TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RaxL Archive

View 38 posts and 421 comments by RaxL on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
104

RaxL/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:02 PM
22

DiscussionRaxL/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:40 PM
20

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:53 PM
19

RaxL/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:48 PM
17

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights07/10/14 06:53 PM
17

RaxL/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:28 PM
16

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights13/10/14 05:24 AM
14

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:04 PM
14

RaxL/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:35 PM
11

RaxL/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:01 AM
8

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:45 PM
7

RaxL/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:40 PM
7

DiscussionRaxL/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:09 AM
6

DiscussionRaxL/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:36 PM
6

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:47 PM
5

RaxL/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:10 PM
4

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:04 AM
4

RaxL/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:04 PM
4

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:26 PM
4

RaxL/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:49 AM
3

DiscussionRaxL/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:09 PM
1

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:02 PM
1

RaxL/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:27 PM
1

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:59 PM
1

Red Pill ExampleRaxL/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 03:15 PM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:28 PM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:56 AM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:45 PM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:22 AM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:29 PM
0

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:08 PM
0

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:11 PM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:01 AM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:20 PM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:09 PM
0

Blogs/VideoRaxL/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:06 PM
0

RaxL/r/seduction11/04/12 10:59 AM
0

RaxL/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

23andme.com or a similar service like familytree is how you get it done once the child is born. No idea about obtaining dna that is considered admissible in court.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:08 AM
4

I realize that. This just shows how ridiculous the claim was.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:24 PM
-10

Stupid. You don't fight social justice with social justice. Make shelters for everyone, not only men or only women.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 03:13 PM
7

Feminism: n. Putting women first.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:04 PM
1

It's one thing to point out the feminist hypocrisy, but whether it's boys or girls, it's still just a moral panic.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 12:53 PM
0

The schools are pushing it big time now. They want drones, not rowdy kids.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:18 AM
0

Sure. I just don't see a lot of men's or women's actions as "toxic", just as natural or evolutionary. Yes, some of these behavioral traits might be philosophically immoral, but I rarely see people labeling these actions as "toxic masculinity". What I see instead is toxic masculinity pretty much being summarized as "masculinity that we don't like." Man starts a bar fight = toxic masculinity. Woman starts a bar fight under the exact same circumstances = <crickets> Men telling each other to lift we…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:05 PM
0

Toxic masculinity is a bunch of bullshit. I don't see why toxic femininity would be any different.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:17 PM
0

Yes. Congradulations. Head over to /r/censoredbyfeminists, submit your story and claim your subscription.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:46 AM
0

Well, no. In fact, as far as I know, they encourage it. If there was support you could start up a "Project Men's Rights" and go into an editing war with them. But what is that liklihood of that happening? Wikipedia encourages these sorts of groups. For the most part, I would say they are a good thing. The problem isn't wikipedia itself. I mean, look at the world around you, wikipedia is just one more area under control. The only way to change something like this is for opponents to go on wikiped…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:00 PM
7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_dzeDvx2QA
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:56 AM
13

Because feminists have pretty much taken over wiki. http://www.google.com/search?q=feminism+wiki+extra+credit http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism You can't write or edit much without their approval. Yes, we can all edit wiki, but they both outnumber us and have accounts that give them much more control than the average user. Fighting them is exhausting and so people just don't, and leave. They took over wikipedia.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 01:46 PM
0

https://www.numbersusa.org/pages/jobs-americans-wont-do
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:46 AM
1

Wow. "White ribbon" campaign? They knew exactly what they were doing with that.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:40 PM
1

You know what. Fuck it. Let's do it. Half of all mariners, women. Half of all miners, women. Let's just fire men until we reach 50% parity. It would be a utopia within 24 hours. The power would be off, but it would be a fucking utopia...
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:24 PM
-1

Does anyone have the statistics on the female/male genius ratio?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:14 PM
0

Then from Kyriarchy they went to intersectionality.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:28 PM
7

"It's impossible for her to be sexist because she's a woman. Woman are an oppressed class and don't have privilage." I literally read something like this today, can't find it though. But it seems fitting.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:18 AM
0

I think very few, if any, individuals would switch browsers over this. Aside from it being bad press, people don't care.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:24 AM
1

In my experience, no. Usually they tend to be feminist/liberal and lack masculinity.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:17 AM
-1

I actually have it wrong. Not conflict theory, but critical theory. My bad. I don't know if your argument is still applicable or not after this clarification. That aside, though, do you think that when others let it be known they agree with an idea that this reinforces that idea in someone's mind? Well, yes. An echo chamber is an good example of this in practice. When others make it obvious they do not agree with an idea, does it tend to have the opposite effect in someone's mind? Yes I would ag…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:38 AM
-3

I would say that most physical violence against other people is morally wrong. (I only say "most" because there might be some violence that might be situationally appropriate) However, I feel that much of physical violence is natural and evolutionarily rooted. Thus, it is normal. I do not condone violence against people. This is not violence against men. This is a facebook post that you believe helps to perpetuate a cultural violence against men. This is literally conflict theory and you can tha…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:47 PM
-7

Eh, I just don't think that it's a big deal and that you're blowing it out of proportion. There's a huge difference between a facebook post and action that I feel you're failing to understand. But by all means, keep working yourself up over how you think I'm supporting/condoning domestic violence against men, no matter how many times I say I'm not. I've been calling feminists "professional victim squad" for a while now. Never thought I'd encounter that kind of mentality here. Why, which one of t…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:32 PM
-3

I don't think it's a big deal... like... at all. I wasn't just talking about physical fitness or sports combat, I was talking about any and all forms physical violence between men. Aside from the fact that I view her threat as trivial, a non-issue and more-than-likely nothing but talk, I am not justifying her behavior, only trying to explain the rationality behind it. In my view, any man that would put up with such behavior is not much of a man, but at the same time any man who is whiny is not m…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:28 PM
-11

Physical violence is an important aspect of masculinity. It's unfortunate because it is not equal, but it is probably the quintessential masculine trait. I interpret it as, "I will beat some masculinity into you."
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:56 PM
-5

Women want masculinity. If you want to believe otherwise, then fine. Good luck in the dating world.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:54 PM
0

Unscientific how?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:31 PM
3

Needs to be sent to Thunderf00t.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:17 PM
0

You need to get this on film. Hidden cam, blur the faces, youtube.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:14 PM
0

Yes, I've read good portions of it. If you actually go through and read it you will find significant portions of the text agrees with me. I disagree with the claim that race is meerly a social construct and hold the position that race is directly tied to genetics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_genetics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHOmNGkLlk0
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:07 PM
-1

Awesome book drop. Thanks. Added to my list.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:32 PM
0

So, I could have said, "Is phenotypical classification a social construct?" and you would have said, "no." but since I said "Is race a social construct?", you say "yes." In the previous comment, I showed that race and phenotypic groups are the same thing. You said it yourself, "race" is just informal. Literally, Race = phenotypical classification, and you're contradicting yourself. In one sentence you agree and in the other sentence you disagree even though the words mean the same thing. You don…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:27 PM
-1

Prove you right again? It is amazing the sheer amount of mental gymnastics and denial you are going to, to keep yourself from admitting that you're wrong. Did you even think about what the page was saying? Yes, " Starting from the 19th century, the term was often used, in a taxonomic sense, to denote genetically differentiated human populations defined by phenotype." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_%28human_classification%29 And from the previos page, "In biological classification, a race is a…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:55 PM
-1

Race is not a word for biological differences differentiating different groups. Yes it fucking is! lol. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_%28biology%29 Besides, if you want to make it a semantics issue, then what word should I be using? Breeds? Haplotypes?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:25 PM
0

Ya, true. Class has a culture. I was just bringing up that they're really denigrating black culture. African Americans are just more vocal. This is part of their culture. So when they go after them for being vocal, they're really going after the for their culture.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:19 PM
-1

You know, I don't really care what your skin color is to be honest. Your race isn't determined by the color of your skin, it's determined by your DNA. If you get a DNA test and it's determined that your genetic Y haplogroup is O, guess what, you're father was Asian (and probably chinese), if you're Y haplogroup is H, guess what, you're father was from India. Is any of this getting through to you? Here just stare at the picture. Can you manage that even? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:52 PM
-1

I don't really know what you're arguing against, I mean, you said it yourself, that you're completely different pysically than your white friend. Why are you arguing against the idea that he's a different race than you when the evidence that he is, is right in front of your face? You realize that race =/= species right? Saying that there are no human races is the same thing as saying there's no dog breeds. Races were created by the separation of different groups of humans at different periods in…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:37 PM
-2

this is a subreddit about gender See, and I totally understand this. I'm not the one that brought up race and I wasn't even trying to "get into it", I just dropped a subreddit link. And ya, I wasn't trying to add anything, I was just trying to bring some awareness to it. I understand the Aryan-supremacist assumption. I guess I just see men's rights, gamergate, atheism+ and occupy wallstreet as just being part of a larger issue of social justice, conflict theory and cultural Marxism. I just think…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:25 PM
-4

So the only difference between a japanese man and an icelandic man is "society". So if you were shown the skeletons of a japanese man and of an icelandic man, you would be wholly unable to tell them apart? That's stupid. Sorry, but that's stupid. At the same time, if you believe that gender is a social construct, maybe you should start spending a little more time over in r/feminism because that is probably more in line with your views that r/mensrights. Men and women differ biologically and psyc…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:37 PM
-2

Oh. Ok, well, I expected you to say 'no'. Do you accept that gender is a social construct?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:23 PM
-5

Neckbeards with a persecution complex. Wtf-ever. So you accept that race is a social construct?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:03 PM
-3

Stop what? Stop talking about race?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:51 PM
-2

I'm not trolling though. until they presented the idea against white men. Have you actually gone to /r/whiterights and read anything? I think I'm a race realist, but I don't know, I've only been looking into the race thing for about a month.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:35 PM
-2

Don't be obstinate. What? How am I being obstinating? It's about sociological conflict theory. Yes, I know. People like you need to shut the fuck up. I didn't say anything, I just dropped a subreddit link. What's your problem? Oh, now I see you've added a bunch of things to your comment after I had responded. I think you lost me with this, The entirety of feminism is about the man/woman concept of conflict which was traditionally placed on race and class. The notion that there is a subgroup of m…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:11 PM
-2

Street harassment isn't about class privilage - it's about culture. (fixed that for you Time)
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:15 PM
-4

/r/whiterights [EDIT] I'm not fucking trolling. Enough with the trolling shit. Go to the subreddit and actually fucking read. Like the feminists are oblivious to male gender issues, many of you here seem to be oblivious to white racial issues. I am a race realist. I believe in human biodiversity and that race is not a social construct. I am not a racial supremacist of any kind nor am I a racist. Jesus fuck. Learn something.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:12 PM
25

/r/pussypass
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:42 PM
3

Ya. I find myself partyless. Social justice feminists on the left and theocratic idiot economic social darwinists on the right.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:52 AM
5

I still think this should be illegal, but the guy was choosing to have sex with her. I hardly think he was abused. And I don't pity him. And yes, I don't think it would be much different if the genders were reversed. It's not like he was a small child.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:24 PM
3

Peacocking originated in the seduction community, long before there was a Reddit let alone TRP. It doesn't have to be "dressing like a lunatic" and not everything in seduction is 100% the way everyone should do it everytime. If it's not for you, don't do it, but it is a technique that works for some people and there are good reasons for why it works.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:53 AM
2

I don't think anyone on this forum is actually interested in a discussion governed by reason, respect, or facts. There are 61 comments in this post. 17 are not a result of your comment. 44 comments or 72% of the comments section deals with your comment. Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean they don't want to have a discussion. Some of us here are going to a lot of effort to reply to you. expect to be shouted down by them at any moment for not towing the line. Just because people…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:47 PM
2

So, instead of admitting my comment falsified your claim, or maybe asking for more information on the subject so you could consider it further, you disappeared. No response. Instead of admitting you were wrong, or maybe asking me to explain if you didn't understand, you just blew it off. You then proceeded to repeat the same words that had been debunked just hours before, all under the holier-than-thou guise of educating those dasturdly Know-Nothing MRAs. And this - is how feminism propagates it…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:51 AM
3

"The portion of the pay gap that remains unexplained after all other factors are taken into account is 5 percent one year after graduation and 12 percent 10 years after graduation." So, if the wage gap is 23%, you're talking about a difference of 5-12 percent of that 23 percent which means that the wage gap due to discrimination is 1.15% - 2.76% Sowell talks about this here when he says "the differences become quite trivial". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EK6Y1X_xa4 1%-3% is a trivial differe…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:40 AM
2

Wait, so I'm a man-baby that has to mansplain imaginary men's issues because I'm "offended" by women that want equal political and economic power? Interesting argument. How exactly does women having political and economic power offend me?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:18 AM
21

You could reply with a witty sarcastic joke, or maybe some sort of connection. But, I think you should just ask her, "what's wrong with men's rights? I never heard of an MRA before and reading their subreddit on reddit I don't get the joke. What about this movement is bad?" Or something along those lines. Try to get her to actually read some MRA stuff instead of just spewing the feminist line like a drone.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:15 AM
1

Ya, I get what you're saying, but this is just going too far. And on top of that, I would say it's commonplace for other males to laugh at someone hit in the nuts, even as they're hlping that person get up. I mean, does the America's Funniest Home Videos audience laugh as a guy gets hit in the nuts because they see him as possibly unable to reproduce and have his children compete with theirs in the workplace? No. It's just a vulnerable spot. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:55 AM
5

Eh. You're reading into it too much. The whole point is that they're stupid trashy children that know there's a lot of pain receptors in that area.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:45 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIbp31nQg1Q
/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:35 PM
0

Lol, you're fuckin stupid dude. Maybe while you're here you should actually read some of the posts and educate yourself a little? You know, maybe learn something about an opposing group?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 07:28 PM
1

This post is stupid. What the Hell are you going on about?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 06:48 PM
30

We need to figure out how to better support individuals and groups like this.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 10:58 PM
6

Aaaaaand, men don't do this because men look for attractive women and don't care about their economic status while women look for successful providers. If women are serious about entering the workforce, they're going to have to resolve this issue or wake up at 40, with no husband and no kids, but a successful career.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:11 PM
1

And just what am I supposed to think man? I don't know anything about you having or not having a "fake personality", but hold on, "rebound girls" and "all these girls are 18-21"? Dude. You're confirming what I'm saying. If the only women you've met are "rebound girls" and 18-21, you haven't met many women, sorry. What are you in a frat and picking up sorority girls? This sounds like some college situation. If you were picking up women, you should be picking up girls within a 5-10 year range of y…
/r/seduction16/10/14 09:26 PM
1

I'm not talking about /r/relationship or /r/seduction. I'm just talking about the difference between relationship advice and seduction community advice. Seduction isn't about getting a girl to fuck you or getting a girl in a relationship or getting a girl to do anything. If you're trying to get a girl to be in a relationship with you, you're in the wrong community. It's just about becomming more attractive to women so they're interested in you, they're attracted to you. What it turns into from t…
/r/seduction16/10/14 06:34 PM
1

Whoa whoa whoa. I would just like to state that this is not seduction. This is relationship stuff. I think a lot of the advice here is good, but seduction is only about the first 8 or so man-hours of interaction. Seduction is only concerned with getting women interested in or attraced to you. If you're having problems attracting women, that's one thing, but you stated that is not a problem. This is looking for some sort of relationship advice or something... Personally, I don't believe you. If y…
/r/seduction16/10/14 05:01 PM
2

Ya, I realize the MRM doesn't mirror feminism, but for me, I can see how it could eventually come to mirror feminism. I just don't think that it's right to have groups that focus solely on one gender's issue's. I think this logic has lead to the "everyone's a feminist" mindset. No, everyone's normal and people don't agree with women being treated worse. Everyone is like this. And I would argue that everyone is in essense an MRA along these lines. If everyone is something, then just get rid of th…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:12 AM
7

I think a fair amount of this is talking about people like me. I'm an anti-feminist, and I also don't believe that we need any sort of men's rights movement to mirror the feminist movement and advocate solely for men's rights while ignoring the plight of women. Basically, I don't want to end up with a movement that brings to light men's issues and another movement that brings to light women's issues. I think that doing this obstificates the issues that should be tackled as they are, by everyone.…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:56 PM
3

On top of this, if they really were being paid differently, the company would be in breach of federal law. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_of_1963 If they had a legitimate claim, they would be in court.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:47 PM
14

See, I'm not arguing that the pendulum swung too far. I'm arguing that it only swung for women and that society just reached the point where such actions were no longer tolerable. It's not that feminists fought some war against society in which feminists were right and society was wrong, it's that the counterculture movement said "hey, let's not do this anymore" and then society went along with it and feminists took ALL the credit. But, what happened was just a hysteria that women needed to be p…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:59 AM
13

NOW has never changed their stance by the way. See also the Duluth model. The fact is that all feminist organizations that I've come in contact with have been acting exactly as NOW has been. NOW's stance is not an exception. If you are a woman and you want a restraining order against your husband, feminists will support you. If you want a domestic violence shelter, feminists will support you, if you want to keep the house, the kids and for him to pay you alimony, feminists will support you. The …
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:44 AM
9

You mean like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXtApkkdgT0&list=UUcdQla_9PbQb4-FKFxJN2ag&t=11m31s
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:02 AM
-1

Only, those women never did fight for protective orders from domestic abuse to be utilized by men nor did they combat misuse. NOW has been supporting women like that since 1974, no matter what Judge Judy thinks. Like it or not, she was using that system EXACTLY how the feminists that pushed for it intended.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:37 AM
8

You are banned from r/pyongyang. Post to /r/censoredbyfeminists
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:07 PM
4

This. Exactly this. I would like to build on this and say that they do in fact fight against this. In fact, they bring up women in other countries long before they admit that men in this country face problems. Have part of your body cut off when you were a baby? You just need to shut up because you're a man and fight against circumcision in the third world because it's happening against women. You start caring about the homeless here, you start caring about the poor here, you start caring about …
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:54 PM
1

I don't see anything wrong with it. I don't find it sexist. I have no problems with the masculinity, the femininity or the gender roles portrayed that I'm sure social justice warriors will rail against. Personally, I don't like the video. I think it's stupid. But I don't find anything ban-worthy.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 04:48 PM
1

What? How is it circular reasoning? And where did violence enter the situation? If you go buy a plot of land, how is there violence involved? I never said anything about violence, at all. All things have value. Land has value. All things with value can be bought, sold or traded whether they are owned by the individual or the state. Land has value, but that doesn't make it above anything else. Like I said, there is no shorage of land. I made no argument against your "violent parasitism" because i…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:16 AM
1

It's a commodity. It's a finite resources like timber, gold, water, iron or any other thing. I've never understood this Communist argument. I mean, you act like you can't go out and buy land or something. You act like land isn't cheap and it isn't plentiful. If you were to argue that resources should not be owned, then you would have some sort of a standing argument, but this fetish for land makes no sense to me. And no, you are wrong with this statement. They can't build shelter primarily becau…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:13 AM
1

Ya, true. I guess it is looking at church attendance and not religiousity.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:50 PM
2

Uh... land is a commodity like many other things, you can buy it and it's not terribly expensive. Simply giving people land doesn't solve the problem. They're not lacking land, they're lacking shelter. They lack shelter because they lack wealth and there is a myriad of reasons why they lack wealth.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:43 PM
1

Don't really know how accurate the religion section is. Many studies have shown that atheists and agnostics have a slightly lower divorce rate than religious individuals.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:07 PM
6

Not to mention that the entire thing is bullshit anyway. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SpVVsOUsLo
/r/MensRights11/10/14 05:26 PM
2

Awesome thanks. I didn't realize that a Google search would actually be productive. Will try to go find more.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 09:43 PM
1

I asked for examples because I only know of one outside of the tumbler nutjobs, which are anecdotal. I was hoping for someone to come back with an example from NOW or some other prominent organization, that, I could add to my bookmarks. What feminist group or organization or prominent feminist figure has campaigned for a female or females making false accusations not to be jailed? It's important to answer this question if you want to fight actual feminism and not just be blown off as fighting a …
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:34 PM
0

When you say that feminists often campaign for females making false accusation not to be jailed, what are your sourcesexamples of this?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 12:28 PM
1

Yes, and what you said makes a lot of sense. We don't want to do things to exclude trans. And there is only trans, there is no other non-binary that I know of. Are trans people complaining? I think not. I don't think it's the trans community at all, I think it's social justice warriors. I also think that it's feminists that are trying to remove treating anyone a certain way due to their gender. I think this is the heart of the issue; the removal of all gendered treatment. How far is this suppose…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:29 PM
5

Because some of us here believe that men and women are biologically and psychologically different and that this type of behavior is at the heart of gynocentrism and blank slate theory. What is the purpose of removing gender? I mean, never mind the purple penguin thing, they ARE "boys and girls", they're not "campers". A lot of us feel that this comes from a desire to stomp out masculinity and femininity in favor of some gender neutral, unisex, everyone's the same, culture. I understand there's p…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 04:26 PM
2

As if having that dumbfuck Steve Harvey wasn't bad enough.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:24 PM
1

I'm surprised more people here don't get it. Come on. Get it? Have you ever been around a woman when she has a bad hair day? Hyuk hyuk. I'm actually surprised feminists are calling this out as a stereotype against women... oh... wait... it's violence against a man. Never mind.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:27 PM
2

Seriously? An hour long?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:17 PM
3

Oh man, this cracked me up: All young men will encounter the “seduction community” at some point. Beware. While there is some genuinely well-intentioned dating and self-improvement advice to be found there, so much of the discussion is absolutely riddled with misogyny. Next paragraph goes on to give the foundational core of the seduction community, TRP and MGTOW. If there’s a real secret to “seduction”, here it is: always be building a life that turns you on, represent yourself as honestly and s…
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:03 PM
1

You said it, that is the problem. We have justice system for a reason. Schools and employers need to stay out of it. It's okay to use the Solo case to point out the hypocracy of feminism, but advocating for there to be some sort of extrajudicial punishment against her is just as wrong as it would be for a man.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:51 PM
-4

Jim Jeffries literally said that people with learning difficulties were the definition of stupid. So, if you've got ADD, you're the definition of stupid. Lost all respect for the guy after that. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WxsUHXnlHH8
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:42 PM
5

Something that I feel is one of the biggest problems with feminism is that many people that call themselves "feminist" are pretty much individuals that aren't really educated on the movement. No, they just read the "dictionary definition" on wikipedia and said "I'm for equality, I'm a feminist." The reality of the situation is that you have actual feminists that are supporters of feminist theory and you have a bunch of people that think they're feminists because they agree with a sentence they r…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:24 PM
4

<facepalm>
/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:09 PM
9

SJW is not just "feminists". Social justice applies to all "marginalized" groups, gay, lesbian, trans, black, etc. You're just wrong on that. Cultural Marxism is different from Marxism. They're not the same thing. Cultural Marixism is the application of Marxist theories on the culture. Feminists have long supported 'blank slate theory'. Yes, they have. You don't know what you're talking about. No, feminists do not necessarily think that men and women are totally different. Once again, you really…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:33 PM
3

but when the law tries to redress that burden and demand that parents share in childrearing, then feminists object. Why? Since courts have overwhelmingly awarded primary custody to mothers in the past, feminists see shared parenting as part of the men’s rights movement. Bullshit. They've been this way the entire time. This is why Warren Farrell left NOW. The mrm had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:27 PM
0

There's no need for either campaign. We don't need a heforshe or a sheforhe because problems that people face cannot be simply boiled down to gender. There are many issues that men and boys face and there are many issues that women and girls face. Address the issues instead of adopting some sexist gendered approach to problems.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:23 PM
2

Yes. That's what I'm sayhing. But I was trying to get at the question of, 'how much of a role will men's rights play in the future and what imact will the mrm have on the feminist movement?' Ya, they've always claimed to be "fighting for those things" but will that be the narrative of their group as a whole with the mrm marginalized or will you end up with them abandoning that idea in favor of some "mrm for men and feminism for women" ideology?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:37 PM
26

I think their argument is that MRAs don't actually accomplish anything, they just complain on the internet. The mrm has been gaining traction and feminism has been under a lot of attacks lately. Things will start to change and then you won't hear this argument. Or maybe the feminists will change and adopt men's rights arguments and then claim that they were always fighting for those things. Or maybe it will be acombination of the two.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 06:02 AM
5

Post to /r/censoredbyfeminists.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:59 AM
1

Banned from their subreddit like your thoughts and ideas are banned from their movement. Welcome to the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 01:55 AM
1

This isn't r/conservative.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:30 PM
8

Thunder.... THUNDER!... THUNDERF00T HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!..... <Symbol of long-haired bearded man shines in the sky>...
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:32 PM
3

Ok, I think I understand what you're saying. But, I think you're claiming that they're being absolutist. I don't think that they define the 'patriarchy' as "always this" or "always that" but more "preferrential treatment", good ole boy's clubs and traditionalism that favors men. Right? I mean, using something else; they're saying that blacks were enslaved (in the US in 1800), not that every black was a slave. Right? So, they're not saying that men always oppressed women, but that the distributio…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:05 PM
6

The real way to discredit patriarchy as an unsupportable model is to ask them under what conditions could the validity of patriarchy be tested, then pidegeonhole their answers. Can you explain this a little better. I'm not sure I'm following...
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:46 PM
9

Can you post a link showing it's false? ... I can't even get the article to load.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:45 PM
14

Orrrrr. It was always shit, sensible people bought it, and are now trying to rationalize the garbage they "think" they support.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:25 PM
1

Oh I figured that was what was going on. Either way, I just figured that it should be said.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:31 AM
12

This is fucking stupid, just as it's fucking stupid when it's done with women-only. You need to have people there that are qualified, irregardless of gender. I can just imagine having such a thing in the U.S. and Karen Straughn being left out because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:22 AM
2

Yup. And doing so would cause them to re-think their stupid policies.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 07:16 PM
1

Shave your kneecaps? Daym, that is harsh. I shave my FACE. And more complaining that assertiveness is coming off as bitchy. Maybe you're coming off as bitchy. There's a lot of bitchy guys out there and we don't like them either. I don't think most people have issues with you being confident and assertive. Ya, you get periods, but you also have the ability to produce children. I'm not trying to downplay periods, just saying that with that negative comes a big positive. You know, sometimes people …
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:52 AM
-1

I don't know, there's been how many studies showing that it's women that are the ones calling each other sluts, not men? It's probably the dumbest thing known to mankind. "Men only want to have sex!" "I should be allowed to have sex, why are men shaming me for having sex!" It's nonsense. What do I think? Take pics for me and post 'em man. The more tits the better. Oh, and no fatties, thanks.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:04 AM
10

Um, no. You're not allowed to say anything critical of feminism. Period. You can talk at length here all day about how men's rights is bullshit. The mods here are good as far as I know. Just don't be a complete jerk or doxx ppl. Hopefully the mods here never approach anything like the mods there.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:15 AM
13

We need to start a bet on how long it will take for you to be banned for this post. I'll say, 2 more hours, so, 4 hours total.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 10:14 PM
3

No. None of this is showing up anywhere employers can see it. Anything would be in your school file with the school. This never gets checked by anyone as far as I know. Maybe a psycho college would ask for it, but I would say that never happens, ever. All they want are your transcripts. There were no charges filed against you. There's nothing to "look up". You could have committed a felony. You could have committed 1st degree murder and unless you were charged as an adult (something you'd kind o…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:12 PM
5

Yes, but only to a certain extent. This is how you end up with Jim Crow laws.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:00 PM
1

It doesn't happen in the sense that it's a widespread thing that anyone really does. It's a reference to this: Columbia U: rape accuser Emma Sulkowicz performs mattress piece theater to demand bureaucratic lynching http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/columbia-u-rape-accuser-emma-sulkowicz-performs-mattress-piece-theater-to-demand-bureaucratic-lynching/ Emma Sulkowicz: "Carry That Weight" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9hHZbuYVnU
/r/MensRights25/09/14 08:44 PM
2

I don't follow what you mean with the 'thesis being terrible'. I think you really missed the point I was making about the whole "capitalism". I don't care if you're Communist, or Capitalist, or what; it doesn't matter. What I'm saying is that entire movements and ideologies cannot be boiled down to a single word or sentence. Everyone is for fairness, equality and justice; that doesn't make one a capitalist, feminist and communist. It's more than just, "not that simple", it's literally the fallac…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 04:59 PM
3

You said it yourself. First line of your comment. The problem isn't women, man. The problem is feminists, sjw's etc. Yes, I realize that you're right when you say that any woman can be convinced to engage in this behavior, but you're forgetting that most women do not self identify as feminist and you're not giving those normal, rational women out there, credit. Don't throw all women under the bus due to the actions of a few. Women, are not the problem, feminists are.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:24 PM
4

But I dont understand how that is even slighty feminist. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9hHZbuYVnU I don't know; do you feel this is justified? She claims she was raped. She went to the police, but they said that there wasn't any evidence a crime had been committed so they couldn't do anything. She went to the campus administration, but they too said that there wasn't anything that they could do due to there being lack of evidence. And so, she's going to carry her mattress around campus until h…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:14 PM
3

Hey dude, shut the Hell up. The last thing we need are a bunch of no-working, entitled women coming onto the job site. The few women I've worked with have been great. But 3 women out of 100 dudes is far preferable to having 3 women out of 50 dudes and 50 useless cunts.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:50 AM
40

You have been banned from posting to Forbes.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 09:11 PM
29

As far as I'm concerned, stay away from feminists period. The last thing you need is to have drunken sex with some girl that's going to put your name on her mattress and then carry it around campus in an effort to get you expelled.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:23 PM
2

So, what's the purpose of putting someone in prison for 10 years? It's a negative punishment, literally behavioral modification. What is the purpose of behavioral modification? To change behavior. This is why we put people in jail. This is why punishments are effective. But, people have lost sight of this simple fact and instead of saying "our goal is the modification of behavior" they are saying "our goal is revenge and fairness" and like you said, "retribution." This "eye for an eye" and "I'm …
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:34 PM
10

... because then it would be for everyone.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:26 PM
9

Ya. And even if found guilty she should stay, and so should ray rice and all those people at universities that raped. We have a justice system for a reason and this business of doubling down is bullshit. Leave it to the courts. This is "revenge" mentality and has no place in or out of the justice system. You need to rehabilitate people when they've messed up, not try to destroy their lives from every angle in some effort to "make them pay".
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:48 AM
1

Just different opinions. You want to ignore them in the hopes they'll go away. I want their ideology drug into the public arena for everyone to see. In my opinion, their arguments are bogus so the best way to turn people against them is to showcase their arguments and then tear them down.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:27 AM
1

Boycotts don't really do much of anything online. Even in the real world, a boycott has to be a really cohesive effort to be effective. So you not reading an article made one less page view. That matters about as much as this comment's 'score'. But I think it's more than that. If they really are in the wrong, give them page views. Keep them writing articles demonizing men. Let them build a little echo chamber of crazy. This isn't a bad thing. It gives us ammo to lambast.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:09 AM
6

Not stealing is in the ten commandments Ya, it's also in the code of Hammurabi, which predates the 10 commandments. What's your point?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:54 PM
4

Dat dimorphism...
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:49 PM
-2

Pff, "boycott" fuck that.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:46 PM
8

No one is saying what exactly? From my vantage point, all I'm hearing is "don't place any blame what-so-ever on the actions of the victim" and teach men not to rape. I'm not a fucking rapist. Fuck off. As far as I'm concerned, stay away from feminists period. The last thing you need is to have drunken sex with some girl that's going to put your name on her mattress and then carry it around campus in an effort to get you expelled. http://washingtonexaminer.com/what-if-we-applied-feminist-logic-to…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:40 PM
1

1.7% or 7% of men are raped in their lifetime, yet men are raped at the same rates as women at 1.1-1.6% per year? That doesn't make any sense.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:39 AM
-1

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:33 PM
1

No. I don't think they would support that idea, but I don't know. Maybe just change "men's rights activism" to "men's rights"? Because you have to admit, they are all about some men's rights. Men's rights issues and the impacts of feminism are core.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:38 AM
3

No, this is not right. Feminism literally came out of cultural Marxism, which is an interpretation of Marxism from a social standpoint instead of an economic. Although I would say that all cultural Marxists are liberals, not all liberals are cultural Marxists. I would also disagree that liberal ideas have guided the country for decades. The conservatives have pretty much had their way since Reagan when we branded government as the enemy. You got your deregulation, wars, drug war, tax cuts for th…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:08 PM
-1

I used to think that. But now I don't think so. I think those traditional roles were formed for good reasons. I'm not saying that people should be slotted into traditional roles, but what I am realizing more and more is that people are slotting themselves into these roles and this is something I think should be recognized.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:02 PM
2

Ya, I don't mean "conservativism" as in right wing politics. I mean it in the broader sense of maintaining traditionalism. But even then, I've come across a lot of right wing ideals in red pill writings supporting religion or other right wing ideals.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:20 PM
2

Venn diagram. Good idea. This is pretty much how I see the red pill.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:03 PM
8

Ya, there's quite a few people here that subscribe to Red Pill and there's quite a few people here that feel Red Pillers are retarded. What other wonders of the world will you uncover today?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:52 PM
1

Whoah whoah whoah. Okay, first of all, I never advocated for the nationalization of anything. And you're wrong. Deregulation does not lead to increased competition. It just simply doesn't. Removal of regulation leads to monopolies through corporate consolidation. I mean, this is why we even have the Sherman Antitrust act. This business of getting rid of regulatory controls is a bunch of nonsense. Did removing Glass-Steagall have a positive effect? I mean, you do realize that when you say "deregu…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 02:02 AM
1

That's how you end up with Jim Crow laws. An unregulated market is a bad thing as we have found from the last 30 years of Reagan's 'nomics. Sensible regulation is what is needed and the goal of sensible regulation is not an impossibility.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:28 AM
1

I went to 2x when it became default. There were so many posts about "period poops". I knew that what they were doing was driving out outsiders, but, I never really saw them as much more than trashy and juvenile after that.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:33 AM
1

I disagree with this idea. I don't feel that what the feminists are doing by segregating things by gender, is right. This is just advocating the same bad policies but with the genders reversed. There is no need for a female only taxi service. I am against this. The solution is not to create a male only taxi service. The solution is to rule the female only taxi service "sexist" and discriminatory and force them to accept men or be shut down.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:28 AM
2

I disagree. In my opinion, he churns out way too many vids, but I guess people like that. Every once in a while he makes a good vid with good points. I'm not an expert on the guy, but I have been watching him for about 6 or so years now and like some of his stuff. You made a lot of claims that I would love to check out. What are your sources?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:16 AM
15

How can it fail? The problem never existed in the first place. They will conduct some better studies that show that rape is practically non-existant and declare "Mission Accomplished"! Add it to the history books under the, "what feminism did" section.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:29 PM
0

Otherwise can you really imagine anyone explicitly saying rape is okay under certain circumstances like that? YES! lol. It's like a radical feminist staple. Their statistics are always full of shit. I see no reason to assume this will be much different.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:19 PM
0

You have no evidence of this. Why are you assuming it to be the case? You literally have no argument against the quote unless you literally quote the study or find some other article and quote it.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:46 PM
0

I'm taking the words at face value. I really don't understand this feminist apologism. I mean, it says "rape". Interpret it as "rape". Why would you not want to interpret it as "rape"? Why are you trying to explain it? It's explicit. I just don't understand why people here are defending some blatantly bogus feminist study that claims that men that pay for a night out think that it's okay to rape a woman.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 07:19 PM
0

Dude, just go back to r/feminism.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:06 PM
9

Go back to r/feminism.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:05 PM
2

Raping a chick is refreshing? Are you trolling? Are you not paying attention? The article literally said that there are men that think it's okay to rape a chick if they paid for the date. No one fucking believes this. What are you even trying to say?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:24 PM
1

I guess if you mean "available" you mean "behind a paywall". And as far as the "study" goes, we're all well acquainted with how legit feminist "studies" are. And are you serious? You honestly believe that there is any statistically significant number of men that believe that if they pay for a date they should be allowed to rape a woman? Bull-fucking-shit. You don't know anyone that believes this. "I paid for the date, I should be allowed to rape her." -said no guy ever. I think it would be hard …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:20 PM
1

Ya, have to agree with this for no other reason than women are just more social and outgoing.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:36 PM
1

In all reality, you probably just entered yourself into that database. lol.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:35 PM
3

Wow, I respect her a lot even though I think he overreacted and hit her too hard. At its core, this was an argument between two adults that got out of hand and not a beating of a poor helpless woman by a superior man as the feminists would want her to believe.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:32 PM
6

“Rape was rated as more justifiable,” the authors wrote, “when the man paid all the dating expenses rather than splitting the costs with the woman.” Let me guess, either A) They interviewed 3000 people over the telephone and 3 said that rape would be okay, but when the man paid, 4 people said that rape would be okay. B) "Rape" is defined as a goodnight kiss. Or C) They were fed bogus answers to their retarded questions. All jokes aside, you have to be a really special type of dumb to believe thi…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:17 PM
1

Ya, but it was just that one word that killed your post. I wasn't actually aware that mens suffrage had become an issue That sounds like something a feminist would come in here and say. "Oh, I didn't realize it was so HARD for men to vote these days." When in reality I think you meant something along the lines of I wasn't actually aware that men's rights had become an issue. Or something to that effect. So, I think a lot of people downvoted your post without even reading it and those that did re…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:05 PM
1

Ya, have you ever actually tried to do that? I'm not saying don't, but I am saying it's more difficult that many things for the reasons I listed above.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:02 PM
1

I think I know what you're getting at and agree that this should be done. I will say that it's difficult as feminists use no-true scotsman and dismiss everything as anecdotal. So, it's difficult to pin them down on anything. But despite that, there needs to be an encompassing, comprehensive list of everything against them.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:32 AM
117

If she thinks she will get away with this, she's mistaken! This man will receive justice! Oh, it will be served. The patriarchy will make her pay for her crime.. maybe...will maybe make her pay... like a fine or something, but it will be a really big fine!... definitely nothing to scoff at...maybe as much as $10,000!...or maybe just $1000...a couple hundred? Well, I'm sure what ever punishment she will receive, it wiil be - OPPRESSIVE!
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:11 AM
2

Oh, no apology needed. lol. I don't mind. I was just letting you know that your post probably got voted down due to your use of the word 'suffrage'. No big deal. The Karen Straughan comment was in regards to your questions. She goes over everything you would want to know. Her BBC interview is a fairly good coverage of things.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:04 AM
1

Suffrage is the right to vote. All men have had suffrage from like 1870 or something. You need to watch some Karen Straughan.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 08:31 PM
1

Well, you were supposed to say that giving them traffic would cause them to spew more anti-male rhetoric. To which I would reply, "what's wrong with that"? To which you would say "it's anti-male, why would you want the internet filled with anti-male rhetoric?" To which I would reply that I want them to become as hostile to men as possible. This makes it so much easier to demonize them and they will face a backlash against their efforts the more radical they become. IMO, click away. All it does i…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:16 PM
12

Umm... How can you end up making $240K with an associates in Physics? This doesn't even remotely make sense to me.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 02:04 PM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:08 PM
4

Evolutionary biology man. Until the baby is born, it is part of her body and she can be allowed to do anything except self harm. It's immoral to force her to abort and it's immoral to force her to carry it to term, therefore no other entity should be allowed any say in the matter. The father and state should be given rights that dictate what happens to the child after birth. The mother should have complete control until birth because it is her body, her property that is being used to gestate the…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:05 AM
3

If feminism did anything for men, we wouldn't be here. I always hear or read that feminism deals with those topics Ya, we hear that too. A lot. When was the last time you saw feminists specifically campaigning for a men's issue that didn't affect women or would affect women negatively? You need to watch some Karen Straughan. I don't even know what video's of hers are the best. I would start with the most popular and sort work your way down. I would also like to point out that feminism claims res…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 09:48 PM
1

This is only for the people that have been following the whole GamerGate debacle. Obviously, if you haven't, you'd have no idea what's going on. Here's the source article.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:47 PM
2

So tired of people posting low-res images with text on them. Here's an actual readable image.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:22 PM
30

*/r/pussypass
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:15 PM
1

Excellent question. No. Maybe catcalling, but I don't think that is nearly as pervasive or as much of a problem as it's made out to be. I don't think I know of a single feminist issue that I would consider to be legitimate. Rape culture doesn't exist. Wage gap is explainable. Violence is not one-sided. Maybe the Bechdel test. No, I don't think that feminists really have a leg to stand on in anything. They shouldn't exist. Call me out though. Maybe there's something that you feel is unreasonable …
/r/MensRights17/09/14 02:40 PM
4

I would like to say "campaign for men's only gym hours," but no. I'm sure there are plenty of people that will be ticked with this single gender issue. I would just spread the word about how stupid the rule is. What's wrong with women in your school man? They can't work out in an equal environment? lol.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 02:54 AM
3

I think you misunderstood. I LIKE that the whole article is pua theory AND I LIKE that the first citation is Warren Farrell. I literally wrote "(not being sarcastic)" after that sentence. Come on man!
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:01 PM
4

I like how the whole article is pua theory and the first citation is Warren Farrell. (not being sarcastic)
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:04 PM
1

I don't think you'll find a productive outlet. Odds are you will keep doing what you have been doing which is consuming anti-feminist media. I don't see anything wrong with this, it's just what you're doing for now. Your anger, however, is misdirected. First, realize that most women and most people do not call themselves "feminists". Next, realize that men are just as much to blame for cowtowing to feminists as women are. Third, you also need to realize that women have had to break out of some g…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 01:28 PM
6

There are plenty of anti-feminist videos/channels on youtube. I don't really know how to introduce these, but theyis undermine feminism at very fundamental levels. 0) You need to watch some Karen Straughan. I don't even know what video's of hers are the best. 1) The Gender Equality Paradox - Documentary NRK - 2011 Supposedly, (you can't say for sure), this documentary was responsible for shutting down the Nordic Gender Institute http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjernevask 2) Steven Pinker: Human nat…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:52 PM
1

If you accept the position that "feminism" is anything that has ever had to do with "rights for women", then just about everyone in the country is a feminist. Unfortunately, if you look at what feminism is a little closer, you see that is not an accurate assesment. Feminism started as a cultural Marxist movement in the 1960's and as much as they would like to lay claim to anything giving any rights to women, this is not the case. Most people realize this and that is why most men and women do not…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:33 PM
2

Wtf? Give her the compliment if you want. What is the problem?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:25 PM
2

Can't really place judgement on a case in which we know none of the specifics. She's emotional, but aside from that, we know nothing.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:49 PM
3

Wow, I can't believe I read that. I need to go take a shower or meditate or something...idk.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:53 AM
3

Yes, that's me. I'm not an MRA, I'm just an fervent anti-feminist. I would say that I'm part of the MRM, but not entirely sure where. I suppose I would be best described as a masculinist... but I don't know.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:50 AM
2

Why would they mention that the victims are men? Their point isn't that violence doesn't happen to men. Their point is that men are bad. Violent by nature, men have to be "taught" how to behave in society. This, is gynocentrism. And maybe they're right. Maybe men are much more violent by nature than women. But that's the whole point, what is seen as "male" is seen as bad through a gynocentric lens.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:03 AM
1

Eh, no. You can't say that Red Pillers and Rad Fems are just illogical strawman-making types. They're just "out there" with their beliefs and represent small groups. Also, I don't think that feminists or MRA's should even exist... at all. I believe that you should just address issues wherever they are and that sorting issues by gender is preposterous.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:53 PM
2

I'll just leave this here It's all about whether they are attracted to you or not.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 01:04 AM
0

I think you've grossly mistaken r/mensrights for r/conservatism.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:51 PM
1

Ya, well, I've been using MSPaint since Windows 3.1. Aside from ascetics, do you have an problem with it now? How about now? I think you're seeing an issue when there is none.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:53 PM
1

No. I'm definitely arguing for "equality". I'm just giving a reasonable explanation for why the infographic is made that way. More than likely, the author did not have men specifically in mind when they made the infographic about suicide. It's not always some big mysandrist agenda. Sometimes, it's just a shitty infographic.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:24 PM
3

The FBI needs to get logs. Enough of this shit.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:21 PM
1

How is it saying that women suffer the most from suicides? Are you getting this from the age group pictures? I agree that it's not a good way of presenting the data, but all they did was alternate men and women. They did the same thing by ethnic group, they alternated pictures of men and women. I don't think it has to do with them wanting to be misleading but them wanting to put pictures of people of those age groups or those ethnicities in the infographic. When they did that, they alternated me…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:22 PM
1

I don't know about the 1/6 boys are abused because I don't know how that data was collected. But if you look at them, feminist statistics are usually bs. Go look at the controversy over the 1/5 women on campuses are sexually assaulted. Look at how they came to that number. If the 1/6 boys number was collected in a similarly shoddy manner, then it is bs as well.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:16 PM
4

Rape statistics are not always skewed. You have to look at the methodologies of data collection to determine validity. Statistics can be skewed, but that doesn't doesn't mean they always are, it just means you need to be careful and not accept them all at face value.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:09 PM
14

It matters. It matters a lot actually. You have to have numbers like these to identify problems within society. Now, 1/4 vs 1/3, yes, you're right that's not going to make much of a difference at all between each other, but if you were to say that 1/20 or 5% vs 1/2 or 50% of the students on campus were arrested for drugs, those are huge differences. In one case, you can argue that it's just part of the background noise, in the other case, you have a shitload of drug arrests on your campus. Stati…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:01 PM
1

What are you even talking about? You're trying to say that you get treated negatively by geeks because you're a girl? I'm seriously asking.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:38 PM
2

Well ya. I mean, you're exactly right. Yes, some people call out others as using a logical fallacy when that is not the case. But not everyone is a philosopher and you just correct them when it comes up or abstain from doing it in the future when it's you that's done it. Kantbot is just wrong though. To claim that ad hominem is not a logical fallacy is just asinine.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:46 AM
3

Whatever. I fucking love Berta Lovejoy. Ya, I realize some people have no sense of humor or just dont find it funny, or are feminists, but I love reading those youtube comments.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 10:22 PM
6

Wat? Ad hominem is a fallacy. You're attacking the individual and not the argument itself. Yes, you can attack individuals and show them to be hypocritical, but that's a different case. "Your entire comment is completely wrong because your user name has Kant in it." That's an ad hominem. "You'll understand when you grow up." Ad hominem. It's only ad hominem if you use use the presenter to dismiss an argument. That's a fallacy. If an argument is valid, the source doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:31 PM
3

Are you comparing a woman's vagina to food? As if it is merely some object to be consumed? Cannibal! Misogynist pig cis scum shitlord!
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:54 AM
1

Sure, and maybe you will never be able to completely remove issues, but that still doesn't mean we can't introduce controls. Give it time. These things just take time. If our position is the logical, well-reasoned and backed by science and statistics, we will win.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:44 AM
23

Source: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ This is more readable. I would say you should delete your submission and submit that.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:27 AM
1

Yes. Because we can reason. Just because things are one way in the animal world does not mean that they must therefore be this way in human civilization. Don't be so down on the whole idea just because society isn't turning on a dime to realize that men have problems too that it won't ever.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:24 AM
7

No, that's not correct. Anti-theism is an opposition to theism, not an opposition to only organized religion.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:17 PM
2

Eh, I disagree. How would you have an anti-theist theist?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:11 PM
1

The purpose of responding in that way is to point out the flaws in their own argument that anyone for equality is automatically feminist, not to adopt the argument itself.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:55 PM
9

I prefer the term anti-theist.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:39 PM
1

Some of this mgtow stuff really begs the question. The guy has some good concepts, but these assertions of "this is why" are really reaching and leaves me wondering how much of it holds up under scrutiny. Interesting read. Good post.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:32 AM
1

Ya, father's definitely right. It's not to scale. That's the only real issue with it. I would also add it's stupid to have to, "write a letter". Why would you not draw it to scale?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:41 PM
3

Agree. 427 - 316 = 427, minus 3 100's, so 327, 227, 127, minus 10, so 117, minus 6 = 111. The parent obviously started counting 10's when they should have been counting 1's and so ended up at 57 instead of 121. As someone that's been through Diff eq as well, I find it funny the parent couldn't figure this out. The picture and way of presenting the problem is still confusing.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:04 PM
1

Ug, so tired of this constant desire for "men to become more emotional", "get in touch with their feelings." Do they ever stop to think that maybe "out of touch with feelings" is part of masculinity? Maybe their "out of touch with feelings" is just the male "normal"? I mean, even a good piece like this is STILL fraught with interpretations of men as somehow 'defective women'.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:09 PM
0

lol. Figured you'd bitch up.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:05 AM
3

Well, the feminist's idea of what the patriarchy is much more subtle than what you described. They don't believe that there was an oppressive patriarchy where men had the capacity to oppress women in the same way that Nazi's could oppress the Jews. I mean, some of the loonies no doubt believe this, but the vast majority don't. I think the best way to describe their idea of a 'patriarchy' would be to use religion. The priest can be a man but not a woman. Why? Well, there really is no reason. Patr…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:01 AM
0

you inferred he meant all men... another lie. He's talking about commensurate compensation. He starts off by talking about the traditional women that come onto his channel and how they declare themselves to be "good" women. And so he would like to "appraise" the services that these women offer to their husbands. Right off at 0:45 he says that "a lot of it just boils down to a simple exchange of sex for resources". Then he goes off to question whether or not this is commensurate. From about 0:40 …
/r/MensRights08/09/14 04:59 PM
-1

Oh, so, because I disagree with you about some of the things this guy says I'm trying to advance some sort of "agenda"? As far as the last sentence. What exactly are you talking about? Post it up. I can't respond to you if I don't know what's bothered you so much. No, I'm not trying to counter everything the MRM stands for. That's a stupid thing to say. But, everyone here isn't going to see eye-to-eye over every issue. I'm going to agree with some things and disagree with others. That's actually…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 02:19 AM
3

Trigger warning: This comment talks about killing and also includes the misspelling "toremind" which is very close to "torment".
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:33 PM
-3

Listening to this 'Bar Bar', this guy jumps to some overreaching conclusions. Like, that all married men just follow their wives around etc? I know men that do this, but I also know of the opposite and I feel that most people I know are somewhere in between. Don't get me wrong, he makes some good points. But stuff like this video is really flawed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySMVtRmQl1Y#t=11 Not "men have been conditioned" but "Some men have been conditioned". And this idea that anyone is ar…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:07 PM
1

Who is barbarossa?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 03:36 PM
0

i never made an analogy about a startup. It's just two people that want a car. It has no holes that i can see garage = womb car = baby tools = bodily processes materials = food plans = dna And, all I'm arguing is that a woman should not be forced to carry a fetus to term if it is against her wishes or she should not be forced to terminate a pregnancy if it is against her wishes.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 03:27 PM
0

Ah, but he can't sue unless she used his plans without his consent (rape). That's a different topic. Right now we're only concerning ourselves with gestation and the termination of fetus. I'm not arguing against what the law says. I'm arguing against what you are advocating, that a man should have some say in regard to a fetus being developed by a woman. He should not. You're using her body to make the baby. As much as women don't want to hear that, and as much as you might not think that it's f…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:15 PM
0

Whoa there. Let's not get too far off on a tangent. See, we're not concerned with the economics or practicality of things. The important thing to take away is that women are victimized by the fence. Let's stay on topic.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:09 PM
0

You can't make it "fairer". How in the world would you make the process fairer by giving men some rights over the fetus? My turn for translation machine. See you're too far off with your analogy to the wheel chair. A more accurate analogy goes like this: Women have a garage. A man and a woman have gotten together and drawn up plans to construct a hotrod from scratch in this garage. They came to an agreement that they will use 1/2 the plans the man drew up and 1/2 the plans the woman drew up. The…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:54 PM
0

Ya, well maybe the whole reason for the fence was to keep the balls in? You know, so grounders didn't roll off into some area where they were irretrievable? But you see, this is sadly just another instance of male only privilege as it is only the balls that the fence seeks to contain. Women have no balls and so from the onset they are excluded.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:45 PM
0

Obviously feminists are removing the fence as another commenter pointed out. You just have to stand around and watch them do it and not speak up or interfere with the removal of the fence in any way. If you don't, you hate people that can't see the baseball game.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:20 PM
-1

Yup. Never mind that the fence was put there for good reason and that maybe instead of trying to peer over it you should buy tickets to the grandstands instead of trying to make the world revolve around you and your self-created problems.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:14 PM
-1

You make it sound like he is advocating some immutable and permanent gender separatism. Yes. That is what I am arguing. That is what I believe he is doing. You are making gender such a huge issue in this case and I don't think you have the justification in creating an organization that solely services one or another gender when both genders face the same issue. It's wrong when feminists create female only help and support systems and the opposite is also wrong. But it's more than that. It's divi…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:12 PM
-1

What. No. I'm just arguing against separating people into gender camps and treating them differently because they're male and female in this particular instance.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:02 PM
-1

Ya, you're right. I realized this soon after re-reading my comment. He's not making gender the 'primary' focus, but he's making it very important. Yes, he was being condescending when he assumed that I didn't even read what he said just because I disagreed with him. Despite my blunder in using the word "primary", the rest of the comment holds. The last sentence is pretty much right on the money.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:01 PM
2

That's the thing though, you can never make this situation "fair" in the sense of giving the man some sort of say over the fetus. The reason for this is because you are using the woman's body to develop the fetus. The man contributes nothing to the process except for DNA. Now if you're talking about artificial wombs, now you have a completely different argument. In that case, both parties are contributing the same amount. It's like complaining that only women get to have vaginas or men more easi…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:59 PM
-1

Ya. I wasn't voicing any opinion on after the child is born. Once the child is born then you can make all sorts of arguments about who gets to dictate what happens to the child between the mother, father and state. I'm just talking about from conception to birth, it's her decision and hers alone.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:53 PM
8

I don't know if I fully understand your position, but IMO until the kid is born, it's her decision. Is this fair? No. It's evolutionary biology, man. Sexual dimorphism. It's her body, her choice and you don't get to determine what happens.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:47 PM
3

In a feminist world there would be no need for boxes. Feminists seek to remove the fence so that everyone can see irregardless of whether they have a box or not. The fence was put there by the patriarchy and it oppresses the people.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:38 PM
-3

Yes, I read what you wrote. Stop being condescending. You are making the primary focus on the gender, not on the abuse. What evidence do you have that the victims will all adopt this fear of the other gender due to abuse? I'm not taking that stance. I'm taking the stance that the victim will fear their abuser. Period. I mean shit, should we also separate shelters based on economic status with some shelters catering to one income class and another catering to another income class? What if a poor …
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:30 PM
-1

No! Enough sarcasm. I vehemently disagree with you. The solution is not to act like them but just flip the gender. Their way is sexist, immoral and wrong. I do not support the argument that we should be just like them, the only difference is that we help men. The solution is to be better than they are by not making the mistakes that they make. Fuck your men's shelter. I'll open one up right across the street that doesn't discriminate against ANYONE.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:21 PM
0

Eh, the argument isn't whether or not 'gun control is necessary' but to what level of gun control is necessary.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:16 PM
-4

Men's rights can go in two directions. We can either: 1) Go in the direction that feminists and Red Pillers go in which the genders are separated. Men's shelters for men, women's shelters for women. I feel this is bad in that this leads to a needless separation in society. 2) Go in the direction of 'integration' or whatever you want to call it in which domestic abuse shelters are domestic abuse shelters. I feel this is a better idea because it combats the idea that men and women should be separa…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:14 PM
-3

Cool, that way we can keep the genders separate instead of trying to integrate them in some way. After all, after you've been abused by the opposite sex the last thing you want to do is be around the opposite sex right? Because this is gender war. And they are the opposite gender. So instead of delineating people as individuals, we can separate them into groups. Men can be men in the man place and women can be women in the woman place.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:06 PM
-2

A "men's only domestic violence shelter", How very Red Pill of you. Feminism is bad. Let's not combat feminism by acting exactly like them, only for men.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:10 PM
2

These are conservative issues, not men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:06 PM
1

How about 'sports are games and obsessions with games are unhealthy and unproductive'?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:51 PM
0

Ya. Agree. I was just trying to work their 'treatment of women' into that. Like, it's not just that women would reduce the effectiveness but that women 'don't like it', 'want to be protected/treated in a certain way', 'should be housewives/like being housewives' etc. I realize that's really generalizing things though.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:09 PM
2

Ok, I'm going to lay out the 3 camps that are always mentioned here: MRA's feel that men should be treated equal to women and women need to take more responsibility. "MRA: Women should have to sign up for the draft just like men. That's fair." MRA's try to help men from more of a "we're all equal" feminist viewpoint. Red Pillers feel that there is an argument for traditionalism due to sexual dimorphism and human evolution. TRP is largely people trying to reconcile traditional/conservative values…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:39 PM
4

I attemped to explain to someone the other day the difference between pua and trp. You can keep reading up if you want, but this post probably summarizes it best. TRP is not just men's rights, it's a combination of things including men's rights. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2f5ci9/radicalicising_the_romanceless_great_takedown_of/ck70htm
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:39 AM
1

Sarkeesian is full of it, but I don't think you fully addressed 'how'. She makes the argument that games are 'patriartical' and cultural Marxism is what is needed to 'equalize'. I realize she didn't overtly say this, but her argument is basically that the characters are slotted in to gender roles. I agree with her on this point. There are gender roles, I just don't see that as a problem. Games reflect culture and society where men are protectors and providers and women are beautiful. This is evo…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:25 PM
4

I like communism better. Are you for equality? Congratulations, you're a communist! Communism is about equality. (Never mind all that other stuff...)
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:29 AM
46

Wow, shitlordism has made it to Time? Fuck ya! Oppressing womyns got pretty mainstream with that. Can't wait for the fallout. "Feel that? The way the shit clings to the air Randy?..."
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:54 PM
1

Let me put it another way. Saying that pickup and the red pill are closely related or whatever is like saying that psychology and pickup are related. It's a one-sided relationship. One pulls from the other. One has existed for a long time and the other pulls from it. Red Pill pulls from pickup, so yes, when you read the Red Pill you get all sorts of pickup stuff. You don't find this and it largely, if not wholly, didn't exist at all prior to about 2, maybe 3 years ago. When you read pickup stuff…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:12 PM
2

Good for you. Want a goddamn cookie? It doesn't change what I saw. Ya, I do want a cookie. I want a big cookie with, "Raxl has 3 years of first-hand experience with this subject and Frensel read a couple of forum postings and watched a video" written on the top. I dunno, it's the most severe example, but certainly not an isolated example of contempt for men who don't take the pill/pickup approach. If the rest of my browsing experience on TRP/pickup was one where people were highly respectful and…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:57 AM
1

k, thanks. Ill repost tomorroww i guess.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:28 AM
1

IMO stuff like this http://listverse.com/2013/01/15/the-top-10-most-inspiring-self-sacrifices/ http://listverse.com/2013/04/04/10-more-inspiring-tales-of-self-sacrifice/ Even thought I hate lists of things online, you get the idea.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:18 PM
2

I was very active in the pickup community for about 3 years until I met my wife and had kids. In that time, I never once came across anyone espousing that "if you don't want to talk to girls you should kill yourself." At best you are highly ignorant. At worst, you are a liar. The thing is that even if you did come across that very statement by some individual, you are using it to generalize an entire group of people and multiple schools of thought. You also keep using "TRP" and the "pickup commu…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:49 PM
1

Your portrayal of the pickup community is so off. That community is about gaining and maintaining attraction with women and nothing else. Your comment is a disservice to those that lack these skills.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:19 PM
4

Posting this here is - ironic. lol.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:28 PM
-1

Is it the police department's fault? She got a protection order, they're just enforcing it right? Isn't this supposed to be settled in court? I don't think the police are supposed to look at the video, then go "oh, you're right" and override their orders.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 03:38 PM
3

I responded to him. I was asleep. Chill. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ez9s2/destruction_of_the_black_family_by_enormous/ck4p3au
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:19 PM
3

I responded to him. I was asleep. Chill. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2ez9s2/destruction_of_the_black_family_by_enormous/ck4p3au
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:15 PM
2

Yup, you're right. It was a stupid thing for me to say. Even in the article the guy said "over 30 years" and when you add up pretty much any government spending over 30 years you're going to get "trillions". I'm not counting unemployment benefits as welfare, so that would be $370 billion in 2014 and probably about INT0.125x,0,30,x= $5.625 trillion over 30 years? http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1980_2014USr_15s2li111mcn_41t46t However, I think it's a bit disingenuous to claim t…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:14 PM
1

In the video, time: ~34s, hover hand. You're the man dude. You beta suckup you...
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:16 PM
0

We have not spent "trillions" on the poor in America. And there are many factors that have lead to poverty. A decline in manufacturing and low skilled labor and globalization and outsourcing have had far greater negative impacts than America's pitiful excuse for a safety net. This is the same old tired busted conservative rhetoric against social programs.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:46 AM
9

TwoX isnt an activist site. It just a bunch of women talking about women's issues like "period poops" etc.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:06 AM
2

Most feminists that I've run into freely acknowledge that men can be raped, they just don't see it as a problem. Like, it's not that they usually don't care it's just they see men's rape as a minor, or practically non-existent issue. The real problem in their eyes isn't even actual rape as much as it is a 'culture' that cultivates in men the idea that rape is okay... or something.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:33 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/tMwPKlx.jpg
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:11 AM
6

"...red pill feminists..." You should just change that to something else, like "crazy feminists" or "radical feminists" or something. "Red pill feminists" doesn't work.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:05 AM
3

Oh, but haven't you heard? It's "kyriarchy" now.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:05 AM
0

Lol, "John Wayne". It's not just that "under god" is bullshit, the whole pledge is mindless chanting conformism.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:06 AM
3

Hmm... Not sure if Poe's Law....
/r/MensRights27/08/14 05:52 PM
1

Even though his statement is written in an absolutist manner, I don't think that he was trying to convey what he did in absolutist terms. But, instead of recognizing this and giving him the benefit of the doubt you jumped straight to being very offended. The guy made a good point. The top causes of death are largely due to lifestyle choices. Yes, there is a genetic component to some of them, but they are overwhelmingly due to choices in lifestyle. Chill.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:24 PM
1

I think you missed the point of what he was saying.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:15 AM
0

But I thought alimony was anti-feminist?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:51 PM
7

"Is alimony anti-feminist?"... Is alimony anti-feminist!? Are they even paying attention to what anti-feminists are saying!? Tomorrow's headline: "Is backlash against the men's rights movement anti-feminist?" Own your shit feminism.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:41 PM
2

The one of the largest predictors of women's entry into male dominated fields is their socioeconomic status.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:15 PM
5

Yes. This. Where did 50-50 come from? More like 95-5.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:28 PM
2

God damnit...
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:21 AM
5

Awesome. Cite sources. Fix misspellings.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:44 AM
7

Statutes of limitations should remain for all types of crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_limitations#Purpose These people don't want rehabilitation to make society better by reforming individuals, they want revenge.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 07:14 PM
3

It looks stupid to the point that, if made, will be something feminists can use to bash on men's rights. There are far better people to make this type of documentary.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:08 PM
1

Seen where "with commentary like "down with patriarchy""?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:59 PM
2

Upvoted. Watched video. Downvoted. Look, I really want to see an anti-sjw video made, but this looks like shit.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:01 PM
1

Ya, that's why I asked. There's no citation for that entire paragraph or even the two preceeding paragraphs.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:29 PM
0

Is this sourced?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:15 AM
0

I've never understood the allure of taking photos of naked kids. I'm not talking about pornographic, I just mean all the parents that feel the need to take pics of their kids naked in the bathtub type pictures. It's like a stereotypical thing to show a SO in movies. Don't get it. But, I'm glad there are people out there that are that free spirited.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:08 AM
2

Ya, well, the issue you brought up is very anecdotal, which is fine, it's still bad to be doing that and bringing up those instances where it happened is important. But the thing is, that's not how your comment is written. Your comment makes it sound like it's happening to all the programs, that it's everywhere.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:30 PM
-2

Bah. I disagree with this. The women I was in school with were just as hard working as the guys and there was no "watering down", in fact, they increased standards to remain in the college of engineering. The funny thing, though, was that despite all their efforts, depite all the 'women in engineering' and the scholarships and the pandering, the women never materialized. Women don't like it.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:05 AM
1

Wow, 213 victims. That's a lot in 3 years. We should do something to bring that number down.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:02 AM
2

Ok lol. Wasn't sure. Poe's law.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:26 PM
1

You're being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:03 PM
3

This is why I don't call myself an MRA. I'm more of just an anti-feminist. It's fine to combat feminism and it's fine to bring light to issues faced by any demographic, but I don't like the fact that it's largely just men's issues, as if each demographic needs to argue in favor of themselves. I just come here for the news and discussions, but I'm more of an all around egalitarian I guess. This isn't to say that MRA's aren't egalitarians, but to call yourself an egalitarian and then surround your…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:31 PM
1

I found this Is that even remotely factual or usual?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:22 PM
2

I was saying the same thing 20 days ago. It's an ideology and they're like any other ideological zealots. Slavoj Žižek anyone? lol.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:50 AM
1

Conflicting information my ass. Come on guy, the top results are literally Selective Service . gov Maybe you can explain 'how' it is you're getting conflicting results?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:08 AM
0

Oh sorry. Ya, I guess you're right, I should have taught instead of berated. Ok, well, in the spirit of teaching, I'll leave this link.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:06 AM
3

Google it you lazy bastard. Geez lol.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 08:26 PM
4

Can you explain a little better or drop links?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:46 PM
10

Ah yes. Well that's beecause men don't date, they only see women as sex objects. You don't think about an object till you need it. I swear I should write a feminist book or something. This crap is just too easy to make up.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:32 AM
18

See, but men have all the power, because patriarchy. Men have also had this power for a very long time, so, it is institutionalized. The only logical thing is for women to take power for themselves, they have to fight for it although many men do understand the privilege that they have had for so long so they support women in their fight against the patriarchy and power grab. Women are the victims here, not men. See, it all makes sense... you know... so long patriarchy theory is an accurate model…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:37 PM
6

The problem with your argument is that even if you're wrong, you can believe it forever. Anyone who's worked any dangerous job knows that there are very few people barring women from signing up and that at the end of the day, no one really gives a shit what's between your legs so long as you aren't drama, unreliable and can do the job safely. I've worked rough jobs with women, 10/10 would do it again (the few that signed up). I've also been around women that bitch, moan and complain all the time…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:03 PM
1

Is this translated? What is with the poor writing?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:19 AM
1

Really? Where? I don't think I've ever heard him say anything about feminism. Yes, he argues against them, but he never uses "feminism". I think he just sees feminism as "equality" and that's why he's so blindsided by these arguments he has with feminists.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 10:07 PM
1

Can you help me out with some history on this? I could have sworn this ideal emerged in the 70's... I found Mary Daly's stuff, but are there others?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:37 PM
3

No idea what's going on here. Edit this video or something, it's incredibly annoying to watch.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:39 PM
1

Ya. Suicide attempts fall into two categories, being unable to competently carry out suicide, and not being genuine about the suicide and using the attempt to draw attention to oneself and one's problems. It makes sense that women would experience more attempts, as a suicide attempt is a way of 'reaching out' and drawing attention to oneself and one's situation. This fits into the stereotypes and expectations we have about men and women where men are just supposed to 'deal with it' and not reach…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:36 PM
5

Wow, PZ Myers is a friggin idiot. I've noticed this split within the atheist community. Thunderf00t and Amazingatheist are anti-feminist, Matt Dillahunty and Rebecca Watson are feminists, and Dawkins seems to be oblivious to the bigger picture and keeps getting backlash for his logical reasonings on twitter every 6 months or so.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:24 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_suicide#Gender_paradox
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:17 PM
1

Ok, so I'll ditch the term. I was just trying to get at any disorder caused by any chemical. I was trying to convey the idea that he might just have a disorder brought on by biological causes and not to jump to the conclusion that it was caused solely by divorce until we had those facts.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:03 AM
2

Okay, so what would be the proper term? I wasn't even trying to be specific to depression.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:47 AM
1

I never said that. In fact, I acknowledged the potential impact of the divorces multiple times. What I didn't do was find out he died, find out he had financial troubles, find out he went through two divorces and then connect all those together and declare 'that!' was the reason he killed himself. Why are people so obsessed with jumping on this as soon as it breaks? Wait for facts. If you don't wait for facts you risk anti-mrm confirmation bias. Shit. This isn't rocket surgery.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:42 AM
3

Uh, no, it's a pretty standard term. Google it. It's not uncommon or unusual. Many psychological disorders are due to chemical imbalances.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:39 AM
3

We didn't know about the bankruptcy at the time the comment was written.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:36 AM
0

The post isn't wrong. Telling people not to jump to conclusions until we have all the facts [EDIT] All I'm saying is that you need to get all the facts first and evaluate them in a logical manner before jumping to conclusions and declaring him a men's rights martyr because if it comes out that he had a gross worth of $40 million and a net worth of $25 million the argument that he killed himself due to an inability to support himself financially will fall apart. This is the right position to take…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:08 AM
3

I'm going to guess by the 0 rating, your user name of "supremeslut" and the comments of various other users out here that you are a feminist. No matter. Let's answer your question. I'm not an MRA nor a feminist. I would also like to explain that I don't have a problem with a lot of gender roles. Women like what women like. It's a biological attraction. Men need the gym and women need to not be 200 lbs. Sorry. Biology. Gender roles: Well, first of all, it depends on what level you're talking abou…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 11:00 PM
-1

Sure. And no doubt his ex wives will claim no responsibility as they fight over what's left of his assets. I agree with what you said. I'm just saying that you can't take a depressed man, who has had his deression exacerbated by two divorces, and claim that the divorces were the sole cause of his depression that led to his suicide. That very well might be the case, but we don't know yet. All we know is that he suffered from depression, he suffered from financial troubles, he suffered from two di…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:44 PM
4

Lol, no, you misunderstood.. I meant a chemical imbalance in the brain, not that he was using drugs. Some people have chemical imbalances that cause their depression. It's biological. You could have $100 million to your name and more friends and family than you could count and still be crushingly sad every day. Irregardless of whether or not he had a chemical imbalance, we can most definitely say that his divorces contributed to his financial troubles, depressed state and eventual suicide.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:33 PM
-10

You can have $100 million in assets and still have serious money troubles. At the same time, you can have $100 million in assets and have what you perceive to be 'serious money troubles'. Which is it? If you were in Robin's shoes, what makes more sense, to bring light of your issues and try to struggle through or to kill yourself? His choice shows us a little of his state of mind. Come to where I live and see my house. I assure you it is nothing like anything Robin was living in at the time of h…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:17 PM
0

I don't know. Good question. I'm not assuming he did or did not own it because I don't have evidence for either position.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:12 PM
127

Men's rate of suicide is an issue. Marriage is a raw deal for men and divorce and alimony is an issue. Robin Williams needlessly suffered due to his divorces. However, with these facts out of the way, I'm pretty sure he had serious chemical issues with depression. He owned a $35 million estate, and yes, some actors that were lesser than him owned much more, but at the same time, he could have sold the estate, downsized and still been more than well off. The divorces contributed to his suicide, n…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:59 PM
3

Yes. Feminists dehumanize men so much that they literally do not even want to fantasize about having sex with a man! Men are nothing to them, literally lower than animals. Women would rather have sex with fantasy animals and dogs than a man! r/sexwithdogs http://www.zoofur.com/Silicone-Canine/ Men, the disposable sex. Disposable = garbage. Garbage is non-living. Men are literally non-living. Our society views men as disposable inanimate objects, like tampons, to be used and then discarded. In th…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 07:40 PM
14

The ultimate feminist sex toy: Nothing but a circumcised, testicle-free, silicone, phallus. Wait, what am I saying? Many dildo's/vibrators don't even look like a penis at all. See how they objectify us men! At least we want something that resembles a female. Women have objectified men to the point of wanting nothing more than a stick for sexual pleasure. </sarcasm> See feminists, we can play your stupid games.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:56 PM
7

It doesn't take into account any inherent biological traits of men or women. Feminists like to believe that we are born with a blank slate and society molds us into who we will become. (blank slate theory) Their argument is that society has developed patriarchially this way and must be fought against, see cultural marxism. So, when you look at the pay gap, what you find is that loggers make more than secretaries and engineers make more than nurses. The fields that men choose to go into are physi…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:52 PM
0

Cultural Marxism. Blank slate theory. "The Gender Paradox".
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:38 PM
9

Facebook isn't a particularly good place to talk about anything...
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:21 PM
6

Intro: Honey Badger Radio: Feminism Objectifies Laci Green http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PduWgBFHhEc Honey Badger Radio Feminism Objectifies Laci Green http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX4G56p61PY Tumblr Feminists http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eCnmeaoGMA&t=7m50s RE: THE F-WORD (Video Response to Laci Green) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyIDItr_CW4 Laci Green, I'm calling you out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTGuCL7zFe0 Laci Green: The goals of feminism have been achieved! http://www.youtube…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:36 AM
5

There was a recent article on this. (Within last 6 or so months) I don't know if I can find it though. This is partially what you need. Of foremost importance is for you to fix her logic. It is illogical to consider race or gender of the presenter of an argument as relevant in any way to the evaluation of the argument itself. This is argumentum ad hominem? That is your real argument, the sexism and rascism. http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/denial-science-chris-mooney
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:15 AM
2

Oh, that makes sense. Well-put. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:52 PM
1

Defense of Stalinism... really?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:24 PM
6

Damn, that one was good. I'd post it to r/feminism, but... you know...
/r/MensRights03/08/14 09:59 PM
1

Thanks. I didn't realize so many people used Tumblr...
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:45 AM
2

What are "notes"?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:34 AM
7

"Self esteem" bullshit. $80 an hour dude! I would never do that though. It seems like an excellent way to get a false rape accusation from a "princess", and it would be soul crushing imo. But hey, maybe there's some guys out there that would be into it.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:31 PM
1

;)
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:06 AM
4

You know... we could be educating the guys not to supplicate.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 09:42 PM
12

Knowledge is more than half the battle here. Spread the word. That's all you need to do.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 09:39 PM
0

Dude. Capitalization. Seriously.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 09:34 PM
-1

Wow, really? Voted down? You need to actually watch the video, it's actually pretty good.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:25 PM
1

I used to be fully onboard the nuture train. I never thought that anything personality related had anything to do with genetics. I was full onboard the blank slate idea. The way I saw it, genetics made up your physical body and your IQ and nothing else. Many people think like that. It took a while for my opinion to change. I will tell you something though, there is nothing in electrical engineering that dissuades women from entering. No one looks down on them. In engineering, we only have bias a…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:04 AM
2

By, "you people" I was just generally referring to the people that push the "blank slate" idea. This theory is pretty common in feminism and is foundation for a good bit of feminist theory. Without it, a fair amount of feminist theory falls apart. What's with the "femocommunist"? I don't know what you're getting at with that.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:35 AM
5

Ya, or are you so stuck on your blank slate theory that you're wholly unwilling to consider the idea that men and women might have preference differences at the biological level? You need to watch The Gender Paradox. Of course nothing would probably change your mind. This line of thinking is like a religion for you people.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:37 PM
5

Ya, well, they're not going to. Most women don't like STEM. Sorry, but there's nothing barring them from pursuing STEM degrees. In fact, they have women-only incentives.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:21 PM
3

Because it's authoritarianistic.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 05:13 PM
1

Shit guys, it's just about "equality." I mean, that's all feminism is. Equality, who can argue against that? See, the real problem is most people don't know what "real" feminism is. This comment is satire.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:54 PM
3

Religion. It will make you suck a baby's dick.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:24 PM
5

Ya, as long as it's not a historic symbol, I don't have a problem with the removal. Is it historic, or 10, 20, 30 etc years old?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:42 PM
0

Watched the trailer. The funny thing is, I don't really have a problem with this. I also wouldn't have a problem if they made one where girls were controlled either. lol.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:21 PM
2

Ok, you're getting off track. I said that coal mining is more difficult of a job than nursing. It is. It is much more demanding of a job than nursing will ever be. These aren't comparable jobs and "everyone does their part" and all that. Some jobs are just much more difficult than others. The surgeon might have a difficult job to perform, but it doesn't kill him 15 years before his peers. He doesn't die with a broken body. He performs his job in a safe, air conditioned environment. The idea that…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:17 PM
2

lol. I don't think you fully appreciate how hard of a job coal mining is. It is a much more difficult job than nursing. They'd never make a show like this about nursing. Working Man's Death: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWgEzYefFYI
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:12 PM
-4

Yes, but in this specific instance, men don't work "harder", they work "more". This is more work, not harder work. Harder work would be like... coal mining vs nursing.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:12 PM
64

The feminists over at r/feminism already refuted the claim in their comments section, despite voting the post up to 150.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 04:14 PM
9

^ Truth. They don't tolerate any form of dissent. That shit's patriarchy. Keep posting anything that doesn't automatically agree with them. You'll get banned.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:57 PM
3

Take your phone and record her while trying to have a conversation with her, then post that on youtube for us to listen to. I don't believe any of this, but if it's real, it's a big deal. You will have an outpouring of support and suggestions. I wouldn't be surprised if r/feminism condemns it. "Don't cut off parts of my child's body without my child's explicit consent."
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:53 PM
5

Maybe so, and that is wrong. It's wrong if anyone is fired from their jobs without a conviction. Corporations, employers, universities, these have no business performing the duties of the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 01:45 PM
1

Will never work because police forces are overwhelmingly male. If it weren't for that patriarchy it just might work though...
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:45 AM
-4

Just shut your trap and keep blessing those originally sinned (sp?) babies. Oh and cut off your kid's foreskin!
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:06 AM
2

Male disposability. An end to the villification of men as rapists, molesters, abusers, stupid simpletons, and others, and the belief that women are inherently smarter, better with financees, more moral, objectified when men aren't, etc etc etc. This baseless gender war needs to end. The assault on masculinity. Specifically, the cultural beliefs that women are attracted to and desire qualities in men that would classify them as 'beta' or that other men respect and admire these qualities.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:41 AM
2

One of the biggest reasons people kill is because they are lashing out.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:58 PM
1

Work campps where men are enslaved to build for FIFA 2022. The end even focuses on the women and children that suffer in their home countries as a result of their enslaved husbands and fathers dying in a foreign country, no longer able to support them.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:10 AM
0

Who cares what Drudge is doing... or Infowars for that matter.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 08:30 PM
1

Well ya. Exactly. There has always been two main types of people in the seduction community. On the one hand you have guys that just want to get the hot babes of their dreams, but I would say that far more prevalent are the guys that are involuntarily celibate and suffer from love shyness. You seriously have guys that not only are virgins at 30, but they can't even get dates or they get used by women and they cant figure out what they're doing wrong. You look at the community and this is what yo…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:10 PM
6

Eh. I guess that's a pretty big difference between us. Hitting on many women is because you have to build experience through trial and failure to see what works best in certain social situations and what doesn't. Repeating this you start to see patterns, repititions and you realize that people are more alike than you previously thought. And you said it yourself, you have to tailor your interactions to various individuals in various situations accordingly. To be good at this, you need experience.…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:01 AM
2

PUA tactics put women on the defensive and make the problem they are trying to fix worse. What do you mean? I'm not following...
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:20 AM
5

You mean that it's essentially manipulation with the sole purpose of eliciting sex from another person?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:05 AM
-1

Ug. Why all this hate for the PUA's? It's exactly as misplaced as all the hate for MRA's. Seriously, to you, what does pick-up-artistry teach men?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:21 PM
1

Ug. "American Enterprise Institute"
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:23 PM
-7

This. Beating on someone after they beat on you is NOT self-defense. Maybe it feels good, but it's not "self-defense". Self-defense would be moving to another area of the train.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:17 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RozEFVPDxeg&feature=share&list=TL_wbO975Mtsk&t=6m07s
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:30 PM
1

I said I wasn't an MRA or feminist. Where did you get the idea that I don't abide by any labels at all because I'm not those two things?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 12:31 AM
-1

I read the title and closed it. Here is why I feel it doesn't apply. I just got back from the gym. If you read my response to that other person, and you still feel the article is relevant, then I will read it once I get out of the shower.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:21 PM
0

I wasn't even remotely hinting at that notion and I'm not arguing law in the slightest. I was just getting at the idea that everyone seems to think that abortion is a "women's" issue. Like, it's a women's alone issue as if, because the baby doesn't grow inside the man, the pregnancy, birth, and parenthood doesn't affect him until the baby is born. And this idea makes sense, after-all, the baby does grow inside the woman. So, the physical aspect and her emotions to the physical aspect are mostly …
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:17 PM
-1

I'm not an MRA, and I'm not a feminist either. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. It was just a realization that I had while reading this and I was wondering what others thought. There's no point in asking the feminists because they're all fucking crazy, so I posted here to gather other people's opinions.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:43 PM
1

I'm in the minority, but I actually think that the whole men's rights thing is unsustainable. I don't think that people separating themselves and then advocating for the respective demographic categories they fall in to is a good way to organize society. Just my perspective.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 02:56 PM
0

If you had the procedure done on her, she could still have a kid, with you, through in-vitro. If the procedure was done on you that wouldn't be possible? Or at least it wouldn't be near as easy.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 02:43 PM
2

But we 'are' inferior. You can't just brush it under the rug and slap a cut guy on the back and go "aww, it doesn't matter either way", because it does.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:41 PM
0

No, definitely not. I'm claiming that it's statistically easier for men to physically rape women than vice versa. Men are statistically larger, stronger, more violent and better fighters than women, so I would think that a lot of the times the man was under intellectual coercion rather than physical force. "We're having sex or I'll tell everyone X", "Lay there or I'll Y" ... etc. These are situations where the man
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:14 PM
2

Actually, I think it is. The purpose isn't to "dump em". The purpose is to 'pull away', it's to show that you're not going to stand being treated that way. If they're not going to engage you, then you will just go find someone else that will. You need to stand up for you. Marriage... or partnership... or whatever is a mutual agreement to stay together. You're not obligated to stay with someone that treats you poorly. The desired outcome is that the other person sees that you're not going to stan…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:58 PM
0

Well ya, that makes sense. I do feel that the statistical physical advantage goes to the men. If you select 1000 random men from the population then select 1000 random women, much more of the men are going to be able to overpower the women than vice-versa. I don't think men and women are equal in this matter...
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:53 PM
2

I'm surprised how many men will put up with this. As soon as this started, I would make a profile on a dating site seeking 'friends to hang out'.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:54 PM
1

Thinking about the classification of the two terms, initially they sounded really stupid, rape vs 'made to penetrate'. But, I'm wondering if there isn't more to this. I wonder if maybe their objective in classifying them differently would be physical vs mental states? For example, if a man rapes a woman, the idea is that she cannot physically resist, blah blah blah, because he's bigger and stronger, so no matter how much she tries to resist, she will fail, vs this 'made to penetrate' which might…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:45 AM
2

There is no 'good' answer in this case. The most rational couse of action is that each person checks the state of the toilet before use. Men are frequently cowed into conforming to this social convention, so even if you take a stand you will likely not get support from them. You could take a humor route and post printings making fun of the situation, but the women will invariably become angry. It is a power struggle and if you leave the lid down you can be seen as avoiding the issue passive agre…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:22 PM
1

Well, I don't know about that. The way I thought it worked is they took your DNA, then grew the body part with stem cells, then transplanted it onto you. In theory, they could grow many different parts of the body. But maybe I misunderstand. You talk like they're just growing skin in a certain shape, then transplanting the skin, and if that's the case, ya, that's not going to be the same...
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:06 AM
2

I don't know why the nerve cells wouldn't be regenerated as the foreskin is created using DNA... But, I don't know, it's not my area of expertise. But this would replace 'foreskin restoration' which currently takes years. The regenerated foreskin from stem cells would be better than a 'restored' foreskin because it would contain features that can't be duplicated by 'restoring' such as the ridged band. But many of the benefits would be the same such as increased sensation of the glans or better s…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:56 AM
3

lol. I thought it was an acronym. My bad.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 11:31 PM
2

I quoted you.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:33 PM
11

Ya, it's pretty disheartening to see the lack of interest. I submitted this 2 minutes after this post, and you can see which one ended up being more popular. I mean, of the two posts that were submitted within minutes of each other, the post about some personal Facebook drama is 4x more popular than news about research beneficial to men. And what's even more intriguing is the top comment from that post is: i've said it before and i will say it again, this sub should be much more pro men's rights…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:23 PM
7

This shit doesn't work. It's a conservative Republican pipe dream. Most people don't even know any of the bad things about the companies they buy from. This "informed consumer" is pretty hard to find. And to be honest, that's understandable as there are a plethora of companies with tons of reasons to not buy from them. It's unrealistic to expect the consumer to be educated about every issue with every company out there and then act accordingly. There are plenty of examples of shitty, horrible co…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:43 PM
6

I would really like to see a list of TV shows where men/husbands are bumbling idiots vs a list where women/wives are bumbling idiots. A comparison or something...
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:40 PM
1

But of course. You realized that I was making a good point and instead of fighting a losing battle or conceding that I might have a point, you instead choose to silence me. And in order to justify your actions you label it as a false flag attack or label me as a troll or some other thing it really doesn't matter. This enables you to quash any differing views as you go around and silence anyone that would hold views that you disagree with. I can understand if you didn't think it was funny. I unde…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:16 PM
1

How's that again? I think you have a hard time reconciling humor with politics... or something. Look, we're not just talking about a group of people that are espousing differing beliefs. This isn't like a women's rights, or a LGBT group. Feminists are more like Nazi's or KKK racists or hardcore right-wing conservative ideologes. And look, if you think the post isn't funny, then sure, no problem, but if you think that humor shouldn't be used to portray these people in a negative light and have a …
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:57 PM
1

Ya, that's what I meant. I don't hate people I hate the ideology. But what I was saying was akin to saying "I hate racists", I understand they're deluded. But I disagree with you on everything else. See, I don't agree with you on this "don't attack them" thing. If you want to espouse some gay rights or women's rights or men's rights, I might disagree with you but I'll listen and not make fun of you. But, if you're a feminist, or a Nazi or a member of the KKK or a hardcore right-wing conservative…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 09:51 PM
1

Only, I am about hating feminists... You're not? You like feminists? You think feminism is somehow relevant and you seek to limit their exposure to things they would take offense to? Or is it that you're being disingenuous so that you don't offend potential r/mensrights customers? If you didn't think it was funny, then I utterly see no problem with that. But you didn't even get it like you're somehow disconnected from how this would even be funny. Feminism's a joke and if you think otherwise the…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:56 PM
1

I never made an assertion did I? Does everyone in here have Aspergers? It's a joke, it's funny. How come the people here got it but you can't seem to wrap your head around how this would be humorous, chuckle at it and close it?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:39 PM
1

Right. First of all, it was a joke, it was funny. After I posted it, I realized it was also posted here. Those people figured out it was a joke and laughed at it. I don't really understand why you can't seem to. And as far as making feminists out to be the devil, I don't really see how this sets back men's rights or women's rights in any way. I guess if you buy into the whole patriarchy and believe that feminists are right but also believe that men need rights aswell, I can see how you'd not lik…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:37 PM
0

Really? You don't get it? It's an unrealistic rape scene. Get it? Unrealistic rape scene where women are just getting raped and there's penises everywhere and then men are having their penises shot off. It fits with the feminists unrealistic views of rape and is an excellent fantasy because all the men are getting their dicks shot off? Oh never mind. You people have no sense of humor.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 07:10 PM
0

Ya, I suppose that's probably true. What's a "KJ"? Kill Joy?
/r/seduction09/02/14 12:57 AM
0

I guess so. I was just curious if anyone had tried it. I don't really see how this would be considered a bad post...
/r/seduction09/02/14 12:32 AM
0

They have to keep up the war hero facade to continue feeding the poor to their war machine.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:32 PM
3

In my opinion, yes and no. I don't believe in all these selective representation groups. I think that having a group made up of women, supporting breast cancer awareness is just as bad as a group of men supporting prostate cancer awareness. Hell, let's polarize everything by race, gender, age etc. We can have blacks only supporting issues that affect them, women only supporting issues that affect them, Asians only supporting issues that affect them. The children really need to get their act toge…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:18 PM
0

Ya, it's not copypasta. I should have known you'd respond with something idiotic. Your responses are short and you're not writing anything of substance. I think you are genuinely trolling me. <Slowclap>
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:49 PM
0

I'm not so presumptuous to believe that 'I' will change it all. I'm just throwing some ideas out there and looking at the feedback to see if anyone agrees or disagrees or has a new way of looking at things, etc. I'm starting to think that it's all detrimental. You know, a lot of these policies that are detrimental to men came from the women's rights movement. The women's rights movement wasn't supposed to have that effect! You're all about demonizing these women's rights groups. But why the Hell…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 08:17 PM
0

Whatever. ^ Logical fallacy: Argumentum ad hominem: Labeling. Thank you, but I know full well what this sub is about. Please stop trying to portray me as a troll. I am not.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:49 PM
0

Whatever. ^ Logical fallacy: Argumentum ad hominem: Labeling
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:43 PM
-1

Your comment is pretty much just, "That's just the way it is. There's nothing we can do about that. We're better than they are. If you don't like it then you can giiit out."
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:40 PM
1

I'm stuck on men's rights because it's the only place I really go, and it's the only place I really feel I'm a part of. Sure, I need to start going there more and interjecting. Hopefully they don't bring the same argument that you have or I'm really SOL huh? You have to start somewhere right? You're last sentence isn't a sentence. I don't know what you're saying with it so I don't have a response to that.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:32 PM
1

Well, I wasn't trying to be absolutist. I was meaning major advocacy groups that gain traction and people agree with. The Black Panthers were never widely accepted nor popular. I understand what you're saying, but you do realize the Black Panthers are an example of what I'm saying? Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure they started out as a well-intentioned black advocacy group and effectively devolved into racists. Feminism was a women's rights advocacy group... We're a men's rights advocacy gro…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:27 PM
1

Sure. Maybe. I'm not trying to make this into us vs feminism. I believe they fail on multiple levels, and I agreed with this guy on their failings. I feel this is a problem endemic of all groups of this type, not just r/feminism. It's like these groups are forming into little religions. You have your feminist religion, your men's rights religion, your native american rights religion. I'm not saying that we should hold hands with them, not even in the slightest. I'm saying we should get rid of al…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:08 PM
1

Why are you so stuck on r/feminism? I'm just doing what I can. In fact, I'm not even trying to do anything. I'm just bringing up my thoughts on the subject. I think we should be better than them, not like them. I've addressed all of your previous comments. I don't know what you're getting at with that comment. I tired of this weekly requst for /r/MensRights to join with /r/Feminism or /r/Equality not being told to piss off within 5 min. It's not new. Shit. I didn't know this actually happened. I…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:03 PM
1

Yes. See, I agree with that. But I disagree at the same time. What I've noticed in all advocacy groups is that they always start out egalitarian and level-headed. The pattern is the same in nearly every group. They start out bringing up the inequalities that their side faces. Then these inequalities are addressed, but the group remains and continues to fight for the rights of their 'members'. With women's rights, they abolished nearly all of the issues or at least got the public on their side wi…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:50 PM
-1

Ya, I don't like the feminist argument. But I think that it exists because they just advocate for themselves. All they do is read about how women are disenfranchised. But that's what we're doing here. As far as posting what I have done; I'm questioning the purpose of the men's rights movement. It's called discourse. And in your picture, I'm not acting like the boss. I'm trying to change people's minds. I'm the one saying "follow me over to this other place and let's accomplish this task in a dif…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:38 PM
0

Got called a troll within 46 minutes. Whatever. Hmm, let's see why I didn't cross post this in r/feminism. [–] subreddit message via /r/Feminism/ sent 1 month ago you have been banned from posting to /r/Feminism: Feminism. Thanks for posting that other similar request. I'm glad to see someone agrees with what I'm saying. I don't really know much about egalitarian groups. If they do that, then it's wrong and they should change. We should go over there and inject some sense.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:18 PM
2

Of course it could be historically important... I don't really know what that means though because that doesn't mean it's good or bad. There's tons of bad things that were historically important. But ya, I think that the things that are addressed by the men's rights movement are historically important. Here's the thing. I think you're going to end up with black rights movements that advocate for black rights and women's rights movements that advocate for women's rights, etc. Those black rights a…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:13 PM
1

Sure. I mean, I'm not trying to disagree with anything you've said. I'm just saying, why have all these different movements at all? Why not have something in the spirit of the civil rights movement? Why have all these little groups that only focus on their single issues? I mean, I agree with what you're saying, but I don't see a reason to have a men's or a women's rights movement. Why not have a civil rights movement? That's what I'm getting at. What's so wrong with being egalitarian?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:05 PM
1

Well, because it's just the reverse of women's rights movement. You know, the women's rights movement wasn't always nuts. Historically, it was important. But it's just a group advocating for themselves and I think that this is bad. You're going to end up with a black rights group, a men's rights group, an Asian rights group, a women's rights group, a transgender engineer's rights group, a lesbian coal miner rights group, etc. etc. etc. Instead of addressing issues as issues, we separate them int…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:54 PM
3

Women: Don't be fat. Solution: Eat fewer calories than you expend. Men: Don't be fat, don't be skinny, Build and maintain muscle. Healthy diet with exact amounts of protein per bodyweight. Exact calorie amounts need to be calculated to prevent overconsumption or underconsumption of calories. Eat 6 small meals a day with proper proportion of fat, carbs etc.. Lift heavy weights 3 times a week rotating routine every 4-6 weeks to prevent stagnation, keep log of weights lifted to track progress. Know…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:01 PM
2

I'm pro-abortion and anti-church, and I'm all sor some violent uprising (I think...) but what really bothers me about this video is that it's women on one side attacking men on the other. Men and women might have voted to put in place policies the limit the freedoms of women, but feminism universally drives hatred of men. It is universally divisive and damaging to societies.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:40 PM
-2

The Red Pill is just the seduction community + conservative religious philosophy. The crazy stuff is just the conservative religious stuff they try to meld with seduction community theory.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:04 PM
6

Yes, but a lot of this holds fathers, 'dads' in contempt, like they knew a lot of what we know.... or are trying to learn. A lot of these guys never figured women out, or never realized you make fewer friends as you get older. A lot of the things mentioned, a lot of dads still don't know. Is he a bad father/dad because he never figured it out? Also, they didn't have access to knowldge like we do with the internet.
/r/becomeaman14/11/13 02:09 PM
1

Sure. It doesn't have to be that way though. You could argue that the unguided hand is what causes the pink to sell to girls, but, at a certain point, the advertising begins to affect society. You start having girls buy things that are pink because all the advertising they see, with girls, which they are, has those pink products. At a certain point, advertising breaks away from being a tool of informing the public of a product's existence and becomes a tool of social coercion, of social change. …
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:43 PM
1

lol wat? Did you not understand what I said? You didn't understand what I said. lol.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:37 PM
1

You know what you can do that really highlights what you're saying. Just walk into a store like walmart or something, and randomly turn down an isle and just walk down it using your peripheral vision. You can see it in the isle, the whole fucking isle is pink, or blue and black and red. You could probably take a picture and then blur the image to the point you cant see anything but colors.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:35 PM
0

A lady came into a store one day asking how to sign up for selective service. HAHAHAHA, no she didn't! I liked the singing and carrying on, there's not enough of that in society these days. That being said, some of this shit was pretty sexist. The miscarriage thing was one example of probably out-of-line. That being said, I think that a lot of people are just too damned sensitive. Dead baby jokes are not an attack on babies or support of baby mistreatment. It's macabre humor. It would have been …
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:30 PM
8

Well, if "boys will be boys...etc" then there's no reason for gender based marketing right? They can just market the toy and whichever sex wants it can buy it right? I don't think the issue is that they're trying to force marketers to change what children are playing with but what sexual demographic they're marketing to, to stop excluding children. Ex: Doll commercials with nothing but little girls and Nerf commercials with nothing but little boys.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:12 PM
3

Now this is an issue. Example: woman goes to hospital and says she wants to deliver in some specific way. Instead they drug her and do what they want. I can see if her life was in danger, but go read some of the stories, if true, it's wrong.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 04:36 AM
2

Ya, I was just banned from r/feminism. I wasn't even being an ass,they just didn't like my opinions. Whatever... at least I wasn't called a troll. I hate being called a troll when all I'm trying to do is have a conversation.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 03:48 AM
3

Umm... what is "squandering commitment"?
/r/RedPillWomen04/09/13 11:47 PM
0

Or, maybe she's just shit at choosing men? To be honest, nearly all of the single women I've seen had a kid with a retard. They're single mothers because they suck at choosing.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/13 11:02 PM
-1

oneitis
/r/seduction28/04/13 03:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter