TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Regnes Archive

View 11 posts and 304 comments by Regnes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
284

Anti-MRMRegnes/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:01 AM
91

DiscriminationRegnes/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:36 PM
59

Regnes/r/MensRights02/05/16 08:02 PM
39

Legal RightsRegnes/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:22 AM
15

Regnes/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:54 AM
14

Regnes/r/MensRights05/02/17 04:52 AM
5

Social IssuesRegnes/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:36 AM
2

Regnes/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:01 AM
0

Regnes/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:23 AM
0

Regnes/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:51 AM
0

Regnes/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:08 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It's worth noting that sexual exploitation is the most severe charge possible in Canada for rape and has a max prison sentence of 14 years as opposed to 10 years for sexual assault. In case it sounds like they downgraded the charges.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:43 PM
2

Eh, she doesn't want his definition anymore because he blew on ice cream to cool it down, not because he's a man. Seems pretty inoffensive unless you've been blowing on some ice cream recently.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 11:01 PM
1

Personally I would accept the lead role and then just tank the production by being impossible to work with.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 09:27 PM
2

They banned me for posting about how during the most recent Canadian federal election, the CBC (state funded media) app was only showing political ads from the Liberals. CBC has always had a reputation of being biased, but that really crossed a line for me. What pisses me off with being banned was that I didn't even bring up any political issues, just that it's not a fair or justifiable use of taxpayer dollars.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 06:37 PM
1

Very little. I imagine once it's done and dusted, we are going to be seeing a lot of ads and other marketing focusing on the "true survivors" of domestic violence that still implies that generally only women are victims. Probably something absurd like a montage of women talking about experiences of horrific abuse with some random dude moping about his girlfriend calling him mean names thrown in for "equality" .
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:00 PM
1

It doesn't affect women, it affects people who jumped the gun and crucified Depp on a whim. They all look like fools now. Those people need to be set back.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 12:37 AM
3

I don't know anything about Malta's political system, but wouldn't it be insanely illegal to nullify votes for a formal candidate?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 12:20 AM
1

trueoffmychest has 1.3 million subscribers, about half as many as the original sub. When a knockoff subreddit has that many people, you just know the original is toxic.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 05:23 PM
21

Without citing anything in specific, I do feel like the MRA movement is starting to gain traction in the sense that we aren't as demonized as before. Men's rights issues are becoming mentionable and less people are automatically dismissing us as mysogynists just for speaking up. Wikipedia is still really problematic though as always with its disgustingly biased articles.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 08:28 PM
1

I feel like they brought the incel guy on the show just to create a straw man of sorts, he got way too much airtime. If somebody like that is on the show, why wouldn't they have a "kill all men" hardcore feminist to show just how toxic the conversation can get on both sides.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:17 AM
2

Options 1 and 2 mean the same thing as 3.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 07:33 AM
3

This is obviously satire. Bad satire at that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/05/20 06:33 AM
2

Holy shit I've seen this woman on dating sites. She's also extremely racist, hates blacks to death.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/05/20 06:23 AM
0

I don't think this is a gender issue so much as a legislative and infrastructure issue. Unfortunately when it comes to legal garnishment of wages, any institution handling money is typically bound by law to comply, at least in Canada. This creates a problem, third parties won't be willing to break the law, meanwhile on the other hand the government will be hesitant to just make exceptions without specific legislation to back it up because they could unintentionally set a precedent that can be ex…
/r/MensRights24/04/20 08:03 PM
4

No, all bodies should be disposed of by a neutral and authorized third party.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 06:52 AM
1

Destroying currency is a federal crime in itself though.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 05:26 PM
1

What bothers me here is the judge pretending she cares when she clearly doesn't. If she took it seriously she wouldn't be inserting dramatic pauses. She enjoys his misery.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 06:16 AM
2

Did they just stop writing the article halfway through?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 06:05 AM
2

Can you confirm business owners are actually receiving government subsidies based on their gender?
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:37 PM
1

Only a leftist would care, I suppose to some it's an indication that this business is a liberal safe space for all those political dinner conversations.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:35 PM
1

The way I see it, we actively shelter hateful people just because they're willing to parrot some of our causes. You don't usually have to do much digging on this sub to find somebody who just reeks of legit misogyny getting away with posting hate speech. I can understand how we are so easily tied to hate groups by casual observers.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 07:03 PM
0

To be fair, when I read that it is more directed at the sorts of people who only want to derail the conversation rather than be constructive. They have to put up with a lot of crap from our end unfortunately. That's always been the main reason MRAs are disregarded, because we shelter toxic people rather than cast them out just because they're willing to parrot some of our beliefs.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 07:58 PM
-1

To be fair, he is clueless, and lots of people are acknowledging that it is a weird thing lots of women do.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:48 PM
0

Depends on the country, we have full top freedom in Canada. It's lewd what she did, but not illegal.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:21 PM
2

Could be a promotional offer or something. Costco often retails things for way lower.
/r/MGTOW07/11/19 02:59 AM
1

I try to stay away from group activity in public for the time being. There are some hateful people in the movement I will never willingly affiliate myself with. Just being seen in the same building as them is bad enough.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:22 PM
6

He can sue her in civil court can't He?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 02:28 PM
18

It's about time these street gangs became more gender inclusive.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:04 PM
1

I think the intent is to be funny by taking jabs at Dads. I don't think it's offensive, but it's not really progress.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:21 AM
1

She thought it was a real statue and was going to take a stupid picture. Don't see what the issue is.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:11 AM
1

You mean his grandson right?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:06 AM
3

She makes a point that she doesn't intend to hold him accountable for supporting the kid. But what happens if she decides she needs a little help with the bills? He's still liable.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:01 PM
2

This is pretty standard here in Canada. Natives are eternal victims and a protected class. Justin Trudeau caused a huge controversy recently by saying Canada is actively engaging in genocide against natives, this information being based off an independent (and biased) investigative committee. Trudeau initially wouldn't use the term "genocide" which the committee uses, but was bullied by them and basically had to make a big speech to the people about how it actually was genocide, even though it's…
/r/PussyPass06/08/19 04:08 AM
1

I don't understand how the breakfast one relates to consent.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 08:00 AM
1

I think there's a lot of truth and hate at the same time in the movement. The most toxic thing about the community is the fact wars. The other side is just as guilty though. I hate how to participate in any discussion with the opposition, we're all expected to arm ourselves with all the latest points to make and how to derail what they're saying.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:57 AM
4

How is this not considered a pass? She still ruined his life and got away with it, she got away from the media too, they can't find her and they're not going to try.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/19 07:58 PM
12

She was a hooah!
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/19 01:43 AM
2

In reality if a guy attempted to have this conversation with a radical feminist, he wouldn't get a single point in because of the childish screaming being directed at him the moment it looks like he's about to disagree on anything.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:15 AM
7

Age is irrelevant. If she did participate in the murder, then she should die in prison, not as a free person.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 02:17 AM
2

I don't understand, if no party involved wants to anything to be done about anything, what is there to investigate?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 10:57 PM
3

It's legal where I live. As long as it's consensual it's not rape in any way. I think 16 is a good age of consent. She's an unprofessional moron, not a sex offender.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 10:53 PM
1

I don't have any nuts, does that mean I'm sterile?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:39 AM
-2

Kind of makes me sad when I think of all of this from the son's perspective. Even if he's not the kid's biological father, he raised him, he is still effectively the father. How would you feel if your own dad sued your mom for having to raise you?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:30 AM
1

Are you that daft? I'm talking about the bit about Connolly not caring about the two boys.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:05 AM
3

His name is Brett Connolly, he is from my town, and he's a really nice guy. I'm disgusted that you would just assume these horrible things about him.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:49 PM
1

That stood out to me too. That, and her appalling grammar are huge indicators that she's not very educated.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:00 PM
2

She shouldn't be obligated to continue the relationship or even explain why she doesn't want to continue. Though, she just completely misses the point. Ghosting somebody you've never met in person is one thing, doing it to somebody that has actually committed their time and money to you is just needlessly cruel and quite frankly is emotionally abusive. A quick and simple "I'm sorry, I'm not interested" text would have been appropriate. Bullet to the head, instead of the slow and agonizing altern…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:52 PM
5

I so wish there was a cop there to arrest him.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:14 PM
-7

In fairness, the described attire isn't lewd, so there shouldn't really be a need to cover up.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:11 PM
1

I think where we see a lot of contention is from the flat out denial of the wage gap. Yes, there is no such thing as the wage gap, but there IS a gender earning gap. I assume all regular posters here know how the stats get skewed and twisted to appear, and how it comes down to the individual choices of men and women that reflect on how much money is being earned. I think you should be going into the debate with the mentality that your opposition is not wrong, but just misunderstanding the proble…
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:52 PM
3

Both Canada and the United States have are led by people who are horribly unqualified for the position with little to no political experience. One left wing fanatic and one right wing fanatic, both just desperate to say or do something to get the news to talk about them again.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:14 PM
2

And now they make 78 cents for every man's dollar instead of 79.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:06 AM
4

The ADL is an untrustworthy source, given that there will be a human element to deciding what constitutes hate speech and what doesn't, it's going to be very biased.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:52 AM
1

Not really, not if the fear is true. In my lifetime, the only films I can recall Disney releasing with a non-white male villain (excluding films with non-human villains) are Alladin, Emperor's New Groove, Princess and the Frog, and Tangled. The first three of which being ok in their eyes because all the characters are the same race.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:59 PM
5

For me the last Oscars left a bad taste in my mouth. In 2016 we had this stupid boycott of the Oscars because apparently not enough black people are winning. In 2017 we had record nominations for blacks, just blew the other record right out of the water. Gee, what a coincidence... I never tuned in because I knew this one was bound to be just as political and preachy as the last. I've always known the Academy Awards was pretty fishy about who gets nominated and who doesn't, but I can't even prete…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:31 AM
1

Looks like the citation needs to be fixed somehow, might just get removed on a technicality rather than it's content.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:09 PM
2

To be fair, that DOES describe a lot of people here. The article isn't about the sub itself but the people who tend to congregate here. You never have to look far to find some jerk completely ignoring the thread topic to spew anti-women garbage. People who are righteous and try to keep the subreddit about men's issues I commend you, but there's no denying that a lot of awful people use this sub too.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 06:26 AM
8

No, being a member of KKK is near universally frowned upon, there's a ton of pressure to ditch it. SJWs have the support of a ridiculous number of sheeple who may not preach SJW values, but will either support those who do or stay silent, there's a lot of false reinforcement that their views are always correct.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 01:23 PM
1

Also suspended just three months prior for essentially being a boozer, sounds like a real class act this cop.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 04:21 AM
-1

Thread title is biased and completely goes against the story being told in the article. The OP is calling this a bad end to the date, the article is basically saying he attempted to rape her. Believe whichever side you will, but it's this kind of shit why this sub is so awful at times. People will push whatever kind of narrative they want, even if the source material barely supports if at all.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 08:00 AM
1

So what about it? He says he needs the money for that, but does he? How very convenient for him that we just have to take his word for it. How very fortunate for him that these "powerful people" haven't attacked him yet, they all must just be assuming he's going to name somebody else...
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:40 AM
1

I would believe him if he just released the names instead of making the whole thing into a huge publicity stunt. He's not doing this for justice, if he were, he wouldn't be waiting to be booked on a big tv show before making an announcement in this obvious attention grabbing scheme he's running. "I just need a little bit more courage, if you can just get me on the Tonight Show, maybe I can be brave enough to tell you another name. I just need more mon...courage."
/r/MensRights06/11/17 08:04 PM
1

A little conflicted, I know these are all just allegations, but too many people have come forward for me to just waive it off.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:35 PM
1

You made zero effort to explain how this relates to Men's Rights. Some of the examples cited involved men behaving poorly, but the points they're being used to support are gender neutral.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 07:24 PM
1

Yahoo Answers, great, this will give us a lot of insight into how the real world thinks.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 05:52 PM
8

A little off topic, but I think the Huffington Post has become well aware of it's reputation as a hateful left-hugging media outlet to many sects of people. I've been noticing more neutral articles as of late, I think they're trying to repair their image to a degree.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 05:41 PM
-5

He's still a creepy ass motherfucker. Cheated on his girlfriend with a girl 35 years his junior and was essentially his daughter, and then married her. Even if it's not legally as such, that's incest, he's a rapist. He sullied a sacred bond.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 12:07 AM
1

Doesn't seem like a sustainable business. That's a pretty massive chunk of potential customers she's throwing in the garbage. If she pays an hourly rate to her drivers, it will sink her because of all the downtime waiting for customers. If she pays commission, it will sink her because drivers won't want to work for her because of the low pay. If she opts to just have drivers on call all the time, it will sink her because at that point, you might as well just use Uber.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:13 PM
1

At the very least, the picture is a nice one of him, so readers aren't being left with an impression of guilt in his case, especially since the entire article is framed around him being innocent. Also, I'm not certain on the laws, but where I live it is illegal to expose a minor to the media for criminal offenses. She was only 18, in my province that is still a minor.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:48 PM
4

Honestly, I respect her more for being open about what feminism is, much more than I respect the people who expect us to believe the fallacy of it being about equality for men too. Not that I respect either all that well in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:41 PM
1

Hmmm I'm not seeing much of a double standard here. If a woman is wearing thin material and her nipples are poking out quite a bit or she's exhibiting a camel toe, I think it's an unspoken expectation that men are going to be checking out the goods. Most of the women behaved in a manner consistent to what I would expect of a man. The woman who did bring it up was clearly under the impression he was sporting an erection. Which is not the same thing as simply wearing revealing clothing.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:38 PM
4

I would normally just pass this off as extremely poor wording and a PR disaster, but this is a company I've repeatedly witnessed promoting women's health as a literal number one priority.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:24 PM
8

I'm not seeing any context for this posting. I just see this as being targeted at men who have chosen minimal involvement in their children's lives as opposed to those being forcefully kept from their kids. I know we don't like the term "Deadbeat Dad", but there are those who truly deserve the moniker.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:18 PM
1

Well, it has a lot to do with one of the primary purposes of the justice system. A lot of people simply think of the justice system as a means to punish those who have done wrong, but they consistently forget that the ultimate goal is to rehabilitate criminals to become functional members of society upon release. In this case, it appears mercy was shown, because the impact of her sentence would far exceed the appropriate punishment for her crimes, and unnecessarily hinder the rehabilitation proc…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:58 PM
3

Yeah, but it's the Patriarchy holding down those obese women. If old white men didn't have so much power, she should expect to live to at least 95.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:37 PM
7

I'll probably be in the minority here, but I'm not entirely sure this was an unjust sentence. The article frames the case as being somewhat inconclusive as to what actually happened. I'd have to see some additional information, but from this article alone, it doesn't seem like they could prove she intentionally harmed a child, only that he had head trauma consistent with abuse. That is certainly evidence against her, but clear cut proof, I just don't think so. This doesn't sound like an open and…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 05:21 PM
61

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children, this is ephebophilia, a sexual attraction to post-pubescent minors. Pedophilia is widely accepted by the scientific community as a legitimate mental illness, after all, it makes no evolutionary sense for us to have a drive for mates with no fertility and it's associated physical features. Ephebophilia is not actually a condition in itself, though there is often predatory behavior associated with it, it's not a disease of the mind. In…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:55 PM
23

I hate the registry to no end, even if they're only going bonkers because a woman was negatively affected, it's a bitter pill I'm willing to swallow if it means limiting the registry even more. You can't rehabilitate somebody if they're on trial for their crimes for their entire life.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:34 PM
1

I only saw one person referenced as being opposed to the film. So where are all the rest of the critics? Or was this article written to just to fire back at a single journalist?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:31 AM
2

I'm calling BS on this story. Either that or you've fabricated some parts to make it bigger. As for your observations, I think you're only seeing what you want to see, and you're going down a path of blind hatred. Maybe it's because I live in Canada, where we have a reputation for politeness, but I've never observed any trend of such rudeness. Yeah, there's a toxic system in place with modern day feminism, and it corrupts the values of countless women and men. There is a mechanism of propaganda …
/r/MensRights02/09/17 09:32 PM
6

I can believe the theatre didn't intentionally do anything wrong, but all the same, they should face the consequences. Some DVDs aren't going to fix the harm they've done. I believe we're developing a culture of celebrating the exclusion of men from events, and it's just not cool at all.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:37 AM
3

There are a lot of people on this sub that are every bit as bad as what radical feminists portray us as. A lot of what you just described, and a whole lot of misogyny. All too often I see rational posts being torn to shreds because somebody dared to sympathize with women on some issues.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:10 AM
1

I dunno, it's sad that the kids don't have good relationships with their fathers, but your observations don't shed any light on the circumstances behind the trend. I might be a bit biased, but people in the low income category often make very bad decisions, like carrying through with a pregnancy despite the father not wanting anything to do with it.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 09:06 AM
3

Saw the "Jake and Josie" post on this sub (https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6hqxwr/wait_a_second/), wasn't even new to me, and I've long since been aware of the absurdity of men being charged with rape even though both parties consented and were drunk. On impulse I did a quick google search because I like to know what both sides have to say about things, even if I've maybe heard their arguments before anyway. This one really made me smirk a bit though. It clearly asks the important q…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:44 AM
7

This sub isn't really all that much better. Sure, you don't get banned for dissenting. But there's a LOT of people here that are every bit as scummy as what the feminists portray us as. It doesn't matter how rational you are about it, the moment you even think of siding with women on an issue, there's some asshole just waiting to jump down your throat.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:16 AM
4

Not necessarily reflective of the current state of things. Feminism is socially acceptable and celebrated, it's all out in the open and it's everywhere. You know what we are? We're a support group, because partaking in men's rights activism will put you on the fast track to becoming a pariah. We have fewer places to go to discuss such things.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 10:11 AM
1

How many times is this going to be reposted here?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:27 AM
2

Practice your rebuttals, anticipate what sort of questions they will throw at you to derail your presentation and be ready to shut them down promptly and civilly. I abhor the whole notion that it's whoever debates the most effectively that wins the argument whether they're right or wrong, but that's the world we live in. You have the advantage since you know what's coming, they don't.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:15 AM
1

Don't care what they have to say about anything, even if they're siding with me. TYT is one of the trashiest most biased news sources out there. I've long since lost any notion of them being credible in the slightest. A crackhead's opinion is just as meaningful as theirs.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:02 AM
-1

They don't offer a lot of details about the case itself, but it is a tricky situation. The damage the conviction would do to her career far exceeds the punishment intended for such a crime. I don't think she should get off easy all the same, if she's going to avoid jail time, she needs other consequences to be weighted.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:27 AM
15

Not a believable story in the slightest.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:28 AM
1

I can't say when it happened, but at it's root it's purely about derailing the actual Men's Rights Movement. They portray themselves as the true equality supporters, and us as the crazy nutjobs who just can't get along with feminists even though they're fighting for our rights too. They de-legitimize us by making us the unreasonable ones, and the media laps it up. The reason for this propaganda is because people are starting to listen to men's rights activists, the radical feminists know their d…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:07 AM
0

To an extent, if your mother told you she was raped, would you shut her down and ask her to back it up? Would you assume she was lying if she couldn't? This is just a really complicated issue, and neither side really knows how to approach it properly, if that's possible at all. I understand what the "pro-believers" are getting at, due process is a double edged sword, it can harm people just as easily as it can protect them. The law is cold and unfeeling. This is a plea to our humanity, not our l…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 12:55 AM
16

I'm not going to even read that, because I know it's a bogus study. 91%? That's an even dumber claim than the whole 1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted study.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:07 AM
1

Since she's pregnant, she will have the option of keeping the baby with her for the first 18 months in a more cushy mother-baby unit. Justice at work...
/r/MensRights11/05/17 07:32 AM
12

I mean outside of her show. I've watched interviews with her. Her book is a good read.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:33 AM
2

I recently learned that my Mom wanted to have me circumcised as a baby because she thought it was just the normal thing to do. It was the doctor who stood up for me and refused to do it unless she were present to witness me suffer through it. She didn't do it. I was eventually circumcised when I was maybe 7 or 8. Though, I know it was probably the correct call. I had a lot of complications prior, I was at the doctor's just about every other week because of infections, sores, and other unpleasant…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 01:51 AM
31

Judge Judy is a very smart woman when you listen to her speak. She was also a family court judge before her show went on the air, she has seen it all, she knows what's up.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 01:40 AM
8

Yes it is. How is it not?
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:03 AM
1

I think they should be free to say whatever hateful things they want. I have faith in people, they can recognize what is hateful and discriminatory themselves without the government stepping in. Silencing the worst among us only protects them from the scrutiny they deserve.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:59 AM
7

We can be topless in public while in a lot of places it's illegal for a woman to do so. That's all I can think of really, and that's an inequality quickly going out the door anyway. Already legal in my province.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:47 AM
10

To be fair, even though they presumably didn't get all that much backlash over it, the kinds of people who would say something like that aren't the types who garner a whole lot of respect from those around them. Nobody but the absolute slime of society would think having a gun pulled on somebody is funny.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 07:40 AM
4

I'm surprised this isn't all over the news considering the backlash over United Airlines assaulting and dragging that doctor off the plane because they overbooked. PR nightmares like that typically result in the company being scrutinized under a microscope by the media for even more controversy. Even though it was not United Airlines themselves who detained this man, it is still entirely on them in this case. They're the ones who took the complaint from the crazy passenger and forwarded it to th…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 06:39 AM
0

One of the problems here is this post has a bias itself. This isn't an open and close case. Can even one person here claiming self defense tell me under which circumstances did the slashing/shooting occur? I'm not saying he's guilty, but from what we as the public know, it's entirely possible that she was the one acting in self defense. The police only give us limited information on ongoing investigations of serious crimes. There are almost certainly important details being left out here. The wo…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:05 AM
1

Hmmm, it's more just the whole "this is what you're supposed to think, please conform to my views" vibe I get from the notion. Even if they agree with the content, people don't like being nudged.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:32 AM
4

How many close friends will you have afterward? It's not very respectful to exploit your friendships to push your political beliefs. It's almost as awful as the Jehova Witnesses who think family time is a perfect opportunity to push their literature on non-Witness members.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:30 AM
1

Chill dude, that's not at all I was saying. Seriously, some of you people on this subreddit are so sensitive. Always quick to jump and take something entirely out of context.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:18 AM
2

Almost half of the men fighting in that battle signed up for it.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:03 PM
-3

I feel kind of sad for the kid at the same time. He had a father once, but not anymore because his dad didn't love him in the end. Serial killer origin story incoming.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:59 PM
1

Feminists didn't take over Cracked. What's happened is that Cracked's clickbait format has backfired on them, looking at the actual numbers, their viewership has shrunk to nearly half (56%) of what it was 2 years ago. I think they've realized that SJW crap like this garners more attention than other articles, so they've begun to focus more heavily on them. It makes sense in a way, Cracked is a website for young people on the internet, young people on the internet tend to lean far to the left.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:32 PM
2

Cracked has progressed into a far left shithole over the years. They don't even feature the same sort of content they did like 10 years ago when they were still funny and relevant. All this SJW crap emerged when the website went from being a comedy/light reading website to just clickbait shit everywhere.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:22 PM
2

That was so cringeworthy to watch.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:58 AM
-2

No, your friends and family are NOT a platform for spreading political ideology, even if it's correct. If the subject comes up, feel free to educate them, otherwise, stay out of it. You're disrespecting your relationships by doing this.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:15 PM
64

The two controversies are not similar at all. Also where is she being celebrated as a hero? Going from the article alone, it's anything but.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:08 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/ Just have to ask a mod for approval to post. The Men's Right sub can be pretty bad too though. You usually don't have to look too hard to find very thinly veiled misogyny and unwarranted attacks on feminism. I prefer to take the high road and show "the other side" some respect, even if they may not return the respect.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:53 PM
0

http://imgur.com/a/SkW52
/r/MensRights21/02/17 05:18 AM
3

I don't always agree with Whoopi Goldberg, but I respect the hell out of her. She speaks sensibly and from the heart and doesn't let any political bullshit get in the way. I always hate the strength inequality argument, it makes zero sense. If a scrawny 5'6 guy hit another guy who is a muscular 6'6 behemoth, he would get his ass handed to him and it would just be karma.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:19 AM
0

A flaccid penis is nothing like the size, shape, or firmness of a banana...
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:32 AM
54

This is the Men's Rights sub.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 09:29 AM
1

When you sign a waiver before any operation, it typically covers any foreseeable complications that somebody might sue over. So when something does go wrong and you try to take action, they can just pull out that form and say "well we did warn you". It's to cover the doctor's ass, because even the best doctors muck up sometimes.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 06:36 AM
1

If a doctor was sued, the waivers you sign would receive a hasty update.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 07:47 AM
1

It's like the joke about Hitler killing 6 million Jews and 3 clowns, except the punchline is reality in this case.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:32 AM
6

I always found it absurd that she was selected as the UN's ambassador for the whole cause. What does a girl who is in her (then) early 20s, from a first world country, born into a upper class family, never had a real job in her life; know about any of the struggles people face in the real world? I remember seeing this interview with her and Malala Yousafzai. It was just unbelievable seeing Emma using Malala's image to push her agendas. On one side we have a woman who took a freaking bullet for s…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:21 AM
13

It's one of the best South Park episodes ever. It really makes you step back and reflect on the society we live in, all without ham handing the issue. It's really funny, but eventually you have this horrible realization that it's all true.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:56 AM
2

That corrupt male politicians can get away with their misdoings. Like I said though, there would only appear to be a bias because we haven't seen enough corrupt female politicians to draw accurate conclusions.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:51 AM
4

Correct. One might only assume there's a male bias in that environment. Regrettably, the top tier politician's are still overwhelmingly male. Because of this, there is a very small sample size of female politicians to draw from compared to men, so statistics would be skewed most likely. Before anybody jumps down my throat, I'd also like to clarify that while I do want to see more women holding political power. I'm NOT for voting in women solely for the sake of evening things out.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:41 AM
2

The funny thing is that at heart, this sort of thinking is very progressive, very liberal, very left wing. Yet when it's inevitably contested, supporters are going to be labled as right wing nutjobs.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:33 AM
1

Both at fault in this case. She mislead him at first, but he should have known she wasn't 18. 12? Come on man.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 07:34 AM
13

I would so love for something like this to go viral and pushed by wage gap believers.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:36 PM
-9

I don't really see what the issue is. That was a pretty tame statement she made.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:56 AM
1

I think you misunderstood my post. I understand how the "wage gap" was manufactured, I've never bought into that propaganda.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 03:58 AM
2

Doesn't actually prove anything for either side. One individual company does not represent a worldwide trend. The wage gap was debunked by analyzing tons of data from a gargantuan sample size, not just relatively small isolated sources.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:55 AM
2

The OP is throwing a hissy fit because they're hosting their ladies night on Thursday instead of the weekend. She's expecting them to forego some of their profits for her sake. Further down she says it's a man's world because the other 6 days feature female strippers. The logic being served is via the comments that it makes much more business sense to hold ladies night on a night that would otherwise be less busy than a weekend night. And that's the only justification a business like that needs.…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:26 AM
1

Sort of, sort of not. Even as an MRA, I believe women are still the bigger victims of sexism. Though, at the same time, I think it's out of place to add that little bit to the definition.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:32 AM
3

I kind of just let it bounce off me, I believe the people who matter will recognize that petty comments like that did nothing to refute me. It's only the fools who say stuff like that.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:16 AM
1

I have come across this article a few times already as well across various platforms. Everytime it was extremely easy to shut down the feminist hysteria. https://legiscan.com/AR/text/HB1032/id/1485883/Arkansas-2017-HB1032-Chaptered.pdf Page 4, lines 11 & 12. Boom Suddenly everybody who made a show of it look like the biggest bunch of morons out there. EDIT: Speaking of morons, this isn't the article I was thinking it was. Same bill, but the articles I've encountered put the spin on it claiming i…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:04 AM
3

Though, still dumb of the OP. It's a strip club geared specifically towards entertaining men. Why on earth should they be obligated to sacrifice revenue by booking the big money making weekends for women only?
/r/MensRights05/02/17 04:55 AM
1

I disagree with that, the viewership is what brings in the money, but the performance is what brings in the viewers. People like winners, if you're a winner, people will watch you, if you aren't people won't watch you. Think of the Pittsburgh Penguins, they have one of the most disloyal fanbases in the entire NHL. They have gone bankrupt twice, and have been on the verge of it several times more over the course of their existance. They weren't performing well during the low income years, but add…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:07 AM
3

They didn't refute it in their tweet, they simply said that they themselves offered equal pay. They weren't speaking on behalf of the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 07:56 AM
1

Hmmm the article is very vague about whether her accusation had any merit to it or not. I mean, sure,showing the police the bestiality videos is incriminating for her. But it doesn't exactly refute the sexual assault claim, which the article is also vague on what the assault was. Hard for me to call it a false rape accusation. Though, I think the police will side against the one they know is guilty of a sex crime.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 09:34 AM
2

I think it's just unprofessional. This is a court of law, she's disrespecting the court by bringing obnoxiously loud political propaganda into the environment.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:53 AM
4

I don't want to be associated with him, ever.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:46 AM
1

I dunno, I think she may have been punished sufficiently. She did get jail time, about 2.5 months of it, 200 hours of community service, order to pay compensation, and the best of all, curfew. If the neighbours didn't know she's a crook, they will now. Curfews are enforced by the police, they will show up every single night at her residence to ensure she's where she's supposed to be. People tend to notice when the cops show up next door every single day. Also, I doubt there's going to be any pos…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:43 AM
5

I'm honestly more offended, and equally baffled by the message of the video. Ok, so we give women more money than men. But that money doesn't appear out of thin air like magic. No company is going to just allocate more funds to pay for employee wages, they're going to trim the wages of men. So basically the message of the video is women like to look pretty, and men should be the ones who pay for it, because fuck men right?
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:20 AM
2

I believe we're in the midst of a major shift in the political landscape of this world. We've become so over saturated with liberal propaganda that we've reached a breaking point. People are becoming numb to it. People are starting to take off their blinders and question the status-quo.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:21 AM
3

I think the bigger victory here is the fact that the "journalist" Sabrina Erdely is being held accountable for her actions. Rolling Stone will swat this off like a fly, the damages they have to pay out will have no consequence to them in the long run. Erdely will likely take a much bigger hit as an individual. It sends a big message to scummy journalists who think they can say whatever they want, their big money company can't protect them.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 03:09 PM
0

Because you're quoting it out of context. They should be happy that if they're going to be discriminated against, at least it doesn't cost them any money like it does for the men. What's outraging some feminists according to this article is the sexism behind why the parking stalls for women are larger. They're larger for insurance reasons because women are statistically more likely to cause accidents in parking lots. Men on the other hand are overall more likely to cause accidents on the road. Y…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:33 PM
1

It is discrimination, but women should be happy that the system has adapted for their benefit. Meanwhile men still pay more on their car insurance. As an exceptionally safe driver, I'm still expected to just bend over and take it.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 05:15 AM
1

It's funny how offensive the smell is to some people. It drives people nuts, but when I smell it, it just makes me want to smoke some myself if I haven't already recently. I remember before I was formally introduced to weed, it smelled like puke or something when burning. Now it's just like the best smell in the world.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:12 AM
1

In Canada there's no such thing as a statute of limitations. If you commit any crime, you can be held accountable at any point in your life.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:57 AM
-1

I don't know how that woman can look at herself in the mirror.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:41 AM
8

At least from her interview, I don't think she really understood the bleakness of it all in the end. I know it's an extreme comparison, but it's like visiting impoverished villages in Africa and thinking you know the first thing about how awful their lives really are. Because in the end you get to go back to your life of luxury while those starving kids continue to suffer.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:59 PM
1

That's called trolling. Believe it or not, some people quite enjoy posting absurd shit on Yahoo Answers for the lolz. Believe it or not, some people really enjoy doing that: http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1591052/Became/
/r/MensRights20/09/16 12:47 PM
2

That's not what the article says though, nor does it imply it in the slightest.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 06:21 AM
1

What does this have to do with Men's Rights? Did you just want to feel smug about yourself by posting the failures of somebody who could probably wipe the floor with you?
/r/MensRights16/09/16 06:19 AM
2

I'm sure it's been done, but I think pushing for legalization of female circumcision could be effective as an eye opener to the lunacy of it all. Put out ads calling for female genital mutilation to rustle people's jimmys, include a website name, people go to the website only to find it absolutely against mutilation of both genders.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 06:12 AM
2

Why are you posting this here if it's not addressed to people in Men's rights? I know if you post it on a feminist subreddit you will be banned/deleted in the blink of an eye, but still.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 06:07 AM
1

Any man that describes himself as a feminist is clearly pandering to the feminists. The whole fad is just propaganda in line with the recent notion going around that feminism covers both women and men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 07:48 AM
1

I had to tilt my head waaaay too far to read that.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 07:34 AM
1

Being 75 doesn't mean you should be excused for hitting somebody. Unless it's clear the person has early onset of dementia, to which I could grant some understanding.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 12:55 AM
1

I think the actual lost revenue is being misreported. This is Ghostbusters we're talking about. The Ghostbuster toyline in the 80s/90s was a massive money maker on par with Transformers. According to Mattel the new toy line is doing better than expected. I think it's very uncertain at this point if the movie has failed or will fail to turn a profit overall. Just being realistic here.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:45 AM
1

I'm a little confused, isn't a barber a haircutter trained for men specifically in the first place? Should men be getting upset that gynecologists only serve women?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:48 AM
2

It's sickening that the adoptive parents would actually dare try to appeal the decision. What kind of monsters would willingly try to keep a father away from his child all for their personal benefit?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:38 AM
2

I have an argument I'd like to counter, but I'll start off by saying I think a lot of MRAs, especially here, are every bit as bad as what we are portrayed as. There are people making issues out of non-issues, sourcing from tabloid newspapers like the Daily Mail, and just a whole lot of honest to god misogyny. All too often I see comments relentlessly and mindlessly bashing women for no good reason, even when it doesn't have anything to do with the topic. These are the kinds of people that ruin a…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:33 AM
11

Definitely sheds light on how indoctrinated people are that circumcision is somehow ok. On these sorts of shows, whenever somebody challenges a social norm with a totally valid and correct real life observation, they get applauded through the roof. What did he get? Two clappers who abruptly stopped when they realized nobody was going to clap along with them.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:56 PM
0

First off, you're sourcing a tabloid newspaper. Secondly, there is some merit in an anonymous survey. People have nothing to gain from lying in this case. Those that have been legitimately raped know they were raped and don't need to prove that to themselves. That being said, the Daily Mail is craptastic, it's hard to follow what sort of point they're trying to make lol.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:22 AM
1

I think that's insulting to the women who put themselves on the line in order to be respected as equals to men. There really hasn't been much activism in the topless movement, and it's already legal in a lot of places in the world. My province of British Columbia being one of them.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:23 AM
6

Did you expect anything else? Ever hear that quote, "be the change you want to see in the world?" Not saying there isn't a lot of hateful people over there in the first place, but hate begets hate, be the better person.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 10:49 AM
4

To be fair, while people should be viewing it as domestic abuse, nobody is supporting her. They're all portraying her as a psycho, even if in a comical light. Treating something as a joke isn't always the same thing as not taking it seriously. Humour in these situations makes people think. If a real life situation is a joke, ought it not be a reality?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:26 AM
1

I think it's important to note that that piece came from the Daily Mail. Checking sources, it does appear to be true, but the Daily Mail is the last place you want to go for credible information. A good rule of thumb, if it's on the Daily Mail, make sure it's on a reputable source as well. Citing the daily mail is akin to using the National Enquirer as a news source. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:13 AM
5

Facebook has always been a cesspit of crap like this. If I go through my friend feed, it's inevitable I'm going to find some BS "inspirational" piece about why women are objectively superior to men. That among many other things is why I'm not on Facebook a whole lot lol.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 08:03 AM
1

I have a difficult time placing us on the political spectrum to be honest. I like to think of myself as an alternative left wing liberal, the idea of men's rights isn't conservative in nature, it's new and it's controversial, and it needs a voice. However, if we generalize purely by right and left, it's the leftists that opposes us, so in a manner of speaking, we are right wing. It is usually those defined as right wingers that have our back more often than not. When I started becoming involved …
/r/MensRights28/08/16 07:55 AM
1

Same reason most guys who frequent nightclubs instinctively spread theirs arms for a pat down upon entering an establishment. It's institutionalized discrimination, we just expect it at this point. I don't think this will stick though, if society doesn't raise a stink over it, the owners are sure to see the light when profits go right down the drain. By 25, most people are going to be starting moving away from the party scene. They're turning away the most profitable age group. Not to mention a …
/r/MensRights28/08/16 07:41 AM
1

This really isn't a men's right issue anymore. I get people are invested in this media circus because of the domestic violence thing, but it's just not relevant anymore at this stage. Also why would you put in that part about her wanting to "forget" to donate it. Setting up a false narrative much? If you're going to do that, you're no better than the people you criticize, you've made yourself lesser. Now how long before people jump to the conclusion I'm pro-feminist because I believe in everybod…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 04:17 AM
5

"105 Year Old Man Comes out of the Closet, Requests Hunky Firefighers for Birthday Party"
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:39 AM
1

I'd sympathize with her, "you know nothing Joan Snow". That's a bit harsh. She'd overcome the adversity and be all the stronger for it. DAQUEENINDANORF! Plus you've got to give her a break, her Dad died giving birth to her.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:32 AM
1

No, you're definitely upset. Put down the thesaurus, have a bath and listen to some soothing music or something.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:13 AM
1

Not a troll, but I've definitely rustled your jimmies by the look of it lol.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 10:43 PM
1

It's the fucking daily mail lol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
/r/MensRights22/08/16 10:20 PM
1

Probably because they're deluded and actually think their movement is pure and good. I understand where they're coming from, but they just don't see the wrong they've done to others. The feminists who try to be rational anyway, there will always be the "kill-all-men radicals" tarnishing their image.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 06:56 AM
-1

This is the Daily Mail, a tabloid magazine. The National Enquirer is probably a more credible source of information.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:19 AM
6

Somebody's angry.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:27 AM
25

Whether you agree with how she obtained it or not, that money was legally hers when she donated it, doesn't change anything really. That's what a settlement is, one party agrees to give another party money on the basis of agreed conditions being met.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:29 AM
43

People will trash her regardless for "saving face", but whatever, good on her for donating it.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:22 AM
2

I'm a little shocked it's actually happening. I was sort of anticipating a bankruptcy strategy that involved them staying in business. I guess the Hulkster really did sue them into oblicion lol.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 05:18 AM
3

It's nice because they're often publishing stuff that passively or sometimes even heavily promotes feminist propaganda. Today they actually move to help debunk the myth that women are the primary victims of war.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:02 AM
0

Daily Mail, tabloid newspaper, nothing to see here folks. Seriously, can we stop using the Daily Mail as a legitimate news source already? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
/r/MensRights17/08/16 09:32 PM
3

There are a lot of stories about Hulk Hogan's conduct in the wrestling business that don't paint him in a good light either. Basically he's selfish and hates to lose and uses his star power to get his way. In the winter of his career it eventually led to one of the greatest moments in wrestling. At Summerslam 2005 he was supposed to lose to Shawn Michaels, but backed out and refused to do the match unless he won. What happens when one of the biggest names in wrestling refuses to lay down for a m…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:40 AM
0

Don't count all your chickens before they hatch. You know what made Ghostbusters so lucrative back in the day? It wasn't the movies, as well as they did financially. No, it was the toys. Ghostbuster toys were right up there with Transformers back in the 80s and early 90s. So just because the movie itself isn't going to be turning a profit, the toy sales may very well warrant a sequel. Just trying to be realistic here, people are getting a little too smug a little too early.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:09 AM
0

Stop assuming any comment that isn't focused entirely on bashing the person of discussion is mitigating fault. I never blamed Howard Stern you doughnut. She's at fault for saying what she said, but if Howard Stern intentionally put her on the spot, it's still a dick move regardless. Nothing is black and white, believe it or not you can have two guilty parties.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:04 AM
1

Gawker being as classless as always. They wouldn't be able to expand anyway as they're on the verge of folding due to their beyond shitty ethics.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:56 AM
0

Did Howard Stern know about there being a settlement between the two? If so, kind of a dick move to bring it up in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:26 AM
1

It's sickening that her lawyer is actually going to roll with "he was going to kill himself anyway" as a defense. I know people joke about lawyers having no morals, but really now.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:20 AM
2

This is really old news, but yeah, it's almost certainly fake. She probably felt like she had been slighted by men in the past over her weight, so she invents this bizarre over the top story to make her feel better about herself. IMO
/r/MensRights10/08/16 10:18 AM
1

It's funny because all too often nutcases denounce men for being straight white males, the unholy trinity of privilege. Going by that logic, straight white females would still score in 2 of those categories and are quite privileged. But no, I suppose it's only privilege if you're all three.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 10:52 AM
3

That's the reality of it though, you should know better than that. look what happens when men's rights are brought up anywhere else, people are uncomfortable with it, it's controversial. Bring up women's rights and you're just viewed as an average liberal looking out for basic human rights.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 10:44 AM
1

I was born to my parents at a fairly average age. I'm 13 years older than them, and my Dad is 9 years younger than their dad. I'll likely have my Dad for 22 years longer than they will have theirs. That's more time than it takes for a newborn baby to complete a college degree. So I think that is a big issue. Think of your grandparents and your parents. If you had a typical family, you would have noticed your parents increasingly becoming the ones supporting their parents instead of vice versa. T…
/r/MensRights09/08/16 10:16 AM
11

Ah the Daily Mail, Britain's finest tabloid newspaper. Britain's first surrogate father, interesting. There's no such thing as a surrogate father, he gave his sperm to a surrogate mother. He's just the father, plain and simple, nothing complicated about it lol. Also a side note, I feel bad for those boys. In the story they say the Dad faced accusations of being selfish for raising the sons without a mother. Nonsense I say, he's selfish for having them at such an old age. He will be in his 70s by…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:20 PM
2

God forbid anybody dress up as something purely on the basis of liking it. People should only be allowed to dress up as characters from financially successful movies.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 02:40 PM
1

This is also only taking into account women murdered by men by blunt force trauma, the actual number of women dying every year would be much much higher than just 4 million, making it even more ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 08:19 AM
2

You sent a shitty email to a company whose heads will never read or care about. Yup, you're a real activist, you changed the world. It's laughable that you actually think posting shit on the internet counts as real world activism. If you think a person's reddit posts reflect what they do in the real world, I think you need to leave your computer for a bit, go step outside for a while, you probably haven't done that for a while. Also did you really just look through my post history to find dirt o…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:52 PM
2

I agree with a lot of points, and most others I won't contend, but some points are just ludicrous. It kind of trails off topic after a while and starts listing off things an irrational feminist might think instead of listing actual privileges. It also has a lot of technical errors in the writing. "Woe be to the man"? 15: There's evidence of a gender bias in sentencing, but is there evidence of an attractiveness bias"? 20: How does workplace harassment correlate to workplace fatalities? 30: Accus…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:56 AM
3

How about no? If you're actively working to supersede somebody's intention to refuse consent, you're a sex offender.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:00 AM
7

They never said they hadn't heard of the story, in fact their response indicates the opposite. You're the one lying, not them. The moment you attach a false narrative to something is the moment your word becomes worthless, be the better man, if you have beef with somebody, you call them out on it, but don't think you can just invent grievances.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:37 AM
2

But when a bunch of Hasidic Jewish women get men banned from a public pool during select hours because their religion is still in the 18th century, that's A-OK. Women have every right to be upset over being barred from entering a public pool. Though, I sincerely hope none of these outraged women are ones who spoke in defence of the Hasidic hours at that pool in Brooklyn when the story was making it's rounds.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:01 AM
1

It's ridiculous because he even admits they've tried promoting more women up, but the women made the decision to not move up.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:02 AM
1

Yes, but the problem is that there is no solid trend established due to how small the sample size is. Can be a lot of fluctuations in small numbers like that. 100 or more would be more telling, 1000 would be even better, and so on.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 03:44 AM
1

So what exactly is your point then?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:20 PM
3

I understand their plight, but we shouldn't be going out of our way to accommodate religions that quite frankly treat their subjects like garbage. My favourite part is when the article compares women's only hours to wheelchair ramps. The ramps are so everybody can go to the pool, limiting who is allowed to access the facility is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 03:06 PM
1

I've heard differently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRjurRdep_Q
/r/MensRights25/06/16 03:46 AM
1

Skyfall kind of ruined it, but there was a pretty good fan theory that James Bond is a codename and not the agent's actual name. If they retcon Skyfall revealing James Bond is his real name, the character could be literally anybody. I'm guessing they're going to retcon option, especially since the next James Bond may very well be black.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:09 AM
12

http://66.media.tumblr.com/cea9db2929debbc50377d092aa7f633e/tumblr_inline_nanta49r4S1r2l115.png Can we just not?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 06:39 AM
0

Why does your break room have sexual assault posters? Doesn't that seem like kind of a weird thing to put in that sort of place?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 05:57 AM
0

I know you need money and all, but at least be thankful you don't have to stoop as low as to preach for some liberal crap marathon.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:59 AM
2

It's a joke, and it's at the expense of women. So I don't see what the problem is if she's chosen to poke fun at her own gender.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:19 PM
6

I hope she's identified and publicly shamed for what she's done.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:08 PM
1

Seems to be more about the Steelers than anything lol.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:39 AM
2

Almost everybody hates us and celebrates feminism.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:35 AM
2

I'm interested what Harvard's law students think of this. Sure the masses buy into this lunacy, but what of the people training for a career in law? They're being taught that one of the founding principals of the modern justice system is inherently wrong. These students being some of the brightest in the world, surely they call BS.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:30 AM
1

SNL hasn't been relevant since the early 90s lol.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:17 AM
1

Shows how much you actually know. China has gotten themselves into a serious problem that they should have seen coming decades ago. The one child policy was enacted to control and reduce their overpopulation. So what happens when a couple are allowed just one child? Well, in theory it should reduce your population in the long run since 2 coming together to make 1 isn't going to sustain the population. The drawback is that it will destabilize your economy while you wait for things to balance out.…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:30 AM
1

That's almost as shitty as the Westboro Baptists Church claiming the Sandy Hook Massacre was a punishment from God.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:08 AM
2

Not technically the same crime since she was cleared of the murder charges while her boyfriend was not. It still begs to ask the question, why was she cleared? I've tried researching it, but there's never any mention of a mitigating circumstance that could clear her. They just say the boyfriend admitted to abusing the children in the past, it paints him in a bad light, but it doesn't do anything to her picture.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 08:42 PM
2

I'm not going to watch Ghostbusters. It's nothing political, I just don't think it looks good at all. I guess if it tanks though, everybody is going to be blamed for not supporting this "milestone" moment in cinema. It doesn't help that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones make up half the main cast. McCarthy I just don't care for, Leslie Jones, whenever she's on anything in SNL, I have to change the channel.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 08:53 PM
9

So you think she should go to prison for what she did? Context is everything, she says the tape was only on the dog for a very brief moment, enough to snap the photo. They say the dog appears well cared for and doesn't exhibit signs of fear of it's owner. She did something stupid and mean to her dog for the sake of a funny picture, but it hardly warrants a prison sentence. Don't think she's getting away with what she did, people will remember what she did, and she will have to pay a hefty fine.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:05 AM
7

It's silly because this isn't some helpless woman being strangled. This is Mystique, she's consistently portrayed as a complete badass who could whoop just about anybody's ass.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:44 PM
3

Not entirely true, lawyer code of ethics do transcend the courtroom to a degree. If he's representing a client, he is acting in a professional capacity and wouldn't be exempt from scrutiny. Remember, many specialized lawyers will never set foot in a courthouse, but they still have rules they have to follow in how they conduct their practice.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:37 PM
12

I wonder, an experienced lawyer would recognize they're participating in a kangaroo court, wouldn't they? Couldn't that constitute misconduct? Believe it or not, Lawyers are held to a legal standard of ethics, and this is anything but ethical.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:21 AM
1

I don't think anybody wanted to see this movie in the first place, crap article is crap.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 09:18 AM
1

I find this deplorable, not because she's wasting all these men's money, but she's screwing with them so hardcore. She's toying with men's emotions and feelings for some stupid social experiment with zero purpose at all and doesn't shed light on anything other than what a massive bitch she is. How many of those men actually felt a connection with her? Each and every single one was feeling some heartache while she's filling her gullet with some other bloke she's going to screw over just as quick.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:16 AM
2

What I don't get in that article is how they're confused about how to investigate the case. You investigate it just like any other case, sexual assault is sexual assault, and discrimination is discrimination. They actually discriminate against her by assuming it's not the same. Gender is irrelevant. Also you're providing a narrative that is misleading. The article is actually quite unbiased, agreeing overall that men should have the right to file such complaints. And you know what, she IS a vict…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:59 AM
2

No it's not, a false accusation is when one knowingly accuses somebody of wrongdoing when they know there was no crime. Labeling somebody a false accuser is in fact an accusation in itself. So I ask you this, should you in turn be allowed to call her a false accuser when there is no proof of it? This is what bothers me about a lot of people here, people talk about due process and the concept of innocent until proven guilty and all it's virtues, but they're no better than the feminists they bash.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:58 PM
6

I think you're attaching a bit of a narrative that isn't present in the article linked. Police said there was no evidence of abuse, but that doesn't equate to a false claim exactly. It would be false claim if there was evidence that she caused that bruise herself, but alas, there is no evidence for either party.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 09:54 AM
12

I just don't understand alimony in cases like these. Yeah, she's not going to be living as glamourous since she's split with Depp. But she can live beyond an upper class lifestyle with the career she's got as a C list actor.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:27 AM
4

It is interesting, a big boom in feminism came from World War 2 as there came a sudden boom in feminism. It was a great moment for women and equality. Though, now when I think of that famous "We Can Do It" poster, it almost seems a little silly. Promoting women to enter the workforce as equals, but only out of need because all the men are off dying in the bloodiest conflict in history. "We can do anything men can do, except that, that's a job for men only."
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:50 AM
3

So the courts of Argentina ordered the boy to be returned home five and a half years ago and they still haven't done it yet? That's political imprisonment at this point, let the kid go home for Christ's sake.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 03:40 AM
3

James Rolfe made his career by being overly critical of things, and he does it well, he's the shit. Plus he's got a baby daughter, he's busy.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 01:28 AM
5

Justin Trudeau is a tool, I hope this keeps escalating for him. Maybe now he will wake up and realize it's 2016. For those who don't know, Mr. Trudeau is the one who made the now famous "Because it's 2015" statement when asked why he made half his cabinet comprised of women. Because legitimate concerns over assignments of which people run our freaking country should be dismissed with a cute little quotable.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 01:20 AM
64

I honestly hope this gets even more blown out of proportion. Trudeau needs a big wake up call. These are the kinds of people he's enabling.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:38 AM
1

I think there should be mandatory life sentences for people with a certain number of convictions. There's a point where you've got to admit some people can't be rehabilitated. At 102 convictions, I think she probably reached that point a long time ago.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 06:38 AM
2

A lot of things with her story just don't click or seem plausible. From waiting 37 years to tell her story, to Ted Bundy abducting and attacking her in a way he was not known to have killed people all the way to her ridiculous escape story, it just makes you raise an eyebrow. Her book shows her to be quite narcissistic , and even more mind boggling is the amount of time she spends plugging her weird sleep apnea invention. There's no evidence to support or disprove her claims as far as I'm aware,…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:24 AM
3

Well it's difficult to separate the two because feminists are always the ones dismantling the conversation when people want to talk about mens rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:55 AM
1

Well since we're talking simply about how the hypothetical women feel, your point isn't really relevant at all. We're talking about people who know they were raped, not people making stuff up for god knows what reasons. Due process does not apply here. If you were mugged, do you need to gather credible evidence in order to prove to yourself that you were mugged? No, you know what happened.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:43 AM
1

I guess, I just see women murdering their kids being a frequent discussion on this forum.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:38 AM
5

I dunno, don't they make more than men usually? It's a more lucrative business for them. Simple logic, they're worth more so they're paid more. Though, of course the delusional out there would accept that and still think female athletes should be paid as much as men lol.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:28 AM
1

Has she even seen combat?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:35 AM
7

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/anesthesiologist-trashes-sedated-patient-jury-orders-her-to-pay-500000/2015/06/23/cae05c00-18f3-11e5-ab92-c75ae6ab94b5_story.html Most of it's about her unprofessional conduct while the man was under. But the worst part is actually that she was caught on tape intentionally misdiagnosing him out of spite.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:27 AM
2

Did you contact the San Antonio police? Technically you should file the report with the city the missing person was last known to be. I would withhold information about the text message, it's still true if you say you can't reach him since it's been several days without any response. Also use a pay phone and phone his cell so there's no way of telling who is calling. Might get lucky and get an answer.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:13 AM
1

Just wait until all your peers are all indoctrinated in liberal PC bullshit, won't get this sort of support to take action.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:05 AM
1

How would that make anybody feel better about anything? Women who saw their legitimate rapist go free want to see their actual rapist go to jail, not just some dude. Is this the Red God we're talking about, demanding compensation?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:44 AM
2

I did a little extra research on it since the article didn't go into more detail about that. It's actually more along the lines of a resistance and endurance test. Working in a warehouse, what you can lift isn't the only thing that matters, what's more important is if you can keep doing a task over and over without running the risk of injuring yourself.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 04:52 AM
3

And then suddenly WCB claims within the company skyrocket as people hurt themselves lifting things they shouldn't be lifting. Strength tests of this nature have to be in excess of what you're actually going to be lifting. If you pass a strength test just barely being able to do what's required of you on the job, it's just a matter of time before you're going to hurt yourself. The strength tests aren't to discriminate against workers, they're to protect them.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 11:27 PM
2

Because the police are supposed to be better than us. She should absolutely be prosecuted for the false allegations. But as far as the legal gongshow these young men faced, it should never have happened, it should have ended before any charges were laid. When she went to the police. It was in their hands to steer the course of justice in the right direction, and they failed miserably.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 05:25 AM
35

The Detective should be responsible for the remainder of their legal bills. Whether through incompetence or malice, he did them wrong, and he needs to make them whole again.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 06:23 PM
1

Thankfully everybody else is calling it like it is. I'd love for that person to be charged with peeping since he/she is the one trying to get an arrest made in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 06:11 PM
21

The named administration staff in the lawsuit should be held criminally responsible. This constitutes gross negligence. The moment the school became fully aware, the police should have been called in.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 07:20 AM
1

Care to explain why this is relevant to mens rights?
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:11 AM
2

That women in a lot of other countries are treated brutally and deserve better.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:08 AM
-8

I have no respect for Thunderf00t. He was awesome 9 years ago when he started his Why People Laugh at Creationist series, but from there it quickly went downhill. He's no better than SJWs, his entire point of being is to stir up shit and incite needlessly personal hate rivalries with one person after another. I really wish feminists did get his ass fired, because he's not one of us, he's just a prick who deserves everything coming his way. IMO
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:28 AM
3

I remember that case quite well, was an absolute disgrace to the entire justice system. An inquiry found there was no evidence to support the arson theory. Of course, nobody was held accountable for the gross mishandling of the case. I feel just as awful for his wife, her children all died, her husband was declared their murderer and executed, and only after his death is it revealed he was innocent. It will take a lot of strength to move on from something like that.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:16 AM
9

Here's hoping she violates her terms again, then they really won't have much of a choice, they will throw the book at her...a light novel she can read during a two or three day prison sentence.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:05 AM
3

In my case at least, I'm at peace with what happened. Like I said, in my case it wasn't preventative medicine, I have it all on paper, I was suffering for nearly two years before I was put to the knife. I must have blocked the bad memories out, but the records don't lie. Sucks, but I could have lost more than my foreskin.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 05:01 AM
1

Buzzfeed lately has been going out of their way to piss off basically everybody. It's not surprising, you can't pander to the majority when you're shitting all over everybody in sight. Sadly they probably won't go belly up, but this probably will signal a big change in content. If people aren't using their garbage website, they will focus on different content.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 07:45 PM
2

There should be criminal endangerment charges as well. She's drawing police to his house under the pretense of a violent disturbance occurring. Police aren't stupid and recognize patterns with troublemakers like these well ahead of time. However, the first few times it would be certain that they're on high alert when arriving. Police in those situations are extremely dangerous.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 07:41 PM
12

I have no respect for any "host" that will frequently cut off their guest and not let them get even a complete sentence out most of the time. It's all a big ego trip, they don't give a rats ass what the guest thinks, they either want to hear the sound of their voice, or somebody vehemently agreeing with them. cough...Nancy Grace
/r/MensRights02/05/16 07:07 PM
3

I'm wondering, if he has clearly stated legal rights that are being denied, and he's served jail time as a consequence of those rights being denied, can't he open a major lawsuit?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:02 PM
5

One positive to be gleaned from this. The only one having their name dragged through the mud is the false accuser.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 08:05 AM
3

Is it really surprising, given that shithead Emma Watson is a good friend of his?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:53 AM
7

"An autopsy found the baby died from smoke inhalation and burns." You don't say...
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:51 PM
3

Obama too often sticks his nose where it doesn't belong. In 2012 he helped to create a racial divide in his country by disregarding the Not Guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman trial and speaking as if Trayvon Martin was the victim. His speech threw fuel onto the fire that was already raging out of control, not helping. You know who really hated the whole Trayvon Martin controversy? Dylann Roof AKA The guy who shot up the African American church in Charleston. He states it was what made him be…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:37 AM
8

You know, if he had a concussion, that's a major lawsuit that his family WILL win. By law, teachers are responsible for the safety and well being of the students in attendance. It's not mentioned in this article, but upon doing a bit of my own research, it appears there was a teacher present. That is gross negligence that this happened.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:16 AM
2

I secretly hope something like this comes close to passing. We need something as absurd as this to come to light for people to realize how far we've taken this madness lol.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:40 AM
1

I like how you had to specify he was Romanian. I think his race is what is making you uncomfortable more than anything.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:13 AM
1

I'm confused, was that pro or anti-male?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:42 AM
3

To be fair, the guy is being creepy. He's taken her picture and put it on the internet, both without permission.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:36 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82nzJ-V40X8 From The Man, Don Cherry himself. Funny thing is the video was uploaded by an obviously skewed male.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:43 PM
1

The big question is, what has she done in the past? This seems so absurd that a Spanish teacher would have this sort of form in the first place, I hardly think this is the first offence. There needs to be a harsh punishment for this sort of person. Not because of how political it is, but she's teaching kids age 12-13 to feel bad about themselves because of what they were born as. That can't go wrong can it, kids that age all have great self esteem, right?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:32 PM
2

It's interesting because there's so much discriminatory hiring that goes unchecked. We all see fast food joints everywhere with 100% immigrant minorities usually all of the same race. They all just think, "Hmmm" and go about their day. Nobody really does much to try and get to the bottom of the almost certainly discriminatory hiring practices.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:21 PM
1

I thought their greatest strength was blurting out skewed statistics.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 06:21 AM
5

Unrestricted religious freedom is a fallacy. If we can put our foot down and say no to some religious practices, we can say no to everything. Are honor killings protected under religious freedom? Same principle, just more extreme.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:25 PM
1

I suppose it all depends on what one's perception of justice is. There are an alarming many who believe justice is a democratic process. It's a madness that goes far beyond just feminism. It gets scary when real justice rears it's ugly head for them, shit really hits the fan. Remember Trayvon Martin?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:13 AM
1

I hate Thunderf00t though, because he always brings this sort of attention on himself and whines when surprise surprise, the opposing side singles him out. It's also almost always the same videos over and over. Like during his Anti-Islam phase he went into after his "Why Do People Laugh At Creationists" series started getting old. Every day another angry video, and the same points over and over, stopped following him after that.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:18 AM
3

It's amusing, when I clicked the link, an advertisement played before the video...about drunken rape awareness.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:39 PM
2

That's pretty much the way to go, it's just gross negligence. I very much doubt this person would have the contempt to let a child go to a home where she actually believed the child would be harmed. Not every guilty person has to be a psychopath.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:55 AM
1

I think it would be dangerous to compile such a list. At least as far as names go, because that's creating a registry for both the accused and the accuser. Kind of like the sex offender registry, no matter what the crime, I'm not cool with exposing people to outside justice.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:41 AM
5

This is a horrible story, horrible woman, but how is this a gender issue thus far? As far as the article goes, it seems like this is being taken very seriously by the police.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:36 AM
2

I find it very interesting that they didn't mention the father. From an earlier update on the child's death it was revealed the father had recently attempted to take custody of the child, his primary dispute being her acknowledged history of mental illness. The Judge obviously didn't side with the Dad, and now there's a dead kid in a swing.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:14 AM
1

Can we maybe just not turn this into a gender issue?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:07 AM
6

They're both pieces of shit, but we really don't have all the information in this case, so it's difficult to say if there's sexism involved. First, what was their criminal record prior to the charges in discussion? I wouldn't be surprised a man like that has any previous convictions, possibly even for related offences. On the flip side, it wouldn't surprise me if she had a record too, luck has a lot to do with it, can't be convicted if you don't get caught. Second, who was distributing the video…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:09 AM
1

This is a little shocking to me, I always assumed interrogations were all taped anyway.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:59 AM
1

United we stand, divided we fall. The PC era has split everybody up in their own little groups and pitted us all against each other.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:54 AM
2

And then there's this: http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-uncomfortable-truths-behind-mens-rights-movement/
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:43 AM
2

I honestly feel like throwing up after reading that. I'm at a loss for words how deplorable her actions were. She should be locked up in a institution for the rest of her life. You can't fix somebody who is that broken. I can't believe anybody would actually agree to defend her, this is a person who WILL hurt somebody again if you let her.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:20 AM
1

Problem is that there is probably a strong bias as I would tend to think more men than women frequent Urban Dictionary. Still, acceptance among ourselves is a start.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:13 AM
7

"Allegedly" How is it alleged exactly? She pulls out a weapon on camera and explicitly states "I'll stab you dog". That's open and close, no interpretation required.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:03 AM
1

I was sickened when Emma Watson interviewed Malala Yousafzai. She has her come out and say how women's rights are about gender equality and that supporting men's rights will bring about good changes for men too. My beef with this is that Emma Watson is a rich white girl with an over-privileged life even before her fame. Malala took a freaking bullet in the head for her cause, the world she grew up in is a world that desperately needs women's rights, her idea of women's rights are not the same as…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 01:19 AM
1

nothing noteworthy here, the media does this crap with every killer. They are always inventing causes for everything.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:01 AM
0

This is actually a whole different issue, though, has some ties to men indeed being much more likely to be shot than a woman. We live in a world with virtually zero police accountability. There have been much much worse police incidents caught on tape. In Vancouver there was a really awful video of a cop executing an unarmed and severely wounded man crawling on the ground. His hands weren't hidden, it was clear he was unarmed, and he was executed at point blank range after already having been sh…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:29 AM
1

So are they actually going to force the kid to live with his mother? Like seriously? That's not a CPS issue, that she murdered her children's father right in front of them?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 05:52 AM
1

Any charity is great, but seriously, have you ever seen a female charity promotion have a cap advertised? A really low cap for such a huge corporation too.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:32 AM
1

What's the Karma exactly? Did she lose her job? I don't get it.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 08:48 AM
1

You're right, it's not, but I've seen it being discussed a lot on Men's Rights, which is why it's being posted here. It's being labeled a men's rights issue when it's not.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:45 PM
-1

What is the world coming to when I can agree completely with Fox News on an issue?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:58 AM
1

Yet at the same time it's perfectly ok for a woman to make a false rape claim and take it public when she doesn't get her way and charges aren't laid. I forgot, the justice system is only supposed to benefit women.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter