TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Saint_Chad_of_Mercia Archive

View 2 posts and 414 comments by Saint_Chad_of_Mercia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

It's just solipsism. When a woman says this, she means that not every man who she's attracted to is interested in a romantic relationship with her. This doesn't make sense, as both men and women are looking for ''a one'', rather than ''the one''. If a woman has a reasonable circle of attractive guys who are potentially interested in her, then it won't be hard for her to find one who is satisfactory for a relationship. It's the same situation with attractive men and sex. When Chad goes to the clu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 12:18 PM
2

Redpill self-selects for sexual failures. It will never be mainstream, because 95%+ of people develop social behaviours naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 10:13 AM
1

The likes of Dawkins and Hawking are potential GOATs amongst their fields of expertise. The problem is when they branch out from their field, and think that their specific scientific eminence carries more weight in the real world than anyone else. It doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 09:53 AM
2

I'm genuinely curious about your opinions which lead to you to view the obvious science, yet reject it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 09:41 AM
1

Please cite some valid sources which show that the concept of ''conditioning'' is an observable, testable and repeatable phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 09:33 AM
1

My point was that eminent figures in specialised fields of science have no more or less validity than you or I, when they talk about issues outside of their specific fields. If some uneducated weirdo is arguing against evolution, then Richard Dawkins is your ''go to'' man. If someone is debating theology or philosophy, then Dawkins counts for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 09:30 AM
1

I don't think that forcing fat and breathless children to run will cure their parents' harmful lifestyle and attitudes for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 09:21 AM
2

Here in the UK, polls show that the majority of people are atheist or irreligious, yet we have a wide diversity of political and social opinions. As far as advanced countries go, the USA is an anomaly, in terms of rigid, authoritarian Christian fundamentalism. I think that maybe many Americans don't understand that irreligion/atheism is the norm in most parts of the developed world.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/17 09:12 AM
1

Many avenues of psychology would have to be ignored if we couldn't make some generous inferences from experiments. Psychology, itself, is pseudoscientific rammel. Also the compilation of independent anecdotal evidence isn't worthless. There are many disciplines which rely on such constructs (sales skills comes to mind). Sales skills? In a discussion about science? Deary me... I agree hard science and the standards you outline are clearly the gold standard. But human interaction, especially human…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 11:29 PM
1

What do you make of the notion that within a tribe there is teamwork and reciprocal altruism and everything because that's obviously evolutionarily beneficial, but if you're in the out-group then you are treated as an enemy and regarded among hunter-gatherers as being the "other" and having no soul and so on, and if someone from the tribe encounters an "other" then they will brutally kill them? [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 11:16 PM
1

All psychology is pseudoscience. Absolutely. Neuroscience is the discipline which (hopefully) will quash most of this pseudoscience in the not to distant future. People like Jordan Peterson can be thought provoking but nothing they say or claim is really out there, it's pretty much common sense. The likes of Jordan Peterson, Sir Stephen Hawking and Richard Dawkins are just spouting off ''populist'' opinions to keep themselves in the public eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 11:14 PM
2

If they were genuinely mocking it, then we'd have stories about ''AMALT'' and fake ''FRs'' from a different perspective. Instead, it appears to be awkward people with no sense of humour who just parrot some kind of ''hilarious'' mockery, rather than creating any kind of amusing content.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 11:01 PM
5

Science has to be observable, repeatable and testable. Evolutionary psychology is impossible to meet the demands of any of those three criteria. Ergo, it's pseudoscientific rammel. Furthermore, virtually nobody here actually understands the subject of evolution and genetics. They just put a semi-religious ''pill'' lens on the process, whilst claiming that it's science.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 10:46 PM
2

I disagree. r/shitredditsays, for example, comes in for a lot of criticism on reddit, but their plan of attack is obviously ''knowing'' hyperbole, and turning the tables on the generic posters of reddit. There's nothing tongue-in-cheek or ''satirical'' (Americans need to learn what this word actually means) about r/thebluepill, when they don't even attempt to make mocking or humourous contrasts about the manosphere's content.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 10:35 PM
4

Evolutionary psychology is pseudoscientific bullshit. I get frustrated at the fact that almost all contributors here don't appear to understand even the basics of evolution, genetics and epigenetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 10:22 PM
1

When people talk about status, they are just talking about power and control over other people. This doesn't always have to be in a negative context. People can use their power in a benevolent way. At its most primal level, the 6'4'' tatted-up, unemployed and roided-up badboy is a pussy-wetter because he has power and dominance over others through intimidation, despite being on the bottom rung of society's status.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 07:10 PM
1

Money is not relevant to status. In fact, money is hugely overrated in terms of attraction. Actual gold-diggers are not only few and far between, but make up a tiny percentage of the population. Lottery winners don't become high status, even so they become top 1%ers. People with ''beta'' jobs like accounting/programming/engineering, etc. aren't considered high-status, despite the fact that they make decent money. This shows that money is usually just a by-product of possessing traits which are c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 06:12 PM
2

I don't see anything too wrong occasionally with placating or soothing your child with a treat. They're not going to get fat overnight, after all. The problem comes from their inaction when their child starts to balloon in weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 05:59 PM
1

Yeah, it's just another one of those subreddits which has a very narrow ''right on'' view of everything, without room for much independent thought or challenging the circle-jerk without ostracisation from the herd. r/thebluepill is a waste of space because it's just another one of these subreddits, but dedicated to the manosphere. The are more serious subreddits which monitor racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. content on reddit, which also link to posts on subreddits like rtheredpill, r/MGTOW and …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 05:54 PM
4

The guy's post is worthless because we don't hear the daughter's side of the story, or the stories of the other people connected to their lives. This is the problem with these kinds of posts on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 04:24 PM
8

A major step would be to acknowledge that it's an addiction/eating disorder, and approach it socially and medically from there. One of the major impediments to tackling obesity is how to stop parents from letting their children be fat. This is a very difficult problem to negotiate, because people generally don't take too kindly to government authorities interfering in the parenting process. Shifting to the view that obesity is a disorder/addiction would make people more sympathetic to authoritie…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 03:51 PM
11

Yeah, r/thebluepill is a complete waste of space. That subreddit clearly has a rigid, circle-jerky ideology which contributors dare not steer away from. But people aren't self-identifying themselves as ''blue pill'' because of that subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 02:52 PM
14

Blue pill just means ''not the red pill'. The only ''ideological'' part is the rejection of red pill concepts. Just as the only aspect of atheist ideology is the rejection of God/gods. Beyond that, there is no unifying values or beliefs which atheists hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/17 02:26 PM
2

I've been lurking and posting on this sub for maybe 18 months. My favourite part of this sub is that people with hardened positions about sexual and relationship dynamics invariably soften their positions if they stick around for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 11:33 AM
1

Regulations are important for two main reasons: Firstly, because it would ensure that brothels have workers who aren't being exploited in any way, because regulations would confer legal rights to the employees. Secondly, making prostitution fully legal would decrease the market for human trafficked sex slaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 11:16 AM
5

It's weird. The level of contempt and resentment appears to be proportionate to how much he fell away from the fantasy image which she had of him. ''Oops, my mistake. Now I see that this guy displays traits which I'm not attracted to, rather than the superhero which I built him up to be in my mind, so I'll learn from my naivety'', should be the normal reaction. Instead, it's ''I'm so angry at him for not living up to my fantasy idea of him. Ugh, he disgusts me and I'm so angry about him for not …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 10:28 AM
1

And the system relies upon imperfect people to adjudicate these rules. The rules are in black and white. Wrongful adjudication will not be left unchallenged, because there's a legal team whose job is to challenge and appeal against this. There was a serious problem of juries being unwilling to convict women accused of murdering men, no matter how compelling the evidence. I'm almost certain that the issue here is whether it would be murder or manslaughter. The jury system is outmoded and needs ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 10:12 AM
7

So you think it's more about neglect than any actual feelings of disgust or hatred? No, I think that it's solipsism. A woman builds up a picture of a man in her mind, and creates her image of him, complete with a variety of positive attributes which he hasn't even displayed yet. When the man does something to shatter that mental image, then she feels anger, contempt and resentment. It's obviously not a logical reaction, but humans aren't generally very logical. But would you argue that fat men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:47 AM
1

Because the justice system is made out of people and people have biases and flaws in cognition. Firstly, the legal process has actual objective rules and evidence which can be pointed to if they are exploited, so there is little chance of a miscarriage of justice. Secondly, the defendant has a legal team who have a vested interest in ensuring that any kind of misapplication of justice at their client's expense will not go unnoticed. In addition, cases will just not go to court if the evidence am…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:38 AM
8

I think that women treat unattractive men in a similar way to how we treat fat women. Fat women aren't on our radar, so we are generally oblivious about their good or bad points, because we're not really paying too much attention to them. Similarly, a woman isn't really going to notice or analyse the behaviours - good or bad - amongst unattractive men, because they are borderline invisible to her, unless they force themselves into her world (such as chatting her up). Attractive men, on the other…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:30 AM
1

How is it optimistic to expect the police and judiciary to do their job? Especially as failure to do their job could result in severe consequences for them, professionally. Police forces aren't going to press for a prosecution with insufficient evidence, and judges aren't going to convict with insufficient evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:21 AM
4

I think that women have a general contempt for men who display weakness. The level of contempt generally seems to correlate with how attractive she found him previously. For example, she feels more disgust for an 8/10 who suddenly does something that makes him look weak, rather than a 4/10 acting that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:15 AM
1

Another issue is the law. In cases of domestic violence it is assumed the man was the aggressor despite women overwhelmingly being the aggressors in instances of non reciprocal partner violence. That is, the man does not hit back and she keeps attacking him. The second he defends himself, he has lost. She can call the cops and they will arrest him. Hitting back is not a good strategy and, due to the women are wonderful effect, people will believe her victim narrative. But this has to go through …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:54 AM
3

Prostitution should definitely be legalised, but heavily regulated. I don't think that there are any reasonable arguments against prostitution, which carry any weight. The issue of trafficking and coercion is obviously a danger, but stringent regulation should help to minimise this to levels far lower than when it's illegal. Here's an interesting map of prostitution's legal status around the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_by_country#/media/File:Prostitution_laws_of_the_world.P…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:27 AM
1

So basically that means that girls are beating up their BFs and husbands and the dudes aren't fighting back. Why exactly aren't men hitting back, and putting a stop to the issue? Is it because they are raised to not hit a woman? Are they concerned that they will be perceived as the aggressor if the law becomes involved? Are they just a complete wuss who lets their woman disrespect them? I find it hard to take female-on-male domestic violence seriously, because a man can easily put a stop to it b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:44 AM
3

Yeah, on paper, they are above omegas, because not only can they get a girlfriend, but a girlfriend who doesn't seem to have difficulty in finding other boyfriends. But a lot of omega male problems are not their fault. These ''men'', on the other hand, wilfully disgrace and shame themselves in a way which would make most omegas blush.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 05:43 AM
3

No, most men can't. Baldness is a very unappealing trait to the majority of women. There's just no way that you can rationalise it into something positive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 07:20 PM
6

Women don't go bald, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 07:16 PM
16

Voluntary cuckolds like these are even lower than omegas. Seriously, my disgust and contempt for these ''men'' is extremely high.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 07:14 PM
1

Women and men do age pretty symmetrically. The only major difference in appearance between a fresh-faced teenage and an elderly person is degradation in quality of hair and skin. It's obvious, due to balding, premature greying and the social acceptability of women using haircare products, that a man's hair quality degrades quicker than a woman's. I've seen claims that a man's skin quality lasts longer, but that is to a negligible extent in the grand scheme of things. All in all, men age worse th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 06:42 PM
5

As a woman grows more old, her physically appearance will detoriate over time. This timeline is not the same for every single woman, it does not affect women on the same magnitude, but it will still affect women in the sense that physical beauty does lower with age. The same applies to men, as well. I think that men age worse than women, for a number of reasons. If ''the wall'' is just ageing, then there's no point in RP even utilising the concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 06:05 PM
2

I think the theory is that a lot of BP guys who remain BP in adulthood, are above average in looks, and have social acuity. So they hot the ground running and never have to question the BP mantra, because they have success in spite of it, rather than because of it. These are the kind of guys who can't understand RPers, and think that there's something wrong with them, because to these BP men, sex and relationships are not hard to come by.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 05:56 PM
1

The main thing which is important for men is to get a style or look which makes you feel confident, comfortable and in control, and then stick with it. Do not follow trends like some teenage girl; just carry on expressing yourself in your own style. That's not to say that you should wear the same clothes for ten years. There's more than enough variance within any given style to ensure that you won't look out of place as time moves on. Grown men following fashion trends is one of the textbook bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 04:53 PM
1

I think that it's more of a lower class thing, rather than anything racial. I doubt that there are very many sober middle-class men above the age of 17, who have ever cat-called or leered at women. Like with a so many issues among those from poorer backgrounds, it's an issue with lack of education, lack of power and lack of authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 04:29 PM
1

The sidebar is a complete mess. It contains a random collection of manosphere blogs and unremarkable posts on the subreddit. There is no order, theory or coherency to it whatsoever. I have a suspicion that they just keep it there so as people can just parrot ''read the sidebar'' when confronted with awkward questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 03:50 PM
4

People who think about sexual strategy and different ''pills'' are going to usually be those who struggle with sex and relationships. For most people, these things just happen organically, so they don't need to spend time mulling over these ideas. There's quite a popular theory among RPers, that a lot of BP men remain blue pill because they are attractive looking and naturally gregarious. I think that there could be some truth to this idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 03:46 PM
4

The concept of ''the wall'' doesn't make any sense. People generally date within their age range, so gradually deteriorating looks don't matter that much, as you aren't competing for, or competing with, people 10-20 years younger than you. Both men and women are obviously more sexually attractive in their 20's than their 30's, but that's not important as they are in a different dating crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 03:39 PM
5

Most men don't want to display emotion. Some people will claim that this is socialised, but I'm not convinced. Not only do emotional displays of vulnerability make vaginas drier than the Gobi, but friends, family and colleagues will also sub-consciously think less of you. Whether we like it or not, a man's default position is ''strong and stable'', and any deviation from that will make people think he's weak, untrustworthy and volatile. A man who has any kind of public emotional breakdown will a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 05:44 AM
2

It might not be the only factor, but a large part of why assholes, genuine assholes, end up looking better to a lot of women is because meek men won't oppose them. It's not just meek men. The whole structure of 21st-century, first world society is one of civilisation. It's ridiculous for a normal man to get into a petty confrontation with a badboy acting out, in this civilised society. One of the main reasons why a woman's predilection for a badboy is met with resentment, is because it's pretty …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 05:34 AM
3

Incredibly cringey post from TRP. FTFY.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 02:04 AM
3

But I'm not attempting to belittle the position of one of the most powerful men on Earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 06:14 PM
4

LOL! Hes the leader of France. LOL! You're making anonymous comments on an internet forum about ''sexual strategy'', so....................
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 06:04 PM
7

As I say, ''Le président'' is one of the most powerful political positions in the world. I'll wait with bated breath until ''BPremium'' becomes a geopolitical force.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 05:45 PM
2

"Watch what she says, not what she does," is little else than a practice in cherry picking. Not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:33 PM
–

Whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:11 PM
1

This assumes that you have real life experiences to fall back on. Yeah, school.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:11 PM
9

I don't like men who are bodybuilders, players, arrogant or narcissistic This is why the ''watch what she does, not what she says'' is one of the trusims of TRP. If Douchebag McDouche comes swanning in with these qualities, then suddenly your objection to these traits becomes irrelevant. Worse still, these ''nobhead'' traits are actually the ones which detonate the loins in women, so the ''PC'' ''I don't like that in men'' takes on new hamsterisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 02:06 PM
–

Maybe you'd like to believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 01:29 PM
1

Well, shtum then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 01:02 PM
–

You're weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 01:02 PM
1

I appreciate your point. And it's a good one. Maybe 85-90% of scenarios are true, but it's the 10-15% of fantastical situations which make these films and series so popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 12:58 PM
1

So why are you complaining about it if it doesn't directly impact your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 12:48 PM
1

Mate, my comment was questioning the veracity of the purported actions and conversations of her son, which she displayed in the first paragraph of her article. To put it simply for you: A mother who posts an attention-seeking and virtue-signalling article about her 3-year-old son is unlikely to come from a household where a toddler would grow up with an attitude of ''flowers are so gay, and girls are so mean!''. So, how would this 3-year-old child be exposed to the ''flowers are gay, and girls h…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 12:46 PM
1

Why should a character be seen as ''wrong'' just because you are uncomfortable with that aspect of a sitcom?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 12:19 PM
3

It is unrealistic. The mother who writes the story is clearly not someone who would raise a child in a household where a fucking 3-year-old would equate flowers with nasty girly cooties. So, how exactly would a 3-year-old boy - who probably doesn't have the mental capacity to even know that he's a ''boy'', or what ''boyhood'' entails - be exposed to gendered socialisation?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 12:17 PM
1

Why should it be seen as ''wrong''? If a nerdy loser steals a hot girl, then why should that be seen through a different lens than the one which also sees the aforementioned ''nerdy loser'' do some other obviously ridiculous, non-sexual stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:51 AM
1

But shouldn't the needy behavior of sitcom characters be seen as wrong instead of encouraged by the other sitcom characters? I don't think so. It's just another aspect of the humour in the scenarios which these films or TV series portray. If you watch some classic UK and US sitcoms from the 1960's, 70's or even 80's, then you'll see that sexual and relationship dynamics are a very small part of the show. A lot of this, of course, was down to the puritanical censorship at the time (which is/was w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:18 AM
3

You should really get out more. A lot of people especially women do this or that project Disney mindset onto reality (ie wanting prince charming) That's just wishful thinking, which is prevalent in the human psyche. Everyone loves to think that they have some kind of actionable power to control aspects of their life and fate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:07 AM
3

No one struggles with this concept. The point is though that even in escapist fantasy relationships still have to be believable in some way. You have to believe that the main woman will fall in love with the main man. They are believable in the context of fantasy. In the US sitcom ''Friends'', for example, there is way more (obviously) unbelievable non-romantic or non-sexual stuff than David Schwimmer's character netting a hot chick, and the ensuing relationship. Sexual and relationship situatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:01 AM
3

But children generally go to school, where any fantastical concepts of reality are swiftly beaten out of them - literally or figuratively - through normal socialisation in a social environment with extremely limited filters.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:56 AM
1

Escapist fantasy still have relationships. And most people understand that the depictions of relationships within a film are also escapist fantasy, just as all other themes are. Nobody in films ''umms or aahs'', goes to the toilet, takes time to consider their actions, etc. But no-one grows up thinking that this what real life is like in adulthood. Yet, apparently, some people on TRP and PPD struggle with the simple concept that sexual and romantic dynamics are also heavily stylised, escapist fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:42 AM
7

No, films and TV series are clearly escapist fantasy. People generally work this out at a young age. The fact that grown adults - wallowing in self-imposed victimhood - cite Disney films and Hollywood rom-coms as something which stunted their social growth, appears to be something peculiar and unique to RP and MGTOW circles. If films reflected reality, then we'd recoil in horror at the violence and depressing scenes in them. Instead, we grab some popcorn and invite friends to share in our enjoym…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:08 AM
8

Most people can easily discern between films and real life at a young age. I don't understand why this is such a prevalent theme on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:57 AM
1

The concept of ''agency'' is the synergy of multiple genes, which are beyond our control, and which are hugely impacted by our environment growing up, which is also beyond our control. I generally have a ''can do'' attitude, but that attitude has been formed by environmental conditions in my childhood, and ''honed'' by environmental conditions in adulthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:52 AM
1

And that is caused by genetics and environment, both of which we have no control over. You or I have no control over our ''agency''.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:45 AM
1

I would really love to write something about agency, self responsibility and "muh genetics! muh upbringing!" But ''agency'' isn't some magical property. The ability to actuate change in your behaviours is solely determined by your genetics and environment. but then I learned not to argue with black pillers a long time ago. Isn't it amazing how those from the red pill suddenly adopt a ''blue pill'' mentality, when harsh realities are laid bare before them? ''If I stick my fingers in my ears, then…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 09:36 AM
4

The black pill which both BP and RP refuse to swallow, is that behaviours and thought patterns get deeply entrenched in everyone during childhood. People take on advice, but largely don't follow it because they are too stuck in their ways. People change very gradually. And, by gradually, I mean years and even decades, in some cases. Familiarity and routine in thought and action will always win out, unless you have some kind of life-changing experience or epiphany.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:54 AM
1

''Shallow'' is a concept dreamt up by the hamster of physically unattractive or sexually/romantically unsuccessful men and women. The same applies to the concept of having ''high standards'' and ''pickiness''. People are attracted to what they are attracted to. It's ridiculous that we live in a society where the concept of letting other people do what they want permeates, yet some people get angry at someone else's personal sexual or romantic standards. If a woman only wants a 6'0'+ man, or a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:42 AM
5

The other day I was sitting in the park with James, 3, when I picked a dandelion and handed it to him as a present. “No way, Mummy,” he said, pushing away my gift. “Flowers are pretty and I’m a boy.” r/thathappened
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:33 AM
3

She grew up in the DDR, so I think that she's very aware of how overarching, ''good on paper'' ideologies can be damaging in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:29 AM
2

Intelligence is ridiculously overrated on a personal level. Like with every other trait, the important thing is to not be noticeably below average or not be on the extreme ''good''end. Average intelligence is fine to live a normal and fulfilling life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:23 AM
2

Like I said, there possibly is no logical''why''. Despite what TRPers, and their cringey broscience interpretation of evolution and genetics, would like to believe, evolution is just an unguided and purposeless set of trillions upon trillions of random genetic mutations. For most things, there is no definitive ''why''.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 07:44 AM
1

I used to think that I was good when I managed to string a break of 20 or 30 together!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 08:28 PM
7

Haven't you considered the possibility that the pay gap is just a normal consequence of how male and female skills are rewarded in modern civilisation?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 07:36 PM
1

Anyone watching the snooker?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 07:22 PM
6

Why do you think that this is the case? It doesn't really matter the ''whys''. There possibly is no logical ''why''. But, children who have had sexual experiences (aka sexual abuse from adults or older children) invariably develop mental issues which stems from that physical sexual contact. This is why we need to protect children from sexual overtures until they are physically, mentally and emotionally ready.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 07:08 PM
6

The important thing is that protecting children from sexual contact by predatory adults isn't some kind of puritanical or outdated act of moral indignation. It's well documented that children who experience premature sexual contact have a high rate of harmful psychological issues throughout their lives. The age of consent has to be arbitrary, so it's best that we just agree upon a general number, rather than making idiotic ''arguments to subjectivity'', or to post comments such as ''so if she we…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 05:50 PM
1

It has to be at an age which is equal to, or above, the age which they are legally deemed to be outside of their parent's or the state's guardianship. It would obviously be ridiculous to set the age of consent to, say, 14, if they still have compulsory schooling until they're 16. Or if their parents are legally responsible for their welfare until they are 16. Of course, age of consent laws shouldn't apply to two children of round about the same age having sex, so long as they are something like …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 05:05 PM
1

This is just selection bias. Reddit is one of the most visited websites in the world, and hosts communities of every different political, religious and cultural persuasion. A black transgender anarchist brony is a redditor, as is a fat white nazi with a feeder fetish. Therefore the identity of ''redditor'' is worthless. This picture just showcases what the average numpty who uses the fact that they visit one of the most popular websites in the world as part of their identity, looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 03:18 PM
1

Neediness is seen as worse in men because it's a large deviation from masculinity. Neediness in women is just an extreme expression of femininity, so it's not viewed as negatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 02:48 PM
–

I have no interest in US politics, but I'm guessing that this guy's political ''position'' is overseeing rednecks, hillbillies and trailer trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 04:09 PM
1

Victim mentality and the ''grass is always greener'' mentality. While this behaviour , of course, is not exclusive to women, it's more prevalent amongst them due to the society which we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 06:10 PM
5

There's a certain kind of "nerd elitism" which is just making others feel bad for having different interests and those guys never noticed that women didn't dislike them for their nerdy interests, but for making her feel bad for not knowing what some obscure anime is or for liking different music than him. This is a telltale sign of low social status. Someone who knows that they're near the bottom of the societal hierarchy will seek to put great importance upon things which will elevate themselve…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 06:08 PM
2

It's reasonable advice so long as the woman uses birth control, and aborts any accidents. If she ends up with a litter of Chadspawn in tow, then it's not good for her, her children, her future beta husband, and society in general. I would hazard a guess that the main reason that female sexuality was controlled in the past, is because the men who give women the tingles aren't the best husband or father material for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 04:22 PM
2

It's funny that in an era when ''slut-shaming'' is increasingly becoming a taboo, that a derogatory term for a male ''slut'' (fuckboy) is commonplace, and the negative qualities of his ''sluttiness'' are fair game for ridicule and criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 09:49 PM
3

It's funny that in an era when ''slut-shaming'' is increasingly becoming a taboo, that a derogatory term for a male ''slut'' (fuckboy) is commonplace, and the negative qualities of his ''sluttiness'' are fair game for ridicule and criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 09:49 PM
3

TRP is usually good advice when it comes to stripping away the blue pill/beta conditioning/mindset which is prevalent in society. Where it goes wrong, is when they decide to add a an extra layer of thick bullshit to create their slightly deluded philosophy. Weeding out and correcting your beta or omega traits is all you need to do. The rest will fall into place as if you do this. There is no need to create some kind of misogynistic framework with things like AWALT, or to create some kind of pseu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 05:06 PM
6

They just do cuz all that money and status and "oooh you're a Dr??? Sign me up baby!" just gives them a little better road to travel down toward old age. The problem here is that you're talking about the top % of men. The overwhelming majority do not have careers or income which elevates their status as they get older. Even worse, large swathes of men have careers and income which makes their status depreciate as they get older. This ''men age like wine'' is just a TRP coping mechanism. If you h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 07:58 AM
15

It's just a TRP revenge fantasy. Both men and women get less attractive as they age, due to hair and skin quality gradually deteriorating. I think that men generally age slightly worse, due to the prevalence of baldness, and also because it's not considered socially acceptable for men to cosmetically enhance their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 05:54 PM
4

There's a world of difference between letting off steam online, and actually bitching about other people in real life. Not only is it a very unappealing character trait, but 9 times out of 10 they have not confronted the person who they are bitching about. This makes them come across as pathetic, ineffectual and weak. If someone is doing something which aggravates or annoys you, you have the choice to either approach them and discuss it like adults, or just keep shtum about it. The third option …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 12:29 PM
5

Seeking approval from others Excessive fear and avoidance of potential social humiliation Not taking responsibility or accountability for his actions Negative/whiny/bitchy about other people Has a marked change of interaction style with different people Putting others' needs before his own Inability to stand his ground Is a grown adult, but changes his style/hair/fashion to match current trends
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:44 AM
3

It was the kind of hotel that you walk right up to the door, on the first floor. I saw her outside when I was leaving the afternoon the second day I was there. She made chit-chat with me. She told me rather quickly what she does, I told her it was obvious by all the cars that would park in front, stay an hour, then leave. She wasn't really that attractive either (slightly overweight but would be considered somewhat pretty), either way, she constantly had "work". I told her that her secret is fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 04:25 PM
1

I wish I knew what makes an RP idea an RP idea. RP beliefs are just uncomfortable or inconvenient truths regarding sexual or social dynamics. The problem with TRP is that they don't seem to understand that the ''Red Pill'' occurs just by stripping away ''Blue Pill'' just-world beliefs and societal dogma. They seem to be obsessed with adding layers of fantastical bullshit to create an ideology, when there is no need to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 09:16 AM
5

Red Pill is just PUA 2.0, with some additional social and political beliefs. I think that a TRPer would be called out as a PUA (which a lot of people are aware of), rather than a ''red piller''(which virtually no-one outside of some sections of reddit has heard of).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 09:09 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that the concept of ''anger phase'' was made up just so as they have an excuse for hosting misogynistic bile. The stupid thing is that being angry goes against RP principles, and they shouldn't encourage people to act out like an emotional little beta. A grown adult being angry about lacking the social acuity and intelligence to work out social and sexual dynamics should be ashamed of himself, own his mistake, and take full responsibility for his lack of intelligence. Lashing out…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 06:57 AM
1

You're all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 07:15 PM
4

Yeah, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 07:13 PM
6

I love you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 07:12 PM
1

I'm open for a serious discussion. I just think that it's absurd to suggest that American and British sitcoms are some kind of deeper propaganda, with longer-term societal implications...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:44 PM
1

Yes, sorry, I based my reality of life growing up on British and American sitcoms. Therefore, I'm a grown adult who thinks that Basil Fawlty, Mr. Bean, Captain Mainwaring, Sheldon Cooper, and Frasier Crane are wholesome characters who inspire me in real life!!1!!! Or maybe not...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:32 PM
2

Because if you were remotely au fait with the show, then you would know that Ross was the tallest. Matt Perry is around about 5'11', yet David Schwimmer was clearly taller than him. Matt LeBlanc was the best looking of the Friends cast, but he's about 5'9''.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:19 PM
1

You need to pull yourself together, mate. ''Big Bang Theory'' sitcom = ''propoganda''. PMSL. Grow up, kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:10 PM
8

AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:05 PM
1

I've never watched ''How I Met Your Mother'', but the ''Big Bang Theory'' is yet another example of a fantasy sitcom. It's kind of weird and cringey that you'd be reading anything more into these throwaway American sitcoms. Do you get get your news from Alex Jones and Breitbart?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:00 PM
1

Wut? In English, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:11 PM
1

No. Friends was a fantasy comedy. If you think that it was remotely supposed to be realistic, then you need to get your IQ checked, as I suspect that it may be sub-80, judging by your comments on an innocuous fantasy sitcom.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:10 PM
2

You claimed that he was ''average height/short'', and you got proved wrong. How can you ''show your face'' here when you are clearly spouting shit with no factual basis to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:03 PM
13

Sexually unsuccessful men arent "victims" Of course they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:00 PM
4

He's ugly, skinny and of average height/short. How would flirting help him get laid? I agree with where you're coming from, but it's ridiculous to suggest that Ross was anything other than tall. He was clearly the tallest on the show, and David Schwimmer is at least 6'1''.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:50 PM
1

Er... no. It's no wonder that the average BPer has such a weird view of reality, if they seriously struggle to differentiate between fantasy comedy, and real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:44 PM
2

Unattractive men don't, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:13 PM
2

Once again, this is the ''apex fallacy''. What percentage of physically unattractive men, or even average looking men, succeed in the sexual market place?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:08 PM
6

There's a clear correlation between a man's n count and his sexual attractiveness/unattractiveness. This concept obviously doesn't apply to women, as Slutty McSlutface could be anything between 1-10, yet still have the same n count, regardless of her attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 01:23 PM
3

Are you serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 01:16 PM
7

I think overt friendliness to men they barely know is a huge tell. Those big broad smiles, ''genuine'' sounding personal questions towards the man, touchy-feely ''kino'', etc. Every woman must have learnt when she was about 12-13 what this kind of social approach does to the man. It also has the plausible deniability of ''I was just being friendly!'' or ''I'm like that towards everyone!'' to excuse the ''slutty'' intentions of behaving like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 11:11 AM
19

Bluepill is apathetic to your suffering I think that it's even worse than apathy, in most cases. It's victim-blaming sexually unsuccessful men. According to BP, with their Just World philosophy, there always has to be something which a sexually unsuccessful man is doing wrong. Some supposed or imaginary ''character flaw'' which is his fault, and is ''easily'' correctable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 09:31 AM
1

But that's the thing: sigmas are a fictional concept. The kind of guy who operates on the outside of society, yet doesn't need any social interaction. Obviously, in the real world, the kind of guy who goes off the grid and lives in the woods has some serious mental issues, likely to stem from negative social experiences. The fictional Sherlock Holmes variety, however, can take or leave social interaction, and don't have a problem extricating themselves from normal society at will.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:44 AM
1

The problem is feminism is that it has lost credibility and legitimacy because it's such a broad umbrella term that it's now practically meaningless. If someone self-identifies as a feminist, how do you know whether they are someone who is concerned about legitimate women's issues, such as reproductive rights or street harassment, or whether they are of the more extreme and embittered man-hating variety?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:39 AM
1

I think that ''reward'' is the wrong term here. ''Major perk'' would probably be an apt term, from a man's point of view. When you see that acting like an anti-social psychopathic bully gets you lots of positive sexual attention from women, then you can obviously see the major perk of aping these traits to also achieve this sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:17 AM
3

TRP are all over the place. This guy acted like a pathetic little beta bitch-boy. He's mate-guarding, pedastalising his date by altering his behaviour to impress her, and getting completely dragged into the frame of some drunk old geezer. Yet they think that this guy is some kind of an ''alpha''?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 04:35 PM
1

There's still no man alive who looks better bald, than with hair. All the often-cited attractive bald men became famous after they went bald, so we have never known them any other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 02:26 PM
1

Saggy or small breasts can be hidden or boosted by a bra. Cellulite can be hidden by trousers, and (non-pregnancy related) stretchmarks happen to both men and women. Baldness can affect women, but it's easily and acceptably hidden by a wig. A bald man wearing a wig is mocked and humiliated for doing so, whereas a bald woman is met with sympathy. Unusually short women are the equivalent of unusually tall men, so that's even, as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 02:25 PM
3

You are in a small minority, then. Baldness - and especially balding - is generally considered to be a trait which leads to sexual invisibility. Even then, you conditionalise the trait, as in: ''Yeah, I totally don't mind bald men, just so long as they look or act like a man in the top 5% of attractiveness''.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 09:09 AM
4

Wait a minute, being bald is a bad thing? Of course. Bald and balding is a universally unattractive sexual trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 09:02 AM
3

Physical negatives which affect both men and women equally: Being ugly Being fat Being deformed Being disabled Growing old Physical negatives which only affect women: ................................................................... Physical negatives which only affect men: Being short Being bald Being skinny It's abundantly clear that women have the better deal in terms of physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 08:42 AM
3

I disagree with this. The so-called ''apex fallacy'' is only controversial because it's almost exclusively applied in debates regarding identity politics. There's no real legitimate body which defines ''logical fallacies'', and even then it's just an unchallenged issue of philosophy (a pseudoscience) which makes these fallacies ''official''. If anything, the so-called ''apex fallacy'' is just a specific extension of the established ''composition fallacy''.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 08:30 AM
2

It's a bit of a cliche, but my friend with the highest n count has some kind of serious daddy issues, and a need to be loved. When she was younger, she bragged about ''aiming'' to shag 20 men by the time that she was 20. I do think that it's an incontrovertible fact that promiscuous women have mental issues and low self-esteem and self-worth. There's just not that much difference in the sex hormones pumped through the endocrine system between one person and another. So there's no biological reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 08:20 AM
0

A girl I know has an n-count somewhere in the low 4 figures. r/thathappened
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 08:14 AM
2

I accept that white privilege exists, and to a certain extent, male privilege also exists in some forms. The irony is, though, that men - especially white men - are the least cohesive demographic. There is no solidarity or fellow-feeling between the average white person, or between the average man. If I have a successful job interview with a white male interviewer, then there's no knowing winks, or secret patriarchal, masonic handshakes. Nor does he whisper to me: ''See you on Monday, my white m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 07:55 AM
1

Oh no, I agree that there's nothing inherently wrong with blue pill beliefs. Whatever helps gets you through life. What I'm saying is that blue pill beliefs are more conducive to those with a spiritual or religious outlook on life. Whereas a nihilistic outlook is slightly more pragmatic and often even cynical, so some of the more harsh realities of TRP become more acceptable or believable when you follow a more cynical path. Although I try and curtail cynicism as much as I can, because it genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 05:32 AM
4

I've always assumed that companies who use fat models are just trying to ingratiate themselves to their consumer base. The fat models are used in advertisements that are targeted towards women. The average man and woman is getting fatter and fatter in a number of Western countries, so it makes sense to pander to these people, considering that they are the ones who will be buying the product.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 05:13 AM
1

Which makes it intriguing ti analyse the psyches of those who are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 05:09 AM
1

This hasn't been my experience with women. The average beautiful woman tends to follow the same dating patterns as the average average woman. There's hardly any difference in opportunity for a 9/10 and 6/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/17 05:08 AM
1

Unfortunately so many men just bring nothing to the table. They can't cruise on the outmoded provider/protector whiteknight role anymore, much to the chagrin of the self-styled nice guys. It's crystal clear that now, when women don't need a man to provide and protect for survival, that most women would prefer to remain single, rather than get in a relationship with one of these cardboard-cutout men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 06:40 PM
3

Hmmm... The problem I have with this line of reasoning, is that you are trying to make ''religion'' an external factor, which makes no sense whatsoever if religion isn't true. If we accept that religion isn't true, then all the ''hurt'' and ''trouble'' which you mention is clearly caused by how our genome evolved. If someone wants to blow people up in the name of ''god'' and their ''religion'', then it is hardly intellectually honest to put the blame on external factors which don't exist, and wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 05:00 PM
1

There is no evidence, though. Fear of ''Paternity fraud'' doesn't appear to be a biological thing amongst humans. Post-hoc evo-psych pseudoscience doesn't pass any kind of scientific rigour.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 04:38 PM
2

An alpha has to have a lot of other people who he can ''alpha'' over. I don't think that they can exist in a societal vacuum. A sigma like Sherlock Holmes, for example, has an IDGAF attitude, wealth, power, and personal contentment, yet he has no friends, romantic relationships or any kind of traditional social standing. If he didn't have sigma traits, then he'd objectively be an omega in the social hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 03:36 PM
1

Bond is more of a sigma, as he's detached from society, operates by his own rules, and could easily excel and be happy on his own. Alphas need others around them, to be ''alpha'' in the first place. Alphas can't live without other people, and the validation from them, whereas a sigma would be happy to just live in a cabin in the woods for the next 20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 02:52 PM
1

LOL I was posting on mobile. I don't know why there was a double or triple post there.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 02:46 PM
0

[citation needed] What ''evolutionary reality''? You need to provide some verifiable and refuteable evidence that ''fear of paternity fraud'' is even a biological thing in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 01:50 PM
1

Worshipping the concepts of ''truth'' and ''honesty'' is very omega, very autistic. Why put self-imposed bounds on yourself, when you know that those bounds are irrelevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 12:59 PM
4

Because they don't occur outside of fiction. You're not Sherlock Holmes or James Bond just because you're a nerdy loner who thinks he's a special snowflake. This is real life, not a fantasy movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 12:25 PM
3

Neck game is strong. He looks like a rugby player. If I were Faust, then I'd sell myself to the Devil for a neck like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 08:31 AM
1

Paying child support to your LTR?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:10 AM
1

It's an English Midlands thing...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:09 AM
2

Why are you so obsessed with the behavior of a minority? I think this is what makes it interesting. An average, non-fat young woman could have sex with 100s of men, but most actually have modest n counts. The most beautiful women around have probably only had sex with <10 men. There is clearly no correlation between opportunity and promiscuity amongst women, so there must be something else going on with those women who sleep around. With men, on the other hand, there is a clear correlation betwe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 06:47 AM
2

Wealthy male. There are very few downsides which come with being wealthy. On the other hand, being an attractive female has almost as many disadvantages as it does perks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 06:32 AM
1

Men care about a woman's sexual history because it hearkens to a primal instinct to protect against paternity fraud. I have yet to see any remotely significant evidence to suggest that ''fear of paternity fraud'' is a major biological issue for men. The only time I see it mentioned is in post-hoc evo-psych pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 06:28 AM
1

Red-leaning purple 30s Male Nihilist I'd say my disbelief is 8-9 in importance, in terms of how it influences my outlook and attitudes in life. I think that red pill makes more sense in a nihilistic framework of reality. Blue pill thinking correlates more with a spiritual/religious/idealistic outlook.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 06:25 AM
–

The big question is whether she'd let Chadwickius van der Turbocock rawdog her in the nightclub toilets, once he melted the permafrost between her legs, and set off that clathrate gun of vaginal tingles. The answer to my rhetorical question is, of course, yes. So guys need to stop being Olly Omegas, and just not accept anything less than she'd do for Chad. Have some self-respect and stop putting up with the beta treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 07:29 PM
1

But hardly any heterosexual man is looking for a gay encounter, even if he has some latent or untouched bisexual predilection (which most men probably have).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 06:52 PM
5

Women love a man who oozes a propensity for violence, and a man who dominates and humiliates other men. This is why you hear the mealy-mouthed and disingenuous phrases of ''sticking up for himself'' and ''having a backbone''.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 06:50 PM
1

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 03:14 PM
1

That looks like it's in a different world to a toothbrush, vis a vis shoving a large object down there like a failed human weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 03:12 PM
1

Uwotm8?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 03:03 PM
1

I hear baby, honey, babe, sweetheart, and darling all day long. Not just me, every single woman between 18 and 150 hears it, ugly, old, fat, thin. I heard duck, darling, babe, sweetheart, love, sweet-pea when I was working in retail, as a 20-something male, so I don't think that these pet terms are relevant to the concept of whiteknighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 01:54 PM
1

Kinsey also had a thing for shoving a toothbrush down his ureathra Uwotm8?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 01:42 PM
1

Of course not. Volunteering information about something which would make most women think ''eww'' is not a prudent option. What she doesn't know will never hurt her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 01:33 PM
1

Yeah, modern day whiteknights are just men who haven't moved with the times. Not too long ago, whiteknighting and chivalry would have been a valid display in courtship. But it has become increasingly irrelevant in the last 40 years, or so. The main reason for this is that most women have financial independence. They also have a legal system now which supports them, rather than having to grin and bare physical and emotional abuse, which they had to do in the old days. In the not too distant past,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 01:28 PM
4

this leaves people who are not good prospects for whatever reason (they're unattractive, they're overweight, they're awkward, they have emotional baggage, they're promiscuous, etc.) to date each other. This is what I've mentioned before. If 10% of people are undateable at 18, then that percentage will just grow every year, as the dateable 90% gradually take themselves off the market. By the time people hit their 30s, that 10% of undateables will now constitute something like 30-70% of the single…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 12:23 PM
1

Another thing worth mentioning, is that most heterosexual people have no need to explore any latent bisexual desires, because their sexual and romantic needs are met by the 95%+ of other heterosexual people. I doubt that there's any differences in romantic feelings between man/woman, woman/man, man/man, or woman/woman combinations, so there's no need to explore the the other combination. Similarly, other than mechanics, there is not going to be any major difference in sexual satisfaction and ful…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 11:43 AM
1

The claims in TRP are formed from anecdotes, pseudoscience, and fantasy. Falsifiability is an alien concept to them. I do think that a lot of TRP concepts are true, but they are only opinions based upon personal experiences and observations, and never have any corroborative factual backing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 08:53 AM
10

I think it's because a man with a high n count is invariably high value, whereas women with high n counts is usually a signifier of low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 08:49 AM
12

A lot of people are talking solely about being mugged, but I think that the main fear a man has, walking alone at night, is the fear of being beaten up by a gang of (usually drunk) young men, for the fun of it. These kind of assaults can lead to brain damage, paralysis, permanent physical incapacity of dome form, permanent physical and mental scarring, or even death. A serious assault by a group of men which leads to these injuries is every bit as bad as a woman being raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 08:45 AM
3

I don't really get the point of this story. The tl;dr is: I made a mistake in not getting an abortion, and now I regret it. There's nothing more to it. No larger social issue. The woman just made the wrong choice, and now she has to live with it. I feel sorry for the child, as she'll grow up with an angry, bitter and resentful mum, and a dad who doesn't give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 07:10 AM
11

Yes, the outrage is at the fact that one particular football team decided to put ethics aside in pursuit of sporting success. Fortunately, it appears to have backfired on the team, as they are losing sponsorship deals. But your OP makes it sound like that he was let off lightly by the legal system - you said he ''served only a third of his sentence'' - as if that was intentional. He had to be conditionally released (regardless of his crime), because the state's appeals procedure wasn't followed …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 07:54 PM
10

He's been conditionally released on a technicality, because the Brazilian state where this happened cocked up the appeal process. He is likely to go back to prison once the appeal is heard. This has nothing to do with being ''soft'' on a callous murderer, and everything to do with incompetence in the state's processing of the appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 07:44 PM
3

(i.e. "After 30, women experience fewer decent dating options while men start to have better luck") This is revenge fantasy nonsense. It's blatantly obvious that women age better than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:28 PM
1

Yes, there are more factors to be insecure about, but each factor has more of a minor impact. It's like putting all of your money in one investment, rather than, say, spreading it out over five different ones. If two of the five investments go wrong, then that's not desirable, but you've still got the majority of your money left. Whereas if your gamble on the single investment fails, then you're left with nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 06:45 PM
5

The idea that women are hypergamous doesn't match up to reality. Hypergamy only occurs as a means to escape poverty in poorer societies, and is entirely environmental. If we're honest, men poorer men would also engage in this behaviour, if the same opportunities presented themselves. In countries where women have sexual freedom and choice, they invariably pair up with their social peers. The amount of women who do date up are cancelled out by those who don't. In actual fact, I'd say that restric…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 06:41 PM
2

I'd say that women are, because - rightly or wrongly - a woman's value is tied up very closely with her physical appearance. When her value is dependant upon one factor, then that leads to more insecurity. In addition, any woman from a sizeable town or city is surrounded by hundreds or thousands of other women who are equal to, or better than, her in looks. The average woman is acutely aware that she's a much of a muchness, and it's next to impossible for a woman to stand out from the crowd, unl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 08:52 AM
2

How have you dealt with the Nihilistic reality of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:27 PM
0

Yeah, you're a troll. It was my error to indulge and engage you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:22 PM
0

If you're actually serious, then get off this site. PPD is not a good place for the advice which you request.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:13 PM
1

What I mean is does he have other women who are interested in him? If a man has little or no options, then he's bound to fall for a woman who shows him any kind of meaningful attention and affection. If he's shy and doesn't have too many ''threats'' hanging around him, then I'd say that aloof is the wrong way to go. There have been millions of potential dalliances throughout human history which never happened, just because both parties were too coy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 10:43 PM
2

I'm not saying that some people can't correct problems when they were younger. It's just that, for example, if there were 100 people leaving school when they were 16, 5 of those were ugly/incel/socially awkward, etc. If we followed those 100 pupils through their adult lives, then most of the 95% of ''normal'' people would develop normal and meaningful relationships over the years, whilst the 5% would still be unattractive and still in the SMP. It's basically like you've got two categories: ''dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 10:34 PM
1

Does the guy in question have any options? That is important to the whole picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 10:21 PM
2

Feminism is a female advocacy group which has enjoyed a great deal of success over the past few decades. One of their big successes is to shift social attitudes regarding traditional roles for women. It is somewhat of a taboo to criticise a woman for any kind of non-harmful lifestyle choice which she makes. Obviously, there is no serious or cohesive male advocacy group, so changes in traditional male gender norms are lagging decades behind the advancements which women have made.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 09:01 PM
3

The idea that staying single longer, whether by choice or through circumstance, makes you damaged or flawed is simply not true. There are lots of people who are flawed, have a bad and irredeemable personality, have mental health problems which inhibit relationships, or are just plain sexually unattractive. These people will seldom get into any meaningful relationships, if at all. Considering the fact that these people are largely undateable at 18, let alone in their 30's or 40's, then they are g…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 08:34 PM
3

TRP is for sexual failures. The people who find and use it are grown adults who have failed to understand basic sexual dynamics which most people pick up intuitively. If someone utilises some of the advice on TRP, and makes huge steps in self-improvement, then they are hardly likely to brag about the fact that they became sexually ''normal'' through an online community for sexual rejects. That would be like an ex-alcoholic or drug addict telling his new social circle about how he went to AA/NA.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 08:24 PM
4

I think that you're creating an erroneous dichotomy between having insecurities and being confident. The major driving force behind most people's actions is fear, and insecurity is just a manifestation of fear. It's just part of being human to have dozens upon dozens of insecurities. Non-deluded confident and self-assured people are confident about things which you are accomplished or competent at, while still being insecure at the same time. The idea that Donald Trump - or anyone else - could b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 08:15 PM
1

You're all over the place, bruh. When (and if) you can formulate a coherent and logical rebuttal to my comments, then please come back to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 10:14 PM
2

''High testosterone'' just means the kind of guys who make aggressive displays of dominance and masculinity. The kind of displays which leave the crotch of a woman's knickers looking like they've just received a deluge from the Niagara Falls.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 10:06 PM
1

Until neuroscience figures it out, we have no choice but to use what we have. We have every choice. ie. the choice to disregard pseudoscience because it fails to meet scientific rigour. There's no point to impatiently ''fill in the gaps'' with mumbo-jumbo, just because we are frustrated that actual science will take decades to answer the questions which we want answers to. Thankfully, science doesn't move goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:55 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:50 PM
1

I know exactly what the scientific method is. I believe that you, too, know what it entails, and that you know full well that social ''science'' comes nowhere near meeting the rigorous conditions of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:50 PM
1

So you're saying that your argument that TRP is wrong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:24 PM
1

No, it's not claiming to be science. Pseudoscience claims to be science. I think that studies like this fall within the realm of self-styled ''social science''. If that isn't a claim of science, then I don't know what is. You rather just say we don't know why anyone thinks or behaves the way they do so let's not even bother? Neuroscience will eventually answer these questions. All of this other ''sociological'' or ''psychological'' pseudoscience just stems from the fact that people are impatient…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:22 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:13 PM
3

I'm pretty sure that PPD has an inordinately high amount of people on the autism spectrum, as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:05 PM
1

it's not pure science either. In other words: pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:02 PM
1

If you want a better idea of what research is telling us, a review of several studies would be needed and those do exist. Only if all of those studies follow the scientific method. Considering the fact that virtually no social ''science'' comes close to fulfilling rigorous scientific criteria, then I won't be holding my breath.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:08 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 05:58 PM
2

How the fuck would you be able to conduct a valid, ethical and scientifically rigorous examination of this issue? People need to get it in their heads that social ''science'' studies are worthless and unadulterated horseshit. I don't even care one way or the other about this particular ''research'', but if it's untestable (in controlled conditions), unrepeatable and unfalsifiable, then it's pure and utter pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 05:51 PM
3

If you search for ''autism'', ''autistic'', or ''aspergers''on TRP, then you'll find - after wading through flippant and insulting comments - that there are a number of contributors are who are openly on the spectrum. And that's just the guys who are aware/diagnosed and comfortable in acknowledging it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 05:43 PM
1

You don't have to dig too deeply to realise that most of the r/bluepill contributors are angry at the objective of TRP, rather than the misogyny which is often displayed. The idea of guys gaining tools to essentially go on a ''pump and dump'' lifestyle is what is irksome to them, even so they dress it up in other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:40 AM
17

The 12-tonne elephant in the room is that a large number of TRP contributors - and manospherians in general - are clearly on the autism spectrum, to varying degrees. This systemising approach appeals to people who struggle with even the basics of social dynamics. Even on PPD, we sometimes have grown adults posting angrily about their confusion between Disney films and real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:16 AM
1

The concept of ''slut-shaming'' is just another example of people conflating tolerance with acceptance, and attempting to force other people to accept something which they already tolerate. There's much more ''slut-shaming shaming'' going on than actual ''shut-shaming''. Which is ironic, considering the fact that ''slut-shaming shaming'' is demonising someone for a personal preference which doesn't harm others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:09 AM
13

The majority of normal teenagers enjoy partying. The majority of normal teenagers don't end up with high n counts. While alcohol lowers inhibitions and increases horniness, it doesn't turn humans into bonobos.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:53 AM
4

One thing you'll notice with all of the ''callout'' subreddits, is that the average commentator is unsubtle, angry, lacking in humour, bitter and mean-spirited. r/thebluepill is no exception to this, even if the subject of their mockery is valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:49 AM
3

Yes. Laws and social etiquette are based on what society deems as objectively right and wrong. What is irksome, is when some women promote certain socio-sexual male behaviour as objectively and morally wrong, but - in reality - it's entirely subjective and conditional to the woman in question. You just can't operate a functional society on a feels before reals basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 12:29 AM
3

It's the vitriolic misogyny which is allowed to fester in TRP which instantly turns most people off. I understand that a lot of the general and hyperbolic sexism on TRP is meant to gee people up and help them to de-pedestalise women, but justifying all hateful ramblings as the ''anger phase'' does TRP no favours.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 11:24 PM
5

I think that the main gripe that men have is when some women get on their moral high-horse to denounce certain male behaviour. Then the behaviour isn't apparently so terrible when a sexually attractive guy displays it, and gets rewarded in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 10:32 PM
2

No, it would be much higher. Percentage wise, how many Chads do you actually meet? Very few. Whereas average young women are two a penny.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:23 PM
2

This perfectly illustrates the importance of the looks threshold in men. If a man fails to meet a woman's looks threshold, then he's got a 0% chance with her. If he starts to act in an overtly sexual way towards her, then she's bound to be creeped out, as there is no possibility of anything sexual happening between them. Whereas if a guy passes her looks threshold, he can usually get away with being overtly sexual because she's amenable to the possibility of a sexual relationship with him. That'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:21 PM
1

I'd rate Joplin a 4, and young Nicks a 6. These are the google image results for ''Stevie Nicks 60s'': https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=stevie+nicks+60s&espv=2&biw=1517&bih=735&site=webhp&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjflNXbiMDSAhWsLMAKHRplDTMQ_AUIBigB I don't think that you'd find too many men who would rate her a 5 or lower (which she'd need to be, to be classified as ''average'').
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 07:13 PM
1

I suppose Janis Joplin was average looking, but Stevie Nicks was definitely above average in her younger days; not incredible looking, but certainly above a 5/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 06:48 PM
1

It's not that all left-wing men are unattractive to women, or that all right-wing men would be attractive. Like I say, most ''Chads'' are probably apolitical. Politics is generally not fun to discuss casually. The point is that right-wing beliefs usually = masculine, and left-wing beliefs normally = unmasculine. If someone lets these slip in their interactions, then they have a good chance of increasing or decreasing their attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 03:35 PM
2

Individualism just creates a society of ''haves'' and ''have nots''. Then people are born into being a ''have'' or ''have not'', and enjoy all of the social advantages/disadvantages, due to the luck of their parents or grandparents. There needs to be a way to redress this, and redistribute unfair advantages, so that's why a left-wing approach is the best approach in a modern, populous society of disparate people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 03:27 PM
1

You suggested that a woman would would think that you were a mouthbreather and walk away at the display of masculine and dominant traits. This is obviously very far from the truth, and your comment sounded like sour grapes and 'that's not how it should be''.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 03:18 PM
1

No, it's because socially liberal people will generally hold back and place self-imposed restrictions on their verbal and physical interactions. You won't see too many left-wing people violating their self-imposed morals in public. Right-wing ideology generally dictates looking out for number 1, other people should sort their own problems out, and not sugarcoating reality to be socially expedient. There can be no doubt that the latter will be more attractive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 03:14 PM
1

Both left and right can be applied sexually attractive and unattractive Left-wing behaviour is all about tolerance, conceding ground, and letting things which you personally disagree with, slide. This is very weak and unmasculine behaviour when applied to social and sexual situations. This can't be denied. Which is still attractive to women that go for lefties. A colorful hipster sweater and this attitude can be attractive The purported political beliefs are just part of the hipster persona, tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 03:06 PM
2

More as ''wise'' and ''motherly'' entities.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 03:01 PM
2

Nonsense. Caring about others, and helping those less fortunate than you are, is the foundation of a decent and civilised society. The problem is that rigidly applying these values to your personal life will create a self-imposed burden to success, whether that be romantically, sexually or socially. Even so they are broadly good for a civilised society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 02:57 PM
2

They lose their sexuality in public perception, and are more likely to be judged by their achievements and personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 02:50 PM
1

If truth be told, most ''Chads'' are probably apolitical. I don't see how it can be denied, though, that modern-day left-wing behaviour is good for civilisation, but bad for personal sexual and social interactions. You don't even need to go full TRP hamster to notice this. Women are repulsed by male weakness. The ''Can't we all get along'', ''let's play nice'' ethos of modern liberalism is generally weak, unmasculine behaviour. Not taking any shit, looking out for number 1, and not sugarcoating …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 02:48 PM
1

When broadly applied to society, left-wing thought is better than right-wing. However, in personal and social interactions, right-wing thought and actions will bring you more success. One of the main things you see in TRP contributors is that they previously applied left-wing thoughts and beliefs towards their social interactions. The problem being that this tends to make a woman's vag drier than the Atacama. Whereas, the unabashed, non-sugarcoated and somewhat aggressive reality of the right is…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 01:17 PM
1

I'll give you that one. She looks absolutely gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 01:04 PM
2

She's not hot or really even pretty. YMMV. She's not my type, either, but her popular looks were obviously the primary reason for her being cast in the Harry Potter films. A UK newspaper ran a daily countdown clock until she turned 16, when she would ''become legal''. That doesn't sound like the kind of stunt they'd do if the general consensus was that she was average looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:59 PM
1

I still don't know who she is, even after a quick Bing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:56 PM
1

Yeah, re-reading it, my reply was a little snarky. Women generally get respected for who and what they are when they reach menopause age. Middle-aged and older women are generally respected by society for their accomplishments.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:55 PM
1

Hillary Clinton is old. Emma Watson is only famous because of her looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:51 PM
3

In the case of Merkel and May, I think that you may be stretching the definition of ''young'' by quite some margin...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:41 PM
2

I don't know who she is. A google image search reveals that she's around the 5 mark.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:39 PM
4

I'm talking about how society views and judges them. Our happiness is largely based upon validation and social approval and acceptance. I may think that I'm absolutely awesome, but if other people don't share that view, then I'm deluded and ultimately disappointed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:33 PM
1

I'm going to hold you to your claim. When you're ready, please provide examples of average or ugly young women who are respected by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:29 PM
1

Roughly translated as: ''I'm going to spend the next 2 hours googling to find an obscure example of an average or ugly young woman who is tenuously accepted or celebrated by society''. It just doesn't happen. The only possible exception is a sportswoman who brings ''glory'' to her country. Even then, it only appeals to highly chauvinistic people, and most men will still make snide remarks about her looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:16 PM
2

Evolutionary Psychology is largely pseudoscience. By its very nature, it's unfalsifiable and untestable in a meaningful scientific way. People from the TRP only cite a crude version of it because of confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 11:26 AM
2

Like deliberately picking up the drunkest chick because you know that she can't say no anymore and won't remember it or doesn't even know her name at the moment. Have you got any evidence that this seriously happens? This sounds completely predatory. ie. nothing to do with ''rape culture''. From my experience, horny drunk people in clubs and parties hunt down other horny drunk people because their standards will be lowered and they'll have a 3am ''why not?'' attitude to a hook-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 11:16 AM
2

As I originally stated, there is an overwhelming correlation between a woman's sexual attractiveness and her physical looks. Men are lucky in the fact that there are more components to their sexual attractiveness than just looks. Average and even ugly guys are revered by society if they gain success by another means. Donald Trump. Elon Musk, Louis CK, etc. There are no average or ugly young women who are considered successful by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 10:58 AM
3

The fact that you're reliving these experiences in excruciating detail on a niche subreddit suggests that there are some unresolved issues about them burning in your psyche. It sounds like your situation and experiences aren't as ''smooth'' as you'd like to describe. This contradicts reality. No, it doesn't. Men who have power over their peers are alpha. If you can socially or physically dominate another man, then women get wet and other men get scared. Alpha males have power over others through…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 10:52 AM
2

A 7/10 is going to be valued just because she's a 7/10. A 4/10 is going to be generally ignored because she's a 4/10. It's hard to argue that a young woman's worth isn't largely based upon her physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:53 AM
3

Fat people are sexually repulsive to look at, and they generally smell bad. I don't understand why this is so confusing to people. It's not complex. If you're an overweight man, then women view you in the same way as you view obese women. And vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:46 AM
20

This issue arises because I'm assuming that you didn't stick up for yourself when they treated you badly. That's not a criticism, as it's easier said than done, and not necessarily the most sensible or prudent option to take. Because they used intimidation to walk over you in the first place, they naturally assume that you are still scared of them and that you'll oblige them again because of this power they have over you. Sadly, it is alpha male behaviour, because they are leveraging the fact th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:29 AM
4

I think that there are the reason why young women have low self-esteem is due to the fact that - rightly or wrongly - their value is derived from their sexual attractiveness. A woman's sexual attractiveness overwhelmingly correlates with her physical appearance. Most attractive women are a much of a muchness, and they are acutely aware of this. A 7/10, for example, is constantly surrounded by other 6s, 7s, 8s and 9s, so she knows that she's nothing special, and that there's not a lot which she c…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:21 AM
-1

The problem in Europe is that a lot of our Muslims are from lower class, less educated backgrounds, where they actually take their unreformed beliefs seriously, and use the Qu'ran as the basis for their world-view. The middle class Muslims are just like better educated people from all cultures, and largely eschew religion or take it with a heavy dose of salt. Christianity in Europe has been forced to change along with progressive social values, so we don't have much problems with Christianity in…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:01 PM
2

I think that it's a subset of feminists who treat white men as surrogates for ''daddy''. They are motivated to be pro-Islam out of spite, because they know it's going to piss off ''daddy''. Also, as far-fetched as it sounds, I do think that there's a subconscious sexual subtext to them welcoming in dark, brooding men from a masculine culture. Ahmed and Abdullah Alpha give them the tingles. And there are just too many homegrown Billy Betas and Olly Omegas. If you switch it around, and imagine tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 08:47 AM
2

Women are full of intellectually dishonest and obfuscatory bullshit in regards to sexual attraction? News at 11...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 10:23 PM
5

8 - Hot girl-next-door look, and the kind of face that I like. 8 - Not really my type, but I'm not going to argue with what my penis thinks. :) 5 - Butterface, and I don't like her breasts, but the rest of her body bumps her up. 5 - She's got a pretty-ish face, but I don't like her hair or clothes. It looks like she's just stepped out of the 1930's. 2 - An absolute cartoonish monstrosity. She only avoids a 1 on my scale because my level of revulsion is slightly lower than that which I feel when …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 08:25 AM
1

What I don't understand is why are there so many men like this slipping through the net? The behaviour you describe - while on the extreme end - is not drastically uncommon among a lot of men. Why are there so many men like this who lack the simplest social skills and know how to interact with other like a normal human being? Are they just from unstructured homes and slipping through the cracks in society?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 06:14 PM
1

The problem with the issue ''mansplaining'' - as in a man ''correcting'' a woman on her views and experiences on women's issues - is that it's sometimes perfectly valid. Just because someone is of a particular demographic doesn't mean that they are going to necessarily hold rational or accurate opinions on societal issues which affect them. There seems to be an opinion amongst some people that challenging their own personal experiences and opinions is ''invalidating'' them. Unfortunately, not al…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 07:13 PM
3

Whenever I see a couple where the man is noticeably more physically attractive than the woman, my instinctual thought is "he must be a loser in some way or another if he can't get a hotter girl". I'm not entirely sure that that's a normal reaction. They could have been childhood sweethearts, or maybe she was on a par with him originally but let herself go and became overweight. If you were the woman in question, and gained the sexual and romantic attention of a guy that was more physically attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 09:36 PM
3

I can't believe that website has the audacity to called itself ''askmen''. That's like TRP calling itself ''askwomen''.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 09:29 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but the majority of women I talk to here in any detail seem pretty normal and socially adjusted. Aye, but the majority of conspiracy theorists, for example, think that other conspiracy theorists are normal and enlightened, if you know what I'm saying... I don't think it's fair to say that posting on a specific topic means you are mentally ill or don't have a normal social life. It's reasonably fair if it's a niche subreddit that discusses issues which most grown …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 09:21 PM
1

Also, if you just mean ASD, say ASD. I don't think there's a massive link between being an omega incel and any other mental illness. I don't just mean ASD. It seems that depression and social anxiety are the most common, followed by ASD and BDD, and other social disorders. In truth, it's the combination of one or more of these which seems to create the perfect storm for their 0/10 omega status. I don't know whether you've seen a lot of their posts - and it must be stated that half of their stuff…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 09:03 PM
1

I said ''almost all of the women here''. So, if you are actually an exception, then that's fine by me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 08:56 PM
1

So yes. If ''social acuity'' is being an aspie, you are saying you think the women of PPD are all on the spectrum. That's why I said ''acting like someone on the autism spectrum''. I have made cringe-inducing social faux pas, and I have also done and said things which showed a glaring lack of social acuity, yet I'm not on the spectrum. So basically...there is no real tie between ''mental disorders'' and omega status? I find it hard to believe that you genuinely believe that internet incels aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 08:32 PM
1

If they weren't saturated in it since childhood, then maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 08:25 PM
1

To boost their self-esteem when they are feeling down. It's also pretty obvious that a lot of the time women aren't posting these selfies for Billy Beta, Walter White-Knight, Octavius Omega, Creepy Carl, or Felicity Fatty to make comments along the lines of ''so beautiful''. They are posting them in the hope of getting that one particular ''friend'' or ''follower'' to compliment them and give them attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 08:18 PM
1

Okay. Can you explain to me why Catherine Zeta Jones is an omega because she was mental illness? Marilyn Monroe? (killed herself). Like I said, it depends on the causes and extremities of each one. The average male incel who posts on the internet, for example, has mental illnesses which are severely affecting their lives, and which has a knock-on effect of making them 0/10s in the SMP. On the other hand, Chad Thundercock may have a number of personality disorders, but they do affect his status a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 08:12 PM
1

Next, they'll be divining, casting runes and reading tea leaves in their quest for the truth!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:57 PM
1

Obviously male attention is not useless to them... But they don't know any different. And they have no choice in the matter. They have had men creeping on them and being inappropriate towards them since they were girls - who probably weren't even old enough to know about the birds and the bees.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:52 PM
1

A lot of women here mention that they have psychological/social disorders of some kind, as do a lot of the men. I can't link any specific ''Q4W'' women threads here, but they're generally the ones which are similar to questions which pop up on r/askreddit. The difference being that the overwhelming majority of answers on the r/askreddit thread are standard things which you observe in the real world, whereas so many of the answers in the PPD threads are extremely niche and idiosyncratic. When I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:50 PM
4

Because every woman and her dog receive this same kind of attention, making it worthless as an ego stroker. Women appreciate it from someone who they are attracted to, but that's about 1% of the people giving them attention and compliments.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:42 PM
1

Because women have low self-esteem. They can get a fleeting high from this kind of validation when they are feeling down in the dumps. But, it's ephemeral.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:40 PM
1

What does this mean? To put it delicately: acting like someone on the autism spectrum. Why does this make one omega? Jack Kerouac had an unconventional view of reality, was he ''omega''? Because an ''unconventional view of reality'' is not always good in the real world - in terms of socialisation. Also, an ''unconventional view of reality'' is often not real. aka. living in cloud cuckoo land. How can you conflate all of these things? Are Catherine Zeta Jones and Demi Lovato ''omega''? Was Marily…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:39 PM
0

They're upset because they've lost their identity and felt ugly for the first time in their lives, not because they crave male attention. It's similar to how good-looking people often have some kind of existential crisis when they get older and their looks fade. Women take sexual attention and compliments for granted, because they don't know any different. They and their friends start receiving it when they hit puberty. Just because they feel loss if it's taken away, doesn't mean that they activ…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:30 PM
4

A friend of mine is pretty hot and once in the bus little kids made a close up picture of her ass, I told her to slap them but she was like "Uh nice" and started grinning. Well, little kids don't really count. Another friend is always like "uh I must look great today everyone in the city looked/stared at me" That's just comparing her average level of attention to an increased level of attention, and drawing the probably correct conclusion that she must have looked especially hot. Either that, or…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 05:22 PM
9

Male validation is generally useless for a woman (unless it comes from someone she has the hots for). Women know just how horny guys are, and they see exactly the same compliments and attention bestowed upon their friends, sisters, cousins, work colleagues, maybe wven their own mother if she's a MILF. When they see a flurry of ''so beautiful'' comments on their latest uploaded selfie, then it only gives them a short-term pick-me-up when they are feeling bad about themselves. But they see exactly…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 05:05 PM
1

That's why I said ''not in content''. I meant that they're the equivalent of those men in terms of lack of social acuity, having a slightly unconventional view of reality, and having personal/mental/social disorders. There's very little a woman can do which takes her out of the relationship game, so it's no surprise that the majority are in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 04:36 PM
2

Most of these seem to be largely biologically based, and unavoidable. For example, I can't imagine any scenario where a young male virgin wouldn't be shamed or insulted for it by others. It's something which is highly undesirable, and something which you've failed at that most of your peers have succeeded at. Also, most of this shaming is done evenly by men and women, so I don't think that you really say that it stems from one particular gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 02:57 PM
1

I've never seen that - at least in online communication. I've only seen people just describe themselves as the 4-letter-string. I'm sure some people must describe their percentage, but those people are certainly a small minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 02:36 PM
1

For women, it's much the same as men: lack of social acuity, personality/mental/social disorders, etc. The difference for women is that there doesn't appear to be such a large correlation between looks and beta/omega status. Whereas, for men, that is one of the major factors. Just look at any of the questions angled towards women here: almost all of the answers are niche and very PPD echo chamber type answers. Post the same question on r/askreddit, and you'll see that these types of answers are …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 01:40 PM
1

That's another reason why it's worthless, then. If you say that you're ''Ixxx'' for example, then there's absolutely nothing to tell whether that ''I'' falls in the margin of error, or whether it's an overwhelming 90%+ ''I''. Another problem I had with it, were that a lot of the options for answers didn't apply to me, so I had to just pick an extremely hypothetical answer which wasn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 01:34 PM
3

That's because there's no threat of physical violence when a woman acts weirdly and awkwardly around a man. On the other hand, there are numerous incidents of creepy men murdering, raping, stalking, etc. women. While these men form a tiny percentage of the population, it's obvious why women would be instinctively wary of men who give off this creepy vibe. I'm sure that a butch lesbian making awkward sexual comments towards a petite woman would be viewed as ''creepy'' in some form.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 01:31 PM
3

The content of their posts. The anecdotes; the slightly naive questions; the outlier personalities and experiences. If you step back for a second and assess, you'll see that most of the women on here are the equivalent of the more cogent posters on r/incels and the average poster on r/mgtow. Not in the content in which they post, but in their lack of grasp of sexual, romantic and gender dynamics. This is an observation, and not a criticism. The men on here (myself included) are in the same boat.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 09:29 AM
1

I agree. It's amazing how many religious and superstitious type beliefs exist in the modern day in pseudo-scientific form. Once when I took the test I started off with an ''I'', then the next time I started off with an ''E''. If something as glaringly different in someone's personality can change because of what kind of mood they are in when they answer the questions, then it shows what worthless bunk this kind of pseudo-psychology truly is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 08:01 AM
7

Why do people throw around the word ''insecurity'' all the time in here? Insecurity is just a manifestation of fear, and fear is probably the biggest inherent driving force behind all sentient animals' behaviours, including humans. Everybody is naturally insecure about most things in life, because you have no - or extremely limited - control over them. It's perfectly normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:45 AM
2

From what I've seen, almost all of the women here are the female equivalent of low beta/omega males. Not necessarily in terms of looks, but in beliefs, behaviours, attitudes, mental and social problems, etc. A lot of the ''Q4W'' threads on here can be a little bit cringe-inducing because of this, because you have beta/omega men earnestly asking questions of beta/omega women, who - in turn - are earnestly giving replies. It's a solipsism fest on both ends, but bears little relation to sexual and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 07:39 AM
3

I'm not ''talking shit'' about her to belittle her. The entire crux of the story is the claim that she was sacked because of her looks. I'm merely pointing out that her claim is dubious, considering the fact that she's not exactly stand-out attractive in her working environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 12:46 PM
1

I guess that she's not my type.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:42 AM
2

I have to disagree a little bit, the first photo is looking like shit. All of her photos look like shit, when you remember that these are carefully posed to make herself look as good as possible, and probably had numerous try-and-fail attempts to get that look. She's smack bang average in her environment, and you'd probably be shocked at how she looked on a bad day IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:40 AM
3

Ha! I understand how my comment may sound like that, but I'm merely pointing out how this girl is smack bang average in her career environment. Her nose is bad, her tits are small and unshapely, and you can only make out her cheekbones after a dozen filters and shadowy lighting. Her mole isn't ''cute''. It looks disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:35 AM
3

Yeah, the girl in the story is probably only a 5 or 6 without make-up. I don't want to sound mean, but she has a bad nose, big asymmetrical eyes, and despite all that make-up, there is virtually zero cheekbone definition. She also has quite small breasts, hence why she tries so hard to create that fake cleavage. Not to mention the Rowan Atkinson mole which she has on the left side of her face. She's pretty normal looking for someone in a London media firm.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:58 AM
1

I don't have any real world examples, but my personal 10s are people who are so hot that they inspire immediate romantic feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:53 AM
6

I doubt this is true. Especially, as she's not exactly amazing looking. She's probably a 7 or 8, but for the world of media that doesn't count for much, where 9s and 10s abound.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:01 AM
2

I'm a man, and I think that a lot of it is age-dependant. In my teens and early 20's, I would say that it was a necessity. Now that I'm on the wrong side of 30, it doesn't matter so much. That's not just because of the slight and gradual loss of the sex drive as you age, but also because of maturity and life experience. I wonder, also, how much of it being a necessity for younger people is down to peer pressure. When I look back on my younger days, I recall that a lot of the worthlessness I felt…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 07:28 AM
16

Are you serious? I can think of numerous incidences where boys and men belittled and humiliated fat or ugly girls and women for no reason whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:33 AM
1

Again, though, as countries modernise, they will also develop more efficient food production and distribution methods. We have an abundance of food in the world, yet some regions still occasionally experience starvation and famine. Starvation and famine are clearly something which comes from poor utilisation of resources, as 99+% of the world's population aren't dying of starvation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:14 AM
1

Who has an IQ of 75?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:08 AM
18

While this is hyperbole, there is some truth to it. But, the same also applies to women. A chubby 4/10 is sexually invisible to most men with options. When men talk about women in a sexual context, then we're talking about sexually attractive women. It shouldn't be too shocking to realise that women use these same standards when they talk about men. For example, a lot of men indulgently claim that they have a natural in-built desire to protect women. But what they mean is that they feel protecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 09:07 AM
2

Have we? Because in your own example of attaining confidence there was no change in your abilities or status, instead you changed your state of mind. But my lack of confidence became authentic confidence. That's the point. As soon as I internalised the fact that no-one is better than me, then it gave me a huge boost in natural confidence. For me, faking confidence does not mean adopting a fake persona but not giving into your anxiety and depression, not airing your insecurities and pretending yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 08:56 AM
1

Most of the alpha traits I see celebrated on TRP are individual traits which don't take into account other people. The kind of traits, which displayed in their purest form, got Ken McElroy murdered by dozens of his acquaintances. Over on TRP, there is absolutely no importance placed upon non-sexual relationships with other people. There is no guide to how co-operating with, and influencing others, is a fundamental component of being of an alpha. Just look at how they absolutely worship weightlif…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 08:50 AM
1

Well, we've obviously had different experiences in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 08:21 AM
1

What you're describing as a "true alpha" is just a regular person - no? No. Because the regular person doesn't display other alpha traits, such as leadership, dominance, etc. The problem is that TRP types don't seem to realise that alphas have to display traits like co-operation and expediency to be successful in society. You can't throw your weight around without giving something back, otherwise people will just get pissed off at you and you'll end up in a bad way. I don't know who Ken McElroy …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 08:16 AM
2

I'm not so much talking about confidence in specific abilities. I was just using ''acting tough'' as an example. If you're genuinely confident in yourself (bordering on cocky and narcissistic) and your ability to handle the world around you, then you'll just exude confidence to everyone else. My point is that people can't successfully feign this as you can't fool yourself. A 3/10 can't authentically believe he's a 10/10, unless he's deluded. If he acts like one, then people will spot the fakenes…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 08:01 AM
1

I agree that people are quite bad at reading a lot of emotions, but I don't think that confidence is one of them. I'm a man, and I can usually tell when other men are feigning confidence and BSing, so I don't think that it's too much of a stretch to assume that women can also sniff these men out pretty soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:55 AM
2

Yes, but unless we know the measurements, then the choices don't mean anything to the casual observer of the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:50 AM
1

It's ''wrong'' in the sense that you'll end up disappointed and unfulfilled. As with any idealistic fantasy, reality will soon catch up with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:49 AM
8

But it doesn't make for very interesting reading if you are asking women to make choices on their own subjective ideas of what constitutes subpar. A woman who has been with a few ''big boys'' may consider 6'' to be subpar.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:45 AM
2

What I'm saying is that if you feign confidence, the inauthentic nature of the act leaks through for others to see, even if the person faking it doesn't realise it. If you strut around like you could take any man on, but aren't exactly a fighter, then people will be able to see that you're all talk and no action. If, on the other hand, you are a black-belt in some martial art, then you'll probably have genuine and well-founded confidence in your ability to handle yourself in a fight or confronta…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:40 AM
0

I think that mentally normal, ugly and/or fat guys don't generally wallow in their lack of sexual or romantic success. They are probably acutely aware of being unattractive since they were a child, and most have probably never had any serious attention from a woman. While I'm sure that they get depressed and upset at the cards which life dealt them, they aren't too caught up in being ''incel'', as there is an glaringly obvious reason why they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:16 AM
2

Feigning confidence is obviously fake because the person isn't authentically confident in his abilities. The only way you can get around this is by genuine self-delusion. If you genuinely believe that you are the hottest guy in the world, and that all women fancy you, then this kind of fake confidence will work. Because even if it's delusional, it's still authentic in your mind. Most people feign confidence in a vacuum, which is why they fail. It's confidence and self-assuredness in your own abi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 07:07 AM
2

There is so much anger in regards to those women that I don't understand, because don't you want a woman that has learned from her past mistakes and knows what she wants in men and knows how to screen for that? I think that it's mainly an ego thing for them. In their minds, she was gobbling on Chad's throbbing member in a nightclub toilet within 15 minutes of meeting him. But she's making him wait, which means that he's not inspired an instant, ripping-off-knickers level of lust within her. Wors…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:53 AM
14

You need to give some measurements to define what you mean by ''subpar''. If a subpar penis means a micropenis, subpar height means 4'10'', or subpar face means 2/10, then that's going to change the answers. Whereas if you mean 4.5'', 5'7'', or 4/10, then you'll probably get a different perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:48 AM
3

One of the main things which people - especially TRPers - seem to forget, is that authenticity and congruency are essential in these traits which women describe. Confidence is a perfect example of this. Some people may mock women when they claim that confidence is sexy, because they've put on a confident persona and have achieved no noticeable improvement with women. But the confidence and self-assuredness has got to be authentic. You can't just feign conidence in a vacuum. It's also got to matc…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:42 AM
4

And re-read your original comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 11:58 AM
16

Education and comfort lead to low birth rates. Most Western countries have barely replacement level birthrates. As the rest of the world gets more modernised and educated, then their birthrates will also fall. There is absolutely no reason to impose any kind of regulations on people, as this problem is already resolving itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 11:35 AM
2

So, re-read your original comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 11:26 AM
1

True alphas have to operate within and around the societal laws and customs. Expediency is a huge component in being an alpha. This means that they have to supplicate and kiss arse sometimes, to achieve their objective. The TRP fantasy of an alpha is this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_McElroy And look how he ended up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 11:22 AM
3

I've suffered from severe depression and social anxiety in the past. In fact, I'm still afflicted by these conditions even so I'm largely ''over'' them now. I'm also, technically, an ''incel''.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 11:08 AM
3

That's just Maslow's personal opinion. It carries absolutely no weight whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 10:54 AM
8

I think that we should stop pandering to and indulging the ''incels'' with discussions surrounding their lack of sex and romantic relationships. This is clearly a symptom and external focus for their mental illnesses. Instead, we should focus on combating their mental health issues, and ignore the whiny sex-based stuff - as that's just a tangential coping mechanism. Trying to give sexual or romantic advice to an ''incel'' is like trying to give interior decorating tips to a severely depressed pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 10:51 AM
1

Have I missed out on something here? Who on earth would ''feel sorry'' for someone who isn't going to university? By college, I assume that you mean university. People who don't go to university are usually from poor socioeconomic backgrounds; communities where a degree doesn't count for toffee, anyway. Most university places depend upon exam performance in school, so if you fail those then you should just resit at a later date.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 10:44 AM
6

Romance is still alive on an individual basis, when you start to develop those ''in the moment'' feelings. However, as we gradually adapt to, and accept, the nihilistic reality of existence, then I don't think that it the concept of romance holds that much importance any more. We can now see romance as just another fleeting aspect of a natural process, rather than an objective - which it was in slightly more naive times.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 10:36 AM
2

I think that the financial benefits won't last too much longer. There's just no logical reason to reward married couples, and to discriminate against single people or unmarried couples. I wouldn't be surprised if financial tax breaks for married couples get ruled illegal in the not too distant future. It's clearly discriminatory for arbitrary and outmoded reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 09:48 AM
1

You have to respect people who are social winners,especially the ones with professional authority over you. But that description applies to Donald Trump. I doubt there are too many people who have anything other than disrespect for him. He's a social winner, and he has authority over Americans, but he's still a pathetic, thin-skinned clown who's full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 08:57 AM
5

It doesn't take a genius to see that a lot of posters there are angry and frustrated at the sexual freedom of women, and would love to have controls put back upon it. It's OK to say that you love sluts, but most TRPers aren't truly happy with the situation. A lot of posts there seem to be along the lines of reluctantly taking advantage of the current SMP, but still not being happy about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 08:51 AM
2

I think that they're selectively libertarian. It's clear that they are angry at the sexual freedom of women, and there's an undercurrent of a desire for some kind of societal control of a woman's sexuality. The current attitude to sex and relationships in modern society is very libertarian. If anything, a more libertarian approach would legalise and normalise polygamy and open relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 08:07 AM
3

Marriage is just dying a slow, natural death. And it won't be coming back anytime soon. Just as other religious and cultural norms - which served a valid purpose in the past - are naturally getting phased out in a modern and secular society. Marriage is just another one of those antiquated customs which is in its death throes. I can see why a monogamous couple might want some symbol of commitment to each other, but there's no need for a state-sponsored institution for them to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 07:18 AM
2

I think that Type 1 is invariably just a different expression of Type 2. Type 1 just doesn't happen organically.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 02:21 PM
1

You could, though. Women have sex on tap. Only obese, deformed, or socially inept women would struggle to get laid when they want. This is even truer in the tinder age.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 02:08 PM
3

Naturally attractive men who have good genetics are probably the only ones who have a largely high quality n count. There are lots of very average men with a high, largely low quality, n count. I think a lot of people have a tendency to associate quantity with quality, whereas, in my experience, most men with high n counts are average guys having sex with a lot of average and below average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 08:15 AM
4

It's not reasonable to expect women to date guys who they aren't sexually attracted to. AKA ''lowering their standards''. I'm sure I'm not alone in the fact that I'd rather be single than date an overweight woman, or a sub-5, because they just don't engender any sexual attraction within me. In the luxury of the Western world, it's ultimately: LTR with attractive person> being single> LTR with unattractive person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 08:08 AM
5

I think it's more to do with social status than attraction. If someone's middle-class and reasonably ell-educated, then those attributes are generally mandatory in their LTR partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 08:00 AM
5

Women - low self-esteem, low self-worth, childhood emotional issues. Men (other than the very attractive who are just taking advantage of their genetic gifts) - chip on his shoulder, self-absorption, unhealthy obsession with validation and approval from others.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 07:47 AM
6

Female sexuality only favors stereotypically masculine men. So other men who don't fall into stereotype cookie cutter end up getting ostracized, bullied or ignored. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 11:42 PM
2

A baby's brain is so underdeveloped that it probably has virtually no meaningful sentience, so it doesn't really matter whether you leave it to drown or not. The only thing is that its death may upset the parents, so if you have empathy for them, then you probably should save it. It's a personal choice, though, and certainly not an ''obligation''.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 11:30 PM
3

There is no reason to believe matters of attraction won't as well. Not if the factors in attraction have some biological component. A lot of women, for example, are still turned-on by the badboy types, even so those guys have been social misfits for centuries. Whereas the model citizen's virtues aren't exactly panty-wetters. Unfortunately, biology trumps civilisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 11:08 PM
1

The problem here is that the traditional masculine guy - looks permitting - is going to be attractive to women, regardless of the social environment. Whereas the man who shuns masculinity is going to make a woman's vag drier than the Atacama, again regardless of the social environment. Most aspects of toxic masculinity exist because it helps men to get laid - and that isn't going to change anytime soon, unless we alter the human genome...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 10:53 PM
4

ITT: Beggars playing the role of choosers, to assuage their fragile egos.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:53 PM
2

But Chad, Brad, Thad, Dad, and Cad live in the same society, yet they aren't exactly shy to let a girl know that he wants to impale her with his magnificent weapon.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:50 PM
1

Is this is why artists have such a huge reputation as womanisers? Musicians? I'm pretty sure that that's down to status...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:45 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:43 PM
14

It's because people who are failing at dating and romance have unique issues which need to be addressed individually. Generic, one-size-fits-all advice is completely worthless. There's also the problem that honest advice and recommendations will probably sound cruel, so most people don't say it to spare feelings and avoid potential confrontation. Worse still, the reason for a lot of failings in a relationship are not ''PC'' to mention. For example, men will enjoy much more success in dating if t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 12:24 PM
3

Obviously fake, but this purported conversation is clearly mocking the NiceGuy types, rather than the TRP types.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:54 AM
3

One of the things I've noticed is that a lot of men seem to be embarrassed, uncomfortable, and even ashamed of their sexuality and being sexual. I'm not saying that men should be lecherous and offensively sexual, but some guys do themselves no favours by not wanting to show any sexual feelings. I think this could be an explanation for a lot of guys who claim to get called ''creepy'', also. If someone who, in all intents and purposes, presents himself as asexual suddenly makes a sexual comment or…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:49 AM
3

Most women don't seem to be too concerned about ''physical vulnerability'' when Chad Violent-McBadboy is pounding the living daylight out of her gushing vag.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 06:39 PM
2

The majority of women aren't promiscuous, even so they have the opportunity of sex on tap. There is no doubt, in my mind, that a high n count is a symptom of a flawed and damaged psyche in women. It can't be explained away by biological differences between individual people, as the ceiling on the normal hormonal levels of both men and women isn't far above the average levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 07:26 AM
3

Shouldn't there be an effort in incel communities to actually reclassify the varieties of ''inceldom''? Reading some incel forums, there is a clear distinction between a guy who is incel because he has no idea how to sexually escalate, and a guy who has had no regular female interaction since he has been at school.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 08:06 PM
1

I don't know why this has received such criticism. I think that it's perfectly valid. The internet provides a platform for people to - mostly anonymously - vent their anger, rant at the perceived ills of the world, and generally just left off some steam and pent up frustration and aggression. Personally, I think that this is one of the many benefits to society which the internet provides. Others may disagree. If someone has gone through some messy break-up, or is unhappy and disillusioned with s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 07:09 PM
1

This is one of those situations where men and women are talking over each other with their solipsism. The fact of the matter is that: Casual sex means something different to men and women. NSA sex means something different to men and women. FWB means something different to men and women. If your endocrine system - and the hormones which it produces - only allow to feel one way, then you're not going to understand the experience of the other sex. As a man, if I meet an average or above woman with…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 09:05 AM
1

I think it all comes down to a combination of attitude and developing a passion in a field other than ''pussy''. Devout religious people who save themselves until marriage probably don't feel like that they are missing out anything. They've internalised their beliefs and probably feel that their lustful urges are wrong. The world is littered with great minds who were either incel or who developed warped views of women through oneitis and pedestalisation. eg. Sir Isaac Newton,Tesla, Schopenhauer,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 08:40 AM
2

Poor dress, styling and hygiene (cheap/poor-fitting clothing, bad habits, laziness, no money for quality self-care) Is this really that big of a problem? I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of ''normal'' men under 30 who dress noticeably badly or smell of BO.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 08:17 AM
2

People (men and women) generally want political actions. The majority of women and beta men are inherently conflict avoidant, passive and unwilling to take major action, even when necessary. In a woman's case, this isn't a criticism, and is just the result of being less physically powerful. I think it would be quite interesting to see how feminine leadership could shape society, and probably the Nordic countries will be the first where this will come into place. As it stands, though, most mainst…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 07:59 AM
1

I think the incest risk is the ultimate evolutionary root of womens' disgust here. But aren't there estimated to be somewhere between 2%-10% of children who aren't the biological progeny of the nominal and ''official'' father? This leads to way more inbreeding than a man with a predilection for teenage girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 12:07 AM
2

There are always downsides to supposed privileges. The grass isn't greener on the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 11:59 PM
1

There's definitely more social stigma for a man. Most older single women are generally considered to be ''unlucky in love'', and also with the fact that women are inundated with sexual attention from men, the idea that she never received opportunities is not even considered in judging her. On the other hand, unless there's some verifiable trail of sexual success for a man, then his failure to have secured a romantic partner in his middle-age is tantamount to him being a sexual failure. Let's als…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 11:56 PM
1

This is about sex and having your desires met. I'm having sex with you. I've bent you over, I'm pulling your hair and smacking your arse, pounding you to half way to Mars. YOU'RE the woman. Act like one. Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 02:47 PM
6

Men who post on r/relationships and r/deadbedrooms are going to be fucked anyway, because they obviously lack the personality and balls to make their own decisions in life. It's as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 02:16 PM
7

Why is there no empathy for incels? Incels are only a thing in a small corner of the internet. I have never once encountered anyone in the real world who tells me about their sexual and romantic incompetence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 02:08 PM
3

I think the problem is that dominance is amoral. Women are attracted to male dominance, regardless of the rights and wrongs of the display of dominance. Obviously, both men and women can't help who or what they're sexually attracted to, so it's wrong to negatively judge people for this. However, it's perfectly reasonable to point out that the average woman desires traits in men which are counter to normal civilised society, which is based upon co-operation and a ''quid pro quo'' philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 01:59 PM
1

I think that you're probably correct. I just find it funny (strange, not ha! ha!) that she claims that she's a feminist, yet wants to reap the benefits of men conforming and performing their gender specific roles. I'm having sex with you. I've bent you over, I'm pulling your hair and smacking your arse, pounding you to half way to Mars. YOU'RE the woman. Act like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 12:43 PM
1

I don't know too many men who want to do anything other than keep their emotions in check. For all the self-indulgent talk I read from men about how bad it is that they have to bottle up their emotions, I doubt that too many of them would want to look weak by public displays of emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 08:00 AM
1

Yeah, I can understand how media could influence your outlook on life if you're from a very sheltered upbringing. I just can't believe that most people on TRP share this kind of background.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 07:43 AM
9

I am a raging feminist bitch YOU’RE the man. Act like one. If she's a feminist, then why is she using shaming language to ridicule someone who doesn't fall within a narrow gender stereotype? To be honest, I wouldn't give this article too much credence, as she sounds all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 07:39 AM
3

Well, Romanticism was an philosophical and artistic movement in Europe. He immediately gets it wrong by implying that it had anything to do with sexual or romantic relationships. Also, the relationship formula which he describes has been present in a multitude of cultures for millennia. So, there's no real basis for any argument which claims that there was some kind of subversion against the norm which we still experience in the 21st-century.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 06:25 PM
1

My honest opinion? I think the man in the video talked a complete and utter load of bollocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 05:53 PM
3

Many men are under the impression you simply don't need to try to win a woman's heart after you've already won it. This may be broadly true, but it's not really applicable here. I doubt the TRP people who are grumbling about supposed Disney indoctrination was ever in a position where they won a woman's heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 05:45 PM
1

Yes, but the lady in the photos is pretty ''ugh'' looking to most heterosexual men, so appealing does not apply to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 04:33 PM
5

Yes, I have seen people on TRP and PPD unironically claiming that Disney films and - believe it or not - Hollywood romantic comedies were major contributors in them growing up to be beta, blue-pilled nice guys. What they seem to neglect is the fact that they would have gone through 10+ years of education, and the socio-sexual dynamics in the last few years of schooling should have made it abundantly obvious how sexual and romantic relationships work.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 04:32 PM
8

I suppose it's easier to be Don Quixote tilting at windmills, then it is to accept personal responsibility for your own naivety and lack of social acuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 04:16 PM
2

I don't think that that definition is commonly used or understood these days. It's one of the most common adjectives used to describe children, and I doubt that people are implying that someone's young son or daughter is ''ugly but interesting''! I think that it's generally understood to mean something along the lines of ''appealing'', but the term - when applied to adults - almost always suggests some kind of sexual or romantic attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 04:14 PM
11

I'm amazed at the amount of men who claim to have built their worldview about socio-sexual behaviour from watching Disney films when they were little. I smell BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 04:04 PM
1

Well your definition of ''cute'' is at odds with the that of most heterosexual men. There is no doubt that from what we can make out of her features, that she would probably be quite pretty if she lost weight. But those hypotheticals are just that: hypotheticals. In reality, she looks gross because she has a fat and blobby face. And that is the bottom line.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 03:59 PM
1

Now that's a non sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 03:33 PM
4

How could she be remotely described as ''cute''? She has a fat face, which completely blurs any kind of attractive features. People need to understand that it's the fat, amorphous face which makes overweight men and women unattractive. It doesn't matter how theoretically ''good'' someone could look without the fat, because it's solely the fat which actually makes them look gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 03:30 PM
3

Your reply is confusing, because I'm talking from about the male perspective, not the woman's. Average and above average women get constant sexual attention from men in the ways which I describe. And that's just the normal ways. That doesn't count the innumerable times I've witnessed socially uncalibrated men just staring at attractive women, or flirting with them in totally inappropriate situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 06:35 AM
2

Unless he's just ejaculated within the last couple of minutes, or has dangerously low levels of sex hormones, or is about 80 years old, then yes!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 06:30 AM
1

One thing I've noticed is that men and women can both easily judge who's aesthetically good looking within their own gender, but are both completely useless at judging sexual attractiveness. There's obviously quite a large overlap, but a lot of models are perfect examples of people who - on paper - tick all the boxes for beauty, but have mediocre sexual attractiveness. This is what you also see with guys and muscles. If you see a muscular, well-proportioned guy with low body-fat, it looks very a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 06:28 AM
3

If he has a working set of testicles, then absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 08:33 PM
5

That's protecting your women from being forcefully stolen by other men. Mate-guarding is beta behaviour. If you're attractive and providing your partner with what she wants, then she's unlikely to stray. And even if she does stray, then a man just looks like a complete and utter pathetic chump if he gets emotionally invested in forcing her to be ''loyal'' to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 08:14 PM
6

Every interaction with a non-ugly and non-fat woman is a sexually charged affair for heterosexual men. Women who are reasonably attractive and above are constantly getting hit on in these interactions, whether the man is intentionally doing it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 08:10 PM
3

A doormat woman is not hot long term. She's not even hot short term, once the novelty and ego boost gives way to a logical appraisal of her behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:54 PM
1

I don't think that women are necessarily showered in attention all the time. But it's obvious from my experience that men are always on the sexual prowl, and can't hide this from even average looking women. Most men are too pussy to look a woman in the eyes, much less hit on them. But that's still attention. Why would a man not look a woman in her eyes? It's not out of physical fear. It's because he's subconsciously giving her sexual attention, which makes him nervous around her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:36 PM
2

Yeah, most men want to be a woman's hero. Not in some kind of master/slave dynamic, but as equal partners - in terms of respect, not necessarily relationship roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:28 PM
1

It's because women are generally turned on by aggressive men who ooze a propensity for violence, and even more turned on when the guy physically or emotionally intimidates, dominates and humiliates another man. It's obvious that these kind of guys are going to be more likely to resolve a ''domestic dispute'' with a little more than verbal communication. I know that mugshots are always unflattering, but just type in something like ''domestic violence mugshots'' into google, and most the men look …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 12:27 PM
1

many men are losers who can't offer much to women. So a woman could get a lot of dates and offers but it doesn't mean the men will be good candidates for a relationship But how much of a loser could he be if he's managed to impress a woman enough for her to agree to go on a date with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 12:14 PM
2

You are mistakenly conflating femininity with estrogen. Estrogen =/= femininity. Average hormonal profile = femininity/masculinity. Estrogen is just one of a cocktail of sex hormones which men and women possess. As long your hormonal profile falls within the broad range of average, then that's fine. Above or below average levels of sex hormones are bad. Men who use steroids become a comically bad caricature of masculinty: grotesquely unnatural amount of muscle mass; fragile ego; highly emotional…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 12:10 PM
1

We know there has been ZERO feminist societies in all of RECORDED HISTORY that has been powerful or a success. We also know all the greatest recorded empires/civilizations have been patriarchy. Reliable recorded history is only a few hundred years old, and only applies to a tiny minority of the human population. Even going back to the undocumented and unknown days with our highly similar Neanderthal cousins (around 60,000 years ago) is a tiny span in human evolution. We shared common ancestry wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:02 PM
1

but extensive research in archeology and history has given us some idea of how civilistaions developed. As I haven't got access to the book at the moment, can you give me a summary of how we have knowledge of the social development of human civilisation? I'm especially interested in how this could be gleaned from disparate tribal societies of homo sapiens sapiens (and related cousins) in a variety of environments, spanning over 150,000 years. Written history is only reliable over the last few hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:38 AM
5

We have absolutely no idea of the rules and social behaviours of humans or our ancestors. We have no idea of the variety of unique evolutionary pressures which would influence various tribes' customs and behaviours. In short: what you are saying is a complete work of fiction, as the only reliable recorded history we have is from a small number of human cultures from the last few hundred years or so. Who exactly were ''cavemen'', anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:13 AM
1

There's no way to regulate the sexual marketplace without some kind of tyranny. The cat's been let of the bag. You can't reverse personal freedom and knowledge. Almost all of the suggestions here hark back to a religious time which is never going to come back. The only slight tangential change I'd make would be to have mandatory paternity tests for all births, and especially for any child support claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:03 AM
1

Do you think at one point women will stop selecting guys who are too tall? Women generally do anyway. Unless you're blessed with good skeletal genetics, then anything over about 1.90m (6'3'') is not going be that attractive, because the average person over this height has weird proportions and looks gangly and awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:57 AM
2

Who cares if it's non sequitur? You said being slightly overweight is "far from ideal". My argument is that being anorexic and looking androgynous as a result is a lot further from ideal than a woman who is slightly overweight. Are you seriously comparing being slightly overweight (which is perfectly normal) with a debilitating mental illness which ruins lives and, in extreme cases, leads to death? Not only is that a non sequitur, but it's an absolutely horrible thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:46 AM
1

Where we seem to disagree is that a woman's self-esteem should be based on how she looks. I think the solution to this problem is her not basing her self-worth on other people's perception of her looks. This is easy to say if someone is average looking or above. The problem for notably unattractive men and women is that it's a denial of reality. Humans are shallow, and people are mercilessly judged by others. A key component of our happiness is respect and approval from our peers. This makes not…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:43 AM
1

No, toxic femininity is feeling like you need to wear heels, coat your face in makeup, love the color pink, and be submissive in order to be socially accepted. I disagree. The behaviour you describe is normal femininity. Conforming to normal societal standards of attractiveness (except wearing pink, which nobody cares about) is perfectly healthy, and - more importantly - the correct thing to do if you want to achieve the goals which just about everyone wants to achieve in life. The examples whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:33 AM
2

I think that misogyny is a natural step for sexually rejected, frustrated and unsuccessful young men. Look how quickly the average nice guy turns from pedestalising his crush, to becoming bitter and resentful towards her when she rejects him. Men generally will grow out of this as they get wiser, gain life experience and introspection.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:28 AM
2

Being slightly overweight as a woman is a lot better and more feminine than being anorexic and having no curves and just bones. Anorexics look androgynous. I don't believe that I, or anyone else in this thread, has even mentioned eating disorders such as anorexia, as it has no relevance to the discussion. Your comment appears to be a non sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 06:49 PM
3

The women who are fobbing each other off with platitudes. Telling a fat girl that she's beautiful isn't going to make it true, and while it may boost her self-esteem for a little bit (if she's not got a very high IQ), reality is going to smack her in the face sooner rather than later. This is why it's toxic. Toxic femininity is generally the socially endorsed behaviour of shielding women from the harshness of reality and encouraging learned helplessness, which prevents so many women from develop…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 06:18 PM
2

Invading armies are unlikely to kill the women of tribes who don't fight back, they're more likely to just kill the men and add the women to harems The almost certainly going to kill the men *and children, and rape the women. If a burglar comes into a family's house, the man inviting the burglar to take what he wants without a fight isn't necessarily going to bode well for the wife and children.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 06:09 PM
1

This is just an aspect of toxic femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 06:03 PM
3

If you look throughout history, I'm sure that most wars were fought out of necessity, to acquire resources for survival. Nobody is going to sit around and die of famine and disease if there's another tribe nearby who have food and a safer environment. Also, in wars of conquest, you can't really blame the men of the country or territory which is being conquered. It's not like the indigenous Amerindian men were any less victims of European conquest than the Amerindian women were, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:56 PM
2

While being slightly overweight in a woman is far from ideal, a little bit of chub is not really an obstacle for a woman being feminine and sexually attractive. ''Curvy'' is mainly down to the luck of genetics, and certainly doesn't mean overweight. It means women whose genetics provide them wide hips, and fat deposits which are stored in all the good areas (breasts, thighs, buttocks) and not in the bad ones (face, stomach, waist).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:16 PM
7

More men are overweight in any case, so the point still stands. I think the difference is that most men who are overweight are generally betas and omegas anyway. Their fatness is a symptom of their unmasculine lifestyle. If a young man is living a masculine lifestyle - which, by definition, will involve physicaity and strength - then it's going to be almost impossible for him to become anything more than a little chubby, at worst. On the other hand, fatness in women is the primary cause of a lac…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:37 PM
3

60% are from outside North America - so I assumed that 5%-10% would be from Canada and Mexico. http://uk.businessinsider.com/analysts-say-tinder-is-a-real-business-and-its-growing-fast-2016-2?utm_source=feedly&utm_medium=webfeeds&r=US&IR=T Match Group disclosed some numbers about Tinder during its earnings call. It said that more than 60% of Tinder users come from outside North America, according to Goldman Sachs. It's the most popular dating app in India, western and northern Europe, and Austra…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 08:03 AM
2

Tinder and OKCupid are international platforms. Only 30%-35% of Tinder users are from the United States, and I'd imagine the OKCupid numbers are not dissimilar. So the readjusted figures for the US should read: If 80% of this number is garbage (spammers, bots, exaggeration, etc.) that still means 2 million people, or about 4% of the single population, has tried out online dating at one point. If half of it is garbage, 11% of the single population has tried out online dating. If the number is rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 07:55 AM
10

Is this in the land of the free and the home of the brave? I'm only asking because it seems like the US police have far more evasive powers than in most advanced countries in Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 12:21 PM
3

This is something which I find contradictory about TRP. Getting cucked is obviously considered to be the most humiliating experience for a man. On the other hand, they claim that ''mate-guarding'' and getting overly attached to a woman is beta behaviour. How can you treat women like throwaway sex puppets, yet still get mad when she has sex with another man? It seems like most TRPers are repressing their romantic feelings, and hiding behind sexual urges to comfort themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 11:34 AM
4

It's just that it's impossible to justify this in modern, secular societies, without a switch to a more authoritarian and dogmatic rule of society. Individualism has been unleashed, and there's no way to stop it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 11:25 AM
3

But that was in an era where dogmatic beliefs were able to flourish. The cat's been let out of the bag now, and as education increases and people eschew religion, arbitrary controls like this cannot be enforced on people. There's no way that a Western, 21st-century society could implement any rules to govern sexual behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:47 AM
4

I think that a lot of this is going to depend on how sheltered your upbringing was. In the absence of real life experience, people are going to fill in the gaps themselves. These gaps are likely to be filled by things which people see in films, TV programmes, novels, etc. There's also the problem that people are generally introduced to sex and relationships in their school years. Yet, teenage sexual and relationship dynamics are very different to those which you will encounter in the adult world…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:39 AM
2

They consume so much media and food that they barely have half an hour for reading and exercising and even sleep less because of it. Surely that 11 hours of media already includes reading? There's no difference between reading a book and reading the same thing on your laptop or smartphone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:18 AM
1

Women don't have sex and intimacy with a man for the sake of it. There are always conditions there, and it's very rare for a woman to have sex with a random guy for sex's sake. On the other hand, the default position for the average man is to want and desire unconditional sex with random women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 09:40 AM
1

Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 09:34 AM
21

The concept of Feminism representing equality has been redundant since women acquired full legal equality. Which happened in most jurisdictions between over a hundred years ago. Feminism is a non-issue in 2017, outside of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 09:20 AM
2

I think that it's a combination of the scattergun/dartboard sex drive of men, and the fact that women generally want more than ambiguity in their sexual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 09:12 AM
4

There are no ideal relationships. The concept of ''ideal'' just leads to disappointment and the ''grass is greener on the other side'' mentality. Human relationships are generally formed through propinquity, and are generally haphazard, chaotic and unscripted.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 08:40 AM
3

If a youngish woman is not overweight or excessively ugly, then 90% of men will have unconditional sex with her, if the opportunity arises. However, a man would only commit to a small minority of these women, unless he is desperate. The problem for women is that a man's actions and behaviours are almost identical, whether he wants just sex or is interested in something more. So she is constantly looking for some kind of guarantee that he's more than just sexually involved with her, if there is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 08:36 AM
1

You're trying to compare two completely different things - career and relationship - and conflating the outcomes of both, even so they have little to nothing to do with each other. A relationship can't replace a successful career, and vice versa; People need both. The part of the human psyche which gains pleasure from acquisitiveness is completely different to the part which gains pleasure from personal and sexual intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 08:22 AM
2

Unfortunately, this isn't how humans work. If human nature was about looking at the bigger picture, then there would be no such thing as poverty, or extreme wealth disparity, and everyone would access to advanced amenities and social services. We only care about looking after number one, and we have an entitled baseline which keeps on moving up and the entitlement progresses. Mark Zuckerberg said "A squirrel dying in front of your house may be more relevant to your interests right now than peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 08:15 AM
1

It's pretty obvious that most women aren't hypergamous. If they were, then they'd all be vying to be a trophy wife for successful or high status men. It doesn't make sense to claim that women are hypergamous, then, on the other hand, claim that they want to have sex with some Chad who is unemployed or works a minimum wage job. That is the complete opposite of hypergamy. Hypergamy only really occurs in poor societies, where it's usually done out of necessity, rather than because of some biologica…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 06:41 AM
6

35% Being Good in Bed 35% Being Good in Bed Is this real life?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 04:09 PM
13

To be honest, it sounds like this guy has a bit of an axe to grind. By the tone of his comment, I imagine that he was overweight or had some other trait which made him sexually invisible to women during his youth. This sounds like some attempt at payback, now that he's all trimmed up. There is some kind of agenda behind his comment, as this just isn't how a normal man would respond to a woman trying to get with a man out of her league.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 03:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter