TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sharplove365 Archive

View 2 posts and 246 comments by Sharplove365 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Men are people likely to compete against each other, since women leverage selection, so naturally they're going to be less sympathetic to each other. I don't actually know why people still don't understand this, everything we do as men is like 90% for the opposite sex long term, what we earn, our social economic status, our physique etc, it's always interesting to see women flex how they're trying to get far in life for empowerment, for us it's for genetic survival. In the back of a woman's head…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 10:29 PM
3

Difference between your assertion and reality is that the women in any of these scenes aren't in a relationship with the men watching. It's like a man or woman watching a romance film and you making the assumption, that they're watching it because they want to watch their real life partner go on dates with someone else i.e boyfriend or girlfriend, wife or husband - absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 10:24 PM
1

Social media has been mainstream for two decades by now in the USA and similar rich countries, and smartphones by one, neither of your links disprove that This is outright incorrect, the sales/revenue of the major smartphones & social media blow up around 2011-2014, they were no where near the same as the early 2000s. You can do better than that, look at the links again. As for your data, I already said to in another comment that it's not easy to find reliable data because of limitations in ; ✓ …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 08:01 PM
2

Since men overreport and women underreport, that means men's figures serve as the maximum end that women's can be. It seems you don't even understand what locker room talk is, or that modern men overreporting is far different from what it was before the inception of Social Media. I know people who've straight up lied about having 50+ bodies, I know celebrities that have lied, don't even get me started about that being the "maximum end" that a woman's can be, otherwise you'll be into the hundreds…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:38 PM
2

It's not that all data can't be trusted it's that the dude provided data that's outdated for the current demographic. People that were 25-44 in 2018-2019, are now in their early 30s to 50s, those people don't represent Gen Z which are at the crux of problems and are around 25. If we were to get a real answer. We'd have to account for; ✓Area where data was taken ✓ Sample diversity (you'll need a bunch of people from different backgrounds, different occupations, different education, different clas…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:17 PM
1

You think self reported surveys are actually reality especially when men tend to over report sexual ✓ activity and women underreport sexual activity and that's a fact ✓. Even the range is ridiculous and use of a median is. Whose to say that's a randomized sample, since when using medians it boils down to the central figures instead of accounting for the entire group I.e If you have 5 incels in group or 10 guys then the starts will end up with 0-1 to represent all men. ✓ [ Most people in general …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 12:22 PM
0

Common sense Are you really trying to argue whether women were less promiscuous or more promiscuous in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 01:13 AM
0

Sounds stupid. 30 is an arbitrary number, not everyone man or woman is exactly the same at 30. People's worldviews can change over time. Remember social media was actually an unregulated social experiment. The average woman by 25 likely has had 1000 men approach them, either digitally through social media, in person, at parties, at work, at the gym etc. That's not the same as the past. In the past women got approached 100 times less than they do nowadays, that's why their body count is 10x highe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 11:15 PM
–

Reduction in testosterone, whilst everyone not understanding that feminism is more of a mimicry of masculinity than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 03:29 PM
6

Translation: "Making me bitter & jealous should be illegal"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 03:27 PM
1

Well that's real what simps are, and they're the true incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 04:31 PM
1

The real definition is really anyone whose being obsequious in order to have sex. Technically speaking, that would be an incel since an incel is desperate, so In reality; Incels = Simps
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 03:11 PM
1

When you deal with women, from a biological standpoint they're not just thinking about themselves but whether the environment you're to bring will be suitable for children. That's why they're appropriately dependent on your ability to be resourceful even if they're themselves resourceful. We live in world now where we've created distortions about how resourceful the average man is, since half the workforce is now women, which means the more money she gets then the less resourceful you will seem …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 03:02 PM
14

Those aren't alpha males, those are weak men that pride themselves over fulfilling and using women to satisfy their teenage fantasies, I'd love to wonder what happens when they've daughters themselves. It's probably why men don't want to have daughters, they don't want other men to think the same way they've been treating other women. The irony is out of this world.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:53 PM
0

One trait of being a people pleaser is being a blatant liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 07:48 PM
1

You've reached a delusion level that I can't help you with, please seek help. In most modern countries........ In the states where feminism thrives you can vote for war, and men have to go and you don't.. Getting educated is feminine if anything........ Getting an education is to get a job, that can make women independent of a man or open doors for higher paying jobs that require competence and dominance Women take more leadership roles compared to 50 years ago.... Being a leader, requires asser…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:26 PM
2

You have more legal rights. Women can vote for someone who will start a war without having to register for the selective service, literally meaning you have the supreme vote to men to be wars you don't have to fight for. Are we really going to sit here and pretend the modern women isn't more masculine than ever whilst a man is more effeminate than ever. Women are being encouraged: ✓ Enrol at higher rates to college ✓ Take more leadership roles ✓ Become independent of any supporting income (men) …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:43 PM
–

I would have started with it's just as bad as misogyny Since that never gets even an iota of coverage compared to misandry
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:48 PM
3

This is by far the worst arguement I've ever heard on this subreddit. Making women more masculine, and enabling men to become more effeminate, is as furthest away from heterosexuality as anything can get. Rather simple and basic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 07:00 AM
1

It's achieved it's goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:26 PM
1

The Corporate influence was to promote women in the workforce, to half the wages and double the productivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 05:59 PM
–

Yet when a woman leads, she'll lead the guy to the end of the relationship. This is also stupid as hell... Women considerably want a guy who makes more, yet you want take leadership at the same time. Truth is you don't want to lead a fully grown man quite clearly, you just don't want to be told about it, so instead are concocting what is an emotional response to previous incompetent men to try and over-represent an non-existing issue with the gender roles of a heterosexual relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:11 PM
-2

Women prefer hypergamy*, and it happens that a typical man whose the exact same age gets circles ran on him by the women; he's not in a position to be masculine, be a leader, or protector or provider usually when women are in their peak age 18-25, and also when a man is 18-25. This is usually because the average girl 18-25 gets approached and deals with by 10-100x men compared to the average man dealing with women, we take a little longer to realise that, and have to go out our way to get that e…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 08:01 AM
2

Men and women are different, men are more sexually unselective whilst women are more selective. A virgin is the definition of a selective woman, you can't say they're not desirable from our perspective especially since they've not seen the worst side in men, don't have trauma or any other bs. I do agree they're fairly non-existential in the west, but men want to eat their cake and have it, and thus by hoemaking, women have the liberated themselves with ideals of pseudo masculinity imprinted into…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:56 PM
–

I mean your performance; ✓ Suggesting an expression of "It's giving" is objective and serious ✓ Using the term solipsistic without understanding the comical irony of the given context ✓ Suggesting that Jordan Peterson and Elon musk are idiots, without understanding again the comical irony of the context ✓ Suggesting that 85-155 is "mid range" for IQ tests without understanding how absurd those ranges are. You clearly have no understanding of what nominal bell curve distribution is, or any concep…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 02:40 PM
3

This.
/r/RedPillWomen06/12/24 08:40 PM
4

Pure, unapologetic facts. Well said my brother.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 07:31 AM
2

Women wanted a patriarchy. Men were typically taller, stronger so would have taken the role of being the provider, defender in a relationship, which comes with authority and leadership. There has never been a time where most women didn't want a man, taller, stronger, smarter, and more of a leader than them. So if men are to be more dominant as a response to what women have always wanted, then you yourselves create the very patriarchy by nature..since you'll select leaders.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 07:27 AM
–

The same women try to remove stigmatization from their profession. Women start to think if sex work such as OF is normalised than promiscuity is also ok, but in reality that stats show more that higher promiscuity actually destroys society; more likelihood of divorces, more likelihood of abortions, single parent households, more likely to have lower IQ children, more likely to have STDs, more likely to have children with an lower income that commit crimes... Also such women also simultaneously i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 06:36 AM
–

It's because those same women are delusional, and think they're entitled to the same quality of man. Haven't you seen already there is tons of debates/podcasts that show that those very sex workers want an above average man, which means they don't lower their standards at all. Being delusional in the real world doesn't go without it's punishment; • The same women then experience depression and trauma from seeing the worst side in men • The same women are statistically more likely to self delete …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 06:28 AM
–

We don't hate them at all, if anything a bunch of men get off on sex workers and OF girls. It's the delusional thinking that comes from it. There is no society by which normalised promiscuity is ideal in the back a man's mind. Most men will lie about how they really see women, when they're sitting in front you on a date. The reason and backing for normalisation of sex work stems from mostly from women inside it, that want to get have their cake and eat it too by it not being stigmatized. Promisc…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 06:20 AM
–

What's funny about this, is that most men are invisible to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:41 PM
-1

worthy of neither time nor attention ✓ You've already given your time, and attention = Low IQ You're too easy. Just so you think I'm trolling, your first few lines which were entirely ad hominem and an association fallacy used the term "solipsism". In truth it further adds to the point that you're oblivious to the fact there is nothing more solipsistic than replying to a post by saying "it's giving", which is a direct attribution to your uncoordinated conclusions based off internalised feelings.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:33 PM
1

You still proved OPs point by attacking the person rather than the argument and aren't taking accountability, and the post clearly wasn't a troll, meaning you yourself ironically are continuously acting on said bad faith. Besides that, where has the women empowerment movement got you ? ✓ Women are more depressed than ever ✓ Women commit self deletion at Higher rates than ever ✓ More women are having to lead single parent households, which lead to; higher crime rates, lower incomes and lower IQs …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:27 PM
0

People that generally follow a theocracy, have lower rates of single parent households. Single parent households, usually give rise to; • Higher homicides rate • Higher cases of violent crime • Higher cases of sexual assault • Higher cases of robbery • Higher cases of crime overall • Lower IQs • Lower income Laws alongside some form of civilised theocracy is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:16 PM
1

Traditional conservative women are superior women. Much lower body count, better looking, more feminine, more respect for society, humanity, history, and will be the future matriarchs of our households and legacies when we pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:10 PM
2

I disagree, we pay attention to liberal women, they're somewhat very easy to L.S.P Lie Smash Pass
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:37 AM
0

"Giving" is a low IQ way of saying "I feel like" rather than actually saying objectively what you think. Our entire efforts to give people so much verbal autonomy, has meant people use think speech to camouflage their lack of intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:32 AM
-1

You've just proved the OP's point: -"Women often deflect by claiming they're simply protecting the vulnerable or defending their own rights. Criticism is reframed as misogyny or an attack on their character, shutting down any meaningful debate and turning the spotlight away from the real issues."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:25 AM
0

"Because we won't give you any attention' Complete deflection from the dozen points you just said. She probably read the first two lines and immediately thought "criticism against women is misogyny"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:21 AM
1

Men have already led, and also still currently lead, since women are attracted to those qualities. There is nothing wrong with that, the point is despite OP alluding to women being the frontiers of said degeneracy, I'm instead giving light that those women had fathers, brothers or some masculine figure that probably led them, and their leadership failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:08 AM
0

Every civilised society has a theocracy or law. There used to be a time where bad behavior was shamed, but instead now victimhood is championed. People aren't accountable for their actions, both the women and the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:06 AM
-4

Real Men lead, the women follow. So although is happening, any collapse to society is because we as men enabled it. I'll go into further detail; • Men enabled feminism as it developed, perhaps some did it for sexual access. • Liberal men, enabled the above as you mentioned • Men in 2024 are completely dishonest with women because they're insecure in order to get sexual access. • Men in the west didn't understand the importance of their own theocracy which made the west dominant for the last 400 …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 10:51 PM
1

Complete transparency on sexual history, and we'll be completely transparent on ours and also our earnings. Happy days.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 10:46 PM
3

Better for who ? If it's for society then you've engaged in an egregious level of cognitive dissonance. Since if men are better for society as a generalised statement then they'll be better for the women automatically. ✓ They won't hoemake ✓ They'd destroy the OF, sex industry by not fapping ✓ They won't cheat ✓ Other men won't be attracted to married women or women in relationships It's rather funny how that coincides with trade-cons, which centralise their religion above all else. Maybe we nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 10:42 PM
-3

What ? Did you even read what OP says. It literally says Rp is against marriage 😂, yet your first sentence is they want women to be desperate to marry them.. absolutely laughable, you made my day.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 10:38 PM
1

You can't work hard like men do without developing masculine qualities. That's like saying a man can garner respect from women if he knew how to put on make the same way they do, or wear a dress the say. That might sound wild, but that's literally how we see career orientated women, you trying to ascertain qualities that we're not attracted to.. Men can certainly respect women that; ✓ Feminine, people orientated - she goes to see her parents every now and then, loves children and the idea of hav…
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/24 02:39 PM
11

Yeah destroy a marriage over a bad gift collection, so much for the "oppressing patriarchy".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:23 PM
2

Cheating isn't commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:21 PM
3

Or it's the other way round. Older women can't meet the standards of a man the same age; • They don't have attraction from a fertility standpoint • They carry baggage • Sexual history and probably have children • They don't go backwards on their standards, so an older woman if she's ever been with a guy making serious bread, will stick to that benchmark or remain single.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:19 PM
2

c0rn to its credit, is a lesser evil than cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:01 PM
1

Gold
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/24 01:57 PM
1

There is a difference between maintaining an average income and being career orientated. Nowadays women want to be exactly like men when it comes to their careers thinking that's going to make them happy long term; Whilst it instead; ✓ Robs them of their youth ✓ Makes them more masculine ✓ Makes them linger towards geriatric pregnancies In reality we're more attracted to, feminine women that live with their parents.
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/24 01:56 PM
-2

Another lie from Feminism; Being the man you'll want to date first, then meeting him later will make you most happiest; • Make the same money that your future man could make • Have the same career as the man you'll want to date • Move out the house, and get the same body count as the man you'll want to date will have. • Drive the same car that your future man might drive Instead people end up forgoing having an actual family and legacy to share life itself with, like the other thousands of peopl…
/r/RedPillWomen26/11/24 11:27 PM
1

There is a difference between acquiring a relationship and maintaining a relationship. Maintaining a relationship has nothing to with how much she's still in her prime, how she looks or other things since she would have been vetted during the meeting and dating period. I'm not really going to give a crap if my future wife goes from a 7 to a 4 in the space of 30 years of marriage and childbirths, that's not really a problem at all. The difference between that and dating an older woman is not that…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 11:04 PM
-2

I did say not going to be in your prime forever.. Which means ideally people should date whilst they're in their primes, that's probably where you can find the best in each other, produce the most wildest memories, and be healthy/fertile together. The reason why men don't go for older women let's say 25+, isn't because of looks at all really. If anything that doesn't change till late 30s for women, but it's about the life experience. More experienced women tend to come with; More baggage (previo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:55 PM
1

✓ Firstly it's the women that are attracted to men and men that are attracted to the women. ✓People aren't necessarily attracted to whoever is attracted to them. For instance a woman that gets 100 Dms per month doesn't mean she's going to be attracted to those individuals. If the dating market range is anywhere from 18-40 for both men and women; For a 35 year old, that'll be most people from 30-40 year old women and some younger women. For a 24 year old - they're not going to get long term attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:51 PM
-1

Being a relationship Is acknowledging you're not going to be in your prime forever. I thought that was common knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:19 PM
-10

The reality is men and women reach their primes at different ages. For women it's 18-24 For men it's 25-35.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 07:04 PM
1

Unless you live in your own solipsistic delusion, you'd find most people if they could would rather not work at all, both men and women, but especially for women since there is a risk that they'll get pregnant and will need some security. Raising children to not be degenerate isn't easy work, single motherhood is probably one of the toughest jobs in the world, it takes full time commitment, i.e staying at home. Facts remain: ✓ Most people women or men would rather work electively if given the op…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 06:58 PM
2

Brilliant you can't even argue one point Checkmate ✅
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 05:12 PM
2

Well you didn't read 2 & 3 properly; 2 The former position of Having equal rights morphed itself into the false idea wanting equal things i.e working all the time, being promiscuous, these aren't things women naturally want Having to work isn't the same as wanting to work. Majority of women in the past preferred to be at home with the kids. 3 Although This should be a good thing, it meant people didn't take responsibility for their actions, men won't afraid of affairs, having kids out of wedlock…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 05:08 PM
4

Doesn't sound like an argument, it's more of a schizo inner-monologue you've scripted before auditioning to be the next joker. I'll simplify the Red pill in 10 basic facts. 1. ✓ Most people prefer hypergamous relationships or in hypergamous relationships 2. ✓ In a heterosexual relationship there are conventional gender roles in most 3. ✓ Men and women as sexes are biologically different 4. ✓ Men are thousands of orders more fertile than women, which can be expressed as higher 'libido' 5. ✓ Heter…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 04:59 PM
5

You're using pure ad hominems to attack what makes the space prominent - which is their arguments. I'd like for you to bring up one major point in Rp or maybe several actual arguments you disagree with. Attack the argument not the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:38 PM
10

Current dating market is shit because of 5 things: Secularism, hyper-capitalism & multiculturalism - diluted collectivism and communitarianism into pure untapped individualism... Individualism meant people do whatever they want without thinking about their family first or having a family anymore. Feminism - The former position of Having equal rights morphed itself into the false idea wanting equal things i.e working all the time, being promiscuous, these aren't things women naturally want Contra…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:33 PM
14

It all went south because of modern feminism coupled with c0rnography.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:07 PM
7

Rp has always existed as a mentality since it's based off an understanding of biology and evolution. I hear what you said, ofc there are grifters and people that can make money off it, but they're making money off information, the manosphere is information that anyone who disagrees can decide to argue against.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:06 PM
–

Hypergamy is a statistical fact, you're literally trying to make a ball stick on a dart board - time wasting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 02:43 PM
–

Red herring, people when they use the term chivalry in 2024, aren't envisioning medieval knights, they just mean general politeness, being kind, gestures or being a "gentlemen".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 02:30 PM
–

If you want to go off a point on about ancient semantics, without understanding the crux of the point, be my guess, because you're not saying absolutely anything to counter it. The point still stands - women are smaller, weaker, more fragile physically, and men being more gentle around them is something that has existed way before Christianity. It's rather actually stupid to argue against chivalry especially if you're a woman lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 02:27 PM
0

We cater to women in order to reproduce, and also to ensure our progeny (kids) are safe Women are selective, which is good in ensuring a healthy pool of genetics reproduce. We're millions of magnitudes of fertile than women, so there is excessive need to reproduce and compete Mostly biological Most men are heterosexual, we're not interested in becoming women, neither should women. Women are physically weaker sex, they're shorter, smaller, and require protection during childbirth - hence the birt…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 09:02 PM
1

You're arguing just to argue. Hypergamy doesn't imply one person doesn't work at all, it simply denotes that one party is either biologically more attractive (taller, stronger, better looking, genetics) or social-economically superior (more income, higher background, higher education or network) This is what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 08:49 PM
0

It's fairly common that blue pillers use exceptions to the rule to try and counter against the majority. For instance: You tell them women prefer monogamous relationships, they'lt give an example of 1 person they know in an open relationship If you tell them men accept hypergamy, they'll give you an example of an exception where a woman is the breadwinner If you tell them most women initiate divorce they'll give you an exception of a man who once divorced his wife If you tell the women most men …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 08:38 PM
1

You just proved my point. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 08:34 PM
-1

✓ In those relationships, the man is still the bread winner for most. ✓ The most preferred relationship is one where she can choose to work electively based off the security of a man ✓ Hypergamy doesn't imply one person doesn't work at all, it simply denotes that one party is either biologically more attractive (taller, stronger, better looking, genetics) or social-economically superior (more income, higher background, higher education or network)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 06:19 PM
–

Modern feminism is a psyop that's to make women less heterosexual, in order to reduce the birth rates of developed countries. Red pill as far I can draw back from it promotes promiscuity in men, but certainly doesn't make them less heterosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 06:14 PM
-2

I'll simplify; • Exceptions don't make the rule • Hypergamy is a consequence of gender roles, which were formed based on a woman baring children whilst the man works • Most women are in hypergamous relationships and prefer them
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 06:10 PM
0

Blue pillers always assume their exceptions make the rule..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 06:08 PM
-1

Hypergamy is prevalent for most relationships, not all. Notice how you self admittedly find your own case unique, wouldn't have to use it if non-hyperamous relationship were more prevalent than hypergamous relationships. Even in the case of "not all", hypergamy is a consequence of gender roles. Could have have elected decided to not work ever again ? The answer would be no, since that right is for people that can bare children i.e women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 06:06 PM
1

I appreciate your effort, but we have to talk about the 2024 reality not the 90s, and also consider the average age of people here, which is like 18-30 (24). Using the force of trust me bro like you used: For the typically 24 year old's perspective man or woman: 16-20 Man - Low self esteem, average man has just come out of bullying school, low sexual market value. At a push might secure a girlfriend. Woman - High self esteem but high anxiety receiving complements from everyone, the same age, or …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 12:22 PM
2

And it's a woman saying "trust me bro" Loooool.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 12:09 PM
0

Well said OP Don't listen to those contrarian types, they will disagree first, then think last.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:50 AM
-2

Not a happy man, leads to an happy wife eventually.. Key things; • No competition • Honesty in the bedroom • Prioritising kids • Communication • Duality between not getting bored of each other whilst also persevering during tough times • Keep your vowels • Understanding Legacy and the nuclear family 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:43 AM
2

Have you actually seen the full ick list ? It literally goes up to 600+ If you haven't caught up by now, "ick" basically is when you're doing something to add onto a list of the already existing reasons of why she's not into you. For instance, take the above, and let's say you forgot to take off your shoes when walking into the house= Ick For instance, take the above and let's say you sneezed into a paper towel but didn't wash your hands immediately after= Ick For instance, take the above and le…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 08:18 PM
1

You've compared apples and oranges, kids shows to adult movies, and taken a purely strawman stance based on your presupposition that a considerable amount people watch 50 shades of grey as a way of generalising real life. Let me tell you they don't, most people don't relate with anything you've said, if you perhaps said there are films within our popculture that give people - in general unrealistic expectations of the other sex then I'd have agreed with you, but your post is nonsensical generali…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 07:55 PM
1

I hope I'm not the first person to tell you that sponge bob was for kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 07:40 PM
2

Aesthetics and practicality are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 07:36 PM
1

✓ Sign an agreement by which revokes her right to terminate it based on "unconscionable" terms. Agreement will be thus the following; • Have as many kids as I want • Let me go through your phone whenever I want • Let me smash whenever I want (as long as It doesn't risk your health) • If you cheat again, I take 99% of your assets, and get full custody should there be kids. • The agreement gets terminated if I cheat myself more than twice. But we know ain't no one signing that, so there is nothing…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:47 PM
1

Kim K is a billionaire that gets child support. "Women's lives are soo much harder."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 05:54 PM
4

Since there is an entire infrastructure and economy that's taken thousands of years to build, that wasn't based on a person's ability to get 1 million views for eating enmeshed box.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 05:35 PM
1

Meaning you're interested in only one of many. You've just proved the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 05:21 PM
3

✓ Women reject most of their offers and DMs Doesn't sound like advice, sounds like a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 05:20 PM
26

You've just proceeded to defeat yourself by pointing out all the things that make a guy unattractive, whilst comically maintaining your titled position.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 05:16 PM
18

The sex ended as soon as you got married, no offense but that's the funniest and saddest thing I've heard all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 01:07 AM
1

Of course they care more about it, because it's harder for men to pass their genes and also it's even more difficult for them to even know that it's their genes. There is a massive difference between becoming a man who a bunch of women will want inside them, vs watching a man who already is what you want and telling him to go inside you. Two different Worlds entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:20 PM
2

You're mixing Rp with black pill, your comment borderline is projecting a napoleon complex. We as strangers don't know how tall you are but you somehow found a way to make that entire pill about your height - projection. That's not basic Rp shit either, "basic Rp shit" is: • Understanding or accepting the differences between men and woman from a scientific, sociological and evolutionary level.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:16 PM
1

Agree bluepill is more of a idealology that tries to overlap the intersexual differences into the exact same thing, where in reality men and women are actually different.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:11 PM
2

That's not blue pill, blue pill doesn't necessitate ideals other than overlaps in intersex dynamics, it believes that there is a person for everyone, so going to the gym, having a positive mindset and kindness isn't necessary since there is a person for someone who doesn't have any of those things. I think that's horseshit, that's not how the world works, people have roles that are attributed to who they are, and they have to understand those roles because the universe has laws, and has order. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:07 PM
5

Please tell me you did not just try to compare all men to CEOs This is precisely the problem with society, history is only written and survived by the victors, everyone forgets all the beta or sub-par men that died in wars, that died getting murdered, statistically speaking a man is more likely to: • More likely to die • More likely to be broke • More likely to end up in jail • More likely to work blue collar jobs • More likely to be working jobs at or below minimum wage • More likely to die wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:51 PM
0

I'll simplify the two major ones. I lean more towards Rp myself btw. Redpill - Women and men are different, and need to respect the differences in order to be happy and fulfilled. Bluepill - Men and women aren't that different at all, the more they collectively concentrate on similarities the more happy and fulfilled they will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:36 PM
1

If we are broaching on equality, then both women and men are to be treated equally. You can't suddenly connote that a man can manipulate a woman simply because she is a woman and then argue against the Rp narrative that women and men are massively different. It's a self defeating position.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:07 AM
–

Most marriages have an age gap where a man is older. Most marriages aren't of women and men being the exact same age but of a similar age. Those 3-5 years are exactly the difference that women are into. What I said remains, women aren't idiots for dating much older men since guess what...such a man comes with a bucket load of money and they get half lol in the divorce, so whose actually the idiot. It's not really bad advice if she knows what she wants, which is the money. Regardless, statistical…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 12:58 AM
2

Couldn't have said it better. 100% accuracy. Clean kill.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:43 PM
–

So If a woman is attracted to a man that means she's the idiot and now he's the predator ?. Just like beauty and beast all over again. It's incredible how people are vilifying what both men and women find attractive about each other. Adults can think for themselves and should be held accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:38 PM
3

Op says "A woman" it's in the title. I'm not going to repeat myself once more, it's basic comprehension to understand that he's implying that Rp males are narcissists and abusers that can manipulate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:34 PM
–

Bad advice I'd wager is telling a woman that older men are more intelligent and will manipulate them because they're idiots for being women. If we are to treat everyone equally and fairly, everyone must take accountability for their actions regardless of age, race, age or sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:28 PM
5

If you're ignoring the OP's point that women can be manipulated by men in Rp which itself signifies massive sexual differences, then it becomes a self defeating trek of ironically proving Rps point that there are indeed massive sexual differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:19 PM
–

1 billion percent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:13 PM
1

Nice effort but the math ain't mathin. There are more younger single women into older guys than older single women who are attracted to younger guys or even guys the same age. The 6ft thing is an inclination that women have, but it excludes 85% of the population of males within even their same parameters of age, discipline or social/cultural demographic. If men were to do the exact same thing, it'll be like them eliminating all younger women 18-24 who have had intercourse with more than 1 person…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:12 PM
1

You don't need to men to do that, they're already doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:03 PM
-1

Walls of text.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:02 PM
–

The OP already made the goal post specifically about women listening to Rp, and I'd argue women can think for themselves just the same as the men inside of those spaces. The critique of Rp generally is itself a separate discussion, but the post clearly screams women are vulnerable to manipulation by men, which denotes massive sexual differences between men and women, which ironically is the major talking point of Rp.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:00 PM
5

The title of the post literally begins with "a women listening to".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:55 PM
3

The points you made make as much sense as gollum wearing a pretzel as a ring.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:46 PM
–

But women can think for themselves lool. They're not idiots, they're humans with somewhat the same IQ, why is it people like to vilify the qualities that women find attractive or the differences. If a man's taller, and goes for a much shorter woman, he's now just a creep that likes to smash small people, if a man's got higher crystallized intelligence, then by going for women with less then he's manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:43 PM
4

Women can think for themselves. How are we championing equality when you literally believe one sex can abuse the other's mental intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:41 PM
0

Testosterone
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:20 PM
-1

70-80% of divorces are initiated by women. Okay women love hard but they also fall out of love faster. Makes sense. Till death do us part.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 06:53 AM
21

If almost 50% of modern day marriages ending in divorce isn't telling you something then I don't know what will.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:10 PM
–

Everyone wants power, females included.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 11:36 AM
–

Several..... I think people need to seriously consider their vocabulary usage. Introverted doesn't mean autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 11:34 AM
1

The consequence of this, is that women knowing about who the father is won't lie about the father early-on to their partner..
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 03:22 PM
1

They don't exist anymore than such a man in a hypothetical situation would, how many men do you know who are celibate on 6 figures, 7 figures let alone 8 figures. We're also sort of taking liberties with this conversation here, let's get some things straight, there is plenty of 20 year olds getting invited to sections, yachts, parties by older men that aren't multi-millionaires just for sexual access. Also there is plenty of 35 year olds that are smashing girls in their 20s without also being a …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 08:01 AM
1

Or a woman with the same sexual experience (which doesn't have to be a virgin), like a 20 year old, the same exact age he started his celibacy. And you think "chicks" don't prefer hypergamy ? Hypergamy: ✓ Taller man ✓ Stronger man ✓ Wealthier man ✓ More intelligent man Is it really him or is it the chicks, or it just life in general in terms of attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 05:33 AM
1

just don't see the merit in focusing on career goals to the detriment of all other goals What other goals are those, other than working for the next 50 years knowing you wouldn't have had to have you just kept it together and focused ? Let's not get it twisted here, any life story of someone who went from nothing to making 8 figures is going to be crazy, extreme, narrow and not likely, so why is it the premises of your arguments keep lapping around this idea that they could have done both, could…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 05:24 AM
1

What.. I'm sure women in the west are traumatized by the antics and sexual quiverings of men that watch porn, masturbate, and are promiscuous, but my question is why are you expecting the same quiverings from a man whose clearly able to practice restraint ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 05:11 AM
1

The 20 year is his equal. He started being celibate at 20, and had no sexual experience after that age, so they'd have the SAME sexual experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 05:00 AM
1

You can say that for any situation. There is no guarantees in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:59 AM
1

He'd have had a social life. Social life doesn't mean you have to be promiscuous, take drugs, masturbate , drink and watch porn. This reminds me of one of those situations where when someone's starting eating people say they're "dieting".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:58 AM
1

Same sexual experience is what we're going here, and now you're arguing against that too ? Lool. I mean what's more powerful than a woman who can secure a very competent man with the same sexual experience as herself, can provide for her, potentially their family, her own family, and helps those in need, and a man whose worked half his life whilst bearing this in mind for his own future woman. (And yes it's true some men are working for women and families they've not even met, and so are some wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:54 AM
1

Why you keep talking about virgins, I never brought it up ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:47 AM
1

So a multimillionaire with 8 figures, is going to financially take advantage of a girl that works in McDonalds ? We're talking about a guy who values sexual restraint, celibate for 15 years as well, it's highly unlikely he's going to be hedonistic after those years of discipline. Don't forget the specifics of this hypothetical. He would have started being celibate at 20 years old, no porn, no masturbation etc, and is only trying to go for a 20 year old because that's the very same age he was whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:42 AM
1

You're the one who brought up "virgin", I only said the same sexual experience as himself. Sexual experience is a large part life, maybe even most of it some would argue, it's why people use terms like "take advantage", if it wasn't for the sexual experience of our parents, me and you would literally not be here. In if not all cases, the age gap would mean he'd have more sexual experience, of which typically comes with older men, who have magnitudes more experience in courting women, having them…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:39 AM
1

Most women work and have their own careers and seek a man who also has a career. And are promiscuous in the process, in this case he isn't. It's in the best interest of a woman to be gold digger, since digging for "gold" per say isn't just financial in this context .The above list should have given you an idea that there are things of value that aren't maximumly liquid, like personality, physique, looks etc. There is plenty of women out there that go for men that might not be wealthy, but they S…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:28 AM
0

You're not quite getting it, the only way he'll be able to hypothetically "take advantage" is sexually, for instance having an easier time getting dates, selling her dream, having game, all of which comes with previous SEXUAL experience of which he'd have exactly the same as from he was 20. There is no incentive to "take advantage", he's a multimillionaire with 5 lifetimes worth of wealth, the only advantage that can be taken is sex and that's it really, what's he going to do, steal from a girl …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:12 AM
1

Yes but he's missing out on arguably more important things in life by over-focusing on wealth. He's sacrificing half his life for the almighty dollar. What if, in spite of making no efforts at dating, he just so happens to meet the right woman before he's done with his goal of getting as rich as he can? Don't you not realise that working towards your career for 10-15 years isn't as uncommon nowadays as it used to be, there is literally women that do it, but in the process ARE promiscuous, and no…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 04:01 AM
3

Well said
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 10:00 AM
2

There is heavily more men that go through periods of being celibate in order to focus on work than they're women. Women for their biological fitness don't necessarily need to be a provider, and protector in order to be attractive to the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:55 AM
2

I thought I made it obvious that the end of the 15 years, is clearly a point in time which he can put his feet up, 8 figures is enough to be comfortable for 5 lifetimes. When you accrue such wealth, unless you're a gambler, there is a very good chance it's because you've been successful on the conquest of fulfilling your goals, objectives and passions. There are dudes out there that don't spend 10-15 years of their lives, partying, being promiscuous, watching porn, or masturbating. With this exa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:53 AM
0

It literally has nothing to do with sexual experience, from being celibate for 15 years experience. The experience which is associated with taking "advantage" her, is the very area of which he'd hypothetically have the SAME exact experience. How's he going to know how to 'manipulate' her when he has the SAME in dating experience. The only experience he'd have over her is in his work, which could be anything, but that's simply irrelevant when comes to dating. Since income isn't game, the question…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 09:40 AM
1

With some methods to success, it's just not possible I'm afraid to upkeep a marriage and relationship whilst pursuing 8 figures, such a feat requires all energy, sexual frustration and focus in order for feasible attainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 12:11 AM
0

Yes men find women 18-24 attractive no matter how old they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 12:05 AM
-2

You're basically calling out all women that are into older men as being dumb, and the men for being predators for wanting to take care of a woman once they've acquired the financial insulation in order to so comfortably.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 12:04 AM
1

Where did you get muslim from ?, Muslim's don't believe in being celibate lool, but they also don't believe in porn, masturbation and promiscuity or this plastic shit. They believe in marriage as early as possible from what I've seen. Real incels as the one's who masturbate and spend money on OF, they can't even transmutate their energy into being productive and becoming a man with whom a woman can depend on IF she needs to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 12:02 AM
1

To be honest... Let's be real here. Men that acquire wealth and status do so by possessing traits that are already attractive to women; ✓ Charismatic ✓ Intelligent ✓ Competent ✓ Passionate ✓ Dominant ✓ Machiavellian ✓ Meticulous ✓ Caring ✓ Loyal ✓ Disciplined ✓ Bold ✓ Relentless A lot of you women, like being the receivers of the finished product, but absolutely don't understand what it takes for a man to attract women, I'd take advice on how to catch a fish from the fisherman and not from the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:57 PM
1

Premarital abstinence never works, and it certainly wouldn't for 15 years. The age fixation is because by being abstinent from the age of 20, after all that time even upto 35, he'll still only have the sexual experience of a 20 year old. So this is actually a unique case where the older man actually has the SAME sexual experience as the woman he's trying to court rather than the othe way round.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:52 PM
1

Since when is watching porn, masturbating less weird than NOT doing those things. Clown world.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:50 PM
0

You clearly don't live in the real world, I've repeatedly said he has the same sexual experience as the 20 year old he's trying to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:45 PM
1

“Feminize the dude” What in the….and I can’t stress this enough…actual living fuck? This is why some people seriously lack critical thinking skills. If the woman the same age at 35 year old has magnitudes more sexual experience, is she more likely to be attracted to him and him to her... no Are women attracted to men with less sexual experience than them, typically no. Gender roles exist, and as such a man with far less sexual experience than the women, puts him in the feminine role which is una…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:34 PM
0

You wish, so you could take half the dude's shit LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:28 PM
1

He'd have the experience of making 8 figures, but the sexual experience of a 20 year old and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:28 PM
1

Say that to an athlete, who can leg press 15 times your weight about "low t". Not sure you even know what causes low t, it's caused by masturbation, pornography and too much sex. Ejaculation immediately lowers libido which is proportional to testosterone. Testosterone is also proportional to human growth hormone, which can boost athletism and performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:26 PM
1

I was talking about the 8 figures, but the abstinence is just the method used to earn the 8 figures. There is used to be time when masturbation used to make women cringe but now you're rooting for porn addictions and limp dicks, hence why there is a 30% reduction in testosterone, and more virgins than ever. It was to discern whether there is difference between what women think of men who are highly experienced wanting a woman with less sexual experience, Vs a man with less experience wanting a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:22 PM
1

Not quite as experienced as a 35 year old woman though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:15 PM
1

You just said, maybe he will want to make for things he didn't do, which I agree is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:14 PM
0

If it's the reality of just doing the minimum in life, why is no one doing it...... Also I hope you're not implying achieving 8 figures isn't a benchmark of success either. Money isn't free, there is people getting injured, and limping to work to barely make 5 figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:05 PM
–

This has to be a hard cope to think he'd be "lucky". I've seen men over the 35+ command the sexual attention and access of women 20-25, who were barely making over 6 figures. Now I'm questioning why it's a cope. Why older women have qualms about men who will work even to the point where they'll willfully sacrifice their youth's sexual experiences yet you'll throw the "predator" bag at them if they want women of the SAME sexual experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 10:01 PM
1

8 figures is rare, and I've seen women for an even larger age gap for a differential in income. It's also rare that a 35 year old man has optionally decided to have the same sexual experience as a 20 year old women, but that's precisely the whole contention of the post, is it better or worse than any other 35 year old who has magnitudes more sexual experience and can fully take advantage compared to someone who isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:52 PM
-1

There is a clear and evident reason why he'd go for her, which is basically she has similar to the same sexual experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:50 PM
1

Yep and that's our two sexes, and it's been like that for a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:45 PM
-1

Extreme age-gap relationships are frowned upon because of the overall power imbalance between the older person who has had a lot of life experience in general, and the younger partner who is still learning how to navigate life as an adult. Yeah because it means they can sexually get taken advantage of.. but like I said he has the same sexual experience as the younger woman. If you're trying to say he can take advantage of her in other ways what are those ways when women are in fact more attracte…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:42 PM
0

Please do Google the fuck out of it. I dare you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:36 PM
3

All women are gold diggers and so are men to an extent, and it's natural, just some are honest about it, I mean think about it. ✓ Income ✓ Looks ✓ Intelligence ✓ Height ✓ Charisma ✓ Physique ✓ Health This is all value related, having 8 figures just means on a probabilistic scale, the man will likely be value adjacent to the above.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:33 PM
1

He took himself out of all the sexual experiences, not necessarily all the life experiences. We live in a hypersexual society so it comes to no surprise that being celibate is demonized.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:28 PM
0

So you're saying he won't be trustworthy... Ah seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:26 PM
–

You're tripping.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:24 PM
2

Do you know what celibacy means ?. Abstaining from sexual activity, masturbation, porn and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:23 PM
0

I'll ask you a direct question then, if you were to date a man 10-15 years older, would it be more appealing if you were 20 and he had the same sexual experience because as you because of discipline, focus, and hardwork, almost as if he was doing it for you or would you be more inclined to him having literally 15 years more sexual experience than you and just happens to be on 8 figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:21 PM
1

Finding the right fit, IS cutting down the dating pool. That's the whole point lol. Easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:17 PM
-1

stringent self control to the point of denying a normal biological urge How is this any different from cheating. Have you even heard the stories of men that took 5 minutes to ruin a relationship/marriage, is that better than practicing actual self control. Let's not lie, it's a clown world when girls who have cried over someone cheating are the same ones trolling someone for practicing celibacy. That's pure clownage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:11 PM
1

You've never heard of a private marriage lol. Basically it holds no legal bounds in the court of law, but the ceremony takes place, and she can legally change her name, but they're not bound by divorce laws. Just because he has money doesn't mean he's good looking. Well groomes yes. How ?, the man has been celibate for 15 years, he has the same sexual experience as the 20 year olds he's trying to date. There is no hypocrisy, such as him being more experienced enough to take advantage, he is simp…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:09 PM
-1

I said most men who make it to 8 figures at 35 aren't celibate. Less than 1% of men have 8 figures at 35. That's the whole point post, I'm tryna gauge how "unfair" life is for women, if a man of the less than 1% calibre is going to struggle to land a girl with the SAME sexual experience as him. How hard is life really for women if this is the case. Let's be honest here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:04 PM
0

In the hypothetical scenario I didn't said he'll have had no girlfriend by the age of 20, I just said after college, he decided to become celibate and work for 15 years, which means when he starts dating women younger will actually have the SAME experience as him not less or more.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 09:00 PM
1

No there is gender roles, yes or no ?. In every relationship there is someone who takes the masculine, and another who takes the feminine role. Who said being feminine makes a woman inferior?. Is taking care of an entire family, and being their beating heart inferior. Is keeping your hair whilst a man balds everyday to work to keep food on the table make women inferior ?, is the ability to carry life, raise it and be the wisdom to your grandchildren inferior ?. Where is this western take that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:56 PM
0

Sorry to tell you, but women are hypergamous, if anything they become less attracted to a man whose suddenly; ✓ Weaker than them ✓ Shorter than them ✓ Less smart ✓ Corny ✓ More broke The very pillars in the constitution making women attracted to men are the ones you're trying to grind down into dust and call it empowerment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:44 PM
-1

This isn't your typical older man now is it. How many men are celibate for 15 years in order to focus on their work? The man will practically have the same experience as the very exact women that he is dating. There is no hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:37 PM
1

That's an idealistic take, and I never said ownership. I said the man would be less hypocritical since he'll have the SAME sexual experience as the 20 year olds he will be dating, the only difference being he had to work for 15 years and be celibate to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:35 PM
1

Men simply don't give credence to how much the woman makes nearly enough as how much women care, and I said the women the same age won't make 'nearly as enough' to emphasis how even more irrelevant it is. Put it this way, similar age differences are preferred because of: • Similar life experiences • Similar sexual experiences • Similar N counts • Similar social economic status or income In this situation even if the 35 year old dates a woman of a similar age: • They won't necessarily have simila…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:32 PM
-1

What you’re referring to is mostly done by athletes who engage in combat sports like boxing, UFC fighters and the like. And they don’t go sexless for 5 years. Those who do it only practice semen retention 2 weeks (at most) before competition. Which fights have you had?, have you personally experienced the difference between being celibate for 2 weeks vs 7 weeks, or 7 weeks vs 12 weeks ?, don't think so. It's not just that either, women come with distractions, they're attention needy, you think a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:23 PM
-1

Technically when he was your age, he would have sacrificed having fun, or engaging in sex for hardwork and to be successful, now he's essentially in the same position as yourself but with more "work experience". Btw he can probably move onto the next girl rather quickly, 8 figures isn't something that is easy to come by.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:16 PM
-5

You're not getting it. There is men with a ton of sexual experience, who have a high income, but want girls with minimum sexual experience, this hypothetical is a spinoff of a man with minimal sexual experience wanting a woman with minimum sexual experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:12 PM
-2

That doesn't answer why being celibate is the equivalent of being "neurotic". Celibate literally means not engaging in sexual activity for a long time, porn, masturbation or sex, like what is wrong that ?, what is wrong with self control.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:10 PM
-8

Yes it does, the main reason why people are aversed to larger age differences is because it is believed the man is sexually taking advantage of the younger woman. In this case however hypothetically the man is just as sexually experienced as the woman whose 10-15 years younger, so isn't privvy to taking advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:08 PM
-1

I think a man's looks is his income, so really it'll be down to his personality whether it works or not. Looks are only surface level attractions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:04 PM
1

It's not the kind of experience with which the 35 year old is going to know the ins and outs of taking advantage of a woman younger or getting into her pants, he is pretty much going to be in the same position as her in terms of sexual experience, the only difference is he'll have more "work experience" but will certainly be in a position to provide her with access to a lifestyle she'd want and the stability for a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 08:01 PM
-4

Relationships and sex are the distractions, when you're working, you're; planning and networking which includes socializing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:59 PM
1

A woman his own age will have way more sexual experience and feminize the dude. She'll be the equivalent of him being 20 and her being 35 in experience difference. Why does this make him a sicko, isn't the reason why women are aversed to large age difference is the man is "taking advantage". In this case he isn't taking any advantage, the man has been celibate for 15 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:56 PM
-2

Ever heard of a private marriage. If the man has 8 figures he clearly isn't going to be your average jock, and 35 isn't even that old relatively speaking. There is plenty of athletes that are around that age still in their primes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:54 PM
-1

Can you explain how a man who has the ability to sexually control himself is neurotic ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:49 PM
0

It's a way for men to feel above women even more than they already are Really is it our fault that women are attracted to men who are ; ✓ Stronger than they are ✓ Taller men ✓ More charismatic men ✓ Smarter men ✓ Wealthier men ✓ Older men ✓ More experienced men Do you ever hear men saying women are weak, dumb, boring, bland, cringe creatures just because they're attracted to the above?, so why are you demonizing what men find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:48 PM
-3

I didn't say being celibate makes one neurotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:44 PM
1

The unflattering truth is "respect from the opposite sex" is the reason for life. There is a plethora of people that have died getting plastic surgeries, injections, or died trying to acquire status. In the back of your mammalian brains, we know deep down our purpose is intrinsically intertwined with our legacies, and that involves building a family, a name, correcting wrongs, and helping the those in need, all of which comes with some sexual access, which in itself is status adjacent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:43 PM
1

Less than 1% of people make 8 figures, I'm sure his wherewithal will extend beyond any limitations of women that are the same age with less sexual restraint and a lot of experience. There is plenty of men not even on 8 figures that in relationships of a higher age range than 25-35 or 20-35. I hope you're not missing the point which is that he isn't hypocritical, as in most men on 8 figures won't celibate in order to achieve that but also want inexperienced women, in this case, he has restrained …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:33 PM
0

Even if she did make the same amount, why would he feel more empowered to be more feminized rather than more masculine in being a provider. Women are heavily hypergamous already, so it's already less common for them to be the breadmakers. Women that make more are genuinely more difficult anyway, older, less good looking and possess masculine traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:27 PM
-1

I don’t know any man who would or wants to voluntarily give up sex for 5 years There are athletes that practice celibacy to boost testosterone and mental focus, particularly in combat sports. The mere point is, there is already men that make 8 figures, that haven't been celibate, yet want women that are celibate and have a low N count. So my question is isn't it less hypocritical when you have a man who simply wants a woman that is celibate and is of the same n count ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:23 PM
-1

If his goal is to find women that are 20-25, who probably have the same body count, or haven't been promiscuous and celibate like himself, then I'd like to say women who aren't of that criteria probably aren't going to be a great fit or "be long lasting" in a relationship. .
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:19 PM
-6

She said "neurotic", on the basis that the man in the situation is celibate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:17 PM
-1

Is there anything wrong with being completely celibate in order to focus on work ?, since when has this become negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:16 PM
0

At surface value, of course she isn't. That's like saying no girl cares about you when you first meet other than your looks even before your personality, and the very same man can say he doesn't care about her apart from her age and looks. It goes both ways here..
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:12 PM
-1

You don't accrue 8 figures by being unsocialized lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 07:11 PM
-1

Highly doubt that, we live in a world of information, men are already catching on to marriages, prenups and divorces. The main question is whether he'll command respect from a woman 10-15 years younger since instead of eating his cake and having it too, he's restrained himself and Why should he not want a woman whose done the same ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:48 PM
0

Similar social-economic classes can be proportional to age differences, so is positive associative mating in most cases. Making 8 figures isn't most cases, even women that'll be 35+ or older aren't going to make that amount, despite the common natural assumption or inclination because she's the same age, she'll be of a similar social class. Even if you look at most relationships, the man is typically older in correlation to the financial difference, not solely because women are just attracted to…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:44 PM
-15

Most men who make it to 8 figures at 35, aren't celibate for 15 years, and absolutely command the sexual access of 20 year old, whilst they want women who don't have much sexual experience or women that are celibate. I'm merely questioning whether you'd think it's more appealing for such a man to hold the same restraint he expects from a woman of the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:34 PM
-15

In what world would an average 20 year old western woman be impressed by, or respect a neurotic 35 millionaire? So a man who is celibate is neurotic ?, so you'd rather us cheat instead...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:29 PM
0

So he still loses lool. I hope people are seeing that this scenario is the flipped version of men that work, don't commit to long term relationships and want girls much younger, whilst they themselves have been promiscuous and ate their cakes and had them too. In this situation however he hasn't been enjoying himself, hasn't been promiscuous and has literally worked from dust till dawn for 15 years.... Also why would he go for women the same age who have been promiscuous, whilst he hasn't ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:28 PM
-1

Sure, because a lot of them are born into money so it becomes about the social economic status of their family name but we're talking about a scenario where someone started from the bottom quite literally. Nowadays you have a bunch of them that won't born into money and wouldn't mind dating a girl from starbucks as long as she has the looks and isn't obnoxious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:21 PM
-1

Nice points, but It's probably the case that the man won't care about her social-economic class as much as she does his.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:13 PM
0

The point is, whilst some men will work to increase their income, and negate long term relationships whilst being promiscuous, the same men often don't want promiscuous women, now this hypothetical is that reversed, you instead have a man who isn't promiscuous, and wants a woman who isn't promiscuous also.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 06:07 PM
-7

Men produce the entire world population's number in just sperm pal, it's a different ball game to just one egg.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 12:48 AM
7

This has been saved, just to let you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 07:48 PM
–

As far as age-gap relationships, as you indicated they are quite rare. 1/10 relationships is uncommon from a statistical standpoint. Most men don’t want to date women young enough to be their daughters because that’s just fucking weird. Maybe you don't understand the statistics, so I'll lay them out for you: Husband older • 20 years and over ~1% • 15 - 19 ~ 2% • 11-14 years ~ 5% • 6-10 years ~ 11% • 1-5 years ~ 66% Wife older • 1-5 years ~ 10% • 6-10 years ~ 3% • 11+ years ~ 2% They have to all …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:33 PM
1

18-24 is absolutely very young for a man over 30. That’s why extreme age-gap relationships are statistically quite rare. They're not as rare as you think, it's around 10% of relationships that are around 10 years. 20 years is rare, at around 1%. You can't have an egalitarian relationship and still have chivalry. That's not how it works. If I buy a woman flowers, open the doors, and slide the chair, that's not equality. 3-5 years is most common, and most men want to settle as they get past their …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 05:17 PM
1

At least someone gets it.. W
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 05:09 PM
1

I don’t know. Maybe it’s because I’m tall and attractive but iain ever work to get some pussy. Well there you go, being physically attractive to women makes up for income when you're younger, you probably don't feel the urgency to perform above your potential compared to other men that have to compensate for their looks, and physique for sexual access. I kind of grew up with women approaching me more than I approached them, and learned now that I actually had physical advantages over other men. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 05:08 PM
1

18-24 isn't super young firstly, it's the age range most people consider women as most attractive. Submissiveness is in relation to gender roles. Typical heterosexual men don't want to get smashed by a strap-on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 06:02 PM
1

But to claim men want to fuck so they work hard is just kind of insane Right here, Is where you're not understanding the sexual differences between men and women. Yes it's not just as blunt as just a "fuck" for some but it also is for a lot of men. You've heard of locker room talk right ?, and how men brag about the bodies they had. It's about the survival of the species and the direct hedonistic incentive that comes with sexual access. You wouldn't be here if your dad didn't impress your mother…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 05:59 PM
2

Exceptions don't make the rule. But I'm guessing he isn't ugly and short neither now is he.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:40 AM
2

Yep, we're motivated to do everything that makes you feel empowered, just to get laid or to have children. There is no intrinsic value to a man's name unless he provides and protects, both of which usually come with sexual access or children.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:38 AM
5

Let's see how long that lasts..
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:37 AM
1

Being short doesn't mean you also have to have a low IQ and low income, but it certainly does make life harder for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:35 AM
1

There would be some correlation however for disease-free Good looking women with minimal sexual experience that are 18-24, submissive, without masculine features and are close to average female height.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:34 AM
1

You're a minority... Most women would have cheated or left by now. Not all women search for the best of the best amongst men. Is he ugly, broke, and short ? Don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:26 AM
1

That's not how men think, and you're not a man so I don't expect you to understand straight away of course, but yes that's what 125 million potential kids will do to you. You know the history, and the astrocities that have been committed by men in the name of "spoils of war", on a biological level we're more predator than even all the lionesses of a pride. But that's how we got here, competition can be good for bringing out the best in men and the worst at the same time, and mostly we're not thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:24 AM
1

The pay gap only exists because of women taking maternity leave and being relatively new to professional environments and not knowing how to negotiate pay and or raises. No. That's one of the few reasons, but again one of I'll just brief you; ✓ More women go college yes but, and a big but; • Men take college courses that are higher paying (stem), whilst women take healthcare and people orientated courses • They work longer hrs • Men take less time off • Work more overtimes • More likely to take …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 02:14 AM
2

Did you read the entire post ? The main performative measure I used was the gender pay gap, which has nothing to do with "men are smarter" or some bs like that but all to do with sexual motivation. To secure women, hypergamy is ingrained within a man, particularly to ensure that they earn more, just because men can be attracted to women that make less, absolutely doesn't mean women will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 12:05 AM
1

Sexual differences is one of the main causes of attraction between men and woman, usually physical initially and then competence related.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 12:02 AM
1

It’s wild that men still believe that women’s every waking and dreaming thought revolves around men. I've also said around this post that men will still put perform them, because everything MEN do revolves around sexual access more than women. You cherry picked that without even understanding the explanation, I further added that some women have caught onto it because they know it's not going to attract more of the opposite sex, the same way performance as a metric attracts the opposite sex for …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 11:50 PM
1

Whose more likely to win a competition, person with greater incentive to win and needs to win or a person without the incentive or need. Men perform for sexual access, and are more desperate for sexual access.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 11:43 PM
6

You're forgetting that the attainment of all of these gave the men above SEXUAL ACCESS and in the process didn't deplete their sexual attraction towards mediocre women. Where's women who ascertain monetary success, income, status, DON'T go back. They proportionally don't lose or gain sexual access but absolutely lose their sexual attraction towards men. Rich men smash broke women all the time. Rich women... definitely aren't smashing broke dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:28 PM
0

killing each other for sex which isn't really 2023 thing You don't understand a figure of speech for competition, whilst women are busy thinking if they earn more than men it'll make them more attractive, men are still having to compete against each other even after realising that typically when women earn more they LOSE ATTRACTION to the opposite gender, and men don't. Jay-Z could have found another Beyonce at McDonald's, but Beyonce never could find another Jay-Z at McDonald's. Maybe we'll tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:23 PM
3

but as a woman, you have to work so much harder to be seen as a ‘leader’. I noticed in my job, male managers where held to a less high standard by female managers by the staff, and more likely to be misinterpreted negatively (Like a quiet manager. Male- he’s stoic and serious. Are any of these qualities going to attract the opposite sex. Do you think most men are attracted to women with; - 6'0+ High upper body muscle women - Women on 6 figures - Women with Masculine characteristics - Women with …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:01 PM
3

So all the guys you've ever been attracted to were broke, living in poverty or were crackheads ?. Your viewpoint represents the minority if you're strictly only attracted to low-income men. Nevertheless, points above are the REASONS why men do what they do, although some women are in denial about what they're attracted to but even though the qualities that come with performance and income are proportional to being: Athletic can lead to income Physical can lead to income Historian can lead to inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:51 PM
2

But I do agree men have a far greater incentive to impress women with skills and wealth and achievement Exactly so why are people surprised at men for outperforming them when the incentive is much larger or the need is greater. On a biological level let's be real, failure to attract the opposite sex is itself failure in life, and immediately destroys a man or woman's self esteem, yet deep down everyone knows there is a much more restricted selection for the average man, than there is the average…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:34 PM
4

You think the average man takes a stem course ? Haven't been paying attention, do you know more women go college than men, and yes more men take stem, but those men REPRESENT a minority of men in general. Most men in general just haven't been to college.. Average denotes baseline levels, so automatically you've thrown yourself into muddy waters by saying "average men taking stem courses", there isn't average men taking stem.. those men are above average, and such men are taking these courses to …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:27 PM
-1

It doesn't mean that men outperformed I'm talking about 2023, and the 21st century, don't change the goal post. Men that outperform women, usually do because they're trying harder to gain sexual access yes or no ?, because biologically speaking women are more selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:20 PM
1

Those biological advantages are evolutionary, we adapted to be stronger than woman, that doesn't necessarily mean we're smarter, instead the barometer of attraction is income and women have simply forgotten they don't have to work nearly as hard to attract the opposite sex. There are even experiments that have shown almost a 90/1 ratio in sexual attractiveness between men and women, women will reject 99% of men if they straight up asked for sex whilst close to only 10% of men reject women. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:11 PM
2

You're only thinking of the few hyper- successful men which represent a minority, most average men are invisible to women and it's supposed to be like that. It's actually good, but a lot of women simply don't realise men aren't trying to work harder, climb faster, and take stem courses just for the heck of it as empowerment, we're doing it to attract the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:06 PM
1

You read the title and missed the entire point of the post because you didn't read the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:00 PM
0

You kind of projected and still don't get it. Men have literally been killing each other for sexual access whilst women aren't, how do you expect there not to be a performative discrepancy when one sex has to try harder than the other to impress the other, did you not read my post at all ?.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 06:58 PM
1

Typically men aren't that invested in your career but a person can't say the same for what they've worn or make up they decided to choose. It's just horseshit, that you're trying to deny this. Yes there could be exceptions but exceptions don't make the rule You might as well say... "I've never made a decision that I thought would make the opposite sex attracted to me" Ken was a modern day simp, plain and simple, and the main character goes to a gynecologist at the end clearly to what..... Utilis…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 12:39 AM
1

Most people are up keeping their career. Up keeping their socials. Up keeping their look, body and lifestyle. Maybe not all the time but most of the time, for most people. I hope the figure of speech hasn't thrown you off.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 10:56 PM
1

How did you get here ? Did you bootstrap yourself into existence ?. Are people less happy or more happy who have family? Would they rather have a family ? You ignored everything else. Everyone is one way or another trying 24/7 to make themselves at least attractive towards the opposite sex, through the career you choose, the body you choose (by going gym), make up, social circles, etiquette, social economic status and standards. Don't forget we're literally animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 03:04 PM
1

It stands out as the highest grossing box office garbage ever watched...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:24 AM
2

"There is soo much pressure to be thin in the US" ✓ US also statistically the country with the highest obesity rates
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:20 AM
1

Virtually every single man's identify is pursuing women, and the same for women in men, it's how children are made, and when people are most happiest. You just called out every dad, and mom, your grandfather, your grandmother, ancestors, humanity. "Terrific message"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:11 AM
2

One of the last remaining Alpha Males in the world. There is probably about 1 million left. 1 million Andrew Tates. You get the point, there is nothing unique about what he's saying but the way he's saying it, honestly men have been practicing it for years and lied all the way.
/r/AllPillDebate21/06/23 04:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter