TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PurpleVNeck Archive

View 3 posts and 85 comments by PurpleVNeck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not a redpiller... I'm confused now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/14 01:15 PM
2

Yeah, I agree completely. Like TRP says, preselection might make men for attractive for a ONS/fling (the say way they're attracted to promiscuous women for one night stands and flings), but that doesn't mean they're attractive for an LTR. If women are going to have kids, they want a parent who can commit and provide for the child, and a guy who has spun plates all his life is a risky choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:16 PM
2

Sure, but you can't compare the word slut to shit. Shit's a bad word for poop. Whatever. Poop doesn't care. But when you use derogatory words that affect people (slut, nigger, faggot, etc.) you don't get to excuse it by saying "oh, but I meant it in a positive way!" Anyway, I'm less fixated on his use of the word than the fact his use of it stems from a belief (propagated in TRP) that women who have casual sex are somehow bad people or less deserving of equitable treatment, etc. There is no dams…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 08:22 PM
3

Wow, you completely missed the point. Slut is a derogatory term which is why using it implies that the user thinks that for whatever reason, women shouldn't be able to have casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 08:04 PM
11

Also don't refer to the women consenting to have sex with you as sluts, that's just generally uncool.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/14 07:56 PM
2

A lot of those stories on TBP are people's experiences of being in abusive relationships. Here's the thing about emotional abuse: it works. If you find someone with a low self-esteem and then employ dread game, you can get them to date you and give you sex all the time, to cook for you, to make you the centre of their world. The problem with this is that it isn't healthy. The whole "young and stupid" isn't a convenient excuse, it's "I was in a bad place in my life and got manipulated." So sure, …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/14 07:08 PM
2

TRP complains and complains about supposed feminist shaming tactics (because apparently calling something immoral is a shaming tactic instead of a legitimate criticism) and now you're telling me TRP is in support of shaming? Isn't that a little hypocritical?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/13 09:03 PM
5

Why are you okay with members of TBP using such oppressive and bullying language to describe members of TRP. Some members of TRP describe bluepillers as fat lesbian cunts or whiteknight manginas who can't get laid. Shaming goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/13 04:40 PM
2

Yeah, I agree. It's important to understand that girls bully too, but it doesn't mean all women are evil or anything like that. Some girls are bullies, some boys are bullies; they just bully in different ways.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:57 AM
2

Personally, I can say that I only love one person at a time, and when I choose to love them, I stay committed and put in effort until the relationship ends (for whatever reason). Is my current BF my first love? No. Do I love him? Tons. I get fuzzy feelings in my stomach even just getting a text. Do I still think about any guys I dated before? Sometimes they cross my mind, sure, but never in a romantic context. Obviously I can't speak for your gf or other women, but that's my experience, and I ho…
/r/RedPillWomen18/06/13 04:10 AM
2

I'll summarize their responses for you: Casual sex: mutual desire, both parties want to have sex with each other. Paying a prostitute: they wouldn't want to have sex with you otherwise, the idea of sex as commodity instead of an mutually desired experience shared by two people.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 12:56 AM
12

Actually, I read the thread, and the woman who posted that says she has only been with one man (her husband). When someone asked the same question you did, she said: One...Thank you for the insult. I am a woman of high morals and standards and lost my virginity to the man I married. He keeps me happy in all senses. Even if I did go through a dry spell I wouldn't seek out the attention of a stranger.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 12:46 AM
1

Okay! That's along my line of thought too, I wasn't sure about the specifics of something like that though. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 11:53 PM
1

From reading it, it just seems that it means looking at them like men would, eg evaluating them sexually. Or do you not sexually evaluate women when you look at them? Doesn't seem like it has much to do with rape culture.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 11:48 PM
1

I have a question for you about the marriage stuff, actually! I have mixed feelings on alimony (for either gender). On one hand, I obviously think the concept of financial enslavement is bad, but on the other... there's a reason alimony exists. An MRA once explained to me that men risk everything in the marriage because a woman can take the kids and take all of their money. But imagine a scenario where, say, a man and a woman get married and the man asks her to give up her job and raise his kids…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 11:45 PM
1

That's a fair point, I agree with you especially about those posters, where there isn't context/a legit example, just "tell your sons not to rape." :) I just wanted to point out where this poster can be misinterpreted as offensive.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:34 AM
2

I don't entirely disagree, but someone can make the same claims about "men, don't rape" posters. Eg, "it's not insulting to men, it is recognizing that society tells men that certain behaviours aren't the same as rape when they are (eg, coercing someone into sex, marriage is consent, etc.) and asking men to recognize the truth." and, "These posters aren't targeting the men who actually knowingly commit rape, it's the ones who legitimately think their behaviour is okay." It's a lot about how you …
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:22 PM
2

But, and sadly it is the case, often the girl will not say no to sex when she does not want sex. That scenario.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:19 PM
3

Yeah, I came here to say this. Saying "Women, don't make fake rape claims!" is like saying "Men, don't rape!". There are assholes in life that are going to do these things regardless of something they see on fb. Plus, just as men are offended by "men, don't rape", some women are offended by these - they can be interpreted as insinuating that women are too dumb to realize that it wasn't rape. I don't know if people who regret sex actually believe it's rape; they just say it was for various reason…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:20 AM
9

In the scenario mentioned above, the girl doesn't say yes at any point. He's saying you should never assume consent (at least with a one night stand, clearly relationships are different). I think you're arguing against something different?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:18 AM
2

If this is how you treat people who are hoping to learn about Men's Rights and trying to have a discussion (even if they're wrong), then you're gonna have a bad time rallying support for your cause. You're the cunt here mate, I tried to be civil but you thought character attacks were a better way of having an argument.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:37 PM
3

If girls see you hitting on every other girl at the bar and failing, they'll be less interested in you.
/r/seduction01/05/13 03:55 AM
2

In the article though, it says they hadn't discussed finances before getting married, which imo is a mistake on the behalf of both partners. You make a good point though, it's just hard to see it through you being a patronizing asshole.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:23 AM
1

Hey man. You're right. I am outsider. That's why I'm asking questions and trying to have a discussion. Good luck trying to gain support for the MRM movement when you act like a douchebag. Though you do realize 100% of divorce cases aren't just evil women trying to steal all of their husband's hard-earned money, right? I'm not fucking trying to shame men - you'll notice most of my posts, at least earlier, were gender neutral.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:20 AM
1

I agree with you and the analogy, but what I originally meant wasn't referring to if your partner screws you over (which of course isn't your fault, you're a victim) but if you are unhappy in your marriage and always worrying about your partner screwing you over, you are partially responsible for the situation you are in. In the latter case, you are not a victim, you just made a bad decision.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:06 AM
-1

I'm taking a STEM degree right now and my boyfriend wants to be a lab tech. While I support his dreams and want him to be happy, the chances are that if we stay together long-term, I'll be making more money. So it's actually quite a possibility. Look... I didn't mean to come across like "men don't have the chance of being screwed over hahaha". Women who screw over their husbands like that are terrible people. I didn't think I needed to say "I recognize this and would not hurt my husband if we go…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:55 PM
0

That sounds a lot like victim blaming. You should be able to marry someone without being put at risk of destitution and ongoing financial slavery, regardless of how well you chose your partner, just like you should be able to get drunk at a party without some woman raping you. I thought the MRA point was: "if you have sex and you regret it, it's your fault, it's not rape." It's the same thing for marriage, isn't it? If you marry someone, knowing how the system works, and regret it later, own up …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:51 PM
0

So basically you're telling me if a man makes a mistake and marries a (for lack of a better word) "bad" woman because "love is blind, he can't help it", he isn't responsible for his actions? Don't fucking marry someone that you don't trust. I know people change and sometimes people spring surprises on you, but that goes for both men and women. They start out in a seemingly great marriage and then it turns abusive. Look, if your marriage is abusive, get out. If you're unhappy in a marriage becaus…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:06 PM
-3

Dude. If, when I get married, I end up making more money than my partner (which many women are starting to do now) I would feel the same way. If you feel that allowing your spouse access to your bank account is "giving it up", then that's a bad mentality to keep. Trust isn't a reluctant and begrudging exchange of numbers. It's given willingly and enthusiastically - or it should be, if, as I said, you're with a partner you respect in a healthy relationship. Yeah, trust is earned, but by the point…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:57 PM
-1

Why would you marry someone that you think would enslave you? Why would you remain in that marriage if that's how you feel about your spouse? Don't marry someone if you're just going to worry about divorce. tl;dr marry someone you respect and have a healthy partnership where you can make financial decisions together. (I agree slavery >> hurt feelings, but you shouldn't dismiss emotions as meaningless.)
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:48 PM
-2

That's a really good point, and I did change the original phrasing of my post because I came across as entitled. I hadn't thought of it like that. My response would be that in a long-term marriage, a mixture of joint and individual bank accounts would be the best (imo). If my partner was set on keeping a separate bank account, I would find it a bit insulting and see it as a sign of underlying trust issues. That said, I understand that some people prefer it and are uncomfortable with other people…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:44 PM
0

How does that relate to what we're talking about?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:31 PM
-4

Having an allowance is infantilizing. Children get allowances, not grown adults. Either this man has trust issues and is too possessive of his money (what's mine is mine) or he married a women he can't trust with their money, which is also a problem. A good marriage works as "what's mine is yours and what's yours is mine" and then you work together with your partner to make sound financial decisions. And it's not like that's the only bank account you're going to have. You might have your own sav…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:07 PM
1

Yeah, I usually find that it's not too bad here. But there's a lot of bad blood between MRAs and feminists which carries over into legit women's rights issues. While I agree this isn't the space to discuss women's rights, it sucks to see them being torn down in order to validate men's rights, an act which is unnecessary because they aren't mutually exclusive. tl;dr it's oppression olympics at the moment.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:20 PM
1

/r/Egalitarianism
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:15 PM
1

Just because you think a joke is harmless doesn't mean it won't harm somebody. I know some people are overly sensitive and it isn't our responsibility to pander to them, but that doesn't mean all emotions should be disregarded. As a woman, I agree with a lot of the stuff on that list (eg sexist jokes in tv shows) but that doesn't mean I don't also agree with all the men's issues listed here. Yeah, female issues are more social than legal like men face. We should stop both of them. I'm not saying…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:13 PM
5

Yeah, I agree. There are issues facing both genders and some (like the body hair one) are the same. We don't have to belittle women's issues to make men's issues more important, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:08 PM
2

Yes and no. First, while learning to deal with your own problems is good as an adult, this idea perpetuates the notion that men are shouldn't ask for help, that doing so is a sign of weakness. If you have problems that are difficult for you to handle on your own (maybe depression or relationship issues) there's nothing wrong with seeking therapy or counselling. If more people (men and women) would seek help instead of letting everything bottle up, a lot of future problems could be avoided.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:55 PM
5

If I was receiving an allowance from my partner, I would be insulted. A joint bank account seems fairer, not so I can steal all his money, but because it's a sign of trust. I trust him not to spend more than he needs, and in return, I would expect him to trust me. It seems like the man in this case has issues trusting his partner with money which could be his problem, or she might not be good with money, in which case he shouldn't have married a child. If people choose to keep separate accounts …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:35 PM
2

News flash: they probably find some of the things you say boring too. Seriously, though. Go out with girls that you enjoy talking to. If you really like a girl, you'll probably find her stories a lot more interesting.
/r/seduction18/04/13 03:25 AM
6

Sexism isn't cool, dude.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 10:02 PM
18

I think that's a bit of a rash judgement. While I agree that there are ways she could be helping out (a part-time job where you work from home), being a stay-at-home mother is pretty demanding. For all we know, she could be busy as hell raising the kid(s), doing chores, cooking meals, giving her husband nice backrubs when he returns from work... I find her comment is symbolic of a traditional attitude about gender roles, and I do think that's pretty close-minded of her. As a quick edit, I realiz…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:54 PM
3

Are you getting downvoted there for having feelings?
/r/seduction20/02/13 09:22 PM
1

Wow dude, way to generalize...
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:10 PM
-3

I know MRAs believe that feminism is essentially sexist, and that's not what I want to debate here. I'm posting this to show that there are well-intentioned feminists, and that she recognizes that hating men is sexist, none of this 'you need power to be sexist and women are powerless' bs.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:34 PM
4

I agree with you here, but I think the problem with a lot of these graphics is that they can be easily misconstrued - people who are on the fence in regards to MRAs can see it as "oh, men think it's fine to stare at a woman's chest?" or "oh, you think men shouldn't be seen as evil if they hit women? they should be seen as brave as well?" (and thus negative press is garnered.)
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:30 PM
5

Tbh, it sounds like a lot of these women were abused. "You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs." -- Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.) and My feelings about men are the result of my experience. -- Marilyn French and "I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... -- Sylvia Fraser; Journalist This definitely doesn't condone their s…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:08 PM
3

It's less being weaker and more having it rubbed in your face. I consider myself fairly strong (rugby and hockey player, black belt), so when guys belittle me and insist I'm weak or that they could take me easily, it's insulting. This has less to do with gender politics and more to do with some people being jerks.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:24 PM
1

In think, in her case, he walked up close behind her, stayed there for a bit, and then overtook her. This is different than two people walking in the same direction and one happening to pass the other. That said, she might be exaggerating in her letter.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:58 PM
4

They took away a shirtless picture of a football player and a half-naked Ken doll; it's not like they're flat-out ignoring the men's side of things. Plus they only removed things from the common rooms/workspaces, not from private rooms.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:46 PM
3

I don't know, I don't buy that logic. That's like saying a clothing store for women is sexist because it only supplies clothes for women - which usually isn't a problem because there's a men's clothing store nearby. I don't think there's anything wrong with a piece of legislation targeted for one gender - as long as the other gender receives an equivalent, which seems to be one of the issues here. EDIT: For the confusion - I'm merely saying something isn't sexist because it is for women as oppos…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:42 PM
5

Hmm...as a woman, I've never really considered that before. I mean, I get it objectively, but I can't understand feeling as violated by someone looking at my pecs as I would if they were looking at my boobs (in a ogling manner obvs) - if that makes sense? Definitely something for me to think about.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:04 AM
10

While I disagree with these kind of photos being taken (regardless of gender) I don't think that they're the same kind of creep shots of women that earned media backlash - those were shots which tried to be upskirt or down the cleavage, right? It might be totally unethical but I definitely wouldn't call it misandrist. That said, I agree that it's gross that people think this is ok.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:16 PM
1

Yeah. Not that I agree with the viewpoint expressed in the pic, but the question did specify "extra courtesy" as opposed to something you would do for anyone (eg. with the probable intention of getting laid.) EDIT: Yes, I meant people only hold doors open to get laid. /s But if you show extra courtesy to a certain group of individuals and treat them differently than you would treat others for no other reason than that they are part of that certain group, than you should consider whether or not y…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:14 PM
2

No, don't worry, I'm not trying to convince him that he's a victim - I didn't really say anything when he was relating the story.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:30 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:29 AM
2

Yeah, I know, I'm not forcing the issue and trying to convince him he was raped. It's just... surprising, I guess? Anyway, this happened awhile ago, it isn't recent (I just heard about it recently.)
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:27 AM
1

It's an awful site, but easy to find if you just Google it.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:43 PM
-1

I didn't say you were - just pointing out common sense.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:39 PM
1

I think the point that's missed a lot of the time in debates such as these is that one person can feel/be raped without the other person necessarily being a rapist. If someone's about to have sex with you, and you don't want it (and they're not asking you if you do, and rather assuming), take some responsibility - say no. If they continue after that, then we can start labelling them as rapists. That said, if you're having sex with someone and they don't seem that into it, ask! If you ever have a…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:03 PM
1

Oh, I never said I agreed with it - common sense should be taken in all cases. Your whole life is basically about caution vs expediency, and accidents result from the choices and errors in judgement you make. But saying "you shouldn't dress like this at night alone" is different than "if you hadn't dressed that way, you wouldn't have been raped". The first one is acceptable. The second is salt in the wound, and even if you aren't blaming the victim, he/she will certainly feel that way.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 04:54 PM
1

I'm pretty sure they're called Gender Studies in order to include Transgender persons. They don't really care about men. Sorry. :(
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:14 PM
0

To be fair, the more correct comparison is "don't tell us how to watch our kids", implying they're already paying attention to how they're watching their kids (dressing) and don't need you to blame them because they looked away for a second (wore a tube top). They're against victim blaming, which is why slutwalks occur, hence their posters. It's just unfortunate they have to target men as opposed to people in general (whether or not you're a rapist, you probably have the physical capability comm…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:07 PM
1

As a point of interest, the site was founded by men. There's none of this "us poor women" stuff going on. Let's go point by point again. We can agree the first point is good. Violence against women is a men's issue because they people they care about get hurt. Good. Both men and women can be community leaders. It does not say all men are the leaders. It says in the capacity of community leaders, men can make a key difference. If a man is abusing a women, who are they more likely to listen to? A …
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:49 AM
0

There's a a 'why engage men' section in the about, Violence against women is a deeply personal issue for women, but it is also very much a men's issue because it is their wives, mothers, sisters, daughters and friends whose lives are being harmed by violence and abuse. It is a men's issue because, as community leaders and decision-makers, men can play a key role in helping to stop violence against women. It is a men's issue because men can speak out and step in when male friends and relatives in…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:05 AM
-1

We have lived in a welfare state from the moment we started paying taxes. A welfare state is a concept of government in which the state plays a key role in the protection and promotion of the economic and social well-being of its citizens. Even in the simplest system, we pay taxes in order for the security to have a "free" market. That's technically a welfare state. Unless you're going by a different definition? Whether or not feminism is bad for the economy, feminism did not cause welfare state…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:18 PM
2

It might just be bad luck. I'm a teenage girl, and honestly, if I'm not interested in a guy, it won't matter how he asks me out - I won't be interested. My advice? Be yourself! Don't change your behaviour in order to woo a girl. Be their friend, without being friendzoned. Don't always be there for them with nothing in return, available whenever. Be yourself, be amiable, be casual, and don't always put them (us?) first.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:40 PM
6

Erm... wouldn't the solution be to make men's experience more similar to women's? If women have it better, as you seem to be saying, why drag them down to a lower level? Why not just elevate the standard for men and give each urinal a proper stall?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:34 PM
0

Expecting downvotes, but... This is the Oxford definition, meaning it's British. Here is the definition of rape in England: Rape (1) A person (A) commits an offence if— (a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, (b) B does not consent to the penetration, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents. So you see, rape in British law requires penetration, which is why they make the assumption that the perpetrator is male. This by no mean…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:48 PM
3

Victims of rape (women AND men) are usually scared and ashamed. Going to the police and saying that you've been raped - a terrifying ordeal. You know what makes it worse? The thought that the police, and that the people around you, won't believe you. They'll think you're making it up. Look, false accusations suck. They hurt everyone. There's no need to argue over whether or not they hurt future victims of rape.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:05 PM
1

I believe the sentiment behind this ill-phrased example is that society should instill proper morals and values within its members, such as "rape is bad" or "do not rape." We should be making an effort to teach everyone - regardless of gender - that rape isn't permissible under any circumstance (and subsequently teaching people that false accusations are not humorous). I agree that rape can never fully be eliminated from society, but a lot of the time, when people say this, they are not feminist…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 11:25 AM
1

gender feminism does to dehumanize and objectify women. This sounds really interesting; can you possibly elaborate more? I've never looked at it from this perspective. Are you saying that in order to create a need to empower women, feminists are creating a weak female stereotype?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:09 AM
1

I call myself a feminist because I advocate more strongly for women's rights issues, though not at the expense of men's. Would calling myself a WRA be a better term?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:05 AM
3

You can not tell me that you are 100% for equality when the very title you choose to "rally" under is sexist . If you truly just want equality for both genders, then like I said, use "egalitarian". If you want equality, but only want to focus on womens equality (but aren't so crazy to push things that elevate women beyond equality), then feminist is a perfect title to use... just don't say you are 100% for equality for both genders, because you aren't. I think I am naturally more inclined to pus…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:02 AM
3

...Are you kidding me right now? Misogyny is the hatred of women/girls. Misandry is the hatred of men/boys. They both fall under sexism. That does not make them the same, or even similar, as I believe they manifest themselves in different ways. As a woman, being involved in gender activism, IMO, should be about advocating for women's rights, AND for men's. TL:DR People should have equal rights. I don't know; maybe you're just trolling me right now.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:51 AM
0

No, because I agree and see that women have equal rights to men. That does not, however, equate to them being treated equally. Then there's abortion rights, which is quite simply, a woman's right to her body. But then there's the social aspect - feminists strive to have women treated (and perceived) as equals to men. It's just as much a movement against discrimination and sexism than it is for civil and legal rights on paper.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:24 PM
1

Thank for the wonderfully well-written, relevant, and calm response. You deserve more upvotes.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:15 PM
1

Haha, I guess I will. I guess I came here to ask for clarification on what I was seeing, but you're right, I did it in the worst way.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:13 PM
2

That's a really good response and the answer I was looking for. :) I'm sorry I came off as such a bigot; I never meant to, and I appreciate that you ignored it and answered my question regardless.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:43 AM
3

Hah. I know this will come as a huge surprise to you, but I'm actually very interested in reading everyone's opinion here. I am most certainly not crying, though I do feel like an asshole for being so aggressive during my initial post.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:42 AM
2

OP had to go to bed and now to work. OP will be responding to has much as she can when she has time.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:39 AM
1

Reading that, I feel awful! I never meant to imply that everyone on this subreddit (or in this niche movement) hated women, only that there does seem to be some of that feeling on these forums and I don't understand why, considering your goals.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:38 AM
2

I recognize hating feminists is not the same as hating women; that's why I'm confused by misogynistic comments that I see (that are belittling WOMEN, not just feminism. I'll edit this with examples after.) destructive, sexist, and heartless movement. First, equity feminism and gender feminism are two separate movements. I identify as an feminist because I want rights to my body (abortion rights, for example) and rights to equal pay, etc. In Canada, I'm lucky. But in the States, it seems there ar…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:37 AM
3

Fair enough, I hadn't thought of it that way, thanks!
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:30 AM
3

Check my edit. I didn't want to come off as that; I checked out the subreddit and questioned what I saw because I'm interested in this movement, just turned off by what I've read.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 11:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter