| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | A university ‘welcomed’ everyone but men in STEM events. A professor filed a Title IX complaint. | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/01/20 08:26 PM | |
| 40 | CNN lying and trying to weaponize feminism against Bernie in debate | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/01/20 04:10 PM | |
| 37 | Why can’t we hate men? | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/01/20 11:06 PM | |
| 31 | Is the current state of the Left due to Occupy Wall Street? | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/12/19 07:42 PM | |
| 24 | Excommunicate Me from the Church of Social Justice | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/02/20 07:30 PM | |
| 16 | Elite schools snub £1m gift for poor white boys | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/12/19 04:08 PM | |
| 5 | The Cost of World War II | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 08:26 PM | |
| 1 | Elite schools snub £1m gift for poor white boys | SculptorAndMaterial | /r/MensRights | 30/12/19 07:08 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joe's life of privilegeIt's all good. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 10:58 PM |
| 1 | Joe's life of privilegeWould certainly explain it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 10:55 PM |
| 1 | Joe's life of privilegeThe two graphs seem pretty identical to me, to be honest. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 10:53 PM |
| 1 | Joe's life of privilegeThat's what we in Denmark calls 'flueknepperi'. Look at the difference. It's within a margin of error and very minor, which was what I claimed. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 01:47 PM |
| 7 | Where questionable feminist pay gap statistics come fromThe pay gap talking point I always felt was forced to get more women into the workforce (to demand/work more hours) for more labour, like how cigarets were advertised as empowering and sticking it to male society in the early days. Of course cigarettes kill you slowly and one could argue work will too. Personally I don't work much, just to get by and save a little, and I have personally taken much time off because I like free time. This is a result of a relatively low paying job and less money f… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 03:15 AM |
| 1 | ThankyouFirstly, that seems to me a discount without much difference. Second, my comment was an invitation. Not asking for some ideological credentials. You guys need to relax, or funnel that energy elsewhere. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 02:02 AM |
| 1 | ThankyouPlanning on getting bussy? Another question, if the other users will allow it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 02:00 AM |
| 5 | ThankyouWhat sentence are you guys reading? I'm asking him to tell us how he came to change his views, not challenging them. But that's beside the point, I don't have to respect anything. Neither do you, or anyone else. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 01:59 AM |
| 1 | ThankyouHardly worth any tone policing, but perhaps this is a leftist space indeed. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 01:15 AM |
| 5 | ThankyouWow, a grandpa. What made you question your faith? Death by a thousand cuts, or is there a single cause for the doubt? If you don't mind me asking. You putting up this post is asking to be asked. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 22/01/20 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Joe's life of privilegeI don't, I merely point out that black women's dark skin does not affect them in police shootings, which was what was being claimed. That does not map on to the numbers. More like their femaleness neuters whatever drawbacks their black skin might have given them. That's my explanation. To assume all dark skin people suffer in every area compared to whites is not true, and a lot more nuanced that simply having dark skin = worse, as you can see. The effect isn't as large for black women More like … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/01/20 10:45 PM |
| 4 | Joe's life of privilegeFor example, black people are more likely to be shot by the police, regardless of their background. Having brown skin leads to profiling and more aggressive actions towards you. Likewise, men are also more likely to be shot by the police and to be the victims of profiling. Which adds up to a whole lot of privilege for white women. Au contraire mon ami. Black women are shot perhaps only an iota of an iota more than white women in America. The point is the amount is negligible. Clearly their (blac… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/01/20 06:28 PM |
| 13 | What has feminism taught you?Sorta the same thing I learned from Christianity. That moral arbiters in reality have no claim to their position as such and are often hypocrites using retoric to fund their ends. Then again I was never a feminist, nor a christian, but it was a lesson I learned all the same. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 21/01/20 12:00 PM |
| 2 | The Cost of World War III believe you have to watch it to really understand it. The visuals and presentation really puts things into a perspective I can't in words. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 11:57 PM |
| 11 | Thoughts about the 1917 Movie (removed from MensLib) repostI did always find it odd back in 2012-2015ish when words like 'mansplain' and 'manspreading' were words thrown around by feminists online. Odd how the same people who were otherwise speechpolice around all other gendered words suddenly not only coined, but spread and used those words. Now, I believe they have the right to use those words, and I won't complain, only when there's a double standard will I become sour on the person. Like if they jumped down my throat because I said someone 'threw li… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 10:34 PM |
| 4 | Thoughts about the 1917 Movie (removed from MensLib) repostwe live in a society Mfw | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 09:26 PM |
| 8 | Thoughts about the 1917 Movie (removed from MensLib) repostThe system came about because of reality demanding it in order for it to exist. If the system didn't adhere to the rules it set out to survive through the generations, it wouldn't be here today. It had to be this way, or nothing would be. It had to acknowledge men and women's differences (and by necessity inequality) on a biological level and build social roles around that. In the past, for example, it made no sense to have an army of women, you'd be conquered and your people slain (men) and ens… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 09:22 PM |
| 9 | Thoughts about the 1917 Movie (removed from MensLib) repostSome wars can very bloody indeed. Russians in WW2 got fucked over pretty bad. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 08:21 PM |
| 6 | Exceptionally insightful MensLib OP discusses male disposability as portrayed by the movie 1917Exceptionally insightful MensLib OP discusses male disposability as portrayed by the movie 1917 You don't say. Wow, better go rea... | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 04:58 PM |
| 9 | Exceptionally insightful MensLib OP discusses male disposability as portrayed by the movie 1917In order to control the narrative certain voices will have to be denied or minimised. /r/Menslib is a sub where discussion is curtailed in such a way to only end in the 'authorised'/pre-approved result. No curveballs there. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 04:55 PM |
| 5 | Exceptionally insightful MensLib OP discusses male disposability as portrayed by the movie 1917Is this progress, or is it just a matter of time before the post and OP are yeeted? Three hours later... EDIT: FUCK, they removed the post. Also, if you go into OP's post history you can see that they yeeted a lot of his comments defending his views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n_NXSa0_Uc | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 20/01/20 04:52 PM |
| 6 | Why can’t we hate men?Don't think I'd post it here if that was the case. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 19/01/20 01:14 PM |
| 1 | Finally some common sense on The Guardian: "'Believe women' is being cheapened to score political points. That will backfire"the Believe Women mantra came about years before Kavanaugh. I remember Anita having a conference where it was the talking point in 2015-16ish. The Hashtag might have been made and came about in 2018, but the underlying thinking was laid down before. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/01/20 12:59 PM |
| 2 | Men seem to be the only privileged group in which there are so many caveatsI have heard that "white supremacy hurts white people too", though admittedly not as often. Perhaps not in those exact words, but something along the line of 'Whiteness hurts white people by separating them from the rest of humanity, and that it gets white people to vote against their interests, that kinda stuff. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/01/20 12:54 PM |
| 8 | Finally some common sense on The Guardian: "'Believe women' is being cheapened to score political points. That will backfire"This was always what 'believe women' were, otherwise it would have been 'believe victims'. And I even take umbrage at the latter saying, since a victim, imo, has to be determined first. After all, if you are falsely accused of something, you are the victim and the 'victim' the abuser (via social power). Perhaps 'Listen and check' would the best way to put it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/01/20 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Why I Left the Men's Rights MovementWell, spoiler; it won't go that way. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Why I Left the Men's Rights MovementIronic since, of what I have seen, IF have had a beef with individualism for ages. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 08:24 PM |
| 3 | Why I Left the Men's Rights MovementI think historically the 1% were pretty much all men. Again, theit wives and daugthers didn't benefit from their husband's and father's position? Regardless, why use outdated terminology? Since the term obviously mets a lot of resistance, and you yourself admit it isn't really accurate and indeed meant to describe an elite? Seems dogmatic instead of pragmatic and even accurate. Should you really be surprised when people take umbrage with an inaccurate term? If your goal is to get people over to … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 08:23 PM |
| 4 | Why I Left the Men's Rights Movementand that almost all of the misandry comes from TERFs TERFs are man-haters, tis true, but not the sole source of it from feminism, nor even the majority. This is just pushing the fault unto a minority within the movement to clean up it's image. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Why I Left the Men's Rights Movementintersectional feminism is individualism then? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 08:08 PM |
| 3 | Why I Left the Men's Rights MovementI think that patriarchal systems are ultimately set up to benefit the 1%. And yet the name suggest it benefits men. Do you not think the wives of the 1 percent, and the daughters don't also benefit from the way things are? You ever find it odd how every 'negative' concept in feminist lingo is male slanted? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 08:05 PM |
| 3 | Why I Left the Men's Rights MovementI originally posted this to menslib, but it got removed for unknown reasons. Of course. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/01/20 07:21 AM |
| 2 | Post from r/menslib of trans man's experience after transitioningMy bad then. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/01/20 11:45 AM |
| 7 | Post from r/menslib of trans man's experience after transitioningOnly so much leeway even trans men get on /r/MensLib | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/01/20 01:03 AM |
| 36 | A study shows that when men treat women equally, they are treated as sexist.Y'know, feminists often attack people and groups for having a bias, but do they ever think they themselves are biased? Notice that benevolent sexism is used when women are treated better by society (somehow implying they are still a victim?!) and male privilege is used when men are treated better by society. This verbal slight of hand can also be seen with when they use internalised misogyny when a woman has a bad view of what a woman should be or are, while when men have a bad notion about what… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/01/20 04:27 PM |
| 3 | Minority males report more discrimination than minority females. (Link to study abstracts in comments.)I mean looking at who gets shot, not who goes missing. Black men gets shot the most, then white men, then mexican men, etc. Nowhere are women shot more than their men, and the difference is massive. This could mean two things and a mix of them, either the genders (and races) aren't equal, aka different, or there's systemic discrimination against men. I think it's a mix, though where to cut the percentage is often hard and beyond me. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/12/19 03:14 PM |
| 5 | Minority males report more discrimination than minority females. (Link to study abstracts in comments.)Reminds of looking at the data of shootings (in America) and seeing that being a black women literally only mattered half an iota more than being a white women in shootings (which is to say very little). In the dating market I can see certain minority women doing worse than their male counterparts (BW), others much better (AW). | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/12/19 02:56 PM |
| 5 | Some words for you.Never tried to go against the stream in /r/TrollXChromosomes in particular, becuase I knew it would be fruitless. Though I have had similar experiences in other subs where I thought me not kowtowing wouldn't be taken as an offensive act. In some cases having a spine is rewarded with a ban, but that's a reward. How is being in an environment that is against you a good thing? The bad is that it leaves the sub without dissenting voices and create a more solid echo chamber than all online communitie… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 30/12/19 12:33 AM |
| 5 | Some words for you.You're not in control of the conversation so it doesn't really matter if you speak about it with the same distaste, more influential people weave social rules. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/12/19 09:58 PM |
| 4 | Some words for you.Didn't HashtagWomenareTrash trend recently and the very same people spreg out over it? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/12/19 09:56 PM |
| 3 | Some words for you.Sure, but a word of advice first: never get angry when going into 'opposite' online echo chambers. It does no one any good, least of all you. https://old.reddit.com/r/TrollXChromosomes/comments/ebqaoh/little_troll_figured_it_all_out_early/ | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/12/19 09:55 PM |
| 10 | Some words for you.I suspect that the only reason this gets traction is because it pays lip-service to other identities, more worthy (in the usual Tumblr user's eyes) than men. Still an improvement, I suppose. I wonder, was this snapped in the /r/TrollXChromosomes thread with this image? Fun to read the mini civil-war about calling men trash being wrong or right. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/12/19 08:24 PM |
| 2 | Vaush, the left winger who rants like a right wingerOnline debater with an attitude, like destiny or the old atheist personalities on youtube halcyon years. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/12/19 02:20 PM |
| 10 | Apparently parenthood is a penalty, and an unaffordable one... for womenWhat society survives when either/or fatherhood and motherhood is seen as a negative? This is some death spiralling shit. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/19 07:33 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter