TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PrekaereLage Archive

View 0 posts and 272 comments by PrekaereLage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you really want a number, you can support anything from 2% to 80%, depending on what suits your narrative. It's all about what information you leave out. Anybody who tells you they know the exact rate with a crime this hard to prove or disporve, especially with accusations that happen years after the fact is somebody you should probably be careful with. They are either lying or overconfident in their information.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 04:36 PM
1

It's not "now" pride month, it used to be pride month, it's now Stolzmonat.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 04:21 PM
7

Definition games are their bread and butter.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 04:12 PM
8

Society is imposing marriage as a default on women&girls. And what are we doing with boys? What do we tell them as the default? Joining a buddhist temple in nepal?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/05/22 09:40 PM
14

I'd say get a lawyer, but you knwo the justice system....
/r/MensRights30/03/21 11:02 AM
3

TikTok, so it may very much be staged.\ It then still encourages and celebrates this behaviour, so the only difference would be that the guy would be an asshat sexual harassment promoter instead of a victim. Horrible shit either way, and deserves to be called out.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:24 PM
4

How tf is that mutually exclusive?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:07 PM
6

"It shouldn't apply to me, I'm a woman!"
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/20 11:55 AM
31

The law is specifically designed to not allow that excuse.
/r/PussyPass18/07/20 01:31 PM
27

They really DO see children as state property, don't they?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/07/20 01:25 PM
3

Were they trans-critical?\ If so, the ban has nothing to do with misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/20 04:22 PM
2

I approve of this. But not of her not getting banned.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/20 04:21 PM
1

I just don't find these funny because the punchline is relatability. The "ahh, haha yes we've all been there, haven't we boys!" factor.\ To me this just seem s pathetic. The idea that if my gf or wife tells me to go away, in my own house, and not sleep in my bed, and I'd do it is weird to me.\ The only time a joke about this landed with me was Bill Burr's refutation of it.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 07:31 PM
39

No longer I'll just give you a dose of differing opinion that you seem to desire: The first big thing that feminism claims responsibility for is women's suffrage, which is presented as "just getting what men already had".\ However, notice how women were not drafted into the military. Ergo, the first big part proto-feminist, part feminist push was for suffrage without service, whilst not opposing the draft for men, or the dependence of suffrage on military service.\ Feminism has been about gettin…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 06:34 PM
8

Bitch you don't fucking know me. Also we're routinely told that women do this "for themselves, not for men", so why do you expect recognition or respect for themthing done for yourself? If I buy a nice car because I want it, you don't see me on social media acting like I deserve a nobel prize for that.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 06:20 PM
2

gay rights count as men's rights No. There is an overlap, if something effects specifically gay men, due to their sex/gender, rather than due to their sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 06:16 PM
2

I once replied to a post without realising it was on r/askfemenists which btw I didn't follow, reddit just thought "he'll like this."\ It was removed and I was warned because only feminists can have tops and they need to show a "feminist perspective."\ Which kinda shows that "feminism is just equality" is bs.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/06/20 11:57 AM
1

Well, OP is progressive, ergo pro-quota.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/20 12:33 PM
5

The world would be a much happier place if women just understood perspective and established that they do not know what it's like to be a man any more than the other way around.\ Yes, I know ladies, "but I didn't even say that", blah blah. You know exactly what I mean, and that this applies a large number if women, if it doesn't to you, don't feel offended on behalf of the women who do this.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/06/20 09:58 AM
1

Remind me which sex still spends overwhelmingly more time raising and influencing children, especially during the age of single motherhood?
/r/AntiFeminists14/06/20 09:54 AM
2

I hate the limited set of clothing options and all that. "Looking good" as men means all looking the fucking same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/20 08:48 AM
2

Strong, independent, free thinking people are secure enough to not need to tell you how strong and independent they are.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/05/20 11:14 AM
2

Reverse sexism/racism.\ Toxic masculinity.\ Mansplaining.\ Manspreading.\ Internalised misogyny.\ "Rape" (not the word itself, but rape by the feminist-invented Koss definition).\ Rape culture.\ Wage/pay gap.\ Male "dominated".\ "Consent" (similarly to rape, I mean the redefined feminist version that works differently for women and that can be retracted after having had consensual sex.)\ Edit: "Empowerment."\ Edit: "Independent."\ \ Rape and consent aren't what you mean by "invented" but they ar…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/05/20 11:11 AM
1

Stop, she's already dead!
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/20 10:50 AM
12

This is exactly how women sound to me when they complain about not knowing what to wear because they have too many options.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 11:31 AM
1

Don't comment other posts. Take the victory, and be done with it. Don't give her the illusion that she made you upset by winning.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 11:02 AM
1

No, it's not stalking, you decide how public you want to be. If they excessivel follow you around and observe you irl to the point you feel very uncomfortable or unsafe, regardless of your and their gender, yes, they are stalking you, get a restraining order. If they pester you with DMs and replies and actively try to get around blocking features they are harassing you.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/20 11:00 AM
3

This reply to this post perfectly illuminates the typical double think though. OP is talking about women "doing it for themselves, not for anybody else!" and you just, on behalf of them, flip flop over to the "actually, society forces us" point, which seem to always be switched out at convenience. Whenever women are held accountable, society forced them, but when you talk about the social aspect of their actions, then suddenly they do the exact same thing that society supposedly forces them to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 10:54 AM
1

If you go out to meet people you can't dress more sexily for that if you would in everyday married life, else you're not a full person! You're on step short of convicting make up users for fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 10:47 AM
2

I'm going to anticipate the "not cheating if poly" replies by saying that unless specifically open, a relationship is to be expected to be monogamous, so it's cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 10:44 AM
2

Being a fully functional adult doesn't mean that you can't modify your behaviour slightly specifically to attract a partner and stop that when you're successful, and on the female side this can obviously include more revealing clothing than you'd otherwise wear when you're out in certain situations meeting people.\ And once you got a bf, while you normally still want to be attractive to him (and he to you), you already have his attention, and you're not going out to find other guys anymore, so i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 10:42 AM
12

He should've decked her in mouth. The justice system won't deter her, so in this situation, you have to, or she'll repeat.
/r/PussyPass26/05/20 10:15 AM
8

Literally "women most effected."
/r/MensRights17/05/20 12:11 PM
1

Yes, all men are potential rapists. Also potential murderers. And potential child abusers.\ And guess what? So are women.\ We like to think that "I could never do X, I'm just not capable of it", as a way to retreat into a comfortable reinterpretation of the world and of humanity.\ Basically, to admit that every person has the potential for evil means to deal with your own potential for evil, so it's much easier to just define some outgroup, declare the perceived-to-be-evil thing in question as s…
/r/MensRights16/05/20 03:09 PM
3

I'm not sure if I can wear that mantle yet Looking for males that are GENUINELY feminist ^ On a sub that I once replied to without looking what sub the post was from, and got it removed and sent a warning, that my reply wasn't from a feminist with a feminist perspective, also he's asking himself if the way he feels is in line with feminism.\ \ But remember, feminism means equality, there's nothing more to it, if you believe in equality, you're a feminist!\ Fuck me. This guy is being abused by th…
/r/MensRights16/05/20 02:48 PM
1

Wrong flair.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 02:36 PM
1

I spy with my little eye:\ Assault with a deadly weapon.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 02:10 PM
36

The fuck has her BDSM fetish to do with it?\ Oh, wait, it's to put the blame for her actions on her partner, how original and surprising.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 09:10 AM
1

No they weren't. They had a role, just like men did. The idea that these roles were motivated by hatred is a feminist invention.
/r/PussyPass15/05/20 11:35 AM
2

Fuck the big silicon valley corporation Google, Imma support big silicon valley corporation Microsoft What
/r/PussyPass15/05/20 11:22 AM
3

Neither is there for women.\ Rigid gender roles applied to both sexes, and the whole "but we had it worse" spiel is stupid an unproductive.
/r/PussyPass15/05/20 11:21 AM
2

There's quotation marks in there for a reason.\ Imagine being on the internet and not expecting people to reference well known things. Do you are have stupid?
/r/PussyPass15/05/20 11:19 AM
1

[Don't use Google.](www.duckduckgo.com)\ I know Google has a powerful position as the mainstream thing, but you can and should do your part in normalising alternatives.
/r/PussyPass15/05/20 11:15 AM
25

A manufactured storyline Look who's talking.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 07:27 PM
47

You know how you want to make sure you got a new job before quitting to skip the "between jobs" phase?\ It's kind of like that, if you don't care about acting this way to your SO.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 12:38 PM
1

Yep. This is why it's legal, and should be. Doesn't mean you can't call it out.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen10/05/20 09:51 AM
6

These dudes' neutral game though!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/20 09:05 AM
1

Yes, sure, the state that gives special treatment to women enforces patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 07:58 AM
2

Ah, yes, reddit, a magical place where the Guardian is an authoritative source with no bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 07:48 AM
3

It's allowed because Reddit is a lefty platform that is scared of being declared an "alt-right neo nazi misogynist racist 4chan clone" by the media if news comes out they've been banning feminist subs.\ The media will ignore r/feminism still being around as well as the blatant misandry of the subs being banned, as well as all the right wing and manosphere content like MGTOW and incels being banned, and just reduce it all to "Reddit doesn't allow feminist discourse on their platform, why do they …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 07:44 AM
-1

Nope. Intersectionalists are the feminist majority, and among among "terfs" you have a spectrum reaching from "I just don't think that they are the same and that there are many issues that don't apply to them in the same way" to actual irrational hatred.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/20 07:35 AM
2

How tf is this even legal.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 07:28 AM
4

"Nobody cares about men" includes other men. I mean, Biden doesn't seem to care about women either, going by his actions, so why would you expect him to not throw us all under the bus for power?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 09:06 PM
1

Almost like this is why they want more lockdowns.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 08:30 PM
2

Equivalent.\ If you are in the business of exchanging iron with iron, you are a pretty shit alchemist.
/r/PussyPass08/05/20 03:30 PM
3

Ah, yes, 2v1 and still going for that moral high ground.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/20 12:56 PM
8

Prenups don't mean shite, they'll just be declared "unfair" and yeeted by court.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 07:44 AM
3

Nice idea, doesn't work due to the concept of common law marriage, de facto marriage, etc.\ If you cohabitate and own a place together, etc, the system might just treat you as married. This differs between countries and legislations, but a lot of the time, there's little legal difference between a wife and a gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 07:42 AM
1

Because they disagree on what the best thing for their daughters would be, they want different things.\ This is why you have the agency to choose yourself and your dad can only offer his opinion and advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 10:57 AM
16

Yep, and when he gets to pay child support from age 13 to 31, completely hindering his start into life and growth which will hinder his chances to build his own happiness beyond what the psychological damage can do on its own, they still call him "lucky."\ Because fuck what happens to my life, at least I got laid, right? People are fucked.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:48 AM
14

They also never give us mugshots of the rapists. They always show us their most attractive, beautiful, joyous moments to ever be captured in image form.\ Blatant manipulation.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:45 AM
6

Doesn't matter. Most of the time when a woman is celebrated as the first woman doing X, or one of the first women doing X, she actually isn't.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/04/20 09:42 AM
3

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/how?s=t\ https://www.dictionary.com/browse/why?s=t
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/04/20 09:41 AM
1

Why attribute anything to short sightedness when you can attribute literally everything under the sun to sexism?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/04/20 05:03 AM
2

Uneducated bitches who think slavery was a colonial British invention, raise your hands, history books will be distributed among you.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 12:32 PM
1

A woman can climb the career ladder, make money, collect experiences, etc, and her standards may go up rather than down. And depending on where they started, her standards could reasonably rise a lot without being entitled. She might also grow and mature to the point that she socially brings much more to a relationship than before, and reasonably expect more in return.\ When she becomes older, she also becomes more likely to start looking for marriage partners, because today many don't want to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 12:23 PM
1

We've been over this one.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:44 AM
4

When did everybody start forming plurals with apostrophes? Is this the new "your"?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/04/20 03:56 PM
4

Karen "n-word" So by their own admission, these two words aren't actually equivalent. They had to spell it out because people may not realise what the K-word is, because it isn't actually equivalent, and if it's ok to spell out one it is also ok to spell out the other. Or maybe, maybe they think they are allowed to say Karen because they are women, but even then that just means they couldn't find a single black feminist who could use her nword pass to write "Karen is equivalent to nigger."\ I'm …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/04/20 03:54 PM
3

Interestingly, this story was posted to r/Feminism and they've yet to celebrate.\ Let's see if they condemn them.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 05:31 PM
1

Actually read the post.\ She is angry at men for admitting their own mistakes and not having a victim complex like herself.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/04/20 10:47 AM
1

quest npc had quest reward on him/ starts playing evil characters and never actually does a quest again
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/20 09:04 AM
15

You're the one who knows her personally, but my bullshit dictionary says that "I don't think men should get" translates roughly to "I don't really care about the politics, but I certainly don't want to pay."\ Is this accurate?
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:51 PM
3

Yeah. Man openly doesn't want to use condom: Not ok.\ Woman lies about taking the pill: Legitimate and he's responsible for the child.\ They are the righteous and the humanitarian and have no tolerance for people who call that identity into question.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/04/20 06:28 PM
1

Not surprised, and at this point, not disappointed, either. Just tired.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:27 AM
1

Yeah, I think he was saying that in criticism of the rally. Now, whether he only did so as a way to back paddle on behalf of the university because he heard if the evidence, or he was genuine, well, y'all already have your opinions on that, I imagine. I really don't know what's more likely.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/20 06:23 AM
1

I think "they believed to be victimised" is not an argument for there having been a "hate crime". \ It's probably just to get the charges for falsely reporting a crime to be dropped, because they (allegedly) didn't do so with malicious intent (even though they did).\ This will hopefully be wrecked in court.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/20 06:19 AM
7

If these civil rights activists really care about society believing them, they must oppose the radical leftist #BelieveAll garbage, this "immediately rallying behind" people needs to stop. It is damaging to the wrongly accused, it encourages people to make shit up for the attention, and it puts well intentioned people in the same camp as reactionaries with a history of crying wolf and backing the wrong horse.\ It's shit and unfair, but you have to distance yourself from these people if you wish …
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/20 06:12 AM
1

"They call me the trash man."
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/20 05:23 PM
2

Again, it started with the demand for suffrage without service, ergo the demand for "rights" that men didn't have (read: special privileges).\ Gender roles meant division of responsibility and authority. Women did hold authority in matters where they held responsibility, the brunt of responsibility was carried by men.\ The historical view of female oppression and hate is a feminist retelling of history. Was the system fair? In some ways, yes, in many ways, no. Was it the best way to do things im…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:25 PM
9

Just because your favourite dictionary says something, doesn't make it true.\ And by attaching yourself to a label and defending it to the death you defend horrible people.\ The first big feminist cause was suffrage without service, which had nothing to do with equality. And today, the overwhelming majority of feminists do not consider men's rights a valid cause.\ Feminism caused male rape victims to be defined away. Feminism endorsed the Tender Years doctrine throughout their concurrent existen…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:08 PM
3

"Body positive" tends to mean "unapologetically fat and demanding to be considered sexy."
/r/PussyPass02/04/20 11:27 AM
6

You can be jacked in perfectly healthy bounds and overweight.
/r/PussyPass02/04/20 11:25 AM
1

Is he really called Chee Kin or is that a pseudonym?
/r/MensRights01/04/20 02:02 PM
4

Somebody didn't learn from Gillette.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 12:04 PM
8

Also archiving means they can't edit the entire thing and pretend it never said the things it did.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 12:03 PM
1

Shouldn't have dated a feminist then.\ Women at large aren't into what feminists claim women want. Feminism is not the easy path to pussy.\ Also, if your political affiliations are governed by which you deem most likely to give you access into panties, you're many things but not a man of principle and moral standards. Such arguments therefore can only appeal to sycophantic pathetic simps with no self respect, and I mean actual simps, not as the new buzzword to use instead of cuck.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 11:47 AM
4

Neither MGTOW, PUA, incel nor MRA hold mainstream power as labels, and each of these groups, like them or hate them, is honest about what it stands for. I know, calling MGTOW a movement is debatable, but you know what I mean.\ "Feminist" is a powerful label. Ergo people want to march under that banner.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 11:41 AM
2

Only particular people celebrate it.\ Most people either look down on it or do not care, depending on how conservative of a country you look at, the distribution between those two standpoints will differ.\ The liberal west mostly doesn't care.
/r/PussyPass29/03/20 02:12 PM
9

Well, yes. You are absolutely correct, I'm not disagreeing with anything.\ But let me add this: False allegations being considered abuse is a victory. The problem that remains in this situation is that a father wouldn't get any access to their kids, while the mother gets 50-50 despite being considered abusive, a linked, but separate issue.\ There are just so many ways in which family courts are broken, that if one thing actually works probably, it is still 99% broken.\ A system that approaches a…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 12:08 AM
1

Progress? On a real, important issue?\ Impossible!\ Seriously, though, this is looking good, and I'm happy with this. But it will only matter if she gets convicted in the end. This just means we may keep hoping.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 12:00 AM
1

Phone survey... suboptimal, but I'll take it.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 11:39 AM
2

Literally the top definition for feminist includes a jab at MRAs to put it lightly, whereas the MRA definitions glorify feminism. Also the top definition doesn't mock feminism from an antifeminist perspective, which would be the equivalent to the clearly feminist-based MRA definitions, no, it's itself a feminist perspective on another subgroup that's apparently #NotMyFeminism, specifically, it's a hardcore intersectional attack on "white feminism".\ The MRA page would be the manosphere equivalen…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 11:09 AM
1

Implement civil service like Germany had before we stopped drafting, so that the state can put you to work elsewhere if you don't want to join the army. Than draft women.\ Boom - you just solved the labour shortage in nursing because all the less qualified tasks are performed by women who don't want military service.\ I don't know if the US is missing nurses atm, but you get the point. Certainly not nonsense.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/20 09:37 AM
1

Her last name is Black.\ Of course.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 11:30 AM
2

They'll try to outlaw any technology of that ilk.\ They know what they stand to lose.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 11:10 AM
4

Yeah, linking the body part used to feed infants with fertility and thus sexual viability, maturity and attractiveness is totally a social construct with no base in biology. Tits aren't just a fetish, they are a sexual body part.\ Nature doesn't give a flying fuck whether this is "fair" or convenient.\ Sexual dimorphism doesn't work how we decide, but how it just happened to work out for our apish ancestors.
/r/PussyPass17/03/20 10:06 AM
1

If you want men to stop complaining about women, maybe women should also stop complaining about men? Yeah, neither is going to happen.\ The issue isn't having standards, but setting them too high. Unless we completely abolish monogamy and women agree to do relationships the muslim way, meaning four wives per married man, you simply cannot all have the man you want, because 80% of women going for 20% of men means there's simply not enough "high value" aka attractive men to meet the demand.\ On an…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 09:47 AM
-1

Look st the tweet. Now guess what kind of person made it. Now imagine what kind of person actually follows them.\ Comments explained, case closed.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:21 AM
2

When men are more effected or similarly effected, women still get the attention and help they need while men don't.\ According to the "most often" argument, breast cancer does not need more attention than prostate cancer, or at least not by as wide a margin as is commonly the case.\ As to your "don't have the means" point, it's also void as women do have the means to have their partners arrested and removed, even protecting their children in the process as well, whereas men do not have the optio…
/r/PussyPass05/03/20 04:25 PM
15

See, I agree. But in order to challenge her on that, he'd have to get into rape definitions and have an entire discussion on that, so he'd have lost the patriarchy argument by letting her have the last word on that. This might have even been the intention, as whataboutism is usually a tool to derail the conversation, but he chose to stay on point, and block the whataboutism completely by showing that even if women were 99% of rape victims and 1% of the perpetrators, she'd still be wrong about th…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:09 AM
0

I'd like this if it was on r/clevercomebacks, even if "clever" is stretching it a little.\ But this sub is anout women trying to get away with shit or expecting special treatment and experiencing equality, so off-topic.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/20 10:46 AM
8

Some of them, maybe, but I think a lot of them are just misinformed about the damage it does.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 10:43 AM
13

It's a myth. Bad hygiene will mean a risk of infection, even if cut.\ The biggest risk lowering effect of male genital cutting is a slightly reduced risk of urinal tract infections. And statistically speaking, you need to cut more than a hundred babies to avoid a single such infection, because it's already not that common, and very much treatable.\ Also, by your own standards, you should support cutting girls at birth because girls and women get UTIs way more often than males, so if it's enough …
/r/MensRights03/03/20 10:36 AM
1

Thank you bot, very cool.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/03/20 10:49 AM
3

You don't change minds like this.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 11:26 AM
58

Because pussy pass.\ This is the murderous equivalent of "had sexual relationship" in articles about rape.
/r/PussyPass01/03/20 10:46 AM
2

People stay with abusive partners because it's hard to realise what's happening to you and what to do.
/r/PussyPass28/02/20 01:32 PM
0

It's not off topic. This is part of the rape hysteria, female experiences are sometimes even deliberately exaggerated to create ammunition against men. Particularly, this happened with the creation of the "! in 4" statistic where a lot of "rape" cases were women who didn't clai to be raped, but just felt bad about a sexual encounter and thus said "yes" to some extremely loaded question.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:50 AM
25

People fall for psychics.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:43 AM
398

Wow. In that situation I might have said things to her that one shouldn't say before one's young daughter.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:33 AM
1

Seems excessive, but if you tell him you'll deliberately infect someone with a deadly desease everybody there is currently scared shitless of, that's just peak stupid and whether deserved or not, she brought this on herself.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/20 12:15 AM
3

Sadly, if you had called the cops, it's more likely you'd have been arrested than her.
/r/PussyPass25/02/20 12:11 AM
2

Because calling you something cute makes you seem delicate and thus less stronk and independent.\ At least that's what I presume the feminist "thought" process might be.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:09 AM
1

See also:\ Online dictionaries on whether referring to someone by their genitals is ok or not (obviously extremely fair).\ Noticed that some time ago.\ And no, as of this post, there's no warning for dick, and these are just the first examples I looked at, didn't select them specifically. Don't know if there's examples of it being handled differently.\ Edit: Had a short disagreement with someone on r/feminism about this at some point, I just recalled.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:05 AM
2

Ah, yes, thread locked and criticism towards the feminist gets removed half of the time.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 11:01 AM
1

Yep, second paragraph is perfectly consistent with my personal anecdotal experience.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 10:47 PM
15

Everyone I don't like is a (shuffles cards) misogynist! Point out where I said anything that constitutes a hatred of women for being women, otherwise mind our own biases or get a job at a cinema where projection is actually beneficial.
/r/PussyPass20/02/20 10:33 PM
23

The only difference that makes is that her Pussy Pass is accepted by the victim instead of the network or legal system, and keep in mind that a lot of people will absolutely see losing her spot on the show as "punishment enough" and he's under social preassure to let her off lest he be accused of being a whimp or an opportunist trying to make money or take revenge for having his masculinity hurt after being assaulted "humiliated" by a woman. It's irrelevant how exactly the easy outcome is reache…
/r/PussyPass20/02/20 10:20 PM
3

Why tf would the males of a species of mammal evolve to perceive the organ used by the female of the species to nourish offspring as a signifier for fertility? Makes no sense! Yep, big brain moment right there.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/20 09:52 AM
2

It takes more than one experience to change a mind. Declaring something an exception is easier than admitting you're wrong. It's like these "befriending Klansmen" stories that exist. The first adjustment is always "wow, you're really civil and intelligent for a black man", never "oh, fuck, I've been wrong about my powerful conviction regarding your entire ethnicity!"
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:37 AM
7

"Nah, all communities hate women, you're just an alt right GamerGate troll!" -feminist media
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:32 AM
2

Dogs can overcome legitimate fears of certain people. A friend of my mum had a large dog who had apparently come from very bad circumstances, I think the dog may have been beaten, and had a legitimate fear of men. She pissed on the kitchen floor when she first saw me, but the second time I met her she realised she knew me and was happy like any dog, I even ended up walking her and she was an absolute angel even though it was my first time walking a dog her size, but she'd have been scared shitle…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:30 AM
1

Regional thing, dude. When I went to school, I came across one corner every single day and nearly every morning there were teens standing just around that corner, out of their teachers' sight, in the middle of the way in a circle getting in everybody's way, because they were secretly smoking cigs. And over the years, that didn't change, the kids just got younger compared to myself.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:17 AM
3

Yeah, probably what she saw as making fun of him was just some "hey Mike, who's your nee gf?" or "quiet, the professor is speaking"-tier banter. Boys make fun of each other because they can laugh about themselves and it helps establish healthy boundaries and makes them toughen each other.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:07 AM
5

I really don't care about whether he's right about how many women's salons there are, if women get women only spaces, we get men only spaces, complaining about this is, ironically, unfair to men.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/20 10:03 AM
2

This is not violent, so if current trends continue, punishing this kind of behaviour will become impossible in the UK.
/r/PussyPass18/02/20 08:22 AM
17

r/FemaleDatingStrategy is a misandrist subreddit which has been criticized for it's views on transgender women and men. Wikipedia outright labels it misandrist as a factual statement? I'd say I'm positively surprised but who knows if it'll stay that way if the feminist mob starts editing. Also notice how basically the only source they ever have for claiming misogyny is the SPLC, so I guess Wikipedia's official stance is that it's reasonable to categorise the ok handsign as a white supremacist ha…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:10 AM
3

Wikipedia is a far left InSec cesspool. You can use the site to look up some science stuff, but never trust it with anything remotely political, everything will be biased to hell and back. I came to that realisation years ago when GamerGate was still a thing that actually happened outside of just feminist journos' imaginations.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 07:54 AM
123

Mutilation.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 01:10 AM
13

Listen. People still kill each other. People still starve to death. Are those things not important? By your logic, we can never address literally anything Men's Rights related until we end all murder and world hunger. It's fine if you personally want to focus on court bias etc, your energy is finite after all. But that doesn't mean everybody needs to stop paying attention to issues that they feel most passionate about, or are most knowledgable of. And activism against MGM is in large parts about…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:19 PM
24

You get mad at men for being circumcised. It's not about someone being circumcised. It's about cutting infants who cannot consent. Nice straw man though. Body shamers! Waaah! Dude, you're arguing that because YOU are ok with something, it should be done to other people as well, and at an age where they don't even understand the implications. "I'm fine, therefore other people's human rights don't matter", but you think you have some kind of moral high ground because you perceive others as being m…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:07 PM
1

So if I feel lone and neglected by my (theoretical, I'm on reddit, after all, but at leas bigt tiddy goth) gf, I guess it's fine if I cheat, too, and her fault. Got it. Also, she accidentally had sex with her guy friends. Yes. That's how that works. https://i.redd.it/a2ka33fmo9931.jpg No, seriously, if she he had sex, she had it willingly and is fully responsible to what she consented to. Yes there's the obvious exception, but that isn't "cheating", that is rape. That is not what we're talking a…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 01:50 AM
2

It sounds like a slapstick comedy to them. That's the main context in which people know female on male violence.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 01:36 AM
1

It's sick and wrong, yes, but understandable. Remember, feminism is about power, not about women. So of course they're afraid of bi women speaking out, lest people find out that bi women are the most likely out of all demographics to be victims of intimate partner violence and lesbians are the ones most often performing it, while gay male relationships are dishing it out the least. It's hard to push the violent-men-narrative when society realises that IPV/DEUS VULT becomes statistically less lik…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 01:35 AM
1

Yeah, that's a misrepresentation. Historically, before the rise of manufactures and especially the industrial revolution changed the world, most people, as in, the overwhelming majority of people during the middle ages was the feudal equivalent of being self employed. You ran your business out of your home, living on the land you grew your crops on or having the tools for your trade at your place. Add to that the simple fact that half of the adults in the household not working wasn't a luxury pe…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 01:26 AM
1

Arguing on the internet is not about winning over the one idiot screeching at you, but the fifteen silent lurkers who are watching either both of you REEE at each other, or you making solid points while they call you names, depending on which you choose, or in very rare instances, somebody actually showing you you're misinformed (not that you or I are never wrong, people just usually lack willingness or ability to communicate that to you civilly and show you convincing evidence). It's basically …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 01:13 AM
1

See, this is the exact kind of feminist mind reading (read: projection) that led to the invention of manspreading. These people are so caught up in the mindset of viewing everything through a feminist lens and being motivated by feminism in everything they do that somebody doing literally anything without having first analysed that decision through this lens is unimaginable, a foreign concept to them. Therefore, literally every little difference between men and women must, according to social co…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 12:50 AM
2

Women are just a different thing when you're a rock star, man.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 12:30 AM
9

Looks like sarcasm. Note she didn't tag "feminism", but "feminists", i e she's talking about feminist women. She's doing the same this sub is.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/01/20 12:19 AM
100

This is why special women's organisations need to lose government funding.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 01:03 PM
4

There's also differences between those carrying that label. There are those who support equality before the law, etc, and then there are nutters who's "egalitarianism" is basically feminism.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:52 PM
5

"Don't disagree with the basic idea of feminism" is a point that completely depends on your personal opinion of what that "basic idea" or "basic principle" is supposed to be. I mean, arguably, the first feminist demand was suffrage without service, so I don't think equality was ever at the core of feminism. Also, almost every other person who calls themselves "feminist" means something different with feminism, so why would all antifeminists have to oppose the exact same things? Also, the number …
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:47 PM
11

Respect is earned. What you are talking about isn't respect imo, but common decency/politeness. But yes, both that, and respect, are two way streets.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:37 PM
10

What?
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:36 PM
87

Respecting her means not acting like the slightest bit of discomfort means the end of the world because she's so - bloody - fragile.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:35 PM
14

Yeah but people don't give a fuck if the victim is male.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 06:06 PM
2

I din't like either. It's true that some disagreeable behaviours are more prevalent in a gender, and are scientifically linkable, but we really shouldn't link them together socially. Calling a behaviour toxic masculinity gives us an excuse ("that's just how we are!"), even if men won't get a pass for that excuse, woman would, and implies that women never display such behaviour, the other way around with toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 10:38 AM
9

It's packaged in a bigger thing. Jews/muslims can protest a ban on MGM, but protesting a law against violence towards children and having it go over well with the public is harder. Though if they ban life changing surgery for small kids, the trans lobby and thus InSect Feminists may become involved, and that's way more worrying.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:57 AM
17

Fuck the UN with a white glowing steel rod.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 02:02 PM
2

"You're not a man!" Reply saying "real women are strong and independent. You are not a woman."
/r/MensRights16/11/19 05:33 PM
1

German here, female students in tech can apply for scholarships to have daddy state stick money up their vaginas that their peers don't get.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 05:27 PM
11

Ah, yes, it's ok when you say "I'm sowwy" and look sad afterwards.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 05:17 PM
1

Translation: It's shit and she knows it.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 04:47 PM
14

This is the reason why we must point out violent females. It's not because we hate women, it's because everybody who perpetuates the myth of women not being abusive has this girl's and much more blood on their hands.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 04:44 PM
5

They miscalculated. Soldiers and Police officers get a lot of shit, but firefighters all across the western world and beyond are among the last profession/responsibility that people still massively respect. They can pull this with other men, but with firemen the nation may actually get mad.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:42 AM
2

Except the big sausage is actually called a pathetic incel loser by society, with women leading the charge.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:12 AM
12

left us with mostly construction and football. This is exactly the kind of stuff that "the patriarchy" allegedly does.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 09:35 AM
1

I'm not "using" them. Progress on children's rights can lead to multiple specific improvement, how troubling. I never said anything would be easy. I'm generally in favour of expanding the rights of children in areas where they are lacking, that doesn't mean I can give you a utopia in five minutes. And I'm not touching the other point, the US are a strange place I only know from a distance, figuring out how to do secularism properly and fight religious abuse is an issue I can hardly help with. It…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:03 PM
206

It's objectively true though. Women's interest groups are still going on about the "wage gap", yet more and more, they are complaining that there is a lack of higher earning men to date. This means women should earn the same as men, but men should earn more, and that is not just unrealistic, but logically impossible.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:09 PM
12

Many.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:02 PM
2

Except for the case of taking sperm from condoms where the child is not a consequence of the sexual contact itself. And only for men. And in case of rape victims, who by definition didn't consent to have sex in the first place, or were legally unable to in the case of statutory rape, it also doesn't apply. In the case that the man actually does consent to sexual intercourse, what you said is effectively how things turn out, but consent to anything is not a requirement in the current systems, esp…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:00 PM
1

Going off of OP. Unless I misunderstood him, this is my opinion.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:50 AM
1

That is true. BUT: If men are expected to behave a certain way towards women, then women need a consensus on how they want to be treated. "We spend this time and effort for you" is a blanket statement, so I reply with women's talking points that clash with it. Of course we can settle on "women are individuals, they think differently", it would even be preferred, because it's true. But if you take that point, you can't then go "men should pay because women do X for them" after establishing that y…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:48 AM
1

I live in Germany, splitting the bill is more common here than in the US. American culture is very Christian-influenced and a little conservative.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:22 AM
1

The "overwhelming majority of women throughout history" weren't modern stay-at-home-mums, that's common revisionist history. Throughout most of history, half the population only cooking and cleaning with 2-3 kids was not a sustainable luxury. Home used to be where most people including men worked, women (depending on social status) worked a lot to keep the family alive, helping their husbands with whatever tasks they could manage with the body of a woman running on contemporary nutrition, all th…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 11:19 AM
1

I think a lot of men and women who are violent are "driven" to it by abuse cycles. Recognizing women's roles in this is a step forward, jumping to the opposite stance typical human behaviorur, so you'll see some people doing it.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:53 AM
1

Neither have I. But mothers? I'm pretty sure that happens. I think children of both genders are at danger from abusive mothers. I did not mean to imply the MRM shouldn't concern itself with this, the root of this problem are things we already oppose, I get that.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:49 AM
2

Been there, brother.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:46 AM
1

No it doesn't. My point is that other people, including your parents, should not get to decide on any live changing medical procedure without medical necessity. If you think I am arguing for transitioning toddlers or sexual "relations" with them, which is where this would go, you are interpreting my words in bad faith. Making the choice whether to transition or get circumcised should be a right of the child, that's my point, I never said they have to make that choice at age 7. I want these proce…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:45 AM
3

Please point out flaws. This is literally the exact thing I want. Don't make assumptions. And paper abortions absolutely do away with your "when you consent to sex you are responsible" post.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:35 AM
3

Stop responding to her, guys. She repeats the "get real problems" line under every post and ignores replies. She's not worth your attention.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:26 AM
3

Women get to reject the consequences of that sex as they are rarely if ever forced to take responsibility for the child. Women have also been awarded child support after using semen from used condoms and lying about contraception. Men who consented to sexual intercourse under the express condition that contraception be used are held responsible for the consequences of sexual intercourse without contraception, even secretly aimed at conceiving when expressly not having consented to that. In any o…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:18 AM
2

"Absolutely real", yet every single time supposed evidence is presented, it's always completely different products.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:08 AM
36

Not really male specific, but definitely relevant. Let's be hopeful that we can move towards making "my body, my choice" apply to men and children in the future as well. They are overplaying their hand, if this turns into a victory for self determination it can potentially help us against underage MGM as well. :)
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:40 AM
2

Good luck with that. But kids your age, while being fed propaganda, can sometimes be more open minded than adults, from how I remember 10th grade.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:35 AM
10

You know if you fid this on r/feminism you'd already be banned, right? You are achieving nothing. You're not even a good troll, you are just sad. Also, by female standards, your "real problems" are being called "bossy" and throwing like a girl. Remember that stuff? Feminism invented "microaggressions" but the MRM has no real problems, sure.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:16 AM
4

Ouch.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 08:13 AM
2

Water is wet.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 08:04 AM
3

"We fucked up ours, so we'll take yours!" How fucking entitled can you be? Also there's a joke about socialism in here somewhere, but I'll try to resist.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:59 AM
1

Hover pissers can fuck off And guys who stand in stalls when there are urinals, too. I seriously don't get how my uni's men's rooms manage to get piss on toilet seats so I end up wiping other people's liquid waste off with toilet paper before ending up hover pissing myself, but with a penis so it hits. Also guys need to keep their dick aiming downwards when working with high pressure, lest the seat's underside will start dripping. Recently left a toilet and went up an etage to get away from what…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 07:50 AM
11

Female rapists in war zones are more violent to compete for status and recognition in a traditionally patriarchal context. Stunning and brave.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 08:58 AM
1

Unless she's the neon haired kind, which in itself also isn't conclusive, you don't see the difference looking at a stranger.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 08:39 AM
13

It's not going to be easy to revert to the old system, because men's outlook has changed. After hearing the stronk and independent narrative all my life, I'm not willing to feed an adult like she's five.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 08:31 AM
10

It's called statistics. A study can only produce averages and trends. The fact that every referral to a trend needs to explicitly go "#NotAll" when that should be generally understood is said.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 07:42 AM
31

It's in Greek stories way before opera was a thing. I mean homosexual women still call themselves after the husband-murdering temptresses Jason and the argonauts met on Lesbos. Not to mention creatures like Sirens and Circe in the Odyssey. Men and women doing the worst of things to their closest partners is common in ancient literature.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 07:37 AM
10

And for women it's the other way around, bad actors are all isolated incidents, but ONE woman does something seriously impressive and instead of celebrating her individually for her achievement we applaud all women for doing fuck all while while this one woman did something great.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:52 AM
5

But they don't deserve that, because they are weak and muh oppression 2000 years ago.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:49 AM
9

And of course Feminism backs the mother financially. The law is optional for her.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:36 AM
4

But for us, an erection equals consent even if we say no....
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:21 AM
3

It won't ever be a complete save space, because unlike r/feminism people who disagree with the people on here aren't banned for being "uneducated" or "speaking from a position of privilege" but will have to face criticism.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:18 AM
1

We're trying to convince the outsider Exactly. Can't convince radicals.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:14 AM
5

If some random woman had picked her up, would she have acted the same way? Nope. I'm 99.99999% sure of that. Even though, correct me if I'm wrong, a woman would statistically be more likely to kidnap her than a man would be.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:56 AM
6

It does not make you a woman hater to notice these things. They are simply reality. Not because women are all awful, but, and I'm not a sovial constructivist, mind you, I'm open their being biological influences, I think the main reason is just that women CAN do it, they get away with lying and are believed by default while seldomly suffering the same consequences of this climate that men do. So by giving women free reign to do as they please, you'll see a lot of them take advantage of that.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:54 AM
12

That reaction towards OP, if aggressive enough could summon his nearby wife, and her moral high horse would be fucked. Sadly, his daughter is involved, and we likely agree that she did not need to experience a sexist outburst at age two, so she takes priority over some random harpy.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:37 AM
6

As the guy who did Obama's campaign, forgot his name, put it: You cannot change the mind of a partisan. You're not going to change the mind of a feminist, either, but you can stand up for yourself and your family. I would have flipped it around by telling her to stop stalking my daughter, pointed out to her that she's the one overstepping boundaries. Yes, when it comes to changing minds that are open to it, you need to be open, but to enforce reasonable boundaries, the ones overstepping them nee…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 06:25 AM
5

Which is historical revisionism, but it's ok, that isn't dangerous at all until the holocaust is involved! /s This kind of thing is why the "women are historically oppressed and men historically benefitted" myth needs to die.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:11 PM
7

People who hate the very concept of a strong female character and don't ever want them in media, aside maybe from a handful of religious fundamentalists, are a myth. These people don't exist.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:07 PM
2

But we can't say mean words to women, that'd be awful!
/r/MensRights24/10/19 11:51 AM
15

"I don't do make up and all that for men, you misogynist! I'm doing this for myself, so empowering!" "Our investment in the date is looking good for you!" Choose one. Add to this that I legit cannot do most of the things a woman does in this regard without being perceived as unmanly (or a transvestite) and immediately losing points with 90%+ of women (as a bf option, not her gay friend, which is not a position you date for).
/r/MensRights23/10/19 02:43 PM
1

It's not enforced though, mostly. Domestic violence is also already a crime, yet women get off regularly.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 02:16 PM
3

you need permission from the defence to present evidence In other words, Canadian citizens don't have a right to due process and thus the world has zero reason to respect your legal system. Good god, your country is fucked.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 02:06 PM
3

Femaliclorians.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:51 PM
3

Good point. I'm sure I'd turn the classroom into a battlefield as well, teen me didn't like authority at the best of times and had supportive parents. Would have absolutely put this arse in his place. Though I don't know if this also works in the US.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:50 PM
7

And backup the evidence in case they decide to try confiscating the phone.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:46 PM
21

Fuck that. How about supporting rural people in general? Focusing on women always turns to discrimination in the long run. Think farther ahead.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:30 PM
26

That's why the term "useful idiots" exists. Your "select minority" is deliberately pushing misinformation about how feminism is just about equal rights while silencing the MRM to get well intentioned people to adopt or defend the label for them.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:21 PM
29

We need more female ___ isn't bad Wait until the job you want is given to a less qualified person to fill some arbitrary quota before saying that. All of this stuff is extremely hurtful, and in the long run it also hurts women, so men can be blamed for that by feminism, too. Your teachers and school generally are well intentioned, but the movement behind these trends isn't. Also, if "we need more women in X" isn't a bad thing, explain why it is valid. Do you think computers need more female role…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:15 PM
6

Unless you're in the UK, where her sentence isn't just shorter, but unless she goes all the way up to the most serious crimes, she won't even be locked up at all.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 03:29 PM
3

If they don't think they are sexist, they can still be sexist. If I'm fine with my neighbour being gay and thus decide I'm not homophobic but then shun my son for getting a bf, then I am homophobic. Discrimination is discrimination, intentional or not. Most people doing so are well intentioned.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:43 PM
4

They will make that argument against any and all possible steps! They will insist that accusers should never face consequences, no matter what consequences we are talking about.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 12:43 PM
13

But she IS the Commissioner. She would need to be attacked from above that.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:49 PM
2

Huzzah, a woman of quality!
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:46 PM
1

Thanks for the link, will do.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 12:06 AM
3

On one hand, yes. Statistics are often fake, and somebody's lived experience does have a worth, definitely. If it happened to person X, than that doesn't prove it's common, but it does proves that it can happen, and happened. On the other hand, while person X's case needs to be dealt with and shouldn't be dismissed, it in an of itself doesn't constitute a wider societal problem, and the lies of statistics can be mitigated partially, by actively spending some time looking at how the data was coll…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 12:04 AM
6

Ouch. Religion's probably the worst case scenario for things like this, makes one unlikely to ever change one's mind. My condolences, stay strong for the little guy. He's lucky to have you standing up for him from the very beginning.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:37 PM
1

Yeah, sure. My judgement was obviously just based on what I could see and how it looked to me as a teen. Like, girl spends half the time just walking to take a break from running, I try to pace myself and manage to keep at least a steady jog throughout the entire exercise, girl 4+, me 3-, at best, unless she also gets a 3. (I guess D+/C- are your equivalents). It may just be that my perception was completely off, or maybe the standards were based on adults and applied to us as teens when the dif…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:24 PM
2

There's a difference there, and that's that she still has all of her rights intact, and the law, law enforcement and justice system at least try to protect her, but not him. If she decides to end him, all of the above will more likely aid her than stop her. The most risky thing one can do is be alive, of course, and you can't expect to live risk free. But there's a point when the risk becomes too high. Walking along a country road can kill you, as you could be hit by a car, is it therefore equiv…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 11:13 PM
2

:D My bad then. And thanks!
/r/MensRights12/10/19 10:33 PM
1

My pleasure! :D We didn't get to choose individually (not because Germany but because rural area, I'd guess), but our grading standards were different, and I felt the degree was questionable. Since I was a teenage pupil, and not a sports scientist or whatever, I just had to accept it though.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 10:07 PM
1

Similar, actually. We aren't drafted anymore, I don't think I'm even in any form registered for it. I think, actually that introducing it again woldn't be bad, it would actually help us, because we also had the option to do civil instead, and I don't think most women, if both genders were drafted, would want to go for the military, so we'd have a fair enforcement towards both genders, and I predict that instead of a huge increase in female soldiers, we'd see some more female soldiers and a huge …
/r/MensRights12/10/19 10:00 PM
5

Good. Whether you're for women in the army or not, surely we can all agree that those women who are unfit to serve, shouldn't.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:38 PM
6

But how can men push women out of the military with exams, if women are just as strong as men? 🤔 Big thonk time.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:37 PM
8

Holy fuck. 14 months? Well, least I can say is respect for not giving in to pressure, I would crumble if my dad shunned me. Why would one be so extreme on this, religious family?
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:32 PM
3

This is why the dad needs to be involved, instead of the hospital ambushng the mother with that decision when she's recovering from giving birth. Congratulations OP+wife, and best wishes for the little guy!
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:28 PM
1

Wealth is a far greater division than ethnicity and especially gender. Big part of the reason I can't take it seriously when somebody whose parents make five times what mine do tells me how hard it is to be a woman, and I didn't even have it that bad growing up, generally speaking, I mean, I always had food and clothes and all else I needed. But being working class is already hard to get for people who grew up without knowing what money problems even are, being seriously poor is as real to some …
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:25 PM
1

If you haven't read it when coming to this sub: https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/whats-the-difference/ I don't like what's going on in the comments below the article, but I tend to agree with the message. Feminism is not about equality, equal rights for women aren't its goals, therefore you can't really find common ground between the MRM and feminism. If you mean common ground between "women's rights" and "Men's Rights", or common ground between men and women, that's not really an issue.…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 07:05 PM
1

You got outta there intact?
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:53 PM
1

MGTOW isn't intellectually homogenous. MGTOW dismiss NAWALT because while not every woman would destroy you, any woman could. MGTOW who claim every woman will 100% do X are unreasonable, yes, but the generalisation still holds. Then again, men are naturally risk takers (generally speaking), so not marrying or having long term sexual relationships under a government that does not afford me adequate rights is just rational in my eyes, while close friendships with women, being alone in the same roo…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:50 PM
6

Correction, the MRM is the radical notion that men and womena re human. Feminists say that line about themselves, but it's a lie. Feminism rejects female humanity in my eyes. Humanity is more than just our worth and potential for good. Humanity has an ugly side to it. To be human means to be able to steal, lie, kill, scar, and not least of all, lie. Feminism rejects the idea that men and women have equal potential for good and evil, as they uphold men as creatures of inherent evil and women as c…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:42 PM
1

"Because women breed." If fighting is our duty and a woman's is to give birth, the west is harbouring a generation of traitors. Childbearing is not mandatory, so equating it to military service is immoral.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:37 PM
3

The state happens to agree with feminists, for reasons that have nothing to do with feminism. It's just convienent for itself. The state's only interest was itself, specifically shielding itself by any means available. This is exactly why the MRM is not treated fairly by the system, because of people who see behind the fasade. Because the target of its criticism isn't women, but the system itself, that's hiding behind feminism, the useful idiots that will support the erosion of rights until the …
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:33 PM
4

Great to see her message actually reached some people despite the media's best efforts.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:24 PM
1

It's a really long story. Leaving out a lot, you still get a textwall: My parents never really made gender, or girls, an issue and I only had brothers, my early thoughts about feminism (or what I thought that word meant) and standing up for girls were shaped by school and media, I bought the "girls/women have it harder because men hate them for no reason" myth as well as the typical view of history as "men free - women oppressed". During my later years of school however, I noticed the obvious. I…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:17 PM
2

Thanks, I guess. Peak internet is me not knowing if you are being sarcastic, because text based communication.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 05:27 PM
1

Put your search into quotes. DuckDuckGo will search for that specific term, for example, "male on female crime" will not be counted as a hit for "female on male crime" even though it has all the right words in it.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:01 PM
1

This. And TinEye for reverse image search, because DuckDuckGo doesn't currently have that.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:59 PM
0

Well, just one more reason to stay away from dating apps. I wouldn't say that these women neccessarily have unrealistic expectations though, based on how I'd apply the term, as such looks are possible for men (even if only for a few of us). I'd call these expectations unreasonable.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:56 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:59 PM
2

Men shouldn't have "unrealistic" beauty standards, according to feminism. What exactly is an expectation of a world in which 1. Women earn the same as men, because equality 2. Men earn more than women in order to be adequate for dating if not unrealistic. Women are literally demanding that m > f && f = m. No matter how much you complain, 3 will never be 4, the feminist expectation towards society and men is not just unrealistic but impossible. I guess this is why we are declaring empriricism to …
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:58 PM
5

It doesn't matter what a woman does for a living or what position she holds, there is a general underground current of understanding among men that a woman's career is just never as important as the man's job. And, assuming that's actually the case, why could that be? I mean, it's not like women are instinctively looking to date men more successful than themselves, as we see with all the "where are all the good men?" screeching, so perhaps men might have a fittingly opposite instinct to outperfo…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:51 PM
3

609 views•2 Feb 2014 Where do people get stuff like this?
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:30 PM
1

Since you said men shouldn't have a say in whether the woman gets an abortion, which in isolation, I agree with, but mentioned vasectomies: If I am not misinformed, doctors in the US will straight up refuse to perform vasectomies on married men unless they get the green light, possibly even written consent, from their wives. If we shouldn't have a say in whether you get an abortion because "your body, your choice", I think this is an issue that at least deserves mention. If we married, you could…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:58 PM
0

The issue is, unless the rape probelm is addressed, these rights that men should have are impossible. Imagine that you are a guy, a woman you slept with accidentally or by lying about birth control and damaging the condom becomes pregnant. Now imagine we implemented everything you said, and which I and most people here will agree with, so she has to file some legal stuff that ensures that you are informed about the pregnancy (so you can't later lie about her not telling you), and now she needs y…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:45 PM
7

Make him officially sign that he was informed about the pregnancy and voluntarily guarantees child support. Then he can't later say he didn't know.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:31 PM
2

Dating apps are inherently shallow.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 02:50 PM
13

Straight up feminist terminology, but remember, we patriarchal oppressors are the status quo, they are the rebels.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:08 AM
3

Can’t see them.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:48 AM
8

If the responsibility of “handling her” is with us, we’d need the freedom to actually do so, as in, do what’s necessary without inflicting serious harm. But we’re not even allowed to protect our children from our spouses, even though they are mostly the ones abusing kids. I’d prefer it if police and court would do their job adequately so we could do this like civilised people, without more violence. Either way, women need to handle fights like adults, and I think the majority of women do, so the…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:47 AM
24

Don’t generalise Europe as child beating. Beating your child in Germany is treated largely the same as in the states. “Turning out alright” doesn’t mean it’s ok.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:41 AM
11

Now watch the "wahmen are powerful" crowd deny that she was in a position of power and abused it.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:24 AM
1

I think that's technically coersion? Not that it makes much of a difference.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:23 AM
1

She's doing the opposite. I'm still pretty sure that feminist mothers raise "nice guys."
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:20 AM
1

Quite the attention hogger, it looks like. Almost as if that's typical of liars and not rape victims. Sure there's vicctims who go far to get justice, but turning it into an activist campaign and trying to look like a hero while doing it? She obviously has personal motives for this, and yet people will still listen and believe.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:07 AM
2

Listen. I'm going to say something here. Humans say and do awful things sometimes. Agreed? Because based on that, get ready for my next, controversial opinion: Women are human.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 12:28 AM
0

Fractal was clearly refering to women's capability of immoral ideas and actions, not their intelligence. And even if you want to disagree on the "clearly" aspect, you're still arguing in bad faith.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 12:25 AM
9

explaining the same things over and over and getting ignored Doesn't stop the MRM. Also, Women's issues "being ignored". Sure. Society is gynocentric, men are the ones being ignored, or shamed for speaking up. If there wasn't this history [of being ignored], then they would. You mean like when women demanded suffrage and were ignored? Or when women demanded to get custody of their children instead of it going to the father by default, and were ignored? Or how women wanted affirmative action and …
/r/MensRights01/10/19 12:23 AM
11

And in the end they will manage what they want in college. They will artificially manage to get women to pass, though the average female graduate will as a consequence be of far lower qualification than the average male graduate, which will lead to loads of naive young women who've been led to think they are qualified finding this out the hard way and becoming unemployable, companies will catch on and stop hiring women for anything other than being a useless diversity hire, maybe let their recen…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:14 PM
1

Remember, though: Twitter does not have a pro liberal/feminist/leftist bias, this would totally be tolerated if it was targeted at women.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 09:33 PM
2

Oof, yeah, that's bad. Although of course having one doesn't fix the issue. I still think it's helpful to have the basic principles (free speech, equality before the law) set in stone.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:56 PM
9

Do western countries want to drive people towards regressive ideologies? Because the more we fail to hold women accountable, they become more and more attractive. I really shouldn't be able to find a single thing Sharia does better than the UK, yet here we are.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:19 PM
3

How? Even in über-leftist Germany that is objectively undeniably unconstitutional! Is the UK constitution this bad, or does the UK just work like Germany, where the constitution says something is to be illegal and can never be legal, but we just do it anyway because nobody cares about these documents unless they are effected themselves?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:15 PM
1

I don't think that when a man says "I don't need that", he neccessarily means "I don't need to reflect on my state of mind". We handle our stress, our fears, our regrets, our pain, but often differently. Men communicate their feelings, you yourself noted that many are quite good at it. I think a denial of that usually stems from a rejection of the feminisation of men. When feminists say, "Patriarchy keeps men from expressing themselves, and we'll change that", they are thinking of the feminine w…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:16 AM
2

If the same level of flexibility was tolerated coming from a man, I could turn every single injustice in the world into a misandrist issue for you, too.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:53 AM
1

Patience. I know, most people don't care, gynocentrism and stuff. But when it comes to female accountability, there may very well be a tipping point in the future. Women are seen as independent, mature adults, and the expectation of that maturity and responsibility will catch up with them.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:03 AM
3

Every woman But remember, it's us who don't respect them as individuals.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:08 AM
2

On a serious note though, I admire his patience. She likely wanted him to beat the shit outta her to get him locked, and in his situation, I might have, well, at least given her a mean slap or two.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:07 AM
2

Y'all misogynists should stfu. It's already well established that men are mindreaders who always know what a woman is thinking and what she wants them to do or not to do, and this disgusting little shitlord of the highest caliber is obviously abusing his mindreading abilities to always go exactly where she currently wants to go and confuse her! How low can you sink to use psychic attacks on a lady? lmao "lady".
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:04 AM
2

I hope she sues you for defamation As in, she declares him to be a false accuser, and... wants the false accuser to be punished? Interesting idea. I'm absolutely sure she'd apply the same standard to proven false accusers, who are female, I bet my liver on that.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 12:56 AM
3

And then they turn around and ask where all the good men have gone and why nobody is asking them out.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 12:38 AM
2

Also, can we appreciate the hypocricy of this coming out of the ideology that targets "microagressions" and equates physical and "psychological violence" (by which they tend to mean "insult") as the same severity when it's convenient for them so they can justify violence based on your word choice?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 12:36 AM
3

Domestic abuse is first and foremost about manipulation and control, isn't it? The physical aspect is just another means to that end. If an abuser isn't physically beating you up, it's because that's against their "strategy". Provoking physical violence instead can be used to guilt trip. And making the abused think they are at fault, according to my impression, seems to be a hallmark of domestic abuse, regardless of direction.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 11:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter