TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Rolling Stone Magazine is predictably trying to downplay Depp vs Heard verdict. This is the type of argument I predicted would be used to warp the narrative against male survivors. The intent of the article is hateful in nature and should not be accepted.

Regnes

June 2, 2022
284 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/amber-heard-johnny-depp-verdict-metoo-trial-1361356/
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Rolling Stone Magazine is predictably trying to downplay Depp vs Heard verdict. This is the type of argument I predicted would be used to warp the narrative against male survivors. The intent of the article is hateful in nature and should not be accepted.
Author

Regnes

Upvotes 284
Comments 44
Date June 2, 2022 6:01 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/v323x0/rolling_stone_magazine_is_predictably_trying_to/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/rolling-stone-magazine-is-predictably-trying-to.1117602
https://theredarchive.com/post/1117602
Top posts by Regnes

Calgary social worker admits to police that she raped a child multiple times over several years, no charges laid until 24 years after her confession.

91 upvotes
September 12, 2023
/r/MensRights

I just found out my Mom wanted me circumcised as a newborn, was touched to find out a doctor protected me.

59 upvotes
May 2, 2016
/r/MensRights

Thinking back to my first major exposure of gross inequality in courtroom sentences. The Balloon Boy Hoax

39 upvotes
June 17, 2017
/r/MensRights

A mother in Bangladesh murdered her own son by hanging him and using his body as a counterweight to commit suicide.

15 upvotes
May 14, 2016
/r/MensRights

Found this on one of my city's most popular community Facebook groups. I was pleasantly surprised by the OP getting served with logic rather than blind leftist support typical of the group.

14 upvotes
February 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

Found this blatant strawman argument article while searching for opinion pieces on drunk consent.

5 upvotes
June 17, 2017
/r/MensRights

Cracked.com published a rare (partially)anti-feminist article. (#3 on the list)

2 upvotes
August 18, 2016
/r/MensRights

Interesting, one can't help but be skeptical that this woman is making a false rape allegation, but it's hard to sympathize with the accused since his name is Ted Bundy.

0 upvotes
May 17, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 84 points85 points86 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

They claim that victims of DV are upset because they identify themselves with Amber Heard. They should be identifying themselves with Johnny Depp, and then this case would be a win for them.

[–]NutsLikeMelons 58 points59 points60 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

1) Ask them which of Depp or Heard was on tape freely admitting to hitting the other.

2) Watch their heads explode.

3) Make a sandwich.

[–]Vanriel 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

On to the important question now, since I don't really want to give that abusivet vile woman anymore of my brain power.

What type of sandwich are we talking here?

[–]Auserna 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I vote for egg, lettuce, tomato, mustard and sliced pickle.

[–]muskypirate 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I pledge to make this sandwich

[–]andejoh 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That means you already did.

[–]Vanriel 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not really a fan of mustard, think I'd replace it with mayo or salad cream.

[–]Queeezy 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They excuse it by saying that she acted in self-defense. There is no winning with these people.

[–]Alarming_Draw 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

4) Use salt from their tears to flavour your popcorn.

[–]dcs577 31 points32 points33 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got my hair cut after the verdict yesterday. The woman cutting it was telling me how she followed the case closely because she herself was a victim of DV. She very much supported Depp and said she saw things in Heard that reminded her of her male abuser. I imagine there are other women like her.

[–]KDulius 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quite a number of DV orgs came out in support of Depp during the trial.

Notably right after Heards first meltdown in the witness box

[–]GivePuppiesBazookas 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They can't do it because EVERYTHING is about sex and gender to them. They don't care about "victims", they only care if the victim can be female.

[–]Pepperclue_55 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I identify with Johnny, I can see through her facade bc of years of narcissistic abuse at the hands of my mom. Yup, they are good at making you crazy and then blaming you and becoming the victim.

[–]Interesting-Eye-5464 51 points52 points53 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

“Men always win” what bs

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 21 points22 points23 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Depp didn't win in the British trial

[–]Alarming_Draw 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Britain and UK attitudes are always 10 years behind American ones. Right now, we are in the DEPTHS of the worst kind of man hating feminism you could imagine. Posters went up on public transport telling women to report men to the police if they "felt they stared at them without permission".

Now.

Do you think its any surprise nobody could win in such a feminised toxic environment? Things will change and sense will prevail again-and this verdict will help show Britain this insanity cannot last.

[–]fwoomer 33 points34 points35 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I only had to read a couple paragraphs to realize that EJ Dickson, obviously a woman who is part of the “believe all women and no credibility or evidence is necessary” movement, is either dishonest, a moron, or both.

[–]Maleficent-Life4799 36 points37 points38 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Jonny Depp admitted in court and took responsibility that he had issues with drink and drugs and occasionally overreacted when the pressures of domestic abuse got to him. (Victim)

Amber heard in court tried to excuse her behaviour and blame Jonny for her outbursts and minimize her actions and took no responsibility for her actions as not that bad and again blamed Jonny, and clearly lied regarding the payment to a domestic abuse charity. (Perpetrator)

And now the media is just focusing on Depp's behaviour and not heards behaviour, as a Male survivor of domestic abuse I'm finding it difficult to understand how anyone male or female who is a victim or as survivor of domestic abuse can't or won't see the clear evidence that she is the perpetrator of domestic abuse and is now gaslighting those who will listen to her.

[–]ThatGuyNicho 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The media is only interested in sensationalism and the Feminist line. They're not interested in truth or nuance. I just saw a news report which described the verdict as a win for Johnny - which it is - but also giving a lot of air-time to Amber's claims that this is a "set-back" for victims of abuse, as if that claim was accurate or even honest. It isn't. I don't doubt that both of them are victims in a way, both of them are perpetrators in a way, but the weight was that Johnny was less of a perpetrator and Amber was more. The verdict *is* actually a win for people who bring claims of abuse - *Johnny* bought a claim of abuse, and he won out! So how is this anything ***but*** a good thing for anyone who claims - and supports with evidence - victimisation?!

[–]Training-Celery3946 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To answer your last question it’s simple, because Johnny is a man and people don’t empathize with men smh.

[–]syedalired21 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I have followed the trial, seen it live, and I read the media coverage. Media coverage was terrible and extremely pro-Amber.

Glad JD won.

Now waiting for a bullshit article saying jury had 5 men so that's why JD won.

[–]hedic 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fortunately the jury is anonymous for the next year unless they come forward themselves.

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Interesting how the media is mostly pro-amber yet public opinion is mostly pro-Johnny.

Almost as if the media is controlled by radical feminists and says what it wants the public to think.

[–]PM_SHORT_STORY_IDEAS 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists tend to seek out roles that write these kind of publications. It's not any kind of conspiracy, but it's definitely not representative of the public, and it's not researched: just their opinions.

[–]IronJohnMRA 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

“This is basically the end of MeToo,” Dr. Jessica Taylor, a psychologist, forensic psychology Ph.D., and author of two books on misogyny and abuse, tells Rolling Stone. “It’s the death of the whole movement.”

Someone is going to have to find a real job now.

[–]Graveyard1919 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists who actually want equality like they claim should see this as a win for MeToo.

[–]Nylahjllh 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm confused. Feminists keep saying that Depp winning is the end of MeToo, doesn't this prove that feminists consider only women to be part of MeToo?

[–]disayle32 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is true to form for Rolling Stone. After all, they threw away all their credibility and trustworthiness when they published that bullshit "A Rape on Campus" story.

[–]Kuato2012 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This. Rolling Stone has had zero journalistic integrity for a while now. They've already outed themselves as a shit-tier tabloid rag, and now they're doubling down on it.

[–]JSutt771 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“This is basically the end of MeToo,” Dr. Jessica Taylor, a psychologist, forensic psychology Ph.D., and author of two books on misogyny and abuse, tells Rolling Stone. “It’s the death of the whole movement.”

If this is all it took to end it, then it wasn't all that great to begin with.

[–]Inevitable_Brain9852 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See I do understand why so many people are confused. I watched her direct and cross examination. And she put on an incredible act. Knowing what I know about the case/evidence I believed she was guilty. But some of the things she said resonated as someone who’s experienced abuse. All the things I had thought and felt I was hearing from her mouth. Then I remembered all the evidence and it reoccurred it was just an act.

But because of that I do understand why so many people believe her. Lack of understanding or seeing the rest of the evidence. As for the media they are just abusing everyone’s emotions.

[–]GivePuppiesBazookas 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shit genuinely blows my mind... there is literal audio of Amber admitting she is the one "making it physical", she literally utters that in a full sentence.

[–]npcomp42 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are correct in claiming that this is a setback for victims of domestic violence -- Heard STILL has not even been charged with assault.

[–]Alarming_Draw 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just to let everyone know, in Britain, the media is full of headlines saying "Depp verdict hurts all domestic abuse victims worldwide".

They just cant help themselves can they? They ignore the fact feminists SUPPORTED this liar, and she got CAUGHT lying, and feminists caught supporting lies, and instead jump to trying to blame men and crying about how it negatively affects THEM (even though its their own fault).

[–]andejoh 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's even weirder is that she perjured herself in the UK trial. That's beyond doubt.

[–]Svenskbtch 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. However, before seeing this, it actually took some effort to find articles openly defending Heard. Almost all at this stage defend Depp, although he is far from a saint himself. Many actually now mention male victims of abuse, although put in a sensationalist tone as if no one could imagine that being a problem. More among liberal and conservative outlets than progressive ones, but not starkly so. And caring about male victims of abuse is in fact a hyperprogressive issue in its nature.

I see this as the door opening a bit.

[–]jinladen040 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's always hard for those on the Left to tell the truth when it goes completely against their social narratives.

[–]steak-n-jake 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why in the hell is Rolling Stone magazine still even relevant? Ever since covering mattress girl story they have been ridiculous

[–]Halafax 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was the UVA hoax: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus The Rolling Stone shat the bed (the Heard maneuver) then rolled around in for as long as absolutely possible. They've learned nothing since then.

[–]hehimCA 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Screw Rolling Stone.

[–]IVIaskerade 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course they are. Rolling stone has consistently been on the wrong side of basically everything for years now.

[–]porkopolis 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately I’ve come across more than a few articles from mainstream sources that are downplaying the verdict. The gist of these articles is that they both were found guilty of defamation while downplaying the clear win for Depp. They’re really showing their agenda.

[–]dojoboy 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All they had to be was transparent and honest. Holding their own accountable for false accusations, deceitful behavior, etc. For every insensitive response by feminists regarding innocent males, especially those killed by female relatives/friends or by suicide, I don’t give a shit about any silenced women. Period. Have dignity. Be a humanist. We can all be supportive if treated fairly. Until then, it’s fighting fire with fire.

[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't link to these dipshits. Clicks are money, they are being misandrist for attention. Stop giving them attention.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter