TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Realistic_W8974 Archive

View 6 posts and 116 comments by Realistic_W8974 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Your stupid arse should be aware that women in 1920s are different than in 2024 you funking idiot u/Nelo999
/r/MensRights16/03/24 11:55 PM
8

Most women are left-leaning feminists. They are leftist on women's issue. But quite right-wing when it comes to men's troubles.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:37 AM
1

A YouTube video of a social experiment, I don't see any reason why this evidence ought to be brushed aside; it well captured the gender dynamics in public. I'd be interested in any research that conducts an analysis of the empathy gap: for example, have a population place jail-time for the same crime on two different suspects, one female the other male. We could reasonable conclude that gender could play a role in how we treat the individual with regards to ease of punishment. But I'm not aware …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 12:17 AM
3

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dtVHnZX8E50&pp=ygUjc29jaWFsIGV4cGVyaW1lbnQgbWFuIGhpdHRpbmcgd29tYW4%3D This social experiment demonstrates to us the inherent empathy we have towards one gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 05:34 PM
5

I think we have to find a means to properly integrate them into the workforce. I know that's easier said than done, given that many business owners are, justifiable, hesitant to work alongside an ex-inmate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 03:14 AM
3

AI isn't artificial conscienceness; they certainly can't replace a sentient human being, it would just be symptomatic treatment. We must address the true causes of this schism between men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/24 03:14 PM
9

Yes historically men were the ones who owned the wealth. Most men (99%) throughout history were foot soldiers, peasants, and factory workers. A powerful woman would be keen on helping other women in her society, but such an in-group bias isn't prevalent across male dynamics of power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/24 04:13 PM
7

It would depend on what we define as a woman's right: a woman's right to accuse a man of a crime with little to no evidence, or even when there is evidence against her, is absolutely a right gone too far. The cultural aspect is just too difficult to prove: try finding proof for the fact that emotional abuse is tolerated when its women inflicting it on men... you'd hardly find any scholarly researches on this matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/24 04:10 PM
11

Their celebration of toilet day is an obvious passive-aggressive statement, demonstrating a lack of professionalism; all the more proof that the UN should not be taken seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/24 04:07 PM
-5

The article was a bit vague about what was going on on those posts. It mentioned that some of them included the implication of violence against specific and doxxed women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 02:34 PM
-17

Men aren't conscripted because of misandry or hatred of their gender, it is because they are seen as more physically capable, and unlike women are less likely to be targets of sexual assault in the case of captivity. And no, I do not support war conscriptions but rather demonstrated that misandry doesn't correlate with it. Moreover, I do not deny that misandry kills.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 02:33 PM
10

From my understanding, the article was a bit vague about what was going on on those posts. It mentioned that some of them included the implication of violence against specific and doxxed women. In my opinion, that crosses the permissible grounds of free-speech and police intervention is justified. Again though the article was too vague. My main point from the post is that if the genders were swapped, we would not have seen justice on that day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 02:32 PM
6

Pretty much, this is a strong case of the economic war we are all part of; late stage capitalism has well placed the hands in few corporations, thanks Reagan!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/24 02:39 PM
11

This is a bit off topic, but to comment on the notion of "women don't need men": The way I see it is, men desire women more than vice-versa, but economically women need men more. A woman might feel men to be dispensable given that the collective rewards of labor compiled by all men in blue-collar jobs are allocated in a means to benefit all men and women across society, in other words, a woman does not need a male companion, but she certainly needs men as a whole population to support the functi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/24 02:37 PM
3

They're downvoting because they do not believe in this merit: an app implying for women to make the first move doesn't actually mean will will follow through, and most don't.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 06:46 PM
7

That's absurd lmao.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 06:14 PM
1

you asked where history has favored men and there's your answer. You gave an answer, and it was false: I told you above that this history that "favored" men oppressed them in many ways. they are encouraged from early age to be leaders and women don't get the same treatment? Are foot-soldiers, servants, and peasants leaders? Most men throughout history have been such people. why is it so hard for men here to accept history? like seriously, grab a book lol Lmao, You need this advice more than anyo…
/r/MensRights04/03/24 09:58 PM
1

Do you think it's a coincidence that most people in power are men? From my understanding, power is correlated with risk-taking behavior. Men are much more risk-taking than women, this can explain why men are simultaneously the occupiers of positions of power AND suicide/homeless/prison as a population. A few decades ago it was illegal for women to own property. Women lose their last name when they get married. Women weren't able to vote. Women weren't able to study. At the same time, who were th…
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:49 PM
1

Can you give an example of history favoring men? And be specific about the year and location.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:36 PM
1

Perfectly summarized.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:35 PM
164

Please draft her.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:28 PM
2

I doubt that, wokeness is strongly compatible with liberal costal societies. Morality is not tied to financial performance, in fact you're likely to be more successful with less morals.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:27 PM
8

Hope this shuts the feminists' mouths up.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 08:26 PM
13

What is your definition of feminist theory? For many, feminism is the ideology to liberate women from patriarchal rule. If the inherent supposition in this framework of thought is that men are privileged, then this undermines men's welfare by portraying them as a group unworthy of supporting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 08:14 PM
16

After all, if both traditional gender roles are restrictive and oppressive, why focus exclusively on women's? Gender roles aren't necessarily this bordered ground that can easily be identifiable, rather it's intertwined into our daily behavior that it's difficult to spot. As far back as the medieval age, knights held chivalrous codes to protect women. This is traditional in the sense that it was dragged by men throughout the eons. Of course, many a times men didn't abide by this chivalry and act…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 06:46 PM
2

Is South Korea truly a misogynistic society as that feminist claimed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 05:35 PM
11

I know this will sound authoritarian on my behalf, but this is an inevitable consequence of liberalism: the rugged individualism of the west causes this sort of radical drift of each individual towards their own micro-culture. As Hegel put's it: man creates man, contrary to Descartes' "I think therefor I am", in an individualistic society, men and women run the risk if exploiting one another as they have little incentive for the abiding to any sort of collectively agreed upon morals. I am not ad…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/24 05:32 PM
6

I have many stories dealing with awful women and the simp men who support them. I really wished society acknowledged toxic femininity, but it just doesn't; women are always perfect and moral in the eyes of mankind. Granted, I have come to learn to open up only to a specific group that I can relate to. The harsh truth is that we humans (rightist or leftist) are really just in it for ourselves in this world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 01:16 PM
1

Would society be doing that intentionally?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/24 06:06 AM
–

Be honest with yourself: a lot of "traditional" men aren't trad at all; they very much live a liberal lessie fair (I know I misspelled that) lifestyle. Wanting a traditional wife while wanting to be a liberal man yourself simply won't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 06:02 PM
4

She is more attracted to 渣男 (fuckbois). The degeneracy seems to be international.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 05:16 PM
1

This resonates well with my thinking, I've come to embrace a more centrist position between right and left over the years, seeing as to how hostile and vile the two sides can become. With regards to justice, it doesn't always boil down to "live and let live" scenario, as feminism has clearly demonstrated its venomous hostility towards the male gender. Social justice absolutely has its place in any civil society. The issue is that the bringers of such justice become the very tyrants themselves: d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 04:06 PM
9

I think psychopathy is unstructured; people may not be born so but are conditions that way in our hyper-competitive capitalist society. I don't buy into this trad-idea of women being shy angels; women are far more capable and clever than most men realize. Given that women, on average, lack the physical strength that men posses, it conditions them from a young age to develop strong social skills that may be the reason for the public's favorable impression of overall women's morality. Furthermore,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/24 12:13 AM
1

It is bad, but why worse? At least it criticizes toxic femininity, modern men are too afraid to do that.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 10:55 PM
2

My take is that everyone should have the freedom to put whatever they want on their list of "must-haves" and "can't stands" when looking for a romantic partner. You can speak of the word entitled while it's in a vacuum, I see that you attached some meaning to it. True: our entitlement is most likely not going to be fulfilled, but in the spirit of democracy we cannot force those who are delusional to accept reality; they must do that on their own. The merit of democracy is that people get punishe…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:36 PM
8

Quite the contrary, I'd say if they're argumentative then they are investigative - a sign that they're looking for the truth of the matter.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 05:28 PM
5

Correct, they do say that. It's far more commonly the case that they claim Patriarchy favors men, "feminism" would depend on who defines it. I do see the benefits of an egalitarian society such as Scandinavia for both men and women; there are problems with that however. We do see a deconstruction of the family unit, rising cost of living, and social aloofness which aren't prevalent in less developed societies. This is the price one would have to pay in more developed societies. Of course, plenty…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:27 PM
11

"this hatred of men is a response and reverberation of the patriarchy itself" I don't think the existence of powerful men is an excuse to hate men, much like it isn't fair to hate women because of Italy's prime minister. "women hating men is because of misogynistic men. Men hating women is because they want to control women"? This idea infantilizes women, where a flawed women is supposedly just a victim of social programming: that is, if a man is hostile, he is toxic, but if a woman is hostile, …
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:46 PM
4

It just keeps circling back to blaming men.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:36 PM
25

Women posses a soft-power: try criticizing women as a population and you will received an extremely hostile reaction from people, but the same isn't true is you criticized men, in fact you'll actually we lauded. This creates a culture where women, especially naive young women, feel entitled to disrespect men and treat them like cannon-fodder. This is huge in relationships. You might find this trivial as it's not legal or political, but when we see that suicide is strongly correlated with divorce…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:04 PM
2

The radical feminists hate men. And they have communicated that perfectly and abundantly. Miscommunication is no feasible explanation.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:43 AM
6

Almost every woman on these dating apps is either crazy or disgusting looking; it's a waste of time.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:25 AM
11

This is a truth so many people are just unwilling to acknowledge.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:24 AM
1

You mean the billions of dollars? Test: would the average man prefer a middle class pretty woman or a millionaire disgusting obese one? Moreover, OP didn't imply all women are taytays; she just used her as a loose example. What you did was you zoomed in on a flaw in OP's argument and magnified it, as if it were the whole bulk of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 12:30 AM
1

Would the average man set his sights on a delusional billionaire celebrity that's going to look objectively worse in a few years, or a kind woman next door? Why would any man care about the status and money of the woman? Men are objectively more visual than women, but they still mimic similar patterns of partner-seeking behaviors to them. Most women wouldn't marry a rich celebrity, assuming those women are stupid enough to do that; no amount of looks and money can compensate for a lack of loyalt…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:27 PM
1

The f is a neet?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:25 PM
2

I don't know which world you live in, but a lot women over thirty look damn amazing, or at least as good as they did in their twenties, expect that they have increased confidence and better financial security. They may mot be Taytay but they're doing splendid, and they aren't going to repulse the average man cause radical feminism is a mostly online thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:24 PM
2

Holy Christ, this is a brilliant observation.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:02 AM
27

This is more likely to be used as Islamophobia fuel rather than Misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 09:29 PM
9

For example they are plenty keen on breaking down hierarchies within science, the administrative state, and law. One isn't necessarily rightist for critiquing what is widely acceptable as Science and Law. There have been many conceptions throughout history that have been widely believed to be science; the gender-pay gap a massive example of this, a statistical manipulation turned to dogmatic "scientific fact". The same case goes for what is often deemed as morally sound law.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/24 02:00 AM
15

Hi OP, We are all human, and though we are all different in our cultures, we equally experience vulnerability. It is my firm belief that struggle is integral to life: some may struggle because of their gender, others their religion, sexuality, race, socioeconomic status, and so on. Without the ugly experiences in life, we can never learn to truly appreciate its beauty. With regards to the relationships a man can have women, I would say it's far better to remain single than to get entangled in an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 11:14 PM
6

Per John lock's theorem, an individual is born as a blank slate, ready to absorb all knowledge and formulate his human nature. Supposing we, a generation of men distressed with societal problems, and can be characterized as male (M) and problems as X, then our persona is defined as follows: Male in 2024= M+X. Fix the problems and you end up with a generation of just M; they will have forgotten the very reason for which great collective and cultural effort must be placed to protect men from the p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 04:54 AM
1

If women don’t feel comfortable opening up to men that is because they don’t believe they will be warm or supportive. Women have to create that environment by being attentive, encouraging self expression and responding positively. Would you agree with this statement? I am curious to know if, like that of many other users on this sub, your arguments hold a double standards against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 02:33 AM
5

Are you blaming biological determinism or the traditional culture?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 01:21 AM
6

I see your point. Perhaps regarding those war-torn countries, those men have a radical perception of reality, but then we'd have to acknowledge their truly more dangerous society as a result of decades of conflict and imperialism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/24 03:01 PM
73

In what world does she live in? Most societies around the world assume that women are more honest and less destructive than men. I would speculate that some authoritarian societies might not be too keen on helping and protecting women like Afghanistan and Pakistan, but those countries hardly represent the global population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/24 11:52 PM
1

Hard times create strong men who create good times. Good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:55 PM
2

Just want to point out that most muslim countries don't actually practice polygamy, it's allowed by religion, but even extremely conservative muslims don't actually take it seriously. With regards to soft-harems, they have always been a thing. I don't understand why red-pillers believe there was a time of complete sexual purity in our history; insecure fatherless women have always gravitated to the same handsome guy for gratification, nothing new here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:54 PM
1

I totally agree with you OP, no point playing hero at this point. My motto in life is: be selfish, but never cruel.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:02 PM
5

Your claim is that the patriarchy is a sociological -not economic- system by which the man must work and provide, while the woman does household chores? But from my conversation with many feminists it is clear that you're incorrect about what today's "patriarchy" means: they assume it is the immanent capitalist system whereby only the top figures benefit from class exploitation. I've heard it many times: men and women as workers are exploited by old white patriarchal men. For feminists, "patriar…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:42 PM
13

Being atop the hierarchy: yes you are burdened with responsibility, but you are adequately compensated. Whilst being subjugated by a power, you are forced to exert effort but with no reward. If most men today are underpaid and overworked, are they truly "in charge"?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:41 PM
24

Patriarchy doesn’t favor men, it put them at charge, which is as much of a burden as being put under charge Would you rather be a millionaire or homeless?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:18 PM
107

The patriarchy favors men The patriarchy oppresses men This is a narcissist's prayer.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 08:26 PM
38

I've come to notice that the internet is essentially people's emotional dumping ground; you have some women and men saying violent things about each other, that's primarily due to the lack of social barriers and inhibitions that would be present in face-to-face interactions, guess that says a lot about human nature.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:43 PM
116

You're absolutely welcome on this sub! Bare in mind that some comments do indeed express radical opinions, but they do not speak on behalf of all members.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:34 PM
0

I did not make a racial analysis here, my focus was purely economic. I believe blacks in the US are struggling financially due to inadvertent factors rather than a deliberately Racist regime. I think this matter would be impossible to truly get to facts off without statistics on circumcision amongst inmates worldwide.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:43 AM
3

I know r/mensrights is more conservative, suggesting that my following argument is likely to be rejected, but my rational here is that despite being 13% of US's population, African Americans are 38.7 % of the US prison population, a very disproportionate incarceration rate relative to the population portion. So this might suggest that economic challenges are a significantly stronger predictor of US incarceration rather than circumcision. I am not downplaying the emotional struggles of men, but w…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:57 AM
6

Do we have any statistical evidence to suggest that circumcised men are more likely to end up in prison?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 12:11 AM
34

What are the long term personality effects?
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:37 PM
6

Is there footage of men doing this course? I'd like to see how feasible it is to complete it if.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:29 PM
-16

I agree, this criticism of women needs to stop; males today need to man up, engage in self-improvement and stop complaining.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:34 AM
2

Interesting flair, I never thought I'd see a trad woman on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:17 AM
2

That's life, adapt and grow, we gotta be men 💪
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:37 PM
1

There are no solutions in life, only trade-offs.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:41 PM
2

When dealing with hateful people, you never lower yourself to their standard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/24 08:27 PM
14

That when women tell men to "open up about their problems", they mean about extremely specific problems are almost always relate to women's problem with traditional gender norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 08:04 PM
13

Absolutely true. His reaction says a lot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/24 11:59 AM
1

Well then friend, if you have no intent on explaining yourself here then I guess you're another crappy youngster not worth taking seriously.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 03:13 AM
1

Good.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:42 PM
63

The reason to post this is this one from here "https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/s/WE7mubgNKC Yall he made a different post cause he didn’t like the way this one was going." ^ that was one of the most upvoted comments. The lack of empathy is just astonishing, it's just nauseating. And people wonder why men don't open up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 08:10 PM
-7

Right. Try thinking for once: anyone who rejects extreme liberalism is a far-right trumpist?
/r/MensRights07/02/24 06:04 AM
19

This is it pretty much, I place more blame on weak men than on women for this modern feminist and liberal degeneracy.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 03:57 AM
21

I agree that much of culture war is exaggerated by the media, but if you see a constant anti-male sentiment being projected al over social media, don't you think that's going to instill some toxic traits into a great number of young women who are most likely spending several hours a day over the internet? I think the idea that just because something is on the internet then it isn't dangerous should be relinquished based on the fact that most people are spending a huge amount of time on it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 01:40 AM
28

Today's dating is liberal for women, pseudo-traditional for men; Full responsibility, but no authority.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 01:26 AM
1

They aren't expected to do any chores, even if they aren't bringing an income?
/r/MensRights06/02/24 10:46 PM
1

https://www.np.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/s/2aMBFhKYqI A quick google search showed that many people subtly deny it. Yes I know that reddit is liberal compared to the average world population, still we can't say that it's completely denied in mainstream where it's almost a taboo to acknowledge biological differences between men and women. In any case, would you get upset over someone's insistence that every schoolboy is different in the discussion of school-consent classes or would you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:31 PM
5

They do not call it benevolent sexism from my observation, it's simply a victory. Have a look at any news report about a county in the US where women are out-paying men or buying more houses, the word "inequality" is nowhere to be find, rather we only hear the echoes of "victory", "achievement", and ironically, "Equals rights".
/r/MensRights06/02/24 09:51 PM
1

https://www.np.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/s/2aMBFhKYqI A quick google search showed that many people subtly deny it. Yes I know that reddit is liberal compared to the average world population, still we can't say that it's completely denied in mainstream where it's almost a taboo to acknowledge biological differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:35 PM
1

We humans are full of dissonances and contradictions. What one holds as a true and irrefutable conviction when discussing laws, such as the case of men being hornier than women, one would subconsciencely hold as a myth when discussing dating in order to keep certain liberal realizations alive in one's head. As if to say: yes, I'll admit that men are hornier than women and thus we must pay better attention to that from a law enforcement perspective.... but when it comes to dating I'll just preten…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:21 PM
1

I often have qualms with the blue-pill; I like that you were honest here, but far to many other blue-pillers on this sub have flat-out denied this and claimed that the any collective description doesn't exist, and that everyone human is of some unique combination to be examined, it's far too nebulous.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:17 PM
1

Are men hornier than women? I want to see your answer on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 04:37 PM
8

All in moderation and situational awareness. There are times where if you cried it will make awful people mock and laugh hysterically at you as the way they did JP.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 07:20 PM
18

All human beings cry, of all ages, genders, socioeconomic status and so on.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 07:09 PM
13

They were also hated in previous society, and there was no word for it save by a few worker unions.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 04:49 AM
12

My talks with real women are always civil and polite, I'm not going to start political drama in person. My main concern is social media where people actually voice their truthful opinions where they feel comfortable enough to not be criticized. In other words, we are more likely to be honest on social media, so that's where the ear must be. I see hateful behavior in men and woman both towards each other recently, Well... maybe it's because you refuse to talk to real men and women about their opi…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 04:04 AM
6

Islam could either be about charity for the poor or beheading infidels. Feminism could be about providing education for women or about hating and wishing death on men. It's a case of semantics. In any case, I for one do not see any benefit for men from feminism in the 21st century. It's an ideology of hatred at this point, completely detached from its original goals; what is feminism even? It is essentially the collective wills and mentalities of women and men who supplicate to them, and I have …
/r/MensRights02/02/24 03:04 AM
40

The radical feminism seeks to have its cake and eat it: yes, they want to be princesses, but also autonomous strong women. It's like how tradcons of Andrew tate seek to live like traditional patriarchs while engaging in social media hooliganism, it's an incompatible worldview.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/24 04:24 PM
0

Can you link the tiktok?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 03:09 PM
7

I'm noticing a major disconnect from feminists in general: on one hand, they'd have you believe that women are facing major discrimination and constant threats of harassment. But once this sort of doom is voiced by a male concerning his issues, he is immediately told of how wonderful everything is. "What gender wars? It's all in your head."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/24 02:35 PM
14

Ah I didn't pay attention to that part of the article. Yes I agree with you that women leaving the workforce won't help men (it would actually hurt as less workers would slow down the economy), however I would point out that this new culture of misandry being pushed on young women through education ought to be addressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/24 08:18 PM
20

We don’t need to return to trad stuff to help men An advocacy for men might seem traditional if they resemble a historical event, but it doesn't have to be the case. For example, if in the 1800s, a Russian travelled to France for a proper education, we can't conclude that people today traveling to the west for an education are "traditionalist"; they simply are doing what's best for them. And thus men seeking to garner power in a society they feel disgruntled with aren't necessarily traditional, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/24 08:13 PM
–

OP is a woman. And in my opinion, her post sounded like a humble brag more than anything else. It's also important to note that the drive for power is ubiquitous among all human beings; white male ambition is not limited to them in the least bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 07:39 PM
28

Feminism is not for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/24 03:21 PM
1

An advocacy for men might seem traditional if they resemble a historical event, but it doesn't have to be the case. For example, if in the 1800s, a Russian travelled to France for a proper education, we can't conclude that people today traveling to the west for an education are "traditionalist"; they simply are doing what's best for them. And thus men seeking to garner power in a society they feel disgruntled with aren't necessarily traditional, rather they are constructing a society that adhere…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 12:07 AM
16

I've noticed that these big scary tyrannical patriarchs often cater to women citizens rather than men; sort of a caring father-daughter archetype relation. People tend to empathize more with a financially struggling woman as opposed to a man in the same scenario. They'd envision the bigger risks a woman might face during homelessness and so on, thus have a bigger drive to push women into higher paying fields. Granted, this theory is not the entire explanation on this subject.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 10:38 PM
1

I feel like this is a male larping.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:57 PM
3

I think it's because right-wingers pay no heed to any sort of political correctness (aside from religious contexts) and thus have no problem challenging feminism or the idea that women are angels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/24 03:55 PM
11

I agree with you, OP: selection biases are the root causes of Misandry and Misogyny. My only problem is that Misandry is openly accepted and downright encouraged at some time. The power is shifted well in favor in women's hands in the western world and there is plenty of evidence for that. No such thing as bad man or bad woman, just bad people. Males and females exhibit aggression and power in different ways, and keeping such a topic a taboo won't do much to help struggling young men in a societ…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 03:38 PM
5

Correct, toxic men must be humbled. Let's also not forget to call out the ignorant people who invalidate men's problems and completely refuse to critique women, since women aren't perfect as-well, and refusing the criticize them only reinforces their abusive tendencies towards men.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:32 PM
5

Avoid nasty men and women, and just live your life comfortably.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 10:14 PM
3

I don't think AI women would be an adequte solution for men's loneliness. Consider how social interactions have changed since the 1980s: back then a person's potential social circle was limited to his neighborhood which would consist as let's say 1,000 people. Today's internet offers talks with hundreds of millions; despite the enormity of today's discourses through digital means, the exponential increase of interactions have not only failed to alleviate people's feelings of solitude but have ac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/24 08:12 PM
3

Contrary to some on this sub, I do think feminism has been mostly a positive force for change in the wellbeing of women; We must accurately define what it means to be a feminist here; plenty of modern feminist dogma offers young men nothing but fear and hostility towards 50% of the population. In terms of workplace success, then yes old-school feminism's advocacy has done enormous strides for the betterment of women's lives. Though we must still Account for the contribution of blue collar worker…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/24 03:05 AM
–

The discussion of marriage is often overrun by radical generalizations; it's not so much of a discussion about ensuring the choosing of the right person for marriage, but trp outright claims that marriage is toxic to its core.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:14 AM
–

Alright that sounds reasonable. But I still notice a big delusion in many women where they demand a strong social-savvy man, while at the same claiming that strong men are just "insecure".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 10:47 PM
–

Tall nerdy or tall introverted women may struggle, but tall active women don’t struggle with dating. Tall women who don't fit into conventional standards of attractiveness won't struggle to get laid, but they sure as hell ain't getting into a healthy long term relationship. How delusional are you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 10:38 PM
3

No need to throw an attitude like that. Even your mother does a better job at being polite when I visit her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 10:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter