TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SomethingSpecialMayb Archive

View 0 posts and 122 comments by SomethingSpecialMayb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I would like to see that video, please provide a link.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:02 PM
1

Not OP, but you could say this is more of a men’s issue as this is a men heavy industry and therefore it disproportionately affects men. Similar to how bias in the nursing profession disproportionately affects women.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 11:53 AM
3

If I’m looking at a pile of CVs then I’m looking at number of years relevant experience vs seniority of role. If you’ve got a developer who is looking for a junior role but has lots of experience, that probably highlights that they aren’t very good (or that senior jobs are hard to come by). If you’ve a CV for an older person (in the UK having o-levels on your CV is a dead giveaway) if they have only a year or so’s experience because they are a career changer and are looking for a junior role the…
/r/MensRights06/10/20 11:50 AM
1

First times can often be short, make sure if that happens he knows you don’t care a bit. Alternatively (apparently) some guys can be so nervous they struggle to finish, so just take it steady and try and respond to his signals. Don’t put too much stock in it being the ‘first time’ it’s not just the first time, it’s the first of many. So make sure whatever happens the first time, the second time is not far behind.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:07 AM
2

While exs can be friends (I’m long term friends with a few of mine) the kinds of messages that are mentioned are wholly unacceptable and I don’t think it’s unreasonable to have a problem with that. If that was happening with my wife I don’t think I’d even have to ask, she’d be blocking them on her own because that’s the healthy move. That said, the OP is perfectly ok to have those boundaries, his gf is also ok to say she’s unwilling to do that. She just has to accept that the consequence is the …
/r/MensRights14/08/20 06:09 AM
18

Yep, based on the OPs words he acted like an absolute fuckwit. I’ve nothing against establishing paternity officially (though I think my wife would be a touch offended if I asked) but to just suddenly drop the person you’ve spent the last 3 years with until there is hard proof is just unkind. If I was his dad I’d be ashamed of him
/r/MensRights13/08/20 05:16 AM
1

I’m intrigued as to how you think they further rather than urge to combat harmful stereotypes.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:08 PM
8

That entire post is ALL about stereotypes. The whole premise of it is challenging them.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 08:04 PM
11

Exactly what problem do you have with them? They seem straightforward and innocuous to me?
/r/MensRights14/07/20 07:41 PM
44

This is probably the best post I’ve seen come out of that sub.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 07:31 PM
60

Golly what a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 08:53 PM
7

What’s the deal with the line about the status? I think I’m missing the context for the latter half?
/r/MensRights18/06/20 06:09 AM
5

Doxxing is never fair IMO
/r/MensRights12/05/20 03:48 PM
-1

My personal view is that I would want to be better than her by not sinking to her level.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:21 PM
2

My personal view is that I would want to be better than her by not sinking to her level.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 01:21 PM
-11

Have you ever heard the phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right”
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:25 AM
2

I’ve never heard of her either. Not sure if I’m living in a cave or if she’s someone on the internet that people like to get cross about which has no impact on real life.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:21 AM
-8

Which is why I said in my initial comment that her reaction to dox a child was unforgivable.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 08:32 AM
-19

There’s a difference between ‘can’t say’ and ‘shouldn’t say’. Being told you can’t say something is a free speech issue. That you shouldn’t is different.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 08:12 AM
-40

It’s not a butt hurt culture to say that it’s probably not a good thing to be telling another person to kill themselves. It’s never ok and he needs to learn that, apparently you do too.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 08:09 AM
358

While I’m not supporting the boy’s choice to say that. Her reaction to dox a child is unforgivable.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:07 AM
3

Digits are fingers.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:02 PM
2

Whilst it is true that by law women cannot commit “rape” it’s not as big of a problem as it first sounds. It turned out to be more of a nomenclature issue because of the definition of rape as a penetrative act. “Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent” is still covered by the 2003 Sexual Offences Act, which is what rape of a man or woman by a woman would be prosecuted under. This carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Edit: It’s also worth noting that if a man or w…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 08:29 AM
4

No idea, I’m not part of that group. There’s a big difference from my perspective about wanting to make sure things are equal (MRA) and seemingly hating women (MGTOW)
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:57 PM
5

Most of the time men just hate not having a chance to get the kids, custody hearings are heavily weighted in favour of the mother irrespective of who might actually be the better parent.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:52 PM
1

I wouldn’t necessarily go as far as that. But I can see why you took that from what I said.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 11:45 AM
7

Well aren’t you smart. I can say it’s statistically unlikely because the figure of false rape accusations held up against a backdrop of estimates of the number of people having consensual sex in a given period is vanishingly small. To demonstrate if we look at figures in the UK for rape the figures I’ve found say approx 60,000 reports of rape in the UK. If we take your highest bound of 11% that means 6,600 we’re false. It’s difficult to estimate how many people are having sex, so for the purpose…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 09:36 AM
6

It’s statistically unlikely but possible, your best protection is choosing the women you sleep with carefully. Choose the situations you have sex in carefully too, if you’re in an ongoing relationship with the person rather than having a drink fuelled one night stand, you’re much less likely to have a problem with false allegations.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 08:14 AM
7

The problem is not with the children in the classroom, it’s that we don’t tailor the education in the classroom to the child. All are expected to learn the same way and we just don’t!
/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:26 PM
2

Short answer is we just won’t know, 4.6 million years is vanishingly far in the distance. Anyone who gives any definite answer on what you have just asked I suspect we could call a liar.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 02:59 PM
3

TLDR: yes it is, it will be about 4.6 million years. Species which have already lost their Y chromosome show that male characteristics ‘jump’ to another chromosome. Those species still have a male and a female with associated traits. Article text: The Y chromosome may be a symbol of masculinity, but it is becoming increasingly clear that it is anything but strong and enduring. Although it carries the “master switch” gene, SRY, that determines whether an embryo will develop as male (XY) or female…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 08:00 AM
8

I’m pretty sure the answer is either no, or this will very quickly make you unemployed
/r/MensRights15/04/20 07:22 PM
3

It is reasonably expected that in a time of increased pressure like this that domestic violence rates will go up. Just like it does at every holiday season. When we see such a strong trend like that it is reasonable to ask why there as been an unexpected drop when a rise was expected. A strong guess for a reason for the drop would be that people don’t feel safe enough to call at any point. Equally reasonable as a guess is that people know there’s nowhere to go at the moment, so aren’t bothering …
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:35 PM
4

A no true Scotsman argument, really?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 06:13 PM
12

That article completely fails to consider a woman as a possible perpetrator. How are people not understanding this.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 01:24 PM
5

Having now read the original thread in your history It feels like you were intentionally misunderstanding her. She was saying that some men don’t behave well. Which is a true but fairly pointless observation akin to the sunshine is warm. You could equally replace the word men with women and the observation would still be true. You seem to have interpreted that as no men behave well. Which is not what she meant. Also, if I may be allowed a further observation, your etiquette in that thread makes …
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:05 AM
1

This is clearly satire
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:04 AM
14

I just read that bit was instantly cross and came to say the same!
/r/MensRights02/02/20 09:39 AM
1

Perhaps don’t make remarks like those detailed in the story. The zipper one was probably an off colour attempt at defusing the embarrassment of leaving ones zipper down. The other one about rubbing herself, if true, was wholly inappropriate. If you’re in the situation where a lie is told about you then it sadly becomes a he said / she said, and that mud sticks.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 06:53 AM
2

Subbed. FYI rule 2 is truncated. Edit: at least that’s how it appears on mobile app.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 07:24 AM
5

That’s insane
/r/MensRights11/01/20 08:33 AM
1

Don’t you think that’s a bit excessive? Death because you shoved your hand in someone’s face? As a side note, in the original thread it was confirmed that she didn’t make contact with his face. So still a rude overreaction, but not assault or battery as some are calling it.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:31 AM
0

Freedom of speech doesn’t stop you being an ass at times.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:38 PM
48

Kinda an ESH scenario here. The guy offering help did it in the most offensive way possible to the woman by actively belittling her rather than just saying “that thing looks heavy, happy to be a third pair of hands”. She then reacts physically rather than verbally which is pretty crappy. Assuming she actually made contact with his face rather than just doing a close up ‘talk to the hand’ style gesture.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:16 AM
71

In the space of one clip she’s given bad advice about almost everything from conception to child development. What an awful show. Also, who is that failure of a bloke front left clapping along to tricking someone into having a baby. I’m not going to make a judgement about it being labelled rape or not, but it sure is immoral and a terrible way to bring a child into this world.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 07:54 PM
21

Having clicked through to it it doesn’t look like a men’s rights convention at all. It sounds a bit bizarre tbh.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 06:22 PM
3

I mean this completely genuinely so please don’t think I’m being obtuse, but do people really self censure in that way? “Women aren’t good at this, I’m a woman so I’m not going to be good at this”? I tell myself plenty of times that I’ll be bad at something, but that’s because I’m rubbish, I’ve never put it down to gender. Come to think of it though, I can’t think of many “men aren’t good at X” scenarios. Lots of “it’s not manly to do X” however.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:06 PM
39

That was some mental gymnastics
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:40 PM
15

This, having read that set of comments the guy is a douche and has it coming. It’s worth noting that in the hypothetical reverse situation and she were the one with the issues then he would have little to no power to protect his child. But back in the real world, he made his bed, now he’s got to lay in it.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 06:29 AM
18

As a man, no thanks.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 06:31 PM
13

Mrs Judge, who has studied feminist issues Tells you all you need to know about this. I’m all for re-examining literature to properly discuss the issues within. But this is offence for offences sake. I read these with my son and the messages are usually very wholesome. Miss curious is seeking to learn and asks a question based on a pun. Mr clever answers. End of story.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 09:26 AM
4

Doesn’t sound like they did anything except introduce her.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:30 PM
6

This is awful parenting. Truly terrible parenting. Shaming is an insidious way to punish a child and will result in long term emotional damage if used frequently.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 09:19 PM
37

What a joke
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:27 AM
35

TLDR: everything men do when injured is wrong, they should do what this narrow self selected set of fictional women do when injured. Completely ignoring that there is a spectrum of response to mental injury in both genders which whilst does have some traits which typically follow gender lines also have a lot that don’t and those who present atypically.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:35 AM
11

Well someone needs to look at what the word sexism actually means!
/r/MensRights09/11/19 03:49 PM
2

I can’t see that in the text so I’m assuming that’s your own opinion. If that’s the case I heartily disagree, my wife’s career allows my family to have a far higher standard of life than my career all on its own could do unless I was willing to sacrifice much more of my availability to my children.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 07:17 AM
3

I mean, I’d say that’s far enough ago not to count.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 07:20 PM
136

I was all ready to accuse you of getting unduly bent out of shape over a light hearted article. Then I read the article. What utter tripe it is, labelling us as sleep stealers, tarring us all with the same ineptitude of her husband’s inability to move quietly at night. Saying that men don’t have to manage as many roles as women. She’s got me on the snoring front though. But I can’t actually help that. And if I could, I would! Women lose sleep in the way they lose lots of things - and instead lie…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 06:47 AM
4

Can we talk about that comment which uses the wrong they’re / they twice
/r/MensRights01/11/19 02:59 PM
-1

Now you’re really reaching, I never said you needed to toughen up, or that I am tough. All they said was that on the all female spacewalk that happened the other day (dunno if you noticed but it’s the first ever one, hence the media attention) someone’s glove got contaminated. No one has said that it is more of a problem than if it was a mans glove. No one even made the comparison.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 08:27 PM
0

Just searching for something to be hurt about here. Bit of a non issue.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 08:14 PM
2

Gifts meanings are always defined by the receiver. Personally I think it’s weird to give your ex wife’s ring to another person unless it’s a very special heirloom. It’s unusual for the bloke to retain the ring after the end of a relationship as it’s given as a gift.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:24 AM
1

You can edit posts, not the titles, but the posts themselves. If you hadn’t added your comment I’d have assumed it was spam!
/r/MensRights07/10/19 05:39 AM
1

I said nothing insulting to you. You’re clearly a troll and have no idea how the burden of proof works. You have no evidence that companies like 23andme are amassing DNA profiles for people they haven’t worked with directly or from other companies who have the right to share the data they have based on their prior agreement with the DNA profile owner.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:20 AM
0

This is utter rubbish.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:16 AM
1

I haven’t listened to this particular message but her general point is that the science has been done and it’s time to act on what we already know. Anyone who starts learning in a STEM field now with the thought of working to fix climate change will be too late to make a difference.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:15 AM
12

It’s pretty clear that person has been seriously hurt by a male figure in their life. Now everything, particularly every male, is seen through that distorted broken lens. Healing is going to be a very long road for that person, I hope they get there.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:54 AM
31

That’s pretty disgraceful. All it would take to not be disgraceful would be a change to: “This establishment reserved the right to search guests prior to entry”
/r/MensRights05/09/19 09:36 PM
1

Anything except guns huh?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:38 PM
2

None of my business?
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:11 PM
40

Circumcision has no health benefits unless there is a preexisting health issue. Circumcision without a preexisting health issue is mutilation.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 08:33 PM
13

It’s not sexist if it’s science led. Though not all children will conform to those stereotypes, research into children’s learning styles has shown that young boys are poorer at sitting down and concentrating for longer periods and that this style of classroom learning will likely result in lower results for boys. I, for one, welcome the beginnings of acceptance of the genuine differences between the sexes so that differing learning styles even within sexes can be accommodated in the classroom. T…
/r/MensRights23/07/19 08:40 PM
3

It’s such a bizarre post, I wonder if he’s high
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:52 PM
2

Right, you’re clearly just trolling so I’m going to disengage.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:51 PM
2

I do as a rule follow politics but your post doesn’t make any sense at all.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:50 PM
3

I’m from the uk and have no fucking idea what you’re on about.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:47 PM
7

Given the non reversible nature of some vasectomy operations (and the known complications in terms of sperm quality and motility in reversed vasectomy patients) you could draw parallels with hysterectomies. It’s not perfect as that would be more like having your testicles fully removed. So maybe better to talk about tubal ligation as an option which has similar experience for both sexes. Women have access to the most effective pregnancy prevention methods, men do not (yet) have access to a pill …
/r/MensRights15/07/19 08:51 AM
-2

While I agree with your second paragraph, I’m uncomfortable with your statement that it is irrelevant how the child feels. It’s far from irrelevant, it is in fact crucial.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:07 PM
35

Any further context about how the child feels?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:18 AM
77

What a load of horseshit. My legs are wider apart because I have something between them that doesn’t like being squished. If I hold my legs together my testes will get over-warm reducing my sperm motility and general viability. Men and women are different, not better or worse, different. Get over it. Imagine the furore if she’d designed chairs that only allowed people within a certain BMI range to sit in so fat people couldn’t sit down.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:53 PM
2

In that situation it could well be considered coercion. When you’re about to get to it and he changes the parameters, she might have felt unable to say no. Either way it’s totally a dick move.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 06:39 PM
8

You’re choosing (without further discussion) to ignore someone’s safe sex preferences, potentially putting them and yourself at risk of STIs or pregnancy. Ignoring someone’s wishes regarding one of the most personal acts we have as a species definitely smacks of assault. I’m surprised it’s not being treated as rape tbh as the consent could be considered to have been based on the agreed precautions. When you (intentionally) don’t abide by that agreement you could say it renders the consent null a…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 05:51 AM
20

I’m ok with this, you’ve jointly made a decision about birth control and you’re sticking to that decision
/r/MensRights04/07/19 09:09 PM
40

Most concerning sentence for me is You need to have a penis in order to rape an adult. This is a classic misunderstanding and is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:03 PM
3

This is a really strange image
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:52 PM
1

A bit of a health warning, the daily mail is not known for sensible science reporting in the UK. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI&feature=youtu.be
/r/MensRights01/06/19 08:09 PM
18

That has actually happened in the UK with two progeny of a prolific sperm donor.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:54 PM
4

None...none bones.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 08:22 PM
2

Brilliant, you’re a bit of a twat aren’t you. Mods, fancy banning this guy from here too?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:17 AM
-1

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bounder+and+a+cad
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 10:27 AM
7

You are a bounder and a cad.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 06:58 AM
2

Not sure why this is on men’s rights. This seems like a serious miscarriage of justice if the article is to be taken at face value.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 10:25 PM
38

Rape. Rape is what she did.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:26 PM
4

Stop, it is true that her algorithm was not used. But at no point did she say it was. The media got all of a kerfuffle about a mildly photogenic scientist and made lots of claims to sell papers/ advert clicks. She is not “exposed” she never lied, she has also spoken out to correct this.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 08:31 PM
2

Username does not check out.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 05:53 PM
1

Out of interest what makes you identify ‘The color purple’ as a book written for women? I’ve never heard that said before and just wondered?
/r/MensRights06/04/19 05:50 PM
3

Do you mean Souad Adel Faress?
/r/MensRights30/03/19 09:17 PM
2

?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 01:36 PM
0

That is not what I was saying. In my opinion that sentiment should reflect both ways. But I’d also stress (as I’ve said in other replies) that I’m not suggesting consent be legally required to progress with the operation, just that in a relationship context it is wise to have a discussion about it with ones partner.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:45 PM
1

I’m not advocating mandatory partner consent, but if you decide to do something with your body that your spouse doesn’t agree with then you are not free from consequences of this. As a different example, I am free to get a full face tattoo of a skull, it’s my body and no one can stop me. However my wife who dislikes tattoos would likely find it difficult to be attracted to me. Equally my disregard for her feelings on the matter would also undermine how she felt I cared about her. It would be dis…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:50 AM
-3

It is a really good idea to discuss with your partner any permanent change to your ability to produce children.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:11 AM
-9

It isn’t a legal requirement in Canada, it’s just a really really good idea. Edit: I would note that I’m not saying that it’s a good idea for a legally required spousal consent. It’s a good idea to have a discussion about any major life change like that.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 05:49 AM
3

Only if they sleep with their own children.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 09:23 AM
3

Auto mod explains right there why. This isn’t discriminatory, it’s just a really common question.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:09 AM
2

That..actually made me smile.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:32 PM
6

I think you already are and haven’t realised yet.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 08:28 PM
70

My dad was circumcised, I’m immensely grateful that he did not get me or my brother circumcised.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:31 PM
0

I’m getting the feeling your attitude towards women isn’t a healthy one.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:03 AM
2

There’s a big difference between a rape fantasy where there is still a semblance of control and real life rape which is an incredible violation.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:52 AM
25

Is that a genuine poster? Because I’d love to see that message out there.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:44 PM
5

Given the context he doesn’t want them any more anyway...
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:43 AM
6

There’s a big difference between what he did and what she did. She, up front on her profile, said that she likes taller guys. He went and poked fun at her. IMO saying that you like slimmer women is equally valid to put on your profile. What wouldn’t be ok is going round and calling everyone who doesn’t float your boat a fatty.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:45 PM
7

No it’s ok I’m just a crap Muslim...
/r/MensRights04/02/19 11:12 AM
1

IIRC the defence was that the form was submitted without her knowledge, but she did nothing to rectify the error. So the actual offence is committed by the person submitting the form,
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:31 PM
5

The majority of that is bullshit. The only one I’ll agree with is not holding in emotions, that’s on the whole rather unhealthy.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:52 PM
5

Fair is irrelevant, that it’s not effective is far more important
/r/MensRights20/01/19 06:26 AM
1

Playing devils advocate here, are they not expressly talking about civilian victims of war in regions of unrest where there is a war on the ground?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:56 AM
4

I think this is a great article, but I’d like to pick on one thing I don’t like in it. You look at a beard as being a symbol of toxic masculinity like I look at callous-free hands on a man as being a symbol of weakness. While I happen to have callouses on my hands, I don’t get it from my work life, I get them from my own hobbies. It would be very easy for me not to have them, but not having them wouldn’t make me less of a man. This comment hints at there being only one way to be manly, with anyt…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:05 PM
1

But this isn’t just raising our voice in a positive and constructive manner, this is just lowering ourselves to the lowest and worst sjw territory.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 05:10 AM
3

This is exactly the kind of shit that gets this sub called a hate sub.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:28 PM
9

If it is that is especially ironic as women have a longer lifespan on average so really if it’s working life as a percentage of total life then they should have an older pension age.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 05:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter