TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Psada Archive

View 0 posts and 143 comments by Psada on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You said those that were criticizing me simplying posting was "advice"so I shared what that "advice" was and now your throwing a fit that I'm mocking you telling me to accept the advice(insults). I already told you that those weren't the posts I ment and then I redirected you to my original comment which was advice you could use later on when posting.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 04:47 PM
2

Insults can never be advice, stop butchering the english language please. Go back and read my first comment then. It should be obvious what to do next time from that explanation.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:36 PM
3

That is not an advice and therefore OBVIOUSLY not what I'm refering to. Seriously, how on earth do you read my comment and go from "advice"(the word I used) to "insult"?
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:33 PM
1

You ought to just lean back and take in the advice you're getting in this thread.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:28 PM
4

I'm simply explaining to you why your method of sharing the content you wanted isn't optimal. They way you read my comment(trying to guess my tone) says way more about you than it does about me.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 12:00 PM
3

Using RES the video is embedded in reddit - the description is not.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:25 AM
2

He said because it would lead to more accurate insurance premiums for drivers. It would also be more accurate if you could use race - but that is not legal. Therefore it isn't a valid argument when trying to use it on the gender-question.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:07 PM
1

I won't do all your thinking for you but what he said is fundementally wrong.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 05:57 PM
11

Correct and that correlates perfectly with what I said.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 05:15 PM
13

Pearls are not hard to get because they are valuable. Pearls are valuable because they are hard to get. It takes ressources to get them, having one means you got more ressources than those who dont and that increases your own value in the eyes of others.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 10:35 AM
-1

I don't see how "the amorality of sexual strategy" dismisses my points at all since the moral law of "not cheating" benefits both genders.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:54 PM
0

Morals and laws are not different things. Laws reflect (and sometimes, for administrative reasons, lag behind) the morals of a culture. Morals and laws at completely different things based on the exact same need; We need to agree and cooperate on certain areas which will benefit us all. That doesn't mean that what is illegal is immoral and that which is immoral is illegal. Therefore calling my example bad is not a valid argument. Do NOT moralize people in this subreddit by calling them douches f…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:50 PM
0

But I will definitely read that link and thanks for that.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:34 PM
-1

Bad example. The legal provisions against murder are a contract we ALL agree to. If you let the killer get away, you DO have a problem. Not a bad example. We are talking about morals here and not law. Yes you might have a legal problem but I would say you would also have a moral one. It is very important to make the distinction between laws and morals in generel. Just because something is a law doesn't make it morally correct.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:33 PM
0

Thats a good way of saying it. And I'm with you.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:19 PM
-2

Yes you are not a part of their relationship so it is not your problem but inaction reflects your character as much as taking action. If you saw someone gun down another person in a robbery and simply went on with your life without calling 911 or getting help otherwise, then yes, you don't have a problem. However you still let someone poor smuck bleed out on the streets and die.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 08:18 PM
1

If that truely was the case then I can respect that, however Hot drunk girl and I talked about hanging out at some future date. If she remembers enough from that night she will remember me well enough to probably want to hang out with me. I'm guessing it will be fairly easy for me to score that if I decide to. He's not a friend of mine...hell, I'd probably be doing him a favor giving her a ride on some Alpha cock and keeping her sated at least for a little while longer. I read the above situatio…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 04:53 PM
-2

You don't know that guy, for all you know he'd fuck your woman if he had the chance. Your gut is putting you in the victimized category rather than the one who victimizes. I'm not buying that. By not screwing around with taken women you are not all of the sudden at a higher risk of getting cheated on. Trying to propose that peoples mindsets are a binary fucked/fucker switch is just as weird. Edit: And by this I mean that fucking with taken women doesn't make you more alpha. It just makes you a d…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 04:41 PM
0

Thanks I'll view it later when I have the oppertunity. But you are right and as I said there is a big chance he won't listen but I see no reason for that to be an reason to go behind his back with his girlfriend.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 03:25 PM
2

One worthy of discussion. Apprently not since I'm being downvoted. This thread reminded me about another thread where OP claimed to have two children with a woman who was married with another guy and the guy thinking it was his children. Made me sick to my stomach honestly.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 02:43 PM
1

Doing him a favor: yes. Because he needed to understand that his girlfriend is a slut and that he should move on. Once a girl loses respect for you as a man there is no going back and why should you either. He failed as a bf. I've failed as a bf before. That's why my ex cheated on me. Since you are someone who has been cheated on before would you honestly prefer to find out about it after she cheated rather than before?
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 02:42 PM
0

If she doesnt fuck OP, she will fuck someone else, sooner rather than later. I'm totally with you on this one. She is pretty immoral and shouldn't be in a committed relationship with anyone. Angry men dont see the girl "falling out of love" as being the problem, they tend to see the guy as "trying to fuck up the relationship so he can have her to himself" & so your method, which is good advice if the world was a fairy tale , wouldnt work in real life. Why would the BF in the above story be angry…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 02:40 PM
-1

Never fuck your brothers woman. Never fuck your brothers ex (without permission, even then it's a Bad Idea), regardless of sexual strategy being amoral or not this is dishonorable. If it's just some chick with a "bf" and you really don't know them, she's fair game if she's jumping on the branch. Could you elabroate on why you see it as dishonerable if it is one of your friends and not as dishonerable if it is a guy you don't know? Because I'm totally with you until. I don't know what it is but m…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 02:31 PM
4

As seen from the 10 hour walk video this is correct. Scary!
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:55 PM
1

Hey, you just virtually attacked me!
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:42 PM
1

Ah, I see. Good point.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:55 PM
1

It doesn't seem like the spiders are collecting everything. For example, 9 days ago you posted this[1] . Reddit is a huge site and I do actually regret quoting "whinemoreplease" directly because he is not completly correct either. It can take google months to index a site if it isn't requested to do it and therefore you cannot use a 9 day old site as an example. I tried googling for other stuff on that particular page and there were no results of that either, so it isn't like google only indexes…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:31 PM
1

You missed this part. The comments in this thread can't be found right now at this moment, but in a couple of days the robots/spiders will crawl through here and index everything.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:50 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've been led to believe that "that time of the month" can make women feel sick. Stomach aches and so forth. If you want a true answer, I suppose you have to filter those days off in your research, which I doubt anyone has.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 01:54 PM
59

Yes and so is she.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:36 PM
3

We had showers after gym class. And yes, everyone was naked.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:27 PM
5

Born 1991, had showers after gym class. And, no acceptance letter to Hogwarts when I was 11 I'm afraid :(
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:27 PM
25

I dont remember what grade it was, but when I was around 6-8 years old the girls and boys would shower together. Its weird thinking back on it but it didnt cause any problems then.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:34 PM
1

They test both for a reason tho. Sure, but saying she will do worse in the strength department when in fact the only part she had trouble with was the 'endurance department' is wrong.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:17 AM
1

It looks like the running test is the only part she failed. So apperently not.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:06 AM
3

The machine! I'll show myself out..
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:18 AM
7

If its that scene it certainly isnt rape. Trevor is a fucked up guy, sure, but up until that point he's actually been helping Floyd realize that a controlling girlfriend and a dead end job is not what life is about.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 10:46 AM
2

I'm not a woman but dare I say "Wow"?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 11:39 AM
1

I encoutner that a lot in many other cases. People will often use excuses that when turn out to be the total opposite of what they thought, it then turns out that it suddenly doesn't matter anymore.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:11 PM
6

Equality is not good when both genders gets punished unfairly.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:45 PM
7

Because we live in a free society.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:48 PM
1

Well to be fair you didn't give her many examples to back up your theory. Should she just take her word for it?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 01:34 PM
3

You're arguing a moot point. The picture clearly shows that it is a short-length skirt.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:45 AM
14

There is nothing wrong with giving men the option to wear a skirt, actually thats a good thing. There is however something oddly wrong about denying them to chose shorts, which covers exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:07 AM
18

On another note, I agree with this comment: Fourteen-year-olds are pretty stupid. Eighteen-year-olds are even dumber. Yeah, I think 15 years in the slammer and a lifetime of being labeled a perv for being young and dumb is a bit extreme.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:53 PM
5

But it might just be that men don't go to the docter for crazy pills. Therefore you cannot claim that women actually are more likely to develop mental illness. Who knows, perhaps thats why men kill themselves more often.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:00 AM
2

I thought the point was that fatherless homes are more prone to produce runaways/homeless people. But we need to compare the relative numbers and not the total to see that.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 04:43 PM
22

I believe it is ment to be understood as such: Out of those who are homeless/runaways, that have grown up in a household where they where missing one parent, 90% come from a fatherless home while 10% come from motherless homes. What would be interesting to know if they took into account that there probably are a lot more fatherless homes to begin with.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:38 PM
1

I read that as "Wow, cool.. wait wat, superman?"
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:02 PM
1

Nothing wrong with being more precise.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 11:52 AM
-3

So this popped up on your newsfeed(I guess facebook?) and you then found the picture on some kind of blogwebsite to post it here? Why not rightclick and "Show picture" then?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 11:24 AM
1

But it might indicate something that would be worth investigating. I have also experienced the same kind of culture around driving as he has.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:06 PM
1

That's why it's a bad analogy. It doesnt work.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:12 PM
1

We have two persons who have both their eyes. The criminal then pokes out the other guys eye, and the criminal now gets his punishment. Now they both only have 1 eye. Then the criminal pokes out the eye of the other guy again, and the criminal is now king. As a king, he rules and decides over whatever. He never gets his punishment.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:39 PM
1

Im just saying that the analogy doesnt make sense, since it would make the criminals kings...
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:17 PM
1

In that world, a man who doesn't take the eyes of others (doesn't transgress on other's property or person) becomes king. Not really, because the criminal will have trangressed on you anyway, making you blind before his punishment comes. And when you are blind, he has an eye, and he will be the king.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:30 PM
2

And in the land of the blind the man with one eye is king. Whats that even supposed to mean in this context? That the first man to blind the other person deserves to be a king? Which would be the criminal?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:01 PM
6

Whats this wolf heart story?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:11 PM
2

He beat the system. They want him to kick their asses...
/r/MensRights06/04/13 02:50 PM
-1

Also, he probably pays per view, sooo if we could F5 the shit out of the commercial somehow he would lose money (Even though I guess it's supposed to be unique views).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:16 PM
26

Personally, I look on my scars on my knees and legs and think "Damn, those were the days!"(as in: it was awesome).
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:49 PM
3

17 years in the developing phase might have something to do with it.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:13 PM
1

Well, for his theory to work men and women need to be equally sick. From a quick google search it didn't actually appear that way, but I could be wrong as I havn't researched it further. Questioning him - even if you are a feminist - doens't make one butthurt.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:17 PM
5

To be fair though, you don't get to be "toned and lean" with abs and decent arms without bulking up. You first bulk, then cut.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:37 AM
2

Of course we should allow it and I'm pretty sure that OP feels that way too. He is simply poking a hole in the argument that "men don't know what it feels like to be bombarded with "virtually" unattainable bodies".
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:34 AM
9

The ending made me laugh a little. The first part was pretty dark, though. That said, it's just humor. I have been told so many times "Don't laugh of that, thats offensive!" that I try not to judge others.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:41 PM
3

Everytime there is something about suicide on the danish media, it is always about some young girl who for some reason didn't do it succesfully. They never focus on the people who actually did it and I have never heard of any men in these stories.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:38 PM
2

Would like to see how many men actually rides motorcycle compared to women.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:24 AM
2

I can't find the source from where I got it, but as I remember it there where several different kinds FGM and many of them were not as severe as the typical MGM. But, what about a persons ear tip? You don't mind them cutting up there Labia Majore for not reason so I was just wondering.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:16 AM
3

Just pointing out that there are several difference degrees of female genital mutilation, some of them not as severe as the one done on males and some more severe - all of them are banned though - So do you agree that some forms of female genital mutilation should be legalized or are you are hypocrit?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 11:56 PM
1

I suggest you go back and look at the comments yourself because clearly NONE of those you replied to mentioned or even talked about gender quotas, so the fact that you get butthurt when nobody understands your sarcastic comment is just hilarious. Gender quotas is such a far fetch from yours and those comments. You're clearly to stupid to comprehend the meaning coming out of your own mouth. I'm not saying your sexist or your comment was. I'm saying that I and pretty much anybody else who read it(…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:55 PM
1

I think it is quite a feat to interpret ideas about feminists and gender quotas from a comment that only had the words Run into the ground by a woman. But I guess that language is something you can bend over backwards afterwards if it fits you, though, some clearly do it more elegantly than you.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:32 PM
1

I'm saying there's only one way to read that post.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:53 PM
0

Was he? Yes. Or was he saying that artificially forcing leadership, such as with mandatory quotas, is a terrible way to run a business? No. Not ambigouos at all.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:08 PM
0

I don't believe it is ambiguties at all.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:47 PM
1

Yes and no.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:42 PM
1

But we can surely agree that not every company will run into the ground, right? JabCross' comment indicate just that.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:25 PM
18

No. But it is sexism to say that woman-run company will be run into the ground, which was exactly was he was saying.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:10 PM
4

Here is the link for anyone late to the party or people from the future seeking it: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/18tv7j/i_am_warren_farrell_author_of_why_men_are_the_way/
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:33 PM
1

No problem at all :)
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:56 AM
0

I think /r/MensRants is good solution to the current problem, that's why I try to advocate for it in several threads. The subreddit is only 3 months old, but I will admit don't have the traction some might have hoped.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:13 PM
4

90% might be an overstatement but what ever, it is still the core problem that the mods are trying to fight. Everytime a subreddit grows bigger and bigger its content gets watered down, which is clearly why they created /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:56 PM
0

Perhaps more fitting for /r/MensRants. I think the mods strive for more serious content on here than a comedian(Not that a comedian can't lead to long and deep discussions, but you get the gist, right?) - That said, he certianly is a funny guy.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 03:46 PM
-8

Perhaps more fitting for /r/MensRants
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:04 PM
2

It was HER decision to put him into this situation Oh hell no - It was his desicion 100 %.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:05 PM
1

Quit trying to force the government's hand on everyone for something you personally agree/disagree with. Stop assuming you magically know what I am doing.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:53 AM
2

An argument in favor of mandatory paternity tests, that I actually agree with, is that it is just as much a right for the child to know who its real parents are.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:02 PM
-1

But what about he who must not be named?! :O
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:48 PM
9

Depends on how they got there. When you drink a lot of alcohol you sometimes don't remember half the night, but that doesn't mean what you did wasn't under your control at the time. Regretting having the sex doesn't make it rape. edit* words
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:58 AM
0

Film it Post it Shit goes viral ???? Profit And by profit I mean media coverage and discussions about it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:07 PM
2

"In Danish"? - As in, there exists a english dubbed version or you were in Denmark?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:10 PM
3

Some would argue that there are many cases of people that have experience a loss of sensation after getting the surgery performed as an adult. To over look these examples when comparing to child circumcision would be ignorant. I don't have the time to post sources for this, but I doubt it is hard to google - if you indeed care.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:11 PM
3

Sure.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:12 PM
12

They back off because most people have a sense of decency of not trying to get the other person to cheat on their SO. That's my take on it anyways.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:18 PM
1

When he switched to that slide I just waited for him to make that mistake and I am very glad to find that this point is the most upvoted in here.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:25 AM
1

I know it isn't relevant, but damn that sounds like a Harry Potter spell - Reducto!
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:03 AM
6

I saw the movie Up with a bunch of male friends - They were surprisingly accepting of me when I shed a tear. That film man :,(
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:00 AM
1

Thanks for the indepth explanation, it's nice to know.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:12 PM
2

Thanks a lot! I recently fell over the subreddit SRSwomen and I can now see where all these crazy stories are coming from. It's hard to believe it's serious from reading their site, though. I mean "Ban all men hail Satan"?. The whole subreddit seems highly sarcastical yet the posts and replies don't. I'm scared.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 04:54 PM
1

the red pill was taken and I couldn't turn back. Upvoted you for matrix reference. And ofcourse valid content ;)
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:02 AM
1

adorable how you think you know things about him
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:12 AM
2

According to the facebook-film, that's very much like facebook started out with in its very beginning - rating girls. Not that you should trust that movie - This is totally irrelevant, though, so I accept any incomming downvotes.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:59 AM
1

Can someone give me a brief introduction about SRS? The only thing I found on google was something about switching genders through surgery and I somehow doubt that's what you guys are talking so much about. Thanks!
/r/MensRights03/01/13 01:51 AM
2

I do not know how many countries have experienced this, but in Denmark, the politicians in power, talked about introducing gender quotas in Danish listed companies. The legislation was basically that companies should have at least 40 per cent. women on the boards or they would be forced to dissolve. And it was of course in the name of equality. I do not know where the proposal is right now, but there was obviously much opposition among many politicians, but the general population did not condemn…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:41 PM
1

Mood: Genuinenly interested. I hope you don't mind me asking this question, but as a jew how do you view the traditions of your belief in regard to circumcision and does it influence your stance on the matter?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:18 PM
1

Mens rights problems and homosexual/gay rights problems might overlap on some issues, and it would be interesting to see what the general consensus is, even thought I believe it to be open minded. Fore example, are two gay partners allowed to adopt a child, if not, is that fair when a lesbian couple are allowed to get sperm donated? Personally, I believe they should be allowed and I also feel that it might fall into the category of Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:00 PM
1

I think that this comment could be considered funny More importantly, given the context it should be considered a joke and not be taken as a serious argument. Honestly, the inhaling and flapping with the hands is in my experience "stereotypically gay" behavior(not saying it actually is) and the comment is simply a joke playing on that.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:42 PM
2

I like your analysis of the rules of engagement when debating. I percieve it very much the same way but I hadn't really thought about it before reading your comment.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:36 PM
1

I do not share his view since I have not done my own research on the area, but I do agree with "loose-dendrite" about the terms of a discussion. One thing that struck my eye when reading your last post was: It wasn't really an argument, I figured I'm not gonna change his mind, y'know? But had you pursued the debate and asked for his sources, he might have changed yours. Interesting food for thought.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:34 PM
1

That was a pretty informative video - to the top!
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:39 PM
1

He didn't argue it was false, he merely pointed a fallacy out.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 12:28 PM
1

I must gave misread your comment, sorry about that.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:17 PM
1

Precisely. Therefore anyone could in theory claim that it hurts for them, and therefore get it.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:10 AM
1

How do you know they didn't?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:12 PM
1

How does one prove how much it hurts, though?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:54 PM
-1

Yes and I even made a spelling error.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:15 PM
1

God you're sad.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:51 PM
-1

Yes I know. Everyone on reddit knows - in fact EVERYONE in the entire fucking world knows that by know so stop fucking posting it. It's still a good way to describe it because to the user it can in fact be free. I can get my education and leave Denmark for good and I wouldn't have paid shit and therefore it would be free TO ME.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:50 PM
0

Okay, it just seemed to me that you put free healthcare together with tall the bad stuff.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:40 PM
-1

oh please
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:38 PM
1

Yes, it serves as a measurement of capability within calculus. Business and finances are something entirely different.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:37 PM
1

Ah okay, thanks for the elaboration - and I did think that it looked like Tyra Banks but I wasn't sure!..
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:42 AM
1

Don't you think free healthcare is a good thing?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:40 AM
0

Okay, I'm not entirely sure that I follow but I assume that the argument that "bras are there fore men's gratification" is an argument made by feminist sometimes? Also, the reason I asked was because I was under the impression that wearing a bra is supportive for you breasts. Upon researching I found that only women with large breats actually need bras for that purpose(and of course if women do sports).
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:33 AM
1

Just because you can fix the car doesn't mean you are the one who have to drive it. That was the point mwilke came with and that didn't seem to sink into your head. That said, I was under the impression that calculus is about learning mathematics and not so much business. If that is true, then the fact that you're taking calculus is even more irrelevant to why you should handle the finances.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:17 AM
2

Are you saying that bras are a symbol of male oppression?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:09 AM
0

I made the mistake of drinking of a cup while reading that last sentence - Luckily I avioded the keyboard and I didn't spill much so I just used my T-shirt.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:56 PM
1

Sneaky!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:44 PM
2

I'm trying not to go on the internet and speak of things with certainty which I in reality know nothing about. For me to give advice to depressed people would be like an economics student giving medical diagnosis - It sounds ridiculous and it is the truth at the same time. That said, how I behave on reddit and in reality in front of my friends(which may or may not have mental health problems, don't feel like sharing it here with you)are two different things.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:35 PM
0

It's the same spirit.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:07 PM
1

Your advice isn't different than what the comic offers.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:38 PM
1

I don't think you got the point of the cartoon either.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:36 PM
11

.. I don't think you got the point.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:58 PM
2

Ah, I see your point in it defining the intentions and results. That said, can't a country have a high tax and therefore be able to help the people on the bottom while still have a relatively free economy? So it wouldn't reallyt be a "state-controlled/managed" country?(or does the high tax simpyl translate to state-control?) Like you said, Denmark wasn't very controlling in some aspects of the economy yet we would be described to be "socialist" right?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:38 PM
2

Well, I didn't feel like typing out all the differences between the countries and the income tax rate seemed like a good way to describe the "mentally" difference. Anyways, thanks for the indepth explanation, I didn't know much of it actually but I must say I didn't mean socialist as "state-controlled managed" but in a "helps the guys on the bottom".
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:11 AM
0

I highly doubt that. Source?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:11 AM
4

Ohh, but it's much more than that :) But ye, it's understandable and many actually have left.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:21 AM
-1

It's just so useless because it doesn't even show any new kind of "acceptance" like a black president or lesbian judge does. We have had other "dark-skinned" ministers before so there is nothing new.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:32 PM
8

When comparing Danish politics with American politics, it's two different sides of the spectrum - they are not comparable. If our most liberal party got all their wet dreams fulfilled, then we would still have free health care, educational support, but only with max. 40% in taxes - and they are called "super-liberal" in Denmark. Imagine what Obama is then..
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:02 PM
18

I'm afraid he would be to much of a "socialist" to even get noticed over there :)
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:46 PM
5

Offtopic - I think it is pretty ridiculous to call him the first minister with a non-european background. I mean, why does it matter? It is not like danish politicians before him only were light skinned, blue eyed, tall vikings.. And he has only been nominated for The Politician of the year multiple times - never actually won as far as I can see.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:36 PM
-2

After you(The OP) described /r/Feminism I went over there because I wanted some good old rage-fun - I was pretty disappointed and I didn't have any fun, because it actually appeared to be a decent subreddit. Apperently a lot of them think MensRights are the degenerates ( http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/14eg1z/you_guys_are_alright/) I don't know who's right or wrong, but its worth taking into consideration.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:00 AM
-2

No, she's fucking a student :3
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter