PyroPenguin73 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. How in the world is that related to rape? And male rape is not insignificant. You are using a study from 18 years ago, when men were too embarrassed to come forward. The red pill complains about male rape not getting attention all the time. I'm disgusted that you would compare getting raped to it being easy to find sexual partners.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 10:57 AM
1	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. See the reply I posted earlier.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 10:55 AM
2	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Yes, I said that. To choose to sleep with someone is a choice. You're not judging these women on their heights, but for making the same choice your philosophy advocates that you do. That is what is hypocritical.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 10:54 AM
3	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. I'm not entirely sure what you are saying. Men can be raped as well, and nobody's consent overrides anybody else's. Nobody is a gatekeeper of sex: I've known plenty of men who refuse to have sex on the first dates or longer. It all depends on the person.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:52 AM
2	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. I don't see how. Also, where is this 20-80 rule coming from? You do realize it would be mathematically impossible?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:50 AM
2	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Or you are. Goes both ways. Have an incredible night!	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:48 AM
3	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Depends. Did he consider her a slut when he slept with her? Did he give it up easily? Based on your definition, that could be considered a slut. It's certainly hypocritical. And men enjoy sleeping with women who have high attractiveness values. What is the point you are trying to make?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:42 AM
3	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Shall we chalk this one up to different experiences in life, sir?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:38 AM
3	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Except you already claimed men have low standards and unfortunately for your claims, women do care about sexual past. Quite a bit actually if your thread is to be believed. Otherwise why would so many men on the Red Pill dodge when their dates ask them about past experiences? A question is hardly a test. Also, partner count is what we are discussing in this question, since it's "studs" vs. "sluts."	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:37 AM
2	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Except women enjoy sex as well, not just for biological reasons. If judgment is being applied, apply it to everyone. Especially once again from the hypocrisy that comes from encouraging people to sleep with "sluts," thereby becoming sluts themselves.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:32 AM
3	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Except I'm not saying that. As far as I'm concerned, a woman doesn't want a man with that many partners either. The problem comes from the connotations attached to each word. If men have lower standards and they sleep with 30 people, and women have higher standards and sleep with 30 people, then she is clearly putting in more work in choosing partners. Garnered from what you said, then men would be the ones with the negative connotation, but your worldview excludes that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:28 AM
4	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. But then why is the woman a slut and the man not? If women have higher standards and have slept with more partners, then they slept with capable men, according to your logic. If a man does it and has low standards, then he is not sleeping with people of the same caliber and would therefore be giving it out easier, AKA, being a slut.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:22 AM
4	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Except I have not seen it apply to the majority, in my experience. Though I appreciate if you are including your opinions. Given what I've read on the Red Pill thread, it's truly tiring to see AWALT constantly.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:19 AM
5	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. So guys are open to more sex with strangers. Wouldn't that make them easier then?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:17 AM
2	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Still requires an extreme investment from the woman in question. I didn't include studies because I'm trying to discuss the logical fallacies of the argument presented. It only works if you assume every person of each gender is the same. It's not logical.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:16 AM
6	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. How so? Following what you believe to be biological proof, a promiscuous man could just as easily impregnate a woman and leave her. Not a good choice. If you want to call something a fact, I would like links to peer reviewed research.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:06 AM
0	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Not necessarily. Depends on the woman and the man in question. Broad generalizations about how easy it is to find partners for each gender don't work. Attractive men find partners, attractive women find partners.	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:01 AM
-3	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Actually it really isn't. To sleep with someone is a choice, not a biological fact. If you're going to make the same choice, why should you judge someone else for the same thing?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 04:00 AM
2	The "Slut vs. Stud" debate. Thank you for being open about it. I don't mind if a former partner has had multiple partners or one night stands, I just don't want excessive, and it's adjusted by age Of course. Where do you stand on this idea of spinning?	/r/PurplePillDebate	26/03/15 01:16 AM