TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RingosTurdFace Archive

View 12 posts and 1,125 comments by RingosTurdFace on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2042

DiscriminationRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:16 PM
737

DiscriminationRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights07/06/17 03:01 PM
103

Social IssuesRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights07/02/21 12:33 PM
58

RingosTurdFace/r/MGTOW20/01/19 07:22 PM
32

Social IssuesRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:49 PM
9

RingosTurdFace/r/MensRights31/12/19 02:25 PM
3

RingosTurdFace/r/MGTOW19/07/19 09:36 PM
2

RingosTurdFace/r/MGTOW20/11/19 11:56 PM
1

Marriage/ChildrenRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:26 PM
1

IntactivismRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:04 PM
1

GeneralRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights10/06/21 01:38 PM
1

FeminismRingosTurdFace/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:31 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,125 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
57

I’m happy such a book has come out (and I’ll buy it) but isn’t it sad only women are “allowed” to bring these books out or be listened to when advocating for men. Christina Hoff Sommers similarly has written some great books and advocated to men too. Men it on the other-hand just get shouted down, ignored and accused of being toxic for daring to try and stand up for ourselves, whilst ironically (given we’re not allowed a voice) simultaneously told were the privileged ones.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 11:25 AM
3

100% of false rape allegations are made by women as is paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:54 AM
26

Edit - TL/DR The term “toxic masculinity” is used essentially as a form of ‘victim blaming’, implying men are the cause of their own problems and that is then to justify not creating tailored support for men. In detail: Rather than acknowledge that men have very little organised support (eg government funded initiatives or awareness campaigns) tailored for us and therefore have to engage with that point and accept that generally problems that men face as a group aren’t important to society at an…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 04:18 PM
29

Men and boys in the west have been systematically “attacked” for want of a better word and it has had an impact. From portrayals of men as either evil, incompetent or both in mainstream media, a feminised education system which even has specific programs to explain to boys how they’re toxic but don’t know it and DEI programs which only have one gear - make it easier for women. It has had an impact. From falling enrolment at college, dropping out of the job market. Increasingly living at home wit…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 02:34 PM
1

If this is truly to help address problems specific to men and boys, feminist organisations will 100% throw everything they have at it to stop it. Not because it would be of any detriment to them - but simply because they can not allow anything to threaten the lies about gender they have so effectively and totally pushed to the point where they’re recognised as universal truths.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:18 PM
53

I argue the only reason why people like Andrew Tate are the defacto face of the “manosohere” is because any other moderate and reasonable voices are simply shouted down and cancelled. Like it or not, it’s only people like Andrew - totally unapologetic and not having any regard for what other a might think of him - who are able to continuously get themselves out there and hence become the only ones who aren’t lecturing young men for being evil/toxic/defective, etc, etc.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:22 PM
1

Check out r/womenareviolenttoo
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:39 PM
53

No doubt this will be added by feminist organisations to their stats of “failure to prosecute rapist”.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 08:16 AM
1

I think Margot Robbie talks about taking her opportunity and full-on kissing Johnny Depp on set once.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:31 PM
25

Here’s one - in the UK, the cohort with the worst outcomes share these characteristics: 1. Poor 2. Single parent household 3. Male 4. White This “wheel” screams having been put together by someone wanting to push their agenda/pull together an overly simplistic view that they can use to try and legitimise/add credence to their ideas as to what constitutes power, privilege and oppression.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 12:14 AM
15

Look up adjusted vs adjusted pay gap. The latter (produced by the US bureau of labour I think some time around the mid 2010s) showed that the majority of the pay gap was down to personal choice (ie people/women could choose to take jobs that paid more but decided not to for whatever reason). Oddly we very rarely hear about the adjusted “pay gap”. 🤔
/r/MensRights02/12/25 12:19 PM
3

The glaring and longstanding self-disproof in the concept of “the patriarchy” (as a system that gives men privilege) is in the last screen-grab: “Bell Hooks wrote a lot about this ‘until we can collectively acknowledge the suffering patriarchy causes and the damage it creates..” Why would men set up a system that causes us such “suffering and damage”, especially if we have the so called privilege to change it. As usual here - men as a group being held accountable for all the ills of the world, t…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 05:41 PM
2

Also in the UK all men didn’t get the vote until 1918 (in exchange for getting shot and blown to pieces on the battlefield). When the centenary of that date came - crickets. I don’t think it even got a mention in the nation press despite being a significant moment in our history. Presumably because recognising that means understanding that being male doesn’t automatically mean you had “privilege”. Yet when we get to 2028 (the centenary of all women getting the vote) I suspect it’ll be rammed dow…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 02:02 PM
8

We’re all equal until being treated equally isn’t enough and they want equality with preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:50 PM
38

I have a friend who plays rugby. Once a year they put their rugby kit on and tour the local pubs collecting for charity. He says the behaviour of the women is outrageous - stroking/grabbing all parts of the body, hands everywhere, lewd comments, etc, etc. Basically exactly the sort of thing they complain so much about, but then do it themselves with wild and reckless abandon and without fear of any repercussions.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 08:32 AM
18

I think the female support system she talks about hasn’t been eroded - it’s modern equivalent is social media. Facebook groups, WhatsApp, etc. If anything it’s a female “support system” on steroids, allowing women to turn to any time, any where it to get validation for their actions (“Of course you should have divorced him, you deserve better”, etc). Meanwhile anything similar for men (such as this sub) is ridiculed, ostracised and men even admitting we turn to each other for support (in a men’s…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 12:25 PM
91

Yet most married men I know would love to see their friends more but are terrified of the reaction of their partner/wife and have to essentially get permission to go out.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 11:23 AM
7

The only “pro-male” (I.e. not telling boys they’re predators who oppress women and also every issue they face is because they’re toxic and don’t talk enough about their emotions) voice that continue to be heard are the extreme ones like Andrew Tate. Any moderate pro-male voice is shut down - they’ll be branded ‘misogynistic” (just like Andrew Tate is) and cancelled, but unlike Andrew Tate (who couldn’t care less) the typical moderate pro-men person will succumb to the criticism and stop. The med…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:59 PM
30

When a man scams money of a woman it’s “romance fraud”, is illegal and will get written about in the press. When a woman takes half a man’s stuff, it’s just divorce and men are expected to suck it up and no-one’s (certainly not the press anyways) interested in the slightest.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:51 PM
2

TL/DW - currently boys who are victims of some types of crime which is categorised as “gender based violence” are protected under policies created for female victims, this bill is basically “boys should have their own gender specific protection vs being treated essentially in a regime set up for girls and women”. Remarkably though - the boys treated this way (under VAWA protection) seem to be included in the stats for violence against women! If so I can imagine the feminists shooting this down p…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 12:40 PM
39

I think we should start to normalise the phrase “false accusation survivor”.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 11:05 PM
1

I had a brief Reddit exchange on this very topic recently, the person I exchanged comments with claimed this preferential treatment of “women and children first” was in exchange for women “not being treated like real people”. They’re probably is able to hold (like so many others) the two contradictory views simultaneously that a) men have privilege and oppress women whilst b) being literally expected to give their lives in preference of the people we supposedly have privilege over and oppress 🤷‍…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 08:42 PM
10

It’s not a “wage gap” it’s a choice gap - it’s acceptable for a woman to choose career or other, for men, much less so. How many women for eg are forced to pay alimony/child support after a divorce?
/r/MensRights25/05/25 01:30 PM
4

Very risky: https://c2cjournal.ca/2020/11/the-millionaire-his-ex-girlfriend-and-the-family-court-judge/
/r/MensRights05/05/25 09:23 PM
12

Misandry leads to misogyny.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 10:14 PM
3

Presumably in this instance, it’s whatever it is that means you have to sit and wait until after all the other people who don’t qualify as little boys, get to do everything else before you.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:57 AM
5

Have added Nike alongside Gillette. I’ll try to never buy any of their stuff again.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 08:52 PM
1

Ask what is the purpose of having a patriarchy is if it’s damaging to men. If there is a “patriarchy”, presumably it’s there to oppress women and help keep men in power, and if that’s the case then it wouldn’t be harming men. If they insist it is harming men, then any “patriarchy” can’t exist fr the benefit of men, in which case men can’t be ‘privileged’ at the expense of women and the patriarchy can’t exist (at least in the way feminism claims it is).
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:54 PM
2

Because if the male acceptance rate were to be higher, 100% it would be held up as proof of some form of discrimination and there would be some form of action/programme to stop it.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:50 PM
1

I best describe this with bell-curve distributions. Consider the phrase “men are physically stronger(*) than women”. Is that true in all cases? Of course not. There are many women stronger than some men, but on average (ie the population under the peak of the curve) men are stronger. It’s the same with marriage. For whatever reasons, I’d say in the west women are on average more inclined to get married than men. However there are certainly women who either don’t want to get married at all or can…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/24 03:27 PM
1

There was parliamentary conversation a few years ago to stop sending women to prison altogether (for any offence), apparently it’s not good for them. Of course we’d continue to send men to prison. More evidence the system (and society at large) just cares more about women than men.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 01:21 PM
1

The acknowledgement that this has been happening to men for years, but now it’s happening to women something must be done is awful. It’s essentially an admission they knew how unfair it was, but didn’t care as they benefitted. Now however it’s not a completely one sided game, it’s not fun anymore and so something must be done. Awful.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 12:05 PM
9

Another example of the empathy gap. Women can somehow understand and approve of this when a man is forced to give a woman money (“she supported him success”, “she have him the best years of her life”, “she sacrifices her career”, etc). Yet the same circumstance with the genders reversed and it’s totally unfair.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:18 PM
38

There was that good samaritan in Australia who helped a woman whose car had broken down. In return she falsely accused him of sexual assault. Edit - here’s a link to the story: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7178347/amp/Teenage-girl-lied-Good-Samaritan-demanding-sexual-favours-fixing-car-apologises.html Edit 2 - I can’t help myself here, gents, who would you rather come to the assistance of: 1) a bear with say it’s leg in a bear trap, or: 2) a woman broken down at the side of a remote …
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:56 PM
6

The behaviour of the wives of several male friends I know I would consider to be coercive control. They’re often afraid to go out, needing “permission” and living in almost constant fear of their wives mood and anger should they stray from approved activities. It’s almost a national joke (and remember that many a true word is spoke in jest) that men will live constantly needing to get their wife’s approval for any and all activities once married. “Happy wife, happy life” as they say. Yet no focu…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:21 AM
8

A social experiment of the same gets the same result here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/BjkCjanisx
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:54 PM
25

Ask most women: “Do you normally get broken up with or do you end the relationship” and almost all will proudly tell you that “they do the dumping” (and somewhere between 70~80% of divorces are imitate by women. Yet, those same women, if asked, will tell you that men are commitment-phobes, the huge discrepancy lost on them until you ask them to explain it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 02:57 PM
10

Consenting adults, good for both of them I hope they enjoy it. Media hostility to this is only one way though - it’s bad when men older men do it. Demi Moore and a man almost half her age gets applauded in the entertainment sections of newspapers and magazines. There was on the front cover of a pull-out magazine here in the Uk recently a woman in her 50’s crowing on about (as the sub headline) how good sex with her young man in his 20s was. Again, I have no problem with this, it’s just that coul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 11:26 AM
3

I think you’re initial thought is correct - it will include men (and it’s not “zero sum” so both men and women can “benefit” at the same time from this). I guess I was just having a moan, if this guy gets his way, whilst fewer men will be imprisoned, no women at all will be. So I think it’ll be another double standard…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:12 PM
9

In the interview where he spoke of the thirds of prisoners who should/probably shouldn’t/shouldn’t at all be in prison, the final third (who should NOT be in prison), he specifically mentioned containing women. There has already been suggestions to never send any women to prison in the UK, it looks like that policy is about to be picked up again (though hopefully alongside it there will be a softening on incarceration of men for non-violent offences with more of a focus on rehabilitation/support…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:29 AM
-6

This is likely going to be unpopular, but hear me out: The world is the least stable it’s been in decades, the west faces threats from many sides - China, Russia, North Korea and places like Iran would all like to replace the west’s dominant position in global politics or simply see us burn, and we’re currently ill prepared to fight if things really did start to go down. The reality is men generally are much better than women in combat and (this sounds awful, but it’s true) - you need women to p…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 09:40 AM
6

And yet - try dating a woman for more than a year or two and see who’s the one pushing for marriage and legal commitment. In my (and many of my friend’s) experience, it’s the ladies who want to get married more than the men. “If you liked it then you should have put a ring on it” etc The more paranoid side of me thinks certain pockets of feminism (the academic kind produced by bitter, middle-class, educated women) use this type of study to further drive a wedge between the sexes and damage the i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 08:56 AM
14

A) assuming the surgery is necessary, she’s only harming herself with this. If I were the surgeon, I’d think: “OK, your choice, next patient please.” and let her consider her next move, presumably trying to find a female surgeon, which brings me onto: B) there’s a reason most surgeons are male, and it’s not sexism. Becoming a surgeon is extremely tough - you have to do the hard years in general, specialise and then have what it takes to skillfully butcher someone. Because of all that, it’s a lif…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:40 PM
11

EDIT - TL/DR - I think women find it harder to compensate if they’re physically unattractive. In more detail: I think women are judged on their looks which can be an amazing advantage, or can put a real dampener on your life. Attractive woman - your life can be amazing, so many doors opened for you, offers, etc. just because people want you around. It’s the same to a lesser extent for attractive men, though there are far fewer men who make women weak at the knee solely on looks than there are ho…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:12 PM
6

In 1997 in the UK, Lee Jeans ran a poster ad which featured a naked man lying on his stomach, hovering menacingly close to his anus, emerging from a pair of boot cut jeans was the stiletto heel from a woman’s boot. The tagline was: “Put the boot in”. Google seems to have forgotten about it now, though it’s mentioned here: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=nT6pCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT153&lpg=PT153&dq=lee+jeans+put+the+boot+in+advert+stiletto+anus&source=bl&ots=sU_GDLHD80&sig=ACfU3U0D-c6ojnLXSv0PyOOrwzItV…
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:03 PM
9

Male “role models” are only “allowed” (ie given airtime in mainstream media/not shouted down in social media) if they repeat the message that women are oppressed, masculinity is toxic, etc. So any moderate male role model is simply drowned out and the only ones who’s voices remain are on the extreme end of the spectrum, unapologetic, not allowing themselves to be silenced like Andrew Tate. If our feminist dominated media was less extreme itself, there would be multitude more of “normal”, positiv…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 08:32 PM
2

But wait - we’re the ones with the male-privilege! What do you mean we get banned for participating in privilege subs like this one? Where’s the privilege in that? It’s almost like we don’t have privilege, but that’s not the case surely…? /s
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:59 AM
33

You can understand the dynamic - they crave being the centre of attention, playing the victim gets them that in buckets. It must be so addictive for them. Inside either they’re psychotic enough that they’ve tricked themselves that they believe it, or it’s some kind of Munchausen syndrome where they crave the treatment without actually having the disease. For the people flocking to her feed to tell her how “strong” she is, and what a “survivor” she is, they’re getting to validate and amplify thei…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 03:22 PM
4

At this point I’d like to think you’re a troll, but looking at your post history I don’t think that’s the case sadly. Assuming you’re not trolling, could I ask you to look in the mirror and ask yourself the question: “Would I accuse women who’ve never been pregnant but are discussing concerns around not being allowed the choice of a termination if they became so of ‘stealing the pain’ of women forced to carry to term, of ‘puffing themselves up’”? And by your logic, the researchers who wrote the …
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:08 PM
3

Sadly I think you’re absolutely correct, a case of pulling the ladder up behind them. There was post on here a few days ago where I think a Spanish men’s organisation had published figures relating to female perpetrators of domestic violence. Apparently many prominent feminist organisations were up in arms, demanding the government prevent publication of the figures, claiming it damaged their cause. Absolutely disgusting, happy to have their voice, shout it loud, ram it down people’s throats and…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 03:21 PM
11

LOL
/r/MensRights20/05/24 02:21 PM
8

Lol, ok. Though .. extending your philosophy, I guess that means women don’t need to worry about a potential lack of abortion rights unless they’re actually pregnant themselves? And for the record - I should say I’m 100% pro-choice, I’m using such a provocative question to understand more your “If it doesn’t directly affect you, don’t sweat it” outlook on life.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:17 AM
19

Bit of of a “mike-drop” comment there with no context, though I think I get the point you’re trying to make, however as far as I cam see the article doesn’t contain enough information to be able to support it. You can be trying to show that either on a) an absolute or b) relative basis sex work (predominantly female) is more dangerous than all other jobs and therefore dispel the “myth” that men make up the vast majority of workplace fatalities? If so, firstly then, let’s tackle absolute deaths. …
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:08 PM
102

And also more than 90% of workplace deaths are men.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:52 PM
4

This is partly a result of birth sex selection in China - normally ever so slightly more girls are born than boys, however in China this is natural ratio was disrupted by various means and hence there are more men than women, meaning women can to an extent have their pick, leading to desperation (like Jiu Lie’s) and giving women lots of money to pick you. A similar thing is happening in UK and US universities where women massively outnumber men. It means the men there are in high demand and can …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:03 PM
79

It’s wild - imagine a world where the “offcuts” from female circumcision (aka female genital mutilation) were used essentially recreationally (or at least in a completely non-essential, cosmetic use) by men. The world (or certainly western media) would practically implode with screams of misogyny, systemic oppression, etc. But the other way around (as it is here) - it’s almost a mildly amusing/interesting filler story (however it essentially highlights the fact there exists an actual industry th…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:23 PM
6

I’ve seen a few marriages work, a few that haven’t and a few friends (also myself) in longterm, stable relationships without having the legal contract of marriage in place. My friends who’ve ended up getting divorced never saw it coming, the legal process, cost and emotional impact of dissolving that contract was significant and had significant impact on the children (mainly when the divorce was acrimonious). I.e. There is a real downside when a marriage turns sour. On the other hand, unmarried …
/r/MensRights11/05/24 07:37 AM
132

Probably seemed like a good idea in the product meeting at the time: Bumble management: “We’ll remove men’s ‘privilege’ to make the first move and ‘empower’ only women to do that, go empowered women!” Female bumble users: * crickets * Bumble management: “We’ll remove men’s ‘privilege’ on our platform to not have to make any effort and not risk rejection by removing their rights to not make the first move!” Try as they might, pretend as much as then can, these companies just cannot get around the…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:57 PM
2

Where and when?
/r/MensRights09/05/24 09:44 PM
2

You’re absolutely right about people lying (unless there’s some real edge-case person out there). Also I respect “getting out” of religion. I had an ex-partner, she got out of the witnesses after her then husband cheated on her, she told me how they completely ostracised her when she first stopped attending church; as pretty much her whole life was that congregation it made it very difficult initially, which presumably is all part of the plan - keep the flock nice and close/tight so it’s hard to…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:49 PM
30

Some humans lie sometimes. Women are humans :. some women lie sometimes. :. Require solid evidence to prove any accusation.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 02:41 PM
3

Enough of us unite and a) with a combined voice win recognition for the gender specific issues which men face and b) create organisations that are accepted enough by the institutions and machinery of our governments that they can influence policy and lobby for recognition of mens issues and actions to address them (so in sort, what “equality feminism’s” original aims for women were. I’m cracking on a bit now and can see the growth of this sub and our “movement” - more and more men (and women) th…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:29 PM
1

Found it: https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/mandel-multi-millionaire-must-pay-support-even-though-he-didnt-live-with-woman Check out the “commonlaw marriage” rules where you live, you can easily get caught out.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:56 PM
3

Also be aware of “common law”, where you’re legally automatically deemed married after certain conditions have been met. Remember reading about some Canadian millionaire getting fleeced by his “girlfriend” when they split up. They hadn’t lived together, but had been dating exclusively long enough for her to be considered married to him. He lost millions.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:20 PM
3

Nor in the UK. Divorce lawyers wouldn’t be able to cream it in with hostile divorces if everything was already agreed with a clear head before marriage.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:18 PM
5

Can’t have women being disadvantaged when they divorce now can we.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:17 PM
6

MeToo When I was young (sadly more years ago that I would like to admit now) I was reasonably stacked and had a decent set of guns/disco-tits. Many times in bars, late at night when everyone was well on their way, women would have no qualms about grabbing my arms and giving them a good squeeze and telling me how much they liked them. I’ve also woken up twice having been black-out drunk (entirely self inflicted) with women kissing me, one was even prying my mouth open with her fingers so she coul…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 10:18 AM
2

This doesn’t answer your question directly but is relevant and was too good a coincidence to pass up - this post was directly under yours in my feed: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmTheMainCharacter/s/kVL65QxXoE
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:14 PM
9

It is genuinely sad that I would be made to feel uncomfortable approaching a child or young person who could be in trouble, however like u/reddiot says - in doing so I risk being falsely accused or even attacked. Depending on circumstance I might observe at a distance whilst calling the police, but as the saying goes: “No good deed goes unpunished”. I even read for example of the police being called on fathers at the play park with their own children…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:09 PM
3

Fair enough, “you do you” as they say, good luck with the nihilistic crazyness! Maybe relevant: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-3SE33rxH04
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:30 PM
19

I get it, the man vs bear argument is ridiculous, but you can’t fix stupid and point scoring like this a) gives them attention and b) the satisfaction they think they’re “getting” to us. “They” can x-post everywhere every time a woman is attacked/injured by a man. Then “we” can respond by pointing out every time a man is attacked by a woman…. But where does it all get us? Almost no-one is going to change their beliefs with all this. I say ignore - move on, live a good life. For my part, sadly, I…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:52 AM
13

“Don’t argue with idiots - they’ll bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience”
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:04 PM
4

Imagine a male judge saying this to a sexual assault perpetrator - “you didn’t leave any no physical scars, so bad but not really that bad”. Wild.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 01:01 PM
16

Funnily enough there was a video earlier (I think on r/IAmTheMainCharacter) where a woman was in a gym, filming herself next to a couple of guys. She was boasting how she was lifting more than the guys next to her. So on the same day this story “breaks”, an example of a woman filming (and shaming) men in public.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 05:05 PM
4

I remember once many years ago getting annoyed (in a polite and friendly way I should add) with a doorman who wouldn`t let my (male) friends and I into a bar, but was letting women in. Sexism! We persisted and in the end he was like: ‘F**k, go in if you want” and in we went. It was an absolute sausage fest, we took one look, didn`t even get a drink, turned around and walked out. On the way out he looked at us with a smile and we admitted he was right. After that I begrudgingly understand this pr…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:04 AM
1

There was a similar app years ago called LuLuvise - it hooked into men’s Facebook profiles (without permission) to take their information and allowed women to add to that and rate the men anonymously and without any knowledge on the man’s part. Originally it was just for college populations but it rapidly grew and had no problem finding funding. Ultimately it faced enough concern they limited the type of information that could be added before it finally died. Ultimately a formalisation and norma…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:23 PM
29

Also women kill and harm children at greater rates than men. And it’s highly likely that women kill their male partners at higher rates than is currently understood because they use less obvious methods (usually poisoning) to do so.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 03:54 PM
4

By her own argument, do we not continue to need a minister for women then? Also by her defensive logic (of having a minister for men making an enemy of women) would she not think that having a minister for women would “make enemies of men” or does she not care?
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:52 PM
22

Questionnaire: “Did you look at a woman you find attractive and have thought that could be described as sexual about her”? Respondent answer: “Yes” Researcher conclusion: “Respondent admitted committing mind rape and hence has performed multiple acts of sexual assault/aggression”.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 11:26 AM
16

Interesting in a way but I believe the “pay gap” measure is absolute bulls**t overall. Encapsulating something as complicated as pay, for an entire large organisation, into a single value is almost meaningless. Also the pay gap figure is never (that I’ve seen anyway) accompanied by an explanation, e.g. was it a highly paid CEO that skewed the figures, are certain junior job grades dominated by a particular demographic (for example here, could the pay gap against men be powered by janitorial and …
/r/MensRights27/02/24 10:00 AM
9

Someone quick - tell male criminals not to run too quickly - it’s unfair on the female police!
/r/MensRights25/02/24 10:08 PM
1

American police kill, per capita, more police than those (police) in Pakistan. Compared to their wealthy counterparts, US police kill rates are truly eye-opening: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2020/06/05/policekillings/ Edit: this page has more data and isn’t limited to rich nations: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/police-killings-by-country Also, just remembered about this which made it onto Popular today: https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/s/AmGWYHHx8V Finally, in at leas…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 10:07 PM
215

Company I work at (large multinational, generous maternity leave arrangements) - young woman completes her three months probation, then literally within days - bam, pregnant! Takes full maternity entitlement. Returns, shortly after - bam, pregnant! Again full maternity entitlement (leave/pay) taken. She returns a second time, and then … bam! Pregnant a third time. You guessed - full mat leave taken. In the almost three years this took place over, she was barely in the office (this was pre-lockdo…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 03:04 PM
17

Yes, women absolutely use the scarcity of sex to tempt men into doing what they want. Looking at it from another angle though - we men allow ourselves to be manipulated by women who restrict sex to make it the scarce resource we will sell ourselves (and our friends) out to get. Don’t marry. Spend the money you’ve saved on the divorce on things for yourself, like personal training, retiring early, fast cars and/or prostitutes(*), etc (* one way or another you’ll pay for it anyway).
/r/MensRights21/02/24 09:03 PM
28

Men having time for themselves is seen as selfish. Feminists will complain of the extra “emotional labour” women have to bear when men spend time on themselves. Feminists will argue that on the other hand, women need to spend time on themselves, and if any man dare comment on that, it’s controlling behaviour/toxic masculinity. Evidence again of the feminist total lack of empathy.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 07:24 PM
428

Welcome to the patriarchy, a system set up and run by men to oppress women. /s
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:18 PM
96

Men need to behave like saints. We can be provoked, angry partners in our faces, pushed, slapped, yelled at and have to walk away. The second you react, it’s: “Look at this man, violent like all the rest of them. Toxic, violent masculinity!”
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:50 AM
28

“Violence against women and girls”. This they promote as a “hate crime” whilst violence against men is some kind of “normal”/acceptable(?) crime. The “pay gap” - this made up statistic they pump hard and try to stop anyone asking questions about. If accepted, it gives the appearance that women are paid less than men for the same work (which they aren’t, it’s been illegal for decades). But it allows them to press for lots of initiatives that focus only on promoting the development of girls and wo…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 11:21 PM
15

Yet - (and I have had this very conversation), when you point out to the person who’s just told you the “patriarchy” oppresses women and benefits men, with clear, objective, undeniable examples, how men are suffering, and in ways that don’t affect women, that fuck-knuckle will often say, without even an iota of doubt or critical thinking that: “Yes well the patriarchy harms men too, and thats why we should all be feminists, to overthrow the patriarchy and make life better for women AND men”. To …
/r/MensRights14/02/24 10:29 PM
37

Even more, feminist organisations will actively try to stop anything from happening or even allowing this message to be shared widely.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 02:00 PM
38

Because obviously if a woman commits a crime against a man, he deserves it. She wouldn’t do it if she didn’t have a reason. /s Though seriously, I’m sure if you ask a feminist, the patriarchy is to blame here. If men helped women overthrow the “patriarchy” then we’d see more women punished for their crimes. Also /s
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:37 PM
1

Absolutely. You are most welcome, even if you disagree with us, as long as you’re prepared to explain why to disagree, debate in good faith and with an open mind we will do the same. Maybe we’ve misunderstood something as a collective and can learn; or if others have misunderstood something about this movement we would like to help them understand too (hopefully dispelling the myth(/deliberately spread mistruth) that we’re angry “incels” who hate women!)
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:25 AM
27

Check out the “adjusted pay gap” which accounts for life choices and other germane factors. The US Bureau of Labour Statistics produced one a few years ago, the “gap” came out at about 2%, so there was something they couldn’t account for which meant men got paid more than women. Though similar to your observations - men make up over 90% of workplace fatalities, so how much are those extra 2cents worth…?
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/24 08:13 PM
64

It’s classic “it’s only bad when they do it”. If women were forced to behave according to the standards expected of men, they wouldn’t know what hit them.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:07 PM
158

“…tried to initiate sex with him by fondling him under the bedcovers…” According to the morals of today, that touching without consent is sexual assault right there.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:58 AM
87

Wouldn’t be surprised if the police had turned up and hand-cuffed + arrested his corpse under suspicion of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:49 PM
107

There were a few posts years ago on AITA, exactly the same but with the genders reversed. When the “woman” was asking the question -“NTA” When the “man” asked the same question - “YTA” Absolutely, direct, clear double-standard. Undeniable. When it was called out, the responses were like “well you tricked us, misandry doesn’t exist you MRA incels”. Wild. You couldn’t ask for more a clear and precise demonstration of different attitudes to men and women online.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 11:02 PM
8

Fails to mention the adjusted wage gap 🤦🏻‍♂️ Either very poorly researched article or deliberately stoking the flames.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/24 07:32 PM
8

Author of a book printed on a press, invented and probably run by … men. Or broadcasting her inane drivel on the internet, again the result of mainly development and efforts of men, and kept up and running largely due to the efforts of … men. Who buys and eats food produced by … men, built by men, and travels their on transport systems , etc, etc. She clearly has mental issues, though it’s a shame she gets any airtime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/24 05:33 PM
24

I can only imagine their reaction if one of us complained on here that we weren’t getting enough head (or even sex) from our female partner and how we needed it to “know our true worth”. The hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:32 AM
1

Replies apply to the West (UK/USA): Education - men falling significantly behind, esp in higher education. Crime and punishment - significant focus on non custodial sentences/rehabilitation for women, men get sent to prison, so less support for men. Homelessness - around 80% men. Many young men growing up without a father present at home, contributes significantly to likely hood of poor educational achievement/substance abuse problems/involvement in crime. Conversely - fathers routinely being lo…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 12:50 AM
19

In the US, there are no exceptions for not paying child support. One boy became a father at 13 to a girl several years older than him (so he was per statute, raped). At 18 he was forced to pay child support. One veteran who was a PoW in Bagdad (and so understandably couldn’t pay) was arrested and sent to prison the seco d his feet jit the tarmac on US soil following his release. In the UK, men are significantly more likely to be sent to prison than a woman for the same crime and will receive a l…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 08:40 PM
29

At least they get media and parliamentary interest to look at their problems. I’m sure the industry will be forced to reform as have financial services. Compare and contrast with the number of men who’s lives have been ruined by being denied access to their children (as well as being forced to pay crippling child support), often with false allegations of abuse. Or the plight of working class boys (often from households with no father) who’re statistically the cohort most likely to have poor outc…
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/24 08:26 PM
12

The Daily Moan is all over the place, sometime spouting anti-male drivel, other days lambasting woke feminist non-sense. The Guardian is consistent however in it’s far-left, ideologically/academically driven feminist agenda which is very anti-male.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 03:34 PM
39

I think you could be right. When I was at school, it was nothing like as bad as it is now, if I ever expressed any of these arguments, almost no-one agreed with me. As my friends and I have gone through life, and some of them have experienced divorce/parental alienation and the treatment of men by the “system”, they’ve largely all come to agree. The younger generation in school now though it seems the vast majority of boys (and a good number of girls too) see how one sides it all is. Hopefully t…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:17 PM
213

God I hate the Guardian. I hate feminists who actively block the other side of this conversation, which if they allowed would give them the insight they need into why men REALLY retract from “feminism” (because it shames and silences men). I hate that men are told to speak out about our feelings yet when we try to discuss our issues in an open forum we’re always shouted down, and what we say labelled “misogyny”.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:01 PM
1

It’s throughout the curriculum now - history lessons they have to imagine being women throughout various phases of history and imagine how the women felt to have no power/choice, etc, etc. Politics, sociology, English assignments, school assemblies bringing in speakers to talk about the oppression of women (seriously, he’s been through all of these at his secondary school). There’s no way to avoid it and they can’t do anything but enthusiastically agree or stay silent.it cannot be questioned.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 10:54 AM
1

Sure, as Bill Burr puts it - we all have our “shit sandwich” to eat. The point here is - women’s issues are constantly discussed and brought up at school, in assemblies, in lessons, in homework assignments, etc, etc. Everyone hears about these. NONE of the issues boys face are ever discussed. If they try to bring them up, they’re shouted down and told they’re misogynistic and shamed into silence. It’s a huge double-standard and it leaves them asking the question - if no-one is going to even let …
/r/MensRights02/02/24 10:50 AM
110

This is my major issue with many “feminists”. Women do face problems which are specific to them, and I have no problem with those people trying to address those issues (as long as in doing so they don’t have to roll anyone else over). However when those people try to stop others addressing their problems, and threatening people who are telling the truth, because they don’t like what they are saying, they then are terrible people And that’s a lot of “feminists” - they actively try to block truths…
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:28 PM
18

And this (you) is one of the guys, who if s**t goes down, will literally be putting their lives on the line in battle to “defend” those women and the country they live in.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:49 PM
189

There can’t be any surprise with this. My girlfriend’s son and all his male friends (~14 yrs old) feel the same. They’re constantly told at school that women are oppressed and face discrimination, and are made to feel that they, simply for being male, are responsible and must learn how to prevent this/support the betterment of women. Basically they feel shamed as a group. This is with a background where the girls at their schools generally feel “empowered” to act as they feel and be supported fo…
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:27 AM
120

Jess Phillips is pretty anti-man, up there with Harriet Harman. She mocked a suggestion for a discussion on men’s issues in parliament and have a feeling she blocked another proposal for parliamentary action on men’s issues, but can’t remember details so may have made that up. In short, she’s a pretty toxic individual.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:13 PM
39

Well … in the USA, if you’re name is on the birth certificate as the father - you’re 100% liable! There’s cases of women just putting a man’s details on the record who’s had almost nothing to do with the woman and the first he finds out about it is when child support comes knocking on the door demanding money. And the laws in the US are wild for non-payment. Literally no excuse/defences. One guy was a PoW in Bagdad (so obviously unable to pay child support) and was arrested and sent to prison th…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 11:16 AM
2

It’s tough man. Really easy to give advice but I know it can be really hard to follow, even if you think it would work. Low self esteem and depression is fucking tough. Firstly, as others have said - don’t be hard on yourself. You’ll do it (most of us do), look out for it, catch it, try always to stop it. But old habits die hard. Physical exercise is really important. Start with walks, set goals. Tidy the house. Eat less processed food and sugar. These simple things can add ip to significant imp…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 12:28 AM
7

Holy s**t OP, the details in that story are insane. “Then, one day, she asked him to get her marijuana. He said he didn't smoke or use drugs.” Right there, they should know this kid isn’t even into drugs, instead she insisted he got her some weed, he wanted to give it to her, she argued and insisted she pay, when under duress he takes the money, bam - “you’re a dealer son”. I’ve heard of this before, usually I believe the cops then threaten a lengthy prison sentence unless the kids go undercover…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:44 PM
2

Kind of agree. They care about the very successful men, the rest of us I agree - no interest.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 02:57 PM
347

He puts that very eloquently. Not defensive, not emotional, just matter of fact in a calm, logical tone which explains how it is, to a cohort who in my experience typically exhibit low empathy (and often high entitlement to boot). If that stunned-face was her genuine reaction then he’s done a very good job there.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:59 AM
151

Women are so much better than men at everything (according to this woman) but for some reason over 90% of all the gender specific aid/accelerator programs (girls who code, bursaries for education, gender specific networking events, etc) are for women 🤷🏻‍♂️ If is men are such bumbling buffoons, how come more/(/any) help is slung our way specifically?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:50 PM
17

Had to double-check, but that’s India. According to our media narrative, women have it pretty bad over there, yet here is literal slavery for the man ordered by their legal system. Absolutely disgraceful.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:44 PM
1

If you want to look at edge cases/try to disprove the rule with the exception, sure. Generally however, I think it stands to reason that a segment worth close to $1 trillion(!!!) /year is probably a strong sign that the people to whom that segment caters aren’t doing too badly.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 05:44 PM
34

Some are used in cosmetic treatments for women. Which when you think about it is pretty bad. Also at the end of the vid - “Come with me to get cells from foreskin!” caption with a smug-face. 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:48 PM
6

Housing. Percentage of homeless people who are male is something like 80%, meaning nothing really gets done. If it were the other way around, I’d bet a large sum of money on the fact that the problem would be prioritised and solved. Which leads me onto: Gender specific support and political representation. In the UK, we have a minister for women, but not for men (even the very suggestion drew mockery). Look for gender specific initiatives to help girls - you’ll find hundreds. For boys, you’d be …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 11:48 AM
9

Are the women in modern Bond movies two dimensional - no. Are they viewed as sex objects - generally no, though yes, the beauty of Bond women can be important parts of their characters. Though Bond’s attractiveness himself (see “budgie smugglers”) mean’s the guys don’t get to escape beauty standards either. Are the women now or have they ever been portrayed hatefully and overwhelmingly negatively? No Would I mind a man being portrayed the same way in some female led franchise as the women in a m…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:40 PM
16

You mean the ones where he has a female boss who insults him and is prepared to send him to his death has lots of uber-capable female assistants who frequently save his ass? Even engaging with your point, the Bond films from a less “enlightened” era never hated women, sure, they were sex objects, but never universally portrayed in such unflattering means. And even if they were, is it an excuse that because in the past women were treated in such a way, so now in the modern era (when they would no…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 07:21 PM
4

If you’re a “normal” person (ie or at least not into hateful “gender vengeance”), this film isn’t for you, and TBH if I’d have known ahead of time what I was in for, I probably wouldn’t have watched it (at least definitely not at the cinema). That said, having seen it at least gives me a fully informed opinion, so maybe buy it for £1/$1 in a charity/thrift store in a few months time, watch it and see what the debate is all about?
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:34 PM
307

IF society were so misogynistic, we wouldn’t have a film that hates(*) men gross billions of dollars and break box office records. (*) why do I think there is hatred of men in the film Barbie? Look at how all male characters are portrayed in the film, utterly two dimensional and pathetic. They’re either useless or awful when they discover the “patriarchy”. If you imagine a film that gave all female characters the same treatment, the internet would go into meltdown about how “misogynistic” the wo…
/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:12 AM
43

An aside from this story, more a personal reflection on a related topic. My girlfriend took me to see Barbie when it first came out, I had absolutely no idea what it was about, assumed some light-hearted feel good film with a good cast. Wow. I walked out of that theatre stunned by what a hate filled film I’d just watched. Awful. Yet it was celebrated as one of the best films and commercially far and away the best. Which to me shows just how much misandry sells.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 08:35 AM
7

Quite. So again, the very opposite to what we consider “oppressed”.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 08:18 PM
6

I agree entirely (and a lot of that pressure of course comes from other women, intra-sex competitiveness amongst women is just as high as between men, if not moreso). And let’s not forget we men have pressure placed on us with our “societal value” stemming largely from wealth, status and power; hence pressure to drive a good car, wear an expensive watch, etc.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:09 PM
47

Here’s food for thought: the world’s richest man owns a fashion and luxury empire (so predominantly female clothing and accessories). Yet we’re told women are oppressed and underpaid 🤷🏻‍♂️ My point being (for anyone reading this who didn’t get it) - how can this “oppressed” group spend so much on technically un-necessary, extremely expensive luxury items to make the person who sells them richer than industry titans and tech innovators like Musk and Bezos. I also acknowledge the point that men’s …
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:10 PM
28

The thinking behind this is that she is coming to this role with the brainwashing/false mindset of “women and girls are hugely discriminated against”, and therefore “equality” is obtained by focussing only on the advancement/betterment of women and girls. It’s not an exaggeration to say that at this point, this is a real life example of Orwellian “double-speak”.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:02 PM
20

Just to calibrate on your point of view - would you then also see it acceptable for a man to throw acid on a woman’s face (to remove her “beauty”) in revenge for her having cheated on him with five people?
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:13 AM
60

Have a read of this for an insight into a woman’s mind on a related topic: https://amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/apr/19/husband-is-becoming-domestic-slave Your relationship sounds like it’s focussed on domestic drudgery. Yes, we do need to tidy and cook and do boring things, but doing that it’s easy to forget to make time to enjoy fun, exciting things in life. I’d suggest you find a way to “break the pattern” together and try to find moments to enjoy life together as a couple.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 12:39 PM
4

Honestly, I don’t get why there is any contention with such a request. If there’s a council for women’s health already, it doesn’t mean that having a men’s health council will take anything from them, it’s not zero-sum, it’s additive, it should make it better overall. I don’t get how anyone can reasonably deny this.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 05:56 PM
7

The media portrayal here is interesting, single man = a somehow substandard human, desperate and incapable of getting a woman. Single woman = strong, independent, enjoying life, doesn’t need a man. The paranoid in me would say this [controlled portrayal/narrative] is done even if on a minor level to drive a wedge between the sexes, break down the family and make us easier to control as a population (divide and conquer), though maybe I should stop wearing my tin foil hat…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 11:18 PM
122

I call this the “empathy gap”, typified by the rules “it’s only bad when they do it” or “Judge me by my intentions but I’ll judge you by your actions”. These women typically are incapable of understanding/perceiving men as emotionally complex humans; instead seeing us as coarse “penises on legs” with only two primary driving emotions - lust and competitiveness. Them cheating on a man in this context is of no consequence, our feelings don’t matter, only their “YOLO”/don’t miss out on life. They a…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 12:31 PM
1

As you say, in your opinion. If you wish to live that way (and you can successfully live that way) then power to your elbow and all the best. For me (and many others), the world is more complicated. Sometimes working long hard hours is best, sometimes (well quite often in my job) it’s “can you x/y/z done by close of play/first thing tomorrow” and it’s a case of workload prioritisation and working incredibly hard over the space of a few hours to turn it round.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 11:48 PM
1

It’s the same as asking: “What’s up with big-bang exams?” (Which favour the way guys work/achieve) “You’re gonna have to work under pressure to turn around that presentation in one night”. The answer is nothing is wrong with either. However … the education system has largely chosen continuous assessment which is know to favour the way women work.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:36 PM
39

Pretty sure TwoX shadow bans you if you’re posting here.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 08:46 AM
18

Homelessness is similar - about 75% male. I remember there was an appeal for a homelessness campaign some years ago, it actually had the slogan: “Nearly one in four homeless are women”! If you wouldn’t need to look much further than that alone for reasonably solid proof society in general cares more about then plight of the average woman than the average man.0
/r/MensRights13/01/24 08:43 AM
93

The really scary thing here (aside from the fact a man can be sent to prison for many years, with flimsy evidence backed only by a woman’s accusation) is that very often, the only way the man is exonerated is because the woman admits her lies.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:24 AM
12

Your second paragraph is something never covered in these articles - how hostile education is to men. False accusations, mandatory “awareness training” of how anything they might innocently do can be considered assault and oppressive. The very structure of the courses (constant assessment vs big-bang exams) and the fact they’ve probably gone through an entire education dominated by female educators who discriminate against them. Misinterpreting their behaviour and undermining confidence. It’s go…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 07:01 PM
5

You don’t have to “let him in” on what you’re trying to do, in fact, I’d suggest don’t “try to do” anything other than spend quality time with your dad, away from your mum. Sadly you can’t tell him how things are, he needs to see and feel it for himself. Just getting him away from there, however that may be (trip to the zoo, going for lunch after he’s helped you with something where you live, etc) and having a good time with him, bigging him up and restoring what it sounds like your mother has t…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 05:50 PM
8

This is hard, manipulators will usually isolate their victims as it makes it easier to control them if the only viewpoint they get is the manipulators. Once isolated they (the manipulators) typically undermine confidence and make their victim think the best thing for them is to stay close to the manipulator. Any efforts to break the victim’s isolation will be seen as a threat by the manipulator and attacked as such. Assuming this is what’s happening to your dad, I’d suggest the best first thing …
/r/MensRights09/01/24 04:05 PM
4

This is the well documented “halo effect” that women benefit from in full swing.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:15 AM
5

I remember a woman on BBC Radio 4’s woman hour being interviewed, she’d written a book and in it had discussed her abusive mother and described their poor relationship. Apparently a some feminists/feminist organisations had tried to put pressure on her/threaten her because they didn’t want the appearance that all children’s relationships with their mothers are perfect to be threatened. Similarly, Erin Pizzey (the woman who set the first women’s shelters up) wrote a book (I think called Violence …
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:52 AM
49

“But he’s high value”. She seems to be so devoid of empathy that she expects anyone that hears her ex is “high value” will suddenly totally understand and consider her actions justified and rational.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/24 12:33 AM
15

They should this include this in the “unconscious bias” section of mandatory DEI training at work. Of course though that’s about as likely as an Elvis comeback.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 10:56 AM
14

“Equality doesn’t hurt men”.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 09:36 AM
3

Merry Christmas my man. Hope you’ve had a great day and “santa” got you what you wanted ;) Christmas can feel a lonely time, but conversely also can be intensely stressful if you can’t get space free from family, peace and quiet is bliss. Enjoy!
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:17 PM
4

Sexism is so rampant that the most senior person in the company is a … female. And she responds by only scrutinising male applicants (so with her current policy the entice c-suite could be white women and that would be fine?) The reality in these industries (esp in the UK) is the real discrimination is by background - public or privately educated individuals are proportionally more likely to be at the top or in senior positions. People from poorer backgrounds will be cleaning or making tue tea r…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 10:54 PM
2

How come you’re getting so many death threats?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 01:59 PM
3

So then you admit modern, western education systems cater to the needs of females over those of males?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 10:40 PM
38

Yes. So much so in fact that even the normally woke/feminist BBC covered it: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-31751672.amp
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:51 AM
3

Do you know what country they’re in? The Uk for example doesn’t have common law (where by default you’re treated as legally married and all that goes with that once you’ve been in a relationship for a period of time). If they’re in Canada however, he’s fucked.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:16 PM
3

To make the split of homeless even by genders you’d need 300% more homeless women (currently women are around 1 in 4 homeless).
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:31 PM
8

Absolutely, the privileges of: going through school with almost completely female educators (good role models) much more likely to be raised by a mother (again a good gender role model) vs in the UK almost 40% of boys grow up without their father present at home growing up in an environment that encourages you (“you go girrrrrl!”, “this girl can”, “Girls who code”, etc, etc) vs an environment which degrades you (“toxic masculinity”, “if you’re not an ally you’re part of the problem”, “you only a…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:29 PM
11

Yes, but that was because of the patriarchy - if a queen didn’t declare war, she would be seen as weak (by all the men that would be sent to war by her and killed) and she wouldn’t get equal taxes to a king. #TaxGenderGap /s
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:01 PM
18

Troll?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:29 PM
2

“Entitlement” - fact (as least for some hair colours): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1243964/Blondes-aggressive-brunettes-attract-male-attention.html
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 11:22 AM
58

Thank you for making this post, I saw the Two X one the other day and it made me recoil. Another point relevant to the topic: * women since the early 2000s have had higher average earnings than men (which is what you’d expect as they get a better education with a system tailored to their needs). This reverses at around the age women chose to have a family (a choice often not extended to men). Another strong indication of “not a patriarchy” is crime and punishment - men are must more likely than …
/r/MensRights09/03/22 11:13 AM
1

Men also make up the vast majority of victims of violence, so why focus on only female victims? Also I’ve never (as have the vast majority of men) never committed an act of violence, so why is the problem being put on us as though it’s our fault? Also, the truth around violence rates may not always be as clear cut as you’re led to believe: https://www.reddit.com/gallery/sl5emh
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 11:36 AM
11

Interesting but not surprising, evidence of the the original chads. What is surprising is they’ve not somehow tried to blame it on the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 05:21 PM
10

I find it extremely passive-aggressive. It’s worded to promote and agenda more than it is tackle the actual problem. It’s basically trying to shame men - it implies: A) the problem is created purely by men B) the problem continues because men aren’t doing enough C) so by extension women are completely innocent and nothing but passive victims And telling people off for something they’ve not done just drives them away in anger. If this is in good faith, the person behind it is an extremely angry p…
/r/AntiFeminists05/03/22 05:24 PM
4

Even BBC Radio 4’s regular programme on statistics “More or Less” covered the “one in four” myth, and thoroughly debunked it. The methodology by which the women got her data was breathtakingly biased. It was akin to going to a prison, and asking people of they were convicted criminals, and concluding that 100% of the population were law breakers.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 10:11 PM
12

Plot twist - Alexa identifies as male.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 09:52 PM
8

That heavy eyeliner always makes me think of a shit stage hypnotist.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/02/22 09:24 PM
124

From the article, emphasis mine: “The truth is, a more female future should in no way feel threatening to a real man” Compare that with the “No true Scotsman fallacy”: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman “…in the same way a "future is female" T-shirt doesn't threaten a boy who understands his privilege.” This should at least be a two-way street, yet there is feminist and media outrage at almost anything directed at boys to encourage them or give them a positive roll model. Feminists…
/r/MensRights18/02/22 01:54 PM
4

Not sure I get your point, are you saying that it’s just as hard being a single father as a single mother (i.e. gender doesn’t matter when it comes to being a single parent)?
/r/MensRights13/02/22 04:19 PM
35

The heart of the issue (in the article) seems to be that women who are mothers find it difficult to stay in employment whilst being a parent. If that’s the case, this is very much an outcome of feminism, with it’s “you can have it all” and “you don’t need a man” messages. Sadly, as many women who’ve swallowed these feminist lies are finding, having it all (i.e. being a single, independent woman and mother with no partner to help you) is very, very hard. Raising a child is very hard work, doing i…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:21 PM
3

Respect is a two way street - women shouldn’t be posting #KAM or stuff like “I love the taste of male tears” or “Yes all men” if they expect men to be chivalrous and pander to their princess fantasies.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 04:13 PM
7

Have no ideas of relative numbers (men vs women leaving sick partners), however I could make a guess as to which sex is more likely to leave their “deadbeat” partner if they lost (or even left) their job, affecting their ability to provide. Women know if they kick their unemployed partner to the curb, the state will pick up the tab and then when/if their ex partner gets a job again, they can take a bunch of their earnings via the child support racket.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 01:47 PM
3

As for most tests, the girls are outperforming the boys (in the article it mentions English and reading), what would be the point in feminists claiming the tests were biased against girls? Also looking at final outcomes (ie GCSE results), girls get significantly better results than boys pretty much across the board, so again I don’t see how feminists could claim discrimination against girls.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 09:15 AM
12

“Second-degree murder in Louisiana carries an automatic life sentence, and obstruction of justice carries a sentence of up to 40 years in prison.” also the daughter effectively testified against her mother by saying she didn’t see her father lunge at her mother. A very sad case all around, a child is left with one parent dead and another facing a lifetime in prison. Another example that these cases aren’t about gender - just violent people. And I’m not happy about it, but it’s good that this wom…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:43 PM
8

No, equal pay isn’t enough. Let’s have equal work too. Let’s see women work like men, in mines, on powerlines hundreds of feet in the air, in bad weather, let them work as many hours as men do and die as often as men in industrial accidents. And have their children taken from them by biased family courts, yet forced to pay the majority or all of their wages to their ex so they have no choice to work hard or be sent to prison. When they’re doing all that, then let’s talk equal pay, until then equ…
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:10 PM
260

If anyone is in any doubt as to how “equal” modern feminism wants things, then look at this very stark example from Sweden, a country often hailed as the poster child of “equality”: https://www.thelocal.se/20100112/24330/?amp tl/dr - When men were in the majority at Swedish colleges, Sweden used to allow men being denied positions solely on the basis of their gender, favouring women (who were the minority). The law that allowed that was gender neutral, so when men were the minority, they started…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 01:06 PM
7

I mean, what’s the point of even making a comment like this? If one day all men suddenly disappeared, I doubt any women’s thoughts would be: “Cool! Let’s go hit the nearest sperm bank and impregrate myself, we’ll all be fine!” It’s just needlessly inflaming the relations between the sexes. Presumably he’s just virtue signalling to try and get a crumb of pussy?
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 11:44 AM
6

Quite. Wouldn’t it be interesting to see a dramatisation of say one of the many thousands of instances every year where a man gets royally fucked by the feminist system. Plot could be: we meet a married couple, he works hard, good man, provides for his family. -wife, not fulfilled, cheats on him he finds out, they argue, she decides to divorce him he’s kicked out of the family home and is prevented from seeing his children, yet is forced to support them all financially unable to afford rent for …
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 11:54 PM
10

There’re some good comments made in there. Personally I don’t see a problem with female only “spaces” as long as male only spaces are just as acceptable. Unfortunately that’s not really the case - the Boy Scouts are a good example. Also public areas (like parking) just for women are a bit far, unless similarly we have male only parking spaces too. All this only stands to reason if we’re all equal as feminism tells us that we are.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 02:46 PM
19

Lol, I also do this exact same thing, it’s good to hear it’s not just me, thought I was getting paranoid. Very few white men, lots of interracial couples (though almost always African man/white woman, much less frequently it’s white man, African woman). I’m from the UK where our demographic is 80% caucasian, so statistically, it TV were representative, you’d expect most people on TV to be white, but of course that’s not the case. I’ve cancelled my TV license, Netflix, Prime (Prime studios are al…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 09:25 AM
5

Patriarchy, as in a society were positions of power are held predominantly by men - yes, looking at their political class most countries probably fit that definition. However, in the West in particular, those political systems most certainly are NOT set up by men to oppress women, if anything I’d say the opposite - men overall tend to be women’s protector, and this you can see in from gender specific laws which protect only women (VAWA), to the way women are punished (in the UK there are calls t…
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:18 AM
1

Probably metalwork closely followed by combined sciences (this was before the age of 14 which is when we elected which science subjects we wanted to study and classes were split into chemistry, physics and biology). How about you OP, care to share your favourite school subject?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:51 AM
1

Again a complex topic. It happened to one of my close friends who now has a traumatised 6yr old daughter and lives about 60 miles from his ex-partner/daughter of his child. The impact on all is horrific - the child has little stability, is deeply upset her parents don’t live together (and don’t like each other - they try to hide that fact but children are very perceptive) and he spends so may hours driving for picks ups and drop offs. It was just such a horrifically selfish act on her part - she…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 09:34 PM
1

And if a woman lies about taking contraception?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 08:53 PM
1

Having sex is not implicit consent to becoming a parent and all the responsibilities that goes with that. How can you possibly argue that from something as simple as a one night stand someone has moral right to change someone life so much without their explicit consent.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 08:43 PM
150

From the article: “Male pride' is suggested as one reason many older women miss out on children” “Male pride, … may be part of the reason.” So, there are other reasons and this may not even be one of them, but instead of looking at the various reasons for this problem and giving a balanced opinion, they honed in on the most newsworthy one which relies on an offensive stereotype of fragile male egos.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:45 AM
1

Do any of your friends see her do this, are there witnesses, or does she only do it when noone is watching? What does the teacher say to you/her when you report her for hitting you?
/r/MensRights23/01/22 08:36 PM
14

Yet society “oppresses/hates” women and men have “privilege”.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:44 PM
11

Just goes to show how full if hate they are. It’s not enough there’s already shit loads of help available only to women, they can’t stand to see men get any help at all. They’re like a vicious ex partner, who despite breaking up with you, can’t bear it when you move on and find happiness so come after you to make your life miserable.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 05:37 PM
3

If just one girl had been killed, the article would have focussed on her (or possibly she would have got an article to herself) and the phrase “epidemic of violence against women and girls” repeated all over it.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 10:02 AM
9

I watched an episode of the Big Bang Theory last night - in one scene the character Howard tries to kiss Penny and in response she punches him in the face. The next time we see him, he has a plaster on his bloody nose with considerable bruising around both eyes. The audience finds it hilarious. Reverse the gender and there would be absolute outrage.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 09:51 AM
2

Feminism and women have for decades demanded equal opportunity and treatment for decades. We’re told constantly that women are every inch men’s equal. Yet time and time again, when really being treated equally (pension age, criminal punishment, the draft, etc) suddenly equality equality it totally wrong and outrage occurs.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 08:28 PM
17

Some countries (I think Spain is one) have “yes means yes” laws on rape, which means as an accused man, you must be able to prove the woman was enthusiastically consenting throughout the encounter. I.e. you are guilty, solely on the word of your accuser, if you cannot prove your innocence. And even in “norma”, “guilty until proven innocent” legal regimes, like the US and UK there are many cases where men have been found guilty of rape who subsequently were totally exonerated. So yes, it’s absolu…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:06 PM
7

When women don’t choose STEM subjects, they blame it on sexism and patriarchy, despite it not being the case. When boys don’t choose teaching and healthcare, I bet they try to blame it on “toxic masculinity”.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 11:01 PM
1

Yup, having to construct and entire new theory with no basis whatsoever just to ignore evidence I can’t otherwise disprove.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/01/22 04:51 PM
5

Education and role models for young men. Currently the education system in the UK amd US is set up around the needs of girls leading to boys falling behind at an early age and never catching up, this can be seen most starkly in college enrolment rates. Also many young boys grow up without a father present and can go through the entire education system without a single male teacher. Feminists have driven home the importance of good role models for girls, but we completely ignore the same for boys…
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:22 AM
47

According to these US government statistics from 2019, almost twice as many children are killed by their mother than father: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubpdfs/fatality.pdf Approx 1800 children in 2019 alone and: “More than one-quarter (29.2 percent) of fatalities were perpetrated by the mother acting alone, 14.2 percent were perpetrated by the father acting alone …” So by the logic of the pitchfork mob you encountered (who claim it’s the gender of the perpetrator and not the victim that count…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/22 10:53 PM
113

If it’s bad for women, it’s the patriarchy. If it’s bad for men, confusingly, it’s also the patriarchy. If men do it and it’s bad, it’s the patriarchy. If women do it and it’s bad, it’s the patriarchy. If you ask for any evidence, you’re a misogynist, as concepts like logic and evidence are tools of the patriarchy used to oppress women (and men, because the patriarchy is bad for men too!) The only truth is our feelings and emotions, unless you’re a man, in which case your feelings and emotions d…
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 09:10 PM
2

I guess asking is for free, but then she must bear in mind that the response may often offend.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/22 05:58 PM
7

Look at France’s President Macron and his wife (who was his teacher). There would absolutely be outcry if the genders were reversed (I think in the UK it would be illegal now even). And yes, your example - media/reporting would be of rolling their eyes and saying “typical shallow man, after some arm candy”, yet the other way around (and I think Kylie did this + Demi Moore) and it’s encouraged/celebrated. Massive double standard. Also - thank you for being you. We need for female “allies”
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 03:05 PM
44

She had me, sorry, I meant totally lost me at: “I’m expensive” and then for good measure “looking for someone to make my life easier”. Absolutely shameless.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/22 11:40 AM
8

Yup. Turn up to a feminist space and try to raise men’s issues (because feminism is there to “help women and men”) and you’ll be told to fuck off and set up your own space by them.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 11:12 PM
1

Depends on context, though for the most part gender has little to do with it. For example if I see someone being attacked and believe they didn’t deserve it, I’ll try to help as best I can. I wouldn’t give a woman CPR however and would think twice about approaching a seemingly lost child, I’d perhaps just call the police. I also probably would think twice about helping a woman broken down at the side of the road (honeytrap and also false rape accusation like that dude in Australia). Though I als…
/r/MensRights16/01/22 05:42 PM
8

Good summary of the situation. It takes two to make it what it is, and from what you’ve said it sounds like you friend should pluck up the courage to end it with her, as it doesn’t sound healthy for either of them. Breaking up with someone is tough - seeing the pain you cause in someone you care for, but in the long run it’s the best for them both, and the sooner he does it the better.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 02:46 PM
3

I don’t get why feminists think it’s the most important thing in the world that a particular (well paid) field isn’t necessarily filled with the most qualified people, but instead a good proportion of women. If women aren’t at least 50% they won’t accept any other explanation than sexism. They demand all stops must be pulled out to get more women in, simply for the sake of getting women in. Yet if a field is mainly female (veterinary, much of healthcare, education, etc) it’s a sign that women ar…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 04:31 PM
2

Absolutely agree with this. Fundamentally for most people they’ll want to be parents at some point. Generally for a man the more resource you have, the greater the odds of you getting mate and having a better choice of mates (yes it’s a lot more complex than just this, but you can’t deny not having massive debts/having no financial trouble living/having a car/house/being very rich isn’t a part of it). For a woman it’s much more simple - largely just exist, don’t be morbidly obese and then pick w…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:03 PM
2

I’d argue to a large part the way society functions is driven by biology. Talk about one, and there’s a good chance it can be linked to the other.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 11:58 AM
5

“The suffragettes faced death for the right to vote”. And most men in the UK at the time were actually sent to war and many thousands actually killed for their right to vote. Those men who were eligible to fight and refused to do so (conscientious objectors) were in fact shamed for doing so by women who faced no risk of the horrors of being sent to the front (See the White Feather brigade). Also all women in the UK got the right to vote in 1928, however all men didn’t actually get the right to v…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 07:45 PM
16

In the UK you hear “pandemic of violence against women and girls” all the time from multiple sources. They’ve 100% been been prepped to say the phrase and the Met Police have had to respond, spinning up specialist units to investigate violent crimes against women. Yet look at murder statistics and (no surprise) you’ll find men make up the vast majority of victims. If you were an alien looking at these two facts, you’d be forced to conclude women are cared far more about than men. Yet we’re told …
/r/MensRights13/01/22 07:06 PM
2

Also women: https://www.boredpanda.com/hot-dudes-reading-books-instagram/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic Also let’s not forget the original purpose of the Luluvise app, which was a massive, organised invasion of privacy (against men) that thousands of women had no qualms whatsoever participating in (and in fact found fun and humorous whist rating men as objects and potentially destroying their reputation): https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/luluvise-nobody-ma…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/22 05:56 PM
6

Now this is true “toxic masculinity” (and toxic femininity) from that cunt Dr Phil and his horrific audience. The attitude of all in this clip makes me incandescent with rage, it’s so hypocritical and nasty. I’d like to understand a “feminists” take on this and see of they really are “allies” as they claim and disagree with it. Though sadly I think I’d be disappointed (to put it mildly) in their response.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/22 02:06 PM
24

To be fair to her, she’s not making it about gender, she just doesn’t want to lose half of her wealth, which man or woman I can certainly get on board with, and I would expect most of us could too. Yes - it’s satisfying to know women occasionally fall foul of these heinously unfair laws too, but in this case I empathise with the person about to lose half of their worth to another person because of ridiculous laws.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 02:02 PM
3

I think your question is mis-worded - you should look for general (eg by the legal, education or education systems as a whole) examples of men facing systematic discrimination vs “specifically women systematically oppressing men”. Flip your question the other way around for eg - can you give an example where specifically men are systematically oppressing only women? If you look for general examples of systematic mistreatment of men you’ll find: the Uk education system is designed around the need…
/r/MensRights09/01/22 11:43 AM
15

Another thing at play here is the original (hypocritical) advice she got when thinking about the break-up: Woman - “I’m not 100% happy and fulfilled in this tbh overall good relationship, what do you guys think?” Everyone - “Break up with him! You go girl! You only live once, if he doesn’t treat you like the kween you are, he’s not the one/doesn’t deserve you! Find someone who’ll treat you better.” ————————————————————- Vs: Man - “I’m not 100% happy and fulfilled in this tbh overall good relatio…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/01/22 12:47 PM
22

“Here’s some of your own medicine, how does it taste?”
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/21 08:50 PM
8

She is either absolutely stunning and can treat men this way, she’ll always be on the lookout for someone “better” and will never be happy, or no man with settle for her (because she treats them so badly) and she’ll go on to be lonely and blame men for her unhappiness.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/21 05:46 PM
52

“Men are really bad, they abuse women” “We’re better than men, let’s abuse this completely helpless and utterly innocent person that we’ve brought into the world”
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/21 10:55 PM
6

Only the right kind of bias is allowed. Check out this mews from Sweden, they had an equality programme that prevent men from going to university so that women (who were the minority in higher education) could go. Skip forward a few years, men were the minority and started getting places under the same programme at the expense of women. Suddenly it was disgraceful that we would prevent women from going to university (even though they were now the majority) and the programme was scrapped: https:/…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/21 11:47 AM
7

Good exchange there. Her position is the “No true Scotsman” logical fallacy. Very deluded.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/21 02:05 PM
4

Exactly
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/21 01:06 AM
11

There was a post on TwoX recently where some woman shared the fact that her partner wanted her to stay a “healthy weight” if they had a child together. Note - he’s not asking her to stay skinny, just healthy, ie not morbidly obese. You can imagine the response most of the women gave. Of course they all agreed he was awful and should be broken up from. How do you think they would think they would feel about obese men?
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/21 11:05 PM
2

And worst still, if you try to do anything, unless you know what you’re doing it’s easy to be branded a predator or pest. And if you try to get better at courting, you’re options are limited. The PUA route gets you labelled a misogynist/incel. And if you have any standards then you’re shallow.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 03:41 PM
2

And worst still, if you try to do anything, unless you know what you’re doing it’s easy to be branded a predator or pest. And if you try to get better at courting, you’re options are limited. The PUA route gets you labelled a misogynist/incel. And if you have any standards then you’re shallow.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 03:40 PM
160

“Protected groups”. AKA “Some are more equal than others”.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 09:35 PM
14

Here is a list of things that a woman’s charity considers coercive control: Isolating you from friends and family Depriving you of basic needs, such as food Monitoring your time Monitoring you via online communication tools or spyware Taking control over aspects of your everyday life, such as where you can go, who you can see, what you can wear and when you can sleep Depriving you access to support services, such as medical services Repeatedly putting you down, such as saying you’re worthless Hu…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/21 03:28 PM
32

So this man’s life turned upside down by this woman’s lies, I can’t imagine the pain. Also the child gets a good fucking over on this situation because of this woman’s lies. Also in the good old US of A I believe this poor dude is still going to have to continue paying child support even though he isn’t the father to a) prevent the state from having to pay in his place and b) I think the state actually take’s it’s slice of that money too. If we live in a patriarchy (for the benefit of men) I’d h…
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/21 03:54 PM
1

This is the patriarchy’s fault. I don’t know why it’s the patriarchy’s fault, but everything else seems to be so I’m guessing this must be too. /s
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/21 11:04 AM
8

Also the field of plastic surgery (which many women now happily benefit from) came about due to the number of horrifically burnt and disfigured pilots in WWII who were shot down in flames and couldn’t escape their cockpits. Surgeons of the day developed early plastic surgery techniques in an effort to give these brave men some normality back.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 10:53 AM
13

Related note - I remember listening to an interview with a female author (it was ok a programme called “Women’s Hour” on BBC radio 4, before you ask - no there isn’t a Men’s Hour annoyingly), the author was talking about her relationship with her mother who was abusive, she’d written about this. Apparently she was contacted by several women’s/feminist organisations telling her she couldn’t write bad things about her mother! They only wanted positive things to be written about women and mothers, …
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/21 08:26 AM
13

I would be more psychologically traumatised living in a world where I couldn’t look at or say anything to anyone in case I “traumatised” them because an everyday, normal action made them feel like they were about to be/had been sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 07:20 AM
6

It’s not a fight against women, or equality, it’s partly against gender feminism (look up Christina Hoff Sommers for her explanations of equality vs gender feminism), gender feminism does seem to empower women and in cases as the direct expense of men. It’s only concerned with women’s outcomes but not mens. And as women have “feminism” which seeks to address only the needs of women, then men need a men’s rights movement (or masculism if you prefer) to look to improves men’s outcomes in society w…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 06:34 PM
11

There’s quite a few results that come back if you google it, but here’s a couple of links on the topic: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-54278727 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-lost-boys-the-white-working-class-is-being-left-behind/amp
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:25 PM
16

Men having power is completely different to men using that power for the benefit of men. The “patriarchy” as feminists call it (that is men holding power) really is already worse for men in many ways, most of which are listed in this thread (e.g. worse treatment at the hands of the law, worse educational outcomes, worse health outcomes, less rights to a family. There’s hardly any recognition of these issues and even less gender specific action to address them). In the UK for example the statisti…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 02:12 PM
5

They’re like: Women’s problems = real problems Men’s problems = really women’s problems
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/12/21 11:44 AM
4

They’re hot on this - if it makes women looks bad or men look good, block it. It if makes men look bad, promote it. Not interested in tackling issues by looking at things objectively, just managing appearances. Pure hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 12:10 PM
1

This would have huge positive implications for western society. Unfortunately in the US I think the federal government takes huge amounts of money from child maintenance payments, so would never allow it on financial grounds. Also feminist organisations will fight tooth and nail to stop any and all of the above being implemented.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/21 07:39 PM
25

Whoa there cowboy! They be words of reason you’re talking. If you’re not careful you’ll say such reasonable things to the wrong person and it’ll challenge their rigidly formed, ideologically driven beliefs, and they’ll have to accuse you of being a woman-hating incel in order to find a sense of balance with their world again. /s?
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:22 PM
16

My observations: Women grant other women “YOLO” - live your best life, if you’re not happy move on girl. However women apply responsibility to men - they’ll often label you pathetic and a commitment-phobe / a man-child if you break up your family to follow personal happiness and fulfilment over your wife or children. My advice (and I admit it’s so easy for me to say this not going through what you are which I imagine is awful, but) - it’s almost certainly going to happen, if you let it break you…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:11 PM
18

Complete double standard from these women. “Men should hold the door open for me, pay to take me out, provide for my needs, fuxk me hard when I feel horny, never reject me, be strong and masculine, protect me, always be there for me”. But then about themselves: “I’m a princess, I shouldn’t have to worry about my size, I’m beautiful however I am, he should accept me as I am. I shouldn’t have to cook for him or clean the house, this is modern times. He should respect my boundaries, I can say “no” …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen25/11/21 06:26 PM
1

You know things are bad when a 1960’s 2nd wave feminist who owns a copy of the SCUM manifesto is having to jump to the defence of men and who also faces a barrage of abuse online for doing so. As an aside - I’ve cancelled my TV license (I’m in the UK) and my Netflix subscription. Don’t give these misandric cunts your money or ruin your mood by watching this mainstream hate.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:28 PM
12

Consider how the behaviours are painted - traditionally when a man returned from work and his wife wanted to speak to him (perhaps not having had adult company all day), he would have been portrayed as cold and uncaring towards her - there was sympathy for the woman and the man was at fault. The man did not display enough emotion to his wife. Here it’s the opposite, and yet still the man is at fault for wanting to talk to his partner on her return from work. Men’s needs and actions are always po…
/r/MensRights15/11/21 02:57 PM
3

Those same NGOs are also active telling these young girls that they’re oppressed, victims and men in general are to blame. So they provide both opportunity and reason to become feminists.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 09:43 PM
5

More lorry drivers would be nice too.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 11:41 AM
63

This is the exact same “arrogance” that almost all women are born with - the fact it’s easier for them than a man to find a new partner if they’re not happy with their current boyfriend. Suddenly it’s not so funny and “ruining dating” when men can take them for granted, cast them off for a trivial reason and easily find someone else. Welcome to the experience of most men ladies.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 10:49 PM
5

Check out the book “Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture” (it can be found on Amazon). It goes into this topic in quite a bit of detail, underpinned by their research.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:17 PM
5

What a timely post - I was taken to see “Last Night in Soho” recently and holy shit. Warning - plot spoilers: Every white man in the film is either absolutely, irredeemably horrific or murdered by a woman. Those men who are murdered are depicted as nothing more than pitiful, faceless creatures who’s crime was to use a prostitute (who is the person who murdered them). The prostitute is treated with compassion and forgiven by the script despite being a mass-murderer, whilst the men all deserved to…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:15 PM
3

And then get’s labelled a “deadbeat dad” because he doesn’t spend time with his children, even though he would love to and it’s the courts and system which actively prevent him from spending more time with them.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 12:11 PM
4

Look for the “adjusted” wage gap produced by the US Bureau of Labour (don’t get a much better source than that). They basically take the raw wage gap data (which shows women earn something like 80c for every dollar a man earns) and control it for personal choice. After that, the data shows women earn about 98c for every dollar a man earns. So women are making deliberate choices to prioritise life choices over work/higher wages. Choices men don’t get to the same degree (such as being a stay at ho…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 06:23 AM
129

Ahh well that’s the patriarchy you see. If we supported feminism and tore down the “patriarchy”, they could make life better for men by not requiring us to pay for a woman and her child, for 18 years because we both had a drunken one night stand, she decided to keep the baby and society placed all of the responsibility on the man’s shoulders, despite us both being mature, capable adults. So be a feminist and stop the patriarchy from doing this. /s
/r/MensRights18/10/21 06:22 PM
3

She is absolutely, cringingly awful. I’m mid 40’s now, if this is what many young women are like I really feel sorry for the young ken of today having to grow up with women like this. Utterly awful.
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 01:35 AM
11

These aren’t necessarily directly against feminism, but they make a strong case for the mens rights movement and highlight the issues men face in an increasingly misandric world: The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrel The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers (in fact anything by Cristina is good) Sanctifying Misandry Feminism is Cancer I think I know of others, I’m away from home at the moment, when I’ll look at my bookshelf and update this comment. Edit - Men on Strike
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 08:07 AM
-11

This fascinates me. Why do you think men’s rights is a pro-rape movement? For example, could you provide links to any posts in this sub calling for the legalisation of rape? Edit - I should say I believe in men’s rights as it’s right that men should get to discuss the things that negatively affect us as women have been able to change the world by discussing the things that negatively affected them. I am in no way whatsoever “pro-rape”. I believe that topics (to name but one) such as men’s growin…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:33 PM
13

Remember, one in four homeless people are women.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 02:50 PM
40

It is a symptom of the “empathy gap” these women have to men. To them, men are barely human, we’re a group responsible only for “oppressing women”, men are terrifying, evil creatures, who’s sole purpose in existing is to drop from trees late at night to attack women as they walk back home alone from their late shift. Women are only “joking”, when they say men should be killed, we shouldn’t be offended by it. God, can’t we read their minds and understand? But they shouldn’t have to think of the m…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 04:11 PM
42

She can check your phone because “all men are cheating bastards” but if you look at her phone you’re “posesive” and “controlling”.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:05 PM
40

People have experimented in AITA by posting the exact same scenario but flipping the genders. The results are so revealing - the man in the story is voted an asshole while in the post where the woman has done the exact same “thing”, she’s not the asshole. Ask people who claim “society hates women” and that we live in a “patriarchy” to explain this and they call you an asshole, ask why you hate women and they say it doesn’t prove anything. So basically completely avoid it. They tried to ban the p…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:31 PM
1

Or even better, either “Karen, stop interrupting” or just “Karen, STFU”
/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:04 PM
8

The type of woman who feels like she is being constantly interrupted is probably the type of woman who thinks only she should be talking, and has a high chance of being named Karen.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:23 AM
9

It (Robin Thikie grabbing her breasts whilst drunk on set) probably did happen. However it’s no coincidence that it wasn’t really that big of a deal for 8 years until she’s about to release a book.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 10:17 PM
32

Marriage is the first step towards divorce.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 09:54 PM
47

It’s a bit passive/aggressive, casually mocking/implying men ordinarily wouldn’t know to do these things in it’s effort to flip typical advice on how to avoid sexual assault from women to men. I imagine the reverse of “how to avoid false allegations of rape” giving advice such as “don’t falsely accuse people of rape”, etc could ruffle some feminist feathers (to say the least). Similarly, imaging advice on how to avoid crime (lock door, don’t leave things of value in the open) being flipped to “d…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 02:34 PM
11

It’s ironic that this sort of “protection” of “minorities”/fear of not seeming inclusional seems to have come from the same leftist/marxist academic groups as 2nd/3rd wave intersectional feminism.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 12:03 PM
40

They’re (women’s advocates) already trying to prevent the police from investigating digital evidence, describing it as a “digital strip search” which “victim blames”. https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2019/04/231080/rape-victims-submit-phones-to-police It follows the collapse of several rape trials where it turned out the police/prosecution service had deliberately withheld exonerating evidence and even deliberately misrepresented evidence to try and improve “low” rape conviction rates. https://m…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:47 AM
1

Further “proof” that women are “oppressed”. However bet they daren’t look at fashion/modelling when the top women make waaaaay more than the men. Or even algorithm gig economies like Uber where men make more than women despite there demonstrably being no discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 01:59 PM
3

Hey, I’m sorry I didn’t realise it was you in the video, otherwise I wouldn’t have written about you in the 3rd person! Regardless I mean what I say above. Thank you for being the person you are and also not dismissing all MRA as hate filled misogynists. Keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:40 PM
3

She is a perfect example of the use of critical thinking skills. Rather than just accepting the dogma and flawed premise of “gender feminism”, she dared seek out the answers to natural and obvious questions, rather than just doubling down on the hate. Also hats off to her for doing that with a background such as hers (conservative culture which does impose different expectations on men and women). If only more people were like her.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:05 PM
3

Yes, men face much more violence (at least in large cities in the UK). The London murder map for example: https://www.murdermap.co.uk/maps/london-murder-map-2021/ Significantly more men murdered than women. Also very tellingly, the only two out of this lot which made the national press are two women, and with that much hand-wringing about a “pandemic of violence agains women and girls”, calls for police responses specifically to protect “women and girls” despite the fact that maybe nearly ten ti…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 08:44 PM
27

Boy raised by fucked up mother (father not allowed to see his own child) becomes a sociopath by adulthood. A product of gender feminist hatred. Feminists - “look at that man, he hates women, society hates women, more feminism” The cycle repeats and gets worse and worse.
/r/AntiFeminists23/09/21 03:24 PM
1

I agree, modern feminism presents a huge dichotomy, on one hand it’s all “women are strong, powerful, just as good or better than men, we can cope and succeed”, but then a blink of an eye later, it’s all “oh no! You terrible sexist man, you said [insert minor, not very controversial thing here], I’m traumatised! I’m a survivor! Look at me! This is why I’m oppressed, this is why I need feminism, men are pigs!” #KillAllMen It [modern feminism] really does remove a woman’s agency. I have or have kn…
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 11:05 PM
7

A working man without a stay at home wife is like a marathon runner without a blister.
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 10:06 PM
5

Whatever happens here (ie guilty/not guilty), I’m just surprised that a woman has found herself in court charged with sexual assault for possibly slapping a man’s bottom. It’s progress (equal treatment by law of men and women as a man would definitely have wound in up court for a similarly minor offence) and it looks like feminism is finally reaping the whirlwind that it’s sown now that women are going to start finding themselves in court if they can’t keep their hands to themselves with men.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 10:04 PM
13

A few months ago there was a similar post on there, I posted a comment saying that we men were trying to advocate for ourselves but the difference is noone really cares or listens. Ironically my comment was shadow banned (probably because I’m active in subs like this one). None so deaf as those who won’t listen I suppose.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 10:53 AM
59

Yet If a man said “kill all women” (any only a tiny number of mentally deranged men would), they’d be immediately held up as an example of hate and banned from the social media platform he said it on. Yet thousands of women tweet/tag/say this every day and … no ban, no censure, hardly and eyebrow raised by society. If you call them out on it you get: “Lol, only joking, god you men are so fragile, who hurt you?” gender shaming responses. Also women band together and openly try to destroy men’s re…
/r/AntiFeminists20/09/21 10:49 AM
88

It’s funny, women seem to be instinctively much better at non-physical methods of control (eg mental bullying) than men, which probably isn’t a huge surprise given the fact that trying to be physically abusive often won’t be that successful for them. They (women as a group) also brag about how they have higher “emotional IQs” then men. In the UK feminists had laws implemented around “coercive control” which basically made emotional bullying and control illegal (see the below link for details): h…
/r/AntiFeminists18/09/21 05:30 PM
8

So called “date rape” (where both parties know one another) is usually one person’s word against another (e.g. no proof or “he said/she said”). Violent rapes committed by a complete stranger however often do have evidence - if someone jumps out from behind some bushes and rapes someone they’ve never met before, then evidence of violent intercourse is pretty much evidence of rape.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 01:29 PM
22

There was a video on this a while back (possibly on this sub, will see if I can find a link). In it the source of the “2%” stat is looked at, and basically when traced right back in comes from a book written by a feminist with absolutely no data or evidence to back it up. It’s then referenced as a primary source repeatedly, giving it an air of credibility, however in reality it has no credible basis whatsoever. Totally made up. Also whilst on this topic - some researchers tried categorising rape…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:08 AM
6

How dare you bring a reason perspective to this debate you horrific misogynist - if there is ever a negative gender disparity between women’s outcomes and men’s, it is because of the patriarchy and the oppression of women. This man must be cancelled before he makes people think. Men and women are absolutely equal and therefore all must have exactly equal outcomes. Of course should women be doing better in any area than men (eg in college admissions), then it is perfectly normal as women are clev…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:06 AM
1

Don’t disagree with the group think. Something that rationally challenges their beliefs is the worst for them. They do not want to hear and don’t want you giving anyone any funny ideas or have them start thinking for themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/21 04:06 PM
40

Created “a more inclusive workforce” … by deliberately excluding one half of the population? True Orwellian double-speak. Basically proves men have no place in “inclusivity”.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:49 PM
14

It’ll be interesting to see how it pans out. But … this is astoundingly discriminatory. We were told it was bad men only men we’re allowed jobs, so why is this any better and what message does this send to men that they should be feminists? Finally what exactly is the business case for this? Why only women? Are they cheaper, better or is this just massive virtue signalling combined with horrific discrimination?
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/21 03:36 PM
2

It was funny to see that earlier. He was in some other post last night (about a guy who takes down a couple of women who were attacking him) and being equally unpleasant to everyone there, a lot of swearing and needless aggression. He may have got reported and banned?
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/21 04:09 PM
2

And raising awareness. For example a friend has a young sun who’s at school and he’s constantly being told that as male he’s an abuser, women are better then him, etc, etc. It’s definitely affecting his self esteem. Showing him videos like this open his eyes to the hostility deliberately directed at him to make him feel bad, vs him being told he’s a bad person. When he gets to see how the game is being stacked against him by the feminists, it makes him angry and gives him bit of ammunition to fi…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 04:03 PM
1

Only taxing women.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:00 PM
2

You really are living up to your username. And I haven’t given you a single downvote random internet person (and I hardly think with the one downvote I have I could “downvote the shit” out of your comment). Regardless either you have emotional control problems or you’re young to get this agitated over something like this. I suspect the latter, though it really doesn’t matter to me. I’ll let you go away now and be busy with your more “interesting shit”. Ta-ra
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 10:11 PM
1

You’re talking about a small range of circumstances based on your experience, I’m talking about other circumstances in mine. Both are valid and must be considered when considering “do dress codes affect women more”. Specifically you seem to be focussing on women’s breasts - they can’t get them out and must wear bras? I’ll agree with you on that then, but even so, men generally face tighter/more restrictive expectations on what we can wear than women. And there’s no need to be rude.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 09:59 PM
5

Don’t forget: “a romantic gesture once every two weeks” and to work out “at least five times a week.” Be interesting to know what she thinks of men who expect things of women, including standards on their physical appearance.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:52 PM
2

We (men) can, but don’t. I live in a major European city, very permissive, open minded. I have seen men in drag, but it’s always for an event, I never see men casually wearing heels and skirts or bikinis in the shops or at bars and clubs. It’s largely a theoretical.l that you’re arguing. Maybe I’m not going to the “right” places to see it (men wearing women’s clothes), but then if you want to open that up, there are equally places I can go to where women are topless too. In the same way, it’s le…
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 09:47 PM
4

Could a man walk around wearing a thong or bikini? Or go to a bar wearing a tiny skirt and thin strip of material just big enough to cover his nipples? I mean, legally, yes he can, but I’ve never seen it, yet women get to do that commonly. Also women get heels, skirts, makeup (again men can wear these things, but almost overwhelmingly don’t because of the reaction they would get). So sure, on the rare occasion a woman would want to go fully bare chested doing physical work in a public place whil…
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 09:26 PM
65

In an office environment (such as the one I work in) women can wear pretty much whatever they want whilst men must wear black lace-up shoes, trousers, shirt and tie. Also - the Swedish train drivers and school boys who were forced to wear skirts in hot weather because shorts weren’t allowed (and the women/girls could choose to wear trousers or a skirt).
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/21 05:31 PM
92

Will they only open educator jobs (predominantly female) to men only?
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/21 08:23 PM
6

Look at the gender ratio (in the UK) of people entering medicine. It’s heavily skewed towards women- way more female med students and more female doctors. This is the pipeline to the surgeons of the future. More female med students should = more female surgeons. Yet look at the gender ratio of surgeons - heavily male. Why? Read this Guardian article about why women don’t make it as surgeons (and bear in mind the Guardian is heavily left-leaning/feminist): https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019…
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/21 03:53 PM
4

Her comment is based on hate (misandry) which is awful. However In a Darwinist way, if you’re stupid enough to try horse dewormer to cure Covid, they it’s perhaps better you don’t get to pass you genes on to another generation.
/r/AntiFeminists07/09/21 04:16 PM
6

Whatever you do, do not marry her. It will give you nothing extra, but will allow her to take half your stuff in addition to the child support you already owe.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:18 PM
2

“Plus sized” women, “overweight” men.
/r/AntiFeminists05/09/21 07:54 PM
1

Don’t disagree. However re-reading my comment I didn’t quite say what I meant, which is: Some men are just “better” with understanding women. I think being able to recognise when a woman is interested in you and responding appropriately is key to success. If you can’t pick up her signals and respond in the right way, it’s difficult to be successful with women, even if you’re attractive to them. I’m absolutely hopeless at it for example, however I have a friend who just seems to know when he can …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:58 PM
0

Attraction is a lot more complicated than being rich or tall (though admittedly neither will hurt your chances). Look at comedians for example - many women are very attracted to men who can make them laugh irrespective of his stature or wealth. In any event, re-reading my comment I didn’t quite say what I meant anyway, which was that some men are naturally “good” with women and I think an important part of this is simply being able to recognise when a woman is attracted to you and knowing how to…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:53 PM
32

This is based on my observations, no data or studies to back it up, just anecdotal: Some men seem to just be born with an instinct of how to attract women. Many other men aren’t. Men also tend to be quite “algorithmically” driven, i.e. they’re looking for “if you do [x] then [y] will happen”. Western men have it drilled into them at a young age (and more-so now than ever): “Respect women, be nice to them. Women are looking for a nice guy who will take care of them.” The men who aren’t naturally …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:40 PM
4

The problem is feminism picks and chooses the “best parts” of equality. Feminists whine about what outcomes they wants but aren’t prepared to put the hard yards in to get it. Modern feminists want a world which is perfect for women - e.g. women earn as much or more than men but without having to work as hard as men do (look at workplace deaths by gender for example). They label masculinity “toxic” and decry the violent side of men, but do so in a country made safe by an army consisting mainly of…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:13 PM
13

It exposes the double standard which feminism prevents us from addressing. Feminism tries to prevent any nuanced discussion of violence, to them it is always gendered - men beat women. Any feminist solution to violence protects specifically women (e.g. VAWA). Try to discuss violence against men and you’re branded a “woman hater” and told society hates women and gives men privilege. Videos like this starkly disprove core parts of the feminist narrative.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 09:17 PM
1

I was surprised it didn’t end with her having custody (or whatever it’s called now) of the children and him having to pay her child support. Progress.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:26 AM
63

Holy mutherfucking shit that is awful. The audience being behind that is disgraceful too. Stuff like that, mainstream TV, men told to take abuse, but then in the next breath told we’re “privileged”. Total bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/21 08:21 PM
2

Yet men who stay at home and look after the house are “deadbeats” and “losers” and women advise other women not to be with them.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 08:41 PM
6

Also in my experience it’s overwhelmingly women that put pressure on men to marry them. Many want the big “rock”, they want their day in the limelight as a princess with a fairy-tale wedding, they want the world to know how much someone values them and enjoy being “taken”. So if it’s so bad for women, why do most of them want it so badly?
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 01:30 PM
191

Don’t forget, 25% of homeless are women! (/s of course)
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:29 PM
5

I watched this the other day: https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/p55dd2/the_origin_of_a_brawl_in_the_stands/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf Women start fights by proxy. They’re every bit as competitive as men, possibly even more so as (and this is anecdotal I admit) they seem to be much less likely to let anything go at all. For example I have a few friends who’ve been through divorces, the guys are like “I gave her almost everything just to get out of the marr…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen19/08/21 10:34 PM
2

Absolutely agree. And you bring up the golden point that feminism will not acknowledge - women and men are different. And with that in mind what does “perfect gender equality” look like? It can’t be equal outcomes. And from our little discussion so far we know it can’t be truly equal treatment. Yet our society is at war with itself over an un-defined and impossible to achieve (by the outcomes that feminists selectively choose) “equality”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 09:00 AM
16

Women stand to lose the most, so in this enlightened world of “equality” (where we’ve had it rammed down our throats for decades that women are every bit equal to men, except when they’re better than us) it stands to reason the women should fight. The men can stay at home and look after the kids, keeping the home tidy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 08:19 AM
10

Without that recording this whole episode could have turned out so differently for him. I’m not a Hollywood celebrity, but sadly I think there’s a lesson here for many of us - that to protect yourself from false allegations you have to think ahead of the fact and get for yourself the evidence that can prove your side of the story.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/21 08:58 PM
58

She could be the hottest person on earth for all I care and I’d still want nothing to do with her because she seems like an absolute bitch.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/21 11:09 PM
2

Whilst a part of me would enjoy the vengeance it would bring, if you think about the scenarios it could lead too, it’s a pretty scary tech. Personally I’d much prefer a degree of harmony to be restored between men and women. It’s maybe an old-fashioned view but I’d be happy to work hard, be a provider to my child and it’s mother and even put my life on the line first for them, but only if I’m respected by them and my partner happily plays the opposite role to mine.
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/21 11:19 AM
36

It’s an interesting one. Ask them and they’ll probably say something along the lines of: “It reinforces the female form as a sexual object and encourages men’s sexual domination of women” However, they’re also against effective male contraception (eg vasalgel), I once read an article (can’t find the source, sorry) where some feminists used an argument along the lines of: “We wouldn’t trust men to use contraception, therefore contraception for men shouldn’t be developed” (which I know doesn’t mak…
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/21 10:38 PM
11

It’s “the patriarchy’s fault” that women abuse their children. Hopefully not necessary, but just in case - /s
/r/MensRights12/08/21 01:09 PM
10

Complex question, my take - with women it’s often a cry for help and importantly, for the issues women face there is a lot of support set up specifically for them - people listen to women and help them. So for a woman, a suicide attempt gets you help. For men, the gender specific issues faced have very little to no support, they are deeply systemic (education, crime and punishment, exclusion to family, no father figures, homelessness) and that results in men realising no-one really cares about t…
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/21 10:59 AM
13

They are almost certainly some of the main drivers of high male suicide rates. Your comment “now do suicide attempts” was presumably because women attempt suicides at a higher rate than men? I usually see this response from feminists who don’t want to ever acknowledge that men face issues. So “now do suicide attempts” is really “so what more men die, look at how many more women try to kill themselves”. Listing the drivers of male suicide is a good way to bring the high male suicide rate into con…
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/21 10:27 AM
21

Now do government spending on gender specific support, e.g. shelters for women vs shelters for men. Now do the number of boys growing up in a single parent family without a primary male role model vs girls growing up in a single parent family without a primary female role model. Now do fathers who have been legally excluded from seeing their children vs mothers who have been legally excluded by seeing theirs Or gender specific healthcare spending (eg breast cancer research vs prostate cancer), o…
/r/AntiFeminists12/08/21 10:10 AM
3

And in the west, neither are women.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/21 10:26 PM
2

That’s the problem - any male “plight” is not newsworthy, whereas all female plight seems to be.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/21 09:02 PM
6

R/MensRights may have the occasional questionable post but it is without doubt 100% more moderate than the hate-filled and sexist r/FemaleDatingStrategy. The fact that mainstream UK media (in the form of the Guardian) is almost lauding FDS tells you absolutely all you need to know about representation of the genders in the media. Anything that focusses on men and issues they predominantly face is automatically labelled as “hate”, and anything female centric, no matter how hate filled, is accepte…
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/21 11:10 AM
4

It’ll be interesting to see how it pans out. To appease feminists across the seasons the writers could have all the women slowly pull together, get everything back up and running and rebuild a better, utopian world without men. What are the odd?
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/21 08:24 AM
30

So the woman in the comment says women should never be jailed for killing their abusers. So by her own logic, presumably the men killing their partners with their bare hands should serve no jail time if they were defending themselves from their armed partners. Though I suspect her prejudices wouldn’t let her see it that way.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen07/08/21 06:21 PM
1

Imagine being so privileged that one of your key campaign points is some people take up more room than you think they should on public transport. And then taking up an entire extra seat by putting your shopping/hand bag on it.
/r/AntiFeminists06/08/21 03:19 PM
11

I don’t think I can think of an instance in a men’s sub where a man has been referred to as a “king”, yet on FDS it seems like almost every other post the women there are saying “don’t forget you’re a queen and deserve to be treated like one”. This cringy woman is projecting.
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/21 10:39 PM
5

In the UK all men couldn’t vote until 1918 (all women got the vote only 10 years later). Before British men were slaughtered in their 10s of thousands, in cold foreign lands by the machine guns of their enemy in exchange for the vote, only certain men (who met property ownership criteria) could vote, and even then it wasn’t uncommon for the wives of these men to vote on their behalf. In 1918 all men and some women got the vote (though women didn’t have to be slaughtered en masse to get it). If y…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/08/21 07:58 PM
9

A classic bigot too looking at the response - instead of engaging with the discussion around their unacceptable behaviour, they use gendered insults and just ignore the valid criticism. Imagine if a male mod behaved in a similar way, leaving incredibly sexist comments and then using gendered insults (e.g. “sad, lonely old cat-woman” etc) against anyone that called them out. How long before they’d be banned?
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/21 02:02 PM
33

As is gender neutral criminal punishment. Eg the UK trying to prevent prison for women.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 01:15 PM
2

Great link, very relevant content. Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 02:47 PM
1

Interesting one that. Do you know it that would extend to the person looking for a roommate to express preferences based on race or sexual orientation?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 01:16 PM
26

Had this footage not been discovered, it’s almost certain her husband would have been found guilty of abuse. #BelieveHer. That guilty verdict would have been used to inflate statistics of how many women are abused by their partners and support calls for more legal support of women who claim to be abused and punishment for men who they accuse. All this raises the question of how many completely innocent men have been found guilty purely on the word of their accuser?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:15 AM
12

It’s one of their foundational beliefs used to construct the philosophy of second wave/radical “feminism”. The first belief is that “women are oppressed”, this cannot be questioned or reasoned with, feminism need this as it’s starting point. Without this belief it would have no need to exist and so it’s the basis for everything that follows. If then “women are oppressed”, the question becomes who are they being oppressed by and why? So next feminists claim women are universally oppressed by men,…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 11:05 AM
5

I’m pretty sure there have been many cases when women who’ve voluntarily joined the army in peacetime have been called up for active duty, they all suddenly became pregnant and were able to avoid being sent to the front line.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/21 12:50 PM
10

The rest of them probably still believe it’s about “equality”.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/07/21 10:10 PM
5

Love it how she doesn’t attack the content of the argument, it’s bad because “he’s a middle aged white bloke”. Imagine the response is anyone attacked a policy because it’s being proposed by a “overweight white woman”. Disgraceful and hypocritical.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/21 08:09 PM
13

FDS is an insane place, it’s filled with involuntary femcels and sociopaths. As far as I can tell they either want to convince themselves they don’t have a man as they’re yet to meet a man “worthy” of them or just want reassurance that their total lack of empathy and unabashed greed and laziness is justified respectively. It’s so bad they were actually afraid they’d get banned and set up their own external website when Reddit did it’s cull of hate subs a while back. If you need any proof that sh…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/21 08:04 PM
23

And yet pretty much any man in any American college can have his entire life derailed on the say-so of a single woman. He’s not allowed to defend himself and she is protected from even being questioned. Her word is taken as gospel.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 06:05 PM
2

And then (probably): “Don’t assume my gender” Or “women are absolutely men’s equal in all respects, except when we beat you in which case we’ll rub it in your faces about how you’ve been beaten by a woman”
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/21 06:00 PM
3

Sexual dysmorphia in us also gives a clue to this (as does the fact that most women love big arms on men). Why would men evolve to grow (on average) taller, stronger, more expendable (largely by choice) if those qualities were not beneficial to the success of our species in some way?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/21 04:23 PM
5

A point made in the video: By forcing the police to pursue ALL allegations (regardless of merit), proportionally many more are sure to fail. The higher percentage of failed prosecutions will allow feminist organisations to claim the system is failing women, and demand more changes to the law. More and more justice will be discarded in favour of a hateful agenda that will increasingly see innocent people prosecuted and have their laves ruined by a corrupt and biased system.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/21 10:38 AM
27

Same in the UK - many schools have mixed and girls only football clubs. No boys only. Also boys are told they have to “play nicely” with the girls, ie not play to the level they can play at and not be aggressive.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 03:15 PM
3

If she wasn’t the group leader, she’d no doubt find it sexist that the “patriarchy” had put men in charge again. Literally no winning with them, it’s always sexist, and it’s always because of the “patriarchy”.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 09:57 AM
1

Guilty until proven innocent is a fundamental and incredibly important concept, I agree with this absolutely. But as President Reagan once famously said: “Trust, but verify” In this case, a child had died, no suspicion was raised and that cost the lives of two more children. Edit - thanks u\locks_are_paranoid for pointing out that I did indeed mean innocent until proven guilty above.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 07:28 PM
0

Often when a man kills someone, it’s a violent death (e.g. stabbed, shot, beaten) and it’s pretty obviously a murder and will be investigated as such. If an elderly or ill person dies of poisoning however, it can appear to be natural causes and not investigated further. So the bodies just get buried as normal. This tends to be how women operate. The problem is it’s very difficult (for obvious reasons) to know how many murders like this are committed, and just like in this case, that further remo…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 01:33 PM
12

So the first child’s death went unexplained, had the death occurred whilst the child was in the father’s custody, it would very likely have been much more thoroughly investigated. There is a presumption that women don’t commit violent crime and so investigations often don’t even occur. Warren Ferrel covers this in his excellent book “The Myth of Male Power”, explaining also as women tend to use less violent methods (eg poisoning) they (as a group) could well be getting away with many murders and…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 10:09 AM
2

They also rarely acknowledge the incredibly hard work, overcoming many setbacks, determination, focus and sacrifice that those top 10% of men make to get to the top.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 07:48 AM
4

The ruling explicitly mentions a woman can claim child support from a man “even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman”. i.e. the court was aware of the ages at the time of conception, and still decided he should pay. I can’t remember details, but think this is possible because of a federal amendment to child support laws which removed ANY possible defence to non-payment of child support. It was that amendment which made it possible for the PoW veteran (linke…
/r/MensRights21/06/21 07:07 AM
10

So it’s a 13 year old rape victims fault they’re paying their rapist child maintenance and not the system which it appears is clearly biased against men in this regard? What then about the veteran who couldn’t pay child support as he was a PoW in Iraq at the time and was arrested regardless as soon as he stepped foot in the USA after being set free: https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19901216&slug=1109727 Either way, the case Hermesmann vs Seyer set a precedent that a woman can pursu…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:54 PM
54

Absolutely: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ As an aside I remember telling a [female] friend who was insisting how oppressed women are about the above, she looked genuinely upset - but only because she realised she couldn’t play the victim card anymore. After that she told her friends how I hated women (for daring to give a good example of how men get fucked over as well as women; damaging her ability to bash me as a man for bei…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 05:02 PM
7

But, but “there’s no such thing as gender, how can this be!” /s Whilst I fully accept some people are born with gender dysmorphia (or just want to flex their gender roles out of pure interest, and good luck to them) the overwhelming majority of people have their gender (biology and role) determined by the gender they were born with. This story could not be a more clear example of these very basic biological facts and the real dangers of forcing a potentially very damaging gender ideology on the …
/r/MensRights17/06/21 10:15 AM
7

Thanks for the suggestion, don’t want to support YouTube (Google owned) though.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 09:07 PM
21

Allow me to improve your life, have a look at the “Wilkinson Sword Classic Double Edge Safety Razor”: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07HM9D1BN/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_KPJPVQD523BAYVA6F1TJ I didn’t realise how crap Gillette was until I discovered the above following their “toxic masculinity” ads. It’s better because: 1) Not Gillette 2) no disposable plastic parts 3) doesn’t clog/easy to wash 4) blades last ages and are much, much cheaper (few quid for 10 double-edged blades) 5) looks way cooler…
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 07:25 PM
16

Whatever floats your boat. And if you don’t tell I won’t ask!
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 05:29 PM
76

I haven’t bought anything from Gillette in years. Cancelled my Netflix subscription + BBC license. Will never use the Automobile Association (they had some unpleasant man-bashing ads in the 90s). Largely stopped using Google products due to their woke recruitment and training practises. Need to cancel Spotify (for promoting woke feminist playlists) and move to Amazon music but bit of a pain as need to export all my play lists.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/21 03:25 PM
11

The association of age with sexuality/attractiveness I would argue is strongly linked to fertility. Older men can be fertile - “allowed to age” Women have a “ticking clock” - fertility dramatically decreases with age - not “allowed” to age.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/21 01:46 PM
36

“Emotional labour”, their new favourite phrase of something unmeasurable that they can level at men in general to try to justify their feelings of anger towards us.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:38 AM
9

And then held up as an example of the struggles women face against “toxic masculinity” and generally just another example of “men bad, women oppressed”.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 11:47 AM
45

And yet try telling a joke about a dumb blond or woman who can’t drive and see how deafening the triggered/offended screeching of how sexist you are is.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:53 AM
17

Males in the west face systematic oppression in the form of a school system biased against them, a penal system more likely to send them to prison than women and for longer, for the same crime + mandatory drafts. Males in less developed nations also are killed in honour disputes and over dowrys, etc. Total lack of empathy + pure hypocrisy.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/06/21 06:16 PM
12

Don’t forget Mein Kampf was changed a bit to hive it feminist terms and them published to them, winning many accolades. They are beyond parody at this point and certainly beyond sense in what they write.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/06/21 12:24 AM
3

It’s interesting, and this is a totally anecdotal observation but: one of feminism’s claims is that the “patriarchy harms men as well as women and they (feminists) want to make life better for men too by dismantling the patriarchy”. Yet, there is a very clear statistical link between the set of boys who grow up without a father/positive male role model in their lives, and those boys who will go on to have very poor life outcomes (poor educational achievement, poor job prospects, poverty, drugs, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/21 04:56 PM
11

Zero empathy.
/r/AntiFeminists31/05/21 08:24 PM
8

100% agree with you. Women don’t choose physical abuse as it’s not a good strategy - being weaker (than men on average) means that they’ve had to choose different ways to abuse/express power. For the average woman gossip is a much better choice that trying to beat someone up as it plays to their strength.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen31/05/21 08:17 PM
3

Also look at the hypocritical reaction between something like the fappening and when leaked nude pictures of Idris Elba came out. Woman and the media were pissing themselves with excitement, there was certainly none of this “typical toxic behaviour” talk.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/21 08:07 AM
0

I disagree. The definition of abuse has nothing to do with consent, only maltreatment. A cornerstone of BDSM is that it’s consensual. If you’re doing anything that isn’t mutually consensual, then something very wrong is occurring.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/21 10:59 PM
4

Abuse is the whole fucking point of BDSM. (Albeit in a controlled and consensual way).
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/21 12:54 PM
9

It’s already happening and the women are already trying it stop it: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/inmate-sues-government-over-keeping-trans-women-in-prison-t7w2t5lx8
/r/MensRights28/05/21 07:22 AM
50

Lets not forget it’s been openly suggested by politicians that women should never be sent to prison in the UK: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13666066 For some reason though, despite “equality”, prison is still suitable for men.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 10:20 PM
5

“It’s only bad when they do it” “Judge me by my intentions but I’ll judge you by your actions” “Men and women are absolutely equal (for the good stuff, but we don’t wan’t men’s responsibilities)” “Women have rights, men have responsibilities” I used to believe in “feminism” as I believe in equality of opportunity (and treatment), but feminism now disgusts me. They’re blatantly hypocritical and show no shame when in one sentence they say “men and women are equal” and in the very next sentence wan…
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/21 05:56 PM
29

It’s not that she’s full of hate that’s the problem, it’s your patriarchal, heteronormative beauty standards “oppressing” women like this. To teach us all a lesson she’s not going to shave her armpits and will free-bleed all over the pavement. Take that patriarchy!
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/21 05:41 PM
6

I’d like to out these questions to them: Why when a woman rapes a boy, it’s called sex or sexual activity, not rape? Why do raped boys have to pay child support to their rapists?
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/21 09:04 AM
11

This has been going on for ages, they (second wave feminism onwards) are absolutely not interested in the truth and tackling issues where women are the problem. The rules are: If it makes women look bad, it doesn’t happen, destroy anyone who discusses it. Only focus on bad things done by men, try to present these bad things as the only things men do. Silence anyone who tries to discuss the fact not all men are bed/most of what men do is extremely positive/beneficial for society. Then the icing o…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/05/21 05:03 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/21 10:36 AM
3

Not that I doubt the figures, but do you have a source for them?
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/21 07:25 AM
6

It’s a bunch or sociopaths with zero empathy and the female equivalent of an incel (admittedly they can probably get sex, just not with a man they feel of high value for themselves). If it was a subreddit for men, it would have been quarantined/shit down ages ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 07:45 PM
15

You source doesn’t make reference of girls getting higher grades than boys for the same work, it just says girls do better with no explanation of cause. This story however talks of the bias boys face in the classroom and girls getting higher marks for the same work: https://www.bbc.com/news/education-31751672
/r/MensRights18/05/21 08:00 PM
13

The problem I think is society doesn’t give a shit when it’s men doing worse than women. When fewer women than men went to college action was taken to get more women into higher education, regardless of the underlying reason. The other way around ... crickets. Look at this example from Sweden for eg - they had a programme set up to favour women (who were in the minority at college) candidates. When men became the minority and women started to lose places to men, suddenly it was wrong and the pro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/21 09:13 PM
8

Exactly, just don’t have a fucking child of you don’t want to be a mother. What are the odds this same woman supports men being forced to pay for a child they didn’t want, and labelling them “deadbeat dads” as well?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/05/21 04:01 PM
56

Worse than that - they use them as examples of how they’re constantly harassed/receive unwanted attention from men.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:58 AM
4

They get mad at everything don’t they. They’re constantly looking for things to get mad at to prove how the whole world is out to get them and how terrible a person you are, even though you’ve done nothing wrong other than being born male.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:47 PM
38

Until recently I would have described myself as a feminist in as much as I believe in equality of opportunity. Now though absolutely fuck “feminism”. As far as I can tell it’s nothing to do with equality and much more a hate movement against men for the mentally defective, people who want to play victim and otherwise just generally virtue signal. Stories like this one 100% confirm all I’ve come to think “feminism” has become.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:34 PM
1

Teach women like this not to become single mothers as not having a father at home vastly increases the likelihood of a whole raft of poor consequences (including turning to crime) occurring to a child.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/21 07:52 PM
26

Also she argued the usual: “He was controlling and aggressive”, ie “I’m the victim and he deserved it”. Another good example of why #BelieveHer is dangerous. It should always be #BelieveEvidence
/r/MensRights09/05/21 03:19 PM
1

One that wasn’t spoof was when they got upset about the minions being male (assuming their gender - triggered! /s). To defend this heinous crime (of not having considered offending the sensibilities of gender and identity politics obsessed academics just looking for the next opportunity to be offended), their creator claimed “they’re all make because they’re dumb and stupid”. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jul/21/minions-creator-theyre-all-male-because-theyre-dumb-and-stupid
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/21 03:39 PM
1

I think the feminists would call that “victim blaming”.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 04:47 PM
1

Women as a group have reason to hate women who have many partners as they lower the “value” of sex; if more men are able to have sex much more freely and easily, it lowers some women’s ability to control men using the possibility of sex as a reward. They may also see these women as a threat - “will they sleep with their man”. Men’s attitude to these women as you say is more complex, though there isn’t any reason for men to be hostile to them, at worst maybe not see them as viable longterm partne…
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/21 09:31 AM
6

I know someone who’s a rugby player (muscular guy, big legs) and once a year he’ll wear his kit and go round the local pubs collecting for charity. He says the women are awful, hands everywhere - grabbing his arms, legs, bum and even up his shorts. Not the occasional one - many of the women. Also whenever I talk to men who wear kilts, it’s the same thing, they (women) will ask: “Are you a real Scotsman?” And then put their hand up the man’s kilt to check if they’re wearing underwear. Basically w…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 06:58 PM
56

Be prepared to be called all manner of unpleasant things if you actually try to discuss any of this IRL.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 03:38 PM
2

Or the men who grow up with shattered confidence and are unable to find themselves a woman to enter into a loving relationship based on respect.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 11:48 AM
226

Who would have though that yet again it’s not a gender problem but a shitty person problem. Thanks for posting OP
/r/MensRights25/04/21 07:09 AM
12

This from the sub where if a man doesn’t pay for 100% of the bills, he’s a LVM (low value make) and not worthy of their time. I would say they’re the ones projecting.
/r/AntiFeminists23/04/21 06:16 PM
7

U/IHaveTheSquirts comment above (and linked below) highlights the point, people have posted the exact same scenario but flipped the genders, when the “woman” posts it -nta, when posted by a “man” yta. I couldn’t think of a better way to expose the general bias against men. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mwknx4/sexist_much_this_is_my_third_attempt_to_post_this/gvjjqdn/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:42 AM
30

If the majority of homeless were women, there would have been out-cry years ago, it would have been held up as proof of men’s oppression of women and the problem would have been solved. As it’s a problem which affects mainly men however, there isn’t the political will to solve it. Solving it just for women though is one even I’m surprised by. The state can’t really say much clearer - “we don’t care about men” that by doing something like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/21 06:46 PM
4

One hundred percent agree with you. By constantly talking about it, they’ve “made” it, now they can point and say “see how terrible men are and how oppressed women are”. Being a victim now is very powerful - it let’s you silence/cancel people - just twist anything someone has said to present it as offensive and call them toxic.
/r/AntiFeminists22/04/21 10:25 AM
3

Feminism is dead against it and anything that would support it - for eg there was an edit war a few years ago on “parental alienation” being listed in the classifications of an American psychological institute’s list of conditions. The feminist side wanted it removed and claimed it doesn’t exist (as it’s a strong reason to ensure a child has continued access to both parents as it develops). Also a study here: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268222232.pdf Show’s feminists will argue against equal…
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/21 06:21 PM
17

And women can get the pill (so have full autonomy over reproduction) and can buy the morning after pill over the counter. Men get to pay for the child if the woman decides to have it.
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/21 10:49 PM
12

Head and Shoulders = Procter and Gamble = Gillette. At least this “stupid cunt” (lol) doesn’t have a multinational corporation producing short films branding her entire gender “toxic”.
/r/AntiFeminists15/04/21 01:00 PM
6

Daytime TV is no place for men. Let’s not forget the time Sharon Osbourne described as “quite fabulous” the sexual mutilation of a man who had his penis cut off by his wife who thought he was cheating: https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussion/1508789/sharon-osbourne-cutting-off-a-mans-penis-is-quite-fabulous
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/21 05:55 PM
15

“Women have rights, men have responsibilities”.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/21 05:54 PM
5

And now that woman can pose as a “victim” and “survivor”, making herself the centre of attention and expecting people to take her views more strongly into account. A real bonus for narcissists.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 12:20 PM
1

A pleasure. And thank you for an uncharacteristically pleasant interaction on Reddit!
/r/MensRights12/04/21 08:02 AM
2

Thanks for the question. I guess that’s what the “men’s rights” movement is trying to achieve, sadly though the press is against reporting much of the above honestly and also MRAs tend to be portrayed as women-hating, misogynistic incels, which doesn’t help. The first step to fixing things though is to raise awareness, fatherlessness and boys underachieving in education would be the two most important ones to address in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 06:23 AM
1

So then presumably the fact that young women now out-earn their male counterparts is due to some form of systemic discrimination against men then? https://www.marketwatch.com/story/young-women-are-getting-richer-as-young-men-get-poorer-2017-04-20-16881139
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 06:20 PM
1

Ahh, sweet condescension and throwing “incel” around, you’re trying so painfully hard you must be a troll. Either way, the statisticians have done the cold, hard analysis on the wage gap data as reported by the UN (and many, many others with an agenda + funding to obtain) and concluded the cause is not discrimination but personal choice. And any argument with that is an argument with the analysts of the US government, who have no agenda and who do not need to justify why budget should be spent o…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 06:03 PM
5

You’re right in that lifestyle choices men make explain some of the difference, but it’s much more complex than just that, there are systemic issues which affect men for example. Look at dollars invested in research for breast vs prostate cancer and the outcomes. Or look at homelessness - highly (and understandably) correlated with reduced lifespan, men make up 75% of homeless and society doesn’t do much to prevent it. I’d bet my shirt if women were 75% of homeless there would be outcry and gove…
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:36 PM
1

Lol, I took time to explain to you the difference between the "raw" and "adjusted" paygap, and in response you provide links quoting the "raw" data. Did you even read any of what I posted? You need to find sources that don't have an agenda to use the [debunked] raw figure. Impartial sources, such as the ones I've linked all clearly conclude that the paygap is around 5% (though the workplace death "gap" is nearly 100%). Also the UN is very biased against men: https://www.researchgate.net/publicat…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 02:30 PM
2

The offensive way that you partake in online discussion does you no favours as neither does your woefully poor knowledge of this topic. The "wage gap" in what it's presented as being has been well and truly debunked, whilst you typically hear "gaps" of up to 30% flying around, the true (as found by several high-quality studies the best of which from the US Office of Labour of which I give a link to below) find the actual "gap" to be around 5%. Now you might say that in itself is a sign of some f…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 01:50 PM
1

The offensive way that you partake in online discussion does you no favours as neither does your woefully poor knowledge of this topic. The "wage gap" in what it's presented as being has been well and truly debunked, whilst you typically hear "gaps" of up to 30% flying around, the true (as found by several high-quality studies the best of which from the US Office of Labour of which I give a link to below) find the actual "gap" to be around 5%. Now you might say that in itself is a sign of some f…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 01:43 PM
1

The offensive way that you partake in online discussion does you no favours as neither does your woefully poor knowledge of this topic. The "wage gap" in what it's presented as being has been well and truly debunked, whilst you typically hear "gaps" of up to 30% flying around, the true (as found by several high-quality studies the best of which from the US Office of Labour of which I give a link to below) find the actual "gap" to be around 5%. Now you might say that in itself is a sign of some f…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 01:40 PM
12

You won’t get as good an education on average and are much less likely (and increasingly so) to go to college You’re more likely to die younger and you’ll spend a greater percentage of your life working You’re much more likely not to have the most important role model (ie your father) in your life You don’t have as much “right” to a family life (ie you’ll face discrimination in the family courts) You’re more likely to be sent to prison for a crime and your sentence will be longer than if you wer…
/r/MensRights11/04/21 09:36 AM
5

IF it wasn’t illegal to pay women less doing the same job, then companies (which exist solely to make money) would employ only women to lower their costs and maximise profit.
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/21 08:29 AM
3

They type from their comfortable homes, heated by a modern boiler and connected to the internet using high speed broadband and a powerful, modern smartphone/tablet/laptop whilst the dishwasher hums away in the background. The fuken blind hypocrisy of them. If they truly believe this shit they’re spouting and had any commitment to their cause, the only place we’d see this is scrawled into a cave face somewhere deep in the woods where they lived free from any of the “patriarchy’s” usual trappings.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/21 06:01 PM
8

Bill Burr has a great skit on the Titanic, basically saying for whilst for women it’s romantic for men it’s a horror movie.
/r/AntiFeminists05/04/21 10:22 PM
4

What I find most disturbing about these cases is how the accused man is wholly reliant on his accuser to come clean and tell the truth. How many more men, found guilty without physical evidence, are in prison right now because the woman who lied and put them there simply hasn’t told the truth.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:05 AM
2

It’s a very disingenuous “fact”. In the UK in cases where a woman is attacked by a stranger, where that person is identified there is a greater than 70% conviction rate in the UK. Let me repeat that - over 7 in 10 men who stand trial for the rape of someone they did not previously know are found guilty. A very different figure to the ‘blended’ one which is widely reported. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00526/full Feminist organisations however are dead against any offic…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:49 AM
3

They [feminists] almost always refuse to even engage with any debate or accept any evidence that doesn’t back up their agenda. The worst thing I seem to be able to do in discussions on gender with feminists is make a good point (ie one they’re unable to deny), as soon as I do it’s: “God why do you hate women so much” You’re right, it’s not worth trying to discuss with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 11:29 PM
32

Yup. I lurk ok TwoX (they seem relatively moderate); a few weeks ago there was a post there about “feminist spaces are for women not men” and in that a comment from someone saying “men always have to crash women’s conversations but never start their own”. I replied to her (if you look in my comment history you’ll find it) saying that there are many men’s “conversations” about our issues and there had been for years. The irony - presumably as I subscribe to a subreddit like this one, my comment w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 05:50 PM
165

Don’t forget the next two steps when you point this out: Feminists - “See, the “patriarchy hurts men too, be a feminist and together we’ll make the world better for women AND men” Men - “OK, I believe in equality, I’ll join the feminist cause to make life better for us all” man raises a men’s issue in a feminist ‘space’ Feminists - “get your own space, feminism is for women’s issues not men. Typical men always trying to derail stuff and make it all about them”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 02:16 PM
1

Years ago Birmingham (UK) council lost a similar case. In that one, female council staff claimed the fact mainly male jobs such as grave digging and waste collection (i.e. bin people) being paid more than their mainly office based job was discriminatory. How collecting rubbish at 4am in the cold and rain and sitting behind a desk performing unskilled clerical work are comparable are beyond me. And in any event, of a woman wanted higher pay, she could have applied for a job collecting waste.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:32 PM
38

There’s a section of this type of thing in Warren Ferrel’s “The Myth of Male Power”. Just as women are less likely to be diagnosed with autism, they’re much less likely to be suspected as a murderer and often use less obvious methods (such as poisoning) to kill. The upshot isn Women generally could be (/probably are) responsible for many more homicides than reported and we just don’t know.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:25 AM
5

Also I remember reading somewhere Serena Williams getting thrashed by some very low seed (~200) man and also possibly upcoming young make players (college age).
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/21 12:13 PM
6

This is it. It’s a huge empathy gap - they can empathise only with women - when a woman is violent they are able (or willing) to relate and understand the cause/effect. Men they just see as animals and violent by nature. We don’t have feelings such as anger or frustration that might drive violence, they just think we run around attacking things for no reason.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/21 03:41 PM
6

Holy shit, this is absolutely fucking disgusting, I can’t believe it. An apology is nowhere near enough. Imagine making all white and Arabic people stand and apologise in front of people of African heritage. Or all girls stand and apologise for false accusations of their sisters who have deliberately seen innocent people in jail. This is an absolute disgrace. What can be done to spread awareness of this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/21 02:59 PM
7

Did you mot get your invite to the local patriarchy club? They give slaves out there apparently.
/r/AntiFeminists22/03/21 09:05 PM
7

On the flip side, the more they do it, the more people will realise just how much bullshit most of it is. It should help the pendulum swing back quicker.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:23 PM
21

“...’The death never ends. Women die. Nothing happens to men,” she said’....” So men aren’t victims of violent crime in Turkey? Or is this like the UK where men are 300% more likely to be murdered than a woman, but it takes a single middle class white woman to erupt the country into a fit of hysteria about violence [against only women]?
/r/MensRights21/03/21 01:30 AM
11

In most places women aren’t (by legal definition) able to rape, as the offence usually involves “penetration without consent” rather than “unwanted sexual activity” or including “made to penetrate”.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 09:55 PM
3

You could go on there and agree with what they’re saying, you’ll be banned just for subscribing to a sub like this. People have even reported being banned from them out of the blue - never even having posted there.
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/21 03:15 PM
11

Nice to see this issue on a major news channel.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 11:53 AM
8

Hadn’t heard anything of him so just looked him up, found only this news article which actually even goes on to cover the Sarah Everard case after saying Kieran is missing. He doesn’t even have the “dignity” of having a newstory fully cover him: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/keiran-campbell-missing-boy-brixton-b922875.html
/r/MensRights15/03/21 06:07 PM
3

Thank you. You’ve probably heard what’s going on in the UK, it’s insane. A politician (Green) party suggested proposing a bill that would prevent men from being outside after 6. Outrageously sexist. Yet no uproar as it’s against men. On TwoX there’s a straw man argument against this currently, comparing advice to not go out if you may be vulnerable to a law discriminating against half the population. It’s really upped the hatred from women towards men.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/21 09:24 PM
5

It’s validating their beliefs, which is why they’re lapping it up. Does the original post provide details of the source of data?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:22 PM
4

Thanks for correcting me. And fuck. I have a Spotify account, will try to export my playlists, cancel and find another less woke service.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 08:12 PM
5

Cancel your Netflix subscription.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 06:04 PM
8

Strong independent women! (Men please give me money). “Women aren’t shallow like men who only like us for our appearance”. next sentence “eugh I wouldn’t date him, he earns less than me, but that doesn’t make me shallow, I just have standards”
/r/MensRights09/03/21 03:01 PM
5

Thanks. Was wondering how such an article would be allowed to persist on Wikipedia (as it seems to present men as something other than oppressors), but then I read: “This bias is suggested as a form of benevolent sexism -towards females” and it clicked. So even when people think more positively of women then men, it’s still somehow sexism against women!!! Of course of people thought more positively of men than women, that would be sexist also as it would “prove” to them society’s “hatred” of wom…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 02:56 PM
11

Fuck. Mental. I don’t understand how anyone can be opposed to due process (ie basic fairness and allowing people to defend themselves).
/r/MensRights09/03/21 01:10 PM
11

How long before the current administration (I believe Biden in fact set up Title IX?) repeals the Last administrations guidance on this and re-instates sexist “equality for the benefit of women only” legislation and practices?
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:09 AM
13

Sadly not, no, and I doubt we’ll ever see that (look at how hard feminists fight against “parental alienation” for example). If the governments are setting up single sex tasks forces to investigate issues against one gender, it would be fair if they extended it to both sexes to get their problems looked at rather than just women.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:05 AM
53

A male only task force to investigate the discrimination and exclusion on men from families announced on International Men’s Day would be a nice follow up to this. Think it’ll happen? /s
/r/MensRights09/03/21 07:58 AM
10

They get more upset by it. Men just die fighting.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 07:55 AM
2

2nd time I’ve seen this exact scenario - another vid a week or two ago some guys were following a woman in her car, she stopped, got out and said she had a boyfriend before the dudes in the car pointed out she had a gas pump hanging from her fuel cap.
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/21 10:51 AM
2

She changed Britain a lot, that’s for sure. Away from traditional industry and manufacturing to our “service” economy. Worked very well for a lot, and very, very badly for another lot. A lot of the North has never really recovered from Thatcher’s decimation of the industries that used to support it.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/21 03:42 PM
17

If you haven’t already, look up Jordan B Peterson. Lot of relevant thought/content and suspect he’ll have lively groups formed around him that would be worth joining.
/r/MensRights02/03/21 01:19 PM
2

How about countries with the highest standards of living/political stability are able to offer women equality of opportunity? Correlation does not indicate causation. Also now the USA (a first world country where the modern version of “feminism” is rife) has sliding quality of life metrics and in some cases is beaten by “patriarchal third world shit holes” - would the person OP quotes be happy to extend her comparison to draw the conclusion too much feminism lowers quality of life?
/r/AntiFeminists28/02/21 06:08 PM
24

They are fucking mental. The BBC refused to cover the story of a man who committed suicide following a false rape accusation. “Wasn’t in the public interest”. More like an agenda to not allow the plight of many men to be known so feminists can continue the “men are privileged, women are victims” lies to get more money and laws passed that help only women, sometimes directly at the expense of men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/21 12:02 AM
7

At best I hope you’re a feminist trying to “prove” that men think women owe them sex by posting what you did here. Failing that, some other kind of trolling. If this is you real point of view, you really need to change your outlook on life. I could offer you some links that may help, but reading your replies to other comments I don’t think you’d be interested. Rest assured though, if you’re not trolling, the problem here lies very much with how you’re seeing life.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 08:46 PM
3

Pure marketing, Madonna just jumping on the bandwagon in a desperate attempt to not be forgotten. Just a shame she’s throwing half the population to the wolves to do so.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/21 08:39 AM
25

The irony that this person will probably label men who talk about their issues and the spaces in which they do it toxic woman-haters to try and shut them down.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/02/21 08:10 AM
6

I’d hope the law would see the sexual humiliation as an aggravating factor rather than one that would lessen the crime.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 01:24 AM
2

Tellingly there’s a relationship (inverse I might add) between the proportion of women in scientific and engineering fields and how egalitarian a country is. In Iran for example, “STEM” roles are much closer 50:50 men to women than in Nordic countries such as Denmark - the more “equal” a society, the more gender polarised fields like healthcare and science/engineering become. It’s nothing to do with discrimination.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 01:17 AM
7

It’s so blatant isn’t it. Especially the response OP got from the BBC saying they’d chosen not to cover it. Men aren’t allowed to have their issues covered. Women committing suicide of course (say due to lockdown) gets full coverage. Bit men’s issues - don’t even whisper it.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 07:56 PM
29

They were certainly happy to extensively cover Caroline Flack’s suicide, brought about by press attention, after she assaulted her boyfriend (hit him over the head with an object causing him to bleed) and the police to charged her with domestic assault. Whilst I’ve never seen the BBC cover angles sympathetic to male domestic abusers, oddly here a female domestic abuser was treated with sympathy, the BBC providing quotes from her support network saying what a lovely person she was and how the pol…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 05:26 PM
3

Teaches/lies to young women that they’ve been and are being oppressed and will face a lifetime of battle where men are the enemy. They’re told men have historically treated women like dirt and gives them the impression that they have a score to settle. Yet young women in the west are amongst the most privileged group in the world and to an extent is is at the expense of young men who are increasingly marginalised in education, are told that they are toxic just for existing and now face legalised…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 01:20 PM
5

It’s a really interesting one that. Initially I though how regressive it was - forcing a woman to carry a child she didn’t want to term. But then I thought of all the women who say to men: “If you didn’t want a child, you should have thought of that before you put your dick in her” So this is the same thing in reverse and should make both parties think twice if either of them could end up in the hook of being a parent against their will.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 11:31 AM
38

If that’s what she’s like when the child is developing inside her, imagine what she’ll be like bringing him up. He doesn’t stand a chance of the loving, supporting environment all humans need to develop and become rounded, well functioning members of society. When this abused child matures, what research tells us is that he’ll likely have violent, abusive tendencies and pass on the abuse he received to the next generation. And feminists will point at this person they made and say: “He’s violent …
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/21 04:45 PM
29

The “why do you hate women” line. Classic silencing tactics since as long as I can remember.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/21 11:12 PM
4

Oh the irony - gender studies students being upset about the gender of their lecturer.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 10:21 PM
10

Women have actually started to “marry themselves” now. The woke/female mouthpiece BBC of course loved it so much they’ve covered it multiple times: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41413297 https://www.bbc.com/news/business-42415394 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11722248 https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/4059a9c8-0e3f-4c56-9fd5-f5547c2c6e53 My reading is they’re so entitled to feel special and the “one”, that they’re prepared to go full “inception” and “marry themselves…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/21 11:48 AM
16

Some feminist groups should definitely be recognised as hate groups.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/21 11:03 AM
14

I’ve not seen it in the news for probably 2 or 3 years now, but then issues like Brexit and of course Covid have been the pressings issues. I do remember a senior politician (unfortunately I don’t remember which one and can’t find anything by googling) supporting the idea more recently, though there are much more recent news articles (Independent and unsurprisingly the Guardian) still pressing for the abolition of women’s prisons. I’ll continue to look and update this comment if I find anything …
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/21 11:02 AM
45

In the UK the “Women’s Justice Taskforce” are trying to abolish prison for women: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13666066 Some senior politicians have expressed similar views more recently. Of course, prison for men can stay and is appropriate.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/21 10:07 AM
5

After reading this post, I went there and found a post on women being more likely to punish companies with a wage gap. Left a comment explaining the wage gap being a myth, including a link to the UK IEA’s lead economist saying as much. Received one downvote and then nothing. Browsed the thread as a guest from a different computer and as I suspected - my comment wasn’t visible. Suspect I’ve been shadow-banned. Opposing views and perspectives. Total BS.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 02:23 PM
2

It depends where you are. But also falsely accusing someone of rape is illegal, but with the new laws as they are, they’ll 100% get away with it unless you can provide concrete proof of consent. I can’t think of any other way. If it came to it, I’d rather be found guilty of recording someone without consent than rape.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 09:20 AM
3

With laws like those is Sweden, Spain and now Denmark, pretty much the only way I can think of to protect yourself would be to record the entire encounter (using the voice recorder on your phone for example). Otherwise, as soon as you’re accused under these laws, you’re guilty until you prove consent, and without an irrefutable record, you can’t do that unless the person accusing you says it was given.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 09:58 PM
2

Depends which country you’re in, but generally rape is defined as “penile penetration without consent”. Even if just for a second. Julian Assange was charged with rape in Sweden for not wearing a condom, even though consent to penetrate was given (the conditional element of wearing protection could invalidate the consent given). So all the scenarios I give above could be seen in the eyes of the law as rape and lead to a prosecution.
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/21 04:26 PM
11

They’ll flip and blame the “patriarchy” (rule 1 - it’s always the patriarchy’s fault) by saying they face societal pressure from men to be beautiful. It’s definitely nothing to do with female rivalry and a knowledge that by making more effort they expand their potential mate selection, possibly enabling them to parasite off a male by using society’s expectation that men be the provider in a relationship.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:56 PM
8

You can literally “rape” someone and not even known it until the police turn up and arrest you. A woman might lie there, not really wanting intercourse but not telling you so either, after the fact she decided she definitely didn’t want the encounter and calls it “rape”, legally nothing to do with physical power. There’s post that’s been around where a woman had sex consensually with a man because he’d promised to marry her. When he didn’t she called that breach of contract “rape” and accused hi…
/r/AntiFeminists04/02/21 11:47 AM
50

“Out of respect for our female members” But with zero respect for our male members. Why should anyone be asked to show respect when they themselves are given none?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/02/21 11:34 AM
8

These people don’t see the irony. They walk around saying directly how much they hate men, male babies should be killed, men shouldn’t have an opinion, etc, etc. All very cool and woke. But when a man says something like “I prefer feminine women”, they scream at him saying he’s a misogynist, he “hates women”. So they’re proud they hate men, but it’s the worst thing in the world if a man “hates” women (even if he doesn’t and really is just expressing a perfectly innocuous opinion).
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 09:59 PM
22

Let’s not forget “Luluvise”. An app, that illegally shared personal information of men from Facebook, with women, who could “rate him” on features such as did he pay on a date, was he any good in bed, etc, etc. It was basically a gossip network and gave women a platform (if they so chose) to destroy a man’s reputation, in private, where had no right to reply. So sure, the behaviour of some men is not ideal, but women are just as bad if not worse. They’re just less likely to get caught and in any…
/r/MensRights02/02/21 05:36 PM
5

It a crazy 100% zero-sum mindset they have - “if it helps men, it must be at the expense of women”. Aka “you’re with us or you’re against us”. If you take their psychology and apply it further to them, it indicates that deep down, feminists do think feminism must gain at the expense of men and that therefore when they say: “But feminism is for the benefit of men too” they’re lying.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/21 05:21 PM
19

This is essentially silencing victims. The stories they would come out with I suspect would highlight women who were sexual abusers or predators. Why would such a post get removed? Could you imagine the uproar if a post asking female “survivors” to share their stories of abuse was removed by an “anti evil” team?
/r/MensRights02/02/21 03:12 PM
28

Evil on this context is anything that would make women look bad. Even if they legit are.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 02:29 PM
25

Have a read of this: https://www.thelocal.se/20100112/24330 Basically laws were set up in Sweden allowing “positive discrimination” in universities to allow them to favour women over men. However, overtime women became the majority and men could use the laws. Suddenly it was wrong that someone (ie women) should be denied entry for a man, just because women were the majority. Utter hypocrisy, “equality” has nothing to do with fairness, it’s purely about making it easier for women at the expense o…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 11:40 AM
4

Damn, I didn’t know it ran that deep! That’s a real determination to engage with reason and discuss. And thanks for being who you are.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 06:57 PM
9

I’ve used this point in many an argument with a feminist, pretty much every time it’s pissed them off. The usual retort is “why do you hate women so much?”
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/21 03:31 PM
12

Yeah, and when you’re in your 30s, you just try dating a woman for more than a few years without proposing to her. Marriage is 100% wanted by way more women then men. Either way, if feminism wants to stop/ban it, then it’s one thing I can agree with them on.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen10/01/21 09:53 PM
6

Thanks for the definition. After reading it can see definite similarities with the way feminism is operating - authoritarian, suppression of opposition, strongly regimented.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 05:28 PM
5

Well ... in 2017 a female teacher didn’t allow the boys in her class to play with Lego, whilst the girls got to. Blatant discrimination based on sex. No uproar, no shouts from feminists of “that’s not equality/too far, etc”. It was punishing boys and deliberately trying to hold them back, for something they’ve never done wrong. Apply this actual example to the hypothetical in this post and consider just how vile it is.
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/21 05:04 PM
4

It’s a straw man logical fallacy. They like those.
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/21 04:59 PM
32

In the UK, exams won’t be going ahead this year because of Coronavirus, exam grades will be awarded by teachers. No doubt that boys will come out of this worse than the girls due to this well researched and proven bias. Very little mention of it in the press however :(
/r/MensRights07/01/21 01:32 PM
2

Some great points made in this. In particular the fact the video shown only talks about male violence but ignores all female violence. Also repeating the well debunked “one in four” myth and (mis)use of statistics to support a pre-determined narrative. Also that fact that male teachers in these environments are now unable to oppose this type of misinformation and must rely on female staff members to do so. Yet “patriarchy”/“male oppression” and other lies.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/21 09:48 PM
47

And yet when you try to yell (or even just point out the hypocrisy) at a woman for joking (or being extremely derogatory) about men, you get yelled at for being fragile/can’t take a joke/“it’s not possible to discriminate against men”.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/21 04:59 PM
3

Updated my comment to include a link to an article.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/21 07:12 PM
4

What does your skin colour have to do with anything? And we’re in a world now where we all agree discrimination is bad. So the last thing we want to do is replace it with discrimination. We all need to treat each other with respect, not “they must respect me but I can disrespect them”, otherwise the whole thing isn’t going to work.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/21 06:08 PM
8

You’re right, thanks for pointing out. “It’s” a force of habit with me.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/21 03:09 PM
14

Absolutely lol, manspreading the root of the world’s ills. It makes it more difficult for a woman to occupy two seats too - one for her and one for her shopping bags.
/r/PussyPass05/01/21 03:07 PM
43

As it was males that did the crime, it’ll be chalked up as more violence from men, despite the fact is was a woman who was the instigator. Wonder how the BBC and woke media will report it?
/r/PussyPass05/01/21 02:22 PM
32

Have you seen Facebook changed it’s policies because people complained that by applying it’s “anti hate speech” rules evenly, their hate was getting banned. Facebook caved in and now only bans offensive content directed at women/people of colour, whilst offensive content directed at white men is fine, they won’t remove that. Welcome to “online free speech and equality” everyone. Edit - link to story covering Facebook’s policy change: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2020/12/03/facebook-ranks-…
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/21 02:20 PM
16

Classic example of causal misandry that feminists claim didn’t exist, whilst telling the world “Kill all men” and then screaming how misogynist the world is because they sometimes have to queue longer for the toilets than men.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/21 07:05 PM
1

Yet generally since 1957 a greater percentage or women then man have been against abortion under all circumstances: https://news.gallup.com/poll/245618/abortion-trends-gender.aspx
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/21 07:00 PM
3

European here, also help in recruitment for a large company. I wouldn’t bat at eyelid at the name Adolf on a CV. Also you’d have to be a retard to put an otherwise good CV in the bin just because of the person’s name. Not just that but it’s also a very discriminatory approach.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:44 PM
19

Cassidy Boon is satire, though in real life there was that Australian woman who falsely accused a man of rape after he pulled over to help her fox her broken down car.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/21 10:13 AM
2

On r/LeftWingMaleAvocates there are some excellent sets of slides that take something considered by feminists to be solid (like men being more violent) and then challenges the assumption in really simply, bit sized steps. Perhaps try to get her to look at some of those? Check out u/TheTinMenBlog for some great examples.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 08:29 PM
20

This sounds great. I think Spain has pushed the pendulum of feminist driven law the furthest of all European nations and consequently it may be one of the first to have a truly organised pushback in the shape of this Vox party. If successful that could be the first domino to fall and be the reason many more finally see how damaging, false and hateful modern feminism is.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 10:27 AM
1

I don’t know if you’ve heard of Tucker Max? If you have, don’t let that put you off. Listen to his podcast “The Mating Game”. It’s quite long, but gives a good overview and practical advice covering all of the conflicting advice you mention above (be a gentleman/treat them mean/etc). Well worth a listen if you’re confused about dating (and it is a very confusing and difficult topic). Also often given advice, admittedly difficult to follow but very valuable if you can - try to follow what makes y…
/r/MensRights29/12/20 04:15 PM
17

Feminists when a woman is violent - “she must have had a reason to do it”. Feminists when a man has had his family taken from him (by a biased system), falsely accused of abuse, bankrupted by the legal fight to clear his name and regain any access (even hours a week) to his beloved children, whilst being labelled as a “dead beat dad” and having to pay more than half of his wages to the ex who’s destroying his life, and ultimately after years of built up rage and frustration commits and act of vi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/20 10:51 AM
74

If you haven’t already, cancel your Netflix subscription.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 09:24 AM
40

You know what, let’s flip this. Just did a quick search for a men’s charity, found the links below. Feel free to protest society not giving a damn about men by ... giving a damn about men less fortunate than yourself. Let’s be the change we want to see: https://ukmensday.org.uk/supporters/ https://eachother.org.uk/gender-justice-empowerment-men/ And of you don’t like the look of the above, look for another charity that exists to make life better for other men and boys less fortunate than ourselv…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 11:28 PM
1

The Gillette ad led me to discover safety blade razors (I use the Wilkinson Sword butterfly razor). Even if I forgave Gillette I wouldn’t go back to environmental-disaster-disposable-plastic razor cartridges anyway as safety razors are so much better.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 03:43 PM
47

I find them utterly disgusting and completely disingenuous that they try so hard and viciously to stop information like this from even being discussed. It shows beyond a doubt that they know they’re full of shit (otherwise why try so hard to deny other people a voice). In a way it’s satisfying though - it looks like they’re scared of this coming out and it is doing now. These subs are growing, most people I speak with about this are aware of what feminism has become and appreciate it’s unfairly …
/r/MensRights21/12/20 11:11 AM
43

Like it that that article takes great trouble to highlight “kill all men” is just a “joke”. Hilarious. Remind me again why it’s “funny” for women to say “kill men” yet a man simply saying he’s attracted to a thin woman is disgusting, hate filled misogyny?
/r/MensRights20/12/20 12:08 PM
2

Feminism and the media who so happily carry it’s message (presumably because it’s profitable in some way) have been teaching young girls to be angry with the world. It tells they they’re victims, they’re universally oppressed (and always have been) and that they’re owed something because of that. Victim mentally seems to appeal to some, perhaps because they feel it absolves them of personal responsibility: “I’m a failure not because I didn’t try hard enough, but because the wold is against me” o…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 09:12 AM
10

The worrying thing to me is looking back there weren’t really laws to prevent women from entering office or universities (not that I know of), just norms (and yes, historically discrimination) that prevented them from doing so. However as feminism has gone through is various “waves” from basic equality to the hate movement it is now, it’s put legal restrictions in place that disadvantage men and advantage women. As soon as these equality policies have helped women become the majority, feminism r…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:29 PM
34

Well ... probably get downvoted for this but: It’s an admittedly distorted view of the world as previous generations of men saw it: Learn a trade, go to work, be able to look after yourself, get married, have children and provide. In exchange for providing, men probably did have a (not unreasonable) expectation that his partner would run the house - he’d perhaps return home to a clean home and warm meal. Or at least get respect from his wife and family (he’d of course have to respect them too). …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/12/20 06:09 PM
2

Standard feminist total lack of empathy and self awareness.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/12/20 05:50 PM
23

I hope this behaviour will show more and more people the truth of this movement. This type of thing should just speed up people’s realisation.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:21 PM
15

It’s really, really bad. It demonstrates beyond a doubt that they’re not bothered about fairness or equality at all. They just want more for them.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:20 PM
20

It’s like the “patriarchy”. One minute it’s for men’s privilege and to oppress women. When you provide examples of men not having privilege then suddenly the “patriarchy” harms men too and feminism will cure all men’s problems too. Both these terms are whatever they want them to be as long as it helps them advance their agenda. They’re certainly not well defined or measurable.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:23 PM
129

Sweden did the same thing with programmes to get equality in universities. When more women than men were going, and men used the laws to get entrance, suddenly it was outrageous that women could be blocked from university just because they were the majority: https://www.thelocal.se/20100112/24330
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:39 PM
3

It’s just so blatant now, I don’t understand how anyone can’t see it any more.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:56 AM
7

It’s just so blatant now, I don’t understand how anyone can’t see it any more.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:35 AM
3

Thanks to Aibrony I’ve edited my comment above, but here’s a link to the Swedish story (in English): https://www.thelocal.se/20100112/24330
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:34 AM
15

There is no such thing as “toxic masculinity”. It’s a gender slur constantly repeated by feminists to try an make it stick and label half the population toxic.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 10:55 PM
10

But their argument has been that people doing jobs should be ‘diverse’, i.e. more women. They argued for rules that would make it legal to discriminate against men and allow them to get their ‘diverse’ workforce (in the name of ‘equality’). But then - when there’s more women, diversity rules are ‘absurd’ (quoted from the article). They’re hypocrites and are now showing their true colours that it’s nothing to do with equality and fairness - just getting women to fill the top jobs.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 09:03 PM
32

Because you have to get “your people” in to really implement your agenda. This is clearly nothing to do with equality and fairness.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 08:59 PM
389

“Since then the absurd rule on parity in management had been repealed, she noted.” So as soon as the rules feminists put in go against women, they’re ‘absurd’. Finland did a similar thing with programmes designed to get more women into their universities. As soon as men started to use the equality rules to get places, the rules were scrapped. They’re critical of anyone who resists these rules that they insist be put in, yet as soon as it suits them, their rules are ‘absurd’. Massively hypocrites…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 07:42 PM
7

This is why I no longer pay the license fee. Why on earth for this story would they frame it around women, other than for the fact that the BBC is not interested about men. It’s not really even trying to hide it anymore, by it’s own figures: - 16 to 29 age bracket, women seem 3% worse off 30 to 39 age bracket, men 21 worse off Yet the article focusses on the first. Undeniable bias.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 04:55 PM
13

Men already pay way more tax as we earn more (...because we work more and also have financial responsibilities placed on us to support our wives/partners and children when they choose to be a full time parent or it’s mandated by a court). Also I’ve read that women cost the state a lot more (majority of healthcare spend + state benefits). So women are already benefitting doubly. Then look at how much women’s specific slices of the economy are worth - fashion and cosmetics to name two + we’re told…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 03:07 PM
22

Reporter takes time to point out “it’s only happened twice”, presumably to drive home the lie “false rape accusations are very rare” Then we fond out the boyfriend was only exonerated because this woman confessed to her own lies, so presumably he was jailed on her lies alone, with no other evidence (as the crime didn’t happen at all). Therefore detection rates of false rape accusation to an extent are based on these women fessing up, which I don’t think will be the normal at all.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:20 AM
1

I try to socially distance when I sit with my legs open on a train, but they try to gender shame me by calling it manspreading! Also I’d say 80% of videos I see of people refusing to wear masks and yelling at others for doing so are of women.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/20 08:14 AM
11

Would you please explain your reasoning for this statement?
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/20 11:57 PM
508

This is a ‘light at the end of the tunnel’ article, we need much, much more of this. It’s so sad that the realisation that boys have emotional needs is almost considered radical thinking, but here we are. I hope to see more and more articles like this.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 12:22 AM
3

Feminists: “The patriarchy was set up my men to oppress women, men have privilege” Rational People: “But life is just as hard, if not harder for most men, because generally society cares less for men than women” Feminists: “The patriarchy harms men too! Be a feminist, we’ll make life better for men!” Rational People: “OK, great, let’s talk about issues men face then” Feminists: “Typical toxic masculinity, invading our safe space, mansplaining to us and ignoring our issues, create your own moveme…
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/20 04:24 PM
13

I can only imagine how vilified, ridiculed and hated a man would be if he complained about his wive’s sexuality and tried to take her to court. He’d be portrayed as controlling, held up as evidence of misogyny and oppression of women and feminists would cheer and laud the wife for following her desires and being empowered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/20 10:31 PM
3

Think you’ve just explained how 2nd wave feminism came about.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/20 08:36 PM
2

Don’t forget the fact that states gets federal money for screwing men over with child support demands. This alone means they’re motivated to not treat men fairly, even if they acknowledge how unfair it is currently. Also the adversarial legal system is hardly incentivised to make things smoother (and better for all, most importantly children) when if doing so means it would loose a lucrative slice of business. The salt in the wound though is when fathers are being screwed over by the state and l…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 09:25 AM
9

I think the 2nd wave of feminism which has it’s roots in Marxist class identity and which spread it’s roots through radical left portions of western academic institutions is when it really started to get nasty.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:47 PM
16

You may find the book “Prone to violence” (which addresses the question of why women stay with abusive men) by Erin Pizzey of interest. She set up the first women’s shelter and the book his her experience and data collected during that time. She portrays a much more complex relationship between these women and their partners than “men bad, women oppressed”. Rather than engaging with the data and looking for ways to end the problems, feminists turned to her (and even threatened her life) and ulti…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 04:13 PM
5

TBH I’m surprised it was only around 50% of women that wanted a taller man. And I have no issues with that - people are attracted to who they’re attracted to, can’t change it. Just don’t label men as sexist simply because they’re attracted to someone slim and you’re a fat porker who can’t moderate your diet or get off your couch to exercise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/20 03:12 PM
6

And as a double-bind, we’re not allowed to talk about it. Media outlets rarely carry stories on the problems specifically men face. When men suffer or die disproportionately, women are portrayed as the primary victims. Men aren’t allowed pro-male speakers or their own “safe-spaces” at universities, with pro-feminist groups trying their hardest to cancel any such things. Yet with no hint of irony they accuse the “patriarchy” of trying to silence them.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 03:06 PM
66

Brought to you from the people trying to fuck up boys, men and masculinity since 1970.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 01:19 PM
8

Teaching the youth to be white nights to for bonus woke points.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/20 05:04 PM
7

Couldn’t she be report be for sexual assault and this video used as evidence?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:52 PM
4

Why isn’t this prick focussing on the huge problem of boy’s failing in education in the UK? Year on year proportionally more girls are going to universities than boys, some degrees like veterinary studies are nearly 100% female at some colleges (yet no mention of diversity there oddly). It’s also been recognised that white, working class boys are the most educationally disadvantaged demographic in the UK, yet ... crickets. Just recruiting more male teachers would probably make a big improvement …
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:18 PM
2

You raise good points and I should have have qualified that men didn’t do everything and women have made significant contributions. I’ll edit my post to do so. However ... today, still, with legally mandated “equality”, I look at people building and maintaining roads/bridges - pretty much all men. Drive past a building site and look at the people building houses - pretty much all men. Look at pictures of miners getting the raw materials - same. Linesmen, out in the middle of winter, up a telegra…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 10:54 AM
5

Try this - the BBC recently released it’s “100 women” for 2020 - a list of female role models and achievers. I did a search for the BBC’s 100 Men, not surprisingly there isn’t such a list, but what there is is ... “Sarah Janes 100 Hottest Men - BBC”. Pure hypocrisy. Also men are treated as “success objects” just as much (if not moreso) than men assess women on how physically attractive they find them.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 04:22 PM
1

There is that too - if you use the iPlayer or stream anything in realtime (e.g. sports events), then you have to pay also. If you use a VPN then the iPlayer blocks you, so that’s good evidence (if they check) that you’re not using it.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 04:03 PM
17

Yup. Life in the west is now comfortable, advances (to name a tiny few) in agriculture, infrastructure, medical science and domestic appliances have freed some of us up (more than others) to concentrate on making lives better for ourselves. The upshot - feminists, on the back of men’s blood, sweat and toil now turn on men to try and make a utopia for themselves without an iota of gratitude as to who’s provided them with the ability to lead the life they now do. As u/nonumbersinmyusernam points o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/20 04:00 PM
2

Cancelled my license recently, they still send threatening letters, but I’ve cut the cable from my aerial so if they do come round to inspect hoping to catch me out, they’ll be disappointed. The BBC has really lost it’s way.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:43 PM
12

Just Googled this, it seems most of the major Uk news outlets (Sky, Independent, etc) are covering it but nothing on the BBC. Is carrying such a story to close to a criticism of women/motherhood for the UK’s “woke” news corporation?
/r/MensRights02/12/20 08:13 AM
7

Nothing to do with gender difference. You’re basically not allowed to question feminism, especially in an intelligent or considered way. That’s especially dangerous, so he had to go. On the other hand, had the guy been telling the pupils how bad men are (which is also saying there is a difference between the sexes), there would have been no problem. So it’s not about the message that men and women are different (which feminism will happily embrace when women are “better” than men), but more he d…
/r/MensRights29/11/20 12:52 PM
110

Clearly guilty of wrongthink. There can be no questioning the truth of feminism, do not ask for proof, or evidence, all must believe, for it is truth. Anyone who asks questions of feminism, is proof that the patriarchy exists and therefore only prove more strongly the gospel of modern feminism. Noone can have a voice other than those who repeat the words of the feminist. Any who try to speak against feminism shall be cancelled, have their platform removed and be vilified in the media.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 10:40 AM
33

The King is literally the most important piece on the board, it’s worth more than all other pieces together. So ... if these women want to compare themselves to a chess queen, I’m all up for it assuming they extend the analogy and will do anything to protect their king, including put their life on the line.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/20 04:54 PM
38

And yet modern feminism tell us the exact opposite, using anecdotal evidence to try to convince, such as “boys ask more questions in class”. It’s unbelievable too that still, most news outlets give the feminist viewpoint of “girls need more support at school”, “STEM is male dominated” when in universities across the western world (at least) graduates are increasingly female. I think in Finland, there were programmes to ensure at least 50/50 females/males in higher education, which helped a lot o…
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 10:30 PM
29

It’s this type of behaviour that gives the game away they’re not after equality, they just don’t like men. It’s the same when they won’t engage with evidence showing that men don’t have everything handed to them at birth (as they claim), or that the reasons underlying some of their headline stats used to claim victimhood (such as the “pay gap”) aren’t caused by discrimination, but rather by life choices. Even worse when they try to deny a voice and silence anyone with evidence that usually life …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/20 10:02 AM
7

Are you really suggesting the way to avoid someone being violent towards you is to avoid people physically bigger/stronger than you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 08:28 PM
10

Agree. The BBC is obsessed with white women and multicultural youth. Cancelled my TV license this year, I know a surprising amount of men who done the same thing for the same reasons. The BBC has started to bleed itself to death.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/20 11:10 AM
1

“One mother has written for an online paper about how her 13-year-old son found himself sucked into extremist online groups, which provided him with a sense of community and treated him like an adult when he felt dismissed and lonely.” It would be interesting to know this boys circumstances more - a record number of boys (around 40% I believe in the Uk) are growing up in a fatherless household. Online it’s the boys who face a barrage of hate and harassment (#KAM anyone?), often with the platform…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 11:23 AM
6

If a man got filmed doing this, he’d be arrested for false imprisonment/some kind of domestic abuse and a restraining order put on him. Whilst arrested, she’d probably be given free reign to collect “her stuff” from his house too, and after release he’d be labelled as an abuser and she a victim and the whole thing held us as an example as to why more funding is needed for women’s shelters.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/20 01:48 PM
2

Thank you! This absolutely backs up my point, and I agree - it’s nothing about gender, but more about power/wealth/class.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 02:04 PM
2

Thank you! This absolutely backs up my point, and I agree - it’s nothing about gender, but more about power/wealth/class.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:24 PM
4

Look up “taking the king’s shilling” or the “White Feather brigade” for some of the more direct methods of enlisting men against their will. In the US I believe males have to register for the draft in order to be able to vote. And whist you’re right, it’s mainly men that made the rules, the rules here benefitted women - men had to go and fight whilst the women didn’t (though they did contribute to war efforts by providing their labour from home). Just because men make rules does not mean they ma…
/r/MensRights07/11/20 10:09 AM
17

In the UK I think there are some tax benefits for married couples (so not specifically for the men). Traditionally women and any children would take the man’s surname, though that’s perhaps not really a benefit depending on your viewpoint and in any case, it’s happening less and less nowadays. Finally (that I can think of), if you marry a wealthy woman (which is unlikely unless you’re at least equally wealthy yourself), and she dies without a will, you’ll be the sole benefactor. All marginal and…
/r/MensRights04/11/20 01:41 PM
8

Very succinct appraisal of the situation. Dare to say anything outside of “women are oppressed and men are terrible” and you’re instantly silenced, usually by “why do you hate women so much”. From what I’ve seen men tend to learn about the system early/mid 30’s when they or a close friend goes through a divorce and/or custody battle.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 04:00 PM
1

First things that spring to mind: A move to continuous assessment (instead of all-in-one exams at the end of the year). Classroom environment not catering to boys needs. Young boys find it harder to sit quietly and focus for long periods. Instead of modifying the environment, boys behaviour is instead described as defective and drugs are administered to calm them down and behave more like the girls do. Vast majority of teachers now female - few role models for boys. Plus several studies show fem…
/r/AntiFeminists26/10/20 10:35 AM
1

Good points. To add to something you touch upon regarding the different ways in which the sexes differ in how they judge their worth. Women rarely tend to “marry down” (select as their mate someone with lower educational achievement/financial worth). So for these lesser educated men, the dating world has become a much more difficult place and for the women, the pool of what they would consider “good men” is much smaller than it used to be.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 02:04 PM
5

At this point it’s just painful. The “pay gap” has been debunked so many times, encapsulating such a complicated thing as pay into a single factor “gender” is useless. Putting even “age” into the mix as a factor and you get a completely different story - young, better educated women comprehensively outearn men, until around the age they choose to have children. No discrimination involved. Put “wealth of parents” or “father present at home” into the dataset and you’ll get an even clearer picture …
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:07 AM
1

I’m sorry, I don’t know your full situation, though also I didn’t suggest you move out (unless you read more into “be independent” than I intended).
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:36 PM
1

My advice? Just be the best person you can be. Have a passion? Follow it. Don’t have a passion, improve yourself, take courses, earn more. Be independent. Succeed. Or turn to charity and help others. Basically, if she’s being a negative influence on your life, don’t waste time and precious energy battling her - don’t argue with stupid people, they’ll bring you down the their level and then beat you with experience. Focus on being a better you and move on.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 06:11 PM
52

Suddenly feminists understand how unfair this whole thing is, though women tend to avoid marrying down so generally avoid this. But hypocritically label men as shallow for having mate selection criteria.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/20 03:22 PM
5

It’s well documented that girls work harder and more diligently. So in a school framework with continual assessment (as is now in place in much of the western world) girls do very well. I.e. western schools are designed more to the needs of girls, also the vast majority of educators are female. However in big-bang assessment (i.e. a final exam at the end of the course which accounts for 100% of your grade), boys do a lot better, especially in STEM subjects. Boys have tended to respond better to …
/r/MensRights15/10/20 10:33 AM
3

Also in the UK they played a surprisingly small part in getting women the vote. There was a much more rational, political campaign underway, supported by many male politicians, which was pretty much responsible. Also all men in the UK didn’t get the vote until only 10 years before women in 1918, before that it was only titled landowners who could vote. That centenary was 2 years ago and what a surprise - no mention of it in the UK press.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/20 11:13 AM
8

Classic silencing tactics. I’m in my mid 40’s and had very similar experiences at school in the 90’s - try to discuss any viewpoint other than ‘women are discriminated against’ and instantly: “Why do you hate women?” I imagine it’s a lot worse in schools now, back then there was no internet or Twitter/Tumblr/etc to radicalise us. Number one piece of advice I can give is don’t loose your cool, if they get under your skin and you loose your temper, in their minds it proves their point. Also I’m gl…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:48 AM
6

And sadly there’s probably men who’d queue up to be a “paypig”. I don’t know who is worse, these women or the men who let themselves be treated this way.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen06/10/20 08:26 PM
6

How many young men growing up with men-hating, toxic mother’s like this?
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/20 08:03 PM
9

This is a symptom of a massive lack of empathy. Possibly high levels of self entitlement play a factor here as well.
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/20 11:20 AM
5

There was a news item about a girl stabbing a boy with some scissors because he lifted her skirt. Generally everyone supported her actions. On the thread I said it seemed a little over the top to stab someone for lifting a skirt, but if they’d be OK for a boy to stab a girl if she grabbed his balls (which girls sometimes did at my high school) then fair enough. Of course I was heavily downvoted.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:34 PM
10

“As she left the court, the mum-to-be embraced a male supporter carrying two holdall bags, before lighting a cigarette outside.” So the court went lenient on her to protect her unborn baby, and the first thing she did after was go and spark up whilst pregnant. There is so much wrong here.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 02:22 PM
2

Punishment is a tricky one. In an ideal world these people would get the same sentence as the crime which they falsely accused a person of would carry. However, quite a few men have been acquitted because the woman recanted her story (guilty conscience), had they faced significant jail time for doing so, they may have kept quiet and an innocent man in prison. In this case however, I believe she was caught out by evidence (not a confession), so she should definitely be punished for trying to ruin…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 02:19 PM
1

Thank you, I’ll have a read and comment when I have.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:11 PM
1

“Majority” - you got stats on that claim please? How many sources have you sampled and verified? Again, referring back to the rule of thumb claim in one of your links above, they may not be as rigorous as we might initially think. Regardless, here’s an open goal for you - in the West (there’s clearly heavy oppression of women in muslim countries for example), could you give examples of the sort of roles women weren’t allowed to play which the common (/poor) man could please? I’m not saying there…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:17 PM
2

I’d be interested to read more, please could you give me a few examples?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:00 PM
7

Sure, but it’s not as simple as “women were oppressed and men oppressed them” which is how feminism’s agenda tries to present history as much as possible. You even hint at this yourself, you don’t say “poor men had more rights than rich women”. Wealth has been and currently is still a greater predictor of privilege than gender. In the UK wealthy, titled women played very active roles in society and could hardly be considered oppressed at the time by any measure. Yes restrictions and expectations…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:00 PM
7

The mention of the “rule of thumb” in that context is unfortunate, it’s a good example of the specific thing OP is trying to highlight - that we’ve been sold a false history in that women weren’t treated as badly as modern feminism wishes us to believe: https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1998-04-17-1998107056-story.html There is a lot of reading in OP’s posts, have you read any of the links and do you refute them? No-one is doubting that genders/sexes had a much more clearly defined split …
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:09 PM
5

You mean the articles OP has posted links to?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:01 PM
7

No doubt, but equally there have historically been laws and customs unfair to men. For example, historically men in the UK were responsible for the debts of their wives and would themselves be sent to prison if their wife failed to repay. And in the US, some states have had “bachelor taxes” - basically additional taxes places upon unmarried, childless men who were over a certain age. As Bill Burr puts it - we’re all given our “shit sandwiches”, but for some reason, we’re told women have been opp…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:26 AM
21

Great post! I’ve tried to have this conversation with women several times, they usually get absolutely furious however as they don’t want to loose their victim status. Also not being able to paint men as monsters historically doesn’t go down well with them either.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 06:36 AM
2

Also that he treated her to expensive gifts and holidays, so as the legal logic goes - he has to continue to do so in the future. Talk about no good deed goes unpunished...
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/20 05:22 PM
2

I’m unfamiliar with Canadian laws, however in this particular instance, the guy didn’t live with his partner and the courts ruled they were commonlaw man and wife, no children involved either.
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/20 07:29 AM
7

As against common law marriage as I am, I assumed you at least had to live together to be “caught”. This is something else crazy, just go steady with a girl for a while, and after some point, no warning, she can just leave you and take half you stuff or expect you to provide for her for life. Totally insane.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/20 07:22 PM
28

Thanks for the correction. No marriage. Not even cohabiting. This man has been made her slave, legally, society barely bats and eyelid and then we’re told women are oppressed and men the oppressors. Total joke.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/20 02:21 PM
38

In the UK there’s no such thing. Also, you don’t even need to get married to be stung by this. There was a story recently (this week I think) about some rich Canadian dude who’d been dating some woman for a while. Not married, didn’t even live together. Yet when they split up, the courts deemed they were commonlaw married, so he had to pay something 10k/month to her for LIFE! He appealed and now he has to pay for 10 years. Like WTF
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/20 01:01 PM
5

Feminists can actually write a book on hatred of men, have hashtags like “KAM”, and not only are they NOT pulled up for their hatred by society, their efforts are well received and highly successful. Then in their next breath feminists claim men have privilege and keep saying there’s widespread hatred of women in society, yet any man who publicly even says “men have problems too” (let alone getting anywhere near actually expressing dislike of women) get’s immediately shouted down/silenced as a m…
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:54 PM
5

The response you get from women’s organisations when you suggest industries dominated by women need to become diverse says a lot. I read once someone from the Fawcett society (an English women’s organisation) who basically said (I paraphrase a little and annoyingly I can’t find the quote): “To suggest that increasing the amount of men in teaching positions would be beneficial belittles the success and hard work of women in these teaching positions”. So basically according to influential women’s …
/r/MensRights11/09/20 10:24 AM
106

The way to make the world see how utterly ridiculous and unfair this is, would be to make a few wealthy woman pay for their ex toy-boys for life. Cue media uproar, widespread public awareness and a hasty redrafting of suddenly “outdated” laws.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 06:59 AM
2

Due to gender equality and diversity quotas, there are no male professors allowed anymore. Male faculty staff are a sign of patriarchy and oppression.
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/20 11:38 PM
10

Also 20k/month on phone and “email” along with 100k for “entertainment”. I get unlimited phone + 100gb data for 20/month + Netflix for 15/month. Wtf is she doing, calling the Australian speaking clock whilst enjoying a private performance from Madonna every night?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:26 PM
4

Could someone make a meme about how women sing about and treat men now? First two things that sprig to mind are “no scrubs” by TLC. And then Cardi B drug/robbing men. Sure some maybe men did treat women badly in the 50’s (and I’m sure some women treated women just as badly) But modern women are hardly saints, so what’s their point?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 09:08 AM
3

Ten year sentence for her, justice done and kudos for the police for the investigation to uncover her lies.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 03:43 PM
1

Also the impossible standards of the typical rom-com plot: He gives up everything for her, realises she’s the best thing in his life, fundamentally changes and does some way over the top romantic gesture before proposing. Obviously the film ends before she get’s bored with him (as he’s always tired from work to provide), cheats on him and the takes half of his stuff.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 06:13 PM
1

Great examples. Definitely strong societal rules impacting men. I’ve read many stories on along the lines of “i was a dad playing with my daughter at the park and the police were called”.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 10:10 AM
1

I think it’s somewhat of a semantic difference - the rules lead to the treatment. E.g. the legal enforced rule that women have more rights to family then men. Also some of their gripes aren’t even “rules”, jeans with no pockets for example. She could just buy jeans with pockets.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 07:50 AM
3

I’m surprised you haven’t been banned already. I expect you will be. r/Feminism is usually not any place for reason and debate!
/r/MensRights02/09/20 09:04 PM
1

Another “benefit” of fatherless families.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 08:09 PM
19

Also women as a rule don’t date unemployed/poor men. Why do I mention this? Those type of men have the opportunity to stay at home and perform this “decommodified labour” of housework, but they don’t get a chance as women aren’t prepared to pay for them to do so. We’re often told we have “unconscious biases”, yet here is a huge selection bias they bring up again and again as “proof” women are undervalued, when in fact they’re calling the shots and doing what they prefer doing, leaving men with l…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 08:06 PM
5

Absolutely. Like the women on “gender studies” courses complaining there aren’t enough women in STEM. But yes, very much a 1st world non-problem. Just like the women who bought jeans with no pockets (it’s not as though the secret agents of the dreaded “patriarchy” break into to women’s homes at night and remove the pockets from their trousers). Or free-bleeding. They can do it, no law against it, but would they complain if I “free-poohed”, it’s a natural bodily function after all, why should men…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 07:41 PM
39

Reading through the top comments in the r/feminism post referenced. the oppressive “rules” set by men include (and I’m not making these up): no pockets in her jeans to carry tampons people on Reddit get upset when they somehow discover she’s not wearing a bra it’s bad female nipples are taboo they don’t make bedsheets which aren’t white as white ones are discoloured by periods women don’t like men doing housework. But even though that might seem it’s bad for men (restricting our gender roles), i…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 03:11 PM
26

Funny. By their own logic then, by being for women’s rights, they are against men’s rights.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 01:24 PM
27

This is pure r/ToxicFemininity It’s funny how feminists for years have been saying “men are toxic, women have higher standards of behaviour as men” (whilst also paradoxically saying we’re equal) but look at this - a woman using her position of power to have her sexual gratifications filled.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:12 PM
26

Title says it all - mother allowing her daughter to be abused yet CPS enforces her custody. If it were the way around of course...
/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:34 AM
5

I wonder if it could identify a Tweet like “Kill all men” as offensive or are they just focussed on trying to constantly prove women are victims despite obvious, widespread and outright hatred of men?
/r/MensRights30/08/20 10:15 PM
7

It’s deliberate. One thing I did find more interesting (and frustrating) about this article than others is that they listed a lot of the legitimate grievances which are turning men towards these movement. Yet they don’t investigate a single one.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 10:06 AM
5

Or getting more men into teaching. Apparently girls not having good female role models is damaging, so what about the growing number of boys who have no father at home and no male teachers to look up to?
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:22 AM
1

The Guardian. It has a massive agenda, needless to say it’s not very male friendly or impartial. It’s worrying that it’s one of the UK’s largest papers, tries social engineering like this and then men are told women are oppressed universally and invisibly by the “patriarchy”.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:46 PM
11

Feminism says it’s only white, western males who aren’t allowed to treat them as property. Cultural oppression of women from outside the west is fine. Sounds like with the goat trading thing you’re good according to feminisms rules.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 10:09 AM
4

I suspect we’d see far fewer children born into bad circumstances (where a man wasn’t ready, prepared or able to be a father) and also where women are having the child partly or largely just due to the fact they’ll get money for it. And the richer the man, the more money.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 03:50 PM
4

This reminds me of the figures of how many female troops suddenly get pregnant when they’re about to be deployed.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 01:57 PM
18

Had this conversation with a colleague, flip it around and it’s a mid life crisis if you can’t afford a sports car.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 09:19 PM
1

We’re all 100% equal right. That’s what we’ve been told for decades. But try to treat them equally...
/r/MensRights12/08/20 10:05 AM
24

Sorry for the mini-essay: Christina Hoff Sommers has a good view on this. There are (very broadly) two types of feminism: Equality and Gender Equality no-one can really argue with and if asked we’d probably all say (I would) that we support equality (of opportunity) between men and women. Women should be able to get an education, work in any job they’re capable of working in, be paid the same, etc. Gender feminism is totally different - formed in far left academia in the 70’s, based on Marxism c…
/r/MensRights11/08/20 03:55 PM
51

They just haven’t thought about the consequences of true equality. Men get paid more they were told. Men have privilege they were told. They weren’t told that the extra pay comes with extra work and sacrifice. They weren’t told that the privilege is actually non-existent. When the get treated “equally”, and in fact it not shangri-la, they freak out as if it’s men’s fault once more. Edit - couple of typos.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 03:14 PM
7

Does she have a version that’ll stop women “woman spreading” by putting their bag on the seat next to them?
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/20 07:23 AM
2

Lol, thanks. Think I have more of a face for radio so will stay away from YouTube. But yes, the power to close the “wage gap” (aka the work effort gap) is within the hands of those who claim to suffer from it. What’s ridiculous is that people accept such a complex number as earnings (with a myriad of factors) being explained by just one dimension - gender. If you pulled age into the analysis it’d immediately show that in the west, young women significantly outearn you men (which the market predi…
/r/MensRights09/08/20 02:16 PM
5

Men dropping out of “the game” is also largely a reflection of the respect paid to them in their role as fathers. I don’t think most men would begrudge working to provide for their wife/partner and children if they were appreciated, respected and had more security than they do now. Instead, as you come close to saying above, a woman can cheat on a man, go though a no fault divorce, take half his stuff, accuse him of abuse, prevent him from seeing the children and force him to pay half of his fut…
/r/MensRights08/08/20 09:06 PM
1

I don’t think it’s solely women driving this. The effect is well documented in repeatable experiments with mice for eg. This is an as yet unexplained behaviour of mammal populations that grow too big, though in our (human) population it’s correlated (not necessarily caused by) with economic development.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 12:03 PM
1

Have you seen the “mouse utopia experiment”? Some good videos on it, basically shows that mammal populations, even under “good” conditions (enough food, space and no disease) will for reasons unknown, crash and vanish. They just choose to stop breeding. We (humans) seem to have started that - figures show a predicted global population crash is already underway. Currently in developed nations, but spreading as more of the world become developed.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 11:15 AM
8

“Advocating for fathers, isn’t about diminishing mothers” That nails it right there, we’re told so often it’s men’s egos that’re weak, but it’s like reinforced concrete compared to the fragility of the mindset of feminist advocacy groups. They feel so threatened by anything that might help men. To them it’s zero sum - help men, take from women. That’s why they actively try to stop help for men rather than just try to help women. It’s pathetic. Example - Erin Pizzey, the founder of women’s shelte…
/r/MensRights06/08/20 10:03 PM
2

Yeah, this is top tier hypocrisy. Incredible they dare criticise men for a “thing” they do and enjoy just as much as we do. And then tell us they’re oppressed when they’re literally telling us not to do something that they do.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 07:11 PM
25

After “that” Gillette ad, I bought a Wilkinson Sword double edged safety razor. Never looked back. Way cheaper in the long run just buying the blades + no disposable plastic crap with throwaway blade cartridges. Plus a great shave. Love it. If Gillette hadn’t put out that vile feminist propaganda I’d have never have discovered the above, so in a way I thank them for it.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 11:16 PM
13

The “pay gap” is different to “pay discrimination”. “Pay discrimination” (paying someone less because of their sex or skin colour) is true discrimination. It was made illegal in the 70s in the UK and USA. Historically women could be paid less than men for doing the same job. The “pay gap” is nothing to do with the above. It is something created recently by feminist institutions to try to prove that women are oppressed and victims of discrimination, even though young women now out earn men. There…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 09:53 PM
98

Lol, this is absolutely the logical outcome. Companies aren’t sexist, they exist to make money, if they can get the same labour for less money LEGALLY(!), why would you hire the people who cost you more!?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 04:17 PM
518

I know you’re making a joke, but to be serious - there won’t be a pay gap because it’s a meaningless and “made up” statistic, this is pay discrimination (paying more for the same work) which has been made illegal in many countries since the 70s.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 04:04 PM
4

By the very logic of the mindset of the person who thought this up, it would be sexist to assume that the “normal” stick figure is male, because women can wear trousers. Why should anyone assume the gender of the regular stick figure is male just because it’s ‘wearing’ trousers? Sexist! Conversely, a figure in a dress is much more exclusionary - it is very unlikely to be male, unless it’s a cross dresser or a Scotsman in a kilt. So by their logic, they’re specifically excluding most men from the…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/20 02:40 PM
2

100%
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:07 PM
14

“Yes yes, rich, famous man, I love you and am not interested in your money at all, please marry me, I’ll not go after your money if we divorce” -begins divorce proceedings- “Give me half your money, it’s only fair, we were married so I’m entitled to half of everything you worked so hard for and I didn’t contribute towards. You scared me into signing away my claim when I professed love for you. In fact I only married you because I was scared.”
/r/MensRights05/08/20 01:22 PM
17

And the already lost battle over education plus due process in sexual assault cases. Don’t they see the irony of phrases like “manosphere” and men feeling threatened flocking to it in this context also? Isn’t that exactly what feminism originally was - women felt they had fewer rights, felt threatened and started a womanosphere movement (which we happen to call feminism). We’re doing exactly what they did because of inequality in the areas of life you mention above and others.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 04:17 PM
2

There’s a reason many insecure women are attracted to big, muscular dudes who have something to prove. I understand partly the feeling of security it offers but also in addition for some women it offers power via the proxy threat, like some people like to have dangerous dogs for the same reason.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 09:13 PM
13

There is more than a whiff of gaslighting to it.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 05:08 PM
71

Mother’s day - fine. Father’s day - sexist and devalues mothers. Also: “Feminism is there to help men as well, be a feminist, make the world better for us all.” Accept the above and try to talk about men’s issues in a feminist forum - get accused of derailing feminists discussing their issues and told to start a discussion of our own. Start up our own discussion, get accused of being insecure, sexist and told that feminism is there to help us and we should discuss our issues with them.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 09:35 AM
7

The “patriarchy” has set the standards that benefits the wealthy and powerful, it’s nothing really to do with gender. Poor men suffer under it probably more than women, and also some of the “rules” are set very much around the needs of women over and above that of men. Men get rewarded if they willingly sacrifice themselves or succeed. So the “patriarchy” is just a misleading name given to the “powerarchy” by second-wave academic feminists, who studied Marxism and hated men.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 05:17 PM
13

Agreed. Another failure of the patriarchy. On a more serious note, “wage gap”, if you factor in age, you immediately see younger women significantly outearn men, which the market would predict because they’re getting a better education than men on average now. Another reason why the wage gap stat is so disingenuous. Interestingly it starts to reverse at the age where women choose to have children 🤔
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/20 12:21 PM
10

Me too brother. All this hard work just to make my own life worse is making me ask is it even worth it? I only signed up for the cool membership card and to be taught the secret handshake. The privilege they promised me never turned up in the end though.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/20 12:18 PM
10

I know right? If we told people that we’d set up a covert system of oppression, so ubiquitous that it’s pretty much everywhere, but that it in fact makes our own lives so much worse, they’d think we were making it all up.
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/20 12:16 PM
9

Sheesh guys, I often wonder why we make all this effort to have our patriarchy (the secret meetings, “oppressing” women and ourselves, etc), but in fact it just seems to makes our lives more difficult and not women’s. We’re unhappier, work longer hours, increasingly less educated compared to women (the oppression of education really backfired) die younger and much more often die at work. It’s almost as though there’s no point in having this patriarchy at all, does anyone know the reasons why did…
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/20 11:08 AM
75

Sheesh guys, I often wonder why we make all this effort to have our patriarchy (the secret meetings, “oppressing” women and ourselves, etc), but in fact it just seems to makes our lives more difficult and not women’s. We’re unhappier, work longer hours, increasingly less educated compared to women (the oppression of education really backfired) die younger and much more often die at work. It’s almost as though there’s no point in having this patriarchy at all, does anyone know the reasons why did…
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/20 11:08 AM
3

He abused her of course meaning that she was justified in doing anything she wanted and it would of course be his fault.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 10:47 AM
2

I suspect/hope this is non-news. Just an attempt by the rag Daily Mail trying to drum up some clickbaity story out of a few deranged tweets.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 08:22 PM
8

I few years ago I used to be reasonably buff (did the usual thing of benching as much as possible and lots of preacher curls so I developed a good set of disco-tits and guns). Anyway, this resulted on a few occasions in bars (usually when I was waiting at/leaning on the bar) of women just grabbing and squeezing my upper arms, sometime with a “compliment” of how much they liked my arms or othertimes just giggling to their friends. It didn’t really bother me too much other than for the hypocrisy o…
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:51 AM
8

Nice, be the change you want to see. So this subreddit - a bit like everyday sexism, but for men?
/r/MensRights27/07/20 09:15 AM
2

claims systematic societal oppression of her gender demands that society unilaterally changes to enforce her vision of “good” on the male gender 🤔
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:57 AM
6

But remember folks - we’re all equal. Except apparently where statutory rape is involved.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:55 AM
2

Interestingly(?) the word “husband” is based on an old Norse word which meant “house bound”, “Bound” in this context could indicate being a serf or slavery, ie “husband” is derived from the phrase “house serf/slave”.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:58 AM
4

You can see this effect in action in films - very few female characters are killed because audiences don’t like it. Whereas men dying left, right and centre doesn’t raise an eyebrow, let alone a heartbeat. Also, want to take all audience sympathy from a male character before he’s killed - have him be disrespectful to a woman. Whereas have a woman beat the s**t out of a man and the audience loves her.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:48 AM
10

Remember reading a study where de-gendered CVs led to recruiters choosing more men, which makes claims of “subconscious biases” damaging women look a bit weak. I think in particular this effect is strong in academic positions where being a woman significantly boosts your odds of getting the job. Also machine learning models (which you would hope are free of human biases, though may be a bit more complicated than that) ended up selecting men for the positions they were “recruiting” for. In short,…
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:49 PM
21

I’ve noticed as soon as I used a solid, logical point in an argument with someone who thinks women in the west are oppressed (such as ‘if women are underpaid compared to men, then companies would hire women over men’), they immediately turn from discussion to anger (e.g. “you hate women, shut up”) to try and shut me down.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:06 PM
36

All for blind auditions, cannot be accused of any bias, other than for picking the best candidates based on talent.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 01:59 PM
8

This guy is fantastic.
/r/AntiFeminists20/07/20 10:17 PM
7

Blaming the “patriarchy” for everything bad, including things which are bad for men is the ultimate gaslighting. I mean - what’s the point of setting up a “patriarchy” to oppress women in the first place, if it’s also going to ruin the live’s of men as well?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 05:48 PM
3

And society has every mechanism in place to back her up and make it as easy as possible. Turnkey solution. Then feminist organisations hold it up as another example of make brutality, get more funding to pass more laws to make it even easier for it all to happen again in the future.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 04:22 PM
10

We need much more awareness of this.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:00 PM
11

It’s feminism that’s shamed women for wanting to be women. I know a few women who feel ashamed at “just” wanting to be a mother, staying at home to focus on raising her children. Men are told we’re sexist oppressors if we want a woman who’ll stay at home and raise his children whilst he provides. Feminism, nothing else, has given both these messages. Women have listened to the lies, are unhappy, and as always, are now blaming men for this folly.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 02:40 PM
13

There was a study on the cause of sexist abuse women receive online and it discovered that a lot of the gendered insults and threats women receive came from other women. As always though, it’s the fault of men.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:57 PM
42

I think it’s just that life can be hard for anyone. Unless you’re born rich, you’re going to have to put effort in and will face adversity from others having to do the same. Modern feminism seems to preach to women that any difficulty/lack of success they face is because of men and not because life is just hard or they’re not trying hard enough/good enough.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 04:55 PM
17

Can you spoil your votes in the US? In the UK spoilt votes are counted and can (to an extent) act as a mild form of political protest in a - “I bothered to turn up and cast a vote, but for no-one as they were all bad choice” Kind of way
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:54 PM
6

It’s obscene isn’t it. Imagine the apoplectic media uproar if a male politician said the primary victim of cervical cancer is the men who are left to bring up the children.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:51 PM
108

Check out “bachelor taxes”, which have been imposed on single men over a certain age at various times though history, most recently in various US states. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_tax But of course, we’re constantly told it was only women who had it rough in the past. Despite sexually discriminatory laws like this any others (such as military drafts and being responsible for the debts of their wives).
/r/MensRights09/07/20 10:09 AM
1

Just don’t get married.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:57 AM
3

The whole thing is disgusting, the waste of police resources and money, trying to ruin a man’s life, cheating on her husband, but the bit that made it all so much worse was this sentence: “Dowson fell pregnant and had a son in November 2016.” Imagine being brought up by a mother like that.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:09 AM
5

If they’ve not already banned you simply for being a member of a sub such as this.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:21 AM
4

“Lace curtain”, great name for it. I’ll be using that.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:20 PM
3

“While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups...” Guess why they’ve written that. They’ve set it up so they can say what they want about certain groups, which I’m guessing includes us. You can see the Marxist roots to their movement shining through still.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 10:40 AM
94

Moreso now than ever.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:56 PM
37

All I can think that’s happening here is that the guy has some weird kink and by saying he does it for “feminism” he can get away with it in front of his girlfriend. At least I hope that’s what’s going on, it would be much worse if he actually was doing this to show he supports “feminism”.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/20 01:32 PM
523

Also Spain - “A man is presumed guilty if accused of of a sexual assault and must prove his innocence, but not a woman”.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:29 PM
6

As does “avoid women who only respect men who are talk/muscular/wealthy”
/r/MensRights24/06/20 01:03 PM
57

Or one of the many men who spent years in prison for a heinous crime (so as one of the most hated people in a place where it’s very dangerous to be hated) for a crime they didn’t commit, or even a crime that may never even have happened.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 12:53 PM
5

Therapy to learn to deal with all the casual hostility men face whilst being gaslighted and told we have privilege by the very people being open hostile to us.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/20 10:25 AM
20

And hurting STEM by (it would seem) not selecting the most suitable candidate.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 04:47 PM
5

The irony is that the education system is set up with girl’s and women’s needs in mind.
/r/AntiFeminists19/06/20 06:52 PM
1

I believe women’s organisations lobby for this as it makes it easier to get funding dedicated to women. Then they say that they exist for equality.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:13 PM
5

It’s possible girls generally (not in all cases) are better than boys at this specific skill. What bothers me is when the data shows an advantage to the girls, the press is all: “girls are great at this, better than boys” But if it’s the other way around in some area, the press is like: “Because of sexism/unconscious bias/discrimination, the girls are disadvantaged. A new programme is being set up to help them be better than the boys”.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 11:37 AM
2

Don’t let a woman being able to say “kill men” on a public platform, and it being liked by tens of thousands of people, convince you that we don’t live in a world rife with misogyny however. It’s the patriarchy’s fault women are allowed to celebrate threats to men’s lives and it’s just one of the many ways in which women are “oppressed” by men.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 02:27 PM
17

Basically she found a series of court cases (for example for sodomy) in the 1800’s where the sentence was “Death recorded”. She didn’t do any research and interpreted that sentence as a death sentence. She then this book. It turns out however, as pointed out by the BBC interviewer (who had looked up the term on the Old Bailey website), that “death recorded” didn’t mean a death sentence, and in many of these cases the punishment was commuted. So she heard a phrase, didn’t do any research, jumped …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen09/06/20 09:30 PM
11

Thank you. Think we can confirm this is not some weird fetish thing but just typical everyday misandry whilst we’re told men have privilege and women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 11:43 AM
4

The image is from the product page for the shoes on the Steve Madden website here: https://stevemadden.dk/products/bashment-pink-patent Am not on Instagram so can’t verify the comments.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 10:45 AM
7

Also if someone poor kills an aristocrat, as they’ve been oppressing the poor for generations.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 03:54 PM
180

The image was cropped and all I could see on one of the comments at the bottom was: “I would love to see women held...” and thought after I clicked on it, it would say “...accountable for their actions”. Disappointed when I read what was actually written.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:00 PM
1

They’re so insecure, it’s the Reddit version of splitting up with someone you like because you think they might split up with you but you want to do it first. TBH the approach is probably aligned to one of their dating “strategies”.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 06:44 PM
4

Thank you!
/r/MensRights26/05/20 01:34 PM
14

#BelieveAllWomen, #BelieveHer /s Ps - sorry for bold, the pound sign seems to be the format tag for large, bold. Edit - used escape character above to not have text large and bold.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 08:58 AM
2

The headline in there now seems to be “Clementine Ford will keep arts money despite offensive tweet”. Sadly predictable.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:58 AM
4

I see standup comedy quite frequently and it seems that many female comedians focus (negatively) on men. Sometimes it’s funny, often it’s just lazy stereotypes and the rest of the time it’s offensive. Then apparently I’m sexist for not finding it all funny (just like I’m sexist for not enjoying shite like the Charlies Angel reboot which lazily relies on slating men in preference of a plot). It’s like the modern female version of “sexist” 70’s comedians like Les Dawson.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 04:45 PM
56

Yup, this caption under the picture of the husband highlights this: “Cordice's ex husband Daniel said he felt betrayed by her illegal sex with the teenager” “Illegal sex”, that really is a very polite way of saying “rape”.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:08 PM
3

I’m sure she’s equally “full of love” for female babies to be aborted/killed in China and India. /s
/r/AntiFeminists16/05/20 11:32 AM
3

Some researchers got promisingly far with ectogenesis, I believe they stopped further research due to the moral and ethical implications of motherless children. It would be interesting to see the reaction of these women should such a technology be developed and announced.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 02:16 PM
13

Absolutely this. Or even build the hospitals where all these artificially conceived babies would be born.
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/20 02:13 PM
1

I’d actually look forward to it as long as the central character is a just a person and not a woman. I mean by that if her central defining characteristic is she’s a woman and the story focusses on her being better than men and almost all men she encounters being 2-dimensional total assholes, then it’ll be depressingly predictable, will flop and then be blamed on us men because we “hate women”/“can’t handle a strong woman” (even though characters like Ellen Ripley or Sarah Connor pose no problem…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen13/05/20 09:28 PM
60

And then there’s this: “Wey will also get to have the case completely dismissed and expunged from her record in 10 years if she does not violate her probation.” So a completely spotless record awaits her if she can stay away from the kids which will presumably allow her to work at a school again.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 07:49 AM
12

Sums up the bullshit perfectly.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/20 09:02 PM
1

They absolutely have to own the “victim card”, playing victim is how they get to justify all the changes and initiatives that benefit women and not men.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:32 PM
12

Only a Karen would say such a thing.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/04/20 06:15 AM
3

Ok, so I think what you’re saying is “toxic masculinity” is a thing (label) forced on men (an adjective) and not a thing men do (a verb). Won’t disagree. My debating here however stems from the fact that I believe generally simply being male is now labelled “toxic” (ie not our behaviours, just the fact or existing with a penis and identifying as a heterosexual). Also from my experience, ironically the people who largely (but not exclusively) define what they want in men are women. For all that g…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:00 AM
1

You’re absolutely right about the homeless thing, if genders were reversed it’d be a national emergency, proof of the patriarchy, men’s oppression of women and not be out of the news until it was solved.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:11 AM
3

Also probably goes without saying, but anyone reading this, if you haven’t already, watch her documentary “The Red Pill”.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:08 AM
4

But it’s modern day feminism pushing for the divide. If left unchecked it would (and has - VAWA for eg) see gender based laws enacted and there are a myriad of initiatives and groups set up to solely help women even though in the west it’s boys that need the help more. The above and this push for “toxic masculinity” - they’re literally trying to label the whole of masculinity toxic, legitimising use of the phrase via a pseudo academic framework and are pushing hard from there into politics and m…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:56 AM
8

Generally I find that men don’t have a problem talking about emotions to their friends and people who will listen and not judge. I think the real problem is that society doesn’t want to listen to men’s problems. Try this experiment - when feminists say “feminism is there to help men”, start to discuss a male issue issue (eg child custody or workplace deaths), you won’t make the end of your sentence before they’re trying to out-victim you and telling you men don’t have problems, only privilege.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 09:51 PM
25

How about teacher’s being proud that they they don’t let boys play with Lego whilst girls can, in the name of “equality”: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/update-kindergarten-teacher-denies-legos-to-boys-in-name-of-gender-equity
/r/MensRights18/04/20 06:57 PM
6

And remember, if it’s “accidental”, they can claim it wasn’t consensual. False rape accusation coming right up!
/r/MensRights18/04/20 07:59 AM
8

I have also. Though I do also see it a lot from women who have the same view on life - female sexual assault is “good” sexual assault and men are lucky to receive it.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 01:49 PM
10

Was initially pleasantly surprised by this being reported by the Guardian (which is a very “woke” newspapers to say the least) but then saw the second line: “Despite rise of ‘Cinderella’ abuse cases, men are predominant perpetrators”. Firstly, what the f**k is “Cinderella abuse”. Does that make men who beat their partners “Prince Charming abuse”? Pushing a name like that is almost glorifying what’s happening. Secondly why do they feel the need to point out that men are still “worse” than women? …
/r/MensRights16/04/20 01:46 PM
13

This has been going on since the mid nineties and it happens of course because the market isn’t somehow covertly sexist as “feminists” would have us believe, but in fact pays more for more highly skilled individuals. Due to factors such as education having been designed predominantly around the needs of females since around the early 80’s, most teachers (who act as role models) being female for decades, more boys than ever growing up in a fatherless household and constant, hostile media messagin…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/04/20 07:48 AM
1

I think what you’re referring to would be better described as just plain old equality [of opportunity] now. I know what you mean - back 100 years ago when women couldn’t vote or go to some universities, etc and the original “feminist” movements sought to bring equality. However that’s been achieved (and then some) a while back and is probably largely taken for granted now. What people think of now when they hear feminism is an pseudo-academically justified hate movement that seeks to take offenc…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/04/20 08:32 PM
15

And then: “Feminism is there to help men too, join us”. Yet as we all know, mention issues men face to a feminist discussion and you won’t be able to blink before being shouted down with condescending cries of: “Oh the menz, the menz, who hurt you, why do you hate women”/“this is our safe space”/etc, etc
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/20 07:40 PM
5

They’ll use it as evidence that women are better than men. If men are in the majority it’s because of privilege and oppression. If women are dominant however then it’s simply evidence that men aren’t as good as women.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 05:13 PM
35

Lisa nails it with this topic, there was another one of her tweets about the “Future is Female” printed on a mug but misread as the “Future is Male”. Need more women like her.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen11/04/20 07:52 AM
123

When they get to 100% female then and only then will they be happy with their “equality and diversity”.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 07:33 AM
26

I see this. The women most men want to be with (“conventionally attractive”) are almost always with big (and I don’t mean fat) or successful guys. The kind, caring/sharing, “I’m here if you want to talk” guys typically end up with some woman who treats them like crap and walks all over them. Equality in such relationships is very much the exception and not the rule.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:00 PM
2

It seemed to start off reasonably enough (equality of opportunity) but some groups just kept pushing it further and further and now it’s an industry based on hating men and looking for things to be offended by. No wonder people are turning against what we now call “feminism”.
/r/AntiFeminists09/04/20 06:52 AM
54

Call me old fashioned but I’d feel braver running over open ground to try and save a fellow soldier’s life whilst people were shooting to kill me than kissing my friend and someone calling me something unpleasant. Don’t get me wrong, neither is nice, but one you go home, feel bad and in time forget whilst the other you potentially die a slow agonising death, in a foreign land thinking of all the times you’ll never spend with your family.
/r/AntiFeminists08/04/20 09:58 PM
2

“Educated perspective” (wink, wink) Seriously though, r/Feminism isn’t a place for reason or debate, I think even if you posted a comment which agreed with their agenda, if they saw you belonged to a men’s “rights” subreddit it would be enough to get you banned.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/20 09:50 AM
4

Brilliant. This is r/murderedByWords worthy.
/r/AntiFeminists07/04/20 09:07 AM
7

Why haven’t these hate subreddits been quarantined or banned? Of that’s right, because it’s hate against men.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:53 PM
350

And if there wasn’t 100% incontrovertible evidence of his innocence, there would be no way in hell he wouldn’t be punished for this and the case used as further “evidence” of the inherent violence of men and the oppression of women. Also the asymmetry - a woman simply has to accuse a man and it’s over for him (e.g. Amber Heard), yet for a man to defend himself he needs 100% rock solid evidence and even then it can take months for things to turn in his favour. Like you said, so called “male privi…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 11:37 AM
6

Don’t forget the female rapist’s anthem “No, No, No” by Destiny’s Child. The lyrics are literally a woman not taking “no” for an answer and despite constantly hearing it, still believing that the man wants her: https://www.metrolyrics.com/no-no-no-lyrics-destinys-child.html
/r/MensRights04/04/20 09:25 AM
5

As more women out earn men (in part due to an education system built around their needs) there are fewer “eligible men” for them to date (as women generally don’t like to date “down). This means the remaining “eligible” men find themselves more in demand than ever, so why settle down for one women when it’s easier to play the field than ever. This also feeds into more promiscuity, lower coupling and marriage rates.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 09:17 AM
3

Probably known by most people here, but in case not, as it’s not mentioned in the post, check out here documentary “The Red Pill”. Contains themes familiar to most of us but it great to see reason and logic avail with someone’s reasoning (especially female) with their feminist beliefs.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/20 12:56 PM
7

Absolutely, they’re very Stalinist in their approach to debate. In fact I’ve already been banned from r/Feminism and r/wgtow for daring to ask questions.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:20 PM
8

This narrative is disgusting. Reducing this phrase to it’s logically absurd conclusion, we arrive at: “The biggest cause of problems for males is being male” which is fundamental and profound and should never be propagated as a serious consideration due to the damage it can do to developing boys and young men. However this viewpoint has been legitimised by the American Psychological Association: https://www.apa.org/pi/about/newsletter/2018/09/harmful-masculinity Yet trying to imply the imaginary…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:33 AM
30

Agree absolutely, r/feminism perma-bans people just for asking a question which might mildly challenge their world view which simply isnmt backed up by reality. Here we welcome debate as it allows us to show people our side of the coin, where men actually aren’t handed everything on a plate just because they’re born with a penis and in fact in many cases live very difficult lives rife with discrimination (family courts, criminal justice, Title IX denial to education, etc).
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:20 AM
15

It makes me wonder if causes such as the more extreme end of modern feminism attract people with certain mental issues, as it allows them to express extremely self-centred, selfish views and be applauded for it by their peers, rather than being socially shunned.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/03/20 12:07 PM
43

Or a strong independent woman who could buy herself an electric blanket if she needed one, presumably as is her mother.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 12:03 PM
13

Fantastic article, this section in particular says why it’s so bad: “The abuse they suffer at the hands of their wife or girlfriend is not only minimized and ignored, but they are often forced to shoulder the majority of blame and accusations when things get ugly.” Also one of the biggest predicates of whether a woman will face violence with her male partner is whether she herself is violent. This is something which has been known since the very first women’s shelters were set up (read Erin Pizz…
/r/MensRights19/03/20 11:01 AM
1

This. In the UK men got the vote in 1918 (following the expectation of going to fight and die in the first world war), so the centenary was two years ago, not a whisper. In 2028 when it’s the centenary of women’s right to vote (with no sacrifice), if the present day is anything to go by, the UK is going to shit itself for 365 days non-stop.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:27 PM
3

Very well written and reasoned arguments. Hit’s it dead on the head - very few people have problems with strong female leads like Ripley. It’s when it constantly in your face “women are better than men” + “all men either evil, incompetent or both” and we have to like it or we’re sexist. It’s just offensive now and very boring, I’ve pretty much stopped going to the cinema because I’m so bored of this sort of stuff.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/20 10:31 PM
36

Now this shit is affecting women more, how long before it’s recognised as being unfair and scrapped for something fairer?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/03/20 07:28 PM
5

The video is classic apex fallacy - the “man” in the video probably does exist, but is about as representative of the average male as Taylor Swift herself is of the average woman. Yet this crude (and rare example) is what “all” men are presented as. If she’d played a manual labourer, working hard, long hours, low self esteem, not cared about by society, wife left him, can’t see his kids but also is barley able to have enough money to live due to crippling child support payments it would have pro…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/03/20 03:27 PM
2

To make it absolutely fair (as we’re equal and all) at the end of the respective leagues, the winning women’s team should play the winning men’s team in a winner-takes-all match.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/20 10:47 AM
2

Does that make someone a cultural appropritist if they call someone fat?
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/20 08:11 AM
25

“Had sex with”, so not raped then as the victim was too young to consent.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:09 PM
3

Could not agree with this more. We’ve had “equality” rammed down our throats for decades now, even to the [ridiculous] extend that apparently “gender is a social construct”, yes as soon as a man dares to defend himself against a woman...
/r/MensRights23/02/20 11:38 PM
3

To be honest I’d like to see schools changed so that they cater for boys more rather than the feminised system we’ve got now.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/20 08:02 AM
9

Absolutely maddening - “equal, equal, equal”, we’ve been having it rammed down our throats for decades. Even “gender is a social construct”, yet as soon as a person() defends themselves against someone(*) else, suddenly it’s all out of the window - unequal, binary gender, weaker sex, etc, etc and the media don’t call out the disjunct Utterly, utterly hypocritical and pathetic. And dare a person(*) speak about it, we’re hateful oppressive misogynists, women are smaller, different, need special tr…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen19/02/20 09:34 PM
6

From the teenage boy’s perspective, it’s nice he wasn’t yelled at for being a pedophile by the mother. There was a video posted recently where some woman is accusing a guy (think he was a pro skateboarder) at a skatepark, giving free skate gear to kids there, of being a pedophile and calls the police on him.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:17 AM
1

I saw an example of an article (possibly the definition of sexism where someone was battling over whether is affects mainly women or it should be applicable as a term to both men and women) where there was a huge battle visible in the history, I think the non-feminist editor had their ability to edit removed and/or the article was locked so that edits had to be approved. Of course only edits which backed up the feminist viewpoint were allowed. TL/DR - I agree with you - you can’t argue against f…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 05:23 PM
29

There’s a lot of people on from the more “radical” spectrum of feminism active on Wikipedia. You can often see tug-of-wars in the edit history around topics like these. These feminists play a dirty campaign and know to “manage the message”, they don’t want and open, frank and fair conversation where topics can be discussed logically and with evidence backing it up. It would be disastrous for them if open minded people, new to the debate saw well reasoned arguments from the likes of us around (fo…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 11:10 AM
55

That’s part of the problem. I think the f**ked American “justice” system (plea-bargains, agreeing never to appeal, etc) also plays a large part in what happened here.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 01:28 PM
24

This is worthy of being posted on r/iamatotalpieceofshit because that woman is a total piece of shit. I bet she get’s offended if people “objectify” women by commenting on their appearance as well.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/02/20 09:42 AM
44

At yet whenever there’s a discussion on increasing rates of suicide amongst “young people” sex isn’t mentioned (or only briefly touched on as an aside). As you say, if the figures were reversed, media and politicians would be acting like the world was on fire. Just remember - one in four homeless are women and war disproportionately affects women because when men are killed, it’s women who then have to do the work that the men would have.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:48 PM
23

But we’re all equal right, and “gender is a social construct”, so even by their own deluded logic (let along basic fairness and decency) how can that statement possibly be true.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/02/20 03:54 PM
8

Absolutely this. Look out for the person you’re with, keep them able to look out for you. Life can be hard and can come at you in ways you won’t see coming. Someone you trust having your back at all times is something you can’t put a price on.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 03:07 PM
9

Ahh, my bad, will edit my original comment. Many thanks.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 11:12 PM
5

The “trans men” thing is also slightly reality bending - I’ve nothing against transsexualism, but let’s face it - someone biologically male doesn’t get a cervix/womb/etc when they transition and hence won’t be in the market for products to deal with menstruation. Ok, so I retract the above - as per a reply to my comment a woman transitioning to male may well need use of these products.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 11:08 PM
1

sigh if this sort of thing is important then it would be nice if they’d give equal consideration to the arguably (vastly) more important and meaningful fact that primary and secondary school teachers are overwhelmingly female. This really does have an impact and a lot of young boys are growing up with no primary male role-model at all.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:49 PM
10

If a woman get’s rejected, it’s probably by one guy she likes, she can then go on “Insta”, post a flattering pic of herself get 100s of likes to feel better and probably has a few other guys she can call up to get sex on tap anyway. Some guys on the other hand get rejected by every ... single ... woman they proposition. They even get branded “creepy” and start getting rejected by women they haven’t even asked. This leads to feeling utterly worthless, unworthy and then in desperation, loneliness …
/r/MensRights05/02/20 08:50 PM
9

Let a woman smack you in the face with a frying pan and say as a man you can “take it”. Or getting your penis cut off whilst you sleep. Then the kicker is everyone thinks you’re the abuser and she gets the sympathy.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:34 PM
20

If there was a school where bunch of boys were punching a girl in her breasts or hitting her genitals the media would explode with stories of it, analysis of how this highlights the hatred of girls, gendered violence, etc, etc. Yet a boy looses a testicle, which is a terrible injury, humiliating and possibly carries lifelong health complications and that it seems from the post the school hasn’t even taken any action yet.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/02/20 12:24 PM
5

This does seem to back up claims that there is a pro-women/against-men bias in criminal law.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen31/01/20 03:09 PM
140

And if most of these men try to defend themselves, they’ll be arrested and removed from their homes on the basis of being domestic abusers.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 06:58 AM
2

And then men are the assholes for even thinking about sex.
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 11:04 PM
4

This is female violence not male violence though. Male violence is “bad” violence whilst female violence is ok - the right kind of violence. Remember - men are inherently violent and bad whilst women only turn to violence when they need to and it’s always justified.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 01:17 PM
2

Shouldn’t we applaud and encourage the one’s who don’t want to get married? After all marriage is usually a much worse deal for men than it is women.
/r/MGTOW27/01/20 05:29 PM
5

I suspect because feminism have for decades been establishing increasingly powerful advocacy and lobbying groups that now have deep roots into education policy, academia, government and perhaps most importantly, media. Society’s been listening to this because they’ve largely believed that all this was in the name of “equality”, though largely haven’t thought critically of the significant difference between equality of opportunity and outcome. On a more positive note it feels like they’ve been pu…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 06:53 PM
8

Correct. It only shows where men supposedly fare better than women, it does not show when women fare better than men. Like the UK’s “gender pay gap”, it’s an engineered statistic to present a biased view and back up an agenda.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 04:39 PM
71

“Identify as female”, etc, etc. Additionally a) never go back there b) state factually on any social media outlets you’re a member of the name of the establishment, where it is and the fact they have mixed and female only bathrooms, but no men’s bathrooms so we can all avoid it. On a separate note, I see a lot of people reporting similar experiences, yet it makes no sense: A woman’s restroom is inherently more suitable to being made gender neutral as it doesn’t have urinals, only traps (so you’d…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 04:26 PM
3

Even so, I don’t think treating men as badly as it seems it does will help it increase application rates and hence be more selective with prospective students.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 02:27 PM
5

The markets should sort it out, if a company isn’t as competitive as it’s peers because they have a “woke” board, it’ll loose out to companies that have recruited purely on talent and experience.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 12:22 PM
19

A shame, they should try being less hostile to half the population and maybe they’d get better quality applicants.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 12:16 PM
1

What she meant to say was: “The inability to differentiate between someone who cares for you trying to solve your problems and your own wish to drone on about yourself whilst they have to passively listen is rooted in being self-centred and narcissistic.”
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 11:57 AM
2

I get your gist but in the long run an unwanted child usually costs the state a lot more than the cost of giving a pill out for free. Ie cost/benefit analysis = give 1 (probably expensive) pill out for free but save possibly £100’s of thousands in costs (education/healthcare/police, etc)
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/20 08:35 AM
9

I find it very difficult to begin to describe how utterly unfair and telling actions like these are. They want their place to discuss their topics and presumably slate men, but cannot handle the thought that others can have their space and actively shitting it down and them having the audacity to claim that they are the oppressed and discriminated against ones. It’s absolutely disgusting that it’s allowed to happen, continues to happen and happens at higher education facilities, places that shou…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 08:30 AM
141

I find it very difficult to begin to describe how utterly unfair and telling actions like these are. They want their place to discuss their topics and presumably slate men, but cannot handle the thought that others can have their space and actively shutting it down and then having the audacity to claim that they are the oppressed and discriminated against ones. It’s absolutely disgusting that it’s allowed to happen, continues to happen and happens at higher education facilities, places that shou…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 08:30 AM
1

The word “equality”, be careful when using it! Feminism was originally about equality of opportunity - women should have the right to vote/get an education/have a job/etc, you get those things and from there it’s up to you - you get out what you put in. Increasingly now “equality” is used by “gender feminists” to describe that of outcome - mainly that women should hold the same number of top jobs as men, and if they don’t that’s because “sexism”. This is how they can pull a switcharoo on you: “O…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 07:56 AM
7

To tackle the problem that young women out-earning men diminishes their ability to promote women as oppressed, in the UK we have the “engineered” (for want of a better word) “pay gap” statistic. This is designed to ignore many factors and present a picture of men being paid more than women. The lead statistician for our Institute of Economic Affairs - Kate Andrews is highly critical of it and explains to people who’ll listen why it’s meaningless, but that didn’t stop a law requiring companies of…
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 09:32 PM
2

If these figures were reversed there would be an outcry. Front page news, celebrities raising awareness and money, commentary and analysis on how it’s evidence of women’s ongoing struggle against oppression, etc, etc. Yet it’s men who suffer and ... crickets.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 05:54 PM
3

Of course it’s good when women are outstripping men - empowered/“equality” But it’s bad in any area where men are doing better - sexism/oppression.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 04:00 PM
15

Exactly this.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 03:58 PM
3

The problem for me here is how subjective this is. “You’re not friendly enough”, what does that mean, you don’t smile enough, your don’t make enough small-talk? Conversely could you, as a man, go to HR and complain that the women aren’t friendly enough to you? I couldn’t imagine that working out well at all. Also if I were facing such a accusation, I’d say (truthfully) I’m afraid of being complained of if I’m too friendly towards women in the office. All it takes is to make one feel “uncomfortab…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:35 PM
2

Whist some men do “emotionally or physically” control their wives, there are also a great many men under the emotional (and in some cases physical) control of their wives. They’re not “allowed out”, are separated from their friends, etc, etc. So the feminists had better be careful with this one - if they do establish this as a defence, it won’t be long before men will be using it as a defence also.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 04:15 PM
3

If she just wanted a lapdog who she could brow-beat because he’s male and white then it seems that yes, she would be.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 11:35 PM
6

She also tried to lie about what happened which makes it even more disgusting.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 12:43 PM
1

As above - in the scenario the comedian is describing, presumably the woman wants her rape fantasy fulfilled by him, but she can’t tell him “rape me” because that will ruin the fantasy (by sensible definition you can’t be raped if you’ve given consent). This leaves him in a predicament. And so the comedian, who again in his scenario may be getting “vibes” the woman has such a fantasy, is telling us (the audience) his thoughts on the predicament - why does a woman think he will risk himself getti…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:18 PM
6

The context is that of this sub - though to elaborate - some women have a rape fantasy and will be “consensually raped”, but this fantasy is ruined for the woman by discussing consent prior to the act. However for men this is extremely risky - without consent, society has been changed so much, and men who assume consent face so much hostility, that men cannot safely fulfil this fantasy anymore. There’s in fact a film with this plotline - a male character is tricked by a woman into rough, aggress…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:42 AM
1

Watched “Don’t f**k with cats” on Netflix, one thing that struck me is on two occasions, females are describing an online video in which a man and then an animal is killed. In both instances, they describe with some revulsion, but generally in a matter of fact tone the murder of the man, but then when the animal is killed, they begin to choke up and cry, unable to finish. Perhaps I’m reading into it, but it seemed they were more upset about the animal being killed than the person.
/r/MGTOW13/01/20 06:24 PM
4

Whilst by implying that women have equal or greater spending power, this appears to contradict the narrative that women are oppressed and earn less than men, that couldn’t be further from the truth. This statistic is in fact a sign that women are oppressed, for example this clearly shows that the majority of car buying duties are left to the long-suffering women of the world, who as well as having to work fewer hours than men and face a significantly less risk of death or injury at work, are als…
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 03:16 PM
10

Irrespective of their financial position women tend to marry “up” and not “down”. But they’re not at all shallow for doing so or judging a man on something which is entirely external to him (ie not an intrinsic part of him). Men on the other hand are disgusting and shallow for wanting a woman simply because he finds her attractive (ie admires a quality which is intrinsic to her).
/r/FeminismStopsWhen08/01/20 11:56 PM
3

By doing this though I’d argue he just damaged his own cause by showing that not only do people believe these allegations, they’re TOO WILLING to believe, even total fiction like this. He’s just shown why false allegations are so dangerous and why due process (including corroborating physical evidence of an assault) is absolutely critical if we are not to see repeated miscarriages of justice.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:09 AM
4

Good argument, nice set up, good examples. Wonder how many threats she’s got from feminists for presenting such a reasonable argument as this against their cause?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/01/20 08:29 PM
38

Feminists: "But it's not bad when it's happening to other people (in this case white men) , discrimination is only bad when it happens to women." Also feminists: "We're here for equality and the betterment of everyone, men as well as women, join our cause!"
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:50 PM
1

I could not even begin to imagine. If this sort of thing happened to a woman, they’d be queuing up to make a film out of it that would no doubt be acclaimed. As it’s happened to a man, and worse would give a powerful voice and perspective on men’s experiences, there’s no way it’ll be allowed to happen.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:00 AM
3

Firstly and most importantly ask for their concise definition of feminism - as they can tell you what feminism isn’t, they should therefore be able to tell you what it is. If they won’t give you a definition, don’t waste time with them - as soon as you start to debate, if you make valid points against feminism, they’ll “shape-shift” again and claim it’s not feminism. If they do define feminism (I’d hope along the lines of “equality of opportunity for females”), then you have something to discuss…
/r/MensRights02/01/20 09:36 PM
2

Of course, the BBC mentions the video several times in this article: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50945206 Denial to present the video as evidence is mentioned in this article (by the probably less impartial Times of Israel): https://www.timesofisrael.com/cyprus-court-convicts-uk-woman-of-making-false-rape-claim-against-israeli-teens/ Also it seems I was somewhat incorrect in my above comment - the prosecution against her tried to present the video to prove that sex was consensual (not the defe…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/19 02:57 PM
2

All over the news here, even the BBC reported in it which is a tough one for them, ordinarily they'd be tripping over themselves to push the "women aren't believed"/"rape culture" angle, but then if she didn't lie, it mean's Jewish perpetrators. Though I digress - the defence tried to have the video of the event PRESENTED to the jubge, but the prosecution objected, saying it would be bad for her "mental state". So if the video would have helped proved the defendents guilty/help her case, she mig…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/19 09:45 AM
14

I’ve never spotted this [totally different way in which men are presented in ads] even though on reflection it’s absolutely blatant. The diet coke advert is a great example - the male focal point is idealised - excellent physique and presented in an almost fetishised manner for the consumption of women. Similar in perfume ads - the man (usually in a sharp suit, perfectly disheveled with just the right amount of 5o’clock shadow). Contrast with selling a household product - the chubby, balding hus…
/r/MGTOW30/12/19 11:44 AM
1

Holy shit.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 08:24 AM
55

Yet remember folks - the “system” was set up and is run by the “patriarchy” to oppress women for the benefit of men. /s
/r/MensRights28/12/19 10:17 AM
15

It’s so blatant isn’t it. And yet we’re constantly told it’s girls and women who face a hostile media, despite the fact it’s holding everything female up as incredible and celebrating the success of females because they’re female and largely ignoring men or asking questions like “what’s wrong with men” or “why are men so problematic” (I paraphrase somewhat) And lets not forgot of course that 1 in 4 of the homeless are women or that when large numbers of people are killed in terrorist attacks or …
/r/MGTOW26/12/19 02:13 PM
1

Don’t forget to add the Buzzfeed on where they decry the leaking of female celeb naked pics but thank Santa for the leak of a male celebs personal, naked pictures.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 09:51 AM
41

The workplace death statistic is so stark. If it were the other way around it’d never be out of the news and after endless campaigning they’d have probably banned work by now for being sexist and to try and stop women dying.
/r/MGTOW26/12/19 09:43 AM
15

What utterly Orwellian double-speak. Most women find motherhood the most rewarding and enjoyable thing in their life and would give up work to do it in a heartbeat (or those women lucky enough to have a man earning enough to enable her to do so). Flip it around and you get : Being on average larger and stronger for men is a penalty. Not only does it mean we have to take on the majority of the difficult and dangerous jobs, and work a typically dedicate a greater portion of our lives solely to ear…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 10:38 PM
4

And she’ll probably spend all the free time that money gives her on Instagram or Tumblr posting patriarchy memes and complaining about how oppressed women are in western society.
/r/MGTOW25/12/19 09:57 PM
2

“Ego violence” 😂
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/12/19 12:23 PM
56

Someone please tell her about basic, decent behaviour, shouldn’t slap anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/19 10:37 AM
2

A PUA might call this a “shit test”, I understand a lot of women do this. Sure this example is offensive, and if you think she’s truly a bitch, then drop it. Otherwise maybe try having some fun, flip it round on her (“did you just assume my gender”, etc, etc); see what comes back. If she’s a ct, fk it, but perhaps she’ll see you’re the great guy you are, quieten down and you’ll both have a great time...
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:49 AM
3

HTML isn’t “Turing Complete” - it’s not a programming language. I’m not sure about HTML 5, though probably the same. I’d recommend SQL - it’s the language of relational databases and is very “high level”, i.e. you tell it what to do and not how to do it. This makes the language very easy to get into (though it’s nuanced and there’s lots to learn and master). Plus data is recognised as being an extremely important asset for many companies and whilst relational databases aren’t very sexy (being ba…
/r/MGTOW23/12/19 11:49 PM
5

Exactly. This sort of article proves 100% they don’t actually want equality, on the good bits of “equality” that improve their lives, whilst leaving the rest of “equality” (ie the shit parts of being a man, such as actually getting punished when you commit a crime and having to work your entire life).
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/12/19 11:25 PM
161

“...should get a new trial because the judge relied on stereotypes of how women behave, Ontario’s top court ruled on Thursday.” It’s great they’ve called it out but holy shot, there it is in black and white - the judge jailed him not based on evidence or reason, but on basic, sexist stereotypes about how a person behaves based on sex. How the hell did the system allow such a bigoted and fundamentally unsuitable person to become a judge and will they review previous cases that went before this pe…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:42 AM
11

Said the man who, whilst ruling the most powerful country in the world, didn’t had over power to a woman. If he really does believe that women are better rulers (which is of course a very sexist and disputable statement), by his own measure, he did the USA and the world a disservice by hanging onto power himself.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:15 PM
4

Even the fact there’s a name for it - “toy boy” speaks volumes. Does anyone know if there’s a similar name for the younger women of an older man?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:10 PM
1

This is classic. Women like those who wrote this are our allies in the fight for reason.
/r/MGTOW15/12/19 11:29 PM
23

How can that possibly be the case? If true the bias in absolutely unbelievable, men in the US have been put in prison for non-payment of child support whilst they were held as a PoW in Iraq and even lamentably whilst a prisoner of the USA (as soon as they were released from prison, they were re-arrested and sent to jail for non payment). The area of the law chosen to implement child support has absolutely no exceptions and also is not concerned with the concept of fairness or equitability. There…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 11:38 AM
63

They tell us women gaining isn’t about men loosing it’s not “zero sum”, everyone wins - women have more and men stay the same. Yet here’s a powerful feminist effectively saying that if women can’t perform well enough, they’ll have to damage men to level the playing field.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 04:17 PM
5

Don’t forget the ‘cutesy’ “Boy’s are stupid, throw rocks at them” t-shirts designed and sold by “David and Goliath” clothing in the early 2000s and marketed to young girls. The fact this was extremely sexist was picked up by someone who cared, their campaign led to the tshirts being pulled, but was also criticised for focussing on a “trivial issue”. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys_are_stupid,_throw_rocks_at_them!_controversy
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/19 02:54 PM
1

Nicely written and powerfully argued. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 08:28 PM
5

Ouch. The bit about being bi makes this particularly hard to argue with - this guy’s got experience of both side of the fence (so to speak) and so can compare.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 12:21 AM
2

I cannot upvote this comment enough, amazing sentiment and phraseology!
/r/MGTOW04/12/19 08:19 PM
1

Indeed, excellent, thank you for posting the link.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/19 07:56 PM
1

As one of the examples states, a woman inseminated herself after performing oral sex with her partner, and then using the ejaculate from her mouth, so in some cases women do make themselves pregnant it seems. As for 20%, it does seem a little high, especially for the population as a whole, though I could easily imagine for certain demographics that type of percentage with people looking for an “easy way out”, trick a man into a child and now you don’t have to work, don’t have to even see him (if…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 01:02 AM
1

My response is in the spirit of the post’s content - a very one dimensional counter example to a very one-dimensional implied criticism of men. Though otherwise I entirely agree, many men enjoy cooking and I can’t see anyone ridiculing a man for doing so.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/19 07:47 PM
44

Or perhaps they’re down a mine somewhere, working hard to put food on table, or maybe on a battlefield getting shot at to defend their wives and daughter’s freedoms and way of life. Selfish, lazy men.
/r/AntiFeminists29/11/19 08:19 PM
11

Also how would that work in the (growing number of cases) where the father does the majority of childcare? Not that I agree with the argument in the first place, but by arguing that lower retirement should be based on gender and not who actually does the childcare, they are being extremely sexist indeed.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/11/19 11:23 PM
2

This woman stabbed a man in the eye with her stiletto heel over a minor disagreement involving a bag of crisps (which she wasn’t involved in), miraculously not blinding him, and also walked free: https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/stiletto-stabbed-eye-piccadilly-attack-10758082
/r/MensRights24/11/19 11:17 PM
3

It’s odd how one day these presenters are smugly harping on about how happy women are, better than men, control spending, better lives, etc, etc and then the very next day (or possibly next hour) will be reporting on how oppressed women are, how unhappy women are and how unfair life os towards them. Also it strikes me how they got so incredibly threatened that a report or man could dare say otherwise, they absolutely HAD to win the argument of who has it better. Finally, for a group who at the m…
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 10:33 PM
2

Exactly. And the equality bit (as has often been said) is to have all the “advantages” to being a man, but without giving up any of the advantages of being a woman.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/11/19 12:14 PM
2

All strong points and very lucidly put.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 11:06 PM
6

Surprisingly, even the usually “woke” BBC gives it a bad (and remarkably detailed) write up here: http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20191119-charlies-angels-review-bland-witless-and-ludicrous
/r/MGTOW22/11/19 08:35 PM
6

Had he not died after being stabbed, he’d have probably been arrested and charged with domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 08:48 PM
31

I remember the outcry from certain women’s groups a few years ago when it was announced we very very close to reliable male contraception (vasogel I think). They were appalled, using some very odd logical reasoning against it along the lines of: “ Men cannot be trusted to use contraception Therefore it should be the women that use contraception Therefore men should not be allowed contraception “ Basically they seemed very threatened by men gaining a more comprehensive [than condoms] form of birt…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 02:14 PM
8

Marriage. Bringing a legal contract into romance. How could it possibly go wrong?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen19/11/19 11:25 PM
12

Remember what happened to that Australian man who helped a woman with her car? Rape accusation, wife left him and his life was left in tatters even after her baseless claim was proven to be false. The quotes in that article too criticising men for being “cowards”, holy fuck. They’re literally attempting to define men as “toxic”, criticise us from cradle to grave but as soon as they’re in trouble - this. They try to shame us for not acting in a “masculine” way - the very thing they say is wrong w…
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 01:47 PM
3

From the trailer it seems that the film is just rubbing men’s faces in how bad we’re meant to be, via contrived two dimensional situations, before rejoicing in “strong” women who “don’t need no man” beating the crap out of the aforementioned men, it doesn’t seem like the kind of film any reasonable person would expect men to go and see. We’d much rather watch a buddy film involving cars and with a much more positive message.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/19 11:13 PM
3

Another “deadbeat” dad, or so women would have us believe.
/r/MGTOW17/11/19 07:01 PM
10

Men choose the same professions, but don’t have the choice to take years out to do something much more rewarding, such as raising their own children. Instead traditionally we get to go to work without a break to ensure our wives and children have sufficient money for a secure and stable home life to develop in. Then as a bonus for not having a choice and having to go to work, we get told the fact we earn more is sexism and we’re the “oppressors”.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/19 03:30 AM
3

Also women are reporting being much less happy now than they were in the 70s. They have to go out, work hard, stress instead of getting to stay at home and look after their children. If that deal was on the table for men, I’m sure a lot would take it, but there’s no way most women would keep respect for their husband if she felt she was having to pay for him to stay at home and have all the pleasure of seeing “her” children grow up.
/r/MGTOW16/11/19 08:37 AM
2

Brilliant review, films like this are just gender politics garbage now - the very point of them is just to be unpleasant to men. Imagine the outcry if a film was made with pretty the whole point of it being to portray as bad and then rejoicing in men beating the shit out of them.
/r/MGTOW16/11/19 08:03 AM
2

And why victims of “domestic violence”, why not homeless people, of whom there are legion and meed help more than ever at this very cold time of year? Other than being discriminatory, this is purely political.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:18 PM
16

Since the early 2000s young women have out-earned men (this is predominantly seen in cities and totally predictable as women since around that time have been leaving higher education in greater number and so we would expect would earn more than men). So if we are going to have this, let’s let men see women’s salaries too, that would help put an end to this myth (/engineered statistic) that men out-earn women simply because of gender.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:27 PM
10

Yet a man so much as passes wind too loudly near his children and the mother reports it, he'll be out of his house and under a restraining order quicker than you can say "men have privilege".
/r/MensRights11/11/19 10:57 PM
82

From the BBC article reporting the story: “The woman, who cannot be identified, had said there had been little contact after sex.” It’s insane that even though he’s now been found innocent his accuser cannot be named. And feminists still repeatedly claim that women are oppressed and men have “privilege”.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 09:57 PM
3

Absolutely agree with your last point - for some reason it’s great news and to be applauded when it’s two women whereas two men would be terrible and not be “diverse” enough.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 09:47 AM
2

Holy. Shit.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/11/19 11:18 PM
10

Jesus :(
/r/MensRights03/11/19 10:09 AM
1

OP, the “source” you provide is extremely biased, it would be like me posting a link to a far-right organisation who were providing “information” on why some races are superior to others. As others have already replied, it’s very easy (just a google search) to discover that in the west, young women out-earn men, and by a significant margin (nearly double digits). This has been a trend since the late 90s. This trend reverses (ie men begin to out earn women) at around the age of motherhood (late 2…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 12:10 AM
2

Exactly, even a cursory search on Google yields many results from trusted sources of young women out earning men. The kind of “research” OP has posted (from an extremely biased source) I think hints at someone who’s perhaps not quite as open minded as they present themselves.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:46 PM
6

That is fucking insane - * She had custody but “just” could take the children away from the father * if she continued to live in the house, she would have to pay towards it, which meant she’d have to get a job. How could any person with a shred of fairness in them think either of those things anything other than utterly fair. The level of self-entitlement and bias that those women in the comments are displaying, it’s awful there’s so many of them too.
/r/MGTOW02/11/19 01:26 PM
11

It’s refreshing to see the sentencing reflect the gravity of what she did.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 09:03 AM
3

Yet they cried foul when the state pension age was harmonised with men’s in the UK (women used to be able to claim their pension 5 years earlier than in the UK).
/r/MensRights02/11/19 12:13 AM
3

Yet they cried foul when the state pension age was harmonised with men’s in the UK (women used to be able to claim their pension 5 years earlier than in the UK).
/r/MensRights02/11/19 12:11 AM
2

Well done, takes some balls to do something like that. Is there anyone else there who agrees with you? Suspect they’ll probably try to shame you to shut you up.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 12:01 AM
3

Sadly a very accurate and succinct assessment of whats happening.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:55 AM
3

Done also. As others have said - thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 06:52 PM
4

I second every other reply you’ve had to your question, it’s mainly because this is committed by women against men that they don’t care about it. They’re also worried that this could be used by alienated parents (mainly men of course) to convince courts that the best interest of the child is to have both parents in it’s life and this could weaken a woman’s huge advantage in the family courts. They basically want to keep the odds stacked in the favour of women.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 06:52 PM
2

Absolutely agree.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 08:57 PM
17

Just watch out for “commonlaw” laws - the gotcha where the law will automatically treat you as having married of you cohabit with a woman for a certain length of time or if you provide for here also.
/r/MGTOW26/10/19 02:08 PM
1

Which country is this may I ask? That sort of talk could be considered as creating a hostile environment and discriminatory. I know it’s not easy, but if you can get proof she’s saying those things, then a complaint about it, along with a statement from you (and possibly other’s who she teaches) explaining how it makes the environment unpleasant for you all should have an effect.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 02:04 PM
10

Yet a boy who “touched a girl’s arm and waist” has to pay here £250 and sigh the sex offender’s register for five years. But men are the oppressors. Also women are strong and powerful, but the girl in the story above was “too devastated to continue her studies and lost a place at Oxford university”. Because someone touched her arm.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 01:57 PM
2

More talking, would it help? Perhaps, though how much of this is being caused by a society which couldn’t really give two f**cks about men at the bottom of the pile, brought up in a feminised education system, without a father to guide them or build them up and explain to them how to cope, as a man, in such a world?
/r/MensRights26/10/19 12:34 PM
55

Yup, even going so far as to explain women’s use of violence pretty much as acceptable and normal responses. Absolutely, appallingly biased.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 06:05 PM
2

“Currently, there aren’t any U.S. laws that restrict the use of puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones or outline a minimum age of administration.” So, smoke a bit of weed once, which will do no damage, and if caught, the law could seriously damage your life. Vs these drugs, which will totally ruin your life, and the law has no interest. Utterly ridiculous.
/r/MGTOW22/10/19 10:31 PM
9

It’s where lots of subscribers in one sub all flock to the post in another sub and cause mischief/mayhem/voting bias. Eg users from r/Canada going to r/USA and being overly polite in lots of comments
/r/MGTOW18/10/19 06:32 PM
2

I’m with you, it wouldn’t be pleasant if some old woman tried to forcefully plant a kiss on me and I’m sure it wasn’t nice for a random woman on a train to be on the receiving end of a drunk Gazza. That said, I don’t think it’s serious enough to be described as sexual assault, so think this is the right result.
/r/MGTOW17/10/19 09:41 PM
2

For Australia this is pretty refreshing news and also a huge relief for common sense. Actually recruiting based on ability and not some ideologically driven agenda which cares very little for competency.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/19 10:15 AM
7

Sorry, my minority-omics were a bit off there. I’ll try to remember in the future that regardless of circumstance, white men are always the oppressors.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:52 PM
12

Apologies, forgot the first rule of equality club.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:42 PM
55

Isn't that creating a hostile and non-inclusive environment, the fact that she's effectively mocking a minority in the classroom? Title 9 violation?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:10 PM
6

I wonder if a 5yr old girl was wondering around, hugging and kissing her classmates she’d be branded as sexual offender, or would people point at her and say: “Look at how caring and emotionally expressive she is, if only boys could be more like girls”
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:01 PM
15

Apologies in advance for pointing out some obvious stuff here. What we are is what the nature of our species (and women) required us to be. Women are physically compromised and vulnerable for a good portion of pregnancy, historically they needed a loyal protector and they generally selected men who were bigger and stronger than them to fulfil that role. We (men) of course benefitted by protecting our offspring, over time this selection got us to where we are now. So yes, it’s [using violence to …
/r/MGTOW12/10/19 10:37 PM
21

Men: No reproductive rights at all, must pay for children that aren't ours Imprisoned for longer than women for the same crime Almost always portrayed as idiots or inferior in the media Women can say on TV it was "quite fabulous" a man had his penis cut off, laugh about it and not lose her job, or admit to drugging and robbing men and be applauded for it Shamed for being under six foot or not looking like the Rock Very little support if homeless or abused Make up a very small percentage of teach…
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/19 10:02 PM
1

How on earth do they expected to be taken seriously with the attitude of a spoilt child, refusing to take responsibilities for their actions.
/r/MGTOW08/10/19 09:38 PM
3

Amazing video, a very good summary of what’s going on now and very clearly presented with good examples. I’ll be forwarding a link to this on.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/19 03:52 PM
10

Like the irony of women taking a gender studies course and being taught how there isn’t enough women in “STEM” subjects.
/r/MGTOW06/10/19 12:15 PM
5

Could not agree with you more. Also as Jordan Petersen eloquently explains in his now famous Channel 4 interview, you cannot present such a complex number as income analysed by just one factor. Even if you bring age into the picture (as well as gender) we immediately see that women earn more than men right up until around the average age of motherhood (lates 20’s), which is exactly what the market would predict as women enter the job market on average with better qualifications. IMO the “wage ga…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 09:24 AM
3

Could not agree with this more. Remember many years ago being sat at a table with some woman who was going on about how great it would be with all men gone. I suggested that with no-one to repair the roads, maintain and fix water mains or power networks, spend gruelling hours behind the wheel of a truck to deliver food, clothes and even cosmetics to stores, etc, etc, etc, that their celebrations may be short lived. To give her credit, her smile was quickly replaced with a pensive frown as she re…
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/19 02:35 PM
1

Yeah, because those women would of course be happy to pay for their boyfriend to live in their house and for him to then invite female friends over. Or in fact for almost any woman to be happy with a boyfriend who they largely pay for to have female friends who they hang out. /s
/r/MGTOW04/10/19 01:47 PM
1

I could agree more with you. She is driven by hate, I seriously hope she doesn’t get elected as the speaker.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 04:03 PM
2

I disagree - rich people have everything, male AND female. There are a lot of men out there who have much less than some women, noone walks around saying “you’re a man, here have lots of money and power”. What people have have very little to do with gender as a cause, it’s either what you’re born with, or to a lesser degree how hard you work and a bit of luck. Here’s some food for thought on this topic too - women not wanting to marry men who don’t make as much as them: https://www.reddit.com/r/…
/r/MensRights26/09/19 05:28 PM
13

Don’t disagree. however I suspect a female child wouln’t have been labelled a “sex offender” for similar behaviour.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 05:29 PM
1

Genius
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 11:32 AM
2

Holy shit this is utterly infuriating to read. The western news would explode if a judge said an immature 20 yr old man was fine to have raped an 11yr old girl.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:12 PM
3

[hashtag]BelieveHer /s
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:06 PM
3

Most feminists - "it's only bad when they do it"
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 07:27 AM
1

It’s utterly ridiculous, what these people seem to be saying is that objectivity and content doesn’t matter, all that matters is appearance - these lists must be made to “look” right and not be right.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 09:23 PM
3

Perfect
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/19 03:30 PM
2

Beautiful.
/r/MGTOW06/09/19 03:31 PM
10

Voting aside (which as mentioned above in the UK all men got in 1918 (and so had an utterly uncelebrated centenary last year) along with the responsibility to fight in wars) if you look at the conditions of many men back then, they weren’t sitting on their backsides all day, smoking pipes and eating food in immaculate houses kept clean by long suffering women. Back then men (when not being shot to pieces in a foreign country or forced to take the “king’s shilling”, etc) were in the mines, the fi…
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/19 10:27 AM
1

Reading those quotes I’ve just realised that they’re similar to delusional conspiracy theorists in the way that they believe all men have somehow clubbed together and agreed that we’ll “rape our way to the top” to “oppress” women.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 07:17 AM
3

Agree completely. Also the “wage gap” is misnomered, it’s actually a “choice gap”. Women can choose to work or have a child. Choose the latter, work less, earn less. Men of course don’t really have a choice. The fact that we earn more (aka work more) is a symptom of our lack of choice, not the fact that society discriminates against women.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 06:51 PM
2

I remember reading a gloating article in one of the UK papers (maybe the Metro) on how women “owned half of everything”, I didn’t keep it and had been trying to find some other sources for years, so thanks for this. No matter how you spin it (e.g. women still earn leas than men, they just inherit it) it shows that women aren’t hated and oppressed by society, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowed to get and keep more than half the wealth when all was said and done.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 11:38 AM
1

By then most of the men’s restrooms will be non-gendered though (whilst of course the women’s will remain women only).
/r/MensRights29/08/19 06:13 AM
1

Religious nut.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:13 PM
213

Remember the woman that took her daughter to a men-only barbers (I think Australia) and when he refused to cut her hair (because he wasn’t trained to do it) she took him to court. They hate men having anything of their own (even our own toilets) but demand their exclusive spaces and organisations, all in the (Orwellian double-speak) name of “equality”.
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 07:44 AM
157

As a recent post on Reddit pointed out, it's amazing how quickly the feminists and media can suddenly grasp other aspects around the bullshit "paygap" when women are earning more than men. Of course then it's nothing to do with discrimination, but perfectly understandable market forces.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:26 AM
2

On the gender aspect, I believe the highest rates of domestic violence are within lesbian couples. Toxic masculinity? And I suspect the only reason why women aren’t much more violent than they are is because in many cases it’s simply not going to be a winning strategy for them - men typically are bigger/stronger. If women were generally stronger than men, you can bet they’d be much more violent than they are.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:13 AM
7

They don’t even pretend it’s anything other. If you post a comment there which uses perfect reasonable logic to explain why for example something negatively affects men as well as women, you’ll be banned. They want nothing other than “women are oppressed/have to overcome great difficulty to achieve” or “men are oppressors/violent/have everything handed to them on a plate at birth/have an amazing life regardless of what they deserve”.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 10:27 PM
134

I love their their thinking on this one: Feminists: “Men created the ‘patriarchy’ to oppress women and benefit themselves” Rational people: “but many men’s lives are hard too, increasingly excluded from higher education, most workplace deaths, excluded from family, most likely to be homeless, most likely to be victims of violence etc, etc” Feminists: “The ’patriarchy’ is bad for men too! Feminism is about making things better for men as well as women, join our cause!” So they go from “the ‘patri…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:39 PM
9

Nothing like taking away a man’s ability to earn money in order to force him to pay money.
/r/MGTOW13/08/19 08:31 PM
4

Yet it’s paid out of a taxed income, so it’s certainly counted as income for the poor sod having to earn it.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 02:00 PM
9

They are encouraged to speak up though, they’re told their opinion is valid and they’re smart and can achieve anything they want. Successful females are celebrated not as just general examples of successful, but as examples of FEMALE success: “Look how smart the girls are! ... And they achieve regardless of the rampant ‘oppression’ the boys inflict on them” The experience of boys however is very different - if they speak up/ask questions/play and behave like boys/pretty much exist (with a backdr…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:58 PM
8

Holy shit, I was scrolling down thinking “this is all just for women” then I saw the links for men and thought not completely sexist then. Then I read the mens links, fuck that is awful. Pure evidence as to how the state sees men and how deeply infected it’s become with the worst kind of gender feminist logic and hate :(
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:33 AM
2

She's been having a good time at college (or at least a good month) : "At that point they discussed sexual intercourse, sexually transmitted diseases and their sexual histories, including Jane’s five sexual partners from the past month." Link to article: https://www.thecollegefix.com/penn-state-retroactively-redefined-consent-after-accused-student-won-a-new-hearing-lawsuit/
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 02:47 PM
1

Love it how they call men to deal with their issues. (I realise not all cops are men, but most are and correct me if I`m wrong, I'm assuming the ones dispatched to you were also).
/r/MGTOW26/07/19 07:09 PM
3

Exactly - it’s pure victim blaming. He was “asking for it”. If a man had tried to defend himself in the same manner he would have been [rightly] crucified by the media. As it’s a woman who raped a you boy however ... crickets.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 10:30 PM
5

I’d say they see logic (and in some cases facts) as an obstacle to overcome.
/r/MGTOW23/07/19 04:22 PM
1

Right, we need a white, female Black Panther next as that franchise lacks inclusion if you ask me. Also a black, male Wonder Woman and an Asian man as the next Captain Marvel. Edit - we now have a female Thor. One more for “female [only] equality”.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 11:01 AM
3

So she used the phrase “toxic masculinity” (and so demonstrating that she thinks masculinity is toxic) yet before that she’d told someone to “man up” (ie become more masculine). She’s encouraging (in her own eyes) someone to be more toxic. And if she really thought that little of men she should tell us to “woman up” instead. She sounds pretty thick to me.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:46 AM
1

Also no mention in the headlines that the good samaritans were male. If females had helped push someone’s car that far I would bet good money that would be one of the central aspects of how the story was reported.
/r/MGTOW19/07/19 09:37 PM
7

This is the bit that really worries me in a lot of these cases. These women should be punished severely but then conversely doing so could make false accusers in the future stay quiet and prevent innocent men from being freed. Accusations like this have to be much more thoroughly investigated before action is taken against the accused. It’s ridiculous that just the word of a woman can have a man treated like this with no due process. It’s not like I (as a man) can just point a finger at someone,…
/r/MGTOW16/07/19 04:39 PM
1

How can someone even say "I just found out I was raped" (unless they were unconscious during the act). For rape to occur, by definition you must be actively resisting the act. You can't "find out" about it after the event unless you've decided to rewrite history (as this woman's trying to do) because now you don't like them and you want to get them in serious trouble because you're a nasty' vindictive person.
/r/MGTOW15/07/19 09:57 AM
6

Holy shit, if this had happened to a woman the western world would have almost imploded, the law would probably have been modified to make sure it never happened again and a blockbuster made about it to rub it in men's faces about how horrible we all are and what discrimination women have to put up with. It happens to a man... Crickets
/r/MGTOW11/07/19 06:20 PM
10

What on earth does any of that utterly feminist-agenda crap have to do with sentencing anyway? If such factors should make a difference then sentencing should be based on a person's background regardless of gender. By that logic, the following examples should apply: If a defendent was from a poor background having gone to a bad school they should be treated less harshly during sentencing than a defendent from a weathly background and had an excellent education. Preumanly these discriminatory UK …
/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:10 PM
2

Exactly. When women are bad the headline mentions “people”. When men are bad, the headline mentions” men”. When men are good the headline mentions “people” And when it’s women who’ve done something good, then the headline mentions “women”. The BBC do this all the time.
/r/MGTOW28/06/19 10:11 PM
2

Men do dominate the higher end of the IQ spectrum (I forget the figure but above a certain IQ score it`s 13 men for every woman) however... men also dominate the lower end of the scale too. Women are clustered much more in the centre. So a distribution chart of IQ for women looks like a typical normal distribution whereas for men it's a much flatter line.
/r/MGTOW216/06/19 10:32 AM
15

I dread to think how having a mother like this affects young men as they grow up. Amongst many other things it surely can't help them develop a normal, healthy attitude/relationship towards women.
/r/MGTOW15/06/19 01:40 PM
6

Don’t forget the recently released (online only) scene from Captain Marvel where some guy harasses her, she humiliates him physically before stealing him motorbike. the whole thing was utterly contrived as some kind of revenge fantasy. Of course women loved it. Do a film where a man get’s revenge over a woman who falsely accuses him of harassment and you won’t be able to hear yourself think over the screams of “misogyny!” online and in the media.
/r/MGTOW10/06/19 10:29 AM
6

“The fairer sex”. Absolutely disgusting crimes which seem to have been directed at the victims because they were male. Will they be treated as hate crimes? Also a perfect counter example when a feminist is trying to paint men as violent and toxic and women as caring and empathic.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:49 AM
5

Apologies upfront if this post comes across as a bit ... hippyish. At it’s core - absolutely not. I think subs like this have come about as a forum for like minded men to reassure each other that we’re not crazy, men aren’t “toxic” and generally in Western society/media now there is unchecked (though this is changing) aggression, discrimination and even hatred towards “maleness”. However ... I think some posts on these subs are driven by frustration and anger towards women generally (ie not from…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 01:18 PM
12

And then when the air conditioning is turned on and it’s too cold for them (despite the fact they could put something warm on, whilst men cannot remove items of clothing, like a tie) it’s suddenly “sexist air conditioning”.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 08:40 AM
3

It's crazy to me that people would are surprised (though probably secretly enjoy) the fact this type of scene will ruffle feathers. If the character did this to someone just because they were "bad", noone would too upset, but the fact is this scene is engineered to present men in a bad light and allow the [mainly female] audience a brief power-fantasy over specifically this group of people. The fact it does this essentially makes it discriminatory. If a scene were constructed so that someone was…
/r/MGTOW30/05/19 10:31 PM
1

Looks great, walk in wardrobe gets a big thumbs-up in particular!
/r/MGTOW26/05/19 11:51 PM
39

This is appalling, I had no idea. It’s amazing that the press doesn’t make more out of it - imagine the uproar of women were denied food but it was given to men and children. Another in a long (and growing) list of things to retort with next time I’m told women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:03 PM
71

Yup - I’ve also yet to read of a man who’s escaped a prison sentence for a violent crime “because of the effect it would have on his child”. Whereas is pretty much a common occurrence to read of women who escape prison despite appalling acts of violence (e.g. kicking someone in the face with their stiletto heel) only to avoid jail completely because of their child.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:01 PM
1

I kind of agree - if as a man you’re tricked into becoming a father, you should have the opportunity to denounce fatherhood and the woman be left with the option of bringing the child up on her own with no way to force the man to pay her anything. This is unfair on the child (someone knowingly brining it into the world with one father) , but the alternative of forcefully aborting the baby is a abhorrent though. Alternatively, if you don’t want a child, then why have one? Adoption is a far from p…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:25 PM
2

Forcing a woman to have a child she doesn’t want is condemning that child to a potential life if misery and also placing a burden on society should that child grow up to become a criminal (as many children in such a situation do). Until “pro lifers” are prepared to adopt these children and provide all the time, resources and love necessary to bring them up to be contributing members of society, then their thoughts are practically as useful as “thoughts and prayers” are to victims of earthquakes,…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:54 AM
3

I totally agree with you but would go onto say that not just MRAs should support it but everyone. If a woman doesn’t want a child, then if forced to give birth she’s unlikely to look after it and there’s a bigger chance the child will grow up to be a problem than a contributing member of society. And the people that oppose abortion rarely put their money where their mouth is and offer to raise unwanted children as their own in a loving household. They just condemn the mother and force the child …
/r/MensRights15/05/19 07:35 PM
6

Having to pay for 18 years, getting sent to prison/driving license/passport revoked if you don’t, for a child that even the courts acknowledge isn’t yours. Not saying it’s worse, but there are parallels of sorts.
/r/MGTOW15/05/19 06:51 PM
7

I’ve always wondered about this - why will the legal system prosecute a man that does this to a woman but when a woman does it to a man (tells him she loves him, lets him spend lots of money on her and then breaks up with him) it’s fine?
/r/MGTOW14/05/19 05:03 PM
4

As it’s been pointed out elsewhere - she is paying absolutely nothing with this. It’s the men who’s lives are ruined who in fact are paying this price, to make people like this detestable woman feel smug about themselves.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:51 AM
10

Presumably feminists would respond the same “in the name of equality” if this was a push to force men who’d been accused of sharing their phone and social media contents, saying it’s traumatising for those accused to have to do this? Or would that be a price they were “absolutely willing to ‘pay’” (at someone else’s expense)?
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:48 AM
1

MeToo
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:53 AM
8

“The judge didn’t want to compound the boy’s tragedy by taking his mother away for a significant amount of time.” They don’t have a problem taking fathers away for significant amounts of time. It’s pretty much Orwellian double-speak: Father does something bad - lock him up, must protect the child. Mother does something bad - taking her away would just add to the child’s problems.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 09:55 PM
15

This is so true. I notice that when my friends get girlfriends, suddenly there’s a shared calendar and these women then start booking stuff into any free weekends. Often they don’t ask beforehand either, treating an empty weekend as consent for them to fill it. They all instinctively seem to know that if you control a person’s time, you effectively control the person.
/r/MGTOW19/04/19 09:32 PM
3

2+2=5
/r/AntiFeminists18/04/19 10:48 PM
8

ToxicFemininity
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:25 PM
24

Holy crap, this is genius. It pulls together so many disparate thoughts I’ve (and I’m going to guess many others) have had and codifies them into this single, coherent analogy. Brilliant.
/r/MGTOW02/04/19 11:29 AM
2

Yeah, I commented on a post about how women” just want basic human rights” by pointing out that as women can admit to drugging and raping men without so much as a slap on the wrist, we can probably assume that they have rights. Knew it would get me banned and so it did. You cannot say anything there other than how oppressed women are. Anything against the groupthink, no matter how logical or reasonable will be a ban on that sub.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 10:42 PM
3

The problem with programming languages is that they’re all based on logic. And logic of course is the male way of thinking and therefore oppressive and non-inclusive. The only way to solve this is to create a programming language based on emotions and feelings alone. For example a function called “AreYouOK”, which takes as input a question such as “Aye you ok?” And then gives an answer which may not be correct at face value but which you have to determine via empathy the truth value of. Continui…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 03:15 PM
3

“It made me feel uncomfortable therefore it’s sexual harassment ... probably”
/r/MensRights21/03/19 09:59 AM
17

ToxicFemininity
/r/MensRights19/03/19 07:24 PM
3

But then they claim discrimination when men get more STEM degrees/doctorates.
/r/MGTOW16/03/19 10:22 AM
1

Incorrect, it’s not if women ruled but of women did the fighting.
/r/MGTOW12/03/19 06:10 PM
4

To me this sounds like male disenfranchisement - why work for a system that doesn’t give a f**k about you. Which I’m pretty sure is what a lot of these men have worked out.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:00 AM
12

Came to make a similar point - the way how these things are reported differ hugely by sex. If it were men in the article with this behaviour it would be discussed as a problem with men that women have to tolerate. Discussion would be around how to treat or deal with this “defective behaviour” in men. As it’s a behaviour with women, it’s normal and nothing to be ashamed of. Society makes women feel guilty and men should learn to live and deal with this in women. Men who can’t are somehow “lesser”…
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 11:52 AM
3

Or insist on having it slung over their shoulder taking up precious extra room on crowded buses.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/19 01:59 PM
3

“...pressure from their boyfriends and husbands to be thin.” Too right. If I’m dating someone I want to feel attracted to them and I’m attracted to lean, slender, firm bodies not rolls of fat. Also there’re many studies that show being thin has huge health benefits (including being able to reverse a pre-diabetic state, aka “insulin syndrome”). Also your knees will thank you for not piling on the pounds. In return I stay slim, fit and go to the gym. I’s also rather any woman I’m with to point out…
/r/MGTOW16/02/19 03:57 PM
4

Then the same woman: “Why aren’t all men feminists, feminism is there to help men too!”
/r/MensRights14/02/19 01:47 AM
28

So according to the legal reasoning here, as she was told to commit these acts by her “master”, it’s ok(ish) and she’s not a risk as she wouldn’t have done them on her own (even though she apparently did a couple of times). So if someone tells me to do something like this, and I do, presumably I can just say “but they told me to” to get away from being branded a dangerous sexual predator?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:42 PM
1

I agree with you, but [and I’m of course simplifying it a bit here” if you have brand “x” effectively encouraging the world to view you and your kind as potential rapists and brand “y” not, then all other things being equal, I’ll use brand “y”.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 08:09 PM
10

Not quite a free chance - her career is pretty much over at this point. At her level any prospective future employer will look into her background, quickly find out about this case and then pass on her application. Also it’s likely (though I don’t know for certain) that she’s paid quite a lot in legal fees which she won’t be getting back.
/r/MGTOW09/02/19 11:18 AM
1

You’re right it can (though I can’t think of many examples where this was the case) and the reason is because the audience (women as well as men) cares about women and animals more than they do about men, the screenwriters know this and exploit it to make successful films. Generally in Hollywood films, no lasting harm comes to women, even the female antagonists are often given redemption (though I admit there has historically been a trope of protagonist females being mainly helpless-heroines). C…
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:02 AM
1

Yup, sounds like a perfect example.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:34 PM
4

I don’t really think you can compare opera’s to films in this respect - a typical Hollywood film is expected to make as much money as possible over pretty much any other thing and is therefore produced to appeal to as large an audience as possible. Opera’s don’t really have financial success as their number one priority. And if you mean revenge fantasy such as Law Abiding Citizen, this is a good example of what I was trying to say above - the death of a woman (and or child) is a simple Hollywood…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 08:37 AM
9

Agree with you entirely. One example of this is in film - audiences don’t like it when women die. It’s generally fine for male characters (either bad guys as comeuppance or good guys paying the ultimate sacrifice for the greater good) to die, but test audiences react badly when women die.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:48 AM
1

This must be a parody. Please tell me this is a parody ...
/r/MGTOW05/02/19 05:31 PM
6

It’s the same with all the women studying utterly useless “Gender studies” courses, being taught about the lack of women in STEM subjects being due to “discrimination”, but not realising the irony that they themselves could correct the “imbalance” by themselves studying a STEM subject instead of studying how to moan. They’re just professional whiners.
/r/MGTOW05/02/19 05:27 PM
58

This is awful, utterly heartbreaking. Imagine having to grow up and develop in such an insecure environment with no father there to protect you.
/r/MGTOW01/02/19 05:40 PM
3

What was that quote, something like “toxic mother’s are worse than absent fathers”.
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 04:27 PM
1

You mean why don’t both parents quit working prior to any discussions regarding custody? It’s typically a lot easier for a woman to take this route as they’re not judged by society as much as men by their ability to provide plus all other things being equal (ie if both parents were unemployed) then the courts will favour the mother and award the child to here. So in OP’s case, I presume the father could only take this route because the mother was working.
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 01:19 PM
2

Holy fking st, I know it happens but when you see it... I can’t believe that some people actually try this as their plan.
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 12:14 PM
2

In the UK it’s normally the unemployed parent who gets the child, probably with the thinking being they have more time to devote to it. It’s ridiculous as it a. Rewards bad behaviour b. Encourages [typically women who are judged less on their ability to provide] to not get a job and be a drain on the welfare state and c. It’s typically the person who can hold a job down who is demonstrably the more stable person and therefore likely more capable a parent Though this arrangement probably suits ma…
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 12:09 PM
6

But there’s a bigger risk to him doing that - if she’d subsequently have regretted it and accused him of assault, he’d then be thrown out (despite not being the instigator) and branded as someone who’d committed sexual assault. She of course would become a “survivor” and hypocritically held us an another example of “rape culture” in the armed forces.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 07:18 PM
1

Just visualise their logo and remember the condescending voiceover in that dreadful “advert”. Hopefully like a pavlovian response you’ll be associating the brand with all sorts of negative things in no time.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 10:38 AM
10

Holy fucking shit. Never buying Gilette again . Please tell me Wilkinsons sword have never done anything like this or I’m goona have to get real hairy.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 07:29 AM
1

If “it doesn’t happen to many people” is an argument to belittle something then ... most women aren’t raped either, so why do they all rag on about it some much all the time? Another argument (against unequal pay which they often erroneously think is the pay gap) which also really gets them is: companies exist to make money lower costs is a great way to make more money if a company could hire from a pool of resource which it could pay less than when hiring from another pool of resource, but stil…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 02:15 PM
20

Classic example of male privilege being shown by the homeless man there. Remember one in four homeless people are women.
/r/MGTOW13/01/19 01:43 PM
4

HR departments - predominantly female and pulling up a guy for something for basically an act of manners. Other than the fact this is utterly ridiculous and sounding like something from an Orwellian dystopian novel, I’d say that they’re creating a hostile environment for men. Seriously - written f’king warning for holding a door open for someone. Jesus. What the hell is this HR dept even thinking - if someone came in complaining that someone has held a door open for them, they should probably ge…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 01:42 PM
6

I completely agree with you. I think it’s pathetic that many UK police forces seem more interested in “thought crimes” on Twitter than they do an old man getting beaten and burgled in his own home. I put the forward thinking in quotes to indicate a euphemism. They think they’re being progressive/responding to the needs of modern society, but in fact they’re being a bunch of nobs in this area.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:05 PM
8

“Misogyny” isn’t a hate-crime in the UK, that article is just reporting that a particularly “forward thinking” police force (Nottingham) will start to classify/record crimes where women are the victim as such. A bit pathetic/unnecessary virtue signalling, but that’s how some of our police are (though I think since that article was written things have got a bit better). That second article though .... wow. It amazing the mental gymnastics some people will go to. “intersecting social hierarchies w…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:53 AM
28

Remember that guy in Australia who’s wife was caught punching herself in the face on the CCTV in an elevator, before going to the police and reporting him fo domestic violence? He did get arrested though, spent several nights in jail (whilst she cleared out his apartment of all of his things) and spent tens of thousands of dollars in his defence. The only reason the evidence came to light is because whilst awaiting trial, he spent time investigating and looking for evidence (something which the …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/19 09:33 AM
10

A few people have mentioned carrying. Honestly, if I were in that situation, carrying, and the woman had got away with my child, I would be so apoplectic with rage towards those people that prevented me from saving my baby, I would probably be unable to control myself from shooting them. Their misguided good intentions that almost caused an absolute tragedy due to their idiocy and incredibly pathetic prejudices.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:40 PM
13

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:43 PM
13

It’s unbelievable. And nothing in the news makes it even worse.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:43 PM
9

Well that guy pretty much allowed the kidnap to happen by violently assaulting the baby’s parent and therefore neutralising that’s baby’s only hope of protection. After that he covered himself in “glory” even more by allowing the kidnapper to simply walk away. Whilst his intentions were there, he nearly made the whole situation unimaginably worse and everyone would have been better off if had done nothing.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:42 PM
257

Reverse the sexes in that and the whole western world would implode for several news cycles. There would be cries of misogyny, oppression, it must never happen again, etc, etc. There’d probably be a new law rushed through named after the mother. Yet it happens to a man and ... beyond a post on Reddit, nothing. Yet “patriarchy” and “male privilege”.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:29 PM
1629

Did you the see the post (I think yesterday) about a man who’s baby was kidnapped (by a woman) right in front of him on a store parking lot, and when he chased after the woman to stop her she screamed: “Help, he’s trying to take my baby!” Then the FATHER get’s punched to the floor, held down and kicked in the ribs whilst the woman walks off with HIS child. I can’t begin to imagine the feeling of horror and powerlessness he must have felt at that point. It only stopped when the mother came out of…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:00 PM
3

Thanks for the info again. “They do not provide a breakdown by level” and herein lies (I suspect) the problem of why the rates can look low. Though the final part of your quote does seem to agree with the premise that it’s much easier to prove the “against their will” part of the definition with assailants unknown to the victim. I have no data on this but would also imagine that with “stranger attacks” the attack is more aggravated/serious vs someone known to the potential victim where they coul…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:38 AM
5

Sexual assault is an unbelievably broad offence, from patting someone’s bum (and as I’ve just learnt from your post even verbal threats!) up to much more serious actions. It also sounds serious as a classification. Counting such minor actions under such a serious sounding banner makes it easy to generate alarming statistics. Grouping all of that under the term “rape” is extremely disingenuous and does nothing to help the debate (or truly understand the extent/nature of problem) at all. But is of…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:58 PM
3

Apologies, I should have been a bit more explicit in my “making out” scenario, I was hinting at digital penetration (or the vernacular “3rd base”), I believe this if non-consensual would be considered rape. Thank you for the links, the 2nd degree charge sounds like my second scenario, however whenever I’ve read of the low conviction rates (almost always mainstream press), I’ve never seen them split by these categories, also as per the figures in the post to which I replied (just one set of perce…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:52 PM
3

It’s a tricky one to compare directly these two types on crime - there’s much less he said/she said to (for an assault and battery example) someone punching someone else in the face. The ambiguity of the act can make it very difficult to determine if a set of actions actually constitutes a crime. It doesn’t help that the term “rape” is such a catch-all also. It covers everything from a couple making out on couch and at the time (say) the woman is a little uncomfortable with what’s happening but …
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:15 PM
11

Probably a first grade basic addition problem to add up how many years they got between them.
/r/MGTOW08/01/19 08:45 PM
123

Pete is very funny. (No “/s”, I genuinely find this funny)
/r/MGTOW08/01/19 05:53 PM
27

Exactly this. Their (the “diversity” crowd) argument: * if you discriminate by sex (or age or race) you reduce the pool which you recruit talent from therefore there is a “hidden” pool of talent amongst the group you “discriminate” against. this is bad for everyone as it makes businesses which “discriminate” less competitive LOGICAL FALLACY ALERT: * therefore business which don’t discriminate (/are “diverse”) must be more successful as they hire from the largest pool of potential talent. Therefo…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:58 PM
3

Came here to say this. Aside from the creepiness and utter hypocrisy of this image, imagine also the hell of having a partner like that who’s so insecure and controlling that they allow you absolutely zero “you” time up to the point where you’re monitored taking a dump.
/r/MGTOW01/01/19 12:29 PM
46

Honestly, that looks f**king awesome. Would give me the tingles for years everytime I walked towards it with the keys.
/r/MGTOW28/12/18 05:59 PM
10

The license fee isn’t mandatory, but if you do stop paying you can’t have any display equipment capable of receiving a broadcast transmission and you’ll get bothered until you die by the TV license people. They don’t believe that anyone could live without a TV and you’ll constantly live under their shadow of suspicion. But other than that, you don’t have to pay!
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:17 PM
83

Apologies upfront for the essay here: By today’s extremely conservative, even Puritanical standards you’re absolutely correct, patting someone’s bum is considered sexual assault. However as normally functioning, mature adults, I’d hope something so trivial as someone patting your bum, whilst drunk at the office party, is something that could be dealt with via an apology. Not by trying to likely derail/ruin their career via the HR route without even talking to them first. I’ve had people relay to…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:08 PM
2

As neither do I (insult black women). And who accused you of not being able to differentiate between strong and obnoxious?
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 06:58 PM
3

Well now that you come to mention it, probably it seems like you.
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 06:31 PM
5

Unfortunately, most obnoxious people don’t know what that difference is.
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 05:50 PM
2

It’s only bad when “they” do it.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 11:15 AM
1

I’ve edited my comment and provided a link. If you search for “james younger gender” it should also being back more examples.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:15 AM
13

Don’t forget about encouraging them to take gender-bending compounds to chemically castrate them too. I can’t even begin to comprehend how people allow this to happen -children who can’t legally drink, or watch many films are allowed to make such a choice and are given such powerful medicines on which there are no going back. Here’s a link to the story which informed my comment above: https://www.rt.com/usa/445172-transgender-child-mom-court/amp/ The child is called James Younger and is caught i…
/r/MensRights13/12/18 10:08 PM
1

Yup, that one works, thanks.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 08:58 PM
1

Link seems to be dead.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:58 PM
22

Whilst reading through it, at points I came close to respecting her honesty on some points, then about midway through it hit me that I was reading, as an online dating profile, a pseudo feminist essay trying to justify wanting all the perks with none of the downsides. If this is what she’s like to ATTRACT a guy, imagine what an utter nightmare she’s be like a few years together when all the shine has gone and you’re just left with her awful, bossy, demanding personality.
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 07:52 PM
5

Looks like you’ve touched a nerve there bud!
/r/MGTOW13/12/18 09:47 AM
14

The problem with trials is that in raising facts, it makes is more difficult to imprison a man simply on the word of a woman alone. The easiest to implement solution it seems is to keep modifying the “trial” so that a guilty verdict becomes easier and easier to obtain, to the point where it’s all but guaranteed. Title IX - no due process. Penn State - no cross examination UK - CPS withholding all evidence against the accused so that he couldn’t properly prepare his defence. Try doing anything si…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:32 PM
22

Utterly infuriating, we’re taking the consent videos to prove no-one’s getting raped! So even in a “rape-free” world, we’d still need them. And she’s done some double-speak on this too - the correct response to a question of “what the easiest way to not need consent videos is in fact”: “Don’t falsely accuse people of rape” As that’s what the video’s are being made to protect people from.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 03:08 PM
0

Aside from the blatant double-standard - what a massive waste of the court’s time and taxpayers money.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 12:32 PM
10

This happened to a friend - wife started attacking him, after a few hits he pushed her away. She immediately accused him of assaulting her and called the police. Police turn up and send him out of the house whilst they take her statement. After they take his statement and it matches up with hers. This is the amazing part - they them tell him that’s HE’S been assaulted and arrest her. They asked if he wanted to press charges even, though he declined. But seriously, women are crazy on this, anythi…
/r/MGTOW04/12/18 04:12 PM
2

It’s utterly ridiculous that just on the words of anyone someone can be arrested, months of their life ruined as they fight to prove a truth and loose tens of thousands of dollars. Though I’m pretty sure I couldn’t just punch myself in the mouth, point at someone and say they did it to have them arrested and loose thousands of dollars. Domestic violence is treated far too one-sidedly. And women know it.
/r/MGTOW03/12/18 09:21 PM
8

In their hear their feelings are the real truth, secondary to logic and reason.
/r/MGTOW03/12/18 11:30 AM
2

Also had this same conversation - my friend’s girlfriend sat back with a smug look on her face expecting me to get destroyed on the “wage gap” discussion with her friend, only for her friend to be unable to respond to this, my very first point. She’s now just branded me as a “misogynist” to shut down any conversation from me. I think a lot of them are angry because they’re told to be and they actually don’t even know what the “wage gap” is, thinking it’s unequal pay. They’re basically just ignor…
/r/MGTOW28/11/18 04:09 PM
2

Then you’re going to have to deal with using it as it is, with lots of people (who also probably don’t have a choice) shoved up close against you. Don’t get me wrong, I hate how crowded the tube is. I imagine everyone does. But that doesn’t give anyone the right to try to keep people away from them by passively aggressively shoving their bags in peoples faces whilst using public transport at a peak hour. Doing so is just downright rude, reduces capacity and increases crowding by leaving more peo…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 12:49 PM
2

If you don’t want people close to you, peak hour tube journeys are not the place to be.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:25 PM
8

I came across an interview where an [American] father who only had visitation rights was worried about the weight gain of his child. He tried to get the child to eat more healthily, weighed him and basically be aware about the health implications of being overweight. The mother found out about this and wasn’t happy - she complained to the court who came down on her side and formally prevented/told the father to bot mention weight to his own child, because “it was bad for the mental wellbeing of …
/r/MGTOW26/11/18 04:37 PM
9

Also the vast majority of mass shooters grew up without fathers and we all know why that’s happening. In fact many had no male role models at all due to there being so few male teachers in lower and increasingly middle education. Similar reasons are being put forward for the huge increase in violence/killings between young people in London now - no fathers, women treating their children like friends and not discipling them leading to the child’s poor impulse control and resorting to violence fir…
/r/MensRights23/11/18 12:24 PM
6

This is f**king ridiculous. If anything the footage from the bar shows her as being the abuser - she’s all over him and he’s pretty much having to push her off him. Then she’s making obscene gestures behind his back outside. They’ve both been drinking but yet again only the man is held responsible.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:55 AM
0

There’s a podcast series called “The Mating Game” by Tucker Max (but don’t let that put you off). It’s quite long but may be worth a listen to for you. As others have said - before deciding to quit the game, you should be able to play it (at least a bit). Now that can be very difficult for some people because figuring out the rules for yourself is hard, it’s generally in women’s interests to not let you know (gives them an edge - imagine if every man was a great player) and also it can be in a m…
/r/MGTOW11/11/18 09:43 AM
14

I agree but “we” (ie men) didn’t start it. Women saw us doing something in a way they don’t and added it to their list of reasons why men are awful and started endlessly bitching on social media about it and even gave it a name. Yet they do the same thing, just in a different way. Ordinarily we didn’t see the need to point it out in a gendered way, but because they’ve been such cunts about it, here we all are.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:54 PM
41

This. Morning peak hour on the tube - upper body space is at a premium, yet probably 50% of women don’t think to drop their bags off their shoulders and end up taking up loads of extra space that could be used to squeeze in extra passengers.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:41 PM
3

This gives a real insight into the awful, vindictive and childish mindset of these people, many of whom likely identify as “feminists” - it shows how utterly selfish and incapable of considering life through the viewpoint of others they are. They want something for themselves to feel special (and for the record I have no problem with Mother’s day, even though as a man it technically excludes me) but then when someone else gets the same thing, they can’t handle it, throw a tantrum and want it tak…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:50 AM
3

She’s a pussy pass master. Remember when she described Kieu Becker sexually mutilating her husband by drugging him, cutting off his penis and throwing it in the waste disposal because he filed for divorce as “quite fabulous” on “The Talk” (link to video below). In fact all six female hosts and the predominantly female audience found the terrible act quite amusing and something to joke lightheartedly about on daytime TV. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G6_klWFzzgw
/r/PussyPass04/11/18 11:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter