TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SJW_Skeptic Archive

View 8 posts and 260 comments by SJW_Skeptic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Report her for creating an unsafe work environment and start job hunting.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 12:32 PM
1

I’d be taking some time to decide your limits. It sounds like your wife is abusive. It start documenting things. Get your nose dealt with. Divorce promptly is the best idea.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 02:54 AM
4

Easy feminism is a political movement that pretends to want equality but promotes victimhood harming women as much as it does men. Women who have missed on the feminist indoctrination can be lovely.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 05:08 AM
1

This is where you have to get another job lined up and make an equality commission complaint about your sexist bosses. They are discriminating against the law
/r/MensRights29/09/23 03:08 AM
3

Not surprising. You tell people that circumcision helps reduce HIV infection they take less precautions. Even if there were a small benefit it is swamped by this effect.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:48 AM
1

What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. This may demonstrate equality. I hope it gets treated equally.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:04 AM
1

The best response is to ask open ended questions that may direct her to discover another perspective. do you think it is bad if a woman decided to stay at home supported by a spouse of her own free will? Should she have the right to choose that life. Should her spouse be able to oblige her to work equal hours so that he can coparent equally. How would you feel about me if I decided I wanted to work part time so I could stay at home with the kids but we earned less and had to move to a worse neig…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:01 AM
1

This story is a bit sad we have gone from focusing on a woman who over reacted because she is paranoid about being groped to a boy who is being taught that grievance collecting and outrage is a way of being successful. It can only create more outrage, more conflict and a worse society.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 04:56 AM
5

If they start getting female convictions expect the law to be reversed.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 03:07 PM
1

Generally the response goes “you can’t compare circumcision to female genital mutilation. FGM is far worse, men don’t suffer consequences to circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:34 PM
2

What will is saying is that any accusation by a woman is enough to stop a career in its tracks. The fact that a few men will be punished wrongly doesn’t matter because women are special so their testimony is worth more than a man. Sounds like feminist logic. /s
/r/MensRights07/10/18 12:12 PM
6

If masculinity is so toxic why is it that the lack of a father in kids life result in so many poor outcomes?
/r/MensRights07/10/18 11:47 AM
1

I agree with this sentiment. Too many people equate being anti feminist with anti woman. Better to ride on the coattails of evolution and campaign for men’s equality as it benefits women. Criticize feminism for its harm to women.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:08 PM
2

It’s a shame the video of the presentation was removed so the public can’t evaluate the conclusion that there was a personal attack. The whole thing may be justified. I’ll be interested to see his interview with Gaad Said if it goes ahead.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:58 PM
2

Any students should contact the Australian Union of Students and protest the counter rally. This is typical of the misandrist students organization.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 01:43 PM
2

I proposed this at an Australian university when they were discussing ways to decrease sexual harassment and assault. I was told we have to be careful to avoid “victim blaming”
/r/MensRights12/07/18 12:16 PM
3

Perhaps some of us have observed people of either sex lie or misinterpret things to support a narrative. Wonder why accusations of sexual assault are closely associated with custody battles.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 12:13 PM
1

Using their own laws is using the system. Not the family court but the other components of the legal system. Sex discrimination laws and independant review processes. Only then do you have a smoking gun to go after the politicians if they do not demand law changes or equal application of the law regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:03 PM
1

Thanks for providing an example of how difference this reddit is to others. Come here with a crazy assertion and people ask you to justify it. When you come across as illogical and biased you get called out and the whole thing is visible for honest people to read and evaluate.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 03:52 PM
4

The issue is that the performers/hostesses/hosts have an idea what is going to happen. Their employers need to provide a “safe” environment BUT these days we assume that even when women give consent they are not competent to do so. Whereas men are held responsible for their decisions. Similarly the audiences have different standards. Men who step over the line are punished, women excused. The usual double standard.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:35 AM
2

Not quite true. Most of the people making these adjudications honestly believe they are fair. They have to be lead to the realisation that they are bigoted so they can do better. Sometimes this means using their systems against them. Using the ombudsman and sexual discr8m8nation laws. If they dont apply to men then target the politicians.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:39 PM
10

You need to ask yourself “Is this acceptable behaviour” if not will you “Ignore it and hope it gets better” “Stand up to the perpetrator” or “leave the relationship” My recommendation “Go to a friends place, tell them about the incident” Next day Tell your wife how you felt about her behaviour and that you felt it was abuse. She may apologise, most abusers do. Be prepared for an escalation rather than a meeting of minds.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:00 PM
8

The concern as usual is that the people involved in making decisions in these programs may have their own bias. In Australia where legislation is non gendered. Enforcement and judgements certainly are gendered. The battle is for a system to identify and correct bias within the system.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:47 PM
2

Similar thing at my local university. I come out of a lecture looking for the loo. Ladies on the floor, look further an there is an occupied all gender. So go up a flight ladies only Up one more staff only so down one from lecture theatre ladies. So back to all gender. Now unoccupied. Large wheelchair accessible room with urinal in one corner and throne in another.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:26 AM
1

If you are 18 you are an adult. Unless there was undue pressure placed there is no crime. But this may be against policy and in most educational institutions would be. It is time to hold people accountable for their own decisions regardless of gender. If the school has a fraternisation policy it should be well known and enforced. For example if people have a relationship where one is supervising the other then they need to change supervisors or end the relationship.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:33 AM
6

My primary problem with feminism is the tendency to merge equality of opportunity with equality of outcome. The assumption that a different number of MP’S of each gender is assumed to be due to discrimination and the solution is more discrimination. Instead of starting with how MP’s get there. When I go to a party meeting for a local branch of a major political party I see 75-80% men and 20-25% women. The when it is time to serve on a committee or take a leadership role the numbers diverge more.…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:46 PM
8

The answer is to give everyone what they want. “I’d invite you back to my place but I’m concerned you may not be fit to consent”, let’s schedule a spontaneous encounter for Friday. Here is the consent form and contract for you to read before we meet. I recommend you seek independent council before signing. Friday “ Good to see you could make it I’ve planned some special spontaneity. Ignore the guy in the corner he’s my registered chaperone. He will ring the bell and flick the yellow light if he …
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:28 PM
6

Are there any specific points JP made that you think are inaccurate?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:46 PM
1

In most countries the established political party groups are quite small. I recommend find one that most closely fits your personal views and ask the tough questions about gender equality. Remind people that half the electorate is male and that male issues exist. Gently correct the feminist lies with data, in a calm and stable way. Jordon Peterson’s ch 4 interview is an excellent example. Don’t get drawn into straw men arguments. Just deny them and focus on the facts.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:28 PM
1

The woman has power to cause a man significant social damage with a public statement while concealing her identity. That sounds like a hell of a lot of power to me.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:22 PM
2

I’m guessing getting naked and performing fellatio would be unspoken cues.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:18 PM
10

I’m assuming you are a troll at least look at the research, listen to the interview and learn about personality traits.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:07 PM
6

Love the way this interviewer kept saying “but you are generalist get about women” and then proceeded to argue about generalities like the pay gap, the behavior of his followers and the lack of women in High power positions.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:06 PM
16

Jordan Peterson was a star in this interview. I wish I could emulate him. The interviewer kept putting up straw men then watching them be destroyed.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:02 PM
1

"do you have any idea how much I would be charged for car insurance if I wasn't on my parents' insurance" how much you are charged is irrelevant unless you are asserting that the cost is not based on the actual risk of insuring you and people like you but due to an unreasonable stereotype. While young men have twice the accident rate of young women insuring women will be cheaper. This usually disappears by the age of 30. In Europe the EU has decreed that insurance companies are unable to base di…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:24 AM
1

So in Japan’s case the low risk drivers are subsidising the high risk drivers and someone who is disabled by an accident caused by another driver gets less compensation so that insurance is cheaper. So the costs go from the driver who has the highest risk to everyone else and the victims of someone else’s driving. It doesn’t seem fair to me. If travel costs are too high where you are, so you are not paid enough to commute to work, then you are not paid enough to cover the costs of the work you d…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:32 AM
5

Focusing on issues like different car insurance prices is counter productive for the MHRM. This is the sort of thing feminists do when they decide there is a pink tax, or there is a pay gap. The premiums reflect the risks. On average young men make more claims than old women. Until young men are no longer having more accidents than young women the price differential will remain. If you complained about medical insurance being mandated by government to not differentiate on gender then you could h…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:02 AM
0

Society being gynocentric may object because it is not logical or fair. BUT If women had higher claims than men and the premiums reflect the true cost it would also be fair.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:58 PM
1

So your solution? Driving uninsured be allowed so that if you hit someone on the road destroy the local pub and destroy a Lamborghini you declare bankruptcy so they have to bear the costs. Or there is a government policy so that people pay the same regardless of risk? So someone with no car is subsidising you. Or people with an accident free record pay the same as the local drunk who has accidents regularly. If you live in a rural community then running a car is one of the costs of living. It is…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:43 PM
0

But it is not arbitrary. If it were you could establish an insurance company offering policies that offer the same premium for both sexes and you would not be at a disadvantage.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:31 PM
0

Yes but how does someone work out your personal risk? These criteria and statistical averages are used to work out the best estimate of insuring someone. Until an alternative is available it is the best option. The alternative would be for people to place a large sum of money in escrow prior to taking to the road. Of course few of us have that sort of asset particularly when young. So by taking out insurance you have access to these assets if needed.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:29 PM
0

No not having car insurance is not a crime. Driving a car on public roads without insurance is a crime. You are not obliged to own a car. Many people don’t own cars. You are required to have insurance to protect the other road users from suffering financially if you cause an accident. There is no obligation to take a specific policy out. There is a level of cover required. The insurance price has been determined by the market based in previous claims. As it happens on average, young men are more…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:12 PM
1

Again you are assuming a responsibility of the insurance company to care about you as a person they don’t. The cost of providing insurance to you is predicted by looking at the claims made by people like you driving a car like you drive. The insurance is not just for the value of your car. If you insured for fire and theft only the amount of the cover needed is for replacement of the car. The government is not really concerned if you get a new car after an accident. The compulsory insurance is t…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:02 PM
0

“You don't seem to understand that there are no other options for men who face these sorts of premiums. Also, you claim this is about numbers and not emotion, numbers don't justify discrimination in any other field so why should it be allowed in insurance? “ Of course numbers justify discrimination. That’s how most things are decided. You get a high number of answers correct in a test you get a high grade, You work more hours you expect more pay. You sell more product, you get more commission. Y…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 03:17 PM
4

“Notice a lot of health insurance companies don't seem to have a problem charging men and women the same even if women cost the companies A LOT more than men.” This is due to government interference with premiums. In Australia they are not allowed to take claim history or gender into account in health insurance premiums. Definitely not fair and an example of gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:59 PM
2

If car insurance is mandatory that is a decision for the government to make hopefully in line with what the people decide. It is rarely fair for everyone but that is a different debate. The obligation for insurance is to protect people you share the road with from suffering financial loss in the case where you are responsible for an accident. If there is only one insurer you may have an argument about compulsory insurance. BUT there are lots of insurers and lots of policies. Some with bigger exc…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:55 PM
1

I can imagine that siblings of autistic kids have a whole lot less attention paid to them by parents, Have more than the usual sibling care responsibilities and have a whole lot of potential home interruptions living with an artistic sibling.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:32 PM
4

You seem to think of insurance companies as some sort of charity or mutual society. They are businesses that make decisions based on the numbers not emotions. It is only government mandated limitations and the potential reputation impact that prevents them offering premiums based on ethnicity.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:30 PM
1

‘insurance should be based on the value of the item being insured not the person.’ Insurance is based on the risk of a claim and the size of that claim the biggest cost for car insurance is third party injury and third party property compared to that damage to your car is a tiny risk.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:27 PM
1

Read it again. In a logical and not emotionally unstable world you would be able to offer a low premium for an ethnic or cultural group that has a low risk of making a claim. For example if Orthodox Jews do not drive in the sabbath then they will have on average decreased time on the road and therefore less risk of accidents. If people of a particular ethnicity were culturally socially or physically less likely to make a claim then their premiums should be lower. If on the other hand people who …
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:20 PM
-1

Maths is used to discriminate a group of people that cost more to insure than another group. You bet it is discriminatory it is not a charity. Just like I discriminate when I spend money I willingly pay more for some things than others. I pay more for a BMW than. Ford Focus. I decide the value and vote with my money. My point is the reason for the discrimination is not the gender. It is the trend for people who are of that gender to have more accidents and hence cost more to insure than people o…
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:53 PM
1

That’s where the US falls down you can be uninsurable because you are already diagnosed or carry the wrong genes. But insurance is a business not a charity. You could make an argument for the government establishing an insurer of last resort but it would need to be subsidized and therefore may outcompete non subsidized companies.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:24 PM
6

I don’t see any sweeping generalizations.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:09 PM
-1

No it is simple math. In insurance identify a group, identify their risk. Set a price for insurance. If someone identifies a small enough group that is a better risk then they will sell that policy. I suspect legally they may come into problems if they tried race. But if they decide that 18 year old Latin speaking men with. ATAR of 95 and above are a low risk they can offer an insurance policy tailored to them.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:07 PM
2

I’m thinking we need a list of excessively touchy, angry women but that would be sexist and would probably result in a call to HR.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 12:59 PM
-2

Insurance companies are the most fair on sex discrimination. They know if a company works out the risk and feels a group is overcharged they can be under cut by their opposition. The problem is the risk taking in young men that is correlated with extra claims. I wonder if government was not involved in health insurance would the premiums for the two genders be the same?
/r/MensRights15/01/18 12:14 PM
1

You missed that women control more household spending. Women work less hours when working full time. Women choose daft degrees.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 01:15 PM
2

This is a common behaviour in both real life and fiction. It perpetuates the myth that women are entitled to use violence and men should not complain.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:21 PM
2

https://youtu.be/pyJXAallsyY Let’s stop the slap
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:18 PM
1

The formula is number of women /number of men * 100%
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:15 PM
2

A very good question. The reverse is also equally valid how does someone falsely accused demonstrate their innocence. It seems that there are experts willing to testify that any behaviour is normal after rape. My suggestion is be honest and report to police early with as much detail as you can but don’t try to fill in gaps. Your family will support you.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:57 AM
5

This has always struck me as a stretched issue. If women doing the same job in the same companies have a different rate of injury and death then an investigation into why is warranted. If women choose to avoid dangerous jobs then that is fair enough just ensure that pay differences reflecting risk are not used to justify discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:41 AM
1

Simple be honest and open in dealings with everyone. Don’t play games and negotiate with partners in good faith.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:56 AM
3

For what it is worth make a transition to independence plan. Get some professional advice about how to avoid being pulled back in to this toxic living situation and perhaps how to encourage your mother to get help. Your mother is unlikely to change unless she has a reason. Your father may also appreciate ongoing involvement and being recognised as a victim. It may do wonders for his depression and alcohol abuse.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:51 AM
1

Certainly the introduction of more social benefits and social acceptance has correlated with higher unmarried birth rates. Since the introduction of Lyndon Johnson’s war on poverty we have seen more people reliant on benefits and no significant change in poverty rates despite skyrocketing costs.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:27 AM
2

Ah but they have decided to take on the in loco parentis role because they decide that students are perfectly capable of incurring a lifelong debt for their education but are incapable of looking after themselves in social interactions. The pattern is repeated in the modern workplace where the HR department has become the parent figure for toddlers to call on.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:30 AM
2

Agreed generally they have no understanding of legal practice. Certainly in my university some of the administrators who have responsibility in this area don’t seem to even know the federal and state laws on harassment. They are unaware that their actions are often asking students to incriminate themselves and they often don’t follow their own written protocols. Their focus seems to be exclusively on support of women making allegations. They will announce that they offer equal support to male st…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:10 AM
5

You are assuming that the benefits go to support the children. There is always the option of giving the children up for adoption. The problem is if you continue to reward a behaviour you encourage it. Hence you see that middle class working parents have few children and those dependent on government payouts have more children. 100 years ago there were bigger families on average but the only social support was from charities. Removing consequences from people making decisions has an effect as doe…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 01:36 AM
7

The effect is that the person making the decision will bear the brunt of that decision. And the man who has not had a role in the decision does not. My question to you is why should the father who gets no say in the decision to carry a child to term and keep it be held financially responsible? I’d prefer to pay my tiny share of the benefits and preferably minimise benefits to parents that continue to conceive while dependant on the state.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:55 AM
5

I accept that that is better than being the man that gets the responsibility for a child regardless of being unable to have a say in the decision to keep the child.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:51 AM
9

The long term effect is that mothers will need an agreement with their partners to bring a child to birth and be financed in that decision. Your assumption is that mothers will not change their behaviour if they have no guarantee of financial support. While I suspect many will continue with the pregnancy many will not and some pregnancies will never occur.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:45 AM
1

So they have somehow linked gun rights a uniquely US issue with Men’s rights a world wide issue. They decide that MRA’s can be dismissed without discussing the issues. I’m betting they didn’t do a similar cartoon for the women’s. Marches and vagina hats.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 04:30 PM
1

I agree, ask yourself is this investigation going to have a positive outcome? The answer is almost certainly no. If you must then first research heritable characteristics some are visible and you can raise or lower your index of suspicion. Then broach it with your family or don’t.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 04:24 PM
2

So now a he said she said case will be decided on who is believed more the innocent woman who made the complaint or the violent man who assaulted her. Where could it possibly go wrong with a bunch of feminist academics making the judgement.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 04:11 PM
1

She is a rapist /s
/r/MensRights27/12/17 03:54 PM
2

We are battling Millenia of evolution where protecting women has had an advantage.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 03:50 PM
1

I would say more cult than simple religion.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 03:46 PM
1

Sneaky f**kers approach - unfortunately it reinforces the feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 03:44 PM
3

If a movie is promoted and evaluated based on a political ideology then you have to wonder if it distracts from story telling and production values.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:50 PM
1

Sounds like a Poe.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:46 PM
1

Good questions.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:32 PM
1

Good questions.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:32 PM
8

Problem is that there are two standards being used. So an innocent finding in a court of law does not necessarily mean innocent according to the university system. You cannot assume that different findings mean a miscarriage of justice. We need to hold the universities to their own standards and hit them with Title IX complaints demonstrating that their administrators and equity offices are sexist in treatment of male accusers and victims.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 02:18 PM
1

The risk is if she divorces he could get custody,the home and child support.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 10:00 AM
2

Can you link the source of this graph
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:01 PM
2

Their arguments almost won me over. /s But then I realized they are trans-age and are acting like preschoolers. So now I understand their mental disorder they deserve sympathy and I hope they will grow out of the “terrible twos”.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 05:01 PM
1

The risk is if she gets advice from the wrong person they will tell her to say that the two of you provided an “unsafe” environment because of harassment, sexual assault, or simply being sexist. Then she can claim that her not contributing was due to victimhood. It would be good to have something where she admits that you were always supportive gentlemen.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:22 PM
2

Record everything, make a brief document summarizing the facts, then link to specific proof. Admin are lazy if you produce 100 pages of evidence they probably won’t read it. Counter claim for harassment in that she is using the system to cause you problems. Then be patient. If the treatment is unfair then go to Fire and get support for a counter suit.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:16 PM
1

I agree we need more positive advocacy not simply criticism and reaction.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:09 PM
1

Have you read the community info on this subreddit it has some good overviews. You can look at this http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V71-Straus_Thirty-Years-Denying-Evidence-PV_10.pdf Or http://ncfm.org/libraryfiles/Children/DV/Gender%20Paradigm%20In%20Domestic%20Violence.pdf Are good places to start this YouTube video by Donald Dutton https://youtu.be/WHcQ_gx5bbk
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:03 PM
3

You have made some gross assumptions. You assume all accusations are valid. I bet you assume that employees that are sick on Fridays and Mondays but never the other days are just unlucky and people never use the system to punish others. In 30 years I have never chased after work colleagues but I have shared the workplace with manipulative people who have made for an unpleasant work environment. Unfortunately the good people leave and the toxic ones stay. When you end up in a workplace where peop…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:47 PM
8

Yes there’s is a difference but not all women are honest and sane. The process is a punishment in itself an there is no recompense to falsely accused. The standard in Australia is that the person felt harassed not that the accused intended to harass. There is a reasonable person test but in my experience people conveniently forget it until things end up in court.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:39 PM
4

I agree stick to facts. Focus on a couple of specific examples where only one perspective was accepted. Specifically mention the sources in lectures and the references and summarize in an annotated bibliography their point. Then suggest a similar list of better quality that supports alternative views. The argument should be about quality of the teaching and your feeling that in this area the course crossed the line from teaching facts an arguments to indoctrination.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:35 PM
6

Perhaps you should speak to the guys that have suffered from unfounded accusations or gross exaggerations and get their view on being made unemployed. Or more often recognize the chilling effect on the workplace. No more will people interact socially with workmates. We will all end up looking for partners on line.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 03:25 PM
2

You could do a study looking at newspaper articles in your area and the wording used around male and female victims and perpetrators and particularly look at comments
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:47 PM
7

Problem is the definition of misogyny seems to include everything where a man is not an obsequious servant to a woman or has an alternative opinion.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:41 PM
3

the biggest issue is helping men who are facing injustice in title IX complaints and ensuring that there are supports for male victims, and accused. Ensuring that there is not discrimination against men in other areas.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:17 PM
5

By all means make a polite attempt to establish the Men's officer. Then document all the responses you get positive and negative and use this to argue for the need if you get turned down. You may be better to talk to the womens, gay, mature overseas, and crippled, lefthanded, dragonsexual officers to ask about their responsibilities and what they do fo their fellow students. Then see if it applies to men and then go looking to see if there is a demand for this sort of support.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:15 PM
3

How is welcoming people to a movement ever a problem if they agree with the aims. There may be diversity of Approach but that is generally a good idea. Multiple approaches can help achieve results.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:08 AM
1

There are gender studies departments around the world but in reality they are all gynocentric. The only men’s studies department is run by feminists.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:03 AM
1

Get involved in local politics either in professional areas, clubs, government. When issues come up and a gendered view is assumed speak up as ask the questions about evidence, how they would feel if the genders are reversed. Do they recognize the risk of denying natural justice to athe accused. Most people swallow the gendered narrative and don’t think to criticize it. If you are scrupulously balanced and ask the tough questions you can help a lot. Remember most people are fair and reasonable b…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:56 AM
1

Other options; perhaps you could complete your point succinctly ad allow others to speak. Please address the facts not the feelings Anecdotes are not data Do you have any points that have not already been made?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:51 AM
0

I’m feeling the schadenfreude growing
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:35 AM
4

So when someone accuses you of crimes and tries to destroy your reputation with malice. It is time to call her bluff and tasks her to court for libel.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:04 AM
7

Yes in the UK it is a crime simply never prosecuted.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:15 PM
5

The issue was that nothing gets published unless the experiment has been passed by an ethics committee. Even the surveys you see on social media have to have ethics approval if the results are to be published.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:13 PM
2

Wow a brave lecturer. I’m betting he gets persecuted for this.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:05 AM
2

Yes the jury should hear it all. Evidence of an accusers unreliability, is relevant. If the story doesn’t match the facts or previous stories - relevant. If the date and place of the incident are inaccurate then changed multiple times -relevant. You would think people in the justice system would realise there are liars everywhere and some times they are the accusers, sometimes the police, sometimes the prosecutors and yes often the defendants.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:04 AM
11

Great now lest the Men’s clubs alone to do what they do. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 03:46 AM
3

The danger is that you could spend 10 years of your life fighting to exonerate your brother instead of building a relationship with your nephew who probably needs you more than your dead brother.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 01:38 PM
1

But it is just as much a breach of trust to interfere with any form of contraception.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 01:33 PM
10

What do you want from this? Accumulating evidence that women have been know to lie about rape, exoneration for your family and particularly your nephew, compensation from the legal system, Justice? My thoughts is to get her to confess to more people then take the evidence to try for an exoneration. But in the long term you have to be careful that getting revenge, getting an exoneration, or any other decision you make doesn’t become your life.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 09:26 AM
1

I also couldn’t get past the start. They were long on accusations and short on facts. If they want to make this argument start with a 5 minute review and some specific verifiable issues.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 02:45 AM
1

I also saw this coming but I think your blaming and interpretation is wrong. Any men’s movement gets maligned and misrepresented. Being anti feminist is as valid a view as being pro feminist but in today’s world people are so terrified of the feminist kickback they don’t take the time to look at the issues.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 02:43 AM
0

Unfortunately he got what he wanted. Facebook hysteria and a cancelled contract.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 05:01 PM
2

I think your concerns are sensible. Cases where men are accused without evidence then go through an entire process that causes them significant distress are not published because hospitals want to protect themselves. Don’t know about the US but many Australian Hospitals will always roster men with women and insist that they work in a team.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:40 AM
2

It would not be allowed in any company in Australia. But yes it looks like consensual activity to me not rape culture. At least no more rape culture than the “slut walks” or any Friday night when ladies wear as little as possible to attract attention.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:34 AM
1

This would be non gendered if extended to all cases of interference with birth control performed by either gender.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:27 AM
4

Another demonstration of why the MRM is needed. No political organisation should be above criticism.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 12:49 AM
2

Most of the time you are arguing against bias and stereotypes. You won’t do well if you directly attack these things. People just hold on to them further. Better to have the data and ask people to explain how Patriarchy causes lesbian couples to be more violent than gay couples. How constantly telling women they are victims and teaching them fear improves their quality of life.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 12:44 AM
1

I agree try to be selective in the argument. Focus on just a few issues
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:10 PM
2

You wonder with cases like this how universities can be allowed to maintain jurisdiction of these processes.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:46 PM
1

Women will always have the choice to abort, adopt or keep any progeny. They have plenty of options. The focus on ‘stealthing’ the one temporary contraception available to men while ignoring, the pill, iud’s, caps morning after pill etc demonstrates the legislations inherent gender bias.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:43 PM
1

Except that it is about the one temporary contraceptive available to men and ignores those available to women that could be manipulated just as easily.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:40 PM
2

Ask any man if he has been sexually assaulted and the vast majority will say no. Ask if they have had a woman grab their crotch, or backside or try to plant an unwelcome and invited kiss and the majority will say yes. This is a matter of perception. Reverse the genders and we have a lot of examples of sexual assault with the associated moral panic. A lot of #Metoo’s, are these sort of minor annoyances that happen when people drink, or misread signals, some are just people with no manners. They r…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:36 PM
1

Nope don’t object to the term just recognise it is about manipulation. Personally I’m old enough to not need to prove my masculinity by being manipulated to fit someone else’s view of masculinity. Take your white feathers and make a fan.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:25 PM
1

Generally the term to me says I’m about to be manipulated. My response is generally can’t you find a strong independent woman without a bicycle to do that.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:22 PM
2

It is human nature, we resist recognising things that don’t fit with our current beliefs. The best way to change a mind is to ask questions. When I say #NotAllMen how does that make you feel? What do you think I am saying? How is that different from your response to my story?
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:15 PM
1

150 years ago the upper classes had the problem solved. You wouldn’t speak to a woman until you had been introduced, you wouldn’t be alone with a woman without a chaperone. Of course the common folk were more lax. We could always go back to that arrangement.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:01 PM
3

Such laziness. Couldn’t even read the Damore Memo,
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:38 PM
6

It reinforces all those stereotypes. Wonder how the candidates were selected. I suspect farmers daughters and city lawyers sons may have had a different outcome
/r/MensRights01/11/17 04:26 AM
1

Ah thanks for the information
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:07 PM
3

Simple solution express the wage gap in $/hr to compensate for hours worked. Then use median rather than mean so that extreme incomes won’t skew the numbers badly. This will drop the gap below 5%. This will mostly be explained by career choices.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 01:45 PM
7

Yes when someone says or implies all men. That includes me. If they say men who do this or that, or a specific man I have no issues. I do have problems when they focus on one side without
/r/MensRights31/10/17 05:08 AM
28

Not surprising
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:04 AM
2

The focus of these programs is more about education availability rather than closing the gender gap. We should take care in seeing discrimination until it is real.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 01:25 AM
2

These programs are more general and barely mention the gender gap.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 01:18 AM
1

There are studies that demonstrate the risks of being around people drinking even if you don’t drink. If you hang about SJW’s you have increased risk of falling victim to a perceived breach.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:21 PM
24

That’s fine I’m sure raising him with original sin of being male will help him grow up with confidence /s
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:07 PM
1

So Susan Wojcicki hasn’t read the memo or if she did she simply used her feminist glasses. Wonder if she is qualified to run such an important company if she reacts emotionally and unjustly. If she admitted it was bowing to public pressure, that would be more honest.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:09 PM
1

Next time a woman grabs my ass or crotch I will call the police and ensure she is prosecuted to the full extent of the law. When the judge gives her a slap,on the wrist tell make a big issue of it on social media and in the press. When they accuse me of being a wuss and complaining about nothing and saying she was just drunk, she didn’t hurt you, there was no damage. I’ll accuse them of being rape apologists and supporting rape culture. #HowIWillChange
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:04 PM
1

If they deny equality of offending ask about studies using the conflict tactics scale
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:53 PM
2

It would be reasonable to call them out. Ask questions. So when you make comments about men and that’s ok but I can’t make comments about women because that’s sexist. How equal is that?
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:09 PM
4

If you want good marks from a feminist you could bring in expectations of gender roles, male stereotypes ie male nurses, flight crew and hairdressers are assumed gay. A male pre school or primary teacher is assumed a pedophile, in Australia if a man rings a support line about DV the police are called to identify and check on the partner.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 11:54 AM
14

Ask any man if he has ever had is backside or crotch grabbed by a woman most will say yes. Ask if a drunk woman has tried to kiss them when it wasn’t wanted, again yes. Ask if they have been sexually assaulted or harassed, they will say no. It is all a matter of perspective.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 11:37 AM
1

If you ask most men who have ever spent time in pubs if they have ever had a women grab their crotch or ass of had one dry an unwelcome kiss they will say yes. BUT if you ask the same men. Have you been sexually assaulted then they will say no. Mostly we just accept this behaviour and ignore it after slapping the hands away. The difference is men who are assaulted bony get status for being a victim.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:49 PM
1

If you ask men if they have ever had a drunk woman grab their crotch or backside or try to kiss them I’m betting most will say yes. Ask the same men if they have been sexually assaulted they will say no. It is a matter of perspective. Most men will not be rewarded if they play the victim. Whereas women who make a claim will usually gain support and increased status.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:15 PM
2

She is right in one way. Don’t expect a rapid change in societies judgement of men’s issues. But the best way to convince people is to ask questions. How would you feel if I was assaulted by my girlfriend and was then arrested when I tried to report it to the police.? Would you feel differently if I was your daughter and my boyfriend assaulted me? If so why? What about if I hit back and got arrested? Just ask the questions. Why is circumcision of baby boys ok but of baby girls not?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:04 PM
2

Where is the genre reverse of this. Women don’t walk as a gaggle blocking the foot path Women don’t make derogatory comments about men. Women don’t assume that all men are rapists and any contact has a sexual meaning Women just stop being asses and victims.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:46 PM
8

Tell your mother the following. I don’t want to discuss this while we are all upset can we schedule a time to speak privately about this. I think you have treated me unfairly. Then in 2 days ask do you have time to speak? If she says no then ask if there is a time when she will be willing to speak to you like an adult? When you agree on a time and place avoid emotion and blame. But focus on the issues. Ask questions and wait for answers. 1) Why was your story dis Issey without consideration 2) W…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:40 PM
1

The other option that is needed but will be blocked is training on the real sex Ed for male uni students. See Victor Zena’s Chanel https://youtu.be/dGIaa80i1SE
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:13 PM
10

Generally you will struggle to get support. The first step is to collect information from men about what support they need? I’d go for the Men’s shed model. Where you are helping men who won’t speak about their issues by having them work on projects. Push it and interracial, sexuality diverse but women excluded because men will not expose their vulnerabilities when women are around. Perhaps there is a cellar in the engineering school where students can talk while servicing bicycles and maintain …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:11 PM
10

Some cultures solved this problem. Simple, don’t leave your house without a protector. And no contact with the other gender unless supervised. We did it in the west as well. BUT we had to have freedom of choice and sexual freedom. They come together. There are bad men and women out there. Be prepared. I do wonder if the months without reporting but having the guy in the same building caused any distress. Or is it only when you decide to seek publicity now he has been charged that you feel the di…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:02 PM
1

Sorry missed the /s I use (sarcasm font)to make it clear (sarcasm font)
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:46 AM
-10

You are crazy. There is no evidence of a link between pedophilia and homosexuality. This sort of bigotry just makes the Mens rights movement look bad.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:04 AM
9

It would be good to do the male version of some of the more popular feminist research to demonstrate symmetry.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:15 AM
24

Or you could feel good that you attract interest from the opposite sex. It’s your choice how to react as a victim or as a superstar. Which will make you feel better?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:10 AM
1

Gotta wonder if she was hiring the hitman to kill an ex partner would the penalty be less.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 12:27 PM
1

Nope it is about increased productivity. Every time society has pushed for socialism and had bigger government the efficiency has plummeted.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 12:06 PM
1

So why do you think that MRA's favour the elite discriminating against average men. Just because people believe in capitalism and small government in no way means that they favour discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:28 AM
1

Your logic is faulty. Men are not a homogeneous block. They are individuals. Just like women. When you discriminate in favour of one person based on their sex you are discrimination against others.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:24 PM
2

You must be crazy. Where did you get that statistic. Men are much more likely to be circumcised than women.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:45 PM
4

Yes ignore her, she feeds on criticism. Leave her in her echo chamber and don't rise to the bait.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:28 PM
43

Just because you are a mother doesn't remove your child's right to a relationship with their father.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:28 PM
2

Studies show men on average are more right wing than women on average. The issues is using legislation to discriminate against men, differential enforcement of non gendered legislation. What has wages got to do with MRA's. some MRA's will prefer a low tax, free enterprise approach where safety nets are voluntary and not based on government. Others will prefer a a bigger role for government. If the government is funded by the population as a whole it should not discriminate against one sector sim…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:26 PM
2

Studies show men on average are more right wing than women on average. The issues is using legislation to discriminate against men, differential enforcement of non gendered legislation. What has wages got to do with MRA's. some MRA's will prefer a low tax, free enterprise approach where safety nets are voluntary and not based on government. Others will prefer a a bigger role for government. If the government is funded by the population as a whole it should not discriminate against one sector sim…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:26 PM
3

Let's accept it for most the default is Men's Health last.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 06:27 AM
1

I would hope that MRA's deny the systemic suppression of women. So would any people not indoctrinated by feminism. The revisionist history that labels generations of protection of women at the risk of men as control and coercion is blatantly dishonest. As soon as women wanted the vote it happened but there has never been the corresponding push for equal responsibility. If you look at the news we still minimise women's responsibility and wrong doing and focus on male misdeeds and never look for e…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:22 PM
2

Yes the latest gendered term to describe undesirable behaviour. Perhaps I should create woexcuse, or ladyblame
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:37 PM
2

My issues with men's rights currently are impacted by feminism. In my current role I serve in a university committee with 2/3 women and 95% feminists working on reducing sexual harassment at university. There is no space for a point of view that does not include female victims and male perpetrators. There is no discussion of justice or presumption of innocence. It looks like we in Australia will simply follow the US. Without the pressure of title IX
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:07 PM
3

Where do you get that view? I suspect the MHRM would reflect a range of political view from left to the right and libertarian to authoritarian. I agree that in the whole men and MRA's are more likely to be right of centra and more libertarian as men suffer more from the excesses of government interference.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:49 AM
6

For a philosophy that on one hand claims to be about equality between the sexes (genders) feminists are keen to rid us of terms like fire man, man hole, post man, and history. BUT they have no problems with labelling everything bad with a male term Patriarchy, toxic masculinity, mansplaining, manterrupting, manspreading. Just another demonstration that feminism is not about equality.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:40 AM
2

Just document the inequality and suggest a research project to be funded by the local gender studies department.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:35 AM
2

She can join a panel with Philip Davies and Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad) I'd fly from Australia to see that.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:30 AM
2

LOL the cognitive dissonance is strong in the producers. They forget that in the past Star Trek was progressive without being propaganda. It was popular with a broad section of the populace. Why do they expect blatant propaganda to make a good product? I'm waiting for the NFL to suffer the rejection by their own. When will the progressives decide that footballers don't deserve their massive wages and when will there be a maximum difference between player salaries and the lowest paid groundsman o…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:26 PM
4

This is an opportunity. Time to ask your sister. Does she believe in equality? If so why did she assume that a men's rights advocate doesn't. Has she listened to a men's rights advocate or has she only listened to descriptions of MRA's from feminists? How would she feel if someone found out about feminism by asking a MRA.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:13 PM
1

It's not the rape culture definition I have heard from other feminists
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:17 PM
1

May be worth contacting the Honey Badgers
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:05 PM
5

I backed this on Kickstarter, I want to receive the download link but not sure I want to see the movie. I may need to start drinking first.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:58 PM
2

The wish for men and women to have equal rights - pretty sure most MRA's agree BUT MRA's recognise that in many areas men are discriminated against in the application of law even if not in the legislation. The expectation that men and women should earn the same pay for the same work - MRA's agree BUT MRA's disagree that differing earnings of the two sexes is due to discrimination they feel that most of the difference is due to individual choices. Men and women should have the same opportunities-…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:52 PM
17

At least this article didn't name the true victim. Unlike in the U.K. Where the falsely accused has his name dragged through the mud and the false accuser has her name protected from exposure even after the trial. And of course it is rare for the liar to be prosecuted for perjury.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:37 PM
7

He can't resist asserting that men are a power block. (17 min)Strange that we have all the gendered legislation. None of it in favour of men.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:28 PM
2

I disagree he is one way that men may hear a different point of view. The mainstream view like to ignore male issues and assume the feminist perspective. In the U.K. He is one of the few voices that show another view exists.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:09 PM
1

It all depends on which research you look at. Any research that looks at domestic violence through criminal statistics or ask people to report on crimes the male numbers of victims will be much lower than the female victims. If you actually ask people about specific behaviours they exhibit or experience by using the conflict tactics scale or asking couples about their behaviour without labelling it then you see equal numbers of men and women use and suffer from domestic violence. For example htt…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:07 PM
1

Interesting that a discussion about male suicide comes back to men as the attackers and women the victims again. Perhaps that is part of the problem. My experience is that women can be just as abusive as men. They are less likely to accidentally kill someone. And police are less likely to take a male victim seriously. You would be forgiven for believing that men are never the victims of women because our public discussion space focuses on excusing violent women and demonising violent men. When a…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:10 AM
2

Nope quite easy to comprehend, if you have an open mind. Perhaps hard to comprehend when the media has finished cutting the comments to remove context OR if you have a mindset that is not genuinely egalitarian but only accept a single view of the world where men are all the beneficiaries of societies inequalities and women are the victims of all discrimination.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:00 AM
1

If all the other emotional responses have been crushed out of men perhaps that is what is left. Mens needs are rarely considered by society just their responsibilities. The same as women have discovered by the time they are pre teens that crying and projecting victim-hood works for them. When you have a 40 year old that has accepted after 40 years of experience that revealing emotions is unhelpful that his impression is wrong, simply telling him, telling him to cry and share is another attack. A…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:44 AM
4

At least he is on TV and responds to the factual inaccuracies in a way that is hard to criticise. If you want to support other people go for it.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:10 AM
1

And blaming men for not acting like women and offering services that appeal to women is the solution? I don't think so. Better to start with where men are than to bully them into conforming to a female model of mental health. Saying that men area socialised into not showing their feelings so they should start to show their emotions is pointless. When men show anger (their primary response) the response of others is fear and rejection. When women show tears the response is support and sympathy. S…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 01:07 AM
2

Me too
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:54 PM
3

It's easy to sit back on reddit and criticise. The ICMI plays its role in building the movement. It is more about supporting those who will represent men's issues in the future.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:49 PM
2

Find the job adverts and point her to refuse collecting, fly in fly out mining and Woking on the roads in winter and suggest she could help fix the imbalance by taking one of these jobs. But seriously. Tell her it is not Men or women who work. It is a man who gets a job and another man who gets another job and similar for women. There are well paid women and well paid men. The issue is has she ever asked herself how she could end up in the well paid job. And what is stopping her.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:04 PM
1

Problem is you expect men to react like women and assume that the way women respond is better. You are showing your own gendered perspective. Demanding men start talking about problems is often counter productive. Psychologically a man will get over grief and issues by working or being alone. Working with other men is not threatening but forcing them to talk face to face is. Set a group of men with issues to build something and at the end of the effort they may be prepared to share. Our mental h…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:58 AM
2

Lol Next work on coal miners, morticians and refuse collectors.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:49 AM
11

It was long ago and my perceptions have long since changed. But I thought a perspective from someone who had been there would be relevant.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:46 AM
5

When I was considering suicide ( I am male) I did consider who would discover my body and deal with the situation.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:35 AM
27

When I was considering suicide ( I am male) I did consider who would discover my body and deal with the situation.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:35 AM
3

In what way. They have had some success curbing some of the most unjust legislation. Mind you a lot of sexist legislation and corrupt enforcement still exists.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:24 AM
5

Save Indian Family Foundation http://www.saveindianfamily.org/ Is one of the most successful men's rights groups in the world. This YouTube video from Anil Kumar at ICMI16 gives some background https://youtu.be/jkB-8OwMYjM
/r/MensRights25/09/17 11:18 AM
1

Similar things happening in Britain where the Crown Prosecution service will not drop false accusations even when patently false. Cases like Mark Pearson's are all too common. http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/true-stories/how-a-halfasecond-sex-assault-charge-ruined-this-mans-life/news-story/9252ea521fd7c7a572c8d7e518f4d852 Similarly in Canada The Gomeshi trial shows a one sided process that is not looking for the truth just convictions to demonstrate they take sexual assault seriously.…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 03:58 AM
1

thanks thats helpful to get a balanced view without the excesses of gendered stereotypes. I graduated in Vet School when it was 50/50 of the genders now it is 90/10 but the academic staff are more balanced. I don't have much to do with the vet school at the moment but have worked in a predominantly female work place for 20 years. I'm constantly aware of the perceptions of harassment at work. The interesting thing is that frequently i walk into the lunch room and walk out again because of the con…
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:33 AM
1

It is always interesting that sexist and abusive language that targets men it acceptable and never considered harassment. If a woman over hears a sexist joke that is sexual harassment according to our local university standards. But rants about patriarchy, rape culture, "white men" etc that's not harassment.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 01:39 AM
12

Oh and get a DNA test to be certain.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:55 AM
2

The focus should be on the daughters rights. She has the right to have the opportunity to know her father. He will need to head to court. But keep the concept of his daughters rights paramount. NO ONE cares about fathers. THEY DO care about children.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:54 AM
5

It may be possible to track cell phone locations of the accuser and accused . If budget allows a private investigator may be able to help.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 01:10 PM
2

It is a pretty typical educational video of its era. I'm guessing the 1970's I suspect now it would have a different format. In Australia most areas have very low rates of circumcision but the government subsidizes the procedure.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:38 PM
3

Yes (sarcasm font) That institution of equality and justice (sarcasm font) as long as you are a protected group.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:27 PM
2

On one of his videos he claimed that this was the result of an error that occurred when Berkeley asked for a list of speakers with short notice and the list of potential speakers was sent rather than the list of confirmed speakers.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 12:24 PM
1

Please message me any comments you have
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:38 AM
1

No problems thanks
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:01 AM
4

Thanks Ive spoken to Bettina. She has put me in touch with one student that has been accused of sexual assault and is going through the process. He mostly seems confused and frightened that he wont receive fair treatment.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:43 AM
1

Was the sexism persistent or just at the start of each class when students & staff were getting to know each other? Have you experienced the glass escalator where you as a male in a primarily female workplace get extra opportunity or do you face discrimination or a mix? How much harassment sexual or otherwise did you see. In the engineering or nursing university experience.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:39 AM
9

So just a name applied to people with views different to yourself. Me I use the term different opinions for each of the specific topics. But hey if you want to misclassify people so you can ignore issues that your option.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:28 AM
8

In the U.K. The default is that accusers even if found to be vindictive get anonymity where as the accused gets publicised in order to collect more complaints. The result of political influence on the crown prosecutor. The case of Mark Pearson was a classic example .his name was plastered over the newspapers for months. The accuser was given anonymity even when it was clear she was either crazy or simply lying. Out of the UK the identity 'Souad Faress' of game of thrones fame is publicly availab…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:53 AM
7

I'd disagree, I'm pretty certain he is motivated by self interest but he is not guilty of most of the things of which he is accused. The response to him is more revealing of the bigotry of much of the regressive left.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:43 AM
1

Thanks that's helpful
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:41 AM
3

Hard to say what is really happening here. It sounds like a SNAFU but Milo's posts keep making excuses. Not sure I believe it all but the behaviour of Berkeley was pretty predictable.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 04:22 AM
2

This guy is excusing behaviour from women that women would never accept from a man.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 04:07 AM
3

I agree, Step 1)Get legal advice. Step 2) find out everything about your schools processes and policies. Step 3) State that you will be recording all conversations and that you reserve the right to not answer until you have independent legal advice.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 03:59 AM
1

Seems the article divides rape incorrectly it is "R" rape and unsatisfying voluntary sex that I later define as rape without a thought of the consequences to the poor Schmuck that failed to measure up to the standards of today's romance novels and women's magazines.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:03 AM
2

So as usual then identitarians think blaming men and labeling unhealthy behaviors as masculine think they can help men by telling them manliness is the cause of their problems and feminism is the solution. I disagree.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:41 AM
15

How we dress is a form of advertising. When you dress to highlight your assets then complain about the response you are being deliberately provocative.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 12:44 PM
4

She should take her dog to the park. Then let the two adult dogs involved do what they want. Bitches on heat will seek out mates just like male dogs will seek out those on heat. I hope she likes the idea of puppies in her future.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 11:01 PM
4

You should complain to the manager of the premises and have them speak to the witness and record the statements and contact details.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 10:57 PM
213

The sex offenders registry sounded like a good idea but when people get put on for peeing in an ally after a night drinking you know it has lost sight of the original purpose. This system needs an overhaul so that only people who are a real danger remain in the list. 19yr to 14 years I have to question if this is read pedophilia or simply teenage hormones out of control/
/r/MensRights19/09/17 05:11 PM
1

The response to the "Men have no problems" response is "the fact that you can feel comfortable making that statement and see no need for a group representing men demonstrates the need" .
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:31 PM
15

The quicker we remove skin colour, ethnicity and gender from these discussions the better. If we need to discuss disparity of income based on “caring responsibilities” then thats a society issue more than a work place issue. In the western world most families have one bread winner that works excessively and one person who concentrates on the family and works very little. How to make these two roles more balances and if they remain unbalanced how these two roels are allocated is where the discuss…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:43 AM
23

A well argued essay. Hope the author doesn't get lynched. In the modern world heresy is still a crime punished by society. people seem to forget that most people only have one primary career. if they choose medicine, gender studies or history of indigenous peoples then they wone be choosing Mathematics, chemical engineering or taking up plumbing. If people choose to be stay at home parents then the time will come out of their chosen career. If they choose to return to work but only accept work t…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:37 AM
2

If this is true and represents a common behaviour then we have a problem. The issue is that no one knows how many rape accusations are false and how many are true. Systems need to accept the two possibilities and act accordingly. When we hear stories from activists again there are three broad possibilities. 1) The story is true and often created/ or reinforced the activists beliefs and attitude 2) The story is false and the activist created it to send a message. 3) The story is false but the act…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 06:38 AM
2

I just downloaded in iTunes
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:40 PM
1

Generally women do most of household purchasing. Therefore advertisers pander to what women want.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 01:24 PM
4

The Reality is that most of the"wage gap" is a Parents gap. Stay at home parents earn less and at the same time the other has to earn more. When you comparre never married people the gap mostly disappears. But Men supporting a wife and children tend to earn more. I posit this is an effect of gender roles but no one surveys young couples to discuss who decided the division of labour. I hope it is both parents but I suspect the mothers get a disproportionate say in any decision involving children.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:35 AM
3

So the author has never used her looks to get out of a ticket, or started crying at work to stop a reprimand, LOL
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:42 PM
1

Thanks, if Portugal is anything like Australia there are thousands of men in sexless marriages. Sounds like they are all victims. Strange their wives think of them as potential rapists.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:15 PM
1

The reverse is more likely. A man in early childhood teaching assumed to be a pedophile, a man in nursing assumed not capable of being a doctor,
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:42 PM
6

Can someone who is a native Portuguese speaker confirm the article is correctly translated. This surely has to be a Poe.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 12:24 PM
3

Anyone in South Australia please visit the South Australian mental health commission. They are undergoing a community discussion about mental health services in the state. I ask you to do something for men and respond to the survey. For question 1 suggest that men should be a special category in a similar way to aboriginal and other culturally diverse groups. Current mental health services are failing men as they assume that an approach suited to a primary female patient group should work equall…
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:50 PM
1

Gotta disagree that MRM is the flip side of Feminism. The response I use is "if you define feminists as people who believe women should be treated equally to men most MRA's are feminists. It's when you include patriarchy theory, manblaming, and Marxism as integral to feminism then the numbers drop off dramatically. My question for you is why you are not a MRA we simply want equal rights for men and women to match equal responsibilities"
/r/MensRights03/07/17 01:16 PM
2

The problem with rebadging a movement because you have been subjected to misrepresentation by vested parties is that the same thing will happen to any other name you apply if the basic messages do not change. If MRA's never address the excesses of Feminism then they are missing some of the most egregious attempts at anti male legislation and societal bias.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 12:53 AM
5

Yet another demonstration of the need for a men's rights movement. In Australia they discovered that public servant hires favoured women and ethnic minorities so the process of blinded employment selection should be "viewed with concern" ( sarcasm font) you wouldn't want to hire the best candidate based on talent, skills and experience when you can do it based on gender or race (Sarcasm font)
/r/MensRights01/07/17 12:48 AM
3

Couldn't disagree more. My standard response to people dismissing the MRA label is to ask "For what rights do you think I should stop advocating; equal treatment under the law, the right to be recognized as an equal parent, the right to presumption of innocence, the right to intact genitalia, the right to equal opportunity in the workplace. The right to equal educational opportunities. The right to be recognized as a victim of family violence?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:09 PM
5

The sweet spot is being in support of feminism defined as equal rights for women but being against the gender war, divisiveness, Marxism, patriarchy theory and bigotry of some popular feminists is something MRA's can get behind. Most people will recognize the difference.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:56 PM
2

I recommend practicing a 30 second 1 and 2 minute sound bite prior to any media exposure. Joining a public speaking group or practicing hostile interviews with your colleagues can also help. Most of the feminists that end up on media are well trained and most of us are amateurs by comparison .
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:51 PM
3

Agreed. It does not have to be labelled as MHR advocacy. You can join a political party, social group, professional body or union and make sure you make the effort to call out discrimination and false data when you see it. If your workplace starts to introduce sexist programs ask what they are trying to achieve and what evidence they have they the program is necessary or likely to be effective. If you can't block the program then go for establishing criteria for success and a sunset clause.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:46 PM
2

Warren Farrel's book "Why men earn more" is worth a read it is a bit dated 2005
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:31 PM
1

You miss read the course name. It should have read SJW Indoctrination 101
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:03 AM
6

Jail won't help they need deprogramming. These parents are dangerous to their other children because they are victims of the alt medicine cult
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:04 AM
3

Actually both parents need deprogramming from the Alternative medicine faith they share before they should be allowed custody of their children. There is no indication in the article that either has changed their view of the best medical treatments.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:59 AM
1

There are two issues I see in this case. The complete belief in alternative medicine (Naturopathy) by both parents resulting in them making what they genuinely thought was the correct decision. In this case the fathers response of outrage that his families medical decisions were second guessed by the legal system is consistent with his beliefs. To me the real issue is when do we hold the naturopath who failed to send the baby to get real medical treatment and the alternative medicine industry th…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:56 AM
3

Feminists seem incapable if differentiating feminism from egalitarianism. One is sexist and subsumed by Marxist theory the other is about equality.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:54 PM
1

To me it seems like a newbie cop not a 15 year veteran. She needs to know what it feels like to be repeatedly stunned and see if she can keep control of her limbs.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:45 PM
2

No surprise another piece of research that doesn't fit the narrative.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:29 PM
1

Rates vary from 5 to 25 % seem an incredibly big range I'd want to work out how they vary that much. Is it the school or the research?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:04 PM
3

So is your dad still hitting your mom. Use a loaded question on kids that don't know better. Although I though the kid that said texting and other stuff not working may be on to something
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:56 PM
4

I disagree society starts to penalise the accused especially for accusations of pedophilia and sexual assault. Better to not name until the trial ends.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:41 PM
4

I can't help thinking that in 100 years we will look back on this era of media lynch mobs the same way we do of the Salem Witch Trials. "We would never do anything that unjust" The modern lynch mob piles on any man accused of pedophilia and sexual assault without bothering with a right to be seen as innocent until proven guilty. The problem with this is that if this behaviour becomes normalised the protection for the accused progressively decreases and the chance of a fair trial disappears as we…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:02 AM
3

After all in the US 30% of children in cases of contested paternity are found to be unrelated to the purported father.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:42 AM
2

Tells us a lot about Slate and the media agenda. The legal concept of innocent until proven guilty is insignificant against believing any accuser (especially women). Why should any man expect to be given the benefit if a trial first we have the media Lynch mob. Canada and the western world in general needs to be very careful that we don't allow civil rights to be compromised on the altar of gender politics.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:04 AM
5

Some of the biggest feminist commentators followed the trial and the pre trial media but appeared to ignore everything but the accusations and believing the witnesses. Then spammed Twitter about the injustice. This remains my concern that trial by media exacts a penalty against accused regardless of guilt. This works primarily against men as media continues to follow the Man perpetrators and rapists Women innocent victims narrative for the most part.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 06:48 AM
3

Sounds like a standard catch 22 or Witch trial. If you die by drowning you are not a witch congratulations. I'd you are pilloried in the public space but found innocent you still suffer the cost of defence, the public shaming the negative effects on your career. But the accusers who collude and commit perjury get public support and no penalty.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter