TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sinisus Archive

View 37 posts and 140 comments by Sinisus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
305

NewsSinisus/r/MensRights21/02/15 07:53 AM
232

Sinisus/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:53 PM
220

IntactivismSinisus/r/MensRights30/09/15 09:29 AM
176

FeminismSinisus/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:37 AM
153

DiscriminationSinisus/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:32 PM
111

Sinisus/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:47 PM
98

Sinisus/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:11 PM
84

DiscriminationSinisus/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:34 PM
84

Sinisus/r/MensRights30/01/14 11:11 AM
77

Sinisus/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:18 PM
66

Sinisus/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:18 AM
45

Sinisus/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:02 PM
44

Social IssuesSinisus/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:31 AM
36

Sinisus/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:47 PM
34

Sinisus/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:34 PM
26

Reverse GendersSinisus/r/MensRights02/04/15 12:50 PM
22

IntactivismSinisus/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:31 AM
20

FeminismSinisus/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:05 PM
17

Sinisus/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:27 AM
15

Edu./Occu.Sinisus/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:54 PM
15

Social IssuesSinisus/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:30 PM
14

NewsSinisus/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:20 PM
12

DiscriminationSinisus/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:09 PM
12

QuestionsSinisus/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:39 PM
11

QuestionsSinisus/r/MensRights03/09/15 10:45 PM
11

GeneralSinisus/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:18 PM
10

Sinisus/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:02 AM
10

Sinisus/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:31 PM
7

Activism/SupportSinisus/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:54 AM
6

Sinisus/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:26 AM
6

Legal RightsSinisus/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:05 AM
5

GeneralSinisus/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:22 PM
5

FeminismSinisus/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:59 AM
3

Activism/SupportSinisus/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:35 PM
3

Reverse GendersSinisus/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:00 PM
2

Reverse GendersSinisus/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:57 PM
1

Sinisus/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Translated summary: The universities in Oslo and Bergen face a gender imbalance in the enrollment of psychology students. Over 70% of first year students are women. Up to 90% of graduates are women. The universities have asked the ministry for permission to introduce "gender points" in favor of men. These gender points are widely used already to stimulate female enrollment in STEM. The Ministry of Education has concluded, after advice from the Ministry of Children and Equality, that the current …
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:24 AM
14

Wow, imagine the genders reversed. Would be suicide by SJW for the network. Or what about a series featuring white upper class boys fucking up black criminals for stealing their shit on campus?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 07:46 AM
1

Link to rage inducing reading: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR16/WEF_GGGR16_Full_Report.pdf
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:47 PM
2

Yes... NKF considers female conscription as a misunderstanding of the concept of gender equality and the intentions of the Law on Equality. Women make an important contribution to society by becoming pregnant, giving birth and breast-feeding.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:19 AM
2

He edited his post for fucks sake.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:21 AM
-2

That's my point. You are not affected by these quotas.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:51 PM
0

Maybe you'd see if differently if you were competing for these jobs.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:41 PM
5

Yes, I would be outraged. I'm outraged by blatant sexism.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:25 PM
-1

Really?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:02 PM
1

Read the question, and look up the Gender Inequality Index. They could have included workplace deaths as an indicator for example, but chose to only use a metric where women are worse off by default. The paragraph was supposed to answer that. As you point out, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:52 AM
3

Yes, they explain how they calculate it without really answering the question. Edit: You do realize that women's reproductive health is the only health indicator included in the index, right?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:25 AM
5

What is the rationale for using indicators for health without equivalents for men? Yes, it is really what it is saying. Though their answer is: Because only women can get pregnant. I do agree with you that the index lacks relevant indicators for both genders.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:17 AM
4

She cites a study that claims 1/3 of women in the EU have experienced "physical or sexual violence". Then she goes on to cite a Norwegian study on violence. Conveniently, she fails to mention that the same study claims that 44.5% of Norwegian men vs. 22.5% of Norwegian women have experienced "serious physical violence". The double standard is chilling.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:11 AM
1

Where is it being talked about? UK? It is not mentioned at all here in Norway.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:10 AM
11

The blatant gender discrimination in higher education opened my eyes. (Gender points when applying for uni, women-only career networks, events and campus facilities.) I then searched around the web and ended up here.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:44 PM
2

Link to study: http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/10/19/0894439315605806.abstract (Paywall, but also available through university VPNs) I find this study relevant to debates on the low representation of women in politics, in which a common approach is to frame the problem as though women are prohibited or somehow hindered in pursuing a political career.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:19 PM
19

On top of that she barely apologized to Thunderf00t for what she did to him, saying that she "didn't mean to" get him fired. She mostly apologized to her friends for being affected by the backlash of her actions against Thunderf00t.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:04 AM
16

This has always baffled me. If girls can't learn tech with boys present, how are they supposed to do their job when they go into male dominated careers? If anything, these clubs should be about girls and boys learning to function and solve problems together. This would also help against the stereotypes that supposedly hold women back.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:56 AM
4

Your position is not at all controversial regarding FGM. Unfortunately basic human rights does not apply to both genders equally. Norwegian law: The General Civil Penal Code § 284. Genital mutilation Surgery on the female genitalia that harms the genitalia or leads to permanent changes, is punished with up to 6 years in prison. Reconstructive surgery of genital mutilation is punished similarly. Consent does not provide exemption from punishment. Law on ritual circumcision of boys § 1. Purpose Th…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 12:35 AM
2

Why do you think reddit is crap for in-depth discussions? All of reddit? Specific subreddits? Where else would you expose your views for criticism? Closed off IRC channels? Private Skype convos?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:54 PM
3

Here you go.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 07:49 PM
1

When you dig into their materials, it seems that they provide education for both boys and girls. Maybe girl problems receive more empathy and funding?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:28 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:48 PM
7

I need feminism because when my daughter sees women complain about dress codes in schools, air conditioners, and the way people sit on the subway- she can learn about the way women are treated in other parts of the world where they have their genitals mutilated, they are denied basic civil rights, and are treated as second-class citizens- that way she will have a greater respect for the United States. I don't think this angle is very effective. It's like saying the MRM shouldn't whine about chil…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:42 AM
2

Worse...
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:29 AM
1

I was saying this because I have only read the studies claiming so. I was not aware that they were rigged. Do you have any links for me to read up on regarding this? Preferably studies/metastudies.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:27 AM
8

Good for you. Did you consent?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:42 PM
4

They have not performed any actual studies on FGM and HIV prevention. If you read the reports, you will only find hypothetical arguments. They have not performed any actual research. Besides, bleeding also occurs after male circumcision, and many have sex before the wounds have healed. FGM also exists already, so your aguments does not hold.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:08 PM
9

anything that can help counter that, should be encouraged. Should we also fund research into the the potential benefits of FGM with regard to HIV? Remember, male circumcision only lowers the risk for men. It could very well be the case that removal of certain parts of the female genitalia would provide similar protection against HIV for women. However, such research is illegal to perform due to ethical reasons. I have nothing against men consenting to medical circumcision to fight AIDS. Performi…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:54 AM
3

#53millionboys
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:40 PM
1

Just to put #62milliongirls in perspective. Source
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:37 PM
2

Where are the numbers from? It it this shit again?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:20 PM
4

Would we circumcise girls, if it was proven to reduce HIV or urinary tract infections? We'll never know, because it is illegal to even perform the research.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:28 AM
22

Let's flip it around: "The best STEM jobs now require spatial awareness and analytical skills. And that's better news for men than women." Attributing a certain skillset to a specific gender is somehow only ok if it involves women being better at something.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:44 AM
1

Men's rights are about universal human rights for men, no matter where on the globe you live. I'm making the point that FGM is outlawed no matter how sterile, less invasive or "humane" it is performed. It ranges from extremely brutal life threatening procedures designed to keep female reproduction under control, to a symbolic prick with a needle. All these procedures could theoretically be performed by qualified personell at a hospital. But they are not, because it is unethical. Male circumcisio…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:26 PM
1

Nowhere does it say that pricking leads to complications in 10% of the cases. It says 10% of ALL FGM leads to complications, and that complications also happen after pricking. So, no that is totally wrong. MGM is NOT 100 times safer than pricking. Why do you refuse to see this? One is a small prick with a needle, the other is removal of tissue. Of course complications can happen in both cases, but tissue removal definitely involves more risk. Edit: Take a look at this video, and tell me if you'd…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:46 AM
2

What are you trying to say? 10% of all women undergoing FGM experiences complications? How does that relate to the fact that pricking of the clitoral hood is less invasive than MGM? Edit: It's like saying that 10% of ALL surgeries lead to complications, including piercing of the ear lobe. That doesn't mean that that ear piercings are just as invasive as brain surgery. Also, depending on the way it is carried out, the worst complications of MGM are loss of the penis or even death. I really don't …
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:31 AM
2

To repeat my answer from another thread: FGM ranges from sewing the vagina shut, and removing tissue, causing irreversible damage to only a prick with a needle, and no tissue removed. Despite this, all forms of FGM are illegal. Even those forms that are less harmful than MGM.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:16 AM
1

No, FGM at best is actually less invasive than male circumcision. The mildest forms of FGM consists of pricking with a needle, with no tissue removed. All types of FGM are illegal, including pricking. That is a very obvious double standard.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:11 AM
5

We're not talking about medically necessary circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:39 PM
5

We wouldn't use that argument when talking about FGM.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:38 PM
7

Doctors are refusing to do it for ethical reasons, but the hospitals are required to provide the service.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:52 AM
1

Yes, I only want to use the most well founded arguments. Not sensitive issues that make people oppose my view by default.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:38 AM
1

The parliament gave in to religious lobbying. 94 for, 2 against. A lot of representatives that had been critical were conveniently absent. In Norway practically all parties embrace some part of the feminist narrative. Not one party openly opposes gender quotas for example. So all the so called "feminists" in parliament either voted for, or were absent. I'll see if I can find an English-friendly article on it.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:27 AM
1

She was one of the "scientists" that got roasted in that program...
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:19 AM
3

Key factors associated with increased risk for reporting suicidal thoughts and behaviors included...a history of professionally responding to a suicide attempt or death I guess having to extract mutilated corpses from cars after auto accidents could leave a psychological impression. Those who have worked longer might have built up some kind of tolerance to it. Also, those in an all volunteer force might not have access to the same trauma counseling as regular fire fighters.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:13 PM
2

I like to think that we can get there in the end, but I also think it can get much worse before people wake up or dare to face the injustices. There is quite a lot of stigma attached to challenging feminism. I think a lot of people are on the fence, but just not outraged enough to risk their social status. That could change, however, if the current trend continues.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 10:39 AM
2

I did. Apparently it was Schlumberger's request. I'm awaiting their contact info. It is illegal to specifically ask for women or men in a job ad. Since the trip to Paris can be seen as some form of job interview, SLB is in a very grey area with this.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:21 AM
1

We've grown accustomed to this kind of "positive discrimination", true. But people sitting idly and not challenging these measures are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:17 AM
1

Here is the translation.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:13 AM
7

It is a Norwegian university. Women are more "equal" here.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:17 PM
3

Done. Thanks for the heads up.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:13 PM
19

It is a bit difficult to do here, considering our equality law: The Act relating to Gender Equality Section 1. Purpose This Act has the particular objective of improving the position of women. Section 7. Positive differential treatment Positive differential treatment of one gender shall not breach the prohibition in section 5 if: a) the differential treatment is suited to promote the purpose of this Act I have contacted the student organization responsible. If I don't get an adequate answer I'll…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:16 PM
3

This article by him is especially worrying.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:55 PM
18

Schlumberger is hosting a company presentation and a trip to Paris. This is done via a student organization that is supposed to help all technology students at the university find a job. Both of these events are women only. There is no event for male students at all. Edit: Here is a translation of the text that is not in English or purely practical information. Trip to Paris Schlumberger has the pleasure of inviting five girls from Marine, Product development and production , I & IT, Petroleum ,…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:35 PM
7

30 million girls of primary school age are excluded from the education system worldwide ...and 27 million boys. source
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:26 PM
2

Don't forget the UNICEF male circumcision program.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:54 AM
2

Yes, that was how I meant to present it. I could probably have done it in a less confusing way.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:57 PM
7

Yes, UNESCO correctly writes "58 million children". Colbert says "58 million girls". I marked it with grey in the YouTube description. I probably should have used yellow there as well, for clarity.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:52 PM
4

Colbert says 58 million girls are out of school, and that we need to specifically help those girls get an education. The reality is that 31 million girls (53%) and 27 million boys (47%) are out of primary school. How is that not spreading lies?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:07 PM
3

Great summary! I hope he keeps his job...
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:22 AM
1

If only... It is the oldest and leading women’s rights organisation in Norway, founded in 1884 by 171 prominent men and women, including several Norwegian Prime Ministers.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:20 AM
1

Your example is absurd. Putting children on the street to be homeless is in no way comparable to putting boys and girls together in a classroom. Until I read a study that shows gender segregated kids fare better in life, because of the segregation, and not other factors, I'm sceptical. But I'm all for doing more research on the topic.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:12 AM
0

So kids should be sheltered from the real world, get grades that don't reflect their actual performance in real life and then get a surprise when they join the workforce and have to actually work together with other people? Why not make them accustomed to the environment they are going to live in for the rest of their lives?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:44 AM
-2

I don't know what factors the research studies were controlled for. So I'm just asking. With "atypical" I mean that you could have a girl that learns better in a male environment and vice versa.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:18 AM
-2

How do we know it is the gender mix and not the teaching style being applied in those classrooms? And how do we deal with the "atypical" boys and girls? You don't have to downvote me just because you disagree, by the way.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:08 AM
-3

Why is it either or? Should we have gender segregated reading classes supplemented with mixed "coexistence skills" classes? Why not learn both at the same time? If you have a problem functioning together with other people, you'll have to face that sooner or later. What if research shows that white kids learn better without black kids in the class?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:58 AM
-4

School is supposed to prepare you for real life. People should be able to work together with the opposite gender in the workplace. How is that going to work out if we make all education gender segregated?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:29 AM
24

Feminist logic: Women are oppressed. Men are oppressors. Violence against the oppressors is liberation.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:12 AM
25

"Not very feminist", the feminist version of "not very ladylike".
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:06 AM
44

Positive female sexuality: Bathing naked in the blood of cut off dicks. Positive male sexuality: ???
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:03 AM
4

I don't mind being provocative as long as it is with well supported arguments. I just don't think that saying women should be paid less for the same work will gather support for men's rights in the general population. It just reinforces the myth that we want to take away women's rights. How do you find it to be healthier?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:49 PM
3

I think Milo comes off as too confrontational, and over compensates on some points. Like when he proposes that men should be paid more for the same work. When people hear something like that, they might just shut off and disregard the rest of what he is trying to say.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:36 PM
1

Enlighten me.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:58 PM
11

We've created a nation of whores. I agree with a lot of what you have written, but what the fuck is this?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:45 PM
7

As opposed to men, who only work to fill their own personal bank accounts while their wives and children starve at home.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 10:58 AM
29

Or she told him, like my mother told me, that he could not possibly be depressed because she had it worse.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:08 AM
4

Stupid Facebook posts are not a men's rights issue. Sorry.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:08 AM
10

They also have a video about a "femicide epidemic" in Mexico. Apparently the patriarchy is killing 6 women a day. It's just that...the other 64 are men.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:41 AM
8

The point here is that infants and children should be protected from religious amputations carried out without their consent. That some of them might end up being ok with it in adulthood is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 08:45 AM
9

You're right. I shouldn't jump to quick conclusions about the studies making quick conclusions without reading them first.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:27 AM
7

Biases may certainly exist. But I don't think we should be to quick to conclude that they do, without considering other explanations.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:57 AM
17

A female professor simply being less qualified than a male one is not possible in their paradigm, therefore all gender discrepancies showing up in their data must be attributed to bias.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:38 AM
4

They should have been aware of the laws before going to Saudi Ara... Oh. Nevermind.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:14 AM
14

This is mental gymnastics at the olympic level.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:09 AM
0

Somebody needs to explain the concept of sample size to these hobby scientists.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:00 AM
23

Rebecca Reid applauds her for exposing the isolation that hits so many women in Britain Again, a predominantly male problem is hijacked by feminists. With the increased focused on female achievement, women still want partners with a higher social status. This leads to a growing group of men who never have children, while women "recycle" higher status males. (http://sciencenordic.com/quarter-norwegian-men-never-father-children) Men feel more depressed and isolated than women if they do not have c…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:53 AM
10

Swatting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ziLjOPCQwg
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:59 PM
14

Except that the 3.4 vs. 100 stat is probably incorrect. Also, women feel more threatened in general, even in situations where men are more likely to get harmed. It would be interesting to see a statistic on threats actually being carried out, like swatting for example.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:55 PM
4

I'd suggest identifying radical feminist policies like gender quotas, and measure their prevalence in existing laws and party programs. The feminist policies in party programs should be weighed by the relative popularity/influence of the party. Measuring feminist influence in media might be harder. That would probably require extensive research of news coverage and debates. Another important statistic would be the extent of governmental funding of feminist organizations. The prevalence of gender…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:55 AM
4

I see your point about attacking feminism not being the best way to get support for your society, but I don't see why you have to fuel the MRA = misogyny misconception. It is not exactly helping others who are not afraid to identify themselves as men's rights activists.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:18 PM
3

Calls on the Member States, and especially media regulators, to consider the place accorded – in both quantitative and qualitative terms – to women and to promote a balanced, non-stereotyped image of women, in a way that is respectful of women’s dignity, their diverse roles and their identity, and to ensure that commercial audiovisual media do not contain any sex discrimination or humiliating depictions of women
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:01 PM
3

Just a quick comparison from the last 24 hours: Subreddit Readers Top post Upvotes/reader Men's Rights 109,650 1247 0.0114 Technology 5,127,023 6039 0.0012 Videos 7,584,868 4586 0.0006 It's really not that bad.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:56 AM
1

Did she answer?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:28 AM
3

I agree with you, and in itself it's a petty issue. But I think it highlights a double standard in the media coverage.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:47 PM
3

With the massacre of the 132 Pakistani "children"(boys) as a backdrop, NRK writes a story about how girls at a Red Crescent all girl school has to live with the threat of terror attacks. The aforementioned quote accompanied by a picture of a smirking girl prides the article. Makes you wonder what they are being taught at these schools.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:02 PM
4

Walk a mile in his shoes.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:41 PM
21

It's Violence Against Women Day! Let's assault some men attending our event. That'll open their eyes!
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:27 PM
1

– Super unfair, but we do it anyways, says Line Berg at NTNU.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:10 PM
2

Some translated quotes: The department for nurse education sticks out by having only female Professors. Laila Berg, senior advisor for the FOU administration, thinks it is great that HiST has the highest percentage of female Professors in the country. Siri-Malén Høynes is one of HiSTs youngest Associate Professor. She thinks it is positive that the percentage of women are higher at HiST than at other Colleges. - It is a nice development. (...) - We should have more (female) Professors in maths.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:00 PM
1

It appears as though you can pass through. But you can't because society, represented by the glass, keeps you from doing so. I think floor and ceiling makes the most sense, because a cellar implies a lower boundary.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:21 AM
5

That would make sense if she was seeking compensation for something that didn't have a human perpetrator, for example insurance money for hurricane damage. But in this case, the claim involves an indirect accusation. Thus, in my opinion, it is the indirectly accused that should have the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 04:15 PM
5

Yes, she was prosecuted for a lie that she definitely told. As she should be. Even though the article doesn't give a name, their social circles probably know.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 04:07 PM
5

By dismissing the case they aren't taking any stance. By giving compensation they are.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 03:55 PM
9

The worst part of a false accusation is often the social consequences and stigma attached to it. The accused might for example lose his social network and his job. Giving victim compensation in a case like this won't exactly make it easier for the accused to clear his name.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 03:52 PM
5

It might make sense, according to their own rules, yes. But by giving her victim compensation they are also implying that he is guilty. That is what I see as the problem.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 03:41 PM
3

The feminist responding with "but think of the women" and "it's their own fault"...
/r/MensRights21/02/15 08:08 AM
43

Google translate Essentially a governmental office gives her compensation based on their own interpretation of the case, regardless of the court ruling.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 07:56 AM
1

Translation
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:26 AM
10

None of them were under suspicion of anything, but nevertheless was singled out in front of other passengers. Translated link.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:31 AM
1

I have created a playlist of selected scenes from the first season. Be sure to turn on captions.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:58 PM
3

To stay calm and act rational is of course valid advice. I would be okay with the article if it was aimed at couples and provided tips for conflict management regardless of gender. But the article doesn't do that. It makes the male victim of abuse responsible for the outcome of a situation created by an abusive female. It may have nothing to do with you or maybe you did do something to provoke; either way how do you handle the attack? This is what feminists like to call victim blaming.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:42 AM
11

I would like to add that "kæreste", the Danish word for boyfriend/girlfriend, is gender neutral. Roughly translated it means "the most loved one", or "dearest".
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:56 PM
1

They lost to a coalition government this term, but they are still the most powerful according to the latest polls. Edit: They are called "AP".
/r/MensRights16/08/14 11:21 AM
1

Women are taking over law and medicine as well, and I won't consider those worthless. The problem is that for some reason boys are falling behind in education, and at the same time girls are getting "gender points" when applying for university.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 11:15 AM
3

At University of Oslo, 24% and 27% of graduates, from medicine and law respectively, are men. But there are still more men in mechanical engineering and such.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:18 AM
46

The percentage of men graduating from University of Oslo is already at a record low 35%.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:01 PM
5

The total for Uni Oslo is 60% women. Giving extra gender points to men like those who are given to women in male dominated studies would be unfair according to principal. Boys drop out of school because they can't handle the freedom of a more liberal school system, says expert.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:20 PM
2

I suppose you are referring to the show "Hjernevask" (English: Brainwash). From my point of view it sparked a heated debate at the time and shed light on some issues, but it didn't really lead anywhere. The government is still highly infested by feminism, but the public seems to become increasingly opposed to it. We recently had a change from a socialist to a more libertarian cabinet and prime minister, thus the potential gender neutral reform of the law. But as you see, the ombud itself is stil…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:43 AM
8

LDO demands the following from a new law: That the act still has the particular objective of improving the position of women. (Stating that women are still the primary victims of discrimination.) That the act still allows affirmative action for girls and women.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:54 PM
2

I see where you are coming from, and you make a good point. We have to show our children a gender neutral world of opportunities. But I still think that a gender neutral approach is better than a pro-women approach. A gender neutral approach will be timeless and won't need moderation when the "believed equillibrium" is reached.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:38 AM
2

So Google should be allowed to be racist as well then, because it is a private firm? If you have a problem with math you're probably not cut out for Google anyways. The few women you see are there because they're talented, just like the guys who are there. According to your logic there must be an even bigger, hidden reserve of super talented men just waiting to be discovered. How do we know what gender ratio is the "natural equilibrium"? At what ratio do we stop encouraging one gender over the o…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:41 AM
3

I agree. Stuff like this only strengthens the feminist narrative of the MRM as a misogynistic hate group. It also burns bridges to reasonable people within the feminist movement, and alienates people like me.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 11:16 AM
4

If you are black, you are part of a crime culture. Black people can confront black people. Black people can correct black people. Black people can make other black people STFU. It’s your job to have standards for yourselves, and thus, for all black people.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:40 AM
2

Which is the more important statistic when it comes to making life better for Americans, that Men make up 75% of murder victims, or that Men make up 90% of murderers? Why? 40% of male inmates are black. What should we focus on? Will changing their skin color fix the problem? Or should we identify the circumstances that we actually can do something about?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:47 AM
7

Say you are a muslim. Your christian friend sends you a text about "How islamic terrorism hurts everyone". How would you feel? Should you only feel defensive if you actually are a suicide bomber?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:41 AM
1

Welcome to Europe! ;)
/r/MensRights16/05/14 02:18 PM
3

I don't argue that mothers can't be altruistic. But it is not something exclusive for women. And how is slapping your husband like he was a naughty child a sign of altruism?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:09 PM
3

The implication that fathers don't. Though you could say they would make a similar ad for men's health issues. But it is more about the fact that they couldn't make an ad celebrating motherhood without putting men in a bad light (slapped on the hand). I doubt they would make an ad about fathers caring for their families by slapping their wives.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:44 AM
1

A Norwegian campaign about heart disease in women.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:35 AM
1

Yes, the conclusion is a bit fishy. And so far the only publicity has revolved around the rape statistic. The fact that nearly 50% of all men have been victims of serious violence after their 18th year is completely ignored by the media.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 06:27 PM
2

The summary, pages 20 to 27 is in English. Regarding the rest of the document I'll try my best to translate if anyone should have questions such as yours. The simplest and most objective answer to your question would be to translate the questions that were given directly to the participants: Questions regarding rape: Have someone ever forced you to have intercourse by using physical force or threats to hurt you or someone close to you? Have someone - man or woman - ever forced you to have oral s…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:14 PM
3

Edit: The summary, pages 20 to 27 is in English. Some key points:  The prevalence of lifetime rape was 9.4% in women and 1.1% in men.  The perpetrators of sexual assault against women were almost exclusively male. Most sexual assaults against men were also perpetrated by men. Altogether, one third of the women (33.6%) and one tenth of the men (11.3%) reported some form of sexual abuse or assault lifetime (sexual assault before the age of 13, rape, touching of genitalia by use of force or by th…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:37 PM
18

Misusing statistics and inventing its own definitions. Examples are the so called wage gap, and defining rape in such a way that more female victims and fewer male victims are included.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:55 AM
1

The way I see it, we need an equality movement. Not gendered thrench warfare. Maybe a dialogue with reasonable fact based groups like this is the way forward?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:48 PM
7

In the wake of the terrorist attacks on 22 July, there has been increased attention on the resistance towards the Nordic open, inclusive and multicultural society. Particularly the focus has been on utterances in social media, comment fields and online discussion forums. In addition to opposition against immigration and Islam in particular, hostile attitudes are expressed towards women, feminism, and equality. These attitudes can simply be reffered to as anti feminism. Online Debate Anti Feminis…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:55 AM
3

You have to blame Google Translate for that one.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 10:56 PM
1

Det krever nok en viss personlig investering ja. Men ikke en umulig oppgave dersom man får med seg flere på laget. Tidligere har jeg tatt kontakt med ledelsen angående at likestillingsmidler blir brukt på gratis "jentemiddager" for kvinnelige studenter og spurt om noe tilsvarende ville vært mulig for mannlige studenter. Svaret var ganske tydelig: En gang pr år lyses det ut likestillingsmidler fra rektor som vi som institutt kan søke på. Vi kan søke innenfor flere kategorier hvor fellesnevneren e…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:01 PM
5

Apparently not among researchers and professors.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:45 PM
3

Starter kits ~49 000 USD Eligibility Scholarships ~24 500 USD
/r/MensRights16/12/13 01:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter