| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Your experiences with men/women are what causes your opinion of them, but your opinions aren’t true for all members of the opposite genderMore than that, they try and loudly and obnoxiously spread it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/02/18 10:53 PM |
| 1 | Why is there no “Red Pill” equivalent for women?The evidence to prove what you're saying has to be more than your anecdotes about men attacking women. It just doesn't prove your point. We'll listen and care about you, just don't expect any opinions to change with your stories. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/01/18 11:00 AM |
| 1 | Chad is not real, and why this means that 4chan has been trolling you [CMV]Nice, ignore my actual points and just say I'm throwing insults. Here's a new way for you, The Child's Way: Just say everyone else is arguing unfairly and point that out instead of actually arguing points. Happy Holidays kid! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/12/17 02:45 AM |
| 2 | Both men and women hold unrealistic and illusionary beliefs about sexual history, so it's best no one reveals their sexual pastI think every individual has their right to view things the way they choose. If this person believes that someone who pays for prostitution is doing something immoral, then they have the right to view that as a negative trait. The types of people who pay for prostitutes are very stigmatized in society, yes, and, this stereotypical view does not apply to all people. That doesn't mean it's not just as valid as your view. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/17 08:58 PM |
| 2 | [Q4ALL] The "Cheating" ParadoxWhat is the big "cheating paradox" that you are talking about? There's no paradox, it's just cheaters lying to their partners in order to cover up their cheating. In a long-term relationship or marriage that has established exclusivity between two partners, people like to think their partner is, indeed, actually exclusive. Are you asking the reason the cheater would lie? Because that's pretty simple. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/17 08:51 PM |
| 1 | Chad is not real, and why this means that 4chan has been trolling you [CMV]Let's have a mature discussion then. You asked me to focus on your view, let me copy-paste that (In bold) right here so I can refer to it throughout this breakdown. "For a subredit so concerned with being alpha, it is very paradoxic of them of using a meme from an Anime message board as one of their core principles. Therefore, even if you buy into the whole "alpha" thing, r/TheRedPill is not the place to become one." They use a meme that was created from an Anime message board, sure, no one can … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/17 08:03 PM |
| 2 | Chad is not real, and why this means that 4chan has been trolling you [CMV]I wasn't originally going to comment on this post because it is a truly fatuous debate to even be had. However, you have displayed such snobbishness and immaturity that I feel so bad; let me help you understand buddy! Let's just go down your post in very small and easily understood increments for you, so you don't get too confused. Not Chad the way RedPill uses Chad, but Chad as a meme. So you start off the post differentiating the two, nice job. It's pretty obvious they are not referring to the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/12/17 03:19 AM |
| 1 | [Q4women] Does traditional dating advice work for you?Everything I said is simple self-improvement advice. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/12/17 06:47 PM |
| 1 | [Q4women] Does traditional dating advice work for you?1) Work out. Gain muscle and be generally fit. 2) Eat healthy. The foods you eat impact your fitness. 3) Wear nice clothes. Develop a sense of fashion and dress-to-impress. Those are three things you can be doing right now that will make you physically more appealing to other people. Maybe the hand you were dealt fucking sucks, I don't know you. But I do know that your wallowing and self-pity is doing nothing constructive. It's time to stop making excuses for you not being the person you want to… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/12/17 06:33 PM |
| 1 | "it's not the same"I think he thought it was the former. Don't worry, smarter people understand what you said. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/12/17 04:03 PM |
| 1 | "it's not the same"I slipped and fell on her vagina babe I promise! | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/12/17 03:59 PM |
| 1 | Q4Women: How much of what TRP teaches do you believe is actually true?I believe TRP, at its core, comes down to nihilism. So, in that aspect of it, there is no endgame. But they do have advice that pertains to LTRs and I believe they have a sub for married men as well. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/12/17 03:43 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI'm sure they do, I never argued that people weren't capable of changing their views and seeing different perspectives. I'm just not sure you've convinced me that the majority of people are capable of that. On another note, if it is difficult to notice, how did you notice it and how can others, such as myself, try to notice this subtle change over time? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/12/17 03:11 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: What is the nature of "girl game?"r/RedPillWomen | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 08:47 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsWould you mind explaining the reasoning behind your view so I can understand it better? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 05:50 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThank you for the example it's refreshing to hear :) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:49 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsYes I couldn't agree more. I'm not sure what you're trying to communicate to me. I believe you're misunderstanding my point. My post wasn't on red pillers or blue pillers specifically. I am very sure that plenty of red pillers have gotten the astronomical results you're talking about and I do strive to understand their view points. I don't think otherwise, I'm talking about people, in general, being unwilling to change their views. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:48 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsGreat point. I suggested to another commenter that the lurkers comprise a large portion of the community. I do truly wonder where their opinions lie on these topics. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:45 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI believe most people think they are the "enlightened" ones and that the way they see the world is more accurate than other perspectives on the world. I'm sure blue pillers and red pillers feel the same way. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:43 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsAre you implying RP views are more grounded in reality? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:42 PM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: What do you think of this New Yorker story? (Cat person)I'm willing to trade insults. But only if it's an equal trade. No ripoffs! I'm glad to see Reddit going back to its bartering roots. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:35 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI'm going to copy-paste my reply to another commenter that gave me the same point. "That is a critical oversight in my logic. Thank you for pointing that out to me; I hadn't thought of that fact. My argument to your point then is as follows: I assume that we can both agree that the red pill and the blue pill are both two opposite perspectives on the way the world works. In other words, the polar ends of the spectrum. Now, this is mostly speculation, but it is most likely that the correct perspec… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:23 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThere are a lot of commenters who would disagree with you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:21 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI wrote that in my post friend. Individuals change, the majority doesn't in my opinion. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:21 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI've read a lot of stories on here and those gave me insights into my own life and helped me to change my own views. Maybe you just haven't found something that's relatable enough to your life yet? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:20 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsJust as much as someone who believes in something | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:19 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsstill working on getting it published thanks for the support <3 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:19 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsYo listen to me okay. I made a ** lot of REALLY GOOD **points and you SHOULD agree with them bcuz thanks | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:16 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsMe neither, friend. I believe the best we could do is some mesh of both philosophies, combining ideas and cherrypicking the best of others. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:14 PM |
| 2 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsWould you say you're in the majority of people? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 04:12 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI don't think it's really fair to classify it as "help". There isn't anything wrong with the way they think, it just doesn't factor in all the information and viewpoints. That isn't so much wrong as it is willfully ignorant. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 03:54 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI am merely a court jester | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 03:25 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsYes. Thank you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 03:25 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThat is true, there are probably a lot of small nuanced changes that do go unobserved. Excellent point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 03:24 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsDo you believe the majority is capable of that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 03:24 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsDoesn't mean I can help wanting to help the brick wall | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 03:23 PM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI'd love to read a quick synopsis of your story if you wouldn't mind. I'm interested to hear stories of people going through changes in how they perceive things. No memoir is required, just a brief anecdote if you have the time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 08:19 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsYou are right that I am not familiar with the sub, it's culture or userbase. I simply haven't spent alot of time here, something I am working on changing. I am just speaking on my initial observations. I believe you misinterpreted what I was "saddened" and "discouraged" by, however. It is not the conversation or discussion. That is something that actually excites me because it is the only serious forum for discussion on intergender dynamics that I have stumbled on. I was referring to people who … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 08:15 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsAh, I see. That is disappointing to hear from someone with a lot of time spent on the sub. Maybe I'm just excited over the sub because of how new and interesting it is to me. Do you think there are any ways to rectify this issue or is it something that is simply due to the nature of the anonymous Internet forum we all browse? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 08:06 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThat's an interesting story and I'm glad you managed to grow your ways of thinking to see all the different perspectives. As I responded to another commenter, change is certainly possible, it's just very difficult and I still don't believe that the majority of people are willing to undergo the introspection and true empathy that it demands. It's incredibly liberating and truly lets you empathize with others in a deeper way than I thought was possible. Hopefully, there will be more people like yo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:33 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsSeriously, kudos to you. Making that change by yourself is difficult and I respect that you did that. I believe that some people are capable of that, such as yourself, but the majority of people wouldn't have the discipline, self-motivation or willingness to enact the same change that you made for yourself. Do you agree? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:28 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsCouldn't agree more. I think though that the majority of people wouldn't be willing to flip their lives upside down. Change is definitely possible, I even said so in my post. It's just that most people aren't willing to undergo that change. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:26 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsWell, I'm kinda going against my own view here haha, but you just admitted that you went from blue pill to red pill. Isn't that a major change in your views? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:24 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThat is a critical oversight in my logic. Thank you for pointing that out to me; I hadn't thought of that fact. My argument to your point then is as follows: I assume that we can both agree that the red pill and the blue pill are both two opposite perspectives on the way the world works. In other words, the polar ends of the spectrum. Now, this is mostly speculation, but it is most likely that the correct perspective on this topic is some combination of both of these points of view. Somewhere in… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:22 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThat is true haha. I love arguing points and hearing other perspectives. What frustrates me, however, is when the other person isn't as invested in the discussion as I am. It's like I am talking to a brick wall at that point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:11 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsThat is an angle I hadn't considered before. I do see how forming relationships, even on an anonymous Internet forum, could be a strong enough motivator to cause change. One point, however, I'd ask you to think about is that most of the users on this sub are lurkers. That means they aren't commenting or posting nearly as actively as regular users. So what about them? What relationships will they form that inspire change? That is a large chunk of the user base that isn't interacting with others o… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:09 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsI do have to agree that more time will likely provide me with some examples that counter my view. For those who don't, however, would you agree with my underlying assertions on the psychological reasons why? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:05 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsIt is true that I have not been here very long at all. Maybe you could point me to a specific example to help me see this happening? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:01 AM |
| 1 | CMV: The majority of red and blue pillers are unwilling to truly change their views because it would challenge their pre-existing mental schemas and create cognitive dissonance which would signify some oversight in the methodologies and patterns of their own thinking and consequent decisionsCould you please specify what you mean by that analogy? I'm a bit confused. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/12/17 07:00 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Many RP truths are merely solipsism.I find it amusing to observe TRP people doing it because most of them tend to be so unaware of the fact that they're doing it. They're blissfully ignorant of their own methodologies and mental schemas while trying to convince people that they know women's own better than anyone. When anti-TRP people call them out on it by doing the same exact thing it doesn't amuse me so much as it bothers me. They see these people, stuck in the repetitive and angry thought loop that is TRP thinking, and, instea… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/12/17 06:48 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Many RP truths are merely solipsism.You're right. You never said that, so I apologize for jumping to conclusions about your beliefs. I was just trying to make a point about the hypocrisy of people who argue against TRP the way OP is. Again, I shouldn't have grouped you with those people. I just made an incorrect assumption based on your comment, but I see now that you could have simply just been trying to open up a possible perspective to the user that you responded to, the same as I tried with you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/12/17 06:22 PM |
| 1 | Pointing out obvious infoThe point of this thread is to debate how obvious this really is to people if there was a thread on it. The point is that it maybe is not so cut and dry. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/12/17 07:31 AM |
| 1 | So I been having some thoughts on what women want and how attraction is supposed to workI see your point and I agree that there is certainly a relation between the two. However, I think a more nuanced description is required. I believe the relation between the two is revealed through more leniency, in what the female perceives as "pushy and overbearing" behavior, when the male in question is more attractive. So if two guys, one a 5/10 and the other an 8/10, say the same "pushy and overbearing" statement, the female is more likely to be more lenient on the 8/10 because of his attrac… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/12/17 06:55 AM |
| 1 | Q4ALL: Do you view PPD and the pillosphere as an addiction or as something useful in your life?So how did that situation play out? Did you end up paying | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/12/17 06:32 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Many RP truths are merely solipsism.So if they're jumping to conclusions and cherry picking their advice, then OP doing it also makes it somehow okay? TRP does it and it's wrong. Now OP is guilty of the same exact thing and it's equally as wrong. In fact, I'd argue that it's worse for OP because he, at the very least, recognizes this pattern in TRP and yet is mimicking it without any cognizance of it. Rise above those you disagree with and show them a new perspective instead of childishly arguing 'Oh they did it first so it's fine… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 10/12/17 02:12 AM |
| 0 | Question About TextingI keep it on, preview them and decide if I want to respond to it. Something about them seeing you respond to it as soon as you "read" it (from their POV) makes you seem more trustworthy as opposed to them wondering if you read it and are just ignoring them. Also, they can know when what they say doesn't warrant a response, helps with push-pull game a bit. | /r/askTRP | 30/09/17 12:27 AM |
| 1 | How should I react to LTR wearing revealing clothing when we go out?The problem is that she doesn't respect you enough to not dress like that out in public. Normal LTRs will have established boundaries as to what is okay to wear/how to act in public. | /r/askTRP | 14/09/17 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Shit test advice"Takes one to know one" | /r/askTRP | 09/09/17 06:35 PM |
| 1 | Cheated on my gf, feels like I want to pukeDid you experience this? Could you go more in detail it sounds very sad? | /r/askTRP | 30/08/17 04:36 AM |
| 2 | Girl in a LTR wants me to come and "see her" while her man is gone for a fewThis is rationalizing shitty behavior. Don't be that guy. If everybody thinks that then everybody is just gonna fucking cheat on each other all the time. There won't be a single relationship where one of them isnt cheating. No offense, but your disgusting mindset perpetuates an endless cycle of dishonesty, manipulation, and cheating. | /r/askTRP | 30/08/17 04:28 AM |
| 2 | Girl in a LTR wants me to come and "see her" while her man is gone for a fewYea but the difference is the other guy MAY not be a friend of the guy who is still sticking his dick in some cheating pussy which means that there is a higher chance, doesn't matter how much, that he won't be as emotionally betrayed by someone he thought he could trust to not flirt with, as OP already did, and then actually fuck someone he knows is (supposed to be) monogamous with the poor guy. This whole situation already fucking sucks. OP needs to just get the fuck out. | /r/askTRP | 30/08/17 04:24 AM |
| 1 | Have you ever seduced a feminist? How did you do that?Still you have to maintain frame and show them you're not a pussy because they are more likely to lump you into that category faster than other types of girls | /r/askTRP | 20/08/17 08:45 PM |
| 1 | Have you ever seduced a feminist? How did you do that?He's saying that feminists are renowned for being ultimate little cunts and abusing beta bitches to get whatever they want. It's harder to seduce them because they know that there will always be an abundance of betas that will do their bidding all the time | /r/askTRP | 20/08/17 07:44 PM |
| 0 | Seems that no one has a clue about weight lifting.You broke frame and showed everyone you really are a bitch | /r/TheRedPill | 02/08/17 04:38 AM |
| 1 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meI know guys and girls have different sexual natures in general, but I feel like if I thought negatively of my girlfriend for fucking a lot of guys (which I have definitely done) then I shouldn't do it myself. I am aware they don't think it's unattractive, but it's definitely hypocritical to be okay with myself fucking a lot of girls and then getting upset when my girlfriend has done the same thing. | /r/askTRP | 28/07/17 08:54 PM |
| 1 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meI appreciate you taking the time to respond. Perhaps it is because I'm just starting TRP, but a lot of what you said was confusing to me and I struggled to digest what you meant. You suggest that I should simply go with my gut when making decisions and that will help me be more...what? I don't mean to suggest what you're saying isn't accurate, but I just am not really quite sure what you mean. | /r/askTRP | 28/07/17 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meGreat advice. Words to live by. Thank you. | /r/askTRP | 28/07/17 08:43 PM |
| 1 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meI agree with you, they are different. But, following that same logic, aren't all of just guy's sexual imperatives also on a spectrum. For example, not all guys (such as myself) want to fuck random girls, but a lot do. | /r/askTRP | 28/07/17 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meThank you for the reply and the links, I appreciate the good advice | /r/askTRP | 28/07/17 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meInteresting analogy, never thought of that before. Funny you brought that up because a girl that has been interested in me for a while has asked me for sex, and I declined on the grounds that I need a strong emotional connection (she's really just not that attractive and I feel I can do better when college starts in the fall). Holy shit good on you for smelling out that crazy girl's true intentions. What advice can you give for telling when a girl is trying to manipulate me? I am fairly socially… | /r/askTRP | 27/07/17 06:37 PM |
| 2 | Help explaining a concept of TRP to meThat's a good point, something I reflected on a bit as well. My counterargument to that would be that spinning plates and fucking girls are symbolic forms of positive opinions from others. Obviously, they find you attractive and alpha enough to fuck, and their opinion of you is high. I think you are right though, that at the end of the day, it's all about how you feel about yourself. If you are confident, that will radiate, and people will find you more attractive. | /r/askTRP | 27/07/17 06:33 PM |
| 53 | Here's another video of a bouncer rejecting a pussy pass at 0:20-0:29That guys laugh was my favorite part | /r/PussyPassDenied | 23/04/17 11:11 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter