TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SimulatedEnvironment Archive

View 1 post and 216 comments by SimulatedEnvironment on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

SimulatedEnvironment/r/MGTOW19/10/19 03:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Are you a child? I can’t even have an intelligent conversation with you because you’re just spouting nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:50 AM
2

What criteria do they have for what they find attractive and what age range are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 05:17 AM
1

You’re probably right and I wasn’t referring to 18 year olds now. I was going off my experience when I was 18. Most people definitely seem less mature now than what I remember from years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 10:31 PM
1

I agree. I don’t know what that other guy is on about but he’s not worth responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 08:53 PM
0

muh hospital visitation? Edit: u/TemperateSloth I get what you meant now
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:58 PM
5

Men shouldn’t be getting married until sometime in their 30s and then should have already established a career and have their own place by then. At a younger age, they lack the maturity to make the best decisions. Women mature faster so a man in his early to late 30s marrying a girl in her mid 20s to early 30s makes the most sense, since the only reason a man should be entering into marriage is if he wants to have kids. Also, no man should be getting married unless he wants kids. Marriage, as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/21 07:32 PM
6

This kicked me square in the feels. Painful but thanks anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:42 PM
1

I’m sure the world will end before schools will start teaching hypergamy. That being said, how many people do you think frequent this sub who don’t know what hypergamy is? I’d be willing to bet it’s a very small %.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:34 PM
1

Yet another post telling us something we already know. I don’t think anyone is going to argue that women don’t engage in hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/19 08:18 PM
1

Who polices that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 08:05 PM
1

I appreciate all the effort you put into this but isn’t this something we’ve already known? Women tend to act on more emotion and irrational behavior whereas men tend to be more logical and less sensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 07:42 PM
1

Comparatively speaking. You’re taking it in literal terms and not understanding the meaning behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 05:49 PM
1

By that argument, I want sex more often than my gf so therefore she has no sex drive. See how anecdotal information works in mysterious ways?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 05:41 PM
1

Whether it’s 1 woman who won’t have sex and 1 woman who will, at the same time, or several who won’t and several who will, at the same time, is irrelevant. Your OP says, commitment, and what I’m saying is no, you will not get commitment from me if you’re not willing to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 08:29 PM
1

I’d be willing to meet and go dutch for dinner or coffee but I won’t be treating, or at least not anything significant. Like I said, they’d probably bail rather than stick around anyway so it’s practically a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 08:16 PM
1

I should clarify. I have different definitions for the word date. The ones that are interested in sex will get more of my attention and money. A lot more. In fact, the ones that aren’t interested will probably bail on their own anyway. Does that make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 08:08 PM
1

Withhold sex all you want. I’ll keep dating you but at the same time I’ll also date women who are willing to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 06:24 PM
1

Sounds like a lesbian.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 02:21 PM
1

Of course I do. My previous answer isn’t predicated on having the knowledge of the terms I don’t know so it still stands. Women and men can date whomever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 02:17 PM
1

I don’t know what these things are: FebFems RadFems Kinsey scale Women and men can date whomever they want. /thread
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 02:12 PM
1

Firm no for me for several reasons: Lack of maturity Lack of education Lack of worldly knowledge/wisdom gained through life experiences Lack of ability to hold a conversation about current events and/or being able to do so without having her face buried in her phone Lack of independence/ability to support herself Etc. It’s almost as if those are things you’re more likely to gain when you get older. Who’d have thought? Then again I’ve always been partial to women older than me who have their shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 02:14 PM
1

Edited to remove the vulgarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 02:02 AM
1

Go fuck yourself and your condescending attitude. Every time someone mentions the history of the person involved in consensual porn, you discount it and push only the blackmail part. That’s what I meant by you treating the blackmail like it’s happening in a vacuum. Stand by while I cite your answers...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 05:38 PM
1

OP, you keep going back to the blackmail aspect as if it’s happening in a vacuum. It’s not. It’s tied to consensual acts of porn and that’s what people are responding to. You can’t just change the facts to suit your narrative and get answers that agree with your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 05:02 PM
1

For everyone here who may not know what engaging dread/applying dread means, it’s the idea that if you don’t get what you want, you create either a reality or an illusion wherein someone else wants you more and this is supposed to be overt to your partner so they take notice and change their behavior to please you. If I’m wrong, correct me. I didn’t find any good sources to explain the concept so I did what I could.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 04:48 PM
1

Hey man I’m not sure how to break this to you but she fucked other dudes before you and she’ll fuck other dudes after you (she might also fuck other dudes while with you) so worrying about her having nudes at the ready isn’t going to serve you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 08:43 AM
1

I disagree with your 2nd point. That mortgage is the same whether there’s a kid living there or just the women so that doesn’t get to factor into child support. Also, it’s easy to calculate what it costs to feed a child in a given area on a daily basis because it’s already calculated for homeless shelters, college students, etc. There’s resources available that know what an average meal costs in a given area and if there aren’t, it’s not difficult to figure it out. I have to ask you this regardi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/19 08:28 AM
1

What I’m asking is what part of what I said is unclear to you
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 08:59 PM
1

Which part doesn’t make sense to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 08:46 PM
1

I see a flaw in your experiment, OP. “Unless you look unironically like a male model...you have no chance against the sea of other me swiping...your status or finances don’t matter” How would that not extrapolate to all men, including those that you mention are already engaging in this behavior, and not just apply to the men reading your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 07:20 PM
1

I can assure you there’s no shortage of white folks with fuck too attitudes towards other white folks. My point is, in general most people wouldn’t lift a finger to help someone else and that transcends all skin colors. It also correlates with status and financial well-being. But this is just my opinion based on observing situations over my years on this earth so I can’t prove anything. That being said, it’s been my experience and I don’t think I’m unique in this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 10:36 PM
1

Nope. No misunderstanding. Americans in general have a pretty fuck you attitude more and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 07:12 PM
1

Nope. It applies to white people too. I’m white and I’ve been in situations where I needed assistance and more often than not it was a black or brown dude who helped me. Likewise, I’ve been the person to help jumpstart someone’s car on several occasions and each time I could see the look on their face as a PoC when me, a white dude, did what I could to help out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 02:32 PM
1

I’m not sure if that was a typo or not but I do know the ins and outs of why they divorced and it had nothing to do with infidelity or domestic violence. Of course it’s not healthy to stay in a relationship but neither is breaking up a family just because you’re unhappy. I’d be willing to bet a majority of unhappy people place their unhappiness on the marriage when they’re really unhappy with themselves. People are far too quick to blame external factors when there’s plenty of internal ones to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 01:40 PM
1

I was speaking to no-fault divorce. I’m not addressing cheating or abuse since I’m perfectly ok with divorce in those situations. My parents did it. They just found ways to enjoy themselves without each other enough to make the marriage work until I was an adult and then they called it quits. I know other couples that have done that as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 01:14 PM
1

That’s how it worked with my parents and I know of at least a handful of other couples that did the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 01:09 PM
1

Well, you could always try not having kids if you’re not willing to keep your marriage intact. You’re not punishing the kids. The parents punished their own kids when they decided to break up the marriage rather than keep things intact long enough to raise the kids to adulthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 12:54 PM
1

Those countries have great social safety nets for other cases as well. For as much money as the U.S. has, we constantly have a “fuck you” attitude towards our fellow Americans.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 12:51 PM
1

Because they’re feminists and that’s what feminists do...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 10:07 PM
1

How did you glean that from what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 10:38 AM
1

Gotcha. So you don’t like the fact that I’m arguing that men should take their fair share of financial responsibility while I’m also pro-choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 10:06 AM
1

Are you drunk? Do you want to take another stab at that thought and rewrite your comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:56 AM
1

Point out my hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:43 AM
1

Depends where you live and the cost of living. It isn’t expensive to feed and clothe a kid. Don’t come at me with costs of babysitters and such either. If you can’t afford all of that then don’t have a fuckin kid. I’m speaking to both men and women on that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:36 AM
1

Sex is for fun too but like many other activities, you can’t reap the rewards without incurring some risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:34 AM
1

In response to the cases, the women in all of those cases should be charged with rape and should have to register as sex offenders. They did the crime so they should do the time. For the dudes, you gotta take responsibility for your kids. I do agree that the payments should only start once the guy is 18 and has been notified or at least reasonable attempts made to notify. If the guy won’t pay the state has to which means you and I have to pay for someone else’s kid. You good with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:33 AM
1

Your agreeance was noted when you stuck your dick in. If you didn’t want to take responsibility then keep your dick out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:26 AM
1

Don’t get a girl pregnant if you can’t afford the possibility of having a kid. Doesn’t that sound like your mgtow mantra anyway? Not engaging with women and such?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:25 AM
1

Bullet point 1 - cite your sources as I’d like to read the facts of those cases. Bullet point 2 - I’m 100% against NOT allowing women to get abortions under ANY circumstances. I don’t care what their reason for wanting an abortion is. They should be allowed to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:22 AM
1

Then where does the wallet/property factor in?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:20 AM
1

Nah fuck that. The heartbeat is detectable when the fetus is no bigger than the tip of your pinkie. The heartbeat doesn’t mean shit or have any bearing on the conversation. It’s a symbolic tactic used in argument by those that don’t want women to have control over their bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:19 AM
1

Rope who in? Why don’t you as a dude only hook up with women who are at or above your socioeconomic status if you’re worried about getting roped in?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:14 AM
1

The costs for the baby should be split 50/50 between the father and mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:13 AM
1

No. If you don’t want a kid then don’t get her pregnant. Bring your own condoms and keep an eye on them. Otherwise, you don’t get the reward without some risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:12 AM
1

You’re trying to equate money with bodily autonomy? Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:10 AM
1

Unlimited if she’s buying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 07:55 PM
1

Well OP, that includes you too then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 04:10 PM
1

Depends what she orders. If she orders an expensive wine and the surf n’ turf then not only are we splitting but I’m paying for only my own meal and maybe the appetizer.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 07:09 AM
1

The term asshole has no inherent definition. It’s completely subjective. He’s not an asshole for hitting on them initially. I wouldn’t even say he’s a creep for approaching them initially. He was in an LTR and was hurting for some affection and decided to cast a wider net than he probably would have otherwise. However, he became an asshole when he wouldn’t take no for an answer and he increased his level of assholeness (assholery?) when he decided to argue about why he should be allowed to stay …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 08:57 PM
1

You expect maturity from 19-year-olds? Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/19 08:42 PM
1

I didn’t get any of the money back nor did I get legal fees back and the entire process took almost 2 years. Tell me more about my experience while you’re sitting up there on your high horse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 01:16 AM
1

You don’t go to court with a paternity test. You find out someone’s filed a claim when you get a summons and then you hire a lawyer and you have to start paying CS until the case is resolved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 01:00 AM
1

I understand your skepticism. It happened to me and that’s all the anecdotal information I need to believe it’s happened to someone else. After all, I can’t be literally the only person it’s happened to, can I?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 12:45 AM
1

I’m asking if you’re curious or if you don’t believe it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 10:57 PM
1

But it doesn’t take into account infidelity until the infidelity is discovered, which oftentimes is too late as the court has already made its ruling or they’ve already invested years into the relationship. That’s the most important part of this and where the fraud comes into play. You can’t have fraud without deception and if the man knew up front than the kid wasn’t his and chose to stay then there’s no fraud, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 10:57 PM
1

Gotcha. I was talking about the context of infidelity. I’ll edit the comment to clarify that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 07:36 PM
1

Women getting into a relationship with a single dad that has a baby is not the same as a man being deceived into believing a baby is his. They have the choice to not get into the relationship to begin with. The reimbursement for the man staying in the relationship to raise a baby that isn’t his should be funded by the real biological father who chose not to stick around for his baby. Does that not seem fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 05:29 PM
1

It’s produced and directed by women. 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 01:24 PM
1

It should be default policy that a paternity test is immediately done and the results given to the parents unless they choose to opt out. This would relieve a lot of questions about possible infidelity. You may not like the results but you can always choose to opt out before receiving them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 01:24 PM
1

No at home paternity tests. Ok I get that. Do the court ordered tests always occur and are the results given to both parents? I guess you already answered that one so I assume no. Also, I think some dads might still build up resentment just by not knowing. Either way it’s unethical to disallow someone to know if a child is theirs or not and you can call it protecting the child if you want but you also can’t help but draw some correlation to every decreasing birth rates year over year.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 01:05 PM
1

Google is your friend. You can keep your head buried in the sand and not believe it if you want but that doesn’t take away from the fact that it’s true and does occur. If you want to see a good movie on it, The Red Pill goes into depth about men’s issues with things ranging from paternity fraud to not being allowed to see their kids at all yet still having to pay for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 12:58 PM
1

Are you genuinely curious or do you not believe it happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 12:56 PM
1

Forcing families to stay intact only breeds resentment and that’s no better an environment than the alternative.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 12:55 PM
1

Men who knowingly choose to raise kids that aren’t their own should get a reimbursement whether it’s in the form of an increased tax refund or some other form of payment or bonus.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 12:49 PM
1

Age: between 25-40 Sex: M N-count: 127 (90% of these were from age 17-22)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 02:46 AM
1

Nah. No means no and there’s no redefining it to mean: maybe, try harder, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 03:57 AM
1

I get that you just want to ride the elevator. I see nothing in your OP to indicate why you’re questioning if she was being creepy or not. The court of public opinion does affect our daily lives and the fact that they’re often wrong makes it that much worse. Either way, your CMV was that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:07 PM
1

You could very well gather enough people that would agree something is creepy (if only given 2 options: creepy or not creepy) but that doesn’t make it creepy. The court of public opinion is often wrong and people seem to come up with dumber and dumber opinions the larger the group gets. Think echo chamber and the lack of accountability afforded by herd mentality that frequently protects garbage opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 03:28 PM
1

I edited my comment as I meant to type subjective. Always get those two mixed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 03:22 PM
1

Creepiness is an objective term so you’re already wrong since you can’t defeat someone’s opinion of what qualifies a certain person as creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 03:08 PM
1

Of course you’ll claim you’re the victim and you did nothing wrong. That’s childish behavior. Now, let’s stop flinging shit and go ahead and attack my argument. I’ll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 05:50 AM
1

Again with the ad hominem attacks. You’re a 1-dimensional broken record. Reply with a good argument and let’s move this along.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 05:10 AM
1

That’s the best you can come up with? Mostly ad hominem attacks? Go ahead and reply again and let’s see if you can produce a better response. You’re projecting. Take a minute to calm down and formulate a decent argument instead of getting upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 04:00 AM
1

Hypotheticals: $20 dinner 15% gratuity = $3 20% gratuity = $4 Difference = $1 $50 dinner 15% gratuity = $7.50 20% gratuity = $10 Difference = $2.50 $100 dinner 15% gratuity = $15 20% gratuity = $20 Difference = $5 On the higher end, an extra 5% gratuity (easily argued to be worth more than praising someone to their manager) only costs you $5 when you were already going to spend $115. The fact that he’d rather praise someone than tip another $5 in an industry where they’re heavily reliant on tips…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 03:01 AM
1

I’d rather be friends with a woman than be alone because I can tolerate not being intimate with someone but being alone sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 09:06 AM
1

How is complimenting someone for good work sexist?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 09:00 AM
1

Not sure about how everyone else feels but while I’m male, I’m not responsible for the behavior of other males. Just because I share your gender doesn’t make us close to where I share some culpability, and therefore a sense of duty, for your actions. The closer we get to generalizing the behavior of some people as the de-facto behavior of the gender as a whole the less we’re seen as individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 02:54 AM
1

Too risky to date your coworkers unless you were dating them before either or both of you got hired. As far as socializing, I try not to because I can’t be having my coworkers seeing me drunk lest I say something dumb and they parrot it to HR. Nowadays it doesn’t matter if you’re at work or not. HR isn’t taking any chances and they’ll just sack you at the slightest whiff of impropriety regardless or how severe the offense was. The last thing HR wants is for the org to be called out later and for…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 11:25 PM
1

Based on your infographic, PPD is as close as I get to anything possibly related to those subs. Otherwise I’m into 4x4, ham/CB radio, electronics, crypto, politics, outdoor stuff, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 10:54 PM
1

With this account?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 10:49 PM
1

Hah. I only post in PPD. I haven’t visited a single one of those other subs. I do have several accounts though like many other redditors
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 09:30 PM
1

u/StunningLaugh: -Everybody is unique but nobody is replaceable. I believe you meant to say irreplaceable
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 07:12 PM
1

I said opportunity. The opportunity is there but it’s up to you to equip yourself and to put in the work. Be more interesting. I don’t have to explain to you the psychology behind it. I merely stated the opportunity is there. The outcome is not guaranteed and is highly dependent on what you put in but to argue the opportunity isn’t there is disingenuous and makes you reek of bitterness. It sounds to me like you’re projecting your own experiences here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 03:35 AM
1

20 minutes later and your argument is as strong as your ability to grow a beard without medication. In other words, you’ve got nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 03:33 AM
1

I’d like to dumb it down further for you but I can’t do if you don’t understand it by now then I can’t help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 03:10 AM
1

You want a citation that says the demographic makeup of high schools (obviously excluding all-girls and all-boys because they don’t pertain to this discussion) are approximately 50/50 male/female?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 03:04 AM
1

Your personal high school experience doesn’t trump factual information.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/19 03:00 AM
1

When you were in high school half the kids were female and you were always in close proximity to them so you had many more opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 07:51 PM
1

So a gamer is someone who takes care of themselves and has a family and makes a living gaming but a gamer is also someone who doesn’t make a living gaming but games a lot and may or may not have a family and if they have a family, they ignore their family and hygiene. However, a gamer isn’t someone who plays casually because they don’t play enough to meet this arbitrary minimum threshold to be considered a gamer? Thanks for clearing that up. Makes a lot more sense now. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 08:50 PM
1

So someone who does it for a paid living but has other hobbies and a family isn’t a gamer? What would you call them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 08:09 PM
1

Still doesn’t define it. How many hours a day does someone have to game to be a gamer?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 07:33 PM
1

I disagree with you OP until you define what makes someone a gamer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 06:51 PM
2

I said good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 03:24 PM
2

I’m afraid I can’t help you at this point. If you don’t get it by now, I don’t think you ever will. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 03:16 PM
1

I only used the word “objectified” in my most recent reply and I’m not attempting to use it as a pejorative as you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 02:55 PM
1

Yep you still don’t get it. The woman is being objectified. The porn turns her into a thing of pleasure for the viewer. I wouldn’t even say the man is being objectified because there’s little to no focus on him at all. How can you objectify something you’re not paying attention to?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 02:47 PM
1

That’s the one. You don’t understand that most mainstream porn is designed to appeal to men so it’s going to make the woman the focus of it to allow the viewer to substitute themselves into the scene. That’s the mechanism by which porn works. How did you think it worked?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 02:24 PM
1

Read your last sentence in that comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 02:07 PM
1

You obviously don’t understand porn if this is your realistic view of it. The main purpose of porn is to allow the viewer to substitute themselves into the situation and since more men watch porn than women, more of the woman will be featured in the porn. How many straight men would watch porn if it was mostly closeups of the dude’s face, ass, chest/abs, or dick and once in a while, a view of the woman’s snatch? You damn well know the answer to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 04:18 AM
1

Yes it’s ok and that behavior you’re referring to isn’t a case of whether or not it might solicit it. The behaviors you listed are supposed to and actively attempt to solicit it. Were objectification not to exist, porn, modeling, etc. wouldn’t have a basis for existing either.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 04:12 AM
1

I edited my post to make it easier to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:34 AM
1

You’ve got issues and don’t message me again either.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:00 AM
1

Too much risk. Pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 11:51 PM
1

Why do that when you can avoid the risks of rape accusations, pregnancy, and STDs?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 11:06 PM
1

Username checks out and user sounds like a fun guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 10:43 PM
1

You could also just lie to get your numbers up or down and, relatively speaking, nobody can refute your claims unless you kept detailed records and someone found the records. Then I’d argue you’ve got other issues to be concerned about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 10:37 PM
4

I think that’s discriminatory of you. I take a different approach that’s much more inclusive and I treat everyone fairly. Everyone gets a “Hey you!! Yeah you!! Fuck you!!!” from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:02 PM
1

I agree. Stop giving women unsolicited attention as it’s harassment. If they want to be catcalled then they’ll give affirmative consent and make it known that they’d like to be catcalled.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:00 PM
1

It also isn’t take in the sense of claiming a piece of property. It’s take as in accepting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 07:04 AM
1

Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:39 AM
1

U mad bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:36 AM
1

I didn’t even notice your flair until now. I see exactly why you would see your wife as property that belongs to you. If you’re cool with ownership of another human being then I don’t think we have anything else to discuss. Clearly you’re not willing to change your mind so thus ends our conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:33 AM
1

Bullshit. She can fuck whomever she wants and so can he. I’m not saying there won’t be consequences for doing so but to assert that they both can’t do it is wrong. While some states have laws against adultery, there rarely enforced and for all intents and purposes, nonexistent. Think about what the priest asks during a wedding. He asks the bride and groom something very similar to: “Will you be faithful through good times and bad, in sickness and in health as long as you both shall live?” That’s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:26 AM
1

Explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 06:09 AM
1

I didn’t ask you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 05:59 AM
1

Ahem...where might one find one of these unicorns? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/18 01:22 AM
1

The Unsullied from GoT?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 09:29 PM
1

What’s the mechanism by which your proposed solution works?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 09:28 PM
1

Good to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 09:16 PM
1

So you speak for all women now?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 09:04 PM
1

You have it backwards. They’re not claiming you. You’re committing yourself to them. You can revoke that commitment at any point but them revoking their claim to you doesn’t then allow someone else to claim you without you having a say in it. Does that make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 09:03 PM
1

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 07:04 PM
1

u/anothergumnut:
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 06:16 PM
1

Booty sex. We said booty sex. Not duty sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 04:34 AM
1

It’s called the shit test and some girls do it and others don’t. It’s part of the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 06:42 AM
0

Girls can be cliquy. If one turns you down then word will get around that you’re creepy and they all might start doing it for any number of reasons. Start working out, get into classes that will help further you in your intended career, and stop being so hard on yourself. What hobbies or interests do you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 03:42 AM
1

You’re too hard on yourself. You’re not low man on the totem pole if you put in the effort. Like I said, work on yourself and the girls will come. Otherwise, even I can smell your desperation through your posts and desperation is a very stinky cologne.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 03:36 AM
1

Too long to read. Either you’re trying to catch yourself a stabbing or you aren’t. Make your intentions known up front and nobody wastes time. That applies to him too. He should be up front about what he wants and if your wants and his wants don’t jive then you should both move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:52 AM
1

Too perfect of an opportunity to pass up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:49 AM
1

Stop trying. Seriously. It reeks of desperation. I’m not saying to stop working out or taking care of yourself. In fact, double-down on your health and career. There’s nothing women want more than a fit and successful man that they can’t have. It’s a game and the sooner you learn how to play it, the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:46 AM
1

I never needed to dumb myself down. I'm no genus really, but when I'm nervous and attracted and get a little tipsy I do go full on ditzy. *genius**
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:41 AM
1

Are you a r/niceguy or are you a kind person? There’s a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 09:49 PM
1

Depends. If the kids are good kids and love me then I’d still be their father. If they’re shitty kids then I’d leave. Either way, I’m not continuing the relationship with the wife/girlfriend and I’d happy fuck myself over to make sure she doesn’t get any benefits from me. Before anyone criticizes me for saying I’d leave the shitty kids, we all know someone who’s a good parent but the kids are still shitty. If you don’t know anyone like that, it’s you and you have shitty kids despite you trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/18 08:50 AM
1

They don’t like it because it has the word “man” in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/18 07:38 AM
1

That’s fine but why draw the line at in-person occurrences only? Harassment is harassment either way. Also, in the name of all practices being applied unilaterally, we’re going to ban women from being allowed to do it as well. The only way we reach equality is to apply all practices equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 02:31 PM
2

My argument isn’t how much kids cost to care for. It’s how can you take more than half someone’s income for that? What justice is served since he can’t afford rent or other expenses now? Do you want to know what the court’s response was to that question? “Get a better job.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 02:25 PM
1

OP is sneakily trying to get PPD men to say that women will never be satisfied and will increase their standards. In reality, what I think would happen is women would reject less often because their needs would be met while requiring less effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 05:25 AM
10

Male here. I agree with OP. If the conditions aren’t what you want then don’t get married. Not sure what the debate here is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 05:22 AM
1

Lol. This is purely for debate. I’m not insecure and I’m not even in a relationship. That’s by my choice as my lifestyle isn’t conducive to a relationship anyway. For what it’s worth, I have zero doubt that most women will be able to find a ONS more attractive than the ONS a guy could find. There’s multiple reasons for that for another debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 05:07 AM
1

Ok then I’ll say this. Purely for the sake of this debate, every one night stand she has earns me a credit for my own one night stand. Everything is 1 for 1 as far as my argument is concerned. You good with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:58 AM
1

I’ll need to know the bounds of your argument before I can answer. Otherwise it wouldn’t make sense to debate since the entire argument would be fluid and could change any time I reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:55 AM
1

She only wants 1 one night stand? Are the bounds of your entire argument that the relationship will go on indefinitely any throughout the relationship she will have 1 and only 1 ONS?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:53 AM
1

I don’t care about N count. She could have already did it before asking for all I know. Asking simply plants a seed of doubt in my mind as to her loyalty. You’d probably call that insecurity though. There’s porn stars I’d gladly marry given the opportunity and I wouldn’t expect them to give up their careers. The point is, I’d know what I’m getting into and what the expectations would be when the relationship starts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:40 AM
1

I won’t budge because I don’t like the idea of the person I committed to having sex with someone else. I don’t need any more reason than that. What I can tell you is this, if my wife ever went through this conversation with me the way you are and pushed this much to get me on her side, I’d file for divorce the next day because I would no longer trust that she’d be faithful.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:34 AM
1

“Behind my back” doesn’t define cheating. I see what you mean now. You think cheating means being sneaky and hiding it. In this case we should probably abstain from the term and instead use unfaithful. This way we can establish that we’re discussing the lack of monogamy whether it be obvious or obfuscated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:29 AM
3

Well in this situation I managed to find 1 and considering there’s 3.5 billion females on the planet the odds are good that I’ll find a 2nd one. As far as the debate, it seems the only way to settle this is to allow both sides to have sex with someone else. That’s the compromise and that settles the debate. Otherwise, neither of us have shown a willingness to change our viewpoint. Therefore, we meet in the middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:24 AM
1

My rational reason is that I agreed to be exclusive with her and she can expect that I’ll uphold that and she can trust that I won’t break that. Assuming she agreed to the same thing, we now have an agreement. What she can do is ask to be let out of the agreement. At that point, I’m not beholden to the agreement either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:23 AM
3

Cool. I’ll come to your side then. If she gets to have sex with someone else then so do I. We good now?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:21 AM
1

You’re attempting to force me into a decision of agreeing or saying I’m insecure. I’ll choose option C that I created since you’re not the only one that gets to create rules here. Option C is I tell her she doesn’t need my permission to do whatever she wants with whomever she wants but that the only assurance I can give her is that I’ll either leave the relationship or I’ll have sex with someone else too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:18 AM
3

Insecurity about your partner having sex with someone else? I’ll need you elaborate on that one more since I’m not sure your use of “insecurity” comports with my definition of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:15 AM
1

We seem to have different opinions of cheating so there’s simply no way to debate that until we agree on a single definition. Again, she doesn’t need permission to do whatever she wants. What she wants is assurance that I won’t leave the relationship if she does it. Also, it sounds like she wants an assurance that I won’t hook up with someone else either when she does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:14 AM
3

If that’s how folks want to have their relationships then I don’t see a problem with 2 consenting adults doing so. However, if the partners have that in mind then it should be disclosed so that if 1 of them doesn’t agree with it then they get a chance to leave the relationship if they so choose. Even if the guy had someone to “give” me in return, there’s no guarantee I want that person or want the experience of having sex with someone outside of my own relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:11 AM
1

Lol. It’s cheating whether I know about it or not. You can keep saying butthurt all you want btw. I’m not denying anyone anything as I said before, she doesn’t need my permission to do whatever she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:09 AM
3

That’s fine if that’s agreed upon by both partners and the policy is applied unilaterally. What you proposed makes it seem one-sided and I take umbrage with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:07 AM
1

Any rational person would be butthurt if their partner cheated on them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:07 AM
3

It could be clean sex, dirty sex, or any other sex. The issue is, monogamy means nothing if someone expects to be able to do what you propose. Also, no he didn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:05 AM
1

That’s easy. “Sure you can go fuck another dude. Just so we’re clear on this, if you do, it’s over between us.” Like I said earlier, permission doesn’t mean there won’t be consequences. Plus, she doesn’t need my permission to do whatever she wants. She needs my assurances that I won’t end the relationship over that action and that is permission (assurances) that I possess and will not grant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:01 AM
3

No he didn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:00 AM
3

Nobody made you the arbiter of debate. You is ded.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 03:53 AM
1

I see you’re playing the game of stupid or liar. Either you’re really that dense that you can’t grasp the context of the conversation or you’re attempting to play dumb. If both parties agreed to monogamy when entering the relationship then that’s how it stays until the relationship is dissolved unless you both agree that you can fuck other people. I’ve known couples with that sort of arrangement and it’s very rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 03:09 AM
1

Permission is the say The car is something important to me that I don’t want other people driving. Does that make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 02:21 AM
1

Permission /= immunity from consequences Trust her to do what? Butthurt about what?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 02:20 AM
1

I’m changing the subject now too. Let’s say you give someone permission to kill you. That means it’s not murder, right? Explain your logic now. Plus, if my SO ever asks me for permission to fuck another dude, she can absolutely do it and it won’t be cheating because I’ll end the relationship right then and there. At that point I can no longer trust her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 01:31 AM
1

You’re missing the analogy. The car is my SO and the random person is someone I’m supposed to just let drive my car. I’d never do that unless I was selling the car but that’s a completely different analogy and a very awkward situation if applied to a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 01:26 AM
1

A significant other qualifies as a random person? TIL
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 01:10 AM
1

Agreed. Let’s apply this to other things. Let random people borrow your car as long as they promise to take care of it and let us know what shape it comes back in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 10:45 PM
1

You’re trying to justify that cheating is ok? That’s a bold strategy. Let’s see if it pays off.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 10:43 PM
6

u/azngirl7689: Ok, but a man who really doesn’t want to pay can find a way, that was my point. Not really. You can’t get a decent job living in a trailer and getting paid under the table. I’ll assume your bias based on your username alone as well. I doubt we’ll ever change your mind nor did you come in here to debate on a level playing field anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 10:38 PM
1

No man wants to pay CS just like nobody ever wants to pay taxes. They pay it anyway and it frequently is more than what’s necessary for the care of the child and more than what’s fair for the income of the dad. I know someone who was only making $3k a month pre taxes and paying $1700 in child support post taxes. Explain to me how that’s fair while his ex was working and making the same as he was. You can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 10:36 PM
3

Who says they’re confined? Do you honestly think that people don’t already choose to do what interests them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 01:46 PM
1

Cite your source?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 08:05 AM
1

Quite a few of them are the same religion. Any other reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 08:04 AM
1

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 08:04 AM
1

So they’re very much alike yet still resent each other. Ever ask yourself why?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 08:03 AM
1

How alike are they if not the most?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 08:01 AM
5

Humans resent each other for lots of reasons. If we we all looked the same, humans would find other reasons to resent each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 06:56 AM
3

Why do you want to eliminate gender differences? Isn’t variety the spice of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 06:54 AM
1

Rent your shit fixed that to more accurately reflect millenials
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 03:36 AM
2

Intergender communication gap is what it seems like you mean if you want men and women to talk. Intragender communication would be men talking to other men and women talking to other women and that’s already happening and has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:32 PM
1

Ok will do
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 02:28 PM
1

Downvoted. This is supposed to be a debate. Let’s stick to the subject at hand and not resort to ad hominem attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 05:51 AM
8

I’ll be stealing that phrase thank you very much. “LARPing at being very successful.” That will fit nicely with the “May your life someday be as great as you pretend it is on Facebook” meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 12:42 AM
1

Username checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 12:35 AM
1

Harvey Weinstein
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 12:25 AM
3

Mad at the world huh? Hopefully you don’t own any firearms because you sound like you need to work some things out in your life to have a more cheerful outlook.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/18 05:15 AM
–

This OP seems very one-sided...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/18 04:39 AM
1

So you’re like a hipster TRPer. Were your red pills artisanal and locally-sourced?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 07:52 AM
1

Agree 100%. I’d also be willing to bet the woman themselves need to sort out their life and examine what go them to the point that they ended up a single mother and actively avoid trying to do that again. Chances are it was a piece of shit dude they picked and collectively they both made irresponsible choices that led to that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 02:55 PM
5

142 messages on a dating app is not an indicator of 142 quality guys who want an LTR. I mean, it’s not like shitty people or people who just want sex use dating apps, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 02:04 PM
2

Sure they can work on themselves but what’s the excuse for not taking care of their health? It isn’t just aesthetics. It’s a matter of mindset. If that person doesn’t take care of their health then what message are they sending to everyone else? How is someone supposed to take a chance getting to know them and finding out about their career and intelligence if they can’t get past the fact that this person doesn’t care about their physical well-being? Who says they’ll stick around? The statistics…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 08:38 AM
1

Being thirsty for sex and being thirsty for a LTR are 2 very different things. If what you say is true then there wouldn’t be so many single mothers. The truth is, men or women become more desirable when they work on themselves. Women in their 40s that are considered desirable earn that because they work on their fitness, intelligence, career, etc. the ones that don’t work on themselves may find a handful of dudes who want to have sex with them but most likely these won’t be quality dudes nor wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 08:09 AM
4

Most folks’ love is unconditional, until it isn’t. If you’re not going to stay married until death do you part then don’t get married. Why is that concept so difficult for folks to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 01:30 AM
1

So you’re admitting women are exploitative?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 12:06 AM
1

Yes it’s ok and it’s also ok if women don’t want to date a guy with a small dick. It’s also ok if men don’t want to date women who don’t make much money or if they have small tits or a flat ass. Everyone has their preferences and if they have to compromise the relationship as a whole suffers from resentment. If you want a good partner or better than what you have then work on yourself first. You can’t be demanding unless you’re in demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:19 PM
2

The problem is, if he stays, he’s going to remember all of what she said and that’s going to create and build resentment. Resentment kills relationships. He needs to decide if he can accept what he now knows and if he can’t then he owes it to her to break up and not keep this going any longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:11 PM
2

At-will relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:10 PM
1

Perhaps I’m not seeing it in your OP but who is responsible for women making less, in aggregate, than men, and what steps are women taking to both increase their pay and to lessen the amount of male deaths in the workplace?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 06:57 PM
1

Is that your argument? If so, please revise your OP so we can CYV.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 06:22 PM
1

That’s strange because your argument seems very one-sided. In fact, it seems so one-sided that I’ve read it several times now and I can’t find the other side at all. Would you mind editing your post to put the other side in? Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 06:11 PM
1

Would you change your poker strategy if you kept winning hands?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 05:40 PM
1

Men aren’t more physically capable because there’s no difference between men and women and gender is a social construct, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 05:30 PM
1

So your argument is that men can’t complain about having high casualty jobs because they chose those but women are allowed to complain about earning less because they chose their jobs and choose to work less hours?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 05:28 PM
2

If you're referring to the Pareto Principle then it's the 80/20 rule that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. In regards to your assertion that TRP are being paranoid, are they? Perhaps. Women aren't necessarily *better* at hypergamy. It's that they focus more on it. Then again, if women are actually better at hypergamy and most marriages are heterosexual then doesn't that mean that men are aware of this and use the tools they have to secure themselves a perceived better mate? It's s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 04:37 AM
1

10000kicks: I myself am fairly thin 5'7" around 145 lbs, however this is pretty much in the optimal range for BMI at my height. I think being lean is probably the best bet as being short and fat/stocky can accentuate your shortness. Sean Sherk: 5'6" 155lbs
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 11:53 PM
1

Why do so many extremely high value males marry post-wall women? Men, as your lawyer I advise you not to answer that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 11:43 PM
3

BearSaint: So let them vent and give them a hug after. You don’t need to go destroy every guys life that they vent about, or change every law to prevent them from ever having a stressful day. Not sure what side you’re arguing. Guys aren’t the ones destroying guys’ lives. You’ll hear no objections from guys if women just want to vent. The part men oppose is the piling-on and the ever-growing concern about the women who aren’t really victims but want the victim points and will try to join the rank…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 11:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter