TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SideTraKd Archive

View 0 posts and 375 comments by SideTraKd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

She's literally spewing Ibram Kendi.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/23 01:00 AM
45

This is the kind of entitlement and victim mentality that the left has fostered for so long. She cannot fathom how it could be possible that she's the aggressor and not the victim, and all because she thinks she has a right to a shopping basket full of items she doesn't want to pay for.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/23 06:41 PM
2

Yes, and the notion that she may have been trafficked puts it over the top, for me.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/23 11:18 AM
-44

Yeah... she was 15... for fucks sake... Even if she went over there on her own and wasn't trafficked, she was a fucking KID. Normally I would be all about kicking her to the curb, but this one just doesn't sit right.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/23 02:29 AM
1

So you're saying that they'll only do the signature bond once..?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/23 06:56 PM
2

Fair enough... How many times do you get to skip out before they stop doing that..?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/23 03:10 PM
10

Probably not after she already jumped one bail. The bondsman isn't going to be too keen about that.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/23 06:00 AM
55

FUCK TYT.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/23 01:20 AM
78

I bet she's the main thief. She definitely knew what was in the trash cans, and her brother doesn't seem like he has a clue about anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/22 10:39 PM
29

She was deemed unfit to stand trial, but she was a school mentor... wow... lol
/r/MensRights25/11/22 11:23 PM
42

Yet another reason why DNA testing should be mandatory at birth.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 05:14 PM
11

Ignore the west. Our society is corrupted by attitudes of people who have never known real oppression, no matter how oppressed they claim to be. Styling yourself as oppressed is in vogue, here, and such people deserve to be ignored at worst, and ostracized at best. You guys do what you have to, and Godspeed to you. I wish you nothing but the best.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:11 PM
7

No one is forcing them to step up. It's not like there was a draft.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:03 PM
2

Women got it started... that's good enough. It's a GOOD thing that men are stepping up to protect women from an abusive regime. It should ALWAYS be incumbent on the strong to defend the weak from those who would exploit and murder them, particularly since many of these men are out there to protect women in their own families, whom they love deeply. Might it develop into third wave feminism in the next generation or two, where attitudes like you describe will surface..? Maybe. And that attitude w…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:00 PM
77

I downvoted you just because you're whining about being downvoted.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/22 07:25 PM
155

The one woman is smiling the whole time...
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/22 10:05 PM
37

The fucked up system will only get changed once women start getting the short end of the stick in it. That's just the reality. Men getting fucked has always been fine.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 02:31 AM
151

Also, wouldn't this "lowly" guy working at Subway making her sub be proof that the "#patriarchy" doesn't exist..? I mean, surely only women should be in the kitchen making sandwiches!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/22 11:42 PM
13

My point was the combination of those two facts (the video and the timeline of the night he was stabbed) shows a pretty clear pattern on her part.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/22 06:01 PM
16

It doesn't... But consider the fact that she called her mom TWICE for a total of almost 15 minutes and only called 911 after that (after 24 total minutes), leaving him in a pool of what would be coagulated blood by the time police arrived 7 minutes later.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/22 05:56 PM
3

Not based on the time-line. She called her mom twice and was on the phone with her for almost 15 minutes... before she finally decided to call 911.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/22 02:58 PM
5

I don't blame you...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 12:07 PM
20

Because POC deserve "their own space" don't ya know...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:58 AM
46

Harvard law school now has segregated graduation ceremonies... so... How woke IS your average state university..?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:38 AM
10

The first one was definitely not playing with a full deck...
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/22 07:13 PM
1

It was after he didn't win the defamation case against The Sun, if I remember right. And that was in England.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/22 04:21 AM
19

Yeah... He lost more than that just from the PotC franchise. One more movie in that series would have paid him $22.5 million. Not to mention the Fantastic Beasts movies and whatever else he was dropped from.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 09:17 PM
-2

You're literally taking Archer, a series where EVERY character is morally bankrupt (by design), this seriously?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:26 PM
2

Not in Texas, partner. Oh, FFS, just shut the fuck UP already. You're repeating this shit so much it makes me wonder if you're the fucking shooter. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:26 AM
1

No I mean what this piece of shit named Joe Biden did when he left our people behind and now his administration is blocking them from getting out.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:57 PM
2

Was it written on Post-It notes? Please tell me you aren't this stupid... https://news.yahoo.com/taliban-reportedly-control-us-biometric-122757450.html
/r/MensRights05/09/21 04:01 AM
3

Perhaps NOT pulling out our military and abandoning our stronghold airport before we got the civilians out would have been a start. We left behind Americans, to say nothing of all of the people who helped us over the years, who we promised to get out. We had a biometric database on literally hundreds of thousands of Afghanis both friend and foe, and now that database is in the hands of the Taliban, and we have no idea who were are bringing in as refugees. And that's just scratching the surface o…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 03:17 AM
9

Because leaving wasn't the problem. It was the disastrous and incompetent way in which the withdrawal was handled. Think of it this way... Both Trump and Biden had plans to drive to the store... Biden crashes the car on the way and blames Trump because it was his idea to go. Only instead of crashing the car, Biden caused the biggest international fuckup in modern history.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 02:56 PM
21

I don't even care in this case... Because ANYTHING that can be done to call attention to the catastrophe that happened here is good in my book, even if it has to appeal to people who only care about Women. I know that's shitty, and right now, I don't even care. It's a straight fact that some people only care about Black people, or White people, or Asian people, or Hispanic people, or Men, or Women. They're called fucktards. But the fucktards are the reason this all happened to begin with, and if…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:23 AM
0

He came out financially ahead because of her efforts I think you've got that backwards. She's lived the high life on his money for two and a half decades. Quit acting like she's some poor put upon housewife who he's deserting and leaving penniless. Even without any legal awards, I would be willing to bet that she is WAY better off financially today than she ever was before she met him, and definitely better off than if she never met him at all. Why he's obligated to keep the champagne and caviar…
/r/MensRights23/07/21 05:47 AM
2

He already got it. Then so did she.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 03:40 AM
5

But she's been giving something for the past 24 years. So has he. If she had been working he would have had to pay for babysitters and tutors and a maid etc. Don't you mean "they"..? At the very least she deserves a lump sum for her contributions. And what does he get in return?
/r/MensRights23/07/21 02:48 AM
28

She shouldn't be given a damned thing. Even if, as you pointed out, she left her profession to support the family, it is clear she is no longer willing to offer that support. She is withdrawing everything she supposedly brought into the marriage, and since she is giving nothing, she deserves nothing in return.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 07:39 PM
1

I kinda got screwed. I bought a fairly cheap house right before the sub-prime market crash, and was almost immediately underwater with it...
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/21 12:01 AM
1

i married into money. not 1% - but enough that i was given a house as a wedding present. Pretty sure that's 1%... at least worldwide. In America, maybe not, but even our homeless are better off than a good portion of the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/21 04:58 AM
6

I can say with confidence the person who owns a 4 billion dollar yacht is extremely wealthy, and so is the guy who owns a billion dollar home. Either that, or they have had enough guile to convince someone (or some bank) to loan them the money for such things. Many people who have had such things go tits up.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/21 04:53 AM
18

I'm going to have to argue with you on that one... Or at least seek to amend what you said. A person's apparent wealth has no bearing on their quality of character, and, in fact, a person who blatantly flashes signs of wealth is a warning sign of someone who is of low character. Being of low financial standing myself, I know quite well that ACTUAL financial standing (as opposed to apparent standing) can be an indicator of low drive which applies to me just to show that I'm not ripping on anyone …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/21 04:51 AM
5

(I know that's unimpressive today, but back then it was remarkable). That's still pretty impressive to me... My house isn't worth a 10th of that much and I still owe the bank most of that..! lol
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/21 04:42 AM
4

And that last part of the post was the most pertinent... "You own all of those things but you still don't have a man. It's not because your standards are high, it's because you ain't shit"... lol
/r/PussyPassDenied28/01/21 04:40 AM
1

The reason for the quotes is because I do not consider Cuomo to be a leader.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 09:40 AM
1

It wasn't entirely serious, no... But Andrew Cuomo's performance during this pandemic has been so embarrassingly bad that it could easily have tanked the average for rest of us... And then the jackass actually wrote a book to praise himself for his amazing "leadership".
/r/MensRights02/01/21 09:13 PM
-4

I'm pretty sure they're right, though... I'm willing to bet that Andrew Cuomo was enough to tank the averages for male "leaders" across the board.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 10:14 AM
1

Yes....
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/21 10:46 AM
4

Well, just look at the title of the video...
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/20 09:38 PM
30

I wouldn't be so sure about it not being possibly criminal... After all, we're talking about a place where you can get arrested for saying mean things on the internet.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/20 09:33 PM
28

WHOA! Seriously?!
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:28 AM
37

So, wait... Why was he fired? Or at least, what was the excuse..?
/r/MensRights09/11/20 01:34 AM
1

Yes, you're right, it should have been duel. My bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/20 12:10 AM
14

LMAO! I didn't actually think about it like that!
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 07:00 PM
61

They're required by law to dual to the death with pistols or swords...
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 06:52 PM
2

Literally a popular song about this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaSy8yy-mr8 Women cheered this shit on without considering at all just how psychotic it is...
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 05:46 PM
205

When men cheat, it's the man's fault for being a dog, but when a woman cheats, it's ALSO the man's fault because he wasn't giving her what she needed, or some shit... Didn't you know..?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 05:34 PM
8

Oh, I'm more than aware... But there is a concerted effort to say that any woman who has been drinking CAN'T consent.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:39 AM
10

A man can say NO outright and it's still fine somehow.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:11 AM
3

It's not about getting women drunk to have sex... Now it's about a woman not being able to consent if she's had anything to drink at all.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:10 AM
6

Does one sip of alcohol make a woman "drunk/unconscious"..?
/r/MensRights27/09/20 06:08 AM
89

People have been using alcohol as a social stimulant and prelude to sex for centuries... Now all of a sudden the woman has to be stone cold sober or it's rape.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 09:13 PM
0

You actually think that the kids get divide up and assigned to certain agencies?!
/r/MensRights19/08/20 09:50 PM
0

It's more people being involved in finding homes for kids, so it's more kids finding homes.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 07:20 PM
1

If that was true, then there would already be enough adoption facilitators to deal with the problem... But we already know that there aren't.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:03 PM
0

So I was right. Your position is that the state should not enlist the help of the religious unless it forces them to violate their faith. In which case, there is no funding for faith based groups, and less children get adopted, as a result.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 12:37 PM
1

How so..?
/r/MensRights19/08/20 12:34 PM
-3

No funding for you if you don't want to violate your faith, then? Even if you are assisting in solving a huge problem..? It's not like the faith based organizations are getting exclusive contracts, or anything. Their help should be welcomed.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 04:33 AM
-5

No it doesn't, unless you're claiming that there aren't other organizations involved in adoption too that aren't faith based. More organizations being involved in finding homes for kids means more kids getting adopted. I have no interest in the Muslim faith, for example, but I would never try to force a Muslim adoption agency to cater to non-Muslim applicants.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 04:22 AM
3

I also personally disagree with their law about faith based adoption agencies retaining state contracts while denying LGBTQ+ applicants. Not to get off on a tangent, here... But are you actually saying that you'd rather have less kids getting adopted just because you disagree with people of different faiths?
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:35 AM
39

From a moral standpoint (at least from my moral perspective) the judge's ruling makes perfect sense. Which means that the state is intentionally acting immorally...
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:08 AM
318

What irritates me is that the state is still insisting that they're right and they're mad about this judgement.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 01:38 AM
3

these users will just go to other sites like Parker for example. Parler...
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:34 PM
12

Anecdotal, but I remember seeing a cop show... I think it was actually Cops... Where they get to the scene, and the guy is trying to sleep in the car. He's marked up, she isn't. He says she attacked him, but instead of retaliating, he did what he was "supposed to do", which is why he was trying to sleep in the car instead of his own bed... They still took him to jail and left her, because the guy is guilty by default. I remember being so stunned by that, and that was a very long time ago. Since …
/r/MensRights15/06/20 04:38 PM
2

She got rightfully knocked on her ass. Definitely NOT police brutality.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 10:42 AM
2

I'm not really sure what incident you're talking about here... THIS incident, the officer was completely right.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 01:57 AM
1

Baltimore is such a shit show... I worry about that sort of thing here, because our mayor in Indianapolis is of a like mind. Thankfully this state is majority conservative, but my city isn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 01:56 AM
1

Sucker punches happen to people who aren't already involved in violence. She got knocked the fuck out because she INSTIGATED violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/20 01:55 AM
159

Don't be so sure. It's Baltimore, and the mayor is yammering about how unnecessary and inappropriate the cops actions were. In a just world, she'd have been arrested and that would be the end of it, but they live in clown world.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/20 07:17 PM
38

The video is stopped right before the white knights rush in...
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/20 08:03 AM
17

You don't have to hit someone before it becomes self defense...
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/20 01:47 PM
699

The other double standard is that they think it's fine to tell men that if they don't want children, they should just "keep it in their pants". But if someone told them to keep their legs closed, their heads would explode.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:46 PM
31

The "solutions" always involve dismantling capitalism, and would do very little, if anything to help the environment... That's a good clue as to their true motivations.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 04:27 PM
21

She was almost close to having a point. No, Whoopi wasn't anywhere near having a point. Polanski fucked her in the ass while she was begging him to stop. She was THIRTEEN.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/19 07:03 PM
3

He said "on this point". He wasn't validating all the rest of the shit she's ever said or done. Why is he an asshole..?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 12:07 AM
3

Never forgiving anybody or allowing them a way back if they change their opinion is the trade mark of the left and especially today's SJWs. We should aim to be better than them and not ape their worst traits. I love that you said that... But Streep IS (or at least has been) an SJW... And what she just said was dangerous, to them. I'm guessing this will turn out to be a case of them eating one of their own.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 12:05 AM
116

Sometimes even if they're not the actual father...
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:48 AM
2

That means that some people are going to abuse it, and those people fucking suck. And many of those people ARE pro-abortion. Like it, or not, there is a subsection of people who believe that there is no down side to abortion, and that it is, in fact, healthy and life-affirming. Pro-choice people (like me, because I have a very similar opinion to your's) getting conflated with the pro-abortion sect is a different issue. But pro-abortion is definitely a thing, and those people are some of the most…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/19 04:33 PM
8

Speech that offends them is now "violence", which gives them license to be violent in response.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/19 10:57 PM
-1

Ackshually People that do this are hurting other Victims that actually been abused
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/19 07:43 PM
1

It smacks of the whole "feminism is about men's rights, too!" argument, which is disingenuous, at best... But I can see where someone somewhere might've had good intentions in saying it.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:55 PM
4

I'm a traditional kind of person, and I agree with the sign... SOMEWHAT.... I think that the right man and woman, working in tandem, can achieve things greater than the sum of the individuals. But we all know that the sign is really meant to convey the notion that any success any man has ever had should really be credited to some unnamed woman, somewhere, and that, of course, is total bullshit. Plus, if you reversed the sexes, the REEEEEEing would echo through the halls of time.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:54 AM
183

There is sarcasm, comedy, and terrifying TRUTH to this...
/r/MensRights20/04/19 12:46 AM
11

Oh, I'm sure she would have her pick of any soy boy out there... But then again, who wants that..?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 12:44 AM
1

Never heard of it going to a dna test like that. But I have been a strong believer for years that paternity testing should be mandatory with EVERY birth.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:46 AM
81

Why would this fix anything..? As things stand, courts don't even care if you're actually the biological father, anymore. You could be a eunuch, and they'd still try to stick you with the bill.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:43 PM
0

guy is a pussy for blurring her face. Nah... He's smart for not leaving himself open to any sort of claims against him.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/18 11:58 PM
1

A cab driver gets paid during that time. No, we don't, and the guy is right... He definitely put himself in a bad position backing up and continuing to even have a dialogue with her. Once she was out of the car, he should have driven away. Other than that, he handled it like a pro. That being said, this isn't even close to some of the crazy shit I've seen as a cab driver, and it's why I don't generally do cash runs anymore. It's also why I LOVE Uber, because they get these types of runs now, and…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/18 11:49 PM
1

I'd be proud to be the outcast in that room.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/18 09:50 PM
4

Here's another issue... It is understood the mother was never charged with abduction or other criminal offences. Because we all know that a man WOULD be charged with those offenses.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/18 09:24 PM
2

It is understood the mother was never charged with abduction or other criminal offences. Not so denied, then...
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/18 09:22 PM
13

If it is so much better for society for families to stay together, then maybe they should criminalize the cheating and lying of the woman, rather than the truth-seeking of the man.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:59 PM
22

That would be a bad idea. No worse than the one they settled upon...
/r/MensRights17/07/18 10:53 PM
13

They take care of the house, pets, cooking, cleaning, laundry, children. And in these types of arrangements, the husband takes care of all financial responsibilities. After divorce, the wife stops contributing these things, but our society dictates that the husband's responsibility is somehow for life..? And people wonder why more and more men see marriage as a bad deal for them...
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/18 02:32 AM
2

In the video the guy literally says it, and whether or not it's accurate doesn't matter, because the point is that he claimed it was proof of "male privilege", even though it would be the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:06 PM
16

Not to mention the obvious fact that the douche thinks that women outnumbering men 2:1 in this college's admissions is somehow male privilege. Women are twice as likely to get into this school, but the men are the privileged ones... sheesh...
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:34 PM
17

Harvard hosting black-only graduation ceremony... The left has somehow managed to convince black people that segregation is a good thing.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:56 AM
13

It's the reasoning that bothers me... "We don't have enough women passing, so how can we change the parameters to ensure more women pass..?" If the ratio were reversed, they'd be celebrating the outcome.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:38 PM
1

It was Trump's administration that put an end to the stupidity of the "Dear Colleague" letter, and is working to rid us of kangaroo courts in our colleges. You don't think that's supportive of men's rights?
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:37 AM
2

Honestly I think that MRAs are the worst thing ever in her mind, so she thinks that's the biggest insult/slur she can call the people who attacked her (who are supposed to be her allies). Her indoctrination is so strong that even getting her ass beat by the people who are supposed to be her friends isn't enough to break it. She has to frame it in her mind that they were acting like her boogeyman (MRAs).
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:24 AM
1

It's literally an article about the dangers of a system that is unfairly weighted against the accused, and then they turn around and assume guilt, just because it's Trump.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:26 PM
3

Disregarded..? The media talked about the allegations incessantly, in the attempt to sink Trump's campaign.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:45 PM
3

They're pretty far left, though... and even in this article they take it for granted that the accusations against Trump were genuine, without even seeing a bit of irony in it.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:13 PM
15

It's The Atlantic. I'm surprised that they are even able to admit that there is any problem at all.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:48 AM
3

There used to be advertising for jobs on the radio here with the tag line at the end saying "Women and minorities encouraged to apply!" Gee... I wonder who is NOT encouraged to apply..?
/r/MensRights26/08/17 10:47 AM
13

True enough, but I meant that accused men are most often treated as guilty from the start. They shouldn't have to wait until a woman gets exposed as a false accuser before their rights are taken seriously.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:17 AM
45

MRAs want to make sure that victims get taken seriously. And that the accused have their rights taken seriously...
/r/MensRights24/08/17 10:40 PM
12

Ten years is a long time, but she PERMANENTLY destroyed so many lives. What she took can't be given back. Personally, I think that the state should be giving restitution to those men, because they were complicit in their lives being torn apart.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 10:39 PM
1

Hope that bubble of yours doesn't pop too harshly. Never had to worry about my "bubble" popping, because I have gone out of my way all of my life not to live in one. And I'm not the one replying to everyone in this thread trying to convince everyone that my reference to a hate group never happened. That's you.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:24 PM
1

Yup. I made a small comment about it being a badge of honor, and you flipped the fuck out and started trying to dodge the fact that you even said it. But, hey... Whatever floats your boat.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:07 PM
1

Again, you're the one making a big deal out of this, while I'm laughing about how silly this is. I fail to see how you think I made a big deal out of anything. I merely said that being on the SPLC list of "baddies" is a badge of honor.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:01 PM
3

Dude... You pushed the SPLC to shore up your argument, and got called out for it roundly. Since then, you have been working overtime trying to somehow justify it, and you want to claim that everyone ELSE is freaking out..? Honestly, after I read the posts from other people calling you out for it, I just figured my small note about it would go ignored... But you couldn't even let that go.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:40 PM
3

I did not look up anything about the SPLC, because it was not relevant to this article. It still isn't. Apparently relevant enough for you to bring them up.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:59 PM
3

Unfortunately, one of the "notable" references you used is notable, in its own right. I find it to be a rather dubious claim that you know so much about a very small group of fringe pediatricians, but know nothing at all about a very large and oft-criticized group of hatemongers.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 11:27 AM
3

You're the one that put it in a list of reasons why this group is bad. Quit blaming other people.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:59 AM
3

For me to be a hypocrite, I would have to have derived my opinion of ACPeds from the findings of SPLC You did... At least in part.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:48 AM
3

Nobody's "frothing at the mouth". They're just pointing out your (very) obvious hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:38 AM
2

You kind of have a point... I mean... I said what I said about the SPLC before I read the multitude of comments that called you out for it, or I probably wouldn't have bothered. But you DID deserve to be called out for it. You can't chastise a group by proxy like that, especially when the group you're using to do it is one of the most heinous in existence.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:34 AM
1

I made no comment on any of that. You citing them as being considered a hate group by the SPLC is not a negative point of reference, like you infer in your post.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:06 AM
5

The group is considered a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center Well that's a badge of honor if there ever was one...
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:22 AM
5

Even though I knew it was likely to happen, it still hit me a lot harder than I thought it would. Not sure why this one incident put things over the top for me. Maybe because it is so blatant.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:43 AM
2

WTF... That headline... What total bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:40 AM
8

That doesn't seem like a good option for this guy... He has kids of his own that he loves and wants to support. Not very easy to do from jail.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 01:17 PM
3

She took a lot of heat for saying that and apologized (which upset me), but, it appears to me that she isn't walking back what she said so much as apologizing for sounding crass. At least, that's what I hope. This is one of the positive aspects that I was hoping to see from a Trump administration, because we all know that things would not have gotten better under Clinton. They probably would become much worse.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:20 PM
23

It's really sad that this even needs to be said.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 06:31 AM
14

Right, motherhood should never be a mitigating factor for violent crimes. Well, fatherhood sure as hell isn't.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:38 AM
3

I think that they were at that point, all along.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 03:38 PM
2

No doubt... And they extend the same "graciousness" to any minority who dares to question even the smallest part of liberal ideology. But we're the racists...
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:04 PM
1

All reasons why the liberals are shit. Also a big reason why people said fuck them, and voted for Trump... Because that kind of thing turns people off.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 07:00 PM
2

"Crazy Joe" I get... but the whole "bleeding facelift" thing seems tasteless. And I may not be a part of his hardcore base, but I AM a conservative, and I DO think it's hilarious when he attacks the media. I can't think of any more of a deserving target...
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:45 PM
2

Nah... shit like this is where he comes off poorly, except to his harder base. Attack them for being fake and phony... yes. But "bleeding facelift" is just a bad look.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:25 PM
-3

How are those not childish, petty, insignificant and beneath the presidency? They completely are. Obama was a petulant manchild. But Trump isn't doing himself any favors by going off on Mika's "bleeding facelift", is he..? I love that he goes after CNN and the other news outlets, and the liberals are complete fucking hypocrites, but the petty personal stuff really should be something he should reconsider.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:32 PM
4

This kind of thing is definitely one of the biggest problems I have with Trump, though. It's childish and petty, and really should be beneath a president.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:58 PM
3

Or Ivanka, or Kellyanne Conway, or Melania... Or pretty much every conservative female ever. The double standard isn't just a female/male thing. It's a liberal policy.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:51 PM
6

ok. send em
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:41 PM
11

How could anyone doubt me? Because you're long on hyperbole, and short on specifics..? Yeah, that's pretty much why we doubt you.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:20 PM
3

If a serial child killer comes out and says they have turned around and now want everyone to know that they love children dearly, who would believe them? Yeah... I feel like you need to back that shit up...
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:19 PM
296

This outcome was obviously a gross miscarriage of justice. I think even the most staunchly pro-victim anti-rape activists would admit that (maybe). NO... They WOULDN'T... That's part of the whole damned problem. Imagine if he had accused her of sexual assault as well—the panel might very well have concluded that they raped each other. NO... They WOULDN'T... They wouldn't have given his accusation any consideration at all.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 05:32 AM
6

just another buzzword That's a very long list...
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:08 PM
113

Obama is the one that pushed the schools into doing this. I was really hoping that Trump would reverse it, but, so far, it seems to be under his radar.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:49 AM
3

Unfortunately, she just kind of laughed it off. The woman at some point got it through her head that she wasn't going to do too well if the cops came, so she finally got out and let me get on with my night. Because of that kind of thing, I try to get more contract runs these days, as opposed to just regular callers. Less headaches that way...
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:27 AM
21

Dispatcher even heard her say it...
/r/MensRights06/04/17 07:38 PM
37

As a driver, you tend to deal with a lot of shit... It gives you a thick skin when it comes to things like this. I once had a drunk woman say that she was going to accuse me of rape while I was actually on the phone with 911 dispatch. Since I am a regular cab driver, I wasn't getting paid while this woman was refusing to get out of my cab, so I really had no choice but to call the police. Thankfully, my camera is a stand-alone.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:08 PM
2

http://cordellcordell.com/resources/indiana/indianapolis-fathers-rights/ These guys are pretty well known for their efforts on behalf of men in custody battles.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:49 PM
17

where as a mother only has to prove she is fit She doesn't even have to do that much. She just has to avoid being proven UNfit.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:52 PM
7

Not only was Obama linked to it, he was directly responsible for it, and both him and Biden are PROUD OF IT. http://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/biden-and-obama-rewrite-the-rulebook-on-college-sexual-assaults/2016/07/03/0773302e-3654-11e6-a254-2b336e293a3c_story.html
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:52 PM
1

Seems kind of a stretch, and Islamic-dominated governments are notorious for treating getting raped as a crime.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 05:45 PM
3

That's why I said something doesn't add up. The UAE is not typically one to care about such things as "international pressure". But suddenly they decided to relent after they find out she wasn't raped..?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:16 AM
9

I just don't see the relevance. The UAE authorities apparently didn't give a shit about what anyone thought when they arrested her, and were still set to prosecute up to the point when the video came to light.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:40 PM
4

Didn't seem to bother them while she was still supposedly a rape victim... Why would it bother them after the truth came out?
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:15 PM
17

Yes... So something doesn't add up. She supposedly was jailed for extramarital sex, but they let her go after they not only found proof that she had the sex, but that it was completely consensual on her part..? If they were going to prosecute her for having sex even though she was supposedly raped, then why the hell would they suddenly let her go once they found out she lied about the rape part of it?
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:18 PM
0

Right... elite arbiter... But most people know that there aren't any circumstances where rape is okay. Rape is always fucked up. Period. Full Stop.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/16 01:30 PM
3

Yah yah yah, take your virtue signalling somewhere else. I'm not virtue signalling, dude... I fucking hate that shit. I don't give a shit one way or the other who agrees with me usually... And, actually, especially right now. But on the topic of whether someone should go through the trauma of rape, I am always going to be against it, even if they raped someone else. Even if you could 100% PROVE that they raped someone else. Because rape isn't justice for anything. Or anyone. This sub was suppose…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/16 12:35 AM
-4

People like you are the reason the pussy pass even exists in the first place. Now we have to be in favor of a false accuser getting raped to be against women getting away with heinous shit..? Honestly, if that's your position, then you've lost your fucking mind. And if that is the default position of this sub, then it really has lost it's way... And you're just giving ammo to the people criticizing the men's rights movement.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 04:45 PM
1

Repeating almost verbatim what I just said is not an argument... It's just proof that the person didn't even read what I said.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 04:41 PM
-3

And I am saying that's really fucked up. You not being able to feel empathy for someone who gets raped, no matter what they've done, is a problem with you, not someone else. There isn't any scenario where rape is karma or deserved, in any way. Now, on the flip side, if a false accuser went to jail, and had their life destroyed, I would get a giant justice boner. And THAT's what we should want for these people. All of this talk about people bringing it on themselves is exactly what our detractors…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 04:40 PM
-1

Saying it is "just deserts" or that someone deserves it is just as bad. It's beyond fucked up.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 04:35 PM
-3

Murder isn't justice, either.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 04:34 PM
-1

100% agreed... Saying that it would be some kind of karma is crazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 01:53 PM
12

Pretty sure I JUST said: Karma would be her life being destroyed and her ass being thrown in jail over it (which is what would usually happen to the guy she accused). Actual rape isn't just horrible... and it sure as hell isn't "just deserts" to ANY extent. Not even the worst person on the face of the earth deserves to be raped. There is NOTHING just about rape, in any sense. It is a murder of the soul. Speaking as someone who has been falsely accused, I KNOW just how fucked up it is, and I am i…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 12:01 PM
25

Rape is not the "just deserts" for anything. There's no justice in that. That's just revenge fantasy, and you really need some serious introspection over that shit. Karma would be her life being destroyed and her ass being thrown in jail over it (which is what would usually happen to the guy she accused). Rape is a seriously fucked up thing, and should never happen to anyone, no matter how bad a person you perceive them to be. I can't even believe this needs to be said.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 10:52 AM
10

Women who lie about being raped deserve to actually be raped. This is some seriously dark bullshit right here... NOBODY deserves to be raped. NOBODY. People who make false allegations deserve to be punished a hell of a lot more than what we're seeing right now, but nobody deserves to be raped. That's fucking INSANE. I honestly can not believe anyone would upvote this bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 10:42 AM
10

Opposing one extreme doesn't require you to go to the opposite extreme. The problem we have with false rape accusations is that they are not treated as seriously as they should be, not because we think it would be karma for a woman to really be raped over it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 10:37 AM
9

How the fuck is this comment getting any upvotes at all..?! That's fucking seriously disturbing.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/16 10:33 AM
2

Nah... She never faced jail at all until she went to the police. They never knew anything about it before that. The story broke because she went to the police to report a rape, and they tossed her in jail for it. It was only after that when she was discovered to be lying.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:02 AM
27

Something about this story just doesn't add up... If she was jailed for "being raped" because that constituted sex outside of marriage, and they were ready to throw the book at her for that, then why suddenly let her go once they find out she lied about being raped? It seems so upside down to me. If her crime was having sex outside of marriage, then the law would still apply whether it was consensual, or whether it was rape... right..? The notion that she was jailed when they thought she was rap…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:57 AM
29

I don't buy it... She had to go to the bathroom so bad that she decided to waste time refusing to handover her license?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/16 09:14 PM
8

Also that the system is racist, because clearly that old man was a blatant racist who got what he deserved, and she is just an innocent little flower, caught up in a system stacked against her.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/16 05:03 AM
10

I call bullshit on her ever getting bullied, in the first place.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 04:48 PM
314

Look at her pictures in court... She's absolutely ecstatic that she found a way to get herself arrested. This will make her more popular with her crowd... A real leader of shitheels.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 04:46 PM
3

It's a great piece, with great reasoning. With Donald Trump, love him or hate him, what he says is what he is feeling at the time, almost always unfiltered, without a care in the world what anyone else thinks about it. With Hillary Clinton, what she says is always carefully tailored to whomever is listening. She panders endlessly. And, despite the media's insistence that Trump is a horrible racist, it was actually minorities that gave him the win this week, because they were the ones that moved …
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:11 AM
6

Pretty interesting analysis... I went over the numbers myself from the same source before I saw this video, but I didn't really get into the changes from the last election. It does kill the whole "whitelash" narrative, which needs to die a quick death.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:38 AM
5

"Penises." LOL...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 12:49 PM
2

Yes, but most people won't have any idea what you're talking about if you say that. "Kool-aid" was pretty much the go-to term for any powder-flavored drink, a lot like "Coke" was the go-to term for pretty much any cola.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 05:11 AM
1

Pretty much. I'm guessing that her losing to Trump never even crossed their minds as a real possibility. I mean, she clearly didn't even have any sort of concession speech ready last night, and the speech today was genuinely contrite, suggesting to me that she got hit with one hell of a wake-up call..!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 01:22 AM
3

I'm pretty sure the DNC is also responsible for the media giving Trump non-stop airtime during the primaries, too. They boosted his primary run on purpose, because he is the one she wanted to face in the general.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 12:41 AM
9

Touche`
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 04:57 PM
6

Can't break from the narrative...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 01:49 PM
16

Exactly, but you can't expect them to not double down on the stupid. Trump is a thing because so many people are sick of the race card, and the labeling of anyone who dares to disagree with their ideology as racist/sexist/homophobic... But they're too blind to see it.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 01:24 PM
21

Pretty epic amount of salt, isn't it..? The sad thing is they're so serious about it. They simply can not fathom a world where people reject their twisted ideology, and perceive that kind of rebuke as the end of all things. Forget meth... Kool-aid is a helluva drug!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 11:08 AM
10

LOL
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 08:18 AM
129

Which, of course, she did. I just never thought she'd create an actual card.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:59 AM
63

Read the two Krugman pieces... Those stuck out to me. He thinks the world has ended.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:51 AM
68

I had to look at the URL like 5 times to make sure I wasn't getting sent to a troll site...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:41 AM
23

You just described my feelings exactly.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:39 AM
105

Here's a good place to start... http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:38 AM
155

Holy SHIT, that's fucking REAL?!?!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:37 AM
34

Where is Title IX..? Why, it's been re-purposed and is currently being used to set up kangaroo courts in colleges all over the country to make sure that any guy who gets accused of a whiff of sexual impropriety has his life ruined. ...at the behest of our president.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:15 AM
2

I'd argue that they DO want to tap it... Just not in the way you imagine. What they want is to be able to use her as a shield, and frame every criticism of her as misogyny, just as they have framed every criticism of Obama as racist.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:09 PM
16

This is basic civics, and one would think students and others affiliated with a prestigious Ivy League institution would know this. I think that it is precisely the opposite. It is the Ivy League schools that have been effected the most by SJW-type activism, often led by the professors themselves.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:14 PM
2

I think that the people who have noticed are not among the people she cares about.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:15 AM
14

As I said in another thread... She's just counting on her audience to digest the words before "unless".
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:14 AM
1

Oh, okay... And "Top Sports Agent Says that Female athletes 'suffer big pay gap' compared to MEN..." Who fucking CARES..? Men are generally better at some things and Women are generally better at others...
/r/MensRights26/09/16 10:09 PM
7

I don't have a problem with it being a woman... I just have a problem with it being Hillary.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 12:17 PM
4

The correct response (imo) would be to call the cops on her and say she hit him. Good luck with that one... Chances are they'd haul your ass to jail and treat her as the victim. Isn't male privilege great?
/r/MensRights24/09/16 12:14 PM
16

Try putting out some satire the other way around and see what you get out of it.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 12:23 PM
42

Strong independent womyn needs man to buy her a diamond.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:07 AM
15

What I came here to say. I love the female form, and I appreciate the unique beauty of the various individual women I encounter, so I have no problem with it when a woman gets excited about the attributes of a man... As long as they're not being hypocrites about it all.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:08 PM
17

Yes, they can... They'll block you and call you a victim blaming, rape excusing misogynist... And then they'll never inconvenience themselves with anything you said ever again. Rinse and repeat until successful echo chamber.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 09:45 PM
9

"Trust and Safety Council" is about as Orwellian as it gets. 1984 was meant to be a warning, not a road map!
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:50 PM
1

Interesting... I'll have to take your word for it, because I stopped actively reading both Time and Newsweek about 30 some odd years ago, when I got old enough to recognize how incredibly biased they were.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 11:31 AM
11

Yes, but the original article was posted two years ago at the height of the entire fight over the so-called "Fair Pay Act". Plus, the White House, to this day, are still parroting the bullshit 79% stat on their website.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:17 PM
10

Updated just a couple of weeks ago. I wonder what the changes were.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:26 PM
25

True enough, but Time itself usually has a pretty far left bent. I am surprised they would give any space at all to someone like Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:25 PM
201

Great article. Frankly, I am astonished that Time is allowing it.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 12:44 PM
14

Why am I completely unsurprised that Abrams is the founder of The Mary Sue..?
/r/MensRights23/07/16 01:10 PM
10

Actually, the other people were "harassing" her prior to Milo ever Tweeting, in the first place. The entire reason Milo chimed in was because he thought it was ridiculous how much she was playing up her victim status.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:56 AM
4

If women are so concerned about upsetting others... As far as third wave feminists go, they couldn't care less about upsetting others. They only care about other people upsetting them.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:32 PM
1

Everyone loses, so everyone wins. Pretty much sums up liberal thinking in a nutshell...
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:48 PM
190

They fully realize what is going on. It intrudes upon their narrative. They're not so much trying to convince everyone else of what they're saying as they are trying to convince themselves, in order to prevent the fantasy narrative they've constructed over the years from imploding.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 08:05 AM
26

Litigate. As much as possible. It's the only current solution. The DOE actually pushed for this to happen, at Obama's behest. Any appeals to them will only fall on deaf ears. The only way to end these kangaroo courts is to sue them out of existence. As far as support, I think everyone here would be very supportive of you. We don't want this happening to anyone. It's true that this is seen as more of a men's rights issue, because the primary targets of this have almost exclusively been men, but w…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 03:44 PM
12

A better start would have Al Sharpton paying millions for the rest of his life for this.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:59 AM
1

"White people don't know what it's like to be poor."
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:07 PM
1

There are people who HAVE to make a living selling weed, eh? Wow. I don't believe it should be illegal, but still... If you get involved in illegal activity, you know the risks. And the penaltiesshould be the same for everyone.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:36 PM
3

And that's total bullshit. These are people who know that they have children who depend on them, and they commit crimes, anyway. How great of parents can they be? I have people who depend on me, too, but just because they aren't my children, fuck me, right?
/r/MensRights06/05/16 03:34 AM
5

Good Lord, that sounds like a Social Justice wet dream. And I thought that they only used 1984 as a how-to guide. I used to want a big family, myself, but circumstances prevented it for a while, and now I am getting too old. Thankfully, with my job, there really isn't a way for me personally to experience discrimination because I don't have kids, but I have seen first-hand how men without kids get treated. They're always the first to be asked to work late, or to take the vacation days no one els…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:44 PM
37

Yeah, but either one getting a break just because they managed to squirt a kid into the world at some point is bullshit. If you want to see real discrimination, take a look at men who don't have kids versus virtually anyone who does, male or female.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:17 PM
1

It's a pretty consistent pattern of the guy not agreeing to press charges. But if it's the other way around, and the woman is the victim, and says she doesn't want to press charges, they're probably going to, anyway. As well they should... It just needs to go both ways.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:08 PM
19

One reporter called a few only to get told that men cannot be victims and to just admit/confess to what they did wrong. That is fucking infuriating...
/r/MensRights01/05/16 04:06 PM
8

Yeah... But of course she is concerned with how prison affects women. She's worried she'll be one of them.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:00 AM
2

As a cab driver, I had a woman refuse to get out of my cab, and tell me that she was going to accuse me of raping her. Thankfully, I was on the phone with 911 at the time, and the operator heard her say it. It literally went: "I've called the police on you." "Good! I'll just tell them that you raped me!"
/r/MensRights26/04/16 12:00 AM
0

Only if you have your head stuck in the sand, with your fingers plugging your ears. You're still too obtuse to even understand that the article was written to say that there is nothing wrong with calling these women sheng nu, and that they deserve it for not getting married early enough. That kind of wanton ignorance can't be reasoned with, and I am done trying. I hope you grow up someday.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:41 PM
0

I think you have it backward. You're so biased to believe that women are privileged everywhere in the world that you are blind to the treatment of women in China. You just can't get it through your thick skull that women are seen as worthless there, unless they tow the line and become good little housewives, and that the problem is so bad that even supposed women's advocacy groups look down on them. There is even an incredibly derogatory slur used to describe them. I can't tell if you're just st…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:24 PM
0

It's only the premise of the entire article... It only says it in pretty much every sentence.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:08 PM
1

It's that no one should feel sorry for them when they complain that they can't get married. They're not complaining about not being married. These are women who are largely self-sufficient. They have masters degrees and PhDs. But in the eyes of most of Chinese society, they are lowly sheng nu... to be looked down on... because they have yet to get married. The article was saying that they deserved to be looked down on. Because in their eyes, the only way women can be worth anything is if they ge…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 06:09 PM
1

EDIT: Have to rewrite this... Have you read the original article Yes... The article was from a supposed Women's advocacy group, about SHENG NU. They were saying that no one should take pity on the lowly sheng nu, because those women only have themselves to blame for the fact that they haven't been able to get married yet. They're either too ugly for anyone to want them, or have other issues, and, according to this supposed "Women's advocacy group", no one should care about them. The theory they …
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:38 AM
0

Apparently not marrying a woman is equivalent to shitting on them. Sheng nu is a term meant to insult women who don't get married early enough. A woman's advocacy group embracing that term and saying that women are bad people for being less eligible for marriage IS shitting on them. Anyone who says that, including you, is shitting on them. It's called a free ride for a reason. It's not a free ride. It's much closer to slavery. They are subordinate. They don't make their own decisions. The husban…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:44 PM
1

You think that shitting all over a woman because she doesn't get married early enough is a good thing, and I'm supposed to be delusional..?! You also seem to think that total dependency on another person is somehow a privilege, rather than a restriction. THAT'S fucking delusional. Yeah... We're done here.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:31 PM
1

Where? Did you fail to read it? It was taken from an article titled 'Leftover Women Do Not Deserve Our Sympathy' and that's from a supposed women's advocacy group. The term for those women who can not find a husband early on is 'sheng nu', and it is incredibly derogatory. They're not saying that it sucks that these women are less eligible. They're saying that these women are bad people for being less eligible. And again, that's from a supposed women's advocacy group. A) You are legally financial…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 11:20 PM
1

Repeating this doesn't make it true The fact that it's true makes it true. YOU then equate marriage eligibility to "value". No. THEY DO. NOT ME. THEM. They're not complaining about older women being less eligible for marriage. They're shitting on those women for BEING less eligible.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:26 PM
1

Again, this is because of the very real financial burden placed on the parents because of the privileges women are given due to societies overvaluation of them. Chinese society doesn't overvalue them. They place almost no value on them AT ALL. Women with PhDs are valued less than women who can marry early and well. How fucked up is that? Are you even going to try to tell me that a woman with a PhD in another society would be without value? Even in Chinese society, that should connotate at least …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:09 PM
1

The point is that men have no inherent value, while women do. WTF..?! Seriously... It's the exact opposite. Women have so little value, that they are usually aborted... And even if they are allowed to live, their value is tied to how early and how well they can marry a man. Not that men have it that great, either, mind you... But at least they're almost always allowed to live, and are valued for more than just who they can marry.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:49 PM
0

To me...? WTF. NO. To Chinese society.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:31 PM
0

They are also valued inasmuch as they can contribute to society through their work That's bullshit. I just pointed out to you that even women with PhDs are considered worth less, because they've past their prime age to marry. Honestly, this is not a case that you can even attempt to make while connected to any sense of reality. Women in China are FAR from privileged. From the moment they are conceived, they are considered worth less than men, and it only goes downhill from there.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:26 PM
1

Where the hell did you get that ridiculous idea..? Women are valued insomuch only in respect to how successfully they can marry. I really can't believe that you're trying to argue that women in China are privileged. It's like a sick joke, or something.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:06 PM
1

Holy shit... First of all, the Chinese divorce rate is less than 4%. From Wikipedia... In March 2011, the All-China Women's Federation posted a controversial article titled 'Leftover Women Do Not Deserve Our Sympathy' shortly after International Women's Day.[16] An excerpt states, "Pretty girls do not need a lot of education to marry into a rich and powerful family. But girls with an average or ugly appearance will find it difficult" and "These girls hope to further their education in order to i…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:58 PM
-3

Doesn't exist in modern china. For all practical purposes it does. And you're kind of making my case for me. Females are seen as a burden, while males are not. Females are far more likely to be killed before they see the light of day. They are far less valued in Chinese society. That hardly sounds privileged, to me.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:40 PM
-7

Of course it's negligible. Unless you think it is some sort of burden for parents to care for their children. They'd have to give the same care for males, until a certain age, too. The females get married off early and are often never even seen again. Are you seriously suggesting that Chinese women would accept with open arms the same financial responsibilities that men have? In most cases they already do. They get married to, and serve, men that have those responsibilities. And HELL yes they wo…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:21 PM
-10

No. Just... no. Using the word "privilege" to describe Chinese females is ludicrous. You're right that it had a lot to do with the one-child policy, which they only started phasing out last year. Male children were (and still are) more valuable than females. Exceptions were very hard to come by, but one of the only ways to be granted an exception is if your first child was a girl. A parent's legal obligation to take care of a daughter until she gets married is negligible, considering the lack of…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:08 PM
34

He didn't say anything of the sort, and he's right that it might be closer to 67% if China didn't kill off so many female babies, in favor of males. There are a lot of places in this world where women really do have serious issues, especially China, which makes the western-centric style of third-wave feminism all the more ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 05:01 PM
3

It would be great if we would move toward single person bathrooms and stalls so that none of this ever matters anymore.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:18 AM
4

It was a stunning statement that showed the “comedian” to be both unfunny and incredibly sexist. THAT'S the statement it took to show her as an unfunny, sexist hack..? I mean... She has a long history. She's an incredibly toxic, horrible person.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:58 AM
5

I wish you were joking and they didn't actually believe this...
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:29 AM
1

The guy standing with the microphone was the one clearly speaking the loudest. Even so, what evidence do we have of a mistranslation..? And why would it matter? Clinton can only respond to the question she's asked.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:49 AM
1

The man asking the question is clearly not speaking French. Your position that the man randomly seated in the audience is actually a translator?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:35 AM
1

I watched the video. I heard him in his own words. It was NOT mistranslated.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:05 PM
2

Have to agree. I have a lot of things against Hillary, but this is not one of them. That question was outright rude, and wasn't mistranslated at all.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:07 AM
6

I have no doubt that the job has a lot of bullshit involved with it. Government loves red tape. But this woman used her position of power in an abusive manor, and a child is dead because of it. She used her authority to threaten this man into silence in order to hide actual abuse, instead of protecting children from abuse, as she is supposed to.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:29 AM
11

I disagree about her being a victim of the system. She clearly felt she had the ability to take his son away from him, and used that as a threat, so she could have done something to stop this. She is one of the reasons that the system is so abusive.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:54 AM
14

That's the part that sickens me the most. They actually threatened him for reporting her abuse. And I bet that woman doesn't feel a bit of remorse about it.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:46 AM
216

Not only that, but in the minds of many of those people, his suicide will be proof that he was guilty.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:12 PM
3

I mean... How would we ever get role models in the first place..?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 02:11 PM
1

But everybody loves Opera and her kids!
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:01 PM
4

His career got destroyed before he ever had a chance to respond to the charges.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 08:00 AM
1

She went a little overboard... If she had just filed nine, she would have been fine. /s
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:15 PM
1

I think you mean "womyn", shitlord...
/r/MensRights08/01/16 04:00 AM
17

No. The people who put him in jail over this are the ones who should really be paying the highest price here. False accusations are one thing, but using your power to destroy a man's life over a dream is on a whole other level...
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:48 AM
98

It's worse than that. The Obama administration is behind the push to use Title IX to force colleges to go after men accused of any sort of sexual impropriety, strip them of any means of defending themselves, and insist that they prove themselves innocent... then expelling them anyway. You can literally thank Obama for mattress girl...
/r/MensRights14/12/15 01:20 PM
5

"Bitch, go get a goldfish" LMAO!!! Fucking priceless!
/r/MensRights10/12/15 08:55 PM
3

Would it be OK for a civil rights activist to mirror a Nazi site to make sure it wasn't getting advertising? So close to self-awareness... and yet so very far.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:09 PM
11

Well... Yes. We don't have to believe those women. Obviously, those ones were lying.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 05:20 AM
8

The fact that they're saying that in a letter that is specifically designed to shut down discussion on men's issues is mind-boggling.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:17 PM
2

Im too drunk to appropriately respond to everything else you said Haha... Right on. Monday's are usually my night to drink and kick back, too. But I screwed up this week, and I have to work. I really should be working right now, but I need more sleep first. Also, reddit. Damn you, reddit! Anyway, I was VERY active for that election... Trust me when I tell you that it wasn't liberals who were flocking to Perot. It was exactly the kind of people who are flocking to Trump right now. Lazy political …
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:43 AM
2

Him dropping out of the senate race suggests that insider politics has him pegged as the presumptive nominee. Of course, it's all very up in the air at the moment, but that alone suggests both he and the Republican leadership know something that isn't yet clear to the public. Are we talking about the same Republican leadership that pushed Bush on us..? There couldn't be more of a disconnect between the establishment and the voters. I don't think that the leadership has anything to do with it. I …
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:14 AM
3

He just let everyone else do it for him. And anytime anyone criticized him about anything, or pointed out the absurdity of the things he was saying, or the hypocrisy of what he was doing, they were quickly branded as racists.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:37 AM
2

All of the justices appointed under Obama have been middle aged (Sotomayer was 55, Kagan 50). Compare this to Thomas (43) and you end up with legacies that extend far past the expiration date of the presidency. Be that as it may... Women tend to live quite a bit longer than men; especially black men. Women live an average of five years longer than men (81/76) and ten years longer than black men (71)... Mostly due to heart disease. I just don't want to see another SCOTUS justice that compares hea…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:55 PM
2

Then you're looking at replacing current conservative judges with a conservative... Stacking the court with conservatives would require getting rid of the liberals. they view the court as a political football and try to nominate people who will be there for the next 40 years, rather than actually choosing the right person for the job. You're losing me... Because that's exactly what the Democrats just did. In fact, it was the Democrats that started treating judicial nominees like political footba…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:19 PM
2

I think the only way Hillary loses is if she takes it for granted. I don't think she has a chance to win, at all, unless Trump runs third party and splits the vote on the right. Consider this... The very lackluster Romney only lost to Obama by less than 4% of the popular vote, and Obama is still WAY more popular than Hillary. A lot of conservatives stayed home in 2012. That won't happen in 2016, especially if Hillary is nominated. Conversely, Hillary is not very well liked, even among the left. …
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:36 PM
1

Identity politics rears its ugly head again... =/
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:59 PM
2

I think that it depends heavily on the field. As a general principle, you're right, of course... But it doesn't always play out that way. For instance, I don't see anyone knocking Hillary out (except maybe Hillary herself). Reddit may love Bernie, but most of the country, even Democrats, don't have a lot of time for an old, white Northeastern socialist. I think the Democrats are stuck with Hillary this time... But on the other side..? Pretty much anything can happen, and I really doubt that Trum…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:51 PM
1

Big mistake, in my opinion. But Obama in 2008 was a juggernaut. There were people literally worshiping the guy. Hillary never had that kind of pull, and her support among the general populace is even less now than it was when she lost to Obama.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:47 AM
1

Carson's past is better than most (if not all), and the fact that he is not a political insider, already mired in the beltway, is what a lot of people find appealing. But you are right about the polls. They are definitely not the be-all end-all. They just measure the wind, and the winds can change direction at any time... This is politics, after all. Around this time in 2007, everyone was just so sure that Hillary was going to be the Democrat nominee, and the next president.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:41 AM
1

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html Serious enough to be the only one actually close to Trump in the polls, and even beating Trump in some of them. Usually getting numbers higher than Rubio and Cruz combined. I like both Rubio and Cruz (I have some issues with all of the candidates, including Carson, but that is neither here, nor there), but neither one of them has the support they need to actually win this thing.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:18 AM
6

He didn't need to. He had tons of surrogates doing it for him.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:39 AM
2

I don't know. I think that Trump's support is stagnant. The people who support him are die-hards, and the people who oppose him are equally set in stone. I don't see his numbers changing. He's stuck at about 40%. That's enough to be leading the race right now, but as the number of candidates dwindle down, that other 60% is going to coalesce behind someone else... Probably Carson.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:33 AM
25

Except that won't happen. What will happen is that she'll make all sorts of questionable decisions, do some really shady shit, and anyone that calls her out for it will be demonized by her supporters and the media as a woman hater... The last eight years should be all the proof anyone needs of that.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:24 AM
4

Not necessary. The thread is locked already.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:05 PM
3

She knows. She doesn't care.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:01 AM
1

It goes even farther than that for some of them. I've seen more than one of them say that any PIV is rape, no matter what.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:11 AM
6

What's even better is that they approach the subject as though sex were a commodity that the man is taking from the woman, as if women don't enjoy sex as much as men do. Kind of gives you some insight into how they view pretty much everything in life.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:41 PM
12

Their ideas wouldn't resonate enough in an open discussion, and so they seek to shut down any open discussions.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:12 AM
2

This all reminds me of a radio advert that I used to hear every day... It always ended with "Women and minorities encouraged to apply!!!" Hrmmm... I wonder which group ISN'T encouraged to apply..?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 09:23 AM
13

This basically sums up what I came here to say. I agree with most of the overall points of the article, but when the day comes that women have their entire lives destroyed to satiate the whims of extremist political activists, THEN we can start talking about how this new paradigm is "as damaging to women as it is to men".
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:19 PM
1

False rape claims are just an excuse to "open up new dialogue"... Didn't you know that?
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:14 AM
10

You can't be serious... It would definitely be the left wing "War on Women" types that would get out the pitchforks over this.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:30 AM
1

Or more accurately, I know that this shit is not nearly as tough as having a full-time job. I suppose that would depend on the job, wouldn't it? None of this is set in stone. It is all variable. I see the difference between having a job versus a career as very similar to the difference between someone who simply does the housework, and a homemaker. I place a great deal of value on an actual homemaker, because I believe it takes a lot of love and care, which can not be paid for. Similarly, one ca…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 10:40 PM
0

I have, but you are apparently ignoring what I am trying to point out to you, and that is that finances are not the only thing on the table, here, and, if the goal is to even things out (which seems to me to be a faulty venture, in the first place), then those other things need to be considered, as well. Marriage is a mutual endeavor. Support goes both ways. Alimony is a parasitical arrangement, where one spouse is released from all obligations, and the other is not. Only one spouse is required …
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:54 PM
1

You are not worse off continuing Your life just like it was except suddenly You have double or more disposable income. No, you can't. That's exactly the point. The contributions of the other spouse were what allowed you to work as much as you were, in the first place. Unless you find someone to replace those contributions, you will not be able to generate the same amount of income. And where in the world did you get this idea that paying for a maid to do some housework would somehow be cheaper o…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:03 PM
0

Finances are not the only concern, and nothing else gets equaled out. That's the problem. You don't seem willing to consider that. Also, often the finances don't get truly equaled out, but from your other posts, you do clearly recognize that.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:00 PM
0

Ah, but they DO very much relate to the topic at hand. In the case of alimony, one spouse is required to keep contributing to a marriage that no longer exists, while the other spouse withdraws all support, unconditionally. The entire concept is broken.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 03:20 AM
0

You really can't comprehend that, in the scenarios we're describing, where one spouse works outside the home (and provides monetary income to the family) and the other spouse works inside the home (providing for a home life), that both roles are equally important? You have trouble comprehending that the spouse providing the monetary support for the family would not be able to do so at that level, without the material support of the other spouse? You have trouble understanding that when one spous…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 03:08 AM
0

Yeah, it must be Poe's law when you can't refute anything I've said, right?
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:21 AM
0

Sorry, but that is bullshit. In the type of scenarios we're talking about, her contributions during the marriage are what made it possible for him to spend so much time working. Now, in the divorce, he is not only expected to continue to do that, without her support, but also to continue to support her, as he always has, AND create a second household. He's basically being made into a slave.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:24 AM
2

The concept is inherently flawed, unless you're taking the very sexist position that the woman's contributions during the years of marriage were negligible compared to the man's. If the woman is no longer required to provide any sort of support to the man, then why should the man still be required to provide any support to the woman? He is no longer a beneficiary of ANY of her contributions, but still required to contribute as he always has... And we wonder why so many children grow up without f…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:11 PM
2

You mean he has 20 years of work experience and a salary that used to be sufficient for two people or more. It used to be sufficient for two people or more. In one household. But now he still has to pay for that household, while basically being banished from it. He still has to work constantly, and doesn't have much time for anything else, and, on top of that, he has to figure out a way to pay for a second household... to say nothing about making an actual home. He's basically being turned into …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:01 PM
5

And, functionally, he is going to be worse off. He has spent 20 years working constantly, with little time for anything else, and creating a decent home life is difficult. This is a sacrifice he has made, like all men, for the marriage, the family, and the woman.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:08 AM
10

It still never made sense, since in those scenarios one spouse was providing material support, and the other spouse financial. She is no longer required to provide any sort of support for the man, but he is required to maintain the same level of support she has always been used to? Alimony has ALWAYS been bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:06 AM
251

Apparently they can try, really hard, to rationalize this... This could be cross posted to /r/rage
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:04 PM
0

Which is why I noted that in such a case, they'd actually be right, for a change. Or did you skip over that part?
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:21 AM
0

If she were suicidal, and some guy she thought loved her was discovered to have been encouraging her to kill herself (and even helping her plan it), what do you think the reaction from the third wave feminists would be? Or the media? And in such a case, they'd actually be right, for a change. I bet she even thought it was funny and empowering to manipulate him like she did.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:46 PM
3

I think you'll find that we don't have a lot in common with the feminists... especially the third wave feminists.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:19 PM
2

And yes, you're welcome to call me a fag, fudge packer, homo, etc. My skin's not made of tissue paper. I don't know what you've heard, or where you've heard it, but that is not something that we, as a group, tend to engage in.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 03:24 PM
2

I'm guessing that they'll only get rid of it where it is perceived to adversely affect women...
/r/MensRights17/08/15 07:55 AM
3

How is this a men's rights issue? Poor effort, OP.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:45 AM
3

I agree... And you can't bring people to Christ by force. It just doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:15 PM
2

Ummm no. No they can't.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:23 AM
2

That the girlfriend didn't really have any objections to this, for one. I got the impression that they were already trying to get a wedding together, but that they couldn't quite get things the way they wanted them.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:21 AM
142

Isn't forcing someone to write bible verses as a punishment unconstitutional Extremely so... It isn't even in question. There isn't even a fine line here. And I say this as a Christian. This is not the domain of the judiciary.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 03:26 PM
18

I heard about this on the radio on my way home a bit ago... but somehow I got a FAR different impression of this story. I made a post replying to you a couple of minutes ago, but it was SO wrong that no strike-through could salvage it... so I delete it. This judge should be disbarred and removed from the bench.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 03:23 PM
0

And they have it. The Supreme Court just ruled this year that all gay marriage is legal... Which is a decision that I support... I just wish that the government had NO involvement in marriage, AT ALL... because I think that they have basically destroyed families.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:09 PM
3

This doesn't really even have anything to do with transgender people. They're not trying to promote transgender people by doing this... They're just trying to shame anyone who identifies as the sex they were born with (Cisgender) and gain some oppression points.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:04 PM
2

Not sure I see that connection...
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:28 AM
11

I agree. And the bolder they get, the more they expose their true nature. It will collapse under its own weight.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:33 AM
21

I don't think that's necessary. They're already pros at being obnoxious and shitting on pretty much everyone. The facade they put on about just being for equality is paper thin.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:24 AM
43

I wish they would do shit like this more often. It exposes their blatant hypocrisy and hatefulness to a much wider audience.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:29 AM
1

Given the way the SJWs have been shitting all over homosexuals lately (especially gay white men), maybe you weren't actually supporting a SJW cause, after all..?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:23 PM
3

We're talking about people who are terrified that they might get exposed to a point of view that isn't pre-approved. They're already mindless.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:40 PM
30

Also it seems like it would generate a ton of "false positives", considering the fact most of the subs they seem to hate are not ban happy (unlike the circlejerk subs that they seem to love), and I have seen a lot of contrary posters in subs like /r/MensRights and /r/KotakuInAction. I appear to be on a list, as well, and I am fine with it. Let them label me. If someone is so myopic that they need to put people in a box so they can feel good about ignoring them, then they aren't worth my time, an…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 09:38 PM
2

Yes, you have... But that is the difference between us and the people who oppose us. We do not ban people we disagree with... We just tell them why we disagree.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 12:00 AM
3

the same benefit of the doubt we would offer a man. She's already getting more than that. If the roles had been reversed, it would be considered evidence that the man was abusive, and justification to block him from ever seeing his kids.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:31 PM
4

It didn't seem to me that you felt it was a good thing when you characterized it as her getting "screwed over" and us attacking a woman.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:20 PM
7

And rightfully so.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:07 PM
8

If I understood the article, You clearly didn't. they say it was legal if she believed he was abusing the kids. Her lawyers claimed that. The claim was rejected. Women claim things like this all of the time, in order to get an upper hand in custody battles. She screwed herself. She broke the law in an attempt to make sure the kids' father would be blocked from being a part of their lives.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:04 PM
8

He did far more than that. His administration has been pushing Title IX on colleges in ways that has resulted in men's lives being destroyed on accusations alone, with no meaningful way to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:08 PM
2

The younger generation's It isn't just the younger generation... This is just a new form of what has been happening for decades. sense of justice tends to be based on emotion rather than fairness Pretty much the textbook definition of an SJW. starting with the universities Because Obama himself is in agreement that Title IX should be used to push radical leftist agendas, and his administration has been forcing universities to adopt a hardline stance against anyone (male) accused of any sort of s…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:24 AM
1

What... so now Women = SJW? Really..? Because if you really believe that every woman in the country is against you, then you've already gone far beyond lost.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:05 AM
2

NOT "feminine" principles... FeminIST principles. More specifically, RADfem principles. This has NOTHING to do with sexuality, and EVERYTHING to do with IDEOLOGY.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 01:43 AM
0

This is ludicrous. The radfems do not speak for all women and plenty of men swallow their BS. They sure do like to claim that they represent all women. Apparently you listened and believed.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:26 PM
1

What gets me is that they're so close to a truth, but so unable to see it. The misandry is so strong in them, even though (of course) it doesn't exist. Anyone alone at night in a major city, male or female, can be a target for criminals. They actually think the solution to criminal sexual assault it to "teach men not to rape", as if western society honors rapists, or something.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:28 PM
2

Don't you know that the patriarchy is to blame for men not being allowed to have feelings? Did you not read the script?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:21 PM
28

They're not bad at math... They just don't CARE about math. They only care about "The Narrative"TM
/r/MensRights06/07/15 09:06 AM
1

Seems a little like jumping the gun, here. If it's true, then it's not even a men's issue, but a First Amendment issue. IF it's true. We're only getting the information from the lawsuit, and one side of it. I suppose it could happen, but schools are far more predisposed in this day and age to squelch any religion, rather than act in behalf of it.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:13 PM
1

My mistake.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 06:00 PM
37

That's a good point. Also, I read her article. She is clueless about the fact that tattoos are a collaborative work. Her approach to the whole thing was like she was ordering a Big Mac at McDonald's...
/r/MensRights13/06/15 10:08 PM
121

She's a shitheal. The guy refuses to ink her, and then she suddenly decides that his work sucks. But, of course, his work was good enough to be permanently etched on her body before that.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 07:54 PM
1

I don't think people who like being judgemental and handing down this type of retribution really care who their targets are.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:35 PM
5

Or it will just end with more people being treated shitty.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:30 PM
10

I'm so fucking sick of this trend where we use accusations to destroy every aspect of a person's life. Okay, fine, it usually happens to men, and this time it is a woman. But it is wrong when it happens to men, so it should be just as wrong to do it to a woman. How about we start using the criminal justice system to deal with criminal acts, and stop trying to push colleges, employers, and sports entities into the law enforcement field?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 11:39 AM
5

Holy crap... That hipster "ally" guy is SO cringeworthy!
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:58 AM
4

I think the gossip is the real issue. This is what I was thinking the entire time I was reading in the other threads that he posted. Those other subs are detestable. For the most part, they basically just told him to shut the fuck up and live with it, and the threads are locked up now. There are tons of deleted posts in them both.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:06 PM
3

I'm sorry, but this is bullshit. If a woman has sex with multiple men (consensual, or not), there simply is no way one can reasonably decide which one got her pregnant, absent empirical evidence. But she did it anyway, and she was motivated by her desire to see the case re-opened. She lied. She lied on purpose.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:53 PM
5

So who is lying here exactly? SHE was, and demonstrably so. You, yourself, said that she could not have known (assuming that she was raped) who the father was, and yet that is EXACTLY what she claimed to have known. She lied. Not only did she lie, she lied for a very specific purpose, with a specific goal in mind... To reopen the case.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:23 PM
7

How exactly would a woman KNOW that a particular man impregnated her if she had sex with more than one man in a short period of time? That's exactly the point, isn't it? She COULDN'T know. But, whether or not she was raped, there are things that she DID know. She knew that she had sex with at least one other man around the time of the alleged rape, and that the pregnancy might not have been a result of that alleged rape... Yet she insisted that she became pregnant as a result of being raped. The…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:57 PM
3

But they don't care about their credibility, and never have. All they care about is their perpetual victimhood, and that is what they use to promote themselves and their cause. Victimhood is attractive to a lot of people who feel like they aren't getting everything they want in life. They sure as hell don't want to blame themselves for all of the ills in their own lives. Who better to blame than the "oppressor"? And who better to cast as the oppressor than the evil white males?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:32 PM
1

I read somewhere else that it was actually just one redpiller that called for a boycott of the movie, and that the guy in question is considered somewhat of an extremist, even in those circles. It now sounds like someone blew it out of proportion.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:24 PM
2

If there is some reason that we all supposedly hate Mad Max, then I have yet to hear of it...
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:57 AM
1

That's the coolest thing I've seen all day. How does this even work?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:56 AM
69

True, but this one reminded me of the recent case where the woman put her baby in a dumpster to die when she could have taken it across the street to the firehouse and put it in the baby box... Where the baby would have lived and no questions asked.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:46 PM
8

Wait. I am confused. Isn't it these same types of people who fervently deny that a "welfare state" even exists? Now, not only do they admit it exists, but that they defend it?
/r/MensRights10/05/15 02:12 AM
19

However, the courts will be looking at both sides of the story and Wyatt's side of the story is that Vince was abusive and left her destitute while he went out and grew his business. What the hell?! He didn't even start the business until after they divorced an the psycho bitch stole his child.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:18 AM
3

They'll never do that, because it wouldn't give them the results that they want. The goal was never to actually fix an existing problem. The goal all along has been to reinforce a victim mentality, and they've been pretty successful at it.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:08 PM
1

And pressured them to make some pretty ridiculous claims that were also dismissed.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:00 PM
2

They literally live in "Opposites Day". I'd say that it has overtones of Orwell's 1984, where freedom = slavery, war = peace, and ignorance = strength, but it goes so WAY FAR beyond it.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:28 AM
0

None of this matters, because we all know all of these problems are because PATRIARCHY! /s EDIT: Please tell me that all of you are smart enough to know that the SJW crowd would blame every single one of these problems on " The PatriarchyTM ", and that they'd do it with a straight face.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:43 PM
3

How would that help their whole "war on women" mantra?
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:25 PM
9

But if the critiques were "Her arguments do not hold water under scrutiny. The statistics show [blank] which opposes Clinton's claims" - that would be a perfectly fine and appropriate critique. I doubt that people will actually cry "sexism!" for the latter. Really..? They cry racism all the time for any critique of Obama, no matter how appropriate. Why else do you think they want Hillary? They can push through radical aspects of their agenda, and label anyone opposed as a bigot, just like they'v…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:10 PM
1

I would have to disagree. It is really only the third wave feminists that are complete and total nutjobs. And those are the ones that will even attack other feminists, if they think that they aren't being radical enough.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:23 AM
8

Unfortunately, it seems that in our current court climate, it is logic that is being destroyed.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:38 PM
18

And you know damned well there are a bunch of SJWs out there that won't care anything about this and still go on with their "listen and believe" bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 12:56 PM
1

Why is it the only way people can defend this asinine idea is to pretend that we'd toss away people unable to prove a rape happened? Because they're fundamentally dishonest. They're still calling her a "rape victim" even after it's beyond obvious that she outright lied.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:29 PM
2

They don't care. In their SJW circles, this makes them look like heroes.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:54 PM
1

What's even more twisted is that the ones crying the loudest about this typically see nothing wrong with it being done to people they don't like.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:06 AM
2

If these women were doxxed and had their lives threatened, as they claim, then that is certainly wrong. However, given their strong desire to construct their special snowflake victim status, I can't take their claims at face value, and we all know full well that the radfems have no problem with doxxing and threatening (and attacking the livelihoods) of anyone who irks them.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 12:54 AM
5

...women famously earn much less than men on average, even in traditionally female-dominated fields. Some women experience discrimination when they try to take maternity leave. Men just out of college with the same degrees and jobs still make more than women, and the higher a woman rises in business, the less likely she is to be paid as much as her male counterparts. What a bunch of horseshit. sigh
/r/MensRights25/01/15 02:07 AM
1

The third wave is alienating so many people. Sad to see, since there are so many causes for true feminism still left to face, the world over.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter