TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SodaPalooza Archive

View 4 posts and 253 comments by SodaPalooza on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

"touched me sexually while I was asleep and could not say yes or no." Oh honey... how do you know this happened if you were asleep while it happened?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:06 AM
1

Well, they are both non-consensual based on age alone No. In many situation, a 16 year old student with a 20-something teacher is completely consensual.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:03 PM
4

The cases with female teachers are frequently consensual (albeit currently illegal) sexual relationships. Philippoussis had been booked on suspicion of sexual intercourse or sodomy with a child 10 years old or younger, lewd and lascivious acts on a child under 14 and oral copulation of a person under 18. This case seems to be unconsensual.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 02:46 PM
-1

I'm pointing out that your position of "it is altered from natural, so it isn't normal" isn't really valid. Piercing ears, cutting hair, cutting nails, etc. are all "normal".
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:18 PM
-1

Meh... I think cutting hair is normal even though it is altering the natural state.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 10:21 PM
0

77% of American men are circumcised. 91% of white American men (my demographic) are circumcised. Source So that covers the "typical" part of my theory. As for the preference by women, that's mostly an unsupported opinion. However, I think that the fact that virtually all professional American porn is filmed with circumcised guys provides something... even if people aren't really watching porn for the dicks. Here is one study that is blocked at my office, but from the google preview it looks like…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:50 PM
0

If you think a girl who really knows the difference between cut and uncut is going to prefer cut, you are delusional. American porn, from what I've seen, is nearly all circumcised. Get into European, Asian or amateur porn and you start seeing uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:41 PM
-2

Circumcision rates are also declining That may be true. When I was in school in the 80's, based upon what I saw in the lockerroom when trying not to look, everyone was circumcised. There was one guy (Hispanic immigrant) who wasn't, and we all wondered what was wrong with his dick.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:30 PM
-1

Yes. There is a fetish for everything. Some guys like chicks with hairy vaginas too. But not me and not most. I'm playing the percentage here. Also, you should mark that link as NSFW
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:29 PM
-6

Why do we have an appendix?
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:26 PM
1

My theory is that in America, women consider a circumcised penis to be typical (because it is), prefer the look of circumcised penises and are therefore less likely to recoil at the sight of a circumcised penis than an uncircumcised penis.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:26 PM
1

No hostility, just pointing out that what you believe is based upon nothing but faith. There's no logic or evidence to support your belief.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:23 PM
-3

Because my dick looks normal and girls are less reluctant to put it in their mouths than if it was uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:01 PM
-2

"liberal" left. But how can those same people who praise that book, also attack MRA's Liberals aren't opposed to Men's Rights. Liberals think that men already have all the rights. TL;DR - Liberals are delusional.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:58 PM
-9

DON'T CARE. But glad my parents got me circumcised as an infant.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:54 PM
1

But I believe You can believe in unicorns and mermaids too, but that doesn't make them real.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:52 PM
1

give the people an incentive to speak the truth But there isn't always a "truth". Her: I had 8 drinks that night and he still had sex with me. Ii never would have consented without that impairment by alcohol. He raped me! Him: Yeah, she was drinking. But she was also all over me. She definitely wanted to have sex, and so did I, so we did. Totally consensual. Which category does that go into? The facts aren't in dispute. So when she says "he raped me", is it a false allegation or a rape?
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:31 PM
1

things that people initially don't want or can't be honest about The problem is bigger than that though (and I'm not even sure you can get around that problem). The problem extends because you can have two people agree 100% on the facts of the case, and one will say it was rape while the other will say it was consensual. "Rape" has become such a bastardized word that it doesn't really carry much meaning anymore. When someone says "I was raped", the first logical question is "what does that mean"…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:49 PM
2

97% of alimony payers are men. 97%
/r/MensRights24/07/17 11:31 PM
1

The only thing surprising about this post is that the OP seems to be surprised by it.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 11:30 PM
0

How many people would have to say they weren't happy about it before you took it seriously? I don't know that there is a specific number, but it is certainly something > 0.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 10:50 PM
0

why is it so ridiculous that a man who was altered in infancy might object to it? Because I have literally never met a single person who felt this way. Not one, in over 50 years.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:10 PM
21

You never really know for certain. If an accuser admits that they made it all up, that is some reasonable evidence that it was a false accusation, but still not 100% conclusive. In my opinion, it lends more credence if the accuser provides an explanation for why they made it up (didn't want husband to divorce her, for example). I don't want to speak for everyone here, but I think most MRAs position is that we know that false accusations happen, but there is really no idea to know how frequent th…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:09 PM
1

a circumcised man who wants to be intact To me, this is a unicorn. Literally, the only place I've seen anyone make this claim is in this subreddit. Not even anywhere else on the internet. And certainly never in real life.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:42 PM
1

No. Women generally think penises of any sort are "gross" and they'd prefer to not touch them - much less put them in her mouth. Add a funny looking dick to the mix and you've just turned an uphill climb into a steep mountain ascent.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:40 PM
0

our bodies are for the pleasure and service of women Literally no one thinks that.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:32 PM
0

And I'm not really opposing your position either. If it is an issue you find important and want to dedicate time and effort to, I'm not going to be out there campaigning against you. I just think it is one of many non-issues that MRAs needlessly focus on while important issues like alimony and child custody are still on the table. Unlike feminists, we aren't quite to the point yet where we need to invent issues like manspreading and affirmative consent to justify our existence.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:06 PM
-1

I'm not going to go out in the streets and protest to make it happen, but I wouldn't object if it was already happening either. In reality, I wouldn't really care what "all" women do; but the small number that I'm going to be intimate with in my lifetime? Yeah, I'd prefer they be pretty for me.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:51 PM
-1

Plenty of women have "funny looking" and even "gross looking" vaginas Can't argue with that. but we have accepted them as a natural part of the body. Maybe you do. I certainly don't. Some chick has a gross looking snatch, and I'm going to be less into that. I'm not saying it's a deal breaker, but I'd much rather be with someone with an attractive vag than the alternative. Of course, there is a lot of "acceptance" discussion and "loving your own body". But you know who is leading that discussion?…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:22 PM
-2

Have you ever heard of body shaming? Yes, mostly from SJWs and feminists... which is kind my original point upthread. If the boy grows up to hate his intact penis then he can get a circumcision I suppose, but how many people are going to do that? After 2 or 3 chicks freak out over your "funny looking dick", you're probably more likely to avoid women rather than going to get cosmetic surgery done that most people have done as an infant. We need to ensure everyone's right to bodily autonomy Again,…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:41 PM
-4

Lots of men are very resentful of their circumcision I'd need a citation to believe that. I'd need an adequate quantification of "lots" to be concerned about it. infant circumcision has NO medical value. If we're going to start banning things that have "no medical value", we're going to start limiting a lot of pretty mundane things that people do with their children. There are reasons other than "medical value" that things are done. you want to make sure that everyone is happy and confident abou…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 05:47 PM
0

ritualistic excision of the clitoris or other parts of the vagina under surgical settings Here's the thing: I don't know what that would really involve and I don't know what it would be like to experience it, so I can't really judge it from first hand experience. All I can do is listen to other people's first hand interpretation and rendition of that procedure and believe them when they say it is bad. With circumcision, on the other hand, I've experienced it. I can still listen to other people's…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 03:59 PM
-6

Because those who oppose abortion do so because they believe it is fucking killing an innocent person for convenience, while those who oppose circumcision do so because they think it ... well, really I don't know why anyone gives two shits about circumcision. This is like asking why people are more opposed to murdering children than they are to having babies with pierced ears.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:39 PM
37

Despite what feminists claim, I'd just take it as a compliment and move on with my life.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:00 PM
2

So if the woman has 90% custody in your case and the dad has 10% custody, does the mom still give money to the dad so that the are equal in parenting? I think that's exactly how it works. We hear stories all the time about people paying support to parents that have less time with the child than themselves.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 03:00 AM
1

the general consensus is that I'm right LOL. Significant <sup>[Citation</sup> <sup>Needed]</sup> on that one. Being drunk pretty much absolves you of zero legal responsibilities, while being adjudicated incompetent pretty much absolves you of all legal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:35 PM
2

I don't think adults should be treated like children unless they've been adjudicated incompetent.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:25 PM
0

I think they have the same Which is what you denied saying upthread And there you have it: Women are just like children and need to be protected from making bad choices for themselves. That's not what I said or what I implied, and you know it. You believe that drunk women should be treated like children. That's fine if you want to believe that. I think it is patronizing and sexist, and I think most MRAs and feminists would agree with me.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:18 PM
1

Ok, let me make it simpler for you: Drunk 24 year old Jessica initiates sex with sober 26 year old man. Sober 15 year old Lori initiates sex with sober 26 year old man. By the standard you contemplated when you posted: We don't allow children to consent, for instance, and personally I see that as a very good thing What is the difference between Jessica's and Lori's ability to consent? As far as I can figure, there's only 2 options: Either you think drunk women have the same capacity to consent a…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:09 PM
1

Scenario 1 neither will be drunk (probably), so no issue. A bottle of wine and 2 coladas over 10 hours and you don't think she's drunk? Ok... change it then: Same amount of alcohol in the prior 2 hours. Now what's the difference between Jessica and Lori?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:51 PM
0

That is what you said whether you realize it or not. If you don't think you said that, then clarify for me with this example: Here's the situation. There's a man and a woman at a resort hotel hanging out by the pool. They begin talking and flirting. One things leads to another, and eventually the woman takes the man by the hand and leads him to her room. Once he the room, she removes her own clothes and his clothes, pushes him down on the bed, and has sex with him. Scenario 1: The man is 26 year…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:19 PM
1

And there you have it: Women are just like children and need to be protected from making bad choices for themselves. That's a pretty sexist attitude you have there.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:56 PM
2

whether someone can consent when their ability to consent is inhibited. Read that sentence. It is nonsensical. Either they consented or they didn't. If they did, then they were clearly able to do so. If they didn't, then nothing else matters.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:47 PM
14

Part of the challenge with this question is that many people don't understand the theory behind child support (and one can certainly argue with the theory). Let's go with a situation where both mom and dad are divorced and both still in the picture, but dad has custody 90% of the time. Dad is a factory worker with a high school education making $40,000/year. But Mom is a writer. It didn't seem like a very lucrative career choice when they got married, but she hit it big. Now she is a writer for …
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:45 PM
2

Tell me if it's relevant when your kicked out of college with $100,000 of loans and no degree, or fired from a job, or have your kids taken away or are ostracized from your friends and family because some chick who was all over you at a hotel 3 months ago decides its better to claim she was drunk and raped rather than admit to her husband that she made the choice to cheat on him.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:28 PM
1

I'm sure she won't have any regrets. Russian roulette, my friend.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:19 PM
3

if a sober individual has sex with someone who consented You can stop your sentence right there. If consent was granted, and the opportunity to deny consent was available, there was no crime.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:45 PM
3

What else inhibits your ability to consent: Being emotionally down from a recent breakup? Being euphoric over getting admitted to your preferred college? Being depressed and suicidal? Being "intoxicated" by a person's good looks or money? Being horny after seeing someone dressed sexily? What state of mind is the "baseline" state of mind? And is any deviation from that state of mind a variation that inhibits ones ability to consent to sex? If your partner isn't typically horny and only consents t…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:40 PM
1

There are people here talking about one party being drunk and another being sober is completely acceptable All that matters is whether both parties consented when the option to decline was available. If so, then the sex was completely acceptable. If not, then someone is a rapist. Alcohol doesn't matter, consent matters.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:36 PM
2

People who get drunk consent to intoxication, not sex. What? I've been drunk and consented to sex. Guess I'm a fucking unicorn!
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:35 PM
1

Don't fuck drunk women, it's not worth the risk. FTFY a woman who is bat shit crazy about you as she'll do anything in bed to keep you around. Even...say.... get drunk and have sex with you?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:29 PM
4

The first question when somebody accuses rape because there were drunk should always be: 'Were you incapacitated?' I would go with "did you consent" as the first question, because (assuming you actually had sex), consent is really all that matters and what differentiates sex from rape.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:27 PM
2

can't differentiate between buzzed and black out drunk. I'm not particularly proud of this, but when I was in high school 30 years ago, I could go out drinking and drive my parent's car home 50 miles without a scratch on it.... and then not remember driving home when I woke up the next morning. There were several times that I would rush to the window to verify the car was in the driveway... then go to check it out for dents and scratches. Are you suggesting that even though I was capable of driv…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:11 PM
1

I'm sorry this happened to you. It isn't your fault. There are good resources available at raiin.org. /s
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:06 PM
2

if they consent while drunk they can't recant That's all anyone here is saying: Consent is all that matters. Alcohol is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:59 PM
2

Bullshit. People consent to sex every day with people that they know are just taking advantage of them.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:55 PM
6

But if you were so inebriated that the next day you don't remember if you consented or not, all you know is that someone had sex with you, what are you supposed to do but believe that you were raped? Why would you jump to the conclusion that someone is a heinous criminal rather than jumping to the conclusion that you consented to something you now regret?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:52 PM
2

convicted That's the thing about rape accusations, conviction isn't really needed to fuck up the accused's life.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:47 PM
5

There is no gray area. Sexual consent is agreeing to sex when the option to decline was available. Alcohol doesn't change that definition.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:44 PM
1

That's a nice opinion you have there. I don't share it.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:37 PM
1

Comrade!
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:14 AM
0

I'd say the same thing about a 16 year old chick with a hot 25 year old male teacher. So maybe you fuck off, eh.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:42 AM
-18

If that's her mugshot, she's pretty hot. If she had an opportunity to put some effort into it, she's going to look 10 times better than she does in her mugshot, and she doesn't look bad in her mugshot. Can't find a victim here. My assumption is that this was a consensual relationship.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:28 PM
7

With regard to men's rights and eliminating the pandering to feminists in the United States, you've got absolutely zero chance with the Democratic Party. They actively campaign to the feminists and against MRAs. The previous administration's actions that created the explosion of campus Title IX bullshit is just one example. The leader of the Democratic party was literally campaigning on the concept of "vote for me because I'm a woman". So the Democrats are the enemy of the Men's Rights movement.…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:04 PM
27

When feminists use the word "right", they have a different definition of it than non-feminists do. To me, there are only 2 kinds of rights: Natural rights & Legal rights. Men and women have equal natural rights. Women have all the legal rights of men and more, plus have fewer legal responsibilities than men. Feminists often think of "rights" in the same way some people misconstrue the "right" to free speech. They think that if it is a "right", then it means they should be able to do those things…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:55 PM
14

If you see your boyfriend of 2 days with another woman, he isn't cheating on you, he's cheating with you.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:47 PM
1

You again? Good grief! push even further to the free market right, which means even less power and wealth for average men. [Citation Needed]
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:43 PM
27

I always tell me one night stands a fake name. That way I can be rough as fuck - slap, choke, leave bruises. If they regret it the next day, they don't even know who to accuse of rape.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 07:41 PM
2

In order for sex to occur without coercion by these definitions, both parties need to simultaneously decide on their own that sex is desired at that moment. I think of it first and ask "do you want to have sex with me"? "Stop pressuring me! That's coercion! Rapist!"
/r/MensRights14/07/17 08:59 PM
2

Never giving out your real name is the best form of birth control.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 08:53 PM
1

Derp.... Found the rapist! /s
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:50 PM
5

The list can be subdivided into eight different categories: material gain, alibi, revenge, sympathy, attention, a disturbed mental state, relabeling, or regret. Where does this frequent one fit in: "I didn't intentionally false report. I just didn't know that it wasn't rape because feminists have so distorted the concept of consent that my sorority sisters were able to convince me that I hadn't consented when I actually had".
/r/MensRights14/07/17 02:35 PM
7

Some innocent chick gets the shit kicked out of her by a couple of scumbag cops and you're trying to make it a men's rights issue? That's the kind of logic typically reserved for feminists.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:41 PM
-8

There's no victim here. Same thing if the genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:50 PM
3

I cried over an episode of ALF once, so there's that.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:47 PM
0

There are tons of media stories about men being unjustly attacked by cops.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:44 PM
8

I'm a 50 year old white dude. In the same situation, responding to the cops in the same manner, I'm confident that I would not have faced the same outcome as this poor girl. This is not a gender issue. It must be something else. If only we could figure out what that something else is. Hmmmm....
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:44 PM
8

0:32 - If you get in an argument with your girlfriend while sitting in a parked car in an empty parking lot, it is abusive to remove yourself from the situation. WTF?
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:32 PM
12

I'd say Libertarianist more than anything. Basically "keep the government out of our shit and let individuals succeed or fail on their own".
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:15 PM
8

I really wish colleges would put more effort into teaching women what consent actual is regardless of what their sorority sisters or Women's Studies professors tell them. Consent is agreeing to sex with the option to decline is available. A pamphlet like this for college women with points like these would be helpful: If you consent to sex while drunk, and you wouldn't have consented while sober, you haven't been raped unless you were so drunk that you were unable to decline. If you consent to se…
/r/MensRights22/06/17 02:53 PM
2

Nope. I negotiated that leave myself via the private two-party contract I have with my employer. I have no need for the government to negotiate or interfere with a private contract I negotiate with another person.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:00 PM
2

This is completely wrong. I live in the US and I got like 8 week paid time off when my daughter was born. Land of the free!
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:26 PM
0

Doesn't matter if she "knew" he didn't open a condom, she said no already. Are you under the impression that a "no" never expires and can never be revoked?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:24 PM
3

she said no Right. And then she said yes. And then she said no again (at which point the sex stopped).
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:23 PM
2

At some prior point, she indicated that she only wanted to have sex with a condom. Then, in the heat of the moment, she went along with having sex (initially) even though he never put a condom on. Once she "realized" he didn't have one on, she changed her mind; at which point the sex stopped (as it should). Let's turn the tables a bit and see what you think: Same exact situation, except that the guy is the one who only wants sex with a condom on while the girl is suggesting maybe they should go …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:21 PM
2

/r/twoxchromosomes
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:16 PM
2

Male parents in divorce and custody. I'm not sure parenting, divorce and child custody are really a "first date" topic. Even if she agrees with you in principle, it's going to come off as planning your future marriage, children and divorce with her.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:21 AM
4

You got that answer from the school. You want to get an answer from your lawyer.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:18 AM
3

I guess 32 panels just weren't enough to squeeze in "the equalist" or "the egalitarian" somewhere.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:26 PM
2

This will be a good test case to determine whether filming consensual sex is actually sufficient to avoid a false rape charge.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:05 PM
48

Have fun being accused of rape!
/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:32 PM
13

Bad lawyerin'. They went with the "wasn't me" defense when they should have gone with the "I'm an abused wife in fear of my life and acted in self-defense" defense instead. What did her in was: A friend of Stanley Van Wagner told investigators he tried calling Van Wagner on May 15th, and that Amy Van Wagner called him back and said Stanley was sick, which he said he thought was odd because Stanley "never called in sick," according to the complaint. Stanley Van Wagner's employer reported there wa…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 06:30 PM
2

I decided long ago that if a job required me to wear a suit and tie, it wasn't a job I would take. Get a different job.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 06:18 PM
1

Feminism is the opposition to men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:27 AM
1

No one, male or female, is getting their ass grabbed by strangers on a weekly basis unless they're doing something to invite it.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:57 PM
1

a woman grabs my ass, or says something inappropriate, I generally think "you handsome fucker" and wouldn't register it as assault or harassment. What if it was a 300 pound woman with facial hair and a stench? Because this works for both genders too: The line between harassment and flattery is the perceived attractiveness of the harasser/flatterer.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:55 PM
15

And when they do get them paid off, it is generally because they married a guy who makes enough money to pay off her loans.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:09 PM
-12

There was no victim here.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:38 PM
2

Who has more reproductive rights in America, men or women? What changes would an "equalist" make and how would those changes compare to a change that a feminist or an MRA would make? I don't see any women marching over right to more alimony or custody. Women’s rights groups to rally in Tallahassee against Florida alimony bill. You don't see what you're not looking for.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:10 PM
5

Wouldn't you agree that it's more broadly culturally driven inequality rather than feminist-driven inequality? No. Women having complete reproductive rights while feminists continuing to march for more and oppose granting any post-conception reproductive rights to men is not a cultural issue. Women being the recipients of 97% of alimony payments and having feminists oppose any legislative changes to eliminate this inequity is not a cultural issue. Women being considered the default parent in cus…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 07:10 PM
3

Because we realize that achieving equality in the face of feminist opposition is too lofty a goal to reasonably be expected to achieve. But concentrating on specific areas of discrimination against men, and focusing on improving the rights of men in those areas, is both a reasonable goal and achievable. Some day we may have made enough progress fighting against feminist driven inequality that eradicating inequality all together would be realistic. But for now, we've got to be able to walk before…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 06:07 PM
1

I'll do my best: Consent is only valid if it is freely granted by a fully informed individual. If I appear to grant you consent, but then later regret that decision, was it really consent at all? Remember, consent has to be fully informed. And if I was fully informed before granting consent, what possible reason would I have to regret that consent after it has been granted. The only possible answer is that I gained additional knowledge that caused me to regret that consent - maybe you weren't as…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:05 PM
5

Sure you weren't born that way?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:56 PM
10

A white girl accusing a black dude of rape; WCGW?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:56 PM
7

"I want you to stop" isn't really a problem. That means stop. Everyone knows it means stop. Unless you're an actual rapist, you stop. "Maybe we should stop". "I don't know if we should be doing this". "I don't normally do stuff like this". "I feel like I should tell you to stop". etc. - Those are the types of ambiguous responses that women give - often while body language is saying "don't you dare fucking stop" - that result in consent disagreements and possible false rape allegations. You want …
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:55 PM
2

She's wrong.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 05:39 PM
1

Take out the word "sexual" and you're going to get pretty close to 1 out of every one men experience violence while in college. Especially if you take a liberal definition of the word "violence" (like they do for the 1-in-4 statistic) and include threats and intimidation and "feeling unsafe".
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:30 PM
3

heterosexual I don't think you know what that word means.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 02:28 PM
10

Their target market is feminists, not women.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 04:45 PM
14

I assume this is supposed to be satirizing the idea that men sit around a pass laws restricting women's reproductive rights so wouldn't it be funny if women sat around and restricted men's reproductive rights. What the satirist feminists fail to realize, is that men don't have any reproductive rights to be discussed. Reproductive rights are the sole domain of women (who are somehow oppressed).
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:15 PM
12

They know their target market.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:12 PM
16

Is it just me, or is that headline basically saying that women have nothing to offer but sex?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:34 PM
1

a man having multiple partners doesn't diminish his value to red pill women FTFY
/r/MensRights02/05/17 04:06 PM
4

Outside of TRP, it's also pretty common knowledge that any man who will sleep with women they just met are not quality men.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:31 PM
1

The confidence and mental strength he gets early in life will help him get a quality women later in life You're the one who made the distinction between women pursued when a guy "just wants to get laid as much and as often as possible" while attracting red pill women and then wanting to have a relationship and family with a quality woman.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 02:35 PM
2

The confidence and mental strength he gets early in life will help him get a quality women later in life Yeah... I'm not sure I agree with that assessment. I suppose its possible, but it seems to me that it would be kind of hard to just "flip a switch" and start attracting quality women when you've spent your entire dating life attracting red pill women.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 02:13 PM
2

Yeah, I should have said "different" aspirations rather than "higher" aspirations. I was projecting my own aspirations, but others don't share them. Bad choice of words on my part.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 02:11 PM
1

No. On a completely unrelated note, Martin Luther King's civil rights movement never cooperated with the KKK on anything either. And I could find no record of the Jews and Nazis cooperating. Maybe I just missed it.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:08 AM
1

because they think women are these easily manipulated idiots. From what I know of red pill theory, I think it actually is likely to work on a specific group of women. Namely, those women who happen to be easily manipulated idiots. If your goal in life is to fuck as many easily manipulated idiots as possible, then I guess red pill may work for you. If you have higher aspirations, however, alternative approaches may be appropriate.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 11:04 AM
5

Couldn't make it. Way, way, way longer than it needed to be. Got half way through and have no idea what Marriott did to you.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 02:13 AM
-6

Maybe in Europe, this a 'Merica.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:46 PM
-7

Poor guy had to live with a funny looking dick for 34 years and probably never understood why he couldn't get a blowjob. His future wife did him a favor.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:45 PM
22

Damn. I never realized how misandrist /r/bestof was.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:27 PM
6

Feminists be crazy. "Women should not be treated as sex objects!" "Well, ok then, we'll create an actual sex object and then not have to trouble you any further". "Nooooooooooo"
/r/MensRights27/04/17 04:21 PM
2

Age limits make enforcement easy. That's why we have them. Ideally, everything would be a case-by-case basis. And if a 24 year old teacher has sex with a 17 year old student, society would be able to determine whether there was a victim or not rather than just defaulting to their being a victim.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:38 PM
2

Why is the 16 year old with a 58% interest loan a victim but the 19 year old with the same loan isn't? (admittedly bad example since usury laws protect people of all ages, but you get the point).
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:42 PM
2

You're making no progress here. I disagree with basing those laws upon chronological age as well. If a competent 16 year old signs a contract to purchase a $7,000 used Honda Civic that he wants, drives the car happily for 8 years, who is the victim?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:32 PM
0

Right. Which goes right back to my original question "was there a victim here". You are now correctly pointing out that just because one party was under age, and just because sex with that person was against the law because of that age, it doesn't mean that the person was a victim of anything.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:23 PM
0

And there are some 36/37 year olds who aren't bright enough to give informed consent.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:14 PM
0

A 15/16/17 year old is a "minor child" by law only. A 12/13/14 year old may or may not be a "minor child" depending upon the individual. Under 12, you probably are a minor child, but there are also likely exceptions to that.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:59 PM
1

I didn't bother reading the article. Can someone tell me whether or not we have a victim here?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:48 PM
2

Step one to advancing men's rights is to stop feminism. Do you think the civil rights movement would have gained any traction if politicians were worried about pandering to the KKK? You can't achieve progress unless you first stop those who are trying to push you backwards.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:44 PM
1

Work on improving your own situation with legal paternal surrender and male birth control - don't sit around fantasizing about how things could someday be just as shitty for women as they currently are for men. In the current political environment, we aren't going to get legal parental surrender until conditions are just as shitty for women as they are for men. You're clearly of the mistaken belief that politicians give a shit about men.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:19 PM
1

It completely takes away the "bodily autonomy" argument. If women want to exercise their bodily autonomy, they can do so by decanting their embryo into an artificial womb. That retains their bodily autonomy, but doesn't relieve them of their financial responsibility for the baby. This is a step towards gender equality.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:01 AM
7

Yeah. Just like some postal workers, Mustang owners and gamblers adopt red pill philosophies.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:34 AM
9

I guess "irrelevance" would be my response. It'd be like asking what postal workers, Mustang owners or gamblers think about Red Pill ideology: the two groups have nothing to do with each other.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:08 AM
39

Don't have to put the toilet seat down when you're done if you never put it up when you start.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:03 AM
17

A step towards equalizing post-conception reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 10:36 PM
3

They get close to hitting the nail on the head, but miss the second part of it. In Russia (and other similar countries), the best way to pull yourself out of poverty or lower-middle-class is by working and earning money. In America (and other similar countries), the best way to pull yourself out of poverty and lower-middle-class is by marrying a man who is working and earning money.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:31 PM
1

So if she's insured, then the insurance will cover it (except for the deductible, of course). That's probably what the insurance company was talking about - the deductible. And when they said "you" would be responsible for those charges, what they really meant was "we're not paying them". By "you", they meant the insured person receiving treatment - which is your wife.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:58 AM
3

The insurance company wouldn't be involved either. If your uninsured wife goes to the doctor and doesn't pay the bill, there's no way that comes back to you unless a change somehow requires you to pay it in a divorce settlement.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:53 AM
7

I don't know about the rest of your post, but this I would be responsible for any unpaid bills relating to the pregnancy simply can't be true.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:46 AM
6

These articles never really discuss the socio-economic level of the couples they're talking about. My suspicion is that we're primarily talking about college-educated, middle-class couples. Those are the couples where income levels most affect lifestyle. So if the couple is making $140,000/year, and the wife is pulling in $85,000 of that, she's kind of stuck (just like the guy is stuck if he's the one making more). It's pretty tough for her to abandon her career and drop to a $55,000 lifestyle. …
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:43 AM
2

So?
/r/MensRights20/04/17 07:57 PM
0

Using archive sites is stupid. Let readers of the sub make the decision on whether or not the link is worth the click based upon the original source.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:20 PM
6

I always facetiously say: Equality that benefits women is the best kind of equality! I guess it isn't facetious.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:17 PM
1

Who knows? The first chick already said she failed economics.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:04 AM
1

That's not how the pay gap works, silly!
/r/MensRights14/04/17 01:03 AM
8

Do you understand how birth control failure rates are calculated and why condoms (and others) have what appear to be ridiculously high failure rates? This is a bit simplified, but basically they ask women "what is your primary method of birth control"? Then, of the women who say that condoms are their primary form of birth control, the see how many of them get pregnant in a one year period. So if you choose to not use a condom for a few sexual encounters, or if the condom breaks but you decide t…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:46 PM
1

I simply pointed out that if you tell that to a woman, you are shaming her. It's a blatant double standard. You have to go upthread a bit, but it is quite clear that I'm referring to both genders when I say "That goes for both men and women."
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:09 PM
-1

lifetime supply
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:34 PM
-1

Vasectomy, but that's kind of permanentish. For me personally, if I have to wear a condom to have sex, the sex probably isn't worth having. But if you're a guy (or girl) who wants to have sex and you live in the United States, then you have access to birth control. That was my only point. People who claim to have no access to birth control are either lying or too stupid to be having sex.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:30 PM
-3

What part of condoms didn't you understand? Have all the sex you want without having kids.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:28 PM
-7

Condoms. Or, of course, abstinence is generally available everywhere unless you live around a bunch of rapey rapists.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:17 PM
3

Condoms are birth control and they are available virtually everywhere.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:44 PM
-3

C'mon dude, seriously? Hate fuck is sum the best fuck.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:30 PM
2

but the women should still have asked for clarification on something they're signing. "OMG guys. This, like, totally creepy guy with an iPhone and a microphone was following me around asking me to sign his stupid petition. I just, like, signed it to make him go away. But then he just kept asking me stupid questions. OMG. So creepy."
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:28 PM
1

1:25 & 2:20 - SOOOOOOO hot. And let's be fair, suffrage is a stupid word.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:26 PM
19

If you live in the United States and claim you "don't have access to birth control", you're not looking hard enough. That goes for both men and women.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:21 PM
3

I think it has more to do with women not needing to earn more money than men. So long as people desire relationships with the opposite sex, men will be attracted to physical beauty and women will be attracted to money. That means men are always going to be striving to earn more money to become more attractive. And women will have less drive to earn more money because many of them will have access to money earned by a man's labor.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:51 AM
4

What a disgusting piece of shit trying to grab her tit like that! Amiright?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 11:44 PM
-15

She could be so hot if she dropped about 15 pounds and kept her mouth shut.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:31 PM
5

I'm not attracted to that sex doll.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:02 AM
2

She should fight this by starting to refer to men as boys. Especially black men. She should especially call black men "boy". That'll show us!
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:15 PM
15

That bottom picture: Millions(?) of women gather with meaningless signs and pussy hats a couple months ago. What did they accomplish? Absolutely nothing. We've accomplished as much on this subreddit this morning as they accomplished with their march. Men are just that much more efficient.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:06 PM
18

So the Dallas Under 15 men's team should be paid equally to the US National Men's Team because equal pay for equal work, right?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:21 AM
4

Regardless of the "crime", we should always look for a victim. If you can't find a victim, you should question whether or not there was really a crime.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 04:56 PM
22

When is "equal death day"? Like how many days do we have to get to for women to die on the job as frequently as men do in a year? Oh... nice... Google is my friend. Someone already did the research. Bookmark this article from 2015 and post it every time someone laments about Equal pay day. It looks like equal death day for women is somewhere just over 12 years from now.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 01:55 PM
4

For that matter, the entire "women's studies" curriculum is a Title IX violation.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:18 PM
5

actually telling her what's going on and her solution is 'mentors' They already have mentors. Uncle Freddy who lives in a 360 square foot apartment while working 70 hours a week at two jobs and paying alimony to the woman he divorced 10 years ago who is living in the $450,000 house he bought is their fucking mentor.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 11:54 PM
8

Because the Admins have an agenda.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:15 PM
1

Women are 100% AOK with VAWA You spelt feminists wrong.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:29 PM
2

It's nice that feminists are working on this issue since feminism is just about gender equality!
/r/MensRights26/03/17 10:59 PM
10

Only to the extent women lose access to the fruits of a man's labor after divorce. While women might be better off during marriage than they are after divorce, they are better off after divorce than they were before marriage.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 10:56 PM
16

/r/imgoingtohellforthis? Seriously, that's just a comical subreddit. I didn't even know it was controversial.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:44 PM
-4

When she learned the baby had died, however, she told police she knew she and Fuller were both drunk when they got into the car, and that Fuller was the driver. That wasn't part of the linked article that I read. Either it changed or that's a different article.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:41 PM
-4

Based upon the information in the article, there is no indication that she was aware of the driver's level of drunkenness. Of course, evidence at the trial may have shown that.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 05:41 PM
-31

"Killing her own child" is a bit of a stretch. She was holding her child in her lap as a passenger in a vehicle being driven by a drunk friend. The drunk friend hit a tree and the baby died. It sounds to me like the friend killed the baby, not the mother. I'm not sure why the mother was even charged.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:40 PM
-3

I didn't look to see if she's hot or not. I looked to see whether it was consensual or not.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:27 PM
1

Sticks and stones... yada yada yada
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:24 PM
-4

Of note, the victim testified that the sex was consensual. Authorities say the teacher and student had sex several times between Aug. 22 and Sept. 22. There is no victim here.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:22 PM
1

I like the reality spike when Trump was elected.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:20 PM
4

None of the girls in my highschool were interested in dating me to begin with. All profit, no cost.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:03 AM
23

I really don't understand kids today. It's been 30 years since I was in high school, but I would have totally "identified as a woman" to be able to hang out in the girl's locker room. Did none of today's youth ever see the movie Porkies? A good portion of high school as a guy was spent trying to figure out how to sneak a peek into the girl's locker room without getting caught. Today you just walk right in and if anyone complains, they're the one with the problem. It's the fucking golden age of v…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:15 PM
9

the cis kid can always opt to walk to the nurse's office and change in the bathroom there. Based upon the article, it would seem not: "Doe tried to discuss the incident with school officials, but they brushed it aside and told him to “tolerate” the situation, the groups representing Doe said."
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:11 PM
1

What's embarrassing about waiting until 4 months into the relationship to have sex? In my day, 3 months was pretty standard.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:24 PM
0

There is no victim here.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:09 PM
1

I don't think that linking to a company's career page on their website is a reddit rules violation, but mods feel free to delete if it is: http://www.corporate.r29.com/careers/ At Refinery29 we strive to help women fulfill their unlimited potential through our work. When you work here you will feel the passion and commitment to that mission throughout everything that we do. We are a creative, driven, entrepreneurial culture that is leading what's next in digital media. If you want to work in an …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:59 PM
2

Confidence comes from having a successful presentation, and knowing it is successful before you present it. If you're super-confident about your presentation, and then are unable to formulate an answer to the first 3 questions you're asked during the presentation, then your confidence was misplaced.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:55 PM
1

Jesus Christ Dude, where the hell do you live?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:20 PM
1

"I'm on my period!" Congratulations?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:45 AM
2

Just for fun: If a girl is raped while she is drunk, she is at least somewhat responsible for letting things get out of hand False. A girl is never responsible for her own rape. So based upon the question, this response is unequivocal. However, in real-life scenarios the question isn't whether or not she's partly responsible for getting raped, but whether nor not a rape actually took place at all. When girls go to parties wearing slutty clothes, they are asking for trouble Too ambiguous to answe…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:06 PM
-6

I didn't have any male children, so I never had to make the choice. But if I were faced with the decision, I would likely opt for circumcision because: I was circumcised and never had any ill-will about it. In fact, to the contrary, the 2 guys in my high school that weren't cut were kind of looked at as the guys with the weird dicks in the locker room. In my personal experience, women in my culture prefer cut dicks to uncut dicks and I wouldn't want my son to live a blowjobless life. When I was …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:25 PM
0

It's only a Title IX violation if it discriminates against women, silly.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:19 PM
2

"If you tell the cops, I'll kill myself". Mind you, I'm just speculating here because you were speculating. I'm not suggesting this is the actual case.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:44 PM
1

A lot of speculation there. I can speculate too: Maybe she is living in a violent and abusive home situation, reached out to this teacher for help, threatened to kill herself if he didn't take her away, and right now they are just cooling their jets somewhere helping her to feel safe.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:38 PM
1

She willingly runs off with her 17 year old female friend, she's a runaway or the 17 year old kidnapped her? Kidnapped Okay. We'll just have to disagree then.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:20 PM
4

Most of those were not yes/no questions.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:17 PM
1

It is only sexual abuse if the boy is 15, if it was a 18... Cant you see what you say? That's exactly what I'm saying. Just like the 15 year old boy would be a "victim" of statutory rape, this 15 year old girl is only a "victim" of statutory kidnapping. Why to be a hypocrite here? I'm not. Keep reading. Or are you ok with teen boys having sex with their teachers? Whenever a story like that gets posted here (really, regardless of the genders involved), I typically reply with "there is no victim h…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:13 PM
3

So she willingly runs off on her own, and she's a runaway. She willingly runs off with her 17 year old female friend, she's a runaway or the 17 year old kidnapped her? She willingly runs off with her 17 year old boyfriend, she's a runaway or the boyfriend kidnapped her? She willingly runs off with her 20 year old boyfriend, she's a runaway or the boyfriend kidnapped her? She willingly runs off with her 40 year old uncle to escape a violent home life, she's a runaway or the uncle kidnapped her? S…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:09 PM
4

It is only kidnapping because she's 15. If she were 18, it would be two lovers running off together. To paraphrase Whoopi Goldberg, it isn't kidnapping kidnapping. And that's not even getting into the fact that all of this is just alleged at this point.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:38 PM
2

If you read more news stories about the case, there is little doubt that she thinks she is in love with him and that they planned to run off together.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:34 PM
2

Kidnapped only in a technical, legal sense. She clearly went with him willingly and desires a relationship with him.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:09 PM
8

government at various levels provides benefits and resources to female owned businesses Equality that benefits women is the best kind of equality!
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:10 PM
4

Will they have a trial first to determine whether or not they are actually rape victims, or are we really just talking about rape accusers here.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:08 PM
6

Not going to read the article, but I got a question. Does Trump's budget slash worker training and safety, or does it slash government funding & mandates for worker training and safety? There's a difference. Even if it isn't mandated or funded by government, companies can offer all the training and safety they want and that the marketplace demands in order to attract and retain employees.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:27 PM
1

Just like when everyone whines when this happens with reversed genders: I don't see a victim here. When I read the headline, I wasn't prepared to conclude that. But reading the article makes it pretty clear.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:59 PM
0

50-ish.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:36 PM
5

then realized if it were girls I'd feel totally the opposite. Really??? You'd honestly have a problem with a 17 year old girl having a consensual, sexual relationship with a hot, 28 year old male teacher? Unless there is some indication of manipulation, force or coercion, why would that consensual relationship bother you?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:48 PM
8

Authorities began investigating Guffey (pictured right in her mugshot) when she applied for Medicaid this month and identified the 14-year-old as the baby's father So it sounds like she's no smarter than your average 14 year old, so she's got that going for her.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:29 PM
4

I haven't seen this yet, but I have a problem with the film's title. I think it is going to cause additional confusion to those not already sympathetic to the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:21 PM
0

Haeli Noelle Wey, then 28, was a math teacher at Westlake High School until October 2015, when she was arrested and accused of having a pair of months-long relationships with two 17-year-old boys. Police say the crimes occurred during the summer and fall of 2015. Under Texas law, it is illegal for teachers to have sex with students, even if they are at least 17, the state’s legal age of consent There is no victim here. And I'd say the same if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:15 PM
-9

She's pretty hot.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:37 PM
1

Equality that benefits women is the best kind of equality.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:42 AM
0

First time I've ever upvoted one of your posts. Upvoted because you included the source rather than just showing it as archive.us.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 12:35 AM
1

Well, if I was going to masturbate, it isn't going to happen now that I've seen that picture.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:36 PM
52

Admins have an agenda. Fortunately, TwoX has pretty much been stifled by being a default because their bullshit gets called out now while it didn't before. For awhile after they went default, they still tried to delete and ban opposing views. But the dissent has become too overwhelming and they simply can't keep up with it.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:58 AM
-1

Don't post crap without giving the source. I'm not going to click on this only to find out it's from some shit blog.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:56 AM
5

Because TwoX is a default sub.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:49 PM
12

Because it was a home for girls. They certainly could have said that "19 residents died" and any informed reader would already know that those 19 were girls. But there is nothing offending about making that clear to the reader who isn't informed.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:10 PM
33

Your outrage is misplaced this time. This was a youth home (sounds basically like an orphanage) for teenage girls. They're saying that 19 of the residents died. The 10 others weren't necessarily men (since it is a home for teen girls, I'm guessing very few of the other 10 were men). They were just people who worked at the home but weren't residents.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:15 PM
6

I'm assuming she's talking about "unpaid work", right? Or, as other people refer to it: "hobbies".
/r/MensRights09/03/17 03:39 PM
5

Exactly this. He tries to portray /r/mensrights as being hypocritical because we oppose false rape accusations while leveling false accusations against Lena. In a vacuum (which he is apparently in) that's a reasonable accusation. But the reality is, most here knowit is hypocritical and it is done to point of Lena's hypocrisy of being an extremist SJW/Feminist while having her own closet skeletons. If it were a guy and was writing about masturbating next to his "sticky, muscley, 11 year old siste…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:44 PM
4

That's woman rapist, shitlord!
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:37 PM
14

If a guy modeled some clothes with his dick hanging out as much as her tits are hanging out, Ebay would take down the listing.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:14 PM
8

never married men usually earn less than married men though Cause and effect are backwards. Men who earn less are less desirable mates for women and are unable to get someone to marry them.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:11 PM
54

Multiple pictures of the named, acquitted accused included with the article. No name or pictures of the liar that accused him.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:42 PM
5

"We find these truths to be self-evident. That all MEN are created equal". The American history classes are going to be a god damn nightmare.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:25 PM
15

lifetime alimony
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:23 PM
86

Didn't read the article, but I assume that numerous feminist organization have come to his defense by explain that we must believe victims. No?
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:21 AM
9

You can't have effective laws protecting transgender people without defining in the law what "counts" as being transgendered. The people advocating for transgender protection laws refuse to define transgender in the law for fear of being criticized for leaving someone out and being outed as transphobic.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:30 PM
2

it is merely to demonstrate feminist hypocrisy. The same link was posted on Twox (see "other discussions" above) and was ignored (got like 7 responses, half of them deleted). Had Trump or some other conservative said something anywhere near similar to this, we'd have calls of being a rape apologist, contributing to rape culture and looking for someone to get fired. When feminists do attack someone for an ineloquent use of words, it has nothing to do with the words that are actually uttered, and …
/r/MensRights28/02/17 11:26 PM
4

I think this is a clear example of a liberal saying something extremely misogynistic and getting a pass from feminists because they have no desire to "destroy" Warren Buffet who typically sympathizes with causes they support. But what if someone in the conservative movement said this? What if it was Paul Ryan, or Rush Limbaugh or even Donald Trump? We'd see another massive liberal women's march talking about how their rights have been violated. It's the same as Lena Dunham not being criticized f…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:54 AM
3

Here is somebody saying that women have huge egos in a generalising statement. The kind of statement that would piss this sub off if the genders were reversed. The generalizing statement is an afterthought in that post after making a valid main point. Even with that, the most upvoted comment in response to that post is calling him out on generalizing women. And while the statement may generalize a gender, I would hardly call it misogyny. Here is a post blaming women for something that both men (…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 12:53 AM
2

I will share examples later. Of course you will .....
/r/MensRights27/02/17 07:08 PM
4

They're easily hired, but once inside they deal with lots of issues. This is a serious, non-rhetorical question: Are those issues any different from the issues that men in those fields have to deal with? Should people have to change their work style to accommodate a new employee simply because that new employee is a woman? If the culture of a workplace is that the employees joke around with each other, give each other a good ribbing, cuss out co-workers when they fuck something up and go out dri…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 07:02 PM
4

I feel that lately this sub (and a lot of MRA circles in general) have been increasingly misogynistic Can you post some links to examples of upvoted, supported posts that you find to be misogynistic? I just had this debate with someone on /r/changemyview and she was unable to provide anything. Because if there is misogyny being supported here, then it must be that those who are supporting it are blind to it. Because generally speaking, misogyny is called out and downvoted in my experience. But p…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:53 PM
3

Tell her that you are going to go for full custody and sue her for child support.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:02 PM
6

Trust me, more than 20 students at UC Davis are confused about consent. A good portion think that if they consent while drunk, they didn't really consent. Or if they consented without continuously verbalizing "yes', they didn't really consent. Or if they consented because they didn't want their boyfriend to breakup with them, they didn't really consent. The sad part about this is that we do need to educate young people about consent, but most of the programs designed to actually do that spread l…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:00 PM
1

The only problem with these bathroom bills and other transgender laws is that none of them define what transgender actually is so no one knows who the law applies to. That's the only thing that Carlson is trying to explain here. I suppose it's possible that the liberals are leaving it intentionally ambiguous so that the courts will eventually make that determination. But my guess is that the liberals are fall all over themselves to not provide a definition for fear of being attacked by their fel…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:16 PM
1

Still trying to figure out who you think the victim is.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:03 PM
3

8 years old is what, 3rd grade? If her precious little snowflake hasn't had a male teacher yet, she's going to soon. Can't imagine all the raping that's going to happen then.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:01 PM
0

Yep. Sincerely, Ray Rice
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:48 PM
2

There are sometimes posts that you open just to see the "other discussions" tab at the top. And of those posts, there are those where you are inexplicably disappointed to see that tab completely missing. This is one of those post. This is not the subreddit that needs to see this information.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:48 PM
48

false rape culture
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:23 PM
5

And like 8 when they first met.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:22 AM
2

Who is "she". Are those questions from the NEA to Devos, or from Devos to the NEA?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:17 PM
10

Not the biological father - important fact missing from the thread title.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:54 PM
4

men will soon be the beneficiaries of these laws Can't.Stop.Laughing That's a good one.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 07:51 PM
3

So as an 18 year old I can bang by 15 year old girlfriend. But then next year, when I'm away at college, while I'm 19 and she's 16, she's off limits again. Then the following year, I'm 20 and she's 17; so we're ok again, right? How does that make sense?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:59 PM
26

Office bragging and gossip. Happens all the time. Plus, as a civil matter, you could just put them under oath and ask them. Having 30 people testify to observations they made of an intimate relationship would certainly provide circumstantial evidence. See 2. Eyewitness testimony is certainly admissible in court. And if they had good evidence of those reasons, that's fine. If they don't, then they'd have some splainin to do. On a 5-point scale (5 being the best), the promoted person got an averag…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 12:58 AM
74

They could admit it. The sexual relationship could be obvious to everyone. You could see them dating Other supervisors could speak to the promotee's lack of qualifications. Performance reviews could be counter-intuitive to the promotion. Tangible, measurable differences - like a salesperson who is making twice as many sales is paid less than the whore.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 12:13 AM
231

Perhaps a lawyer can chime in, but I believe that if a man is passed over for a promotion or raise that a woman gets, and if you can prove that the woman got it by sleeping with the boss, you have a sexual harassment/discrimination case. More men should employ that tactic. As a male boss, I would never sleep with a subordinate because it is an absolute no-win situation. It gives your subordinate too much power to control you by being able to make viable threats that would cost you your career. T…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 10:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter