TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SoftDeveloperReturns Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by SoftDeveloperReturns on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's a femcel echo chamber.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 11:14 PM
2

women buying their own booze. Women don't buy their own booze though. They get it free on account of their genitalia. Also, you don't need to give the business model. We've heard it tons of times now. And it doesn't make it any less discriminatory. It's so pathetic how a lot of men will make excuses for being discriminated against. men are the one's that pay for drinks So much for that "not being pressured into social norms" thing 🤦🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:31 PM
1

Jim Crow laws were put in place specifically so business owners in the South could discriminate against black people. The reason Jim Crow laws needed to be abolished so that businesses COULD stop discriminating against black people. Therefore, the entire idea of a business discriminating against black people in the Jim Crow era was the fault of the free market at work. The free market can be a good thing to make money but no business should be allowed to discriminate against human beings for pro…
/r/MensRights19/12/19 11:56 PM
1

Google what?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 10:00 PM
1

It actually doesn't. Anyone who claims that is being beyond ignorant. I used to attend bars all over my main city on the weekends that had guys in it, such as sports bars (for example, since there are usually just guys in there wanting to watch sports), and they never descended into violence of any kind. A bunch of guys being together in one sitting, and it descending into violence, doesn't have much evidence behind it. And the theory of "bringing women into a room with a bunch of violent guys" …
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:50 PM
1

It actually doesn't. Anyone who claims that is being beyond ignorant. I used to attend bars all over my main city on the weekends that had guys in it, such as sports bars (for example, since there are usually just guys in there wanting to watch sports), and they never descended into violence of any kind. A bunch of guys being together in one sitting, and it descending into violence, doesn't have much evidence behind it. And the theory of "bringing women into a room with a bunch of violent guys" …
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:50 PM
1

Yeah and we could say that the profit that the slave owners made off the labor of african slaves was "doing its job" as well. Something "doing its job" doesnt make it ethical. Or moral. And I'd rather support venues that treat people equally than actively discriminate against everyone of my gender.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 02:53 PM
1

If you typed all that and still think Jim Crow is wrong, then you contradicted yourself. Because "a business should be able to do what they want" was the justification for Jim Crow.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:20 PM
1

If by "people" you mean "pathetic horny beta-males who are so pathetic they're willing to sacrifice their own humanity and be discriminated against just for a better chance to get laid" then yeah.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:18 PM
1

sausage party. You mean the ones that happen at a "ladies night" since it's most of the time more guys than women?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:15 PM
1

It is changing super fast actually. 4 states have signed on to banning "ladies night" because it is the only logical thing to do. It's a double standard because if the same business did the exact same thing in regards to race, there would be an uproar of protests. But yeah, women being favored more than men in clubs is quickly dying out. Only a couple clubs per city (except maybe Vegas) even have them anymore because everyone is shit scared of being sued for favoring one gender over another. And…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:14 PM
1

Unless it's in women's favor, right? If your answer is yes, then you are guilty of a double standard.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:12 PM
1

In most "ladies nights" I have been to, there was always more guys than girls. It becomes a hot bed for some of the unsavory creeps that are responding to the advert.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:11 PM
1

Gender and race are the same thing in a legal sense. Both are protected classes and you cannot charge one more than another in most civilized countries that have impenetrable anti-discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:09 PM
1

The thing is, most "ladies nights" are the biggest cockfests around. There's usually ALWAYS more men than women there because of the monumental amount of creeps that are responding to the advert.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:08 PM
1

sausage fest? You mean what "ladies night" ends up usually becoming since there are always more guys there than women?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:44 PM
1

Because it's a pathetic justification.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:44 PM
1

The Civil Rights Act would disagree with you.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:40 PM
1

Would you have made that same argument during Jim Crow?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:39 PM
1

This is discrimination. Charging one gender more than another is defined as discrimination in a number of states.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:29 PM
1

More men shouldn't go.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:26 PM
1

I thought "ladies night" was "more for the men"? 🤔
/r/MensRights07/12/19 04:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter