| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.See the reply I posted earlier. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 10:55 AM |
| 2 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Yes, I said that. To choose to sleep with someone is a choice. You're not judging these women on their heights, but for making the same choice your philosophy advocates that you do. That is what is hypocritical. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 10:54 AM |
| 4 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Except women enjoy sex as well, not just for biological reasons. If judgment is being applied, apply it to everyone. Especially once again from the hypocrisy that comes from encouraging people to sleep with "sluts," thereby becoming sluts themselves. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:32 AM |
| 3 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.But then why is the woman a slut and the man not? If women have higher standards and have slept with more partners, then they slept with capable men, according to your logic. If a man does it and has low standards, then he is not sleeping with people of the same caliber and would therefore be giving it out easier, AKA, being a slut. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:22 AM |
| 6 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Except I have not seen it apply to the majority, in my experience. Though I appreciate if you are including your opinions. Given what I've read on the Red Pill thread, it's truly tiring to see AWALT constantly. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:19 AM |
| 2 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.So guys are open to more sex with strangers. Wouldn't that make them easier then? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:17 AM |
| 3 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Still requires an extreme investment from the woman in question. I didn't include studies because I'm trying to discuss the logical fallacies of the argument presented. It only works if you assume every person of each gender is the same. It's not logical. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:16 AM |
| 7 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.How so? Following what you believe to be biological proof, a promiscuous man could just as easily impregnate a woman and leave her. Not a good choice. If you want to call something a fact, I would like links to peer reviewed research. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:06 AM |
| 0 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Not necessarily. Depends on the woman and the man in question. Broad generalizations about how easy it is to find partners for each gender don't work. Attractive men find partners, attractive women find partners. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:01 AM |
| 0 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Actually it really isn't. To sleep with someone is a choice, not a biological fact. If you're going to make the same choice, why should you judge someone else for the same thing? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 04:00 AM |
| 2 | The "Slut vs. Stud" debate.Thank you for being open about it. I don't mind if a former partner has had multiple partners or one night stands, I just don't want excessive, and it's adjusted by age Of course. Where do you stand on this idea of spinning? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/03/15 01:16 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter