TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PortalesoONR Archive

View 17 posts and 372 comments by PortalesoONR on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:32 AM
32

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights18/11/13 04:10 AM
26

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights19/12/13 10:49 PM
19

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:31 AM
13

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights20/01/14 01:07 AM
7

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights20/10/13 09:29 PM
7

PortalesoONR/r/seduction09/07/14 05:53 AM
6

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:53 AM
5

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights05/02/14 05:51 PM
5

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:09 AM
4

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights28/11/13 06:57 AM
3

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:56 AM
3

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:07 AM
2

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:11 AM
0

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:48 PM
0

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights22/12/13 03:57 AM
0

PortalesoONR/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:09 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

what exactly did they try.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:46 AM
0

it tells a few truths though.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:37 AM
-7

who gives a crap. why are we listening to women in this sub.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 01:41 AM
17

first do it, then send screenshots.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:34 AM
2

it's not the same on post on reddit than an entire article on feministing. good bye.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:29 AM
2

this situation was awfully managed at every end. the strange part is that there was plenty of reasons to resign (like having her email spied, being harrassed by a cofounder's wife, etc), yet the situation that makes her quit is some guys gawking at some women playing hulla hopp. priorities. they are important.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 10:22 PM
7

Lol. feelz everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:57 PM
-4

My thoughts exactly.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:45 PM
1

yeah. let's feed the paedo hysteria.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:01 AM
2

this
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:00 AM
0

I'm pretty sure yews and armenians did not choose to be victims.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:04 PM
-1

dude, you sound like a genius. ever though about majoring in women's studies?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:31 AM
-1

yeah, because that's the way things always happen.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:22 AM
0

why is feminism so depressing?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:17 AM
0

what the fuck. wasnt there a rule in srs not to post links to /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:56 AM
3

Yeah, sort of. It may perfectly be the case that current research is finding that the egg is not as passive as it was thought to be. I think the scorn here is directed at the literary analogies.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:11 AM
15

feminists want to control language. i have been saying this for ages.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:30 AM
1

there should be a reason stated why posts are deleted.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:26 AM
2

yeah. that rob green brainwashed idiot was unable to even answer the question he was asked at th end.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:17 AM
24

lol yeah, you know, the egg has to enthusiastically consent otherwise is egg rape.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:00 AM
2

This bitch is 100% nuts.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:41 PM
2

Are you retarded. the point is to bring these issues to our sub attention. you can‘t fix a wikipedia article by yourself when you're against a ton of people. don't be an idiot .
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:39 PM
4

No.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:49 PM
6

What about gay pride?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:48 PM
2

This. Both pargraphs
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:57 PM
4

Just fyi nearly 25% of men initially accussed of rape are cleared of guilt by dna tests. source is on that paper on the origin of the 2% figure.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:41 AM
36

Great post. i always wondered what it would be to be taught “not to rape“ as a child.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:08 PM
1

Excellent. So, summarizing, the 2% thing can be traced back to only one source, the book "against our will" which itself is based in some unpublished speech by some policewoman in New York. Also, in 25% of cases adn test indicates that the initially accussed individual was in fact not the rapist.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:58 PM
2

jesus christ i'm scared of even reading this.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 06:56 PM
1

holla plugin for chrome
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:04 PM
2

What. You're seeing a lot of shit that isn't there. The sketch was just awful.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:00 PM
6

The issue is that she made a fuck load of money with that art. Correction. She raised money in order to undertake the huge task of making a documentary abouy sexism in videogames. However, she decided not to pay or even give proper credit to the author of the art she used. Clearly she is not using the money for the ends it was provided to her, making the whole thing a fraud or even a scam.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:04 PM
-1

this is a one day thing to commemorate international women's day. it's not worth such outrage imo.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:12 AM
2

/r/feminism is a troll sub
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:11 PM
3

You didn't lose much. That sub is unreadable with the amount of "removed" posts within threads anyway.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:35 AM
-3

cliffnotes please
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:47 PM
14

lol yeah. fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:41 PM
3

and someone said india was first world. bahahahaha
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:26 PM
3

all womens shouls feel shame for female pedophiles.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:17 AM
1

it would be fun.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:56 AM
1

zing!
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:37 AM
4

no man. in reality this is terrorist privilege.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:00 AM
2

this shit was funny. why all the hate to op.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 04:55 PM
3

just more first worls probñems bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 04:49 PM
2

woozle effect in all its glory.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:57 AM
3

i too wish there were less posts and links to feminists articles. they are extremely uninteresting and boring.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:34 AM
4

i dont disagree about this. however as a defense, if the law was different, the male could use "she raped me" as a defense. it would be a whole new ball game.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:11 PM
0

lol. they are for sure going to tell you.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:22 PM
3

does that article hace a comment section?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:04 PM
3

very nice article.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:42 PM
1

so are we saying "lets not blame the royal family" or something?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:08 PM
10

herein lies her and tarantos mistake: I feel safe in presuming that few males charge females with rape following a party. few males do that because it is legally impossible for a man to claim he was raped in standard, PIV sex (definition of rape as forces penetrarion and not forcibly made to penetrate). if that wasnt the case, im sure men would respond to this insane rape hysteria with "no, she raped me". they could even go ahead and accuse women of rape after having sex with them for the same r…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:06 PM
12

By biggest problem with her position is that she views sex as a matter of physical force even when it's apparently consentual. The man has more responsibility because he's stronger. exactly. now consent depends on physical strength and no sexual attraction? thats completely nonsensical.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:57 PM
6

so article on false rape accusations dont belong in mens rights because the subject police dont like it. ok.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:46 PM
1

what do have castle peasants have to do with racism.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:31 PM
4

it was in the ruling class best interest to keep "believing" blacks were inferior.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:11 AM
3

maybe they were smart and preferred get back to slavery were labour was cheaper than in a labour market of free people. also the right to free associarion has alwats been a threar to the powerful.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:33 AM
0

is this a way of saying women want to be submissive in sex?
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:02 PM
3

good bot.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 04:52 AM
5

just leave it up.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:38 AM
12

a.k.a. "our strength is only to hurt other men".
/r/MensRights21/02/14 02:33 AM
3

why would anyone go to college, a place where they have a 33% chance of being raped?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:01 PM
40

but female aggression doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:44 PM
5

Again, you're assuming she RUINED his life by taking all of his money. are you fucking serious.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:43 PM
2

wow, pretty awful. shooting beauty queens is a surefire way to generate chaos.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:13 AM
2

whats the sorce of that? thats the miss Venezuela im talking about and was killed one month ago in a robbery.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:58 PM
2

i know the snl skit but, was there a "gate" around it?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:00 AM
2

i just learned that protests of students started as protests against "insecurity" after an attempted rape on a female student in a university campus.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:44 AM
3

there is a third option: funding from private institutions.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:20 AM
13

who is now and who appointed them the arbiters of acceptable speech? who funds them?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:56 AM
2

of course venezuela undergoing problems. high inflation and high crime. but i see the crime of this beauty queen the psychological event that triggered these riots and protests.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:54 AM
2

this is a sort of essay, so corroboration of what my i ask? here is an article on the murder of the beauty queen. www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/09/former-miss-venezuela-murdered-in-roadside-attack.html
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:18 AM
1

fuck that woman off. good thing you realized early she was worthless to have a relationship with.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 06:37 PM
8

this is good advice except the part about contacting the media. dont do that.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:47 PM
1

only if Y is use of force.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:14 PM
1

since you dont understand how male vulnerability is relevant to mens rights, you should step down from being a moderator.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 07:37 AM
1

lol @ male vulnerabilty being irrelevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:31 AM
6

once again people not understanding the meaning of "coercion".
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:04 AM
0

lol, you're asking a bit too much bro.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 10:09 PM
1

proof of what
/r/MensRights09/02/14 02:40 AM
9

what statements do you find questionable?
/r/MensRights09/02/14 02:37 AM
4

exactly my thoughts.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 06:21 PM
2

its absurd. intellectuals are nothing without proper funding and tribune. Im with alain soral here in saying that feminism is just another "blue pill" to give the population to distract them from the real issues, such as the class struggle.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:27 AM
2

interesting. what is interesting from these conservative or libertarian thinkers is that they blame "proggressive intellectuals", as if intelectuals were such an influential force in society.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:09 AM
2

The family of the victims also requested that she not be given prison time. And does the family have any say on on a criminal justice decision? Even in that case, had this been a dude odds are they would not have been this forgiving.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:20 AM
1

Or really was this shit the highway or a residential zone?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:18 AM
0

So yes.. she was a victim. HAHAHHA, you're a complete imbecile. A street in a suburb or residential zone is not the same as a high speed road. You have to drive safely because it is expected to find children playing on the street. And no she's no victim. She is a criminal who got away thanks to pussy pass. The family would not have given that kind of forgiveness had this been a dude. The victims are the children who died. End of story.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 02:18 AM
1

show me those articles.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:27 PM
0

orly? and didn't she call the cops not the ambulance? she must have been so chocked! she was the vicitm here for sure.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:27 PM
-1

and where the hell did you get your facts? Abigail and Anna had been playing in leaves along a roadway near their home in the 1700 block of Main Street when they were struck around 8:30 p.m., according to Capt. Mike Herb with the Forest Grove Police Department. Herb said the driver may not have realized the girls were struck. Monday was "Leaf Day" in the community and leaves were piled high along the streets. Unnless you have a different definition for "along" then it's pretty clear they were no…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:17 PM
2

Abigail and Anna had been playing in leaves along a roadway near their home in the 1700 block of Main Street when they were struck around 8:30 p.m., according to Capt. Mike Herb with the Forest Grove Police Department. Herb said the driver may not have realized the girls were struck. Monday was "Leaf Day" in the community and leaves were piled high along the streets. White knigts jumping to conclusions without even know what happened .
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:16 PM
2

Where does it say that. The closest to any account of facts I have found after reading several articles is this: Abigail and Anna had been playing in leaves along a roadway near their home in the 1700 block of Main Street when they were struck around 8:30 p.m., according to Capt. Mike Herb with the Forest Grove Police Department. Herb said the driver may not have realized the girls were struck. Monday was "Leaf Day" in the community and leaves were piled high along the streets.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:12 PM
0

what about fleeing the scene after acknowledging you killed two children?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:59 PM
0

If I hide in a pile of leaves behind a shooting range, should my family be mad at the person that pulled the trigger? Are you mentally retarded? Is there any reasonable expectation to get run over a car when hiding in a pile of leaves outside the road? Your analogy is extremely stupid.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:57 PM
2

old. already posted here.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 11:03 PM
2

americans need to gtfo from there as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:48 AM
1

2 years of probation.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:46 PM
0

ok.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:04 AM
2

This makes me think how deprived of (female) affection these old men are. So much that they can get conned by women who pretend to have genuine affection for them. Here is the catch-22 of men: admitting that you long for female affection and you aren't getting it it is seen as uncool and whiney, and probably even creepy, which paradoxically it puts you one step farther from getting female affection. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that most men are highly deprived of female affection.…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:58 AM
6

What was your lawyer's rationale behind giving her "a glimmer of hope"?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:14 AM
6

Who cares. The opportunity should be offered anyway.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:06 AM
2

Who cares. Equality of oportunity not equality of outcome.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 04:04 AM
-2

nobody gives a fuck about these "i'm no longer blah blah blah blah". They are doing it out of spite because at some point they feelings were hurt by those people they wanted to be part of. I have yet to see one of these "why im no longer XYZ" doing it out of intelectual integrity and not out of butthurtness.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:32 AM
1

old stuff. already posted here.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:30 AM
1

Indeed, this is an awful post that people will be better off just ignoring it.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:28 AM
3

How about the privilege of being able to shutdown the student's opinion?
/r/MensRights21/01/14 03:27 AM
3

no
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:50 AM
5

She's a model, man. She's worth more than an entire family.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:36 AM
1

Excelent article. Bookmarked.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:34 AM
1

exactly. what an awful sub.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:16 AM
1

Keep track of that shit. Hopefully with video and audio. Don't talk to the police nor take legal action alone: hire a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 08:55 AM
1

lol, what a fiasco.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 01:40 AM
0

That article instilled in me a newfound love and respect for women.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 01:22 AM
4

Double standard.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:12 AM
7

Insurance based healthcare it's flawed from its very conception and it should be abolished in the civilized world.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:09 PM
2

Most well deserved upvote I have given in a while. Good job.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:01 PM
32

Exactly my thoughts. Removing the work of scholars because couple of shitty press articles? I hope this is overblown hype and it is not actually true.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 07:44 PM
3

This is due to the lack of documentation about male issues basically. However, the MRM has done a great deal to help with this. Nowadays many claims of femnists don't go unchallenged. And the ideals of equality within the MRM are not in conflict with general ideals of social justice and equality of the left. As Warren Farrel put it, men liberated women but forgot to liberate themselves. The liberation of men is not something the ideals of the left are oppossed to. The problem is when these ideal…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:06 AM
6

So what. Plenty of MRAs share the same values and they are not called socialist. Neither would I want to be lumped with right wing extreminst or libertarians.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 05:47 AM
2

I saw she had a poster on facebook with the communist symbol on it and saying "feminism is socialism" and other bullshit. That's as retarded as saying "men's rights advocates are right wing extremists".
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:52 AM
7

awesome.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:39 PM
2

Good stuff mostly. However, in general, I tend to take what she writes with a grain of salt. She writes a lot of neocon bullshit on twitter.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 07:25 PM
8

what a load of bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:05 PM
1

My mother has always complianed about this and I thought she was just bullshitting. I guess she wasn't.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:41 PM
1

Since the man isn't here to answer your questions, would you mind why his statements are "crap".
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:16 AM
0

Meat heads + greed. What the hell did you expect.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 09:09 AM
9

Wow, this is one of the best posts I have read in this sub. Concise, yet touching stuff. Beautiful.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:48 AM
7

Haha. That tv critic is solid.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:49 PM
0

he wasn't chivalrous enough.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 01:27 PM
6

not reading that shit.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:59 AM
2

it is necessary imo.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:03 PM
-4

the point is to demostrate the absurdity of this discrimination, not to "get things". jesuschrist.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:58 PM
-3

they are free to be wrong and stupid as well.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:56 PM
-2

nah. it's better to have the links.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 10:53 PM
7

Argument ad Hitlerium.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 07:17 PM
5

Interesting. I am seeing a sort of patern, though. These testimonies of people whose lives have been highly affected by false accusations of rape/DV, all seem to use some rationalization or self blaming to to justify their victimization. In one thread it was "I totally understand she felt the need to accuse me of rape and save face" (WTF), and now this man says he won't take legal action because "he prefers his daughters to have his mum present". That's dumb imo. I wouldn't be that "compassionat…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:25 AM
1

Serious marxists being prophetic as usual.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:57 AM
24

Yeah, wtf. Daddy issues are strong in that article.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:16 AM
10

are you fucking kidding? are you saying she doesnt have moral agency on her own? fuck off.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:28 AM
9

I guess this entire post is sarcasm, not just parts of it.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 05:05 AM
3

Well now my jimmies are rustled, because I seriously cannot believe the amount of people defending the wife here in the r/mensrights thread. Are you people trolls? Are you misguided MRA's letting your own white knight tendencies blind you? What's the deal here? At some point this sub filled with people with half a brain. Mostly conservatards and tradcons who don't know better than regurgitate "cultural marxism!" as the cause for every problem in the US. I blame the mods too because they don't do…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:58 AM
-5

lol, you idiots need to drop the "cultural marxism" shit talk. It makes you look extremely retarded.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:39 PM
3

"your story seems way too convincing so it must be fake". Great logic.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:29 PM
-4

Violence among men is normalized and accepted. Just as verbal violence among posters within this sub is tolerated and condoned.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 07:37 PM
0

ok, that's different then, but not so much. she still has to decide wheter to reject the aggression her sister did against you or not. if that implies a cost in her relationship to her parent's family, such as cutting contact with them something else, then it's her call, but she can't be on good terms "with god and the devil", iykwim.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:38 AM
0

why would you let yourself to be punched in the face, and even rationalize you cowardice as an attempt to "protect my wife". That just pathetic and you aren't helping anyone nor earning anybody's respect with this. If she doesn't apologize I would lawyer this shit up. Furthermore, this is a crucial moment to see who is your wife loyal to. Probably you don't want to escalate the situation because deep inside you feel she would be loyal to her sister. If that's the case, and that unfolds to be tru…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:53 AM
2

Chile
/r/MensRights24/12/13 04:08 AM
1

i edited my post for better clarity. and I don't understand your final sentence.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:06 PM
1

i edited my post for better clarity. and I don't understand your final line.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:05 PM
2

Sorry, man. My goal isn't to hurt per se. I acknowledge there is a lot of pain in you so far caused by this unfair situation. However, you seem to be rationalizing this as if somehow there was a goot reson for that woman to do so. Of course there wasn't. And by thinking like this you might be subcommunicating that you're ok with being bullied. It's ok to be against exploitation of women, but you don't help the world by justifying your own exploitation. Acknowledge this as an injustice and move o…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:42 PM
2

in my country there is something called joint property of assets and it is the traditional form of marriage. On it, man is the admin and wife has the right to 50% of the property owned, including property inherited by husband. and no this is not india. its a country influenced by continental law.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:29 PM
3

when marxists talk about controlling means of production, they mean collectivelly owning them. A CEO is just an employee.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:22 PM
2

for the most part they do.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:19 PM
1

but the goal is not to defeat borgueoisie per se but to control means of production. what would women get control of by defearing men?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:52 AM
2

as women control means of reproduction, could marxist maculinism be created?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:42 AM
3

I was having a discussion with a marxist and from what I could gather, they see the traditional role of the woman as housewive analog to slavery and as a form of expoitation. This is obviously wrong because a slave doesn't own the property where he works, unlike the wife who owns 50% of all the property acquired during marriage (including property inherited by the husband), under the traditional marriage laws. So if the husband contributes equal amount of value in the form of new income or acqui…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:50 AM
1

cheap shots are actually free shots on the internet, aren't they?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:05 PM
1

Yeah. I was stuck at "exploitation". This person was making domestic work analog to "home slaves", or those slaves that preferred to be slaves instead of free men because they enjoyed a better standard of living. It took me a while to remember that in the traditional marriage arrangement, woman had 50% ownership over everything acquired during the marriage, and including inheritance received by the husband. Then the home slave analogy doesn't apply anymore. The other point was that "servitude to…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:17 PM
-1

In another thread this guy was telling me that equality is a disease lol
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:05 PM
0

stick to cheap shots and awful comics bro.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:04 PM
-9

jesus christ what a shame this sub attracts so many retarded people.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 05:47 AM
-1

it's a man who said this. and no, not everything is a projection of personal problems. There is something called abstract thinking. Please either engage this thread assuming an intellectual interest or stay away.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:38 AM
-3

irrelevant. average man beats trainig woman. also, bad trolling.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:21 AM
3

why would anyone take down a page like this?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:47 PM
4

She will be the NOW's spokeswoman in jail.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:31 AM
-6

its only tangentially related and highly hysterical.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:08 AM
-23

let's keep the rape/pedophilia thing away from the discussion on education and cognitive achivement. At least for a while please. It ain't cool to be reading about rape and pedophilia on the most unrelated topics.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:47 PM
6

Very good read man. I had read those articles you cited, also another by Baumeister called "sex as a female resource" along the same lines. Eventually, female power in the traditional division of roles would be a form of second-order agency, as in "to make to do".
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:31 AM
1

It just seems intuitive that, if a person continuously subordinates themself to another person, regardless of gender, that will cause problems. Yeah, however a red piller would probably tell you that women should subordinate more in order to be happier. I would like to see how whould that fare in a study.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:10 AM
3

I read that artcicle when it was posted here a couple of days ago, and this conculsion in inaccurate. What the article did show was that by saying yes to every demand of his wife, the husban became increasingl depressed to such a point they hd to interrupt the study. I am waiting for the reversed version of this experiment, and to know whether women becaome equally unhappy when saying yes to every demand of her husband. Which of course is unlikely to take place because men are bad and could make…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:10 AM
1

haha, nice observation.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:03 AM
3

Sounds like white knight training.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:02 AM
12

It is not necessary to "stick our nose in there activism". Just a note of sypmathy or letting them know that we support their cause is enough.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:47 AM
16

Next step in the road to liberation will be mandatory use of burkas.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:27 AM
0

This has a lot more to do with homosexual rights/discrimination (reversed from the typical scenario) than men in general. lolwut. the discriminated person is a hetherosexual man. this has nothing to do with gay rights.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:04 PM
1

pathetic.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:59 AM
1

You may need a small dose or /r/TheRedPill But only a tiny one.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:41 AM
1

Step in, bro. That's why families are better when there are men. They are probably used to fatherless retardation. Lay down the law in your own house.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:34 AM
-8

Googled it and found it. They [men] ARE being demoted — from a superior to an equal — and it feels wrong to them because they're so used to being privileged, to being the most specialest girl in the whole world. WTF. This people is fucked in the head.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:28 AM
4

It's as-fucking-tounding that a site with intelectual aspirations cites a site called "manboobz" as a supposedly reputable source.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:23 AM
-6

she can go fuck herself.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:16 AM
1

Due process is a human right. lol @liberturds who think college is like a fucking nightclub.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:32 PM
2

expelling someone for showing up with a lawyer?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:14 PM
22

https://bitbucket.org/FeministSoftwareFoundation/c-plus-equality/commits/55cf92001a3188967e7adb7bd7b2ce2a9a6f225e/raw/
/r/MensRights16/12/13 09:46 PM
58

I hate this shit. Every man who who parodies, mocks, or criticizes feminists end up apologizing. It's a fucking shame. You can't have a good laugh at some feminist expense without expecting that the person who made said joke will apologize within a couple of days. Grow some balls for fuck sake. On the other hand, a honorable exception to this rule are the guys from C plus equality or "feminist software foundation". They released a statement that wasn't apologetic at all.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:55 PM
1

indeed, thats some wage gap!
/r/MensRights16/12/13 03:41 AM
1

it sucks. i had to inform myself that it means "almost", but a more rational take it is "anything except", which is exactly the opposite.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 03:40 AM
0

Terrible. One hug should not be harrassment. Repeated unsolicited hugs MIGHT be.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 03:31 AM
2

This is one of the most crige inducing things I saw this week. Awuful presentation, awful idea, awaful attitude, awful fucking everything!
/r/MensRights15/12/13 08:27 PM
7

So this is the woman who jumped to stardom through elevatorgate? GTFO.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 08:24 PM
1

This is a good post. Too bad it was downvoted.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 08:47 AM
9

6 years? sounds like a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:27 PM
2

Male disposability hurts women too!
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:22 PM
1

this is one of the things that pisses me off the most. women personnel being allowed to enter male rooms in hospitals with total disregard of dignity and private space. that is a violation of human rights, noting less.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:54 AM
6

"Encouraging more women into the profession is vital to the country's economic future." Yea, by giving money away to the most likey group to drop out the work force early. This will give the UK a whole new breed of part-time engineers, highly educated secretaries and stay at home mothers.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:11 PM
15

I hear ya. I haven't read his books, but from what i watched, it sounds as if the man is proposing that men "are mad at the increase in equality", which is a strawman.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:04 PM
1

End demand "End demand" makes reference to the "movement" that aims to end protitution by targeting buyers and not Sellers. Little do they know that if demand of prostitution declines, sex workers won't switch to another job, but will have to work more for the same money. Specially at the low end of the spectrum.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:00 PM
3

I'm also saying that the better knowledge we now have strongly suggests human male-male bonding is even stronger than Tiger thought, mainly because our evolution is from the extremely rare patrilocal breeding system. We lost the natural counterbalance to male aggression of alliances of female relatives that exists in nearly all other species - including baboons. Matrilines form the backbone of the vast majority of species. Males are peripheral, transient, relatively short-lived, only occasionall…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:49 PM
21

"Their pain is real, but not true." wat? I guess that's the logic you learn under severe political correctness indoctrination.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:41 PM
12

Great. That was the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:38 PM
1

lol @ erradicating western culture. Seems the other way around to me.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:35 AM
-2

Wrong. The aid to girls is being sent on the premise of helping oppressed people and making a better world. How is helping boys in warzone not helping the oppressed and not improving the world? Furthermore, let's not forget who is invading who.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:49 AM
1

Funny find.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:34 AM
1

I remember someone refuted this shit in the past here on MR.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:20 AM
48

You don't trust a man to take the pill? Then take yours, bitch!
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:55 PM
14

pfff, that's stupid. and Farrel's choice of covers was pretty awful too.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:34 PM
-5

so what. they made him look like the huge wimp he probably is.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:24 PM
-9

Women have created the welfare state, Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:02 PM
1

Can we stop with the "my friends said this on facebook" posts, please? Let's keeps some standards imo.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:24 AM
1

Last time I cheched they were complaining that in medicine there weren't enough studies on women because men "were seen as the default" now that those studies are being done they cry sexism.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:44 PM
3

I agree. I don't know what was Warren Farrel thinking when he chose those pics.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:02 AM
3

the good ole mantra rears its ugly head once again: "female violence is always justified"
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:41 PM
35

I'm quite impressed by the wimpiness of the top comments in that thread. If woman gets angry because he is "overly zealous" with his own semen, then maybe it's HER problem. I'm sympathetic with this guy who has recognized that his semen is his bargaining power.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:29 PM
5

its the creed, bro: "female violence is always justified under any circumstance".
/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:32 PM
9

"female violence is always justified"
/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:29 PM
10

Yeah. All in the name of a shit ton of money.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:30 PM
1

Strawman.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:28 PM
0

But your first world/third world thing is pure speculation. And furthermore, that reasoning is very weak. Male contraception also prevents unintended pregnancies. And on top of that, woman can abort. That doesn't need a lot of research. I was just appalled at the fact that you completely swallowed their obviously BS reasons.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:59 AM
0

You don't even know if that is the reasoning under their disaproval, so at best your just speculating, at medium you're rationalizing, and at worst you're talking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:31 AM
1

Female contraception exists from the 60's. No need for more funding (if there ever was for such purpose). And I'm not sure if WHO ever even funded conrad's project.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:50 AM
1

However, in some parts of the developing world, child birth is still a very dangerous thing which often results in death for the mother, so the risks incurred by men in that scenario really are not comparable, thus making it a different ethical calculation to western countries. you're saying that contraception is only ethical when the risks implied in not having contraception are high, as in underdeveloped nations. by that logic contraception in developed countries should not exist.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:17 AM
3

by your logic contraceptive pill should be banned in developed nations.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:08 AM
0

what a retarded stupid bitch.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:46 PM
3

in before 13 yo kid sent to jail for flashing penis.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:58 PM
86

I have reached a point where whenever reading or listening to someone, i completely lose intellectual respect or the desire to pay attention when they bring terms such as "patriarchy" or "domination of women". These kind of terms are very alienating and even offensive. IMO, feminism will destruct itself by alienating more and more people with this kind of rethoric.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:46 PM
7

his brain is a toilet.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:06 AM
1

Where are the comments in that site? I see none.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 11:49 PM
2

i see zero comments.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 09:07 PM
1

Failure to enforce regulations. It's pretty clear where the problem is.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:27 PM
0

When profit is the main end, there is by necessity a conflict of interest between the buyer and the seller. I don't know about the US, but I'm from a seismic country. Regulations have been pretty decent for the last 100 years. And buildings have resisted quakes pretty well too. However, the more they "de-regulate", the shittier the buldings become. Lattest earthquake here fucked up a lot of the newer buildings (built under the newer, more "pro market" governments) but the older ones resisted pre…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:14 PM
3

come on, guys, drop the retarded "free market" talk. if the "free market" was so wonderful and good for people, men's centers would exist from long ago, and people like Earl Silverman would not have killed themselves because lack of funding.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:22 PM
-1

lol, i concur. libertarians are the most naive people ever.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:17 PM
2

LOL, yeah. i'm pretty sure things such as anti seismic regulations, which raise the cost of buildings to the roof, would be volunteered or mututally enforced by private building companies whose main purpose is to profit.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:15 PM
11

hoy about "imagine how your child feels when he knows his mother stole semen when swallowing random cock"
/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:05 PM
0

awesome.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:37 AM
1

"but rape is normalised in patriarcal society!"
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:25 AM
1

that kind of too much coming from a reddit nerd.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 12:59 AM
1

it could have been great. but it came across weak and evidently whoever made it was scared as fuck not to be accused of "misogyny".
/r/MensRights18/11/13 10:01 PM
51

Unfucking believable. Thay made it all about the poor woman who was in fact a raging cunt. Men have the right to fucking defend themselves.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 09:54 PM
-5

don't be retarded. what you have "dangling between your legs" happens to have a correlation with the way your brain is constituted, your hormones, and the way you have been socialized.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:37 PM
2

pussy pass at its best.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 02:27 AM
-1

Shut the fuck up , spanish is my first language. Having that kind of openness, with methodological errors but an open mind to listen, is way better than just the all men are privileged and evil. She's recognizing that is not the case. It's a good thing.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:08 PM
-1

you didn't understand shit. i prefer to believe it was because of spanish.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:17 PM
7

What an awesome counter argument to the infamous feminist experiment of those identical resumes sent with female/male names.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 05:49 PM
2

Are these people saying that when she takes initiative I should not consent?
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:08 AM
3

not sure about this. I have seen entire threads, with all their , messages and branches which say "deleted". I doubt every user delted their post in those threads.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:00 AM
1

1 in 40 last time I checked.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:57 AM
-4

awful post. we don't need your permission to discuss this before a veredict has been made.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:54 AM
0

that's not what it found.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:20 PM
1

she's right and probably she was citing a recent study that concluded that.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:51 PM
0

as if being propossed by a successful male was not the epitome of achievent in a woman's life. World won't imporve a single iota as long as women don't realize how fucking shallow they truly are.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 05:28 AM
5

Accountability. I'm above it.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:43 AM
2

"good call. so i can see how you behave in public. i'm pretty picky with that".
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:05 PM
1

they are tradcons.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:38 AM
1

i'm not sure if that is how you get falsely accused, but perhaps.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:27 PM
-2

how about teaching women not to send mixed signals?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:50 AM
2

But it's unpleasant. It's men's rights sub. I would demand them to behave respectfully. It's about manners. They can discuss whatever they want keeping proper form imo.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:20 AM
1

tolearting those kind of posts just lowers the level of the debate.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:08 AM
2

You get called that when you tell the truth, whether it's convenient or not. Sorry, clit-enviers, but there is no hidden epidemic of women raping men. And what the hell is this? that's insta ban in my book. reason: being a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:02 AM
3

"bologna". is that an opinion?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:58 AM
3

neither your stupid comment was, dumbass.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:53 AM
3

you don't understand what free speech means.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:51 AM
4

wow, you are some sort of political genius, aren't you?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:43 AM
3

well, i guess that must be why i don't feel very compelled to open this sub as of lately.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:33 AM
0

tolerating that level of retardation is just stupid. this is going to become a trash forum.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:15 AM
2

tolerating that level of retardation is just stupid. this is going to become a trash forum.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:14 AM
5

is this dude still posting? wow, where are the moderators?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:05 AM
-1

who?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 09:10 PM
-1

what an awful poo flinging contest. those people are completely retarded.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 04:57 PM
0

it didn't pass thru the faggot mangina filter.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:55 PM
-12

United states of faggotry.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:59 PM
1

i concur.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:57 AM
3

skimmed thru the arcticle and didn't find any reference to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:08 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:18 PM
1

what the hell is this post
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:17 AM
1

ugh...
/r/MensRights22/10/13 05:56 AM
-1

What does this mean? That if a woman enters into a situation that is legally raped she...raped herself? Or? Ihad edited that post right after you read it apparently: in other branch i explained why a woman that wilfully enters in a situation that would legally be deemed as rape should be legally punished. As in, "according to the law, this situation would constitute rape (with me being the victim) because I have drunk more than my fair share, but I know I can consent and I want to". The point is…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:29 AM
-1

in other branch i explained why a woman that wilfully enters in a situation that would legally be deemed as rape should be legally punished. As in, "according to the law, this situation would constitute rape (with me being the victim) because I have drunk more than my fair share, but I know I can consent and I want to". The point is to demonstrate how absurd is to hold adult women to an unrealistical low standard of consent.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:24 AM
2

people don't say "I consented to a sexual act and my judgement wasn't impaired" when accusing someone else from rape, so most likely the amount of such cases being taken to court is zero.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:21 AM
1

In american college "courts" they only need 'preponderance of evidence' to expel you from college.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:18 AM
1

I don't think there have been any cases where it was ruled a rape if the girl consented and her judgement was not impaired jesus, of course, because none will accuse someone of rape and then say in court "i consented to a sexual act and my judgement wasn't impaired".
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:09 AM
1

Can you name a single instance in which a guy who had sex with a girl who's been drinking but who's judgement is not impaired was convicted of rape? That's what date rape distputes are all about in court.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:57 PM
-1

First, there are degrees of drunkness. It is not an either sober or intoxicated dichotomy. You're suggesting she's raping herself and should be punished as such? Are you being serious? I'm saying that at a certain point, where the degree of drunkness is low (her judgement is not impaired) but the fact that she has had drinks would make sex rape, then she is entering a lose/lose situation where she is legally a victim and the other part is legally a parpetrator no matter what happens.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:46 PM
4

Yes. As an underagy kid is unable to consent to many important things, as his/her parents are responsible for him, the idea that alcohol makes women unable to consent implies that someone else is responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:40 PM
0

Nobody said it would be an easy thing to do. They point is to have fairer standards than we have now. Also, an "easier" thing to do would be to disallow women to drink alcohol.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:34 PM
0

Making a clear distinction between drunk sex and rape. Treating women's consent as valid as long as they aren blatantly unable to function. A established range of grams of alcohol per liter of blood.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:14 PM
0

but I am not aware of a single case in which a person knowingly gave consent which was considered invalidated from intoxication. how many of those have been taken to court?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:10 PM
0

how drunk?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 11:09 PM
1

there have been at cases where the judge has ruled that one drink is enough to deem a woman unable to consent.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:41 PM
1

It's not raping men. It's knowignly consenting to acts they legally can't consent to.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:35 PM
2

I'm saying that by having drunk sex women would knowingly engage in an act they can't legally consent to.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 10:26 PM
1

hahahaha, holy shit. intersectionality in action, bro! of course that's not discrimination! edit: but apparently it is a satire, right?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:37 AM
2

and where are those valuable, wisdom filled post of yours?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:22 AM
2

Yeah, what the hell. Very weird article.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:42 AM
14

You really should take this article down the author of that post is just mentally handicaped.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:38 AM
2

but male disposability is... is... is a bullshit argument.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:33 AM
1

it doesn't seem as if he is trying to tears others down to me.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 04:38 PM
1

Completely agreed. The tone of people on here is sometimes unnecessarily conciliatory towards feminists. We need to shape this movement in our own terms.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:11 PM
1

nice read.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:21 AM
-3

women can't get over the fact that they are just not as good artists as men.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:01 AM
1

Feminist trying to make rape a political issue is just mindblowing.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:23 PM
2

Michael Kimmel is a disgusting mangina.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:08 PM
2

more like feminism is poo.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:03 AM
3

Yeah. I'm not even surprised about this shit: Michelle Bachelet was president of "UN women" and I totally understand how all sorts of bullshit were published with UN's endoresemnt under hers. Yeah, feel my fucking pain. This person is pushing for her second terms as president here, in Chile. Truth is, she doesn't exists. She is just a likeable (for the ignorant) face. She signals to the left, but she goes to the extreme right. Last time she gave away this fucking country to the Rockefeller and C…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:01 AM
2

that principal must be feeling the pressure.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:53 PM
2

that article reflects my feelings with regards to the recent male rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:57 AM
6

peter shiff has been, maybe indirectly, covering several men's issues lately.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:01 AM
-1

tell them to fuck off.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:46 PM
0

next article should be about financial rape.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:04 PM
0

do cases like this get registered under register-her.com?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 05:38 PM
-7

seconded
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:04 PM
1

the question is why people should be talking about traumas of other people.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:03 PM
0

amen
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:42 PM
0

sad shit.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 06:20 AM
1

she was a victim of oppression imo.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:21 AM
6

The problem is that this shit is all about women's sexual "liberation"... but really, nothing about men's sexual liberation. Women can do whatever they want without repercussion but men must behave circunspectly at all times, even if some drunk bitch sexually teases you and gets naked in your bed. I'm getting sick of this double standard.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:19 AM
58

This has to be a fucking joke. Like, who supported the fucking company by buying and/or reading their comics and being loyal customers over many years? Hint: it wasn't girls. What an awful business decision. And STEM scholarships!! This is going to be a resounding fail.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:09 AM
-1

No. Feminists just want privilege. End of story.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:27 PM
0

"deal with it" is the proper response.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:51 PM
1

sounds like you have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:44 PM
14

What else did you expect from that shit site?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 07:49 PM
1

very good article. loved the top comments.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:34 PM
1

I was going to make this recommendation on this sub but I had forgotten the name of the book. Good stuff.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:21 PM
1

he had to protect teh girls and teh womys. it was his god given mission.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:00 PM
1

just joking dude.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:03 PM
1

reading that thread that felt like reading the comments of pz myers blog.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:34 PM
4

I don't really care. I'm not making judgement of someone's immutable traits, origin, or gender. I'm criticizing a behavior. Men can also be cunts. Take care, cunt.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:33 PM
6

im no libertarian turd but i have come to realize teacher unions are awful.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:30 PM
0

well, for starters, they don't go hand in hand.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 03:20 PM
55

i don't understand why are game creators giving that much of a shit about these opinionated cunts if they aren't the ones who are buying videogames.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:37 AM
4

The beloved game takes a dim view of workers, people of color and women it's clear here the effort of feminists to conflate the workers struggles for better conditions of living (struggles against capital) with inane struggles against patriarchy. They need to be called out on this every time.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:04 AM
-11

women supporting women may suck cock in hell
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:01 AM
5

Teaching staff at Boston College described the findings as 'surprising and concerning', in part because it did not seem to fit with their experience with students in the classroom. of course it doesn't fit their experience, because it is bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 12:50 AM
1

great read.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 12:32 AM
1

I called the school board a few minutes ago and they said that they cant do anything about it since it could be looked at as them being sexist because the school board is all males. wow. that's called institutionalized faggotry
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:56 AM
1

does that mean that men have to pay for abortions too? Basically you are saying that it is ok for men subsidize women's health care. Why is that?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:08 AM
1

So basically you are saying that there are "marxists" who don't understand marx. Then guess what, dude, they aren't marxist.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 09:35 PM
1

no, but i'm pretty sure the people who cries "marxism" didn't even open Das Kapital.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:02 AM
7

always be recording.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:16 AM
1

That's a given. Pretty sure when she said "he saw street harrassment as a compliment", she really meant "he saw cat-calling as a compliment".
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:43 AM
1

Hating means "to dislike strongly". From her account of the relationship, it doesn't seem he strongly disliked women. Actually, he seemed to like her a lot.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:19 AM
1

one that arises from actually reading marx.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:26 PM
1

The proponents of Alimony assert that it addresses all the legitimate ends that Rehabilitative Spousal Maintenance was crafted to address; but it goes much farther. Alimony forms an indenture, a punishment for failing to fulfill a promise. It will increase when the payor is deemed to have caused the breakup of a marriage. that must be one of the most retarded things i have ever read
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:30 AM
2

I think they are doing a great job. But they need to do a better job at understanding marxism. Sometimes I cringe when they touch that topic.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:23 AM
6

really? I have seen his site has been of help for men going to incredibly unfair legal battles.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:20 AM
2

this is sad
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:17 AM
8

that's because men have insane amounts of privilege therefore we don't need to use violence in order to control women's bodies, thoughts and actions... ...or so I was told.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:00 AM
24

no, worse than that. women are bad at math because they are discriminated against in math courses.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:58 PM
12

being a man and voicing that you are being screwed is not what society wants to hear.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 12:09 PM
3

sorry my american friends but i'll say barack obama is one of the worst things that could have happenned to the world. With G.W. Bush, it was clear you were in front of an ignorant warmonger, who barely knew how to read. Obama is just as bad just smarter at handling PR and communications. That motherfucker is a wolf in lamb skin, and for this reason way harder to combat. He needs to go.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 02:39 AM
-6

sadly i agree with this sentiment to some extent. edit: so i'm downvoted for agreeing with that. good stuff
/r/MensRights29/09/13 05:30 PM
8

you're naive if you believe feminism is really about equality.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:45 PM
11

there is a portion of us who actually are antifeminist.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:12 PM
2

LOL, yeah, what a bunch of tools.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 01:59 PM
-2

old
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:26 PM
3

That is what a real, though brief, men's studies article looks like.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:03 PM
1

She is already way ahead of most women studies and psychology majors.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:42 PM
-3

They need to be called out on their BS tho. The dude that has been trolling hard lately and posting in this thread has a clear pro feminist stance, and will show up in every other thread trolling and derailing. There are few people working for this cause. There is basically no financial support. It's frustrating that every time people does something, you get a brigade of people saying how that is not good and it should be done this or that way. It's ridiculous.like, why dont' they move their fuc…
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:49 PM
1

aren't you trying to peddle your feminist bullshit into the men's rights movement. There are already feminist-supervised men's rights groups out there. Look them up, join them and be happy.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:25 PM
-2

even if i don't 100% agree with their stance on everything, I'd take them over you every time. Because you are the kind of people that retards the advancement people who actually put some work.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:22 PM
0

i'll take that as an admission of doing nothing.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:01 PM
-1

It's pretty funny that you call me troll, when you admitted not giving "two fucks" about doing anything pro mens rights.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 03:00 PM
-2

i have no way to verify that, and actually i'm not interested in your feud with avfm. however, my question to you is, what have you done for men's rigths, aside from challenging people on reddit? and, what do you want to accomplish?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:52 PM
-1

why don't you challenge them directly. seems the joke is on you.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:45 PM
-3

you're clearly not above ad hominems either.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:41 PM
-2

This is funny because it's actually you who I had in mind when I wrote this post. And no, I'm not AgentOrange, but I read the other thread where he called you out on your BS, so I totally understand why you believe you are seeing him everywhere. And yes, most of your post are bitching and whining about other people's initiatives, so the message in the OP applies 100% to you.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:15 PM
1

may I ask what exactly are you currently doing for men's rights activism?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:02 PM
-1

good reply.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:01 PM
2

I fully support this campaign and I say just ignore the do-nothing mras that don't do anything but complaining at what other people are doing.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:00 PM
1

I would not bother replying to truthhjusticeimafag. He does nothing but to attempt to mess with people who are actually doing something legit.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:38 PM
31

Straight feminazis.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 12:39 PM
4

Equality is a bullshit concept anyway. Absolute equality can never be achieved. too many factors come into play. Best you can expect is equality of oportunity and equality before the law. MRM is to raise awareness and understanding of men's issues, and to create solidarity among men.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter