TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RothyBuyak Archive

View 1 post and 297 comments by RothyBuyak on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
55

DebateRothyBuyak/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:32 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I don't expect anyone to solve all the world's problem. I do expect everyone to put in effort into solving some of them. People only being willing to do anything for their own benefit is why this world is a shitshow. I wish all those women happy divorce and to take all their assets the moment they get permanent residency
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:16 PM
1

Oppression isn't altruism. The commenter above trying to give those men some virtue is disgusting. I wish all those women happy divorce and to take all their assets the moment they get permanent residency
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:14 PM
3

The better outcome is fixing global inequality so that their countries aren't shitholes and they don't need to become exclusive prostitute to escape poverty
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:57 AM
4

Oh my objection to being passport bro isn't that it doesn't tip the scale in man's favour, it's that i consider that morally repugnant. There are plenty of poor countries with women desperate for visas to a place with any prospect and finantial security
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:27 PM
2

They aren't asexual! For once asexual women don't *wait* for sex, they don't want it at all - in relationship or out. It's possible to be attracted to someone and not act on this attraction until you are reasonably certain it's a good idea
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 06:50 PM
2

What's with men telling women what they are thinking and what is the decision making processs behind their decision. You literally cannot have your mind changed because you believe you know how women feel better then women themselves. There are plenty of women that wait when looking for serious relationship to weed out men not interested in commitment. Because one who just wants to pump and dump is unlikely to be willing to put months of dates into it, but those interested in relationship very w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 06:24 PM
1

🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 07:58 AM
3

I was mostly refering to choking and slapping. That's physical assault
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 06:40 PM
7

Or he can talk to women aboit what they would like beforehand and hopefully listen? Plenty of men think choking slapping and rough jackhammering is good sex. If you did that to a woman without discussion then it's basically assault
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 10:04 AM
–

Then don't read the thread/don't click the post
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 06:27 AM
4

I am a real woman. And I met plenty of others. Noce try
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 04:54 PM
1

I mean wildly imbalanced gender ration on all those apps suggests women do opt out more often then men. Which is another thing people don't mention about apps - with 60-40 ratio (typical some are even more skewed) means almost twice as many men as women. Since there are still thousands of women that gives illusikn of abundance but in reality mathematically roughy one third of those men have literally no chance to find partner (assuming mono relationship obv)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 11:25 AM
5

You are projecting. In general men here really like to attribute theur own beliefs and attitudes to women
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 11:17 AM
–

When a woman has a lot of sexual partners, that just means that she has horrible judgment and self-control. Why? If she had a bunch of pleasant encounters with respectful casual partners and they used proper precaucions how is that a bad judgement or lack of self control? You said "men have sex with who they can women with who they want" - which means women only sleep with some of the options available to them (so they decline some - ei "self control") while men are the ones who will fuck anythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 12:01 PM
–

Who are you to decide that? You had casual sex for pleasure and thrill of it I assume. Why is it wrong for a woman to do the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 11:57 AM
–

Wow. So you dismiss trauma, and consider women less for it. Out of curiousity - would you describe yourself as a "good man"? And if so why?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 11:55 AM
0

Ok? I already knew you are more likely to be murdered by intimate partner not stranger on the street. Same with rape etc. Show me stats that when those "undeairable" men enter relationships they are any better
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:54 PM
4

Women d not exist for your benefits. Plenty of people lived without relationships in their lives - some by choice, other by circumstances - and they didn't die from it. Relationship is not necessary for survival since you aren't going to die from lack od it (unlike like of food that will kill you). If all women want to have a "hoe phase" and then try to have ltr that's their choice to make. And the man can chose ti take it or leave it. Same vice versa - men have past too and if a woman doesn't l…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 05:10 PM
3

You showed no stats/researchanything showing that parrtnered men are more likely to be criminals/abusers then single ones. So... <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 04:52 PM
2

Ssri is often used to manage menopause syndromes. So a lot of women using them are simply menopausal. And even if we assume it is a result of being single (doubtful) it is stillawoman's choice if they'd rather have antidepressants or a man. And a lot chose first option. That's none of your business
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:24 AM
2

Having a job is necessary to support yourself. Relationships are optional. You can just chose to stay single. The delusional part in your hypothetical son is that he expects to stillhave food, housing etc and unless you have generational wealth you need a job for it. Woman (or man) doesn't need a relationship. Most want one but you can just stay single and live single. Staying jobless if you don't already have money will end you on the street. That's the difference. In current world relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:21 AM
0

Being a virgin isn't being in prison. Emmanuel Kant died a virgin, happily in old age
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:53 AM
4

How is it delusional to say: "those are my dating criteria. If anyone who fits them is interested I can have arelationship. If not I'll stay single"? Fyi delusion is defined as A false idea or belief A persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary If someone claims that they deserve the best partner ever and society is obligated to provide one and then cast some weird magic spells to ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:43 AM
2

Why are all the men here incapable to accept that just because they cannot imagine being happy alone that means everyone who claims to be must be coping/lying. No. Not everyone bases one s worth on being in relationship. And if being single is preferable to being with any available partners then the obvious rational reaction is to stay single
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:33 AM
1

Contemporary society is highly individualistic. It encourages everyone (men/women/enbies/whatever) into always following their rational (meaning economical) self interest. Contemporary mainstream feminism (not the only kind that exists. Like feminism is an actual ideology with many branches) is not separate from contemporary society, of course it encourages hyperindividualism literally everything else does. And some women simply don't want children (or don't want them that much) which obviously …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 03:15 PM
2

If exceptions exist it's not everyone. And I don't consider this number fixed. If culture wasn't so gun-ho over romantic relationship and didn't tell people finding a partner is their main worth more people would be ok staying single until the right person shows up
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 08:00 AM
3

Ok sorry, misunderstood you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 04:26 PM
1

You realize you are contradicting yourself in a single sentence? You acknowledge they exist (might exist, sorry), but that's somehow irrelevant? And then you again repeat that "everybody" wants to be loved (i assume romantically) so i guess this "everybody" is just "everybody except all the exceptions" which is completely meaningless categorization
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:43 PM
2

In your honest experience, do you believe the dating and sexual marketplace has been noticeably easier for the average woman than for the average man over the last 10–15 years (roughly 2010 to now)? If yes, why? If no, why not? I am too young to remember what dating was like in 2010, I can't answer that question Do you see “female sexual privilege” as a real thing — meaning women can get way more attention, validation, and options simply by wearing short/sexy clothes, makeup, or going to clubs/p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:40 PM
2

Men who aren't slaves to their dicks exist. Some are straight up asexual and have no interest. Some simply have some self control and deeper inner lives which makes them desire deeper bonds then just lust. I do not believe all men are sex crazed beasts despite what some men here (that basically degrade themselves to claim to be no more then collection of primal instincts) claim
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:18 PM
4

Not everyone. Some people are in fact content single, believe it or not
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:07 PM
3

Compromise is something done for mutual benefit. You compromise with person you want to be in relationship with in order to be in relationship with them. Because you want to be in this relationship and it is worth it for you. How is entering a relationship you don't want (because you'd rather stay single then be with that person) a compromise at all? You don't gain anything since your life is worse the singledom
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:00 PM
5

Why should a person be open? If someone wants to be single by choice I see no problem with it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:57 PM
1

Then he has about same options as first guy. Have you considered focusing on women you are compatible with might lead to lower rejection rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 03:51 PM
-1

If you message 1000s of women but no one answer do you have more options then a guy whu narrows it to 10 that are actually compatible with him and finds one who's actually interested?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 11:33 AM
1

Irl I would agree. On this sub specifically? Men suck more definitely
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 11:24 AM
2

Source for that? Because i call bollocks. Plenty of single women who live alone and managed to not get bankrupt. So marrying a woman who pay her half or rent, utilities, groceries etc is a net benefit. And the more woman earn the bigger the benefit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:51 PM
3

How does it decrease your standards of living exactly? Please explain
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:29 PM
4

If 99% of what you care in relationship is raw physical attraction I don't know what to tell you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:21 AM
4

Because genuine connection and personality does matter to some men? Men aren't a monolith any more then women are and plenty don't have "youth and fertility" as their most important thing to look in woman
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:20 AM
3

It does affect you. You can rent bigger appartment (or get bigger mortgage for a bigger house) by splitiing a bill in half which allows you to increase your standard of living (you live in better place but pay less then you would for smaller plave alone which leave you with more money at the end of the day that you can save or spend on whatever you want). Same with splitting money for utilities etc
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:15 AM
1

If you have a lot of money/looks/status you will find some women (so called gold-diggers that most men here claim to not like) that will be interested even if you are a complete tool. Doesn't mean personality doesn't matter - just that enought of everything else outweight it for some women (there is plenty of women who will reject/dump asshole no matter how hot and rich he is. So yeah gold-diggers exist. Have fun with them
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:11 AM
4

Or they are (some combo of) just very introverted and wish to live alone, low sex drive, just not that interested in romance and perfectly satisfied?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:22 PM
7

Planty of people don't find family life fullfilling while finding fullfilment in their careers
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:10 AM
2

No. Some just don'thave temperament for children and no natural desire. Some think parter is too much headache. Some are asexual and/or aromantic
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:09 AM
5

Being married and having a family is not a duty. And it's not everyone's calling
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:06 AM
2

You have zero proof of your claims. I can make a post just like you about how all men are parasitic on women and it will have exactly as much sense
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 02:04 PM
3

Source for that? Because while most women might be uninterested in a completely broke man who they will have to support they are typically perfectly fine with 50/50 split (most people pair up withing their socioeconomic class) which benefits both parties since they pay less and therefore have more money for ither things. It isn't men giving benefits to women it's mutually beneficial arrangement
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:01 AM
8

Full time personal assistant earns median salary of 55k (source), for personalchef it's 69k. So yeah he can spend more then half of his salary on that and have 80k left for everything else. Morgage/rent (basically always upwards of 1k per month unless you live alone in a shoebox, so > 12k a year) food (chef's salary doesn't cover ingriedients) utilities, and any and all entertainment
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:58 AM
6

Observing human bevavior (by one person) is basically never unbiased because your friend/social/work environment (places where you naturally interact with women) is not random distribution. If I take your claim at face value (to be clear - you are probably biased) that just means women from your social circle act like this. There are plenty of women who you will never interact with at all
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:51 AM
–

Yeah. You are operating under the old transactional "finantial stability of sexual and reproductive access" the thing is women nowadays prefer to have their own finantial stability via having their own job. So the only benefit of financial stability is mutual. Moving in together and splitting bills benefit both of them, it's not a man doing favour to a woman. And since women no longer have to pair up with men they can stay single and only be interested in genuine connection yk someone who is als…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:48 AM
–

Exactly. He can want a woman like that. Wheather he'll actually find one who not only fullfills those requirement but is also interested in him is another question
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:43 AM
5

It's funny because while I very much disagree with your take I do actually believe children being guaranteed opportunity in general so that unwilling parent fucking off wouldn't be a problem over current system where individual deadbeats are responsible and if they find a way to avoid paying child support (many ways to do it thought most tend to bite you in the ass by not leaving you with any retirement contribution or legal work history) the kid is fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:40 AM
12

Is it really that hard to understand that "good dick" is basically a synonim for "good sex"? That's literally only way I saw it used
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:36 AM
14

Dud you jump to extremes. I admit that probably significant number of woman would not want a micropenis. There's a difference between micropenis and just being below average. And like other commenters said - good dick is basically short for good sex. Person with micropenis is capable of that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 09:35 AM
–

Unless you divorce. That's the point. If you divorce you are fucked. And being stuck with a single person is significally more vuldnerable since you canchange your employers easily
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:34 AM
–

It's not terrorism to have requirement on who you're willing to sleep with. If someone wants to wait for marriage that's their choice. You you're not down with it don't date them
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:28 AM
–

Society feeds me. I am not obligated to be a farmed. I appreciete the health care - I am not a doctor etc. Just because you appreciate something doesn't mean you need to personally take part in all of that. Sure you should be a productive member of society in some way - but having children is just one of them
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:20 AM
–

Unless she and husband divorce before his death. While your retirement contributions stay with you and don't depend on your relationship status
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:16 AM
–

I mean most femists I know including myself supports either abolishing the draft or adding women to it and I see no reason why not. It's only fair
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 06:14 AM
–

you can "demand" anything. But no all demands are good to have. And the fact that so many men here would like to subjegate women also pretend patriartchy doesn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 05:48 AM
1

Most marriages are male breadwinner marriages, meaning the man earns 60% or more of the families income, and in the avg male breadwinner marriage the man earns 70% of the families income. In usa. And it's dropping. And that's good. Women by and large want to be SAHM less and less. Mostly because being a breadwinner gives you economic power ovee your spouse (other side of the equation you forgot to mention) You should leave if you have to leave. If there is no chance is salvaging or working thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 10:44 AM
1

There are plenty of women today in the usa that are pressured into marriage at 18 or below by their families. Women were not discriminated in the workforce and education. Of course that together it denied women economic independence. There cannot both be an expectation of woman being a sahm abd being economically independent. And women who wanted differently had to often fight tooth and nail. Edit. Plus I was litellaly argueing with someone who claimed that the past was better. Women were clearl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:59 AM
1

There is different variation within sex then between sexes. Women are in fact very different between each other (and so do men. Which is why I still believe men are normal human beings at their core despite reading comments here)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:58 PM
1

Being "anarcho" - capitalist explains a lot about you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:49 PM
1

Yeah and why should we care about that? A grenade launcher is more dangerous than a gun, I am ok with a grenade launcher being as legal as an gun. An SUV is more dangerous than a Sedan, you can still drive one. Can I ask why? Because I completely understand whygrenade launchers are more regulated then guns and it is because of quantitative difference. Dialectically it's called "transition from quantity to quality"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 04:02 PM
2

What monetary benefits are women afford that men aren't? This is not accurate to reality becuase the implication is just that men where free and thats not true at all. There was massive societal pressure for men to marry just like there was for women and most did, and most people wanted to get married young they didn't want modern indivualistc independence. Ok. I am glad for men to not be pressured into marriage too. Since the overwhelming majority of divorces are initiated by women statisticall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:09 PM
4

PSSD is rare. Happens but it's rare. And frankly yeah being depressed and free is still preferable to being a second class citized forced into economic dependence. Where you are likely still on drugs (heard of "mommy's little helper"? Those "happy" 50s housewives were chugging valium to get throught the day
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:06 PM
1

Yeah who cares? make it legal to have artificial wombs but not legal to overbreed with them as a separate issue, just like how you can make it legal to own a baseball bat but not legal to bludgeon someone with it Wow. That's literally what "regulating it" means. I was never advocating for banning this technology - I support developing artificial wombs. My agrument was why they would need to be regulated more then biological reproduction - and the answer is you can produce far more children more …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 12:02 PM
3

Natural womb cannot pop a 1000 babies. And artificial womb would (pressumably) be operation quickly after delivery. So with 10 if them (that you pressumably can buy so if yoi're rich enough you can have them) can pop 100 babies in 10 years (I assume 1 year per child with 3 month of "artificial postpartum" to make it operational again). Finding 10 women willing to have a child every year for 10 years is far harder and if you wanted to pay them chances are it would be far more expensive then using…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:53 PM
9

Absolutely this. Those men are the ones who didn't get out of mindset that your biggest value in relationship is money and now that it's not enough they mistakenly think the problem is them not earning enough and use ultra rich men as their "proof". Like yeah if you are very rich you will findsome gold diggers (yk women claim to not want) regardless of how little you have going for you otherwise. Doesn't say anything about normal people's relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:28 PM
10

Back then women often didn't have a choice not to marry so any contract would be under coercion and invalid
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:22 PM
7

Prior era very real problems is women not having economic independence not being able to exit bad marriages (divorce was also far harder for man to obtain though being usually the one with money it was still easier then for women. Aren't men glad to be able to divorcea cheating wife?), and women essencially having to marry some man in order to have a lifehood (they were outliars but on societal level it was true)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:19 PM
1

Exactly. Some people actually see beyond their own noses and care about tjings in general. Funny how all of those men suddenly understand wanting to curb undesirable behavior when it's women behaving in away they don't like
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:15 PM
0

I mean yeah? People usually care first about things directly affecting them. Women are slut shamed much more and in much more hostile way then men sothey careabout it more then men and more then they careabout men being slut shamed. Howis that anything new
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 04:11 PM
1

Bad relationships not surviving to become marriages is imo better then situatiin when they do
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:24 PM
2

So they're just screaming into the void. Got it! They are answering accusartions. In the comments but still There's nothing to explain if they don't want to have an actual conversation on the matter. In what way they don't want to have conversation in the matter? The conversation is literaly "how did that happen?" "That's how [explains]" Most women I know who had bad relationship did take lessons from it and learned some new red flags to avoid. The only real way to learn how to do it is by trial…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:22 PM
1

I mean that's basically what this OP is about? More shitty rekationships just don't last, and those that last tend to be happier. How is that a bad thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:27 PM
3

That sucks. Being bi is no excuse to cheat
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 03:32 PM
-1

They aren't asking for advice and want none. They are explaining why they got divorced/are single moms to people who think it's a moral failing that basically makes them worthless
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 03:31 PM
–

Your responses are so pathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:12 PM
–

So you admit I'm right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:11 PM
1

It's an accurate description of how drunk people act. Men are also stupid drunk. Being drunk makes you stupid. That's not gendered
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:10 PM
–

Not every men is like you. Men aren't a monolight just a women aren't.llenty of men are not slaves to their genitals
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:56 PM
–

The situation outlined in the OP is not that. It is outright about lying about being serious. Sure miscommunications happen. But so do outright lies
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:55 PM
–

The difference is what the sex entailed. Woman in this situation had sex with a false understanding that it is a beginning of a serious relationship. Not everyone is interested in casual sex and chances are she wouldn't have sex with him otherwise. Informed consent
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:54 PM
–

Stop making sex with you so hard. Rape culture here. If you don't want to have sex with any (or every) person you have a right to refuse. You feel entitled to women bodies. You are not
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:52 PM
–

So woman should not be allowed to be single if there's anyone interested in her? Bullshit. Being single is better then being in relationship you don'twant
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:50 PM
–

So you support rape? Because if you are notallowed to refuse sex that's rape. You probably don't think that if gay guy wants you, you should be obligated to sleep with him do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:49 PM
–

Yes not everyone wants what you offer. Relationship is 2 yes 1 no thing. And both parties deserve to know what they are getting into
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:46 PM
–

It's abuse to refuse to be in relationship and have sex with someone you don't want to be with? Forcing/pressuring someone into sex and relationship is actual abuse
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:44 PM
1

You need to think in terms of broad, abstract, network effects of a feminized society. And what are those effects (and the "feminized society") and why are they undesirable?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:40 PM
1

One woman was somewhat dumb just like plenty of men are. And just because in this case going with random men through shortcut might have safed her statistically it is not a good idea. Freedom includes freedom to make your own mistakes. Men are allowed to do it (as they should. And so should women)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:38 PM
1

You were the ducking hordes. Assuming you're from the USA your ancestors actually did what you accuse modern migrants (majority of whom are normal people not drug trafficjers or whatever) of doing
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:36 PM
2

That mentality is so alien to me. Friends are just people you care about deeply. No reason why you can't be romantically attracted to them. Like I believe you and I don't judge, this is how you feel. But I just... don't get this
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:27 PM
1

Standard (in dating) means "criteria that have to be fullfilled for me to consider dating that person". If there's no one fullfillimg them you can reevaluate or you can decide to be single. Both are perfectly fine options
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 10:44 AM
1

I don't care much about cultural norms but I feel that. This insane hyperindividualism we're living in makes genuine connections borderline impossible. People today have a life plan first and any partner have to fit neatly into it. The idea that another person might be worth changing yourself into someone who can spend life by their side is considered absurd
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:56 PM
0

Serial killers are famous. Millions of women know about their existance. Only a very small percentage of women are interested in serial killers but small percentage of millions is still thousands or at least hundreds. There are very vew serial killers and they are hugely visible in media. There's far more normal people married to each other then serial killers and women interested in them combined
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:36 PM
-3

Some men here cannot comprehend not everyone is as selfish and shallow as them
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:31 PM
4

Men are free to collectively quit paid work and become househusbands
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:40 PM
8

Court of public opinion is made by individual people who made their own decision based on whatever standard of evidence they want
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:38 PM
2

I mean I don't think they are necessary more stable, I was simply explaining logic behind the statement
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 09:35 PM
2

Lowest divorce rate (and also lowest marriage rate so that might have something to do with it)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:33 AM
1

There is nothing wrong with man who doesn't want to commit providing he doesn't lie about it and string woman along. If you want to just date casual all yout life go for it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:29 AM
1

Divorce rates are down. Also you didn't link anything so I'm gonna assume you made it up
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 07:54 AM
1

First by your own logic they are attracted to the men when they are getting together with them. Also if it was studied then link the studies
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:25 PM
2

Single women live longer then married women. I'd say it'sa positive effect
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:07 AM
3

Yeah because you know how women feel about being single better then them
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:05 AM
2

This entire post/sub is moralizing about dating
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:01 AM
7

And that is why you are not a "good man". Good people are willing to help others even if it's "not their problem"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:00 AM
4

Wtf is that trying to say? And yeah if an option better then being single comes along most women will take it. Doesn't being single isn't a "good enought" option or that it's not preferable to relationship you don't want
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:58 AM
4

You're projecting. It's men (on this sub) who keep talking that without family to provide thier life is worthless, that their lack of dating success makes them feel subhuman etc. It's men who are afraid of dying alone i no woman wants them
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:52 AM
–

Yeah. Simple principle of statistics - low percentage of a very large number is still a large number. And with organic dating per selection happens automatically (people in your general social group are more compatible with you then the general population) and on dating apps you can literally put filters. Smaller percentage of those will be compatible but the pool is way bigger
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:10 PM
1

I'm saying settling for a man who isn't physically attractive in favor of things like emotional maturity is settling By the same logic settling for a hot man without emotional inteligence us also settling. Basically there's a tipping point between all the desired traits where being with that person and potential for the future outweight whatever negative traits and potential risks. Not all women (and people in general) value the same traits or value all traits equally but basically at some point…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 09:50 PM
1

There's a difference between being overweight/having sone fat and veing obese. Obesity is a medical condition that significantly increases your chance for mant diseases. Having some visible fat does not
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 09:33 PM
1

How do you know? Do you assume no such relationships include any feelings? Where do you get that from. If you are in romantic or sexual relationship with more then one person at the time you are not monogamous. That's the definition. Yeah they don't use moderm poly lingo. Big surprise
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:19 PM
1

How? If you mean they probably have the "main" partner at any time, so do a lot pf poly people in the west
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:46 AM
1

There are amazonian tribes that believe that all the men women had sex with while pregnent are collective fathers of her child. There are more examples
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:14 AM
1

Maybe I should have set a hard line and been line "ok I'm not staying then". But instead I figured, if a child is going to happen regardless then I should be there to take care of it. I mean that's the important part. Child was going to happen regardless what you did and I agree that the only good options was either stay or be a good coparent. It also doesn't seem your girlfriend intentionally baby trapped you, but got pregnant and had a chamge of heart. Unexpected situation happening and you ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:08 AM
4

I am not attracted to men and physical attraction isn't hard to asses. It's compatobility and character you vet for. Men **that you're attracted to**, replace every single instance of men in your comment with Men **that I'm attracted to**. Who's "you"? Not all women are attracted to the same men and are you saying no unattractive men are pieces of shit? Or are you suggesting women should only date men they aren't attracted to? Expecting honesty and decency from someone that have incentives again…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:37 AM
2

Women don't need to assume whatever a man says is a lie OR the truth. It doesn't need to be one or the other. Why can't you just take their word neutrally and see if their actions/values align with their words? They do. It's called vetting
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:32 AM
3

Expecting honesty and basic decency is not too high of an expectation in my opinion. And the vetting process is too weed out those who do that. That men in here hate. And I do not believe every man is a scumbag and some actually care about things other then looks and sometimes can see so called "inner beauty" (it exists). And you are basically saying in this comment that men cannot be trusted that expecting basic decency like honesty in intentions is naive. And then you wonder why women claim th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 06:29 PM
1

Source for that? Also you gave no source for majority of women being bad partners so my sources are deginitely not worse then yours
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 05:54 PM
1

I don't chose any men, and my source on most men being bad is at least as good as yours (anecdotes from friends, studies showing chore gap etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 05:18 PM
1

Majority of men are bad partners
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 05:09 PM
5

Guess what? If an adult offers free candiez and then kidnaps a child they'll get charged with kidnapping. Regardless of how "obvious" it was. It doesn't matter if the lie was obvious - he still lied. And couples of (conventionally) hot man and (conventionally) unattractive woman exist. If something does truthfully happen then it's not "too good to be true"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 05:01 PM
5

if you can't understand that an attractive men would be interested in a mid woman just for casual and not LTR the problem is on you. So you do expect women to be mind-readers? If she asks him what his intentions are and he says something serious is she supposed to think it's a lie? But also women considering men liars until proven otherwise (ei "hoops") is misandry I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 04:29 PM
7

Yeah women as a group (there are exceptions to everything) are not submissive and don't want to be submissive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 03:56 PM
1

Demisexual ppl exist, but not everyone who doesn't want to have sex early on is demi. There are plenty of other reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:58 AM
1

Hurting by deception. Having hookup is fine. Lying about wanting a relationship and then ghosting after sex is not
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:57 AM
1

It doesn't matter if it was legat to discriminate against men if it's women who were actually discriminated in practice. And what discrimination in family court? 50/50 is the default now
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 08:53 AM
1

Less woman cheat in marriage then not cheat (if you believe otherwise just accept it for the thought experiment). Does that make a cheating wife more valuable then faithfull one? Because by your logic yes. Being fwb is clearly more valueble to you then being LTR material. Guess what - some people (men and women) disagree. And yk women generally don't take care for their fwb if they get cancer. They do it for husbands. They don't keep the household afloat as a sole breadwinner if their fwb loses …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:54 PM
7

Women are more emotional then men then why all the road rage accidents, mass shooting and murder in rage in predominantly perpetrated by men?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 07:22 PM
3

If you see woman like that don't date her?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:42 AM
3

Not alone. Having to do them all especially with kids in the house gets tiring fast
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:25 AM
2

Sure but if your partner just lets you be overwhelmed instead of pulling his weight (or you suspect he will) that's a great reason to want nothing to do with him
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:24 AM
2

And women are against it and want equality instead
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:21 AM
1

source?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:18 AM
2

That is irrelevent even if true. Even if we assume only X% of "top men" (whatever that means) gets hook-ups, that doesn't change that those men are often more like walking dildos to women. And yeah sure exceptions exist. But most often then not FWB just stays fwb and when she's looking for relationship she'll look elsewhere. Which was my point
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:18 AM
1

I literaly provided an example - maybe she was in collage and part of the party culture there and then she left collage, found a job left the party environment and started to actually look for something serious? Sometimes stuff changes and you are just no longer confortable having sex on the first date. And I never denied the men right to walk away if relationship progress doesn't satisfy them. My problem is whining that women are doing it - why do you care? Just don't date them. Having sex befo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:14 AM
2

Often - and still it was legat to discriminated against woman - ei lack of equal right ei patriarchy. What do you think sex based discrimination is and what feminist want to do with it (hint: it's abolish)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:10 AM
1

edit. Sorry wanted to answer someone else
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:09 AM
1

Maybe she desired to have casual sex in the past but then things changed (left collage whatever) and now no longer desires it? "Cosistency" you all demand ignores the fact that people change
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:11 PM
5

No unmarried women, who had a job were regularily denied despite qualifying or banks demanded a male co-signer. If woman's husband was ultimately responsible (going to pay for) load he would just take one himself. Women were often not allowed to take loan in their own names
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:43 PM
–

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:30 PM
3

That's literally your opinion. There are women who strictly separate "hook-up" guys and "LTR" guy. I read yesterday comment by a woman who straight up says all of her potential partners, that there's 3 month rule in dating and if they sleep together before that she considers them a ONS and cuts all contact with them afterwards
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:28 PM
0

You seem to assume "hook-up guy" would be women's preference for LTR - more often then not he's not. He's a hook-up material, not the husband material. He was never considered for being a husband
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:24 PM
10

50 years ago banks regularily denied women mortgages and loans. How is that not patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:11 PM
–

Maybe she wasn't interested in commitment before?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:54 AM
2

People are different. High standards doesn't mean only arbitrarily defined top 10%. It means the sort of person who you particulary want. Most people are someone's type
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 10:27 AM
3

It's not necessary. It might be necesary to get laid. And yes? I believe it is morally wrong to deceive people. Including for sex and relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 04:48 PM
5

You are not entitled to "level playing field" in dating that's the thing. Women (and men) are entitled to not date poeple who they don't want to date. If your choice is lie about your core believes and deceive a woman into being your partner and not getting laid/staying single the correct choice is to stay single
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:54 PM
2

Women care more about being able to get out of marriage because historically a lot of them were trapped in miserable ones. And I believe that no-fault divorce is good not only to get out of abusive relationship but also one where you grew to despise each other. Staying together isn't by itself, virtuos. It's a moral/ideological opinion that women are more likely to hold
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:51 PM
5

Well most people aren't that attractive so it's still statistically significant
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 03:49 PM
1

Women do not want providers that the thing. Men want to be providers, which is not biological imperative but cultural conditioning. Women are saying: "no we want equal egalitarian partnership"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 11:48 AM
10

You literally claim you know what women want and need better then women themselves. Newsflash - women are thriving in the workforce, and majority have no interest in being dependant on their husband meaning they don't want to be beholden to a man. Working moms *with useless husbands who don't do their share* tend to resent their situation yes because doing the same amount of work and then doing 100% of childcare will burn out anyone. Plenty of women provide for their families and have that as th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:32 PM
7

You don't speak for all men. Plent of men understand the benefits two income household brings and very much have "having a stable job" as requirement for a partner
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:16 PM
1

It's not doing anything it's doing everything while he does nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:14 PM
5

It's not benevolence to try to rectify systemic injustices. It's justice
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:13 PM
10

If it was this great men would fight to be stay at home husbands. They don't. And if working a job is being a slave to "The Man" then being a sahw for a guy who works as job is being a slave of a slave - even worse
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 06:09 PM
0

If you don't like someone enought to like spending time with them why the fuck would you be dating them at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:01 PM
1

I believe we owe each other basic respect regardless of gender
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:55 PM
–

Sorry but I (and women in general) prefer modern model of we both provide income and do chores) over previous I do chores and am at finantial mercy of a man. That is the relation model women want. And want men to do his half of domestic labor to make it as equal as possible. We don't want the old model
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:21 PM
2

Yeah and the sperm donor consented to donating his genetic material with an understanding that he'll have no contact or involvement with the child so the argument that woman is denying him something is ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 06:03 PM
2

I'm not from the USA but nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:13 PM
2

Well i'm not a psychiatrist either and i can wrap my mind around it pretty easily
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:02 PM
3

We can. It's you who seem to be confused by trans people
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 10:47 AM
0

Great rebuttal to my argument
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:19 PM
0

No it doesn't? A lot of men are doing this and op asked for input from men why. This is perfectly fair question to ask
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:40 AM
1

Dickless suggests physical mutilation, and I understand men chosing their bodily autonomy completely. However I assure you plently would chose to go sexless rather then homeless or jobless
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:22 PM
-5

The title of the post literally starts with "why do so many men" (emphasis mine). OP isn't saying all men, but asking why a large number of them do
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:08 PM
4

You think Bernie SAnders and AOC are crazy leftists lol! In Europe they are barely left-leaning centrists
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 04:11 AM
5

I am poly myself actually - as long as relationship is equal and consensual (women are economically liberated so they don't need to get in relationship - ai staying single is a reasonable alternative) and everyone is on board (so he's not lying about being exclusive) I have zero problem with guy fucking as many women as he can find willing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 12:59 PM
3

She's not settling. She wants him now (wheather she would have wanted him before is irrelevant) and he is free to accept or reject her - if he accepts then it's a mutually consensual relationship, and none of your business
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 12:51 PM
-3

Some libertarian you are being against freedom
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:08 PM
2

If any person A can reject any person B at any time for any reason and vice versa and relationship requires mutual consent, that's very mich equality - just not equity lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:07 PM
4

Specific subset of women signs up for an app for casual srx. It is not representative of women as a whole
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:15 PM
4

Maybe equality is inherently good wheater or not it personally benefits you? I come from fairly wealthy background and I still support greater economic equality despite the fact that it is contrary to my self interest for example
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 11:35 PM
-3

Women fertility (chances of getting pregnant) decline but quality of eggs remain consisrent
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 11:33 PM
4

I read your link
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 09:03 PM
3

Technology for average prasant didn't change. My link had detailed calculations yours have zero sources
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 07:13 PM
6

Everything is much better? Where? If we are talking hundreds of years ago, men worked only around 180 days per year Nonsense. In ancient Rome peasants worked 290 days a week (there are circa 260 non weekend days in the year) here's link to historia disproving it more in depth
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 06:17 PM
–

So, you believe that having high standards for someone is equivalent to wanting to have a monopoly on how the person behaves? lol. Then what does having high standards for women as a whole means? It doesn't matter what the consequences are. You're just looking for something to nitpick. Yes it does matter. Because I cannot answer you're argument that you have to live with those consequences otherwise. And yeah obv i'm looking for something to nickpick - this is a debate forum after all
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 05:10 AM
–

Oh I am absolutely in agreement that current society is rotten and hate it for a number of reasons. It's just that the changes I wish to see are complete restructuring that involves breaking with remnant of old, not returning to "good old days". Yes the society sucks in mountain of ways, programming young men into thinking that their romantic and sexual success determines their worth being one of them - I actually relate to this since in that regard I was actually raised like a guy and felt like…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 08:16 PM
–

You are living with all women as a collective? No you function in a society wuth them. And socuety doesn't owe it to you to conform to your liking. I am sure plenty of people wish they didn't share the society with people like you and yet they do because they understand they don't have a monopoly on how the society should work, and how people in it should behave. Also what consequences do you have to live with. Be specific
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 07:55 PM
1

No. It's my opinion. Just like it's your opinion that there isn't (i presume). But just because something cannot be proven doesn't mean it's false. Let's take God for example. No one so far proven the existence of God but no one proven the non-existance either. And yet one side must be right
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 07:28 PM
5

<image> No. It's your opinion. In my opinion there is an objective morality and subjegating half the population is against it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 07:23 PM
–

Romance, intimacy, and starting a family are unfortunately massive sources of motivation for men. You speak like this is inherent and not learned and socialized
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 07:15 PM
–

Nope. Being with someone incompatible who don't really understand you and you can't connect to is lonely as hell
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 07:13 PM
–

Nope because you aren't dating women as a collective. The standards in question is for who you are willing to date and don't imply trying to force other person to comfort to them - just not datimg those who don't
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 07:13 PM
–

The woman in question clearly wanted to want them. Other women are perfectly fine with their preferences as they are
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 06:27 PM
–

If being single makes you happier then dealing with someone who doesn't meet "laundry list" of factor how is being single not a superior choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 06:23 PM
–

Being single is better then being with incompatible partner. And frankly people's obsession with relationships needs to die. Being in relationship with someone who nakes your life worse is far bigger waste of time then being happily single
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 06:22 PM
–

For many women (and frankly any person with self respect) hierarchy looks like this: Relationship with someone you genuinely like and want to have > Being single > Other relationship. So if 90% of men are sexist pigs (not saying they are just math) and 100% of (straight) women want man who isn't one then even though it's mathematically i.possible for every one of them to get one rational choice is still to not lower their standards hope one of those 10% will happen to them and learn to be happy …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 06:17 PM
3

Exactly. You (whoever is reading this comment) are not compatible with vast majority of your prefered gender. That is okay. Relationship with someone incopatible is a recepee for drama and heartbreak
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 08:24 AM
–

They can't because by virtie of living in the same house how well he does chores directly affects her. If yoi're a booty call who has a mess in his flat then well chances are she'll never see it anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 02:40 PM
1

Nope. He has hands he can put it himself
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:29 PM
–

Criteria for hotness esp on dating apps are higher because you don't really care that much about inner life of someone who is only fwb so hottness and compatible kinks and sexual compatibility in gen are the only criteria that matter and the fact that on dating apps there is ofyen like 3 to 1 ratio of men to women likely higher if we only count those that are interested in casual sex. So a lot of men to pick from
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 10:34 AM
–

It's not? Everyone can make an attempt but it takes 2 to tango. And since with fwb the only criteria are attractiveness, sexual compatibility and not being a psycho you focus on those
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 09:00 AM
–

Plenty of them are in fact celibate
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:44 AM
–

I feel sorry for men for preferring to be only liked for their looks and not their personality. Such a shallow existence
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:42 AM
–

I meab they specifically mentioned the more high class sex workers with the implications that those are far less likely to bedrug addicted better eductated aka aa able to get a normal job as she (?) is and choosing sex work anyway. So that's a specific sub-group largely separated from tge previous grouo she mentioned
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 10:30 AM
8

He only divorced her years layer after marriage failed to produce child and he nedded to play dynastic game
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:26 AM
8

His last word was literally "Josephine"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:25 AM
5

There are rare cases where circumcision is medically necessary but in general I absolutely agree
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 07:54 AM
1

That is not how I took your comment at all. I am actually pretty critical and uninterested in hookup culture and I believe that if a series cannot keep viewer's attention without throwing there a pair of boob then they don't need boobs they need better writers. I absolutely took your comment as suggesting we start pushing some much mlre puritannical norms
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:56 PM
1

I think some of them are happy and some aren't. And that on average men are more happy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:52 PM
1

Sure but how much do they wish for it? You might wish you get to get a family while still prefering the life you have over the life of your more traditional sil
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:02 PM
0

Being raised in a cult is a bad thing you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:01 PM
1

Why do you assume Nancy isn't happy? She haa good career presumably some friends and cats are awesome. Perhaps she prefers the life she has over that of her sister in law? Just because certain life and achievents wouln't make you happy doesn't mean others feel the same way
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:34 PM
5

I genuinely fail to see anything good that could come from restricting people's freedoms
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:29 PM
6

I fail to see any strong version. And you didn't answer at all
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:29 PM
9

Yeah 9 year old forced into marriage lesbians and gay men forced or pressured into straight relationship, women being badically servants in their own homes, sounds super happy /s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:23 PM
0

Men are also the reason why there is danger to begin with...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:05 AM
13

It's still a default. I'm poly and I'm aware i csn't just assume other people are fine with it - that's why I have to bring it up first
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:03 AM
15

Stop being obtuse. There is a default assumption of monogamy in commited relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 07:16 AM
3

I actually do mostly agree in this particular case that simply stating what you are looking for and letting a woman decide if she's in is okay. It's the ones who lie about their intentions that i have a problem with
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:41 PM
4

I believe men shouldn't lie about their intentions. So if awoman clearly seeks a commited relationship men shouldn't string her along
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:38 PM
4

Your opinion that society woulddjust is just your opinion. It was one day. It would get much worse with time not better
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 08:43 PM
1

Maybe women don't find them funny?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:33 AM
0

No, just because you actually want your fantasies irl doesn't mean other people feel the same. Not everyone is you ffs
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:08 AM
1

I have to disagree on the "illegal" part. While most often then not those relationships are bad news I do not believe letting government have any say in sexual lives ofconsenting adults ia a good idea, it sets really bad precentent and infantilizes them. I believe 18 years old means you are legally allowed to make your own mistakes
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:34 PM
1

The answer was varied. And you can think someone is not a loser you can even respect them tremendously and still not want to date them
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:29 PM
0

I know better what i want and what I don't. And ao does other women. You don't know what happens in any person's mind except your own - and not everyone thinks and feels like you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:27 PM
3

How is that hypocrisy? Feminists never promised to get men laid
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:25 PM
3

First of all those are all unsupported claims. But even if it was true it doesn't change anything. Woman can decide she's not interested in men like you - that's her decision - and she can later (after she "hits the wall" what a stupid fraze) change her mind. And guess what - men can also chose not to date those women. Everyone is always free to be single. Maybe men can increase their standards and learn to ve alone instead of settling for woman they are not really interested in
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:24 PM
1

There are a couple hundreds women out of literal millions who were into a murderer. There's far more convicted rapists. If a couple hundred women writing makes you confortable to generaluzing then it is more then justified for women to generalize men as rapists
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:16 PM
1

You are wrong. You can fantasize about something you'd never want irl. I promise yoyu women reading dark romance do not actually want to be raped
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:06 PM
1

Because 40% of cops (in usa) admits to domestic violence towards partner key word admit
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 10:18 AM
–

You realize legality != morality
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 10:07 AM
1

It's up to woman to decides if she's willing to take that risk. And most don't. Because they are already happy and are not going to risk it by inviting a guy they aren't sure about into theur lives. And why do you care? If she won't find anyone then she'll just stay (happily) alone. And if she's miserable down the line so what? Personal responsibility
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:48 PM
1

Because being alone is better then being in bad relationship. Simple as that. If woman prefers being single to being with someone who doesn't meet her standards it's her prerogative. Men should learn from women how to be satisfied single
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:56 PM
3

These are all negative attributes (so things she lacks) nothing about what you actually want her to be instead of what you don't want her to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:43 PM
0

Yeah but she want experiment with ugly woman any more than ugly man. Just because height in particular is more of an issue for men diesn't mean ugly women don't exist. And I actually used to look for women on dating apps which is part of how I got that opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:21 PM
1

Obviously. Just because someone is hood person doesn't mean a particular woman is attracted to him. Or she might be attracted but stuff like incompatible life plans means they have no futute anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:18 PM
1

No? If he wants children and the woman doesn't or vice versa it's a fundamental incompatibility. If he wants to move somewhere rural and she wants to live in a city or vice versa it's a fundamental incompatibility. And sometimes the spark just isn't there even if there's a compatibility on paper. Attraction is complex. If a woman knows nothing will come from dating it's better to not waste guy's time
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:12 PM
0

You realize someone being a moral person doean't automatically make them attractive or compatible for any given woman? I'm a lesbian. I wouldn't date any man no matter how great because I'm not interested in men. And women who are attracted to men in general still aren't interested in all of them
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:10 PM
3

You realized guy can be perfectly fine but a woman might just not feel the vibes right. Being a good guy is a requirement for most women. But that doesn't mean woman can't have additional dealbreakers in addition to just lack of attraction. For example: a woman who is childfree will never date a man who wants children (or vice versa) even if he's basically a saint because that's a fundamental incompatibility
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:06 PM
4

Funny how if women can't find a "good guy" whatever they consider that they are usually perfectly content being single while guys are whining. For women in general it's good relationship > being single > bad relationship, while men tend to prefer bad relationship to being single
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:03 PM
1

Not each but enough that women who are on dating apps are justfiably weary of it. There's plenty of gross men is what I'm saying and you never can be sure wheather any particular man is one until he reveals it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:38 PM
1

"Females" We all get various fundraisers asking for donations. No one donates to them all (or even any) so I fail to see how one of those being related to women's issues is any different then the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:37 PM
1

First I call bullshit, second why do you care? If hypothetical woman choses that it is her prerogative
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:34 PM
1

If a couple mutually decides to divorce still one of them needs to file with for various reasons is usually the woman in hetero relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:31 PM
1

Women rights are just human rights. Women are humans. And you are not obligated to donate to anything
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:23 PM
1

Well they might wait and only hit on women they genuinely connect with, plus not reeking of desperation helps
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:15 PM
0

Young women don't exploit elderly men. They enter transactional relationships with them sometimes, which is basically sugar dating just not explicitely stated as such. Elderly men want hot young women for their looks and for status having a girlfriend like that gives them. No one forces them to do it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:14 PM
1

I mean if someone opens convo with dick pick, or asking if you do anal esp (though not only) if you have long term relationship as you relationship goal (a lot of apps now allow to filter by that) then it is objectively gross
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:07 PM
3

Most women but not your sister? Or anyone like her? And you're wrong. Some (most) women and men believe in such things like love, compatibility common life plans etc. The mode of relationships of "man provides money woman provides sex" is a) dead most women work and b) incredibly sad and transactional and I don't understand why any man would want that And they obviously have something to offer to your sister otherwise she wouldn't be dating them. Maybe they are actually pleasant to be around (yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 12:03 PM
11

You realize you are perfectly free to not date any woman who does that right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 10:24 AM
6

Maybe those "losers" have something other then money to offer? Maybe she actually likes/loves them ever though about it? Most women have no interest in just selling themselves to highest bidder
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 10:19 AM
-1

Well iirc height filter is premium and doesn't invenyivize women to pay premium vast majority of paying users are men. If tinder was better experience for women then men there would be more women then men there or at least more equal split. The goal of dating apps isn't to make it easier for anyone of any gender to find partner (or hookup) the goal is to make aa much money for shareholders as possible. Any difference in treatment of male and female profiles are made for that reason. They don't c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 08:06 AM
1

They aren't trying to make experience good for women which is why they are like 20% of users (and nominally a lot of those are scammers or bots). Men are majority of userbase and they are more likely to pay premium. It's they have no incentives to make it a good for men or women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 07:53 AM
2

Fair. I was talking about women since that's who the commenter above was referring to
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 08:27 PM
1

Em you realize nuclear reactor isn't going to need repair the next day after reduction of personel right? And learning on the job. Have a bunch of women just follow members of crew around and sge can explain what she's doing and why while perflrming her duty And i am very much aware of need for regular maintance
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 04:34 PM
1

If you understand matriarchal societies that as just flipped patriarchy then neighter do I. Which was kind of the point I was trying to make when given power women generally don't use it to oppress men. Societies called matriarchal are usually some combo of being: Matrilinear: lineage is traced through women, child is considered to be a member of their mother's family and gets her surname if surnames are a thing Matrilocal: man moves in with his wife after marriage either with her parents or in …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:12 PM
1

Women aren’t built for combat, physically, or emotionally. It’s simply not their place. If you try, it will not end well Source? Because there are plenty all female combat units and nit just in isn'treal. That's the best thing about guns. There are great power equalizers. If i have a gun and you have a gun and both of us have the same experience in using it you have no advantage over me. Whoever shots other in something vital first wins
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 02:31 PM
2

Who's going to attack the women? Also with current technology? Women are perfectly capable of using assault rifes and throwing grenades
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:48 PM
1

If by "work things out" you mean the person who broke the agreement going back to the original then sure. Otherwise no. Children especially are a dealbreaker situation. If one wants them and thw other don't the relationship has no future. And also marriage is not for life by default anymore. It's a hope but marriage is a legal agreement that gives the couple some benefits like inheriting from each other and access to medical info. And it can be dissolved
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:44 PM
1

Well literally no one suggested taking away young people autonomy. Older women giving younger women advice doesn't mean they obligated to take it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:31 PM
1

"It just makes sense" is not an argument. It's you just accepting your biases as facts
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:30 PM
1

Or maybe they would run a skeleton crew for a short while and started training more women asap?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:29 PM
3

And why should they? If a man marry woman who says she wants children and then she decides she's childfree or vice versa you would told him to stay? Or if wife decided she want him to quit his job and become stay at home dad to support her career? Or if they just started hating each other and were miserable As far as I'm concerned any person unilatery changing terms of a contract effectively renders it null and void
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:28 PM
1

True that is why the main efford should go to educating young women into staying the fuck away. Old geezers can try all they want it doesn't matter if no young woman (who is generally attracted to people her own age) gives him a time of the day
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:15 PM
5

Any man that happens to is also perfectly justfied in immidiately filing for divorce. Now tell me how does that justify men doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:12 PM
11

If a woman initiates a divorce because the person she said "I do" to disappeared after the wedding she is more then justified in it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:11 PM
1

No we don't all know it would suffer. You claim it without any proof. In wwii a lot of young men left the workforce and women who replaced them did perfectly fine. Your claim is that women would be unable to pick the jobs men left. They would. And they did
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:00 PM
1

What did the usa do in wwii? Oh yeah it sent women into those jobs and it worked. Women are perfectly capable of working the mines. If men disappear they would learn how to do it and continue on
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:57 PM
2

How do you know she downvoted your comment? I though that was anonimous? Also consider that you get downvoted for being a sexist
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:55 PM
0

Internet was created by military - public sector Women work in electricity production already. You literally acknowledge women work in nuclear facilities but somehow think the can't keep it running. I assure you most women can drive just fine and getting licence for driving trucks is not nuclear physics. Also healthcare sector would collapse. You wouldn't get treatment for anything
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:54 PM
2

You're moving a goalpost. Your original claim was that women are incapable of backbreaking physical labor. They clearly are. If a xix century women were able to drag carts of coal then modern women are more then capable of infinitely less backbraking operating of modern mining equipment
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:48 PM
1

That's a perfectly fine stance
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:44 PM
1

Also having two women working in mining and proclaim "women work in mines as well" it's absurd, but not a surprise since it comes from the gender that proclaim all men to be rapists because 1 or 2 are. You didn't even click. It wasn't 2 women working the mines. It was two articles about women working the mines in xix century - one historical one modern
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:43 PM
1

Thank you for answer. That's interesting. Tbh while the idea of not being allowed to be your own person is horrid to me I also hate the west "no one owes anyone anything". There has to be a happy medium where people have duty to support one another but also allowed to express themselves individually
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 12:25 PM
1

First honest advice (if you genuinely want one) would be to quit dating apps. Official stats are like 80-20 ratio of men to women and a lot of supposed women are bots scammers or are promoting their instagram and have no interest in actually finding someone there. And while i don't think there is solid proof giving that men are majority of members and even biggest percentage of members paying for premium the apps are heavily incentivized to keep men on the app and showing you people you might ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 11:16 AM
1

First - nowhere in the post did the op suggest that relationships like those should be illegal. This is a question of morality. They believe (and I agree) that older men (or women hell, women can absolutely be predators and take advantage of power imbalance) should be shamed and that young people should be told to stay away from them.nothing about legality. Should we keep 18 year olds from being preyed upon by rental landlords, military recruiters, and politicians seeking their vote too? Landlor…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:56 AM
3

Were did you get that she wasn't exclusive to him?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:41 AM
1

What do you mean by acting extremely Asian? If that's not too intrusive
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:36 AM
0

You realize "capable of running a power plant" and "capable of easily overpower patriarchal insttitution that keeps them from being allowed to" are two different things? One requires brain. Other require organization while men try to isolate women from doing that and weapons that man generally hoard. One is far easier and faster to accomplish then the other
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:30 AM
2

You moved goalposts. It is clearly possible to society function without any women needing an individual man
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:26 AM
2

If half of population dropped our of workforce society would implode. Including women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:24 AM
1

Because patriarchal chimpanzees are so much more advanced. They're literal fucking monkeys
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:17 AM
1

If you are refering to full custody that is a lot. The default is and should be shared custody. Abuse aside child has a right to both parents
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:15 AM
0

Women regularily worked in mines until mid 19th century. Then it was a lot more manual and backbreaking. And the reason they stopped is because they got pushed out. Sorry women and girls. Female children alsk worked in mines. As miners. Sources https://www.historyextra.com/period/victorian/the-scandal-of-female-miners-in-19th-century-britain/ https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1842womenminers.asp First is an article about the topic second is a 1842 newspaper article about the topic
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:09 AM
1

How about you read the article linked before commenting?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:05 AM
2

Yeah. Young people of all genders are depresed and resigned because economic opportunities and prosperity disappear. The fact that tge default retirement plan for anyone under 40 seems to be suicide is imo the perfect encapsulation of lack of hope and trust in society
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 09:03 AM
-1

Not exacly the point i believe the previous commenter was trying to make is that there are no record of women oppressing/subjegating men when given power. I haven't heard of any supposedly matriarchal society that treated tgeir men the way men often treat women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:53 AM
2

Yes plenty of women do in fact work in those roles. And more can be trained to do it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:50 AM
1

https://www.historyextra.com/period/victorian/the-scandal-of-female-miners-in-19th-century-britain/ https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1842womenminers.asp Women and girls worked in mines. As miners
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:50 AM
1

Actually women have better stamina and generally are more of long haulers while men statistacally can get a burst of strenght but for short. Also women and girls worked in mines (as miners to be clear) in fucking xix century and before article original 1842 article that it's referring to
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:35 AM
3

I mean realistically removing 50% of the population would collapse the economy. No matter what 50% but it would
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 08:29 AM
1

It came after industrial revolution because that's when majority of people (men and women) became wage laborers. Before that most were subsistance farmers and the farm belonged to a man 99% of the time so there wasn't opportunity of women to earn a living independently from man. And yes even high class women were tightly constrained by men in their lives. Often upper class women were actually more constrained since you can't really forbid your wife from leaving the house for example if her findi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:40 PM
1

What do you consider degeneration?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:22 PM
3

Fds sub got unbanned though and was active again a couple months ago at least
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:08 PM
1

She was bisexual afaik
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:04 PM
1

Little late I know but I wanted to add my two cents. I wouldn't call the people you refer to as left but liberals. A lot of them are only interested in progressive policies when they benefit or at least they don't have to pay for it. For example I am very much pro choice but too many people support right to abortion not because they believe in women's autonomy but because it is objectivy cheaper for a poor single woman to have an abortion then to give her support she needs. Which in practice mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 11:23 PM
1

Thank you for being the first commenter pointing the obvious. Yes statistically man is older then woman in hetero relationship but not by much. But if for example you sample men and women aged 18-30 it will show significant difference since there's likely a lot of 28 yo datinf 31 yo or something like that
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:29 PM
-1

Gamer girls literally provably exist. Source: I am one
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter