TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PropaneFitness Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by PropaneFitness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

How does this validate compensation for a good/service that was not received?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:16 PM
12

While the discriminatory debate of this article is a different issue, salary is compensation for the work done, like a trade. You don't pay the shop owner money that you could have spent there when they were out of stock, because you never received the product!
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:56 AM
3

Steve Hughes, see below
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:32 PM
2

It does seem sexist, but it's based on statistics. Just like men have average higher salaries because of higher average contribution of value to the firm (maternity leave and many other factors)
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:48 PM
1

Interesting read, although what is the men's rights issue is in the story? Definitely wouldn't want to marry this woman.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 10:55 AM
3

I don't understand why this guy is getting downvoted so much. He's just (quite diplomatically) saying he's comfortable with his body. He's not saying everybody should/shouldn't be circumcised. Be happy for him.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 12:48 AM
1

They've taken this down now, possibly as a result of this thread
/r/MensRights26/02/12 12:41 AM
-2

slightly dumb
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:01 PM
2

"I'm a straight male, "
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:04 PM
1

brb assuming I'm american and not just a Brit with 'idiosyncratic' (bad) spelling.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:55 PM
1

You're the loveliest redditor I've seen
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:59 AM
6

It's the same context, except this one is fictitious. I'd say it's a men's rights issue just as much as the reverse would be a women's rights issue. Definitely in poor taste either way - I guess the thing that annoys me is that it's considered acceptable by whoever made and approved it, yet the reverse is not when in reality domestic violence happens both ways. It doesn't suddenly become a lolfest when it's woman on man.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:52 PM
48

I see your point, but it doesn't change the fact that this ad is trying to make light of domestic violence. Gender-reversal or not.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:54 PM
4

Agreed, surprised this hasn't been mentioned more! This seems like a double standard
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:26 AM
1

Although I agree with your argument, which is often overlooked, I think it misses the general motivation for rape, which is rarely pure sexual desire. Yes, women should be responsible with their own strengths as men are. But your conclusion doesn't follow that men should therefore hold position of authority over women. Rather, it's partly the fault of men who lack the self-restraint to rise to the provocation. Hijab assumes a mutual responsibility and seems to fall exactly in line with what you'…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:45 PM
1

Thanks Celda, interesting stuff. Higher figures than I imagined, 1% is actually huge!
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:33 PM
1

Both you and Celda need to provide sources for some of these claims for them to be taken seriously. 'common sense' doesn't suffice alongside conjecture about numbers/percentages.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 01:47 AM
5

Can you expand on what is meant by the last bit? Could you say this extends to hijab?
/r/MensRights28/01/12 01:34 AM
3

Are people really sad enough to make multiple accounts to upvote their own stuff?
/r/MensRights28/01/12 01:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter