TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RichardJLyon Archive

View 26 posts and 227 comments by RichardJLyon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
183

Social IssuesRichardJLyon/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:30 PM
153

Social IssuesRichardJLyon/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:09 AM
97

Activism/SupportRichardJLyon/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:32 PM
80

FeminismRichardJLyon/r/MensRights16/02/20 06:58 PM
79

RichardJLyon/r/AntiFeminists04/03/20 06:01 PM
61

Edu./Occu.RichardJLyon/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:18 PM
60

DiscriminationRichardJLyon/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:24 PM
51

Legal RightsRichardJLyon/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:07 PM
43

Legal RightsRichardJLyon/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:28 AM
43

Social IssuesRichardJLyon/r/MensRights20/03/19 09:32 AM
41

Legal RightsRichardJLyon/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:56 PM
29

DiscriminationRichardJLyon/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:19 AM
28

FeminismRichardJLyon/r/MensRights24/09/17 10:57 AM
23

FeminismRichardJLyon/r/MensRights05/09/17 11:29 AM
19

RichardJLyon/r/AntiFeminists21/07/19 07:50 AM
18

FeminismRichardJLyon/r/MensRights04/03/20 06:08 PM
12

Social IssuesRichardJLyon/r/MensRights06/09/18 11:17 AM
12

HealthRichardJLyon/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:54 PM
11

Social IssuesRichardJLyon/r/MensRights10/09/17 06:47 PM
10

RichardJLyon/r/MensRights20/01/19 08:56 PM
9

RichardJLyon/r/AntiFeminists14/11/19 04:00 PM
8

False AccusationRichardJLyon/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:19 PM
8

RichardJLyon/r/AntiFeminists19/12/19 10:14 AM
7

Activism/SupportRichardJLyon/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:20 PM
4

DiscriminationRichardJLyon/r/MensRights12/09/18 04:21 PM
2

RichardJLyon/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:45 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

“Only”. Fixed.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/20 11:55 AM
2

Studies repeatedly find that women are more likely than men to initiate domestic disputes. Others find that, if a dispute escalates, women are significantly more likely than men to use a weapon (which includes, for example, boiling water from a kettle, heavy household items, etc.). These studies note that, in situations such as throwing boiling water, the physical strength of the male victim of domestic violence is irrelevant.
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/20 08:08 AM
1

I’ve always found hilarious the fact that the example they supply to illustrate sexism is sexist. All the dictionaries to it. Here’s some more examples: https://medium.com/feminist-watch/sexism-n-discrimination-against-people-56c24e1acd6c
/r/MensRights04/04/20 08:14 PM
1

Imagine “Black culture” / “White culture” Feminism is bigotry.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:06 PM
5

It's worth asking taxi drivers what their experience of this is. From my enquiries, there are many now who refuse to work weekend evenings in my city (Edinburgh, Scotland) because of the frequency of this type of even. Typically, a woman (usually, intoxicated) will refuse to pay, and threatens to report the driver for sexual assault. If the police are involved, they advise the taxi driver to write off the loss.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:28 PM
3

Done
/r/MensRights08/03/20 04:03 PM
22

Here is a UK feminist activist and politician laughing when asked to consent to a debate in Parliament about boys’ and men’s shorter life spans, higher suicide rates, and failing school performance https://youtu.be/VmIG_Hy8_s4 She bangs her head on her table to signal her contempt. Her facial expressions as someone else muses on the seriousness of men’s issues perfectly captures their malevolence.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:43 AM
3

Specifically, they will not change “sexist”, which in all major dictionaries provides examples of use which are sexist - a form of recursion which blows my mind.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 09:00 PM
2

Given women have for decades retired 5 years *sooner* than men despite living on average 4 years *longer* than men i.e. enjoyed an extra 9 years of pension, this is an interesting claim ...
/r/MensRights07/03/20 06:39 PM
1

Women are twice as likely as men to use a weapon during a domestic violence assault (22% vs. 11%) Weapons include scissors, knives, heavy objects, and boiling water. One of the factors that accounts for men’s lower injury rate is the greater strength that women assert presents a risk to women allows them to restrain women when they are being attacked with a weapon.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:12 PM
1

There are some women who literally fear for their lives when they see men approaching. Because the fear is largely unfounded, we call it “victimhood”, and interpret it as an effort to procure some form of gain - e.g. attention, or social, economic, or legal privilege. I’m not saying you are. Merely offering a comparison.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:23 PM
1

Feminist activists are seeking to make changes to the Domestic Violence bill, currently being prepared for making law. Having it established as “gendered crime” is essential to their strategy as it triggers additional erosions of men’s rights This article is part of that effort. They published false, inflated statistics calculated to reinforce the claim that domestic violence is a gendered crime. They allowed the false information to stand for nine days.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:45 AM
9

The world if full of paranoid, neurotic people. I wouldn’t make my happiness dependent on their approval. Reflect on the fact that, while they will be socially impaired for the rest of their lives, you will have forgotten about them in 5 minutes. Then have a beer. Cheers.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:19 AM
14

Academic research attempts to discover novel truth about the world from available data. Feminist advocacy “research” makes untruthful claims about the world to support desired political outcomes. So: it’s necessary to overturn the current assumption that children benefit from contact from both parents. Feminist advocacy research will cherry pick data from cases where that has not been the case that validates the hypotheses that they do not. Alliances of feminist journals then construct webs of c…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 08:54 PM
15

I just read it. Parental alienation is “junk science”. Criticises guidance given to courts to assume that children benefit from contact with both parents (I.e. the father). (This is rooted in hard feminist jurisprudence that seeks an end to nuclear families as the foundation of society). “growing evidence” of its claim amounts to: an uncited academic paper; some feminist advocacy “research”; and a selection of cherry picked anecdotes from hostile jurisdictions. All of this from an ideology that …
/r/MensRights05/03/20 07:58 PM
2

It combines video footage recorded by the UK government of a committee meeting at which feminist activist Jess Phillips attempted to block an International Men’s Day debate, with newspaper articles contradicting her view that men are privileged and don’t require a debate.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:41 PM
2

I believe that feminist activism violates the MP’s Code Of Conduct. An MP is required to behave impartially, and to represent all of their constituents. The behaviour in this video is a clear violation of that code. Feminism is a significant factor in the political shift to the hard right. I’m not sure how many people find nationalism and authoritarianism attractive but I am sure many people find this sort of thing unsupportable.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:35 PM
16

Jess Phillips MP is a feminist activist. She is also a member of the UK government Committee that considers requests for debating topics. This is how she responded to a request to debate men's shorter life expectancy and higher suicide rates, and the failure of boys in our schools.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/20 06:02 PM
1

I think you are giving it too much credit, and underestimate the backlash: Credible, respected institutions such as “The Economist” have repeatedly debunked the wage gap myth and this argument is now routinely presented The leading #metoo agitator (Asia Argento) groomed a boy from the age of 7, raped him, denied it, and was allowed to make a financial settlement in lieu of criminal penalty - fatally undermining the myth The Mansplaining myth is routinely dismissed as an infantile portmanteau The…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 09:24 PM
1

Well, best we don’t give up then, eh? Who else will fight for boys?
/r/MensRights01/03/20 07:53 PM
1

Why? This is a minority. 93% of women and men surveyed in a UK feminist charity’s poll stated they reject feminism.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:34 PM
1

I think you’re right. I’m fairly certain that not everyone is attracted to right wing populist nationalism - there must be many who end up there because they are repelled by the Labour Party’s malevolent identity politics.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 07:35 PM
1

Perhaps you are confusing what ought to happen with what actually happens?
/r/MensRights29/02/20 05:41 PM
1

The Labour Party has been colonised by feminist activists. Two influential MPs are Jess Phillips and Harriet Harman. Harman was instrumental in having fathers rights removed from UK family law. Both are coordinating with feminist activists to align UK law with feminist jurisprudence goals, including: granting women the power to retrospectively withdraw consent; prohibiting the accused man from presenting important categories of evidence including a complainant’s social media history (containing,…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 05:40 PM
3

From an evaluation of proven false accusations in De Zutter, A. Horselenberg, R. van Koppen, P. (2016). Motives for Filing a False Allegation of Rape. Arch Sex Behav, 17 February, with examples: Personal Gain: Material gain (money, promotion) Alibi (cover up other behaviour e.g. adultery, late for school) Revenge (protest of "one night stand") Sympathy (secure father's affection; reconcile with ex-lover) Attention (via police / social worker questioning) Relabelling (consented, but persuaded sub…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 10:54 AM
–

And why do employers facing bankruptcy go bankrupt rather than lower their cost by replacing the male workforce with a female one, if women accept lower pay for the same work?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:15 PM
7

The #MeToo scam is a Female Supremacist tactic for fabricating a sense of emergency to justify political control of the justice system and secure further legal privileges for women. Having fabricated this latest synthetic moral panic, they must now exploit media interest to advance feminist jurisprudence goals, such as retrospective female non-consent, suppression of male evidence, and tolerance of female false accusation. It’s essential to counter this effort. In all social media posts, simply …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 11:25 AM
1

This is the promising line of feminist jurisprudence known as “retrospective non-consent” - legitimate criminalisation of the male victim who’s partner consents to sex, has sex, then withdraws consent.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 01:41 PM
0

Thank you for the examples. In the first video, the officers were fired by the police department. In the OP's, they were defended. In the second instance, the police beat the girl because they mistook her for a boy. In the third, the institution attempted to prevent the girl's assault by the police officer, and the police service fired him. In the OP's, the police officers assisted the institution in assaulting the boy, and the police service defended it. Violent assault of boys is not only more…
/r/MensRights20/02/20 09:10 AM
1

Quite a confection of self contradiction: We fight sexism. Men are excluded. Here's a list of hateful things we don't tolerate - misogeny in, misandry out "All discussions are to be civil". Admirably optimistic, given the extraordinary incivility of feminist discourse. From "A good resource: finallyfeminism101": Sexism is an impersonal bias against the competence and influence of women No. Sexism an impersonal bias against the competence and influence of people. See "sexism". etc.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 08:45 AM
11

I tried looking it up, but I didn’t find any comparable video evidence of a sixteen year old girl being assaulted by security guards and, while handcuffed, a police officer. May I ask you to provide some examples, with an estimate of relative frequency? Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 05:09 PM
1

Since 13% of NHS staff are not British, a better approach might be for racists to take a principled approach and refuse NHS treatment. That would reduce the strain on the NHS, and the number of racists.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:20 PM
1

Self contradiction: Claims that are patronising and condescending are invalid ‘Mansplaining’ as a term is patronising and condescending. Therefore ‘Mansplaining’ as a term is invalid. You are not wrong.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:15 PM
5

“When you see women writing about things that interest you, retweet us”. Will do.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:14 PM
5

I didn’t know about that. How perfect - thank you.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:05 PM
4

It think this is a very interesting point. I'm convinced that much of the swing towards right wing populism is accounted for more by people's repulsion from woke identity politics (of which the worst is feminism) than attraction to authoritarianism. Since authoritarian regimes tend also to be genuinely misogynist, feminists are very much the agents of their own misfortune in this.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:29 AM
2

Controversy” simply means “disagreement”. “Controversial” simply means “giving rise to public disagreement”. Like, say, Capitalism. Or free public health care. Relax. Imagine if no-one cared enough to disagree.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:11 AM
1

you make the normal response to this claim. Replace "men" with "blacks/Jews/homosexuals/gypsies" and reveal the inherent bigotry of the person making it. So, in this instance. "While most blacks don't actively commit rape and sexual assault, most blacks do enable rape culture".
/r/MensRights18/02/20 07:52 AM
6

That’s also true. Feminists are conflicted now- they want to support further privileged treatment of women in law, without compromising the gains they’ve made in degrading treatment of men in law. Interesting to see how this plays out.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 06:56 PM
2

I appreciate your comment and understand your point. Thank you for doing the work that you.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:15 PM
10

Her agency stood to lose a large amount of money if she had been prosecuted. It has led very public criticism of the CPS, possibly to defend their revenue stream. It’s not implausible that they might offer her victim a financial settlement to drop charges. Hence the requirement to prosecute.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:06 PM
1

Me too - best wishes
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:29 AM
1

I appreciate the correction and will amend the original, with a footnote to record it.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:08 AM
4

Thanks John - very sad, and very revealing.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 09:07 PM
1

I understand. His situation is probably very similar.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 07:56 PM
1

Then watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UcC5kwHKig Remember: this boy has grown up under the influence of a multi-hundred million a year feminist lobby, where feminism has grown from being a subject taught at school to the delivery mechanism for school education. And it's failed - he doesn't believe it. Girls don't either: 93% of respondents to (disappointed) leading UK feminist charity "Fawcett" survey said they didn't identify as feminists. 81% of 18-24s women rejected the term. The …
/r/MensRights16/02/20 07:46 AM
1

I posted a reply. Of course, I’ll be instantly banned but I sent a copy to the OP despite him prostrating himself to apologise for being a man, and to virtuously signal his understanding of the reasonableness of the ideological attractiveness of eliminating half the members of a species through eugenics. I reminded remind her that encoding information - the entire basis of her “argument” - is only one necessary function of the gene. The other is to do so in a way that survives cumulative replica…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 09:29 AM
9

I remember the days when you went to festivals for the quality of the music. Not the configuration of the musicians’ genitals.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 09:11 AM
1

Meetoo’s integrity isn’t being question. The absence of meetoo’s integrity is being documented.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 04:33 PM
3

“Every show” and “everyone” as in “Every man” (is a rapist/wife beater/exploiter of women/etc.), you mean? The idea behind antifeminism is to oppose bigotry and intolerance. Not some kinds of bigotry and intolerance.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/20 02:23 PM
1

I presume this kills the #believewomen tag and validated the #hetoo tags. All very positive
/r/MensRights02/02/20 01:29 AM
2

I presume the acts of crying, gossiping, hugging, taking smelling salts, applying make up, and having pillow fights - the impression of women in the 21st Century that 4th wave feminism creates - require their own dedicated space?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 05:54 PM
1

As always. Replace “all men” with all: “Jews” “Gypsies” “Blacks” “Gays” Feminism is a cult, and its followers are sexist bigots.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:21 PM
3

We will look back on this era of feminist ideology the we look back now on blackface comedy - the product of ignorance and bigotry in a less enlightened world.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:45 AM
1

Netflix?
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:55 PM
4

Does that mean that boys and men will die even earlier than women, commit suicide even more often than women, be even more homeless and have even less access to homeless shelters than women, be even more likely to be the victim of violence than women, and receive even longer sentences than women for the same crimes? Poor boys growing up in 2020. On the bright side, 97% of people don’t identify with feminism, including a growing number of young women. So perhaps the claim is absurd.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/20 05:00 PM
5

The “everydaysexism” project is a monument to the confirmation bias fallacy: Take a dataset e.g. the observations of all harm men and women do to each other Remove all the observations that are inconvenient to your ideology e.g. all the harm women do to men Claim the evidence supports your ideology e.g. the only harm that exists is to women by men Childish and absurd.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 10:00 AM
1

It’s almost hard to believe that polling in the US and UK consistently show that fewer and fewer women identify with feminism.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 08:46 AM
21

Crowd source a litigation fund via a viral social media campaign. Take them to court via a private litigation action. Give the damages to a men’s charity. I’ll donate.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 12:48 PM
1

They don’t, but without that claim they can’t argue that only violence against women and girls is considered in public policies. So they claim it. Feminism is not an ideology that places much value on correspondence with observable reality.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 10:27 AM
5

Since men die sooner than women in all age categories from preventable gender-specific disease, surely spending on male disease prevention should be increased if the feminist claim for gender equality is to be taken at face value.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:31 AM
2

Brexit, like feminism, divides, damages, and diminishes my country. I’m delighted Davies is stronger and Phillips is weaker. But I’d strongly suggest you leave your views on Brexit out of this topic, they have no place here. Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:42 AM
1

In the Parliamentary TV footage of the meeting at which she sneered at high rates amongst men of suicide and cancer, there’s a moment when you can see and hear her banging her head off the table as she rocks with laughter. In another section, you can hear her emitting a sort of Beavjs and Butthead “snurfle” with her hand clamped over her mouth shortly befor Davis says, rather uncomfortably, that ha not sure what is funny about collapsing boys’ school attainment figures. I’m extracting and splici…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:19 PM
1

A woman’s husband died years sooner than her from occupational injury, disease, or accident, and she continued to require money long after he stopped providing it.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/19 12:23 AM
2

Thank you for your sacrifice.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 11:28 AM
1

I think it’s terrific news that capitalism is willing to shut itself down as long as the person telling it to has a penis. I always thought it was more complex than that.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:46 AM
3

You’re welcome.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:18 AM
26

“Sensation” is not “sensitivity” and that, I’ll think you’ll find, is all. Best regards, etc.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 12:18 AM
96

Nothing says Christmas like having your arms and legs strapped down to prevent you from thrashing around while your genitals are mutilated. The little red had is a nice afterthought, though - he can keep it as compensation for the abrasion, keratinization, and loss of sensitivity he will be forced to endure for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:58 PM
16

Mortality rate, in all age groups from birth to 100 Occupational diseases/injury/death rates Gender specific medical research funding Suicide rate, esp. teenage Military combat death rate University attendance Homelessness rate Homeless shelter provision Homicide victim rate Criminal justice system sentence frequency and duration for similar crime That should be interesting.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:47 PM
3

It’s why I reject the term “Women’s Equality” - I reject the premise that the only inequality to be corrected is women’s. If the goal was equality of opportunity between women and men, “Equality” would be the necessary and sufficient label. So why do they prefer “Women’s Equality”? So as to preserve primacy in all the areas in which women already have it. This is why you don’t hear advocates of “Women’s Equality” demanding additional resources, say, for the 35,000 fewer boys who go to university…
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/19 12:41 PM
2

The world is hard. Teaching boys how to do maths, and not teaching them how to withstand hardship, seems like an incomplete education to me.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 09:14 PM
1

Interestingly, analysis of the reigns of kings and queens in Europe from 1480 to 1930 reveals a 27% increase in wars when Queens were in power compared to Kings - precisely the opposite of what your claim would predict.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/19 04:09 PM
-1

I can’t imagine where the feminist stereotype that we’re prone to violence comes from.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/19 03:59 PM
3

Dunning-Kruger effect victim. He’s too ignorant to detect his own ignorance, which has overstimulated his confidence. He just sounds like an infantile narcissist. Feminism has done this to him and he is to be pitied and helped.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/19 12:25 PM
10

Because it confers power. It sounds plausible and unjust. So feminists can bypasses tests that evaluate the justness of claims. It runs across social, legal, and economic boundaries. So feminists can claim useful remedies, such as social, legal, and economic privileges. Because the 1% of males who genuinely do occupy the highest positions of power can demonstrate their firm’s ‘woke’ credentials by offering concessions such as workplace affirmative action and remuneration policies that throw ordi…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 05:39 PM
5

Disqualified from a long list of worthy institutions appealing for donations. This is the corrosive effect the feminist narrative has had on our society.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 05:18 PM
1

If you had had cancer, you would be grateful now that the chemotherapy worked and you had the rest of your life to look forward to, not sad that you’d felt ill for a little while. Celebrate! You survived, you’re wiser, and it only cost you a thousand euros rather than the loss of access to your child, the loss of your house, the loss of a large fraction of your savings and pension, and the loss for years of a large fraction of your monthly income. Congratulations. Now don’t give her another mome…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:51 AM
26

Infantile bigotry.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/19 09:12 PM
1

I have to say, claiming while dressed as an infant that your celibacy is voluntary is problematic. At least he took his back-to-front baseball cap off. I wonder why the people who staged this didn’t select an obese, raspberry haired lesbian with a nose ring to represent feminism if they were going for unflattering stereotypes?
/r/MensRights04/12/19 12:52 PM
5

To which the answer is: “masculinity”.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 10:47 AM
1

Presumably when she lies and says he abused her, he commends himself to the hangman in good conscience? Or does his good conscience only extend to others being hanged?
/r/MensRights04/12/19 08:35 AM
3

Witch-hunt culture is a world that treats rape claimants like victims and rape claim defendants like suspects.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 08:27 AM
1

No. She's actually claiming that all obese people are black.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/19 08:22 AM
3

To expand Ms/Mx. Blackfatqueer's last deduction into its fully resplendent modus ponens form: If all obese people are black, then labelling people obese is anti-black All obese people are black Therefore labelling people obese is anti-black She's not merely claiming that all black people are obese. She's claiming that only black people are obese. Interestingly in the context of feminists' confected grievances about pay 'gaps', verbal reasoning skills are a significant pay differentiator in the j…
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/19 08:10 AM
8

Or we could scrap The United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and spend the money on boys’ education, given that they are failing spectacularly in school wherever feminism is the ideological delivery mechanism.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:07 PM
14

In the UK in 2018 there were 32.79 million men and 33.65 million women. In the US, 159.41 million men and 165.92 million women. Men are a gender minority. By her prescription, the invitation would be modified to read “the lunch is for women and men”, which sounds quite jolly, actually.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:02 PM
3

This is an excellent talk, and an excellent post. “The fewer of us who remain silent, the faster we can deal with the issues”. Thank you for posting.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/19 12:05 PM
7

I genuinely am not certain if heart cells beating in a Petri dish signify life. I’m pretty certain though that a foetus grasping the abortionist’s instruments moments before being severed in half does, and that the idea that society should be excluded from that decision on its behalf is absurd.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/19 09:51 AM
1

Again, a confusion between “fault” and “willingness to exploit for cynical gain”. Best wishes.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:46 AM
33

Of course it does. You get to appeal to grown ups, such as University Principles, moderators, the police, and politicians, to sort your problems out for you. Usually by conferring yet more privileges on you. Even if you are a weak, ineffective individual, by manufacturing victim hood you can cause powerful people to lose their status and jobs, conferring on you a sense of powerfulness. It’s the cornerstone of woke culture, militant university campus culture, postmodern intersectional theory, the…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:44 PM
45

Power. Being a victim confers it. So they manufacture victimhood at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 07:00 PM
1

Are you perhaps confusing causing something with minimising it the better to pursue your own legal, social, and economic advantage?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 06:43 PM
6

Comrade Jordan appears to be a couple of threads short of a needlepoint tableaux
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:52 PM
3

Go for it, and don’t back down under any circumstances. Can we read it?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 02:21 PM
1

A test of that would be to ask the question: would we see this level of interest in men’s rights in the absence of fourth wave feminism? To the extent that the answer is ‘no’, then I think it is perfectly reasonable to conceive of men’s rights as a backlash. I’d go further: a very real risk that all women face is the rise of fascist and totalitarian regimes, in which there is genuinely a patriarchal oppression of women’s interest, fuelled by a backlash to identity politics fomented by feminist g…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 02:19 PM
5

In a survey of 193 European reigns between 1480 and 1940, Queens were 27% more likely to start a war than Kings (Source: https://www.economist.com/europe/2017/06/01/who-gets-into-more-wars-kings-or-queens) #justsaying
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/19 07:17 AM
7

The occupational injury, disease, and death rate is pretty skewed to the top of the chart. Possibly one reason why feminists obsess about access to board rooms and political chambers, not fishing boats and construction sites.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 06:59 AM
1

Also: “Hey nonny nonny, pretty Maiden” “Women and children first!” “You look faint, my I pass you some smelling salts?” “The fainting couch is in the other room”
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/19 05:01 PM
6

Hilariously, the definition of sexism in all dictionaries is sexist in that their usage examples Invariably portray women as the victims of it. Look it up and see.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 07:41 PM
1

Well, you really threw some sunshine down on that one. Thanks and best wishes.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 07:16 PM
1

I interpret this as good news. “Every legitimate grievance feminism has campaigned on has been solved and now the grievance industry is reduced to fussing about thermostat settings”. No ideology can survive in that state of intellectual poverty for long.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:15 AM
1

Surely they mean “...end to violence against people”.? Only a psychopath would advocate an International Day To Tolerate Violence Against Men.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 09:24 AM
49

If only women attend the movie, then her comment would be accurate and irrelevant. If men and women attend the movies and there’s just fewer of both, then it would be inaccurate and irrelevant. As far as I’m aware, it’s the latter.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/19 05:55 PM
1

On your last point I fully agree. Best wishes
/r/MensRights16/11/19 09:02 PM
1

OK. Well the Creasy stuff is all over the web. Here's spiked: https://www.spiked-online.com/2018/09/06/stella-creasys-war-on-thoughtcrime/ Here's the EU's attempt to criminalise antifeminism: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf Phillips and Harman take more care to cover their tracks so you have to triangulate. What can I say.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 05:07 PM
1

I’m typing this into a phone and cut and paste defeats me. Search for Creasy’s earlier attempt to extend upskirting to the general crime of misogyny. That’s the origin of this latest stunt. I’m not sure the relevance of your comment about the law commission’s review not mentioning. Feminism - why would it, and why would it be in the interests of feminists for it to do so given the likely divisiveness of the initiative? This is, like all of their attempts to reshape the law in accordance with fem…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 06:13 AM
1

Stella Creasy is the Labour feminist faction’s vanguard for getting the law changed: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-454237 This is the instrument: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/hate-crime/ Part of the strategy is coordinate feminist lobby groups to align with manifesto pledges. Phillips worked for Women’s Aid and (I believe) still serves on their secretariat: this is them lobbying for the policy: https://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/News/misogyny-hate-crime-meeting-statement Creasy, Har…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:32 PM
1

Deary me. The chaps need to give themselves a shake.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:39 PM
1

It’s a disaster. Labour has been colonised by Radical Feminist Entryists - Jess Phillips and Harriet Harmen are revolting specimens (they are currently trying to smuggle the policy of making it illegal to criticise feminists into the Labour manifesto). Lib Dem’s are run by a radfem who thinks white males are a problem. Caroline Whatsherface at the Greens finds it hard - and regularly fails - to conceal her hatred of men. I hate to say it, but the Conservatives are at least indifferent to men’s i…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:34 PM
4

They imagine their ideology is sustainable, in a world in which the very great majority of women and men find their ideology repellent. When the tide turns, it will turn quickly.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:19 PM
1

Not beyond what I’ve already laid out. She wasn’t nearly finished, and yet finished. Her departure was preceded by criticism that is without precedent, and the policies that were the source of that criticism partially reversed. Firing amongst the professional classes is handled differently. This is, fundamentally, a gynocentric society filled with enterprises slavering to demonstrate their woke identity politics credentials, and her ability to land a plum job in it should present no particular s…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:08 PM
1

I do apologise. The distinction is, of course, significant, and the criticism she received prior to declining to renew her contact from, amongst other institutions, the Metropolitan Police, no doubt insignificant.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:35 PM
19

Men should be entitled to see women’s hours worked. We should all be entitled to see all data.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:32 PM
3

Of course, amidst all the violent rhetoric about killing men, the fake pocket is a response to market demand by women for a feature that emphasises their hips and promotes a more flattering silhouette...
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:41 AM
4

My response to a feminist’s claim that feminist Senator Larissa Waters distanced herself: https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/dvqm5n/australian_firefighter_in_despair/f7ejjmy/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/MensRights14/11/19 09:46 AM
2

Maybe they got it from you. If so - well done, and thank you :)
/r/MensRights14/11/19 09:38 AM
1

More background here: https://feministwatch.org/2017/09/feminism-and-false-rape-allegations/ Alison Saunders was subsequently fired from the CPS. The head of the UK’ largest police force, Cressida Dick, stated that Saunders’ policy was bringing policing into disrepute.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:51 AM
1

This idea is gaining currency (and may have originated) in the Intellectual Dark Web. If you aren’t familiar with it, I’d recommend researching it - https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/intellectual-dark-web.html
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:45 AM
1

Of course the risk of being killed in the event of the vehicle being involved in a road accident is about two orders of magnitude higher than the risk of being kidnapped while travelling in it. Meanwhile, the risk the taxi driver faces of being falsely accused of sexual offence is several orders of magnitude higher than baseline risk. Innumerate fool.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:23 AM
30

I used to worry about this sort of absurd misandry but, actually, it appears to be a terrific mechanism for accelerating public rejection of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 01:28 PM
1

Already do so.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 06:40 PM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:57 AM
2

Seems unlikely under a system in which victims of false accusations who actually serve time in prison are not compensated.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:54 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights10/11/19 09:13 PM
2

Looking at them they are both low res and could use a tweak if they are being made into posters. Let me know, if you are using them, if you need any help or if you are happy to sort them yourself.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:31 PM
2

And here's one about the letter she received from the Criminal Bar Association in protest at her creation and manipulation of public misapprehension about male violence, designed "more to alarm than inform" https://ibb.co/q7Zy6ZY
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:23 PM
2

Here's one I made of her sneering at the suggestion our Parliament debates the collapse of boys education attainment and elevated adolescent male suicide on International Mens Day. Put it to good use. https://ibb.co/Z2w2g8m
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:15 PM
30

Proud of you. Get prepared and give it your very best.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:09 PM
6

This will be like the bogus footballer claim. Players are remunerated as a fraction of the total money raised in television rights and tickets. The more money raised, the higher the remuneration. After the top women’s footballer team aired their grievances about being paid less than men, it turned out they receive a higher proportion of earnings than men. Shortly after, the women’s No#1 team were beaten by a team of 15 yo high school boys. Turns out no one wants to pay to watch mediocre sport - …
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/19 10:33 PM
1

19% was anomalous. The annual average is 7%. “[2017] was particularly deadly for women. While the historical average of women journalists killed is 7 percent, this year, it peaked at 19 percent.” (Source: Chacar, Henrietta. 2017. “AN UNUSUALLY DEADLY YEAR FOR WOMEN JOURNALISTS AROUND THE WORLD, REPORT FINDS” https://theintercept.com/2017/12/21/an-unusually-deadly-year-for-women-journalists-around-the-world-report-finds/) Since women comprise more than 7-19% of the journalist population, what UN …
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:47 AM
4

This is correct. This is the charming woman who (I) had it written into UK Family Law that fathers are not an asset to families (knife crime in fatherless families is now epidemic), (ii) received a letter from the Criminal Bar Association expressing their concern about her efforts to systematically manufacture and mislead public opinion by overstating the prevalence of violence against women in order to promote feminist legal theories and (iii) decorates her Christmas tree in her government offi…
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:20 AM
1

As always, substitute the identity categories (e.g. “black/white”, “gay/straight”, “Jew/Christian”) to surface the bigotry that is the core of feminism’s rotten ideology.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:58 AM
6

Having run out of legitimate grievances, feminist ideology is compelled to invent them to maintain the thousands of advocates who’s livelihoods depend on it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/19 08:44 AM
7

On Medium.com, Men’s Rights is a subcategory of Feminism. Absurd.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 08:05 AM
5

She’s a little behind the program. The goal of feminist jurisprudence is “retrospective non-consent”: securing for women who have consented to sex the right to legitimately withdraw that consent after the event. His attempts to procure consent prior to or during sex are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:21 AM
2

Women receive 75% of all gender-specific medical research funding, and live on average 4 years longer than men. Of course they put women’s health first - this is a gynocracy, obsessed by women’s grievances and demands.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 09:32 PM
4

It’s not just twitter. It’s most social media sites. www.metafilter.com hires misandrist moderators to remove any effort to call it out. Medium.com classify “men’s rights” as a subset of “feminism” in their taxonomy. I ignore both now.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:21 AM
3

Done. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 11:50 AM
1

The military prohibits it because it undermines the chain of command. Of all the reasons for objecting to being sent to your possible death, you can’t have one being the possibility that the person giving the order is fucking the other candidates for the job.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 02:14 PM
1

Not of the world. Of a vociferous but mercifully small cohort of infantile, emasculated little people. Let’s not get hysterical about it.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 02:09 PM
4

He’s a cuttlefish. Male cuttlefish are hugely outnumbered. So in their sad effort to mate, they make themselves look like lady cuttlefish, hiding their distinctive male appendage and altering their skin pigmentation. They sneak in under the radar and have their wicked cuttlefish way. Glad I’m not a cuttlefish,
/r/MensRights15/10/19 07:01 PM
2

Infantile.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:43 PM
38

One way to even the wait times is for men to start applying makeup in the toilets too. Or am I not taking this absurd grievance seriously?
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/19 10:08 PM
1

It’s not an opinion. Quote relevant data from credible sources and make it clear you are merely engaging in a balanced evaluation - as school requires you to do.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:45 AM
3

There is literally no issue that the divisiveness of feminism doesn’t irreparably damage.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/19 06:47 AM
1

Unmitigated bollocks.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:54 AM
9

Perhaps you are confusing “afraid” with “refuse to tolerate”? Refusal to tolerate certain behaviours in the work place is an essential leadership obligation.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:52 PM
5

Interestingly, at the time that the photo was taken, working class men had no votes either. During the First World War, disenfranchised men were compelled under threat of execution to enlist, often to their death. The so-called “Suffragettes” would attach white feathers to any man in civilian clothing with the aim of shaming him for not fighting to defend “women’s honour”. Some men committed suicide due to the shame and fear.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 06:39 AM
4

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” Bertrand Russell
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:25 PM
9

The appropriate response is to continue to do this. We hold doors open for other humans, not women, and to think otherwise is to betray your gynocentric world viewpoint. Ignore the imbecile.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/19 08:01 PM
3

The feminist industry, itself an expression of our gynocentric society (I.e. one which focuses exclusively on the grievances and demands of women) spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually researching women’s grievances, gathering statistics on women’s grievances, and dispensing remedies for women’s grievances. There is no equivalent expenditure, research, statistics gathering, or remediation of men’s issues. So your speculation on why women and men act in the way they do, while an interes…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/19 01:54 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights31/07/19 11:39 AM
1

Idiot.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 11:24 AM
1

You’re kidding me! Really? Any recommendations on a sane brand, or shall I just grow whiskers and be done with it?
/r/MensRights31/07/19 11:21 AM
1

Yep. Stopped buying any of their products the day I saw that advert, started buying Harry’s razors, and told all my friends. I’ll never ever purchase anything they make again.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:53 PM
7

This is a fundamental challenge with the law - it often doesn’t align with the sense of natural justice most people have. For example, I once asked a lawyer for help to challenge a neighbour who was growing 40 foot hedge on our boundary. The property deeds said clearly that only “dwarf species” could be used for hedging, and it seemed like an obvious case.“Define ‘dwarf’”, said the lawyer. While there is an obvious natural definition, there isn’t a legal definition that could compel him to remov…
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:10 AM
–

That would be “a female teacher romps with their son in school”.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:00 AM
1

Comments are off, the better to avoid having your myth busting myth busted.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 10:23 AM
1

“Grievances” better captures their nature, in my view
/r/MensRights22/07/19 11:29 PM
7

Men’s knees spread because seat heights are too low - the average male floor-to-knee length (the length that determines the optimal height of a seat) is about 5cm longer than a woman’s. If this was a legitimate grievance, and that grievance didn’t require arbitrary expression of feminist ideology, she could simply have designed a chair with an additional 5cm of height. On the female version, she missed out the little table for the dwinking cup and the restraining straps that infant chairs come w…
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/19 10:25 AM
5

But not 7% of our lawmakers, I suspect. Our political system has been infiltrated by Entryists.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 06:05 PM
1

"Parental alienation” was recommended for inclusion in the definition of “Mental Abuse”. Feminist ideologists had the proposal rejected.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 05:37 PM
1

As always, replace “men” with some other category such as “black”, “Jew”, “homosexual”. This is mere bigotry, and he is a mere bigot.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:29 AM
1

If.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 06:25 AM
1

[1] Men are already “given vasectomies” in the sense that it is an inexpensive procedure that is widely available. The feminist “bodily autonomy” claim also confers upon men the right to choose or reject the opportunity to undergo it. [2] If by “give”, Feminist extremists mean “force men to have vasectomies”, (c.f. “give farm animals antibiotics”), the claim is invalidated by their own bodily autonomy claim (amongst others). [3] Women rape men. For example, a young man is being pursued by the co…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:07 AM
0

And the probability that she does have a child to look after is the direct outcome of feminist ideological lobbying in our legal system to ensure that the Custodial Parent in a divorce will be the woman.
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/19 11:11 AM
0

The complement to this is would be quotations of feminist bigotry with the word “Man” replaced with “Black/Jew/Homosexual/etc.”. i.e. “A real Jew can handle a strong woman. A weak Jew will say she has an attitude”. “Strong women intimidate weak blacks”, “Teach your homosexual son to respect women”, “All blacks are potential rapists”, “Women live in fear of gypsies”, etc. Douglas Laycock describes their bigotry well in Laycock, D. (1991). Vicious stereotypes in polite society. Constitutional Comm…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:06 AM
1

That it is simply a fact that men’s mean earnings are higher (which is true) is not of itself evidence to support your claim that it is “always the most reliable to use”. The most reliable to use for what purpose? The purpose to which feminist ideologues put it is to make the case for changes to legal, social, and economic rules and laws that advantage all women. This has the effect of disadvantaging most men. For example. Young men in their 20’s now, as a cohort, earn less money than comparable…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:15 AM
1

If you are a feminist and wish to create the impression that all men earn more than all women, because a tiny fraction of men do, then this is correct. If you wish to compare what men and women typically earn, then it is not. “Best” is a function of perspective.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 11:43 AM
1

They are actually means, being one of several measures of central tendency popularly referred to collectively as “averages”.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:58 PM
3

Please let us know how they respond.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:07 PM
3

It’s a touching, heartwarming story. Of course: - being separated from a loaf and being separated from your child are different - you can buy another loaf; you can’t buy another child - it's not a competition - you haven’t won something - you did all of the work apart from the work you didn’t do, such as contributing to the safe environment necessary for survival Otherwise, a masterful example of the balanced and convincing reasoning that is the hallmark of feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:58 AM
1

Screenshot-2019-07-03-at-08-08-56.png
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:14 AM
6

‘It cannot be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social cohesion.’ Harman, Harriet QC MP. 1990. "The Family Way”, Institute for Public Policy Research This tragic example reveals yet agains the utterly self-serving absurdity of feminist ideology’s claim that it *can* be assumed that women are bound to be an asset to family life.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 03:58 PM
1

Yes. It will. It just hasn’t done so yet.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:07 PM
7

“If you want to earn more, here’s a tip - swap your Major in Feminist Dance Theory for Electrical Engineering.” Christina Hoff Summers
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:27 PM
3

As always, substitute the word “man” with the word “black/homosexual/Jew/gypsy/cripple (to employ a term used by bigots)” to expose the bigotry that is the foundation of the feminist world view.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/19 01:18 PM
1

The top women’s team was recently beaten by a team of 15 year old boys. $42.6m for sub-junior school level football looks pretty good.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 07:37 PM
1

Laycock’s paper is excellent. Thank you, poster. ​ An estimate of women's lifetime risk of rape is not an estimate of the percentage of men who will rape
/r/MensRights11/06/19 05:52 PM
3

"You're exactly like other girls." Hmmmm. We can only begin to imagine the encylopaedia of grievances that the alternative would spawn. It's like trying to reason with a spoiled child.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 06:19 AM
16

Feminist school jurisdictions (which is to say, the UK Education Authority) are seeking to ban "To Kill A Mocking Bird" from the curriculum because of its disobliging examination of false rape allegation and bigotry.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 06:02 AM
4

I keep my knees spread for equally valid reasons. Yet infantile feminist grievance mongers aren't willing to make the same presumption.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:20 AM
1

Hello - see my correction to my post, which contains the references you need.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:23 PM
2

I need to correct this, which I wrote from memory and, on checking, have misremembered. Harman contributed to the rewriting of The Children Act that took place in 1989. The Act was altered in favour of women as the presumptive parent following divorce, and the word "father" was removed from the related "Children and Families Bill". The ideology that informed this change was recorded in her entry the following year (1990) in "The Family Way" published by feminist advocacy group "Institute For Pub…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 01:16 PM
2

This became the explicit basis of UK Family Law after it was rewritten. It now contains the statement: "It can no longer be assumed that a man is an asset to the family". The word "father" was removed from Law. The instigators of these changes were feminist politicians, principally Harriet Harman QC MP, who continues to seek alterations to UK law to align it with feminist jurisprudence e.g. the valid criminalisation of men following retrospective withdrawal by women of her consent to sex, and re…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:27 AM
1

We seem to have morphed from the rejection of gender bigotry as a business service in Scotland to free speech in the US.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:32 PM
1

A radical feminist vegan cafe that serves crispy bacon and fried eggs? I presume this is a trendy Post-Modernism logic thing, that feminist ideology depends on to accommodate the disobliging nature of observable reality?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 08:08 AM
3

You could compare this with a poorly socialised 7 year old's rules for playing in her sandpit without any significant difference in maturity or sophistication. One of the most significant effects of feminist ideology is the infantilisation of its subscribers.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/19 07:44 AM
1

None of my business. If the residents of the US are comfortable with the society that results from tolerating privacy invading, tax avoiding, minimum wage paying trans-law entities, they are free to tolerate them (looks pretty revolting to me, but I don't live there). The claim I was addressing was about primacy in the event of a disagreement between society and those entities.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:04 AM
1

The private business can only exist to the extent that a civil society has created the rule of law that allows it to. Without it, its existence, like that of its owner, would be nasty, brutish, and short. So the business provides the services in the manner required of it by its enabling society, as a condition of enjoying its benefits, or it does not operate. In our society, people are equal and are to be treated as such.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 05:57 AM
4

Cafe owners with odd pricing strategies really are not nightmare material in this world. They might spend less time concocting vegan snacks and more time reading the paper.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:55 AM
1

My original essay on Beale and calling for the dismissal of Alison Saunders as director of the CPS and author of discriminatory legal process condemned by the Metropolitan Police as undermining confidence in the legal process in this country. http://www.richardlyon.net/posts/170905-feminist-and-false-rape-allegations/
/r/MensRights29/03/19 06:21 AM
1

This provides an excellent summary of current feminist jurisprudence strategy. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:45 AM
3

"We'd love to cater for your event or office meeting, give us a shout." Well, that's an inadvisable way of going about it in a society in which the majority of women, when asked, don't identify with their ideology
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:36 PM
1

Unfortunately, having maintained that your statistical argument is in a different category, I'm not very well placed to discuss its merits. It appears to me that the original quotation is expressed in terms of a syllogism, not in terms of the properties of a general population based on the extrapolated properties of a sampling of it. So I'm not sure what light is cast by your argument. I'm completely disinterested in whether women who are in power are or are not like women who are not. All that …
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:48 PM
1

I'm sorry, but as a categorical error this is (in my opinion) not even wrong. I'm not extrapolating the benefits of the top 0.01% to the remaining 99.99%. I'm evaluating the proposition "women do not have political or institutional power, therefore women cannot be sexist" for logical fallacy. If the hypothesis: "women do not have political or institutional power" was true, then no woman would occupy a position of leadership in a political institution (true?). Yet women are observed to occupy the…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 11:42 AM
3

If it were true that men unfairly prevent women from exercising political, institutional, and societal power, why do we observe that the leaders of the most powerful political institutions are women? If men enjoy a majority among power holders, and women a majority among those who choose the power holders, in what way can it be claimed that only women can claim sexism because they do not have political power? If billions of men, like billions of women, don't have positions of political power, in…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 01:20 PM
74

Re. "Women do not hold political, economic, or institutional power". In the UK: Monarch: woman. Prime Minister: woman. First Lord of the Treasury: woman. Minister for the Civil Service: woman. Scottish First Minister: woman. Northern Ireland First Minister (most recent): woman. Head of largest police force: woman. Electorate majority by gender: women Elsewhere: Premier of Europe's largest economy (Germany): woman. MD International Monetary Fund: woman. etc. etc. The statement is observably untru…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:25 AM
3

If you consult your dictionary and look up "sexism", you'll find the definition is sexist - the example it gives to illustrate the word will feature some harm to a woman arising from sexism. I say this without knowing which dictionary you own as every dictionary does this. Our dictionaries, being the products of our society, reveal its gynocentric nature. http://www.richardlyon.net/posts/171019-sexism-is-discrimination-against-men/
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:48 AM
2

I can code, research, write copy, provide hosting. An example of my writing here https://medium.com/feminist-watch/feminism-and-false-rape-allegations-7b3b723f1a1
/r/MensRights03/03/19 02:39 PM
1

The qualifier implies there are things about which they might be ashamed, which apparently is untrue.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:37 AM
15

Replace every instance of "be a better man" in their advert with "be a better black person/homosexual/gypsy/Jew/disabled person". Bigotry is not a compelling advertising strategy.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:51 AM
1

The strategy is to use upskirting as a pretext for forcing the police to establish the category of “misogyny”, and to commence reporting against it. This then legitimises the claim that misogyny is an issue, for which greater economic, legal, and social privileges are justified, and provides the basis for such pseudo-scientific claims as “reported incidents of misogyny are up x%”,
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:21 PM
1

Helpful advice - thank you
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:53 PM
1

You’re right. With a postcode you could automate populating the MPs address and reduce the barriers to using it, but privacy could a deterrent. Maybe an option button during letter creation. Thanks :)
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:37 PM
1

Good idea. Coincidentally, I'm toying with the idea of creating a website "my letters to Keir Starmer MP" registering my letters to him and his reponses (or lack of), to improve the transparency of this process. I wonder if it's scalable? ...
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:14 PM
4

Perhaps it’s futile because so few do it.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:55 AM
3

Thank you for your thoughtful comment. You are, of course, entirely correct and I’m aware of Mr. Starmer’s contribution to the loss of confidence in the CPS referred to by the head of the Metropolitan Police Force. However, he is my MP and this is the only mechanism available to me to make my view known.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:30 AM
3

... and thank you for doing so
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:58 PM
10

Please do. I’m on the move but you’ll easily find the links through google from the references
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:56 PM
1

Good tip. Saddens me.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:33 AM
2

My entry in the comment section of the piece was removed by the Scotsman censors. It was as follows: == BEGIN == As I understand it, Salmond intends to take the Scottish Government to court in the matter of recent changes to its investigation procedures, and failures of it, that he believes have resulted in his inability to adequately defend himself -- not (at this stage) the women making the accusations. The Scottish Government has advertised in turn its intention to defend itself to the fulles…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:00 AM
1

Ok thanks. Not having a good social media day here :)
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:18 AM
1

It appears to have been censored. My comment in full: == BEGIN == As I understand it, Salmond intends to take the Scottish Government to court in the matter of recent changes to its investigation procedures, and failures of it, that he believes have resulted in his inability to adequately defend himself -- not (at this stage) the women making the accusations. The Scottish Government has advertised in turn its intention to defend itself to the fullest extent possible i.e. to use the legal resourc…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:03 AM
1

Of course, social 'science' (of which this is an example) is not susceptible to the scientific method, and beyond the purview of the scientific community. Pseudo-science (which describes such pursuits as astrology, homeopathy, neoclassical econiomics, and academic feminism) has a very precise meaning in the philosophy of knowledge - one which, due to the lack of explanatory power of its core propositions, is compelled to expand its research program by inventing more and more auxilary theory to a…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 02:30 PM
1

This is a perfectly valid point, and it could be that the writer intends the word to confer the likelihood that the relationship between boys' and girls' happiness is caused by something other than chance. Two observations, however: This is a document intended for laymen, not an academic or formal paper. In that context, "significant" means "sufficiently important to be worthy of attention". It's not obvious that a 1.2 percentage point variation between boys and girls reporting greater than 80% …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:18 PM
1

Do read my open letter to the Chairman of The Children's society on gender bias in his organisation here https://medium.com/feminist-watch/gender-bias-in-the-childrens-society-2a58e3e6c61d
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:10 AM
5

It means feminism is running out of grievances and has to invent nonsense now to try to maintain any franchise. It’s hollowing itself out with triviality and obscureness.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 07:06 PM
1

This was only 4 weeks after Jessica Beale was sentenced for false rape allegations. Feminists justify removing legal protections for men in court against women lying under oath with the claim that is it rare. See my article: https://medium.com/feminist-watch/feminism-and-false-rape-allegations-7b3b723f1a1
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:27 PM
1

I apologise for that. I’ll put a warning at the top, or remove it. I really do want people to engage with the fact that we only reported that as a story about kidnapped girls (and I don’t for a minute imply this isn't also a tragedy)
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:43 PM
10

It’s a combination of dishonesty and poor reasoning. In formal logic, the fallacy of reasoning is called ‘affirming the consequent’. “If you are a White Supremacist, then you support Mens Rights. You support Mens Rights. Therefore you are a White Supremacist”. compare with: “If you own Fort Knox, you are rich. Bill Gates is rich. Therefore Bill Gates owns Fort Knox”. In this instance, the fallacy is instrumental in constructing the main fallacy: an ad hominem attack - reject the argument by reje…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:23 AM
8

Lack of talent? Different preferences? Discrimination? Feminists must claim that everyone is equally good at everything and, therefore, that all difference must be explained by discrimination (except in areas to be protected from the risk of reciprocal claims, such as family law). The facts appear to suggest otherwise: for every 100 girls that score >700 points in the math section of the SAT, 184 boys do the same. To the extent that math is a core competence in Google’s business, it would be sta…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:40 PM
1

As, indeed, did Hillary Clinton when the same question was put to her
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:33 PM
3

Correct. From “barristerblogger”: "Let’s say that the evidence is that the man tied the complainant up and then beat her on the buttocks before having intercourse with her. It is the sort of thing that a particularly nasty rapist might do. On the other hand it is also a thing that consenting adults do to one another. His defence is that this was all a consensual game, and moreover something that the two of them had happily done to each other hundreds of times before. ... The woman could even say…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:06 PM
–

The link is not for fact that a conviction has been made, but to the extraordinary comments by the Crown Prosecution Service in the associated news story: "The CPS will never prosecute somebody for perverting the course of justice simply because, for instance, there may be discrepancies in the evidence, or because the victim chooses not to continue to support a case, if the prosecution stops the case, or if a jury finds the defendant not guilty...A prosecution will only be brought where there is…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:26 PM
1

It’s a term coined by feminists for gender-specific, patronising explanation intended to keep the other gender from speaking up, to train it in self doubt, and to exercise its own unsupported overconfidence. You know, like when a feminist patronisingly explains the concept of “mansplaining”.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter