TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RoryTate Archive

View 59 posts and 2,224 comments by RoryTate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1102

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:50 PM
615

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights27/09/19 07:59 PM
582

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:10 PM
567

DiscriminationRoryTate/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:46 PM
400

HealthRoryTate/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:50 PM
360

FeminismRoryTate/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:13 PM
355

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:46 PM
307

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:19 PM
274

DiscriminationRoryTate/r/MensRights31/05/24 04:05 PM
274

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights06/04/26 04:11 PM
271

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:20 PM
240

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights19/12/24 03:38 PM
229

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights24/07/23 12:50 PM
225

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:17 PM
225

mental healthRoryTate/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:39 PM
201

Edu./Occu.RoryTate/r/MensRights25/03/25 12:48 PM
182

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:32 PM
180

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights12/01/25 01:49 PM
166

Edu./Occu.RoryTate/r/MensRights21/03/25 12:30 PM
164

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:44 PM
159

FeminismRoryTate/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:49 PM
151

IntactivismRoryTate/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:48 PM
106

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:19 PM
104

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights01/02/25 03:31 PM
104

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:04 PM
98

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights24/08/23 02:14 PM
96

HealthRoryTate/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:35 PM
92

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights11/03/25 01:59 PM
85

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights06/06/19 09:09 PM
84

FeminismRoryTate/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:20 PM
81

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:16 PM
77

HealthRoryTate/r/MensRights13/11/23 11:46 AM
77

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:33 PM
71

DiscriminationRoryTate/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:21 PM
62

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:36 AM
61

HealthRoryTate/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:40 PM
58

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights29/11/24 01:05 PM
57

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:29 AM
54

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:07 PM
44

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights05/12/22 04:00 PM
43

Activism/SupportRoryTate/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:24 PM
38

Edu./Occu.RoryTate/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:32 PM
33

Legal RightsRoryTate/r/MensRights03/12/22 10:44 PM
33

ProgressRoryTate/r/MensRights24/01/25 03:36 PM
31

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights20/01/23 01:07 PM
30

Anti-MRMRoryTate/r/MensRights29/09/19 07:43 PM
27

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:22 PM
22

Marriage/ChildrenRoryTate/r/MensRights28/06/19 02:23 AM
22

ProgressRoryTate/r/MensRights24/03/23 02:44 PM
20

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights27/05/24 03:13 PM
17

Anti-MRMRoryTate/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:51 PM
16

ProgressRoryTate/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:30 PM
13

Social IssuesRoryTate/r/MensRights16/07/19 04:31 PM
11

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights21/08/19 06:50 PM
11

DiscriminationRoryTate/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:04 PM
11

GeneralRoryTate/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:28 PM
10

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights27/07/23 09:34 PM
9

Marriage/ChildrenRoryTate/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:42 PM
3

False AccusationRoryTate/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:02 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,224 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Plus, the Patriarchy hypothesis is an unfalsifiable belief. It is deliberately constructed to be a secular form of religious dogma. That makes it impossible to disprove, which would be required before engaging in any productive and rational discussion about male advocacy with these groups.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 05:19 PM
1

An entire academic discipline that only says "men bad" repeatedly. What a waste.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 05:10 PM
3

It's good that the Professor points out how "Just so" stories apply more to Social Psychology than to Evolutionary Psychology. The replication crisis there is simply bonkers. Also, the finding that men's advantages in visual spatial abilities are larger in countries that are healthier and wealthier is quite profound. The idea that this is a core component of the "gender equality paradox" in those societies is something I hadn't considered. Thanks for sharing the great article/interview!
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:59 PM
23

The armed suspect is believed to have left behind a manifesto sharing ideology consistent with the incel movement and rooted in extreme hatred of women, according to experts. Experts? LOL. That particular idiot was a revolutionary communist who targeted male CEO's and board members of multinational companies, male health care execs, famous male politicians, and almost exclusively powerful male figures in his simple-minded manifesto. He actually attacked pornhub execs at their offices for their "…
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:22 AM
3

Don't judge the family too harshly. From the information we have, they spent hours with their son, supported him, and tried to make sure he was okay. They didn't "put him to work", but instead hoped after hours of talking and emotional exhaustion, that doing something – and feeling useful for something, which is very important for men's mental health – would "take his mind off" what had happened. His Dad was there with at his side while working. I've had to watch over a family member who was sui…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 06:49 PM
26

Yet another example of proxy violence. Misandry doesn't kill men directly. Instead these misandrists use institutions like schools, law enforcement, etc, to degrade, harass, ruin, and ultimately destroy men to the point that they wish they were dead.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:38 PM
2

Words are weapons. Language itself is the battlefield upon which the "battle of the sexes" is being fought nowadays. So studies like this one are ultimately meaningless; the end result of weaponized language is that the two sides are no longer listening to each other any more. Accusations of "toxic masculinity" will continue to be applied to everything a man does or can do, and those same constant allegations will just get ignored. Rinse and repeat.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 05:24 PM
12

The whole point of "cis" is political activism, not genuine communication. The term only exists as a pejorative meant to tear down the idea that "normal" exists regarding human sexual dimorphism. And that is why so many activists react hyper-emotionally in an over-the-top manner to any criticism like yours. This should just be a boring linguistic discussion. But it's not. Because ultimately it's just activist-fuelled nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 07:44 PM
14

If "incel" just meant "misogynist", they would have called you a "misogynist" and left it at that. Mixing the ideological definition (hates wahman) with the literal definition (can't get laid) is a deliberate bait-and-switch tactic to try and manipulate you. In response, you forced them to admit to a single definition. That showed them to be deliberately dishonest or at least terrible communicators. And then you disproved that individual accusation with simple logic. A perfect strategy to deal w…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 02:19 PM
3

The studies you've "seen" – or rather, that you've probably read about second-hand – have significant flaws in their demographics. Most mainstream articles that claim "married men live longer and are happier" rely on raw cross-sectional data that suffers from two severe statistical errors: selection bias and the omission of the divorce confounder. I've included a sample of much more rigourous papers that actually try to take multiple factors into account. The Guner paper specifically finds that …
/r/MensRights25/06/26 02:11 PM
56

Even married men get called an "incel". Seriously, every guy gets called one nowadays. I've heard it probably a dozen times. And if I try to refute the label, I would have to treat my relationships like trophies and conquests to be displayed publicly. That's obviously chauvinistic behaviour. Many people don't realize how the term has female objectification baked right into it, and how it's the accuser who is projecting their own ignorant attitudes about the opposite sex onto the target. People n…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 06:11 PM
17

Marriage is an obsolete institution. There's no doubt anymore that the system is broken beyond repair. And even being in a relationship no longer offers any benefit for men. From life expectancy to finances to happiness/mental health, there is no difference between men who are single their entire lives versus a married man, once a proper baseline is established regarding unobserved "innate permanent health" and the "marriage selection effect". So men should simply enjoy the benefits of staying s…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 06:03 PM
7

Did these midwits never grow out of playing with dolls? They're supposed to be professional journalists, yet they can't stop thinking about hair. It's like they're still six years old.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:46 PM
6

They're way ahead of you on that one. Canada already has pay discrimination against men enshrined into law.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:29 PM
12

This reminds me of Saint Mary's University in Canada, where the Code of Conduct policy officially stated that the "Evil Patriarchy" existed and was the root of all "gender-based violence". As a result, any skepticism towards the existence of that supposed "scientific hypothesis" resulted in the student or staff member being judged to have created a hostile or unsafe environment for "marginalized groups". That's the goal of this endless complaining. They want policy that forbids anyone from quest…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:25 PM
5

Research into suicide, and the services offered for mental health, function to make more men die. It's that simple. And it's so frustrating to witness. Especially because the general solution is very straightforward. What are the most important risk factors around suicide for men? Well, it's lack of employment, legal problems (divorce), and financial issues. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Help young men find meaningful and reliable work, and they feel useful and don't have as m…
/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:53 PM
2

They love to gas each other up with these kinds of delusions about men. It's best understood as vicious intrasexual competition, because the vast majority of them don't behave that way in private.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 03:34 PM
1

The legacy news media are the enemy of the people.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:23 PM
4

cis What is this strange, made up word you are using? People understand what you're saying without it, so don't waste time typing it out. Normal is assumed.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 05:41 PM
6

I'm saying that if he pursued civil charges the process is the punishment for her...and for him too unfortunately. She has to pay the expense of a lawyer, live with the ongoing stress of a long legal dispute, has to prep and defend herself in court, etc. However, he has to suffer through the same process and expense, albeit with less risk since his exposure is fixed. That's why I say it cuts both ways. He would be money ahead if he just spent the time wasted on a civil lawsuit working for minimu…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 03:25 PM
4

Yeah, a "perjury charge" is indeed a slap on the wrist compared to three years of hell. Considering all the mental stress, poor health, expense, loss of reputation, lost opportunity for income, and more for the falsely accused, there is no way a simple conviction of perjury can make up for that. There is a caveat here though: because lying under oath directly threatens the integrity of the courts, it is universally treated as a serious felony. So the maximum sentence for perjury is quite signifi…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 03:01 PM
14

She must be a criminal defendant at this point, right? I can see an argument that perjury charges would protect the police to some extent from a lawsuit by this man, given their incompetence – deliberate or otherwise – in this case. On the other hand, maybe by not bringing charges it's easier for them to take what is an egregiously malicious prosecution and sweep it under the rug? If this is the "system working as intended" (i.e. being anti-male), then doing nothing would probably make more sens…
/r/MensRights05/06/26 07:53 PM
19

Agreed. Include all the non-police allegations – the SA accusations done on social media, to the corporate media, to friends and family, to coworkers, via the whisper network, etc – and it is guaranteed that greater than 50% are false. I know some people don't want to hear this, but unfortunately it's the truth. Human beings can lie; so stop pretending otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 07:41 PM
9

They scream "equality!" until the bill arrives.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:00 PM
14

How does "boys are bad for engaging romantically with AI" defend that group's behaviour? You sound like someone who can't see anti-male bias even when it's right in front of their eyes. Do you perhaps believe that misandry doesn't – or can't – exist?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 08:40 PM
33

Yes, two people can have different perspectives. However, it is hypocritical for the newspaper to publish two separate articles that both demonize, ridicule, and pathologize men and masculinity. Journalism should be done in the public interest, not to push an anti-male agenda.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 08:17 PM
5

Oh my sweet summer child. I'd wouldn't be shocked if she didn't even lose her job, let alone if she avoided criminal charges for her predatory actions.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 04:57 PM
91

Wow, let me guess...the lesbian relationship became toxic and violent, a messy divorce ensued, and now he's the one on the hook for supporting the child. Because in the eyes of the law only men can be forced to destroy their physical and mental health to provide for others. It's never the "oppressed" groups who have to do any work (at least according to the biased and selfish academic definitions of "historically marginalized" that get used in legal and governmental processes). It's no wonder th…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 03:44 PM
1

Let me share with you a mathematical "proverb": There's no such thing as probability when the sample size is one. This is a simple reality. Statistics and probability only exist for groups. And even if there is a significant trend for a group of people – say in their behaviour, either positive or negative – individual members of that group are still individuals. Just judge each person on their respective actions, not their immutable characteristics.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:44 AM
2

I think the best objective measure for anti-male rhetoric and hatred would be a simple glance at academia in Western countries: tens of thousand of courses like gender studies, sociology, anthropology, media & cultural studies, criminology & legal studies, etc, exist that discuss concepts like the evil Patriarchy, masculinity being toxic, mansplaining, the male gaze, fragile masculinity, male privilege, manspreading, manterrupion, hegemonic masculinity, etc on the other hand, zero (0) university…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:55 AM
3

Great analysis! Your math shows that the false "no men available" narrative only exists to try and sell young wahmen on the pretense that university educations will be lucrative, and that a degree will grant them the higher status they seek. However, all they end up with is crippling debt, cult brainwashing, and sexual dissatisfaction, which leaves them easily controlled by cynical and misanthropic political interests. I guess the "no men left" narrative also provides older spinsters with the fe…
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:47 PM
1

Actually, feminists support and promote male circumcision. Two good examples of this in the US are Madonna (circumcised her baby boys) and Hillary Clinton (created a circumcision program for Africa as the US Secretary of State). Other prominent examples elsewhere in the world include two feminist prime ministers: Sanna Marin of Finland and Katrín Jakobsdóttir of Iceland. Even those who say they oppose it inevitably end up supporting it because their arguments always prioritize their own group's …
/r/MensRights14/05/26 01:10 PM
0

The plural of "anecdote" is not data. And I must point out that your personal anecdote can't even be verified, since you don't even share the name of the country you're from. That's not a very convincing argument. And I'm also not from the US, but good try with your ad hominem fallacy I guess. Anyway, I entered the following question into Google Gemini: Do areas or populations that are more wealthy tend to vote more left/progressive than those that are working class/poor, when viewed at the grou…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:04 PM
1

It's well established in the political sciences that voters who are wealthy will vote more left/progressive, while working class and poor populations will vote more right/conservative. Are you really this ignorant?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 07:31 PM
1

From what I see the left's economic policies amount to waste and corruption in order to buy votes for elections. And if anyone dares call out the rampant fraud, well that person is racist, misogynist, homophobic, and they probably don't wash their hands properly after going to the bathroom!
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:40 PM
11

Guaranteed 100% conviction rate of men. Canada's "Human Rights Tribunals" have reached this level of conviction rate. An interesting comparison is that not even the legal systems in completely corrupt Banana Republics are able to achieve a 100% guilty rate. These anti-male ideologies inherently assume guilt of some crime, which justifies any and all punishments regardless of circumstances, without reprieve or atonement/expiation.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:57 PM
8

Painting men as evil is not the point of feminism, nor is it the main thing. Yet, somehow, feminism has a nasty habit of naming every single bad thing in their ideology after men. And there's not a single positive association with men or masculinity to be found within its framing. Strange how that works.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:46 PM
29

It was pointed out to me recently that men keep other men in check. Place guys together in a group, and if someone starts acting out of line (i.e. a younger guy does something immature) the others will act quickly to moderate his behaviour (up to and including physical enforcement of societal values). However, who keeps wahmen from being destructive? Well, it should be other wahmen, of course. However, in general, that doesn't happen. They end up just supporting and encouraging the worst in each…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:30 AM
9

Imagine two people locked hand-to-hand. One pushes – the other has to push back just to stay upright. I find this is a good visual representation of the current situation. I often refer to this analogy because the same need to maintain an equilibrium exists even at the level of large populations. Men have been pushed against very hard for decades now. We've been called creepy. Bothersome. Unwanted. Disrespectful. Ridiculed and laughed at for being nervous, or not knowing the "right words" to use…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 05:20 AM
11

I am in a country that has abolished the draft, but that is of little consolation for men. First off, politicians can easily vote it back in whenever they feel like it. No law stops a draft in a time of need. Second, if/when an existential threat appears on the horizon, it will be men who are expected to give up their lives fighting against it, draft or no draft. The only solutions I can see would be to implement a draconian 50/50 sex split of an appropriate-sized volunteer army (supplementing w…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:20 PM
22

Your sister may truly believe that these groups are "old news", but be careful. Watch closely and observe what she does, and not what she says. Sexual competition among w*men is ruthless. And secret. And it acts at the subconscious level. When men compete to attract a mate, we can strive to gain social status, accrue cultural wealth, etc. However, what do you do if you're not a man and genetics make you unattractive? And what do you do when everyone has the same access to makeup and cosmetics as…
/r/MensRights10/04/26 05:14 PM
104

Call these groups by their real name: Are we dating hating the same guy.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 04:52 PM
3

Here's an archive of the article if you want to read it so you can respond/debunk/etc. Don't give the abominable Wired any hate clicks. We shouldn't incentivize this kind of agitprop.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 03:26 PM
15

Unions spend all of their member's fees on retreats teaching union reps about "decolonization" and "dismantling the patriarchy". Plus sending support to w*men's shelters and other similar initiatives. For reference, I was a union member for over ten years, at a company with thousands of employees, and this is what happened, despite myself and others speaking out against it at union meetings. The union even had to be dragged kicking and screaming to acknowledge the National Day of Mourning on Apr…
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:15 PM
41

I think this is already happening in a passive manner, with men disengaging from relationships, work, community, and more. And it all comes down to the lack of incentives for men in modern society. What reason is there for men to fight wars for a country that hates them? What reward exists for men in dating or marriage, with modern wahmen being so insufferable, abusive, and aggressively masculine? Not to mention the risk of false accusations in those situations. There are too many negatives and …
/r/MensRights10/04/26 01:55 PM
11

It was Democrat Supreme Court Justices who were most responsible for killing the 2021 case that sought to end Selective Service for men. Elena Kagan, a feminist and left-appointed SC Justice, along with Sonia Sotomayor (another feminist and an appointment by the Dems) wrote the SC opinions – and they wrote separate ones, to add salt to the wound – refusing the 2021 case, and therefore they are both directly responsible for denying the right to bodily sovereignty to men. That was the only reasona…
/r/MensRights09/04/26 03:54 PM
48

They'll just trot out the "He was abusing me" or "I was defending myself" excuse, and they'll get away with their crimes more often than not. As Gamma Bias has shown us, the idea of a "male victim" and a "female perpetrator" does not register with many people.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 04:48 PM
6

The unspoken truth: boys have always been behind in attaining high school diplomas ever since the advent of modern education. This is true across every Western country since the 1940's. And the rate at which boys are falling behind is even worse than what is being reported. But even if we accept these misleading and overly optimistic rates for male high school graduation as being true, the gap is significant. I think the comparison from this analysis says it best: The graduation rate for boys is…
/r/MensRights08/04/26 04:34 PM
3

My ability to trust has been adversely affected by my experiences, and from hearing the terrible stories experienced and shared by other men on this sub. And I concur with your "If people care this little about you, why should you care about them?" response to those betrayals. However, my long-term reaction has been to try and understand why there is so little compassion for men. I can't stay angry or isolate myself forever; I don't have the energy for that. And after gaining some insight I now …
/r/MensRights08/04/26 03:53 PM
3

Female "comedians" are always some of the worst human beings imaginable. Amy Schumer is pretty much the poster child for this. She has admitted to raping two different men on separate occasions.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 02:33 PM
16

For the same reason Sweden cancelled affirmative action programs when they began benefiting men. And it's why Finland's feminist PM killed a bill banning male circumcision. Because it's a female supremacist and man-hating ideology. Never trust them.
/r/MensRights07/04/26 10:22 PM
19

There are over 10000 veterans who are homeless in the UK by current estimates, and those numbers have risen 25% over the last few years. Norway denies asylum to Russian men who don't want to fight, and the country is about to deny it to Ukrainian men who are conscientious objectors. Oh, but Norway is still offering asylum to everyone who isn't male. Germany won't let fighting age men leave the country for more than three months. Is this the same EU that you are talking about? Your version seems …
/r/MensRights07/04/26 07:49 PM
10

This is just performative nonsense. And the stupidity of the arguments is deliberate. The audience is emotionally stilted individuals who want to have their fee-fee's validated by faux intellectual claptrap. It's interesting to think through this logically though, and estimate what would be the first thing to topple this society. Would it be the economic loss of £150+ billion from the night-time economy (~10% of GDP)? Or the power and communications infrastructure outages because no one could fi…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 03:00 PM
8

Your post makes a lot of great points, and has good advice too. My advice in return after reading through the comments under your post is please ignore the political brigading on Reddit. This platform has cultivated an extreme bias in favour of one side. And modern day politics requires people to define their identity as being on one team or the other, and to sign a contract without even knowing what's in it. So any recommendation that people make a rational/pragmatic political decision is going…
/r/MensRights06/04/26 06:15 PM
3

Being able to claim that man-hating "doesn't exist" actually proves that misandry is real and systemic. This widespread belief can't exist without massive institutional power and support, enabling the relentless hostility against men.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 05:55 PM
23

I am the same as you. And yes, it's frustrating, but there are two important things I want to share that might cheer you up. The first is that being concise and brief when communicating is a skill that can be learned. One trick I've found is to view your thoughts and voice as a finite resource when you are talking. This forces you to value "efficiency" when communicating with others. The second is that the overly broad application of "mansplaining", where it is now wielded against a man speaking…
/r/MensRights06/04/26 05:26 PM
8

Even more chilling, I shared my findings with an AI research assistant, and these were its observations (apologies in advance for sharing AI slop, but I felt it made some insightful points): When a word shifts from being a serious accusation to a form of "light self-admonishment" or a joke, you are witnessing Semantic Bleaching in its final stages. Your discovery on Filmot—the roughly 3:1 ratio in favor of "mansplaining" and the shift in how "condescending" is applied—confirms your theory that t…
/r/MensRights06/04/26 04:23 PM
38

All these academic studies are invariably disconnected from how "masculinity is toxic" is discussed in the real world. Consider all the news articles, corporate media, movies, tv shows, advertisements, marketing, books, comics, K-12 education, online comments and posts, and so much more...that have declared every masculine trait as "toxic" at some point in time. As you rightfully observe: I mean, masculinity is almost always perceived or described negatively today, toxic by default[...] This is …
/r/MensRights04/04/26 04:55 PM
7

If they meant to say: "I hate abusive men", they would have said exactly that. I mean, these are adults, and they have a simple grasp of the English language. No reasonable excuse exists to mistake or interchange one statement for the other. It's like a stranger walking up to you and punching you square in the face, and then trying to apologize because they meant to shake your hand. And considering this rather stark analogy, it's no wonder that the younger generation of men have learned to hate …
/r/MensRights04/04/26 01:48 PM
1

Yes, even boys as young around 10-12 would be needed to work in the fields in rural areas. People forget – or are just unaware – how hard it was for a family unit to survive just over a century ago. The amount of manual labour required was brutal.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 12:35 PM
18

’In previous generations, children left school in their early to mid teens and went into the workplace,’ the report reads. You mean in the days before child labor laws? Young men were often pulled from school to support their families – especially in rural areas during harvest – which means that men as a group have never been ahead in high school diploma rates. That's right. For example, in the US, ever since the advent of standardized education in the 1930's, men have been sometimes as much as …
/r/MensRights16/03/26 01:51 AM
1

This was wildly incoherent dude. The only people who use the cringe word "dude" online are not men. I already told you I don’t believe death threats are acceptable. And I explained why you are lying, because you actually do support threats of violence. Your words betray your true position. And your actions show your support for them as well. Also, please, for the love of god, paragraphs are your friend. They are important tools to help structure your thoughts and make what you say legible. Do yo…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:48 PM
28

Here's an archive of the article, so you don't give clicks to the abominable Daily Mail. To be honest, these kinds of opinion pieces used to anger me. However, once I realized that these screeds are actually written by people who see men as completely invisible, now I just laugh at them. Because this isn't about men. These narratives are meant to soothe and absolve the opposite sex – who are the only audience for this kind of writing – about their feelings of inadequacy due to childlessness. The…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:17 PM
1

When a person says: "I think x" and immediately follows with a qualifier: "if/and/but y", there is an important trick to use. Rephrase the sentence as "I don't think x, because y", to see what they are really saying. Let's do that with your statement back when you finally said that death threats are unacceptable. Here's you original wording: It’s unacceptable. And they’re not mistreated or vulnerable young men. Now let's use our trick to tease out what you're actually saying. I think death threa…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:57 PM
1

I can. It’s unacceptable. Wow. That's it? That's not calling out death threats. Not even close. You're repeating this to me – and only after much prodding and poking mind you – but you will never say it to the people on your side who actually need to hear it. If you can't reign in the extreme elements on your side, you will continue to be defined by them. If you actually want to call out death threats, go and respond to that 8K upvoted comment I listed calling for the death of these men, and exp…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:59 PM
-1

I can't tell whether you're at stage 2 or stage 6 of the Narcissist's Prayer: That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it. Why can't you simply call out death threats, murder, etc, as unacceptable?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 11:51 PM
5

If you don't get the reference, my words are from the anime Freiren. Demons in that world use language as a weapon. They speak only to deceive humans. Words are power, not a means of communication. Does any of this sound familiar? Rest In Power? How about Foucalt: "Where there is power, there is resistance."? I don't claim that "weird" is a hateful slur. I think that they call these men "weird" because they hate them. Those are not the same thing, and that's where you're getting confused.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 08:34 PM
9

You don't hold any of the principles you try to wield against others, so I have no problem ignoring you. Your boos mean nothing. I've seen what makes you cheer.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 08:21 PM
9

This appears to be the ACLS v. NEH case from New York.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 07:19 PM
7

So you support death threats then. Good to know. Blocked.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 06:50 PM
7

It's interesting that my post didn't make any statement of support for DOGE, Trump, Musk, etc. Yet that is all you read into it, rather than my actual words regarding what should be commonly held beliefs that death threats against anyone is unacceptable behaviour.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 06:49 PM
16

Sometimes when a guy is criticized it’s just accountability So you're saying that credible death threats against vulnerable targets are just "accountability"? Is mocking a young man's neurological mannerisms as "weird" and "creepy" the equivalent of valid criticism? You never denounce this behaviour. And when someone like me makes a post that does point out the unfair and dangerous rhetoric, you deflect, change the subject, and pretend that it isn't happening. So I have every right to call you o…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:05 PM
12

"DOGE bros"? Seriously? Do you people even listen to yourself? Using a word like "policeman" is a verbal offence of the highest order in your minds, but anything that is disliked is immediately gendered as male (toxic masculinity, mansplaining, manspreading, fragile masculinity, the evil patriarchy, crypto bro, and more) despite neutral terms already existing for decades to communicate the same idea. As always, "social justice" is only ever "mob justice". And unfortunately the mob has no concept…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:40 PM
8

yes the left wingers on reddit are obnoxious and small minded. I can have an actual conversation with an obnoxious or ignorant person. However, rational discourse is not possible with demons.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:17 PM
5

Activists can't have the justice system prosecute any of these cases after all, or their narrative that false accusations don't happen falls apart completely. Unfortunately for them the internet and social media has shown us – without needing the law's involvement at all – that lies about relationships are far more common than the truth.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:56 PM
7

"A wife should always obey her husband" [strongly agree | somewhat agree | neither | somewhat disagree | strongly disagree] This questions needs more information about the nature of the marriage, and what "obey" means in context to that relationship, for us to interpret the thousands of responses. For example, consider the situation where these men want to be the primary breadwinner, and have a stay-at-home wife. In that case, it is only fair that men have the final say on important financial de…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:38 PM
7

The phrase "Happy wife, happy life" is how "obey" is excused/promoted when done in the opposite direction. And how many times a day do you hear that phrase being espoused everywhere? Heck, I hear it fly around all the time in the workplace. Yes, that supposed bastion of inclusion that claims to have a zero tolerance for abuse. You want to take a principled stand. I get it. However, you have to understand that they don't actually hold those principles. They just want to use them against you in se…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:50 PM
2

Have fun with your Evil Patriarchy conspiracy theory. And just so you're aware, as a leftist myself from back in the 1990's, the left hasn't cared about the rights of workers for decades. The Biden administration had over two dozen lawsuits against it regarding 1st amendment and free expression violations. Glenn Greenwald reported on these cases extensively. Is that what you mean by authoritarian? Every society throws men to the wolves the moment an imminent existential threat appears on the hor…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:30 PM
2

Men aren't going to support a left wing that openly hates and disparages them. And that blames them for everything wrong with the world, both past and present. I'm looking for a logical argument to rebut in your response, but all I'm seeing is that you feel strongly that men are stupid and want contradictory things. It's like you only want to delude yourself into justifying your position, not actually present a reasonable case that might sway a neutral third-party.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:50 PM
9

The insane people will eventually show their bias and be pushed aside. How does saying that this will be fixed "eventually" protect men from these destructive false accusations being made against them right now? Because tomorrow morning people will be getting on trains and buses, elevators and stairwells, and have to deal with the reality that is in front of them. And at this moment guys are wise to protect themselves and avoid any interactions with women unless they are absolutely necessary. An…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:05 AM
23

Richardson has experience of unwanted predator attention, which she has waived her legal right to anonymity to share. She was just 12 and had been watching a stage of the Tour de France. "I had a horrible man sexually assault me in a crowd and then just wander off, and nothing happened," she says. "He was walking through the crowd and just sexually assaulting people as he went. "It's that kind of bystander effect - no-one was really doing anything about it, but lots of people saw." I have questi…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:51 AM
77

I would quit. And I would also send respectful feedback to the company, identify myself with a verifiable account, then let them know I had quit due to their anti-male policies and campaigns. Promoting "equality" for only one group is discrimination. Plain and simple.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 05:24 PM
4

This article is chock-full of the usual tactics for justifying these misandrist censorship laws. First they mention things that are already crimes: revenge porn, credible threats of violence, etc, that are obviously abhorrent and criminal conduct that no reasonable person would do or support in any way. And then they slip in some vague language like: "making someone feel unsafe" without people noticing. Suddenly a man can be investigated and charged for simply criticizing obviously anti-male ide…
/r/MensRights09/03/26 05:14 PM
2

Do you not understand statistics? The survey reported that 31% of Gen-Z men did not disagree with the "obey their husbands" statement, while only 41% agreed that women with a successful career were more attractive. However, adding those together comprises only 72% of men. That's less than 100%. Which means there does not have to be any overlap at all in those two minority populations. And the survey itself does not provide any evidence of an overlap either. So there is no contradiction here, tho…
/r/MensRights09/03/26 03:57 PM
20

Calling men "unsuccessful" with labels like "incel" really is just the flip side of calling the opposite sex "promiscuous". Except any semi-intelligent male advocate knows how stupid throwing around any type of "promiscuous" insult makes them look. However, I don't think the other side realizes the massive amount of popular support they lose when they try to shame men like this.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 09:19 PM
2

the fact that men express their emotions less Men show – and share! – their feelings, but in ways that are invisible to society, or are deemed "unwanted" (like pointing out double standards against men, males sharing their experiences of abuse with other men online in what they term the "toxic manosphere", criticizing the lack of support for men in areas such as health/DV/SA, etc). This really is a case where the other side need to learn to listen better to the emotions that are being openly and…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:59 PM
2

Do they? I thought they were more like partnerships with equal (but maybe different) responsibilities. I said successful relationships. Please note my precise wording. That's literally what "obey" means. To do what they are asked to do, regardless. You can wordsmith it as much as you like, but that's the intent. So where are the follow-up questions in the survey to tease out what "obey" means in practice within a marriage? Wow, would you look at that...there's no attempt to explore the question …
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:20 PM
1

A perfect consensus on every decision is impossible. So who makes the final call? The husband? The wife? These men have seen the precarious economic "partnerships" of the previous generation fail, and they are open to change. Because they want children and a loving wife who is devoted to the family, that means they will be the primary breadwinner to love and provide for her in return. So in the marriage they are seeking, it makes sense that they will be accountable and responsible for making tha…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:11 PM
6

I think many Gen Z men are simply recognizing that a successful relationship requires a strong leader. And that means a single person who is accountable for all the consequences of the important decisions a husband and wife make together. And these men are willing to shoulder that responsibility, but only if the final say is theirs. They're the ones providing the money and resources in the relationship after all. And that doesn't mean that men can't be convinced otherwise, or that they always ge…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 05:10 AM
10

The female accuser is a POS who deserves to be locked away for a long time. However, the prosecutor and law enforcement are equally culpable, given that they kept him in jail when they knew he was innocent, denied his defense access to the video, and even tried to prevent the defense from requesting the video from WalMart to prove his innocence. This is a total travesty of justice.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 01:09 AM
23

I think my life is more valuable than theirs. It's that simple. And I'm not going to apologize for caring about my own health and safety, because I know for damn sure that not a single one of them trying to shame and guilt men into dying for nothing would ever do the same for us in return. There's nothing to be gained from that immense sacrifice in the modern broken social contract, and men who can see even a few years into the future are figuring out that the math simply doesn't math. And so th…
/r/MensRights10/02/26 09:33 PM
28

Here's an archive link for the article in case anyone wants to read it while not giving the anti-male Guardian any clicks.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 03:44 PM
20

This is analogous to a similar finding regarding cancer referrals (for stomach or bowel cancer I think, where the pathologies of the disease are the same between the sexes). That research found that men with life-threatening cancers were statistically less likely to be referred to a specialist, after the same initial diagnostic test results were returned. Unfortunately, men are not the priority for support when shared resources like medical assistance are considered. It's male disposability theo…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 01:10 PM
36

In case anyone wants to read that excellent UK study from 2021 directly, here's a link to it. It's a long read, but well worth it. Here's the key message at the end: Rates of contact with services among middle-aged men were higher than expected; almost all had been in contact with a front-line service or agency at some time. It is therefore too simplistic to say that men do not seek help. Basically, as per the study, men regularly engage with the medical system when experiencing poor mental heal…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 01:01 PM
10

Karen Straughan had the perfect reply to these kinds of "those aren't real feminists" online arguments from gender ideologues. I must admit it's been a while since I've had the chance to trot out this copypasta, probably because it has become a tired and old position that no one really tries to put forth anymore, because it gets instantly dismissed and is so easily disproven. But here we have a post attempting it again, so here's the only response needed: So what you're saying is that you, a com…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:39 AM
6

This is not surprising unfortunately. I've seen the same mindset from so-called "academic" papers on suicide. Except there it's just hidden behind dishonest "scholarly" language claiming that: "suicide is not a male epidemic", which allows government prevention programs to continue to fail men deliberately. So this isn't just the nature of the internet and the anonymity of comments driving this cruelty. The attitude exists in general throughout society. Male suicide is encouraged, laughed at, bl…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:16 PM
11

The lack of any meaningful societal restraints on narcissism is pretty much confirmed/exposed by the extremes of the modern gender ideology movement. I actually matched up common narratives from online "wominists" with the Narcissist's Prayer in a popular post here on this very sub over two years ago. One note though: I would recommend rephrasing your claim of "men being inherently capable of violence" by stating instead that: "men in general are more likely to use direct, physical violence", an…
/r/MensRights02/05/25 02:09 PM
33

This sounds similar to how married men start off sharing a house equally with their spouse, until soon they start feeling like an unwelcome guest or visitor in their own dwelling. First they are exiled to the basement, then it gets worse and suddenly it's only the garage where they feel welcome. After that they are homeless and living in rentals or some small camper by themselves. That's what happened to my Dad. My brother too. And even from a distance, it's terribly unpleasant to watch unfold.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:03 PM
1

I can't find any CBC mandate that includes the language you state about "impacts of diversity and minorities". Here's the objectives I could track down for broadcasting from the relevant CRTC page: Canada's Broadcasting Act declares that the Canadian broadcasting system should encourage the development of Canadian expression by: Providing a wide range of programming that reflects Canadian attitudes, opinions, ideas, values, and artistic creativity Displaying Canadian talent in entertainment prog…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:06 AM
21

I see these rational reactions – even on Reddit of all places! – poke through every now and then, and it is indeed a good sign. Though I do have to point out the dishonest framing here. The idea is that: "things have gone too far", which is an interesting way to say: "wominism has gone full female supremacist". There have been a number of polling questions using this phrase that I've noticed recently, and it's funny how they can't just come out and admit that the idea of "equality" left the buil…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 09:10 PM
3

It's unfortunate you've chosen to perceive me in that manner.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 10:03 PM
3

You don't start a rational conversation about systemic difficulties for young boys by creating fear and hatred towards all men and boys as a group. Unfortunately, you're not engaging with this sub's criticism of the stated motivations for the show, or the predictable panic that ensued (where many are aborting only male babies). After observing your non sequitur responses to my and other's pushback, you're unfortunately nothing but a troll.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 07:01 PM
3

All that does is perpetuate the gender norms that both sides hate... No. There are reasonable people who disagree with this. Regardless, I would never make such a blanket statement about everyone (prejudging and stereotyping much?). And I would argue that those who disagree are the vast majority. Gender norms exist because that's what most men or most women find generally fulfilling and comfortable in their lives. If most people hated those things, they must hate their own interests and feelings…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 06:21 PM
3

I agree. "Presumption of Innocence" and its related issues is what this sub should be for. However, the point I was making was that the very specific angle about the Brand case taken by the OP – lobbying for a shortened statute of limitations on crimes – is a much broader subject that is not really men's rights-focused, and so the post might have gotten removed due to that fact. Those were just my quick non-mod thoughts. For all I know, it could have been removed because it didn't have a descrip…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:46 PM
34

Was your post the one that approached the case from a "charges from 1999 shouldn't be allowed to be brought by police" perspective? Well, if so, then I can perhaps see why it got removed. Because while the Russell Brand case does indeed have aspects that can touch on men's rights (presumption of innocence, etc), the particular angle you chose – arguing for a very limited statute of limitations for pressing charges in any and all cases – would likely get removed simply because it was considered o…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:51 AM
22

Here's an archive so you don't have to support the Guardian's rage bait click farming. Women have been entering areas of work traditionally reserved for men, while men remain resistant to the converse. Of course they have to insult men as "resistant to change" in the article, along with all sorts of other pejoratives about males in general. Notice how there isn't a single accolade offered like: "Men can offer great skills and experiences in education." that might question their supremacist ideol…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:40 AM
2

George (aka TheTinMen) is a popular and active male advocate who leans left politically. He even has a reddit sub you can join. And I'd say that this sub tends to be quite centrist (I'm center-left myself). The real problem is that – given the current state of US politics – any place that doesn't fully agree with constant knee-jerk "orange man bad" takes is automatically labeled as "right wing". Being centrist should mean that people are able to criticize or agree with individual positions as th…
/r/MensRights09/04/25 05:10 PM
15

As I note in my comment, it's actually the corporate media that are largely pushing these narratives like: "dangerous son", "fear all males", "even 5-year-old boys are scary", etc. The establishment are the ones responsible for creating this anti-male hysteria, and the ensuing moral panic against the "manosphere".
/r/MensRights09/04/25 04:20 PM
59

This type of fearmongering is rampant throughout the corporate media too. Just look at all the instances of words like "fear", "scared", "panicked", and more, that are being associated with young boys, in all the propaganda pieces from supposedly "reputable" sites. And this is just from the last few days. UK News: Parents of boy whose outbursts left them fearing for their lives say Adolescence 'touched a nerve' Spectator: What really scares people about Adolescence New York Times: ‘Adolescence’ …
/r/MensRights09/04/25 04:08 PM
2

You're welcome! Lee Jinwook's case is quite extraordinary, since it's one of the few instances of a false accusation where he not only got judged innocent in a court of law, but his false accuser was actually found to have lied and slandered him during a subsequent lawsuit. I wish I knew Korean so I could do a deep dive into the actual court records, and learn more about it, because the little I know about it is quite fascinating. The online discourse swirling around that case made it even more …
/r/MensRights09/04/25 01:38 AM
1

Please stop posting AI slop. Use your own words and arguments, not someone else's. This AI summary misses the fact that Pearson was charged despite his accuser saying it wasn't him. It also ignores the police quotas that exist for bringing charges in SA claims, brought about by the biased chief prosecutor Alison Saunders, because the police are always being blasted by the media as "not taking allegations seriously". All the biased statistics and sensationalist media propaganda – which feeds your…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 12:28 PM
1

If they don’t believe there is sufficient evidence for prosecution, the case will be dropped. Unfortunately, this is not even close to the reality of the horribly biased UK justice system. Just read up on the case of Mark Pearson to understand the anti-male bias in the UK.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 11:17 AM
6

The link you give describes a real clusterf**k of a domestic violence/hostage situation, so I don't know if such a single, special case is really the best comparison here. It does stand to reason that a person with connections inside law enforcement might get special treatment. But then again, there have been a number of highly public recent cases where it's worked against the accused to be cops. So that could go either way I think.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 11:18 PM
21

It's clear without looking much into this case why she was offered such an insanely favourable plea deal. First off, the person she killed was a man, and he would be seen by the system as "disposable" and without value. Secondly, she was not a man, so she would have been seen as less responsible and more sympathetic to prosecutors (despite driving 110 mph with a blood alcohol content of .10!...I mean, that's insanely reckless). Plus, it seems that "in group bias" might have played an important f…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 10:40 PM
55

How can authorities or the public believe the victim before it’s determined which party is actually the victim? That trick of language is deliberate. Remind any of these ideologues that she is only an "accuser", or at most an "alleged victim", and they will enter a paroxysm of histrionics and lose their ever-freaking minds over having to respect due process. They're clearly brainwashed. That's why they can't give up that premature label of "victim". I mean, it should be entirely possible to see …
/r/MensRights05/04/25 03:00 PM
2

If you truly care about these issues that men face, then please stop posting about them here. You have shown that you cannot write at the level required to engage with these topics. Even an eight-year-old can use simple punctuation to communicate. However, you cannot. That is embarrassing for you and for everyone else in this community. So you are only damaging the very causes that you claim to support by representing them in such an infantile manner. Again, please stop posting to this sub.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 10:17 PM
7

Please take this criticism in good faith. You yourself admit that your communication skills are very poor, and yet here you are again attempting to discuss very difficult and nuanced subjects (circumcision, the draft, etc) that require much better-than-average verbal skills to relay to others. It isn't working. At all. As evidenced by the lack of upvotes and engagement on every new thread you create. You are treating this sub like your own personal blog, and you are posting confusing and unstruc…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:16 PM
20

She pled guilty to manslaughter. That means she is responsible for his murder under the law.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 11:33 PM
52

Here's an archive if people want to read the article without giving CBC the clicks. The important details of this story are pretty much found in the following paragraphs: Members of Ahmad Al Marrach's family stormed out of the Halifax courtroom where Judge Mark Heerema sentenced the girl to another three months in custody at a youth detention centre, followed by two years of close supervision in the community. The girl, whose identity is protected under a publication ban, showed a "shocking abse…
/r/MensRights03/04/25 10:51 PM
69

"Believe all women" = "Don't trust all men" There's no way they can avoid this huge and intractable problem with their ideology. And yet we're supposed to be the ignorant ones who fall for extreme stereotypes and prejudice against an entire group of people. Meanwhile, the reality is that we are simply asking for due process, and presumption of innocence, and nothing more than a fair legal system. Nobody in their right mind should a priori believe all accusations are false, or all accusations are…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 04:31 PM
37

Both McElroy and Judge Corr thanked detectives for continuing to investigate the case, leading to the discovery of the false accusation by the defendant. From what I remember of researching this case, law enforcement were shockingly incompetent. They imprisoned him based on a "60% positive identification" alone, then a judge hit him with an astonishing 1 million dollars bail, and finally the family had to approach police on their own initiative to establish an alibi for him. Only after the famil…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:19 PM
1

The left's misandry doesn't have to push you to the right if you don't want it to. Personally, it hasn't shifted my political positions in general. However, the constant man-hating has made me politically homeless, because I won't support a party, group, culture, industry, country, etc, that openly hates me for being male. I know political identity is ultra important to some, due to tribalism being so common nowadays, but I'm honestly happier not falling into that kind of self-labeling.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:37 AM
73

Just a reminder that the marketing materials for this show from several weeks ago advertised the story as follows: In case you were somehow operating under the delusion that teenaged boys are not genuinely scary as fuck, please allow Netflix to disabuse you of the notion. They knew the exact type of fearmongering they were making right from the outset, even though some may now try to pretend it's a "nuanced portrayal" or a "sympathetic depiction of young boys" or similar nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:45 PM
89

Adolescence feels like moral porn for the upper classes. It allows them to indulge their aristocratic dread of the gruff males of the lower orders. Who cares if it’s horrifically inaccurate so long as it gives the chattering class a cheap moral thrill? This is eloquently stated, and well worth repeating.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:45 AM
12

This is such obvious AI-generated politically divisive nonsense, that it's likely just a bot here to try and create drama and infighting.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 10:44 PM
4

A number of cases come to mind for me. Brian Banks - spent six years in jail because of a false accusation, and had a lucrative and promising NFL career ruined, basically destroying his life. A movie even got made about the story, though it mischaracterized the issue as one of racism because he was black, even though he was falsely accused by someone who was also black. Michael Fife - killed due to a false accusation of sexual assault, and he spent days in unimaginable pain before he passed away…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 11:04 AM
2

I agree with your qualms about risking "infiltration". As I said, no strategy is perfect when it comes to these situations, unfortunately. As an individual user though, I do have much more effective ways to deal with bad faith commenters than I do when fighting against a power-tripping mod, so I much prefer facing the former as a threat if possible.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 03:57 PM
9

The most important moderating feature for a sub/community – so that it doesn't fall into extremism – is for disagreement and criticism to be encouraged. Real conversations can't happen when the threat of censorship or a ban hangs over every comment. This does leave a sub open to "infiltration", unfortunately, but that can be handled with active participation by genuine supporters, and it is less of a threat than extreme elements taking hold (IMO). No strategy is perfect, but I greatly prefer thi…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 01:04 PM
1

Thanks for sharing that great article! It's interesting to get a "neutral" – but generally supportive and ideologically aligned – perspective from someone outside of our group. The idea that the "manosphere" – or men's rights in particular – must offer something of value to the men who engage with it, or they would go elsewhere, is a simple but powerful concept that sometimes is lost amidst all the politics of male advocacy. Reducing things to choosing between verbal abuse (on the side of the ma…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 12:27 PM
31

There's an archive available if you really want to read it. It's predictably bad, so I can save you some time with a quick summary. This author claims that men are inferior to the "fairer sex" in every way, but states that men are especially dumb at conversation. She arrives at this angry conclusion after attending a dinner party where she was the only female present, but none of the men there liked her enough to talk to her and ask her anything about herself. Well, given the hateful anti-male t…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:03 PM
11

It's no surprise that this is happening immediately in the month's following Trump's re-election in the US, and with the online "manosphere" being credited as responsible for his win. They don't want the same thing happening in the UK.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 01:46 AM
33

My suspicion is that the motivation behind this nasty series is to propagandize the UK public into support for even more draconian censorship laws – with “the manosphere” being particularly targeted. Considering how instantly and vehemently the UK govt, media, and others, jumped on board the moral panic bandwagon, I have to agree with this writer's assessment. It is clear that this propaganda piece was made specifically to justify censorship of the UK govt's political opponents. I do wonder abou…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:50 PM
15

When violence by proxy isn’t considered, it makes stats like this not just irrelevant, they’re intentionally malicious. Exactly! More and more people are starting to see how violent "the fairer sex" is, thanks to this term "proxy violence". W*men just tend to commit serious crimes in ways where they think they don't have to be accountable or risk their own safety. So they get institutions like law enforcement or academic tribunals, friends and family, social media, etc, to destroy the man they h…
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:39 PM
15

To be fair, most of the commentary/criticism isn't actually about the show, as the story itself really is poorly thought out and largely forgettable. It's the huge amount of press it is getting, and government attention, which is all inorganic and manufactured primarily to serve a political purpose, that needs to be pointed out and discussed.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 10:47 PM
25

At almost two hours in length, that's a lot to get through, so I admittedly haven't watched it yet. However, another channel thankfully did a short reaction to some of Sargon's points from this marathon, and I have to say that Carl brings up some great criticisms and observations about what is happening here. One thing he notes somewhere after the hour mark – and this is an angle I hadn't heard before – is that this young boy is only ever interrogated by female authority figures, and that this i…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:51 PM
9

Merely replacing one set of gendered expectations for men with another more "progressive" set of gendered expectations (i.e. men must be vulnerable and cry at least once a day, etc) does absolutely nothing to improve men's lives. It makes things worse, in fact. So be careful when reading discussions of these ideas. In most cases, the idea of pushing new "gendered expectations" is started by people who hate men, and who want to make things worse for us (deliberately in many cases).
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:41 PM
8

I wrote a post on this subject almost a year ago on the KIA sub, titled: "Why are 'boy brands' seemingly so susceptible to infiltration?". The TLDR of my theory is that stories that are considered male tend to be more universal, because they deal with common and popular themes of being "human" (not just male), so there is always a sense (not always well-founded) that they can "grow" their audience with just a few seemingly "minor" changes. Plus, we are in the midst of a moral panic right now aro…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:08 PM
18

It's the constant and observed pattern of Fathers being useless, absent, deadbeat, and worse. Disney has multiple recent shows with two Mothers as parents, but none with two Fathers. So when yet another show comes out that treats men badly as a group, and in the worst way possible by showing a young boy as supposedly hating w*men, yet also showing that he likes and is attracted enough to this person he supposedly hates (?) to try and ask her out, the clichés about men being responsible for every…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 01:05 PM
29

I watched an in-depth review of the show today from The ArchCast on YouTube, and their discussion noted that the mother only said: "I know that I was a great mum." and that was it. She did not take any real responsibility for what happened. Whereas the father was shown in private apologizing to the son for having failed him as a dad. Seems a little one-sided in its messaging on that front, doesn't it? In the end, their review blasts the show as: "slick anti-male propaganda".
/r/MensRights26/03/25 02:28 AM
1

According to the news article and police reports, both she and the man she shot owned guns. As to why she was carrying hers in her purse at the time of the shooting – if that's what you're asking – that is not known as far as I could find. It might be that she always carried it for protection, so I won't say whether that is proof of anything or not.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 10:20 PM
127

Next week Keir Starmer is going to watch The Hobbit and then introduce a policy banning dragons from hoarding gold.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:33 PM
8

According to the extreme gender ideologues, misandry "doesn't exist", while misogyny is literally everything a man does that involves or impacts a woman. Given this, your best ammunition is to start by pointing out the hateful anti-male bias in both definitions, and then not budge on that criticism unless fair and objective measurements exist for each category. Otherwise, any attempts to debate the topic will be like trying to fight with one arm tied behind your back.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:35 PM
12

"When everything is misogyny, nothing is." That's an attitude we all share, considering our exposure to the multitude of unfounded and spurious accusations. And from what I've seen it's one that the general public is starting to realize as well.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:30 PM
7

People did push back against the concept. But "microaggressions" are a perfect example of the power of the motte-and-bailey fallacy. During the accusation phase, it's just a "minor" issue. See the word "micro" there? Why are you so worried about admitting to your fault when it's such a small and insignificant thing? However, when the punishment phase hits, after the target has been shamed and manipulated into apologizing, suddenly it's not a small thing any more. Now it's like you literally supp…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:22 PM
3

I immediately thought of Orwell and the Ministry of Truth too.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:09 PM
3

The article linked doesn't have a whole lot of information on this case, so I did a bit of looking and found this article, which gives a bit more background on this accused killer's claims of self defense: In the criminal complaint, police said, "Amanda Hughes stated that Anthony was punching her in the face and head which caused her to fall to the ground, Amanda attempted to cover her head and face with her arms and hands. Amanda reached into her nearby purse and pulled out her pistol and fired…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:07 PM
8

Oh, and I meant to add: the incidents of plagiarism by Claudine Gay were characterized by her supporters as...get this..."insufficient citation". It's shameless how they use euphemisms and sanitizing language to shield their political allies from accountability.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:05 PM
21

I've had fun asking these types the following question: Please name ten things a man does regularly involving interacting with a woman that is not considered misogyny by someone. Their brains go "poof". It's hilarious.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 02:30 PM
23

Why would anyone want to participate in a censored sub where there are no genuine conversations to be had and everything is just performative nonsense? Don't waste your time worrying about closed minds like that.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 02:11 AM
21

If it's a small family-owned company, and she's part of that family, then all I can say is run. Get as far away as you can and don't look back. If you want to hear the horror story of what kind of treatment you'll get if you try to stay, I can share my tale with you. However, I highly recommend that you just skip learning about that and find work elsewhere, especially if it's just a second job.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 11:11 PM
1

You, on the other hand, dismissed it outright without even watching. Let's use the restaurant analogy here. If I'm served a meal that smells like crap, and it looks like all that is on the plate are mashed up bits of dog feces, I don't then choose to eat it all just to confirm what my nose and eyes are already telling me. A person who tells others to knowingly eat sh!te in that kind of situation is quite simply off their rocker. But hey, to each their own. You do you.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:50 PM
9

If young UK men becoming violent was an actual problem, the current govt would be trying to find an actual solution for it (like creating a Minister for Men to improve young men's health, career prospects, etc). Instead, they're just using the public's fear of this unlikely threat to further their own political interests, which proves they don't really think it's important. Their policy will ultimately result in influencers that are their political opponents being banned/shadowbanned, silenced/c…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:39 PM
0

You’re bending over backwards to downplay the show’s success. Yet you're the one who used a laughably specialized award like "the most watched UK Netflix original" to try and glaze the show. And after I pointed that out, you tell me I'm the one "bending over backwards"? Sounds like the Tu Quoque fallacy to me. Which reveals to me that my argument landed. Hard. If it didn't matter, you wouldn't attempt the same tactic in return. As a debate opponent, your emotions and reactions are really easy to…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:28 PM
6

the most watched UK Netflix original You forgot to say that it's: "on track to become the most watched UK Netflix original crime drama" there. 🤣🤣🤣 I mean, how many qualifiers can we possibly add before we admit these "most watched" and "number one" corporate marketing slogans are just meaningless awards? These are the equivalent of participation trophies for the entertainment industry. And to be clear, I'm not worried about this show because most of the positive reactions I've seen have been peo…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:10 AM
6

Relative to other releases, that's a tiny number of watch hours spread out across the entire world, yes. My point was about the inorganic news blitz around something of this size. Other moderate Netflix successes have had 10-20 times the hours watched, but they barely get a mention by the corporate media. As I said, the buzz is wholly inorganic.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:15 AM
1

There are far better ways of dealing with that tactic. If I'm debating an extreme person on the left: "How do you know a right-wing candidate is bad if you've never voted for and supported them to find out how well they can govern?" Or in the case of entertainment: "If you're so certain I'll like the show, then send me the money to purchase and support it. I promise you I'll pay you back if I'm wrong." The stupidity and hypocrisy of this tactic is so obvious that any reasonable person listening …
/r/MensRights23/03/25 04:41 PM
5

So your argument is that the show's creators are dishonest, idiotic, and incompetent when it comes to marketing (which – let's be honest – is the easiest part of creating a quality product), but somehow they ended up making a watchable piece of entertainment despite their admitted ineptitude? Sorry, not buying it. Literally. I'm not paying money for it. When something smells and looks like crap, and nothing more than divisive propaganda, I won't spend my hard-earned cash to purchase rubbish. And…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 03:47 PM
17

I saw the marketing tagline for the show and that was enough for me to avoid it: In case you were somehow operating under the delusion that teenaged boys are not genuinely scary as f**k, please allow Netflix to disabuse you of the notion. If something smells like sh!te, do you still eat it to confirm what your nose is telling you? Seriously?
/r/MensRights23/03/25 02:22 PM
91

The huge news blitz is obviously inorganic. The show has very small viewership, and it was only liked by a tiny handful of people for its politics, or its gimmick one-shot style.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:55 AM
13

This short 2min video discusses the existence of a t-shirt being sold that mocks men – husbands specifically – for being "childish". He suggests creating a similar shirt about wives, and offers a rather humourous example of one, to see how people would react to that.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:34 AM
106

The quote OP pulled from the article – in which a contributor states that straight relationships are just "domination and violence by men" – is just Andrea Dworkin's infamous and insane claim that "all straight sex is rape" translated into the political jargon of modern gender ideology. Most "wominists" nowadays say they disavow Dworkin, but in reality their beliefs are no different from hers.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:02 AM
14

This is exactly what Earl Silverman went through after escaping an abusive wife, before he tragically took his own life due to the dejection and despair of his situation. In his own words: "When I went into the community looking for some support services, I couldn’t find any. There were a lot for women, and the only programs for men were for anger management. As a victim, I was re-victimized by having these services telling me that I wasn’t a victim, but I was a perpetrator."
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:17 PM
10

If this piece of entertainment was meant to be about bullying, and the growing negative influence of social media on young people, etc, as some are now claiming it to be (I will press X to doubt that assertion), then the story would have been told much differently. It would have focused entirely on what was happening behind the "closed door" of that teenage boy's bedroom. The show would have chronicled the abuse, ridicule, and threats he received on both a personal and a group level because he w…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:09 PM
27

This all reminds me of the height of the Barbie movie's popularity, where its supporters were certain that they had the next ten US elections locked in, and that "wominist" ideology had finally won the culture war with a decisive generational victory. So, how is that coming along now? Yeah, just look at how badly that worked out for them. By comparison, this UK streaming show has almost nobody who saw it, and fewer who even care about the story. It's not really worth getting worried about. If it…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 03:28 PM
12

How worried should a man be about having a false accusation of sexual assault or misconduct of some kind being made against him? Well, this largely comes down to the avenue by which the allegation is made. To the police or authorities: not very worried. On social media/online: moderately worried. To friends, family, coworkers, etc, via the whisper network: very, very worried.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 08:35 PM
10

Well, at least 40% were honest about lying in that kind of situation. The big question is whether the other 60% were being dishonest or not in claiming they would never lie for revenge, profit, avoidance, etc. And on top of those who did not want to admit to being liars, what about those who think they are ethical in the moment, but whose morals will leave them the moment their feelings take over? Something tells me that 40% statistic may be a low-ball estimate when the rubber hits the road.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 08:28 PM
1

You seem to be new here, so I'll give it to you straight: Tate is not a friend to male advocates. And the feeling is mutual.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 08:11 PM
4

If you look up anything on "snoring" in the vast array of "grievance studies" literature you'll understand that the "breathing" thing is already well established. Of course it's men's partners who suffer from poor sleep due to men snoring more often. Then it's men's fault for not going to the doctor to fix their condition. And it's even further unfair because men are not stigmatized for snoring, whereas it's considered "unladylike" in the opposite gender, which is of course another way that soci…
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:59 PM
8

A misogynist used to be a man that hates women. Now it's any man that a woman hates.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 04:58 PM
37

I applaud the positivity about the show that you share near the end of this discussion, where you suggest that the writer's intention may have been to explore the public's naivety about the important issues young men face around bullying and societal shaming, and that this piece of entertainment was all done to promote understanding and awareness. You share the sense that we all need to be more knowledgeable and charitable about what happens behind that "closed door" of a teenage boy's bedroom, …
/r/MensRights21/03/25 04:54 PM
522

Sheesh. This man actually ends up owing money after his divorce. Given that his own costs were £450,000, the award left Mr Entwistle £125,000 out of pocket - a scenario that his barrister has now argued would not have materialised were their roles reversed. The laws are not equal. Either in writing or in practice/application they wholly discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:17 PM
5

the whole power imbalance in the school system isn't acknowledged at all. Teachers are in an authority position and have power over their students. This line of thought makes sense logically, but the "reasoning" in critical theory is not rational. It's all emotional. Power and marginalization are judged based on immutable identities like sex, sexuality, ethnicity, etc, not on occupation.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 02:54 PM
88

Hypocrite. He blames the "manosphere" for "making money off the backs of vulnerable young men", while he works for an actual industry – namely the corporate media – that makes money off of exploiting the fears of the opposite sex about those very same men. You don't hate journalists enough. You think you do, but you don't.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 10:39 PM
11

I'd want a political party focused on men to prioritize male mental health, specifically by ending the epidemic of male suicide. A commitment to a 1-2% drop in male suicides over a 5-year period (or something like that) would be a meaningful and achievable goal I believe. The reason I would focus on suicide is simple. Because in order to solve that issue, one has to look into the risk factors for suicide, and the mitigation of those. These include: unemployment, divorce and legal troubles, finan…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 03:01 PM
5

It's probably a bit much to assume that she ignored your concerns because she wasn't a guy. Front-line medical staff always try to limit information based on what their experience says is applicable to the situation. I'm not a doctor, but coughing would stress muscles in the groin and abdomen areas, but since the testicles don't have muscles to engage when coughing I'd suspect that the pain there was not due to anything directly related to that. Just my uninformed take on those symptoms, and why…
/r/MensRights18/03/25 02:44 PM
2

Unfortunately, it stands to reason that false accusations of SA would become a cottage industry at some point, given how much reputational, career, marital, etc, damage is incurred from just the allegation alone. I'd heard stories of this type of extortion happening in the trucking industry, using an entrapment scheme that runs several thousands of dollars per shakedown. It seems it's become a bit more organized and widespread since then.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 10:47 PM
3

That's an excellent point that I have thought as well, but too few people bring up when discussing this case. False accusers are dangerous people. Society deserves to be protected from them. Perjurers should be imprisoned to the full extent of the law.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 03:23 AM
23

I'm sure that the lack of male teachers has some effect, but I think the number of fatherless homes has much more of an impact on the developing brains of young boys. Though neither of these things really matter in the end in this specific situation (regarding guys engaging with the "manosphere"), since boys will rightfully not respect any teacher that constantly lies to and shames them for being born with "dangly bits". Just stop with the attempts at brainwashing and you won't lose your student…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:36 PM
3

So men are inherently different than our counterparts? Based on your unsupported assertions, this appears to be the extent of your belief system: some sort of sex-based determinism. Please explain more clearly – with examples – if that is not the case. In good faith, I'll start. I believe that speaking or acting condescending towards someone else – by belittling them in conversation, lying or laughing at them behind their back, etc – is something that is – and can be – done by both sexes. And it…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:10 PM
8

Why make the description gendered when the phrase "toxic behaviour" already existed to describe such actions? Aren't we always being told that men are the same as our counterparts? So don't we share more behaviours than separate us, making such a term divisive and harmful in the eyes of gender ideologues? The honest answer of course is that terms like "mansplaining", "manspreading", "hegemonic masculinity", "patriarchy", "mankeeping", and so many more, exist for the sole purpose of denigrating m…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 04:52 PM
9

Thanks for that link! I've only browsed a few blog posts so far, but all that content looks great! I had no idea that this particular blogger (KC Johnson) was sued to reveal his sources as part of the case, and the lawsuit was brought against him by Duke University no less. Chilling stuff there. I was able to track down Johnson's reaction to Mangum's recent confession of perjury back in Dec 2024, and he summarizes it quite succinctly in his X/Twitter post: At this point, probably the only people…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 01:31 AM
10

Over a decade later and what do you know?...the Guardian is still publishing the same style of lazy outrage clickbait. Here's an archive of the article so that the site doesn't get the engagement, in case anyone else wants to hear this "wominist" try and pretend that "rape" is nothing more than "a shameful liaison". Seriously, I thought "wild sex romp" was the worst I'd ever hear to describe the rape of an underage boy, but this putrid opinion piece has proved me wrong. The use of euphemisms and…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 05:10 PM
11

My experience is the same as yours. I admit that my sexual assault by a wom*n was fairly minor as far as horrible incidents go, but even though it was a "lesser" crime relatively speaking, the men I talked to about it were always supportive. Whether it was to show concern for how I was having trouble dealing with it, or to simply call her an "undesirable sk**k" and to say they would have reacted just as negatively to what she did, they immediately had my back without question. Contrast that with…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 04:56 PM
3

Thanks for pointing me to the stats for late 19th and early 20th century graduation rates! I knew that the numbers were even less in favour of men back then, but I didn't have links handy to support that fact. Personally though, I do tend to start any comparisons many decades later for several important reasons. First, the absolute number of young adults receiving an education in the 1890's/1900's is very small, so percentages can vary wildly and are misleading as to the extent of the "problem".…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 02:05 PM
54

The known facts of this case from nearly 20 years ago proved definitively that these young men from Duke University were falsely accused. I actually did a bit of a deep dive into the story right after Mangum's not-very-stunning admission of perjury, to see if there was an angle worth writing about it in a follow-up review. However, it really only involved pretty standard legal and police malpractice, and only one thing jumped out at me as a possible source of a post on this subject: the name of …
/r/MensRights15/03/25 01:45 PM
94

This 14-year-old boy has learned pretty early on in his life about how little society values his life. He gets raped by a trusted authority figure, she turns around and makes a false accusation of rape against him, and then she barely gets any punishment at all for it (I would bet money she'll be out of prison in less than a year). Seriously, when will the legal system finally realize that the reason these crimes keep happening so often is that female criminals realize they can get off scot-free…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 12:43 PM
41

In the 1980s and 1990s, boys still dominated American classrooms. They easily outscored girls in math and science, they raised their hands more often and they got more attention from teachers, data showed. Oh, and I meant to have a good laugh here. This kind of subjective, biased, and pinhole approach is not how you accurately measure performance in education between the sexes.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 10:27 PM
32

There are a lot of unsupported claims in this post around men and education that deserve some scrutiny. The actual truth is that in the late 1930's, back during the advent of standardized education in every modern country, it was men who were initially far behind in receiving high school diplomas. Check out this chart for the US starting in the 1960's, and you'll see that men trail by a full 3% compared to w*men. The high school educational level only reaches stable parity in the 1980's and 90's…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 10:13 PM
3

Honestly, it's a bit difficult to listen through his personal stories of abuse in relationships, but the way he has created so many positives with the founding of the help line for men is inspiring. It's unsurprising – though still frustrating to hear – that attempts have been made to coopt it into "wominist" goals, when it needs to stay as a male-only support group. I wish there were more government funding for this kind of work, but good on the TinMen community for helping to support it with t…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 02:40 PM
6

You appear to have misunderstood the point I was making. The studies did not set a proper control group, and so their methodology was flawed, making the data useless. All they "discovered" was that marriage heavily skews to selecting for health, full-time employment, youth, and other factors that obviously increase a man's life expectancy. Well...duh. Now I happen to have worked as a data scientist, but even that high level of experience isn't required to see the problem with not controlling imp…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 01:38 PM
22

Any studies I've seen showing married men "live longer" never take into account that men with physical indicators of "health" are far more likely to get married. And married men are also more likely to enter a marriage employed with health insurance and/or access to a high level of medical treatment for health issues they may have. Without a proper control group of healthy, economically wealthy men to use to normalize the life expectancies between married and unmarried groups, any claims that "m…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 12:53 AM
2

There's a variety of reasons for that, societal ideas about being the "breadwinner", men being overall more career oriented, women being told they should do what makes them happy, men being told they should do what supports a family, etc. Oh crap, you're one of those. You seriously think that men only like doing things because of this pejorative and toxic "breadwinner" myth. Seriously, if you're going to pretend you aren't brainwashed into the "Evil PatriarchyTM" conspiracy, the first thing you …
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:40 PM
2

The fix is for more men to enter the field and this won't occur until it's funded properly. How will "more funding" overcome the aversion that any rational male has to hearing that he must feel ashamed of his "male privilege" during his training to become a therapist? Or being told that he must shame his patients – many of whom are suffering from low self-worth and have significant self-image issues – by "challenging" them about simply being born male? Something they have no control over obvious…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 05:04 PM
3

I agree, you're not my enemy. We just fundamentally disagree on the term "toxic masculinity". I think the term is unsalvageable and is strictly a pejorative.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 02:05 AM
4

I wouldn't be surprised either if the incident was completely fabricated. Does that level of dishonesty from a licensed professional only make it worse though?
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:24 PM
2

So what they are saying is that man that get told by other man how bullshit many of the things out there are tend to react to the truth... These ideologues have their propaganda infused into education, the corporate media, entertainment, politics, business, and more. Yet all it takes is a certifiable idiot like Tate to share a few nuggets of common sense truth, and all their indoctrination crumbles. Just consider that for a moment. That really says something about the feebleness of their brainwa…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:11 PM
35

Yeah, it's just the same old "Men are broken w*men" doctrine that underlies so much ignorance these days.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 02:28 PM
4

Anyone who tries to defend the misandric idea that masculinity is "toxic" – as this article does in the opening paragraph – is not an advocate for men. It's as simple as that. They can try to appear reasonable with seemingly "positive" rhetoric at the end, but that falls flat when they don't offer any practical actions to support those words. Here's a simple test to discern their true intentions: if I told them – or you for that matter – that the priority action to take in male advocacy is to st…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 12:41 PM
9

For another example, r/MensRights is a lot more right-leaning than r/MensLib and r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. This sub actually seems more centrist to me. I'm center-left myself, and my experience with LWMA is that it is uncomfortably far left, and sometimes on the extremes of left-wing ideology (especially in how it approaches US politics...yikes). Meanwhile, MensLib could be called even more extreme if it wasn't just inauthentic and performative nonsense that doesn't really fit into a political bu…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:48 AM
6

This is a great post that seems close to what you are asking, but I'm not sure if it is the exact one you're remembering.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 11:30 PM
28

Please direct me to something that points this out and counters them. I need this in my arsenal. I made a post a few years ago showing how self-harm data was misused in a primary study – that was referenced in many later ones – to begin this urban myth about suicide attempts. Hopefully that's what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 10:17 PM
3

I think for much of the public the "mask off" moment for this man-hating ideology came during the Johnny Depp trial. The fact that so many "wominist" organizations came out in support of Ms Heard after the trial, was what finally exposed the inevitable flaw in such group-based thinking. The individual facts of the case proved that she was a criminal – an abuser, liar, and more – but of course this did not matter to the identity-obsessed ideology of "wominism". For those of us who had watched the…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 08:10 PM
53

I did a deep dive into the primary source – or one of them as I later found out – for this urban myth that "men attempt suicide less, but die more often". It turns out that the researchers in the 2002 paper I found used hospital data for "self-harm", which includes things like anorexia, bulemia, etc. These types of medical conditions of course vastly underrepresent men. And the paper's authors noted that the data they used is not fit for purpose because it will: "...overestimate the number of su…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:27 PM
8

The main problem with this type of research is that orgasms take time and effort to achieve, and not every sexual interaction is initiated with the goal of both participants reaching climax. The difference in libidos between two partners – in which the male usually has the stronger desire and initiates the activity – dictates how this compromise occurs. That's where these percentage-based approaches always fail, because in absolute numbers the women have more orgasms than they do on their own, o…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:15 AM
9

She added that the common thread for users was the “weaponisation of online platforms to harass w*men and to plant gender misinformation and normalise misogyny under the disguise of so-called men’s issues”. The article clearly states that everyone trying to simply advocate for men, whether it be wanting to improve their health, employment opportunities, safety, bodily autonomy, etc, like this subreddit and other sites attempt to do for men as a group, are only trying "to harass and to plant gend…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 04:20 PM
20

She kept up her lies for two and a half years, despite early and overwhelming proof that her allegations were false. And when she finally "admitted" that she had made everything up, she still didn't come fully clean: Hood, of Onslow Road, Stockport, told the court she was innocent because she had not knowingly lied, and instead had a false belief of "something so clear in my head". A person can never be trusted again after they have been caught lying about something as serious as this to law enf…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 03:47 PM
34

I think this largely stems from the research finding (which has been replicated) that shows that people react more positively to female- than to male-favouring sex differences. So companies are going to promote – or even dishonestly make up – these findings. And others are going to latch on to them and read them. I've even seen corporate news take male-favouring research and present it as the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 01:24 PM
2

My response? Thank you...for telling the world that you hate men.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 11:38 PM
6

Until they say "It's okay not to cry" in equal amounts this has nothing to do with freeing men from societal norms or anything like that. It's just a new set of expectations that are impossible for men to meet as a group (because – on average – men will never cry as much as the opposite sex), and so it's only a way to manipulate and perceive men as "broken".
/r/MensRights06/03/25 09:38 PM
90

She murdered a defenseless infant. And then tried to hide that fact for over 20 years. The case's investigation consumed countless police resources, including over 500 DNA tests in order to track her down and charge her decades later, which was what finally forced a confession so that the tragic death could be laid to rest. "Tearfully admits"? No. The only reason she confessed was because she had been caught. The only reason she cried was because she had been caught. Don't give sympathy where no…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:47 PM
34

Benjamin Mendy had seven charges of rape/SA filed against him and was found innocent of all seven in a court of law (the judge even risked an appeal regarding jury bias by flat out ordering the jury to acquit Mendy on one charge when an accuser perjured herself on the stand, after video evidence proved she gave consent). The jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on two other charges at the time of that post, but those charges were also dismissed at a later trial. So what does this mean? W…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:06 AM
6

I've argued that there's no way to differentiate the political left in many countries from the media, academia, or the entertainment industry in those places. Just look at all the people who move between corporate media jobs and Democrat positions in the US, as the best argument in favour of this perspective. Anything said by the media automatically reflects – badly in most cases – on the political left because they're literally the same people or at least functionally the exact same beliefs.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 10:58 PM
9

Yeah, they're talking about trying to close the barn door after the horses have been gone for years. At this point, the culture's so broken that it would require several generations to just stop the sexes from hating each other, let alone getting back to sharing common goals and values.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:16 AM
26

Weren't the majority of those university programs already rebranded as "Gender Studies" decades ago to try and hide the fact that they are biased and inherently anti-male?
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:24 PM
119

"Rights" such as receiving lesser sentences for committing the same crimes "ThaT's jUst ThE PATRiarChY!" is of course their laughable excuse for this. Meanwhile, "wominist" politicians, groups, consultants, etc, are all lobbying to close female prisons everywhere, and often succeeding in places like the UK.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 01:09 PM
4

Wow, thanks for the link to that great article! The list of organizations supporting immunity from prosecution for campus accusers is not surprising to see, given their ideological beliefs, but it's still frustrating to realize that so many groups are lining up to deny due process to men. And all because of a need to hide the scope and commonness of false accusations.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:47 AM
8

What do you think of the $110 million lawsuit by Saifullah Khan currently happening against Yale University and his anonymous false accuser? The fact that the appeals court there has made it possible for him to proceed with a defamation suit of that magnitude could lead to historic changes in how such cases are handled. It's been a long time coming, since he was first accused back in 2015, expelled in 2018, and started the suit in 2019. Here's one of the documents in the case (from what I unders…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:20 AM
26

I don't understand why the media never covers shit like this Unfortunately, showing the plight of men anywhere goes against the corporate media's narrative of "men evil". Also, they don't want to get accused of supporting Russia. Though a reasonable person should be able to oppose injustice wherever it exists, whether in the aggression and greed of Russia's attacks or the treatment of its own male civilians by Ukraine, without worrying about getting called names by ignorant hacks. Except that's …
/r/MensRights01/03/25 10:46 PM
10

From the article: Defence lawyer David Jenkins said that Parsons, who has Indigenous heritage, has no criminal record. Her supply of mental health medication had lapsed around the time of the offence. Can we say "soft bigotry of low expectations"? Yes...yes we can. She still won't have a criminal record either after following the conditions of the discharge. So the fact she had no previous record, along with the meaningless aside about her "mental health medication" (I mean come on...she's an ef…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 10:37 PM
12

Everything about masculinity is "toxic" according to this warped ideology, so by this point the slur has simply lost all meaning and significance. If anything, the existence of this article only primes me to see the target of such an overused attack in a more favourable light.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:43 PM
9

So your argument is that because it is a smaller group of people, we should care about them less or their issues are not as important? Beating up a strawman is the only thing that weak and lazy argument is good for.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:15 PM
57

It's indeed progress to see "rape" used to properly describe a female teacher raping an underage male student, but notice they still called her "glamorous", to try and soften that criticism. Can you imagine a headline like: "Handsome male Texas teacher, 35, raped student..."? No, he'd be called a predator at every opportunity in the article (and rightly so), with no praise given to his looks, appearance, or even some backhanded and innocuous compliment like: "He was always punctual in arriving a…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:30 PM
13

Comparing how men are treated right now to the LGBT's experience of decades ago isn't really a great analogy. First off, those groups are/were much smaller and barely made up a single digit percentage of the population, whereas men are close to 50% of society. So there's a lot more opportunity for pushing a lone individual into violence by attacking men as a group. Second, and more importantly, those marginalized groups of yesteryear had officially-sanctioned spaces where they could retreat and …
/r/MensRights28/02/25 07:31 PM
3

File this one under: so crazy only an academic could believe it. Just point and laugh, and don't take it seriously by "reporting it" or anything like that. Despite statistical evidence that men are more likely to be sexually assaulted than wrongfully accused of assault.. Read this and know that nothing meets the absurdly high standard they have set up for something to be a false accusation. For example, did you know that there are still "wominists" and academics out there that believe the Duke L…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:28 PM
9

Even if it does subvert expectations about his innocence, the emotional agenda of instilling fear is still the same. You can't spend hours preying on and manipulating people's baser instincts about a subject like "toxic teenage boys" and the "manosphere bogeymen", and then turn around and suddenly expect the viewer to engage their higher faculties at the last minute.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:53 PM
10

LOL. As much as I'd enjoy seeing those stories, anyone involved in shows on those particular topics would be in danger of being lynched. And I don't mean that figuratively, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:17 PM
20

You might be thinking of a "self-fulfilling prophecy". And there are certainly real-world instances of how expectations can shape behaviour, such as large bank failures during the Great Depression, all the way up to toilet paper shortages during the 2020 pandemic/lockdowns.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:08 PM
16

Goebbels himself would be proud of how commonplace and unassuming this looks, and how the people behind it have been able to hide pure evil inside such a slickly marketed package.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:03 PM
14

The loathsome Cuties also ran through my head when noticing that Netflix is the distributer of this newest abomination. There is indeed a pattern here regarding their hateful agenda.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:49 PM
59

It's prejudice and stereotyping, yes, but that's probably just being used as an excuse for laziness on their part. They want you to do all the actual hard work, while they get all the perceived status from being the one standing in front of an audience presenting the results. Remember though that social accolades in an education setting are fleeting and ultimately meaningless. The only prize in school is the knowledge and skills gained from genuinely working through a problem. You are exercising…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:01 PM
3

My experience with studies regarding domestic violence that tragically results in death, is that there is an automatic assumption by researchers that the men "deserved it" somehow. I've often seen some form of: "Well, it must be self-defense" attributed to those who kill men, and this is often even stated explicitly in papers and studies around the subject. Men can't be victims in their activist ideology, or else that would ruin the narrative of "all men are evil" that they constantly promote.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:46 PM
6

It’s the same thing with their claim that women could not vote prior to 1920 when the 19th amendment was passed when of course there were women voting as far back as colonial America And so many of the ones making this claim are somehow surprised to learn that the majority of men couldn't vote during the same time, and universal suffrage was actually universal, as it gave the vote to both sexes around the same time. This page discussing male suffrage in the late 19th and early 20th century has t…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:01 PM
2

Wow, that post is so bad it comes across as a troll, except I have seen real people who drift into tirades just like that, so it's probably genuine. All I can think in response is that kind of unhinged rant would really drive away anyone of sane mind from participating in that sub. No need to respond to any of the claims; they are all so crazy that they just blur together and disappear.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:56 PM
6

It will be interesting to see what comes of this, so please keep us updated (with general information only, because you should always make sure that privacy is maintained of course). The school will likely find an excuse to do nothing serious, even if both the student and the teacher admit to what happened, so keep your expectations reasonably low (and it sounds like you are doing this just fine based on your post). I think it's good that you have done this, simply for improving your own mental …
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:31 PM
4

This woman should have served jail time (at a minimum) for her actions. Unfortunately, the law in the UK and the US is very stacked against women when it comes to false accusations. I think you mean "biased in favour of..." in the second part instead of "very stacked against...". Or perhaps you meant to say the law is stacked against accused men? Every man, even those not rich and powerful, must make smart decisions to limit their exposure to false accusations. I can somewhat understand this per…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:17 PM
52

Here's her apology to him: I am so sad and I am very sorry for the enormous stress that I have caused because he opened up to me. I have opened up to him. I just want to express to Marland how very sorry I am. I am a law abiding citizen. I am just a mother and an escort. I have been in turmoil. First off, six sentences in a row all beginning with the word "I"??? In this situation? That's narcissism to an extent that likely goes far into a disorder of some kind. Secondly, she's not sorry for the …
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:08 PM
19

So this article from RNZ is yet more fearmongering about "online misogyny" and is overall a callous attempt to instill a hatred of men in the public's mind. Some overseas studies have shown prolonged exposure to online violence has led to women MPs leaving office sooner than planned. I'd love to do a deep dive into those particular activist "studies". I'd hazard a guess that it actually shows that MP's who received more criticism (what this author calls "online violence") just so happened to be …
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:40 PM
6

IANAL, and I want to be clear: this is not legal advice. The first thing I can think of doing would be to take all the evidence I had of this matter to law enforcement, with concerns that this boyfriend is likely to become violent toward you. Those authorities will give you good advice on what you should do, whether that is just law enforcement paying a visit to talk to these individuals (this lets them know the seriousness of them contacting you in this manner), or going to the point of getting…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 05:49 PM
41

Why just crackdown on misogyny when the are numerous online sites filled with misandry? I like to joke that they are obviously male supremacists, since they are acting like men inherently have much better mental health than they do, since we can deal with online criticism without needing intense therapy as a result.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 05:14 PM
6

Plus, it's a four-year-old account with less karma than most people gain in a day. So it's guaranteed to be done in bad faith. Just downvote and move on.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:53 PM
6

Online safety. Seriously, how I have grown to despise this term. Anyway, from this Telegraph article, it seems the UK, and more specifically the "digitial watchdog" Ofcom, is going full authoritarian censorship against anyone who does not fall in line with their anti-male ideology: "The technology regulator has proposed new measures[...]urging social media sites to go “above and beyond” the legal duties required under the Online Safety Act when tackling sexist speech." Of course "sexist speech" …
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:47 PM
33

The notion that toxic masculinity is a theory rather than an absolute truth is never acknowledged. There is an important point to be made within this statement. In order for something to be a scientific theory, it must be falsifiable. Otherwise, it's something that is taken on faith (an absolute truth). All of "wominism's" main tenets – from "masculinity is toxic" to the "Evil Patriarchy" – are unable to be falsified. I've actually challenged some in online debates to give me natural observation…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 01:04 AM
1

If you like him, that's fine. I mean, that's his focus after all: self-promotion. Personally, I don't think a spokesperson for male advocacy should be more concerned with their brand (like Reeves is). They should instead focus on the important goal of supporting men. At the same time, I don't think it's practical to be combative or accusatory in front of a general audience. So it's not an "all or nothing" false dichotomy. It's just that – like many others here – I understand that a concept like …
/r/MensRights24/02/25 03:02 PM
38

This is just standard Richard Reeves fare, unfortunately. As you note, it's a lot of trying to appear safe to "wominists", and apologizing for the "sin" of caring about men. The comments on the video are what interest me the most about this interview though. I've read through dozens of the top comments, and they fall into a small handful of broad categories: complimenting Reeves, approving of his acquiescent style, and promoting that people buy his book praising the interviewer and the show for …
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:12 AM
3

I did speak to a lawyer about a false accusation against me. The discussion was more workplace-related because that's where it all took place, so the business was more the one I was looking to sue. However, the lawyer did mention the "civil" option against my false accuser, but he noted that it was not really recommended for two reasons. The first was that even if it was successful, the amount you might get (after paying legal fees) would not really be worth the effort. You could make more money…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:18 PM
9

If this is not some bad faith "gotcha" question, then you will be happy to learn that /u/thetinmenblog just made a post about some great research in the UK his community made happen around male suicide just in the last few weeks. The discussion he had with the researcher who oversaw the project highlighted a number of follow-up questions that needed answering, but both of them noted the absence of a UK Minister for Men's Health and a complete lack of UK government funding to explore these issues…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 02:24 AM
2

They DIDN'T even go and question my abusers at all. You don't say why this is the case, so I'll assume that the alleged abusers are still alive and able to be contacted. In that event, your case must not have met even the bare minimum of evidentiary standards to proceed. That would go beyond a lack of "physical" evidence (you suggest it is the only cause, but that seems unlikely), and would have to unfortunately include the absence of any other corroborating evidence such as witness statements, …
/r/MensRights22/02/25 02:13 PM
3

Yeah, no one's principles are absolute and unassailable in practice, so it is indeed a tough question to answer. I think one consequence that many don't realize – or perhaps don't care about – is living for years with a lie that serious. Can you wake up every morning and reconcile yourself with the fact that your existence is based on a falsehood? As an atheist, I'm certainly not a religious person, but I do believe there is wisdom in the saying: "And the truth shall set you free.".
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:29 PM
7

It seems to me justice should be about finding the truth, not about encouraging a false confession for expediency. I heard a stat that if plea deals didn't exist, or if every accused person took their case to a full trial, the court system would grind to a halt due to overload. The system simply doesn't have the capacity to handle that many cases, and the expense required for it to adjudicate every crime fully in a reasonable time would be astronomical. So this sets up a situation where law enfo…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 05:13 PM
3

I'd like to think that I value truth enough to never take a plea deal. I have to be practical though and admit that it could depend on the situation. Considering how expensive it might be to fight a false charge, along with the always-present chance of losing that case (as you note, a jury can unfortunately return an emotionally-reached verdict in a case involving rape), there are circumstances where it could make more sense to accept a plea deal. Again, my ethical stance is to never lie under o…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 04:56 PM
3

The more significant problem with that initial 2005 study – and other follow-ups too – is that the men who were circumcised could not have sex for several weeks at minimum (some longer) after getting circumcised. Yet there was no attempt to normalize the time periods measured, so the circumcised men ended up having half as much sex as the intact control group. If the study had lasted long enough, the extra month or two lead time would have become less of a factor, but the study's proponents used…
/r/MensRights21/02/25 01:07 PM
10

That program back in the early 2000's was only for HIV relief, and the funding had nothing to do with circumcision until the Obama/Clinton years. Hillary Rodham Clinton determined to push 28 million circumcisions The studies that launched a thousand snips
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:48 PM
96

I don't know the specific history of this particular program, but I would guess it's likely a remnant of Hillary Clinton's attempt to push circumcision in Africa from all the way back in 2012, when she was Secretary of State under Obama. It was introduced as a supposed way to prevent HIV/AIDS in the region, IIRC. Yes, this is yet another powerful and famous wominist who doesn't believe that "my body, my choice" extends to men (or in this case male babies). Yet every anonymous online commenter in…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 08:34 PM
10

Most of the points you raise here are not at all helpful in this discussion. For example, the last bullet point on methods and firearms...there is a post on thetinmen sub from a few days ago that has an infographic specifically asking that people stop saying what you just wrote, because of how damaging the focus on firearms as a method is to the conversation around suicide. It contains incorrect information about the patterns and impact of different methods for suicide around the world, and also…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 12:04 AM
11

Can you tell me how the Democratic Party has been "actively and strongly anti-male"? A good example of this in the US is the Title IX changes by Obama removing due process for men. Trump reversed this in 2016, but Biden brought it back in 2020. Also, it was left-appointed and wominist Supreme Court Justices who denied the legal challenge to the US draft back in 2021 (Sonya Sotomayor even wrote a separate opinion denying equality to men, which, if you actually read it, tries to make the whole cas…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 12:50 PM
29

They proved during the Kavanaugh hearings they consider accusation, with a complete absence of supporting evidence, to equal guilt. I don't think Dems in the US realize quite how much this tactic has affected their image with male voters, especially among younger men. I remember reading something recently noting that every single male Cabinet nominee that Trump brought forward had a sex scandal accusation made against him by the Dems, left-wing media, etc. That's...insane. And that knee-jerk tac…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 03:20 AM
133

This article spends the majority of its time talking about how the US won't vote for a female Presidential candidate. And how important the 2024 US election was in protecting the rights of "historically marginalized" communities. Oh, and did you know that Trump was "crude", "insulting to wominists", and a convicted felon? <Sigh.> When it finally gets around to the topic of men it kicks off by dismissing the entire male demographic with the following: But as a longtime privileged group, men are t…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:46 AM
2

I feel attacked...don't shoot the messenger People in the comments are simply disagreeing with the idea that the left cares about men, or will do anything to help men. And many are providing strong evidence of that being the case in the preceding decades. That is not an attack on you personally (there are zero personal insults at you or anyone in the 50+ comments that I can see/read). There is not a single instance of someone calling you a name, or disparaging you in any serious way. The closest…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 03:57 PM
50

Here's an archive so you don't have to give a misandrist s(h)ite like Slate the clicks. The TLDR of this article is that it is just lazy anti-male propaganda. The best example I think is the following excerpt: There was Aziz Ansari, who made sensitive, thoughtful comedy about heterosexual dating—and reportedly tried to pressure a woman into sexual contact with unceasing persistence after she repeatedly resisted. I have read the original social media post by Ansari's accuser, and nowhere in it di…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 01:58 PM
4

sleeping with a walking red flag I treat each individual case as having a possible chance of being true, and I don't pass judgment until enough facts exist to arrive at a reasonable conclusion as to the particular truth or falsehood of each situation. However...however, I do have to admit that if you were to take 100 accusations from people who look and act like her, a large majority (>80 or 90) are going to turn out to be lies. From the moment that I started watching her video I could tell imme…
/r/MensRights17/02/25 08:20 PM
8

Oh, and I should add: another common red flag was that her video was billed as a: "we need to have a conversation about getting proper verbal consent" discussion. And so she avoided the topic of whether non-verbal consent was established (i.e. he removed his clothes, she removed her clothes...he got in bed, she got in bed...they both approached each other...he caressed her, she caressed him, etc). Legally, those actions establish non-verbal consent (unless coercion is present, or a few other spe…
/r/MensRights17/02/25 06:32 PM
23

Wow, this accusation fell apart that quickly? I actually saw a video about this pop up about 4-5 days ago (I'm somewhat familiar with BookTube, so it got recommended to me), and I was honestly planning on doing a post about it. The angle I was going to take was: "We should hold off on coming to a conclusion about either of their claims". Turns out that wasn't even needed I guess, and this is yet another confirmed false accusation. Anyway, from what I learned of this drama, her initial video had …
/r/MensRights17/02/25 06:14 PM
35

This post you shared is classic "One Good Man" Syndrome. If you haven't heard that term before, it's a way to describe how many young men unfortunately respond to all the pejoratives hurled at men nowadays in the media, entertainment, online spaces, education, government, etc, in an attempt to not internalize that messaging and to avoid become dangerously self-hating. They protect themselves against falling into despair and try to prevent suicidal ideation by imagining a world where they are the…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 11:26 PM
2

Yeah, I thought the words "successful long-term relationship" made it clear what I was talking about. One-night stand's aren't part of the consideration here. Besides, I think many men don't realize how they will actually react to being asked out, because they've never been approached before in that way. When it actually happens (and I know this from a lot of unwanted advances over the decades, up to and including stalking from a dangerous psycho that unfortunately had to involve law enforcement…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 12:19 PM
2

The person who asks the other one out is the one taking control of – and setting the direction of – the relationship. So are most men interested in a strongly masculine-presenting partner? The answer to that question is no. The honest reality of human interaction is that relationships start with a series of signals by both parties, communicating that interest exists, before things proceed further. However, a direct, overt proposition to a man right out of the gate is not going to result in a suc…
/r/MensRights15/02/25 11:20 PM
23

It'll be interesting to learn how likely this suit is to succeed. Hopefully a lawyer can weigh in at some point on the merits of the case. From what I have read, this is only in California at the moment – perhaps the laws there are more favourable to the case? However, if the legal arguments turn out to be compelling, this could be used nationally to force at least equal commissions being created at the state and even federal level, if not to make governments provide equal funding for both effor…
/r/MensRights14/02/25 12:54 AM
23

Civilian men have been able to vote in almost any society since democracy has existed. Are you sure about this? I'm not sure exactly what you're claiming here, since it's unfortunately worded quite poorly. Regardless, the truth is that the majority of men were not allowed to vote throughout most of human history, and the change that allowed this is only a little more than a century old in most countries. Before that point, it was only a small group of wealthy property owners who were given this …
/r/MensRights13/02/25 09:30 PM
36

Reset the clock. Another female teacher has been caught raping a child, and the corporate media has again refused to call the despicable act for what it is: rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 09:48 PM
11

There is no upside for a "protest" this stupid. People who aren't on your side aren't going to be swayed by something this contrived and delusional, and some who are pro-choice will feel annoyed by what they see as just more anti-male rhetoric from the left. I see this kind of out-of-touch and over-the-top stupidity and all I have to say is: "Good job shooting yourself in the foot regarding any future attempts to win back the quickly disappearing male vote.". So laugh all you want at men "not ge…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:06 PM
2

And that's exactly what happens whenever you try to advocate for men -- they bring up the name of an extremist, who happens to live in Europe, who has nothing to do with US politics. It seems our first priority is clear then: we have to take control of the narrative around men's advocacy, so that we don't get unfairly characterized by extremists who have nothing to do with us. Now that is admittedly hard to do when the corporate media – who oppose us by default – have such a wide reach. However,…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:29 PM
1

You're conflating "interest/attraction" (a very low bar) with a "committed relationship" (a much, much higher bar). How many times have you heard a phrase like: "Men are scared of commitment." or "Men aren't emotionally intelligent enough to handle a serious relationship."? These insults and shaming language are only directed at men to try and force men to commit. Because men aren't the ones who get giddy at the idea of a wedding or going out to shop for engagement rings. LOL. Bill Burr said it …
/r/MensRights11/02/25 02:49 PM
2

I found your concept of "manwashing" (IIRC I heard it from you) by the DNC, as an analogy to how businesses use "greenwashing", to be quite fascinating. However, after considering it for a while, I have to wonder if it will be possible to force the political change required through that same methodology in the way you described it. The comparison here would be a business that runs "enviro-friendly" ads, but in all of those materials they only ever talk about how they don't want to be associated …
/r/MensRights10/02/25 12:17 AM
8

Good catch on that mistake.🤣 TBH, I initially used that word (minus the last "e") in place of "dross", but then edited it out because reddit has gotten so sensitive lately with its automated systems.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:54 PM
63

Men are admittedly not the gatekeepers of sex. However, we are the gatekeepers of relationships. Right from the outset of dating men are the ones who choose who we commit to, and who we don't. So if there's a "relationship recession", it's men who are deciding that – in most cases – the juice just isn't worth the squeeze any more. Also, whenever it's the Guardian, make sure you archive their dross before sharing it. That site doesn't deserve the clicks.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:42 PM
12

This was an illuminating video, especially in how she tried to entrap this man even after her first HR complaint against him failed so spectacularly. As the video notes, the two would have been told to keep contact to a minimum by the company, and yet she approached him and asked to see him outside of work, supposedly to "make up for her mistake". Yeah, right. Sociopaths love to take advantage of the good and trusting nature of men in this way, but it's obvious to anyone who recognizes this type…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 01:37 PM
17

The fact is that these politicians have to say "I don't know" or they will get cancelled by their own party. And therein lies the rub. It's actually a huge problem for the left globally. Anyone who holds any sort of compassion for men – or even if they extend a simple olive branch to us – risks getting labelled a "misogynist" and shunned, excommunicated, and attacked by the left. Look at what happened to longtime supporters of left-wing policies like Warren Farrell, and the extremist rhetoric an…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 12:47 PM
3

As someone from the film industry, I can tell you this kind of advertising is not cheap either; and it makes me wonder, how many boxing, bushcraft, reading, talking, adventure, or sports clubs, for boys, could they have funded instead? This really is a classic story of missed opportunities. So many positives could have been done with all the funding that has only gone to line the pockets of selfish ideologues and extremists. It's so frustrating. And when I think of what boys and young men have t…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:37 PM
2

Those are all excellent ideas. And those kinds of "soft skill" campaigns are used in health care when it comes to everything except men's health. It's difficult to see it as anything less than systemic hatred of men at this point.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 01:40 PM
1

There are fairly straightforward methods to get people to come in for health checkups regularly. And once a person has been made to feel welcome and like they are cared about and important, it is then possible to discuss hard truths about personal health decisions – such as obesity – with that person in a serious but non-accusatory manner. And health marketing professionals know damn well how to do this, and they actually use these "soft skills" campaigns all the time, at least in every other si…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 12:19 AM
9

Everywhere else it is known that health outcomes are determined by a myriad of factors, many of which exist beyond the individual-level. Yet, with men, the idea of a highly complex web of causation is never brought up. The blame is only ever personal. That's obvious and blatant discrimination against men, no doubt about it.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:19 PM
4

That's not the right idea at all. The equivalency is in the fact that victim-blaming doesn't work to help people in both cases. Placing sole responsibility for an illness on the individual attitudes, behaviours, and lifestyle choices of someone is known to be counterproductive. It does not make them feel like they are a priority, even if it is some theoretical case where a supposedly "compassionate" person like yourself would absolutely want to lay into them for what you perceive as stupidity. T…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 11:14 PM
8

While I tend to enjoy dark humour, men have been the brunt of too many jokes at this point, and I'm honestly done with being laughed at for the horrible sin of having been born with "dangly bits".
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:23 PM
20

It probably isn't a surprise to learn that this particular campaign looks like it was released at the height of the Obama presidency, concurrent with the Title IX changes he made and the campus witch hunts against men that followed those new legal mandates. Yet some people still pretend that the left helps men.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:07 PM
60

It's like releasing a campaign saying: "This year thousands will die from eating disorders because they are too lazy to make themselves meals and eat.", and then wondering why it failed because the group you are targeting is instead deeply angry at you. However, with men, this is the accepted norm, as you rightfully point out. And it's not only despicable, it's insane how it is still so common.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 06:38 PM
1

I don't judge the condition based only on the most extreme of situations, since being homeless is not indicative of how most people are alone. I would say that if someone owns a house, or rents an apartment, and they live alone, then I don't necessarily see them as feeling lonely when doing so.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 08:20 PM
7

Expect to see the rate of baby trapping based on one night stands and enforced child care payments increase as men disengage from romance... This is happening in other ways as well. For example, the "Nordic model" of prostitution (that is in place in Sweden, Canada, and other countries), which does not charge the sellers of sex, but only the buyers/clients of it (and of course, only if you are male...and yes, there are actual cases of women who have been caught buying sex from men under this law…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 05:48 PM
2

It makes for a very lonely life, though. Is it truly a lonely life? Or is it instead a peaceful and quiet life, filled with solitude? Both descriptions portray the exact same situation, but while one sounds extremely negative, the other sounds overwhelmingly positive. So I have to ask: is it just the frame of mind with which you approach your life that decides how content you are with it in the end?
/r/MensRights03/02/25 05:30 PM
2

Some fascinating history there regarding ancient Egypt. And yeah, Satan occupies an interesting and different archetype for an adversary in a religion, especially given his origin as a fallen angel who once served God. I've found it fascinating how many in the Christian denomination will often pray for discernment (which is a word you hardly hear nowadays), and ask for help in the form of "guidance and clear vision" to separate good from evil when choosing a path in life. These practitioners wil…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:28 PM
8

Forgive my cynicism, but their troubles are of their own making, and they deserve to reap what they've sown. Yeah, I can't argue with you on that one. "Oh, no. The consequences of my own actions."
/r/MensRights01/02/25 07:33 PM
6

Nowadays, they're Ahriman... That's a very interesting term. I hadn't heard of it before, but after reading up on it a bit, the concept really does capture the idea of men holding "original sin" (in the minds of the extreme gender ideologues at least), which is how I usually frame this anti-male attitude. However, representing us as Ahriman does a much better job at it IMO. A "force creating death, disease, and ugliness, in opposition to life, health, and beauty" is exactly what ideological phra…
/r/MensRights01/02/25 07:31 PM
19

Good catch on that detail. Yeah, it's frustrating how the interests of the "average" man in general are completely invisible when it comes to politics. To give this article credit though, at least it's one of the few pieces talking about men that's actually written by a man. That's progress at least. It's rare to see masculinity or men discussed nowadays without it being done by those who have no clue about what being a man is even like.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 05:35 PM
7

I tend to agree with you here, and I did feel many aspects of the piece were indeed positive. However, in the end there were just too many contradictions, and those negatives were far too significant to do anything except damage male advocacy overall in my mind. The words "anger" and "resentment" appear 6 times each, along with 3 instances of "dangerous", just to point out a few of the pejoratives the author chose to associate with young men. That type of framing is not helpful at all.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 04:43 PM
9

There's a free archive of the article available, if you want to bypass the paywall and view it more easily. /u/Former-Dragonfly2226 you can quickly search for an archive by going to archive.is and inputting the URL (just paste it into the "search for saved snapshots" text box). I did this and within seconds found one already made for this opinion piece. Sharing the archived URL when posting has many benefits, including making sure that everyone can read it (if it's paywalled), not giving the sit…
/r/MensRights30/01/25 05:22 PM
17

...they said they need to fill women in other sides since critical parts of the company (sales, tech) are mostly men. As I said: "...what they're doing is nothing but supremacy under a nicer-sounding name." Many people unfamiliar with US history don't realize that things like Jim Crow laws in the South were implemented with the official motivation being to: "support the black community". Discrimination always gets enacted in a way to make its proponents seem like good, moral people.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 06:29 PM
57

So what is the gender makeup of your HR dept? I'm betting somewhere around 5% male, if it's anywhere near the average in most companies. Personally, I would just ask them why the "Diversity is our strength" mantra only seems to apply in male-dominated fields, and never gets mandated elsewhere. Unless HR deigns to practice what they preach for a few years and proves the benefits of these unfair and discriminatory quotas in their own work, then what they're doing is nothing but supremacy under a n…
/r/MensRights28/01/25 05:16 PM
5

The full details of the case are even more frightening. The surveillance videos did indeed tip off police about her lies, but even after being shown that particular evidence disproving her story, she still didn't confess to lying. She just said that: "the truck's flight was one aspect that she was not entirely sure about.". Nor did the police release this innocent man from jail on just the surveillance footage alone. It was only during an interview with police the next day – when proof of her li…
/r/MensRights26/01/25 05:17 PM
11

The cops likely only charged her because they know that there are solid grounds to sue the department for the injustice of what they did to this innocent man. So she'll just get a slap on the wrist, and they'll hide behind the charges brought against her to try and excuse their own laziness and incompetence when investigating this case. A fair and functioning legal system should never be able to punish an innocent man for a crime he didn't commit, and then try to claim that nothing went wrong in…
/r/MensRights26/01/25 04:50 PM
1

It's not a genuine attempt to understand someone else's position if you're openly arguing against their viewpoint right in the wording and anti-male framing of the questions themselves.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 04:40 PM
1

Cooption by that ideology is indeed a valid concern for all such male-focused organizations. We saw what happened to Movember in Australia.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 10:10 PM
3

Ha! Apologies for the karma hijack...my bad. Great interview btw!
/r/MensRights24/01/25 05:27 PM
6

In this 56min video, TheTinMen talks to Mark Brooks about his history with advocacy for men and boys, and the successes of the many policies and programs in which he has been involved. The discussion focuses a lot on Mark's role as the Chair for the ManKind Initiative, and its work in providing services, resources, and support for male victims of abuse. It's a long conversation, but well worth the listen!
/r/MensRights24/01/25 03:40 PM
4

It's unfortunate if that's your perception of me.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:39 PM
6

The Dems did something positive? LOL! I think not. The Dems/left have been in power in the US for many years since the original Selective Service challenge (Rostker v. Goldberg) failed in 1981, but they have done nothing in all those years. Obama and Biden were silent, despite having control of the entire gov't for many years during their rule. So why should any US voter trust them now to suddenly want to help men? Looking around the world, we see the same pattern. The female leaders of Finland,…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:32 PM
5

Yeah, right. The Dem platform had 82 instances of the word women in it, compared to 4 for men. Breaking it down further, the word "men" was used three times in the phrase "men and women", and the one time it was used on its own was derogatory towards males. And we're supposed to just forget that? Tell, me what policies should we cherry pick to "remember next time elections come around"??? But tell you what, let's consider the draft by itself, if you want. If we take the issue and the Dem's invol…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:05 PM
2

"Amateur liars" is probably the more apt description. With the rise of social media the vast majority (99%) have shown themselves to be completely insufferable or at least highly unlikeable.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:25 PM
16

Wow, it's 2025 and gender ideologues have finally gotten around to removing anti-male language from legal documents that they wrote, and that they have controlled for at least the last four decades. Even worse, I suspect it'll be more than four decades from now before they start looking at all the anti-male activities and funding and more that they still support when it comes to domestic violence.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:17 PM
3

Sorry, but the world would not continue fine if men disappeared from it, no matter what some ideologues may delude themselves into believing.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:32 PM
5

All anti-men discrimination is based on traditional gender roles. If that kind of blanket statement were true, then the gender ideologues who are "fighting against traditional gender roles" would be supporting men. Instead, they are the ones who are making men's lives worse at every level of society (from creating gendered laws to gendered business policies to gendered academic codes of conduct and more).
/r/MensRights21/01/25 10:50 PM
5

Do you mean an op-ed to be submitted to the NYT (there's a snowball's chance in hell they would publish it) or one to be posted here?
/r/MensRights21/01/25 03:02 PM
8

So you were upset and furious at the US election results and accidentally...joined a militant extremist movement because of that? And you're part of other communities that happily use the "inkwell" slur (like the one that led to the post you're replying to) against men who can't get any sex – or at least they imagine that's the case it seems – and who upvote those comments and repeat the same baseless attack, to the point that even the moderators on the sub in question use it without any pushbac…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:13 AM
15

You know what I do to not hate men? I hang out with men... Strange that your account has a post claiming that you joined the man-hating US 4b movement on reddit back on Nov 6, and that you swore off all contact with men on that date. Yet now here you are claiming otherwise. Why should we trust you?
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:47 AM
4

Some lawyer might take it on pro-bono, but they'd be fighting an entire system that in institutionally sexist against men. Not very likely. That's what is always so frustrating about these cases. Law enforcement and lawyers and judges do this because they know they can and will get away with it. No one's going to care enough about a low-status male to bring about the change we need, by trying to make the system accountable for how it mistreats men.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 11:19 PM
11

That huge bail discrepancy had me shaking my head too. IANAL, but it could be due to the fact Pierson already had a criminal record (for drug possession), though that inflated amount still makes no sense even given even that existing minor conviction. I've actually been poking around to find out the relevant details of his arrest, but the only thing I've found so far is the vague summary from the probable cause affidavit against Anjela Urumova (she's the person charged with making the false accu…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:10 PM
38

Yeah, there's no update or correction to that news article you link at all. His name is still out there on the internet directly associated with the crime of rape, without any further information provided as to the truth of the fraudulent case against him. What is worse though is the automatic assumption of guilt in the description of the encounter as is written in that article. Consider the following snippets from it: Responding officers spoke to the victim. [...] The victim said she parked her…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:09 PM
260

There's a better article on this story at another site, with a lot more detailed information on what happened in this case. ...Urumova admitted she falsely accused Pierson because she’d seen him before and believed him to be “creepy.” That was all it took to almost destroy a man's life. He never spoke a single word to her. No actual interactions between them, and yet he was accused, charged, and imprisoned for a month all on the word of a liar. After investigators tracked Pierson down and put hi…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 02:17 PM
8

In the wake of their historic electoral loss, the political left in the US haven't even gotten around to asking men yet. All they've done so far is to ask Type 2's to tell them what they believe men might be thinking.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 02:34 AM
2

It'll happen even before he's old enough to work actually, only it will be his parents who will be on the hook to pay for the money he can't yet earn. Which, of course, has a huge negative impact on this boy's ability to get an education, or even to remain clothed and fed, as he is still dependent on those same parents for his own basic survival needs. If "in the best interests of the child" truly existed, then his ruined childhood would be taken into consideration in any such ruling regarding c…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 02:53 PM
39

I do feel I have been scapegoated for entirely legitimate operational decisions... Legitimate? Legitimate??? So the UK Justice System no longer considers innocence of a crime to be an absolute, unassailable defence against conviction and punishment for that alleged misdeed. Good to know I guess. Because that's what I'm hearing here, and in similar responses to wrongful convictions in many other countries as well. The unfair and biased system is "working fine" – in their activist-addled minds at …
/r/MensRights15/01/25 12:23 PM
3

they must understand ahead of time that we are not inclined to simply take them at their word. I get the sense that a lot of them come in to the sub expecting to get called names and attacked in some way that can be used to embarrass the entire group (like if someone were to angrily call them a "tool used for gardening"...you can guess what I'm talking about). We all know their default mindset is to automatically throw out the "inkwell" slur at us, so it's probably just projection on their part.…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 02:31 PM
9

I've had that happen a couple of times myself, and my first thought is always: "Wow, my ideas and arguments must be better than I thought they were, if all some people have to respond with are fallacies like false attribution and false association.". If you can think of it like that, it will bother you less each time it happens. And you'll also learn to avoid the places on reddit where genuine conversations are not possible, which is most subs to be honest.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 01:20 PM
34

This "oversight" is not really an oversight, because it is both predictable and deliberate. I mean, have you ever noticed how few men there are in marketing and advertising nowadays? It stands to reason that boys would be left out of any campaign emerging from such a biased group of militants.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 01:05 PM
98

Hyperagency: Men have absolute and total control over their lives, meaning everything that happens to a man is the result of a personal decision, or individual failing, and never the consequence of anything external to his person. Hypoagency: Everyone else has zero responsibility at all times, because it's somehow always a man's fault.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 09:15 PM
3

The bill was to ban infant male circumcision. Infant boys do not have a religion, so their religious freedom is not being infringed upon. If they wanted to get circumcised at the age of consent for such actions, then they had every right to do so.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 01:44 PM
21

I was watching some coverage and news clips, reactions, etc, of the disaster last night, and I noticed the huge gender disparity already. Only men were out rescuing, fighting fires, operating machinery, etc. It was the same for coroners, investigators, clean-up crew, etc, combing through the wreckage...all men. And then on the flip side we had the cushy PR media scrums, where hardly a man was there to be seen. All of the city services didn't have a single man representing them inside those air-c…
/r/MensRights10/01/25 12:45 PM
3

Who shames men for not crying? Certainly not the education system, which definitely tells men to cry. And every piece of modern entertainment tells men to cry, and even shows them crying at every opportunity, even when it makes little sense in a story. Politicians also tell men to cry (I'd link many examples, but all you have to do is search on "Tim Walz cheerleader" for articles in the US from just a few months ago). The APA guidelines tell men that they are broken if they don't cry. All academ…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 02:33 AM
148

Ah yes, Sanna Marin of Finland, who scrapped a bill to ban male circumcision back in 2020. Yet another proud and self-proclaimed feminist politician who never did a single thing to help men specifically, despite having all the power to do so. In fact, she just made men's lives worse. Oh, and of course we shouldn't forget to mention the male-only draft and mandatory military service, which only applies to Finnish men of course. She didn't do anything about that when she could have...you know..."f…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 01:39 AM
2

If you go to a sexual assault survivor's sub and say: "Please share more of these stories, because it makes me happy, and I can see you as human by hearing them." then yes, you are fetishizing them. And you are being insulting. Perhaps the core disconnect here is that you seriously believe "men can't cry" is an actual serious political and societal issue for men, when that is not the case.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 10:01 PM
9

Genuine support is not transactional. A statement like: "I support men being themselves, whether they cry or don't cry" is supportive. That thread does the opposite of that, and OP is right. This is just them fetishizing male struggles, either consciously or unconsciously.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 02:38 PM
15

Former academic. I kept in touch and even wrote some recreational papers after I left, but there came a point over a decade ago where I recognized the entire institution was a lost cause. It wasn't just the ideological indoctrination stuff, but that was a large part of why I finally left for good.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:50 PM
29

The spectrum of "acceptable" research in academia is so paper thin that it's almost invisible by this point. There are just so many important topics that they dare not touch. From proxy violence to child abandonment and infanticide to parental alienation and so many more. However, the only allowed narratives are the ones that reinforce the "men bad" decree, and nothing else dare be considered.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:11 PM
39

"Fantasist" is just a nicer sounding way of saying "liar". Just like "contradictions" is used by the media as a gentler euphemism whenever the "lies" of these false accusers are exposed. This is the pattern we see repeated again and again when these urinalists report on these cases. The media is absolutely shameless in the way they protect and promote the dangerous "all women are inherently wonderful" attitude. Let's be clear. This individual is a convicted criminal, who no longer has any credib…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 02:29 AM
60

The "false dilemma" fallacies attempted by this article are legion: Will young men become more dejected and disengaged from society, or might they find their voice in a rapidly evolving culture? Will they see women as the source of their problems or as potential allies in addressing the unique challenges that men face? To paraphrase this slop of binary thinking: "Either men work with angry, aggressive feminists or they will end up disengaged from society and depressed." Wow, what a great sales p…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 07:00 PM
8

There's a lot more bad data and methodology supporting the urban myth around "Men succeed more but attempt less" than just those two simple observations. The main culprit in the research literature is that most papers choose to use hospital data around "self-harm", which includes things like eating disorders, scarring, etc, by an individual. Those are clearly not attempts at self-deletion. Another problem is found in groups of people who have multiple attempts, which almost never occurs in men. …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:24 PM
14

You said: I don't want to help men. So why are you so upset to learn that men don't need your help? We're just enjoying the peace and quiet away from you. Perhaps you need to learn to do the same, and not get so angry and bitter.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 11:56 PM
11

Just having a good laugh at your attempt to gaslight men, dear.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 11:14 PM
14

If that's your – and others – basic level of concern for men, then all I have to say is that most men are much better off without the company of the opposite sex. What you experience as loneliness, many men describe instead as peace and solitude.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 11:01 PM
18

Men preferring Trump had nothing to do with fiction and more to do with the anti-male stance of Biden-Harris as well as other policy issues. Oh, it's one of those articles. The media narratives I've seen on how to solve the "male voting problem" are always hilarious. It usually takes one of two forms: either it's a plea to get men back to engaging with their rhetoric, or a scheme to spread their propaganda into places where men have fled. Both are doomed to fail. They never even consider the ide…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:12 PM
26

Wow, thanks for all your hard work! This is the kind of meaningful advocacy that can help improve men's lives, and it's great to see it happening from the "grassroots" level like this. It's genuine, and it's appreciated.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 11:43 PM
55

The problem is that the gender ideologues don't define it the same way you do. It's like how "misogynist" used to mean a man that hates women, but now it means any man that a woman hates. They apply it to everything now.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 12:14 AM
216

I remember quoting this statistic to someone who trotted out the "men don't open up enough" myth recently, and they acted genuinely confused at the information. "I don't understand...why are so many men dying then?" It's like their indoctrinated brain couldn't even begin to comprehend the idea that our gynocentric mental health system simply doesn't work for men.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 11:49 PM
14

It is harmful to spread this 'circumcision prevents HIV' myth. There is so much actual medical misinformation flying around about men's health, from the myths you document here about male infants to claims that suicidal men don't seek help. Governments, institutions, and companies all claim to want to "stop the spread of harmful misinformation", but somehow when it comes to men's health and well-being the only ideas that ever get promoted are the most ignorant and damaging ones. It's far too com…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:24 PM
37

Ah yes. Male original sin. No matter what horrible thing happens to a man, he deserved it simply for being born with dangly bits. At least in the ideologically-obsessed minds of these extremists.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 02:19 PM
20

People who use that slur look just as stupid as people who hurl pejoratives at women for having too much sex. It's simply the flip side of the same ignorant type of attitude about human sexuality. That action says nothing about the target – almost always a man – or his actual argument or opinions, but it tells you everything you need to know about the person(s) who speak and/or support that particular insult. The best response I've found is to just express a calm disappointment with the lack of …
/r/MensRights01/01/25 01:31 AM
4

Don't look for logic from these female researchers; it's all emotional arguments and nothing more.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 01:23 PM
8

/advancing-gender-equity-by-supporting-boys-and-men/ There's a red flag right in the URL. By: Richard Reeves (he/him) And two more red flags at the name of the author. Wow, the text hasn't even started and I've already got a really bad feeling about this one. In May 2024, Melinda French Gates emailed 12 people—including me—offering each $20 million to spend on gender equality initiatives. Oh crap, so that's why we're seeing so much of Reeves lately. He's being funded by (Bill) Gates money. Thing…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:34 AM
5

Your story sounds very similar to that of Brian Banks, who you may already know. He was facing 41 years to life over an accusation of sexual assault when he was only 18 years old, and it was recommended he "plead down" to a lesser crime since his ethnicity meant he wouldn't get a fair trial. However, despite his plea, he was given a harsh sentence of six years in jail (he served five). His false accuser later admitted to her lies (she surprisingly got in contact with him, and he secretly recorde…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:38 PM
23

Yeah, this is a tactic I saw repeated about a year ago in a few threads in this sub. Anyone that criticized male disposability would get a number of first-time posters suddenly dogpiling them with strange claims that observations about the way male death or injury is treated as unimportant by society is somehow "promoting" the practice. It's just insincere attempts to stir up drama, and a rather transparent effort to stop anyone from pointing out the way men are mistreated.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 03:35 PM
3

At least once a month? It's more like several times a week from my experience recently. And you have to remember: these are only the ones that get caught, and that are then important and sensational enough to get reported on in a major newspaper.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 02:17 PM
4

You don't say if you are a lawyer working within Canada or not, but what you are claiming is incorrect. From the site "Canadian Lawyer" we get the following legal analysis of the Ghomeshi law (emphasis mine): So, now, if the defence has a record that shows the complainant is lying or misrepresenting the evidence, that record must be disclosed in advance. A lawyer is then appointed for the complainant who is granted standing to argue for suppression of the defence evidence. In other words, the le…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 02:07 PM
5

You are not alone. I have dealt with the stress and anguish of a false accusation for more than a decade now. Mine was workplace-related, and it was only after much therapy that I was even able to go back to work without having difficulties with panic attacks (the worst of the panic happened when I was at home, which may sound strange to hear, but that's when the workplace felt like an unknown threat, and was at its most scary to me). I'll be honest with you: you'll never forget about what happe…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 01:35 PM
2

Also, as an addendum, a lot of the original judge's ruling was based around finding Mr. Kruk's testimony "not credible". Now Mr. Kruk did very likely exaggerate some of his claims of being "helpful" during initial police interviews, so there are valid reasons for the judge to find him unreliable. Though IMO that kind of superficial dishonesty in his original answers to the police is understandable, given the terrifying situation of the accusations against him. I definitely don't see these hasty …
/r/MensRights29/12/24 12:52 PM
8

And the US too. Just look at what happened to Daniel Penny. Lesson learned for men.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 12:00 PM
8

IANAL, but the so-called Ghomeshi law would have come into play in this case, since it is a case of a man being accused of sexual assault. Procedurally, what the Ghomeshi law means is that the defense has to turn their entire case over to the prosecution before trial. Functionally, the defendant is therefore unable to properly confront his accuser, because all the evidence – including anything that might prove the accuser is lying – is laid bare beforehand for the prosecution to use in construct…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 03:22 AM
1

I know this person well, so I have no doubts about her character. Unfortunately, it's easy for people to talk like they care. Words are wind, and the wind escaping out the mouth means no more than the wind escaping out the bottom. I understand that you want to believe in this person. But unless you challenge members of that group, you will be disappointed to later find that actions do not match the rhetoric when their expected benefits are threatened. And I have to note that you didn't answer my…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:56 PM
3

This question was asked by a female relative after she saw news articles that stated 'young men are feeling lost' (after young men voted farther right in the recent US election - but that is beside the point of this post). Did this relative of yours happen to vote differently than those young men? If so, then the question needs to be asked if her newfound concern is actually just being done out of self-interest, rather than empathy or compassion. Especially considering the fact that, in your own…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 05:11 PM
7

I'd throw a link to an archive of this article, but some crazy Reddit AI bot seems ready to target accounts that do that, so I'm playing it safe for the time being. An archive already exists though if you throw the link into the web site. I read through it, and there's nothing much to comment on here. Though the media seems to have finally realized that not having any men to write about men is not working out well for them. This writer says she doesn't know anything about the subject of men – th…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 01:52 AM
11

LOL, it has 172 total views. That's not even worth watching to comment on. All I'll say is this: for a humourous take with the "opposing" message about wahmon (just have a good laugh at the lyrics around the 2:30 mark), in an awesome, kick-ass metal song (that has 1.8+ million views!), then click here.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 12:21 AM
3

Is the self-reporting done via survey methodologies? If so, then there is a huge blind spot that most of the general public – and even some researchers – overlook regarding the non-response rate. If a survey asks people to report problems around "mental load", as in your example, and 99% of people choose not to even bother responding, then the strongest claim possible from the survey is that 1% of the population consider it to be a problem. This is because 99% of your sample population already s…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 10:41 PM
12

The energy expenditure to compete in chess at the highest levels is enormous, yes, but there are two other important factors separating the sexes when it comes to this sport. First off, memorization skills are essential in chess, with hundreds or even thousands of positions and possible moves/countermoves being known before the match even begins. And most or all of the world records in memorization are held by men, from what I remember of a list I saw many years ago. The second factor is one tha…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 10:21 PM
28

I think the contents of the article are where the hateful attitudes towards men are on full display. To be honest, I don't see anything wrong with the "whisperer" term one way or the other. I mean, consider this quote from the subject of the article: “We just need to be able to convince a younger generation of white guys that people who live in our society that aren’t white guys face problems that they don’t even know exist.” So how will this rhetoric be different from the man-hating messages th…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:20 PM
13

Yeah, I just posted a comment in this thread with an archive link for the article too, and it appears to be getting shadow hidden/deleted as well. Strange. I'm wondering if this is a recent sub or reddit change that is automatically throwing these kinds of external link comments or posts into an approval queue or something. Can /u/goodmod or /u/iainmf or another mod give us some information on this apparent policy? Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/12/24 03:40 PM
1

The argument that liars existing makes it "more difficult for honest people to come forward" is not convincing when you really consider it. People somewhere are going to lie. About literally anything. And they are going to get found out. If an accuser is telling the truth then they wouldn't care about being convicted of lying, because that should be impossible. Innocence of a crime should be an absolute defense against someone being proved beyond a reasonable doubt to have committed that crime, …
/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:11 PM
1

"Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!" - William Roper (A Man for All Seasons - 1966)
/r/MensRights21/12/24 04:20 PM
2

Are Tiktok's content rules and enforcement better or worse than the average Reddit sub's moderation?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:02 PM
3

I don't even bother looking at these kinds of screenshots, to be honest. I know what goes on in all but a few reddit pro-free speech subs (MensRights and a few others), so I've come to see most activity on this site as "performative acts" rather than genuine comments. Basically, these are people dressed in a Halloween costume. They are not themselves (provided they are not just bots in the first place). The mods of many reddit subs – through years of bans and ever-tightening rules to make people…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:50 PM
17

It's interesting that the defense in this case are using only two arguments: that the statute of limitations expired for any charges to be brought, and that her texts are protected by the first amendment. So what's missing? Well, they aren't even bothering to try and argue that her texts were not a significant factor in this man's tragic death. That's very revealing. Though I understand their strategy, considering that she told him directly to hang himself because his only worth in life was as a…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 05:41 PM
11

Mangum not only filed a false police report but repeatedly committed perjury in a court of law, yet was never held responsible for doing so. What I find most telling about her admission of perjury is that she has now lost any and all credibility for any significant claims she might make. And yet she still asks the public to believe that she feels sorry about her malicious actions, and to believe that she "loves" the young men whose lives she ruined. Furthermore, I'm sure she's going to ask the p…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:41 PM
3

I understand your desire to help the MRM grow, but I have to play the devil's advocate regarding your suggested methods. First off, you appear to assert that the only way for men to win is for our opponents to be "taken down a notch". However, there is no clear presentation of other options or approaches for the MRM to take apart from this kind of attack, or explanations as to why something different will fail. Your argument largely comes down to a false dilemma fallacy, where you strawman one s…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 03:43 PM
20

It could have definitely been worse, I agree. However, the venomous undertone to the cherry-picked history of male advocacy (seriously, no mention of our longstanding opposition to circumcision?...and her blithe dismissal of the US draft is laughably bad) makes the extremist final smears totally predictable.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:21 PM
2

This is exactly the same playbook for how the media misrepresented the "Red Pill" documentary from Cassie Jaye. They pretend we're the equivalent of douchebags like Andrew Tate, then have their other smear merchant allies in the corporate media continue the mud-slinging. And they wonder why no one trusts them anymore. Oh, and here's an archived version of the article if anyone wants to read or respond to it, but doesn't want to give them hate clicks.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 11:11 PM
7

Here's the thing you're missing though: everyone gets used by those around them to some degree. The question then is: what do you get in return for what you give of yourself? And men right now are looking at the modern right and seeing rewards like a sense of purpose, respect from others, self-respect, a meaningful and supportive social structure, money and careers, and more. However, they don't see anything to be gained by getting demonized by the left simply for being men. There is no reward p…
/r/MensRights14/12/24 04:00 AM
5

Everyone needs some time off from Reddit, or from social media in general. You should never feel you need to stay active anywhere online. It's always a good idea to take a break from time to time, recharge, and only come back if and when you feel it isn't negatively affecting your mental health to participate in these communities.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:09 PM
8

Yep, as soon as they are found out to have lied, suddenly it's: "She's just suffering from mental illness and so she needs our help and support!". It's maddening how quickly the excuses start to fly. Though I've found it feels less frustrating after understanding the actual psychology at work in these situations. A large reason for this behaviour is the huge in-group bias among females of course, but another important aspect is simply how lazy people are. If the first impression of someone is th…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:03 PM
70

Here's my long list of relatively famous false accusation cases that I use whenever someone online ignorantly claims that it's "rare". Please be aware that this list is not exhaustive; these are just cases that I've come across that can be found and verified with a simple internet search. Note: in the following list (f) means false accuser...in the particular cases marked with (f) the male victim's name(s) are not public, though the consequences to them are known and significant, including jail …
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:39 AM
1

We're constantly being bombarded with "the left doesn't care about men!" Posts on here which is just an outright lie. I'm a left-of-center frequent poster to this sub, and I have to say I see a much different pattern. There have been a strange influx of "the left care about men too!" posts recently, which always end up asserting that there is no possibility of working with people on the political right in any way, shape, or form, on any issue at all, but specifically those involving men's health…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:35 PM
18

Democrats have to frame the uplifting of women as contingent upon the disenfranchisement of men... So it was caused by identity politics. Glad to hear that you now agree with me. How do you square that with the Bernie Sanders campaigns? From what little I know of US politics, Bernie got kneecapped by both the establishment Dems and the progressives. And they even used the exact same identity-politics laden playbook. The "Bernie Bros" pejorative coded his supporters as masculine and therefore mad…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:30 PM
25

I agree that the Democratic liberal elite are financially incentivized to ignore issues affecting men. How can the Dems be financially incentivized to lose an election? The strategy to win is clear: offer platforms to appeal to different interests. They did this with every group except for men, and lost the Presidency, Senate, and House because of this decision. Where's this financial gain you are suggesting in that obvious result? I am talking about the ecosystem of progressive organizations...…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 06:38 PM
58

Identity politics is 100% the reason the left are losing men. Just look at the recent US election. The Harris campaign spent the last three weeks desperately trying to get men to vote for them, but unlike any other demographic they targeted, there were strangely zero male-only platform initiatives accompanying this campaigning. What other group gets targeted with the message: "We aren't going to do anything specifically for your group, but you should still vote for us anyway."? Look, I admit I h…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 06:06 PM
60

Have you gotten the amount of blowback you’ve expected? No, I’ve gotten less. People want to talk about this—they just need permission. Everybody wants to have this conversation about their sons, their brothers, their husbands, their fathers, the boys in their schools, the young men they’re trying to date. This is getting more mainstream, more normal, safer to talk about. Unfortunately, Reeves was wrong with this answer. And I found just how incorrect he was when doing an analysis of the news ar…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:44 PM
14

changing access and distribution of porn online You have a solution already in mind (i.e. placing restrictions on access to adult material), and you are trying to find a problem to justify its implementation. This is not how professional scientific research is done.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:35 PM
1

Wow, the quality of trolling has really declined in the modern age.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 03:41 PM
95

These hyperemotional and hypocritical descriptions from the media are always hilarious to point out, as macabre and man-hating as they tend to be. More males becoming mathematicians is a "crisis", yet more men dying from suicide is only "a growing concern". And that's the best you'll ever get from these narcissists. At worst, some even celebrate the fact that males are 4-5x more likely to die from suicide. So why not focus your efforts on trying to fix something like the decades-long suicide epi…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 12:47 AM
34

Look back to 2010 in Sweden: The Swedish government said Tuesday it would abolish affirmative action at universities since the practice has resulted in male students being given admissions priority for several popular programmes. Got to love how this particular activist puff piece ends: Women represent about 60 percent of university students in Sweden, a pioneer in gender equality. And feminists in the country were the ones who lobbied to get this law changed in Sweden, once it flipped over to h…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 10:53 PM
1

I think one of the most common reactions among young men these days is to fall into what I've heard called the "One Good Man" syndrome. When boys hear so much negativity about men in general, often the only way a developing mind can keep a positive self-image is for a young man to imagine himself as the only virtuous guy that exists in the world. Later, when he becomes an adult, this unfortunately leaves scars that never fully heal. This mindset does not lead to a healthy relationship with other…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:18 AM
4

When researchers use terms like "cis gendered" to describe men, they have already assumed it is reasonable to erase the sexual identity of men, and replace it with a feminist proxy, full of negative attributes, demeaning stereotypes and misandrist caricatures Yeah, I had a passing annoyance with that insult, but I got lost in the data and didn't even think to point it out. However, you are right to do so, because it is indeed a demeaning insult to men. The survey had a surprisingly small sample …
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:55 PM
6

Don't sweat it. Guilt by association is a fallacy only our opponents think is fair. A lot of us here are actually in the same boat regarding our nationality. Personally, I'm from a country with an even worse history of man-hating activist research (including a study on suicide that was likely the "ground zero" source for a lot of this medical disinformation about male mental health, which I actually did a deep dive review for on this very sub), and I don't bother feeling one iota of shame for wh…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:26 PM
7

Yeah, there's so many sampling problems with this "research" that it's honestly shocking any of this made it past peer review. It has an immediately glaring problem with survivorship bias, in that its methodology obviously only selects for people who are alive, meaning that none of the reported attempts or thoughts about suicide from its respondents were serious enough to result in death. That's a huge problem that all surveys regarding suicide have, and it's one that simply cannot be corrected …
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:51 PM
50

The first sentence of the actual study is enough to be highly skeptical of any conclusions it reaches: Using data from an anonymous online survey of 488 cisgender men... Seriously? Less than 500 anonymous respondents to a survey? If the participants are anonymous, then how was their sex confirmed? The study gives no indication of any follow-up or rigour in this process. All it says is: Data for this study was obtained through an anonymous online survey called Andromind Selbsttest (“Andromind sel…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 05:05 PM
10

That wikipedia article is highly misleading. Unfortunately, the site relies on news articles to form the narrative angle used by the text, due largely to the way it excludes primary sources (the "No original research" rule). As such, you would never know that the main relief being sought in "Rostker v. Goldberg" back in 1981 was to require women to sign up for Selective Service and be available for non-combat roles. The wikipedia article blindly regurgitates the "male superiority/men are perceiv…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:25 PM
40

A full 16 out of the 16 groups listed include women. How is it equality if men are second-class citizens?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:35 AM
15

If a female candidate fails to man bash, she will have zero traction with female voters. That's an interesting observation that I hadn't considered before. You know, it might explain why Harris made that strange: "There are no laws that apply to men's bodies" gaffe on the "Call Her Daddy" podcast. There are all sorts of ways to give a neutral response to that question (i.e. something like "Well, we don't see reproductive rights as a zero-sum game, because we know that both men and women benefit …
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:21 AM
66

she did a 180 on many issues and started trying to court the men’s vote leading up to the election. I wasn't aware of any platform or policy changes they made, but you are right in that the Democrats and the media sure did get the word out that they were trying super hard to reach men with their last few weeks of campaigning. Though the way they chose to do so was...bizarre, to say the least. No specific platform promises to entice men (that I know of, please correct me if I'm wrong). Check. Cre…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 10:13 PM
1

Thanks. I was honestly hoping to find a measurable shift away from divisive content, but yeah, the media really does appear to have a very strong, inherent anti-male ideological bias.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 11:19 PM
2

The four issues you outline should be a given, and the focus should be instead put on more practical matters. I would look to the key risk factors for suicide, and focus any efforts there. Those risk factors are: recent divorce and estrangement from children, financial problems/unemployment, and legal problems. Any solutions that can help men to reconnect with their kids after a divorce, help them to find meaningful careers, and assist them with legal troubles (or prevent them in the first place…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 02:04 PM
1

I know that many on the left think Rogan would have been quite hostile to Harris (since they mistakenly see him as "far right"), and there are certainly many moderates or independents who wanted him to challenge her properly on the issues (since the corporate media failed to do so), but it's not Rogan's style or brand to be adversarial. I mean, he disagreed with JD Vance on abortion during their interview, but he kept any pushback to a minimum (Joe just casually disputed Vance's claim that: "a l…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 01:30 PM
64

Hey, if you want to trust her with your life, then by all means be my guest. I wouldn't though. I've read the parable of the Scorpion and the Frog.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 02:14 AM
280

I don't believe her "apology". She lied about something that she knew was dangerous – deadly even – to another person. She has zero credibility from this point onward.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 01:50 AM
2

From what I can see of the sub's stated rules, posts related to bannings elsewhere on Reddit are clearly not allowed here. No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights") Did you not take the time to read the rules before posting/when your post got removed, or did you just assume the worst about the mods? Considering all the bots and auto-bans flying around on Reddit, I can understand why this policy exists on the sub. And I agree with it. It's not the…
/r/MensRights28/11/24 03:31 PM
13

Or even just a nobody hoping to gain your 15 minutes of fame at the expense of a man’s reputation #metoo. Or that one accuser of Kavanaugh who was living out her fantasy through publicly discussing the topic, and straight up admitted that she found the idea of a powerful man forcing her into sex to be "really hot". This kind of stuff sells, and the media knows it just as much as the "rape romance novel" industry does.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 10:24 PM
9

(*) A short follow-up on the anti-male bias within modern journalism: the CJR review of the disgraced Rolling Stone article gives us even further evidence of this hateful agenda demonizing men, in that it incorrectly pushes the "only 2% of accusations are false" myth (this obvious propaganda does not belong in a supposed "ethics review"), and even worse it does not consider whether an anti-male bias and the associated political agenda – given the larger moral panic against men that existed then,…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:40 AM
16

Great analysis. I also wonder if fraternities get so much attention because they are where males of "higher status" tend to be found. Similarly with sports teams; successful athletes are very often men of high status and importance. Whereas in the case of biology students in your example, there is no conferred status to being a biologist, so it doesn't get noticed. A lot of this "group stereotyping" might be attributable to the Apex Fallacy, and the way a certain part of society only sees the to…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:08 PM
5

Regarding Movember, there have been several recent posts here about the coopting of the movement away from supporting men's health: here and here. You can find other examples of supposedly gender-neutral resources that should go to men instead being used for things like: "teaching feminism to men/everyone" by simply searching for them on this sub.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 07:05 PM
10

Richard Reeves is perceived as being not genuine or trustworthy by many male advocates. He consistently frames issues in ways that put the priority on other groups, thereby abandoning men. I firmly believe that, were Reeves given control of decision-making for some hypothetical committee or task force around men, he would not help men get practical and effective solutions for their problems, and would direct the resources to feminist-approved causes instead (as we have seen happen with the coopt…
/r/MensRights16/11/24 04:00 PM
5

Meanwhile, the actual consequences of false accusation for men are widespread, and often fatal. http://empathygap.uk/?p=2176#_Toc504898470 Wow. I hadn't come across that page before, but holy crap is that a great resource with a lot of effort and insight into the issue of false accusations. I'll probably be pouring through it for the next few days at least. Thanks for sharing!
/r/MensRights16/11/24 02:46 PM
139

An increased interest in pursuing the ideal masculine appearance by going to the gym and the creation of new male-dominated social activities like the infamous exclusive poker nights had seemed innocent and had been easy to write off as typical boyhood behavior. If all it takes for a young man to be labeled as "radicalized" is that he is trying to stay physically fit and healthy, or enjoys playing competitive games with his male friends, then we really have reached peak anti-male insanity. Still…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 05:56 PM
85

Always archive Guardian articles: here's an archive link for this one. Never reward them with hate clicks for publishing such divisive screeds like this. Creating an archive is super easy to do: just go to archive.is, input the URL, and grab the new link.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 05:42 PM
1

Don't worry too much about "disproving" these kinds of articles. Hardly anyone sees them, or cares about them if they do. The media elites write them for the handful of other elites who read them, or the minority in the general public who are already indoctrinated. As far as advocacy is concerned, there are lots of different approaches. Everything from just talking to your friends and family about men's concerns, accessing male advocacy resources to grow your knowledge about the history, issues,…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:22 PM
1

Thanks for sharing that data. It looks like they fooled me with this "look here, and ignore what's happening over there!" trick, but I'll know to be more skeptical of this kind of narrative moving forward. I was too focused on the surface-level anti-male framing to see the real "male inferiority" propaganda hidden underneath.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:16 PM
1

That's a great, succinct summary!
/r/MensRights13/11/24 07:51 PM
1

Unless you change your message to: "Men, it's okay if you cry, and it's okay if you don't cry. Be yourself." you're not speaking to men. You're only speaking to the people who want men to be more like them. It's just replacing one set of expectations with another equally bad or worse set of expectations. Remove the stone of shame. Attach the stone of triumph!
/r/MensRights13/11/24 05:11 PM
3

they're generalising completely grotesquely into every guy in existence. I'm starting to think there's also a lot of the Apex Fallacy involved in how this happens, even more than I ever thought possible. An incredible number of "man-hating"/"anti-male" news articles exist online with images prominently displayed of what I would describe as "frat boys", and/or they include descriptions and terminology that almost always focus singularly on a kind of rich, elite, high status, post-secondary-attend…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:58 PM
34

Good catch on noting the author's bio in this propaganda piece. I didn't even see that part. Quelle surprise though at the bona fides. Nothing but academic indoctrination and no real world experience. What a very sheltered and coddled environment to live in. Also interesting how the language switches from "she" to "they" jarringly at the end. Very poor editing there. You know, I would actually dispute your "paid and respected" description of her. It's kind of fun to realize that this type of gig…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:55 PM
7

That’s probably the best thing you can do as an MRA around this because it’s making us look bad. I never wanted control over women’s bodies, I just want an equal right to choice over my own body and wallet. Yeah. It's not any male advocate promoting this kind of stupidity. It's just a few edgy trolls, and, as you so rightly point out, the media that is more than happy – even giddy, you might say – to put this on blast to their audience, ensuring it gets even more attention, and generates more an…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:54 PM
45

Addendum: Be clear and state that men are being "pushed down", "held back", "told we aren't wanted/needed". The framing of men as "falling behind" suggests we can't keep up in the unfair race that is being run. So don't fall for these dishonest language tricks. Though it's still admittedly funny to witness other groups who are given every single advantage, still end up failing more often than not.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:41 PM
1

You're not wrong in general these days about the right holding many of those laudable principles. And indeed, that is why they are seen as more trusted and genuine by the general public. Though we'll have to see how many keep that principled stand when they are the ones wielding the power...some well-known figures, like Dan Crenshaw, have already shown themselves to be hypocrites. Power corrupts, or in many cases, it just reveals a person's true colours. I must note that I consider myself to be …
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:18 PM
24

Not only do they vote for this kind of legislation directly, in times of war you have activities like the "White Feather Campaign" where they "name and shame" men into sacrificing their lives (wow, way to debunk the "nagging" and "gossiping" stereotype there /s). And a more recent example of this kind of behaviour would be the self-described "feminists" on the US Supreme Court who threw out the legal case that had finally come so close to ending Selective Service in the US (and it was Dem-appoin…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:01 PM
3

I find it frustrating how many people buy that 2-10% figure despite how obviously flawed it is. The trick is in the "measuring stick" used, as was noted in the original reply to your comment (the "very high standard" for something to be a false accusation). That "magic" trick is what makes it so difficult for people to see sometimes. It reminds me of that grade school brain teaser about a worker leaving their job every day with a wheelbarrow filled with worthless sand, and the guard at the exit …
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:55 PM
5

It's more of a comprehensive meta-analysis, but given the number of studies Aydin goes through in the linked video, there may be some in there that you might consider more accurate than others. However, you must realize that any claim of sexual assault would have to be "fully disproved" to meet the impossible standard that ideologues have created in this controversial arena. In other words, you must completely prove the negative. In any situations where that is the case, you're better off just i…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:34 PM
1

Why don't you believe those things??? Do you not follow politics? Or... do you just listen to Fox, or Crowder. This US election proved that the majority of people don't care what media elites tell them to think. Or the elites anywhere (from Tinseltown to political pundits to academia and more). For me personally, when I have a bit of interest and want to delve deep into a political matter, I like to check what independent journalists like Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi have to say about a topic…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:04 PM
2

Well, it already happened to me in similar regard, and it almost destroyed my life. Emerging from that months-long nightmare, I learned the truth of the quote: Before you embark on a journey of revenge, first dig two graves. And you've just let everyone know without telling us that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, because someone who experienced just half of what this student did would never wish that desolate hell upon anyone, not even their worst enemy.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:08 PM
5

I agree this is a dumb topic, and it will go away and be forgotten in a week or two. But the footprint of it is much larger in popular culture at the moment than you might think. Just read my response here regarding how many articles, searches, and people exist everywhere talking about the subject.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:00 PM
9

If you find the site linked by the OP to be "biased" or "poorly sourced", then here's a short list of left-leaning news sites that discuss the online phenomenon (there are many more out there if you took a minute to investigate this for yourself). CBC: What is the 4B movement? Why some women are boycotting men after Trump's election victory Vanity Fair: Emboldened Men Celebrate Donald Trump’s Win By Hurling Attacks On Women Online NBC News: Trump re-election sparks interest in South Korea’s '4B'…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 05:56 PM
6

The right – and the rich elites who control them – are no friends to men. I agree. However, it is impossible to be worse than the left, in how they have wrought damage for more than a generation on males as a whole. Step back for a moment and consider the bigger picture. If the feminist government in my country were to implement a policy that they could associate with feminism, say: "Men must be locked up with an 8:00 PM curfew so that women feel safe", the headlines the next day would read: "Op…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 04:00 PM
13

This is why parental leave, not just maternity leave, needs to be equal and mandatory. The mandatory part is crucial. I had a coworker who said his wife was going to use up all the leave for herself, and he was hoping she would allow him just one week to spend with his newborn daughter, right at the end of the leave period. Where I live many companies offer paternity leave, but the fathers can't take it if the wife uses it. So in practice, what happens is those fathers never get the opportunity …
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:21 PM
4

I can somewhat understand Reeves' focus on a more palatable framing of men's issues. Any man is easily dismissed if he shouts: "Feminists are Satan!" right out of the gate. Not that any but the most extreme of lunatics believe that, mind you. I just wish Reeves used framing that was more honest. If he's worried that women will feel like they are losing out on funding and the sole attention of politicians, then use their: "The other sex benefits when we benefit" argument against them. "We're both…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:11 PM
13

Your friends don't just flip from being friends to having a physical altercation with you because another friend said they were uncomfortable. Yes, they do flip like this, unfortunately. I experienced this first hand, and I still have the receipts to prove it, since they all were kind enough to document it electronically. It starts with a vague accusation: "I'm uncomfortable when he's around". That vagueness is crucial, because it allows the story to grow in the telling. "He must have touched he…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:30 AM
10

unintentional but unforgivable That makes no sense, given the situation. And I notice that this note was supposedly "found" by one of the people who drove him to kill himself. That sounds very suspicious. Did they write this note themselves to try and justify their crimes?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:16 AM
34

I understand your anger, because that was my first instinct as well. However, after sober second thought, I have to remain principled and oppose the concept of mob justice, because that was what led to this tragedy in the first place. Either the police should handle this (reckless endangerment maybe?) or the school (bullying definitely), or we should advocate for a law that recognizes and harshly punishes this kind of proxy violence. If we work legally, within the system, justice can be found fo…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 12:11 AM
9

You cannot know if it's rape or not if you don't talk about sexual encounters. Yes, but the only people experienced enough with applying those laws to judge if it is a crime are the police. A large percentage of sexual assault reports to law enforcement are actually investigated and resolved with a "Closed as informational report" decision (around 1 in 4). This means that the sworn testimony of both participants does not conflict, and the police ultimately determined that no crime was committed.…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:55 PM
1

Oh, if you're interested, there are a few articles that stand out to me so far. This one from PS Balance (never heard of them before) is a full-on fearmongering propaganda piece, and it is quite incredible to witness. The number of times it repeats the phase "feels/felt unsafe" is amazing. Also, this New York Times article that is getting reprinted in other news sites, is remarkable for how unhinged and over-the-top the claims of oppression become as it unfolds. It's like watching someone don a …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:37 PM
1

I do want to say: I understand that these news articles won't have any significant influence on the general public. That particular question of impact was settled decisively this election, and it should be clear by now that these elites only talk to each other and to the elite class in general. Because no one listens to or trusts what they say any more. So that's not why I'm doing this. What I am interested in seeing is how this narrative around "male voting issues" unfolds in the upcoming days …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:31 PM
3

Putin is the aggressor, and he is the one most ultimately responsible for what happened, and yes, Russia should be punished with sanctions and Ukraine should be assisted to hold as much territory as they can against him. I was on board with that position right from the beginning. However, the situation as changed. Now that I see the continued and future loss of life in an unwinnable war (Russia's military can not be "ground into dust", unless another country directly intervenes, and at any point…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:26 PM
3

While you are correct that the right is usually more war-like, I must say in the 2024 US Election it was the left that scared me the most in this area. They were the ones yelling that they would fight Putin out of Ukraine and depose him, even if it meant starting WW3 over it. Yeah, I knew it was just posturing to try and tie Trump to Putin, but those kinds of rash words sometimes have a way of forcing people into stupid actions.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:00 AM
14

At present, you are 100% correct. Traditionalism and the right may stop outright discrimination against men in the form of removing due process rights from men, and ending sex-based quotas in business, which is good, don't get me wrong. However, apart from stopping specific and unpopular overreaches of the left, they aren't going to bring about change. But to think that no one ever will improve how men are valued by society, is to give up on advocacy for men completely, and I'm not there. And I …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:49 AM
5

I don't know one man who refers to themselves by saying: "I'm a dude". The word "dude" is a term gender ideologues love to use to mischaracterize us as immature (since it suggests "dudebros" and is used to denigrate men). Honestly, you're doing a terrible job at trying to establish your bona fides. There's so much ignorance in what you're saying about men and this sub in general, that it would take forever to respond to each claim in your comment. I'm just going to focus on the following, since …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:53 AM
15

That's just the Apex fallacy, and thus an easily dismissed and meaningless argument. For every high-paid corporate position in the entire world, there are 100 times as many low paying and dangerous jobs in a single industry alone (like say, construction), which are all 99.9% male. If you're not fighting for equality everywhere, you're nothing more than a supremacist hiding behind some nice sounding PR.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:27 PM
28

Most boys and young men encounter man-hating first in media (news and entertainment) and education. Then it appears in the workplace, dating, and the political messaging they hear as adults. There's a lot more, such as the family courts for married and divorced men, but those are the major areas. You would have to be living under a rock if you haven't encountered at least one of those institutions in your life. Some examples of these types of attacks include being told that masculinity is toxic …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:19 PM
77

My question to them: "Isn't any man who takes this threat seriously just showing the world that he only values women for sex?"
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:41 PM
9

Read up on the "Tender Years Doctrine", which is a principle of English common law from the early 1800's that still affects legal decisions around custody to this day. Even in countries where this doctrine has supposedly been "abolished", the presumption is still never a true 50-50 split of custody. For example, courts will take easily abused concepts such as "avoiding conflict between the two parents" into account when denying Fathers equal access to their children. The reality of divorce is mo…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:21 PM
2

Trump goes to talk to black journalists. There are ZERO black men on the panel. Wow, I'm guessing that really happened. If so, I'm honestly not surprised. And let me guess, if anyone pointed this imbalance out to them the only response would be: "We know what black men's issues are better than they do, so this is fine." You know, this reminds me of that APA "expert" committee created to define masculinity that didn't include a single man. Or how all the academics quoted in news articles about th…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:45 PM
17

People are actually not very good at judging their own safety objectively (note: this applies to both sexes). Modern feminism is built perfectly to make this group fear much, much worse for its members. It also provides a convenient scapegoat (all men are to blame). So women sitting in the comfort and safety of their own home can often be made so afraid of the dangerous outside world that they are scared to leave. And since they make up over 50% of the voting population, creating and then curing…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:13 PM
5

Are the Dems run by the same twits who wrote that Gillette ad, or that “winning” Budweiser rebrand? I only stumbled across those Dem ads from watching a shoe0nhead video, and they were all so cringe I honestly couldn't believe my eyes. Especially that ban pr0n/nofap one. Though that one at least had some production value to it. The rest looked like home video-level efforts. Every single male actor in those ads looked stiff, uncomfortable, and awkward. And like you said, they had probably been gi…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:14 AM
5

You literally don't if you voted for trump. I'm not a US citizen. And if I were, I would not support Trump, but for my own individual reasons that you would not hear spoken about in any mainstream media outlet. Under your own bad logic women should not become your ally because you aren't theirs. Men do not exist to be allies to women. Sorry, not sorry. I'm not going to be shamed anymore simply because I want to improve men's lives.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:56 AM
6

That's a false equivalency fallacy there in trying to compare this to a punishment, and a call to emotion as well by choosing to childishly shout the argument in all caps. A lack of reproductive rights is not equivalent to a collective punishment when one group is already living in those conditions, and another is not. It's simply collective existence. And it's an existence that we both want to improve. By working together. Not a legal right that is only granted to one group...and then, maybe...…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:29 PM
3

"Men do not exist to be allies to women." The fact that even stating this in a sentence would throw so many of these extreme ideologues into a paroxysm of shrieking and clucking, is pretty much all that needs to be stated in its favour. It really is a perfect slogan, not least of which because it is such a pithy rebuttal and outright refusal of their narcissistic worldview.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:13 PM
3

What a disgrace. Imagine if we used that logic regarding race. "Yeah, ending Jim crow helps black people, but what does it do for me?" Barf. That analogy doesn't work regarding men and issues such as abortion. Guys have no rights when it comes to their bodies, so we just want the "my body, my choice" principle applied fairly to everyone. And history has proved to us that we will get no consideration when we "do the right thing" and just blindly hope that others will care about us someday. Turns …
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:04 PM
7

I'm someone who was once proudly on the left who still believes strongly in the principle of "bodily autonomy" for everyone. As such, I supported abortion rights without condition for many decades, but no longer. Now I realize from experience that the left cannot be trusted to apply that principle fairly, because the majority of them don't actually believe in "my body, my choice". They're just supremacists. And the funny thing is that I haven't changed any of my principles or political beliefs t…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:28 PM
5

I listened to an insight this morning that added a lot of perspective for me regarding the modern political left-right divide (and how it also affects the sexes). The host of the video noted that all the mainstream media critiques of Trump – ever since he first ran for office – amounted to complaints about "decorum". And it's that word – decorum – that has been echoing through my brain ever since. It's a word that's all about appearance, perception...it even shares its root with the word "decora…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:08 PM
1

I understand the dems are not putting policies together that explicitly pander to men, and yet they do for women. You understand this, but you still think men should vote for their party? Even though it will cause men as a group to fall even further behind, and suffer more as a result? That's not a winning move. Seriously, I can hate on Trump as much as the next guy. First off, I do recognize his positives, such as being a strong leader, and not being a pushover in putting his country and its pe…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 08:29 PM
1

I mean, ive listened to JRE for a while.. but if her camp watched the trump interview, it's so obvious that he softballed Trump/Vance and would've done the same for Harris. I didn't watch any of the JRE candidate interviews, since I'm not in the US. However, from other shows I have watched of his, your description of his style is on point. He does tend to go very easy on his guests. Naturally, I think he has found a popular niche of providing interview "infotainment", where listeners come away f…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:50 PM
2

They really thought playing madden could make up for 60m+ Rogan viewers. I think the Dems' strategy regarding Rogan is pretty easy to reverse engineer, based on the actual playbook we saw from them. The most important thing to know about a campaign is that everything – and I mean everything – comes down to "winning the news cycle". Using this formula, the Dems would have calculated the effect of Kamala doing a 3-hour unscripted political one-on-one with Rogan, and they wouldn't have seen a benef…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:24 PM
3

Downvote me away, but if you think any of trumps policies... No downvote here, just rational discussion. The point being made by OP is that it would have been great if political discussion on the left was just about policy. However, it never is. It's only constant divisive identity politics and man-hating. I would love to have a sane, governance-focused left I could vote for again (not in the US, but here in my own country). The policies of the right may not directly help men, but that's fine if…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:11 PM
3

I would respect someone who said: "Be a man, and vote rationally on the platform, track record, and the ability to lead of the best candidate.". That demonstrates confidence, respect, and – most importantly – it doesn't belittle men's intelligence. Our ability to ignore sex, identity politics, calls to emotion, etc, is a trait to be lauded and celebrated in men. Heck, it's praiseworthy in any human being.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:26 PM
3

Half of your response is just a lazy attempt to avoid my arguments with non-sequiturs (like trying to debate a film released half a century ago when it's clear I'm referencing the catalog of Star Wars media being produced within the last few years), and the other half is incomprehensible and seems like you're arguing against someone else, because it has nothing to do with anything I said. It's really not worth my time repeating my arguments. They all still stand if you ever want to rebut them di…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:31 PM
1

The bizarre thing I see about this "pivot" to try and entice men to vote for Harris, is that it is accompanied by no new policy or initiative or funding that would appeal to the male demographic. Now I have admittedly no skills as a political strategist, but even I can come up with simple ideas that would get male votes. However, all the campaign efforts seem to be focused instead on getting the word out on blast that if Harris loses, it's specifically because of men not voting for her.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:32 PM
3

Feminism by definition is equality among the sexes, if you don’t support men’s issues alongside women’s, you’re not a feminist. You’re an extremist. Please don't trot out the tired old: "but muh dictionary definition of Feminism" excuse. Consider this simple question: do named feminists out in the real world with actual power fight for men's rights? Let's consider some recent examples. We'll start with protecting men's bodily integrity at birth. Sanna Marin of Finland, and Katrín Jakobsdóttir of…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:46 PM
7

LOL. I already predicted the: "Our academic terms are so much deeper and more nuanced than you can comprehend and that's the only reason they all just appear to associate men with only negative and pejorative concepts" attempt to invoke argument from authority. And wow! Here you are right on cue to prove me right. Meanwhile, out in the real world I can pull up millions of Google hits on any single one of these "it's all just academic" terms alone. Man-hating media like Barbie and Star Wars have …
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:50 PM
8

Yeah, when you start going down the long list of their hate-filled terminology, the venomous loathing becomes undeniable: "mansplaining" – the word "condescending" already existed, but they had to try to make the behaviour something only males could do "manspreading" – something that is benign and biological since testes and sperm are external to our bodies because they need a cooler environment to function, except now it's given the appearance of terrible violence being inflicted upon those aro…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:09 PM
28

There's really only one response needed in these cases (the quote is paraphrased from memory): Individual feminists may or may not hate men, but feminism sure does have a nasty habit of naming everything bad in the world after men. – Karen Straughan
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:33 PM
16

You should always use archived links to articles like this. Just go to archive.is or archive.ph and follow the instructions there. This article already had an archive made for it a week ago.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 03:19 PM
6

Men are moving right and it's scientifically proven and backed by statistics. Do you know the details of how those studies in question defined the political right? It must be noted that the field of sociology is in the middle of a replication crisis at the moment, and many claims in academia in general are not well-founded. Heck, entire fields are essentially made up whole cloth. A few years ago Sociologists were forced to "investigate" if they were biased against men and the political right. Th…
/r/MensRights02/11/24 02:29 PM
3

Meh. Vapid TV personalities like her aren't worth getting upset at. I mean, I've had worse said about me by better. The interesting thing here is in the audience. Both the ones in the studio and the massive amount watching. They all laugh and agree with this, and tune back in to watch the next episode, instead of being repulsed by her and no longer supporting the show. It's in their continued approval that the truth about widespread male hatred truly lies.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:14 PM
2

Status: currently playing "Sad But True" (Metallica - 1991)
/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:36 PM
11

It says men need to worry about their biological clock more and should consider becoming a ‘community father figure’ (i.e. be open to the single mother). Saying that "Men need to be less selfish" was the entire point of this article. For the person writing this screed, every other word was only put there to build up to promoting this new, modern, and "enlightened" attitude among men. Bitch, men died to give you all the comforts that you now take for granted. Yet you still have the gall to want m…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:27 PM
30

Other than that I argue women rely on men more than the reverse. Once artificial wombs become a safe and cost-effective product, we're likely going to see that particular imbalance grow to the point where the value of eggs are going to plummet to the level of common sperm. It's going to be a huge social revolution on a scale that makes the introduction of birth control seem like a pleasant spring day. Perhaps the other half of the human species will then finally begin to understand what it feels…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:22 PM
28

This commonly attempted argument is just The Narcissist's Prayer in action: That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it. Compare the "Men set that system up" argument – an obvious non-sequitur BTW – to the last line: "You deserve it." Notice the similarities? The idea that just because you share dangly bits with someone else, you automatically share r…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 04:28 PM
2

The problem is that I'm completely numb to the situation. "Living my dream", and all I feel after 90 minutes is my arm getting tired from being in the same position for a long time. Honestly, that kind of experience resonates with me, even as someone who had some dates as a teen. You're no different than most people in that regard. It often just takes a while for people to become comfortable enough to the point where even the barest of physical intimacy can feel something other than stiff and ro…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 01:47 PM
9

Yeah, I guess it could come across as a bit pejorative now that you point it out. To be clear, being "broken" is not how I view men who grow up in this way. Heck, many of the guys I talk to don't even want these particular skills or experiences any more as they mature, because they understand that this perspective is something only society values for its own selfish reasons. And I can't say I disagree with those men either, considering the morbid state of relationships in the modern world. I onl…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 07:16 PM
6

First of all, it can be hard to amalgamate lifestyles after a certain age, regardless of the willingness of both parties. That's an excellent point, and it dovetails with my observations as well. If a person is able to be generally happy on their own, then where is the strong motivation to hook up? I know being a bachelor is not something everyone can do, but some are quite successful at it, and a sizeable percentage even prefer it. Every single one of us – and this applies equally to both sexes…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 04:10 PM
46

That "waiting" strategy, often described as the "guys who don't get any dates in their younger years will have a lot of interest in their 30's" compensation inevitably hits a major snag, and it's one that's not immediately apparent on the surface. Consider the best case scenario. Let's say you have a reasonably successful and attractive 30+ man, and a genuine and decent woman around his age who is interested in a mutual relationship with him. She's not too jaded and knows her biological clock is…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:15 PM
1

sleeping with male game reviewers to get good reviews for her horrible indie game. Actually, the incorrect "sex for reviews" claim was in reality a false flag that Kotaku and others underhandedly promoted to try and discredit the initial genuine criticisms being directed at them. Whether they made this unproven claim up themselves, or it was just a wild accusation they seized upon because they knew it would distract attention away from their unethical behaviour, is a question lost to the annals …
/r/MensRights27/10/24 10:41 PM
2

So, not really a hoax, but you can't say he didn't say something quite similar semantically. That medically dangerous interpretation of Trump's remarks is no more reasonable than those on the right who say that Al Gore claimed he "invented the internet". Simply put, both of these narratives constitute a deliberate misinterpretation of someone's words to cast them in the worst possible light. Giving a person the benefit of the doubt is a principle that must exist in our society, or else proper an…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:28 PM
1

The "Gaming journalist who was in a relationship with a developer behaved unethically by reviewing her game" narrative is not correct. There was never any review done for the game, either on Kotaku or by the journalist in question. This false flag narrative is actually a deliberate strawman that was promoted by Kotaku themselves in an attempt to discredit the real complaint from the public. What actually happened can be found at the following link. In short, there were two Kotaku articles that m…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 06:50 PM
1

I think Grayson was listed as one of the testers of Depression Quest but I could be misremembering it. I was about to say he did something with the sound for some games but I think that was Holowka. To refresh my memory from a decade ago, I just did a quick internet search and the testing is referenced on the Gamergate wiki here with the following: Nathan has been a quality assurance tester or play tester on some minor video games[7] such as "Arcade America", "Disney's Timon & Pumbaa's Jungle Ga…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 05:25 AM
1

The narrative probably exists because of lazy thinking and the hatred against anything that is male-focused. List out some of the things that are associated with men, and you can bet they've been conflated together at some point by this kind of extremist stereotyping. Gaming – and GG – is largely male. Men's advocacy is almost exclusively male. The PUA community is almost exclusively male. Comic books have a majority male audience. Tech/programming is mostly a male endeavour. Sports are male (in…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 07:04 PM
7

Actually, it was Eron Gjoni who wrote the original post, but he is still alive and well from what I know. The man who took his own life was Alec Holowka. He was a later boyfriend of the same ex-girlfriend game dev, and he was driven to suicide directly as a result of false allegations of sexual assault and confinement she made against him, which were loudly trumpeted by much of the gaming media and beyond. That type of dishonesty is certainly a common tale that we're very familiar with here on t…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 03:07 PM
13

Thinking about it in hindsight, this might have been one of the most devastating events for progressivism and feminism. Yeah, the reaction from gamers was quite damaging overall to these activists, and it really set a playbook for how to successfully resist such infiltration. I was actually thinking of making a quick mention of GG2 (the Kabrutus - SBI affair) in my writeup, but things went long already. When GG2 kicked off, everyone immediately understood how to make our point about not wanting …
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:43 PM
5

Are you talking about Alec Holowka? If so, that was indeed a tragedy. And one that can be laid directly at the feet of those lying smear merchants in the media. Though most of the blame lies with the parasitic developer(s) who set the whole thing off. I guess I didn't really think about that case since it actually happened very late into the whole affair. GG had mostly ended when that tragedy occurred, at least in the sense of an active movement existing.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:26 PM
3

There's only a small connection between GG and "MRA spaces", if any. I'm probably one of the few who was – and still is – active and passionate in both subs on reddit. It's true that most people in the GG movement understand and point out the double standards regarding issues that men face, so they are sympathetic to what we talk about here. However, that awareness does not extend into advocacy for men in a social and political manner. Remember, also, while GG was largely male, it did have a sig…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:20 PM
130

I was there personally way back in 2014 when Gamergate happened (you can verify my involvement from my Reddit post history on /r/KotakuInAction if you want), and the media narrative about us is incorrect. The main motivation behind the movement was always to fight against corruption in game journalism, which expanded a bit into the larger culture war that sometimes pops up here as well (where fans and customers try to keep activism and agendas out of entertainment). So...Gamergate. Wow. Where to…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 06:04 AM
44

Any thoughts on naming it in tribute to Earl Silverman? If you're not familiar with him, he fled from domestic abuse at the hands of his wife, but unfortunately he only received further abuse at the hands of an adversarial and man-hating system once he sought assistance. In Earl's own words: "When I went into the community looking for some support services, I couldn’t find any. There were a lot for women, and the only programs for men were for anger management. As a victim, I was re-victimized b…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 08:53 PM
15

All human beings actually have a rather poor ability at objectively judging their actual safety in most situations. This is why the passengers on a flight feel less safe because they are not up in the cockpit flying the plane, despite the fact that they are all objectively much, much safer having the experienced and trained pilot at the controls. The most important differentiating factor here is in how these subjective fears are perceived by others. Men's concerns about "feeling safe" – when the…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 08:35 PM
5

If men are choosing more lethal methods, then they are more at risk of death so it’s a crisis. The "men choose more violent methods" response is a classic non-answer (in academic circles, this ploy or fallacy is sometimes referred to as virtus dormitiva, if you're interested in that kind of thing). Apologies for the tangent there, but this kind of misdirect actually has a long and sordid history. Anyway, from what I have seen, this attempt to obscure the issue – and you rightfully note that they…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 07:11 PM
6

In these cases, I don't believe that for a second, they are actually trying to kill themselves. If they were, they would have succeeded along the way by chance. 99.9% of those who "attempt suicide" more than once are clearly not actually attempting suicide, pretty much by definition. It is indeed just maladaptive attention-seeking, as you note. Suicide prevention resources must be used properly, and made available only to those who are actually at risk of taking their own lives. What is even wor…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:09 PM
2

Considering the current and very real "legitimation crisis" that exists – which is reasonable considering all of the recent examples of biased, corrupt, agenda-driven, politically-motivated, selfish, etc, actions and communications from these supposedly "professional" institutions – then yes, the public's first reaction to hearing that the "CDC" dictates anything to be true is to immediately question it. Unfortunately, blindly trusting in authorities will too often mean that you are left behind …
/r/MensRights25/10/24 03:54 PM
19

The way they try to do this is by misusing statistics around hospital data regarding "self-harm" and the like. I did a deep dive into one of the originating papers of this urban myth that "men die more often but attempt suicide less" many years ago. After only a few minutes of reading, it turns out that the paper itself notes that the inaccurate hospital data they used will always overestimate the suicide attempt numbers for one group (read the section title Limitations in the document), and the…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 03:17 PM
4

Paul Muad'Dib: Stilgar, do we have virtue signaling? Stilgar: Usul, we have virtue signaling the likes of which even God has never seen.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 03:13 AM
22

There's a corollary for this in the world of modern entertainment: the girl-boss who is perfect and undergoes no character arc whatsoever. And over the course of the story it is the men around her who come to realize that she was flawless all along. The pattern is everywhere.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 03:30 PM
4

You are interpreting OP's words in the worst possible light, which means you are not engaging with their ideas in good faith. The point being made here is that men – in general, and individual men will vary in this regard – tend to heal in a "moving into the future" manner. This is different from the static "reminiscing about the past" solution that therapy offers. As a specific public example, consider the fairly successful tennis player Steve Johnson. He lost his Dad unexpectedly in 2017, with…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 03:13 PM
5

There are a lot of inequalities that boys and men face in the world, and many of those issues could be solved through fairly simple legislation. "We care about men too, so join us to help smash the Evil PatriarchyTM!" is a two-faced strategy to ensure that none of those simple laws or government-funded solutions ever get implemented. Anything that might be actually effective at helping men is prevented from being part of the conversation. I mean, just try modifying the: "It's okay for boys to cr…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 02:20 PM
25

If they think abortion is an issue that affects men, then don't you find it strange that they don't include "men" as a category in their official platform? If abortion is "one of the main things the Dems are running on", and this is the only reason for the explicit mention of just one sex, then I find it strange that the other (men) isn't mentioned by name as well. It seems clear to me that they don't give men priority in this list because men's issues – father's rights and 50/50 default custody…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:42 PM
10

Here, we have it in action. The praise of BS, while simultaneously labelling men as 'neurosexists'. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00677-x Even some other female researchers feel obliged to call this out. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01141-6 The neurosciences have become a huge battleground – waged in science journals and the news media and beyond – over the question of sex differences in the brain. The biggest point of contention I've seen recently is around spatial ro…
/r/MensRights18/10/24 02:08 PM
7

That's an interesting and well-written article. Thanks for sharing it! As a fellow physics grad, I think one crucial thing this author missed in exploring academia's current malaise is summed up in the saying: "gravity can only be discovered once". Now this is a bit of a nuanced point about academic research, because there are certainly questions in physics – and also in chemistry, biology, etc – that haven't been answered. Furthermore, I firmly believe that exciting new discoveries await us in …
/r/MensRights18/10/24 01:09 PM
10

Well colour me surprised. I fully expected them to wait until this blew over and quietly reinstate him. I suspect that a short investigation was able to find a pattern of this type of behaviour from him and other professors, and the university knew they had to do something or risk a major lawsuit. No matter what drove this decision though, this was the proper response to such violent rhetoric.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:06 PM
9

An argument can be made in regards to the level of force used. That is a good point. There is a legal definition around using only a "reasonable" level of force to defend oneself. Also, specific laws commonly forbid a defender from "escalating" the level of force used (that doesn't appear to apply in this case, but I wanted to mention it). I think a mitigating factor here though is the fact that she struck him in the head/face area. Even if it's just a slap on the cheek, people feel that as much…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:09 AM
11

They will claim its about the "Power Dynamics" or try to justify it as "She's a woman, her punch to his head couldn't ACTUALLY "Hurt" him" Where as he punching her back clearly did injure her.. I wonder if these people actually understand human biology. A human's ability to see, hear, breathe, eat, communicate, remember, and think, are all contained in our head. By hitting someone in that location, any human adult – man or woman – risks serious injury to their victim, especially when they are th…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 12:16 AM
10

I don't see anyone "blaming" women in this thread, but I do see many pointing out the share of the blame that falls on the explicitly feminist government of the US for being the primary financial supporter of this crap. Tell me, why isn't the "husband of Jill Biden" putting his foot down and denying Ukraine military equipment unless they stop this immoral practice? Or why isn't uber-feminist Trudeau in Canada withdrawing his country's support? Or what about the feminist leaders in almost every o…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 11:17 PM
15

I've seen a number of these videos of kidnappings in Ukraine, and what is consistent about all of them are the masked assailants who look like they are about to rob a bank. These men clearly know that what they are doing is wrong, and so they try to hide their identities from others. Seriously, what a fucked up situation. At least the people filming sounded sympathetic to the person being kidnapped like this in broad daylight. Unfortunately, there are too many people who would call him a coward …
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:28 PM
3

Oh my sweet summer child. Every male advocate has been told repeatedly that we can't genuinely care for men, and we only talk about helping and supporting men and boys as a "dog whistle" to hide our true misogynistic motives. Read up on "implicit bias" if you don't believe me. As a result, we've all learned to just ignore the "if they are misogynist" qualifier in any such screed. Because every man is a misogynist by definition according to their ideology.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:57 PM
4

It's unfortunate you've chosen to perceive my responses in such a negative manner.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 03:05 AM
4

I recall some statistics from Amnesty International many years ago for the lawless region of Myanmar (IIRC) that recorded a 10-20% rate of rape for that country, which they called abhorrent and extreme in their press release. And then we have statistics from universities in the US that claim a higher rate of 3 in 4 being raped. I have to ask, if universities are almost ten times as dangerous as a war-torn and lawless region, would parents really be sending their daughters there? Would any ration…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:55 AM
2

This classroom – and anyone watching this video – just heard extreme physical threats uttered against men as a group for their political views. That's a pretty clear Title IX violation, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a multi-million dollar lawsuit filed against the University of Kansas because of this. It also wouldn't be shocking if more incidents within the faculty get exposed as a result of this publicity. So I have to strongly disagree. This is a big deal.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 10:13 PM
5

I am using the term "democracy" here in a different, more broad context to mean a country that uses a democratic process wherein the citizens vote to elect the governing bodies. That's the low bar that the US unfortunately fails to reach.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 10:02 PM
4

According to other comments in this thread, the professor is on leave. So, if that's true, it's a mute point because action was taken So a paid vacation and continued employment are the proper actions to take in such a case? Please explain to me how that will discourage others from making similar public statements advocating illegal acts in the future? Does this precedent not enable and encourage similar rhetoric from others, and ensure this will happen again? When I talk about focusing on actio…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 09:07 PM
21

There's no official announcement that a society is living in a dystopia. It just happens gradually, over time, without anybody really noticing. The US though is clearly not a democracy. It's an oligarchy, and it has been that way for decades.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 08:40 PM
0

Platitudes and PR from politicians are meaningless. What matters are actions, which always make lies of their cheap and lazy words. In the case of this professor, the justifiable action would be to no longer employ him. However, what I expect to see instead is the university will go quiet and do nothing. Meanwhile, his colleagues and employers will send him words of support in secret, until no one is looking and then it's back to business as usual. I know what the culture is like in academia. I …
/r/MensRights09/10/24 07:56 PM
134

Saying your political opponents should be shot is so crazy, violent, and clearly illegal, that it's something only an academic could believe was acceptable to state within a civilized society. As a bit of a humourous aside, I must say that this professor sounds like he is in dire need of a good exercise routine, given how heavily and rapidly he is having to breathe just from giving a lecture. Hmm, I wonder...physical and mental health problems?
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:10 PM
6

Yeah but it’s the Republicans who keep blocking draft equality bills, not the Democrats. The right openly opposes it, yes, but the left doesn't push it in any meaningful way. Those "bills" are a lot more complicated than you let on. The "draft equality" legislation actually gets introduced as a "rider" on a massive spending bill. Then, Democrats quickly agree to remove it, because it was only a "trading card" to get other actually important things into the bill. Plus, they want to use it as a ca…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 05:56 PM
6

The main culprit here is actually a bit more simple than the sex differences in the human immune system. It turns out this happens largely because men have more muscle mass. An infection (bacterial or viral) facilitates fluid loss in our bodies, as the immune system uses water to fight its microscopic battle. That's why we're told to drink plenty of fluids when we are sick. So as the muscles become dehydrated throughout our body, they can become quite sore and stiff. Since men have more muscle m…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:33 PM
27

Because this sub hates Democrats. I think it only appears this way because politicians on the left are much more likely to make stupid comments rooted in divisive identity politics, which often fall within this sub's purview. The dumb things said by politicians on the right exist in similar regard, but they focus more on topics like international relations, science, economics, etc. Those are off-topic for MensRights.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:07 AM
176

I'm not surprised at this shocking denial of reality. Seriously, they have collectively decided that a male-only draft is actually sexist against women somehow, because in the minds of some narcissists it deems them less physically capable than men. Funny though how the judges that threw out the recent case challenging the male-only draft were not just male judges. Oh, and how US history actually shows that a simple legal relief suggested was to draft everyone for non-combat roles. That was four…
/r/MensRights07/10/24 11:57 PM
12

This reminds me of that huge "inkwell" panic that swept through everywhere a couple of years ago, with fears of terrorist attacks and school shootings, accompanied by article after article in the media, etc, all because of two individual cases of mentally ill young men that turned out to have nothing to do with the "rise" of the online phenomenon at all. Though of course no one ever admitted to the mistake, and most of the public nowadays still refer to those incidents with this long disproven l…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 02:01 PM
1

Most subs on Reddit aren't worth your time participating in. These mods are really just helping you curate that short list. I'd advise you to not spam them with messages and just move on. They've just told you that their sub is not a place for genuine conversations and honest dialog, so you should silently thank them and don't let your emotions get the better of you. Besides, there is a reason /r/TrueOffMyChest exists, if you want a community that – from what I've heard – isn't as ban-happy and …
/r/MensRights06/10/24 02:48 AM
3

Proxy violence includes using systems (legal, government, etc), institutions (academia, corporations, etc), ruining people's reputations, getting them fired or unemployable, driving them from their homes, isolating them from friends and family, etc. In fact, I already mentioned many of these types of crimes in my original comment, yet you chose to focus on only a few examples where individual men were being manipulated or coerced into unlawful behaviour. Your argument is either deliberately dish…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 01:29 PM
31

When "proxy violence" – i.e. violence enacted through a proxy like a family member, boyfriend, academic institution, legal system, etc – is recognized and punished as it should be, then I think we will look back on even pro-male articles like this as being biased, specifically in how it blithely accepts the belief that "men commit more crimes". This is one of those ignorant myths about the sexes that needs to be left behind in the dustbin of history. Other than that, it's a very good writeup on …
/r/MensRights30/09/24 09:00 PM
7

the reason men "succeed" in suicide is "because of more dangERous methods" This is a dog whistle they use to communicate their belief in XX superiority. It's basically the idea that masculinity is inherently toxic (i.e. inferior), so men would survive suicide if only guys were just more like them.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 03:44 PM
154

That's pretty much my experience in most social settings. The second-to-last movie I saw in a theater, I got there early to find a good seat, and then was asked to move by a family who came late, because the wife thought a lone guy was creepy and she didn't want to have to sit next to me. To add even further insult to the experience, she then proceeded to spend the entire movie bored and on her phone.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 03:32 PM
7

It sucks when hatred like this is directed against you simply for being born with "dangly bits". However, I've come to realize that in another way it's good that they feel free to express their prejudice and pejorative stereotypes of men. So many of these idiots tell us who they really are. And that's not even counting the hordes who descend to claim that: "By definition it's impossible to hate men" and other such nonsense, when anyone dares criticize such blatant bigotry. So let them all expose…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 02:21 PM
3

As Oh has common sense, she likely knew the difference between sexual relations that one secretly does not want to engage in and rape that occurs with oppressive tactics. Therefore, Oh’s accusation against Lee is a false accusation that goes against objective truth. This "common sense doctrine" is an important aspect of these cases. Here's an analogy: I was a manager for a small IT/shipping department, and I would often give references for former employees. When doing so, I was always very caref…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 07:54 PM
4

Lee Jin-Wook himself admitted that there was no consent. This statement is deliberately misleading. The only source I could find for this badly worded claim was a short blog snippet from one of the rulings. Unfortunately, it was presented without any context of the surrounding legal discussion. Still, even though the brief passage was quoted with some obvious bias against the accused, the snippet still noted quite clearly that he did not ask for verbal consent. That specific wording was importan…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 07:25 PM
93

A conviction rate that high is enough – in and of itself – to prove that unfair bias exists against the accused within these systems. 98% is unheard of even in banana republics where they have to maintain some semblance of objectivity. Yet I'm sure some will hear this and think: "Those remaining 2% must have gotten away with horrible crimes!".
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:20 PM
28

I'm not American and men are second-class citizens in the health system where I live as well. There is no corresponding "Office of Men's Health" here either. Nor does such an office exist in any other developed nation in the world that I know of (there could be an exception somewhere that I'm forgetting right now). So no, this is not a "mostly US" problem. This is a global issue.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:50 PM
4

Reddit, in general, is a tiny window showing only the ultra-left thoughts of mostly young, idealistic, uninformed sheep. And the way reddit has been administrated and moderated over the last ten years has turned it into the insular and dying failure that it is. I made a post a week ago that went around into a lot of different subs I usually don't see, and the responses I got were eye-opening, though mostly confusing. The replies didn't make much sense. However, I quickly remembered that reddit i…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 06:02 PM
26

The fact that 1 in 31 people suffer from HAI's (Hospital-Acquired Infections, according to the CDC's own data) even in modern, clean facilities like the US should give the entire medical establishment pause about performing this unneeded surgery. Especially when it comes to the question of cutting newborn babies, given their immature or even completely undeveloped immune systems.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:02 PM
12

We see individual posts of these stories of abuse so often around here that it seems to be an epidemic of major proportions, but it's hard to know for sure. That's why meta-analysis videos like this are so important (I quickly watched through a few 5-10 min segments of it on high speed, and wow, does it ever catalogue a massive number of such cases). These long-form videos give a sense of the bigger picture, and demonstrate the incredible scope of the actual problem. Seeing just the individual p…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:23 PM
1

You could try to argue that, but it would be a losing position. Any person who is desired by another person has a form of "power" over them. Because that "seductive" person has good looks, high status, wealth, powerful reputation, or whatever other trait is desirable, they are attractive and many people want to have sex with them. So the argument is easily dismissed as a simplistic tautology: attractive people have power over others because they are attractive. If you follow that line of reasoni…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:07 PM
6

Here's the proper CDC page, and yes, it references circumcision, just not directly. (Seriously though, damn the CDC and their wont to reorganize their web site constantly, so that even grabbing new links from search engines still runs the risk of referencing the wrong pages.)
/r/MensRights03/07/24 11:08 PM
9

There's nothing unhealthy per se about circumcision. Really? Just the fact that 1 in 31 people suffer from HAI's (Hospital-Acquired Infections, according to the CDC's own data) even in modern, clean facilities like the US doesn't give you pause about performing any unneeded surgery? Or the fact that the number is likely closer to around 1 in 20 for newborn babies after said surgery, given their immature or even completely undeveloped immune systems? And that's not considering all of the other un…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:49 PM
14

There's no benefit to intentionally using language to shame men for something that happened to them against their will as a baby. You have a point about not using potentially inflammatory language, and being aware of your audience. However, having an intact foreskin is the only healthy and ethical choice to make for a baby boy, so I'm not going to worry about mincing words right now in this discussion. Describing the normal state of affairs as "intact" is simply the truth, since the foreskin is …
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:21 PM
102

I’ve only ever been able to have an orgasm with a man who was uncircumcised As others have noted, you should call these men "intact", or just normal. But more importantly, your interests or personal aesthetics do not matter in the choice of what men decide to do with their own bodies. Whether you can orgasm or not is simply not a priority here. Seriously, even Laci Green trotted out the dumb "intact penises look better" argument when opposing the unfair practice being done on baby boys. Just eff…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:23 PM
6

police are against you, they will try to trick you to say things that are inaccurate, do not talk to the police. They will not help you, it is a trap. They will charge you anyway to avoid problems. This is the most important piece of advice in this post, regardless of what charges are being brought against you. Don't. Talk. To. The. Police. Every single guy I told about what happened to me, replied that they had some issue with a girl in the past I'm not surprised by this. I actually contend tha…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:59 PM
6

Before I argue this different point of contention about privacy enforcement, I want to make sure I'm not wasting my time with someone who will just shift the goalposts again and again. Do you accept that your original contention was a false dilemma and would you say that you abandoned that position?
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:47 PM
14

False dilemma fallacy detected. Both of those options are easily possible. A person's medical information is classified with the highest privacy level of all general data out there, so businesses, governments, etc, will not have access to it by default (rare exceptions do exist, but they are not common).
/r/MensRights03/07/24 11:34 AM
1

Wow. They actually leave men out completely from that list. Their hatred of males really is that blatant and shameless.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 06:30 PM
2

In the US the left are also the ones who made the legal decision to punt – and thereby kill – the Supreme Court challenge to the male-only draft, and they only chose to argue against such an unfair draft policy from a "this is sexist against wahmen" perspective. No mention of all the men's lives lost in war. Because that holds no value to them. It's deliberate and systemic at this point. And they think their marketing can override their long list of disparagements against men in the minds of the…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 06:25 PM
5

I completed my math and physics degree many years ago, but my experience was similar to yours. Even worse though, I had the added discourtesy of being denied a significant scholarship because the government decided they wanted "equality" in the STEM fields. And despite this great monetary incentive, all my second-year math and physics courses ended up with all men except for a single holdout from across the aisle, while all the rest of those "fairer sex" first-year students coasted off into chem…
/r/MensRights27/06/24 05:36 PM
31

Aka.. In all situations men are expected to be in control of their actions.. But women are never expected to be held accountable for their actions or even held accountable to the same standard that men are.. These approaches are called "hyperagency" and "hypoagency" respectively. Though for some strange and unknown reason these two words are strongly suppressed in our modern discourse. I say "strange and unknown" with obvious sarcasm, of course. It's more than likely because those words drive di…
/r/MensRights26/06/24 03:01 PM
6

All I know is that all those cars in the driveways of doctors certainly look very expensive. But according to some apologists in this very thread – who argue in favour of taking away the right to bodily integrity for infants – the obvious reality we all see of filthy rich circumcision doctors is only because of "other procedures" they do, because they make "practically nothing" doing circumcisions. Strange how the hospitals maximize profit on every other surgery they do, except for this one. And…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 03:56 AM
5

The funny thing is that this is not going to work out the way the makers of this poster think it will. Let's say you want a person who is feeling too scared to leave their house to get better. Is that done by enabling them to stay locked inside the home forever? I think we all know that only makes the disease worse. And the same thing happens here. Given an irrational fear of strange men, avoidance is only going to make a sufferer more fearful, and worsen the phobia. And that leads to worse illn…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 11:30 PM
13

As far as I know regarding studies on the subject of peer pressure, men are actually less susceptible to social pressure on how to dress, behave, etc. However, when it comes to risk-taking behaviour such as drug use, then yes, because men are less risk adverse they will be more likely at the group level to try drugs as teens. The thing though is that being risk adverse is not directly related to resisting peer pressure or not, so that's a glaring error right there in attributing this behaviour t…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:11 PM
3

I think a more helpful focus would be on issues like the following: even though prostate cancer kills more men, it receives half the funding that breast cancer research does the only common screening for the disease is an unreliable and awkward (for both the patient and the doctor) test to feel around for surface lumps...early detection in treating all cancers is vital, and a better testing methodology for this cancer is sorely needed and long overdue stop with pushing the "it only kills older m…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 10:18 PM
5

Of course most reasonable people don't think that male success automatically comes down to unearned "privilege". I don't think that, and please stop beating up on strawmen and respond to my actual arguments. "Male privilege" is a cornerstone/axiom/tenet of academic discourse at this time, and if you want to try to argue otherwise, then please, enlighten me with your wisdom. I doubt you will be able to find any significant pushback however, because anyone who dares oppose such rhetoric is immedia…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 08:18 PM
8

Unfortunately, it appears I have to repeat the following from my initial comment: Now I wouldn't be surprised if some older analysis existed from before a stranglehold was gained on these disciplines... Good luck though trying to replace all these lazy "men bad" studies coming out over the last decade or so with something useful that might potentially cast the "sisterhood" in a negative light. The modern academy is a monolith. Any success that men achieve is due to "privilege". Yet male hardship…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 05:28 PM
10

Infanticide is only the law enforcement term for the crime, so your comment appears to be based on a misunderstanding. I'm talking about the psychological motivations like narcissism, disgust sensitivity, etc, that are behind the preponderance of these tragedies.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 04:23 PM
65

A better study would be something like: "Investigating feelings of resentment and disgust towards infants in mothers" to explore why moms are the number one parental threat to kill their own children. But of course we all know why that useful research would never be performed by the academy these days. Now I wouldn't be surprised if some older analysis existed from before a stranglehold was gained on these disciplines, but in the present era it's all just lazy echo chamber nonsense that reinforc…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 03:06 PM
1

Like any simplistic view of things, pill ideology attempts – and fails – to summarize all the complexity of life and the world into small, easy-to-understand soundbites, and so it ends up completely devoid of nuance. There are so many more causes and motivations behind what people do than are imagined by that philosophy, Horatio.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 11:14 PM
-1

Your post confuses some variants of the naturalistic fallacy – which should be criticized whenever they exist – with the unarguable fact that certain sex differences do exist and are real. Your assertion basically boils down to: "We mustn't say true things if they harm our position." or "Some idiots might think we are saying this is the way things should be, so we can't talk about these facts.". I fundamentally disagree with both of these stances. The truth about our world cannot be sexist, nor …
/r/MensRights08/06/24 01:26 PM
4

Furthermore, women have less of a fight or flight response than men. "Fight or flight" is more than a bit of a false dichotomy in most species – like humans – where communication and a social order exist. There, "yell for help" becomes the more common instinctive tactic, as it serves to frighten off aggressive attackers, and/or rally support from other stronger members of the species who are nearby. In terms of ensuring an individual's survival, almost nothing beats a loud noise to signal danger…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:22 PM
2

They write what their readers want to hear. So it's an endless supply of: "Men are lonely without you" or "Men are even more miserable than you feel right now". It brings in the clicks.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:48 PM
3

Thanks for the great rebuttal of what is obvious gaslighting. The way I usually argue this point is by noting that "loneliness" and "peace and solitude" describe the exact same relationship situation, and it's only the person's mindset that is different. Dating and romance isn't for everyone; it really is that simple.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 04:37 PM
6

There's another categorization that always appears in these studies, often termed "Closed as an informational report" or similar by law enforcement. These make up around 20% of case outcomes for accusations of sexual assault based on the studies I've read. And what does "Closed as informational report" mean? Well, it's basically the Aziz Ansari situation. No crime was committed, because the accuser's report does not meet the criteria to constitute illegal activity. This is actually quite normal …
/r/MensRights05/06/24 03:24 PM
54

Protecting the sisterhood was more important than helping a child. I think the way so many feminist organizations rallied around Amber Heard – despite everyone knowing she was physically abusive towards Johnny Depp – was a "mask off" moment for exactly this type of behaviour. I think it opened the eyes of a majority of men, and probably more than a few women as well.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 02:48 AM
6

It’s the men who seemingly have it all that often suffer in silence the hardest. <sigh>. According to scientific studies covering over 1500 male suicides, the urban myth of "men suffering in silence" is rightly called "harmful medical misinformation". Here's an extract from the linked paper: Rates of contact with services among middle-aged men were higher than expected; almost all had been in contact with a front-line service or agency at some time. It is therefore too simplistic to say that men…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:14 PM
17

My experience is that individual men are almost always the subject of ridicule and disparagement, especially when they are being talked about behind their backs. The popularity of social media like "Are we dating hating the same guy?" is solid proof of this. Though that is "directed" disrespect, and I'm not sure if you're looking only for unintended disrespect based on your example? Well, in that type of specific situation, it may be the case that men are simply less likely to take offense over …
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:59 AM
2

There was a post on this sub not even a year ago about how 1 in 3 primary schools in the UK have no male teachers. So a child's odds of getting even just one male teacher aren't all that great. And they wonder why boys start thinking early on that school isn't for them.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 11:42 PM
5

I did some more looking and found two articles from a Canadian university basically stating "men have nothing to offer", only in a whole lot more words. The first is here, and this is the second. To summarize both, they basically assert that having a male teacher does nothing to help boys academic performance (based on qualitative "studies" they've done, which is all the proof they need). They also say that representation in education is only important insofar as it show kids that teaching is no…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 08:13 PM
3

Well, I've seen a number of such initiatives start up in many places where men are underrepresented, but it's never very effective. The people involved in these endeavours have to watch out for attempts to paralyze and sidetrack it via the introduction of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt). Claims like: "It's too complex of an issue. Hiring more men is a simplistic solution to a much more difficult problem." will abound. Or "It's not that bad of a gap affecting boys in this one small area (educa…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 07:56 PM
2

Unfortunately, I can't find a link to it anymore. Perhaps someone else can track it down. It was a Canadian school administrator or teacher being quoted in a news story, after being asked if the education system there should push for a 50/50 split of male and female teachers. And the quote (paraphrased) was: "male teachers don't offer anything to students that female teachers can't already provide", so in their opinion things were fine as they were. The fact that things are so lopsided and none …
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:33 PM
2

Yes, movies and shows can be great no matter what characters are portrayed. The fact still remains though that woke writing is inherently terrible. The reason this always happens is because creating a good story is only possible with a very open and creative process, and the problem with activist and ideological approaches that no one really talks about is that they completely ruin the ability for people to work together to create, to communicate, to build a team, and more. The whole point of wo…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:55 PM
2

Thanks! From looking at that comment it appears that they added u/safestbot as well, so that's another bot to be aware of. Edit: Given this info, I was able to track down another post that gave a full link to make sure all of these particular bot accounts are dealt with. Posting direct links appears to get filtered so they had to put all three bot URL's in a pastebin. Basically, if you use the above three URL's, you should see a page either saying "You've blocked this user", in which case you're…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 04:33 PM
2

As I mentioned in another comment in this thread, the only recourse you might have about this is to message an admin and state that you followed all of the IAF sub's stated rules, but still got banned for an "official" but undocumented policy that the sub has been using in secret. However, the only thing this might do is to get the rule clearly and publicly stated, and that's about it. And from the experience of users in other subs in the past, the admins don't ever bother enforcing the sitewide…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:18 PM
9

One of the supposed ways around this is to block/ignore the /u/saferbot user. It's the sitewide bot account that runs the auto-ban script I think. By this point there are probably more bots than just that one, so who knows if that works any more. And even if it does avoid a ban, I contend that the bot saves you time by exposing which communities are not worth participating in. A sub run under that kind of censorship has only "performative" comments. There's no actual conversations or discussion …
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:55 PM
13

I recall the mods of the KIA sub looked into this question in depth a few years ago, when it first started happening to the users who posted there. From their conversations with the admins they found that auto-bans for posting on other subs was not against the sitewide rules of reddit. However, what technically was against the rules was a subreddit banning people for participating in "wrongthink" subs, but not listing that fact in the official sub rules on the sidebar. And surprise surprise, non…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:46 PM
1

but some of these gender norms can be harmful if theyre taken too far. The problem with these types of statements is that they really don't say much. I mean, water is something we obviously need to survive, but drinking it can be taken too far (i.e. drowning). If someone were to say: "Gender norms are like water. We must smash them out of existence!", you'd immediately think they were crazy. Norms are just group averages, and as such they are nothing to fear. Ignorant people can misunderstand th…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:26 PM
2

It's unfortunate that you've chosen to perceive it in such a negative manner.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:58 PM
0

Just a few years ago, there were gay men who were beaten to death with the authorities turning a blind eye to it. What are the names of these actual cases of multiple brutal murders that "no one cared about"? It's interesting that you don't give real-life examples, when it would be so easy to do so and perhaps prove me wrong (if there is a systemic problem of such). Or are you worried that I'll look further into them and come to a different conclusion than you about the "authorities turning a bl…
/r/MensRights27/05/24 08:44 PM
3

I can still remember thought-provoking essays from the 1980's and early 90's on how society had finally learned that the opposite of "normal" was not "mentally ill". Society no longer had to reject the idea of a norm existing in order to accept differences between people. The future looked promising. However, some influential and hateful people felt otherwise, and so here we are.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 05:51 PM
5

In what way weren't either group socially acceptable in the past? Can you name some real-life examples of men being turned away from some career that aren't just exaggerations once you start looking into them? Seriously, the impact of this so-called problem has been way overblown in the imaginations of people from my experience. Looking at actual history, many men still went into hairdressing or ballet or similar fields in previous decades. Sure, there would be a gossipy wife's circle who poo-po…
/r/MensRights27/05/24 05:43 PM
9

I would argue we already had it. It's called personal interaction, and it worked fine to resolve most differences between men for centuries. Simple and effective. No need to get any more complicated than to give people good tools and skills to deal with conflict.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:10 PM
7

Yeah, rigourous definitions are the bane of the woke activists. They hate having to admit it's all just a moral and religious system they use to decide that something is "problematic".
/r/MensRights27/05/24 04:05 PM
10

There's a couple of factors missing in your analysis. One of the most thing though is to stop and consider if your question is even the right one to be asking in the first place. I would recommend that you not fall for the apex fallacy by only focusing on the minority of the most wealthy families who can afford university degrees. You must start with asking a more fundamental question: what are the high school graduation rates for men? Because once you do so you realize that men are even more be…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 10:42 PM
2

If law enforcement or legal systems did start measuring it, then the current narrative of men being the "more violent sex" would be called into question. Instead, they can just ignore those inconvenient facts, and continue to lazily record cases like the one posted by OP as men alone being violent. A lot of powerful interests continue to receive funding, and the useful narrative of "dangerous males" continues to be propagated. I would wager that the number of violent crimes are statistically ind…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 11:29 PM
7

I understand that you mean well. And yes, there may be individual instances of men not seeking the help they need. However, it's well past time that we call out the tired old mantra of: "Men just need to talk about their feelings more" for the blatant and harmful medical misinformation that it is. I recommend that you consider the findings of a 2021 UK study. In the section about "Contact with services" for men who had committed suicide: 91% middle-aged men had been in contact with at least one …
/r/MensRights22/05/24 03:53 PM
2

This case actually started with a rather mild criticism of Greta Thunberg – and one that was warranted – according to another commenter in the thread. And lo and behold, that made the reaction against this individual even more emotionally-charged, since she is like a religious icon in the minds of her supporters.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:52 PM
3

The "hostility and aggression" in this case appears to be at an all-time high. If I'm reading things right, the administration first tried to put him through what constitutes a "constructive dismissal", where they gave him nothing to do and took away all his well-earned positional titles (this is an extremely mentally-damaging thing to do to an employee, which is why it is against the law). Then, when he forced them to give him back the minimum duties of his former job (because it was ruled that…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:43 PM
39

When believing in the Patriarchy can be enshrined in a university's code of conduct – making it the same type of offense as academic dishonesty – you know who wields the power in these institutions of higher learning.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:51 AM
7

There's nothing quite so empowering as attempted murder, don't you know? Well, at least in their mentally ill minds I guess. The truth, however, is that they are just posturing, because the most probable way they will attack is through the use of "proxy violence". Most of them would not dare to start a physical altercation where they risk personal injury, so they will instead use institutions, social networks, manipulate friends/white knights, or other "proxies" to destroy the target of their ha…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:39 PM
46

That anecdote reminds me of when the entire staff of Jezebel admitted in writing that they all physically abused their male partners.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:04 AM
1

The law in such cases is a bit more murky than you are indicating. There do exist so-called "Romeo and Juliet" laws in most jurisdictions that allow a non-minor to date a minor, so long as the two had a pre-existing relationship from when they were both minors. So one person can't suddenly be punished just because they become a few days older and turn seventeen. And in Banks case I believe that he and Wanetta had "fooled around" before when he was a minor too, though not quite as seriously as th…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:42 PM
1

Brian Banks was arrested for statutory rape since he had sex with a 14-15 year old girl who was under age of consent when he was 17 and over age of consent. That statement is factually incorrect as things stand today. Wanetta Gibson, his false accuser, was 15 at the time, yes, but she later admitted to the fact that the two did not have sex under the stairwell at their school, which is what Brian Banks always maintained up until the legal system forced him to plead guilty or face the likely outc…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 10:11 PM
35

Imagine a hair-loss cure for men being created from the similar procedure being done to baby girls. The people selling those products would be taken out into the streets and shot. And I'm not being hyperbolic there. They would be shot. However, when it's baby boys suffering to support the estrogen-fueled beauty industry.... Well, then no one cares, because fashion and cosmetics are even more of a priority for our society than the health and lives of boys and men.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:49 PM
4

Excellent post! I believe this is the one true "wedge issue" that can help male advocates communicate all of the other areas like employment, education, legal rights, family law, medical care, etc, where men are being treated like second-class citizens. Risk factors like unemployment, divorce and child estrangement, legal problems, and more, lead directly to an increase in suicide, yet nothing is being done to mitigate these root causes. In fact they're getting worse. And kudos to you for pointi…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:34 PM
7

It's interesting that you reference external circumstances (bad marriage, career disappointment, etc) as the reasons for this rise in these crimes, but you don't consider the very real possibility that the profession is attracting people who are already mentally unwell. By that I mean they already exhibit an attraction to children, or towards teenagers who are below the age of consent. With so many slaps on the wrist being given, at least if you're not male of course, it's a basic certainty that…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 06:29 PM
3

Supposedly there is a bot account you can block (called /u/saferbot I think?...though there might be other bot accounts they use now) to prevent this from happening. But in the end, you're better off to just let it find you. There is no genuine discussion happening in those kinds of subs, because it's all just "performative" when people don't feel like they can share their honest thoughts, so these bans are actually saving you a lot of wasted time by telling you what places aren't worth particip…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 03:42 AM
2

That 85% number was always a gross overestimate by marketing firms that wanted to get businesses to hire them to tap this "crucial" market. However, it's one of those "female supremacist" assertions that deserves to be ridiculed just as much as the wage gap is. It never recognized the "shared" decisions made by both husband and wife, such as buying a home and similar significant expenses that a family made, which resulted in men always having economic influence well beyond those baffling assumpt…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 04:59 PM
2

The question of "discrimination" can actually get a bit complex when it comes to businesses. Getting a haircut, for example. There are "styles" of haircuts that are commonly called "men's styles" and "women's styles", and as you might expect the men's haircuts do tend to be much simpler and take less effort. So businesses often choose to specialize in just one type of styles to save on the costs of training their employees, shorten the time spent to complete a haircut, etc. It's also important t…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 04:32 PM
-8

Your argument only says that neither of these individuals are mature enough to engage in sexual activity. And I wouldn't paint an entire group with that broad of a brush regarding the way you have perceived their lack of mental acuities. Falling for those kinds of pejorative stereotypes is just a sign of lazy thinking.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 06:10 PM
171

The "making out" phrase in the title is mind-boggling. So a ten-year old boy is mature and adult enough to "make out" with his 24-year old teacher? Seriously? Just call it what it is: sexual assault on a child/minor. These lazy, sleazy, and and dishonest media outlets need to stop pretending that men and boys can't be the victims of anything under the sun. Unfortunately, the proper use of language like "rape", "assault", etc, is still a very rare exception when it comes to men and boys. It's alw…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:40 PM
8

Another likely example of this is the sentencing in the Masterson case, where the judge included impact testimony that should have been disallowed. And then put Masterson behind bars for an excessive amount of time that not even 90% of first-degree murderers get sentenced to, which every objective legal expert believes will get overturned or at least significantly reduced because of the errors in trying the case. I think the problem right now is that a number of judges are scared after what happ…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 06:39 AM
12

What you describe is pretty much the Brian Banks story in a nutshell. The way police and the legal system "work" these cases – they wear you down with infinite resources, force you to accept a plea deal, contact your work and disrupt your employment, interrogate you in grueling hours-long sessions, etc – is basically guaranteed to destroy innocent men's lives. In Banks' instance, he was overcharged – two counts of forcible rape, one of sodomy, and a special circumstance of kidnapping to top it a…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 06:04 AM
10

The politics of these types of cases are chilling. Prosecutors/DAs and law enforcement officials can destroy someone's life on a whim, without any consequences to themselves. The only recourse the wrongly accused/convicted have is to try and bring a civil suit against the legal system, hope to be awarded damages (I don't think the chances of winning are usually that good though, unless discovery uncovers malicious intent or gross negligence), and even then the money they are reimbursed is often …
/r/MensRights27/04/24 05:30 AM
23

If it were "just secular" as you describe it, then the CDC/WHO and others would recommend circumcision only to grown adult men, who can choose what to do with their own bodies and evaluate the pros and cons of the procedure for themselves. These organizations most definitely wouldn't ignore bodily autonomy and the lack of consent from infants in any other case that involves an actually secular procedure, or the fact that babies have poorly developed immune systems and the danger of Hospital Acqu…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 06:57 PM
25

The EU Parliament is an avowedly feminist organization, and this legislation is being enacted under very specific feminist doctrine (VAW), but I'm sure the continued existence of the damaging, unhealthy, and bodily violating practice of circumcision will still get blamed on The Evil PatriarchyTM.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 06:34 PM
6

I would simply paraphrase the wise words of Helen Pluckrose in response: "There are many other ways to achieve equality of the sexes – such as egalitarianism – that do not carry the unfortunate political baggage that feminism does.". It wouldn't make a difference to these brainwashed ideologues of course, but I wouldn't be speaking to change their minds. It's always a good idea to frame your position in a positive way to the public, because that's who you should always be trying to sway to your …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 03:06 PM
7

I don't see myself as a victim, but if someone straight up tries to kill me, I will have no trouble recognizing that I've been made into a victim by their actions. Don't try to gaslight men when they point out immoral and criminal behaviour by others. And the fact is that out in the real world, you don't matter. You aren't the gender activists with power who get to set the laws, form the narratives, write the policies, and who only ever attack masculine behaviours with pejoratives. So your attem…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 01:22 PM
22

So it's all of the people using this term every day all around the world who are "misunderstanding" the concept then? Wow, there have been some delusional takes from apologists posted here before, but this one takes it to a whole new level. And I have to note that you can't name even one masculine trait – not a single one – that hasn't been called toxic and problematic by mainstream media, prestigious academic institutions, etc, from within the framework of that man-hating term. So whatever you …
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:38 AM
40

Can you name me one masculine trait that hasn't been called toxic in the media, academic literature, etc? If not, then the term now means: "all masculinity is toxic" in practice, because that's how it's being used and applied in the real world. It's as simple as that. Also, if the description were as neutral as you are suggesting, it would have been called "toxic behaviour" right from the outset, instead of targeting only men. But it wasn't, and I think we all know why it wasn't applied equally …
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:42 PM
4

Sorry to hear that this has been your experience. I would have hoped that because male advocacy doesn't have so much mainstream funding, that the people involved in it would be slightly more genuine because there was not such a easy path to profit. Unfortunately, it seems that was somewhat naïve of me. Still, I encourage you to stay the course in your style and methods. I've watched several interviews you have done, and I truly believe that you would be a great face for the entire movement on a …
/r/MensRights04/04/24 01:12 AM
2

Interestingly, it isn't just the size of the hands that create this discrepancy, though they do have a significant impact, as I know well from being a 191 cm tall man with hands that seem large even for my uncommon height, and that have served me well as a pianist over many decades of recreational and even vocational playing. A lot of this gender "imbalance" also comes down to average differences in brain structure between the groups. Men have a mental ability called "dead reckoning" that relate…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 02:53 PM
27

These ideologues only had limited and temporary success in changing the rules for what constitutes intelligent and noteworthy research in the hard sciences, thankfully. Once objective and evidence-based criteria returned to those fields, the countdown began on this short-lived age of: "presume a conclusion that the cult desperately wants to hear; find any possible way to give it validity in a lazily-written paper; get published and receive praise". I very much suspect that this will not be their…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 01:49 AM
3

They have done so already. Just read Justice Sotomayor's legal opinion denying the petition challenging the US draft from back in 2021. She wrote a detached opinion supposedly on behalf of the majority of the Supreme Court – but surprise surprise it was just a marketing smoke screen to help build a false narrative about "excluding wahmen" and "male superiority" and the like – and it just ended up blaming the whole thing on men. The entire text is filled to the brim with divisive identity politic…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 03:14 PM
4

Drafting everyone for a minimum of "non-combat roles" was the main relief requested by the "Rostker v. Goldberg" challenge to US selective service laws all the way back in 1981. However, the US Supreme Court ruled against even that minimal requirement, though you wouldn't know it with all the historical revisionism surrounding the current case against the US draft, and the way the whole matter is being spun by bad faith actors as being a product of "male supremacy" and "repressive gender roles" …
/r/MensRights26/03/24 02:48 PM
3

This is why banning the draft is a complete joke. When invading armies are attacking your home do you really think a nation will be able to stick to their guns and say “but what about the gender equality??” Exactly. Men in countries where the draft has been abolished need to realize that their legal status is just temporary, because it is only a product of affluence and an extended period of peace that allows their society to feel safe for the moment. Once an existential threat inevitably appear…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 02:27 PM
0

I'm not really familiar with tiktok, but the totals compiled by trending algorithms elsewhere (X/Twitter) include people who are replying to counter the original claims, or otherwise criticizing them, or even just asking neutral questions like "why is x trending all of a sudden?". To assume that they are all engaging in the same disparaging behaviour towards men is incorrect and lazy, if trending means the same on tiktok as everywhere else. So is there any better evidence for your serious claim?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 02:13 PM
16

It's always good to see these "Are we hating the same guy" groups getting treated in the harsh way they deserve. It's unfortunate though that most men often won't have the resources to bring the law to bear on what is a clear case of defamation, libel, interference with employment, doxing, and more.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 02:03 PM
-1

Where do you source your hyperbolic claim that "literally over 10,000" of these videos exist? Or is that just a large number you pulled out of thin air to try and make this one video seem like an epidemic of national importance? Look, superficial and ignorant people are always going to exist, especially online with the unimaginable numbers and variety of human beings that we are dealing with. I really wonder if you are somehow hoping that these people who poke fun at short men should get censore…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 01:54 PM
6

It's a long and tragic story, but to sum it up: I won – by proving without a doubt that it was a false accusation – and still lost at the same time, because as many accused men discover, the process of being investigated and having such a stigma hanging over you is the punishment. To keep it short, she was an employee who I managed, and who made vague, nebulous complaints against me (sometimes she said I "made her feel uncomfortable", while other times it was more specific, but never anything th…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 07:27 PM
23

This is the same UN that decided men didn't deserve food and water humanitarian aid after natural disasters. Their corrupt version of "equality" needs some serious rethinking.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:22 PM
6

Glad to see someone else understands human biology. Significant dehydration occurs when a person is fighting a viral infection, and that causes muscles to become very sore and painful. More muscle mass = more pain. The real test comes when sharing this information with those who make these jokes about "man flu" and the like, and in my experience they always fail unfortunately. They just go back to their insults even after you show them their ignorance. And when they don't change their minds afte…
/r/MensRights13/03/24 03:28 PM
7

I have never been able to tell the difference between "lived experience" and "my friends and family". It's just crass and corrupt nepotism in nicer sounding terms.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 04:06 PM
35

What many don't realize is that these police actions are in large part due to the sizeable shift of fewer men getting married or even dating. Throughout history, human laws and customs have generally been set up to extract money from men to go towards the benefit of "society", and so I predict that we'll see a rise in these types of crackdowns as the "relationship income pipeline" erodes moving forward. They'll say: "Oh, don't worry. It's just a small fine for posting wrongthink. Men don't have …
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:54 PM
11

The plans could see an expansion in services which offer NHS checks in “men-friendly spaces” – such as sports grounds, pubs and workplaces – alongside efforts to encourage boys and men to be more open about their mental health. <sigh> Here we go again with the "men just need to talk more" medical misinformation. Research exists showing that the majority of men do seek help for mental health issues, so these government plans shouldn't have to resort to unreliable anecdotes if they don't want to. …
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:24 PM
11

There's a light-year difference between "feeling unsafe" (i.e. someone looked at me in a threatening way) and "being unsafe" (i.e. someone was waving a weapon in front of my face). Don't confuse one for the other.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 05:10 PM
49

There are so many different terms used, from "sexual harassment" to "sexual misconduct" to "sexual impropriety" and more, all to criminalize anything that might make a person "feel unsafe". Though, for some reason, men never get to "feel unsafe" in the eyes of the law, and men are the only ones ever investigated for committing these crimes. Strange how that is.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 02:27 PM
3

So in order to disprove this patriarchy we would just have to demonstrate a system within society that harmed men, and worked to the benefit of women? That would be enough to falsify the hypothesis, right?
/r/MensRights07/03/24 06:28 PM
7

There is actually a scientific test for this, called the "Null Hypothesis". The way the test is usually applied is to ask a proponent of a hypothesis to name a simple piece of evidence that could disprove their claims. All natural theories have to be falsifiable, or else they are part of the supernatural, and outside the purview of the scientific method. This challenge has been issued in regards to the "Patriarchy" hypothesis, but that criticism is simply ignored by its proponents. The only vagu…
/r/MensRights07/03/24 06:05 PM
29

The activist nonsense around "privilege" and "masculinity is toxic" in the APA's documents actually breaks ethics rules for mental health professionals. As a thought experiment, let's just juxtapose this onto a psychologist who happened to be a big proponent of libertarian economics. Now imagine if they used those politics as part of their "therapy", and sought to turn their clients into believers and advocates in that political ideology, because they had personal experience that libertarianism …
/r/MensRights05/03/24 02:47 PM
1

Everyone has a choice, because people always have the option of just walking away. I know that doing so feels like giving up on your country, but it's a big world out there, and you're always walking towards something when you choose to walk away. There's a huge opportunity cost involved in staying somewhere – especially one that doesn't value or respect you – even though it's invisible and difficult to see for some. But once you recognize the opportunities that exist elsewhere, you'll wonder wh…
/r/MensRights04/03/24 02:39 PM
34

Any self-respecting man in the IDF should be quitting immediately. Your government just told you that you're worthless. You're just an object, to be openly discarded.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 03:10 AM
13

Kudos to James Nuzzo for speaking out about the poor scholarship in academia, and for exposing the blatant bias against men in funding, government health services, and elsewhere. Also, it's great to see Bettina promoting this; she really is a thorn in the side of all the ideologues who only want a single, false narrative to be heard. No wonder they go after her so much.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 12:18 AM
7

It wasn't just "approve of rape" though. Your quote from the article shows them using the specific phrase "rape attitude" (unless that is your synopsis and wording), which is what I find very curious. I mean, if I wanted, I could justify defining a term like "rape attitude" as believing men and women are physiologically different. Then I would ask the following survey question: are men on average taller than women? If the respondent answered yes, I could logically deduce that they "approved of r…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 05:21 PM
28

Well, this is the first time I've heard the term "rape attitude" used in such a manner (the link to the RWU page gives a 403 error so I can't get any more details on the context unfortunately). Therefore my starting question would be: what is the definition for this concept? Ah, who am I kidding. I already know what the definition is. It will be defined in such a broad and nebulous way as to apply to 100% of men if they needed it to. There's no need for me to do proper research and apply academi…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 04:23 PM
3

I think what the person you are responding to is saying is best summed up with the medical adage: "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.". There are many habits that form better mental health in men, and that can stop a non-suicidal man from becoming ill, or help stop a slide into an even worse situation for those starting down that path. However, it is important to realize that this advice does not magically fix those who are at that stage, so perhaps it would promote better understa…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 01:27 PM
8

I would change the wording slightly to: "...provide resources to a gynocentric world." myself. The people in charge aren't a monolith of one sex or the other, but the motivation behind everything that's built is in service of one particular sex only (hint: it's not men).
/r/MensRights02/03/24 07:42 PM
10

In my experience, the biggest difference when interacting with health services can be seen in men's limited access to testing and diagnostic equipment. My neighbour once shared an experience with me of getting an emergency CAT scan over an embarrassing – and ultimately very minor – health scare she had, "just to give her peace of mind" in the medical staff's own words. Whereas I, a man, only ever get told that those kind of resources aren't warranted for such a low priority problem. That even ha…
/r/MensRights02/03/24 05:41 PM
6

I'm not surprised to learn that "Are we hating the same guy" has a part to play in this tragedy. Anyone who uses or even condones the existence of those groups is dangerous in the extreme, and should be avoided at all costs.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 12:19 AM
27

It's good to see at least there are potentially some legitimate institutions that still exist somewhere, that won't let themselves be (ab)used by vindictive and vengeful individuals, bringing down the huge power and wealth of the state and media against a defenseless lone citizen. We'll have to see what happens in the future with this situation, but to be honest I'm not holding my breath. Too many people in these positions are scared to stand up for innocent men and uphold their right to due pro…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:56 AM
13

And even worse, many "equality" indexes have hard coded this particular gap into their baseline. So in countries where the life expectancy numbers are closer than the average difference – of course men never live longer, but sometimes it's only a few years of life lost at least – the measurement comes out showing that men have "privilege", and that inequality and oppression exist. I'm looking at you, United Nations.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 01:29 PM
3

Of course a man's willingness to die for his country is transactional. And if his country doesn't care about him, he won't care about it or the lives of anyone else within it.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:56 AM
6

This happens in a lot of places on reddit unfortunately. The surprising thing to me is how it's encouraged in so many subreddits, and never opposed by anyone (at least that I can see). I know if someone here said: "Why should we listen to a whore like you?" in response to some critic that posted in a thread here, they would get called out for it with something like the following: "Please shut up and leave the debating to the adults in the room. You're just making other people look bad.". Don't t…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:48 AM
1

Masculinity is about how you comport yourself, and it basically comes down to being a responsible adult. Just don't be an emotional and immature child. That's about all that's required. More specifically, I do think that a significant part of being mature is the art of stoicism. I know that the word has gotten attacked a lot recently in some circles, likely because people who aren't visibly emotional are less easy to manipulate and control. But it's important to realize that stoicism isn't about…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 02:36 AM
4

Are feminist concepts like the Evil Patriarchy, or the belief that masculinity is toxic, part of and extreme or fringe element of the movement?
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:04 AM
2

Surprisingly, it seems to fairly represent the critics and doesn't say "you should think X." The whole "This misinterpretation..." bit in regards to the "anti-male sentiment" criticism is very one-sided I would say. It's the standard: "But those aren't real feminists!" deflection and lie. I would ask it for examples of this so-called "wide spectrum of feminist thought" that doesn't believe in feminism's concept of the patriarchy, and toxic masculinity, and rape culture, for starters. As Karen St…
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:55 AM
10

What often happens in many of these cases is that the public's first impression of the criminal is by seeing them as a "victim" of some kind. I'm not sure if this is who you are talking about in relation to this post, but Amber Heard was the person who popped into my head upon reading it. And looking at her case, she claimed that a man was the aggressor against her, which is an accusation that is automatically believed by many. And that belief is a powerful currency, because even when the facts …
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:32 AM
3

Recess and physical activity are important, yes. However, the single most important change was actually a law. Namely compulsory education laws, which do admittedly vary from country to country, and sometimes even within a country. Basically, these types of laws require children to attend school until at least 16 years of age, or in most places closer to the age of 18. It may sound strange to our modern society, but the biggest single issue facing boys a century ago was that families needed them…
/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:02 AM
4

Won't solve anything. The real issue behind this was the shackling of boys in P-12 education three decades ago. The unspoken truth in education is that boys have always done worse in getting high school diplomas. This has been the case ever since the advent of a standardized education system. Unfortunately though, ideologues have used the "apex fallacy" to limit the conversation to the tiny percentage of extremely wealthy families who could afford university degrees in the past, and ignored the …
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:45 PM
1

The courts unfortunately do not recognize the epidemic of "proxy violence" when it is used by "the weaker sex". As such, it is everywhere in the modern world, especially amongst those who choose to wield institutions and government against anyone they want to destroy. And of course it is men – especially vulnerable men – who are primarily the ones that have their lives ruined because of it.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:36 PM
4

Humans already have sex-typed organs with our different genitalia (men have a penis as compared to a vagina). Oh, and only men have prostates too. And I guess we're missing a womb as well. Oh wait, I also forgot mammary glands. Men don't have those either. You know, it seems like there's already a whole bunch of human body parts and structures that differ based on just the gametes our bodies produce, so why is it so controversial that one more organ – our brain – is subject to similar evolutiona…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:23 PM
3

Perhaps because when men seek help from the health care system, those services aren't diagnosing them properly or providing them with treatment that works for them? Asking for help is obviously only the first step on a long and difficult road to recovery for mental health problems. That should be quite apparent to any rational person. So I have to wonder why your initial reaction to this study's results is to throw up your hands and say: "Well, what on earth could it be if not men being silent? …
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:48 AM
20

It's ok to talk and we must all be ready to listen. Research exists showing that the majority of men do seek help for mental health issues, so you don't have to resort to unreliable anecdotes if you don't want to. For example, the results of a UK study. In the section about "Contact with services" for men who had committed suicide: 91% middle-aged men had been in contact with at least one service or agency at some time. Most importantly, in the paper's conclusion, during the key messages section…
/r/MensRights25/02/24 02:51 PM
2

I understand what you're saying here, but the way this sorting actually functions in practice is by comparing a real brain against properties possessed within what is calculated to be an "average" brain. For example, a male brain tends to have a larger proportion of "front to back" connections than the number of neural fibers that join the two hemispheres together. Also, a male brain will tend to have a larger area devoted to navigation. Plus, men are able to use a technique called "dead reckoni…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:02 PM
9

These reality-challenged ideologues don't understand – or they deliberately misinterpret – that these descriptions of brains as a sex-typed organ are done at the level of huge populations. I mean, no one goes apeshit upon hearing that the average family has 2.3 children (note: that's just a number I pulled out of thin air), because they immediately understand that an average does not apply to – or even exist at – the individual level. The same delineation is true in descriptions of the differenc…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 07:22 PM
3

male feminist (n): a guy who is told that all men are abusers and rapists and thinks to himself: "Yeah, that sounds about right."
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:08 PM
4

There used to be a functional linguistic hierarchy when judging male misbehaviour that went something like this: chauvinist -> sexist -> misogynist. Being called a chauvinist was a minor aspersion to a man's character. It pointed out crude actions such as being a bit too focused on wanting sex or the like. For example, James Bond was often a chauvinist, but that attitude wasn't universally hated at the same time. A sexist was a significantly worse insult, because it comprised thinking that only …
/r/MensRights20/02/24 04:52 PM
13

A major factor is that men are less concerned – in general – about questions of safety and status when choosing work. There is no job that is considered "below" a man to do, and men's higher propensity for risk-taking plays a big part in working certain lucrative jobs. Another factor is that "remote" and "isolated" work pays a lot more than your standard office job, and employment statistics consistently find more men in these as well, because guys tend to be a lot less unhappy when socially sec…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:21 PM
1

Who is this "we" you are referring to? I don't include myself in what a few thousand other people choose to do with their money, as one person among billions of individuals. And to put things into perspective even further, the only reason Amy Schumer was anything for a brief moment is because she's the cousin of Chuck Schumer, and nepotism meant the entertainment industry had to try and market her as "funny". That failed. These people are manufactured successes at best, but even with all the att…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 03:05 AM
15

That's a really strong insight there. If the draconian rules of family court were economically maladaptive, they would have been scrapped a long time ago. The fact that they aren't tell us a lot about how society sees and (ab)uses men.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 08:39 PM
235

A regular reminder that Amy Schumer openly bragged about raping unconscious men, and she even admitted to committing this abhorrent crime on more than one occasion. So I'm not surprised that this unfunny rapist is once again the height of hypocrisy and the best example of: "Rules for thee, but not for me".
/r/MensRights16/02/24 04:28 PM
2

You know, I haven't thought about this idiot even once for about a year. Basically ever since the last moral panic swept around about his "growing influence" on the younger generation of boys. It's interesting to note though that I have never seen a single male teacher or male journalist – those are the two professions that constantly bring him up – getting scared and emotional over his existence. It seems only those unhealthily obsessed with him even notice stuff like his looks to be able to us…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 11:46 PM
58

"Man-hating" is a good description for Western society in general – especially for the media and academia – so it should be no surprise that Reddit tends to reflect that same attitude.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:55 PM
15

The preferred method in these situations is called "proxy violence", and it's becoming more and more common nowadays. Unfortunately, there are no consequences for those who misuse the overwhelming power of institutions, the whisper network, social media, academic policies, HR, etc, to attack someone. I mean, you'd think that calling up a relative, lying to them that you were sexually assaulted, telling them where the false attacker was and his destination, giving a physical description of them, …
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:19 PM
1

"Innocent unless proven guilty" is always a relevant comment IMO, even when information is scant or unavailable.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 09:29 PM
1

Debtor's prisons still exist, only now they are called "family courts". It sounds so much kinder and gentler you see. And some people believe that name change to be "progress", or so I hear.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:27 PM
3

Yeah, mistakes do happen in journalism (though tbh I would not give this dishonest screed from The Atlantic the credit of that label). And in probably 90+% of cases I would be understanding if a correction had to be made. For example, incorrectly writing that something happened in 2014 instead of 2016 is something that could easily slip past an editor when publishing a story. Given the volume of output in a news site, there will always be a number of facts that end up being wrong. This though...…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:13 PM
14

The "correction" by the Atlantic is shameful and infuriating. Just admit you screwed up the actual content of the study, and not just the source. I saw the same problem immediately. Considering the inflammatory nature of the original text, specifically and clearly stating that massive change to the core statistics in their correction – also note how they just term it an "update" to try and minimize the egregious nature of their horrible mistake – should be front and center. But instead it is now…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:14 PM
7

Their correction doesn't appear to admit anything about getting the central – and very inflammatory! – statistics wrong in the original text. That's...a very glaring omission. By my reading, they instead obfuscate their mistake by claiming the article was only "updated" rather than "fixed". And then they describe the problems with the original article as facts being "misattributed" and state the need to "clarify the kinds of behaviors", rather than simply saying: "The original article was incorr…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:00 PM
5

These "well-intentioned" officials always imagine that the law is like a scalpel, and that it will only cut away the unhealthy parts of society that they want it to. However, in reality the law is nothing but a giant sledgehammer, because it can't properly distinguish between normal and criminal actions when "decency" or "feeling coerced" are the vague and nebulous legal definitions being applied. This is just another bad piece of legislation, no matter who benefits more from it in the future. A…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 09:36 PM
35

If you read the article, the ACLU frames it as harmful to women, and that's their focus. They went out of their way to mention how they oppose NCFM on most things. I'm glad they're joining the fight, don't get me wrong. I'm not glad they're part of the fight. The ACLU is horrid. They have become completely corrupted by identity politics and are just piggy-backing on this lawsuit to fight elections. Their participation ends up only hurting a good cause. Recall that the previous case was punted by…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 06:16 PM
3

I don't recall Rodger ever using the term "incel" in any of his deranged rants, and considering the fact that he killed mostly men when he snapped, the idea that he was "targeting" the other sex is laughable. As for your other example, the judge in the Maniassian case concluded that he was only pretending to align with the ideology. The written verdict/sentencing states clearly that he was just referencing it to try and get media attention, which worked to some degree. That ruling was based enti…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:57 PM
7

Tennis is the best example of this phenomenon. The prize money was equalized between the two sexes decades ago, despite the fact that men play more sets, have fewer physical rest chances, and many more disparities that make things harder for males. So basically they work longer hours for the same money. And Men's tennis has always generated the large majority of the revenue on tour. However, it was argued that the new equalization would fix that problem once the level of competition increased on…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:46 PM
19

This dovetails perfectly with the "replication crisis" in sociology, which was widely uncovered back in 2018 I think. Academics automatically accepted findings showing any and all kinds of bias against "marginalized groups", despite the rather obvious lack of rigour in any of the methodologies used by the researchers. What is most interesting is that the sociology papers that got referenced the most by other researchers were the ones guaranteed to fail replication. That unnatural trend gives a g…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:22 PM
19

Many men are choosing to live a life of solitude and peace. It's only the gaslighting from media and elsewhere that tries to trick people into perceiving that much more pleasant state of affairs as "loneliness".
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:50 PM
4

This reminds me of the hosts of The View laughing at a man who had his genitalia mutilated and destroyed by his girlfriend/wife. What was most revealing was how the live audience laughed and clapped at the host's reaction, and how the large TV audience still kept watching the show in the weeks that followed this huge controversy. That tells you right there how a large percentage of "the fairer sex" reacts to male suffering, and it isn't very flattering towards them. Also, if you pay close attent…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 07:00 PM
6

Just another silent statistic in the "proxy violence" epidemic. Unfortunately, the "fairer sex" have learned how to weaponize institutions to punish others for the most minor of perceived infractions. Seriously, even just being rude to someone has become justification to physically assault them in the twisted morality of modern entertainment, so it's no wonder that life is imitating art (or perhaps art is just reflecting life and the moral decline in the real world). And men are always the easie…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 07:37 PM
9

Let me elaborate and explain: Men are seen as being needed of domestication, being civilized of their way of being, basically the idea that without society's influences men are incapable of being sociable and easy-going people to be around It's pretty much the same concept, but the way I usually state this or talk about the idea is to note that the "masculinity is toxic" smear is – at its core – just a form of "original sin". It basically amounts to an edict being levied upon men as a group for …
/r/MensRights18/01/24 03:11 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8orsg4/study_feminists_more_willing_to_sacrifice_men/?ref=share&ref_source=link
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:45 PM
4

The acronym stands for "Women And Children First".
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:25 PM
15

The giant gender conspiracy theory known as the "Patriarchy" is quite annoying, but it is admittedly fun to ridicule at the same time. One of my favourite strategies when it is brought up is to reference the "WACF" rule that make men's lives worthless in the event of a disaster. The most common reply to this historical practice – and one that continues to this day – is to say that this is "benevolent sexism". So then I reference research that show gender studies students are more likely to sacri…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 02:34 PM
3

There are rather simple ways to work around that legal quagmire regarding consent of both parents for testing. First, you take samples of yourself and the child in question in secret. Then you get a trusted friend to submit them for you. Do whatever you can to make it difficult for the test to be traced back to you. If the results come back showing you are not the father, immediately destroy all documentation and forget that the test ever existed. Then you begin the process of getting an officia…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 04:25 PM
2

The way the medical system sees men as "low priority" is the main culprit here I feel. That instinctive dismissal of men's health concerns is what I think turns many away from seeking assistance, because the honest truth is that even though the vast majority of men speak up within a reasonable period of time, they unfortunately don't receive the help they need to from a system that simply is not made for them. Men quickly get the sense that they are seen as a nuisance, or a burden, and rather th…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:30 AM
1

If one debunks the Flat Earth Theory because it is provably wrong that doesn't mean they hate it. Similarly with feminism. Simply pointing out its many flaws and the fact that ideas like "the patriarchy" are a giant gender conspiracy theory doesn't mean you have strong emotions of any type about it. Most often it's just the proponents of feminism projecting their own religious fervour onto you that is the real reason they interpret any and all criticism as "hate".
/r/MensRights07/01/24 05:56 PM
7

I did read in some official coverage that the doctor testified to her finger having a minor fracture. However, the "he broke her finger" assertion being made here is just a lie that's being propagated by many to confuse the issue. The real problem with the very minor injury to her finger is that several videos after the incident call into question when the injury occurred. It was more than half a day later when he found her unconscious in his house and called the cops, and it was only then that …
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:53 PM
8

She actually was successful in taking his phone away from him (she admitted to this in her testimony), and he then took it back from her. Where is it established that her finger was broken? The doctor testified that her finger had a minor fracture on it (i.e. that it was not broken). Plus, the timeline of when the injury to her finger occurred was in question, based on her actions in the multiple videos after the incident (she was seen running her fingers and hand through her hair multiple times…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:38 PM
4

There’s no proof false accusations are rare, but regardless that’s not the main issue, the issue is what happened in this specific instance. Trying to influence the jury with such statements about cases in general is prejudicial and shouldn’t be allowed. Exactly, it's a specific instance. There's no such thing as a probability or averages when the sample size is just one event or object. However, most people don't have this kind of fundamental understanding of statistics, so it was a good decisi…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:04 AM
4

From what I heard from people in the court, this case been over since the victim testimony and they showed the video of him escaping her. So there is video of the incident? That was one of the first things immediately publicized about the case from Majors' lawyers. And they said they would be releasing the recording because it proved his innocence. Then nothing. Radio silence for months. I wonder what happened to make them back off that PR move, if the video does indeed exist and it shows things…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 12:57 AM
6

It's an ad campaign; accuracy and honesty are absent by nature. What's more, it's an ad campaign that dehumanizes and hates men, so it's obviously just the same anti-male propaganda that we've seen everywhere in the last decade.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 01:51 PM
19

The unfortunate real reason behind the "domestic assaults against men are less violent" myth is that men have been dehumanized to the point that they are simply seen as objects that cannot feel pain or suffer in any way. This is like asking people to feel sympathy for a rock. The level of injury to men in DV situations is objectively worse – as you point out – and that happens for the same reason that society doesn't care about us. What we are staring at here is the complete objectification of m…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:43 PM
2

I said I was skeptical about their stated conclusion for why the behaviour exists. The fact that a majority of women are more attracted to masculine men does not mean bisexual men are hated, any more than gay men being attracted to only men means they all hate women.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 02:50 PM
43

Sigh. Yet more collective punishment for men as a group. One wonders if the hysterical and fearmongering media are even capable of seeing guys as individual human beings at this point. It feels like the line regarding the complete dehumanization of men was crossed long, long ago.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:40 PM
5

Considering the methodology used, I am skeptical about the conclusions reached in these studies. The exact same "verificationist" approach has been used to try and prove that straight men being unwilling to have sex with gay men is proof of widespread homophobia. Those parallel studies similarly gather statistics about preferences around sexual interaction and level of acceptance when asking straight men if they would engage in activities with another man, and then improperly attribute the exist…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:19 PM
3

There are 'talent' agencies that bars and nightclubs hire to populate venues they want footballers to come to with women who are interested in wealthy young men. That's an interesting piece of information that I wasn't aware of. It makes sense though, considering multiple business interests would be served by such a crass method. The overwhelming desire for more money drives some really scummy practices in the real world. And speaking of ambulance-chasing lawyers, it's also interesting to note t…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:52 AM
20

It's an unfortunate consequence of postmodern thought that there is no such thing as objective reality any more (well, at least in the indoctrinated minds of some). To them, language becomes nothing but a power grab, and they define racism, sexism, etc, in deliberate ways so that only certain groups can be victims, or even change the meaning of man and woman to ignore sex itself when it suits their needs. Words must remain a useful way for everyone to communicate meaning with each other, from a …
/r/MensRights30/11/23 01:52 PM
14

The guy most responsible for putting this together is Paul Withall - featured in the video. He's a working class battler... Blue collar types who just quietly do their best for others are the ones we really need to highlight and celebrate more. There's so many out there, but you don't see them because they aren't the ones getting all the awards and coverage. Their time and effort are appreciated though.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 05:44 PM
1

You present a nuanced, reasonable, and well-argued position here. What I find fascinating are some of the NPC "your wrong/bad take bro" dumb clone responses to you that are just obvious copypasta. Maybe it's just bots, considering the subject matter, and all the unfamiliar accounts that are suddenly involved in a sub where they never participate. Regardless, the puritanism and fear of male sexuality is the same whether it's from either extreme: left or right.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 02:26 PM
12

Instead, the UN's quietly manipulates the Gender Development Index by removing 5 years from the LEGG, arguing that men living 5 years shorter is justified by biology. The Global Gender Gap Report published annually by the World Economic Forum does something similar, arguing that if women live at least 6% longer than men then equality is achieved. As a consequence, women is Norway living only 3 years longer than men is interpreted as oppression It's crap like this that makes me wonder how anyone …
/r/MensRights25/11/23 01:42 AM
3

That reason would probably be hard to pin down. The threat may have reached a level that the rich and powerful feel they need to insulate themselves from accusations of "sexism", which I think does have some evidence to support it. Also, I would be interested to see if other, better takedowns of the pay gap myth exist, but because they were written by men they were "overlooked" for this easier-to-hide-behind option when deciding on this year's award.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 05:48 PM
7

It's even worse than you may realize when it comes to Economics. Unlike the original prizes for outstanding research that Nobel created in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine, etc, the award for Economics was a very late addition – it was created in the 1970's I think – when a huge bank basically bought it up as a supposed "tribute to the memory of Alfred Nobel". Yeah, that definitely doesn't sound shady asf. Practically speaking, the award in Economics is just a way for the rich and powerfu…
/r/MensRights24/11/23 04:42 PM
8

Wow, the timestamp of my fairly lengthy comment is 10:04:33, while the timestamp of your medium length reply is 10:05:52, according to the reddit UI. And you claim in your response to have read and considered my arguments fully and in good faith. But all I see is very strong emotions and significant personal investment in a position, rather than someone engaging rationally in honest discourse, at least based on the unreasonably short amount of time you have taken to formulate and type out your r…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:31 PM
11

Using physical violence to get your way is something that is a learned behaviour over the course of a person's life, and is the result of a long-term successful strategy being employed by someone. That takes a lot of work and effort to change in a person, and the first step is that the abuser has to step forward and admit they have a problem. Then they have to go through a lot of work and therapy to unlearn that lifetime of conditioning. In this case the abuser does not accept any accountability…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 04:04 PM
66

PPD, or different hormonal imbalances are perhaps an excuse for why she felt angry with you, but it is never an excuse to hit you. And if domestic violence happens once, it will happen again. Do you want your kids to have to watch you get physically assaulted? I witnessed my father get punched, kicked, slapped, etc, by my mother, and believe me, it is a terrible experience for anyone to see that happen, at any age. Whatever you choose to do, please take this seriously.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:10 AM
19

Thanks for all the hard work you do in putting these great infographics together! On this day to celebrate men, I think it's only fair that your continued hard work advocating for men is shown some extra appreciation as well.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 04:25 PM
3

Well, right now you are in a place where men speak up all the time about the unfair treatment they receive, from family courts to suicide to circumcision. We talk about these issues in great detail, even directly to the government and health authorities responsible for them, but we might as well be shouting into an empty void because no one listens or cares.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 10:47 PM
15

Yet another reason why male athletes and men's sports are far more popular than their counterpart's lesser and entirely insular attempts.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:36 PM
52

The pendulum has not swung back in support of men, nor will it ever I fear. If it does, it will end up like 2010 in Sweden, and any affirmative action efforts will get scrapped the second they start working to prioritize men. It's Schrödinger's Diversity in action. Having a male-dominated industry, company, or department is unhealthy, because "diversity is our strength". But when you try to introduce men into a job or place where they are underrepresented, suddenly it's "diversity is unimportant…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:25 PM
2

Men as a group have different tastes though. Superhero movies are a massive global game of demographics and statistics, and people can't naturally comprehend numbers at that scale. So they form arguments like: "That can't be right, I know dozens of outliers.". And they don't realize that their personal experiences are meaningless at the level of billions of people.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:44 PM
8

None of what you said was a convincing argument for "men's properties" vs "women's properties". Women can be into cool gadgets, tech and military equipment and men can love song and dance and slumber parties. Why do we have to cling to gender roles that ultimately hurt us? You're arguing against a strawman of what I wrote. My stance remains that no individual has to be what others expect of them (and that includes those who expect you to mindlessly be the opposite of what a stereotype suggests –…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:41 AM
14

er nah, I choose to think for myself and not buy into "male-oriented" or "female-oriented" properties. That's fine. You can choose to like whatever you want to like. But you're experiencing a kind of level confusion here, because you're thinking way too small when the subject is a globally released entertainment product. First, imagine several hundreds of million men. Next, give that group of men the choice of watching the following two comic book movies: Movie A: has a bunch of cool gadgets and…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:51 AM
48

You're right about how preachy and condescending it is. But I contend that even if the annoying stuff is removed, the basic story elements of these movies are just uninteresting to the male demographic. Let's consider Iron Man for a second, since it kicked off the most successful film franchise in the history of the world. Iron Man had a bunch of tech and gadgets, scenes of soldering and welding, plus it was full of engineering and military equipment, and it contained a whole bunch of expensive …
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:03 AM
162

The movie had a 2/3 male audience. Other diagnostics on The Marvels: 65% male leaning, with 45% men over 25... And yet this article proudly notes the movie didn't have a male director, and had three main actors who weren't male, and claims that these facts "played some part" in this abysmal bomb. Once again, zero accountability. Somehow, someway, it's always men's fault. It wasn't because they made a bad movie. It wasn't because their group didn't pay a cent to support it. Nope. It's all men's f…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:00 AM
5

It really does feel like a genocide of low-status males is taking place, even if that is not a conscious or deliberate choice.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 06:29 PM
1

I'm working right now on a longer post about my full thoughts on a question I've been pondering recently about the way the medical establishment approaches suicide, and it goes something like this: Why is "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" the mantra everywhere in medicine except for the male suicide epidemic? Seriously, no one ever talks about preventing poor mental health in men that can lead to suicidal thoughts. If you look closely, all of the suggested "solutions" I hear disc…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:06 PM
7

A fair amount of research exists showing that the majority of men do seek help for mental health issues. For example, the results of a UK study titled "Suicide by middle-aged men". In the section about "Contact with services" for men who had committed suicide: 91% middle-aged men had been in contact with at least one service or agency at some time. Most importantly, in the paper's conclusion, during the key messages section on page 30, they say the following: Rates of contact with services among…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:34 PM
17

I actually took some time to track down what seemed to be the original source for this urban myth of "men don't attempt suicide as often, but they die more from it". I wrote a lengthy post on it a few years ago. The TL;DR of my post is that academics have chosen to lump in hospital data around self-harm (which includes things like anorexia, scarring, or simply pulling out of one's hair) as a suicide "attempt", which is an incorrect classification. This lack of scientific rigour in the "research"…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:08 PM
45

Yeah, the way they casually normalized and excused domestic violence against men is what I still remember about the horrible people at that site. And how – despite their scandalous admission that they would continue to commit physical violence against their partners – they still got the full support of their audience and everyone else in their ideological circle. The clickbait, ragebait articles they shat out are long forgotten. But the disgusting real-life actions of those writing there are wha…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:54 PM
16

Here's an archived version of the article, since the Daily Mail has so many embedded videos and scripts that it froze my browser when I tried to click the thread link. There's not much information in the linked article, but I found another report (again using archive.is) that establishes that two of the suicides were indeed men (and likely all were, but I can't find the names of the other two deaths at the moment), and that there is no apparent connection between these tragedies, which is the ob…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:55 PM
4

I recall reading some information that false paternity suits like this are actually quite common in the world of male celebrities, but the extent of this particular social disease is never made public, supposedly so as not to create even more dishonest and greedy attempts to entrap wealthy men (or to not ruin the illusion of the "fairer sex"?). One of the high profile cases of paternity fraud that is public knowledge is an accusation made against Keanu Reeves, and we only know about it because h…
/r/MensRights04/11/23 02:31 PM
39

I remember reading some statistic that everyone has thoughts of suicide at least once in their life. So don't feel like you're the only one who has ever struggled with this. The rebuttal I would give to your arguments is that just because society doesn't care about men (and that is a valid observation about our world), that doesn't mean you shouldn't care about yourself. You don't have to conform to even one iota of what anyone else thinks of you. My recommendation is to start small. Cook yourse…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 02:27 PM
166

Men are considerably more likely to die from Covid-19 than women - twice as likely according to the age-standardised figures. OP's link appears to be just another variant of Hillary Clinton's infamous; "Men die in wars, therefore their surviving mothers, widows, and daughters suffer more" ridiculous approach to (im)morality.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 01:17 PM
8

“But it’s not a structural racism issue for boys versus girls,” she said. So the article says that there are no national requirements in the US to track male vs female graduation rates, and only a handful of states do have these numbers. And from the data they do have we see that boys have always always lagged behind girls in graduating high school, ever since the introduction of public education back in the 1940's in the US (this pattern holds true in every Western democratic country in the wor…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 01:11 PM
12

This kind of double standard has unfortunately been my general experience when it comes to ombudsman submissions as well. There is a lot of nepotism in media/entertainment, so the people who supposedly "oversee" the ethics and standards for the industry tend to be promoted from within and are therefore anything but impartial. They only get that cushy job in the first place due to their political connections, and because they'll just be a rubber stamp that approves whatever their "friends and all…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 12:56 PM
6

There was an article I read long ago that outlined the options we have for public discourse as follows: Expect everyone who participates in the marketplace of ideas to abide by male standards, meaning you accept some level of abrasiveness and hurt feelings as the price of entry. Expect everyone to abide by gynocentric standards, meaning we care less about truth and prioritize the emotional and mental well-being of participants in debates. What we actually get in practice though is some monstrous…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 02:18 PM
4

I'd put preventing male suicide as the #1 issue and stop there. The reason for this is that in order to genuinely prevent men from taking their lives at such extraordinary rates, society would have to accept the factors that we know will lead to this decades-long mental health crisis. And then out pops every single other issue that MRA's care about. Preventing suicide risk factors would require us to focus on improving the legal system (family courts especially), giving better access to educatio…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 11:16 PM
27

Is this the same Iceland PM who introduced a bill to protect the genitalia of intersex children, and then specifically excluded bodily integrity of male infants from that protection? After reading the article, yep, it's still Katrín Jakobsdóttir. So yet another supremacist pretending to fight for equality, but somehow never doing anything to support the lives of men and boys.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:47 PM
8

The "bystander effect" is more broad than you describe. It is the psychological effect that prevents – for example – an individual in a crowd from providing medical assistance after a traffic accident. So it is something that should be taken seriously and combatted against, since it is more about fighting conformity than it is about mindless altruism. I do generally agree that men should demand a fair spot on the life-boats though, because no one else is going to care for your life as a man unle…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 05:18 PM
1

Spatial reasoning is the ability to think about and manipulate objects in three dimensions. Spatial reasoning skills are an essential part of art, physical education, math and science. I used to watch a lot of different sports, and in my early twenties I didn't really care if I was viewing men's sports or not. Then I started to notice an interesting pattern: only men's hockey would regularly have no-look passes, only men's tennis would regularly have behind-the-back volleys, and so on. Male athl…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:54 AM
1

I tried to access the full paper on sci-hub to understand their methodology, but unfortunately the free sites don't have it available. However, I was able to track down a link that gave the full text of the abstracts for all the referenced papers, which is enough to tell me what I needed to know. I did a quick search for the keyword "MRI" through all the referenced papers and it returned 0 results. Nothing. That's completely unacceptable. The lack of MRI data is a rather telling omission, since …
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:32 AM
29

I'm seeing more and more cases now where the accused didn't even know his accuser, which is disgusting to say the least. It's not even a case of regretting sexual interactions with someone anymore, but a full-on malicious and premeditated attack against a stranger, just because he's a man. No wonder even the average person is getting sick and tired of this kind of blatant opportunism.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:33 PM
4

'neurosexism' Wow, I had never heard this term before to describe the way neuroscience has constantly proved the existence of a "male" brain, but it is certainly an apt way to describe the horror and recoil that the ideologues feel at the mere suggestion that certain biological realities exist.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 06:03 PM
12

So, the study the OP is talking about suggests that the difference does not show up until the ages of 6-8, and then widens The idea that this does not happen until 6-8 years of age by the meta-analysis referenced in this article directly contradicts other original research showing that sex differences around spatial rotation and reasoning exist in 6- to 13-month-old infants. A sex difference was found on both tasks, with boys showing an advantage in performance on the mental rotation task and ex…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:38 PM
6

It has been long established that men (on average as a group) are approximately one standard deviation better at tasks involving spatial rotation. Here is a paper that references that body of research. This is an extract from the introduction: There is a wide range of evidence for gender differences in behavioral profiles as well as in brain structure and function (Sacher et al., 2013; Ruigrok et al., 2014; Gur and Gur, 2017). Behaviorally, males are shown to perform superiorly in some domains i…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:18 PM
3

The MeToo stuff really is the perfect mix of fear and hatred of men, pearl-clutching victimization, and sordid and sleazy drama, and so it does successfully sell newspapers and catch people's attention when reported on. However, when dramatized in any form it just bombs, perhaps because people get enough of that stuff in the real world, and they only choose to interact with fiction when it is a way to escape their daily lives.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:24 PM
17

You can't help your child if you can't help yourself. It's a continuing tragedy that the courts don't understand that the "best interests of the child" must necessarily include a healthy, financially stable, balanced work-life, welcome, and living father involved in that infant's life.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 05:19 PM
12

A baseless case is a case that does not meet the legal criteria for the crime, but it was determined the accuser did not deliberately lie about the alleged rape. This is from one of their initial definitions, and I was about to write an entire paragraph arguing that these cases classified as "baseless" must not be separates from false allegations, but it's a good thing I read to the end of the abstract, where they say: Finally, baseless allegations should be classified as false. Looks like they …
/r/MensRights18/10/23 02:32 AM
16

The fundamental issue here is how the narrative of "male privilege" has limited the way we talk about men and boys. Take education for example. Men as a group have always been behind their counterparts, ever since the advent of public education. Young men were pulled from school to work in the fields, or to support their family, and so it is actually boys who have failed to graduate high school, and who have seen lower success in obtaining degrees than their counterparts. Yet all we hear today i…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:06 PM
48

Women's clothes > Men's lives Just when I thought the media had surely reached its nadir, they prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 06:24 PM
75

If you want to cause men as a group to dislike all women, this is how you do it.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:06 PM
79

In his victim statement, the man detailed the horrendous impact this has all had on him, including considerable emotional distress about what he had been accused of, the loss of friendships and family support as a result, having to leave his home, and losing his job - all against the backdrop of Covid, which further exacerbated his isolation. He told us that Nelson had threatened to destroy his life, and in his view, she succeeded. This part needs to be highlighted more, and repeated on blast un…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 03:22 PM
12

This article is severely lacking in intelligence. So we should just completely ignore the Duluth model that was deliberately created and adopted to erase male victims of DV? And forget the laws around "Battered spouse (coughwifecough) syndrome" that make men's lives worthless at the mere suggestion that: "He yelled at me once!"? Instead we have to blame some obscure and unaccountable process like "socialization"? So it's all just natural, inorganic forces that caused this eruption of violence to…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:13 PM
19

As is the case in so much of our criminal justice system today, the process is the punishment. And unfortunately, the public's attitude towards crime is changing in accordance with this new, bleak reality, and more people now see the risk of breaking the law as being worth it in many cases. Because when innocence is no longer an absolute and unassailable defense against punishment from an unjust world, the short term rewards for cheating the system begin to look more and more tempting to those w…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:00 PM
12

And most people I ever set down with and that started talking about those topics, it quickly becomes apparent they like their idea of the entire romantic relationship that they have a lot more than they will enjoy the actual thing. You're 100% right that the reality of sex – as pleasurable as it can be – is never quite how you imagined it would turn out, but I think what a lot of us older guys tend to forget is the sometimes overwhelming desire for sex that is there when we are young. The mix of…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:00 PM
37

I know a lot of people who analyze this particular trend often raise the: "but once both men and women enter their 30's it begins to reverse and now the women are chasing those same single men who they wouldn't have anything to do with when they were younger" idea, and they likely repeat this adage out of a need to pretend that things will just naturally balance out. Perhaps they can't stop clinging to the illusion that: "it will all work itself out in the end". Sorry, but no. This does not work…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 06:36 PM
15

To feel that nobody cares about men and boys; to think that the tantrums and whines of a few brittle social media brats, represent the words of the many. Those same brats are the ones to scream: "Feminism means equality!". Yet point out that "equality" does not mean "equal under law" and watch the excuses fly. It's a well-practiced dance that starts with: "That's not true!" [Show them the laws] "Okay, those laws exist, but male rape never happens!" [Show them the statistics] "Well, I guess male …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:32 PM
10

"Forced to penetrate" makes a man's genitals just an object, his personhood and humanity are completely erased, and his attacker is now the victim being acted upon. All of this is of course intentional.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 07:14 PM
10

Well, I guess they at least gave her some agency for her actions through the "plying him with booze" line. Though that's all, because there's no use of the word rape. Not once. Looking through the article, I see phrases like "met the boy", "had sex with a 15-year old pupil", and so on. So much sterilized and unemotional language. It's downright comical. Look, just call it what it is: statutory rape. Of a juvenile over whom she held a position of authority. And whom she manipulated by getting dru…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:21 PM
5

I'm sure there are a lot of feminists in the UN and elsewhere seething at the fact that time that could have been devoted to women is instead used to discuss the idea that men as a group might need some reasonable amount of help and support. That realization makes me at least somewhat positive about this tiny bit of progress. As much as they want to, they can't deny the reality any longer. Men and boys as a group are suffering. Of course this isn't anything new to anyone with half a brain, but i…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 12:58 AM
18

That's an amusing title for a news article. You know that if it were the other way around, the headline would have described it as a "successful protest to open up male-only opportunities to everyone" or something similar. But no. The men "overran" the poor, defenseless damsels in distress. I can't believe how much I've grown to despise the constant deluge of male-hating media narratives like this.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 09:54 PM
1

Kurt of Uncivil Law has a consistent and strong foundation for speaking out in support of the rights of men, and even doing so in many cases where it has not been in his general interest to take that position. He's definitely one of the few people I'd trust implicitly regarding these important topics.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:36 PM
1

I see two significant social forces that might be inevitably pushing this kind of drift into the absurd. The first is the inherent human desire to "feel safe". Note the word "feel" here. People may "be" safer on an airplane, but they "feel" safer driving their car, even though they are actually less safe doing so. Of course, this affects men too, but not as much as our counterparts in general. Even though we are right now objectively living in the most safe time in the history of the world, some…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:28 PM
19

This supreme court decision is great to see. These end runs around the legal process are dangerous, so much so that I would describe them as tearing away at the very fabric of society itself. So it's good that the expectation of accountability – at some level at least – is still part of our social contract. The long list given in the article of those who oppose due process is disappointing. Those ideologically-minded signatories are accepting a system that they know is flawed. Moreover, they are…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 03:12 PM
7

I would cross the street only if I were a cruel and terrible human being. If I am to assume that my "removal from their presence" made some person feel relief and to feel safe, then I am also aware that through a process called operant conditioning I am helping to give that same person a very real and a very dangerous phobia. Because under the concept of operant conditioning, we know that both negative and positive stimuli are identified as precursors to these terrible illnesses. And they are in…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 04:03 PM
23

It paints the innocent man as the villain and the lying women as the “real victim”. For an ideologue who believes all allegations against men, the "accuser" is always automatically seen as a "victim". And even when that accuser is shown to be lying, the ideologue's mindset cannot change. Even a person who is provably guilty of the crime of perjury is still a "victim", only now they are a "victim" of mental illness, or something else. Just look at the UVA/Rolling Stong/Jackie hoax for one real li…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 02:09 PM
66

It's the Narcissist's Prayer in action: That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it. It may feel like we jumped all the way from "That didn't happen" to "You deserved it", and in some sense we did. But if you look closely there were probably a few minutes of "Stop exaggerating! He'll be fine. It's not like his life is over." or "We were just trying to…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 01:49 PM
3

I watched some of their other commentary on this and they seem to fall back on their experience on the comedy circuit a bit too much, saying that every comedian "already knew about Russell Brand". Um, okay? Knew what exactly? Of course, they never give details of what they "knew", because that's the ethereal nature of rumours. Someone behaving like an asshole one time when drunk can simultaneously mean he's an asshole or he's a murderer. That's just how gossip works to destroy a person's reputat…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 02:34 AM
14

If guys could go back and retroactively take back all the money they spent on dates, and charge interest on it to boot, there'd be a huge number of women being taken to small claims court for all the money they owed. "Your honour, I felt pressured into paying for the meal, but now I realize I was forced to do so by her manipulation of me!" The only reasonable response to unilaterally changing the terms of a deal after the fact, and solely in one person's favour, is telling the person to get lost…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:51 PM
17

Imagine noticing a pattern in the physical appearance of leaders during wars and saying something like: "Women die in wars created by people with blue eyes." Insert any other physical characteristic like ethnicity, sexual orientation, height, hair colour, etc, and ask yourself why does it sound so bizarre? Is there really a correlation to suggest that a physical factor like eye colour would lead to warmongering? And what about that behaviour would immediately transfer to the entire group of peop…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:09 PM
4

I didn't know the difference between the two. From my observation, MGTOW are actually reasonable and have a gripe completely disassociated with the fact that they can't get a girlfriend. The "can't get a girlfriend" descriptor isn't automatically true when it comes to MGTOW. In fact, it's not true for the majority of men in the world. Many men who go their own way are actually in relationships, even long term monogamous ones, but when that happens it is always done outside of the "accepted" mann…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 05:35 PM
10

Get the man blackout drunk. Funny how when a woman is blackout drunk and a man has sex with her the man is vilified / demonized as a rapist piece of shit but when its women taking advantage of men? its "Not the same" Amy Schumer – an amateur comedian who has been in some smaller movies – admitted to getting herself off on men who were passed out drunk at parties. Yet she somehow still has a career. And is also somehow not in jail. So you are exactly correct: "Not the same" is always the dumb exc…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 02:45 AM
5

It would definitely be biased towards being higher than the actual average, since any fathers asking for a paternity test would have a reason for being suspicious. However, it would still be interesting if you could share any statistics from your time there on just what the positive/false rates were. At the least it could set a reasonably accurate upper limit on how many men are not their children's fathers.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 02:40 AM
2

The media will write anything that simplifies men as a group into one, single stereotype. Men just think about sex! Men only talk about their cars! They'll promote any horrible and pejorative accusation about men as an entire sex to make a quick buck, by making their target audience feel smug and superior to those "inferior males".
/r/MensRights20/09/23 11:14 PM
3

Also, when it's a person's first offense, and they are demonstrated to have made positive contributions to society throughout their life, those are considered factors in deciding on a sentence. Or at least that's what the law as written says. How it gets applied is up to imperfect interpretation by irrational people though. This all makes me think of that judge who passed the sentence against that one guy (Brock was his name I think) who was convicted of drunkenly fingering a passed-out date in …
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:03 PM
22

This is such an emotional subject that even more conservative commentators are parroting the: "He must be guilty of something bad with so many accusations against him!" talking points. Take Megyn Kelly for instance. She was on the verge of tears in a video as she lambasted "all the guys" (her words/perception) who were "automatically" disbelieving the women. It was such a logically inconsistent rant, where she was saying in one breath that we can't automatically assume one way or the other, but …
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:06 PM
4

It's actually rather amazing to notice how quickly the narrative against Brand turned from "rapist" to "predator", which is a rather stark difference in the level of criminality described, when you stop to think about it. It changed on a dime, once there was just the slightest pushback against the initial story, which says something.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:03 AM
1

If the child is not yours... Well you don't tell anyone either. BUT then you start gathering other kind of proof to go to court for a disputed paternity test. AND YOU NEVER TELL ANYONE THAT YOU DID THE TEST IN THE FIRST PLACE. Exactly this. After you have discovered the truth, you work towards legally getting a test done, using evidence like a simple blood analysis that causes you concern because the blood types don't match or seem impossible/improbable, and you add to that documentation showing…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 06:50 PM
-4

Funny how this sexual puritanism from the "progressives" (regressives) perfectly matches the conservative crusade against porn by religious nutjobs like Jerry Falwell and the like. The only difference is that one has references to religion included in every breathless and pearl-clutching sermon, while the other has references to secular religion included in every breathless and pearl-clutching sermon. The assertions around "objectification" and "positive body images" that we hear the regressives…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 02:07 PM
41

Welcome to the new sexual moral panic, where a poorly done "investigation" by biased individuals in the media – who are open about their political motivations being the reason for this coordinated attack – is enough to get a man's means at making a living shut down, and is enough to inflict significant and permanent damage to his professional reputation. Dropped by his agent. Book deal on hold. No revenue from YouTube. Shows to likely be cancelled (the last I heard their cancellation was "under …
/r/MensRights19/09/23 01:56 PM
504

They'd have to change the punishment to include a minimum sentence of 18 years in prison to make it comparable against being cucked into supporting another man's child without your knowledge.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 01:34 PM
10

Could you please drop me a link to where a police visit is clearly and specifically established? Either in the articles or elsewhere? From what I've read, the articles include official statements from police stating that they have received no complaints relating to the allegations at any time, and they are only currently aware of them through media. Here is the London Police's official response as described by this BBC article: While not referring to the comedian by name, the Metropolitan Police…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:48 AM
18

I support a fair, impartial, and objective system of justice. What you propose is the exact opposite of that: the unfair, biased, and subjective anarchy of mob rule. Here is a list (not exhaustive, since these are only the well known cases) of the reasons why we must never believe accusations without evidence, and why mob justice is only ever injustice. Note: in the following list (f) means false accuser...in the particular cases marked with (f) the male victim's name(s) are not public, though t…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:52 PM
63

In a social climate where accusations confer status and sometimes even wealth to the person making the accusation, and we have yet another rich and famous man being questioned about events years or decades in the past, it's like watching the same film of a car crash on repeat. All sorts of red flags are popping up already, from media coordination to the nebulous – and now meaningless in the age of social media – reveal that he has "multiple allegations" against him. No. This man is innocent unti…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 02:34 PM
1

Sorry, but the Inspection Paradox is a real mathematically established phenomenon (I call it the "selection paradox" personally, because I consider it a subclass of the many problems with selection bias, but that's just my personal way of understanding it...there are several names for it...for example I've heard others refer to it as "biased sampling"), and yes, it does underlie the Waiting-Time Paradox, which is also a well established phenomenon in statistics/probability. Like saying: what you…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 01:53 PM
6

I think you're generally correct in the aggregate, given that if a hundred single men were tracked, and compared against a hundred married men, you would see measurably more crime with the hundred single men. However, that misses the fact that throughout history, the single men are also vastly overrepresented in being the ones who bring innovation and scientific breakthroughs to the world. From Sir Isaac Newton (the greatest intellect that ever lived) to Nikolai Tesla, the most valuable resource…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 02:39 AM
1

Your sampling of men you have met is not random, so therefore it will be biased towards ones that respond in a certain way. This prejudices the results and therefore they are invalid in judging the issue. Not to mention that personal anecdotes are not data. Also, did you ask these men a carefully worded question like: "Do you generally feel content with your life?". And did you make sure to display no visible emotion in your face or voice when presenting that kind of unassuming query? Or did you…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 09:30 PM
1

Or perhaps men who are alone are actually mostly content with their situation, and they are experiencing "solitude" because they don't automatically see their bachelor status as a negative. There are many who do feel lonely, yes, but considering that those who are happy with their situations will generally not be as vocal about their opinion, I wouldn't be surprised if a significant majority of the men in the statistics they reference would be quite surprised and confused to find that they were …
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:18 PM
1

Maybe it's more appropriate to observe that women – whether MRA's like shoe, Janice, girlwriteswhat or otherwise – are just more interested in the topics of relationships in general, and they enjoy discussing dating, sexual attraction, etc. Men (again in general as a group)...not so much.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:56 PM
-1

I think this is a fairly rational opinion, and for the most part I see dating as very low – or even non-existent – on the priority list of most male advocates.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:14 PM
81

The Haiti earthquake is really the best example of how low status men (especially single men, which is who these rules target directly) are made invisible to society. Individual countries can set bad policy, yes, but the UN is supposed to be an intelligent and forward-thinking organization, with a primary focus on collaborative and pluralistic approaches to problem solving. Yet we see even worse discrimination against men and boys from it at all corners, thanks in large part to the gender ideolo…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:02 PM
1

The fact that some people think a convicted murderer who has shown no remorse for her crime is someone who should lecture people on the ethical treatment of those incarcerated in prisons is...disturbing, to say the least. Let's be clear and face reality here. This person tortured and killed a man. In cold blood. Over the course of more than a week. She has got no leg to stand on to try and guilt-trip others. She thought it was an ethical way to treat her victim by repeatedly shoving large object…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:21 PM
1

What's doubly bizarre is, she seems to be considered a "victim" of the system and has never really owned up to or apologized for her behavior, or shown any contrition whatsoever. The whole story just shows the complete lack of morals amongst the organizations and political parties that give her a platform and so much support. Those groups and everyone who attended, organized, and spoke at that Women's March all talk about the idea that this man she murdered was involved in some sort of nefarious…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:48 PM
22

Donna Hylton participated in the kidnapping, torture and rape of a man. Since being released from prison, feminists have hired her as a motivational speaker for events such as the women’s March. And even worse, the subject of her speeches revolves around the ethics of why it is okay to hate your oppressors, even to the point of committing violence against them. I'm serious. Talk about blatant hypocrisy. Then they loudly and wrongly accuse everyone they hate of associating with "rape apologists",…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:50 AM
15

You are exactly right to point out the actions of almost all of the women on this show (minus one of the guests I think who at least tried to offer a counterpoint to the hypocrisy and tried to express some disgust at the complete and utter disregard for a human being's life) along with all the women attending in the audience. But it goes even further than that. None of the women in the entire TV viewing audience considered this wrong in any way, because they all still tuned in to watch the next …
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:42 AM
10

I don't know about your specific situation, but you might want to stop and wonder for a moment if your family is at least partly to "blame" for your decision to not start your own family. For example, I have an uncle who had four kids (three sons and a daughter). All the men turned out to have really lucrative careers and were incredibly wealthy at a young age. The daughter was unbelievably attractive and would have been able to have her pick from a wide selection of husbands. However, they all …
/r/MensRights13/09/23 01:13 AM
5

There was a post on the sub just over a week ago linking to someone who did a fairly rigourous and smart statistical analysis that suggested the current rate of false accusations was somewhere around the 80% range in 2019, and similarly high in the surrounding years. There were several assumptions that were outlined in the analysis, but the basic idea of it was to calculate the overall number of genuine cases of rape that should exist (and for which the base rate has been declining over the year…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 12:09 AM
3

"Mother-of-one who blackmailed man out of £200 by falsely accusing him of rape is spared jail after judge said her plot was 'not sophisticated'" Holy crap. Good catch. They really will use any excuse to hide the real reason behind the fact they let women get away with anything: the empathy gap that means men are unable to be hurt or suffer, at least in their narcissistic and selfish minds.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:56 PM
5

It looks like the age of the boy involved (12 or under based on the charges being laid) is such that they can't use phrases like "sex romp", "wild fling", "passionate affair", or similar to describe this story. At least not without coming across like they are promoting child diddling and are completely abhorrent human beings.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:48 PM
21

I've seen a few good people try to speak out against this kind of mob justice in this case, after numerous public threats have been made against those who simply participated in this trial (from the lawyers of the man convicted, the initial jurors who couldn't reach a verdict on his guilt, all the way to coworkers and friends who wrote character reference letters to the court after he was convicted). And those who are trying to speak up about the attacks are being attacked by the mob as well. It…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:14 PM
1

I think you are right to take note of her choice of words, as that definitely matters. There are certainly better ways to describe "being safe" that are less accusatory and insulting to someone. It wouldn't upset me though. Let me explain why by describing a similar but different situation. This reminds me quite a bit of succession planning in the workplace. I remember some people who would use the phrase: "In case you get hit by a bus", which is obviously a bit macabre. And because there are so…
/r/MensRights11/09/23 02:52 PM
30

The case with Jian Gomeshi, being a : "he graped me seven years ago" case, the prosecution did not know Jian still had all those email and the accuser was wrecked on cross-exmination when she was surprise confronted with them. What most people don't realize about the legal process – and I'm not singling you out here, as you're probably well aware of this insight – is that the prosecution already had access to this information, because they had deposed the complainants under oath. And the police …
/r/MensRights10/09/23 07:02 PM
14

That "Escape from Self" theory is very interesting, and it appears to contain a very broad and full list of the important factors involved in suicide. I quite like it. And it does line up very closely with my own ideas about the matter, given that I have found watching out for thoughts and feelings of "helplessness" and "hopelessness" to be the most important thing to do in maintaining a healthy mental state. Being able to have a sense of "agency" in the world, even just by making an appointment…
/r/MensRights10/09/23 01:14 PM
9

Any billionaire-funded research will be attacked for being "biased", because those doing the work have a clear conflict of interest when investigating the topic being paid for by a rich individual, who will expect or encourage a specific outcome. However, the administrators of publicly-funded scientific pursuits have an even more single-minded agenda and an even bigger conflict of interest, yet somehow their "findings" are accepted by some in society – though fewer and fewer nowadays thankfully …
/r/MensRights30/08/23 08:41 PM
7

Perhaps the etymology of the word is indeed different as you say. The first time I heard it was from misandrists of various types though, so that's what informed my understanding of how it evolved. Please don't deliberately assume the worst about my motivations; the origins of the word weren't central to the point I was trying to discuss. Whether the initial use was pejorative or not, my contention is that it is currently a neutral term in the general sense, so I think we agree more than you mig…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:28 PM
79

When you only compare yourself to high status men – and don't even see low status men as human – is it any wonder that you mistakenly see yourself as a perpetual victim of oppression? Meanwhile, it is vulnerable men who are the ones that truly get left behind by a system that doesn't even know they exist.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:52 PM
25

Another way this is done – and this was pointed out by /u/TheTinMenBlog during his great interview with Chris Williamson – is with the headline of: "Alarming rise in teen knife deaths". Except it's only boys who are dying, so why does a reader have to track down the actual homicide statistics to get this important piece of information? Or one of the ones that I noticed myself: any discussions about the issue of "child soldiers" in many war zones. Except all those soldiers are boys, so why not ju…
/r/MensRights19/08/23 07:00 PM
15

I get what you are saying, because on its own the movie is certainly very divisive, anti-male, and anti-masculinity. I think the real issue though is that this feels like the straw that broke the camel's back for many men who have sat through this same song and dance of misandry in media for the last decade. However, there is one redeeming factor that nobody could have foreseen. The glorious Ken memes that have been produced in the wake of this movie have been endlessly funny and wickedly smart,…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 01:05 PM
2

Meh. I've been called worse by better people. There are two possible mindsets to have when approaching extreme prejudice against an entire group: you can condemn it because it hurts the group being attacked (the emotional path) or you can oppose it because it exposes the ignorance and pathetic lives of those who believe it (the rational path). It's possible to combine both to a degree, but I find the latter path is the more fair one, and it's also the more instinctive one for men. So I naturally…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 11:26 AM
25

The entire UN HeForShe campaign is a simple restating of "Man Up", only with better marketing to try and hide what it is doing. The sense of entitlement from these groups is off the charts, though it is often obscured behind wildly emotional claims of victimization and oppression. The end result is always the same though: they want everything served to them on a silver platter by others, and they will never lift a finger to do anything for themselves.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 02:03 PM
20

The CCMF (Canadian Center for Men and Families) in Canada is a good organization from what I have seen of it.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:20 AM
11

He's not talking about men in general, but a very specific subset of men in a certain context. And therein lies Peterson's biggest weakness. I've listened to him speak on many occasions, and he – like many of those with a conservative mindset – focuses largely on the individual, rather than the collective. This has many benefits of course, such as not falling for the pitfalls of identity politics. However, it also comes with its own set of weaknesses, and one of them is in identifying solutions …
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:33 PM
14

Feminism now dominates gender issues, and it has done so entirely on the basis of "men are at fault and need to change." And society has done their bidding at almost every turn, by revamping the entire education system around the idea that men are "inherently evil" and that masculinity itself is "toxic", passing new laws to specify crimes that only men can commit, controlling the media landscape (both in art/culture and in journalism) so that only their ideas are promoted and only their voices a…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:34 PM
15

This has been my problem in general with Jordan Peterson over the last five years. I know many of his supporters are saying this is just one clip, and it needs context, which is true to an extent. However, this is not the only time he's spoken on this topic, and whenever he has expressed his thoughts his "advice" has been exactly as OP describes. Jordan Peterson really is too much stuck in the past. He hopes that the sexual revolution can just be put back in the bottle, and that modern social co…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:01 PM
1

I heard Bill Maher use the term "Zombie Lies" recently, and I think it's appropriate. These kind of scientific narratives definitely fall under that category. People want desperately to believe them, so it doesn't matter how much they are debunked or shown to be misinterpretations of the actual evidence.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 12:23 PM
8

Only a complete narcissist would see people suffering, throw up their hands and say: "Well, it's not my fault", and then callously walk away.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:58 AM
9

It's funny how the "multitasking" assertion can be restated as: "Men get distracted less easily, and are able to prioritize and focus better". That's what the data shows clearly when viewed objectively, yet only one interpretation – an anti-male one – is allowed. Or, I'm reminded of a similar rash of news articles from decades ago claiming that: "Women runners sweat more efficiently than men". Except when I looked into the actual paper, it could be more reasonably restated as: "Men can run faste…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:53 AM
5

Camaraderie: Men really do have an unrivaled ability to make other men feel like they are part of something big, and important. Men will join forces and become such a close-knit group that they are truly brothers in all but name. And they work together without any unneeded drama, all towards a shared goal. Independent Thought: There is a quote that ends with: "All progress depends on the unreasonable man" that I enjoy and reference often. Men will regularly go off in their own direction, complet…
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:34 PM
15

They even extend it to children - boys don't need help either. An 8-year-old boy was considered a man when the Titanic sunk. The WACF privilege basically amounted to only women getting on the lifeboats, apart from a scant few male infants. It's rather telling that not a single adult woman thought the life of a young boy of eight was worth at least the same as their own. Selfish beyond comprehension.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 09:48 PM
2

Hearing Richard Reeves talk is like listening to some submissive man get embarrassingly aroused as he fantasizes about the supremacy and glorious perfection of females. He really needs to find a hobby or something.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 06:47 PM
2

I think that's a good learning exercise for men. You can't fix something if you're not there to fix it. Do you remember Nicholas Christakis and the Yale University "Halloween Email" protest? Here's a video in case you need reminding. I want to focus on what we see in this case, because this is the type of participation you are suggesting in action. In real time. And what we see is that there are different rules and norms in male argumentation as opposed to that of the opposite sex. Nicholas real…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:48 AM
8

This mirrors my own experience with a false accusation at work. I actually found proof of my innocence and got the owner and authorities to admit that she made up everything. However, even as I won, I lost, because the rumours had spread and poisoned the work environment. Part of the problem was the nebulous nature of what I supposedly "did" – again, this matches your story – so that even as I proved one claim wrong, another accusation that I made her "uncomfortable" would be leveraged against m…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:06 AM
4

That feedback loop is indeed happening, and I agree it is making things worse for men. However, if it results in the core problems getting resolved (i.e. through new and more equal policies at universities, or the rise of alternate forms of secondary education that reaffirm enlightenment thinking, or the way businesses no longer value university degrees, or perhaps other kind of changes to society), then it might be worth a few decades of growing imbalance. I can already see sprouts of these new…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 08:31 PM
4

Unfortunately, most of the references on the page you link are broken. And the ones that do work are behind paywalls of various types. The only one I found working that I could use to investigate the claim has a very limited range of values from 1990 to 2017, and it is difficult to be certain about a long term trend with only two decades of data. Plus, the data they have gathered/used is frankly bizarre (speaking as a data scientist myself). From 1990 to 2000, the life expectancy gap in Sweden a…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 08:21 PM
12

I got my B.Sc. in Math & Physics (combined honours) many years ago, and I was top in my class in high school, but honestly I would not recommend going to university to any young man these days. I think growing mentally and becoming educated is a laudable goal, but the path to that cannot be found within the modern day academy unfortunately. Therein only lies indoctrination, debt, moral panic around male sexuality, and an imbalanced focus that only punishes and ignores men to prop up "historicall…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:20 PM
7

If it is your position that men's disparities in health can be solved – or even significantly reduced – without directing and earmarking money and resources for men alone and by targeting solutions that work for men as a group, then you're only making things worse for men. Also, I wonder where you are getting this idea that the gap is shrinking, or if it is, that it is a significant narrowing of life expectancy outcomes? I just did a quick search, and the most recent article from 2023 I found ha…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:26 PM
14

I managed an employee in a business several decades ago who was having his wages garnished for child support, and it was abhorrent how little was left in his pocket after child services took their cut (only a small portion of which his child probably saw in the end, after paying the salaries of the bureaucrats, the salaries of those who ran the financial systems, plus the money his ex just wasted on herself). He finally stopped doing his job and eventually I was forced to terminate him. I found …
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:10 PM
18

I can only recall a single anti-smoking campaign that was directed at men, and it was unfortunately one that focused on men being unable to get erections late in life from smoking. While this is a true health risk for men, the commercial was done in an insulting and condescending way to masculinity that would not have reached anyone. Thankfully, I never saw them attempted ever again. If you want men to value their own lives, society has to first show men that they have value, and that means not …
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:54 PM
56

The truly frustrating part is summed up in the seventh image you present, where we see so many causes of death that are completely preventable. Yet nothing is done to save men's lives. It is rather eye-opening to realize that physical life and death for men is a much lower priority than, say, online safety for other more important groups.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:34 PM
17

This "awkward phrase" – as you rightly call it – objectifies men and reduces them to nothing but their genitalia. It's like calling a murder: "Forced to impale". What a disgusting term that erases male victims of rape. There is no more immoral and hateful piece of law to lay at the feet of the gender ideologues than this nasty piece of doctrine, that blames men for their own sexual assault and leads so many guys into serious depression, social anxiety, isolation, and even suicide, because they c…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 01:54 PM
4

Some of our detractors try to argue that the idea of "men being born with original sin" is an extreme position that "no one on their side actually holds". Some of them also attempt to dispute the idea that gender ideology is in fact a morality-based secular religion. Yeah, how about no. Megan Fox is yet another nail in the coffin of that indefensible position, but she is definitely not the first, nor the last sadly.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 03:02 AM
14

Thank you so much for providing such a comprehensive list of dates for universal suffrage around the world. What continually amazes me in everyday discussions is how few people know that the majority of men could not vote in the past, and how it is education systems everywhere that deliberately hide and/or obfuscate this historical fact of men being oppressed in terms of not having voting rights. TheTinMen actually had a great point about this not so long ago, when he noted how language is const…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:30 PM
11

I have actually had similar experiences over the last few years in a community where adult topics and all sorts of kinks are discussed and enjoyed. Discussion had gotten to the point of walking on eggshells with every word, and I had to take a break from the whole site for almost a year. The worst thing there was the new go-to claim that someone is "kink shaming" people. If a guy simply says: "I'm not interested in that kind of sexual activity", no matter the context, you can set your watch to t…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:55 PM
3

As another commenter in the thread pointed out, the Inn Proj is very selective about the cases they contest. So the true number will assuredly be much higher than a few hundred false rape convictions.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:00 PM
8

In what regard? And – more importantly considering the subject of this post – how does your claim of organizational ill repute have any bearing on these exonerations and the case data surrounding them? Because that's all I am referencing here. The idea that these would be dishonest acquittals seems highly unlikely considering the number of pathologists, labs, lawyers, etc, that would be involved in these cases.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:10 PM
3

That case does explain a large amount of the 2022 increase. Though I see that officer's corruption was responsible for 81 convictions vacated in 2018 as well, so the 2022 numbers still seem significantly higher than would be expected. Going from a total of 180 exonerations in 2018 all the way up to 242 in 2022 is a pretty big jump.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:00 PM
5

Wow, thanks for the link! This data looks fascinating. From a quick glance at the web page it's very strange how 2022 has such a huge jump in exonerations (non-DNA related) compared to any year before it. There must be an interesting story there, though it could turn out to be due to the way many countries are deeming more and more activities to be crimes, and specifically targeting only men – either by definition or in practice – with those new laws. If that is the case, we'll see the same tren…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:21 PM
17

"I've seen girls half your size in movies take down multiple guys attacking them...you got this! Yas slay queen! ... Ouch. That looks...quite painful. I guess you don't got this. Tell you what, I'll call an ambulance, and I can recommend a dentist who should be able to fix most of those teeth. Probably." 😂
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:37 PM
8

That's a key point to realize. The Inn Proj is very selective in the cases they take on, obviously because they are very expensive to do in terms of time, lawyer fees, etc, but also because the case has to have archived and preserved physical evidence that can be used to disprove the conviction, and that is rare as you rightfully point out. I've heard them estimate that over 11% of convictions they consider are definitely false, based on their statistics of actual exonerations. However, they can…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:24 PM
2

There has to be balance. Just like plants need sun and rain to stay healthy, most humans need solitude and socialisation. Without it, you can feel yourself just slowly dying, you can feel the damage, the wear, the grind, the poison. I know it's probably small comfort to hear, but thank you for taking the time to share this perspective, and for doing it in such a creative and eloquent way. You really do have a way with words. After taking some time to consider what you've said, I realize it's som…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:26 PM
60

It's not surprising that the amount of "direct violence" cases like this seem to be on the rise in conjunction with the daily examples of "proxy violence" being committed by "the fairer sex" (note: those distant/surrogate methods are by far the more preferred method of attack, since they are seen as much safer, as there is little risk of direct physical harm in return when they are used). The jury rejected Wallace's claim Mr Mayo was armed and she was simply using the knife to ward him off to pr…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:49 AM
2

At least this video is bringing a lot of awareness and calling out misandry on the internet. Pointing out misandry and male hatred is indeed a worthy endeavour, but when it is done from within a framework of "men are lonely because they're not dating and sad", I feel it's just shooting yourself in the foot. Just ask yourself this question: Is being mistakenly branded a "low status loser" really any better than being mistakenly labeled a "potential rapist"? I think I have enough self-respect to a…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 04:13 AM
6

I agree that no one is perfect, and moreover I know that purity tests are not productive to any team effort. Please understand that I'm not saying to cancel or cast her out or anything like that. However, she is often lazy and doesn't really offer any new insights into what are fairly complex societal trends and nuanced subjects. If anyone else is feeling that way about her content after a decade or so of her being around, then I'd recommend just moving on like I did. If you're still enjoying he…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 01:21 AM
1

Media: Please men, we understand you! Look! We can care about men too when it affects one of our own! Now would you stop listening to Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Andrew Tate, etc, and send all those views, clicks, and cash in our direction instead? We promise we'll find another feminine perspective to pigeonhole men in another few months or so if you do.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 01:05 AM
9

Call it the "Male Solitude Trend", and it suddenly sounds like a much more pleasant thing, doesn't it? Based on the title of her video I don't see how this helps; men are not broken wahmen, and we don't worry about relationships anywhere near as much as our counterparts. I think Sh0e is probably seeing this – I would argue – neutral trend too much from just one biased perspective. Honestly though, I've moved on from watching her videos. She may "get" men's issues on a surface level, but she is u…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:55 AM
31

Men are not even human beings in their minds. We are not capable of feeling pain or being hurt, according to them.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:56 PM
1

They may think they're helping people with this, but by using the "feel safe" scare tactic, they are instead causing widespread mental health issues in those who hear their marketing pitch. So congratulations, you've actually harmed large swaths of people in your altruistic quest to save the world. You know, if I were an actual misogynist, I would be dancing in the streets at the increased suicide, substance abuse, mood disorders, depression, and other mental illnesses this kind of worldview wil…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:30 PM
10

Here are some suggested grammatical fixes that I think might improve the document (my proposed changes are shown bolded and in italics). This is violates men’s right to be free from discrimination. This is a violation of men’s right to be free from discrimination. Minster for Women Minister for Women (Note: the above "Minster" typo is repeated several times in the document) New Zealand is working on incorporating ‘gender budgeting’ into it’s budget development process. New Zealand is working on …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:58 AM
3

So you're forced to cherry pick the decade to try and get the result you want. That says something right there. And yet still you fail to make your case. The average man from any industrialized nation in the 50's/60's was a war veteran, and he suffered from chronic physical injuries and/or undiagnosed PTSD symptoms. Yet, despite these handicaps, he was still expected to find and hold down a job and sacrifice his personal well-being for others. And that job he held was usually quite unsafe too. F…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:48 PM
3

The 1940's? You mean when every able-bodied man was drafted into WW2, giving his life, or at least his physical and mental health, to protect those who did not have to fight? And when men who entered public education were far less likely to graduate high school? And the average man was unskilled and uneducated, and had to work in dangerous or unhealthy conditions to make a living and support his family? And more? You mean that era? I don't dispute that the other half was treated poorly in many r…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 01:58 PM
3

If a man in the UK is the victim of IPV at the hands of his female partner he will be recorded as a statistic under VAWAG A reasonable person reading this statement would react with some variation of: "There's no way that can be true, right?". However, it is not a surprise to me – or probably to most others on this subreddit – that this is the case. All male advocates have witnessed this kind of manipulation many times. It's quite simple, really. They just hide behind statistics that "show" viol…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:58 PM
4

I'm glad to hear that the discussion went well, and I hope the article is fair and respectful to what you said. I do have a bit of concern at a meta level though, because while the subject of dating does come up from time to time in conversations, and the problems therein do reflect many other modern issues that men are dealing with, I think it's important for people in general to realize that concerns about relationships are a relatively minor topic of discussion when it comes to male advocacy.…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:54 PM
16

I guess it makes sense in their man-hating minds? That's all I got.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:54 PM
17

It could be the Supreme Court in any country, unfortunately. Everything is political now, and so there is no downside to following the "you are all perfect angels who could do no wrong" narrative, along with the "you must feel safe" dictum in legislation and law, and so on, in order to get the votes need to be elected again.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:52 PM
33

"Your honour, the iPhone's marketing campaign deprived me of my power of self-control when I stole it from the store. I believe that Apple should instead be the ones brought forward on charges for the damage they inflicted on me." (a big /s in case anyone thinks this isn't fully sarcasm)
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:46 PM
1

No. Just...no. Focus on this man's memory and learn lessons from his story. Don't fall down the rabbit hole of wanting to enact mob justice on the person responsible for his death. Or even the appearance of such.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:46 PM
285

This story is from 2017, so I thought I would see what events transpired afterward. As expected, there was a lot more drama to come, and I don't think anyone will be surprised to find what his ex did after this tragedy: https://www.shawlocal.com/2019/12/04/family-of-jail-detainee-who-committed-suicide-files-wrongful-death-suit/a5ybvot/ The wrongful death suit is filed by the "executors of his estate" according to the article, but in reality only the ex is the one who has the authority to make th…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:09 PM
108

This sounds like a classic case of a mentally ill individual engaging in lawfare and proxy violence. And the horrible thing is that no one at any level of these institutions thinks they are to blame for letting themselves be wielded in such a fatal manner and causing this man's death. We're about the only ones who will actually genuinely care about his passing, because, as a man, he has no worth in anyone's mind apart from perhaps his wallet. Rest in peace, Thomas Doheny. It's sad to say, but yo…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:53 PM
1

It's frustrating because at this point in our history we really should be able to deal with such knowledge in a rational and respectful manner. I often give the example of the average family size, which turns out to be something like 2.3 children or some decimal value like that (depending on where you are computing it of course). No one hears that measurement and feels upset or offended by it. Everyone knows instinctively that it only applies at a population level, and they understand that it is…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:18 PM
55

F: "Kill all men!" M: "That's hate speech." F: "Well, obviously we just meant that we want to fight back against our oppressors." M: "Then just say that in the first place. You're adults who can understand that choosing to use words like 'kill' has serious consequences." F: "..." F: "Incel! Manbaby! Neckbeard! Misogynist! ..." M: "Okay, I guess I was wrong to call you adults."
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:04 PM
8

I was open about my case with the world and random strangers. Obviously this was not recommended to me by my legal counsel but I did it anyway because the only way this will change is if falsely accused people turn the tide one person, one day, at a time. Nobody that has seen the case records (that I show liberally) believes me guilty. I had over two dozen people write letters for me to be licensed and everyone at the hospital I work at, my new hospital, my school, everyone, wanted to help me. I…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:56 PM
10

I once heard this described as men solving emotional issues in a "moving forward into the future" manner, while the other sex was more focused on "reminiscing about the past". Men – in general – tend to prefer to make new memories and get new experiences in order to understand and manage their emotions. I'm not sure where I heard the "future focused" description anymore (it may have been something Tom Golden spoke about?), but it is essentially the same important observations about men's healing…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:43 PM
1

in a modern civilisation "sperm is cheap and eggs are expensive" is a small factor today Only people who want to deny biology would assert this (and without even attempting any reasonable argument to support it I must note). "Sperm is cheap and common" has made us who we are through millennia of evolutionary pressure to survive, and it is still a huge influence on the human species (indeed, it is fundamental to what some have begun calling "The Law of Inverse Utility" for men in the modern world…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:10 PM
1

Excellent point about gay men. Indeed, their choices in occupation will tend toward more female-occupied work. And this is likely due to the one biological factor that is well established by research into gay men: their brains are not "male" like that of the average straight guy, and they tend strongly toward the average brain structure of the opposite sex. It is the same for lesbians, where they tend to have "male" brains (again on average). It's amazing how sociology, psychology, and other suc…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:53 PM
33

That's a very powerful message.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:37 AM
1

Do they argue against the sperm is useless and cheap and eggs are rare and special? I have no idea who "they" refers to in this sentence. And how is it of any importance that a particular person or group argued against that particular observation? If you disagree with it, present your arguments against the idea so we can discuss them. The rest of your comment is...well, not coherently written, unfortunately. From what I can discern, it doesn't have much direct relation to what I wrote, and that'…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:21 AM
2

No, I don’t have studies right now, I was just trying to explain how I agree that the biology you’ve pointed out is important, but it is indirect. I don't understand how you can think biology doesn't have a direct impact on our decisions. I guess I should just come out and ask the question: Do you accept the fact that the brain is a sex-typed organ, and that there is something that exists called a "male brain"? I have delved enough into neuroscience that I am comfortable with that conclusion. I'…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:10 AM
1

He doesn’t weigh the value of his sperm, he thinks about how society would judge him, how he would be seen as less valuable as a future mate. Do you have any studies or papers that have arrived at this conclusion that you could reference for me to review? Off the top of my head, this explanation appears to be insufficient to explain the behaviours we are discussing. It is unable to explain why men without families are more likely to risk their lives in various activities, or why men who are past…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:13 AM
6

I would first ask what you mean by "dangerous jobs". Because the first thing that comes to my mind is the fact that jobs are often only as dangerous as we choose to make them. For example, coal miners didn't have to work in horribly unsafe conditions where the tunnels were right on the verge of collapse. Even in those days companies knew how to brace walls, dig slowly, and take many safety precautions. Yet they didn't. And even today, over a century later with occupational health & safety laws i…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:45 AM
2

I'm a bit confused by your response. You say nothing about biology, and you only discuss "socialization" as the problem/solution. Are you using "blank slate" ideology here, or do you think that biological differences are also important alongside environmental factors? At the very least: "sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive" deserves to be mentioned as a possible explanation for why men take risks more than women.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:29 AM
16

"...born into male bodies..." is always such a fascinating phrase to hear. It really betrays these ideologue's supernatural ideas about the "blank slate" as a sort of religious ideal regarding human perfection, and it is one of the many ways they try desperately to separate humanity from our biological origins. To the average person, it is a non-controversial idea that we would not be "who" we are if our bodies and brains changed in form or function. Still, no rational individual would dispute t…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 09:51 PM
6

I think you meant to say "not in charge" or "no longer in charge" there.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:47 PM
2

The systems of education, entertainment, and the media all attack men and masculinity at every opportunity, by calling us inherently evil and dangerous. So I disagree in turn, because I see man-hating as a very loud and widespread issue right now. Men are checking out as a result of this animosity, and in turn the society around them has lost the ability to innovate. Even worse, many places are losing to other countries where that drive and ambition is still present, but whose cultures may not b…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:05 PM
28

The formulation of your question unfortunately assumes that men were never discriminated against in the past, which is untrue. Throughout history most men lived short, brutal lives, suffering and dying in terrible and unhealthy working conditions or in unbelievable agony on the field of battle. Or for another example consider public education: ever since its advent in the early twentieth century, it is boys who have failed to graduate high school, and who have seen lower success in obtaining deg…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 02:44 PM
5

Debate with the intention of convincing the large, neutral third-party audience who are reading the exchange. Also, use any such discussions as an opportunity to test and refine your verbal and written skills, and/or as a chance to improve your ability to spot fallacies. If you only approach a debate with the goal of changing the mind of your opponent, you will fail in almost every case and burn out very quickly. So the best solution is to start seeing the bigger picture, and focus on the things…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 01:47 PM
5

Fears about brain drain are greatly overstated in developed economies. That's under different circumstances though. If the problem were just replacing a shrinking population through immigration, then it's somewhat workable. But add in the man-hating and loathing of everything male that leads many guys in a society to just check out and lead a life of "subsistence", and you've got a potential recipe for collapse. We've yet to see if simply importing workers can keep up with that significant chang…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:37 AM
72

Andrew is yet another example of the Brain Drain epidemic that is causing so many countries to lose smart and productive men from their economy. On the surface this falsely accused man probably doesn't seem that important, but he was intelligent and ambitious enough to obtain a degree in math + physics while in jail. Yet here we are. And this kind of protest by men doesn't even have to involve leaving the country, since there are so many other ways in which we see men just check out of a system …
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:39 PM
99

So according to this article, if Andrew is awarded compensation, a clause kicks in where he is required to pay "room and board" back to the prison. This means that a lump sum of money will be deducted from whatever restitution he receives. Holy fucking shit in a bottle, talk about adding insult to injury. Or "compounding injury" is more apt, because this is way more than just an "insult". Trying to bill him for his own wrongful imprisonment is an extremely petty and vindictive action to take, an…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 04:56 PM
48

The "white feather" is only the most overt way in which men are tricked and manipulated into losing their lives and well-being for others. And unfortunately, in the modern era, those that are being kept safe constitute a public who no longer respect or even acknowledge that continuing debt to men. As just a small example of how widespread this manipulation is and in the many ways it manifests, consider the saying: "Women love a man in uniform". There are years of soft pressure placed on boys to …
/r/MensRights29/07/23 03:46 PM
4

Feminism is female supremacy with lots of funding for PR.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 11:37 PM
3

Sure thing, dear. Stop JAQing off and go away, because we stopped listening to you a long time ago.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 10:27 PM
8

Wow, more man-hating from feminists. Unfortunately, hatred only begets more hatred in return. So be a dear, and just shut the fuck up, fucking shut up, and fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 08:24 PM
8

It was made to be divisive, and the media is furthering that intent at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 05:06 PM
5

The way divisive identity politics was introduced and how it instantly tore OWS apart is chilling to recall.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 04:07 PM
2

I made a very well-received comment a month ago on this exact phenomenon. Here's the appropriate excerpt from it: It's one of the biggest reasons that men who are ill (i.e. suffering from depression, nervous breakdown, etc) have so many barriers standing against them, and it shows in how they are statistically far more likely to end up being thrown in jail than given proper medical assistance. A depressed women with a knife is called "a threat to herself", while a depressed man with a knife is c…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 04:03 PM
20

One race oppressed by another, and after trying to rise up after seeing a glimmer of hope, relentlessly put back into a subservient role. Ken: A heartbreaking movie about an oppressed man being abused by those he loves, trying to set himself and others free but tragically failing.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:32 PM
8

The true intent of the Barbie movie was pushing divisive identity politics. Divide and conquer. I've actually watched reactions to this movie tear previously healthy communities apart, almost exactly along the lines of men rejecting the way it's just more bashing of masculinity, but those who think "Pink is pretty" excusing all the clear man-hating as just "satire". It's nothing but divisive agitprop, but unfortunately it does that job very well.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:29 PM
8

"Research". "Radicalised". LOL All these agitprop non-profits, agitprop media companies, and agitprop entertainment products form a silly cabal of authoritarian Chicken Littles. It would be kind of scary if it weren't so hilariously over-the-top in its pearl-clutching insanity.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:22 PM
10

Lol, they think we're the bad guys for wanting equality :D Imagine making a movie where the slaves are the villains for wanting to be free.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:17 PM
23

Its obvious people just don't care just look at any war ever waged ever in the history of man kind. Cue the ignorant response of: "That's just men killing men, ordered by men!" They conveniently forget and ignore all the female leaders who started more wars on average than men, the fact that women are the largest voting bloc and they put those warmongering governments into power (coughHillaryClintoncough...seriously, men dodged a huge bullet there when she lost the presidential election), the la…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:40 PM
2

That staggering proof of extreme narcissism should tell the judge that she is almost guaranteed to reoffend in some way. But I'm sure the legal system will just brush off any future crime with: "She seemed like such a nice person, how could we have known?". Seriously, our institutions are broken beyond belief.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:24 PM
13

There is a really well-known video example of excusing misandry in the form of Big Red from a decade ago, where she sang "Cry Me A River" to a man who said he was trying to work on preventing male suicides. Feminists later tried to pretend that she was an individual outlier, but it's pretty obvious that she's very representative of the entire movement. If anything, she's tame. Compared to the actual feminist institutions that deliberately target men and rejoice at their suffering and death, Big …
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:15 PM
1

They're calling for blood because they assume the allegation is true, and by calling it "undecided", you are encouraging them to believe "yes, there is a truth there!", i.e. the very problem we're dealing with. And you think contributing to the problem will solve it? I would argue that the average person is always going to naturally believe an accusation. From a strictly evolutionary psychology angle, it's more advantageous to mistake that shape in that bush as a tiger, than to not see a tiger a…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:35 AM
1

When an entire group/industry/movement says they hate you, and indeed they repeat their man-hating and masculinity-bashing multiple times to your face, you are completely justified in hating them right back. I am perfectly fine with telling feminists they can eff the f%$k off. After all the open hatred of men I have seen in the last five years, I'm in IDGAF mode for at least the next decade. Congratulations, you divisive fü¢ks.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:44 PM
2

Referencing McCarthy and his overreaches – and lack of human decency! – is a good way to deal with it. I really do think there need to be much better approaches to defending the accused, because I worry that our current methods are being overrun by moral panics. So anything we can do to slow down the encroachment is worth considering.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:29 PM
2

"It is better for 10 guilty men to walk free than for 1 innocent man to be imprisoned" I wanted to remark on this as well in a separate response. This is another point where I have a bit of a strange take, because I don't think the rationale for Blackstone's formulation lies in the presumption of innocence (neutrality) alone. The way I tend to look at this is that a society where an innocent person can be jailed, and where that horrible violation of personal rights and freedoms is considered an …
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:25 PM
1

I won't make any rash decisions until I see all the evidence [...] Unless you're on the jury, it is unlikely that you will ever see all of the evidence. That's true. My wording was a bit unclear there. It should probably read: "all of the evidence that can reasonably be found". An investigation does not go on forever, even though there is always the possibility of finding more important facts about a case. Law enforcement closes or suspends an investigation after a reasonable amount of time has …
/r/MensRights27/07/23 11:00 PM
0

You raise good points here. The question I would ask in return is whether "innocent" can indeed be the starting point in the mind of the average person. I don't think the two things – "innocent" and "undecided" – are considered to be the same in general society, even though it does make some sense intellectually and legally to equate the two. Given that differentiation, doesn't it make some sense from the perspective that language is a tool for communication, to consider changing the formulation…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:19 PM
1

It already has next to no chance of beating the Mario movie, so it won't be the biggest BO for the year. It will likely break a billion, but even that is not guaranteed yet. And just like Mario has been forgotten by this point, so too will this trite piece of content, at least once its divisive intent has run its course.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:12 PM
2

Being relatively isolated is still not a good reason to use a dating app when it is clearly not able to solve that specific problem. The constant attention and instant validation on those apps creates only narcissists, so you have to learn to accept that you're not going to find anyone on them who is worth connecting with. You need to try a different approach.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:18 PM
5

It's amusing how everything under the sun is somehow the fault of "conservatives" in these cultist's minds. Meanwhile there are so many examples of center to center-left people who also criticize the constant man-hating and masculinity-loathing found in Western entertainment. Even Krystal from Breaking Points – who is very far on the left – lambasted this latest example of divisive and misandric propaganda from Tinseltown. But those voice are just erased to form yet more divisive narratives.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:03 PM
15

Get off dating apps. You'll be much happier for it.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:53 PM
73

This is indicative of the total lack of worth given to men's lives by our misandric society. Chemically burning someone so badly they die...what a truly awful and painful way to suffer. Almost every nerve ending in the body would feel like it is on fire. At the same time. This woman is truly a monster. Unfortunately, there are other similar stories of these narcissistic and remorseless psychopaths who have done the same and gotten off entirely free, so probation is not surprising to hear in this…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 12:47 PM
5

male feminist (n): a guy who is told that all men are abusers and grapists and thinks to himself: "Yeah, that sounds about right."
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:38 PM
25

People really have to stop forming conclusions before considering the evidence like in the post you quote, or else they fall into this equivalent of conspiracy theorizing. "He only got away with it because he's rich!". "These cases are notoriously hard to prove!". When there's nothing that can happen that would falsify their initial belief, then that's a primary indicator that they believe in a conspiracy theory. "Inability to falsify" is a requirement for something to be categorized as a conspi…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 05:24 PM
2

New Discourses has a lot of material showing the parallels between those two ideologies. Here's an example, but there's certainly a lot more out there in various articles and YouTube videos. James Lindsay is like a walking Encyclopedia when it comes to the roots and influences that formed modern-day intersectional feminist doctrine. (Note: I originally wrote "informed" in the previous sentence, then upon re-read I edited it to say "deformed", then I finally decided to just write "formed" and ins…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:59 PM
2

Wow, I understood in concept how family courts eschewing a 50/50 equal custody split by default made Dads into second-class parents, but as the old saying goes: "The devil is in the details". And holy crap, this is bad. You are being denied the information you require to do your job as the child's parent. It's as simple as that. The school's laziness – and let's face it, their direct discrimination against men, since Fathers are the ones gutted by this in the vast majority of cases – are making …
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:19 PM
0

I have watched footage from real lineups combined with interviews of those who participated, plus simulations of lineups that were done to show how easily they can go wrong. A simple line like: "You know it's really important we catch this criminal" has been shown repeatedly to make a person want to do all they can for the police, and because of this it is very likely to override a person's uncertainty in a lineup situation. Also, small gestures and unconscious body language that suggest approva…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:53 PM
5

Not when starting from those origins. As soon as I hear the words "toxic masculinity" I stop listening. And every other man I have heard react to that term – across political, social, age, and ethnic divides – has said they just tune out too. You may imagine you're having a conversation, but in reality you're only enjoying hearing the sound of your own voice. Just go back to your histrionic echo chamber and don't bother wasting your breath here.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:30 PM
6

And put his accuser in jail ASAP for double the length he has been jailed for. In the matter of an actual crime and mistaken identity – which is what this case appears to be – there is no reason to seek legal redress against an accuser. The true criminals in this case – and any cases like it – are the system and law enforcement processes that more than likely manipulated/tricked the accuser into picking this innocent man out of a lineup. Unfortunately, that happens more often than we would like …
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:46 PM
3

Here's an archived version of the article, for those who don't want to give the BBC any clicks or traffic. Good on Andy for maintaining his innocence for so long. Many would just take the plea deal at some point, which is what the system relies on to hide its rampant corruption, laziness, and incompetence. But he persevered, got a combined degree in math and physics (I concur!) while incarcerated, and never stopped trying to find avenues to prove his innocence. How nothing in his baffling convic…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:15 PM
1

Sexual attraction exists to ensure reproductive success, and for men this comes down primarily to two things: health (physical/mental) and paternity assurance. Our basic desires can manifest in many unexpected and complex ways, but at the core of men's behaviour when seeking a mate are those two things.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:04 PM
3

You can't start a healthy conversation by first spouting off a slew of hateful insults.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:39 AM
3

The media really hates this development because – like him or not – Elon has status due to the fact he is a tech billionaire. Marginalizing these criticisms of anti-male entertainment (this is essentially what the "incel" slur serves to do – assign low status to a certain idea by way of throwing around a pejorative label) becomes much harder to do when someone rich and influential makes the pronouncement.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:26 PM
1

My disconnect with that scene had more to do with her words calling him a dangerous threat, all while her entire body language and actions were completely dismissive of him. Even after he was dead, neither of the two characters had a reaction like: "That was a bit scary". At the very least you would expect a modicum of stress to be shown, but they both acted like he never even existed. I think the writers/directors/etc are so frightened of making certain characters appear vulnerable that they de…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:18 PM
1

In the section of the video discussing the pay gap, you focus quite a bit on parental leave, and state that you want to make it available to men. I think it's important to share my experience with how that often manifests in practice, since I work in a country with decent shared parental leave practices in many places, and in my last job I was at a large company with a very generous parental leave policy for both men and women. The problem is as follows: One coworker of mine had his first child,…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:01 PM
23

Musk was always popular with the "incel-adjacent" engineer techbro types It's interesting how the other side uses this kind of description in a pejorative sense, when it can so easily be rewritten as neuroatypical, vulnerable, autistic, outcast, etc. I can almost guarantee that Elon Musk was bullied as a young teen, as are so many other young men who are fascinated by tech and science at an early age. So you can add "target of bullies" to that description as well. Now with those new descriptors …
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:35 PM
6

It's frustrating because I – and others I'm sure – want to be more active in opposing something like this. However, I have to take a deep breath and re-read my own comment about the constructive, reasonable, and long-term approach to fighting this attack on men. That allowed me to regain some sense of sanity, I must admit. It doesn't help though that I witnessed firsthand late last night how this movie is so divisive, as I watched it pretty much tear an entire community apart, and almost strictl…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:34 PM
3

Holy crap. I just started watching and I'm already blown away at only five minutes in. I agree 100% with how you don't want to fall into the Richard Reeves trap of introducing every idea with an admission of "XX supremacy". Your "men must have inherent value outside of constantly saying this will help other groups" attitude is exactly the kind of discussion and advocacy that we need, and that has been sorely missing from the growing conversation around men and boys. You seriously need to do more…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:08 AM
17

These campaigns are so common now that I can remember one from almost ten years ago where those championing it were challenged to simply show that their methods were effective in changing men's behaviour. They claimed that it worked incredibly well in reducing the instances of these offenses – and they had some survey or research to back that assertion up (seemingly) – while at the exact same time they lobbied the government saying that the problem had gotten so much worse that they needed immed…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 09:44 PM
5

It's unfortunate you've chosen to perceive me in that manner.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 09:12 PM
15

Whatever financial hardships are currently being suffered by Tinseltown, I can only say that their adversities are well deserved for how much hate they have directed at men and other groups.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:15 PM
21

Yeah: "Throw a little bone/scrap to all the men, and they'll eat it up like the pathetic animals they are". Sorry, but guys these days are more than willing to call this shit out. And we actually love pointing out hypocrisy from supremacists who think they are our betters.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:20 PM
42

This post is already quite long, so I wanted to break this section out into its own comment. One thing missing from my discussion is the question of: "So what should a reasonable person do about all this?" Well, the first thing is obviously to not support this industry in any way. Tell others not to spend their money on this crap. When an entire industry says they hate you (and multiple times at that), you are perfectly justified in hating them right back. The second thing I try to do is support…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 01:35 PM
26

More the flip side of that, actually. Men are shown as closer in function to the "slaves building the Pyramids", yet their desire to be free from that slavery is portrayed as villainous in this particular piece of entertainment.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 01:31 PM
11

This is an excellent infographic, and on a very important subject. The amount of bias and ignorance hidden away behind this practice of only looking at the apex/top 0.001% is staggering. This actually beelines with one of my favourite strategies in the real world when I happen to run into overly emotional claims about modern-day "oppression": That's a rather arbitrary choice of "measuring stick", don't you think? This one brief question is often all I need to then successfully rebut an entire sl…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 12:24 PM
2

People don't always say that; it's only extremists who wish to downplay and ignore the ongoing epidemic of male suicide who make those kind of useless statements. In fact, the ones who call masculinity "toxic" are actively encouraging more men to self-delete. Now that may seem a bit harsh, but it really isn't. Because the cruelty and uncaring attitudes of those who simply let the epidemic rage are deadly enough already. They are all entirely vile, through and through.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:41 PM
20

Yes, research exists showing that the majority of men do seek help for mental health issues. For example, the results of a UK study titled "Suicide by middle-aged men". In the section about "Contact with services" for men who had committed suicide: 91% middle-aged men had been in contact with at least one service or agency at some time. Most importantly, in the paper's conclusion, during the key messages section on page 30, they say the following: Rates of contact with services among middle-aged…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:34 PM
8

Hey, I know I don't know your friends and have zero evidence, but as a woman, I can tell you that they act differently when they aren't around you. Just trust us! You know we don't, like, lie or anything about people behind their backs. Like, there's no way we would spread, like, unsubstantiated rumours about someone to ruin their reputation, livelihood, relationships, or anything like that. Whatever you might have heard about the Whisper Network is just a made-up slur that tries to hold us back…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:53 AM
-1

Don't worry about it happening. Those who care, don't matter. Those who matter, don't care. If the subreddit members seem to care about this kind of association, then you're not missing out on anything by not participating in what are only "performative" comments. They just told you that there's no insightful or independent thought allowed in their community. If anything, you should be happy that they saved you from the wasted effort. Now you can find other places to share your genuine thoughts …
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:35 PM
62

Don't forget the Association fallacy as well. Even though you haven't done anything wrong personally, because a group they associate with you did (or that group is just perceived to be wrong about something), the assertion is made that you should not be listened to about anything.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:30 PM
14

I would argue this happens mostly because men are being gaslighted into believing that not having a gf/wife/etc is automatically going to make them feel lonely. However, "experiencing solitude" and "feeling lonely" describe the same exact situation, only with different mindsets. And the former is how most people naturally feel, unlike the pejorative and negative latter description, which is the only one you ever hear in the media or elsewhere. This is why I believe it amounts to gaslighting. I t…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 07:07 PM
9

It’s okay to cross the road to avoid others, I do this myself. We should all be mindful of how we can make others feel safer when walking home at night – this is just basic common decency. When confronted with the "men should cross the street" dictum, I usually prefer a different line of argument. The fact is that a phobia is best managed through a treatment method called "exposure therapy", and it should never be treated through avoidance. First off, the actual medical term for this is andropho…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 01:33 PM
3

I know the romantic ideal of losing your virginity exists, and society loves to glamorize this act of "becoming an adult", but the fact is that most people's first times are usually more than a little awkward, sometimes even to the point of arousal being difficult to achieve. And this happens whether you are circumcised or not. Hardly anyone is naturally confident about their bodies, and it will simply take time before sex can be fully enjoyed by both participants, in the majority of human being…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:11 PM
13

There's a good reason the MCU is referred to as the M-She-U these days, and it comes down primarily to the parent company that bought up Marvel Studios over a decade ago now. Disney doesn't have a freaking clue how to sell or make entertainment that appeals to men and/or boys, so a genre like superheroes is a horrible fit for them. I'd even describe it as like asking a vegan to market a tasty steak. The workplace culture of Disney naturally recoils from something they consider "immoral" and "tox…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 07:38 PM
1

It's funny. I mentioned this fact – that universal suffrage was equally about men – to my brother, after he told me that his wife and daughter had recently explained to him a lot about the subject of voting rights and what that meant to their sex. However, he was completely unaware of this fact of men's (lack of) right to vote, even after the other members of his family had spent a significant amount of time "educating" him about this facet of human history. An inquisitive mind would wonder how …
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:54 PM
120

Wow. Colour me unsurprised. My only other reaction to this revelation was: "Why does someone who is married care about dating?". However, that confusion faded when I remembered the proper name for all these groups: "Are we hating the same guy". Then it made complete sense.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 10:13 PM
84

More than 150 interviews later, her research – the largest anthropological study to date into why women freeze their eggs – concluded that it was men, not women, who were the problem. I won't give the Guardian any clicks, so thanks for sharing this little gem from the story. Honestly, even after seeing so many examples of this, I still do a double take at witnessing such blatant narcissism, entitlement, and selfishness in a mainstream news article. You'd think there'd be the tiniest bit of self-…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 03:18 PM
44

But unless it's still happening and you can bring up more recent examples, it's about as relevant as feminists bringing up women being unable to vote to support the idea of current sexism against women. The problem with this argument is that it assumes that modern-day feminists disagree with this particular application of the law. However, if you challenge any of them on this case, they actually side with the 34-year-old woman, and only see her as a single mother who needs support. She is the re…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 03:01 AM
221

It's amazing the mental gymnastics that I've seen from women to excuse this kind of case. One of the most ignorant I heard was: "Well, even though he can't legally hold a job at that age, that doesn't mean he is going into debt, because his parents will be the ones who pay for him. He'll be fine financially, and he can just get a job at 18 and it's no problem." I tried to point out to them that his parents still have to feed, clothe, school, and be the ones to support him for many years, and tha…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:46 AM
7

I find it interesting that the two phrases: "feeling lonely" and "experiencing solitude" describe the exact same situation and circumstances. Yet one is obviously pejorative and is also constantly applied to men who are not in a relationship. It's strange. Why would society try to make anyone feel bad and depressed on purpose? Isn't everything these days supposed to be centered around the idea of "affirming" people's choices, so that they don't have poor mental health? So why does that not apply…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:55 PM
19

A lot of failing media companies are trying to reach out to men, especially after seeing the success of many figures – Peterson, Rogan, etc – who have gained fame and fortune by saying the things that everyone is thinking – but that no one is allowed to talk about anymore – and by not treating men like born criminals. The problem with those jumping on the trendy bandwagon is that they are clearly not genuine. As someone wise recently said: "The singular greatest currency of the 21st Century will…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 02:53 PM
8

Very true. In the original story it was indeed a child's wisdom that finally tore away the veil of delusion from everyone's eyes.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 04:04 PM
8

I think you are doing incredible work raising awareness and being a voice of reason within the whole community. If there were one person I would be happy to say is the face of male advocacy, it would be you. So please, keep up the good work! I think that people react more strongly to individual stories, than to statistics, so that may be a way to try and grow if you feel things are stagnating. Governments can/should create policy based on those objective group trends to make the world a more fai…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 02:46 PM
178

The jester is often the only person in the kingdom who can get away with stating that the emperor has no clothes.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 03:53 AM
1

It's not just Canada where this can happen. I recall a US story from more than a decade ago (I think it might have been in New York) where a young man (he was a somewhat accomplished chess player just barely in his 20's IIRC) met a woman online. They started a long-distance relationship and eventually she wanted to meet him, and told him specifically that she wanted him to immediately "ravage" her when they met, because it had always been her fantasy to be forced into sex by a "stranger" (and he…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:38 AM
3

Thanks for the correction...total brain fart there.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 10:24 PM
54

This is exactly like the "Ghomeshi law" recently passed in Canada. The accusers in that case were found to have been lying about their claims during cross-examination, and Ghomeshi was rightly acquitted of all charges against him. In response a law was immediately passed requiring that all evidence the defense is going to use against an accuser must be shared with the prosecution before cross can occur, which effectively prevents proper questioning of an accuser in any and all cases. The goal wi…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:03 PM
4

It's a supremacy movement, as seen clearly by its actions. Gendered laws that were biased in favour of men are now neutral (and this is obviously a noble goal, though I honestly can't even think of one such example of a law...at least one that wasn't just limited to rich men, which is just the apex fallacy again). However, many, many more gendered laws are then created by these same political ideologues that only punish men. So it should be obvious that the PR of: "We just want everything to be …
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:49 PM
1

As I said, one of the accusers was found to have committed perjury. Do you not think that lying under oath is a crime, and she should face jailtime or other consequences? Because she hasn't been punished, and she won't be. As for the others, if all they did was go to the police and there is no evidence suggesting they made up their claims, then there is nothing the legal system can do. It sucks that our society won't let men continue to live and work while they are still awaiting their day in co…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 03:30 AM
2

One of the accusations was proven false beyond any reasonable doubt, because video evidence was presented during the trial showing the female accuser engaging enthusiastically in sex with Mendy and others. We don't know the specific content of the video, as we only have general descriptions of it. The judge gave some further context when she deemed that it proved this one accuser had committed perjury, but the full details of how and why are hidden behind the veil of the mainstream media's impre…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:36 AM
7

We can't say with certainty that they were false accusations, but from reading the court proceedings I got the impression that some of the women were almost certainly lying. One of the female accusers was found to have perjured herself when video was shown of her engaging enthusiastically in sexual acts with Mendy and others. It was actually so egregious that the judge immediately ordered the jury to find him "not guilty" on that count, and said that the jury had no other choice when they went i…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 12:15 AM
12

This is a good catch, and you are indeed correct: multiple attempts by an individual woman are always included in these estimates, and they significantly inflate the female numbers. I actually found some data from a study showing how much this skews the statistics, and I included them in a post I did on this a few years ago. Here is the relevant excerpt: When normalizing for the different number of men and women in this study, it suggests that an individual woman will be responsible for 3-4x the…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:30 PM
10

I would say that "mansplaining" is more a needlessly sex-specific version of the word "condescending". The purpose of this common accusation is less about being right or wrong (as in the case of Dunning-Kruger), and more about how the information being presented is perceived as a form of insult or as being offensive by the person receiving it (which the speaker has no control over). Modern day gender studies is actually full of examples of this beyond the ones you note, from Patriarchy to "toxic…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:04 AM
7

One of the major methodological flaws in the study that showed this result – and as far as I know, there is only one African study that is ever referenced when this subject is brought up – is that there was no control for the fact that the circumcised men could not have sex for several weeks or months following the surgery. So the researchers did not properly normalize for this disparity in participants. Even worse, when they had initial findings that the circumcised men were contracting HIV at …
/r/MensRights13/07/23 09:09 PM
10

"the power" is also a pretty apt metaphor for the smartphone being a force muliplier for female modes of aggression (gossip, innuendo and reputation sabotaging) There are very strong parallels in this kind of story with the longstanding practice of proxy violence that is the overwhelmingly preferred method of cruelty by the "fairer" sex. Notice how the altercations are only presented as safe and one-sided, with no risk to those who have the power (even when such attacks should reasonably cause a…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 07:02 PM
8

I was taller than everyone in my family by the time I was thirteen, and my Dad was not a small man (he was 6'1"). With all the hormones and brain development still happening as a teenager, I really believe that young men – especially those who are physically stronger than the average – are almost forced as they mature to learn/acquire strong empathy and self-control as they grow into adults. That was my experience at least, and that lesson is the one thing that I notice is always missing from th…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:46 PM
5

Yeah, it's unfortunately nearly impossible to find balanced and nuanced criticism of Tate. I haven't watched much in relation to him though, so there may be more out there that I just haven't seen. Still, it's pretty clear that the extreme, hyperbolic takes far outweigh the objective, rational arguments when it comes to Andrew Tate. One of the only good videos I've seen is this one from the Behavioral Arts, which is actually more focused on taking the BBC to task for their complete incompetence …
/r/MensRights12/07/23 11:41 PM
6

Yeah, just like fascist or incel. I must admit, I always smile when I see "fascist" and its variants spelled correctly in a comment that I like. It instantly reminds me of this hilarious picture from many years ago: Your "facism" is showing The fact that so many of the people throwing around these accusations of fascism don't even have a clue how to freaking spell the word speaks volumes about their lack of understanding of the concept. The idiots in this picture have obviously never taken the t…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:01 PM
4

I've had to separate the word "misogyny" as it appears on social media – where it is now used as a weapon to describe any and all activities, thoughts, etc, that can be associated with men – from how the word "misogyny" is used in the real world where we have to have to vocalize and speak those words, and expend significant amounts of energy to communicate actual contained and consistent meaning to other people. At this point, we basically have two different and separate languages, with online d…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:38 PM
19

After seeing so many of these tragedies, I've begun just calling this the "Girls of Seneca Valley High Case". The word "Mean" as a qualifier isn't really required anymore, considering how common this this type of false accusation has become. No empathy for men shown. Again and again.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:45 PM
12

Women are great but hetro women aren’t attracted to men who act like women. The author is even forced to admit it in the article That honest reaction and revelation from the author deserves its own essay. Seriously, why was she so embarrassed by the idea that women are attracted to "manly" physical and sexual characteristics (both primary and secondary)? That's a very strange attitude to have in the first place, when you step back a moment and think about it. What should be accompanying that emb…
/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:18 PM
26

Considering all the times I have heard men being told things like: "If your beard goes, then I go." "Don't you dare wear that, and don't ever buy any more clothes without my input." "I've booked you in for hair removal surgery, because I don't like all the hair on your back and shoulders." I've heard all of these said in stories from friends, coworkers, or just from clips of all those estrogen-fueled afternoon talk shows, and yet no one is saying a peep about this kind of controlling behaviour. …
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:51 PM
3

Course it is. The idea that all men in movies are good looking is preposterous. More like a good majority of mainstream male protagonists are attractive... This is a called "shifting the goalposts". The OP's original contention is that even minor characters (bankers) are shown in unrealistic ways, and you parrot this by referencing the perpetually sleeveless and/or shirtless men in an earlier response. Yet as soon as you are challenged on this broad and substantial claim, after being shown the m…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 12:09 AM
1

Well, the OP is specifically talking about the "background" mundane characters like bankers being too buff, so you are arguing quite a different point in your reply. If that banker is instead the main character as you suggest, then yes, of course they are going to have to be attractive or popular in some way. You don't sell a movie with unattractive people in the lead. And I must note that being popular doesn't always have to do with physical appearance, because charismatic people can be funny, …
/r/MensRights09/07/23 10:00 PM
1

In terms of the overall industry, there are still a vast and wide range of male shapes and sizes in entertainment. Off the top of my head I can easily think of bankers, salesmen, and other mundane side characters or extras, who are overweight, weak, etc. In fact, the male extras in a bar scene are more commonly far below average in terms of looks, from the movies I can think of. IMO this criticism falls into the "cherry picking" fallacy of people like Anita Sarkeesian, where the myriad counterex…
/r/MensRights09/07/23 06:18 PM
4

It is simply a "get in first" maneuver by these slimy little fuckers. No doubt. One commenter I read long ago likened this to what "patent trolls" do in business. Gender ideologues say they own the "patent" on gender issues, but not because they plan to do anything with that ownership. They just want to deny any access to others, and selfishly gain from having that level of control over it.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:19 PM
5

Why does Caitlin think so many men are committing suicide? She suggests they’re simply not as comfortable communicating. Men committing suicide is men's fault for not being more like women! That's a good one, why didn't I think of that? The "men are just broken women" doctrine is so tired, old, and above all, wrong. This magical cure for depression was sold to Chris Cornell, and he sang its praises in several interviews that can still be found around on the internet. Here is one example, and I'l…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:12 PM
5

I would say that linguistics – and Latin in particular – has more impact or application than just that. In fact, one of my favourite sayings is: Obsequium parit amicos. Veritas parit odium. IIRC this is attributed to Marcus Antonio Cicero (the greatest orator of the Roman empire), and it is roughly translated as follows: Lies beget friendship. Truth begets hatred. I think that motto still applies, and probably will for many millennia as regards the human species.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:39 PM
3

I would argue that even if all the administrators of Wikipedia were to be replaced, the site rules themselves would make it impossible to fix the widespread problem with agenda-driven bias in most articles. Their rules against "original sources" mean that the reality they create is the one dictated by the mainstream media. So you could have a person put out a YouTube video where they say they consider themselves left-leaning, because they hold certain positions on subjects x, y, and z. However, …
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:23 PM
7

Wow, I really love those breakdowns of the etymology for misandry and misogyny. Thanks for taking the time to explain their history in such a clear and concise manner!
/r/MensRights07/07/23 04:08 PM
2

I doubt Wikipedia's definition of Misogyny is actually as objective as that in practice. It probably skews closer to the Twitter formalization that "Misogyny = Anything a man does". I actually have fun challenging ideologues to name me even one male-associated activity that has not been called Misogyny at some point. And then I have a good laugh as they go quiet, or try to deflect with some other topic, or try to excuse/dismiss the problem with having such a broad categorization for the prominen…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:28 PM
7

I actually heard the original one that was shot was the most feminist in tone, but that wasn't what we got. In the first ending for Indy 5, Helena Shaw goes back in time and "fixes" all of Indy's signature moments as his replacement (she is there with the Ark of the Covenant, she is the one unlocking the secrets of the Last Crusade, etc). Supposedly that ending got absolutely dismal test audience reactions, and they subsequently filmed many others and finally went with the one that was hated the…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:37 AM
11

That list of entertainment properties is so much longer than most people realize. You can add the recent Masters of the Universe animated series on Netflix (where He-Man was replaced with Teala), Dr Who, Ghostbusters 2016, almost every recent Marvel movie (Thor replaced by femThor and Valkyrie, Iron Man replaced by Iron Heart, Dr Strange made to look incompetent and forced to play second fiddle to the Scarlet Witch and American Chavez, etc), Star Trek, the Wheel of Time, Rings of Power, and many…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:27 AM
19

The point is that you won't find any member of their extended family working in a gas station, moving furniture, or serving tables in a restaurant. They're all part of the aristocracy, after all. And Amy Schumer is certainly no exception to living an easy life of personal indulgence and luxury.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 08:34 PM
100

Many people don't realize that Amy Schumer is closely related to Chuck Schumer, and is therefore part of the US "nobility" class. That's why she keeps getting work despite being completely incompetent at comedy, and it is also one of the major reasons why she gets away with crimes like sexual assault. She's above those "peasant" laws and rules that you and I have to follow.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 02:14 PM
8

I barely got out alive. Yes, I'm being serious; it was that dangerous.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:33 PM
10

Excellent post and extremely well argued and presented. It is unfortunate how academic research has become so activist and politicized in the current era, and information like you have gathered together here is crucial in pointing out the bias and deliberate mistakes that are being made. I've actually interacted with many researchers personally over my time in academia, and believe me, they know which side of the bread gets buttered, and which narratives mean more funding, prestige, and a contin…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 06:08 PM
2

It's a result of the fact that their entire "academic field" is in truth a belief system because it is not falsifiable (though that's just one among many traits showing that feminism is in truth a secular religion). Falsifiability is a core part of the scientific method, and it is not very familiar to the average person, since it relies on understanding concepts like the "null hypothesis", differentiating between ontology and epistemology, and more. But to anyone with sufficient training in the …
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:54 PM
4

Here is a news story from Finland, although I recall more was said by the feminist PM Sanna Marin during this particular debate. However, I can't find specific links to her personal statements supporting MGM at this time, though I recall reading about them. There is also Katrín Jakobsdóttir of Iceland, who as PM was largely responsible for killing a promising bill to ban infant MGM in 2018. She repeated her position against banning the abhorrent practice again in 2020, while introducing legislat…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 02:46 AM
27

I'm sure she was hired because many of them wish they could have been the ones who tortured a man for weeks by sticking large, long objects up his rectum (which she admitted under oath to doing of her own free will). This is just their way of celebrating someone who took "hatred of their oppressors" to its logical conclusion. Of course any reasonable person would hear about such a gruesome murder and not want to be associated with her and that kind of man-hating rhetoric, but there is no such th…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:28 PM
11

There are no statistics and zero research into the fact that proxy violence is a very common tactic used to harm others these days. Everyone has heard all the stories of institutions, law enforcement, family, friends, online mobs, etc, who are manipulated into destroying or even killing someone, yet nothing is being done to track or study this phenomenon in any way. It seems strange that it's radio silence when it comes to accurately measuring these numbers. However, you won't need to think too …
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:06 PM
73

There is an old saying: men are either invisible or they are a threat. A man accompanied by a wife/gf or a family is being a provider, and therefore he is invisible. Or a man alone performing a job is invisible, as they fade into the background like wallpaper. However, if you're alone and not providing something, then you immediately become a potential threat in the eyes of society. It's one of the biggest reasons that men who are ill (i.e. suffering from depression, nervous breakdown, etc) have…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:01 PM
7

I'm not surprised that a feminist organization would be open about trying to make excuses for "knowing and malicious false accusers" like this. There are multiple examples of them enabling and encouraging this exact behaviour over the last few decades. For example, I recall the huge Buzzfeed News article from a few months ago that tried to generate sympathy for dozens of women who had been caught lying under oath in the UK about various assaults, by adding "vulnerable" in front of their group na…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 05:40 PM
41

The empathy gap is real, and unfortunately it's very, very widespread. It's actually amazing how often you notice it, once you have a name for this common anti-male attitude. I was watching a YouTube video just an hour ago, and in it a young woman said – from completely out of nowhere – that hearing about men's weakness and suffering was "therapeutic" for her. Seriously, it was like "therapy" for her to hear that males were an inferior breed (note: this wasn't at all what was said by the charact…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:00 PM
41

Many people don't realize that the concept of "conscientious objector" is a complete farce. Even in the US you need detailed written proof of specific religious affiliation – and you have to demonstrate a pattern of attendance/devotion to that religion – to legally achieve this status. Without that, you're SOL when drafted. And if this is the case in the US, I doubt that the Ukraine is any more accepting of a secular commitment to non-violence or other reason for not wanting to fight. You will b…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:20 PM
6

They don't just support it. I would argue that they are the ones who created and are primarily responsible for it. After all, feminist politicians, lawyers, consultants, bureaucrats, and activists are the ones who wrote and passed the gendered laws in every country that exclude baby boys from any legal protection regarding their rights to bodily integrity.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 04:01 PM
3

I'd like a source on that claim that only men had "scholarships" before 1950, because it seems quite dubious when the education system barely existed before that time. In contrast, here is an actual source showing that men born in 1940 in the US lagged behind by 3% in terms of high school graduation. Not like that will matter though, because the real problem here is that no one cares about the average man. These commenters on this reddit sub's only concern is the apex male, since that's all they…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 09:55 PM
12

There are not many marriages where the man isn't made to feel like a visitor in his own home. Just ask yourself this question: How many serious relationships can you name where the man isn't the one exiled to the basement, or the garage, and he ends up having no say in almost anything regarding how the house looks or functions? I can't name a single relationship that I've seen in my entire life that doesn't end up with the man banished to his "man pit". And it is those men who eventually end up …
/r/MensRights16/06/23 04:11 PM
8

The "boys mature later" stance sounds like it comes from Richard Reeves, and I must say I take more than a few issues with that sort of "female superiority" tactic, not the least of which is that his arguments are being used by primary school systems where there is a clear lack of male voices in the members of faculty (one study I read recently said that 1 in 3 primary schools have zero male teachers) to excuse the introduction of even more barriers against boy's success. Dr T Hasan Johnson is o…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:11 PM
-1

In the end, I don't think there is a strong overlap in the issues that affect the two groups. For example, men's health focuses on getting better funding for prostate cancer (which affects vastly more people than breast cancer, yet strangely receives significantly less funding...only about 10% in comparison I think), testicular cancer, etc, and those are obviously not applicable to the other group. Or even preventing suicide, which is a concern for both groups – the biggest risk factors for men …
/r/MensRights13/06/23 01:37 PM
48

I applaud what is being done here, but this "men in decline" narrative hides the fact that boys have always had poorer outcomes regarding finishing high school, ever since the inception of standardized education more than a century ago. And because this "turnabout is fair play" attitude is encouraged, for many gender ideologues this is celebrated as justified revenge, in a "How does it feel when the shoe is on the other foot?" reaction. However, it turns out that this idea of "historic male priv…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 01:11 PM
20

These institutions have set up a system where accusations can be made against men simply because a guy isn't liked (and for any reason whatsoever...heck, your psychic "aura" could upset their mood, or something just as unhinged as that rationale), and then made it so that there are no negative consequences against a person for making false allegations. What did they think would happen? That's a recipe for disaster. Simply put, your story is the inevitable result. Well, if you're a man anyway. We…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 03:07 AM
59

Madonna chose to mutilate her baby boys by cutting off parts of their genitalia at birth, all while at the same time yelling: "My body, my choice" when the topic of abortion came up. Now personally, I happen to agree with the pro-choice position, but unlike Madonna I'm not an effing hypocrite when it comes extending the same kind of "bodily integrity" rights to baby boys. Just call her what she is: a spiteful man-hating feminist who is universally cheered on by others like her, and then just mov…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:39 AM
5

The phrase "historically oppressed groups" appears everywhere in Canadian government policy, and it really is the "empathy gap" encoded into actual legislation, further making men disposable and invisible. Academia's misandry feeds directly into government action, so don't fool yourself by thinking that this is just some obscure paper because no one will read or reference it. Bureaucrats use it to claim that they've based policy on peer-reviewed academic research, so it's all a CYA scheme to jus…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 02:23 PM
14

The "women attempt suicide 4x more than men" claim is rightly called an urban myth, since there is no solid evidence to support it as a statement of fact. Any study I've seen with that type of conclusion invariably misuses hospital self-harm data – which many state in their own details section is extremely "dirty" data and not fit for purpose, as it overestimates actual suicide attempts – to improperly come to a conclusion regarding the rates of attempted suicide in each sex. The truth is that s…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 12:58 AM
3

The quandary in which you find yourself is the basic, underlying illusion of the economic system in which we find ourselves. As the Gross National Product of a country increases, people become more and more miserable, much to the shock and chagrin of every ivory tower economist the world over. But when you stop to think about it, if I go out for a walk in a beautiful park every day, I maintain good health and my spending for that activity is basically nothing. However, if I happen to get cancer …
/r/MensRights18/05/23 05:16 PM
23

Excellent observation about how she quotes the suicide statistics to make the viewer think they have some correlation to the subject at hand, yet she never establishes that fact, because those issues surrounding suicide clearly have nothing to do with the current changes in the dating world. Also, one thing I find interesting about all the focus on university degrees – which are always brought up in discussions like hers around marriage and dating – is that it is a prime example of the apex fall…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 10:30 PM
15

Good find about this kind of occurrence regarding domestic violence against husbands. Yet another historical fact – alongside the majority of men not being able to vote in the past, boys always having poorer outcomes in education since the introduction of public schooling, and many others – that seem to never get mentioned in the modern era. Strange how so many issues and discrimination that men have faced in the past is never talked about, and indeed seems to be deliberately erased from the his…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:15 PM
6

Oh how I long for the early days of the internet, when the crackpots would just blame everything on time-travelling lizard illuminati and the like. Now crazy conspiracy theories like the Evil PatriarchyTM have become almost mundane by comparison.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 03:38 AM
-3

Penis envy is a bit of an outdated term, and it is quite easily dismissible for that reason alone (academically the idea is certainly verboten, but even in general conversation it will be immediately scoffed at). However, I do believe a more updated concept like pleasure envy is much better supported by observable evidence, and the important point is that it doesn't have the baggage of that old idea. The even better thing about pleasure envy is that it doesn't just apply to feminists, and so it …
/r/MensRights06/04/23 04:04 PM
3

Just report and move on. It's up to the admins to handle the other subs that are brigading, although unfortunately they do nothing to help. Because the admins agree with the incorrect characterization of male advocacy, somehow it's magically only "harmless trolling" when it's done to men, yet it's rightly deemed harassment and brigading when it happens elsewhere. More double standards...nothing new to see here.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 12:22 PM
25

Thanks for taking the time to do this. For others out there who are thinking of speaking up like this, it may feel awkward at first to introduce these ideas – especially into forums where they feel unwelcome – but establishing and normalizing men's advocacy in regular, real world conversations is very important in the long run.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 12:04 PM
24

You can use archive.is to share articles like this, without giving the site any traffic if you want.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:47 AM
1

This is an utterly bizarre argument, because statistically women are actually more likely to attempt suicide than men (men are more likely to succeed) The claim that "women attempt more than men" is an urban myth, based on self-reporting (not reliable) and self-harm hospital data (also unreliable). I made a post on this sub about three years ago where I tracked down the study that appeared to be ground zero for the incorrect assertion about suicide attempts, and after only a few minutes of curso…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:38 AM
1

Thanks! I've added both names to my list.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 01:05 AM
2

Reminds me of the first Ant-Man movie, where the main character is unfairly incarcerated, and when he finishes serving the unjust prison sentence, his then ex-wife tells him he can't see his daughter because he owes her child support. Yet she is shown to be living a luxurious life with a new husband, while he obviously had no ability to earn a living when in jail. Not surprising that the anti-male movie industry would try to pass this off as "justifiable" treatment of a father, because not one p…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 03:27 PM
18

Criticizing feminism does not equate to criticizing women. Those two are not the same thing. Not even close.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:43 PM
7

Just the man-hating New York Times being the man-hating New York Times yet again.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:49 PM
3

Holy...your story is absolutely awful. You are strong for having stood up against it and still being around to tell the tale, even if it didn't unfortunately turn out in your favour. I just wish this kind of discrimination against men wasn't becoming so common that it's no longer a surprise to hear this kind of tragic story.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 12:41 PM
2

So someone who can pressure their victims not to pursue legal action should be considered totally innocent, regardless of the evidence? That is what you suggest by saying that "the only valid way to judge a person's actions is with a legal ruling". I'm having trouble imagining a scenario where someone could be pressured into staying silent and not taking legal action about a crime, yet at the same time feel comfortable going public about it through social media, giving me the ability to potentia…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 01:52 AM
1

But we are not talking about Harvey Weinstein. Never were. Well, that's how this comment chain started, with someone else equating this case to MeToo and Weinstein, and I objected to that comparison. You jumped in halfway through, without seeming to fully understand that context, and it's just been a confusing mess since, with two people likely talking right past each other. being a Bret Weinstein I'm sure you meant Harvey Weinstein here (no relation to Bret, of course, who is a well-regarded ev…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 01:24 AM
3

I don't support either Justin or his alleged victim(s). That's what neutrality means in practice. What I do support is that the proper legal process can begin in this – and any other – matter, and I want it to be given every chance to succeed and get to the truth of this case, so that justice can be done. Anything else is only mob injustice. That is because the mob rushes to judgment based on only its one overwhelming emotion: a shared madness and delirium, and it has no concept of moderation an…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 01:12 AM
74

There was a rather infamous US court case several decades ago at least of an ex-wife who got divorced by her husband, and she ended up walking over to his new house, killed both him and his new wife in their sleep by shooting them with a gun, and then successfully pled "battered wife syndrome" to escape any jail time. IIRC, it did require two jury trials (the first was a hung jury), and the second jury only convicted her of a lesser charge than multiple deliberate homicides because of a single h…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 09:38 PM
3

As someone who has been sexually assaulted, not going to the police is NOT going to correlate with veracity. Unfortunately, I have been assaulted sexually as well, and my experiences afterwards do inform my opinions on this matter. While I did talk in private to a few people who knew my female assailant, the one thing I did not want to do is make anything public or somehow get her attention. You see, the thing I feared the most was retaliation from her in response, either through direct or proxy…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 09:23 PM
1

The situation you describe would be like if Weinstein had used his powerful status to pick up random women in bars (or similar venue), which is indeed not illegal. That still makes him a complete douche because he's married, but infidelity is not a crime under the law. However, that's not what happened with Weinstein, so again, you are arguing against a strawman. The courts rightfully found Harvey Weinstein guilty of breaking the law by offering movie roles and acting opportunities for sex. You …
/r/MensRights26/03/23 08:58 PM
1

Good catch and thanks for the clarification. I misread that part and thought it was about returning his attorney fees. So they simply have to pay back the money that was initially awarded to them. That means the settlement was even less in his favour than I initially thought, which is unfortunate.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 06:34 PM
5

It is likely that he had DV issues And your evidence for this is what? This isn't me judging him based on reporting or what other people are saying, I'm basing this explicitly on what he has said publicly, and proof of said grooming that I have seen. Isn't the "proof of said grooming" based on what other people are saying though? You appear to contradict yourself here. And "what he has said publicly" refers to interviews he gave years ago, on shows watched by millions of Rick and Morty fans (ser…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 02:08 PM
18

Not a lawyer, just seems like he should have legal recourse. I've heard the UK laws around slander/defamation are not that difficult to meet as in other jurisdictions (IANAL though), so he might have some ability to sue. The barrier to that has always been the exorbitant cost of seeing a case through to the end. It's just not worth the legal fees for years of litigation, unless you are willing to endure a victory "in principle only".
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:40 PM
22

People who lie and destroy the lives of innocent men don't get to turn around and say: "Believe me that I'm a good person, and I only ever do things for good reasons!" I mean, they are convicted repeat liars, so why does anyone still believe yet more lies from them? The public really needs to accept the fact that women do exist who absolutely hate men as a group, and who engage in direct and proxy violence against innocent men arising from that extreme prejudice, up to and including their death.…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:34 PM
1

That's why I noted that he was using his industry power to entice them, which is a league apart from how normal adults entice people to perform sexual acts for them. My words were very clear: ...to use their position and power in an industry to entice, force, intimidate, etc... You are arguing a strawman of my actual position.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:09 PM
7

Bill seems to be able to speak his mind on a lot of politically touchy subjects, but when it comes to issues involving sex, he unfortunately just becomes another member of the herd. I've actually heard him talk openly in the past about his early days in the entertainment bubble in and around LA, and it seems he was living a very decadent life of cocaine, sex, and all sorts of other vices. I really wonder if this is just a way to try and deflect from all the skeletons he has in his closet, and be…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 12:38 AM
9

Maybe, but there are a lot of strange upvote/downvote shenanigans that I've noticed over the years. And I have seen proven cases of people organizing to stir up trouble (it usually starts on another site to try and hide the tactic, but it sometimes happens on reddit itself). Somehow it's magically not brigading when it's started on shitredditsays or some other admin-sanctioned sub.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:34 PM
7

Just report it and let the mods quickly remove crap like that. I mean, a five-day old account, posting on a weekend, hijacking the top comment of the top post in the sub, pushing some edgy discriminatory idea that obviously no one here agrees with. Yeah, obvious false flag is obvious.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:20 PM
17

No, it's wrong – both legally and morally – for anyone to use their position and power in an industry to entice, force, intimidate, etc, others to perform sexual acts for them. Full stop. Many of the actresses were also wrong to try and use sex to get roles that others worked harder for, and were more deserving of. Both of those things can be true at the same time, and one doesn't preclude the other.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 05:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter