blatant sexism but you have no problem with it because the man is on the receiving end. I don't get how you can possibly feel ok with such a blatant double standard.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:34 AM
9

The point is that both scenarios are the same, yet women care about one and not the other. Pull your head out of your arse
/r/MensRights22/05/18 06:32 AM
2

I don't see how that part is funny? I'm not against steroids either I don't give a fuck who does or doesn't do them. But seriously look at the top left guy, his arms are tiny. It doesn't take long at all to get to that stage. Im talking about the people in the picture so linking me to pictures of Chris Hemsworth when he's much bigger isn't really fair. And in the "before" picture there he looks wayyy younger so I'm sure he could've made that transformation naturally (I'm just going off the two p…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:29 PM
33

That's a good video, hopefully more women will watch it
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:10 PM
2

Lol 5-10 years? In your first year of lifting you can expect to gain 20-30lb of muscle if you're doing it properly. After 3 the results plateau massively. These guys don't even have that much muscle they're just lean as fuck. People who don't lift can't seem to tell the difference.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:45 PM
1

Sure, a mechanic would know, but being a mechanic doesn't make him qualified to say what a ford focus is. Anyone who has ever seen a ford focus would know. And when a mechanic points at a ford focus and tells me it's a Lamborghini I'm going to call him out on it. Which is what I'm doing now.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:06 PM
1

I'm well aware you dumb fuck, doesn't change the fact that understanding how hormones work and knowing what a man's genetic limit looks like are two completely different things. Put it this way: spending two years studying how an engine works doesn't make you any better at telling what a ford focus looks like.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:55 PM
0

Good for you buddy. Not really relevant here though. And yes, I know hormones are relevant to bodybuilding but studying the endocrine system does not help you identify what your average man's genetic limit looks like.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:43 PM
1

Only because most men are lazy and have poor self control. Assuming you have the discipline required it is very very possible to do this without steroids. Denying this just shows how little you know about bodybuilding
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:20 PM
1

Well obviously genetics will affect how you look (eg length of your various muscle bellies) but you can look as good/ripped as them regardless of who you are unless you have unnaturally low test, in which case you can get TRT
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:18 PM
0

Sure of course you do. But you were saying that some only need a team of specialists etc while the rest need steroids. Don't try and twist what you said. The fact is that most need neither, and if you actually lifted and ate right you could look like that too.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:43 AM
1

If you're talking about some of them, then I'd agree, you don't need steroids, all you need is a team of very expensive specialists and the free time to dedicate to becoming that fit. Looks like you did to me. That's what I'm disagreeing with. You can get a body like that without any specialists and with a full time job. Their arms look like they're about 16 inches, probably less for the two on the left. Very very achievable.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:23 AM
4

I'm talking about the people in the pictures above. Thought that was pretty clear
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:13 AM
2

Powerlifting and bodybuilding are two very different things. Stick to what you know
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:51 AM
-5

Yeah I did, and I can clearly see the double standard between men and women. But dont believe that a body like theirs is unattainable naturally, because it just isn't.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:36 AM
-3

You don't need a team of specialists, you just need a healthy, high protein diet with a calorie surplus along with hard training. The guys in these photos are lean but they are by no means huge. And of course Arnold has taken steroids, he rose to fame for being a fucking bodybuilder
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:31 AM
1

I don't watch superhero movies do I have no idea what that looks like. Either way you'd probably be surprised how far you can go without steroids
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:29 AM
3

Maybe not three years, but it certainly does take a lot of time. None of them have particularly large muscle mass. Just look at their arms, they're not huge at all they're just very lean (apart from top right who is bigger but less lean)
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:46 AM
-2

You don't need steroids to get a body like that
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:39 AM
3

If you don't want to act, don't act. Just do what you do with confidence and assertiveness
/r/TheRedPill20/05/18 07:38 AM
6

She's unstable as fuck. You're not responsible for her inability to handle her emotions.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/18 11:53 PM
1

If it's obviously false, you should be able to identify why it is false. I don't see any flaw in my logic, but feel free to enlighten me.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 11:48 PM
1

No problem. Could you explain to me the flaw in my logic?
/r/MensRights19/05/18 11:32 PM
1

You might find it absurd, but I think in both cases we are saying that things that are caused by biology should just be accepted for what they are. No?
/r/MensRights19/05/18 10:30 PM
1

Imagine men saying this: it's not our fault we have the power to subjugate women for millennia. We were just stronger and superior to women. Why should we give up this superiority? We earnt it.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 09:53 PM
1

Even if they could somehow reproduce, they'd be completely fucked.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 01:39 PM
3

I suspect a large reason for the number of women "failing" suicide attempts is that they don't actually want to die, they just want attention. Let's say you want to kill yourself by ODing on painkillers. Why would you take an amount that only MIGHT kill you? It makes no sense. If you want to die you'd take as much as possible to avoid any kind of doubt
/r/MensRights19/05/18 01:35 PM
6

At least he has some self respect to stand up for himself and not take shit. You seem to be suggesting he should just lie down and take it just for some pussy. There's a lot of pussies in the world, who cares if he pisses one off
/r/TheRedPill19/05/18 01:16 PM
6

Us Brits care a lot less than many other countries do
/r/TheRedPill19/05/18 12:48 PM
1

Oh no someone call the Chinese FBI
/r/TheRedPill18/05/18 03:23 PM
5

Probably because you're built like a twig. I consider myself fairly skinny at 6'0 180lb
/r/TheRedPill18/05/18 03:20 PM
1

Take your own advice. You've got nothing constructive to add
/r/TheRedPill18/05/18 10:26 AM
33

The commenters can't have ever used tinder if they think it's unusual to send sexual messages without intention of actually fucking. A good chunk of people on tinder just use it for fun
/r/TheRedPill18/05/18 08:09 AM
1

Obviously... I'm talking about people that AREN'T fat overweight slobs
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 02:26 PM
1

People like you and me need to remember that 99% of diet advice out there is for fat overweight slobs. Keep eating carbs if you're trying to gain hard
/r/TheRedPill17/05/18 07:59 AM
1

I read it and you sound angry
/r/TheRedPill16/05/18 02:59 PM
-5

The anger phase is strong with you
/r/TheRedPill16/05/18 01:54 PM
8

So you're selfish with your time yet you can scroll through someone else's Reddit comments? Sure buddy
/r/TheRedPill15/05/18 03:33 PM
8

That's no reason to settle for that kind of woman. You need to have some self respect, and start sorting your life out
/r/TheRedPill10/05/18 07:27 AM
4

Reading your comments is depressing as fuck. It's like you're dead inside. You should aim for something more
/r/TheRedPill10/05/18 07:18 AM
6

The hot/crazy scale clearly doesn't work though as your girl is crazy as fuck and still a landwhale
/r/TheRedPill10/05/18 06:47 AM
-1

Well I've watched fox news clips about Muslims in Europe that bear no resemblance to the truth, so I know that they like to exaggerate or just straight up lie about what's happening. Americans like yourselves like to paint a picture of other countries struggling to essentially bloat their own patriotic pride. And that's fine. Just don't present it as truth.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 04:35 PM
-1

American media is some of the most blatantly biassed in the world. And the anti Muslim narrative suits fox news and sites like that very well, so they exaggerated it massively. We europeans don't need media to tell us how many Muslims are here when we can see by looking around.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 04:21 PM
0

You're only backing up my point by bringing up intentionally misleading statistics. That's only true because Muslims are less than imaginative when it comes to baby names. The majority of Muslim boys are named Mohammad
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 02:03 PM
3

Depends what you mean by dominate. They may out populate everyone else but dominance isn't dictated by population. For example there are a lot more poor people than rich people and yet the rich hold all the power.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 09:09 AM
-2

The amount of Muslims in Europe is massively over exaggerated by American media. It's really not a problem at all
/r/TheRedPill08/05/18 08:34 AM
13

One of the main things this subreddit suggests is lifting... But yeah we're all fat slobs... "Your welcome idiots" - oh the irony
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 08:25 AM
6

You've already asked a question when you could've just got to the point
/r/TheRedPill20/03/18 01:26 PM
2

Such a pathetic response. "B-but you're a beta". Wow. Inspirational
/r/TheRedPill11/03/18 12:09 AM
1

"I save my good pick up lines for hot girls"
/r/TheRedPill09/03/18 03:48 PM
1

He quite clearly stated that the bold bits were his comments
/r/TheRedPill09/03/18 02:53 PM
1

You're making so many assumptions it's hilarious. "Fluff" exercises, as you call them, presumably because you think your precious compound lifts are so big and manly, are the best way of targeting a specific muscle. Whether you're a professional or not.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 07:27 PM
1

Who said I'm trying to build mass? What you're saying is basically the broscience assumption that "compound lifts are always the best". Yeah maybe if you want to be a power lifter. If you want any symmetry or aesthetics, you need to do isolation exercises.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 03:14 PM
2

Just because your abs aren't currently visible doesn't mean you shouldn't do ab work. You should train your abs while bulking the same as you would any other muscle.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 11:15 AM
2

Of course there is a point. It's just the same as doing high rep work in any other exercise
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 10:41 AM
1

You can still top it up with a small amount of your own money though. Which will go a long way. And it's not hard to live in shit conditions for a short time anyway. It's part of the experience
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 10:31 PM
1

I just don't see how anything you said is relevant for a temporary holiday
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 09:25 PM
3

He's not saying move there permanently to work as a teacher, he's saying go there for a bit and teach English to earn money on the side.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 09:14 PM
2

Ok but for a visitor, worker shortage isn't a bad thing
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 08:32 PM
10

The pay is low but so are living costs so it really makes no difference
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 05:30 PM
3

Girls on tinder have endless options. Just have several on the go at once, it's the only way to avoid this.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/18 02:20 PM
1

I wish people knew what exponential actually meant rather than just using it to mean "a lot"
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 02:27 PM
-1

Pretty sure the red pill is a much more "independent" than popular beliefs
/r/TheRedPill16/02/18 11:28 AM
6

"Longer words make me sound smarterer"
/r/TheRedPill15/02/18 06:16 PM
55

Drug dealers work pretty hard. It's a myth that it's easy money
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 06:01 PM
1

I never said take steroids. You don't have to take steroids to be in the top 1%
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 06:31 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with the "too fat" part. Anything over 250lb is probably a severe disadvantage unless you're tall or muscular. The oil you're thinking of is called synthol, and people who use it are very rare. My point is, being a muscled freak might make you attractive to only a few % of girls. But those few % of girls are all going for less than 1% of guys. So even if you reduce your attractiveness, you also decrease your competition. So on balance it's a good thing.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 01:40 PM
1

Too muscular will probably work well for you because, although there aren't as many girls that like it, you're competing with far far fewer guys
/r/TheRedPill01/02/18 12:53 PM
1

You make good points, but I'm not eating instinctively. I'm eating based on how many calories I need to eat, which I count religiously. If I'm not hungry but haven't met my target, I eat until I'm about to be sick. So it's a little irritating when people discard it as impossible just because their maintenance is at a normal level.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/18 12:33 PM
10

That's his own fault for splashing out without thinking about the future. You can't just assume your income will remain the same
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 05:15 PM
7

You have to be joking or clueless. Girls on MDMA are ten times easier
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 01:53 PM
1

You don't have to believe me. Bye
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 07:40 AM
1

Always makes me laugh when people just straight up deny it as if outliers can't exist. I'm not an idiot, I can add numbers together. Maybe you think it's not possible because every time you hear someone saying they have a metabolism far higher than yours, you just straight up refuse to believe it? It's not exactly something I'm proud of - it's just a fact.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 01:36 AM
1

I've counted calories for over a year. My maintenance is 4k. Sit down
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 01:27 AM
0

I don't consider myself to be exceptionally active. 30 mins light cardio plus weights on an average day. I've always had a high metabolism as well. I know it is unusually high but it's not impossible.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 11:49 PM
0

I count every single calorie. It's really not hard. I'm an engineer, I can handle basic addition. I just have a sky high metabolism.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 11:00 PM
-3

"It's science"? You don't realise that different people have different metabolisms? This is very common knowledge. Sounds like you've just discovered the BMR calculator and think it's a precise estimate. It's really not. I count every single calorie every single day and I eat 4000 per day to maintain at 78kg. Stick that in your BMR calculator
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 07:30 PM
0

You can't tell just from someone's weight
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 06:21 PM
10

Some people enjoy mental stimulation that comes with debate
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 05:50 PM
3

I wish I only needed 3500 calories to gain weight
/r/TheRedPill28/01/18 12:22 PM
-16

Well obviously it's binary. Anything with only two options is binary.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/18 03:03 PM
5

I've lived in a few different cities in the UK and in none of them is the average weight 73kg. Although maybe older ones are generally fatter? Not sure
/r/TheRedPill27/01/18 02:25 PM
1

I brought it up because it's a logical result of you thinking that the story is invalidated by smoking weed. I never thought or claimed that you said it. I'm using logic, but I didn't realise I was speaking to someone that needs me to spell out every single step of my thinking. I thought you might be able to work it out. Clearly not. If it's not invalid because he's got the facts wrong then why exactly do you think it's invalid? Just because he has a vice doesn't change the story.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:40 PM
3

Didn't realise people here were so sensitive
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:16 PM
1

I've seen it. Fact is, given that it doesn't make you invent things, then what he wrote is true... So what exactly is the problem?
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 08:10 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? Being high doesn't make you invent things that haven't happened. It doesn't mean the story isn't true, so what difference does it make?
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 07:49 PM
-31

Fucking hell this is tragic. Let's just say you didn't need to tell us it was your first time. It's obvious anyway
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 06:28 PM
1

Being high doesn't discredit the story.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 06:18 PM
2

I'm getting pretty tired of people thinking evolution occurs for the sake of a species, rather than the individual and that individual's offspring. Just because a man is expendable to the group doesn't mean that men will evolve to take more risks, because if that were the case the risky men would be the ones who don't pass on their genes as often. There has to be a benefit to the individual in order for evolution to take place. Risk taking is more useful for men than women for a variety of reaso…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/18 01:33 PM
4

I guess we should all just give up and never talk to women then just in case we happen to irritate m'lady
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 01:50 PM
1

You've misunderstood, I'm not debating the definition of the word.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 11:09 AM
6

Yes it's not clear from the excerpt whether women prefer unfaithfulness to faithfulness when pursuing a short term relationship or if they choose unfaithful men more often for short term relationships than they would for long term ones.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 05:52 PM
4

The UK? They stepped in immediately yet are afflicted by feminism. There's really no relation between the two
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 04:31 PM
1

Correction: the USA sat with their dick in their hand. Plenty of other countries got stuck in
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 01:32 PM
4

Correction: the USA sat with their dick in their hand. Plenty of there countries got stuck in
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 01:31 PM
6

I agree up till you said mothers don't care. Remember the goal of a woman's sexual strategy is reproduction. You are a result of that. Your mother is the one woman you can trust
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 03:14 PM
6

This is the truth. Only two people have ever truly cared about my past depression - my mother and a friend who was also depresses
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 03:07 PM
2

I get that, but that doesn't mean they use scent to determine how symmetrical your face is. It just means there's a correlation between the two.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 02:51 PM
5

"Scent indicating facial symmetry" Are you trying to say women tell how symmetrical your face is by smelling you? This makes no sense to me
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 01:46 PM
1

If you're talking about room for growth you need to look at the market cap, not the price. Ripple's market cap is close to half of bitcoin's. Not that much room for growth
/r/MGTOW07/01/18 12:24 AM
12

Dash is higher in value per coin because fewer coins were released. The market cap of litecoin is higher than Dash
/r/MGTOW05/01/18 03:48 PM
9

Why would you prep your exit just before half of the population gains an interest in investing? Just wait for them to push the price up
/r/TheRedPill05/01/18 03:42 PM
31

Stopped smoking weed (used to be a daily smoker)
/r/TheRedPill29/12/17 05:04 PM
4

People should also remember that the diet that is best for you depends on your body. For me eating calorie dense, fatty food such as pizza is the best way as I have a sky high metabolism.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/17 02:16 PM
5

Pipe down, most average girl think they're a 9
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 08:21 PM
1

Well that's like saying "Women have more oestrogen which is what makes them want sex more often"
/r/TheRedPill01/09/17 11:58 AM
2

Testosterone isn't what makes women want sex though
/r/TheRedPill01/09/17 10:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter