TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SeizmicETC Archive

View 3 posts and 68 comments by SeizmicETC on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Eh, she's still calling herself a feminist and blaming men in that article lol.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/20 10:28 PM
1

Uploading Skype convo, gimme 15, at post office.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 01:19 PM
1

Do you want a screenshot of the skype convo?
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 01:12 PM
1

Lolol It's the definition of nonsensical. "Deliberate trap to see your true colours!!!" British, too? Want to know what's funny? My whole OP was a trap to get you to post here, which I knew you would, I've been laughing at you to my friend reading through your post history and I made a wager I could post something that will illicit a response from you. Oops doopsie, not the intellectual mastermind you thought you were.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 01:06 PM
1

Don't steer off point, you made a nonsensical post containing an insult yet criticise me as "emotional" and "illogical" for doing the same. One rule for you, one rule for me?
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 01:01 PM
1

Well you made a nonsensical post. Literally your first reply.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 12:55 PM
1

You're literally admitting to purposely provoking an emotional response in order to undermine not just the person but their beliefs. Either way, why would I waste my time with someone who believes what you do? Lol @ you're the type of retard who thinks "LAST WERD WINZ" too. Criticising someone for responding to an ad hominem with an ad hominem. You're the type of person I'm referring to in OP.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 12:47 PM
1

Your first reply was literally saying I'm "messed up" did you expect some kind of civil response or intellectual discussion when that's literally all you had to say on the matter? Then you turn around and try to undermine people against abortion by comparing them to something absurd? You're a giant disingenuous piece of shit.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 12:42 PM
1

That's cool, I consider you a child killing brainwashed retard.
/r/AntiFeminists13/05/20 12:31 PM
1

There's a scientific argument for being anti-abortion, nice ignorance assuming only religious people can be against it. There's definitely a moral argument, too, actually.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 06:51 PM
2

Lol @ women MY BODY MY CHOICE The child's body belongs to the child... NOPE Lololol
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 06:46 PM
8

500k for that? Some black woman got an equal pay out for accusing the DWP she worked for of racism, turned out she only did a months work and spent 7 months on sick leave. Vs 21 years of thinking you have 3 sons and only find out they're not when you get diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. You shouldn't have to work again a day in your fucking life after that, you've paid your dues 100x over.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 10:43 AM
8

Men can't even financially abort their children yet you honestly think that? Women are pathetic, you couldn't figure out how to invent a wheel without Men around so I'm interested to see how you'd know the Fetus is Male without the technology to do so and enjoy dying of infection when you butcher your wizards sleeve with a metal object to try kill a defenseless child. "NOT YER BODYYYYYYYYY" literally die of cancer.
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/20 10:32 AM
2

Fucking lol @ police being a legal entity.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 03:18 PM
3

It wasn't something that could be answered with a yes or no answer. His reply was sound.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 03:15 PM
1

Best game of all time? That's a massive exaggeration if I ever heard one. It's an interactive movie more than a game.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 12:35 PM
4

Back when? Also, that wall of text had nothing to do with my point at all, you didn't address it once.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 12:28 PM
3

Alan S. Kaufman, a psychology professor and author of IQ tests, writes in IQ Testing 101 that "Miss Savant was given an old version of the Stanford-Binet (Terman & Merrill 1937), which did, indeed, use the antiquated formula of MA/CA × 100. But in the test manual's norms, the Binet does not permit IQs to rise above 170 at any age, child or adult. As the authors of the old Binet stated: 'Beyond fifteen the mental ages are entirely artificial and are to be thought of as simply numerical scores.' (…
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 12:02 PM
1

LOL
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 11:52 AM
4

One could argue the opposite of what you claim by simply pointing out the word itself is sexist. "Feminist" is a play on of feminine/femininity which is exclusively female. If feminism was originally supposed to be what you claim, why wasn't it simply called humanism or equalist?
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/20 11:50 AM
5

Cause men in power are sociopaths and want pussy.
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/20 06:34 PM
1

I'm typing off a phone so forgive my lack of quote mining abilities. You mention my stats about the % of slave owners not being relevant which is ironic because it's in direct response to your inane tangent about George Washington being a slave owner. Lol @ calling me racist because I pointed out the bravery of white soldiers in the world wars, you're aware the war consisted of much more than America, right? Lol @ the 1 million Africans leftist diatribe, too. You realise only 700ish Africans die…
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 08:20 PM
1

Her refusal to comply with racial segregation wasn't out of some stand (stand, lol) against inequality blacks were facing, it was literally because she couldn't be bothered to stand up and even if it wasn't don't conflate that shit to the level of bravery WHITE soldiers displayed in world wars. Don't even fucking try. Your last paragraph is you making baseless accusations against me in order to somehow try and undermine me/portray me in a bad light. George Washington was a great man. I don't kno…
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 07:05 PM
1

Lol, being too lazy to get out of your seat on a bus makes you a hero? And let's not even talk about MLK as a person with the FBI files that were recently released, revealing he was an anti white rapist who had a fetish for white women.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/20 12:35 PM
1

I agree there's differences through out the movement, that's just the nature of society developing. My gripe was, what is gained by defending the word feminism based on the work of philosophers that had nothing to do with the feminism you yourself are describing (marxists think tanks using it as a tool to destabilise society etc) especially on an antifeminist subreddit? The moment the movement came to existence (the movement, not philosophers) it started causing damage to men and society. Also, …
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:33 PM
1

Well this is why I consider this a futile battle of semantics over the defense of the word feminism, on an anti feminist subreddit. Hence why I assumed you were trolling and responded in kind. In my opinion though, actions mean more than words and the actions of feminism are what matters, so even if you want to argue some kind of early pseudo feminism (which I don't even know how to logically define that) it's disingenuous to do so in the face of the actual feminism we've been facing for over a …
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:26 PM
1

The last sentence kind of backs up what I say and you seem to agree, too. If the suffragettes used the workings of those Men as the basis for their movement, they wouldn't have done the things they did. What would be adequate evidence for you? The word feminist for instance entered the Oxford dictionary in 1850s while if I remember correctly, feminist didn't until the late 1800s. So by deductive reasoning, how could a 16th Century philosopher be tied to words that didn't exist for centuries afte…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:21 PM
1

I already proved how it did about 20 replies ago They shamed men of non voting age into going to war to die in foreign trenches, piggy backed off men's deaths to gain political power and leverage which they used to secure more rights without the responsibility men had to agree to, to have those same rights. Amongst much more. I have accounted for your "rehotorical" movement, the problem is, it's not nor never has been referred to as feminism nor was it ever used by what came to be actual feminis…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:13 PM
1

How am I humiliating myself? I mean, I know you're a troll but try to do it properly. Also, wrong, the manifestations happened during the war, hence the white feather campaign. The philosophical "development" you've cited wasn't used by the suffragettes in any way, shape or form. The suffragettes were the first feminist movement.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:08 PM
1

The mid 1800s was the beginnings of the suffragette movement, you didn't know this? I'll be specific 1870s.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:06 PM
1

The suffragette movement came to be in the mid 1800s because women believed they've been the victims of white men for centuries. It was mostly middle-upper class white women who engaged in it. Why am I giving you history lessons and answering your non sequiturs when all you're capable of doing is trolling like an utter retard? Denial indeed. Keep defending the word feminism though, lold.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:04 PM
1

I just told you I did, with points to prove it. I just out right declared the suffragette movement used none of the workings of the men you mentioned. Try to refute that. I'll wait. You're the one defending the word feminism, not me.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 07:01 PM
1

Yeah, I did, it's called the suffragette movement lol. You think feminism wouldn't have came to be without the workings of an Industrial era philosopher? You're actually taking that position? Tell me, what workings did the suffragettes use of either of the men you referenced when deciding to create said movement? I can tell you now, none. You didn't answer my question about why you're so desperate to have the word feminism portrayed in a positive light after the 120 years of destruction it's cau…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 06:59 PM
1

You literally didn't address anything I just said while i directly replied to everything you did. Then you accuse me of "avoidance tactics". No thx jeff. Early feminism = suffragette movement. You lose.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 06:56 PM
1

I don't need to, lol. You didn't specify doctrine in the OP, you specifically said early feminism so now you've abandoned this terminology and are back pedaling with semantics onto "doctrine" all take that as you conceding you were wrong about "early feminism". I knew this would turn into semantics. I have to ask, you call yourself an anti feminist yet you're so determined to cling to feminism as a positive word you're arguing semantics and bringing up obscure philosophers who had nothing to do …
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 06:54 PM
1

Arguing semantics won't change a thing. We were talking about "early feminism" which is the suffragette movement. End of.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 06:47 PM
1

Okay, so the universally established definition of early/first wave feminism is wrong and you're right, based on the workings of historically unimportant intellectuals from the 16 and 1800s? Right. "Indoctrinated" if you're going to use that word, show some context. "Little monkey" Lol @ I could literally walk into your house and have my way with your mom and dad, force you to watch, then have my way with you after.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 05:29 PM
1

???? Avoidance tactics? I replied to your whole comment laughing at the prospect of feminism being a political movement. Early feminism IS the suffragette movement. Two men, one from the Industrial era, completely unrelated to each other, with no actual ties to feminism, isn't some kind of starting point for "early feminism". You can look this up anywhere, early/first wave feminism is universally accepted to be the suffragette movement. You're an imbecile.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 05:25 PM
1

"And here you are believing feminism IS a political movement" Sorry, where did you make the distinction in that genius typing between modern feminism and the suffragette movement, which was still a political movement, by the way. IS actually implies if there was a distinction, you're referring to present feminism, so uhh. Yeah Lol @ "indoctrinated apes" I can't take people with 94 at the end of their username using words like "flex" and laughing emojis seriously, either but here I am.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 05:20 PM
1

"And here you are believing feminism IS a political movement" I just proved it is and your reply, summed up without the dribble is "LOL IM SURE WOMEN HAD ALL THAT 100+ YEARS AGO" Not many political ideologies had the privileges you mentioned, back then, bigger ones than feminism, even Neither here nor there though as my reply was to you implying feminism IS NOT a political movement You talk about reading comprehension so I'm sure you know what IS means, yes? Also I'm in hysterics over this golde…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 05:15 PM
1

Wait, you're actually saying feminism isn't a political movement? It doesn't have lobbyists fighting on behalf of their ideologies? It hasn't got laws and politics changed to suit them? What in the.... The two people you listed literally have no ties to feminism at all. You could argue MAYBE James did but you'd be hard pressed to prove that. Also, lol @ listing Men as original feminists. One from the fucking Industrial period, no less. Do you even know of the people you listed and their work? Ha…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 05:07 PM
1

"Flex" black or a wigga, too? You're the one making claims without evidence. Hence the need for proof. You don't even know what feminism is or its true origins yet here you are, on a antifeminism subreddit. Dumb? Pot kettle black (no racism). Fucking lolling.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 05:00 PM
1

No, they didn't. Lol. Can you prove otherwise? You actually don't understand what feminism is, do you? Lol @ using emojis, are you 12? :DDDDDDDD
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 04:57 PM
1

So we're talking about two completely different things. I'm talking about actual feminists. You're talking about male philosophers from pre 20th century Europe. Feminist is a political ideology as much as a social one, when you say "early feminism" you're using the word feminism incorrectly if you're trying to apply it to those Men.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 04:56 PM
1

Your example is two men from the 16-1870s who had no political affiliation with any kind of feminist group or "doctrine". Yeah, no.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 04:53 PM
1

Okay, could you kindly describe the movement you're talking about and name some of the vocal advocates for said movement, detailing exactly what they did to fight for "gender equality". I've listed a factual example of pre - first wave feminists, they were the suffragettes and just as cancerous as the feminists of today. You're making claims without evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 04:44 PM
1

So.....early feminism isn't the suffragette movement (like we were taught in school) and they didn't get Women the right to vote without the responsibility of being subject to the draft? Interesting. So what "early feminism" doctrine are you referring to? Is this gonna be one of those hurr durr the dictionary says this arguments the feminists of today use when shown evidence of man hating in their ideology?
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 04:40 PM
1

Lol wat?
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 04:22 PM
2

Early feminism...like the white feather campaign or getting women the vote without having to be subjected to the draft, which Men still had to agree to, to be able to vote? That feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/20 03:42 PM
2

His English makes perfect sense. Just because you don't understand the context or aren't aware of something, doesn't mean it doesn't make sense. It means you don't understand.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/20 12:06 PM
2

Are you replying specifically to me? I don't remember saying any of the things you're actually discussing here.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 05:39 PM
3

I know all about it, it's as legitimate and real as battered wife/woman syndrome. I don't want to get into a debate about the inconsistent nature of our mental health system but if you think it's routed in scientific fact/evidence, you're mistaken, by a wide margin.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 02:05 PM
5

Post partum depression? Is that like "battered woman syndrome" where women are allowed to stab their husbands/boyfriends to death in their sleep and then just claim they were abused for years and face no jail time for it?
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 01:25 PM
4

Ding ding ding, we have a winner. Great investigation skills.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 01:23 PM
1

Lololol oh man. Weren't you the one talking about real science and biologists earlier? "I equated a single sperm and a single egg to a fertilised egg and still do. Why would I not." Well, you're the man of science and biology, this being really basic level biology, too, you'd understand that when a sperm enters an egg it creates a fertilised embryo, the first stage in human life. Like...you learn that distinction in Grade 3 science and that's not a joke. So I don't think I'm going to carry this …
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 03:48 PM
1

Well, firstly lets just point out the fact you tried to equate a single sperm and a single egg to a fertilised egg. Which, factually, is wrong, let's acknowledge right now you were wrong on that as you seem to have now discarded that point of view. Secondly, none of what you said changes the fact that a fertilised egg is actively growing into a human. Nothing. You haven't rebutted it at all, none of what you said in regards to that is relevant. Minerals, vitamins? You mean the same things Human'…
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 03:18 PM
1

So, you have no rebuttal for the fact a fertilised egg is actively growing into a human and filled your post with hilarious boomer type ad hominems. Lol @ you're telling me I'm not thinking rationally and that abortion isn't immoral. Have you seen live abortions, I have, in person. There's nothing rational or moral about ripping chunks of an actively growing human foetus out of a womb, I can promise you that. Want rationality? Experience the reality then.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 01:45 PM
1

A sperm or egg on their own aren't actively growing into a fully formed human, lol. Are you this dense? No, there's a lot of issues with abortion and harm does come into it, in fact, as someone who's not religious you should understand the ramifications more but I can already tell you're an absolute fucking moron lolol. Let me guess 18-23, College entry education?
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 01:39 PM
1

Lol @ being this arrogant. Also, all you're doing here is making an appeal to authority "No-one who understand biology thinks a fertilised egg is in any way a formed animal" and "real science". You haven't proven anything, cited sources from peer reviewed biologists or anything close to back what you've said up (I'm not even saying you're wrong, well, completely, that is). It starts gaining the traits you talk of literally within months after conception. The moment of conception is the moment th…
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 01:27 PM
1

So is a fully formed baby ready to come out of the womb not as valuable as a 1 day infant? Is a 1 day infant not as valuable as a 2 year toddler? All these "value" arguments seem to do is try to justify ending the life of something based on its "value" vs a "fully developed human". It's disgusting whatever way you want to look at it and doesn't hold up to scrutiny, it sounds more like a cop out to keep abortion legal as a birth control option when it was never supposed to be used for that.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 11:03 AM
1

Sooo......when does a fertilised egg become "human" what magic biological age markers turn an opinion to fact? There's plenty of people who aren't religious that believe life begins after conception, by the way. All this video does is try to dehumanise the process of mating/pregnancy by comparing it to making pancakes, which undermines the whole point it was trying to make, ironically.
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 10:56 AM
2

So at what point is a human a human? Lol....
/r/AntiFeminists26/04/20 06:38 AM
1

I dunno. Both of them are morons. Ones a female supremacist the other a black supremacist. Rather they both got planted to the floor.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/20 01:28 AM
2

I agree with the learned psychopath explanation. It goes a bit further than just education too into things like honor codes and moral codes, which men still have, we are expected to behave and do certain things socially (e.g put our lives at risk to save others and if we refuse we're looked at as cowards and turned into pariah's, women don't have that). Women don't face this same pressure so they never have to see the bigger picture or look at society as a whole the way men are forced to do, whi…
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/20 08:12 PM
1

Yeah, social media definitely brings out the worst in people but it also brings out ugly truths, as well.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/20 08:09 PM
1

Forced envelopment.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/20 06:39 AM
2

Yeah, probably because that's where their physical decline begins along with the need for a child, they realise the impending doom that's waiting once they can't rely on looks to hide bad character and morals.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/20 06:38 AM
2

Flip the argument and say "Okay then, Nazis can't be racist" when he points out WW2 and historical atrocities committed by them, simply reply "They weren't real Nazis" Job done.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/20 06:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter