TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RememberWind Archive

View 0 posts and 148 comments by RememberWind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Your body, your choice. Your choice, your responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:38 PM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:27 AM
5

It was pretty slow in the beginning, and A Voice For Men was really what kept it moving along. AVFM and Paul Elam make some good points, but they were trying to be as controversial as possible. People still like to misrepresent them as saying awful things while missing the nuanced points, but AVFM and Elam made it very easy to do that. At one point, Reddit actually featured men's rights as the subreddit of the month, which caused a very large influx of people. When people saw feminists pulling f…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:53 AM
1

I'm sorry, man.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:54 PM
2

Nacirema.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:58 AM
2

Many probably lost their jobs around 2008 as well.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 05:55 AM
1

The ones you speak of will all be retired very soon. Probably half, maybe the majority already are.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 05:53 AM
1

does the G word mean gay? It means "genderfuck". Also, I would be very interested to see a college "open house" with an acronym like this in a place with affirmative consent laws (many of which ONLY affect colleges), as the "bdsm" part of the acronym would clearly violate those laws.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:21 AM
9

Maybe the billboard was speaking to lesbians.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 08:13 PM
1

I prefer to ask what happens when a drunk adult's "rapist" happens to be underage. This puts people in an unwinnable situation that forces them to rethink the premise.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:03 AM
1

I have heard that bdsm enthusiasts condemn the behavior in the movie as abuse, but not rape before. I don't know the details of the book or the movie. I know that spoilers - there's a literal contract at the end of the movie, so I guess that's interesting. Either way, the amount of interest in the topic suggests that many women and many sex-positive feminists (also from talking to them) are interested in these situations, which violate affirmative consent laws, if not other tenets they believe a…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:53 PM
1

I'm not going to do it now, but it would be interesting to draw comparisons between sex and real contracts, because people always compare sex to a contract when discussing intoxication. It's strange how some say sex is a contract, but a real contract involving sex can never be enforced.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:46 PM
1

Say what now?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 02:31 PM
5

We live in crazy times. Affirmative consent laws, laws that shift the burden of proof to the accused, police chiefs publicly announcing that no false accusers will ever be charged, not to mention all the other special rules that no other crime has, and what was topping the box office at this time again? Oh right - Fifty Shades of Grey. she can withdraw consent at any time. It's funny how feminists forget this when they start trying to rationalize the kinky stuff they're into, considering it dire…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:58 PM
2

It won't be as big a deal as you think. Make sure you have your classmate with the same abbreviations on board with you.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:42 AM
4

For your feminine dental care!
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:38 AM
1

And when they get those jobs they will cry misogyny if others have a problem with their taking the place of a more competent/deserving person.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:30 AM
1

And what does the being forced to pay child support have to do with biology? It sounds like you should take your own advice.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:09 AM
1

And you're trying to what? Equalize outcomes instead of opportunities?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:04 PM
2

Whining because you just couldn't be bothered to slap a rubber on it is juvenile to the extreme max. Or the condom failed. Or a man is raped...
/r/MensRights08/03/15 01:06 AM
78

It also does not make one a hypocrite if they don't want to be involved with someone who works in porn other sex work. There are many people who are glad police officers exist but would not want to be in a relationship with one.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:33 PM
2

I swear this shit makes me want to boycott Google. They're showing the "leanintogether" hashtag right under the goddamn search bar.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:40 AM
8

I think women don't care that much about finding the biggest, but they would never accept anything less than average. Hell, they used to think 6 inches was average, so really they don't even accept average.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:55 AM
0

Ok...? So because I disagree with you, you're trying to make it look like I'm un-accepting of women. "Unlike feminism"
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:17 AM
2

She mentioned she's a woman because she wanted us to know that there are women out there who get what we're talking about. Why would we think otherwise? Because we are misogynists?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:29 AM
2

If integrity and stupidity are on the same spectrum.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:41 PM
2

I would close women prisons, since women never commit crime, except when the do and that does not count This one is not as far-fetched as you would like to believe.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:21 PM
-5

Then why did she feel the need to tell us that she's a woman?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:14 PM
3

True, but sad. Should we really give into it?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:14 PM
0

This is kind of like that thing that happens sometimes when a cute girl shows up and makes a bad point or does something that's actually not the way we would want to be represented, but she gets a million upvotes and comments and all this support. Or like that post about the women-only coffee farm. There's still this streak of gynocentrism, women-are-wonderful, white knight, whatever the fuck you want to call it. I call it bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 05:25 AM
11

And they should all wear blue ribbons.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:49 PM
3

So if a man has sex with an underage girl, he has not done anything wrong and is in fact a victim himself, as long as he can't remember it because he was drunk? BTW: How do you prove someone can't remember something?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:41 PM
6

It is not a crime to drink, but it is a crime for a rapist to target someone who is no longer capable of consenting to sex though drink. Unless that rapist is underage, then somehow the victim magically transforms into the criminal, the only situation that works that way for some reason. The contradiction smacks of starting from a bad premise.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:46 PM
6

Yes Means Yes.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 10:48 PM
1

Every authority recommends that men eat more than women. Who's going to protect us against that? What was it Obama was saying about women having to spend more on clothes?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 11:54 PM
1

only initiate with people they trusted not to turn them in. Victim-blaming.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:09 AM
-1

In hearing good points from either side of the argument. Oh you mean chaos? You like the sound of chaos? You like the thought of men being mobbed, kidnapped, tortured and beaten to death due to pedohysteria when they have not been proven guilty? That's basically the same as what you have done. But no, I guess we should just believe you, even though you wouldn't expect us to believe the mob that kills men over false accusations.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:48 PM
1

She did get away with it. All she got was a slap instead of a record, and having to actually face what she did and who she is. Now she will never go through those things because you will make sure that the police are never involved, as that would lead to you being arrested and likely convicted as well.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:45 PM
1

The police would be one possibility. Even if you believe that men have no recourse, in this case you still could have made something happen because you are a witness and you are a woman.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:47 AM
-1

I just want you to know it makes me sick the way you claim that you know what you did was wrong but then you gladly accept praise and make jokes about being a vigilante for hire. If you work in any capacity with a "gun on your hip" then I am doubly disturbed.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:28 AM
1

Abortion laws could technically be considered a law that adversely affects women Yes, but the obvious implication was that I'm asking you about laws and policies that actually have the potential to affect both men and women. does not necessarily mean institutionally So you do not think that men are institutionally disadvantaged. Then you should tell me exactly what you mean by institutionally. men are the ones that made the draft rules And women are the ones with the most voting power. Feminists…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:29 AM
1

consequences There are other ways to create consequences. Violence is for defending yourself and others.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:22 AM
0

be happy that she didn't get to assault a guy with zero consequence You could have created consequences for her in other ways.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:20 AM
-1

if there were no repercussions She could have easily created repercussions through means other than violence.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:13 AM
1

I would you imagine that you would click on your own username, then click the word "submitted", find the submission and click the word "flair" underneath it.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:21 AM
2

Do you really think I'm dumb enough to make any absolute statements such as "only men are disadvantaged" or "feminists think only women are disadvantaged" etc.? "Oppression" may be hard to define when you're speaking about developed, first world nations, but if anything, being sent to die in a war against your will is "oppression". If I had to make a guess, I would say that in the US and in many (most?) first world nations, men "have it worse" than women. There are certainly feminists who believ…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:17 AM
1

Then perhaps you should put a "reverse gender" tag on it instead of "story".
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:06 AM
0

I'm not being sarcastic. She admits that it was not in self defense and not in defense of her friend - only revenge. So, you explain to me how this could possibly be "right", and why you want this type of behavior to be representative of this movement.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:01 AM
6

"If you believe in equality then you're a feminist" "Oh, I guess I'm a feminist then" "NO YOU'RE NOT PATRIARCHY PATRIARCHY PATRIARCHY!" "Yeah, I guess I'm not."
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:09 PM
-18

it was a bit of vigilante justice Yes, it was, and I don't approve and I certainly am not going to celebrate your actions on behalf of the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:03 PM
-15

From your description, it seems you slapped her when she was no longer a threat.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:51 PM
1

This is such an insanely important issue, and no one gives a shit.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:15 PM
2

Meanwhile, the males just get swatted.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:05 PM
5

being in a minority position. I'm not even sure that's true, or if it is true maybe it's not as big a difference as we think. It's possible that for whatever reason, "right" leaning people tend to call out "left" leaning people more often than the reverse. That would create the impression that there are a lot more of the former than the latter. Just a guess, but it wouldn't really be fair of me make that assumption.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:00 AM
1

That article has today's date on it.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:45 AM
7

Their goalposts move more than a robot on a comet.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:27 PM
3

She seems to be confusing her body with the bodies of other women.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:29 AM
3

Actually the article says that they plan the charge her later this week. Unless you have a source saying that she was charged today or something.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:30 AM
1

So first he uses an incredibly flawed survey to paint the men's rights sub in a bad light, which he later acknowledged was complete bullshit, and now he claims this girl was bullied on ask.fm when other sources say there is no evidence of that, and that it's more likely that she sent all the messages to herself.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:40 AM
6

When did he do this? EDIT: Nevermind, I got it: http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/11/anonymous-trolls-are-destroying-online-games-heres-how-to-stop-them/
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:28 AM
1

http://gothamist.com/2014/11/12/all_charges_dropped_against_8-ball.php
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:25 AM
1

http://gothamist.com/2014/11/12/all_charges_dropped_against_8-ball.php
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:21 AM
1

Yes, I'm sure that's what you were getting at. No wonder you suck at training people. "Confidant" is not the word you should have used.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:18 AM
1

Right.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:14 AM
3

Fuck yeah.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:13 AM
2

Do you live in a major city?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:09 AM
27

No, you don't understand, when it's just discrimination against men, it's not actually segregation, because the women can still go to whatever class they want, only men are being limited. At least that's what reddit told me: http://www.np.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/2ly83y/eli5why_are_men_and_women_segregated_in_chess/?sort=confidence
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:53 PM
1

Wouldn't that require everyone not press charges or agree to some settlement of sorts? It would only require the prosecuting office to drop charges.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:35 AM
3

Thought crime.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:12 AM
2

Ask her to name one law or policy that affects women adversely compared to men. Then ask her to do the same for men.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:38 AM
2

I don't know. If I had to guess I would say it's because they prioritize this kind of research for women over men. One could always argue that this is because HPV affects women more adversely. The vaccine for females was developed much earlier than the one for men, which is not that surprising. But what is a little more surprising is that, at first, the vaccine for women had a pretty strict age range/limit too (early 20s), but then further research decided to go back on that, and then say that i…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:38 PM
1

Charges can be dropped before a court date.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:34 PM
1

Charges can be dropped before a court date.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:33 PM
1

Using anything other than your fists is a mitigating factor. Mitigating for her or mitigating for him? I think you might be using the word mitigate incorrectly.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:33 PM
1

Which one are you saying was charged with aggravated assault? Aggravated doesn't mean that the person who did the assaulting was provoked or aggravated. It means there are aggravating circumstances. It means that the assault is considered worse and the person doing the assaulting is considered worse. Aggravating circumstances increase their guilt.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:29 PM
2

Right, but it's possible to get charges dropped before a court date. They could easily do that in this case as everyone already knows about this video. But they have not done that. If they have not done it by now, then they will go to court. At some point during court, they are going to argue that it is not self defense. Then they are going to say what I said they were going to say.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:24 PM
1

It always has been. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq7M-HfQxec http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJSgxuoP_88 http://tune.pk/video/4351068/when-a-girl-grabs-a-guys-ass-and-denies-it-prank
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:21 PM
2

Charges can be dropped before a court date.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:35 AM
3

I hope so, but it's bullshit that he goes to court anyway. Charges get dropped all the time, how is a video like this not a good enough reason to drop the charges?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:12 AM
2

So, 30 seconds then...or...?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:53 AM
0

Jesus fucking christ. That's what I've said from the very beginning. I think it's reasonable to still consider her a threat. Not that much time had passed since she hit him, and it's not like he had to chase after her to slap her. You haven't added anything to the conversation. Ok, so 2 seconds is an acceptable time frame. At exactly what amount of time is it no longer acceptable? So no, they will not probably say that he waited too long. Then why has he been charged with assault? You don't thin…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:47 AM
1

There's not even a test for HPV for men as far as I know. Sometimes they test for it in the anal region, but that's it.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:11 AM
1

Most men and women — about 80 percent of sexually active people — are infected with HPV at some point in their lives, but most people never know they have the virus. http://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases_conditions/hic_Genital_Warts/hic_Understanding_HPV It should also be said that condoms do a very, very poor job of preventing the spread of HPV.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:10 AM
1

Can men get the vaccine? Yes, but not if they are over 26.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:04 AM
1

But she also said I did one simple @ reply to one of the main victims several weeks back, What does she mean by this? Who is this victim and why does she see them as a victim? Is she seeing a "victim" being attacked for being unethical or for attacking their fans and playerbase without cause? Does she interpret that as misogyny? Then she is exactly the problem. “Exist and represent yourself the way you want to exist as a woman who loves games, not as a reflection of what other people think or wa…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:51 AM
1

Yes, that's what I said. I'm just saying that things like this are never easy - how much time is too much time before she is no longer considered a threat? 4 seconds, 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 30 seconds?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:25 AM
1

Thanks for sharing...?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:24 AM
1

They will probably say that he waited too long before retaliating. That's a tough call to make, but I think it's reasonable to still consider her a threat. Not that much time had passed since she hit him, and it's not like he had to chase after her to slap her.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:21 AM
5

I can get my wife off without ever having touched her clitoris. The Clit is not required for orgasm. I'm starting to wonder if many of the women who have "vaginal" orgasms are actually having clitoral orgasms, now that they have released a new model of the clitoris, that shows that the internal part of it is much bigger than we thought, and it wraps around the vagina. There is always a chance that the clitoris is being indirectly stimulated through vaginal intercourse and other methods too. Or m…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:09 AM
5

There are different types of female circumcision, and some are much less invasive and even more minor than male circumcision. The point is, even if it just a pin prick, it is banned by the UN. If, there were a type a female circumcision in which the clitoral hood was removed, that would also be banned by the UN. That is the closest we can come to comparing to analogous procedures, because the clitoral hood is the closest thing to foreskin that a woman has. So now that we are comparing exactly th…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:07 AM
6

I'm an MD who stopped by here You're not going to tell us anything we haven't heard before.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:57 AM
1

Why did the goal change from 2500 to 5000? Earlier today, it only needed 50 more signatures and now it needs an additional 2500...?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:51 AM
14

"she made it harder for women who report legitimate sexual assault". I never liked it when people say this. That's like saying if I spray paint "child molester" on some random person's car and then two other people come along and beat the shit out of them, that those two other people are completely innocent of any wrongdoing. If the police and legal officials are letting false accusers taint their approach to investigating rape cases, then the police and legal officials share at least some of th…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:48 AM
19

Go to the innocence project and you'll probably notice a pattern of what men are being exonerated for...decades after the fact.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:46 AM
2

People do a lot of fucked up shit in the name of religion. I'm sure you don't "believe that it should be okay" all the time.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:40 AM
20

It does fit the feminist definition of harassment pretty well, though.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:46 AM
4

That's why it should be legal for me to slice off my newborn baby daughter's clitoral hood. I just think her pussy would look sexier that way. Would you like to sign my petition to make that happen?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:31 AM
4

You should have told them that her clitoral hood was going to be sliced off.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:18 AM
1

The fuck?!
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:55 PM
3

It is more dangerous to be a man on the street.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:53 PM
2

Man I wish we could just get over nudity.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:53 AM
2

Pussy pass is almost like double alliteration.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:28 AM
4

This has been happening since the economy supposedly bounced back. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-03/jobs-breakdown-age-and-gender-or-no-country-prime-aged-male-workers Everyone was so happy and excited, and all they talked about were the new jobs. No one mentioned that ,as a group, men actually lost jobs.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:10 AM
5

Yup. The same way that feminists bitch about there being so many male CEOs etc, but ignore the fact that those guys are all over 60, and if sexism is a factor then it is a product of the past, not the present.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:01 PM
1

In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Canadian Domestic Violence is pretty much a 50/50 split
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:42 AM
3

Can you link to a specific comment, please?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:38 AM
1

I was discussing Master's degrees and higher education, because the chart is about Master's degrees. But yes, once the economy crashed it was apparent that nursing was one of the few occupations that was actually "making it", and it is, of course, overwhelmingly dominated by women.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:48 AM
3

And then they can't do anything with those degrees except work in higher education, which they don't mind at all because college is quickly becoming a place almost exclusively for women.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:23 AM
3

http://www.np.reddit.com/user/everythingisrape
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:18 AM
1

It's always about the argument, not the individual making the argument.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:08 AM
2

Censorship.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:49 PM
5

We have to diagnose them as crazy. What else are we going to to, put them in prison? They're not men, ffs.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:45 PM
2

That's completely irrelevant. I would not approve of it, but I would not be okay with them being arrested for it either.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:27 AM
1

The only "precept" you will find here is that double standards are wrong. BTW We all acknowledge that you had sex with your teacher. You're welcome, /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:25 AM
2

10 hours walking video, Anita Sarkeesian, gamergate - yes.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:54 AM
2

Don't we already have laws about harassment? Does no one understand what harassment is? It's a continuous, repeated thing. It's not someone saying one thing to you, and maybe one more before they realize that you're going to keep walking away from them and ignoring them. Would this woman actually try to argue that the men in that 10 hours video (with the exception of a couple) had the goal of "intimidating"?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:42 PM
6

They still have hardly any feminists. Feminists don't like debates.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:34 PM
1

I can ALMOST understand people who just "want a dangerous criminal off the street", but when you start torturing and mutilating people, maybe it's time to wrestle with your own demons.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:29 PM
2

Aside from the obvious reasons, one reason he was really stupid would be: who is going to protect her now?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:26 PM
10

Do you think that the judge already knew the charges were going to be dropped when she laid into you like that? Which would mean that not only did she have no way of knowing if you were guilty or not, but she had even less reason to suspect it and wanted to deride you like that anyway?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:18 PM
5

I've seen women on 2X arguing that even men who are not addressing them directly should be arrested for saying anything they don't like, such as saying "she's a bitch" to a third party. Could you imagine that? I'm walking down the road and I overhear a black guy on the other side of the street say "he's a honky" and I can have him arrested, convicted, locked up for that? Fucking madness.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:03 PM
2

this subreddit is scaring the shit out of men...have some responsibility for the mental and emotional health of the men who come to you, seeking your help? cough feminism cough
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:51 PM
1

every taxi driver I've ever had was male That's because taxi driver is a dangerous job that doesn't pay in a way that reflects the danger.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 06:02 PM
5

OOOOOOOHHHHHH so that's why feminists say that men are privileged. We have the privilege of being disposable for women...well I guess they were right all along.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:58 PM
1

Yes, but as you said, it's not ironclad. "I choose (x) as our safe word, and I promise to use it if I feel unsafe or want you to stop what we're doing." In that case, shouldn't people do that anyway, but just with the word "no", instead of a safeword? And doesn't that just highlight the problem, that she doesn't have to actually say "no" to stop consenting? Why would anyone care about what was agreed upon beforehand, as past consent doesn't obligate anyone to do anything, and it certainly doesn'…
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:46 AM
0

Yeah. As others have pointed out, it's already ridiculous to imagine someone having "vanilla" sex and trying to ensure that consent is ongoing through a series of endless yeses, but it's impossible to imagine in a BDSM situation.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:41 AM
1

you guys said you wanted that kind of attention. Who are "you guys"? Sexist. Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75aX9mlipiY&feature=share
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:24 AM
4

But...but...rape!
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:13 AM
2

SkateGate
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:08 AM
7

That's because women know there are no consequences for them. I'm not saying that everything those women do is wrong, I'm just saying they know that there are no repercussions in any way, even if they take it too far.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 10:40 PM
27

It's really not that hard to imagine. You sound like a feminist or something: "Don't worry about people exploiting broken laws because why would a woman ever falsely accuse of rape? 'We' just don't do that."
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:44 PM
7

Trimming off parts of women would accomplish the same.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:38 PM
8

What's the point of banning people who "brigade"? Why should only people who discover your subreddit "organically" be allowed to participate in it? What difference does that make regarding the content of their posts?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:30 AM
16

So you're enforcing something when you have no idea what it is?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:29 AM
9

What's the point of banning people who "brigade"? Why should only people who discover your subreddit "organically" be allowed to participate in it? What difference does that make regarding the content of their posts? Also, what is the definition of brigade?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:22 AM
7

Yeah. What's the point of banning people who "brigade"? Why should only people who discover your subreddit "organically" be allowed to participate in it? What difference does that make regarding the content of their posts? Also, why the fuck are you brigading the mens' rights subreddit and why the fuck should you be allowed to stay?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:11 AM
1

It's weird that he says this is a "comedy parody". Seems like more to me.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:50 AM
-1

Do you harass others? I think you mean "'harass'".
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:31 AM
9

No shit.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:58 PM
1

I'm not wrong about my opinion.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:41 PM
1

I'm saying the level of damage caused by the assault does not change it from one type of assault to another, when the exact same actions were taken. But you, being a lawyer, should think that intent matters, regardless of how easily it is proven.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:47 PM
10

Or a drunk adult with a minor. Drunk woman with minor: YOU CAN'T VICTIM BLAME A WOMAN RAPE VICTIM AND PUNISH HER JUST BECAUSE HER RAPIST HAPPENS TO BE UNDERAGE! Drunk man with minor: LOCK THAT PEDO UP!
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:07 AM
-1

You're discussing people who did not intend to do certain things. I'm discussing people who did.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:56 AM
-1

It's so tempting to just start falsely accusing women of sexual crimes all the time, especially in one of those areas where the police have publicly announced that false accusers will never be prosecuted. Then just watch as a woman is grilled about her sexual history, etc., except this time she didn't make a decision to go through with it - she had no control whatsoever, just as a man, and she knows that the person putting her through it faces no risk of punishment whatsoever, and that the real …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:24 AM
-1

Your statements are contrary to current legal reality in the US. IDGAF. our claim that it is going easy on women begs the question that women are incapable of engaging in violence sufficient to do damage. No, it doesn't. I am generalizing, acknowledging the many times that women have had the exact same intentions and wanted to inflict as much damage as a man (generally) could, or as much damage as possible, but failed to do so for whatever reason. There is nothing wrong with generalizing and ack…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:02 AM
1

I think this is bullshit. So two different people attempt to do the same thing to a victim, but one is "luckier" and happens to do more damage, so that one is more guilty of something? That makes no sense. You are the reason that women get away with shit.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:32 PM
1

If someone hits you after you start talking shit ("fighting words") No. or threatening them (self defense) it is not a crime, and that's a good thing. Maybe. An attack that generated no meaningful damage should not be a felony. "Punch count" is irrelevant. No. That's the same bullshit excuse people use to go easy on women. Or do you want me to charge that nine year old from earlier today for punching me? AKA women = children.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:21 PM
1

the more mescaline is responsible. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKYUz7kx3jA
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter