TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SocratesOnPot Archive

View 0 posts and 443 comments by SocratesOnPot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

There is a famous Buddhist story about a woman who lost her husband. She comes to him in tears and looks in him for a shoulder to cry on, and begs him to make her pain go away. The Buddha instead coldly instructed her to go to every house to bring back a flower from every family who didn't experience the death of a loved one. She came back to him with no flowers. There are things in life that words can't fix or make better. The kind of person we are also referring to in this sub are ones that wi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/12/18 10:17 PM
19

This bears repeating here, but metoo's downfall will be how they moved from only attacking the wealthy elites to attacking your average working class man. The feminist movement as a whole suffers from a bad case of apex fallacy. This what may be called the affects of the metoo "mood" - attacking powerful men who allegedly used their position to coerce women into sexual acts has translated on the ground to women lumping awkward advances into the same category. Sometimes no advances have to occur …
/r/MGTOW04/12/18 09:22 PM
18

Strange as it sounds, I could see feminists themselves supporting such measures. It would probably be pushed as a reaction to their safety rhetotic - women need to be separated for there own protection. Looking at this generally, it's sort of what feminism has always done - drive a wedge between the genders. Segregation is the logical endpoint of feminism.
/r/MGTOW04/12/18 09:01 PM
4

I've also head it called "moral license" in psychology. It's fascinating how things that could apply to an individual person can apply to things on a bigger macro scale.
/r/MGTOW03/12/18 09:27 PM
14

They have been in the gaming world for quite awhile. Usually doing smaller, subtle things that just flew under the radar. It's only recently that it's gotten so blunt (and arrogant) that people have started to notice. That was their mistake. It's social engineering 101 - small increments over time aren't as detectable as large ones all at once. But I can see the appeal of video games to social engineers. Get the kids exposed or prepped for your ideology when they are young and will be predispose…
/r/MGTOW03/12/18 09:19 PM
15

It's a shame, but I suppose we live in a competitive world where we are in perpetual conflict with one another. We simply can't back down. If we give someone an inch, they will try to take a mile. (side rant)A lot of people argue that so called "tribalism" is some terrible thing, and quick to point out its alleged flaws. But on the flip side, building and constructing ideas takes a certain degree of cohesion and a shared agreement with key precepts. It allows us to be more open and less defensiv…
/r/MGTOW03/12/18 08:50 PM
5

there is something said about a bond that is forged young I would say it partly has to do with developmental psychology. Behaviors can be more easily shaped and molded the younger we are. As we get older, our personality gets more set in stone. I think partnering early during this time allows the two to make adjustments in that give and take dynamic and makes those adjustments more permanent to the personality. I would think partnering early also limits outside influences. It creates a cloistere…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 08:00 PM
142

STOP IGNORING ME IGNORING YOU!!
/r/MGTOW29/11/18 11:21 PM
1

In the fitness world we call that "skinnyfat". You basically see that with sedentary lifestyles that keep their caloric intake low enough to not pack on lots fat.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/18 11:05 PM
1

Being shallow enough to order someone away because they voted for someone you don’t like will get you left I've been on the fence about this myself. On one hand, having similar religious and political beliefs helps ensure compatibility. Even in daily life, our bigger ideologies govern our smaller actions. On the other hand, being with others who believe much differently than us helps foster empathy because we are forced to understand these positions out of love. It's sort of what Christopher Las…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/11/18 06:22 PM
7

I learned that she was a complete witch at work, always screeching at male coworkers for being lazy. Transference. If we can't confront the source of our anger we tend to take it out on other people/things.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/11/18 09:48 PM
5

Also, please know the difference between your, you're, to... I remember a line from the play Agamemnon that goes something like "although the Sybil speaks in jebberish the god works through her". A lot of the Greek plays toy with the idea that you shouldn't be dismissive of a message because of the medium. You do so at your own peril. Just because someone may not be able to communicate using all the established rules of language doesn't necessarily mean that their ideas are invalid, or that they…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/11/18 07:28 PM
28

I've liked how Peterson phrases it - there are strong monsters who will directly take you on, and there are weak monsters who will take the indirect rout by stabbing you in the back. We can almost respect a strong monster because there is a type of honesty there.
/r/MGTOW25/11/18 03:33 AM
2

Sexual selection in our current culture and legal system encourages women to fuck alpha males when young, and high earning betas pay for it via welfare. It's still the same system. The problem is that the alpha males aren't often the most intelligent. Yeah. I'm just wondering right now if alpha fuks beta bucks is more nuisanced than I first thought. I remember another theory that looked at human vocabulary. Basically we have a far greater capacity for words than we need for communication to occu…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/18 10:44 PM
1

I remember reading a study back at uni that said our total cranial volume has decreased about 10% since 20,000 years ago (not sure of exact numbers. Too many years ago). Found this from Google though- http://discovermagazine.com/2010/sep/25-modern-humans-smart-why-brain-shrinking My theory is that as human populations grew, division of labour created less of a selection pressure on having general intelligence. The more specialized we became, the less we needed to have the high intelligence neces…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/18 09:04 PM
14

Thinking out loud.. Interesting that both paths begin with the subject of study and learning. I think this was a mistake. Being learned doesn't necessarily correlate to being a moral person, and being unlearned doesn't mean that they will fall into degeneracy. I would even argue along the track that rationality can create it's own set of problems. This had been a criticism of that Aristotelian school of thought. I'm thinking right now that virtuous people have a different driving force that's co…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/11/18 08:52 PM
3

apocalyptic fires are more of a marshmallow occasion.
/r/MGTOW22/11/18 07:04 PM
74

Could it be that boys have more mental health issues because psychology has pathologized natural male tendencies?
/r/MensRights22/11/18 06:32 PM
20

I'm pretty skeptical over the alleged impact we think mgtow is making too. Just looking at the thumbnail picture of her tells me there will be plenty of men pursuing her for quite a while. Hell, she's more attractive than probably 80% of the women I saw walking around Walmart today. Whether she will be happy with these men is another story.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/11/18 03:37 AM
10

Just interested in what the possibilities might have been. My spin is much different and bigger picture than the others here but deceptively simple; some people just can't love. You can show support and give yourself to them but it won't mean to them what it meant to you. We always assume that love and commitment is something all people posses by default. But this may be a case of projection in the positive sense. This is the concept of "capacity". We have different dispositions for different th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 07:50 PM
10

Yes, I'm impressed. It's not easy going into a place full well knowing how critical the audience will be. No doubt the ideas here seem very strange to her. No one is perfectly introspective, but as long as someone is making an honest effort we should be welcoming, right? How many of us tried to reach out to the other side only to have been ridiculed ourselves? I think there is a time for everything. There's a time for shame, but there's also a time for encouragement.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/11/18 07:10 PM
1

Sure, think about all the money and effort thrown into the schools to combat drugs and alcohol? The DARE programs. It sends the message that bandwagon, peer pressure is bad only in relation to drugs. But those very same systems are used by corporations to exploit.. I mean market their crap to us. Do schools touch on this fact? Not very often at all. Part of being good with money is having good bullshit detectors and knowing when you're being manipulated.
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 06:54 PM
3

That's my beef in a nutshell with the way the school system handles all of this. They also assume that kids have a "puppy dog" type love and can't comprehend deeper meanings than that, so they leave the conversation fairly devoid of content if such topics ever do come up. School ironically avoids the most important things in life. You sit in desk and learn route memorization. How is trig going to help you tackle the nature of love? How is circling prepositional phrases going to help you find pur…
/r/MGTOW18/11/18 06:24 PM
21

thinking out loud here Right now we've been observing many elite corporate men making poorly thought out, irrationally made decisions. It's been a real puzzle for me personally. This may be a case of the top being so far removed from the bottom that not only can they no longer relate to the average consumer enough to successful market to them, but that they live in sort of an insulated bubble where their ideas become more and more inbreed. Having more in common with other elites than with the av…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:56 PM
7

Should we judge information not on its relation to truth, but rather how that information affects people's attitudes and beliefs? Wouldn't this constitute a form of social engineering, rather than honest truth seeking?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:41 PM
1

And intimacy does not equal sex. You can have sex with someone with no intimacy at all. And conversely you can be intimate with someone without sex.
/r/MGTOW14/11/18 04:12 PM
1

I myself just try to see the beauty in structure.
/r/MGTOW13/11/18 03:56 PM
3

What kind of animal loses attraction to something the moment it reciprocates that attraction? Every animal apparently plays "hard to get" so that the male competes and fights for the female's attention. They have to prove themselves more worthy than their rivals. Another interesting theory is that this process helps select what are called "helpful" males (I. E., secure beta orbiters that she can extract resources from by having multiple men compete for her attention, while she withholds commitme…
/r/MGTOW13/11/18 03:49 PM
14

I checked out of modern gaming awhile ago. The microtransactions, "season passes", SJWism, physical copies becoming less common, ect.
/r/MGTOW13/11/18 12:21 AM
2

Not to mention Grete, the daughter if I remember correctly, also goes through her own transformation towards beauty as Gregor wanes into death. It's sort of like the ancient formula that "for something to increase, something else must decrease". The same logic can be applied to society, where one group (women) gets elevated also deprives another one (men).
/r/MGTOW12/11/18 11:44 PM
1

...but also why they never try to see how it could be a beneficial part of the human condition. That was my favorite part. Insightful comment by the way.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:35 AM
17

I must say you got some grade A bullshit detectors. Sometimes the fancy language throws me off.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/18 04:00 AM
42

This was actually really interesting. Conspicuous consumption has been a under developed idea, imo. As an example, consider how this increased competition plays out in online dating platforms. On Tinder, the top 20% of men are competing for the top 78% of women. Why? It’s a matter of the breadth of selection. Offline, due to the constraints of physical space and time, any given woman would have a finite set of potential partners to choose from. Online, the selection is much more vast and most wo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/18 03:36 AM
16

It was a point that really irritated me, but as I'm really antisocial and hate conflicts, I leave it be because I genuinely loved her. Yes, I've been there before. Introverted personality types really don't want to rock the boat. It's naturally really hard for us to draw boundries and generally just express ourselves to others, ironically, especially to those people whom we generally love. So what happens is we usually get walked on in some way or another and not necessarily just in our romantic…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/18 08:42 PM
2

uptight religious gorgons who hate fun stuff like getting laid Ironic insult, considering it was Medusa's sexuality that got her into trouble to begin with. The Gorgon head was widely used as a symbol of protection, thus why it was painted on shields and used in amulets. So by that point, the so called "religious gorgons" may be protecting us from harm.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/18 01:42 AM
1

Gish gallop
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:44 PM
5

Why is Hufflepuff so far behind?
/r/MensRights20/10/18 07:16 PM
7

Personally, I'm not a big fan of projection theory that's been completely saturating the internet lately and theories that are predicated on it. Essentially, it's a form of ad hominem that presents an attack in a way that makes it unfalsifiable. I would say the reason why people believe in the recurring themes of an "elite circle of oppressors that dictate conditions for everyone else" has more to do with our conceptualisations of "power" and "influence", perhaps even causality. Apex fallacy has…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:06 AM
6

Who ever has the most responsibility should have the most privilege because they are the ones risking their neck, they have their skin in the game. Agreed 100%. Well put.
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 10:03 PM
5

The concept of treating a party fairly, even if one does not like the aforementioned party, did not enter into their heads. Yes, one thing I've noticed is the absence of general respect in society. Variations of it, such as the golden rule and treat others how you wish to be treated are never upheld. This is frightening because this is the neutral ground through which we can peacefully settle disagreements. Without the mutual give and take of respect, there is no reason for any party to be civil…
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 09:10 PM
15

We often forget that children aren't raised in a vacuum. No matter what values that may be instilled in them by their parents, children are still influenced by the larger society around them. At a certain point, I would think children spend more time out in their larger culture because of school, than they actually spend at home. I suppose it's no wonder it's said "a just man can only exist in a just state".
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 07:13 PM
7

Yes, I would add "gender studies" really should just be a part of sociology. It doesn't make sense having it as its own subject matter that stands by itself, especially at the undergraduate level.
/r/MGTOW18/10/18 12:48 AM
13

...but because his wife saw POTENTIAL, she has taken care of him and improved him to be the desirable guy you see. That's why I think love was known to ancients as "the winged one" in that it elevates, or lifts up, one another to greater heights of virtue and attainment. Later it was no coincidence that love sort of became synonymous with teaching or improving the condition of your partner. I would even argue that such an ideal laid down the foundations of many religions. To willingly descend in…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/18 09:45 PM
17

Even much before him, like Aristotle. But apparently modern people just see him as a ragging misogynist at worst, and a flawed theorist at best. But it's well known that our understanding of politics hasn't improved much in the 2500 years since then. Evolutionary theory is perhaps the best candidate for what could be thought of as an improvement. Odd isn't it, how we have advanced so far in other areas, but where it really matters the most we haven't made in progress at all? We can go to the moo…
/r/MGTOW17/10/18 07:43 AM
3

It is possible for one to provide expert knowledge without being able to carry out the advice themselves. Yes, often times, not having a natural talent or disposition for a thing forces the person to have to analytically break it down, whereas their more successful counterparts will have coasted by natural talent alone, and so will be unable to articulate back and teach others their methods (because of its intuitive nature). Things that come easy to someone will never do the soul-searching of on…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/18 03:10 AM
4

Yeah, all too common with me. And in my predominantly blue collar area, I'm one of the most clean cut guys around. I'd even go out of my way to make them, these strangers I don't even know, feel comfortable by walking on the other side of the street, and yet they'd still act like they are creeped out. Okaaay then. That's why when feminists whine about not feeling safe on the streets or whatever I just laugh to myself. They are like deer that are afraid of every shadow and sound around them. They…
/r/MGTOW16/10/18 08:19 PM
6

social combat Good wording. Jostling for position on the dominance hierarchy is a dirty, messy business. Men are more physical and we compete on that level, women are more social and resort to more pragmatic manipulation. But oddly enough we define combat and violence through a very narrow lens, one that overwhelmingly benefits women.
/r/MGTOW16/10/18 07:47 PM
1

Posts like these are why I come here. Thank you stranger.
/r/MGTOW15/10/18 08:45 PM
3

With the caked on makeup, the bright colored hair, and wearing what looks like a tiara, she's not exactly giving me an impression of sweetness, kindness, and maturity. I typically avoided these types of girls like the plague. I like how she lists being a homeowner right up there at the very top. Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I don't see how that's a selling point. Women aren't men, we don't judge them based on their material assets. And besides, being a homeowner doesn't necessarily mean it's all…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/18 06:59 PM
8

When I texted her to go out she said “Sorry, I don’t think my boyfriend would like it if I went out with you.” I mean how fucking retarded are these bitches. I never responded or talked to her again. Same thing happened to me. I found our later she didn't even have a boyfriend. In my particular case, she just wanted to play hard to get and have me dance like a monkey for her amusement. Specific power play that's seldom talked about in the manosphere, but somewhat common technique. In your case, …
/r/MGTOW15/10/18 06:22 PM
10

You read my mind. I did all of that so that I could be the very best version of myself for when/if I did meet that unicorn. And what I found was that other women didn't care at all about their future potential mate as nearly as I did. They didn't keep themselves chaste, didn't abstain from drugs and alcohol, didn't develop their mind or body. If you did truly love someone, wouldn't you want to give them your very best? At that point I saw how pointless it all was. Admittedly, I struggle with nih…
/r/MGTOW14/10/18 10:11 PM
4

I tought women's self defense classes for a number of years. One of the biggest problems we had might be called something like "threat assessment", meaning women often can't distinguish between threats and non threats. This problem manifested itself in a few ways. Some of these attractive women would have an almost borderline paranoia of everyone and every situation. The concept of "high risk" or "low risk" situations are hard for them to grasp. So they walk around in sheer terror thinking there…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 07:49 PM
10

If they fail to be aggressive and domineering in some of those by being "nice guys", then the woman will see him as weak-willed and willing to be walked all over, which will make her think that he isn't such a catch after all... Yes, that's why the redpill mantra is lift and hold frame. Speaking from experience, when I was big into fitness and at my peak, women would approach me and flirt thinking I was this big macho Chad. Even though I had the body, I was still very shy and awkward around wome…
/r/MGTOW14/10/18 07:00 PM
2

I like that line of thinking. Reminds me of Hobbs and his "state of war". Life is an ongoing power struggle and you can't expect people to just play nice.
/r/MGTOW13/10/18 08:58 PM
1

Most of the time, women can decipher what is truth and what is possible, but present an image of misunderstanding. The most dangerous shit test of all, in my opinion. In the most benign sense it's a way to test the character of others, such as a police officer asking questions he already knows the answers to as a way to quickly test the credibility of a suspect. In the most beautiful sense, it's a teaching tool that uses leading questions to have the other person reach conclusions of their own. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/18 07:19 PM
2

Maybe. I've personally seen (and made) very calm and collected arguments, often related back to a hard scientific or mathematical principle, only to be contended by emotional appeals that do, ultimately, get more support from the audience. I think we overestimate the average listener. Rational arguments are often boring, they take a long to form, and they often depend on other supporting ideas, which in turn, requires more cognitive investment on the listener's part to connect the dots. Most peo…
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 10:02 PM
3

profession: department store I read that literally. Well, she is a big girl after all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/10/18 07:25 PM
3

This is reason enough to never go to a shrink. There's significant overlap between feminists and psychology students. Even male practitioners run the risk of being indoctrinated.
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 05:29 PM
4

Being rewarded damages also doesn’t mean one will ever get them. Getting 20 bucks a month for the rest of your life. Oh boy. Hopefully the damages aren't so great that you'll be dead by they time they pay it off. That's what's stupid about our court system. The people most likely to commit crimes aren't going to have any money anyway.
/r/MGTOW10/10/18 04:25 PM
2

Definitely not odd when you're sleeping with the owner.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/18 07:09 PM
8

Funny how it's always them trying to change some asshole guy who gives off every sign of being a bad investment of time, and never a guy who is underconfident but has a lot of promise to make something of himself. Yes, plus those type of men are much more receptive to whatever changes she would want to make in them. But that's one reason why they don't do that, women deep down don't want someone they can get to jump through hoops for them. It's just a shit test. Prison Chad doesn't listen to any…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/18 06:29 PM
5

I don't think they actually intend to do that, just doing any dirty trick they can to win, that is all. It's hard to say. I know that the bigger or more abstract an idea is the more supporting ideas it takes to build it. Ideas often need other ideas to make it intelligible. Though, I can see how that can be interpreted as being disingenuous as off-topic and distracting. I know a good analogy is painting. We bounce back and forth between the background and the foreground when rendering an object.…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/18 03:25 AM
7

It is true for the most part, that they equate bitchyness with intelligence. I wonder why, specifically? I think it's like how if you were to observe from a distance two known authorities on a subject talking, there tends to be a high degree of contention or disagreeableness between the two. Probably because the more in depth of a particular knowledge someone has, the greater it deviates from common knowledge. The gap between eachothers knowledge base grows wider and wider the more specialized w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/18 05:48 PM
20

Yep. They want to share an Alpha than have a beta all to themself. Oh the irony here. They aren't compelled through force, there's no warlords like Genghis Khan kidnapping them, they are willingly placing themselves into harems. So this is what female empowerment looks like? What a joke.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/18 05:24 PM
4

To her, she’s the prize and only a man of sufficient caliber (and she will be the judge of that) gets her. You know, it hard to out my finger on it, but this whole thread is helping paint a picture of women that's very Victorianesque. The whole not wanting to date somebody beneath them might as well be "I can only marry within my caste/rank". It's so bizarre. It's like we as a society are moving back into those fluffy aristocratic notions again, complete with all the other things it encompassed …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/10/18 11:56 PM
4

It will be the Freudian nightmare where the mother metaphorically sleeps with her child. The mother becomes emotionally dependent on her child, as that becomes her only source of fulfilment and companionship in her life. The child's identity becomes entangled with hers. It's very tragic. It's like the myth of Chronos devouring his own children. I suppose that's why the Greeks thought it takes 3 generations to undue a "curse" laid upon a family. The sins of the parent transcend a single generatio…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/10/18 10:53 PM
3

There's a corresponding, generalized coarsening that says all the niceties, manners, and courteous acts of society are masked aggression. Yes, there are many political philosophers who held/hold this view. All actions are driven by selfishness and nothing can ever truly be completely selfless. It's not the philosophy that I have a problem with per say, but that those who follow it apply it unequally, and only to others. They want to claim some moral highground when such an idea isn't consistent …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/10/18 04:18 PM
1

Also if there was a husband and he knew I doubt he would be ok with the baby being in the picture. That's a great find. Of all the real life profiles I've seen of "open" relationships, not one had a picture of her kids with her. It's like they want a clear separation between their family life and their sex life. What happens in vegas stays in Vegas kinda thing.
/r/MGTOW06/10/18 04:50 AM
4

This is a point often lost on modern feminists. They are so quick to look for any indications of speech "inciting violence" in their opposition, but forget that their very own moment had it's own violent history.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:07 AM
1

Have to wear a dress and high heels to certain jobs, wear makeup, keep up their hair. Don't forget that many men still think it's a women's place to cook and clean and do household chores rather than split it up. Are you joking? This is how you define "oppression"? Wearing makeup and high heels? Talk about first world problems.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 03:02 AM
50

The vilification of so called "nice guys" are in line with this thinking - if a man presents himself as kind, he must be doing so out of self interest. Kindness is then synonymous with toxicity. This is what gets me about modern feminism. It presents a catch 22. All actions a man does, whether good or bad, is the result of "toxic" masculinity and "patriarchy". Another example is when men talk about the many inequalities that men face, such as homelessness and unfair treatment in divorce. Feminis…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/10/18 02:22 AM
15

Funny. I didn't know I actually had any hope left for the human race until this made me lose it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/10/18 06:38 AM
3

I was propositioned like this once. I was pretty jaded over relationships and honestly flattered that a women would find me attractive enough to want my DNA for her child. I gave it about a minute of thought and backed out. Not because of child support fears or anything, but because there doesn't need to be any more children who will never know their dads.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/10/18 04:42 AM
4

Tell me, have you noticed any premature death or cancer? What we don't talk about here is that having children later in life has been linked to a lower life expectancy of the children. Something to do with the shortening of the telomeres on the DNA.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/10/18 04:33 AM
2

"I'm an artist". Yeah right. Michelangelo was an artist. Bernini was an artist. You are a clown.
/r/MGTOW03/10/18 09:47 PM
4

There is a few good quotes from Dune that say something similar Enemies appear as angels Thoughts become weapons, philosophies reasons for war, but good intentions are the most dangerous arsenal of all.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:38 AM
4

...the rest God knows. Enough with the religious virtue signaling already.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/18 12:06 AM
14

But she already said that she wants a man who also has a good career, with money, owns a house, and has his shit together, so she wont date those guys. I've always found that odd how they'd want things that become basically redundant. If their relationship becomes serious, they will most likely move in together anyway. Someone will have to sell off their home. It's not like they are retired and can make the second house into a summer home type deal. Or women who already make 6 figures and also w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/18 06:12 PM
21

Back in highschool sex ed we had to fill out an anonymous questionnaire. Things like have we had sex, done drugs, drink, etc. I believe this was either my sophomore or junior year, so we are around 16-17. I was among 2 others who kept themselves chaste in a class of around 30. I was also one of the few who never tried alcohol. Around half the class had done drugs. It was a very depressing point in my life because I realized just how alone I truly am and how high my standards actually are. The di…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/18 05:31 PM
2

Yeah some chokes work on cutting off the blood supply to the brain. Source: judo student.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/18 03:53 AM
10

Yes, in a sense they aren't wrong. "The best lie is told between two truths", as they say. That's the source of power in female rhetoric.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/18 12:32 AM
7

What erks me the most about the whole thing is that they will try to pass off lowering their bar as some enlightening experience where they "matured".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/18 11:17 PM
11

Why aren't you driven to the point of madness...? Odd that you'd wish mental destruction upon good people that have done no wrong to you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/18 11:09 PM
1

Because society requires evil in order to function Insightful on many levels. Society also needs a common enemy.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:48 PM
2

Just my unpopular opinion here, but some of those analysis seem reaching. What stood out the most to me is her voice. She has that atypical sexualized voice all across the board. It signals to me that she is/was very promiscuous, which causes me to doubt her credibility. It's typically best to be critical of anybody who talks like a mix Kim Kardashian and your college thot.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:25 PM
4

It's been my experience that a lot of people that enter into psychology professions have quite a lot of problems themselves. They probably entered into it for self-assesment /improvement reasons and then decided to make a career out if it. They also think because they have a problem or problems, it can allow them to understand and be more empathetic to the problems of others. Not necessarily true because it often turns into the blind leading the blind, and also biases the interaction between the…
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 07:04 PM
23

Yeah I'm left leaning, but don't need shove my beliefs in others face. Everyone has a right to their own opinions. I wish other leftists would be more reasonable and not censor everything they disagree with. But whatever.
/r/MGTOW30/09/18 06:53 PM
14

Thank you and saved. I will be meditating on this for the next few days.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 05:07 PM
4

Ecclesiastes
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 05:06 PM
0

Though indignation is every much an evolutionary mechanism as the sexual behaviors of the female.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 05:01 PM
2

ask yourself why so many romance stories end with the man dead at the end. Very astute observation.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 04:42 PM
1

Women will never suffer or meet their fates when they have men as human shields to die for them. The only thing a civil war will do is hurt men even more
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 02:32 AM
1

Not all its cracked up to be.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 01:47 AM
1

Close. Needs horns and a pitchfork and it'll be photo-realistic.
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 01:02 AM
59

What? Is this a joke? Some feminist college gender studies professors are going to tell me what "masculinity" is? How insulting. Thank you u/where_muh_good_mens and all the other users that put up with my bullshit but I'm done. I'll just continue on my own without the liberal censor police. And I'm liberal! I can hang around you guys and put our differences aside. If I can do it so can anybody else. Isn't that what liberal egalitarianism is about? Everybody and everything has value and worth? Is…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/18 01:29 AM
9

I'm leaving too. If reddit wants to chase off a chunk of their user base well more power to them. It'll only allow their competition (voat) to get bigger.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 12:45 AM
3

Noticed that too. I'm petty pissed. Oh well, I'll just go to voat.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 12:39 AM
1

See you there too. Just tried to get into the redpill sub and can't seem to get to it. It's off of my list of subs. Announcements just posted that they are currently "revamping" the quarantine function to "quarantine subs that users may find offensive, racist, misogynist, anti Semitic.." Yeah I'm done with this liberal censorship nonsense.
/r/MGTOW28/09/18 12:37 AM
5

Cock to cuck Off topic but... Say that 5 times fast. I got tongue tied in my brain just reading it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/18 10:41 PM
1

If they really cared about you, they would never ask you for anything that made you uncomfortable or precarious in anyway. Yes. If someone did love you, they would want to see you happy, even if it's not with them. They wouldn't want to make you worse off but only improve upon your life. It took me a lot if years to realize this. I used to blame my ex for leaving me, but then I realized how happy she is with the right one for her. She has everything I couldn't give her. I'm just a poor and sligh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/18 10:30 PM
2

Sorry to tell you, but we don't wield god like powers. Parameters exists everywhere in nature. I know I'm going against TRP doctrine here, but my whole point is that we need to set realistic expectations, not necessarily that we can't change at all. You get older. Your body undergoes physical and mental changes. This is a fact of life. Such things need to be factored in when assessing your own chances at succeeding in something because I believe in setting people up for success, not setting them…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/18 05:59 PM
15

I can relate. I'm a older fellow myself. I took the "red pill" way before it was a thing (I was a bartender for years. Exposes you to female nature, that's for sure). I too, have been more or less just struggling to get by. Still. It all changes you. Once your innocence is taken it doesn't come back. Some people, I think, really get messed up for a long time once the pill is swallowed, especially those of us that were really invested in that blue fantasy, and especially those of us who lost a lo…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/18 01:00 AM
5

That's a unique angle. I like it better than most of the explanations on here. They will put everything on the line for a chance at scoring that superior Alpha DNA. You blend this together with things like the halo effect and it makes for one hell of a concoction of extreme psychological fuckery. I would think most life on Earth would place reproduction above their own survival needs. In a general way, at least for us humans, having children is a detriment to our own individual survival. The ver…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/18 12:11 AM
26

I've had quite a few women admit to me confidentially that they had sexual relations with their step-dads or mothers' boyfriends. Some of them consensual, some of them not (or so they say). I've heard it so frequently that it leads me to believe it must be rampant in society. A massive scandal just festering beneath the surface. If I had a daughter, especially a teenage one, left to the hands of her single mom and boyfriends I'd be a complete nervous wreck. Edit: I'll also say that women in gene…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/18 08:21 PM
39

Ego. It's a very interesting idea in itself. It's often interpreted as a negative facet of human nature that clouds our judgements and make us less compassionate. However, ego has a seldom exposed positive element. It propels us to achieve and buffers us against the harsh cruelty of the world. It's what makes us hold on to life in desperate times. In short, ego can protect us and provide that necessary self preservation instinct. In this case, from making unnecessary commitments to someone who w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/18 03:51 PM
9

I have to say I admire how much of yourself you are putting into each comment on here. Even writing anonymously, I myself don't have the courage to put myself out there like that. Anyway, back on topic, I agree with what you mean here. Increasing male SMV and, to a certain extant, the Wall, have become more or less products of an almost religious nature - that despite the suffering we witness around us, despite the good struggling and the wicked rising to power, despite all of this, we somehow t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/09/18 04:03 AM
2

Those are great points. It's like transference in psychology. Sometimes we just take out our anxieties on others that are not necessarily doing anything wrong or casually related to what we are upset about. Like believing there is ever really an act of shaming undertaken for its own sake, and not sincerely in the service of some greater goal. Though, doesn't everything in nature have some over arching pattern governing it, and those things are in service to that larger force? The first philosoph…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/09/18 06:17 PM
11

A lot of people are questioning how authentic her profile is with her degrees and writing and all. She could be lying. She could be telling the truth. Truth is, I've worked with and went to school with women (and men) just like this before. Graduated valedictorian, been in the gifted program, ect. ect., yet they have the emotional maturity of someone half their age. I've also met plenty of people that graduated with high honors but can't think their way out of a paper bag. I've also met people t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/18 06:32 PM
43

I can't even imagine being that privileged. I've had to put in a tremendous amount of work into myself to even be considered approachable to others, romantically as well as non romantically. Every day it was like walking on eggshells, where even the slightest infraction chased others away. I just can't fathom getting that much free attention all the while purposely sabotaging yourself. It's insane.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/18 05:06 PM
1

Doesn't seem like it was an impulsive buy acting out his insecurites. According to OP, he is an avid car collector. He's probably been into cars his whole life. Because of his age, he probably just now can afford the ultra high end cars. A younger man wouldn't have the accumulated capital.
/r/MGTOW18/09/18 06:24 AM
3

Fucking for genetic diversity I suppose.
/r/MGTOW18/09/18 06:11 AM
3

there is no such thing as hypergamy. Basic economics. The word itself doesnt exist in any scientific field because it's an oxymoron. Not true. Just do a simple academic google search on the word "hypergamy" and it's used in the social sciences like evolutionary psychology and biology. Look: Higher male educational hypergamy: Evidence from Portugal HR Correia - Journal of Biosocial Science, 2003 - cambridge.org
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/18 07:17 PM
3

IQ 180+ I know this is just the thumbnail, but since when does intelligence have any bearing on attraction? If anything, I would expect high intelligence to be more of a liability in dating, not an asset.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/18 06:52 PM
15

Yeah I found that line particularly interesting too. There's a lot of different angles and layers to it. These herbivore men don’t connect with others, they don’t establish their own families or have children and don’t really contribute anything meaningful to society, either tangibly or intangibly It's a odd statement to say. If something is intangible, by definition, it excludes it from being observed or understood. How can you arrive at a positive or negative assessment of something if it's no…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/18 09:14 PM
1

Reminds me of Nietzsche. Life itself is a battle of wills. "Will to power".
/r/TheRedPill16/09/18 06:04 PM
53

Well fuck. No one else did a long dissection? Ughhh. Fine. How herbivores, hermits and stay-at-home men are leaving a generation of Hong Kong women unsatisfied Well. Guess we all know the direction this is going by how she framed her title. Strange isn't it, how millions of men are becoming social pariahs, outcasts, and recluses, but it's always women who are suffering through all of this? It is this very solipsism in the title that gives the answer to its own questions. In a city already known …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/18 05:18 PM
9

just looking at the author's photo tells us she doesn't want the guy she describes. As well as 99.99% of all the other articles on here
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/18 03:04 PM
19

Both of these things seem to be causing me issues. Online men don't want a "pen pal" so I never get more than one evening's conversation and every man that I've spoken to just isn't interested when it comes to the point where I say "no". Notice how men move on in only a single day. She's not even worth playing the long game to them. Dollars to donuts she's only having this difficulty because she's a postwall landwhale that men only see as an easy pump and chuck. Once confronted with the shit tes…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/09/18 03:49 PM
5

Not me. I usually steal all the toilet paper. What can I say? I eat a lot of spicy food.
/r/MGTOW14/09/18 01:06 AM
3

Cool, you're one of my favorite redditors. Do you plan on spending more time on voat, or will you mostly hang out here still?
/r/MGTOW13/09/18 05:00 AM
47

I was always attracted to handsome, heavily tattooed guys. Musicians, artists - the creative type of person. men who did achieve something in life.. Because when we all think of successful, achieving men, we all think of tattooed artists? Here is a protip from a former figure painter - you don't make much money or achieve a hell of a lot from this. Another protip - chicks say they are into "creative types", but they really aren't. Real creative types have a sensitive and quirky nature that women…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/18 03:43 AM
27

must have: power You mean like how Tyrone had the power of invisibility? He disappeared one day and she never seen him again.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/18 02:55 AM
10

I can almost anticipate the counter argument from the other side of the aisle. They would probably argue that attachment to multiple partners is the norm and healthy but it's social conditioning/expectations that cause jealousy to develop now. Once polymory becomes more diffused ("accepted) onto the population, they think our internalized negative feelings will just go away. That's why I think they are so eager to push this into the wider public sphere outside of their own niche groups. They thi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/09/18 11:39 PM
1

Yeah, all things need checks and balances, a harmony of opposites for it to work. It's the same problem as monopolies. Same problem with relationships. Same problem with leadership. When one side secures the commitment or love and admiration of others, they begin to act in increasingly selfish ways. Love blinds us to the realities of what they do and we hold them less accountable. We psychologically give them a moral license to do whatever they please.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 10:08 PM
1

Yes actually, it was a college class. The girl said "well, they must have been doing something wrong to be arrested. We don't go around arresting innocent people". Basically just responded that what she is describing is a catch 22, unfalsifiable, blah blah blah. That might as well be what I said. Arguing with logic is over their heads. Pointless. They don't give a shit about what we have to say anyway. At long as they continue to be the pampered class they are we are just the peasants being told…
/r/MGTOW11/09/18 08:28 PM
3

she can stem, so can you. Textbook example of survivorship bias.
/r/MGTOW11/09/18 08:13 PM
20

Deserve's got nothing to do with it. Exactly. Whatever happened to "no one is entitled to love"? Guess that is something they just tell all the incels and betas to shut up and keep them in line, but doesn't apply to themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/18 08:06 PM
8

That's partly what's frustrating with some of these articles, especially the ones where they whine about not finding their beta buks or only getting P and D. It's not what they include, but what they decide to leave out that gives the most insight into them. Often, when you match a face with the writing, it's all we need to figure them out. "A picture speaks a thousand words".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/18 07:48 PM
8

Yes. Just because something is old or traditional doesn't necessarily mean it's good by that virtue alone. The converse holds true too - just because something is new, doesn't necessarily mean that the method is better either. To determine if something is better, as you said, we need another way to measure it. I think the problem is that we don't always have the tools in which to measure or predict social outcomes the way we can correlate something like botulism back to some behavior that led to…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/18 04:58 PM
2

Yes. You can only let them look at, or at best taste, the carrot on the stick, not let them eat their fill, otherwise they have no reason to come back to you anymore. You just need to keep them just enough interested in whatever it is they are chasing to keep wanting to chase it. So they will appeal to that sense of hunger, partially an already ingrained instinct, and partially artificially induced by the circumstances imposed by those social engineers. A vicious cycle indeed. It just so happens…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/18 02:18 AM
3

keep it pg and respectful I've never been on this dating site, but I'd imagine the headliner is supposed to pertain to yourself and your interests, perhaps even provide a "narrative hook" to draw readers to your profile. It's very annoying when they instead decide to talk down and insult their audience. Talking to me like I'm a child isn't going to make interested. This is the internet. Not everyone wants to be polite. If you have a problem with the way some people talk to you, I'm sure you can …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/18 11:18 PM
4

Except, what they didn't say is that this "success" comes at the same price for women as it does for men: less time for family, harder time finding a mate... For something to increase, something else must decrease. It seems to be that nature is a series of finely tuned forces and counter forces. Life itself operates as trade-offs. Some organisms are fast, but at the expense of size. Some organisms are gifted with intelligence but lack strength. Reproductive strategies favor quality or quantity, …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/18 09:26 PM
19

A marketing agent told me once, "you see, we're not selling products. We're selling feelings. We want them (the consumers) to think of us when they get lonely or when they feel sad, and know they can come to us". What he was describing is basically the psychology of association. From that perspective, reproduction and the primal drive to have a family presents a golden opportunity for business to sell that bluepill narrative back to us.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/18 09:01 PM
14

Yeah, back on r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen we have this theory that unattractive women, on average, will have a higher n count than attractive ones. The idea is that women who lean more on the unattractive side are easier to approach, need more validation from men because of their physical insecurities, and hypergamy will allow then to shack up with average dudes easier than the high smv chicks. The takeaway is that a 4 or 5 female n count can surpass a 8 or 9 female and male n count. They can get th…
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 02:25 PM
2

Yeah, I have a feeling that we are only scratching the surface of the whole doping thing. We know it's rampant in sports like MMA, track and field, cycling, ect. I guess tennis isn't immune to it either.
/r/MGTOW10/09/18 02:04 PM
2

Thank you, learned something new today. For anyone else who didn't know: Self-licensing (aka moral self-licensing, moral licensing, licensing effect, moral credential effect) is a term used in social psychology and marketing to describe the subconscious phenomenon whereby increased confidence and security in one’s self-image or self-concept tends to make that individual worry less about the consequences of subsequent immoral behavior and, therefore, more likely to make immoral choices and act im…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/18 11:35 PM
3

In ethics, there is a problem called "reclassification of the virtues based on its adjacent category". What this means is that the virtues, such as honesty and courage, can be instead seen as a vice depending on the perspective. The author presents many examples of this in her article. Let's take, for example, a man who doesn't approach a woman. Such men are seen by her to be cowardly. A man of weakness who denies himself, or, how she says, is "dishonest to himself". However, it could be argued …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/18 06:38 PM
7

I have to say that's an awesome username.
/r/MGTOW09/09/18 04:19 AM
3

Perpetuates a very harmful ideal, as in a continuation or prolonging of something previously in existence. Unless I'm mistaken, have women ever been told to stay in relationships to "save" them? The only thing I can think of is a marriage vow "in sickness and in health", but I don't think that's what's she's referencing. Really, where or when have women ever been pushed to do this?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/09/18 12:11 AM
10

She needs therapy. For real Yeah. Most of the women featured on this sub need therapy in various degrees. Some need shock treatment. But getting help would require them having to be alone for awhile as they work through their problems, and I don't think they can handle being alone for the length of time it would take to accomplish that. That's why they monkey branch so fast from guy to guy. Not dating isn't even a thought for them. It's almost like they can't stand being alone because they have …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/18 08:50 PM
6

Historians seem to think the Minoans were matriarchal, but it's still somewhat controversial and critics argue that proposition has been ideologically driven. Any historians in the house? I know Aristotle talks about Sparta being a matriarchy, but only near it's collapse, which would help support your point. Though, Aristotle leaves a very cryptic message: But what difference does it make whether women rule, or the rulers are ruled by women? The result is the same. If we live in a gynocratic sys…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/18 07:07 AM
22

Imagine how long this kind of thinking bubbled just under the surface of civil society; now that women can do whatever they want, whenever they want, this vicious cycle is seen everywhere. The Ring of Gyges is a myth about a man finding a magic ring that turns him invisible. The intent of the myth is to define human nature while asking the question "what would you do if you could do anything and get away with it?" We as a society have collectively given women this magic ring that shelds them fro…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/18 06:42 AM
16

What's depressing is not what she is saying, but the 3 or 4 guys volunteering for this. No wonder they act the way they do. I wish someone would tell these guys that they deserve better than to even associate with women like this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/09/18 09:58 PM
4

The "reader" you would ask this question is best off staying the fuck away from such a woman. There is no certainty of any such psychology.. Yeah, my point exactly. Read through my comment again. We are in agreement.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 11:44 PM
6

Hey! Didn't know you came around these parts much anymore after making that sub. Big fan of yours by the way. You put a lot into each and every comment. But people just assume that's me using big words and trying to sound smart. It's much easier to destroy then it is to create. Don't let others get you down.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 08:46 PM
9

It's more than safe to outright stamp a single divorced post wall mother who is CC rider as not even worth considering. Sadly yes. Even if readers disagree on what degree or range a person can change and give these women the benefit of the doubt, why should they take that risk at all? I'd ask such a reader are you so sure of your own understanding of the psychology behind all this that you'd bet your life on it? Cause that's what's at stake, one way or another.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 08:01 PM
8

I'm going to add too, that it's basic behavioral science that personality is generally only so flexible. Personalty is more or less set in stone with a surprisingly small range of wiggle room, and gets increasingly less flexible as one gets older. What this translates to is that how one acted in the past can and does provide a good indication of how one will act in the future. That's why I'm very suspicious of anyone who claims to be a reformed so and so, especially these older ex carousel ridde…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 06:39 PM
26

I want any boys to have "tall" genetics because it makes a better life for them" It's true, though. On a few metrics, taller people tend to be more successful. I at least commend her honesty. The end goal of having sexual preferences anyway is to create the most fit offspring. She was just being blunt with it.
/r/MGTOW06/09/18 05:36 PM
45

I see this as a part of a bigger structure, which is the way social change happens in gradations. Or, more generally, the science of growth - each layer building upon the layer that came before it. We are currently in an ongoing shift away from conservatism, which means we still collectively have one foot in the door and out the other. The result of this is that women benefit both from conservatism and liberalism when it suits them, cheerypicking which elements of conservatism they like and igno…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 04:21 PM
4

To that I say: If they are going to be upset about accepting responsibility, then nothing is lost if they are scared off. If they do, we will know they were never good for marriage in the first place. Yes, a very insightful and overlooked point from the others.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 04:03 PM
3

Marriage can only be mutually beneficial IF it's within the context of a culture that strongly shuns divorce as an evil that should be reserved for the most extreme situations, strongly shames promiscuity and that practices male authority in marriage. Yes, much more broadly speaking, "the just can only exist in a just state". I suppose to follow your analogy of the grape, some climates are better for the growth of wine grapes as opposed to others. Some soil will be so poor in quality that sour, …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 03:45 PM
10

have a blessed day Find it interesting that she choose to indirectly reference herself being a born again Christian right after her most shallow and somewhat insulting part in her writing. Perhaps some internalized guilt coming to the surface, or just coincidence?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 02:01 PM
17

I'm willing to bet a lot of younger men wanted ltr with marriage in mind until they found out the hard way that girls their age don't want the same thing. So now it has become an arms race where the most detached wins. How far will it all go?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 01:06 AM
3

Thank you for replying back! I actually whole heartily agree with you on every point you made. I suppose I just accept these problems as a necessary evil used to facilitate communication and intelligibility. I have energy today, let's go balls deep! What always happens is that these places form their own sub culture, invent their own vocabulary and phrases. Yes. Modern language calls this "tribalism", part and parcel to division of labour I wonder? A natural reaction by a social species that dep…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/18 07:07 PM
3

Honestly one of the best classes I took was a required feminist one for my political science degree. All the hypocrisy, irrationality, and hatred of men seen strait from the horses mouth. It definitely opened my eyes and I'd recommend every nieve young man that still believes in the feminist propaganda to take this class.
/r/MGTOW05/09/18 12:43 AM
5

My male colleagues don't have this dilemma. Not only are they able to have children easily (often with women who work outside banking) but their ability to start families is making it even harder for female bankers like me to do the same. I don't quite understand why she sees this as a zero sum game. Because her coworkers are picking women outside of banking, she somehow thinks this makes her overall prospects for reproduction worse? Is it because she had her sights on them? Her hypergamy only a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/09/18 12:34 AM
6

Who cares. We aren't here to win a popularity contest. And it's not like using a sarcasm tag is going to be the thing that repulses them anyway.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 10:23 PM
4

Please don't engage with her. Just another woman with daddy issues attention whoring and shit testing.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 09:14 PM
4

It puzzles me why you guys answer a white post with a bunch of black, while claiming you are all about gray. As in only examining one side of the gender dynamic with missing the bigger grey picture that includes both? I'm not sure what you mean here, could you elaborate please?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 08:00 PM
17

Yes, a very important point. Respect is based on fear - fear of repercussions, fear of retaliation, fear of hurting someone's feelings, fear of disappointing someone. Men have been defanged to where they don't elicit that fear reaction. So women walk all over men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 07:45 PM
6

Yes. So many jacked up redpillers and incel types absolutely horrified that maybe their DNA won't get passed on. And here we are horrified that our DNA might be passed on. Life is just absurd isn't it?
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 07:05 PM
9

10/10 roast, excellent work.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 06:49 PM
18

Cancer for my dad. The Blue-pilled will argue that if you're single you'll die alone... In the end, we ALL die alone. How you're treated on the way out has more to do with money than family. Exactly. Think of the shock from all the parents having a kid as an extension of their retirement plan, only to find that the kids say "hell no" to sponge bathing mom and stick her in a home. Karma as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MGTOW04/09/18 06:42 PM
63

Looks like she tipped her hand too soon. She didn't get the memo that you stop having sex after the marriage, not before. Okay let's break this down. Yesterday in the afternoon my fiance started "making moves" on me, where his mood was clear that he wanted to have sex. I told him that I wasn't exactly in the mood and he got irritated because we hadn't had sex for a while and he felt like I wasn't satisfying his needs. I told him that I'm just not a super high libido sexual person, and he immedia…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 03:48 PM
23

This is a very interesting case study of not only Alpha widowhood, but shows a remarkable cross section of many other things. He told me he will be leaving the next morning. For some reason this made me more comfortable about seeing him. This is insightful. Odd isn't it, that she develops a sense of security from a most insecure situation? A stranger offering no more than casual sex taking her, alone, to a hotel with no future of prospects of a relationship?Paradoxically, it's this lack of secur…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 05:01 AM
15

Its that "It's not who she's had, but who she ends up with" bullshit that society vomits.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 03:14 AM
24

Maybe we should go back to nature. Judging by the feral state of women, I'm not sure we ever left it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/18 03:10 AM
6

This exactly. You know, we get a lot of criticism on here from people who just say we are cynical about women because we got burned from just picked the wrong ones. Ok, let's just entertain that notion for a minute. That still doesn't explain away the disparity from the way women (especially those very attractive ones) are treated from men, whom you don't have to get burned from to notice how they are treated. Just being around an attractive woman for a length of time and just being observant ar…
/r/MGTOW03/09/18 05:03 PM
2

I thought this was an excerpt from a post on the redpill sub where the guy tried to claim exactly this but with a twist. "He" tried to redefine unconditional love as "not expecting anything in return" and hence avoided the usual counters. He said that you can "unconditionally love" sometimes, and when it doesn't suit you, you can move on (because remember, "unconditionally" was redefined as meaning "expecting nothing in return" rather than "having no preconditions") I mean, what sophism is this?…
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 05:55 PM
4

Hey that's what I'm doing now. Though I think sitting in a expedition grade tent sleeping on a fancy ThermaRest in a comfy sleeping bag hardly makes me a man :/
/r/MGTOW02/09/18 01:57 AM
3

Does it ultimately really matter what box other people put us in? Do any of us here really have the authority to tell you who you really are? MGTOW is only an acronym, a logical placeholder used to facilitate communication. It only means what you yourself wants it to mean.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 12:03 AM
11

Not sure where this came from, comedy = tragedy + time The reason they aren't funny is because they haven't been through enough of that suffering. Same reason why they tend to be such lousy artists too.
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 11:22 PM
8

Some women see it as "you don't shit in the same river you drink from". Or, Aka: "I noticed that after I branch swing to a different guy, my old bf's get angry and ghost me, and I don't want to lose all the attention and gifts of my beta orbiter if I date him and it doesn't work. So I'll have this stranger pump me instead. That way, when I get bored or he dumps me, I still have something out of all of it."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/18 10:45 PM
5

Yeah I hear ya. I come here to poke fun and have some laughs, but sometimes it does kick up things. When it's not fun anymore it's time to take a brake and think about other things. I see it as a form of training. Fighters condition themselves to go against many of their natural instincts, as our natural instincts are to simp. And just as you have to rest your body after a difficult workout, we have to rest our minds when it becomes overstressed. This all isn't easy by any means. We are confront…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/18 10:19 PM
1

Yes, also I think birth rates would plummet noticeably. Makes me wonder how many births are "oopses" from women "forgetting" her pill. I've read that, in a controlled environment where pills are administered by the researchers, the pill has the same fail rate as the IUD. But since women "forget" to take it, it jumps it up to 15%!! Women also couldn't babytrap men into commitment. Would women finally be forced into owning up to their own end as to why men aren't committing to them? Nah. Maybe whe…
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 09:17 PM
8

We aren't MRAs that are trying to change the world. It took a loooong to get where we are and it'll take a long time to get out (if ever). A lot of us have been through the grinder of gynocracy enough already. We just want to live out the remainder of our short lives in peace.
/r/MGTOW31/08/18 08:15 PM
14

and just like her mama :$ Hum... was that $ sign a Freudian slip?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/08/18 03:07 AM
3

Exhibit A
/r/MGTOW30/08/18 06:50 PM
16

You know, this is the 5th night in a row we’ve spent together. We’re definitely not hookup buddies. I just can't get over the whole 5 day thing. So this is the measure of how we are to evaluate LTR material as opposed to a fling? 5 days together? Oh I'm sorry, 5 consecutive days? So if you spend 4 nights with a guy and miss one, that's still a bang buddy? How about 2 nights on and 2 nights off? Still bang buddy? This sounds so absurd. How about you evaluate LTR material based on character and lo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/18 04:11 AM
3

There's a good expression I find more true as time passes: a man's character is his guardian angel. Now that I'm older I can reflect on the crazy psycho women I was able to curve when I was younger because I was that full on romantic beta chump looking for commitment and love. I hear stories about them from time to time and I thank the stars above that they aren't in my world destroying my life. At the time it hurt, but now I see that it was a good selection mechanism to weed out all the party t…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/18 08:38 PM
32

Wow how selfish.. "daddy, why was I born, what's my purpose in life?" "well son, I needed someone to wipe my ass and keep me fed and housed when I'm too old to work" "oh.... "
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 05:44 PM
19

The choice is settle down with someone who is not attractive enough to be picky, and knows it, or just be by myself and not worry about it anymore. The problem is that hypergamy still eventually kicks in. They get "intoxicated" off the attention in the initial stage, but once that wears out their self esteem slowly increases to where they think since they got you, they can do a little better. You then become the base measure of what they think they can pull. Sometimes it backfires on them when o…
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 04:36 PM
6

Thank you for that write-up. I thoroughly enjoy all your writing. Good catch with The material world is of no consequence to justice Because justice exists as an idea right? And also with that the afterlife is subjective. There is this obscure myth in book ten of The Republic that touches on this and I think about it all the time when I come to this sub. It depicts an afterlife where the deceased draw "lots" to pick their next life. Men who had formally been rich and tyrannical yearn for the pea…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/18 05:19 AM
30

Like I have the power anyway to convince some testosterone fueled jacked up PUA to stop plating his harem. He will laugh in your face as he speeds off with the prom queen sucking his dick in the passenger seat. Might as well be asking a billionaire to stop making money or an elite athlete to stop winning. Why should they stop when it's working for them? I've been that guy a long time ago that used to stand up for women, but they taught me how little they valued there own words. They say one thin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/18 04:18 AM
2

I hate it when Christians answer to all the problems they have and in society is, "well the rapture is coming anyways" That "Justice will be meted out in the end, in if not in this world then the next". Christianity tends to hold spirit above matter, that suffering in this world takes a backseat to the rewards and punishments of the afterlife. The material world is only a temporary stop on the journey of the spirit to its eternal destination. The problem with this is that we tend to resign ourse…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/08/18 03:13 AM
8

So what should we do as straight white males to combat this? Continuing what we have been doing - walking away.
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 08:16 PM
8

Yep. Guess this is what "liberation" looks like. Single moms with 3 kids from 2 different fathers living off of welfare and child support...
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 07:56 PM
2

Just look at how pathetic men have become, some are sodesperate to the point that they will kill/rape...even if it destroys his closet friends or ruins his future. Reminds me of a quote from Lao Tzu if you don't want people to steal, don't value rare treasures. Paradoxically by putting the pussy on a pedestal that feminists have been doing, it actually encourages rapes.
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 07:34 PM
11

Exactly. Women are the gatekeepers of sex and we are the gatekeepers of commitment. It would be like a man complaining how he can't get laid. But apparently it's totally okay and normal for women to complain about men not giving them commitment. "where are all the good men?!!" might as well be "why can't I get laid!!?". Of course when a women says it we have to sympathize. Oh equality is bitch isn't it feminists? Just because you gave him sex and "love" doesn't mean he owes you a family or a dam…
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 07:22 PM
9

And if she's going to say shit like changing the laws and shit, well how are you going to implement that when women vote and are the beneficiaries of child support? Good point. There is a big conflect of interest there. I've also been playing around with another idea. If we eliminated or made child support more difficult for women to get, it would mean that government would have to step in and help provide for her. I think we all know this would either bankrupt the system, or they would have to …
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 06:18 PM
39

When I started out, I wasn't aware I would lose all my privacy, so I was doing everything that your average 21 year old does, but it was there for everyone to see. Would also add that she is trying to deflect blame off herself by saying that "well, it's just what everyone else does!" What she's trying to pass off is the observation bias of "the streetlight effect". It's sort of an inadvertent red pill. If what she says is true, then it means that, by her own logic, the average 21 year old acts l…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/18 04:36 PM
6

She just wants guys to fight over her. My guess it's a sexual selection mechanism. Antagonize a few males into fighting for the female and this allows the female to better discern which male is the strongest.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/18 09:24 PM
2

How would one know if someone is superficial if they are putting on an act? Wouldn't the blame be on the one who had intent to deceive? How is it that intent has gotten scrubbed from our rhetoric completely? It's interesting that "natural" has an elevated position above "artificial". As if, being "natural" is a greater expression of goodness and has a greater chance of having a successful relationship. Just because someone won't take pains to hide their nature, don't mean that the nature is ther…
/r/MGTOW27/08/18 09:05 PM
9

This is why I don't see men as blameless for the situation we've found ourselves in, and frankly why if anything is going to change, men are going to have to be the ones to initiate that change. Yeah I agree, but honestly sometimes I feel men get blamed enough for all the world's problems as it is. Mainstream society labels us as violent sexual deviant oppressors and then I come here and we bash men some more on their sexuality and behavior. Idk sometimes it just works on me. It's always up to u…
/r/MGTOW27/08/18 05:49 PM
4

Thanks for the help. It was a bit too subtle for me to unravel alone. Quite complex. It's scary how even the most uneducated women with no training in rhetoric will naturally come by these techniques on their own. It makes me question whether certain things, maybe what we would call "communication skills(?)", can be consciously taught and malleable, or if they are more or less inherited or just passively learned through the environment. This question has some relevance to this sub because one of…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/18 05:39 AM
28

I was doing a reading of the Symposium again, and there is odd passage where Socrates is learning from this woman Diotima. What's odd is that the Greeks were extremely redpilled and had a very low opinion of women. What would a woman, who has no education, no philosophy, be able to tell Socrates about love that he doesn't already know? Then it hit me. Women teach men about relationships. They show us through their actions and behaviors how we are to act and behave. We learn from them about what …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/18 04:41 AM
13

Last thing I want is for a guy to think he can "keep me" by providing.... what happens when he can't? That's not a nice guy, that's insecure and exactly the kind of talk that's off putting. I found this reply particularly interesting. It was so disconnected from the point HardPiano was trying to make. Is she just pulling pre-stocked arguments from a mental shelf, or does this reveal something more? Ranting because of so many generalisations here... where do I even start mate? 😅 You can't put all…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/08/18 03:16 AM
1

No I know exactly what your were trying to do and your point. You set out to redefine unconditional love usinging a mixture of red and blue pill ideas. What I'm saying is that the definition can't be divorced from all the other baggage we associate with it, and these two schools of thought are antithetical to eachother. It can't be reduced to just "not expecting anything in return". When we say "conditional" in conditional love we know it has a series of dependences and predicates associated wit…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/18 10:47 PM
0

There is a difficulty in reading through the writing. It passes back and forth between (what I'm assuming) two different forms of love without maintaining a clear distinction of either. This could be a symptom of the common problem with idealists, to pass between how things are and how things should or could be, without keeping the two camps completely separate. A common misunderstanding is that a "yes" is not necessarily a yes forever. You do not have to continue to love when you no longer choo…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/18 05:05 PM
9

If it makes you feel any better, I think a lot of us were forced into this by society. The lesser of two evils kind of thing, and we just learn to enjoy the ride. Men are rational, and if men were better off in a relationship than being single, naturally we'd all be back at the plantation. Hell, if I wasn't burned so bad I would still be on the plantation right now. There wouldn't have been a reason for me to question my life and where it's going to begin with. My problem is I seriously want lik…
/r/MGTOW26/08/18 01:50 AM
22

I see this as a shadow of a much greater social problem. Those who attain power and that apex success couldn't do so by playing nice. I'd imagine if you dig a little bit you'd find a whole treasure trove of abuses committed by these elite groups of people. Additionally these people score very very low on behavioral traits like empathy and agreeableness, and very high in Machiavellianism. Not a great combination for someone in a position of power over others. Interestingly too, they also score ve…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/18 12:01 AM
8

There is a good expression "don't think you can be more intelligent as a woman is clever". Biologically females evolved to survive off of the labour of the males. They couldn't take care of themselves, especially so when pregnant or nursing. So females that were able to manipulate males into providing for their needs were selected for. They had more offspring survive to reproductive age. That's the overall theme in nature. Things that are dependent upon a thing will develop tools with which to b…
/r/MGTOW25/08/18 02:50 PM
8

This "boxing in" occurs naturally by humans because we think in terms of patterns and associations. And additionally generalizations are necessary for language to function. If we weren't allowed to abstract from the particulars we couldn't communicate at all. All language depends an certain varying degrees of generalizing. What if we couldn't talk about "chairs" without making a reference back to an individual chair? There's a point where we no longer need a real world "model" of a single chair …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/18 12:39 AM
5

I've never loved anyone like in my first LTR, and I've never loved since. She murdered me. Who and what I was is dead. Women are the teachers of love to men. So I should be thankful. She taught me the hard way that human beings are wicked, twisted evil things.
/r/MGTOW24/08/18 04:09 PM
2

sick of fake love Yet you are fishing for a beta provider, complementary of your dual mating instincts. If that's not fake love, what is?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/18 03:48 PM
3

It's pretty ironic if you think about it. The culture preaches tolerance for a person's sexuality, but everyone is utterly hateful to a heterosexual man that either has lack of sexual success or voices some sexual frustrations. Think about the extent we as a society will take to relieve you of those sexual frustrations, but only in ironically the most extreme cases. If you identify as a woman but born a man, it's OK to mutilate your body, take hormones, and become a woman. If you're a man that's…
/r/MGTOW24/08/18 06:55 AM
7

Don't get me wrong. I did my share of errors but I took no shit. Slowly I started to tolerate. After tolerance I started to accept. Then it became the way of things. "That's just how women are - LOL" became my stupid mantra. It sort of becomes your "new normal". You slowly become more and more miserable and you chug through, but your pain tolerance increases with it. That treadmill effect can be a blessing and a curse in life. It allows us to plow through difficult times and accept the inevitabi…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/18 02:38 AM
8

What society should worry about is the 'non-chad' men finally wising up to the shit hand they have been dealt and deciding to no longer provide resources or energy into the system. An aside, I find that there is a vague common denominator in both the current left and right narratives: hierarchies are formed on top of an exploited under class. The difference being to whom they identify as the oppressor. My prediction is that there will be another smaller global economic crisis. The mainstream eco…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/08/18 10:41 PM
6

I agree in general, but I was extrapolating a bit for this particular example. I assume those girls she "knows" are also some of her friends, and we know that they like to party, assuming fairly frequently by her use of "at every party". We all know what kind of girl that leads that type of lifestyle. Additionally "birds of a feather flock together". We know she goes through men like water, so we can assume that there is a high probability that her friends do to. Hence, slut.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/18 08:54 PM
19

Lots of hypergamy, not to mention with at least a silver medal in the hamster Olympics with all the self deception going on. Here we go again. I've just ended yet another fledgling relationship because I wasn't attracted to him (and was actually increasingly repulsed and annoyed by him, even though he's a decent guy who will probably marry the very next person he dates... because that's what always happens when I dump people). So these men are highly desirable or at least desirable enough for so…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/18 02:36 PM
3

Yeah I was suspecting that she might be thinking beta bucks as well but I think she might have other issues. OP has this under control. He sounds hardly like the beta type to me so he should be okay.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/18 02:20 AM
6

This is the best idea I've heard in a long time. Someone should really pitch this idea over to those feminazis. But I just know that somehow, even after giving them money and land with which to work with and all kinds of help to get it going, somehow they will still be oppressed victims. Maybe they would complain about the location and act like we intentionally gave them a sub par area to work with, ect. ect.
/r/MGTOW21/08/18 10:43 PM
41

Pretty amazing how men's opinion on women fit exactly on a bell curve, which to me reflects how realistic and logical men really are. How can 93% of men be average or less? This shows how deluded women naturally are.
/r/MGTOW21/08/18 10:15 PM
5

That's a good point. Not to mention that they are actors that literally get paid to put on a show. How reliable can they possibly be when their entire livelihood revolves around giving a convincing performance. Essentially deception incarnate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/08/18 09:51 PM
13

Yeah. They aren't really angry about the double standards and the assault on rule of law, but rather worried that their movement, and by extension their ideology, might suffer from having some sloppy performances from some of its leaders.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/08/18 09:21 PM
3

Yeah, I still play sim city 4 pretty frequently. Even with cities skylines out, it's still a better game with more features. It's been what, 10 - 15 years since that game has been released? Nothing has topped that yet. Graphics get better but gameplay continues to decline.
/r/MGTOW21/08/18 03:47 PM
3

To me, she just sounds lonely. She goes out of her way to not deceive readers and make sure that it's clear what they'd be getting into.. I'll follow you up until this point. She's not on there looking for a friend or other companion type relationship. She's explicitly looking for a replacement dad 2.0. There are many other ways to cope with loneliness without having to drag a beta provider into it. People don't have to be in a relationship after all. Honestly, we don't know what happened betwee…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/18 11:04 PM
6

Good catch. Sounds like she borrowed a bit of marketing technique. It's not 50 bucks it's 49.99!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/18 10:35 PM
4

Yeah first time I've seen that as a profession. What a weird thing to put down. I'm not sure exactly how "starting over" pays the bills, hence why she is begging for betabuks to come bail her out I suppose.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/18 10:31 PM
16

Reminds me of a line from one of Euripides's plays beware the well articulated. They will stab you in the back and dress up the murder with words. Deception is also the premier arsenal in the female playbook, the single most threatening device they employ. If that's taken away, they lose most of their tools for manipulation. So yes, I'd rather these things are exposed out for the public to see.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/18 07:16 PM
18

A model, so pretty much the epitome of hypergamy and all that's terrible in a woman concentrated into one person. At least she has enough class not to display all of her bad attitude on her dating profile. looking to see if there are any gentlemen left because it's been a LONG time since I met one and treats me with the respect I deserve. I know some people are trying to defend her but you have to read between the lines. I guarantee you that her inbox has at least a dozen or so "gentlemen" that …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/18 03:22 PM
20

I'm just looking to live my dreams. Nothing worth comes easy, or so I'm told. You better work hard... Guess the irony was lost on her. She wants nice things and a lavish lifestyle but wants someone else to work for it to make it happen. Nothing worth comes easy... So does the converse hold true? If it comes easy, is it not worth it? To bad she will translate this through the lens of hypergamy and miss its application as a work ethic. ...or so I'm told I wonder if this was meant as sarcasm and a …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/18 02:27 PM
14

how much they can lift, it won't mean squat I'll see myself out now.
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 03:35 PM
7

Classic Halo Effect. What interests me is why this particular function in the human brain evolved how it did. Is it just an artifact left over from sexual attraction, or is it complementary working in tandem to ensure attraction? If so, why do we need to idealize personality for reproduction to occur?
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 03:24 PM
5

She is still kinda in contact with my sister, and my sister told me that my ex said she believes we really loved eachother and we'll find eachother again in the future to start a life together Yeah I was gonna say she wrote you off as a betasimp that she can file away until she gets flung out from ridding on that rotating dick wagon. The audacity of these women. To think they can go off to take miles of dick and think we'd just accept them back with open arms. Low key insulting too. What makes t…
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 05:48 AM
8

The very destruction of economic incentives for an individual to be motivated beyond the minimal requirement for attaining those benefits is what created the environment to allow for gender disparity. I've always thought it was excess that leads to disparity, not deficiency. Excess of wealth and democratic freedoms. But yes, I see now. It's a zero sum game. Excess of freedoms created a deficiency in work ethic. Thanks for the more technical talk. I've been kinda down lately, and it made my day. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/18 05:27 AM
9

The growing disparity in wealth between the rich and poor threatens health and wellbeing, inhibits social mobility, and is the most powerful social determinant of violence and criminal activity in modern times. The reasons are due in large measure to the socially corrosive effects of inequality on community life. This is what frustrates me so much about the modern discourse on inequality. We have these blinders on how we look at it. Inequality is seen as something only particular to race and eco…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/18 04:03 AM
25

Hey you been reading Marriage and Civilization: How Monogamy Made Us Human? The title you made reminded me of his point that a group stands to benefit more from less sexual competition, using the Nash Equilibrium and studies done on certain species of monkeys.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/08/18 01:45 AM
15

How do you guys do it? How do you move forward when it feels like the stupidest things knock you down so hard, and it feels like almost entire gender minus your mum is against you. Keep busy. "the idle mind is the devils playground". My work and my hobbies are the only thing holding me together. I could lie and tell you it gets easier, but it doesn't. It really doesn't. It also helps to stay away from blue pilled media and friends. We don't need to be reminded everyday that we are disposable. I …
/r/MGTOW19/08/18 01:21 AM
2

know thyself, love thyself, for no one will ever do either as well as you will. Just screams single mom facebook addict looking at shitty "live laugh love" memes. This doesn't come off as insightful and doesn't make you look like a deep thinker at all. Maybe you should take this meme to heart and go love yourself off of the dating scene. Put on your big kid pants and own your shit. Interesting coming from a chick who never outgrew her moody Goth phase. looking for someone to add to my life for b…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/18 10:11 PM
1

Yeah I called bullshit on her too. I regret having indulged in her analogy between getting robbed and getting bruised up from rough sex. Even entertaining that idea is ridiculous and absurd. That just gave her more ammunition for defending an indefensible position. Live and learn.
/r/MGTOW16/08/18 07:43 PM
6

Women typically (and many men) are really bad at something that might be called threat assessment. Women will sincerely be flipping out when some geeky beta guy tries to talk to her, shaking in his pants, but oh so eager to jump in the car of some slick pua guy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/08/18 12:29 AM
1

What building is that to the right? It's beautiful.
/r/MGTOW15/08/18 02:41 AM
2

please don't be creepy. If a person doesn't respond to you or message them you don't refer to them as "shy" it's weird. It's not rude if people don't respond. It just means they aren't interested. Have some pride. OK spending a fourth of your profile telling people not to get upset when they get rejected isn't going to convince them to want to take the risk to approach you. You come off as an insulting mega cunt who lacks any passing semblance of compassion or sensitivity towards the feelings of…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/08/18 06:35 PM
1

With the huge population numbers today and the presence of technology,there are no defined alpha females today. This is a problem that often gets overlooked. Humans are wired for small, tight nit isolated communities where social hierarchies are not very big. There was a cognitive study helped support this. Humans have the ability to successfully manage only about up to 100 relationships, presumably the population of a tribe.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/18 04:30 PM
29

That might be a good example of the zero sum principle. For feminism to rise it had to come at the expense of men.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 07:50 PM
45

Take this message to the bank: the sexes evolved to be complementary to each other, not adversarial The problem might be that relationships naturally involve a power struggle, and power is a zero sum game. So there will always be an element of conflict built in.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 07:19 PM
8

Hi. Read my comment at the bottom. My analysis is predicated on the self interest of human nature as its sole motivation and not exclusive to women. Females do, however, have a unique biological imperative that sets her apart from males. That is, they are dependent on the male for protection and have unique evolutionary adaptions to aid in selecting fit males. This is known in this sub as a "shit test". For future reference, when challenging a claim someone makes, use logic and reason and not im…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 06:29 PM
3

People are self interested. They don't really care about eachother. Like Hobbs said life is "all against all". If we show pain people will either try to capitalize off of one's misfortune or monkey branch to something more secure. People have long memories, and each and every slip up is jotted down in their mental notes to be stored away for future use. It takes a level of self mastery to be able to pick and choose which emotions to express and at which time and for what duration. Practically sp…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 05:57 PM
13

A woman asking you to open up is just a shit test. She's vetting you for weakness.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/18 05:11 PM
4

The kid will never know his father and become an emotional tampon to a single mom. He will be indoctrinated in the feminists propaganda as a worthless male rapist. By the time he turns 30 his mom will be 70 and I'm sure he will be expected to take care of her. I think that's all it really is... They just want someone to take care of them in old age.
/r/MGTOW12/08/18 04:43 PM
21

The reason why women's profiles, articles, or discussions make it here, is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self destructive, feminist ideology that it is. I just want to be able to have an actual public dialogue about female reproductive strategies in the way we already have with it's male counterpart. Why should it be okay to be critical of mens sexuality but socially taboo to be critical of the sexuality of women? When we open up the hood and really take a look at sex, we m…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/08/18 01:29 PM
21

If you're Chad, you don't need to pursue girls. If you're not Chad, you don't need to pursue girls.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/08/18 01:02 PM
3

Add a healthy dose of idealism and you have genocide bingo.
/r/MGTOW12/08/18 12:40 PM
2

Cool! I've been doing 3D modelling on blender for the past 2 years now. Still suck at it.
/r/MGTOW12/08/18 03:16 AM
9

The planet has completely lost its mind.
/r/MGTOW12/08/18 03:10 AM
7

Notice I said depend on them. Meaning I'm not going to purposely leave my house unlocked or walk in a bad part of town and just expect others to brunt the burden where I could have taken personal responsibility by not being a retard. In other words, I'm not going to take social safety measures for granted. If I take the available safety steps then that's a whole other issue entirely.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 08:20 PM
19

hamster detected. Getting bruised from fucking Chad is hardly comparable to getting robbed or jumped. She choose to get on a fuck app and it was just rougher than she wanted. Boo fucking hoo. Can't cry foul play when things don't exactly go your way. Like it or not, we have to be responsible for our own safety. I wouldn't leave my nice house unlocked and I would'nt go out walking the streets at night in a bad part of town. I'm not gonna depend on others to come help me when I'm the one who choos…
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 07:51 PM
17

Aww poor thing she got a bruise :( Can't have all of the benefits of promiscuity with non of the risks. Maybe she shouldn't be meeting strangers on a fuck app if she can't handle the potential repercussions.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 07:15 PM
3

I'd be interested in what kind of excuses they would collectively invent in the future to ignore what's being said now, much like how ancient sources today are largely ignored because of "misogyny".
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 07:00 PM
2

Not with MGTOW! With stats of divorce cited by the likes of American Psychological Association and MGTOW stories around here, this can't be disproved hah! Don't forget evolutionary biology. The whole field is just one giant redpill. Just when I start to get lonely or start questioning AWALT, a new study pops up that proves to me how fucked up everything really is. You know, alot of the things we talk about come directly out of that field, like hypergammy.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 06:47 PM
3

Natural selection at its finest.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 06:26 PM
1

There is also a glossary of terms in the side bar. It's a good read and freakin hilarious.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 06:14 PM
3

I've had that happen a lot to me. Not gonna lie it really made me feel like a freak. Now I know they were just interested, but didn't know or didn't want to take the risk to approach. That's why they speak just loud enough to where you can hear them. Likely same scenario with you.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 06:05 PM
9

And if every guy was like that it still wouldn't be good enough for them. The bar on how they define success would be raised even higher. That's part of the problem they don't get. We see the world in contrasts. Success is defined in relation to failure, beauty is defined by ugliness, ect.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 05:31 PM
4

Ancient Greece especially. Their literature is packed to the brim with social commentary on the growing influence that women were having. It's like you can't avoid it. No matter what you read, they were talking about it. For them to have been bringing it up so often and by different people from varied disciplines, you know it was really bad. I actually find in Euripides The Bacchae the very first formation of a solid "feminist movement". You read the play and it's ominous how close it matches up…
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 05:01 PM
27

The only fuckable one is in the middle. Solid nope on the others.
/r/MGTOW11/08/18 04:50 PM
5

Well, she looks like a porn star. I'm sure being that attractive she will have the pick of the litter. Though, something tells me she's not gonna end up with a betabux. Realistically, she's not done with the carousel yet. It usually takes the wall or needing a bailout to eject them and make them settle for a beta. She hasn't hit the wall yet and I'm sure she has an army.. No, a small nation state of orbiters that she can prey on for resources. Additionally, her pictures are advertising herself e…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/08/18 04:34 AM
20

Yeah the Star Destroyer definitely had less men inside it.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 06:02 PM
2

Yeah me too. We didn't celebrate holidays either. For me, it's just another day.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 05:36 PM
3

...you will realize that our society is currently upheld by people who never deserved this power. Reminds me of a German expression: The fat rises to the top. (pun intended)
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 05:19 PM
8

women are just completely feral now That's a good way to put it. They act like animals blindly following their desires. They pursue whatever makes them feel good without any thoughts for repercussions or their own long term well being.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 05:02 PM
7

personality: free thinker Then proceeds to be as basic as possible.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/18 04:48 PM
6

Looking for people with similar mindset: you can date or not, it makes no fucking difference This is off-putting. Why would I want to date someone who is totally indifferent about the state of our relationship? Why should I commit my time or energy to you if you're not going to appreciate it? Who would want to be with someone who doesn't find them valuable and not worth giving a shit about what happens between them? Maybe she didn't mean it like this considering the context of the rest of her pr…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/08/18 02:40 PM
3

Reminds me of Parmenides "On Nature" that "Truth is a circle" 40 coming into being and passing away, being and not being, change of place and alteration of bright colour. Where, then, it has its farthest boundary, it is complete on every side, equally poised from the centre in every direction, like the mass of a rounded sphere; for it cannot be greater or 45 smaller in one place than in another. For there is nothing which is not that could keep it from reaching out equally, nor is it possible th…
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 03:45 AM
1

I don't get this whole beef between incels and mgtows. Why are they mad at us exactly? I would think incels would only stand to benefit from ignoring women and just focusing on other things. If women are repulsed that much, there isn't much you can do about it anyway.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 03:25 AM
3

Yeah nothing says virtue like meeting strangers in a bar, to get dicked down no doubt.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 03:12 AM
39

You think you can fight millions of years of evolutionary biology? That might ironically be your answer. We are programmed to want to pursue reproduction, and all the things that it takes to achieve it. We are fighting millions of years of evolution by walking away. That's why it's so difficult.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 03:07 AM
6

...perhaps because sex involves focusing on someone else. Holy crap the hamster on that one!
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 02:44 AM
11

You will be expected to tell her everything about yourself while she keeps herself closely guarded. This is known within circles like political science and business as "information asymmetry". Typically, the party that has the greater degree of knowledge wields power. Sometimes this is more accidental, like the consumer of a product will always know less about the product than the manufacturer. Sometimes it's more deliberate, like governments placing certain key operations as classified. In any …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/18 08:37 PM
-1

Which REALLY only has as much "power" over you as you give it... sounds like you gave it a LOT. Tell that to my 14 year old self as I'm getting my ass beat by the local jocks. Yeah, I gave them the power to do that alrighty.
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 06:39 PM
9

Yeah high school never ends in these dumps. Once you've been labeled you're stuck with that till you die. On the flip side, if you been born to a high standing family and become a jock in school you're guaranteed life on easy mode. When you fuck up people will look the other way, even the police to some extent will be much more lenient.
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 02:46 PM
7

Can confirm. When I first met my ex I had a good friend who was 6'2 and built. We were friends since we were kids, and hung out together all the time. A few weeks after she met him she asked if we could do a threesome on her. That means she was thinking about it for those weeks. Now this girl was the closet to a unicorn you can get. A shy Conservative Babtist virgin. It was a shock that she would even think about something like that, let alone actually try to plan it out. I know threesomes aren'…
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 02:38 PM
27

Shall towns have this weird feudal caste system where it's all about your last name and what family you come from. If your not accepted in the community, you're pretty much an outcast. The second worse thing is that EVERYONE including their dog knows about your personal life. Gossip is the currency of the town. Better not ever fuck up because they will never forget. Small towns are shit.
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 02:10 PM
18

True. In today's day and age it's sad how "not as bad as it could be" passes as some kind of virtue. If being honest about your intentions and fatness is something we should start praising women for, then what is the point of calling them out at all. Baby steps. She may be a horrible person, but she is at least not guilty of deceit. I would rather have a criminal open about their misconduct than one who passes themselves off as a saint. Who is more dangerous?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/18 04:22 AM
59

Well, gotta give her kudos for being more creative than "my kids my world". Rather than saying "looking for a real man" she just capitalizes MAN, subtly implying it. She openly admits to wanting casual sex instead of the usual shit test of "NO HOOKUPS". That's unusual. Instead of "Curvy" she admits to being fat. Probably the least cliche profile I've seen here in awhile.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/18 03:55 AM
2

Then, I remembered all the days I had bad days This is what helps keep you from going back. We all have a tendency to try to remember those best times when everything was working. They are usually far and few between and that's why they are so vivid to our memories.
/r/MGTOW08/08/18 03:36 AM
5

Yeah it's all part of that feel good nonsense where we tell people they can be whatever they want. Which really only sets them up for a greater disappointment and frustration down the road after they put all their hopes and dreams and effort into something just to fail miserably at it. Maybe I'm a dick here but we should only encourage people to do things that have a good chance at succeeding.
/r/MGTOW08/08/18 03:13 AM
1

Oh my..
/r/MGTOW08/08/18 02:26 AM
5

I hate to say this but a part of me is a little envious of you guys. I was on my own, pretty socially isolated, and had to fumble around with getting dates through trial and error. Though AWALT, it would have been nice to have been able to avoid that particular baggage of feeling like a fish out of water flopping around without a clue.
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 06:37 PM
3

It's gotten pretty elitist and PC. They are more worried about their image and playing politics than addressing the issues.
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 04:57 PM
1

I'm not sure how redpilll it is. Checked out the thread and some chick got reddit gold just for being a single mom ragging on dudes.
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 04:41 PM
1

He who is the cause of another becoming powerful is ruined Machiavelli
/r/MGTOW07/08/18 02:28 PM
14

We were all born into this fucking world working and dying just to be told we're not good enough Ever wonder why we give female attributes to nature? Besides the obvious that nature creates just like a female gives birth, nature also rejects. Nature is in a perpetual state of shaving off it's weaker members. How many creatures have the Earth nursed only to have them butchered by her own hands? She then sifts through the bloody reckage and makes from them a new home in the body of another. Nature…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/18 03:35 PM
6

Probably more like swiping on a bunch and in turn getting no to little returned matches. In the past before internet dating you would have to meet and take a little time before you got rejected. It was easier to write off these individual experiences as bad luck. It was harder to see the forest through the trees because it was so spread out in time. Now, you can get rejected hundreds of times in a single day. Besides the greater blow to the ego, you can get a more accurate picture of your own se…
/r/MGTOW06/08/18 02:03 PM
5

I think he's just taking a specific experience and extracting a larger life principle that applies to it. Finding bigger over arching patterns is what us nerds like to do in our freetime.
/r/MGTOW06/08/18 04:44 AM
3

High powered career women are some of the worst people on the planet. Seriously, I think they are worse than single moms, and that says a lot. Control freaks that have this eternal chip on their shoulder thinking they have to out compete all the guys in their field. And they absolutely will not hesitate to throw you under a bus if they think it'll get them ahead in some way.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/18 04:04 AM
7

The fact that she gets so upset after seeing her ex with his new girlfriend doing things together and (presumably) happy really proves the maxim: The best revenge is a life well lived. By the way, lol at the one chick who tells her to date hundreds of guys.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/18 02:38 AM
7

Women want a man taller than them, but they arbitrarily choose the 6ft number because it is more round of a number and easier for women to discuss their wants and needs with that. Wonder what would happen if we switched to the metric system.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/08/18 02:19 AM
0

No. Karma was just a control mechanism for the poor, to keep them satisfied and not revolt against their rulers. The fact is the more of a narcisstic dick you are, the better you fare in life. Not only in the sexual market but in life overall. Nice guys will always finish last. But we need nice bluepilled idiots to slave away and keep society running, so we create these little fictions for them so they don't get too discontent. "the wall" is sort of growing to be our karma equivalent. Just a way…
/r/MGTOW06/08/18 12:48 AM
7

cunt punt Lol! Thanks I needed that.
/r/MGTOW06/08/18 12:33 AM
3

Just tell them about all the love you feel for them. They will leave you alone after that. Problem solved! In all seriousness, if you remember the montra "she's not yours, it's just your turn", you will gradually be able to be detached. Relationships are transient and fleeting. The affections of a female change with the wind. There is no stability to be found.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 10:03 PM
1

So i think its scorched earth...or she will be empowered by your weakness. Sorta reminds me of Machiavelli's advice "never bring others to power". Power is a zero sum game where if one is diminished the other is increased. That's just why women do better when we are suffering. Make no mistake, a relationship is a power struggle.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 09:47 PM
7

Well. I wasn't quite ready for this Blackpill. Just when I think I reached the bottom of depravity I realize it's only scratching the surface.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 06:40 PM
26

I can't be the loser here who doesn't gain anything This says so much in so little it's frightening.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 04:27 PM
4

My first thoughts were thinking if they accounted for a survivorship bias because of the apparent focus on older age. Something like those with shorter lifespans will contribute less overall data than those with longer ones. Old age also comes with fragility that makes one more, if not entirely, dependent on others. Having a family that can provide a caregiving role will ensure that the persons physical needs are met. However this level of dependency is usually only found in old age, where the p…
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:58 PM
1

I think passions pick you, you don't pick your passions. It's sorta like in Greek mythology of The Muses. They choose who will be inspired. At best we can ask politely.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 04:09 AM
19

To bad Wizards is a full blown SJW shitfest. I've played for years but the horrible card stock problems they refuse to fix and the stupid overt propaganda they keep pushing pisses me off. Anyway yeah Dominaria is a great set. I heard they brought back Richard Garfield for it.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:55 AM
4

That's strange. Why would how to get a girlfriend be trending here? Wouldn't it be something more like how to avoid getting a girlfriend?
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:49 AM
5

OK, makes sense. I suppose a bar or nightclub. Other than that, probably can't any other way.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:41 AM
3

Maybe I'm ignorant, but what would wealthy, successful men have need of a sleezy sugar daddy site? Doesn't pussy line up for them or am I way off?
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:33 AM
1

Fun fact, Primeape Alphas actually have very high overall stress levels, and about equal to the very lowest member in the dominance hierarchy. That should tell you something.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:23 AM
2

Yeah I had one of those introverted shy types. Grass isn't really greener. For them to be that withdrawn usually means they have quite a lot of issues.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 03:14 AM
1

What's the name of the painting? Looks pre-raphealite. They did a fantastic job on the children. Usually artists make them all weird looking because they never stay the fuck still.
/r/MGTOW05/08/18 02:00 AM
3

"the hedonistic treadmill".
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 08:10 PM
6

I'd say genetics does matter. Females have the duel matting strategy. They have to try and optimize getting the best quality genetic donor while simultaneously trying to secure the most resources for their offspring. Betabucks alphafucks
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 08:00 PM
2

No homo you are my favorite redditor on here.
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 07:07 PM
10

Most females have never been outright rejected. Character and fortitude is forged through adversity. The only time they experience rejection is when she can't secure commitment. Then they inevitably cry "where are all the good men?"
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 04:04 PM
1

Oh okay. I'm sorry I didn't understand before. I would think the altercations with her ex would be a liability for your public image too. You place a great deal of weight on reputation, I see. I'm not a public figure so it was hard to understand.
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 05:36 AM
1

Wow calm down dude. I can feel the tension through my phone. You sure this isn't all just a misunderstanding?
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 05:18 AM
2

You might like this. It's a subset of evolutionary psychology that explains "sexual economics theory" - which is that transactional element your questioning. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748701630277X
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 04:08 AM
5

Maybe it's more like "I stabbed him with a knife, but it wasn't murder because I didn't hate him". (what she feels about an act has the defining weight on how she perceives the outcome of the action.) Which, in a way, we do base our judgements off of intent and the motivations of an individual. The hamster is hijacking this logic and twisting it.
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 03:24 AM
6

Oh jeez if I saw these women I would walk the other way. I might catch the stupid.
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 02:59 AM
2

Not just biblical stories, but pretty much every philosopher ever. I wish they would start teaching basic philosophy way before college. I learned SO much redpill stuff from reading Plato. It helped me a lot during my more formative years.
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 02:53 AM
8

the perfect is the enemy of the good. I wonder if that is why the noble lie exists.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/18 10:49 PM
2

Caveat emptor (UK: /ˌkæviæt ˈɛmptɔːr/, US: /ˌkæviɑːt/) is Latin for "Let the buyer beware"[1] (from caveat, "may he beware", a subjunctive form of cavēre, "to beware" + ēmptor, "buyer"). Generally, caveat emptor is the contract law principle that controls the sale of real property after the date of closing, but may also apply to sales of other goods. The phrase caveat emptor and its use as a disclaimer of warranties arise from the fact that buyers typically have less information about the good o…
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 08:12 PM
2

Your right about that point, however what he was writing about was more broadly speaking, a sexual selection mechanism where the female will antagonize the males to encourage intercompetition between her suitors. As an aside, a good casual example is the narrative use of "the love triangle" Here is an excerpt confirming your correction: Evidence for the operation of supply and demand dynamics in sexuality goes back at least to the landmark work by Guttentag and Secord (1983), who showed that imb…
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 03:39 PM
16

And of course her book made it to the New York Times best sellers list. God humanity is retarded.
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 04:07 AM
38

I feel you. When I was young I was told that too. Feels great to be told your basically working and waiting to be someone's second choice backup plan for when the wall hits. Fuck that noise. It's like you basically get to sit on the sidelines and watch as your future wife screws around and you just wait till she gets bored or runs out of fresh cocks. Guess this is what love looks like. Or, you can just work to better yourself for yourself and just ignore women. The world is a pretty big place, f…
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 04:02 AM
1

Well a common one is "well, you just hate women". My reply is "so"? Rhetoric must be weighed in relation to truth and evidence, not judged by the precieved emotional state of the one giving it. The means of expression and content are very, very different things. Just because I hate something, doesn't necessarily mean that I can't present good, factual arguments to the table and form a convincing argument as to why the thing in question is bad for whatever reason. I hate falsehood, does that mean…
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 03:40 AM
11

We just live in a weird world where everything is fine until it gets to the point of a physical attack. It's like everything leading up to that is just irrelevant. A good example is bullying in school. The victim endures months if not years of mental turmoil, but once he retaliates back on a physical level, suddenly he's the bad guy. I think there are complex reasons for why we are so biased in defining violence. One being mental anguish leaves no easily identifiable marks. The other might be so…
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 08:10 PM
7

I was told something similar. I wasn't dominate or assertive enough, didn't take the initiative, blah blah. It's like, OK then. I'm not here to raise you. If what your looking for is someone to tell you what to do and set a curfew then move back home to your dads house. If you do decide to stay here in this relationship, act like an adult that has agency and can think for themselves.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 05:37 PM
10

Good grief some women really are like little children. It's like they are wired to push boundaries just like a little kid does. If you give into the tantrums, or don't set and enforce boundaries, they respect you less and less and become a little monster. I think women really want a father figure deep down, not an equal.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 04:47 PM
8

Well for any guy to be able to land a 10/10, that presupposes that he is in the upper 20% of men, and these men also have 80% of the female attention. So he would have many other 10s as options. So to answer, yes. Men who land a 10 can, and do, dump them.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 04:14 PM
4

It's complicated. When this happened to me, I was pressured from my and her family for marriage. I was constantly mocked and ridiculed as a "dead beat dad" if I didn't. Even though she skipped her birth control, I was still liable and the fault rested on me. I got her pregnant and I need to "man up" to my mistakes. So it's partly shame tactics. Plus for the woman, it's not always about getting marriage out of it. Deep down what they really want is a permanent connection with the man, maybe that …
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 03:07 PM
16

A good friend of mine told me "there is not really any good or bad. There just is". The more we understand the natural world, the more we see the absence of a overarching moral order. It was human projection on a utterly indifferent universe. Human morality just evolved from a series of survival mechanisms/behaviors. We can't give more than we can take, otherwise we would die, we can't take more than we can give otherwise the survival of the group is compromised, so we develop reciprocity. I mea…
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 02:45 PM
13

It kind of saddens me that a lot of young men will never have that feeling. I've seen too many good men thrown in the thrash heap. The small loss at never knowing love is a small price to pay to avoid the life long hole in their hearts. You also can never reclaim your lost innocence. At least these newer generations might have a chance to keep it.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 02:25 PM
2

His concept of euthymia is interesting. Basically extreme self confidence. Makes me wonder how you can be a critical thinker if you always think your right?
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 02:32 AM
1

I know. I'm just trying to help add to your criticism. Sorry if it seemed off, it wasn't directed at you.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre01/08/18 09:14 PM
1

Women are followers. They are not trend setters. We are in charge of that. I would respectfully disagree on that. Women are the gatekeepers, and men generally will be or do whatever women want them to be. The only reason the manosphere exists to begin with is a reaction to the world created by feminism, made of men collectively scratching their heads and asking "what did I do wrong?" We are the monsters that they created.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/18 06:40 PM
7

Yeah, dealing with women with emotional or mental health issues is like relationship bootcamp. I've been through the worst of the worst and know that if anything goes wrong in my life, I can survive it because I've made it through that.
/r/MGTOW01/08/18 04:56 PM
6

When used as a noun instead of an adjective, Nice Guy refers to people (men or women) who believe basic social expectations are currency for sex. This issue with this is it reduces the intent of the guy as just trying to get laid and misses the bigger point or goal of what most of us actually were interested in. We were looking for a long-term relationship that connects deeply on the emotional level, someone whom we can grow old with and share our life with, not "pump and dump" or something like…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre01/08/18 03:00 PM
8

I am forcing myself to dislike her because loving her hurts too much. This really hit home for me. What a fucked up world we live in. In order to survive, we have to kill the one good thing within us - our ability to love. What tragic absurdity.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre01/08/18 05:22 AM
47

There is a certain sting of truthfullness to it. The world is a harsh, uncaring, brutal place that is not made for sensitive people. You have to have tough skin and a devil may care attitude just to make it by. If you don't, the world will eat you up and spit you out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/18 02:54 AM
5

She was the manager at her workplace; looks like she wouldn't stop being a boss at home either. I've known a few women like that. They can't separate their personal and work life. They take that attitude with them wherever they go. It sucks.
/r/MGTOW01/08/18 12:17 AM
2

Great. We are giving them ideas :l
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/18 04:52 PM
6

We are also not fragile snowflakes that get upset over some random blanket comment from some random person we don't even know. We have way more important things and more dangerous issues we have to worry about on a daily basis.
/r/MGTOW31/07/18 04:26 PM
2

Men have done our part. It’s time we relax. Kick back and enjoy the sunset. I'm with you there. Men have been bleeding and dying for civilization for countless generations. It's time to hand over the keys. If civilization collapses under new management it's no skin under my teeth.
/r/MGTOW31/07/18 03:44 PM
20

I agree. Its like a type of sexual selection mechanism. All over the animal kingdom, you find these type of sexual competitions, where two or more males have to fight and the female pairs off with the winner to mate. It's just instinctive.
/r/MGTOW31/07/18 12:35 AM
6

Well this was depressing. Not so much what he was saying per say, but the fact that an issue that should be self evident or obvious to anybody with eyes has to be meticulously laid out and padded from end to end with defensive rhetoric.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre30/07/18 06:21 PM
19

I always enjoy a good rant. Rant for a rant? Doing the right thing (according to their immature romantic notions) actually ends badly, both emotionally AND economically, and the government is in on this. You know, this reminds me of a Dawkins lecture where he talks about the ideal distribution of things that buy into the system and things that take advantage of it. Of course he's partially speaking in biological terms of like a predator and prey relationship, however this could be applied to hum…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/18 04:08 PM
4

another soulmate? Plural? Isn't that a contradiction?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/07/18 04:08 AM
41

Well that article unexpectedly went a little extreme. I don't think women need to be sent back to the kitchen and pulled from college to make a great partner again. We just want you to not drug and slut it up. Keep your legs closed for Christ sake (pun intended). I think deep down we all want to be able to be that nice guy again and give you flowers without you losing all respect for us in the process, without relying on PUA mindfuck techniques to get and maintain your interest. I don't know wha…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/18 12:20 AM
16

queer pansexual ethically non monogamous person Wow dude. You survived that for 7 years?
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 04:50 PM
10

"no honey, no money" What's great about this is that it can apply in a general way to things other than specifically sex and dating. Anytime your putting more effort into something than your getting out, that is a bad investment of your time. I've terminated one sided friendships with my bros before and quit shitty jobs that didn't compensate enough for the work involved, for example. The greatest power a man has is his ability to walk away. On a different note, if these women were virgin unicor…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/07/18 04:17 PM
7

True. My ex would complain to me about her weight all the time and some minor health problems because of her inactivity. After years of trying to get her to go running with me or to the gym, I just would say "you know what you need to do". It was so frustrating. 15 minutes a day even and half her problems would go away. There's a lot of people out there who wish their problems were that easy to fix. Eventually I realized it was just for the sympathy, not for me to help her fix it.
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 03:45 PM
2

What is the point of bots like these? Who made them? What do they do? So many questions
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 03:23 PM
1

They are useless outside the average job that existed in the 1500s. Robots will eliminate those jobs in 10y Good point. Pre-industrial revolution having large amounts of people with low IQs wouldn't have been a problem, and would have been an asset. An agrarian society needs lots of laborers to work the fields and be content with their lot. I imagine that's why such variance in intelligence might exist to begin with. It's a necessary form of division of labour. It's also interesting to note how …
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 02:36 PM
42

Plus if he does show signs of being impatient or frustrated, she will gaslight him by accusing him of lusting after her and wanting her for sex. I call this the "your not entitled to sex" defense, which typically shames and embarrasses the guy into falling back in line. At the same time as shaming the guy, it also virtue signals that she "isn't like that", that she wants something serious and not just for sex, ect. But in fact we all know that isn't true, but this helps contribute to the carrot …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/18 08:33 PM
5

What was most surprising was this subtle attitude of indifference towards getting pregnant. If I remember right, she basically said that if anything happens, she is financially secure and can raise it by herself - "I'm a strong independent woman". It never occurred to her that maybe a guy would rather not want any kids than be raised by a single mom? Why does a man's opinion on the matter have such little weight? Even IF the woman does foot the bill, does that make it right? It's not just about …
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 07:27 PM
3

It's kind of a shame the mods removed her post. It was a perfect example of the type of reasoning women will use to get you to be irresponsible.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 05:28 PM
4

Your missing the point. Its about trust and power. We have to just take your word for it that your on some contraception, and your clean. If you do happen to "forget" your pill, the man is at the mercy of the woman from the time forward. Or maybe you just have been with low women who have no self esteem, no sense of honor and who just want, yeah, a baby daddy to take care of them. But then that would say also smtg about you. This is what we mean by women have no sense of accountability and we mu…
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 03:41 PM
11

Also, "I'm on the pill". Doesn't matter of its a random hookup or your wife of 6 years. Can't trust any woman, or anybody for that matter, that will have zero repercussions for a decision and, in fact, is financially incentivized to be dishonest.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 03:06 PM
3

Someone else agreed with me on this one time. Haha was it Plato? ..."Marvel not then at the love which all men have of their offspring; for that universal love and interest is for the sake of immortality."
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 02:13 PM
1

I thought that was an odd inclusion in their rant because it's very much a leftist talking point - for something to increase something else must decrease. In that case, the more successful one is, the more people that are used to support their lifestyle. Like a pyramid, those at the top are supported by those at the bottom. It very much argues against their point of working to be successful. The humane thing to do in this scenario would be to decrease oneself and ones ambitions.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 01:58 PM
9

I hate to say it but you can pretty much tell what kind of life a child will have just by looking at the parents. It seems like we just don't want to admit this level of determinism as a culture. Also there is this taboo around adoption, that "no one can love your child as much as you can". Single mothers who will give up the child for adoption are socially shamed as parents who didn't love their kids.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/18 10:05 PM
9

single mom stereotype bingo You know, we should market this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/18 09:47 PM
2

Last year I went on a long ass thru hike, and stopped by this lodge to resupply and rest a few days. Camped out not far in the surrounding woods. So a couple was having their bachelor/bachelorette party or whatever celebration they do for that at the lodge. Later that night I go back to camp, get ready for bed. About midnight, hear screaming and yelling. I hear them telling some guy to put the knife away. "PUT THE KNIFE DOWN BRO!". That shitstorm lasted till about two in the morning. So I wake u…
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 09:24 PM
2

Maybe it's because you generalized to "people are..."? Sometimes on here I've noticed how we all will be so critical of female nature, but almost idealize male nature, or we will attribute behaviors that both males and females have solely to the female. But anyway, your statement seems fair enough. We evolved from social animals that depended upon our collective abilities to survive. So we all have a propensity to think collectively. Our ancestors depended on social cohesion in order to function…
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 08:53 PM
6

No thanks. Spending your late teens and 20s working your ass off and still expected to wife up someone who spent that time partying and carousel ridding is stupid.
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 08:15 PM
3

I would hazard to guess that there were a lot of good men you passed up in order to pursue the hottest, most exciting guys. Well those guys have options, and you are just the next one on his list She's having done to her now what she's been doing to others. Karma then?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/18 05:04 PM
1

Yeah women are the natural sophists.
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 06:11 AM
14

At the bottom of her profile, she at least considers the idea of what she has to offer instead of being 100% demanding. It's pretty sad that this is what passes as "the good" nowadays.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/18 08:08 PM
3

Honest question - If there were good women, why would you need PUA mindfuck techniques to get them? Wouldn't they have reasonable standards and appreciate your honesty, integrity, love and attention you'd give them, without being all Machiavellian? I mean, it's self refuting. If women (or people, for that matter) were "good", why craft a set of techniques that relies on women's self interests and desires to control them?
/r/MGTOW23/07/18 05:17 PM
3

Hate to say it, but best class I ever took was a required feminist one in college. You can see all this strait from the horses mouth. They have gotten that arrogant that they don't even bother to pretend or hide it. I did a paper on one of the major feminist authors. I counted the number of instances of certain words. "love" appeared only a few times. "power" appeared in the hundreds. What does this tell you?
/r/MGTOW23/07/18 04:58 PM
8

...and can choose to do none of that and still get married and be taken care of and live like a child from birth until the day she dies. Gee, wouldn't it be nice if we could choose not to work? For us it's work or the streets. Liberal or conservative, doesn't matter. We still have to fend for ourselves.
/r/MGTOW23/07/18 04:19 PM
28

He finally asked me if I liked him, I told him no, he said it was fine. He hasn't talked to me since then it's been over a year. So she rejected him and is actually wondering why he's moved on? She really has to go on reddit to ask this?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/18 03:43 PM
21

Asking even a moderately attractive woman to abstain from the CC? You might as well ask them to cut off their arm.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/18 03:28 PM
8

In her mind she should be able to land any guy in the world, there is zero humility. Bingo. They are so used to guys throwing themselves at them they don't know how to handle rejection. It's like a spoiled rotten toddler throwing a tantrum the first time the can't have that toy they wanted. Let that sink in. A dating man might get rejected 9 out of 10 times, but if he's hurt or angry over it, he's "not entitled to a relationship/sex with her". If a guy rejects the girls advances and the girl thr…
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 08:17 PM
1

Thank you! It is anger that can propel a man to do what is right. I remember Aristotle called that "righteous indignation". Wonder if there is a link between the two, or if it was just a continuation of the Old Testament philosophy?
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 07:35 PM
2

So essentially you want to stay in the status of what the ancient world considered an unman. This is new info to me. Source?
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 06:04 PM
1

Haha just turn it around on that tradthot. A real woman is supposed to give us sex whenever we want and do whatever we tell them too. Ah we aren't entitled to sex and obedience? Well you aren't entitled to a man's resources either then. They just want to sit at home and leech off a man. Nothing new here.
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 05:47 PM
5

i love people with style What does this even mean? "style"? They adopt the norms of some sub culture? How is that anything of value or meaning? I can understand styles of painting, or architecture, but styles of humans?
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 07:18 AM
6

Yeah there's a reason we call society a dominance hierarchy. Society functions on violence, violent people are better equipped to survive.
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 07:01 AM
12

As Nixon said : If your explaining your losing. People in general don't have the ability to see what's past the surface layer. Life is complicated. People don't want complexity, they want simple answers.
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 06:53 AM
3

I'd settle for IQ testing potential voters.
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 06:36 AM
3

Protip: a virgin women is still AWALT. Speaking from experience here.
/r/MGTOW22/07/18 06:24 AM
5

That's an interesting theme going on, chaos V. S. order. I'm kinda high here, but maybe the supposed chaos we think we see around us is just our stupid monkey brains not comprehending it's structure? Hell I'd argue that chaos is actually more structured than what we would consider order. It's interesting that this is connected up with Evolution because Darwin was pretty much a teleologist, which doesn't leave much room to entertain the notion of an unstructured part to reality.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre21/07/18 09:12 PM
3

Probably raised by a single mom, so he's used to being an emotional tampon.
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 07:17 PM
20

Yep I was that white knight too. It's funny how nothing makes a girl dry up faster than showering them with love and attention. When you just don't give a shit and treat them like a wet hole, they will line up for you. It's so stupid. Women oppress themselves by making good caring men into shitbags like me.
/r/MGTOW21/07/18 05:53 PM
3

Not just the human female, but most animal species on Earth have some kind of way to test the male. We just happen to be social monkeys that formed strict dominance hierarchies, so the shit tests correspond to what best suits that environment. I kinda think we always subconsciously know about this. How many stories have been written where the guy has to go slay a dragon, or defeat some other creature to woo over the girl?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/18 04:56 PM
4

I think it's just hard for even red pilled guys to process it sometimes. The reality of a super thot and one of your average blue collar dude is worlds apart. It would be like a 3rd world homeless beggar trying to imagine what it's like to be the richest man in the world.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 10:27 PM
2

Interesting, I didn't know about that last stage. I was always told you just go into the woods to meditate and prepare yourself for death. Reminds me of the Allegory of the Cave where the philosopher goes back to help the masses. The idea of life stages always appealed to me. It's like modern society and feminism ignores some very important biological reasons as to why we do things and at what time we need to do them.
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 09:16 PM
14

Haha that NAWALT is all yours dude.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/18 08:09 AM
3

The people we tend to date reflect strongly on our own character I hope your not trying to imply bad people are attracted to bad people, so they had it coming, because it's not always that simple. Good or naive people tend to project good qualities onto other people. They simply can't process how another person could be bad if they lack that specific kind of badness in themselves. I think it's because the brain uses reference points, like internalized motives or past experiences, in calculating …
/r/MGTOW20/07/18 02:44 AM
3

We're all prisoners to biology Yep I think so. Can't undo 100,00 + years of evolutionary programming overnight simply by willpower.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/18 01:38 AM
3

Yeah I think there is something in the way humans make choices out of a need for security. Machiavelli's a good read for this. In a uncaring world governed by violence people will try to cling to any sense of safety they can.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/18 11:29 PM
7

Yes it has the appearance of an easy lay, but those are also the most potentially dangerous women. When they feel that your moving on, they are the ones, out of desperation, most likely to be regret raped or try to baby trap you to keep you around.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/18 11:00 PM
5

One of the best pieces of advice I've heard on here was just this. "Give um enough rope to hang themselves with". People will reveal themselves in time. Just have to be patient.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/18 10:41 PM
2

That's like asking if biology and evolution is "wrong".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/18 06:28 PM
4

You train him to think that he needs to impress a girl instead of considering if she is right for him. This means as adults, men don’t value themselves in a healthy way and will value abusive women because they think that’s just the way life is. This really hit home in so many ways. I think back on all the crap I put up with because I just thought all women were like this and I should just get used to it if I wanted to be with someone. My standards of monogamy and general decency were, in my eye…
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 04:41 PM
1

Haha. Reminded me of Hume's argument that the gun didn't kill, the bullet just happened to be ejected at the same time the trigger was pulled and we humans just, out of habit, draw a correlation between two separate things. It's the same logic how women can separate love and sex, what they did in the past and who they are now, their "true self" and their "it's not really me" mentality.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 03:09 PM
1

Lifting is moving mediation for me. Also learning to accept and deal with the physical pain let's me better handle any potential mental anguish that may come my way.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 02:26 PM
8

To answer your question, I think they mentally separate sex and love. That's interesting to me from an epistemological perspective. Although that begs the question if such a thing is love at all if they have such disregard for the other's feelings. Also I've heard them explain they needed to "get it out of their system". Apparently they anticipate the idea of monogamy to be such a potential tax on them that they need a period of relief.
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 06:04 AM
11

At least all the tattoos and bright hair makes it easier to recognize all the craziest ones.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 09:03 PM
3

You'd be surprised. At least here in the states you can take a intro level political philosophy course and Plato gets almost no coverage. No one really takes him seriously or cares. I think it's partly because Aristotle's writing method is more digestible to the modern reader, compared to Plato's abstraction. I was surprised at how many people in general have never even heard of the cave allegory.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 06:08 PM
4

It's all at a subconscious level. It's kind of like how if a shark stops swimming it will die. That's something I wish mainstream culture would communicate more. When is the last time you heard the word "instinct"? It's like we don't want to admit that we have subconscious urges that guide our behaviors because we are afraid of some moral repercussion to this type of determinism. Again, it's like information is measured not in their relation to truth and evidence, but how people will react to it…
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 05:43 PM
6

It's amazing how humans keep reinventing the wheel. It's like we suffer from a collective amnesia and can't remember our past.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 05:36 PM
2

Any advice for raising daughters?
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 07:51 AM
2

Is that a three season tent? Is it warm and dry enough over there for 3 season?
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 06:35 AM
5

Chiseled on a monument for all the world to see.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 04:09 AM
2

Not too proud of this fact but I had a fling with a female track star who made it to the Olympics. Got to know the world just a little bit, and yeah she was on roids. Apparently so is a lot of others too. Guess they just cycle off when they know they are going to compete? IDK.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 03:33 AM
1

Your laugh is contagious. Haha.
/r/MGTOW15/07/18 02:22 AM
1

I wonder if that's a type of collective projection society uses. Not a big fan of projection theory through. It's essentially unfalsifiable.
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 08:45 PM
1

We shaved apes are interesting. We tend to define and appropriate value based on other people's interest. We only desire those things that other people desire. If it's in short supply, we call it "scarce", and the drive to obtain it goes into overdrive. If it's common, it's easier to obtain and with less effort and so the drive to posses it wanes. Ironically, what this does is we tend to assess worth based on factors outside or extrinsic to it. We never will see the thing for what it is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/18 05:47 PM
2

It's confusing. This sub acknowledges that men are disposable and only valued for their utility because of a deeply ingrained biological imperative for men to sacrifice and provide resources. Its wrong if we do this for a women, but if we do it for something abstract like "the greater good" or "society", we are somehow not just playing into those same gynocentrec impulses?
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 07:48 AM
3

Small price for them to pay for a lifetime of hedonism and debauchery.
/r/MGTOW14/07/18 04:17 AM
6

Interesting, it functions like a selection bias.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/18 10:25 PM
9

Plus I think how its reduces the motivation of nice guys to just sex is missing the bigger mark. I'd argue the end goal for these men isn't just sex, but the idea of having a family and a committed ltr with the woman. It's strange if you think about how we all have aspirations in life, but having a family is the only dream I can think of that totally hinges on someone else to make it happen. How powerless that must feel.
/r/MGTOW13/07/18 09:51 PM
24

"You wouldn't be accused of rape if you weren't a rapist." It's a unfalsifiable catch 22. It operates under the same false premise that if someone gets accused of a wrongdoing, they did some type of wrong to have received that attention to begin with.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 04:26 PM
24

Maybe the real issue isn't whether love exists or not, but where it resides. The Greeks, more specifically the Platonists who developed and elaborated upon those terms, were idealists, as opposed to what we'd call realists. And there's a reason for that. They wanted to see things for how it should be, not how it is. They'd frequently reject epistemically true information in favor of morally just ones, which political philosophers call "noble lies". Love is real in a sense, but is it just a produ…
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 05:12 PM
4

There's a lot to it. I think it's partly a form of virtue signalling to the potential man. She's trying to snag a quality responsible man, so she's trying to depict herself as responsible from doing an irresponsible thing, at the same time disclosing that information. In a way it's damage control (in that if she doesn't acknowledge having a child, it may be interpreted as being deceitful, so she tries to spin it to make it sound better). Also I find these women to be internally conflicted. To sn…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/18 04:27 PM
3

I'm a 36 F Not put all my eggs in one basket This made me chuckle. Wonder if she's aware of the irony?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/18 02:25 PM
2

I see humanities god complex expressed mostly through the unusual preoccupation with free will. Humans think they have some sort of autonomy from the all the forces that shape all other living and non living things. Psychologically, they create a hard division between "nature" and "man".
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 01:57 PM
3

Every relationship - predator/prey, rich/poor, leaders/followers, male/female. Though, what's power?
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 03:05 AM
3

As the saying goes "the same fate awaits both heroes and ordinary men. They pass away and are slowly forgotten." I think some people here only mentally interpret "redpill" theory to apply only to courtship/reproduction. A few people like us apply it to all of the human condition, much like how the naturalism in The Prince by Machiavelli can be applied in greater scope outside of what the author intended, just as well as applying Sun Tzu to more than a literal battlefield. To them we seem overly …
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 12:52 AM
3

I think it has to do with the longing for a sense of justice. We all want to believe good and bad will be rewarded and punished in the end. Just something we do as humans to cope. It could also be a vestige back to religious thinking. I would guess most members in the manosphere are atheists, and that sense of justice that would normally be occupied with a cosmic diety punishing and rewarding in a afterlife has been replaced with a more karmic slant that's easily digestible.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/18 04:40 PM
1

I nominate this article for Hamster of the Year. The sheer lengths it went to rationalize parasitism. Totally amazing.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 04:16 PM
4

I don't have a problem with people fucking around, I have a problem with lying and hypocrisy.. It's interesting how we shaved apes can sit and watch a nature documentary about some other mammalian species, but when human reproduction is put under the microscope things get heated, people get offended, ideologies get tossed around. We can watch that documentary and most people will never be able to extract those human corollaries. I think it's like a magic trick. It only works if you don't know th…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/18 02:26 AM
5

The economy is tight and DUIs are being handed out like candy (at least in my state). People would rather drink at home.
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 12:09 AM
2

One of these is that there were way more people throughout history that were autistic but not feeling troubled on the sidelines like most of those today... Temple Grandin wrote a paper where she postulated that Autism is sort of an concentrated animalistic instinct in humans. This to me fleshes out another angle why it's more difficult in the modern world then back then. The environment in the past was more acceptable of the more physical aspects of our species compared with today. Another psych…
/r/MGTOW09/07/18 11:58 PM
4

This is something we don't talk about much. Reputation is a big deal, especially if your in a small town. Word of mouth travels fast.
/r/MGTOW09/07/18 07:01 AM
2

All governments are predicated on religion? Never thought of it that way. The only other thing that comes to mind is social contract. In that case it's more transactional thus probably fits under wealth redistribution.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/07/18 05:14 AM
3

We call that "fun sized" from where I'm from.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/07/18 05:02 AM
4

He said female.
/r/MGTOW07/07/18 02:01 AM
7

Who was it that said "it's better to be alone than be with people who make you feel alone"? Being a little lonely is a small price to pay for being trapped in a loveless marriage, or with friends who don't really care about you. You, and each and every one of us are completely alone in the universe. But that's true of every living being that ever lived, and yes, died before us. Humanity as a whole has been suffering from an ever retreating sense of belonging. For a long time humans thought thems…
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 04:38 PM
12

Plumbers make a crap ton Hehe. Punny.
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 01:56 AM
4

Never seen Rick and Morty, though I've heard good things about it. I thought it was a Richard Dawkins quote xD. When something is true, why value creativity over perfection by changing it? Mean no offence by my ignorance. Peace be to you brother.
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 08:34 PM
3

ive got some reading to do after work. Ugh... Whyyyy? 😲
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 06:05 PM
26

Yep love is a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed.
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 05:14 PM
3

Humans have a tendency to see patterns or draw conclusions where one doesn't necessarily exist - "Apophenia". In statistics and mathematics it's called "the clustering illusion". No doubt feminism has contributed a great deal to the negative fertility rates of first world countries, but such a effect couldn't have been predicted, let alone planned, by a small select group of individuals. There's no way the first wave feminists in the 1700s could have possibly guessed what our modern world would …
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 04:10 PM
38

The reason we are all still watching it is because it takes that long for them to finish a fight xD
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 03:47 PM
2

This is a tanget here but I was thinking today about the bigger, long term picture of how men are, in women's eyes, becoming obsolete. Because we've grown so used to the plenty of modern civilization, it's useful to imagine here life as a hunter-gatherer. It's very much a physical existence. That in itself puts the human female at a great disadvantage, as nature gave her the ability to reproduce at a tremendous cost to her own strength. She can't carry much. Her skin is thinner, she sleeps colde…
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 05:00 AM
3

Don't forget you can fart whenever you want to. No joke I'm thankful every bean burrito Monday for being single.
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 02:34 AM
9

I have this crazy theory that humans are sort of programmed to be impulsive and irrational because if we were all thinking clearly all the time, the race would become extinct. There is no rational reason to have children.
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 02:15 AM
1

Actually had the opposite problem. I'm a health fanatic thats on a very restrictive diet, so all I eat is bland. My gfs would always complain how hard it is to make meals I'd eat because they would only eat surgery/fatty garbage.
/r/MGTOW04/07/18 01:12 AM
2

Science confirming more and more that the division between mind and body isn't as divided as we once thought.
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 06:41 PM
3

I would love to meet a girl who was like "well, I have junk in the trunk and never succeeded at anything, so I better just find a nice guy who drives a truck or moves furniture to have an honest loyal relationship with". Looks like your unicorn is just settling for a beta provider. Why would you want to meet a girl like that?
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 04:22 PM
3

Yes, can confirm.
/r/MGTOW02/07/18 02:53 PM
60

As a student of philosophy, Alexander sought out to find Diogenes. When he found him, Alexander offered Diogenes anything he wanted. "I'm Alexander, the king. Since you're such a kickass dude, and to show how much I respect you, I will grant you anything you want, just ask". "yeah, how bout you move over. You're in my light asshole". Truth be told though, he was a beggar who lived in the market of Athens, who did ask for things regularly like food from the public. Although he reduced his wants a…
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 03:53 PM
0

to men, some things seem good and others seem bad. But to the gods, all things are right and just.
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 02:12 AM
3

3 cubed + 4 cubed + 5 cubed = 6 cubed. "The Law of Generation" - Each successive number builds on what came before it, just as each generation builds off of the one before it. As all growing bodies die, so does a state reach it's termination. It is excess that causes each stage of the state to pass into the next, with feminism as only its outward expression.
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 01:22 AM
2

I suppose people only want things they themselves don't already have.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/07/18 01:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter