TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RedPillLawyerGuy Archive

View 2 posts and 57 comments by RedPillLawyerGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

Legal RightsRedPillLawyerGuy/r/MensRights10/04/18 02:52 PM
2

RedPillLawyerGuy/r/TheRedPill10/04/18 03:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

It looks like your AVERAGE DATE was to have the girl show up late, with a messy bun and way too much make up, bitching about their kids and their ex, overweight, and addicted to their phone. That really makes me think "quality."
/r/MGTOW02/11/20 07:18 PM
11

Well played, I'm 36 dating 27, 24, and 19. The 27 year old asks about a serious relationship every couple of months, and I shake it off with "I've got too much going on for something like that, this is fun so let's just keep it that way." The 24 year old is just starting out in her work life and likes to go to bars and etc, and brag about how "her guy has taught her about good alcohol" and show me off at work functions. The 19 year old has daddy issues (well, they all have daddy issues) and I'm …
/r/TheRedPill23/10/20 05:50 PM
3

It's been my experience that "child support" is, in all practical terms, "private mandated subsidy for single mothers." Here's a likely scenario: Father makes $28 an hour in a hard-labor job that's $4500 a month, Mother makes $12 an hour working in an office somewhere, that's $2000 a month. They have two kids. Income disparity, give me a break, not a part of this discussion. Best-interest factors for child custody will favor traditionally female gender roles, so women win custody more often than…
/r/MensRights21/05/20 05:12 PM
2

She's low-key doing pre-emptive damage control, wanting to know if there's a way she can justify hiding this so she can make a credible argument at the divorce trial. ​ She'll sit there in Court, tell the judge that she's afraid of her soon-to-be ex because when he found out she fucked multiple dudes for cold hard cash, he got upset and told her he wanted a divorce. He didn't sit there and say, "Oh, honey, I'm so sorry the socioeconomic conditions of your late 20s required you to fuck guys for m…
/r/MGTOW20/03/20 09:05 PM
3

Dude, MGTOW is about going your own way, so go your way. Self-improvement and becoming the best you starts with the very first step. Pick one goal -- not 50 -- that will make you a better version of yourself and go do it. It may be learning how to make a good saffron chicken with brussels sprouts and bacon, or to quit biting your fingernails, or become more conversant in Veteran's issues in anticipation of Veteran's Day (my current goal). ​ When you do that, then pick another. And go do it. Now …
/r/MGTOW21/10/19 07:32 PM
1

A lot of men don't even try -- they just assume they're going to lose custody, pay attorney fees, and get hosed on child support. On average, I'd say around a third of my consultations start off like that. What they don't realize is these are some of, if not the top three, most litigated areas of family law. There's a case to support almost every position, it's just a matter of finding the case that matches your evidence, or gathering the evidence to match the case you want. For instance, I had …
/r/MGTOW31/08/19 06:47 PM
11

I do a lot of family court practice, and I'm always surprised at the frequency of "I had no idea this was coming." BAM open up the texts on her phone and she's sending nudes to some co-worker, BAM I caught her talking in whispers on the phone in the middle of the night to her secret lover, BAM I caught her grinding on some guy at the club when I followed her one night while she was "out with the girls." Passing the 30th floor? A lot of these men are at the 1st floor and still have no idea.
/r/MGTOW29/08/19 10:03 PM
3

Family court attorney, checking in. Theoretically, each parent is required to support their child financially. Since mothers end up with custody the majority of the time (and thus financially support the child without needing state intervention to ensure the obligation is fulfilled), the majority of fathers pay child support because the child primarily lives with the mother. This money is supposed to take the place of the time that the fathers would otherwise have, if they lived with the child f…
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 05:05 PM
2

I'm not particularly religious. I got my daily dose growing up in the Bible belt. But here's a thought about that passage in Ephesians. Three verses later, men are extolled to love their wives as Christ loved the Church and gave himself up for it, so that it would be sanctified. The end of the passage concludes with a command for the husband to love the wife, and the wife to respect the husband. It's a great social commentary, and excluding the submission aspect of it, it's really about love and…
/r/MGTOW01/08/19 03:24 PM
2

Best Response: **laughter** "goddamn, I guess women really ARE funny! who'd have thought?!"
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:37 PM
3

True. I'm on keto, 16-8 intermittent fasting. I'm down 19 pounds in a little over two months, sw240-cw221-gw199. Processed foods used to give me bad joint pains, trouble sleeping, headaches...now it's lean protein, tons of spinach and kale in giant salads, sugar-free jello with whipped cream, low-carb cheesecake...I'm eating like a king at 1600 calories a day. If you're GYOW, then get the fullest out of it, be healthy for your journey to maximize your life.
/r/MGTOW24/04/19 03:49 PM
3

I am on Keto right now with 16-8 intermittent fasting. In the last six weeks, I've lost 14 pounds. I found after about a week, you have to consciously eat more vegetables to make sure you're getting enough minerals and stuff. I eat at 12:30 and 7:30. At 12:30, I'll go protein-heavy, like a 7 oz porkchop, with a side salad and roasted vegetables (zucchini, asparagus, green peppers). For dinner, I'll throw in fiber (low-carb soft taco tortilla) with a little more protein (like a chicken wrap or so…
/r/MGTOW13/03/19 01:52 PM
3

Do a full breakdown of all of your necessary monthly expenses -- car payment, rent, renter's insurance, utilities, etc. Don't include luxury items like your cell phone, internet, DirectTV, that kind of stuff. Now add in your child support. If the total is more than your take home, go to your attorney and ask him to take a look at filing a motion for relief from the judgment under Rule 60 of your Rules of Civil Procedure in the state you live in, which allows relief for good cause, and other thin…
/r/MGTOW13/03/19 01:31 PM
9

I love this. I think the only way that humanity advances is by people leaving the world better than they found it. To me, being friendly -- or at the very least, not intentionally being a prick -- is a great way to do that.
/r/MGTOW11/03/19 08:03 PM
3

I take an "addiction" approach -- when it compromises your ability to live the rest of your life, it's a problem. When I've got a memo or brief due, on some deadline, but I'm stuck on Reddit looking up one more TRP post, yeah, that's when it crosses the line.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:59 PM
3

Whoever's downvoting this, come on, people are allowed to have fantasies.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:56 PM
2

Redpill is, at its heart, a sexual strategy -- an acceptance that in the world of romance and sex, women and men have biological tendencies that have to be acknowledged. In a professional setting, where everyone is acting professionally, this may not even apply. I've had women bosses, and women employees, and as long as everyone does their jobs and is civil to each other, everything is fine.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:55 PM
7

I always take this phrase to mean "redpill within the context of a committed relationship." Just because someone gets into a relationship doesn't mean their fundamental biology changes. Women like to know that they have a high-value man, and men like to know that their woman is loyal to them. ​ My belief is that most RP'ers who don't support marriage are actually against the consequences (and likelihood) of a marriage failing, and the total working-over men get in our family court system. Some a…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:53 PM
7

Mint Chocolate Chip
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:48 PM
6

I'm sure we don't think women are evil. Women have biological tendencies, like men do. When men ignore those tendencies, they deny reality, and end up getting hurt. When they accept those tendencies and act accordingly, the probabilities of a favorable outcome go up. As an example, one of the tenets of the red pill is "abundance mentality." That means that men are biologically predisposed to pursue multiple partners. Women are predisposed to believe that men do this anyway, and naturally a woman…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 05:19 PM
12

Center-left here. ​ I enjoy classical feminism -- the idea that women and men are legally equal (same legal rights, due process, autonomy over person, etc). Modern feminism tends to swing in the direction of "men and women are biologically equal" (anything you can do, I can do too). This is lopsided to me, and ignores basic biology. ​ Socialism, at its root, encourages laziness. Marx's main idea was that everyone would work as hard as they can, and only take what they need. This is an unrealisti…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 05:13 PM
6

Yes. I now consciously make my choices based on whether or not they will improve me, not me+1, not me+whoever. As a sexual strategy, the red pill is about understanding how biology and societal norms interact; those are two areas with definable rules and patterns, so there's very little unpredictability.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 05:06 PM
1

I agree 100%. My common view of an incel is one with some physical issues like acne, out of shape, lack of confidence, but with an attitude that reinforces those things. Let's change the attitude -- get some facial cream, hit the gym, talk to a few strangers (even if they're guys at first, to put YOURSELF OUT THERE). An incel isn't going to wake up one day and be a stud. And neither did any of us. We all make conscious efforts to improve ourselves. ​ Incels make conscious efforts to stay in thei…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 05:09 PM
2

To me, saying "AWALT" is commentary, and the more appropriate acronoym would be AWAPTBLT -- All Women Are Predisposed To Be Like That. Like /u/scarletlagomorph says, it can be overridden, but it's a recognition of fundamental biology. I'm genetically predisposed to be fat, but I can work out and eat well; without that discipline, I will be fat. AWALT is saying the same thing, metaphorically -- and when used in this sub, it usually serves as a reminder of the predictable behavior of undisciplined…
/r/MGTOW06/02/19 10:07 PM
6

I just tell people I "haven't met the right one yet." It's a white lie, sure, but it avoids 1. Their judgment and 2. A long, drawn out conversation about them trying to convert me back to their bluepilled bullshit.
/r/MGTOW28/01/19 08:59 PM
2

Well said.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 07:53 PM
4

https://imgur.com/gallery/r6H6eU7
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 03:54 PM
2

What do you need to know for the divorce? First, JAG won't be able to represent you. They can give you general info, but they are necessarily admitted in the State that you're in. ​ Second, here's my comment from a previous post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/aaaxfa/caught_your_wife_cheating_i_have_bad_news_for_you/ecqmimo ​ EDIT: Third, as a military member, check and see if your branch has any requirement that you "support your dependents." From my perspective, this means that you ha…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:58 PM
1

I'd say that was the original intent. But an underlying subtext can be gleaned, the implications of the message.
/r/MGTOW02/01/19 09:05 PM
27

Four Simple Steps. ​ Paperwork, paperwork, paperwork. Document everything; get a date calendar from Wal-Mart and fill in the times, dates, and quote everything she said. Use it like your journal. It makes writing affidavits much easier. Take pictures of the condition of the house. Get copies of your bank and debt statements for the last year. Get copies of the phone records (hers and yours -- texts and calls) for as far back as your phone provider will allow. Get a copy of your personnel file at…
/r/MGTOW28/12/18 04:47 PM
10

Dude, if you think that's bad, watch Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. I watched it before I swallowed the red pill, and I loved it, I absolutely loved it. Comic books! Video games! Hot chicks! ​ But the whole thing is a metaphor about how girls shit-test guys and compare them to their exes, and even after the guy has made his way through the hoops, she turns out to be some Alpha Widow. And even at the end of the film, when he's finally "done it for himself," there he goes, chasing after the girl. ​ …
/r/MGTOW01/12/18 12:18 AM
1

Dismissed for failure to show up for Court. Didn't prosecute. News of a settlement? I didn't see any. Same legal status as a denial of the claim, or even admitting that the claim didn't have merit. Doesn't counter the fact that Argento is a total piece of shit. Brings up a question as to whether this incident (if true) was somehow a byproduct of his own victimization.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:30 PM
5

Nice
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:31 PM
2

I love it. It kicks a lot, so it takes a firm wrist, but it's loud and accurate.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 08:44 PM
2

raises hand Beretta 92FS 2 Walther P22's SIG P938 (concealed carry) Remington 870 chambered in .410 (home defense)
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 06:37 PM
5

Disclaimer: I don't practice in your state. So don't take this as "legal advice" specific to your state, just as general advice. Most states have codified rights and duties which require non-cohabiting parents to inform each other of changes of address immediately after relocating. In states where the bland "best interests of the child" are used to decide custody, one factor is usually "the willingness and ability to foster the relationship between the child and the other parent." Not informing …
/r/MensRights24/06/18 10:50 PM
11

FYI, TMK Florida is a mother-preference state. Without an in-place court order, she can file for divorce, walk in with a cop, take the kids and leave. Also, obligatory: If a guy does this to a girl, it's domestic violence, resisting arrest, destruction of government property, and terroristic threatening. For Mrs. Glover, it's a misdemeanor assault charge, hubby posts bail, and the prosecutor dismisses the charge if she completes an anger management program.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:43 PM
13

Bill Burr does a bit about this, about how when the Titanic was going down, it was women and children first, and the men had to stay on board.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:32 PM
1

Many states have multiple types of protection orders, from garden-variety "harassment" restraining orders to "fear of imminent harm" domestic violence orders, to sexual assault restraining orders. Can you imagine having a sexual assault restraining order issued against you without a hearing, because a woman had second thoughts the morning after? It's ludicrous. And although there will eventually be a hearing, your life is totally fucked in the meantime, without a single shred of proof. And you b…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:27 PM
1

Rape: 10 years in prison and a shiv in your kidney. False Reports to Police: fine and unsupervised probation.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:00 PM
6

The "liberty" specially protected by the Due Process Clause includes the rights . . . to direct the education and upbringing of one's children. The Fourteenth Amendment "forbids the government to infringe ... 'fundamental' liberty interests of all, no matter what process is provided, unless the infringement is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest." - Washington v. Glucksburg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997) "The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right …
/r/MensRights16/04/18 05:19 PM
1

Some states have "child can decide." In others, the child's wishes are merely taken into account, along with some kind of determination if they actually understand what they're asking for. Also, I would say to avoid the rich vs. poor debate, my state only considers the ability to provide for basic necessities, and not necessarily favors rich people. As I've said elsewhere, get a day planner and document everything, and go out of your way to be an involved parent. You don't have to be pushy, but …
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:52 PM
1

It sounds like you might be talking about legal residency instead of custody. Even in 50-50 arrangements, there has to be some designation of residency for public school attendance and to generally receive mail. That might be what you're referring to. In my state, we have physical custody ("time"), legal custody ("decisionmaking rights"), and legal residency, which is kind of an offshoot of legal custody. Your particular question would fall under legal residency in my jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:47 PM
1

My problem with alimony isn't that it's awarded, it's that it's awarded so arbitrarily. A farmer's wife who dedicates her life to running the farm and doing the books while the husband is out working in the field does deserve something for her effort if, and only if, she does not enjoy the same access and freedom to those financial resources during her marriage. In my state, we have temporary alimony designed to help someone get back on their feet for their sacrificial role (economically) for th…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:44 PM
2

With smartphones, I'm noticing a trend of false allegations going away, and the judges in my state are starting to discount those kinds of allegations without some kind of proof. That being said, the custody factors still favor women in traditional roles, so it's not like the thumb wasn't already on the scale. I'll piggyback off my answer elsewhere that touched on this. Parents don't usually ask for true shared custody in my state, because of school attendance and the fact that I live and work i…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:41 PM
1

If you're laid off, fired for reasons other than misconduct, downsizing, the company goes out of business, those kinds of things. No call/no shows don't count, employee misconduct, aren't eligible.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:37 PM
1

In my jurisdiction, imprisonment is an option for contempt, which is defined as an intentional violation. Like I said before, to get to that stage in my state, things have to go very very wrong.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:36 PM
1

Civil forfeiture is really back-asswards if you ask me. Lots of states do it differently, which in my state means that the State has to prove probable cause that the assets were involved, and then it falls on the property owner to prove more likely than not that they weren't. The burden of proof is actually on the property owner to prove they WEREN'T involved. That's completely stupid in my opinion.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:35 PM
2

The failure to recuse doesn't necessarily mean a feminist bent. But if I could clarify, I would say that the basic function of the Court is to interpret the law and decide the facts and how the law will apply. The process doesn't start with the judge, it starts with the legislature. So if the State passes a law that says judges must award equal parenting time unless certain factors X, Y, and Z are shown, a judge would have to. Also in my state, there is no presumption of favor toward either pare…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:54 PM
1

Divorces fall under civil law in my state, so there are rules of procedure, supreme court appeals, the whole works. I'm assuming that since property can't be taken without due process, they have to have an opportunity to be heard. As for other states, I don't know.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:41 PM
3

In my state, you can record any non-confidential interaction as long as ONE of the parties knows that you're recording. So if it's you and anyone else in the conversation, you can record it.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:35 PM
3

That article inspired me to do this AMA. To Alex: you're probably eligible for a recalculation under a motion for relief from the Judgment, or a total review of the obligation because income levels have changed. Many attorneys do free consults, so you should find one and check and see if these are options for you. Also to Alex. Document everything, as I mentioned above. Judges hate deadbeat dads. But they hate lying moms more. They know that they're out there, and they're always looking to make …
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:34 PM
3

Courts enforce the law. So my starting point is with legislatures, and individual legislators. They have to get elected. They need women to get elected. Everyone likes to hear about deadbeat dads going to jail. But take these into account: If your income significantly changes through no fault of your own, you can request that the Court modify your obligation. In my state, a court will issue an order for a hearing, which is mailed to your mailing address on file, which parents are required to upd…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:22 PM
5

Document everything. Go to Wal-Mart, get a day planner with space for each day, and document every interaction you have with the other parent, and everything you do with the kid. Take pictures -- of your home, of you and the kid having fun doing normal activities. Keep the report cards. Go visit teachers. Get your witness list ready -- friends, employers who say you have a future at work, family members, health care professionals, your medical history. Never antagonize the other parent, especial…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:08 PM
4

I do want to remain anonymous, because our legal community in my area is very tight-knit, and many of them are redditors, and as you say, this is a business, so I want to limit my exposure. This is a state-by-state issue, and national numbers are practically meaningless. In our state, there is almost no custody mediation without court involvement to begin with. And it's true that a low percentage of cases go to trial. The real issue is how our laws are written by state legislatures to be passive…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:58 PM
7

Most of our judges are former prosecutors. It's been my experience that most judges who are former prosecutors err on the side of "believing the victim" without much proof -- "No, she didn't take pictures or go to the hospital, but I don't want to be seen as woman-hating," and that passively comes out. FWIW, in my state we have a specific provision saying there is no preference to mother or father, but the factors deciding child custody structurally weigh in the Mother's favor -- like the nurtur…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:39 PM
6

My view of the law, especially divorce law, is that it's reactionary. My state has a provision requiring the other side to pay your attorney's fees if there is a needless increase in your legal costs because of their harassing/litigious/unnecessary actions. However, it must be raised at trial, or in a separate post-judgment motion, at the end of the process. Also, as an interim process during the case, a party can request that assets be deposited with the Court to ensure that they are not dissip…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 06:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter