TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SaiHottari Archive

View 1 posts and 1,139 comments by SaiHottari on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,139 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
30

Here here! Fuck cancel culture, but fuck pedophiles and their enablers even harder.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 11:49 PM
1

He just got into office after 8 years of liberals. Also, liberals pretty much own the education system as well as the courts. It might be starting to swing back, but it's got a long way to go. Also, it seems many of the folks in office are conservative in name only; They've been pretty resistant to many of Trumps policies. While that's a good thing some times.... most of the time... but not all the time.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:12 AM
2

The fad of bashing "toxic masculinity", the war on boys, the lack of public support for men and boys, and countless other elements of far-left doctrine entering into politics tells a very different story. Sure, some men like big women or working women or women who like to get dirty on the job, etc. But these are by and large exceptions to the trend. Humanity is individualistic but we do tend towards certain preferences and behaviors as a result of our respective differences. What I'm pointing ou…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 10:29 PM
1

The side in power is always the one who limits free speech. Liberals started the movement when conservatives were in power. Now liberals pretty much own the field, so they've turned and started trying to limit free speech while conservatives have started demanding free speech. Society is a pendulum.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 09:21 PM
2

Even with what is said in the article, I think what he means is that female priveledge is threatened by religion. See, men want women who are women, not women who are men. Our best works are made when inspired and driven for the success of our families. Religion may be the most vocal proponent of this, but even many right-leaning agnostics are starting to grow tired of this. We're being told to act like women, and the women we love are being told to act like men. We're all miserable because of i…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 09:06 PM
1

Now my $100 in pennies is somewhere around $20 in copper-plated zinc tablets.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:19 PM
2

Yeah, if he's asked everyone what they wanted to do, and men said they'd stay and women said they'd go home, cool.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:01 PM
2

$1 total. 95¢ if you're Canadian and don't have pennies anymore. :(
/r/MensRights16/10/17 05:52 PM
1

Only because American coinage is similar to Canadian coinage was I able to understand it. However, we abolished the penny, so up here this would only be ¢95
/r/MensRights16/10/17 05:51 PM
6

Yeah, men make better women than women do!
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:21 PM
3

Yeah, I'm not cool with mistreating people over their hobbies. I'm just saying that, as much as a game is a lot of fun and a good way to escape for a while, it's pretty low on the list of important things in life.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:22 PM
8

The was literally my first comment on the subject. It's not obsession to give someone advice.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:21 PM
3

Doesn't really matter at this point if the original intention was benign looks like dispute to me. Maybe you just poorly articulated your response. Try "Yeah, 'created' might be the wrong word, but it has been appropriated by feminists".
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:19 PM
4

I see this far less than game addiction. I love Skyrim and FO4, and play any chance I get. I don't get pissy with people that interrupt my gaming session because it is just a game.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:17 PM
25

They call us idiots too. The world is more simple this way. Infantry proof, you might say.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:10 PM
2

He also praised a Muslim mosque, that still practices gender apartheid, for how well they've adopted Canadian values.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 06:21 PM
1

I know he did. That's what I'm saying: he says whatever he has to in order to appeal to the snowflakes that voted for him. His actions and what he says do not line up.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:58 PM
5

They control the spending where they have access to the money, they have access through their spouses. The artificial womb would offer an alternative to marriage for men who don't want the risk associated with marriage. It also doesn't fully account for the fact that sex robots are still being developed and sold, despite feminist outcry.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:13 PM
4

I don't think they will be able to stop it. Men have most of the money, and corporations exist to make money. If demand for artificial wombs is large enough, feminists will be powerless before market forces. As you said, look at sex robots. Feminists are revolted by their existence, yet they continue to be developed and sold.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:23 PM
3

It's already been done with a sheep. I don't emagine artificial wombs for us will be too much longer. Might even be in our life time.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:02 PM
8

Your name is somewhat relevant here... Is the 5th law that a robot must never allow someone to rape it unless that prevention conflicts with the first 4 laws?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:58 PM
1

Look up the old PC/PS2 game "Oni" by Bungie West. It had that gritty cyberpunk feel and an awesome combat system. The graphics for it aren't too terrible by today's standards either. The lore and story is just a little lackluster, but that wasn't intended as the major selling point.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 04:37 PM
5

I dislike feminists as much as most here, perhaps even more. Justin Castro is not a feminist; He's a populist in a madhouse country of snowflakes and hipsters. He says whatever he has to in order to appeal to his voter base. He flip-flops on everything like a pancake in a hurricane.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:16 AM
6

The problem is that a male only group or even just one that serves both genders is seen by feminuts as dangerous and misogynistic. Canada tried to set up male shelters and look how that turned out; the founder killed himself and now there's only one or two shelters in the whole country. We're laughed out of the room for being victims and our attempts to make our own support programs are attacked. Feminist groups have made it clear they will do anything it takes to maintain their monopoly on vict…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:30 PM
1

Varries. Almost universally, risk seeking and aggression (and many behaviors that stem from those, such as higher career pursuits) are male behaviors because they stem from Testosterone's effects on the brain. But not all cultures grow beards or wear 'masculine' clothes. Likewise, prominent emotional expression and social activity are feminine traits because of Estrogen. But dresses and long hair (as examples) vary between cultures. It comes down to nature vs nurture. Most studies seem to allude…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:14 PM
16

You mean the difference between "what you are" and "what you pretend you are"? Or do you mean the difference between "what you are" and "how you act"? Because if it's the former, the distinction is irrelevant because I don't care what you pretend you are. If you mean the later, I hope you don't use "male" and "female" to identify your gender. You're masculine or feminine, not man or woman. Man and woman are terms for sex. Stop confusing the shit out of everyone by using man and woman in two diff…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:09 AM
4

That's been their plan all along. They don't hide it, they're proud of it.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 02:35 PM
2

I wouldn't call a typo an example of stupidity. Just an honest mistake. "Even monkeys fall out of trees" - Chinese proverb
/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:26 PM
2

Yeah, how dare someone make a typo!? What a moron!
/r/MensRights02/10/17 10:51 PM
52

George Carlin: Imagine how dumb the average person is. Now, that's the average, half the people out there are dumber then that.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 08:14 PM
1

If anything will make a parent jaded about society, it's when a false accusation destroys their child's life. If anything will cause a parent to give up on life, it's having to bury their child that was ruined by that false accusation. I shutter to think how hard it must have been in the days of witch hunts. And again when we consider that is what rape accusations are becoming.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 09:27 PM
2

Wozers. Awesome work. Thank you!
/r/MensRights28/09/17 05:05 PM
1

Yeah, I found that too. Tumblr uses hyperlinking, so it would be time consuming to reformat the contents for other platforms. I got it moved to a Word document for now just via copy/paste. It retains hyperlinks so at least I have it stored.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:10 AM
2

Anyway we can salvage the links in that epic post? Would be a useful list to have.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 09:19 PM
5

Your name and trade often go hand-in-hand. Well, so do many related trades. I don't know how many times I've been elbow deep in a gear-box thinking "I need an adult".
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:12 AM
43

only until typical child-bearing age. Then their pay drops sharply because of how many choose to take time out of the workforce to care for their children.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:09 AM
2

It's hard to keep people on task and motivated when they're up against such a daunting and relentless opponent. Even the heariest soldier gets weary eventually. Threatened with job loss, fines, social ostracism, DOXXing and even threats, nobody will hold the line forever.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:40 PM
6

Oh, I do all of the above. Trouble is, Canada is gone. They'll hit you with fines before listen do a damn thing you have to say. Especially if it's against the current social orthodoxy. You can imagine what that means for a conservative like myself. At least on the internet, nobody can judge me for shit. I'm just a random entity behind a fake name. The most they can do is fill my inbox with autistic screeching and maybe ban me from some subs.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:20 PM
7

Society is a pendulum, and which ever side it swung to wants to keep it that way. It used to be the right, now it's on the left. As a Canadian who's legally not allowed to criticise Islam or social justice, I'm tired.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 07:56 PM
1

When her tits have descended to the point she can use them as knee pads and she can't get a date, maybe she'll realize- nah, who am I kidding? A feminist, learn? Ha!
/r/MensRights25/09/17 09:42 PM
3

Not to mention that it's not even true that white men are the richest demographic. That goes to Asians last I saw. But I don't hear a peep about Asian privledge.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:58 PM
8

Exactly. Even before I learned about feminism, I would have said it is more likely that privilege belongs to the wealthy, not a particular race or sex. A black man with millions of dollars is just as priveledged as a white man with millions of dollars, as is a woman. I would also point out that their priveledged isn't always, or even often, unearned. Starting a successful business isn't easy, especially in today's beurocratic environment.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:41 PM
2

I haven't checked in a while, but last I heard from our feminist PM, Canada isn't doing any better. I think the US is correcting their definition to be in line with the FBI one, which includes males as victims. However, the US media seems reluctant to follow suit.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:34 PM
3

Indeed, but rape in several Western countries doesn't define rape as any unwanted sex. Instead, it is defined as unwanted penetration. So, lacking a penis, a woman cannot ordinarily be charged with rape. At worst, she can be charged with sexual assault or battery, which carries a much lighter sentence.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:39 PM
96

Good. The last place we need someone willing to lie about being raped is in law enforcement and the judicial system.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 04:29 PM
1

We all ready do. It's called taxes. Ever wonder why they're so high? Well, here's one of the many reasons. Note, that isn't me bashing taxation as a concept. But I think we could be much more efficient than we are.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:11 PM
3

I asked about both. I'm essentially saying, is there not alternative options to abortion in pretty much every western country? If the UK and Ireland posses the ability to put children up for adoption, then my question still stands. And safe harbor isn't necessarily child abandonment, you're putting your child in the care of emergency services to become a ward of the state. It's like anonymous adoption for desperate parents (mothers).
/r/MensRights18/09/17 11:20 PM
1

Those places don't allow you to put your child up for adoption?
/r/MensRights18/09/17 10:13 PM
1

Can someone point me to a place in the Western world that doesn't have either Safe Harbor or Adoption rights?
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:53 PM
4

Not overall. But, in relation to frequency on the throne, yes.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 07:57 AM
28

If you want to go, then go. Buy the female ticket, it's cheaper. If they question you, demand to know why they assumed your gender.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:32 PM
3

I don't know if it has to do with either not having a mother or a father. I'm not making this about mysandry. I wouldn't doubt single fatherhood would cause similar results... If we got custody, which we don't very often. This is about single parenthood more that fatherhood or motherhood. I only said motherhood because it more common by orders of magnitude. https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/the-real-complex-connection-between-single-parent-families-and-crime/265860/
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:44 PM
7

Coming from single motherhood homes is the most common variable among prison inmates. Plenty grow up just fine, but not enough to justify it. Spoiling a child sets them up for missery and failure. It needs to be corrected. Either by counseling the child or repremanding the mother.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:30 PM
4

Exactly. We're held from success by a huge empathy gap. If we can't fix that, we will never get anywhere. And if there's anything I wish I was wrong about, it's the reason for that gap: it's in our nature, a maladaptation from eons past. When our numbers were fewer and a woman's womb was one of the most valuable resources for the species' survival, our instincts lead us to protect it, even if it meant men had to die. It doesn't serve us now like it did then: our numbers are plenty and survival c…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 09:32 PM
2

Ah, I misread then. Edited.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 10:17 PM
1

Yup. Thankfully I work a pretty blue collar job, so the PC affliction hasn't hit us very hard (yet). But my gf had to complete an online version questionnaire that read like a SJW circle jerk... She inspections imported vehicles... It's her and one other person on the job site at most.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:21 PM
4

Plus, it's fucking Canada. I live here. We're up to our eyeballs in postmodernist, reductionist, regressive feminists and SJWs. One literally leads our government... Though he's still not good enough for them. You think conservatives get a hard time in the states? We're practically an endangered species up here. It's at the point our party is scraping the bottom of the barrel for members. They've basically just become liberals who hate liberals.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:00 PM
3

Matthew Rigby, 22, right, was found not guilty of baby Ayeeshia's murder, but convicted of allowing the child's death. He fucking reported it! They ignored him! What more could he have possibly done!? Attack the girlfriend and get arrested for assault and never see his child again!? What. The. Fuck. I have yet to hear anything good about CPS. Both the stories I've heard and my own experience says CPS isn't even real. They're just a fake organization we have to pay taxes for to fatten their walle…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 07:06 PM
3

Thanks for the info. I went looking a while back when I first watched that video but couldn't find much. I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 04:30 PM
3

I heard somewhere that autism is the extreme of the male mind and borderline personality disorder is the extreme of the female. I think it was Dr. Randomercam that broke it down in one of his videos. I don't know if there is scientific study behind it though. Note: I don't think it necessarily means women can't have autism or men have BPD, but they are simply the extremes of the difference between male and female minds.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:03 PM
2

Mother nature is unfortunately even more semantic than that. She cares less about individuals and it ultimately comes down to raw numbers. The amount of mixing of DNA and the numbers humanity had even from early days make the individual events less important. 10 men and 10 women, send 5 men to fight the saber tooth and 3 die, you can still make 10 babies. Send 5 women out and 3 die, now you can only make 7 babies. Ergo, women have inherent value that must be protected. Where the nuclear family i…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 07:57 AM
3

From an evolutionary point of view, he is correct. Women have inherent value because of their reproductive role. This plays out in our instincts and psychology. Now, an appeal to nature isn't a sound argument any more because we are sentient creatures capable of addressing our instincts. With millions of women in the world, their value is just as moot as ours was. It's time to address it and seek change. But keep in mind: Since it is instinct we are fighting against, it will be a long hard slog …
/r/MensRights05/09/17 10:39 PM
2

Perhaps, but my argument wasn't about the lack of a humor tag, it was the lack of relavance. I love good humor, but I came to this sub to discuss mens issues. This joke article would be a better fit in other subs.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 05:01 PM
1

Yes I can't lie, I have painted my shween! Now grab your destiny, if you know what I mean!
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:58 PM
1

Please note that some of us use mobile and cannot see tags. Also note that the humour tag is not an excuse to be off topic or engage in circlejerks.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:26 PM
2

This is satire. Why is this posted here?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:20 PM
2

Currently, yes. In a free market, no.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 01:43 PM
10

And where there is demand, entrepreneurs will be there to fill it.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/17 02:21 AM
3

No soldier I have ever met, from any country, has any respect for the UN. When your ROEs basically amount to "no engaging the enemy unless one of you is killed". Fuck that. They don't care about men.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:16 PM
1

Many of the members regularly post action opertunities. They're lists of issues to be addressed and how to do it. An example is a shitty law being passed: the action opportunity will have the senator's contact info, the name of the bill, and what is wrong with it. Action opertunities can also include upcoming rallies and protests one can attend. This all suggests we are plenty active.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:40 PM
3

Not a problem. Yes, we're here to discuss the failings of our legal system, of women, and particularly feminists. But we're men's rights activists, not male supremacists. So it's important to maintain a balanced perspective. I have no patience for woman haters because it makes us just as bad as feminists. I refuse to let us stoop to their level.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:17 AM
1

You asked Are you suggesting that people with different degrees of melanin are distinct species? The answer is no, in line with what you sincerely hoped. I don't think answering questions, even if somewhat facetiously, is disingenuous. Having explicitly made reference to genes as being the source and cause of tribalism in humans, I see you now switch over to psychology. Yes, because we're talking about someone who wants a child who closely matches his own genes. He wants a white baby because he …
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:01 AM
4

Thank you. Many here seem to agree with you.... at least on that point.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:48 AM
4

Want to tell us where the mean lady touched you? Jesus dude...
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:37 PM
7

Your blatant contempt for women is not what the Men's Rights movement is about. It's not welcome here. "Only sith [and feminists] deal in absolutes".
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:16 PM
1

Are you suggesting that people with different degrees of melanin are distinct species? If you take a robotically literal interpretation of what I was explaining without trying to apply the base concept to the circumstances, yes, I can see how you might think that's what I meant. But no, it's not what I meant. Don't be a robot. He's talking about adoption - you appear not to be. Evolution and your genes shapes your instincts and psyche 80/20 over your personal experiences according to separated-t…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:07 PM
15

Wow. Dude. Chill. Nobody here is a loser, just calm the fuck down. Yes, due to our higher aggression, men are statistically more likely to do this kind of thing in general. But in the case of violence against children, women are more likely to be abusers and murderers. Post-partum depression and more time spent around kids can lead to these sorts of incidents. No need to get your gimmies rustled over someone saying men can be vile.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:24 PM
1

I'd want a white child too. Evolution isn't an organism trying be best, the organism is merely a vehicle for genes. Genes want to replicated, they want to spread. A species that doesn't have a preference for those similar to itself won't be successful at spreading. This is why humans are tribalistic by nature. Your genes have a preference for your own. We protect our young because they carry our genes, we protect our loved ones because they gave us ours, we prefer our race because they share man…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:17 PM
8

Bear Grilles: the Island, season 2. Men on one tropical island, women on another. Men were eating crocodile in a well built shelter and playing volleyball on their free time. Women were starving to death in the sand being eaten by sandflies....
/r/MensRights31/08/17 02:56 PM
2

It's Trailer Miffed. Who fucking cares? We aren't feminists, we aren't in the business of overanalyzing people for percieved grievances.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:46 PM
3

I used to watch Steve when he was more focused on religion and did readings on his channel. I forgot about him for a while and didn't hear a thing about him until someone else pointed out how much of an SJW moron he was. I went to check on him and holy shit. That dude went from 100 to 0 in a hurry. It also looked like his wife was manipulating him (his body language showed fear and apprehension around her, like he thought she would smack him if he didn't keep her and other women on a pedestal). …
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:39 PM
9

If it was, MensRights would be a default too. At the time 2XC became a default, they had between 100k and 200k subscribers, same as us now.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 07:27 PM
25

If there had been a large active community of men discussing men's issue for a long period of time it would probably be a default sub Uh.... Do you know where you are?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 06:57 PM
3

Always has ideal body (never gets fat or has achne problems... Unless you're into that), never complains, is always willing, and it's a one time cost with no hidden fees (besides maybe repair costs if you don't take proper care of it). The only down sides I see is that you can't take them out anywhere and they aren't great conversationalists (then again, neither are some women).
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:06 PM
13

If they were, they would make less than they do now. As it is, many sports leagues garnish male wages to help pay for the female wages and league. Women don't attract enough viewers to even operate.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:30 PM
5

So this man is literally going to be murdered because two girls got paid to make false confession. Meanwhile, the judge is refusing to even look at DNA evidence pointing to his innocence. What the actual fuck is wrong with the criminal system here? Why would the judge let someone die before reviewing impirical evidence?
/r/MensRights21/08/17 02:37 PM
1

Christopher Boehm While for the most part I agree with his statements about human nature, term use differences and how human nature organized us I think are a bit different. In Evo Psych, alpha characteristics aren't psychopathic. An alpha is characterized by the valued virtues of the given culture. For early man, valued virtues were those that improved the survival of the clan. Strength, not just of body but of mind. A relatable analogy would be wolves: The pack's alpha isn't just decided throu…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:51 AM
1

In these societies meat (and women) were shared equally. Any "alpha male" behavior was considered socially deviant. If a man attempted to dominate his fellows he was first ridiculed, then banished, then if necessary killed. This is the polar opposite from what I learned studying Evo Psych. Do you have a source? From what I know, Alpha behavior wasn't considered taboo until until early civilization and organized religion (monarchs and religious leaders - 'alpha males' themselves - thought it a th…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:13 AM
1

You're confusing socialism and communism. In communism, means of production is owned by the community (workers). In socialism, government owns means of production and distributes wealth and goods based on need, as Hitler advocated for in 1939 (After the events involving Strasser, who's ideas more closely resembled communism). Hitler, as I described in my last comment, had successfully built a (mostly) socialist economic system with vast welfare and social safety structures.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 06:19 AM
1

Then it isn't really Nazism, it's just white supremacy. So they're literally identical to Antifa, just with a different target for their racist hatred. Then again, there's a number of Antifa that are socialist...
/r/MensRights20/08/17 06:07 AM
1

I have, the socialists he rounded up were dissidents against him. It was a political purge, much like many other tyrannical socialist leaders. That he did that doesn't mean he wasn't socialist. Many of his policies were socialist. With 17 million Germans receiving assistance under the auspices of National Socialist People’s Welfare (NSV) by 1939, the agency “projected a powerful image of caring and support.”[4] The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 02:40 AM
6

My father. Alpha by everything we discuss here and decided to play on a higher difficulty by commiting and making me. His brother is a business man and while his business is small, I've still learned about entrepreneurship and finances. I joined the army at 18 and had two excellent superiors worth note who passed on leadership skills and helped temper me as a person. My Sargeant and one of my Master Corperals. My male teachers (what few there were) were all fat pussies, I gained little there but…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/17 08:43 PM
5

Nazis aren't capitalist... Nazi literally stands for the National Socialist German Workers' Party. They weren't pure socialist (in actions), but they certainly weren't capitalist and instead sought the district in of capitalist systems..
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:23 PM
7

As a conservative, I'm sick to death of Nazis and White Supremacists being labeled the same. The principals of Nazism and Identity Politics are fundamentally opposed to conservative values of meritocracy and personal liberty/responsibility. They aren't conservatives any more than Antifa is. In fact, from where I stand, the only ideological difference between Antifa and Nazis is which race they hate. They are otherwise indistinguishable. No patriot or proud American would dare wave a Nazi flag on…
/r/MensRights19/08/17 03:59 PM
1

Wuah! Reminds me of when my girlfriend tried to make me watch RuPaul's Drag Race. There's something about drag queens that genuinely creeps me out. It confuses the shit out of my brain and leaves me with a sensation best described as fear or maybe anxiety. No offence to drag and trans folks, but you're genuinely creepy to me. I'm sure you're all good people but I want nothing to do with that kind of thing.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:07 PM
4

It didn't the first time, so don't hold your breath.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/17 03:41 PM
3

It's a relic from culturaly Victorian times, essentially.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/17 03:40 PM
7

Yes, that's when you use gauze and sterile cleaning implements. Your mouth is probably the filthiest part of you. It's rare that a bite from a human avoids infection. Our mouths are teaming with bacteria. So even if we hope that these people aren't perverts (despite a job like that being more attractive to certain people...), this practice is still medically unsound in the extreme.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/17 03:31 PM
1

One would think evolution has put that shit on lockdown. Look at our anus, it practically deals in disease, yet problems are rare.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:22 AM
3

no, it was a generalization for the sake of humor. Of course women go for exams and pap smears and all that jazz. But lets be honest, it's not nearly as often as when they go because something downstairs has adopted a funky odor.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:39 PM
1

"There's more vasectomies to be done" Jesus Christ....
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:30 PM
3

You want to show you have emotions, you don't want them to see those emotions. That's the difference. You can say what makes you sad or angry, but avoid actually showing sadness or anger. This makes you interesting and human while still demonstrating strength and restraint.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/17 03:37 PM
5

Penises, testes and foreskins are beautiful too. Cleaner as well (well, maybe the uterus is an exception. If that thing is dirty we have a problem). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and many of us either think both are gross or both are beautiful. I fit in the later group.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:29 PM
5

Given your job, you don't think you might be a little bias? Women don't come to you because everything downstairs is healthy. I wonder what a Urologist would say...
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:27 PM
-6

Uh oh, did I trigger you? lol
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:36 AM
2

Yeah, that Trudeau meme kinda gives it away.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:19 PM
-3

That said, when violence was used on us, we sure hit back hard. Why is the Whitehouse white again?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:12 PM
3

Which is horribly backwards. White supremacy is still identity politics, just on the other extreme. It's why us conservatives get pissed off for being lumped in with the "alt-right" and white supremacists. Those people are still playing that stupid game. Conservatives, by comparison, are anti-identity politics. We're meritocratic, thus egalitarian. Your worth is based on character and accomplishments, not skin colour or demographic.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:16 PM
1

Well, yeah... We work more... Its just like women being more likely to abuse babies... because they're around them more. That said, there does need to be more support groups and assistance for men to use for this problem. The lack of outreach by troubled men isn't helped by the fact that there's not many places to reach out to.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 10:49 PM
1

Not so much wealth, but prowess. A gold watch and suit aren't the only signs of that. Scars, a touch of grey hair, a body that is in shape with good musculature, etc can also show this.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 10:36 PM
1

Damn rights.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:03 PM
2

I have to credit Karen (/u/girlwriteswhat) for most of that. She dismantled the feminist No True Scotsman argument a while back and I saved that shit just in case.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:02 PM
2

Get off the cross, we need the wood, buds. Personality and empathy disorders are more rampant in feminism than corruption in the government. It's not all of feminism, sure, but its not a small enough factor to ignore. Saying that it's petty is ignoring part of the problem with feminism. How do you fix a problem if you're unwilling to acknowledge part of the cause?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:53 AM
0

I'm more refuting that we didn't evolve a mechanism. Modesty is a relatively new phenomenon, so evolution has less to do with why porn can have negative influences.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 10:35 PM
0

Mate guarding doesn't mean hiding your escapades. It just meant that the stronger men had larger harems than the subordinate men. So you're still going to catch tribes members fucking. Maybe not as much as you can access porn, but that's why I always advocate moderation. Porn is a tool, use it properly and its benefits will outweigh the problems.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 10:32 PM
5

Who tf isn't a feminist in 2017? Only 18% of women polled identify as feminist in Canada and the US. In Europe, it's as low as 7%. So... roughly 88% of women. a book might describe slavery, but since you've personally never seen a slave, that must mean that slavery doesn't exist That the negative is also false doesn't make the positive true. There's also a wealth of other sources to back up that slavery existed, including examples of places where slavery is still the norm, such as the Middle Eas…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:39 PM
-3

Uh... Before we invented clothing and religion made sex a private affair, how do you think our ancestors lived?
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 06:25 PM
15

I don't want to bang any of these women. Loose, fucked a million other men, fake tits, shallow dead personalities, and most are so unstable they're just as likely to key your car as look at you. Sure, there's diamonds in the rough, but they're rare and usually already have steady relationships (though I can't speak for the cuckolding those guys are getting). I can see the appeal in some of their looks (not what I'm into, personally), but some of us want women for a little more than a fuck-and-ch…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 06:21 PM
5

I'm not a Christian, I don't go by what's written in a book, I go by observable and testable reality. A book might say Feminists are pro-equality, the reality is quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:09 PM
3

You know reddit is +18, right? By your reading comprehension I'm starting to wonder if you lied on that part. I just explained why it's in OP's post and how that's not necessarily calling all feminists are mentally ill. You ignored it whole sale and continue to do so even now. OP's post isn't attacking individuals but the ideology, as a whole. I don't know how else to explain this to you, it's a pretty simple concept.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:59 PM
1

BUT mental illness is a contributing factor to the rabid and apethetic nature of it, HENCE... You missed a key part of that sentence; the qualifier statement.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:54 PM
2

Men's nipples are also an erroneous zone. Assuming you're not suffocating in chest hair, get your partner to give them some gentle flicks with her tongue (hell, if (s)he's OK with the hair, get him/her to do it anyways). It's not likely to be orgasm worthy, but it's definitely a pleasant sensation.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:01 PM
7

I haven't seen or heard anyone make the claim that all feminists are mentally ill. But mental illness is a contributing factor to the rabid and apethetic nature of it, hence its inclusion in the cart in OP's picture.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:09 PM
14

Narcissism and Borderline Personality are recognized metal disorders. They fuel much of the discourse at the upper levels of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:00 PM
5

Pot, meet Kettle.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:32 PM
1

Basically, cats give all the same things women love from men, but are easier to control and don't do the bad things some men do. Basically trading men's productivity for ease of control.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:49 PM
15

As Jordan Peterson said, if you put a qualifying word in front of "justice", it isn't justice. Examples: social justice and vigilante justice. Justice, by definition, must be evenly distributed. It cannot have qualifiers.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:48 PM
15

Exactly. Free market, let it sell. It just helps us to identify the cunts we want nothing to do with.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 03:01 PM
4

More lessons to be shared.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 09:57 PM
3

How about we trim those mouth flaps a bit? Maybe it will stop them badgering vulnerable new parents. Lips are pretty sensitive too, so it makes a decent analog.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 09:19 PM
7

I’m now 23, and can count the number of times guys have gone down on me on two hands (without closing and reopening those hands, I mean. I’m talking fewer than 10 times). I'm 26 and I haven't had that many sexual partners at all, just makes the next pretentious line even worse: This isn’t me bragging about my blow job skills or my number of sexual partners (many of those blow jobs were on the same guy. My sex and dating life is pretty shit). Your sex life is shit? Lol At least you have one unlik…
/r/MensRights29/07/17 11:00 PM
13

Here is a study that comprehensively looks at the natural seating posture for males vs female and how that is effected by anatomical differences. This shows the bear bones differences between the sexes' hip bones. As you can see, men have a much narrower hip bone which places the legs closer together. Add in a pair of nuts that really don't like pressure and it should be no surprise men don't like sitting with their knees together.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:46 PM
10

Same goes for manspreading. I'm sitting this way so I don't crush my balls. But if you want to sit next to me, all you have to do is say so and I'll adjust to make room for you.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:35 PM
2

they are going to continue to complain and kick up a fuss every time. So we push them to shut up. Our action should be to remove the demonization of showing women in the same positions men have been put in. We can even use their own equality rhetoric to do it. If you're going to yell, let it be for freedom, not more regulation and demonization. The world has enough negativity and restrictions.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:47 AM
0

My approach is far from "sit by and let it happen and say nothing". Saying nothing lead to the double standard. I agree that the double standard needs to go. The only difference between us is which direction we should take it. Ban both vs allow both. I'm for allowing both, feminist autistic screeching be damned.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:09 PM
1

Yes, and I would like that to change. If we aren't outraged by one, why are we outraged by the other?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:35 PM
0

Can we lead by example and stop being petty? I'd rather see equal commercials doing this to women rather than shut down both. This is stupid. The goal should be bringing every one up: more freedom for everyone, not less.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:31 PM
112

Yeah, lots of us have seen it, we're not the ones in need of convincing.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:13 PM
16

I'm still waiting for the fight you part. It's punch a Nazi day! Oh, hey! It's a Nazi!
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 08:05 PM
1

The cringe that was watching a bunch of fat feminists and their neckbeard slaves I mean white knights I mean "friends" at range practice. Their weapon discipline and marksmanship skill was so bad I'm honestly more afraid of them accidentally shooting themselves/eachother than me. Antifa with guns is scary for all the wrong reasons.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:34 PM
3

Yes, which is why I said. Male disposability maybe... But to claim it is misandry is a positive claim requiring knowledge of motives. That's knowledge which we don't have. They may very well either have a different reason for letting him drown, or they may also have let a women drown.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:52 PM
4

If it were feminism she would have simply denied that what she did was wrong all the way to the prison. Then she would have wrote a book about being treated unfairly when she gets out of prison.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:46 PM
4

And what mental illness is that, pray tell? Because it sounds like sociopathy and/or narcessism to me, and those are not disorders that offer any legal defense.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:35 PM
5

They point to the motive. So allow me to rephrase: We don't know that it was misandry because we don't know whether this was because the casualty was a man or if it was just because these kids were assholes, under the influence, didn't want to risk swimming out, etc. Frankly, the idea seems a stretch that they let him die just because he was a man.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:26 PM
4

That's not what depraved indifference murder is. Depraved Indifference to Human Life involves acting with indifference to risks to human life. It would in many cases be an addon to manslaughter. Inaction resulting in the death of someone not associated with you is not a crime. He died because he drowned, not because someone drowned him. He wandered into the lake of his own accord, the bystanders had nothing to do with it. Now, if they had been the only ones around and hadn't at least contacted e…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:11 PM
2

Fair enough. I apologize if I came across as hostile. I'm just a Canadian gun owner and I get tired of all the slander against firearms and the lies about gun ownership. So I'm probably a little over-sensitive to such rhetoric. I'm sure many Americans feel similarly. Suicide is a serious issue, but taking away my right to own a firearm for sport and home defense won't solve it.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:17 PM
7

Male disposability maybe (I think it's just poorly raised kids), but this isn't misandry. The bystanders are all men. When men mistreat eachother it isn't misandry any more than women abusing women is misogyny. As a side note, you're under no legal obligation to help someone out of a situation they put themselves into, male or female. While their actions demonstrate a harsh lack of empathy, it is not illegal.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:01 PM
4

What purpose does it serve pointing out that half of suicides are done with a gun? That's only the case in the US where guns are common. You look anywhere with similar suicide rates and the mechanism changes to ingesting pesticide (China) or hanging (UK). The mechanism of suicide will always be the easiest form, that it is guns in the US is simply circumstancial.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:36 PM
3

To play Devil's Advocate: One could argue that you do it so much to dominate women that you have made it habit.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:38 PM
6

Steven Crowder obliterates the argument here.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:23 PM
5

Because humans are individualistic. While the overwhelming majority of society has a bias towards women, the leaders can be comprised of those women who are exceptions. An example would be mothers or sisters of men who suffered false accusations of rape or commited suicide under societal pressures. Another being daughters who saw their fathers destroyed in custody battles. Karen Straughan comes to mind (she frequents here, so I apologize if I bastardized your name, Karen. Mobile sucks for multit…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:17 PM
4

No, it has to be female led because if a male leads it, lack of empathy for men will lead to it being criticized or ignored. It's only when a women complains that people will actually listen. Did you miss the part where the empathy gap was explained?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:17 PM
310

Good Samaritan laws protected him from the white knight idiot that called the police. Instead of arresting him, they put him up for a certificate of commendation for saving her life.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:39 PM
2

((psst! Look at the edit to the post))
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:32 PM
4

So women and evil men are the only people he gives a single hot damn about. Sounds like he wants law-abiding men to become his enemies. History shows that doesn't tend to be wise for governmental powers.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:32 PM
3

He said "both male and females have equal rights as parents"... While I did catch that he's saying word of law isn't being applied as written, I was simply pointing out we don't even have equal laws, let alone equal application.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:52 PM
2

What purpose does condemnation serve? It's just words. It's sad to say, but politicians have bigger fish to fry. And let's be honest, do we really want to be pissing off Russia? Our relationship with them is already tenuous at best. The idea that the cold war is over is myth. Behind closed doors, it's all about posturing and keeping a leg up on the other nuclear powers. Isis is currently the larger threat along side immigration. We need to keep politicians focused on those issue before we can ta…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:10 PM
2

Not necessarily. Enter "tender years doctrine".
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:06 PM
2

Baking soda is biologically friendly (mostly, avoid ingesting). It will not neutralize the acid, but it will significantly reduce its acidity, making rinsing with water more effective. You can get aerosol cans of baking soda acid neutralizer from most hardware and Autoparts stores as it is needed when handling battery acid.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:55 PM
3

Education is not a right. It's a service provided by other people. To give you the right to education we would have to force other people to provide that service, which would be endentured servitude. Rights are things you would possess in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:02 PM
13

And because they let these girls (I refuse to call them women) do this, those girls never learn that what they're doing is horribly immoral behavior. They learn that it's ok to cheat and be impulsive with no regard for conciquences.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:34 PM
1

Your point? Every group has extremists; Feminism, MRAs, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, etc. But when the moderates in western countries condone or applaud the extremists, you have a problem. Nobody applauds Nazis or KKK. 1/4 muslims polled in Britain believed Sharia law should be held above the local laws, 1/2 believed women should be subservient to men, and 3/4 believed homosexuality should be illegal, and that's just the ones comfortable enough to admit it. Exact numbers aren't known, but it'…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:30 PM
1

You don't have the first clue what you're talking about. At their core, Christianity and Islam are philosophically opposed. Christianity is a religion of repentance (you are guilty and must make amends) and Islam is the religion of retribution (they are guilty and must be punished). But what I said wasn't about Christianity. It was about feminists directly supporting a religion that is uniquely infected by extremist beliefs that lead to terrorism and violence, particularly to the groups Feminism…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 07:40 PM
2

Good for the mind (maybe, debatable) but bad for the prostate.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:17 PM
3

If evo-psych is to be considered credible (my research on it is limited), it does make sense. Men are more capitalist by nature because we are hunters and traders. Our higher reasoning promotes voluntary exchanges for goods and favors. Women are more socialist because they are the oft recipients of gifts which they are dependant upon when bearing children. They can't hunt or even defend themselves as well when pregnant, so they are dependant on handouts to survive. Women are human beings, men ar…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:56 PM
1

3 years in prison, 3 suspended (so nothing), and 5 years probation.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:28 PM
12

Change the culture of autism? I don't think mental disorders count as a cultural phenomenon. If you mean the culture of autistic people being the ones who go into stem, that's not a thing either: autistic people tend to be the ones going into stem because they tend to be the ones who perform best at those jobs. While they lack in social capabilities, they tend to be a much higher functioning in areas like logic and mathmatics. People have a strong tendancy to prefer jobs they are good at.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:31 PM
1

Apostolical approach, not dissimilar to how trolls worked back when trolling was an art form. Basically, come at them from a position of curiosity hoping to understand them. Ask quests, look for contradictions in their explanations and ask about them. The idea is to force them to actually think about how stupid their own beliefs are.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 09:39 PM
1

I think you have classical liberalism and modern liberalism confused. Libertarianism and authoritarianism have switched political sides. The left has become as authoritarian as conservatives used to be, with intersectionality and cultural Marxism taking the place of religion. Conservatives want to bring us back to tradition as they always have, but because of how far society as swing left, that now means going back to "old ways" of liberty and freedom. Religion has largely fallen to the wayside,…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:16 PM
1

We're trained to be disgusted by homosexuality? Really? Did you by chance miss the part where I said I have first hand experience? If it was society that made me disgusted, I wouldn't have gotten to that point. I'm disgusted by it after my own experience. Society doesn't enter into it. It seems you and I both need to be careful of our assumptions of people's motivations and opinions.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:20 PM
12

I'm straight. I'd take the dog shit over gay relationship any day too. I have nothing against you guys, but it literally makes me sick to my stomach to consider bedding another man. I just... Can't do it, and believe me I've tried. So if straight guys feel like this about gay relationships, it shouldn't be any suprise that at least some gay men feel that way about straight relations.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:39 PM
6

I tried being gay once. Did not enjoy it. No chemistry, no attraction, and no fucking clue what we were doing... Yeah, it solidly affirmed that I am indeed straight as they get. That parents are trying to force that awkward experience on a toddler is fucken' retarded. Do you want your son to hate everything that you two bitches are? This is how you create homophobia; by forcing homosexuality on someone that wants none of it.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:36 PM
1

A bot responding to a bot...
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:33 PM
4

Does it have a penis and eyeballs? It's objectifying a poor defenseless woman. Does she feel like someone might have maybe, somehow looked at her? She's being objectified!
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:38 PM
4

I'm still singing the original when called upon to sing the anthem. Out of respect for the men who died for this country (the ones who's sacrifices had "sons" put in the anthem in the first place).
/r/TheRedPill21/06/17 02:18 PM
22

Yup. Our genes have become carriers for industrial grade stupid. Stupid people are passing on the stupid.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:22 PM
2

Might have been him. Between the heat, the weight of his gear, and the girl, he's hauling ass. He's also a bit of an old timer, so he's not exactly in his prime. I imagine the grunting was just strain. I've seen a few pictures of him after this video and he doesn't have any visible injuries.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:07 PM
1

When you destroy a tribe and behead its members, it's not an eviction, it's a slaughter. How could you would look at what is written and call the slaying of hundreds of people who had just helped him an "eviction"? That is both dishonest and devoid of empathy for those who were killed.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:11 PM
1

Here is 109 verses And here, Mohammed slaughters 3 Jewish tribes. He beheaded 800 men from the last one. And that was after they had given their hospitality to help him get to Mecca. So they helped him and he slaughtered them. It's important to note that he is seen as the perfect man, an example to live by. Is it any wonder anti-Semitism is such a problem in the Muslim world?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:38 PM
1

Yes, there are many muslims who are already enlightened as individuals. In their own way, they have rationalized compatibility with other religions and western values. However, the Quran also has many texts advocating and even demanding the destruction of non-believers. I believe I once saw a list of such lines that numbed 109 entries. That's just the Quran, the Hadiths also are not exactly peaceful in their opinion of non-Muslims. The trouble comes in that while people such as yourself will int…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:27 PM
0

Time for a history lesson: Jihad is an activity almost as old as Islam itself (It's a very heavily emphasized part of their holy texts). The conflict has been going steady since the crusades when Islam launched an assault on Europe and managed to capture or convert most of Europe almost as far as modern-day France. The Christians launched a counter attack near Jerusalem and Israel to save their enslaved brothers and strike fear into Muslims. While it worked for a while, the Muslims never really …
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:08 PM
6

Most generals see themselves as fathers. They don't willingly throw their "sons" on death row. No, the corruption comes from higher than generals.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:04 PM
0

Yeah, maybe it started that way, but both before and especially after it has become a holy war. Those people want to kill us. Who or why it started doesn't matter anymore.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:02 PM
1

Couldn't have. She didn't give a name, and they couldn't turn up any suspects because it never happened. If I wanted to grasp at straws, this could be a racial or sex hate crime. She (a young Asian girl) basically sent the cops to arrest a random white guy.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:06 PM
6

I live in Canada... don't remind me of that bill. Fuck, this country has gone to the snowflakes.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:04 AM
104

Forcing your child to be gay and genderless is exactly the same as forcing a trans gay child to be cis and straight. Didn't we spend decades fighting that sort of thing?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:58 PM
2

I was 120 lbs from 7th grade, all the way through a 3 year contract in the Armored Corps (Canada). Only now, 5 years later, working in an autoparts warehouse, have I finally rocketed to a healthier 180 lbs.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 03:45 PM
1

Two idiots' lies about fake girlfriends caught up with them after police responded to a report of rape. How is this a men's rights issue? I'm seriously not seeing the connection. Is it because the police responded? Police need to respond to every call that a serious crime took place, they don't get to claim you cried wolf.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:27 PM
1

I'm sure most here have already covered most points, so I will only address one: you said you are concerned your child might find it odd that his penis doesn't look like yours. I can assure you he will not. My step father and biological father were both circumcised, I was not. I never thought that it was weird in the slightest. I was curious, but when I asked about it he simply explained that his had been cut when he was a baby and he decided not to do it to me so I could choose for myself. That…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:47 PM
1

Editing one post isn't impressive.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:00 PM
1

That's nice of you to say.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:34 PM
1

Sure. Couldn't possibly be him getting notified because you linked his username, then seeing your threat, then replacing it.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:28 PM
1

See? What did I tell you? lol
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:21 PM
1

Perhaps, but even in America, death threats are not protected as free speech under the 1st amendment, harmless or not.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:45 PM
1

Careful, death threats are a quick way to get banned even from this sub. But metaphorically I do agree with you. This site has gone down the toilet.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:29 PM
1

Considering the number of subs that have banned me for BS SJW reasons (many of which might not even explicitly be SJW subs), I'm inclined to believe the rules are only for us to follow. The rest of the site is free to disregard them on whatever grounds they wish and nothing will be done. Don't forget that the past two CEOs of Reddit (The current and the interim before him) are both open SJWs themselves.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 03:25 PM
1

You didn't want to post to 2X anyways. It would be absolutely devoid of any point. You're not missing out on anything.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:48 PM
1

Such as? Besides one or two notions, such as circumcision and the nature of sexual orientation, I find most of what he says agreeable.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:00 PM
23

Sort of like how Milo is the "Dangerous Faggot"?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:17 PM
5

And they argue it isn't a religion... Same circular reasoning and claim to greater inherent knowledge, same shit different pile.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 05:59 PM
10

They're following orders. The question is why the government put him there, and that's a toss up. Oil, appeasement to other political powers, quelling decent, oppressing people... And there's even some meta reasons: if we're at war, we have an excuse to keep military budgets high, thus taxes high. Shave a little off the top for uncle Sam and government employees can pay their mortgages.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/17 04:07 PM
4

Not just. Infanticide by mothers often gets blamed on mother's mental state (she was abused as a child/ husband made her do it/ she was desperate/ etc), stripping her of agency and allowing her minimal punishment or even getting away with it entirely.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:49 PM
1

Scottia Pilgrim vs the World.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:09 AM
1

They knew men liked women and would give special treatment. I don't think it crossed their minds that women like women too.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:07 AM
8

The comments gave me cancer...
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:01 AM
1

If it's a hunting rifle it can be hard to tell unless the chamber is open. On semi autos the magazine is more obvious. There's ways to quickly identify if a rifle is loaded or not. Pistols are a little harder, so if you have a permit, it may be best to tuck that one out of sight. In Canada, pistols are restricted and cannot be carried outside of lock and key at all and the RCMP must be notified (until recent legislation that makes it easier but a little more semantic).
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:18 PM
8

There's also a difference between holding the gun in your hand with a magazine loaded, vs having the gun slung on your shoulder or in a gun bag. Even in Canada, people know the former is dangerous and the later is just a guy on his way up into the bush for hunting season (unless its in a big city, then people become idiots because they aren't used to seeing it).
/r/MensRights14/05/17 11:22 PM
12

Correct: over consumption. In moderation porn is fine. As with all things, too much is bad, moderation is key.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:01 PM
8

It would also set a court precedent which would help in future cases. The result would be putting schools in a sticky position where they're no longer able to safely bypass due process. This would make it financially unsound for them not to fix their policies.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 10:33 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 07:23 PM
2

Signing bonus. Some companies go that high. A friend of mine was offered $500k signing bonus for Telus.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:12 PM
3

I live in Maple Ridge, not far from Burnaby. I've been hearing about this bitch for a while. Nobody I have heard from knows what her issue is, but from her behavior outside of these assaults it is thought she is skitzophrenic or otherwise seriously mentally ill.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:48 PM
6

No shit. "Gender neutral acting awards"? The only people who give a shit about an award being gendered are feminists. Who do you think feminists are going to give an award to? Of course they went to women.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 09:18 PM
2

Yup. The mainstay of TRP is self improvement and little else. That this often means advice on how to appeal to women and how to exploit our social system safely is only because sex is an important part of most men's lives.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:23 PM
2

Private businesses should have as much right to pick and choose their clients as clients have to choose their business. Don't like it? Go somewhere else, it's the business that misses out on a client's money. This is a non issue.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:25 PM
12

And every sewage treatment engineer will hate you for life.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 06:38 PM
3

Yup. We'll use sex dolls for fun and clone ourselves with artificial wombs! We won't need women anymore! Oh shit, now I sound like feminists claiming men are no longer necessary.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 03:51 PM
0

Plausible deniability. He talks and acts like he's licensed, offers the kinds of services typically only licensed practitioners should be offering. Then he escapes criticism by having never explicitly stated that he's licenced. Would you be ok with a dentist offering dental services without a license, then when the authorities come knocking his excuse is "I never said I was licensed, and I stated in this fine print on a poster in the storage cabinet that I'm not licensed. So my customers aught t…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:29 PM
1

Many would say they tell you they want a sensitive man because such a man can be more easily controlled/exploited for resources, which is the primary sexual strategy for a woman. A secret one-night stand can secure the genes and a sensitive man can supply the finances.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:44 PM
2

Exactly. Some of the arguments why women shouldn't vote are based on the self destructive tendencies of female voters. This doesn't mean women shouldn't vote, but they may need a cultural adjustment and a good education so they don't make those mistakes at the box.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:07 PM
2

They may point at Paul Elam. He's said some stupid shit and he's an MRA. Though I think many of us tend to disavow him when he says said stupid shit.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:04 PM
6

Dude, seriously. I'm seeing nothing but red flags from this woman. There's plenty of fish in the sea. If you think getting snipped works, do it. But holy hell, you should be considering getting out while you can.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 04:44 PM
1

Earlier a thread was completely derailed by people complaining because OP used "cuck" like an Australian uses "cunt". Nothing offensive was meant by it. Yet everyone steamrolled him for it. We've already become like feminists. Was it a mature thing for that OP to call us? Probably not. But we're getting so pedantic we can't even have a conversation without it devolving into people getting offended at words used. I would have figured we have thicker skin after all the shit some of us are here to …
/r/MensRights24/04/17 07:59 PM
2

Ok, let's try having this conversation again. This time, let's not derail it with how offended we are about OP using a word.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 02:35 PM
2

I'm not sure what this has to do with Men's Rights. Could you explain?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:24 PM
-1

Jesus Christ..... Guys, Google changes the search results based on your browsing history! You created your search results based on browsing habits! It isn't Google's fault you look for women when you browse for porn. Google is an automated system. It would publicly aggregious and a complete waste of money/time for them to go out of their way to program a bias into a search engine. Jebus cripes, this place has become a giant jercle cirk.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:18 PM
3

I know a 14 yo who looks like she's in her early 20s (a solid 8, too). Though I realize she's just a kid whenever she opens her stupid mouth. Special pronouns, pansexual, vegan "cuz da poor animals!" (She lives on a farm, in case it wasn't ridiculous enough on its own) and all the rest of that delusional crap.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/17 09:23 PM
12

Yup. Good functioning reproductive equipment is pretty much priority #1 in evolutionary terms.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 06:01 PM
15

To be fair, evolution and natural selection aren't perfect. We have a nerve for our jaw (iirc) that goes from the brain, down around the heart, then back up to where it is supposed to go. He eat and breath through the same pipes, excrete waste and have sex with the same tools, and have an appendix that has a higher chance of exploding and killing you than of actually being useful. And nobody has any idea what the fuck a pinky toe is for. That said, the foreskin has more than a few uses. It conta…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 04:08 PM
2

If The Island survival series and Naked and Afraid taught me anything, it's that the majority of women will starve before becoming productive enough to survive. Lacking both motivation and knowledge required. The few women that have what it takes to overcome this stage will inherit what is left and likely won't make it long in a decimated and depopulated world.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:53 PM
1

Perhaps not politicians per se, but there is considerable overlap between socialism and feminism. Feminism has significant political influence, ergo socialism is a heavily influential ideology in politics. It is, after all, a major contributor to the rise of socialized services from our governments. Free-market capitalists don't tend to see socialized services as the ideal solution to problems like poverty, healthcare and education.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:57 PM
3

Meh, experience suggests they'll probably still say men did it.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 06:58 AM
1

Because, at least for the moment, robots can't adequately replace the emotional or social component to an intimate relationship. Once a robot can accurately emulate emotion, conversation, empathy, and all the other complex aspects to a human-human engagement, we have bigger issues to tackle. Issues such as "where do we draw the line in what is a robot and what is a person (even if not specifically human)?" But until then, it's just a juiced up sex toy and no substitute for a real human. The issu…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:03 PM
3

So it's an opinion rather than a judgement. Fair enough. I've always seen sex dolls as just a very advanced masturbatory device, no more questionable than a dildo or a sleeve. Sex with another living person is an entirely different affair, both morally and philosophically. Edit: to add: I also think sex dolls would give a much needed boost to the sexual market place. If masturbation becomes a more enjoyable act, it will mean people need to take the time to be more engaged with real partners to k…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:33 PM
1

People would be more giving if they weren't so often forced to be. Charity breeds charity. Theft (taxes) breeds resentment.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:25 PM
3

You're forgetting that men's superior upper body strength isn't self-induced. It's the result of testosterone's effect on muscle growth and recovery. The heart and lungs are muscles too. Men generally outperform women in endurance sports as well. How many men have been busted for using steroids (artificial testosterone) in endurance sports like cycling?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:23 PM
2

Robots used for sex shouldn't be a thing altogether. I'm not a part of the quibble between you and u/Liv47, but I am curious about this particular statement. Is there a reason why you are against sex robots?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 08:14 PM
46

Why does the perpetrator need to be women?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:32 PM
3

Slut walks are like watching a train wreck... A trainwreck celebrating being a trainwreck while blaming society for its crumpled up cars.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:28 PM
19

Height is a big one women judge men on these days too. If you're over 6 feet tall, your chances of success with women rise sharply.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:16 PM
3

The distinction between this and the "There is no god" type of atheist is subtle but important for the discussion. No, I completely understand where you're coming from. What I'm trying to say is that I don't think many atheists at all hold the "God does NOT exist" stance. From what I have seen, most who say they think god does not exist are simply disposing of semantics. In case you haven't yet realized, atheists are anything but unified. Every one of us holds not just different opinions on the …
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:51 PM
3

Well, since there's no evidence to the existance of a god or gods, pragmatically, it makes sense to think and act under the assumption that there's no god. Also, linguistically it is easier to say there's no god than to lay out the details of skepticism in normal conversation. Most of those atheists you speak of would likely change their stance if shown evidence of God's existance. Until then, why act under the assumption that some mystical sky daddy is judging you for your every move when there…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:03 PM
3

At least most atheists take the time to understand the religions they debate. Perhaps it would be wise for you to do the same for them. Your whole dismissal of atheism is based on a poor strawman. Atheism is not a belief there is no God. It is a lack of belief that there is a God. It's the neutral position: "I am not convinced". Think of the Schroedinger's Cat: Theists believe God is in the box, anti-theists believe there is no god in the box, and atheists say there's not enough evidence to conc…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:17 PM
2

The look on her face says he's getting more than a sandwich for his act of kindness.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:51 PM
4

Free bleed for feminism!
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:34 PM
1

As Gavin McGinnis put it: if women were as horny as men, that's how the world would work. It's not.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:00 PM
5

And big budgets. See, branches of the government funded by the tax payer are incentivized to spend money on their department. Each fiscal year, the budget is redrawn based primarily on how much of the previous year's budget was used, so they have to burn money in order to ensure steady flow of income to their department. There's also very little oversight on what the budget is used for, and it includes the wages of staff. So even if it goes to installing beer machines in the galley, it's still m…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:38 PM
4

"administrative expenses". You pay more tax than needed for the people on the receiving end. All government programs are this way. Source: I worked for the government.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:27 PM
9

This isn't really news. Through the consistency of anecdotal experience, we've always "known" this. The issue is that government benefits from single mothers dependant on the state more than it does from paired parents depending on each-other. So which situation is government going to push for? Add to that, single mothers are a victim class, so white knights come out of the wood work to throw tax-payer money on them and build social assistance programs. Being a single mom now a days can be a luc…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 03:39 PM
1

You missed addressing the first point I made. Nobody said it was. But thank you for the source: So people who "perceive" less body shaming lose weight "easier". Could it be that those perceiving less discrimination only perceive such because they already have a healthy mind? Could such a healthy mind be the contributor to weight loss, rather than objective absence of discrimination? It's on the right track, but misses some key parts of the argument.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 10:13 PM
1

Then don't make it about body positivity, it should be self-positivity. Leave the body out of it. When we want a smoker to feel good about themselves, we don't call it smoking positivity. As soon as you make positivity focused on their body you send the message that it's ok for them to be an unhealthy weight. Also, I'd like a source for the claim that high-self esteem makes losing weight easier.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:40 PM
1

Maybe because it's promoting unhealthy lifestyles, as is recognized by every physician ever. Whether you are under or overweight, you're cutting your life shorter and setting yourself up for serious health problems. We shouldn't be promoting it, just like we shouldn't be promoting smoking or heavy drinking.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:30 PM
1

Satanic? I didn't get that from this at all. And what the fuck is a Jesuit? Honestly, sounds like you had a rough time, but I think you need help that Redditors cannot provide, because yes, that last part does sound like insane ramblings. "I'm not programmed" to do or think anything. I see with my eyes, I hear with my ears, and I interpret the world through what information I glean from that.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:18 PM
1

I think it's because men work, and politicians who put the environment first do so by destroying job infrastructure in environmentally destructive industries rather than boosting it in environmentally sensitive ones. Think carbon taxes and closing oil fields (looking at you, Trudeau), rather than tax cutting wind Mill or solar construction. Some do both, but the former still too much to sustain high employment rates. So men largely prefer the politicians offering jobs over environment because it…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:52 PM
2

Let's take a minute to member that jediism (yes, from star wars) is an officially recognized religion too. A few crazies that take meninism and fsm seriously doesn't take from what it was made for. The world is a big place, no matter what it is, you'll find someone crazy enough to believe it.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:20 PM
12

That racism exists I have no doubt, I don't think we will ever completely be rid of it. That racism is prevalent enough to be a factor here is where I'm still not convinced. While racists may attack Islam and it's adherents, Muslims, I don't see that as what makes them racist. Attacking a religion and the bad behavior of adherents isn't racism, it's anti-theological. No belief should be above ridicule. Though I have to be careful what I say now in Canada because our PM seems to disagree, based o…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:06 PM
13

beating women into submission would have been worse in terms of results as well as morally. I think the premise behind hypergamy in general is that human brain may know this, but lizard/monkey brain does not. The two conflict, and without a strong foundation of reasoning (which we all know feminists lack) the monkey brain wins.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:01 PM
4

Yup. There's concepts under research and a few options working their way through FDA red-tape (like Vaselgel). But right now, most male birth control options have side effects that would significantly reduce a serviceman's operational effectiveness. It will be a major turning point if/when male birth control that is at least as safe and effective as women's birth control hits market.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:49 PM
23

"half of what I see and none of what I hear". That's my motto when it comes to feminism. The only explanation I have heard that makes any sense as to why feminists defend Islam is hypergamy: western men failed a massive shit-test when we refused to tell feminists "no". We let them get away with murder and demonstrated weakness in our resolve. Islam demonstrated strength in their unyealding ideology, thus feminists do whatever mental gymnastics they have to in order to justify and defend Islam. I…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:44 PM
909

It's basically Flying Spaghetti Monster, but for feminism instead of religion. It's satire, and thus a dig at feminism.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:58 PM
1

Glice shault?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:26 PM
1

She let his dad hug him. So there's that at least :/
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:29 PM
5

Double down! If you stick your fingers in your ears and scream, /r/geocitiesuser can't get you with his vile "truths"!
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:27 PM
2

For what it's worth, she was thrown out by force from a city council meeting after she went on an unwarranted tirade against the police. Apparently she's so deluded that she though the city was conspiring with law enforcement to stalk and harass her and a bunch of other shit.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:48 PM
1

You know what they say about the road to hell.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:10 AM
1

Pursuing a career makes responsible/motivated people happy. FTFY I don't know about you, but all the people I admired were always driven by a desire to contribute to society. No one person can do it all, we have to work together. A career, and to an extent the whole economy, is all about transactions: each person contributing their unique skills, time and abilities to help each other get what they need and want.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 08:04 PM
1

Like I said, "even a busted clock..." This site isn't the Daily Stormer or some-such craziness. But it isn't the paragon of even classical liberalism I once prescribed to. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I can't escape the "Alex Jones" vibe I get from sites like this.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:39 PM
1

I don't approve of much of what they have to say, but even a busted clock is right twice a day. Perhaps addressing the article rather than attacking it's source would be a better use of your time. I am concerned when I hear statistics like the 1% decrease in testosterone in the male population per year. I'm concerned about how feminine men are becoming and what that will mean for both the cultural and physical health of our species. If these chemicals in the water and in products we use every da…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:15 PM
0

Yeah, because you're a paragon of self control! If you caught a man in the act of raping your 5-yo daughter, you wouldn't beat the fuck out of him! /s edit: Once I calmed down from the arrogance of your statement, I decided to give you a rational rebuttal: Self defense can be extended to the defense of those otherwise incapable of defending themselves, such as your children. He was defending his 5-yo child from someone currently engaged in violent sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:02 PM
1

Perhaps I did miss your point. Re-reading it, I still see the same point as the first time. It looks like you're trying to point at a double standard in how this sub is handling two different cases. I am pointing out that there's no double standards, the two cases are quite different. Care to clarify?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:23 PM
2

Really? Could I see a source for that? I personally know a 15yo who looks like she's in her mid 20s. I'm not the only one who thinks this about her. If a 15 year old can look 25-ish, how hard can it be for a 12 year old to look 16?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:21 PM
15

The case youre describing the victim was 5 years old. 12 years old convincing someone that they're 16? A stretch, but plausible. Ive seen girls around 12 that look much older. Not old enough I would be interested, but they can make convincing 16 year olds. Confusing a 5-year old as 16? Not a chance.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:40 PM
1

Well, there's truth to it. If he wanted money, he's in the wrong field. But money isn't why most farmers do what they do. And if they didn't do it, we'd all go hungry.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:17 PM
1

Or you just don't make enough revenue from the type of business you do. Not all services are worth enough to generate high profit margins. If farmers demand more money, food becomes to expensive. Prices are high enough as it is. Some of the tax-benefits on farmers have helped, but they aren't a cure. But it still doesn't answer my question. Forget the car for a minute, consider anything that might be property someone is dependent on to put food on the table. If someone comes to steal it, are you…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:02 PM
1

If it's your livelihood and you don't have insurance? Then what? What if you can't afford insurance? Farming doesn't pay that well.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:44 PM
1

I don't think your girlfriend complimenting you on something she probably thinks you're prideful about counts as objectification...
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:00 PM
1

Jews had quite a bit of political power right up until... Well, I think we all know how that power worked out for them. Fascist guns have a habit of pointing up, not down. The powerful make great scapegoats for the ignorant masses.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/17 06:52 PM
1

Old enough to know what she was doing, clearly. If she were a male, she'd have been branded a predator for life. Then there's Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a terrorist who spent 10 years for two bombings. She lied about herself to gain citizenship in the US. When found out, she was tried for immigration fraud but was given the pussy pass because she had "PTSD". She's now the leader of the Feminist Women's March 2017 Angela Davis, is a Stalinist professor and longtime supporter of the Black Panthers. Aquit…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:10 PM
1

Trump seems like a lauded hero around here I've never heard this. Well he's no saint, but he's also the best of the candidates presented and the closest to being anti-feminist and pro-egalitarian. He also takes an unfair amount of heat from the media for the same bullshit the MRM does. constituency constantly tells me that you can't be an MRA and not be a small-government conservative I've literally never heard this either, as a daily lurker. That said, big liberal government is much more liable…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:59 AM
3

Yes, I am. That and by its other readers. What's the problem? If the overwhelming majority of a movement's leaders, lauded heroes, icons, and public faces are all bigoted anti-male assholes who lie about everyone else being the bigots, why the fuck would I waste my time on that movement?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:13 AM
1

its that we are forced to be so Men aren't attracted to fat women because we're evolutionarily predisposed to find it unattractive. We got that trait and it served to help us sexually weed out bad genetics and ensure the health of our species, so it stuck with us. This isn't body shaming, it's natural preferences. It's the same with successful men, women are attracted to successful men because they have the security of their offspring to worry about. You can't just tell someone to be attracted t…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:28 AM
1

aggression is on the definition of masculine traits at least according to Wikipedia. I would use caution relying on Wikipedia. It's been noted that most of the editors ascribe to social justice dogma and are less than objective in their edits. Use it to find sources (under a page's citation header), but take its self-ascribed definitions and explanations with a shovel of salt. That said, yes, aggression is a masculine trait, one of many behaviors influenced by testosterone. I like romantic shit …
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:02 PM
4

You start with a minimum respect, what one would call common courtesy. If you're a good person, you earn respect. If you're a shit head, kiss courtesy goodbye.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:01 PM
1

I'm aware of the satire. It's bad satire, the two concepts are not related in the slightest, and that she would even jokingly propose cutting off men's ability to have sex in the first place underlines how marginal society views us. Though, between the lines it also demonstrates how few reproductive right men have that she can't aim at one of them to make a comparison that is relatable. masculine to get angry and demand that we kill all men... It's not masculine to get angry, only idiots believe…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:40 PM
2

I still cant see any misandry in /r/feminism Literally the 5th item on their front page: Heroic Lady Politician Proposes Bill That Bans Male Masturbation, Sets “Waiting Time” For Viagra Because killing babies and the ability to get a fuckin' erection are the same thing. Right, she's such a hero. Fuck me, you're blind. theres gonna be a lot of misandry from stupid feminist that dont understand their own toxicity. Might we call it... toxic femininity? Oh, shoot, I'm being a misogynist again, I'm s…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:15 PM
2

When it comes from MR, we call it out. Feminism has, if nothing else, served a great example of what not to do. We've learned from its mystakes how to be genuinely for men without being anti-woman (except in cases where in order for equality to be achieved, women must lose something, such as in parental rights or kangaroo court due process). If we have otherwise failed to keep on top of open misogyny in our group, feel free to point it out and we will investigate it. If your accusation is warran…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:20 PM
3

I think that saying was because book covers can be bland and hide a good book. Most good books don't start with a lie and lead readers to open bigotry.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:14 PM
2

I think /u/ExpendableOne hits the nail on the head, but I want to point one thing out that he/she did not: Red Pill doesn't pretend to be egalitarian, and they aren't on great terms with the MRM. They speak unapologetically about the behaviors they see in modern women and aren't always nice about it, but don't conflate them with us, we aren't related. TwoXC does claim to be feminist and are widely accepted as such. It's erroneous to try and say MRA's have bad apples by bringing up Red Pill. Do b…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:03 PM
5

When your book's cover shows an obvious (to many) lie, every person claiming to have read it is needlessly hateful towards men and apathetic to their problems, it doesn't make the book particularly appealing.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:27 PM
7

The name is a great place to start. Like the cover of a good book, nobody is going to give the pages the time of day if the cover doesn't look promising.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:58 AM
1

I wouldn't say the constitution is perfect. It's very good, but not perfect. I'm a conservative and even I will grant you that. Abortion is a tricky one to tackle, and so as a philosophical question, I think it's best to create an environment where the the more homogeneous majority makes the decision for themselves. The majority in Texas is much different from the majority in California. So I think for a philosophical decision like that, it should fall to states rather than federal government. T…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:50 AM
2

From the evidence I've thus far been presented, where life begins seems entirely subjective and up to each person's interpretation. As such, I would say, despite leaning towards conception myself (thus closer to pro-life), that choosing law in accordance with majority seems the best route. As such, I'm in favor of the federal government giving up the decision to each state, as each state has different majority demographics. I do think legislation dictating what to do with aborted or miscarriaged…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:47 PM
5

You can claim your movement is to sell apples all you want. If your colleagues are standing around advertising oranges, guess what your movement represents? I identify movements and ideologies not by what's written in the dictionary, but by the actions of its members.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:48 PM
2

A hash tag like "notallcatholics" would be highly relevant. I haven't met a Catholic who holds that belief under the age of 50. I live in a religious area and have attended many church services, despite being agnostic. The "sperm is sacred" thing is a dying belief in Catholic circles. No doubt some still hold it... Ahem... Religiously... But it isn't mainstream anymore.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:02 PM
6

Except the reason anti-choicers are... Well... Anti choice, is because they believe a fetus is a person with a right to life that supersedes the temporary loss of bodily autonomy of the mother. Ovum and sperm are not people, even in their eyes. Miscarriage is also fine in the same way nobody blames others for someone having a heart attack: nobody should be blamed for a naturally occurring death, as unfortunate as that death may be.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:18 PM
1

Sperm alone does not a person make. It takes a combo of sperm + ovum to make a person. Rubbing the trouser snake isn't murder any more than menstruation.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:13 PM
2

I agree to cooperation to ensure everyone's issues are covered. However, are you aware there are rights movements fighting for women's rights other than Feminism? There's sound arguments that feminism has always been a supremacy movement, such as the treatment of Arin Pizzey to name one of many. But whether feminism has been co-opted by vile people or whether it always was vile is less important. The face of feminism is tarred and ugly in the public view, and it's only gotten worse with more fan…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 10:53 PM
2

I know the point you're trying to make about extremes, but if you'll allow me to nit-pick for a moment: Those who strive for self improvement should never be satisfied with their progress. Because however far you've come, you can always improve further. The difference in what makes the extreme cases is what you are willing to do to yourself to improve. Steroids should be used in extreme moderation, if at all. Also, don't allow yourself to fall into depression if you haven't reached some perceive…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 09:04 PM
4

It doesn't change that their movement, or those holding their banner, have been a constant force of political and social opposition to our goals.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 08:36 PM
-9

Feminism is our opponent as MRAs. This makes a point that undermines their movement. It's a bit of a stretch, but I say it's acceptable.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:17 PM
5

I'll take your word the moment you post your Ph.D. in Psychology. I haven't made a diagnosis, just an observation of behavior. I have days I feel like life isn't real. I haven't withdrawn from society. I didn't say society, I said from reality, which is an accurate description of his behavior. You get off on making strawmen of people's comments and then chastising them for your made up garbage? Here's a diagnosis for you: You're an idiot. Prognosis: bad, there's no cure for stupid. Treatment: ge…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:28 PM
36

In other words, the event traumatized the poor man into withdrawing from reality.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:22 AM
31

You won't find the majority defending any of these actions, point blank. Of course, because only ~17% of people even identify as feminist. So of course the majority wouldn't condone this cretin of a woman.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:19 AM
3

To be fair, most of it is.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:00 AM
1

Maybe the ideal solution is not to toss your games that you love, but to figure out how people like Vin can slay bosses and chicks at the same time. Why give up a hobby that isn't destructive if you don't have to? Plus, not all of us are out slaying chicks, some of us are in LTRs. Should those guys be tossing out the Friday night game with the dudes?
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 11:57 PM
2

Meanwhile I'm going to finish my degree in intersectional feminist dance therapy.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:26 PM
2

Feminism is a religion of peace, you guyz...
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:08 PM
1

Yeah, all the women here showed up for work. My boss took the afternoon off to take her sick kid to the doctor, but that's about it... I think it's because the only women dumb enough to pull a petty stunt like this are feminists. Feminists are only, what, 16% of women? So a tiny minority.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:56 PM
1

But because they are so dirt cheap to make and so heavily mass-produced, many health companies can afford to provide the using surplus from other parts of their company. Arguably, birth control pills could be the same deal, but pharmaceutical companies hike the price for profit. Condoms aren't made by big-pharma, so they avoid that issue.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:30 PM
3

Women tend to be hardliners, doing everything by the books, even when it repeatedly fails to yield positive results. Men as leaders, in my experience, tend to follow a mantra of what I call "meritocratic leniency". For example: my company has a zero-tolerance policy for cell phones. While female bosses go apeshit over the site of a cellphone in any circumstance, men seem only to care if they notice it interfering with productivity. In this way, moderation and hard work is rewarded by leniency in…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:25 PM
4

They care more about diversity of ethnicity and what we are, and they care less about diversity of thought and who we are.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 11:02 PM
1

Has r/veterans explained their censorship?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:02 PM
1

To keep judges to task, a verdict could be reached not on moral judgement but based on criteria. For example, the teen could be asked questions that help ascertain their ability to consent and to understand the impact of the behavior they've engaged in.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:50 PM
43

We're better than having a sense of humor and making digs at a self-professed incenstual child-molester? If being better means I can't have fun, then fuck that noise.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:07 PM
2

I know compete is often what you meant. However, actual violence is often what she wants and Women have a way of getting what they want from blue pill loosers.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 06:46 PM
14

it's "let's you and him fight (for me)" Sounds like violence by proxy. I'm nobody's white knight, nor is a woman worth bashing skulls over. She pulls that crap with me, Hard Next.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 01:18 AM
1

Yup. Age of consent should be a loose guideline at best. The real age of consent should be determined on a case by case basis. Different people develop at different rates. Looking back, I was probably ready around 14 or 15. But the law is lazy, so the collectivist laws that throw everyone in the same pot out of simplicity are how do it.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:46 AM
6

I don't understand the hate for Red Pill. I've always thought it was just another way of dealing with things. We all recognize that society is decidedly anti-male. MRAs want to change they system. MGTOW abandon the system. Red Pill are figuring out the rules to work within the system. There's arguably vile people in RedPill just as in any other group (including our own). I actively avoid letting them be the ones to represent the movement as a whole unless they become the majority. Thus far, that…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:56 PM
5

Everyone telling me women are wonderful, then coming home to a psychotic abusive narcissist mother. It didn't take long to realize the lie.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:49 PM
1

Oh lord, consensual slapping! This is abuse! I'm so trigg- Seriously, what are you expecting from this? We aren't feminists who get irrationally angry over trivial shit.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 03:41 PM
1

I will teach my kids to hit back. It has always worked for me. Keep it civil, inform staff if you're being bullied, save physical force for last resort. But if someone blatantly assaults you, hit back twice as hard. With zero tolerance policies in most school, this meant I got suspended in two cases, but it also made the bully aware I'm not meek and they left me alone from then on. Bullying is a power play, an attempt to assume control. Hitting back makes you not worth the effort and demonstrate…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 07:20 PM
2

I heard somewhere that female monarchs in history have actually been more violent warmongers than male monarchs. So there's that, too.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:38 PM
3

Probably because, unlike feminism, HRAs are actually for equality for all.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:34 PM
2

Egalitarianism seems to be more widely considered a mentality or philosophy rather than a movement. For movements that push for equality for all, see: Human Rights Activism.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 04:57 PM
5

The "who is in power" mantra always makes me laugh. So the president and prime minister of Canada and the US are men... Take a little hop-skip across the water to our friends in Europe and it's a different story. Are these idiots really so thoroughly sealed in their bubble that they think how it is in some countries is how it is everywhere? It would be one thing if they said "most world leaders are men", but that is rarely the choice of words. The dissonance is blinding.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 11:35 PM
1

Slaves were required to act too (if their master orders) - were they more important? I doubt. Important person is that lives in safty and wealth, not the one that goes to die. Perhaps its more fair to say they were important to the survival of the people that owned them? No one is disposable. All people are equal. Ideally, you are correct: nobody is disposable. I want you to be careful with your wording when you say we are all equal though. I know what you're trying to say, but your wording is m…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:38 PM
1

If there are more boys in your family, than girls, but in other families, for example, there are girls only, then why your children should serve and be cannon fodder, what is their guilty? Not an argument. Why do men agree to be lower than women, We don't. Being required to act if your country needs men to defend it doesn't make us less important, it makes us more. It used to be quite the opposite, for example,the penalty for killing a woman was twice less than for killing a men. Yes, because me…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 05:06 PM
1

Nope, it accomplishes that on its own merit. 1: Men are far less reproductive valuable, so we fulfilled the roll of protecting women and our tribe against predators and risking our health to hunt prey. Men are physically far better equipped for military service than women are by virtue of the dymorphic nature of our evolution. Anyone who served would see these differences in action. 2: Women are more emotional and less able to handle stress. Much of this is due to point 1, but is also simply a v…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:10 PM
2

I'm not appealing to accomplishment. The other guy saying "no service, no opinion" might be. I'm agreeing that you don't need to serve to have an opinion. But that doesn't mean his opinion is any less stupid.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 03:41 PM
1

He can, that doesn't mean he does.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 03:26 PM
14

You're not a lesser man because you were circumcised. We use the term mutilated because people tend to respond more to emotion than logic in this day and age. It's to underline the babaric practice that was performed on men like yourself. I don't sympathize, but I do empathize. I hope you eventually make piece with what was done to you and know we're all here for you. But we cant police our language for you until others realize that this practice is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:46 PM
3

Yup, but when you realize it's just part of the female sexual imperative to obtain resources, it doesn't sting as much. A cat will scratch the furniture if not given a post, a woman will take money from the government when feminized men won't act like providers. Both genders behavior is part to blame for this state of affairs. There's no sense getting angry about it.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 01:26 AM
1

Resentment for what? For being lied to? No, I don't have any tips for that because i don't hold it against anyone. If you resent people lying to you so they can make themselves feel better or more righteous, you're gonna have a lot of enemies in life. Accept it as part of how humans work and move on.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 07:52 PM
2

Do you wonder why the number of women who identify as feminist hovers as low as 17% (8% in the UK)? Most complaints and demands by feminists are ridiculously petty. Worse, even if we concede, they'll not be satisfied. They'll just make more demands.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:41 PM
1

I've met people who's businesses are paralyzed at 49 employees because they don't make enough revenue to pay for Obamacare, which takes effect at 50 (IIRC). Do we really want to stack more roadblocks on growing businesses? This isn't how we encourage entrepreneurship and market competition.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:39 PM
3

Streisand Effect in action. To people not learn?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:35 PM
2

Then he sues for damages and keeps his stuff anyways, or at least gets compensated the value. ..one would hope...
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:06 PM
1

The common argument I hear is that the fetus isn't alive, therefore it's rights are null and overruled by her right to bodily autonomy. Another is that bodily autonomy is simply more important than a right to life, thus a parasitic organism's rights are... Overruled by her right to bodily autonomy. I too am playing devil's advocate, so I'm just reporting what arguments I hear.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:02 PM
2

Not anymore it isn't, thanks to her utter stupidity.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:53 PM
2

Scrawny and pimpled? He shows his crowd when he does speaking. There's barely a pimple or a ham planet in sight. I look at leftist autistic screeching, it's always a bunch of D&D nerds and their gargantuan female friends (dont fool yourself into thinking they're actually fucking).
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:44 PM
6

Red pill in the Matrix is the pill that contains a tracer program that allows Neo to wake up from the Matrix and get rescued by the rebels. The blue pill would simply cause Neo to lose consciousness and possibly forget his encounter with Morpheus. In the manosphere, red pill means waking up to this idea that women are wonderful creatures that do no harm and nice guys get the girl. Blue pill is to continue pedistalizing women as virtuous creatures. In each, the Matrix or the Narrative is a lie pu…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 05:22 PM
6

I want to speak to the man in charge. Haha, oh god my sides. Whatever troll sent that message needs a fuckin' medal.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:21 PM
2

Bill doesn't even think it's rape. He denied men can be raped at all, whether 32 or 13.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:58 PM
11

When Milo says that his experience wasn't bad for him, he chases it with an important caveat: he knows his view is skewed because of how he's chosen to cope with the event. He does not want to see age of consent changed and he doesn't want that to happen to other people. In other words, it's still a serious problem and a horrible thing to happen.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:16 PM
3

I'd take you seriously where it not for your name.... No, that's a lie, I still wouldn't.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 05:40 PM
0

Disagreeing with part of a message doesn't mean you must dismiss the whole. I, too, find the anti-Semitic rhetoric distasteful, but I agree with most everything else.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:48 PM
2

If someone bashes on immigration or posts about NFL, and it isn't related to Men's Rights, we already call people out. We don't need to sensor those people, calling them out and down voting are enough. I understood his point perfectly.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:49 PM
3

I, like anyone else, can say whatever I want. I'm merely echoing the mentality of the users here in accordance with the rules. I don't need to be a mod to do that. Seriously, are you a child?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:46 PM
1

When a post is made that isn't relevant to Men's Rights, we already have members that call it out as being off topic. Feel free to do the same. We're not going to sensor people or posts preemptively to spare your delicate feelings. Your post here is not entirely on topic either, by the way. It's nothing more than whiny preemptive concern trolling.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:37 PM
0

None, because such measures would be censorship of opinions you don't like. I don't necessarily agree with the Alt Right, but like any liberal, I think they should be able to say what they want wherever they want. If you don't like what they have to say here, then when they say it you can be an adult and debate them with civility. No more of this whining bullshit, we aren't Social Justice Warriors.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:28 PM
3

So.. you have no counter argument then?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:02 PM
1

Alright, I'll come clean. I made the quip about voter fraud as a devils advocate to show empathy for someone seemingly left leaning. I honestly do believe in voter fraud, I just haven't verified it in such great detail. Thanks for the sources, though. I do appreciate it.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:40 PM
2

According to an isolated but vocal few. I've not seen a verified example of this actually happening. Just a lot of out of context videos and accusations. It sounds more erroneous than the claims of voter fraud by the DNC.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:34 PM
-1

So unless your procrastinating like I did in highschool, two or three weeks. Still not much of a difference.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:30 PM
1

except the people identifying disorders and the people making drugs to fight the symptoms of the disorders are different people. Shall I get you a tinfoil hat?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:41 PM
3

Scientific Knowledge: That gender dysphoria is a disorder, and from psych analysis and statistics like suicide rate, we know transition isn't a cure by any stretch. Philosophical Knowledge: Wisdom that catering to the whims of people's subjective self-identities leads to abuse and is in conflict with our society's sense of liberty and freedom of speech. Who "Our" refers to: The entire western and developed world. The right wing, and increasingly the left.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:43 AM
4

Then get rid of quotas, figure out and eliminate the 2 to 1 preference for women in STEM, stop telling women they are traitors to their sex for being housewives despite being happier, stop firing people for jokes or exercising free speech, stop advantaging women in schools and treating male students as defective girls, shall I go on?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 02:14 AM
4

He said he's seen acceptance of trans ideas before but it's changed. It's because our knowledge, scientific and philosophical, has changed. I understand it can be weird seeing a stance become less acceptable, so I provided examples were this has happened in the past.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:52 AM
1

I've got a real world example of how this is settled: I have a friend who is f-m trans. When I first met him, i thought he was a man, I had no idea anything was out of the ordinary. Through behavior and appearance, he convinced me he was a man. My issue is with demands by obviously trans folks demand I use one when they would still fit in the previous. If you want me to call you a woman, you need to convince me you are one. You're identifying yourself as a woman simply isn't enough, and I don't …
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:45 PM
1

A name is an identifier, it has nothing to do with what he is. It's just a tag he's been assigned to help with communicating with him before other properties about John can be discerned. It's very changing a name and changing your gender and thus pronouns are very different things. So if John wants to be named Mark, provided he's consistent, I have no problem with that.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:27 PM
0

What these types don't seem to get is the difference between self-identity theory, and actual identity. What you claim to be, or think that you are is only a theory, and a small part of your identity. The rest of your identity is up to the consensus of the people you interact with. The rock doesn't tell me it's a rock, I identify it as a rock based on its appearance, properties and behavior. You're not a woman because you think your a woman, you're a woman because you've demonstrated to have the…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:21 PM
2

Yes it is. They have a disorder and they're trying to tell us the sky is red. We're telling them it is not. Being Hitler would be stripping them of their human rights, throwing them in camps, and comiting mass genocide.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 11:05 PM
3

Because their views aren't supported by science, nor do their proposed solutions help with the disorder they have. The fact that they also frequently demand we cater to their unsupported views and police us doesn't help relations any either.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:57 PM
2

there's a healthy balance between Tumblr and Hitler. Oh boy, here we go with the Hitler references. Look, you're on the side of Tumblr, we're the healthy medium.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:55 PM
1

Because their rights, like anyone else, mean they can get a job, say what they want, get married, have kids, go where the please within reason, and not be physically or verbally abused or assaulted. They don't have a right to be called what they want, they don't have a right to not be offended, and they don't have a right to police other people's views of their disorder unless it infringes on the rights above. In other words, they have the same rights as everybody else.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:49 PM
4

Flat Earthers and Young Earth Creationists used be held as acceptable views too. Science advances, new things are learned, views change. This is called progress.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:44 PM
1

It's a little contradictory, but I think it's just an authoritarian religion's (oops, tautology!) Way of encouraging people to have sex and procreate.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 07:01 PM
3

I still remember when the fucking UN gave Anita Sarkeesian and Amanda Wu time to speak. They basically said "more needs to be done to crack down on trolls because someone said I suck on the internet". I was like "Bitch, what? Now I know you haven't played call of duty online. You are no gamer!"
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:43 PM
3

I think you'll find there is a broad consensus on this one. Yup. Look at the down votes and who has em. Hint: you're on the wrong side of the argument, Jarhead.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:31 PM
1

If we place the value of a person's right to life on their ability to think and be self-aware, we run into the problem that even young children would become unqualified. I think as a society we are above such a notion. I'll propose a solution to the dilemma of the brain-dead patient in a moment. As for the Ship of Theseus line of thought, you would still be you, no matter what you replaced. As you grow older, your body already replaces the vast majority of your biological material. You may not b…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:23 AM
2

Do you want to know why? Because we let women get away with this shit for so long. There's not been any pressure on women to behave, we've let them be as shitty as they want and still get everything they want. They haven't had to earn a dime or our respect, we've given it freely. If we want women to actually compose themselves like adults, then we need to boycott those that refuse to. If they want us to support them and respect their companionship, they need to be held to the same standard. They…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:59 AM
1

Does it have partial value during the merge? This is a little more semantic than I think is necessary, but to appease you I will humor the question: No. The definition of life is contraversial, but the best and current model has the following guidelines: Homeostasis (internal regulation, such as regulating heat or moisture), Organization (such as being assembled from cells or basic components that fulfill certain rolls), Metabolism (converting energy and materials into useful components or stori…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 12:21 AM
1

ip 2012 Fair enough I suppose. But I'm still resistant to it, and I should hope that they don't expect me to respect them if they make the choice (Not to say I think anyone is entitled to respect). They're still murderers in my eyes, even if the law allows them to do it.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:19 PM
0

Well consider that the child may share the features of a woman's rapist, but with the option of adoption she can see that she doesn't have to be reminded of that terrible event after the child is born. Also, like I said, I'm all for providing whatever counseling or emotional support she needs to get through the 9 months gestation. Perhaps not you, but some may even be able to look past what happened and view the child on it's own merits, raising it as her own. It weighs the life of one against t…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:16 PM
0

I think that rape and pregnancy, though one can in rare cases come from the other, are morally separate issues. Rape is unfortunate in the extreme and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemies. But the fetus is innocent of wrong doing, and shouldn't be sentenced to death to save the mother from the emotional distress caused by someone else. Emotion should concede to moral consistency. To the mother, I would happily offer whatever support she requires to help her through it, and I wouldn't hold her …
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:51 PM
1

If by conception, you mean the successful merge of two halves of chromosome to form a complete human set, yes. Let me turn the second question back to you: am I allowed to murder outside of self-defense? Can I kill you for restraining my arm? If not, we as a society have decided human life is valuable, more even than bodily autonomy. That it be extended to a fetus is a matter of logical consistency. The particular reason for its value is less important, in part because of its subjectivity.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:01 PM
2

We have shelters! A whole shopping one of them!
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:50 PM
3

No, they're just good for the workforce, soon we will replace them with machines. What use are they then? We'll just throw them in camps for breeding purposes.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:49 PM
2

Im reluctant to say my piece given the vitriol I usually get. However, I'm not the only one here who believes this, so i'll speak for as many of the silent as will allow me. If you'd like to discuss why you disagree with me, I'm open to talking. I disagree with abortion all together. A fetus is still a person by every objective measure and the right to life is above the right to bodily autonomy. Being pro-choice is being pro-murder, and I therefore cannot support it in good conscience unless rea…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:25 PM
2

And most understand why and are therefore ok with it. Now if only they understood that this is the same situation elsewhere, which is why men earn more on average.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:26 PM
11

Welcome to the western family courts...
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:22 PM
17

Not if the mother chooses to keep the child. Her choice determines if the child is put up for adoption, regardless if it goes against his wishes in many cases. If she keeps it, he pays.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:35 PM
3

This is why you don't pork a woman until you've spent a good deal of time getting to know them. Vetting sex partners until marriage wasn't just a dated tradition, it's a defense mechanism. Hookup culture may be liberal af, but it isn't safe in today's climate (it may never be). Women have to weed out rapists, and men - false accusers (to a lesser extent, each the other too). Don't let love cloud your ability to spot the red flags. Feminist? Troubled childhood? Former rape victim? Criminal histor…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:54 PM
-2

Running over people in a truck? Are you referring to the recent Ohio State attack, where a Somali refugee ran over or stabbed 11 students (all survived)? Or the 2016 Nice attack that cost 86 lives, that was masterminded by a Tunisian who had been living in Nice for 12 years before the incident and was described as being "unhinged", having "an unbridled sex life" and of suffering from a number of breakdowns due to family troubles? Troubled lives are what open the gates and make radicalization pos…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 07:11 AM
2

Canada doesn't have an equivalent to the 1st amendment. Freedom of expression isn't protected. As a result, it's a lot easier for bullshit excuses to be used by puritans in government like "it's inspired by the abuse of children" or "will normalize the abuse of children". Basically the tired "video games cause violence/sexism" bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:01 PM
2

I can't read anything on that site. The mobile virsion is fuckin cancer. Just adds and flashy bullshit covering the important stuff.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:43 PM
6

Also, sexual cartoons involving minors, particularly "Loli" hentai, are illegal in many places including Canada and Britain (iirc).
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:34 PM
1

Dear black students, your lives matter. All ^ Dear Muslim students, your beliefs deserve to be respected. Nobody's ^ Dear Latino students, You will find no walls here. Except the one around the campus Dear Female students, . All ^ Men will respect you, we will demand it. Everyone^. Request ^ Dear LGBTQQIA students, . BCDEFG.... You are supported here. Dear international students, You are welcome here. Dear ALL students, We are here to support and learn from one another. Dear CIS White Men, This …
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:31 PM
1

I'm at $12/hour 40h weeks working warehouse supervisor. Rent $600 per roommate (4 of us living together). Food $500 a month for myself. $100 phone plan that I can't shrink. $200 for utilities. Plus other living expenses I see about $100 to $200 a month to spend on myself for things like beer and cigarettes, dates with the woman, ect. You can pretty much forget getting a car under ICBC's totalitarian rule, so I'm limited in advancement or alternative employment. Say nothing of furthering educatio…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:32 PM
5

I've started thinking it's a combination of denial and tribalism. See, women are the ones most in favor of FGM in countries where it is done, and men for circumcision. They're in denial about how bad it is, and they've tribalistically taken to seeing it as a rite of passage.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 09:55 PM
2

This is why many think giving women the vote without restriction was a bad idea (and I'm starting to think it isn't entirely misogynistic). Women are the farer sex. Their vulnerability has selected through millions of years for those that depend on men for resources and protection. Before government, they had to trade that protection from men in return for sex and tender companionship. Now they no longer require giving anything in trade. Thanks to big Daddy government they can use their superior…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 12:02 AM
1

It's because women today don't have anyone teaching them to think with reason instead of emotion. They have no responsibility to either, which doesn't help. So all you get is a regurgitation of their feelings, which make very little sense at the best of times.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:50 PM
13

I've seen a few come through here where both were intoxicated and even some where only he was, yet he went to prison. As far as the law is concerned, women have no responsibility to apply their own agency. If you're the type who gets frisky under the influence, don't drink. Stop blaming him for "taking advantage of you". Sure, it sometimes happens. But that hasn't been the trend in my experience. People of both sexes need to accept responsibility for their own actions.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:48 PM
2

You confuse identity with self-identity theory. When one identifies themselves or an idea they hold, this is only a theory. Identity is what outsiders make of it, how others identify you. For example, I identify as a man. But would I still be a man if I had a vagina, wore colourful makup, a high voice, thought with my emotions as much or more than reason, and pranced around in a dress? No. I could self-identity as a man, just as I could self-identity as a duck. That doesn't make me a man or a du…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:03 PM
2

A troll who makes headline and brings attention to concerns of men far better than we ever have. I hate to say it, but even politically active MRAs tend to get little attention and succeed in very little. Plus, considering all he does is talk, and he's treated like this, people are realizing how toxic the regressive have become, which makes our job of convincing people easier.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:45 PM
16

Which according to poll data someone posted here yesterday, it was women who propped up FGM the most (they think it's an honor rite of passage). Men in those countries largely opposed it.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:31 PM
1

The destruction of society alone will require the death of more people than would be lost in the time it takes to change society. Besides, the change is already beginning. Muslims pour in to replace the people not breeding in protest. They produce little in an unfamiliar country and drain tax dollars for social assistance. It isn't sustainable and the system is bound to fail. The housing market is already at the brink of collapse with the welfare system not far behind. Either taxes have to go up…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:23 PM
5

The destruction of society is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:46 AM
4

Nope. Just the ring leaders. The rest are brainwashed sheep and I have only sympathy for what has been done to their minds. Thing done undoubtedly while they were impressionable by people like their mothers, like their teachers, like the stars they watch on TV, like the terrorists you mentioned and other brainwashed girls and women.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:11 AM
14

I think he was making reference to what is going on in the monkey brain to describe the trend. What you're pointing out is anecdotal examples where the human brain has recognized the flaw in the monkey brain and overwritten it's more inappropriate behaviors. This is the importance of proper upbringing, and why it's a shame men aren't able to be as influential in the lives of their daughters.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/17 07:50 PM
3

Being traditional doesn't mean denying the agency or culpability of women. This isn't the 1400s, we're well aware women can be shitty too. In fact, a lot of us think they are shittier than men because they see how much society lets them get away with. End the pussy pass for God's sakes.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 04:24 PM
3

From what I can tell, it looks like a term to describe people like Milo Yiannopoulos and Ben Shapiro. I have no issues with those people. I might not agree with them on everything, but I agree at least with their opposition to social justice and political correctness. So in that respect, I'd consider them allies. If some of them want to participate in the MRA, I welcome them. We aren't exactly in a political position to be picky about our members, that's how we end up like feminism; a giant echo…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 12:25 AM
8

A traditional conservative? Depending on what you mean by "traditional" this could mean a lot of things. It's a stupid term used by people with too much time on their hands and bitterness in their hearts. This is just concern trolling nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 12:03 AM
8

That remains to be seen. When these things come out, sales records will be the blow to women's egos that might just turn the tides of equality.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 11:42 PM
3

Yup, Canadian feminists pushed too hard too fast up here. It made it more apparent how bigoted their worldview was to the public and now many are pushing back. We might not have big marches or elaborate campaigns, but we know feminism's tricks. In casual conversation most people, at least here on the west coast, think feminism = entitled brats who don't understand real life, reality = much more complex.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 10:46 PM
1

That's true. I've pointed out blatant hypocrisy to them plenty of times and it never goes further than "shut up, misogynist, only a white male like you would fail to see how this is completely different!!!!" Oh well. I've never been a believer in treating others as I wish to be treated. Instead I treat them as they deserve to be treated. If they're going to be hateful to me, I'll respond in kind. If they don't get it, at least it makes me feel better.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:01 PM
1

One would hope it would force some introspection on their part.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 07:14 PM
3

Tagging your first buck while out hunting. Making your first meal from the buck you killed. There's something primal about hunting in general. It feels manly as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/17 03:27 AM
2

Regardless of where you stand on when a human has a right to life in the abortion debate, this is a fucked up message. You're basically telling the pro-life folks "if you don't want me to murder someone, you should mutilate yourself so I don't 'have' to." In that sense, it sounds like some fucked up ransom/threat.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:45 PM
5

Such a place would hastily become a 3rd world country populated by bickering, infighting, lonely, crazy cat ladies.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:58 PM
3

I read somewhere a long time ago that some city in South America had a city that had only women in it as some sort of social experiment. Apparently it was absolutely riddled with problems and they found they had to bring at least enough men in to do the menial jobs because women refused to do them. Similarly, the second season of The Island by Bear Grilles was a competition between two teams, one male and one female. The women nearly starved to death, even as food literally ran through their cam…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:49 AM
2

It was on a (conservative, take the bias for what it may be) talk show a while back. Going by statistics on what men work where and doing what, he extrapolated out what could go wrong, how long it would take, and how long (if at all) before women could effectively take over or compensate. Similarly, I found an article where a woman goes over the Bureau of Labor Statistics and United States Department of Labor statistics. She then plays a headgame over what parts of your daily life would be effec…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 01:44 AM
1

Thanks, I'll give that a read when I'm off work.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:32 PM
1

Bingo, that's the one. Gets me laughing every time.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:31 PM
1

I didn't hear about that. Where did you find that out? I'm curious and would like to give it a read.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:20 PM
5

The funny part being that they aren't necessarily losing the right to abortion, they're just losing the right to pawn the cost off on tax payers, many of whom may not agree with abortion being morally acceptable. On the legality itself, the only change is that the federal government is giving the decision of legality back to the states.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:19 PM
8

My roommate has been watching that series. I've been caught up in Hellsing. Side note, Hellsing has a hilarious abridged series by Team Four Star. I got a chuckle when a vamp accused Alucard of being a misogynistic patriarch propagating cis gendered... His response? "My boss is a woman, I was a chick in the '40s, I hate everyone equally, and there's no one alive who can comprehend my sexual preference. Check your privilege!"
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:03 PM
12

I've actually heard economists talk about it. They give us about 1.5weeks before irreparable damage, 3 weeks to complete collapse. They doubt women could even slow it down let alone stop it.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:45 PM
1

The crusades is another one they often use. My answer is: Which one? There were two, the first was perpetrated by the Islamic side. It involved spreading the newly founded word of Islam through bloodshed and fear. Muslims conquered most of northern Africa and a good chunk of Europe, enslaving or brutally murdering along the way. The second crusade was Christians, who realized Islam was now a force to be reckoned with, taking back their land and freeing their people. Did Christians commit some ho…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:59 PM
2

I've always found the blowing up abortion clinics redirect a hilarious defense of Islam. Since planned parenthood was founded, 15 people have been killed by bombings of clinics. Islam has killed twice that in the name of Allah in the time it took me to type this message up. Don't get me wrong, 15 is still too many, but let's maintain some perspective here.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 07:39 PM
1

Now now, we're all adults and can learn to get along.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 07:37 PM
6

In other words, feminism is a shit-test (to borrow terms from other parts of the manosphere) made into a movement. It has only gotten so strong and has feminized society because we as men have failed it.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 07:34 PM
7

I don't know how much you care, but the accepted denotation of sarcasm is "/s". Might be easier than typing out "Sarcasm, btw."
/r/MensRights22/01/17 01:43 AM
1

women won't try to take revenge for all the years they were oppressed by trying to oppress men They are taking revenge. This is the result. A man can be raped and is still held to account for a child. A woman can steal his sperm to secure child support payments. They aren't required to spend child support on the children (so it's a just a paycheck). And every time we try to point out the hypocrisy and the unfairness they blockade us and call us misogynists for suggesting we hold women responsibl…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 12:28 AM
1

Well your edit certainly does, the original content of the post was not so gracious. You're also still contradicting your own words that I pointed out earlier. But to respond to what you're saying now: Yes, I suppose you could. A man can do whatever he wants to benefit other people. That should be obvious and nobody would realistically stop him, even in today's social climate. The issue I have is when it comes to legislation and the social zeitgeist: Men don't have the option not to pay because …
/r/MensRights20/01/17 11:58 PM
1

I still disagree. It's her body, so to abort is her choice and hers alone. Why should he pay for her decisions? Consider also if he wanted to keep the child, should he still pay so she can abort it? Either rights and responsibilities belong to both or to only one. Whoever has the rights should also have the responsibilities. Whoever lacks rights, should also be absolved of responsibilities. That's the entire point I've been trying to convey. It's not fair to burden someone with a responsibility …
/r/MensRights20/01/17 10:57 PM
1

They are not able to come out and grow up unless a man puts his cells into her body. As a refutation of Then she can pay for those cells when they come out and grow up! Implies you still think a man should be held financially accountable for a woman's choice to keep a child. That's what I'm arguing against.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 09:48 PM
2

You missed the point. Why should a man be held responsible for something only she has the right to decide (whether to keep the child or abort)? Once he's given her his sperm, she now has full control over that sperm because, as you say, it is now a part of her (the fetus).
/r/MensRights20/01/17 08:40 PM
3

So she's accepted those cells as a gift, assumes ownership and therefore responsibility for them. He's off the hook. Either he shares ownership and responsibility or she retains them in full. You can't pick and choose. Nothing comes for free. If she wants bodily autonomy extended to the fetus, it comes at the expense that she must therefore assume sole responsibility for them. If you are the sole arbiter of something's fate, you are consequently also solely responsible for the outcome of it.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 08:01 PM
0

So in other words they aren't her cells, they're a combination of both parties' cells.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:46 PM
5

I know you're just doing your job, but holy fuck you just made my day!
/r/TheRedPill20/01/17 08:22 AM
1

I am a Chris, literally, it's my name. That, and the first bullet point are where him and I part ways. I hold doors open (its manners), I buy a round of coffee for the office roughly once a week, I walk my woman to the car and get her to let me know when she's home safe. This, to me, is just being polite. However, my suit cost $1k, Italian made and tailored to fit. The colours are either white shirt with blue tie (I'm a blonde), or grey with red tie. I know what to say most of the time, and even…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 10:32 PM
4

On an individual level, men are actually closer bonded and more empathetic than women. This is why all-female businesses are so often doomed to failure from infighting. Psychologists have long noted men tend to be better at settling differences as well. Have you ever hated a guy so much you brawled with him, only to find yourself not hating him anymore? The actions against men by other men tend to be when it is impersonal. A senator in his desk has far less empathy for you on the ground than the…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:31 PM
2

For starters, go look up the IQ scores divided by gender. Women are grouped near the middle, men are more spread out. There is therefore more dumb men, but also more intelligent men.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:20 AM
2

I like how it starts out by telling us about several false flag incidents that have been uncovered, then emediately makes claims of a spike in "alleged" hate crimes against Muslims and women since the election as if we'd believe them after the first half of the article.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:34 PM
5

Also, men pay 3 times more than women, who pay less than they gain. In other words, only men pay taxes. Some "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:05 PM
5

Yup, the regular sex offender list could be used. It's just than instead of telling their neighbors that they are rapists or diddle children, they tell their neighbors that they put innocent men in prison on lies of rape.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 03:26 PM
1

In most cases you can opt-out. Still bullshit though. And when gays become even more common it will be interesting to see how automatic common law gets fucked up.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/17 04:49 AM
2

His ass is my Savior? Jesus's booty got it goin' on!
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:22 AM
2

If they're single occupancy, and someone is using the family one, just use the women's. Nobody will bat an eye. I've used the womens' at my local Tim Hortons several times because the men's is full. They even give me the key if it's locked in the early morning.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:16 AM
2

Egalitarianism hasn't done much because it's an ideology, not a social movement. It's adherents try their best to treat all people equally, not convince others to do the same or push for legislation. What you're looking for is HRAs, Human Rights Activists. They have at least made some progress in different fields. Sadly, it tends to fall to special interest groups like feminists and MRAs to actually make any significant differences.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:04 PM
1

In hind sight, I may have mistaken her for someone else. If I could find that video I saw I could verify. Incase I am confusing her with someone else, I'll apologize for the error.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:20 PM
0

I know she used to be a feminist, but I could have sworn she was one of those ones who woke up and realized how toxic they had become. I can't find her videos any more (was a while ago), but I remember seeing one where she explained that she had a moment of clarity and decided to reject feminism.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:41 PM
-2

I really hope you guys realize this is satire. She's actually an anti-feminist. Go watch her actual videos.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:00 PM
1

Shaming is how a free market functions and how social species interact. Neither work without use of an ingrained convention instinctively driving people to behave in a widely accepted way. Hence: shame. This isn't unique to social justice dipshits, and it isn't inherently wrong (especially because they use it).
/r/MensRights01/01/17 10:57 PM
2

But at least you'd get to keep those earnings. You can get suprisingly far being frugal, even on minimum wage.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 12:10 AM
1

The problem is while it will be easier for kids to get help, due to there no longer being threat of prosecution, there's a lot more potential children to abuse than there are children (being abused) who know how to get help. Legalizing it only makes it easier for a pimp to hire new youngsters. It also ignores that most of these kids are being watched at all times. They're escorted between clients and rarely out in the open actually picking up clients. It won't drastically effect their ability to…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 12:01 AM
1

I did say it was a hell of a stretch...
/r/MensRights30/12/16 09:08 PM
8

Yup, you sure were. So what are you going to do about it? Play the victim and whine about it forever? Play the stoic and let it go? Or be the change you want to see? You can realistically only pick one and only two of them are respectable.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 11:55 PM
0

I'm pretty close to you on that. I still believe in gender rolls. I'm a traditionalist who is in favor of equity as much or more than equality. I think it's just fine that some jobs are male/female dominated and that women shouldn't be part of the draft. I'm against the hate towards masculine behaviors like dominance and aggression; they have their place and those that make good use of them should not be belittled or shamed for it.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:30 PM
3

You had me until In conclusion, nobody should call themselves something like feminist or masculinist, if they want to achieve equality. This seems to contradict your opening statements on the good early feminism did. If feminism was working towards leveling the unfair playing field, than it was a good thing. That it since morphed into an abomination simply means it was taken too far. Further, if "masculinist" is really a term used (I haven't heard it outside of satire), why would it be a bad thi…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 06:14 PM
5

I've yet to hear a feminist accusation that is not projection on some level.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:51 PM
1

It's a stretch, but a man's fertility is linked to testosterone and overall health. Perhaps the app could be tracking when you last ejaculated (to estimate sperm level), testosterone based on health patterns or diet, etc. Erectile effectiveness is another one: how's your cardio? Have you taken your Viagra if you need it? Do you do things to maintain good blood pressure? What about your self-esteem and state of mind? Like I said, one heck of a stretch. But with a little imagination the app could …
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:45 PM
1

So I wasn't far off. No rebellious non-citizens under 35 years of age who've already done their term limit. That said, I'd have a beer with Trump.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:17 PM
8

For the most part I agree. But to be fair, the qualifications for presidency were intentionally set pretty low, being only: -Be a born US citizen -be over the age of 30 (iirc) So that Trump only meets those is not that big a deal. The requirements are so minimal because it was intended that anyone could be president provided they won the electoral collage. That Trump also has ample business experience (his few bankruptcy calls not withstanding) is merely icing on the cake.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:26 PM
2

It tends to take a die-hard nationalistic person to give a damn about veterans. To appreciate the sacrifices soldiers make for their country, you have to also appreciate the country they're defending. In this sociopathic and narcissistic society, there is little room for altruism for sacrifices made to causes you don't agree with. Nationalism is being replaced by globalism and socialism.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 05:20 PM
1

I was told my reflexive return of fire significantly hurt my chance at winning such a case. I don't have much money for legal fees either. Add to the risk of a perverted Streisand Effect and it just didn't seem like a good idea.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:19 AM
8

I got really lucky a couple years ago. Some woman mistook me for someone else, ran up and tried to kick me in the jewels. She connected with my thigh and I laid her out in the heat of the moment. The second after I struck her back, I jumped back as I realized the crowd would likely pounce me. Instead, a couple of them just clapped. Apparently I'm not the first one to be mistaken for one of her allegedly numerous exes and receive a swift kick to the nethers for the crime of existing. Had it not b…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 05:25 PM
2

It's like they've all forgotten "The Boy Who Cried Wolf".
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:41 PM
2

Who complains "where have all the good men gone!?"
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:38 PM
1

It's a little tough making sure I get enough carbs while making sure she doesn't get to many. We have worked out a good number of meal plans that work for us both. What would you say constitutes real cheese? I'm personally a huge fan of aged cheddar by the block. I can't remember the brand. What would you say I should be looking for?
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:43 AM
2

A fair point. It would just be nice if they could at least correctly interpret it when trying to call me out.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:40 AM
2

From my experience, attractiveness is inversely proportional to positive character. I value a woman's character much more than I do her looks. That said, I still think she's beautiful. I know that's subjective, but despite her weight, she's got a proportional feminine figure and still has lots of energy. She's also loosing weight with my help. Best description would be what some call the Zaftig body type. However, as I implied above, look weren't what I was going for. She's extremely loyal, self…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:28 AM
2

Haven't seen what before? I'm not 100% sure what you're implying
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:14 AM
22

Nah, if they're going to say Leo is ugly but Schumer is pretty, I'm going to happily correct them about Schumer. Hey, now they're both getting equal treatment, right? I'm not some "holyer than thou" type guy. I realize I have flaws and have no place in higher conversation unless I know something those types don't. For most times, I'll play along with the shitposts if I think I've got something to say. That said, if you want to ignore, downvote, or rebut what I said, go ahead.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:12 AM
2

Believe me, that isn't at all what any of this is about. I don't think anyone has even mentioned me saying that. My inbox has been exploding all day with them sharing the reasons they don't like the things I've said. Particularly where one fellow called her fat as if I didn't confess to know that, and I quipped at his self-esteem for trying to insult her to me of all people. It's all just nonsense. I've given up trying to understand.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:05 AM
1

That was more in reference to their defending Schumer with their misinterpretation of my statements as a vehicle.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:04 AM
1

Absolutely. I actually agree with you. I'm not apologizing for saying it but if you don't think it's relevant or you don't like what I said, feel free to drop a downvote or simply ignore it.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:51 PM
2

No, you're all just reading waaay to much into what was no more than two guys throwing quips at eachother. You all figured you knew everything that was going on at face value and blew up my inbox with autism, white knighting, and trolling. Never in the 4+ years on Reddit has something so trivial I said been seen as so controversial to Reddit at large.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:27 PM
1

Yup. I must be. So autistic I can't tell salient people trolling from genuine idiots. You all look alike to me.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:08 PM
0

The autism is real. I'm not defensive about you calling her fat. I'm defensive because you're attacking me over something completely irrelevant because you're not paying attention. This has become a point I am trying to prove, but now I think it's a lost cause.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:03 PM
2

Don't be so sensitive. Take your own advice. He insulted me, I threw one back. I didn't respond because he called my girlfriend fat, I'm well aware of that. I responded because he tossed that insult to me, as in I'm either too oblivious to realize she's fat, or I'm worth less because I am dating a fat girl. Are you all so socially stunted you can't tell that there's more to a conversation than the literal interpretation? If you can't clue in that there's more going on, do yourself and my sanity …
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:01 PM
1

I'm defending myself. That's not what a white knight does.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:55 PM
1

Correction: I say my girl is fatter, but still has a good shape. I insult Schumer for having no shape despite weighing less. As if not realizing that first part, someone feels the need to call my girlfriend fat. Now, even assuming I didn't already know that, why would he call my girlfriend fat? Especially if I did know, which I've made clear I do? Does that not re-frame his comment as a dig against me for dating this girl? Well, I have no issue with people defending themselves, so I did just tha…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:53 PM
1

Why do my feelings matter? I was stating my opinion to someone who had done the same, there was literally nothing more to it. I don't think there's anything wrong with it, if that's what you mean. She's not here, so it's not like its negatively effecting her.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:43 PM
2

Henry Cavill Not bad, not bad at all. A little too "pretty boy" for me, but I can see the appeal.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:41 PM
1

Why is alright to attack other women in your mind? Same reason it's ok to defend yourself when you are attacked, free speech. Also how on earth can you can Schumer a potato if your missus is much bigger. What on earth does that make her?? A potato is a reference to shape. Shumer has almost no feminine curves to speak of, which is why I don't regard her as attractive. Some women can get much higher than Schumer's 157 lbs and still retain a sexy feminine shape. Schumer isn't just unattractive beca…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:35 PM
1

Kids are angry at me because they misinterpreted what I said elsewhere for denial that she's fat. This post made them realize I know exactly what's going on.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:30 PM
4

On /r/mensrights, where men (and occasionally women) talk about men's problems and discuss solutions rather than insulting eachother.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:06 PM
1

Why don't you actually read the conversation before butting in making accusations, hmm?
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:21 PM
1

An hourglass vs a curveless potato. I think put that way, we're relying less on subjective terms. Does that help? The reason people are calling her fat I think, is because for some reason they're under the impression you don't think she's fat. And when you defend her, or get angry when she's called fat you just reinforce their opinions. My girlfriend needs no help from me to defend herself from being called fat if she feels she must. But when someone tells me she's fat, they're not just insultin…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 08:22 PM
2

EXACTLY. If you go back and read my early comments, I was bringing up my girlfriend's weight as a point that Schumer is ugly not just because she's fat, but because it's not balanced and gives her the potato shape. Yes, my girlfriend is heavy, but she's A: Taller, and B: well distributed so she still has an overall attractive feminine shape. I'm getting the sensation that you and/or /r/osulfan765 didn't read that part, or somehow completely misunderstood the point I was making.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 08:03 PM
0

Again, is someone here dating Schumer? My issue isn't with people insulting someone, not even that they're insulting my girlfriend. It's that they're needlessly doing it to me. I don't understand why you're having such a hard time grasping this concept, whether you agree with it or not.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:57 PM
2

See? Responding with trash-talk of your own is irresistible. Gotta defend your family and loved one's honor, after all. So why are you all jumping down my throat about doing the same?
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:41 PM
-1

Sorry, but your mom's fat.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:35 PM
2

It doesn't really bother me. My response was pretty tame, just as his remark was. If you're trash talking on a random online forum You're likely to get a response. Not that I'd be any less likely to respond if it was said to me in person.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:32 PM
-4

I'm sorry, is someone here dating Amy Schumer? Somebody here (of all places) got a crush on the feminist potato? Insult whoever you want whenever you want. The issue is when you insult my girlfriend to my face. That's a low blow. You do that, I'm going to respond. And I mean, seriously, I already conceded from the start that I'm ok with heavier women. Fuck off with your white knighting bullshit, pal.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 07:28 PM
4

Doesn't change the pettiness of the remark. If you're going to insult a man's girl, you should expect a response. As you said, this is the internet after all.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:59 PM
1

I was never denying that. But thanks for needlessly pointing it out. You gotta say that about a man's woman to his face to feel better about yourself?
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:48 PM
11

I reserve my fetishes for Gerard Butler. There's a man I consider truly attractive.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:42 PM
0

Well, how much she's gained is not under her control. It's a result of a lot of life-changing events and some medical conditions (PCOS and Diabetes). But she's eating with me now and she's cut the sugar significantly. She's getting there, though December has admittedly been a setback for us all! I'm sharing in her struggle by significantly cutting back on my dirty vice: smoking. I'm hoping to go cold turkey in the new year.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:38 PM
9

While I'm less than my gf at 170lbs, I'm taller at 5'11". I'm also all muscle, she's not. I'm also gaining weight where she's losing. Soon I will overtake her and claim my rightfull place as ruler of body statistics! For now, I'm just a Viking and his faithful homely woman.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 06:10 PM
5

A marvel of what? How bad weight distribution can make even just a little extra fat look terrible?
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:55 PM
10

Amy apparently only weighs 70kg, which is 157lbs (she's 5'6"). My gf is 200 at 5'9".
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:50 PM
5

You're allowed to defend your home with a firearm in Canada, so long as you had "reasonable" ground to believe your life was in danger. They sell special safes for handguns here for just such an occasion. Our instructor told us of one that his store sells. You wave a wristband over what looks like a nightstand and it pops open to present you with your handgun and a magazine. There's also mantlepieces that store hidden rifles for similar purposes.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:35 PM
33

I like a bit extra too, my girlfriend has a good 50 lbs on Shumer, it's about distribution. A woman can still have nice curves at a larger size. Shumer has no curves, she more closely resembles an slightly overweight Chinese kid (No offence, any Chinese brothers out there).
/r/MensRights20/12/16 05:26 PM
10

In Canada they have a clause in the criminal code for self defense for just this type of situation. It basically says that in the heat of the moment you are not expected to be of perfect mind and judgement. It covers the possibility of excessive force in self defense to a certain degree. It's proven a time-honored defense for people in the court room accused of excessive force in self defense. I learned about the clause on my Position and Acquisition licence Firearm Training course. Firing more …
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:28 PM
802

There's nothing about Shumers body that is "knockout" attractive. She looks like a stale potato. I'm heterosexual and I still find Leo's body more attractive.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:09 PM
3

THATS TOTALLY DIFFERENT! STOP MANSPLAINING! Oh lord, I never use that word and autocorrect knew what I was spelling...
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:51 AM
2

Thankfully that is already a (albeit poorly enforced) crime. Though, not for the damage it could do to the child.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:48 PM
5

Pregnant and drunk should be a crime. I've seen fetal alcohol syndrome. It's not fucking pretty. She's ruining that kids life before it's even begun.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:13 PM
2

All to often they only serve as a vehicle and outlet for people who would be more appropriately labeled supremacists, misogynists, or misandrist.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:35 PM
3

That would be an excellent idea if I had a passport. I should really get on getting a passport...
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:41 PM
1

Of course. I also think in their fueding over politics because of social justice, they lost focus on more important matters, like the prospect of foreign invasion. Oddly parallel to our predicament. We've been distracted worrying about self actualization, we've failed to notice the barbarian hoards (in our case being ISIS and other foreign ideologies incompatible with our values) threatening our safety (on the Glasgow Hierarchy) lower down. The division within government also threatens to split …
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:25 PM
2

A, a fellow believer that it was something analogous to social justice and over-liberalism that fatally weakened the Romans! It seems we're a rare few.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:12 PM
3

I couldn't find a list like this, looks like I missed the Vancouver event.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 04:51 PM
3

I was just going to say, how are they getting the data from third world countries that don't even have doctors or census data? Hell, I can tell it's not accurate as a Canadian. Circumcision is losing popularity here in a hurry, but most guys still kicking around where cut before the downward trend took hold.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 09:48 AM
2

To them, we're damaged because we left the feminist plantation. The idea that we may have a point, or at least that there's a reason for our being here, simply cannot form in their minds due to the ideological bubble they live in.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:10 PM
3

I implied I used to be one, which is true, not that I am one.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:56 AM
1

You have a right not to be insulted (to an extent), a right not to be assaulted, and a right not to be slandered. What men are doing in these places is none of the above. They aren't even public places, furthering the rights of those they cater to doing what they want with the optical sensors on their faces.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:26 PM
3

Are you asking me personally? I'm not, nothing I said indicates I am one. I will say there are good feminists out there, but I'm not any kind of feminist. If you're asking those who are by proxy, good question.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:16 PM
8

They neglect to consider that many of us used to be, and maybe are still, feminists.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:19 PM
1

We're it not for all the retarded babies they'd be putting out for their hubris, I'd say to just let them live in ignorance. When things inevitably go horribly wrong, we just kick back and say "I told you so, and you called me sexist".
/r/MensRights14/12/16 08:01 PM
5

A lot of these situations are exposed on his show. He's been extraordinarily fair in his judgements of people regardless of sex. That said, there's still part of me that's sure the whole show is scripted, like many other shows of its kind.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:06 PM
1

The point I'm trying to make is that miscarriages are often not treated like they are lost human lives. No, not in all cases. Perhaps it warrants change? or perhaps mothers who lost their child before it was born don't want to have to relive it going through paperwork. At the very least, keeping such documentation would be useful for determining trends and reducing risk of miscarriage. I believe that the right to ownership of your own body is absolute I place life above bodily autonomy for a sim…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:59 PM
12

Dude. Let it go, it's a troll account with -100 comment carma and the oldest comment I can see is only a week ago.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:14 PM
3

Darcia Narvaez is a Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Notre Dame. Also, read the next sentance after the one you quoted. She has data to back up her "opinion". She even puts citations in the article!!! Her academic works are highly sourced. I get that she also goes into her feelings on the matter and opinion, but she's also applying her scientific input. If that's not enough, her position is backed up by other psychologists and neurologists. Read the whole thing for …
/r/MensRights14/12/16 05:07 PM
4

Actually, research suggests that infants record memories as emotions rather than sights and sounds. Your early life experiences form things like your fetishes and phobias. Further, there's strong evidence linking neonatal circumcision to detachment and social disorders. Source
/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:50 PM
1

Experts in sociology and economics seem optimistic. They tend to say it might be rough at times because of brief corporate cronyism, but by and large would do quite a bit better than western countries are doing now.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:22 PM
3

It helps being Canadian.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:47 PM
2

I did research when I noticed sex was causing the skin to tear near the opening. I then went to my GP who, when I explained the problem, prescribed steroid cream and explained a regimen of stretching exercises to make the opening in the foreskin wider to accommodate rolling over the glans. I had allowed the tearing to progress to scaring, so unfortunately it took at longer to do it, but I eventually got it wide enough I have no further problems. It's just preventative upkeep now, stretching it i…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:35 PM
1

I'm 26. My phimosis only cleared up two years ago when I took action to cure it. I'm well aware of how this stuff works, as I said in the comment you are replying to.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:39 PM
1

Your responses are quite verbose, so excuse my truncating them for the sake of space: Right, but I'm talking about how... Actually, most do get names. It might not be on paper, but mothers who miscarry often do commit a name, or discard a prospective name out of respect for the loss. As for all the legal documentation, what would be the point? In Canada, for example, Social Insurance Numbers aren't assigned at birth, they're assigned when one wishes to enter the work force. If someone doesn't ma…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 09:25 AM
10

But hey, at least I can kill spiders and fix my car. I might need that car running when I flee the scene where I burned my house down trying to make a sandwich.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:58 AM
6

You're question is further defensive dodging. Just answer the question. What metric are you going by as to how they are compared? But to answer your question, no I am not. I'm not even making a comparison, I'm just saying that the person you went after was indeed factually correct; The foreskin does contain more nerves than the clitoris. That could be used as a measure of comparison. It would be a fair one, as well. Damage to sexual function is often compared by considering nerves lost as nerves…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:47 AM
9

You're dodging me. Dissociation exists as a failsafe. Only without such a failsafe would infants die from pain alone. So because we have it, the number of infants who die from shock during a particular procedure is obviously going to be low. Overall, circumcision costs about 110 infant deaths per year, compared to the other leading cause of neonatal death; SIDS, which kills about 115. -Source is a Thymos study that is currently having internet domain renewal issues.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:46 AM
8

I don't give a shit about nerve endings in the comparison. Then what metric are you going by? Because if you're going by pure physiological tissue types, then cutting the breast off a woman would be no different than cutting the breast off a man.... which, it should be glaringly obvious is much more severe a problem for a woman.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:28 AM
8

Dissociation is a neurological reflex to prevent overload (to put it simply). It's the last safeguard before death by shock. Do some research on the subject. As stomach churning as it may be, it will likely be a game changer for you.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:22 AM
8

You're the one injecting the circumstances of the procedure when he was only remarking about the procedure itself. Assuming both done by professionals under clinical conditions, your point is null. Further, most circumcisions are also done with shit tools in shit conditions. The USA is the only modern country that so widely practices circumcision. Most of the third world, which all together consists of a much larger population, also still practice it. So your point is further null.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:17 AM
8

When your son stopped crying, are you sure that was because the pain was over? Or was it because he became dissociated, mentally disconnected, to cope with the pain? You don't need to answer. Just think about that possibility.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:11 AM
8

Well, uh, because it's a surgical procedure done with clean tools and mild anesthesia? Sometimes. In religious settings or third world countries you can forget clean tools. As for anesthesia, again, not always. Most anesthesias can not be used on infants because their bodies cannot safely metabolize them due to undeveloped organs. The anesthesias they can use are still risky, expensive, and often difficult to get a hold of. So most infant circumcisions even in the first world are done without. M…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 03:04 AM
3

Canada, at least, is shifting at a fair pace. My father, despite being circumcised, did not circumcise me. Most of my friends are in the same position. It's led to some hiccups; My father didn't know the first thing about how to look after a non-circumcised penis so I ended up with phimosis and frequent infections. But I eventually figured that stuff out on my own and got it all sorted out. I can now pass that experience on to my son and to my friends who need the info.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:57 AM
4

Thank you, hit the nail on the head. A transaction is people exchanging goods and services. A business is a larger and more organized collection of transactions. In other words, it's still people exchanging goods and services. They are free to do that, or not do that, with whomever they choose.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:52 AM
8

No, he was making a point that your point was wrong. Cutting the clit off is not the same as cutting off the glans of the penis. No implication of which is more or less important was being made, just a counter to your ill-informed remark. Overdefensive much?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:42 AM
6

Here, you dropped the mic.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:44 AM
89

Which you're absolutely free to do, boycotting is exactly how you show businesses what you want. If enough people do it, then they lose money. If only a handful do and business is otherwise booming, then clearly there is a market for them. They're as free to specialize as you are to refuse patronage. Welcome to the free market.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:29 PM
1

If you believe that the people who use birth control and are careful should be able to have an abortion, how could you ever tell who to allow to have one? Which women at the abortion clinic were careful, and which are just lying? I don't though. Whether you use birth-control or not, you are responsible for any lives you adversely effect, including those you create, intentional or not. Killing someone accidentally is still called manslaughter. It being an accidental pregnancy, no matter the steps…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:06 PM
1

I'll grant the kidney example isn't a horrible one, I had to really think about that one. I think my main contention after a night's sleep on it is one of the Ethics of Action. With the kidney example, the failing is that the man giving up a kidney is not responsible for the person who needs it. His actions didn't lead to the victim's own failing kidneys, and so he owes no action to save the victim. The mother, on the other hand, took action to create the person inside her. What's more, she does…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:09 PM
1

Your whole argument here is predicated on my agreeing that a man giving up his kidney is even analogous to pregnancy. I disagree. In the kidney scenario, the man is giving up an organ he's (at least partially) dependent on indefinitely. In pregnancy, the mother doesn't lose use of any body part for any length of time. She will have to eat more, carry a heavier body, deal with some minor hormonal fluctuations, and maybe the sensation of the fetus moving inside. And all of that, she need only "suf…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:16 AM
1

I also think it's absolutely justifiable to be selfish with use of your own body. Selfishness isn't always the evil thing the world makes it out to be. Sometimes you truly do come first. I realize the pointlessness of my observation, but that sounds incredibly selfish. Absolutely there are times when you have to look out for #1. When it costs someone else their life is not one of them. To take direct or indirect action to deliberately end the life of another human being, unless they pose a clear…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:18 AM
1

Well as I said, taste is subjective, so I don't stand on their taste as the core of my position. I stand on the known toxins in vegetables that have been recently discovered as organizations in the food industry crack down on safety regulations. Examples include Selenium in grain foods, Thujone found in many organic and essential oils, Prussic Acid (also known as Cyanide) in some fruits, Goitrogens in many vegetables (though these can largely be cooked off), Furocoumarins found in carrots and ce…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:49 AM
1

A risk of you trying to take your own life still doesn't justify letting you take someone else's life. No matter how serious this fear is in your head, no matter how unpredictable it makes your behavior, it is still in your head. It is no excuse for murder, and certainly no excuse to legislate the right to murder for everyone else. I'm truly sorry if this is a bit harsh to you, but do you seriously have any idea how selfish this argument makes you sound? If pregnancy, which cannot every be truly…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:15 AM
1

Fresh means less bitter, but not less bland. At best they taste like stale water. Obviously, I can't speak for everyone. Taste is subjective after all.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:10 AM
1

Tocophobia, in other words, a phobia: an irrational fear. What you need is counciling, not the right to kill someone. Should a fear of clowns mean I have the right to kill them if stuck in a room with one? Hell, let's take your stance ad obsudum using a little emotional gravity: does negrophobia give me sound argument to kill a black person?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:04 AM
1

Bitter and bland. Not appetizing at all unless garnished with other foods or toppings.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:02 AM
1

I don't know about you, but veggies taste like shit to me. Fruits taste good sure, but eating them serves most plants ends because animals that eat them can carry their seeds. Arguably, this serves some veggies as well (cucumbers come to mind), but not to the same extent. Most animals that find those foods more preferential are herbivores that eat them exclusively. Those animals either adapt or suffer from such a diet. Also, nobody said all plants perfected toxins, but there's plenty that did. W…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:49 AM
2

Considering the safety features in place and constant "don't fuck with electricity", I don't think it's because they have the wrong info. People are just stupid. Having the right info will never stop everyone from Darwinizing themselves out of existence or into a hospital bed. In other words, you're right that a lot of people die from it, but not for the same propagandistic culture that causes men to die from marriage related bullshitery.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 12:43 AM
1

Pregnancy doesn't cause PTSD, so while you're right that it causes less physical harm, you're disregarding the psychological harm. That said, I don't agree that rape is sufficient ground to use lethal force either. I would want my assailant to suffer many things, death is not one of them. I reserve death for those who attempt to bring such in kind. I'm unsure what you mean about murder only being done to a person. I don't share the (disgustingly common) belief that a fetus is not a person just b…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:03 AM
3

No, self defense, where you kill your assailant, is only justified where there is reasonable belief that they are going to cause serious bodily harm or death. Pregnancy doesn't do either of those things in the overwhelming majority of cases. In the few cases where the pregnancy is causing risk of death to the mother, you could make the case for self defense. But I would personally like a trained physician to make that judgement. It should be investigated like any other murder. And if there's ins…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:41 PM
3

You lose all credibility when you disregard someone's life as less important than another person's bodily autonomy. Are you saying that I should have the right to kill someone so that I can keep my body as it is? Btw, the body is quite good at recovering from a pregnancy; we've been doing it a long time, evolutionarily speaking. Risks associated with pregnancy (even if they were justification for murder, which they aren't) are much more rare than most pro-choice folks go on about, especially in …
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:29 PM
1

Yup. Most plants contain toxins that our bodies expend quite the effort to deal with, and do damage to our liver. They do this to discourage animals from eating them. While very miniscule at first glance, the damage adds up to shorter life and less healthy organs. That's not to say eating plants is without nutritional benefits, but it's long been ignored that there's risks involved. As such, the "daily recommended serving" is too high and would be risky over several years of adherence. The recom…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:55 PM
2

Circumcision and pro-life arguments are actually the same: Who are you to choose the fate of a child? Don't cut your kids dick up without his consent, don't kill him/her just because it's more convenient.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:47 PM
1

I'm curious what your approach would be to an atheist pro-lifer would be. Because there are plenty of sound secular arguments against abortion.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:45 PM
27

To be fair, the media and culture isn't bombarding you from birth with misinformation about electricity. We're told to have a healthy respect for the literal and figurative power electricity has.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/16 07:04 PM
4

Then there's all the old propaganda about how bad cholesterol and fatty acids are. Now it turns out those are key building blocks for important bodily components like hormones and brain tissue respectively. Or how green veggies are the best thing ever, until we realized they are loaded with defensive toxins and have done harm to the species when we depend to heavily on them (like the agricultural age). Science fucks up. The reasons aren't always the same. Sometimes it political interference, som…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 11:20 PM
1

It's about context, dude. He could still be asking for input about what he learned, to make sure he's taking the right lesson out of his experience
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 11:42 PM
2

This isn't him giving advice. As he says in the first line, he's giving his thoughts and looking for insight. That's a respectable way to have a conversation. Considering he's not that far off in his thoughts, I'm impressed, given his age.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 10:34 PM
2

So what should we do when we end up at war and all the volunteer soldiers are dead or overwhelmed? Just let the enemy take over our country and have their way with our people? The draft is meant to be a last resort lesser of two evils.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:21 PM
1

Wow, you're good at that. The overuse of buzzwords was right on point.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 11:40 PM
2

I think the peak of their power has come and gone in the last 5 years. Feminists and single moms raised the generation that will soon be voting age. Those kids have been disenfranchised and jaded by the oppressive parents they had to deal with. Girls are tired of being pandered to, boys are tired of being ignored. With the election of Trump, some media outlets have wised up about the side of the story they've long ignored. Word is getting around. Major change may not happen until the parent gene…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:06 PM
2

Now I get it. I thought that might be what you were talking about but I wasn't sure. I'm talking about a car, not trying to sleep with it. I don't need to know if a car is male or female. Speak for yourself! If my Jeep could talk I'd be on the registry.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:02 PM
7

You're moving the goalposts. You've been saying women rape more than men do. Then when countered that it's only among male victims, you are back peddling to saying that you're only saying that men get raped by women too.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 07:11 PM
1

I'm not a literary expert. I don't know to what you are referring.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:05 PM
7

As I've said in another thread, some mornings I wake up hoping to see a mushroom cloud over downtown. Western society at this point needs a full restart.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 05:39 PM
76

Manterupting her femsplaining about my mansplaining. Pretty soon every meta term related to social interaction will have man or (jokingly) fem Infront of it. This is stupid.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:27 PM
3

This post, nor the comments, have anything to do with Castro. Yes, Trudeau sucked Castro's dick like the cuck we know he is. Old news, let's move on.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:08 AM
2

You know Elder Mason from the Fallout games? Yeah, I look like him, minus the wicked scar and pimping jacket.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:02 PM
2

Exactly. They nuked Japan until Japan surrendered, then they stopped. And that was the plan before we found out just how horribly inhumane the aftermath of those weapons would be. We won't nuke eachother to complete oblivion, just until one side either gives up or can't keep fighting anymore.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:29 AM
3

It won't have any safe space if that's how it plays out. But turning the earth into an erradiated parking lot isn't going to be the goal. Each participating power will likely only pummel the others to the point they can't pummel back. Bases, nuclear weapon silos, and major cities will be hit. But the overwealming majority of north america that is nothing but wilderness and small towns will not be directly hit. At most, radioactive fallout will come down on them for a brief time, but it won't be …
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:05 AM
2

A fellow societal pessimist? Well, I suppose that's not the right word. I expect the prognosis for civilization is good. It's just that it's bad enough right now that I wouldn't mind to see it burned to the ground.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:41 AM
3

Probably. That's why I'm glad a "zombie Apocalypse" is the least likely doomsday scenario. The most likely is nuclear, and I'm somewhat prepared for that.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:39 AM
1

Because the tech that makes us so good at killing eachother is still prevalent out there. In a nuclear bombardment scenario, that tech goes bye-bye; some nukes will be detonating in the upper stratosphere, bouncing radiation off the ionosphere creating an electromagnetic pulse. Anything that can act as an antenna, including the wires on a large circuit board, becomes a small power-plant and shorts out anything sensitive attached to it. Gone goes the infrastructure and down comes most modern tech…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:29 AM
1

I heard about that. Banning involuntary bodily reactions? That sounds totally reasonable. /s
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:21 AM
12

Speak for yourself. The Fallout universe is a million times more appealing to guy like me than our current society. I'm a survivalist, this social/political authoritarian bullshit can get fucked beneath a 10 megaton warhead. I wake up many mornings hoping to see a mushroom cloud over downtown.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 11:49 PM
2

In the states it is reluctantly classified as art and therefore protected under free expression. In Canada and the UK it is illegal and classified as childporn. However, at least in Canada there hasn't been much effort applied to actually prosecute people for possession of Loli hentai. So at least there it is something of a "don't ask, don't tell" thing.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 11:40 PM
21

Do not fuck with Borderline Personality Disorder boys. So don't fuck women under 30?
/r/TheRedPill25/11/16 02:46 PM
1

/u/Khorib is pretty much implying the same thing I am. By getting rid of weight classes you would be putting 400 giants against 200 rookies. It would be bordering on dangerous for the welterweight for the same reason it would be dangerous to women.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 03:09 PM
1

The problem is that men have advantages that come down to biology and sexual dimorphism. Women aren't separated because we're sexist, they're separated because men have biological advantages that would be unfair. Men are stronger, faster, more durable, recover quicker, have better spacial awareness and mechanical intuition. We were bred to be the hunters of the species. I'm all for women being able to play professionally, but let's not be delusional and assume it would be fair to throw Ronda Row…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 10:39 PM
1

I didn't miss it. Polygamy wasn't in all cultures. Christianity, for example, is largely a monogamous religion. As is Judaism if I recall.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:56 PM
57

Good god, what a terribly formatted webpage on mobile. Also, article contents are behind subscriptions.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:08 PM
6

1500 to 2000 years (counting Christian marriage, if Jews have a form of marriage it may be an even older tradition) is more than long enough to call it tradition. Other religions outside Europe may also have traditions comparable to marriage. When they talk about marriage, they aren't just talking about the government sanctioned part. Before government it was religiously and socially sanctioned and enforced.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 07:44 PM
3

I have one. And a "Make America Great Again" hat. I also have a gamergate pin. I dawn all three at work sometimes just to get that mug refilled. Oh, and I'm Canadian, which makes it that much more entertaining.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:01 AM
6

As a Canadian who lives next to the American border (it's a 5 minute drive), I was not keen on the possibility of Hillary starting a war with Russia. If such a war got serious, it would be naive to assume I wouldn't get cought in the crossfire. That's also assuming it did not go nuclear.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:40 PM
9

His issue isn't just with the nonsensical pronouns, it's with using legislation to force someone to use them. I have transgender friends, and I have no issue using the pronouns they request because we are friends and there is mutual respect. But getting the government to step in and tell me if I don't use the requested pronouns I will be fired/jailed/etc. That is morally reprehensible.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:03 PM
1

I was making an analogy between modern western countries and the Roman Empire. You're right, an external force may not be necessary, but that's not to say there isn't one in action.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:13 PM
1

we're at the decadence stage. Next Trump and Hillary will split America into two empires and, divided, the mongol hordes of Syria will tear the Western Empire to the ground, haralding a new dark age.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:36 PM
3

In Canada, where the RCMP runs a daily background check on license holders, reporting suicidal thoughts will have the cops are your door for your guns and license in a right hurry.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:44 PM
3

Sir! It's victemhood, Sir!
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:22 PM
10

Exactly. The problem isn't with TransLink and I hesitate to say this is great example of societal misandry (though I don't doubt it's existence, let's be clear). This seems more like a problem with a specific person. Fire him, hopefully he learns not to be such a twat, and society can keep on trucking.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 10:43 PM
81

“Paul had every right to be on that bus, in that area of the bus which is for people with handicaps,” Giesbrecht said. TransLink said it’s not their policy for disabled passengers to get off the bus in order to make way for others. An investigation into the incident has been launched. In other words, this was an isolated incident and TransLink is moving for justice. Not exactly a great example of persecution against disabled people, let alone men vs women. It's just one asshole driver, which is …
/r/MensRights01/11/16 08:42 PM
30

"Coming to"? Feminism has been about female supremacy for a long time.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:53 PM
3

One of his most recent speeches he talks in favor of it, saying something along the lines of "you're not the one who has to suck them" in his defense. That said, I largely agree with things Milo says. Circumcision is one of very few disagreements I have with him.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:25 PM
3

I've got trump's skull (still with his hair) on a throne of swords. In big military letters it says "The Deplorables". It reminds me of the logo for The Expendables. But that is my wallpaper on my phone and computer.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:56 PM
3

It's tough to balance a sense of self reliance and self sufficiency while still doing what you can to be socially active. I consider myself highly independent, but I'm blessed with a a very close friend who's entire family has practically adopted me. They always talk about how if I ever need anything to let them know. I've only needed them once, and they provided without hesitation. I think it's more just the sense of having people not only close to you but close to each other that keeps dark th…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:22 PM
1

So you get promoted to what is an actual pencil pushing job Supervisor, not manager (though I am aiming for the later). Meaning Nothing was removed from my responsibilities. I'm still doing the same job, but now I'm also responsible for coordinating subordinates and assisting with managing the department. So I have more on my plate, not less, because they recognized I could handle the load. If they didn't think I could keep up with the physical load, why would they add more on top of it? I never…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:47 PM
1

Holy block of text batman, getting defensive? I guess I'll respond likewise. Well done, you sucked at your job. Maybe it was their fault for hiring you. Perhaps you missed the part where I said: Could I do it? sure... I'm now a department supervisor at our head office providing oversight for the Returns and Warrenty department. Clearly someone disagreed with you about my ability. There's a difference between being too tired to do anything else after work and not being able to do the work itself.…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:33 AM
1

Lol, yeah cos I've never seen a skinny guy doing manua... Oh wait. Yes I have. Because all the heavy lifting is done by machinery, not trained gorillas. As one such skinny guy (or at least I was), screw you dude, that was hell. When you weigh 120 soaking wet trying to stock shelves with break drums and auto batteries sucks ass. Could I do it? Sure, but I was miserable and so tired I didn't have the energy to do anything after work. I empathize with chronically skinny guys everywhere. And this wa…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:04 PM
1

Ooh, I don't look the way I'm told to by TV so I have to pump myself full of steroids, go to the gym 6 times a week and do weights until I'm huge. Or maybe he works one of the countless millions of labor jobs, competes unprofessionally, or wants large muscles for the myriad of other practical reasons and requires a lot of physical power. Maybe then people will respect me! Maybe they will. Is that really such a bad thing to aspire to? Go shout into your echo chamber mate. I know you're not gonna …
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:41 PM
1

I do love steroids. I love testosterone. Thank you for noticing. I don't know where you live, but around here steroid use is pretty common, but only once in a while do I see someone who looks like they're abusing. most guys here look like perfectly normal guys with a healthy layer of muscle. with limited hours in the day, most guys use it just to help get the most out of their time in the gym. Now, if you don't mind, I'm gonna go get my swole on in more informed company.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:58 PM
1

I will ignore it. It's frankly insulting people's intelligence to assume nobody is smart enough to manipulate their own hormone levels safely. And to lump those people in as comparable to people with an eating disorder is silly. As for your second point, I've said it repeatedly; I don't disagree with the message behind the meme. I disagree with the presentation for the reasons I just mentioned.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:35 PM
1

Strange. Then what is the difference between anabolic steroids and the testosterone injections men with low T receive? I am at least aware those are two different drugs. Nvm just did the legwork, they are the same drug. My apologies.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:16 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but steroids are a class of drug designed to boost production of your body's own hormones, are they not? The steroids in question used by many gym goers target testosterone production.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:08 PM
1

I am reading, why don't you? As I said, I don't disagree with the message, just the words used. It's comparing diet to eating disorder. Staroids aren't the problem, abusing them is. The image posted isn't specifying steroid abuse, but staroid use in general, which I don't think is a fair comparison to an eating disorder.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:03 PM
1

Just as I said in my initial comment, I get the message it's trying to convey, and I don't necessarily disagree. I'm just critiquing the comparison it's using to send that message.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:00 PM
-1

No. That's not what I said.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 05:57 PM
3

Steroids on their own aren't unhealthy. They're an excellent boost to your ability to work out. It's when you abuse them that they can become a problem. All they're really doing is kicking testosterone production up.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:36 PM
3

You're absolutely right, which is why dieting would be a better comparison than the eating disorders it's currently being compared to.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:32 PM
2

More muscle is rarely unhealthy. Maintaining your healthy form (by diet or supplements) is rarely unhealthy and even sometimes necessary.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:22 PM
-5

That's not the steroids, that's testosterone. If you abuse steroids, testosterone gets too high and you will damage yourself. Used sparingly as I said will not cause these problems.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:21 PM
4

Then we wouldn't call it an eating disorder, we'd call it a diet.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:19 PM
60

I get where they're going, that both sexes have pressure to look a certain way. But this seems like a poor example. Eating disorders are universally unhealthy, that's why we call them disorders. Staroids, if used correctly and sparingly, are not bad for you and can be a significant boost to your ability to work out. It's rightly a performance enhancer, which is why the Olympics prohibit it's use.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:40 AM
7

Depends. If they have a Burka, they're a skittle. Otherwise, they're M&Ms. Not to be confused with Eminems, which requires a penis. This is all just what I've heard.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 09:01 AM
12

Grabbing guys by the junk is a good way to end up with a cracked eye socket. Your hotness reduces the risk, but will never eliminate it. I for one don't even care how hot someone is. Grab my junk, get domed.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 07:14 PM
5

We're gonna have a child, and the man is going to pay for it.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:01 PM
3

Living in a more conservative town, everybody here gets what's happening. Not even women are shocked about false accusations.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 10:38 PM
5

I never said they didn't. I'm merely saying the purposes are different.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 10:15 PM
15

They aren't necessarily killing men for publicity. If they get it, great. But this was more to remove potential threats. Men are disposable, and they're better at fighting. It's best to kill them off. If they really wanted publicity, they'd harm women. The media would be in a frenzy over that.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 10:07 PM
3

This was pretty different from my household. My father very much acted the leader of the house. My mom took care of most of the families social affairs. But in the church (for what little attendance they had) and in the house he was the one in charge. They did compliment each other well though. My mother didn't take any shit from anyone, so she was good at managing our social ventures and raising 4 kids (as well as half the neighborhood's kids lol). My dad had a keep eye and a sense of duty. If …
/r/MensRights19/10/16 02:32 PM
3

I'm a Republican, and even I can look at Paul Ryan and only ask "what the fuck, dude?" This is why Trump is doing so well with younger republicans. The Republican party is no longer fit for purpose and needs to be torn down and rebuilt. Paul is a cuck for the very feminists Republicans should consider natural enemies.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 02:25 PM
1

For example, ones past could glean insight to motivation. From motivation, we know the chance of recommitting the crime. Parole can be adjusted accordingly.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 01:06 AM
2

Of course he will. What, did you think this was still 2015?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 01:02 AM
1

Hell look at Europe. Circumcision is far less common there. But paradoxically, the rate of conditions like phimosis is also more rare. This paradox has a simple explanation: conditions related to the foreskin are largely a product of ignorance on how to teach uncut children, not the fault of the foreskin. I'm a prime example. I had phimosis for years. Turns out you have to use the thing once in a while when you're young or it gets tight. Stretching it cured me of the ailment. Why did it get so b…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 12:28 AM
1

Only white people can be racist? What, because we're in power? So if I go to China and start calling them "Chinks" and asking when the railroad will be done, I'm prejudiced, but not racist? Can I go to Africa and ask the nice "Ni**ers" why they think they get to be in charge, I'm not racist? That racism requires institutional power is bullshit. You can be racist no matter who you are or where you are or who is more powerful. Also, with all the black men in high political positions including pres…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:26 PM
0

This is what I would have done. Study it for a moment, then take it off the wall, turn it around to face the wall and lean it against the wall on the floor. Then I would shout "Magnifico!"
/r/MensRights18/10/16 01:49 AM
6

I live in BC, that law has changed in wording, but remains in effect due to the Deluth investigative model.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:11 PM
0

I have no idea, that's why I asked.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:29 PM
-1

Is there a reason you're spelling it like that or are you just trying to be cute?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 09:30 AM
15

Since feminism decided to counter attack with a slandering campaign to paint GG as something it wasn't. They were, unfortunately, successful in changing the public view of GG through lies and misinformation.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 09:57 AM
1

I couldn't care any less about Trump sign thefts or their screeching. I'm not American (I'm Canadian, much worse) and I honestly think both Hillary and Trump should be kicked down a Spartan pit. Politics aside, I still see the regressive left as children. They don't know how the world works, they don't know the ills that will come of what they ask for, and they have no foresight. As I said, they have a gun by proxy of the government and shouldn't be underestimated. But I feel more shame and disa…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/16 12:26 AM
1

Eh, I guess I'm more of an optimist. To each their own I suppose.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 04:36 PM
4

You make a fair point. But don't conflate my view of them for a belief in superiority. A child with a gun is still a serious threat. Since they have the government control, they have the gun. Im not underestimating them, I'm just saying treating them like adults is the wrong combat tactic. That won't get through to them like scolding and shaming will. Most SJWs are what they are not out of malice but out of ignorance. They say "everyone's a liberal until they meet the real world".
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 03:40 PM
1

I'm gathering as much. Seems to me that humor is dead. Whether it's paranoia induced by "high occurrence rates" to paraphrase you, or some other reason, this sub has lost its rebellious sense of humor. Fun is dead in these parts. Then again, that's probably why I frequent other anti-sjw forums more. To get serious for a moment, I see it like this: feminists and sjws goal is to use shame and guilt to silence us into compliance. What better rebellion than humor? If their goal is to kill fun, why s…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:35 PM
6

I want you to stop. Take a moment to look at what you just posted. Do you see what went wrong? When you unscramble that word salad get back to me, because right now I can't decipher any of that.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 02:40 PM
8

The urge and the feeling you describe are definitely relatable. I doubt I would act on it, however. That bloodlust is tempered by a sense of being above it all. Feminism, leftists, SJWs, BLMs, all seem more like misbehaving children then an invading army. They need discipline, not so much a beatdown.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 02:18 PM
0

So because some people on rare occasion commit atrocities I can't make a joke about it? This sounds very familiar, almost like the time feminists tried to kill humor involving rape because that happens too... What ever happened to being mischievous and edgy? Life's not worth living if you can't have some fun once in a while. Turn off that buzzkill, there's no missiles coming our way.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:36 AM
-1

It's called comical overreaction. Using a gun is an over the top response to words, that's why it's funny.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 09:28 PM
-1

Humor.exe failed to initialize.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:57 PM
-1

People in prison can still reproduce. A gun gets right to the point.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:20 PM
1

She's so pedestrian...
/r/MensRights02/10/16 08:46 PM
1

Pussy pass: Denied judge Nanci Grant
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:45 PM
0

Amen to that.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:15 PM
1

I guess it depends how you look at it. You aren't controlling what they do, so I don't know if I would define it as oppressive control. But under a slightly loser definition of control, such as controlling how they look, it fits. I can see where you're coming from and agree.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 04:52 PM
1

That's how it started, so it was controlling then. But now a days it's more done out of tradition, aesthetics, or for STI prevention (all bullshit reasons, but I digress).
/r/MensRights30/09/16 04:35 PM
3

Maybe it's because actions speak louder than words. They may talk a good game, but while the republicans are trying to push policies to help those communities through better education and creating jobs, while cops are risking their lives to clean up the streets, BLM is burning cities, flipping cruisers, shooting cops, and rioting because cops shot a black guy who refused to drop his gun.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:39 PM
1

I'd enjoy it because in that particular line of work it is a sign of breaking the recruit, which is your job as an instructor. They need to be tough. Nobody gets a thick skin by being pampered.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 04:29 PM
11

Really? Haven't heard a peep about it over the screaming "WE WANT DEAD COPS!" And the sound of cities burning.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:30 PM
4

/S ?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:24 PM
10

Gotta love the different fitness standards most though. Women in my regiment always had to drag each other because even my 120lbs ass was too heavy. It would have been a treat if I got shot in the leg and only one of them was available to rescue me.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:27 PM
1

I've been under drill Sargent's, if I were one I would have enjoyed making her cry.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:26 PM
21

It's amazing the difference authoritative statements make on getting even stubborn people compliant.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 01:14 PM
5

Is it bad I would have straight up said "Humongous dick! what did you think!" Just go nuclear.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:59 AM
2

He isn't going to ruin an f-350. That thing won't even notice her splattering across the grill.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:57 AM
9

That's some Olympic level long jumping logic you got there. Seems like the racist is you. He said nothing about race, you're the one connecting his comments on food stamps and laziness to black people.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:55 AM
2

I think that is a trap both ends of the political spectrum can fall into. It has more to do with the "women are wonderful" effect than it does political stance.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 06:47 AM
4

Why can't we? Because governments only grow, they never shrink. People don't seem to realize that when you ask the government for help, you make them bigger and once new departments are opened to help with your problem, they won't shut down. They will just find new reasons to continue existing. Much like feminism post-civil rights getting on our case about fake wage gaps and manspreading. And the government likes it that way. They will continue to let us give them excuses to grow. That's how the…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 09:38 PM
3

I foresee another paradigm shift in the near future. Once it was republic vs democracy, then it was liberal vs conservative. Soon I see a fusion of different divisions within those movements to form two new opposing political parties: authoritarian or socialist vs the libertarian.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:49 PM
0

I think it's because socialism is closer to the feminist idea of equal outcome rather than equal opportunity like modern republicans and classical democrats. State owned "means of production" is against libertarian views of non-use of force. Someone has to make the means of production and they should (in my view) get to keep what they made and profit from it, which is more a free-market capitalist stance. I don't agree that the state or society should be allowed to lay claim to it, even if it is…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:24 PM
1

I support the idea of vaccinating my kids, but I would like them to change the preservatives like mercury that are used in vaccines to improve their shelf life. Granted, it's only trace amounts, but it adds up with the number of shots kids are given now a days.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:14 PM
1

Which is, fortunately or unfortunately (depending on your own political views) more of a Republican stance now a days. There doesn't seem to be as many outspoken libertarians on the Democratic side. There are some, like Sargon and Bill mentioned above, just not as many as some might like. Full disclaimer, it may just be my own confirmation bias as a conservative Canadian watching people like Milo, Steven Crowder, and Gavin McGinnis.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:11 PM
1

I'm fine to leave it, but I would like to ask if you still think dismissing it as bullshit without much of a counter argument is appropriate. If we have to agree to disagree then it would seem there's a measure of subjectivity, at which point I don't think either of our stances should be called bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:18 PM
1

She's not factoring the social aspect out, though. It's simply a different subject. Just because she chose to be specific about the part of sex (reproductive strategies used by humans) she's talking about doesn't make her claims "bullshit". It is men's instinctive strategies that society at large demonizes most, so she chose to focus on a video explaining it to clear up misinformation. The social aspects of sex don't change our strategies at their core, they just add nuance that would require an…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:36 PM
2

News flash, we are primitive animals, not as men but as humans. Higher intelligence doesn't mean our instincts went away. We're still apes at our core. Even sex for pleasure is motivated out of instinct. Her descriptions perfectly explain why we tend to follow certain paths and behaviors. By the way, at no point does following instinct the way she describes make us bad people. The motivations behind your behavior aren't what make you a good or bad person, it's the behavior itself. Having sex mor…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:18 PM
1

The way man survived in eons past: dressing what he can, sleeping by a small fire, hunting and gathering for food. I live in Canada. Deer and small game are abundant if you know how to catch them. I will also never give up my .308. that thing is my life line if I'm ever stuck out in the wilderness as I'm not good at trapping.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:43 AM
2

What do you take issue with exactly? I largely agreed with what she said. Most of it was concise, logical, well thought out. While she made a point of mentioning the moral implications, she posed them as disclaimers to otherwise unbiased description of different strategies.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:37 AM
13

Military don't just engage in fire fights. Once you take an area from the enemy, you have to prevent counter attack. That attack won't always come in the form of soldiers that shoot at you immediately. Picture this: you're gate guard. A group of men dressed in civilian attire carrying rifles (as is common in war torn areas, it doesn't necessarily make them combatants) approach. You tell them to stop so you can confiscate their weapons before allowing them to pass into the town you're guarding. O…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 09:25 PM
1

And I'm told men can't handle rejection. We take it every day and we don't go on a stabbing spree... Well, unless we're Elliot Roger.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 07:58 PM
1

Because they had to. The whole thing is there as a contingency. If we're losing the war and at risk of foreign occupation (likely by a nation that does not have our well-being in mind), we may need more troops than have volunteered. What do we do then? That's what selective service is. Someone has to do it, and I would rather the fit ones be at the front lines where there superior physical abilities can give us the edge.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:42 PM
2

I've got a female boss. We butt heads on a regular basis, but I don't think her vagina has anything to do with the conflicts though. We're both very opinionated people who are used to being the ones in charge. Bus aside from the occasional spat over whos plan is better, we get along just fine. I know manage my own sub-dept. So now we don't fight as much being that we each manage different areas. She lets me do my thing and I let her do hers.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:25 PM
9

It's called Vaselgel. I receive their newsletter by email on rare occasion. Big pharma has been doing everything in his power to stop it. It's been 10 years or so and despite a working product and jumping through the FDA hoops it doesn't seem to be getting anywhere.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 07:10 PM
2

She looks like a classy lass. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/16 09:08 AM
2

I was actually debating bringing that one up too. But seeing as that's a bit outside the scope of many people's ability for one reason or another, I wasn't sure how relatable it would be.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:31 PM
2

I like to call this the "Ivory tower of Academia" phenomenon. If you're smart, you go to good schools. There, you're brainwashed by lefties that dominate those spaces. Safe in the classes, you're also exempt from exposure to the gritty trials of the common man. With such a perspective, how could one hope to assume a firm grasp of the world we live in? Join the army or become a farmer. You'll come out far more often conservative than liberal. Those jobs smack you over the head with that thing we …
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:59 PM
3

I hate to break it to you, but the most clear-cut definition of rape is sexual intercourse without consent. You had sexual intercourse without consent. You were raped by even the tightest definition of the word. Maybe the law doesn't uniformly recognize it because of your gender, but with genders reversed this would be textbook.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 02:26 PM
5

I'm really curious about the details of what is going on in someone's head when they think any experience is solely one gender's experience, that nobody else can have it as well. Those mental gymnastics must be really interesting, even if the end result is a regurgitation of shite.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:40 AM
7

I'm not sure how it would interfere. Just because a man got raped by a woman doesn't somehow make it appear women got raped less. They're two independent statistics. The only way I see it interfering would be in direct comparisons, such as "% of victims who were male/female". But if you're redefining male victim rape so it isn't, then it's a BS comparison anyways.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:33 AM
1

Yeah, I don't think we will agree. Fair disclosure, I'm coming at these sorts of topics from the view of a social libertarian. I think a business should be allowed to discriminate all they want if they choose. I think it's more morally reprehensible to force our own subjective opinions of what is right and wrong onto private citizens or businesses. Unless you're paying for their services (such as through government funding) they should not be obligated to serve you if they don't want to. The onl…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:25 AM
2

So you're issue is that it's a business? So having racially or sexually exclusive social spaces is fine? As for our specific example of the barber shop, you do know your penis isn't the only difference between you and a woman, right? You and I have a beard. Funny thing, that happens to be what this business specializes in. Now, I imagine that you might make the argument that any salon could provide those services as well, but that means dividing training between facial hair and the types of hair…
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:24 PM
2

So it isn't a fair assumption that women would largely be uncomfortable with me talking about vaginas, boobs, picking up women, etc? Because I know I would be uncomfortable if women talked about dicks and picking up men in my presence. I don't think they should be prevented from talking about those things. But I would rather they do it in their own space. That's just an example. I'm not sure I understand why a racially inclusive Miss America is not racially equal. Seems quite the opposite, that …
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:41 PM
1

OK, I'll grant that who judges who more is subjective, perhaps we'll have to agree to disagree. But on what basis is having a place where you can be with just your gender against equality if both genders are given such places?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:03 PM
2

Creating an exclusion zone based on genitals isn't against equality. Creating them for one one gender and not the other, in other words, having a double standard, is against equality. I'm a man, I want male only spaces because the judgement of other men is different and wholely less hostile than the judgement of women, even in a secular and egalitarian culture like the area I live in. And if I want to claim a right to a space in which I am free from female judgement then it is only fair women ha…
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:36 PM
2

I'm not against male or female only spaces. I think it's a matter of having a space where you can be with people of your sex without judgement from the opposite one. The nature of the human species means culture may never get to a point where the sexes won't judge each other. So I think it is fair game to let each have their own.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 02:58 PM
1

All I'm seeing here is you dismissing my arguments using emotional statements to separate completely legit conclusions from their supporting factors. When you want to exert some self-awareness for the purpose of understanding what is being said, we can continue this conversation. For now, I might as well be arguing with the Pepsi can on my desk. I'm sure you can guess how much I enjoy such use of my time and energy.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:45 AM
1

Don't just go around changes the meaning of words... My sincerest apologies on referring to common use, rather than referring to the definitions set out in the holy dictionary. this behavior doesn't stop a woman from being safe, or responsible. Way to completely miss the point I was making. I don't care how safe you are while you're cheating on me, you're still cheating on me. Likewise, outside a relationship I care about how likely she is to actually be faithful and experienced with being in a …
/r/MensRights07/09/16 12:12 AM
1

No, whores/sluts are women who are with a lot of different men. We're turned off by it because it is a strong indicator of a woman's lack of ability to commit to or maintain a faithful and long lasting relationship (if not indicating habitual behavior, then at least a lack of skill/experience). Nobody has an issue with a woman who las a lot of sex, as long as it's only to a small number of men.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:31 PM
1

Why not a world full of whores? Because you can't turn a hoe into a house wife, and some of us would prefer the later.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:25 PM
2

If traditionalism is guilty of anything, it's for being outdated. As far as equality is concerned, it was reasonably fair, centered around the concept of personal responsibility, something people these days will bend over backwards to avoid. I'm very traditional, but I wouldn't say im a traditionalist.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:06 PM
3

If they will not hear our pleas, they will feel our wrath.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 09:41 PM
1

If one graduated from "snowflake" campuses is there anything that person could put on a resume that would mitigate the negative stereotypes associated with such a campus education?
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:07 PM
1

Ah, fair enough. I'm not sure on that one. That would probably be more OPs area.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 03:03 PM
1

Muscle mass isn't directly linked to your DNA, it is an environmental response. What is programmed into your DNA is your testosterone levels, what your max mass is, and how easily you gain or lose it.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 02:52 PM
1

That's pretty much all the details I got on it. Apparently he won because he never actually did any PIV, he was the safe type and didn't have condoms. So her claim that he raped her was immediately under suspicion.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 09:38 PM
5

Our company has one on staff. She's helped a few employees out of hot water, not just the company. She got my former manager's brother out of a false rape accusation. She fucked him at a party and someone saw and recorded it. The video went online and the chicks parents found out. She cried rape to save face with her parents. In an odd twist of fate he won the case and everyone in town knew she was a whore. She had to move away to escape the sullied reputation.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/16 02:18 PM
4

Correlation is not causation. This goes for both expectations and the turnout you are mentioning. The article even mentioned that this requires further research due to the overweening number of factors that could be at play.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 05:17 PM
1

I glared at her for a few seconds, feeling a lot of shock and anger building up inside of me... And you don't think she noticed? Your frame broke. Shes walking on you because of this. Going off about it to us here is also what we call complaining.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 03:31 PM
1

Are you serious? You just told us all about how butt hurt you were when she took your fan and everyone sided with her.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 03:14 PM
1

Where I live men hold the door open for me far more than women do. In fact, I've had women slam it behind them in my face. As a general rule, I hold the door open for anyone close enough behind me. It's called manners, being a decent human being, which seems to be something men here are much more prone to than women.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 03:01 PM
12

You start at 50%. The other 50% is earned, the first 50% is also subject to withdrawal if you're shitty.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 02:06 PM
11

I'm going to have to agree with /u/Kill_Frosty on this one. Feminism has never had the slightest interest in men's issues. In fact, there's innumerable examples of feminism proactively trying to prevent men from finding solutions to men's problems. If they have ever helped us, it is as an unintended side effect of working on women's issues.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:18 AM
9

If anything, men should be more embarrassed we have feminists... it's like a black member of the KKK. That level of self-loading and pandering is so pathetic it turns my stomach.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 05:37 AM
1

I'm seeing red flags from her based on what I've seen here. It seems like she values her ideology more than you. Not good for marriage. The mature thing for her to do, even if she disagrees with you, would be to hear you out on what issues you face as a man, separate from her views on what women face.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 10:22 PM
3

I amazed nobody even attempted to call her out for marginalizing real victims of sexual harassment by trying to conflate her petty grievance with the real experiences.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:24 PM
1

Read my other comments. I have explained enough.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:02 PM
3

It is sad, indeed, that such a choice needs to be made. But what I am saying is that since those choices exist at least this book is laying out the facts about each as unbiased as possible. Based on the information the book puts forward, I think most people would see the rational decision as being not to cut.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:34 AM
1

Agreed. But again, that's not what is being discussed. What is being discussed is not which decision is morally correct, it's whether the book is biased or not in explaining those decision. You seem so infatuated on virtue signaling your stance on circumcision you are failing to realize I agree with you. But, one more time, it isn't what is being discussed.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:16 AM
1

How about we leave what we would choose and why out of it. It isn't what we're talking about. I agree that circumcision is wrong and should not be permitted... But the argument on the table is whether the book is portraying the argument from a bias perspective or not, which it isn't.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:01 AM
1

While I absolutely agree that circumcision is wrong, it's not the only side to argue. That is a bias.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 07:10 PM
1

I'll admit I have no idea what that word salad you just typed up means, I'm not that smart. I'm just looking at the issue as having two sides: To cut it or leave it intact. They aren't telling you which choice to pick, they're accurately portraying both sides of the argument. Just like in religion. There's a side that says there's a god, there's a side that says there is not, and being unbiased is to not take a position. Saying there may or may not be a god.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 01:45 AM
2

It doesn't seem bias to me. It pretty accurately lays out both the pros and cons, the reasons some do it and some don't. It mentions that disease prevention is only cited by some and isn't for certain. It mentions the pain effect, and that the trend is falling out. It even mentions that some believe that such a surgery is against the rights of the infant. Over all, it seems like they're doing their best not to take a side on the issue at all.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 12:07 AM
3

Yet another moronic journalist claiming Roosh is an MRA. Despite him saying he is not. Most MRAs want nothing to do with the guy, nor he with MRAs.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 06:06 PM
1

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
/r/MensRights16/08/16 06:02 PM
1

Validity [ ] Relevance [ ] Importance [ ] Passion [ ] Huh... ok then, FUCK YOU!! Wow. That feels good. I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 04:41 PM
1

If we put even the best women against the best men, they would never win in most events. I think getting first place against half the species is better than mere honerable mentions against the whole. Plus any martial sports, were women stand to get quite badly injured if pitted against male combatants. We don't separate races in the Olympics because there's not even half the difference between races as there are between the sexes. As for why there's no men's rhythmic gymnastics: there's not enou…
/r/MensRights16/08/16 03:46 AM
1

I'm not sure what you're getting at. Are you saying women shouldn't be in the Olympics?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 03:37 AM
1

Lol me a white knight. That's rich! Thanks for the laugh. Screw it. I can't find the information I needed. I was looking for the information on how many soldiers receive pensions per year and how much they receive. Perhaps you will have better luck than I. But as I said, if you cut even a single week per year of exercises per unit you would easily make up the difference in the pensions. Tax payers would shit a brick if they knew the cost of a single field ex for one unit, particularly field exer…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:38 PM
1

Since you didn't get it, I'll repeat: at only 213% higher instance of injury at an enrollment rate far bellow men, the cost is negligible. A few extra hands for a little extra cost. Again: a few extra hands for a little extra cost. The tax payers won't even notice the difference. Or heck, make it one or two weeks less spent in field exercises and you've broken even (field exercises can cost a small fortune for every week and for every unit that participates).
/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:20 PM
1

I am looking at the military. As was I. Women represent a 6x injury rate. It's actually just over double. So this is only 213% cost. Then when you factor for the significantly lower representation of women in those rolls, this comes out as a nearly negligible increase to expenses. If you're that much of a penny pincher, perhaps we could formulate some solutions to either reduce female injury rates like specialized training?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 08:24 PM
1

Water polo I think is one. Their higher body fat floats and gives them an advantage over men whos' muscles sink.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 08:01 PM
1

Not necessarily. At least in Canada, medical pensions are usually a fixed amount based on the type of injury. So whether a soldier retires at 35 or 50 doesn't make that much of a difference. If I'm incorrect and it is based on remaining expected life span, we could adjust how we handle it and put in a disclaimer to females that they might end up short shot if they break down early from expected wear-down type injuries. To most of these issues, it shouldn't take much effort to conceive of equitab…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 06:09 PM
1

at what cost Well, that's the golden question, isn't it? Is a life saved worth others risked? This is one of the moral questions we've been asking since recorded history began. Everyone answers differently. Myself, I'll take the risk, as long as I'm not putting another mission in jeopardy. Women can typically carry enough weight to make the minimums. With the right physical conditioning a 14km ruck March with full gear is no issue. The only place I see max load being an issue is in dragging comr…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:57 PM
3

I attended two of their conferences last year. One by the Students for Liberty on threats to chartered rights, and one the night after hosted by a men's rights group. Both featured speeches by Karen Straughan and Theryn Meyer (third from the right in OP's picture).
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:06 PM
1

I've mentioned before, as did a currently serving female in the media some time ago, that the world is not ready to see females treated the way males are in POW situations in places like the Middle East. I'm aware of that drawback. But if women want to serve, that's something the public will have to accept. Who knows, maybe it will also raise awareness about the horrors men face as POWs and force a change in military tactics to avoid soldiers getting captured, or increase efforts to rescue our s…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:41 PM
2

They don't agree with observable reality? Well that sounds like a failing on their part. There's a reason we laugh at Flat Earthers and Young Earth Creationists. The regressive left, if it makes the same errors, should not be exempt from similar judgement.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:30 PM
6

The gender segregation in most sports is because men would absolutely dominate women across all but a few sports. It would not be fair to women as they would seldom be able to win under those circumstances. It's not sexist to acknowledge that men are far superior in most areas of physical ability. It's not women's fault or men's fault, it's just the sexually dimorphic nature of humans.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:38 PM
2

Actually, I think the problem is male psychology. If a woman is as capable as a man, she should be able to serve. However, history has shown men will threaten mission success to protect females on instinct. The solution could be as simple as gender separated units so the two aren't working directly with eachother. The only problem is convincing enough women to jump into that roll to form a chain of command.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:27 PM
6

That is seriously fucked up. You're not safe even having a long term fling! Your only choice at that point is turning into a monk and living away from civilization.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:48 AM
3

In Canada, particularly BC, it is handled almost identically to alimony. What's worse is that becoming common law is an opt-out situation. Ive just opted to never live with a woman. When it gets extended to men living together, I'm head out to live in the bush.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:21 AM
1

Because we're being the bigger man.... I'll see myself out.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:20 AM
1

Exactly, sort of. Due process exists because we care about victims. The first step in helping a victim is first determining who the victim is.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:58 PM
1

Good argument.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:57 PM
1

No, I'm not. That's why I keep one's number saved in case I need his council.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:53 PM
6

Don't date mainstream millennials. I found a farm girl from a very traditional conservative family. She might not be much to look at but her loyalty has been consistently proven. Shes hard working, loyal and altruistic to a fault, supportive, shares a somewhat redpill view, and is a freak in bed. What's more, her entire family loves me like an adopted son/brother to the point that in my rare conflicts with their daughter, they tend towards my side over hers. So long as I continue to take proper …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/16 04:05 PM
1

"You need a lawyer" is a standard response for a good reason. If it has anything to do with law, you're a naïve fool to dismiss the value of an expert in the field. There's so many ways you can get boned hard with the way our laws are written, it's like a minefield. A lawyer can point those out like a mine detector.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:45 PM
8

"you don't move next to the train tracks, then complain about the noise the train makes"
/r/MensRights07/08/16 04:32 AM
2

That in no way excludes the possibility you are veteran. And no, I will not shut up about it because I'm sick of seeing it. Take some damned pride in your service and conduct yourself like the grown adult you are.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:24 PM
2

I should know better than to what? To bludgeon someone with that holier than thou bullshit? Or to make false assumptions about how the world works? Because you did both of those things. I've done neither. You'll notice I also didn't assume you haven't served, just that your behavior is disrespectful to veterans. Having worked with USAF on more than one occasion, I have nothing but respect for your brothers in arms. Your childish antics don't do them justice. You're a veteran? Start acting like o…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:03 PM
1

Cool. Then you should know better.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 10:30 PM
2

Actually, they did open combat trades to women. Nobody showed up. in the Canadian forces, women in combat trades are extremely rare. my squadron of +100 people had 6 females. I don't think women are interested in fulfilling a "duty" to their country. Also, I served; stop using who served and who didn't as some kind of moral bludgeoning tool. It's disrespectful to those who have.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:13 PM
3

Are you forgetting Kim Kardashian? She literally owes her fame to "leaked" sex tapes.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:11 AM
4

Well, you do have one place...
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:28 PM
3

I (25/m) did as well. It got to the point of violence and assault many times. Not just against my dad, but against myself and my younger sister. Despite going through it for 10 years, 5 years longer than my sister, I've all but completely recovered. My sister, however, still is visibly scarred. My dad went through hell, but stuck around hoping he could take custody and run. It wouldn't have worked out were it not for my step mother, who offered to help him fight for custody. The courts made it c…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 08:07 PM
1

Even the shit slinging has purpose. It serves to demonstrate the worst case scenarios in the public forum. One can learn from the mistakes of both sides in these incidents and prepare for a better defense if faced with such lunacy.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:48 PM
0

Same to you on all counts. Have a good one, dude.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:08 PM
1

I am not capable of that. Then I regret to inform you that you and/or your loved ones will die. That is, of course, your decision to make. But for those of us who wish to live, we should have the right to the means of doing so. Guns have literally one function. To cause physical damage to a living organism. Guns have many uses: Protecting one's life, resisting tyranny, hunting for food or to reduce invasive species, to damage other objects, to defend a country, to deter threats, etc. This may be…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 07:50 AM
1

Whooph. There's a mouthful.... Fear what you want, I don't care. What you are afraid of, your feelings, do not and should not affect what I can and cannot do. Meanwhile, I'm going to do what empirically makes me safer: carrying a threat equalizer and relying on being better with it than the guy who wants my wallet. If you don't trust me, carry a gun; If I draw my gun and threaten you, put me 6 feet under. But when you try to advocate that I not be allowed to carry a gun, you are saying that I do…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 03:33 AM
1

people will wake up and realize those metal death boxes aren't saving anyone. They're saving plenty of people. You just don't see it because it isn't as effective clickbait. Again, I can also point you to the military. We're a peace keeping nation, meaning those guns our troops are walking around with are used almost exclusively to save people. But sure, you don't have to buy a gun. Nowhere did I imply you had to. But for those of us who understand that the bad-guys aren't going to magically gro…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:10 AM
1

It only makes sense to people who wants guns, not to people who are against guns. You think I want a gun because "fuck yeah guns"? Look, if you can somehow rid the world of the cursed things, power to you. However, romantic a thought it might be, it's not realistic. Right, because we hear so many more stories about civilians saving the day with their guns, than we hear about civilians using their guns in criminal shootings. /s People doing good deeds is expected, thereby not news. So of course y…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:29 AM
3

Well violence is in human nature. Whether with guns, knives, or bare fists humans will find an excuse to fight. A gun is an equalizer. It puts even the weakest person on a level playing field with a crazed assailant. So given that guns will always find a way into society and, occasionally, into the hands of someone violent, it only makes sense that people should be armed. It's not adding fuel to the fire. It's fighting fire with fire, a common tactic of those who... fight fires. Stamping "guns n…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:03 PM
1

You do know that the foreskin alone has as many MORE nerves as the tip of your clitoris (the part that gets removed in most forms of FGM), right? Approximately 380 thousand nerves. The rest of the clitoris that is internal is more comparable to what is left behind in a man's glans and shaft. Also, the clit gets cut off quickly, it isn't hard to get at. The foreskin needs to be scraped away from the glans (to which it is attached, like your fingernails to the nail beds) before they can even begin…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:10 AM
1

It wasn't me implying that any were religious zealots, I was only refuting that Trump was one. You're right, most candidates are just running on whatever is popular or whatever they've been paid to run on. Trump is financially much more (though not entirely) financially independent than the others. So what you see is at least closer to what you will get. Even if I don't like everything he says, at least I can see the dick aimed at my ass with him. Hillary and other candidates are keeping it unde…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:30 PM
6

Thankfully, Trump isn't a religious nutter. He may be an idiot, but he is a businessman and at least he's not a lying criminal. Hillary for Prison, 2016.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 02:39 PM
1

I fuckin wish. It made my year. But if you can find the video i mentioned of the guy that does the same thing, it was almost identical. She tried to use her body weight to stop the paper from going over the end. The handle of the jack acted like a catapult and launched her over the fall in skid into the loading dock. Thankfully she wasn't seriously injured, just a nasty bruise and some scrapes from the pavement.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:54 PM
3

Men do some stupid shit. But women aren't exactly perfect either. A girl at work the other day managed to catapult herself of a loading dock using a pallet jack loaded with a bale of plastic wrap. It was almost identical to that video of the guy who did the same off the back of a truck. We should also remember, men house both the lowest and the highest IQ. So for every moron cutting a tree down on his own head, there's another landing a probe on a speeding asteroid with a control response delay …
/r/MensRights25/07/16 02:57 PM
2

I was objectified... the next morning I woke up with leprosy... it was horrible.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 09:17 PM
1

Kilts are the next best thing. And they aren't just acceptable, they're considered by many to be manly as fuck.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:43 PM
4

Milo isn't an MRA. He's explained this before. He's said before he's not an MRA, the reason he shares MRA views is only "because MRAs tend to be right". Can we stop calling people MRAs just because they agree with us on some points?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:13 PM
15

Nobody is perfect and everyone fucks up somewhere at some point. Cesar just made a big one. Hopefully he's learned from his mistake.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 12:32 AM
2

No, you're imagining that. Watch the video, she's even encouraging the boy to make humping motions back. Why? Because if you can make people feel guilty for something they can't help, you control the populace. Sex is one of the most powerful drives we have. Demonize sexuality and enforce control. When people inevitably fail to follow your strict instruction, inform them that they are eternally damned unless they repent. Offer your church as a place of repentance. Require tithing and service fees…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 09:37 AM
2

Twirking was invented as a dance move that insinuates having sex in a cowgirl position. She's doing it to the sexual organs of a child. Cutting off the foreskin is an act of sexual control... Being performed on a sexual organ... then he puts his mouth around it, just like oral sex. Your doctor will never put his mouth around your penis. A brief thought experiment: I mean, if you really want to get down to it, there's no such thing as murder because we're all just glorified meat computers. To "ki…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:39 AM
3

at a bris the boy's penis is taken into the mouth of whoever the guy is that performs the circumcision. And many call this religiously endorsed pedophilia. Never mind the barbarism of circumcision itself.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:44 AM
0

Their solution is a tax on vacant properties' owners. We'll see if it actually works. If the tax isn't high enough it won't desuade foreign buyers. If it is too high, it will make renting out properties risky and those that can't afford to buy will take a hit.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/16 09:25 PM
2

So if my parents raised me like a girl my penis would shrivel up inside and I would grow tits when puberty hits?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:46 PM
3

Really? Between "microagressions" and ticketing train riders for "manspreading", you didn't think they would be openly petty? What have they been doing this whole time?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:40 PM
1

I call people pussies all the time. It's one of my favorite slurs next to dick and cunt. I don't see what the controversy is. I'm proudly an asshole myself.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:33 PM
10

-abolish deluth model. -create gender parity with genital mutilation ban. -budget out funding for men's shelters. -minimum sentencing for proven false aligations of assault and sexual assault. -reduce alimony durations to around 1 year maximum. -reform child support regulation. -assume equal parental custody. -push for ban on campuses acting on behalf of law enforcement in federal crime cases. -schedule regular audits into courts and law enforcement to reduce discrimination against race and sexe…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:18 PM
4

and assuming even just 1% of those convictions would carry a punishment of execution, with 2,193,798 prisoners in the US, that would mean over a thousand innocent deaths.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:35 AM
1

It's difficult to pin down what a religions definition is. After all, the spectrum of beliefs across different religions or groups commonly considered religions is too varied for most definitions to encompass. If religion requires god, then any non-daistic belief system would be disqualified. So any definition of religion would unfortunately have to remain quite vague. Perhaps any set of beliefs that identifies the nature of reality or existence that is spiritual or at least not based in science…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:18 PM
1

Buddhism has many different branches, but many of the main ones have Devas. Devas are considered gods in name only, depicted as no more wise than man (Buddha was considered their teacher). Buddha himself denounced the idea of a creator as being part of eternalistic views he considered harmful. Hinduism is a much more diverse religion than many are aware. Some are polytheistic, monotheistic and even Atheistic, as the religion's core doctrine is not dependant on a divine creator. Jainism sees the …
/r/MensRights06/07/16 12:24 AM
0

Well if patriarchy isn't a close enough example, I should point out that there's religions with no gods at all. There's religions with few gods, many gods, weak gods, strong gods, and even some with no gods at all. Did you know Atheistic Jewdaism is a thing?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:32 PM
1

What's the criteria for being a religion, in your eyes?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 04:15 AM
1

Stereotypes exist for a reason.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 12:45 AM
-1

And people still insist they aren't a religion.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 10:30 PM
1

I've seen plenty of arguments that men are paid more because they work more hours, I haven't seen any that say women wast more of those hours using rest rooms as OP claims. Citation needed. As for women wasting time, I really don't care. Managers know when staff are time wasters. Hell, I can't take a drink without my manager meticulously appearing from the other side of the building. In the end, I know my higher overtime and productivity will get me promoted far faster and bring in higher pay ra…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 11:54 PM
2

Well if women are already spending 40 minutes more on the can out of an 8 hour day, as OP claims, then are they not already "stealing from company productivity"? Fuck off troll Oh noes! They figured me out! That's totally why I use reasoned arguments and ask for citation! /s. Give me a break.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 11:15 PM
1

Because the pay gap only exists because men work more hours than women (among other factors). If you stop paying for breaks and women take more breaks, then men will be paid more on top of the already prominent pay gap. This will make the aggregate income of men even further ahead of women. For hours worked (whether it be at a desk or on the toilet) in the same job position, men and women are paid the same. It's literally illegal not to pay them the same for identical work.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 11:10 PM
2

What wrong with having all. Employees wear a lanyard or bracelet that is chipped to monitor movement and rest breaks? I'll just leave the lanyard at my desk to shit. not exactly fool proof. As for men working longer each day than women, there are like 3 posts relating to the topic just today! And that's why there's a pay gap. Men work more hours. As in, more over time and less part time jobs. They aren't talking about how people are using those hours. If women are wasting more time on the can th…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 10:43 PM
2

I honestly wasn't expecting much, considering the tone and content (or lack thereof) in his opening post.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 10:34 PM
1

Citation? I get you're probably joking about collaring and chipping employees (at least I hope you are, hard to tell over the internet). But without citation you might as well be ranting about a strawman. This doesn't contribute anything. Edit: also, if women really are taking 40 minutes of breaks, not paying for wasted time would make the pay gap even larger. Don't forget, the pay gap is in men's favor due to working more hours and in higher paid positions. Now you want to cut women's longer br…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 09:24 PM
1

Yup. It should be left to her to make a deal with him that he finds agreeable in exchange for support. If no such arrangement can be found, such is life. Find someone else who will accept your deal. No bribes, no legal action, just two adults being adults and working things out between each other.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:19 PM
3

He's not saying there isn't social pressure. He's saying that social pressure isn't the whole picture or indeed the largest part. The bigger part is personal pride and desire to achieve, a perfectly healthy mindset. Steroids make those goals easier to achieve if used modestly and safely.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 09:14 PM
1

I've relocated myself to living the way I want. They can call me whatever they want, try to take what rights they want, and persecute me for being who and what I am. What ever happens happens. Better to die on your feet that live on your knees. At least that's my sentiment. I know not everyone will agree with me and they aren't wrong to do so. This is the choice I've made.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:42 PM
50

Tell a woman she's fat and she gets PTSD and goes after you for harassment. Tell a man he's fat and his response is "yeah, I should probably hit the gym and do something about that, buuuut I'm too lazy for that so fuck it" Masculinitysofragile? Right...
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:24 PM
1

I think you just made a point against your own argument. You said spending more time with children teaches coping mechanisms. Well, childcare workers spend more time around kids, are specifically trained, look after more kids at a time, usually dont do so alone, and care for the kids in an environment where they are being watched. It would be harder to get away with abuse. Also consider the demographic that professional child work attracts. You sign up to be a child care worker, so working with …
/r/MensRights22/06/16 02:11 PM
1

Exactly. I contend the notion as well. But I've heard some within our circles use the stats to claim women are more violent than men in proportion to their proximity to children. I just want to make sure we're all on the same page that it isn't the case any more than the reverse.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:10 AM
2

I would see it as a counterpoint to those on both sides saying it is a gendered issue. Both genders can be shitty at equal rates (assuming the question I asked was on to something). But yeah, it would still mean tender years legislation is bullshit and both parents should have equal access by default. Hell, even if one genders was genuinely more likely to be abusive to kids, that shouldn't change equal access rights. It should just answer why that gender would be prosecuted for abuse more.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:29 PM
1

In a way, I suppose it could be put that way. Personally I separate grooming to impress someone from squeezing a free meal out of someone with an empty promise of pussy.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 08:04 PM
3

Question: is this really that women are more abusive or is it just because the majority of child care providers are women? In other words, if more men and less women took predominant care over children would this trend reverse itself?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:52 PM
3

I think a willingness to manipulate or a lack of awareness of the habit are grounds to ditch the woman. I'm not interested in a woman with dubious moral character. Just because you're smart enough to see through it doesn't make it ok behavior.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 04:46 PM
2

Precisely. It's true both ways, hence we are here.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 10:16 PM
1

Ah, that makes far more sense. I agree. There should always be a time for men to learn what rights they have or don't have and discus what should or needs to be fought for. I'm just saying history is so loaded with the deeds of men that we should be proud of it, not shamed for it because there's not enough women contributing.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:22 PM
1

I'm not a fan of feminists, but yes, they do say that. They say it in a demeaning way, I embrace it. Yes, history is overwhelmingly filled with the deeds of men. I consider it a compliment, it means we've been working hard and accomplishing a lot. That said, it's also full of our many mistakes. If we want to continue to be successful as a society, we would do well to learn from those mistakes.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:40 AM
1

We already have men's studies. They're called "history classes". One lesson students should take away from them is the old adage "those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it".
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:24 PM
2

Autocorrect. Guess my phone is not a fan of higher education.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:16 PM
3

I'm pretty sure the money I've spent there has put someone's kid through college. I will continue to do so as long as the coffee and food are good and inexpensive.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:47 AM
3

Fair enough. I wasn't aware my info was out of date. Is testosterone still linked with slower social development in healthy boys or is that also disproven?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:17 PM
3

Violence isn't toxic, why do you think you aren't starting your morning with "Seig Heil!"? It depends what you direct it towards. Islam teaches to aim it at innocent people. Stoicism isn't toxic. Not everyone appreciates puking their emotions everywhere. An emotional hunter isn't an effective one because he empathizes with the prey. How can he then feed or defend his family? From the beginning of recorded time being unemotional was a valued trait by both men and women. Books on the topic of stoi…
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:34 PM
4

I get that. But I don't think it sends the message as well as it could. "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind".
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:03 PM
6

Milo would disagree. I think the realistic thing to say would be that there's morons and intellectuals on both sides.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:03 PM
1

I know a few, but not personally. Friends of friends, kind of thing. My girlfriend thinks feminism is ridiculous and men get the shit end of the stick, but she's not much of a proactive participant in fighting it. She doesn't expect me to marry her and while she wants kids one day she is sympathetic to my hesitation. I give her credit though: she's a little preoccupied with recent events in her own life.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:19 PM
1

PSH if you're still wearing more than a T-shirt it isn't the true Albertan way.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:28 PM
5

Steven's rant was still the highlight of the panel in my eyes. "Listen up, you silly liberal fruitcakes. I came out here to tell a few jokes, time for a reality check" Omg, my sides entered orbit.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:02 AM
7

Well maybe if you stopped acting like a child...
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:10 AM
3

Wet, adjective - Covered or saturated with water or another liquid. -Dictionary.com, the first link when googleing the definition. Water is quite saturated with itself, more so the more pure it is. There's no rule in language against it. The sun isn't in space anymore than earth is and fire works just fine here. The sun's outer layers have a high density of lighter elements like oxygen. Even if it didn't, oxygen isn't the only ionizable gas. the sun's material is primarily plasma/ions, which is …
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:33 AM
1

I think you may need to re-read what I said. Also have a look at what I was replying to.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:33 AM
-1

I'm not ready to defy bodily autonomy by sterilizing people. But parents should have to undergo a competency test if they want license to raise their offspring.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:55 PM
2

I'm well acquainted with the MR sub. I've been around a year or so. I'm well aware of the fate of atheism subs as I was banned from the main. As for the politics here, they're all over the map because different people come from different backgrounds. But aside from the occasional interloper, this sub is relatively SJW free. We're the ones they hate, they have no reason to be a part of this community. Claiming I'm not up to speed with something here, of all places, is quite presumptuous. I'll be …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:57 AM
6

So one guy calls you an SJW and you go and make a full PSA about how we're not SJWs? At what point did one person saying something equate to all of us thinking the same way? You asked him if he was triggered... No, from how you're handling all this, you're the one who seems to have been triggered.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:27 AM
0

As someone who had to move only to find only 0.6% of housing was available and prices were almost double from the last time I bought, holy shit, ain't this the truth? My wallet aches for city council to stop pandering to overseas investors and start cracking down. Homelessness is already insane, just look at E. Hastings. I almost ended up homeless not from lack of money but from lack of housing.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/16 10:52 PM
6

Who is saying we are SJWs? I've seriously never heard this.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:37 PM
6

That's what I thought. I'm not allowed to post on the atheism sub anymore because saying someone is acting like a 10 year old is somehow worse than being called a sexist misogynist.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/16 12:43 AM
1

Just don't come to Canada. I keep getting boned because it's 2016.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:09 AM
2

I don't remember where I read it, but i recall some economist saying that if men universally took just 3 days off it would take 3 years to repair the damage and catch up. That's every man from plumbers to the president. If we checked out or were killed off entirely, I don't think there would be any recovering from that baring a major evolutionary shift. That's assuming they have some way to dodge the reproductive problem.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 07:07 AM
4

I think I have one of them saved on my desktop but I'm mid-move at the moment and it won't be up until Friday. My memory is vague so take what I said with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:22 AM
5

There's a few of those around. One I read listed social anxieties and difficulty bonding to other people, particularly their parents (could you blame him? They should have protected him from that trauma). If women need a problem to effect women before they take action against it then there you go: men have difficulty bonding and socializing with women when they've been circumcised.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 10:44 PM
3

There are only two occasions I use my veteran status to get something: veteran plates for the free parking because carrying change for the meter is a pain in the ass, and access to the legion for a quit(er) place to drink.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 10:40 PM
3

A cat is a good low maintenance companion. You can just leave some food and water out and keep a clean place to shit and they're happy. Good for land whale tumblerettes. A dog requires maintenance and a lot of it. They need to be walked, given something to do, fed (often more then cats), etc. The trade off being a high level of returned affection a dog will give over a cat.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 06:03 PM
2

I'll address this. Just as I was then, I'm not trying to say everyone should share my opinion, but this is how I'm personally looking at it. The idea of where life begins is really subjective at this point. The problem I see with existing stances is that they are based on biological processes beginning that would disqualify other born people. Example: when the heart starts, when the neurons begin communicating, when it starts moving, etc. Well, there's people on various forms of life support bec…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 02:55 AM
3

This is off topic and I've been over it all before. If you like, feel free to check my recent post history if you want to know more about my perspective.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 06:43 PM
2

Considering most places have some kind of safe harbor laws, my thinking was that it was preferable to simply give the child up. Hopefully he or she will end up in a good home. I don't want to force parenthood on anyone either, but I don't think killing it is an appropriate way out.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:14 PM
4

I'm an atheist. I wouldn't quite say I'm a pro-lifer. I don't think abortion as a form of birth control is justifiable, but all other cases (rape, medical problems, etc) it's fine. But try telling them that.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:49 AM
2

I was banned from /r/atheism of all places. Why? I'm a rare pro-lifer out of his natural habitat of the misogynist redpill manosphere. My dissenting opinion will not be tolerated in a place that values open discussion.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 05:53 AM
3

I've been ashamed since Trudeau took office and demonstrated when forming his senate that he cares more about the vagina:penis ratio than merit. I wonder how many more qualified men were denied positions because Trudeau's harem wasn't big enough? He and his tax-gold-digging wife disgust me. I have no sympathy for him in the recent drama.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 06:24 AM
1

1) You did specify that you wanted others to learn from the discourse on the subject in this thread. I'm no expert in debate, but seeing as question evasion and strawmen are the common go-to tactics of most inexperienced debaters and feminists, I figured I'd point out how I've learned to deal with it. It isn't perfect, with some I've been stuck in an unending loop of trying to keep them on topic and facing my questions. More often then not it ends in frustration. Some people can't be reached, bu…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 08:00 AM
1

For those watching, anyone who's ever listened to a politician answering questions from the media will notice what /u/deez_nuts_730 is doing; He's avoiding answering the question directly while remaining on topic so that it appears he's answering the question. While many people do this because they simply don't understand what is being asked, it can also be a sign they don't know how to answer without incriminating themselves, so they dodge the question or attack a strawman of it. A word of advi…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 02:14 AM
1

My question was more about how one would differentiate all those ads being a celebration of the female form versus this so-called objectification. Further, how does this "strip women of their humanity"? I don't see how idolizing the aesthetically pleasing aspects of the human form somehow "marginalizes" the other things that make up who a person is. Also, as an aside: Why is it women fought so hard to be allowed to show off their bodies in more puritan times in the media only to revert back to t…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:28 AM
1

The first step is to place pressure on the speaker to backup a claim. I want to see evidence that "objectification" is even a thing, as opposed to simply being a large scale misinterpretation of simple admiration. The idea that admiring, flaunting, or praising of the physical features of a person strips them of their humanity like a sci-fi dampening field seems a little far-fetched to me.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:48 PM
1

If you're smart you'll line up the next job before you leave your current one, whether your current one is military or civilian. If you don't plan your route, that's nobody else's fault that you're without income. Basics of common sense: always have a plan B. The US may offer a college education after a number of years, the Canadian forces (in which I served) requires you to still be serving through your college education. You sign an extended contract and work part time until your education is …
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:19 PM
1

source as provided by u/eixan up above.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:09 PM
1

And that differs from the military how?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:46 PM
18

In that case, all work place deaths should be ignored.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:35 PM
5

At least here in Canada, calling the police is the last thing you want to do. They are literally told to look at domestic violence through a gendered lens of men oppressing/controlling women. As a man, you call the police, they will arrest you.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:46 PM
2

Milo's sentiment on the BLM is that "black Americans are certainly owed some restitution for the past treatment" and are going to need help to get up to the level of the rest of us, but the BLM is not a movement for equality, it is a movement for supremacy through victimhood.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:26 PM
1

Like when Bill Bye debated Ken Ham, its clear that there's no convincing these ideologues. The real target should the people in the audience that are on the fence. The only way to win their favor is to call out the bullshit as and when we see it. When people see the outcry, curiosity can sway them in our favor. That's probably why feminists and progressive SJWs try so hard to silence us.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:43 PM
1

The difference is that it wouldn't be unfair to women if we tried to fix that gap. The problem is, nobody cares enough about men to go through the effort of improving safety standards at many jobs. OSHA and Work Safe weren't even thought of until women started getting hurt. Wherever women get hurt, safety dicks will be there. But if its all men who gives a fuck...
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:56 PM
6

Men across all cultures on earth are more stoic than women by a considerable margin. This implicates not culture but biology as a driving factor for our less expressive emotional behavior. Psychiatrists have also noted that men tend to recover from grief or depression far better through action than verbal or physical expression. Further, her note about the boy getting his vaccinations being taught to channel his fear into anger: That's not anger, it's aggression. Aggression is not a bad emotion.…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:40 AM
4

Is it really recycling to speak honestly about what's going on when the lies are still the dominant narrative? That said, Milo is fresh because his sexual orientation grants him a level of immunity to the common ad hominems SJWs use to shut down criticism. What can they say to silence one of the "oppressed minorities" they've worked so hard to give a voice to? He's very anti-PC and shameless about speaking on topics that sometimes paint a picture people find ugly. He's also just plain hilarious …
/r/MensRights04/05/16 04:27 PM
3

On Milo's channel he posts highlights from his speeches as 3-5 minute segments. Maybe that's more your taste? Personally I just run the video on a second monitor while I'm gaming or whatever.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 02:50 PM
1

I like my women like I like my coffee: Wet.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:29 AM
1

I used that more appropriate headline in a comment I left them. I hope that's ok. Let see how long before it gets deleted?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:19 AM
3

TL;DR: Wendy goes into a detailed analysis of feminist 'gender social construction' theory, it's history and how it came about (particularly the lies of one Dr. John Money at John Hopkins). She then explains how it is FUBAR and tears it a new logical hole.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 06:51 AM
1

It's kind of ironic because they bring about the behaviors they say they don't want in men. It's more that they don't want those behaviors in men because they know they can't fight them. It's the only weapon we have that they can't defend against, so they'll get big daddy government to strip you of them.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:06 AM
2

At this point, I'm pretty sure it had nothing to do with thinking you're a pedo or a rapist or whatever they want to call you. She just wanted to never have to interact with you. Women have learned that the law is a weapon they can use on us. They'll say what they have to in order to use the law to get rid of you.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:04 AM
7

Woah, calm down there, Satan; I might just fall in love with you.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:48 AM
3

I'm a man, one who served, no less. I don't want women drafted. Its bad enough we have to lower the standards so the volunteers who want to do it can get it. I'm not cool with someone with such low physical capabilities watching my back. If I get shot and she can't drag or carry me (as many couldn't and I'm only 140lbs) to safety, I'm fucked. If she can't pull the weight of her own body and gear over a high wall (once again, as many couldn't) and I have to boost her up, I'm risking getting shot …
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:15 PM
1

Watching his interactions with his spouse, he's a good case study in domestic abuse and Stockholm Syndrome.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:16 PM
1

Well continuing to just bash feminists isn't ever going to do our public image any favors. If we want to get popular, this isn't the way to do it. I have had some luck changing minds in my personal life using well reasoned arguments. Explaining sexual dimorphism and how it effects our neurology usually turns some heads. A good place to find that info was that 7-part Norwegian video series posted here not long ago. Once you dismantle the social constructivist bullshit, the rest of our movement's …
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:08 AM
1

I think he means pro-choice. I don't think anyone is literally pro-abortion.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:56 PM
3

You're starting from the faulty premise that I look down on CEOs and men of power. Not at all. In fact, I look to those men as inspiration to further my own goals. They're using Masculinity the right way: to achieve success. Navigating the business world is like a battlefield to warriors of the past. Every hand shake, every speech, every conference presentation, every gamble and business move. Its common of many to hold men of power in contempt, even feminism is guilty of this. People don't real…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 09:38 PM
4

These men have already taken over. Many CEOs, political leaders, and successful entrepreneurs are ripe with classical masculinity. Perhaps they are using it in new ways, but they aren't deficient in masculinity at all.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:57 PM
4

Here's a name: Idiots I think it fits quite nicely. Rolls off the tongue.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:05 AM
1

To get attention, that's all any of it is. Mommy and daddy didn't love them enough, but all the boys gave her tons of attention. When she wore herself out on them and everyone turned their backs, it became a game to find new ways to get attention. Cue the crazy hair colors, eccentric fashion, loud and obnoxious shouting, and the notorious victim card.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:33 AM
1

That was fucking rich. Remind me, wasn't it Anonymous that fooled them into starting that move?
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:25 AM
1

How feminists and the indeterminate members of society react to this movie's release will paint a very clear picture of who's side feminists are really on, and what side of reality.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 02:51 AM
4

Does anyone have a transcript of the conversation? I can't hear fuck all with all that banter and chanting in the background.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 07:24 PM
4

Reddit user with 1 link karma and no comment karma shares damning accusation of social media with no citations.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:37 AM
2

Anecdotally, My life experience has been similar. I've had the old cliche pregnancy lie used to get me to commit to a girl. There's also been threats and attempts at blackmail. I know it happens. I'm just trying to hint that isolated incidents shouldn't be taken in place of survey data and research to make the claim that this is a regular thing. In other words, it is a regular thing, I agree, but this doesn't prove it.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:08 PM
1

Um, well I did [want to have sex] And men are the entitled ones? Then again, one incident does make a trend.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:03 PM
1

Even if you get penalized for a violation of privacy, small price to pay for proving innocence in a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:32 PM
1

Sounds like the Ken Ham of feminism. ✓ Denies science ✓ Warped world view ✓ Implies we should all follow said view Checks out.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:51 AM
3

It would suit her character to say that, based on what I've seen of her speeches.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:43 AM
4

No, shitlord, she only consented to have her handle seen on twitlr. Posting it anywhere else would be a violation of her consent and rape! /s It's sad I need to bother with the '/s'.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:58 AM
1

I would like to voice my opinion on the matter: A Caucasian man, an Indian man, an African man, and an Asian man have almost identical brains. Across all races, males and females have different ones. The only part of me that is in the game world is my brain. So what do you think maters more to me, my race or gender? I'm not a woman. I identify as a man, not as a white man, just a man. I couldn't care less about what race I am, but I do care about my gender. Because that's what affects who I am t…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:48 AM
8

The group before the individual, cart before the horse. That's the mentality of feminism.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:53 PM
2

All good. Let me tell you, though, as soon as that Vaselgel shit is on the market I'll be on it like a fat kid in a candy store.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 02:16 AM
2

Naw dude. Being uncut makes it worse. The foreskin rolls around in ways it shouldn't, things get all bunched up and jagged, nothing sits properly, the condom keeps slipping off, and the bloody thing is still tighter than a cock ring. Any smaller a size and I'll wring the life out of my dick putting it on. Larger ones end up like I'm having the same problems listed but with a plastic bag. I sometimes wonder if condoms were even designed with our existence in mind.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/16 01:53 AM
4

What you're describing is called Hypergamy. Many sexually dimorphic and K selected animals exhibit this behavior, not just us talking apes. We owe part of our evolutionary success to such mating strategies.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 06:00 PM
4

Not to mention it has a faulty premise. Its like cutting off your fingers and testing if it reduced sensitivity in your wrist. When they find no change they claim cutting your fingers off didn't reduce the sensitivity of your arm. If they were simply saying circumcision doesn't reduce sensitivity in the glans they might be on to something. But they're claiming the whole penis fine despite missing sensitive parts.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 03:02 PM
4

I think its because when mods delete a comment it is still linked to the poster's account. So you can still see it in his history, but not in the thread. In other words, censorship of descenting opinions.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 02:59 PM
1

People aren't kept out based on gender. They're kept out because we're a sexually dimorphic species, women are physically less powerful, and they can't lower the bar just so women can make it. They accept only the best among men, if women could make it they would be allowed in. If I recall correctly there was actually an initiative launched a while back that had a large group of women try their hand at the course to get women in. None passed.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 02:00 PM
1

It's like people have completely forgotten the fable of the boy who cried wolf. Questioning accusations is hurting real victims? No false accusations hurt victims because now nobody takes rape seriously!
/r/MensRights09/04/16 06:26 AM
1

You have to make your payments electronically to avoid triggering the womyn with your patriarchy money. Preferably via your local Western Union or ePayment at participating financial institutions.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:11 AM
2

Nope, you need to work so you can afford to pay the pink tax and make your patriarchy payments.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:49 AM
2

I feel dirty for having given that page a view...
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:48 AM
1

Three cheers for apartheid in the first world! Seriously, Martin Luther King must be rolling in his grave. I can imagine what he would say: "What!? I finally get you to stop treating whites and blacks differently and you start turning men and women on each other instead? What the heck? Have you not learned?"
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:46 AM
2

The fair position: cry if you must, you shouldn't be shamed for it. But let's be honest, your value as a man comes for productivity. This has been the case for so long that many shrinks anecdotal note that venting and crying doesn't even seem to help men cope with emotional stress and loss. This would imply that sexual selection has bred us differently than the dimorphic neotanous females. Rather, men tend to do better at coping when they take action as a coping mechanism. Its my personal hypoth…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:12 PM
15

cough
/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:49 AM
1

You're just repeating part of what I just said in different words. The point is that knowing yourself is half of what is needed, the other is knowing thy enemy as well.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:26 AM
1

Actually, full quote is 知彼知己，百戰不殆；不知彼而知己，一勝一負；不知彼，不知己，每戰必殆 "It is said that if you know thy enemies and know thyself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know thy enemies but do know thyself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know thy enemies nor thyself, you will be imperiled in every single battle" The Art of War - Sun Su. In other words, completely relevant. Nice try to you too, sir.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:22 AM
1

"Know thy enemy"
/r/MensRights02/04/16 07:18 AM
1

Again with the semantics. I included it for completeness as there are some experiences you can have that can help make a more informed decision. Sex ed classes aren't just a teaching, attending them is experience you gain. There's also general relationship experience dating and having romantic involvement with other people.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 01:19 AM
1

Irrelevant. We're not just talking about the abilities of the mind, but the lessons, knowledge and experience necessary to make informed decision. Most schools don't provide comprehensive sex education until students are around 14-16 years old (It's also pretty poorly covered, but that's another issue). Funny how age of consent is often just after that.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 12:44 AM
1

keeping it nebulous to suit your agenda And you're keeping it too particular to suit yours. By your own admission drugging someone is rape. If that is rape, what is the difference between getting consent by drugs or by coercion or manipulation? I'm not on the side of making rape an overly broad term either, but there's a few cases where it is and IMO aught to be encompassing. ability to be held responsible for crimes is proof they have agency What? No it isn't. It's only proof we can hold them a…
/r/MensRights02/04/16 12:17 AM
1

even up to the early 90s, the age of consent would jail teenage males who fucked teenage females. Yeah, and it was silly, so we came up with R&J laws. If genuine rape was taking place where one knowingly took advantage of the other, we could still use statutory rape charges to see justice. The supreme court even ruled that it was okay to unilaterally apply it against males to protect females because of the added risk to females for pregnancy. Which many still do, despite there being many other u…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:56 PM
1

Perhaps, but again, that's not relevant, its a separated issue. Were talking about an adult taking advantage of a teen. That is what the age of consent is for. Full stop.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:18 PM
1

Which it is. I've already explained why. The age of consent is there because that is deemed the age where children have come to understand the gravity of what they are getting into with sex. Beneath that age, the child could say yes, but it is not an informed yes, therefore it does not count. The adult in such a situation, knowingly or not, would be taking advantage of the child's lack of understanding, despite being in a position to know better.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:00 PM
1

Cool response. You just moved the posts back as I requested, made a point about semantics, stated points I've already clearly agreed upon, then accused me of being the one moving the goalposts. You brought up R&J law, which isn't relevant as were discussing relations between a minor and an adult. You moved the post, not me. This is pointless, its not a conversation or debate, its just you barking like a dog, what I've been saying is going in one ear and out the other.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:38 PM
1

16 year old manipulated by a 16 year old? Now you're talking about actual rape and the topic shifts entirely. R&J law protects two teens who mutually consent to sex from being tried as adult sex offenders. If manipulation is involved then this is something else entirely. You've been moving the goal posts of our discussion so much were now in a different field. Let's get back to the topic at hand shall we?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 08:00 PM
1

If by "teen" you mean the 17-18 range, i agree. Under that age, the 20yo should know better. R&J laws aren't meant to be a deterrent. They're to stop your boyfriend from going to "pound me in the ass prison" just because his 17th birthday is just before yours. So yes, it is immunity to AoC laws but only when the two people involved in the act are within a year or so of each other in age. It provides no protection outside of that age window.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:11 PM
1

Am I against R&J laws? Not necessarily. I'm more on the side of parents keeping a grip on their kids and exercising good parenting. That said, if two 16 year olds have sex (which, no, I don't think is appropriate behavior for kids), I don't want one to turn 17 and on that alone be charged as an adult sex offender. That would be too extreme a punishment. So no, I'm not against the protections afforded by R&J. But I do still think there's should be some deterrent against under-aged kids having sex…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:33 PM
1

Many places don't. The legal guardians can press charges of statutory rape. But the age of consent laws aren't there because at that age you magically understand the concepts involved for informed consent. That's just the age when most kids have learned these concepts and risks. Its the age when the groundwork is laid and the kids have most often developed the mental skills necessary.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:07 PM
1

Children are too young and inexperienced about the world to understand the gravity of sex. STIs, Pregnancy, the psychological impact of that kind of power dynamic, the effect of hormones, the list goes on. No doubt his own hormones make it easier for her to exploit him, but that doesn't change that sex has life-altering effects and risks. This is why we have laws prohibiting sex under a certain age; to protect kids from adults that might try to take advantage of their naïveté and ruin their live…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:50 PM
1

Because children can't give informed consent, you sick fuck. She had a social position of authority over him, took advantage of him, all for her sick thrill.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:43 PM
2

Then rally them all to make a stand in numbers great enough that they can't be ignored? I don't know any modern Martin Luther King Jr.s, do you?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:30 AM
1

Too many people think with their dicks. Our culture doesn't promote self-awareness enough for people to think about these things in the kind of numbers we would need to make a difference.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 10:16 PM
2

The trouble is bypassing men's instinctive desire to appease women to get any significant number of men to join in such a move.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:10 PM
1

From an evo-psych perspective it makes sense that an air of dominance would be a commonly attractive feature in a male by females. However, this doesn't quite prove that. Another perspective that accounts for male attraction to open posing females is the fact that many people like following the path of least resistance. An open posture suggests easy to read people, as though they aren't hiding something. In speed dating you want to be able to read someone accurately in a short time frame. It may…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:00 PM
1

Yes... Men's forum. Because women don't have spouses or sons or grandfathers or male friends.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:46 PM
1

Or Canada unless using a foreign object to penetrate him.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 03:38 AM
1

Morbid Curiosity.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 11:14 PM
5

You apply for it at your local government office. It's about $5 and takes a couple minutes to fill out the paperwork. Simple stuff mostly; "Do you have a Y chromosome", "How long have you had a penis", questions about the procedure for non-consensual sex, that sort of thing. Stuff you aught to know.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 05:46 AM
1

I value the opinions of all males. If that were true you'd listen to them. You haven't listened to any of what I have said, even including the advice. I'm not feelin' the love, dude.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:49 PM
1

Its not my fault YOU'RE not intelligent enough to know how surveys are done. OK there, pal. I bet you're just brimming with intellect. I'm in awe of your powerful mind. If I were to tell you the purpose of the survey you would have given biased answers. This way I get the unbiased truth. A: you already told us the purpose of your survey is to turn to women and go "SEE!? THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULDN'T DRESS LIKE A SLUT!" As though that will go over well.... And B: the heavy restrictions on possible an…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:02 PM
1

Talk to me when you have done something to make a difference. It's a little presumpuous of you to assume I haven't already. As I said before, I'm looking for the reasons why men catcall women. Well you aren't going to get an answer with a survey like this. Unless you have something to contribute to the survey... Then let me explain how you could improve it: Q1: If answering 'no' (as I surmise most men will) the following questions 2-4 become somewhat moot. Either those questions need a "no respo…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:16 AM
1

Guys, this dude is a troll. Probably not even an MRA, just someone trying to make us look bad. You're doing a huge disservice to legitimate MRAs like myself. I'd explain but you're answering everyone with a copy-paste answer so I won't bother. Go away.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:44 PM
1

My response to that is the rest of what I said in that comment.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:20 PM
1

Yes, perhaps it is presumptuous. Perhaps, assuming you have, we've each had vastly different experiences from it. Between that and your own sentiment that adrenaline hits everyone differently counters your argument against pretty much everything because variation would mean everyone's fight or flight response would be different. However, simple logic says your brain can't operate faster, its architecture can't change that quickly and said change would be permanent, nor can signals travel faster.…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:53 PM
1

You've never been under attack, it seems. Adrenaline doesn't open up new thought processes, it only streamlines existing ones at the cost of accuracy. It cuts corners essentially. I've been in more than a few fights, some with weapons including firearms. I'm speaking from experience when I say two options is a reasonable expectation of someone under fire. Also, how am I being absurd for proposing a simple two option "would you rather" question? (and truthfully it wasn't even me that initially pr…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:16 PM
1

To reduce it to two choices is a realistic expectation of what will A: be available in all related situations and B: what you'll be able to register while under duress of attack. I'm starting to think you're not actually interested in this conversation, moving the goalpost to avoid facing being called out for the obsurdity of your prior answer. No, getting stabbed is not preferential to the risk of ending up in prison. Not by a long shot. Nobody of healthy mind thinks that way. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:38 PM
1

I think the part where I said "ambushed" escaped notice. Plus, she could be faster than you, then what? In case you haven't noticed, not all dudes are in great shape. Again, the question is whether to get stabbed or defend yourself. Other variables aren't under consideration. It should be pretty obvious that if an option is available that results in a net positive outcome that it would be the more viable option. But if I can't consider what other options are available when given time to think, w…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:42 PM
1

There might be furniture or a possibility of running, none of that was discussed. If like the other user you're ambushed outdoors, those options start to evaporate. Ideally, you wouldnt even be there without someone to escort you that can act as a witness. I've also been around long enough to know there's sometimes a third option, but not always. Crazy things happen. But moving the goal posts back to where they were, the choice was only between self defense or being wounded with a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:39 PM
1

That seems obvious, but wasn't an option in the scenario presented.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:58 PM
1

And many more still will go, even when given the choice. Honestly I can't see this from your point of view, the idea of taking a knife to the chest over a few years in prison seems absolutely absurd to me. I doubt I'm alone.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:54 PM
1

To each, their own. Personally, even when I can think about it, that bitch gonna eat pavement. I'll take the possibility of prison over death or serious injury. Every time, without fail.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:44 PM
2

Which is exactly where I'm at odds with RPers. I get that hypergamy plays a role in where we are now, but I think culture also plays a part in manifesting those issues. I'm not going to enjoy the decline so much as simply understand what I'm dealing with in my interactions with women while still fighting the good fight with MRAs. So it's really in between where I fall, personally.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:08 AM
1

But that's my point. You're not thinking about potential prison rape when someone is coming at you with a knife. All you're thinking about is that knife and what you're going to do about it. It's the same as in a firefight in the military, you're not thinking about the paperwork or how much your ammo costs or whether you left the oven on. You're thinking only about that moment, the guns pointed at you and the guns you can point back.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:22 PM
1

Yeah, sorry, I think anyone who values their lives is going to choose self defense when a deadly weapon is used against them. Hands down. Especially in the heat of the moment: the survival instincts tend to strip the decision making out of the process. When your life is in danger, you fight back.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:36 PM
1

Honestly, from the stupidity I have seen from the regressives progressives, I'm leaning towards ignorance over malice.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:28 PM
1

I can somewhat see where they're coming from, many Red Pill guys are also MRAs and vise-versa, the two aren't mutually exclusive. Yes, the two can and frequently do disagree on some subjects but at the core believe the same thing: the system is imbalanced. The disagreement is on why and what to do about it. Being both myself (more MRA, but I've found a few 'diamonds in the rough' there) this is just my observation. So yeah, I can see why someone ill informed might mistake one for the other, but …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:02 PM
7

I think the bit about us loving the matrix came from the Red Pill community (who are often mistaken for MRAs); the matrix being the inspiration for their very name. The bit about us now hating it because it was made by women, however, is baseless nonsense. I'm an MRA, I love the matrix. Its a good movie with a strong message, I don't give a shit who made it.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:11 PM
1

Because women need protection, men are expendable, so sayeth our instincts.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:24 AM
1

No, we're not there yet. Feminists aren't shooting up shopping centers and blowing up corporate buildings.... yet.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 12:59 AM
2

I always knew feminism was secretly a religion. They have their own devil, original sin, a bad case of cognitive dissonance, and now they don't trust doctors. What next, a holy crusade?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:01 PM
2

Also consider that not too long ago it was apparently oppressing women to not let female reporters into the men's locker room at sports games.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:50 PM
9

Yup. Hell you can put a male and female brain beside each other on a table and see the difference. All the parts associated with socialization emotion and memory at the top/front are bigger in her brain. Where as for men the most pronounced parts are the motor cortex and parts associated with logic, reason and spacial perception. Further, hook them up (alive) to one of those machines that maps the activity of the brain and they're polar opposites. Honey Badgers did a video talking with scientist…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 08:30 AM
2

More accurately; Feminism is about equality, but it starts from the false premise that women are systemically oppressed and disadvantaged. If men are disadvantaged in some way it can only be a side effect of oppressing women.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:56 AM
1

I've noticed this a few times as well. However, I usually slap the "crazy" label on them and move on. We all know the saying about dicks and crazy, right?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:01 AM
1

I guess that's true, but it still doesn't sit well with me. Also consider that the full list of side effects has yet to be determined. There's the possibility that testosterone injections may be required much like with traditional vasectomies. One more thing to consider: No matter how many ugly pictures of diseased penises I was shown in sex ed, what scared me most was babies. Like many kids I thought I was invincible. Remove the threat of pregnancy and now your boys will have less incentive to …
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:43 PM
3

Whoever said skooma is bad for Khajiit was clearly not Khajiit on Skooma. Believe M'aiq.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:56 AM
1

A vaccine isn't taking anything away, like their reproductive capacity. Its the same contention as circumcision (though that is obviously worse due to being permanent).
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:57 PM
1

up to a certain age, no. I feel like that's a bit of a violation of bodily autonomy. If they don't want to have a needle in the scrotum, why make them? I feel like proper parenting would be the better approach until they're old enough to make that decision on their own. But hey, not my kids. Decide for yourself what the right way to raise them is.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:29 PM
1

I'm assuming you mean your kids and not your balls. If so, I think it will be up to them like any birth control. Also, it supposedly only lasts 5 years. On the other hand they claim it should be extremely cheap, like, they could pay for it with their allowance money cheap (though we all know big pharma so that might be a tad optimistic).
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:08 PM
3

I think you must have it confused with something else (perhaps RISUG that has been available in India for some time now?). Vaselgel began development and FDA testing roughly 6 years ago. I've been keeping careful eye on their progress. Mice/rabbit trials went by without a hitch, as did baboon (just waiting on longevity and reversibility results). Over this last winter they've managed to secure a manufacturer. Clinical trials on human volunteers begins late this year. 30 years my ass.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 04:08 AM
2

Assuming all goes well we should be seeing Vaselgel hit clinics in the next few years. So, that's something.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:39 PM
2

Canada classifies rape as penetration (therefore only men can commit it without use of a foreign object). Everything else including 'made to penetrate' classifies as assault. US law, if I recall, varies by state. Odd that the big three western civilizations are counted among those yet to correct this glaring error in law.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 02:28 PM
1

Even if the child becomes a ward of the state because both parents opted not to take it in, it is still to the taxpayers to fund the state caring for the child. So no matter what way it goes, if a parent doesn't step forward to accept financial responsibility, the taxpayers bite the bullet.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:12 AM
1

In America, sure. Come to Canada. BC is the most conservative part of the country. Feminism has had a hard time getting people here to take it seriously. Sure, we have feminists mobs like anywhere else, but they're very fringe and people largely just laugh at them.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:49 PM
2

I heard it was simply a matter of estrogen making an inhospitable environment for the virus. Let me know if you find the source.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:39 PM
3

When backed into a corner, even the most docile of animals will become violent to survive.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:30 PM
20

Once upon a time, men and women were equal in value. But the skills of motherhood stopped getting passed down a few generations ago. Women today don't have what it takes to be mothers the way they did 100 years ago. Most women these days can barely cook their own food, let alone keep the house clean. Raising kids into successful and happy adults? Forget it.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 06:28 AM
11

Fun story: A female friend of mine and I went to Subway to grab some lunch. I'm not dating this girl, so when it came time to pay with our sandwiches we each paid for our own. When the female cashier asked me if I was paying for both and I said no, she gave me the MOST VILE look of judgement I have ever seen in my life. You could cut the contempt in the air with a knife. Even the girl I was with could see it and remarked about it later. Like, really? We aren't even dating and I am expected to pa…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 02:48 AM
1

she just stated that she's having the kid, she wants child support, and other than that, she wants nothing to do with me. Sounds like fraud. You only did it once, so it's unlikely (but still possible) already that she is pregnant (from you), and you used protection, furthering that unlikelihood. What's more is that she's immediately written you off except for a demand for child support. This whole thing sounds fishy. Demand paternity test, refuse to budge until it is proven that the child is you…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 01:36 AM
7

Considering my manager and supervisor are the only young women, and also the least liked in our department, I'm all in favor of Patriarchy period leave.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 09:04 PM
1

You do realize that the vast majority of abusers were abused as kids themselves, right? Addressing the troubles kids face is inevitably necessary to stop the cycle of violence and abuse. I would even bet that his mother was also faced with an abusive childhood. People raised healthy usually end up healthy.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:10 PM
1

financed by hardworking men who pay the majority of taxes. This is the part they oft' forget. It would be a rude awakening if ever this came to pass. Infrastructure would fail, countries would have to tax exorbitantly, economies would collapse almost overnight and wouldn't have a lot of hope for recovery.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:02 AM
16

Campus security are NOT - I repeat: NOT - on your side. They want you to be convicted and have no legal obligation to due process. You will likely be found guilty, expelled from the school, and your reputation sullied. Lawyer the fuck up, no excuses. If your lawyer pulls through you may be able to counter sue for damages and legal expenses: Defamation.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 08:38 AM
5

Only women (stranger) that ever held the door for me was a little old black lady at a Tim Horton's about a year ago. I'll never forget you, little old black lady, the only lady with any respect for strangers around here these days.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:13 AM
1

Right? Normally even trolls get away with shit here. They just get ignored or down voted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:12 PM
2

One of my friends went to a barn party. Lots of drugs, booze and shitty music. A girl he met there took him out into the bush and the two of them got touchy feely. Some guys spotted them and recorded it with their phones. The video made its way to social media. When her parents caught wind she claimed rape to save face with her parents. The only reason he didn't get convicted is because he made one smart move: in lack of condoms, despite invitation, he didn't actually penetrate her. I'm not sure…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:56 PM
1

Motivation. I can never seem to get myself motivated to overcome my fear of challenges, specifically as it pertains to taking charge of my life, career, finances, etc. Fuck, despite knowing how to drive from time in the armoured corps, I don't even have a civilian drivers license. I'm starting to suspect depression as i don't even want to leave the house if i can avoid it. What are some good ways to summon the willpower to move forward?
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 10:32 PM
1

Yup. Both genders need help in the field of education in the developing world. Its a problem of access, not discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:01 PM
1

Most of what happens to women also happens to men. Often in equal frequency or greater but not always. The difference is most of us don't try to twist it into something worse than it is. An example is being "objectified". I literally can find no metric by which to distinguish objectification from admiration of isolated virtues. At best, the difference only seems to be in how it is received by the person being admired objectified.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 05:38 PM
3

Which makes this dumb fucker very happy. :)
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:37 PM
1

Given how the system is not in your favor you had best get on this stuff now. I'm not a lawyer but I would imagine this is defamation of character.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 03:48 PM
2

Yup. Hypergamy. Comes from evolutionary instincts. Successful and strong men are simply more attractive to most women. Period. Why? Gestation makes a gall hella vulnerable. Goodluck bringing down an antelope, let alone a hungry lion, in your 3rd trimester. Men were tasked with protecting her and her children. Thus, we were selected for based on our ability to do that.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:15 AM
2

Considering I can't help but fuck, I'm not about to argue someone else shouldn't. That's not to say I don't recognise the irony or hypocrisy gushing from the scenario.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:11 PM
29

Maybe they should have thought of that before they kicked the breadwinner out.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:50 PM
2

Keep a black towel as part of your vehicle emergency kit. If your back seats flip down for internal trunk access you can get it easily.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 03:35 PM
3

Homo as in "homo-sapien", the scientific name for humans, meaning "reasoning man". You're killing homo sapiens - homicide. Just like infanticide is killing infants/children.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 11:56 PM
0

That is not an example of Occam's Razor. Occam's Razor is a philosophical tool to determine the most likely of two claims to be true. It works by siding with the claim that requires the least assumptions. That many people are wrong is much less likely than that one person is wrong. This is indeed a reasonable application of Occam's Razor. there is definitely an antisocial attitude towards women there. Yes, because working out how best to appeal to a woman (one of the most common topics) is defin…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:34 AM
1

I have little doubt that no matter what I link you to or quote, you will find some way to argue it's not an example of misogyny or misandry, etc. I'm getting deja vu from dealing with religious zealotry's attempts to smear secular movements. Occam's Razor: What's more likely? That all the people you've given examples are too brain-dead to listen? or that you alone simply don't have any good examples? If you can give a good example, do so. All you are is hot air from where I'm standing. LOL. I've…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:19 AM
2

I support feminist calls to end FGM Already been done. Been illegal for years in most civilized countries. If I recall, the law was put in place as a result of outcry to Harvey Kellogg's suggestion to apply carbolic acid to the clitoris along side male circumcision. Remaining instances of FGM take place almost entirely in third world countries that feminists can't touch. Supporting the feminist call to end FGM is largely an empty posture. such as eroding traditional gender norms for women So far…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:40 AM
1

Again, I appreciate it. I found it can be a hassle sifting through the misinformation and I'm only on my computer an hour a day between jobs, on mobile right now.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:26 PM
1

Thanks, that's awesome. I appreciate the legwork.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 04:47 PM
4

I'm unfamiliar with the MGM classes and subtypes. Do you have some reading sources I could look at?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:38 AM
1

If I saw a sign like that in my neighborhood, I'd so vandalize it... by writing something just like that.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:33 AM
8

Does circumcision have health and hygiene benefits? In midevil times, maybe. Today we have showers. I've seen polls that say most American women prefer the look of circumcised penises. In America, perhaps. Here in Canada they are completely indifferent and in many countries they prefer uncut. Tastes vary on this as much as any other aesthetic. Surely male circumcision is not as bad as female genital mutilation right? FGM types call into 4 classes ranging from cutting of the labia at class 1 to d…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:16 AM
10

Basically, Circumcision to prevent infections is like cutting off your toe to prevent ingrown toenails. It should be rather obvious that there's better ways to deal with it than removing a useful and functional body part.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:12 AM
2

From all the observations I've made, testimony from black friends, and from an understanding of economics and their effect on society, i actually think she was close to point about why. Feminism is also partly to blame. The 'don't need no man' trend swept through the already welfare-adled ghettos and didn't do any favors for the development of following generations. But leave it to a feminist to conveniently leave that part out. I'm not saying any of that is correct, I'm aware most of that is hy…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 08:57 PM
1

It would be nice if someone could link a change .org petition. I'm from Canada and don't know how much a vote would count for on a US government petition.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:17 PM
2

Considering that's been the workings of conflict since the days of our cave-dwelling ancestors, I thought you were serious for a moment. It's why we have put so many other species out of business from neanderthals to mammoths. We put our expendable but powerful drones at the front killing and the factories making drones in the back. Even if the first wave of men dies, a second wave is just as strong as the first. We either killed our enemies or simply out-reproduced them.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:29 AM
2

Liberty Prime, online. Primary directive: the destruction of all Red Communist Chinese invaders. Democracy is nonnegotiable. Chance of mission failure: 0%!
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:32 PM
3

Wait... Vikings had marriage? I thought union of man to woman was more of an Abrahamic thing. I wouldn't mind reading what kind of tradition Pagan faiths and cultures had regarding those unions. Anyways, this doesn't really surprise me. Its also been shown that female monarchs wage more wars than male ones in a similar vain. My hypothesis is that male aggression makes us intimately aware of violence and its effects. Thus, we tend to try to avoid it. But with females are less empathetic of the li…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:27 AM
7

Remind me what crime women cry is the worst thing you can do to a women? Where does that happen most again? To whom? Oh right: rape, prisons, men.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:38 PM
1

Because feminism grew too big too fast. They grew arrogant and their beliefs became more and more ridiculous until even a layman could see the bullshit. People began to denounce it and conduct research to understand how the world REALLY works. The result was the emergence of statistics and data we rely on here. As we spread awareness, youth that remained on the fence took the more logical approach and joined our side (or at least, similar stances) further denouncing feminism. In other words, it …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:51 AM
2

Personally, I consider feminism to simply be an atheistic religion. There's too many parallels between the two to ignore.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:37 PM
1

Oh yeah, none of them will ever say it hurts as much as a ball shot. In fact most say they imagine it more like birth but not lasting as long. I'm glad I live in a largely conservative province. Feminism is laughed at by men and women alike here.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 03:29 PM
3

I dunno, I am told by many woman that the good old box punt is remarkably effective.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 02:55 PM
2

Perhaps that women can differentiate multiple sounds so they can better socialize? Men can identify sound direction for hunting? They would make sense from an evolutionary perspective. Just a guess though.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:59 AM
2

The human brain is amazing at pattern detection and profiling. You've seen plenty of people do crazy shit and built a solid profile of what crazy people look like. Trust your instincts, they often know more than you do.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:22 PM
2

It was diverse! We checked Women's Studies candidates from across the country! /s
/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:44 AM
1

I know two. Both pay under $100 a month and still fight tooth and nail not to pay at all.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 06:20 PM
1

I surround myself with people who use reason and logic applied to any and all beliefs they hold. They are able to self criticise. Many are people who came from religious families so they are no stranger to the concept of skepticism. My point is that while I may alienate many women and even men with what I know and talk about, those I alienate are people I wouldn't consider worth my time. The men and women that stick around are the worthwhile ones, the ones who aren't just jumping on the feminism…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:27 AM
1

Except this would be assuming it was proven that A committed the assault. The question then is simply did he commit the crime of his own accord? or was he unknowingly acting under the influence of person B's misdeed? What is the alternative of this option? Should we hold people accountable for their actions under the influence of drugs they were not willingly given or not? If so, how do you justify convicting someone for a crime that they committed only because of something someone else did to t…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:13 AM
1

That's what I'm saying. Drugging someone without their consent should be a serious crime in its own right but if nothing else comes of it, that's all. But if the drugged person commits say arson or assault, the person that drugged him should be held for those crimes. Take this example: person A knows that under the influence of alcohol he gets extremely violent. For that reason, A doesn't drink. If B sneaks alcohol into A's drink and A goes on to assault someone, B should be held accountable. As…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 01:05 AM
2

Supposed 'deadbeat dads' are easy to bash when you make more than $10/h working 50 hours a week in hard labour like many men.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:29 PM
3

But for those that follow such ridiculous dogma, like religious parents, its advisable to spend your time on more fruitful ventures.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:26 PM
2

Video recordings, depending on where you live, can also be grounds for breach of privacy or filming pornography. Though, if it gets you out of a rape charge I guess that would still be preferable.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:23 PM
2

In that case A and C are clear. The criminal would be B who got A inebriated without A's consent. It would be same if you gave someone roofies. You would be the criminal rather than the one you drugged. It would not entirely unjustified, I would think, to thusly hold you accountable for the actions of the person you drugged.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:19 PM
1

The C2 variant is still in use by the Canadian forces. I was in about 4 years ago and we were only just getting new Leo 2s delivered from Europe. But 1-C2s are still very much in service and largely still quite functional.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:44 AM
1

The only rounds I have seen for the Leopard 105mm gun that use wax casing rather than full are smoke rounds and blanks. HESH, HEAT, Sabot, even the concrete training rounds all have full brass casings.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:42 AM
1

To a rifleman with any experience you are no harder to hit just because you're skinny or short. At typical firefight ranges the difference in your size is negligible from the perspective of the shooter. Soldiers are trained to aim for center of mass as well. Arguing that women are somehow advantaged by small stature in the military is a silly argument.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:47 PM
0

Body armor brings everybody to similar size. Perhaps not in height, but in width. Add to that lower mass means less muscle to move all of your armor, tac-vest, field pack or ruck, weapon, ammo, any crew-serve weaponry or munitions, etc. You aren't some sort of ninja just because you're smaller.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:32 PM
3

I was a shut in computer nerd in highschool. We had Co-ed track and field event every year. I never lost. Even against the female sports-team members. Yeah, gonna call BS.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 06:05 AM
3

I chose the former. Always. Even with the child involved in violent crime. I would rather him see rehabilitation over incarceration. But considering none of this is even remotely the tone I set with my comment, why don't you simply move on or try sticking to the argument?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:56 AM
5

He's a minor. What legal obligation should he have to answer his rapist's requests for a life-altering decision, even if it was through the courts?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:48 AM
2

modern tank shells do not leave empty casings, just a backplate. Depends on both the tank and chosen munition. Currently used Canadian and German Leopard 1s and 2s have full casings for Sabot and HESH. Source: I was Armoured in Canada.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:39 AM
2

People say "guns are the great equalizer" But who do you think is going to put a bullet in the other first? the strongest and fastest or the mediocre? A gun can kill quick, for sure, but that just means strength and speed determine who uses them first.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:36 AM
6

Not much on-the-ground shit. Join the infantry, finish even just one contract, then come back and tell us that again with a straight face. Good luck.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:33 AM
1

The world is an illusion to those comfortable in their ivory towers, safe from the ills of the world.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:27 AM
3

I was (no applause, I didn't go on tour), but you are right on point. Mission is first. All else is second, that includes whatever counts for morals and justice in your eyes.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:24 AM
1

When I was going through basic I was a died in the wool beta with no concept of gender issues. At the time I thought nothing of it. But looking back at their requirements, the drama they always caused, their behavior towards others in their units... I'm glad I left before seeing a tour. I don't dare to think what kind of danger I was in with them watching my back in the field.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 12:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter