TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SparkleCharm Archive

View 6 posts and 220 comments by SparkleCharm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

It really does How the hell can you call a settlement outside of court "consent", when you are threatened with jail time? Do you know what happens to fathers who refuse to pay child support? They try to put them in a cage. That's not consent, that's extortion. Believe it or not, most parents put aside their pride to be available for their children after separation If they want to voluntary finance their children, more power for them, they shouldn't be threatened with jail time if they don't want…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:49 AM
2

You cannot legally opt-out of child support in the event of the divorce. You cannot waive your legal "rights" to child support. especially in canada where over half child related settlements are settled outside of court. Settlement outside of court doesn't signify consent. Instead, they might agree to the settlement due to the fear of going to jail, facing expensive court fees, or simply not wanting to waste their valuable time and money. In such situations, individuals may feel pressured or for…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:44 AM
4

you are aware why a judge is able to do that? people coerce people all the time... If you can prove that a clear immoral threat took place ("Sign it or I will shoot you!"), then sure. The problem is when it is abused to include grey areas like "emotional abuse" or "emotional pressure". If legal loopholes can nullify it despite your obvious good intentions, it becomes unreliable. that said how would you tackle violations of that contract? If the contract is made with the State, then the State wil…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:32 AM
3

My problem with alimony and child support is that they are not consensual. The person who has to pay it never consented to it and was not aware of this obligation at the beginning of the marriage, which is very wrong imo and makes it theft. Secondly, you cannot voluntary opt-out of child support, even at the beginning of the marriage and even if both spouses don't want it. It's immoral to be forced into a "contract" you never consented to and can't even opt-out of. In the context of alimony, a j…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:13 AM
1

Thinking in black and white is incorrect and doesn't tell the whole picture. Separating men and women between "good" and "bad" is inaccurate. Would you say that the majority of men don't hold a SINGLE problematic belief? Of course not. Sexism is deeply ingrained and it is well known that most men perpetuate some harmful stereotypes. In the same way, the majority of women are far from being flawless as well. They can promote outdated and wrong problematic beliefs which may harm us. It isn't about…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:41 PM
1

Prenuptial agreements are legal contracts made by couples before they get married, which outline how their assets and debts should be divided in the event of a divorce. But, there is one important thing to know. Sometimes, these agreements can be ignored or rejected by a judge. This means that even if you have a prenup, it might not always protect you fully in a divorce. We don't know exactly how often this happens because there isn't a lot of information available to the public. But, it does ha…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 09:35 AM
2

It was my understanding that premarital assets are generally not accessible / not granted as divisible assets in divorce It depends of your country. In some countries, you can sometimes be expected to give up assets you obtained before the marriage. But yeah what complex legal schemes are even available for me to setup to protect assets. Honestly, the best is to hide the existence of the asset. For instance, a court cannot compel you to disclose the inner thoughts and ideas in your mind or discl…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:44 PM
2

It depends of your jurisdiction and country, but generally speaking attempting to hide assets clandestinely the way you said would be seen as legally problematic. Divorce courts generally have mechanisms to uncover hidden assets, like forensic accountants and getting caught could result in trouble. If you don't want to pay and they can't seize your stuff for whatever reason, then they can't do much besides putting you in jail. They probably won't resort to the death penalty for alimony payments,…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:21 PM
2

But if she does decide to falsely accuse you, everyone will take her side and believe her on the spot. If you get wronged by a man as a woman, society will try to support you and keep him accountable, that is the key difference. In one case, they aren't held accountable, and in the other they are. Interacting with individuals who aren't kept accountable creates a dangerous power imbalance dynamic.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:22 AM
32

It's true, she can accuse you for any reason and you will get your money drained if she choose to do so. It's still the lesser of evils, though. If you don't interact with women you reduce your probability of pissing a woman off. They can't falsely accuse you if they don't know that you exist after all. If you are a famous person, however, this strategy won't work and I wish you good luck.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:08 AM
2

When you look at how society is, this narrative actually makes a lot of sense. When something bad happens to you because of something you did wrong, people think you should receive less pity. But if it's because of things that are out of your control, people feel sorry for you. If someone dies while crossing the road because they were looking at their phone and not paying attention, people might feel less sorry for them. But if someone gets hit by a car even after being careful and looking befor…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 06:58 PM
3

No amount of holding frame, acting confident, and alpha sigma male courses will fix the fact that you are balding, under 6 foot, and have a recessed chin. It's true, and I get what you say, but making money to collect status, learning how to dress, learning how to socialize with females and other self-improvement tips can definitely help somewhat. It started from a legitimate point of view: you are unlikely to play the dating game perfectly and maximize your odds because you are not a robot, the…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 05:28 PM
4

Mainstream relationship advice for men turning to shit doesn't surprise me. How can you give real serious advice, when one side is considered innocent and most people consider it "misogyny" to make some statistical observations about women (but don't say anything when those same observations are about men). Mainstream social media is really not a good place for good effective relationship advice when everything is deemed "offensive" nowadays. If you are talking about some fringe spots in the cor…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:42 PM
1

Men are more afraid of crying in front of other men than they are crying in front of women. First of all, I never said that crying in front of platonic female friends or strangers was problematic, I just said that a man crying is less "dating material" for most women. This isn't as much of a problem with platonic female friends. Secondly, I feel like this was just a way for you to find something to blame men by blaming "other men" with a baseless assumption, but whatever. If a man is constantly …
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:01 PM
0

If you want to imagine fantasies to virtue signal, then more power to you. Oh, but weren't you the one who just referred to men who were constantly crying as "toddlers"? You can try to act like the stereotype of the "strong man who never cries" doesn't exist. You can try to act like crying is the most attractive thing for a man to do to keep a woman and to attract them. But deep down, you know, what blatant lies are.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 03:42 PM
1

I know that a considerable number of women find men crying, and expressing their emotions as weak and a big turn off. It makes sense that they didn't evolve to favor this trait, as this can send a signal against the fact that a man might be fit to provide and protect her. Is it the right thing for women to do it? Probably. Do they do support their men emotionally in practice? Most of them don't, because of societal stereotypes and evolutionary biology.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 02:12 PM
3

What? Are you claiming that the majority of women would wish to have a boyfriend constantly crying on their shoulder?
/r/MensRights06/11/23 02:07 PM
21

My main problem with feminism is that feminists promote immoral laws and behavior. They promote child support, which is theft and slavery. They also promote alimony, which is the same thing. There are also various dangerous ideas spread by a lot of feminists, like the idea that men are dangerous people who seek to harm women, or using derogatory language to refer to men. Their silence is deafening on issues like the male-only draft, boys underperforming in schools, and men struggling in the job …
/r/MensRights06/11/23 09:50 AM
9

Does the fact that less than 1% of men hold positions of power suggest that the majority of men have privilege? If you ignore what the majority of men went through and are going through, then sure.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:27 AM
9

To be honest, this annoys me because this bullshit spills over to normal platonic male-female friendships. This imbalance gives me incentives to limit or avoid having female friends IRL. In fact, it's so bad that it gives me incentives to limit all my interactions with people of the opposite gender as a safety precaution. It really does suck because I know that most women won't do terrible things and they can be great people. It also kinda goes against my "universalist" and "diversity" principle…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 08:45 PM
18

And many women do not appreciate it when you express your feelings and show your vulnerability to them. So, even going into a relationship is no guarantee for emotional support.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 08:26 PM
2

While I understand your viewpoint, I personally don't believe that people have a moral obligation to have children or spread their genes. Each person has the right to choose their own path and priorities in life, and there are plenty of other ways to contribute to society and find fulfillment beyond genetic continuity. Furthermore, having children in a dystopia comes with its own set of ethical and practical problems. Having a child in a world full of suffering and uncertainty makes us wonder ho…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 08:20 PM
3

What? Are you claiming that being single or celibate is a bad thing?
/r/MensRights05/11/23 07:52 PM
2

The issue of "too many bad women" doesn't concern me, even though it is already significant to be honest. My problem are the perverse incentives they are given and the lack of community and legal support when you are in trouble with her. This total lack of accountability seems impossible to escape nowadays and is a deal breaker for me, even if it's a "good woman" who is not held accountable.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 07:36 PM
6

I get what you say, however romance isn't a necessity. There are plenty of aromantic individuals who live happy lives. There are plenty of bad women, but it isn't the main problem we have. The main problem is the biased legal system and court of public opinion that always take a woman's side in case of a conflict. This makes the prospect of close romance way too risky for men in this day and age. In fact, it is so bad that I wouldn't want to date a "good woman", even if she were a female version…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 07:23 PM
26

Pros of heading into a relationship: -Having someone with whom you can share your life -If you are interested with having biological children or adopting children, having a woman on your side can prove to be useful -Having someone close to you for emotional support, and support in achieving goals -Forming a deep emotional connection, which can be a unique and good feeling -Physical intimacy with a person of the opposite sex can be nice Cons of heading into a relationship: -Biased legal system an…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 07:12 PM
1

When I was a child in school, there were certain discussions that me and my classmates would not have had with our teachers if we were aware that those conversations were being recorded. It is still a violation of privacy, even if it is limited to school administrators and police.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 06:47 PM
3

To begin with, I feel sorry for what you had to experience in your past. I hope you can find a way to feel better and recover from your past. I think that romantic relationships are mainly a mirage based on lies. What are relationships based on nowadays? They are based on men watching propaganda in the form of anime, movies, or books that portray women in an excessively favorable manner. The objective is to portray women as more virtuous and moral than they are in reality. Having an idealized no…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:19 PM
207

The reason behind this concern is the suspicion that a considerable number of children might be born from infidelity. Even if it could be proven that the percentage is as minimal as 5%, there is fear that it would have a detrimental impact on society and therefore, there is a preference to prioritize the protection of women. There is a significant group of individuals who strongly believe in protecting women who cheat, regardless of the consequences, often using the phrase "think of the children…
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:57 PM
3

I was wondering how the men from this sub who cannot cook food manage? Even with only raw food and minimal cooking you can already do a lot. You already don't need to cook. Those who say that they need a wife for cooking or cleaning always seemed like a strange excuse in this day and age.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 05:40 PM
4

I mean, I do feel sympathy for this guy, but at some point we have to be honest: someone who literally believes that his life is worthless without women and want to let women dictate the value of his life is weak. There are no other ways to describe it. He should fix his shit before making public suicide threats.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:28 AM
19

If you head over to a womens group, find a post about victimization, and you want to take all the attention from that post and shift it to men with a ‘what about men’ comment, then you deserve what you get. If they claimed in their post that men cannot be victims, they deserve their rebuttal imo. If I created a new thread in a women's group about how we should be careful to not generalize too much about men, it would get deleted within seconds. If I do the reverse in a men's group, it would get …
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:16 AM
5

I am fairly certain that it's bullshit just to virtue signal about how women are the most "spiritual", most "moral", "empathetic", and "fair" gender.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 08:59 AM
0

Calm down, they are just 14 year olds kids.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:13 PM
2

It's impractical. What prevents a kid from creating an email on his laptop and giving it to his teacher during class? The only way to prevent such a conversation from being private then is to monitor every device in the kid's home and teacher's home. It's just not possible.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 07:52 PM
4

Nah, I think that it begins to be overreaching: monitoring the classrooms and alleyways with audio is already more than enough and overkill to prevent any abuse or problem. Yes, sometimes teachers may ask students to use a phone number or email to talk in private, but the cameras will still capture the fact that they asked to talk in private. You are basically asking to monitor every device of the kid, teacher and every online account, which is not practical, ineffective and it begins to be over…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 07:03 PM
6

It's also a possibility, even though it kinda defeats its purpose without audio now, doesn't it? But at least it could still help against false allegations of assault and prevent kids from being physically abused as well.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:44 PM
11

It's kinda horrific to think about the fact that this guy tried to circumcise a child he was babysitting...
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:42 PM
28

I strongly believe that having cameras in classrooms to document public interactions is necessary. Yet, I do have concerns about one aspect: the lack of privacy for private conversations between students and teachers. The thought of students not having any personal space or time to have confidential discussions with their teachers unsettles me. On the other hand, I recognize that it is during these "private moments" that bad teachers may exploit students or face false accusations. If we could at…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:21 PM
12

Even worse is when you bring up how prison rape of men basically equalizes the situation and they lose all empathy as if convicts aren't human or something. It's because men who have acted immorally in the past are completely dehumanized, and society think that they are impossible to rehabilitate. Where I have a big problem however, is when society tries to enact their revenge fantasies on men who regretted what they did and were really sorry. I will take an example: military veterans. Some of t…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 05:27 PM
3

It's actually way more complicated than it seems. The issue shouldn't be resumed by "prisoners should simply go to therapy to have good mental health". I have various reservations regarding the use of therapy for inmates. The first issue comes down to privacy. Therapists are mandated reporters, which means they are required by law to report any information that suggests a potential harm to the client or others. If inmates fear that their conversations during therapy sessions may be used against …
/r/MensRights03/11/23 02:36 PM
7

I don't think that u/flipsidetroll is trolling. They made two claims: 1) They believe that the problem has nothing to do with sexism or how men are treated compared to women. They believe that the problem lies in how we as a society are politically organized. They advocated for libertarianism which means that they believe in a small or nonexistent government. 2) They believe that you are simply blaming women, that you are flip side of "feminism". They believe that you are acting like feminists b…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 01:58 PM
13

No, OP didn't express a preference for libertarianism, or a smaller or nonexistent government. OP said that they were frustrated at how unfairly men were treated by the judicial system, economical system, and sometimes getting their lives ruined despite doing no wrong. OP is tired of gynocentrism or society always putting women first before men and even violating the natural moral rights of men in the process. except of course if you’re brainwashed to see women as the cause of everything bad. Me…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 01:44 PM
15

Not necessarily, they are just making a factual observation about the utilitarian consequences of this. Personally, I do think that they should have been given the right to vote, like men, but it should have come with equal responsibilities and obligations.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:13 PM
50

I think pretty much the same, however it's important to note the impact of these "small judgments" on the long run. Women having less empathy for men may not seem that bad at a first glance, but it can make it easier for them to accept immoral legislation targeting men. It starts with a stupid tweet hurling hate at men, but it ends with complete slavery. People perceiving men as guilty and aggressors, and women as the victims is still problematic, even if it doesn't directly cause any legal laws…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 11:03 AM
6

We have evolved to be so sacrifical that some of us crave the idea of martyrdom as a way to gain value in the eyes of society. The problem is that it isn't valued by society, it's just a dumb merciless expectation. Does society acknowledge men as "the most moral gender" because of this? Nope. Being a man offering gifts to women is such a thankless job, it's just not worth it.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:46 AM
59

Saying "not all men" is alright, but it is not the best reply in my opinion. The issue lies in the fact that it continues to promote the misconception that the majority of men are problematic. For example, suggesting that "not all men steal purple cars" could insinuate that a considerable number of them actually do. A better way would be to clarify that most men don't partake in problematic behaviors.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 06:19 PM
-1

There is a difference between enforcement and morality. My explicit focus was on the morality aspect, not on discussing whether it should be deemed illegal or not. If you find it morally wrong, then individuals who participate in and endorse such abortions in situations you regard as immoral should be regarded less favorably and ultimately held responsible to some extent. If you choose to ignore the moral question, you might end up accepting and supporting actions that are immoral. You cannot si…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 06:02 PM
24

Exactly! They want men to be overly cautious and afraid of them, but they also want to punish men who limit their interactions with women. They basically want men to be at the feet of all women without asking anything back in return.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 05:08 PM
2

I do not like abortion, but I support it being available due to the overall health effects for the population. Morally supporting the termination of pregnancies in cases where it is medically necessary is very different from supporting abortion on demand in all cases for any reason.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 05:01 PM
2

Why do both sides view sex as a requirement these days? Because if they didn't, then they couldn't morally justify abortion as a result of recreational sex. Because if they acknowledged the low efficacy of birth control at preventing pregnancy, a topic deemed socially inappropriate, it would shatter their world view. Without a hookup culture, then most women would be virgins, the teen pregnancy rate would go way down, and unplanned pregnancies would be close to zero. Without a hookup culture, yo…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:45 PM
6

I wouldn’t trust male birth control at all at this point far too unstable. I wouldn't trust birth control at all, whether male or female in these modern times. Not only are the health risks unacceptable, but the pregnancy risk is still way too high for something so important. I find people foolish for doing piv sex and thinking "that they are safe" because they use birth control and get surprised when it inevitably fail. It's either truly safe methods for intimacy that don't require birth contro…
/r/MensRights02/11/23 01:58 PM
1

If you are a handsome 6'2 man that is in good health and has lots of money, intelligence and social skills then apathy wouldn't be appropriate because you have so many things going for you you can overcome many unfair obstacles He is still way less privileged than an overweight woman, lol.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 11:25 AM
3

It depends of your definition of "black pill". Realizing that the system is rigged and deciding to not get married is fine. Nothing wrong with deciding to be single. The problem is when those individuals stay depressed and sad over not being able to have a girlfriend or sex and can't move on, which is a shame for them, really. If they found ways to be happy with their singleness and independence, it would be perfect.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 04:08 PM
10

ok, the basic child support should be determined by a statutory basic living cost for the child not determined by your income if you are not willing to share the burden of bringing the child up. Don't you understand what consent is? If someone wants to have a marriage without child support in case of divorce, he should free to have his marriage in his terms. As of now, most men didn't consent to child support, are threatened with jail if they don't pay and can't opt-out. Well about the 50/50 spl…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 02:12 PM
15

It's even worse than this. It's more like quitting your job and deciding that you should still be paid "to maintain your current standard of living"
/r/MensRights01/11/23 12:11 PM
1

Okay, I get what you are saying. You are correct that a "pension alimentaire" is closer to child support while a "prestation compensatoire" would be closer to alimony. This is taken out of the husband's share in the division of marital assets and can be paid in installment over a few years (8 max if I remember correctly), but it is not like alimony. How so? I genuinely don't get how it differs so much from alimony.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:18 AM
21

basic child support It already is wrong. The man should only pay child support if he consents to, instead of being threatened with jail if he does not pay something he never consented to. The basics here should be that you split 50/50 what you have acquired during your marriage No, I shouldn't have to split everything 50/50 I acquired during my marriage. She should only get her stuff and I should get my stuff. If we both contributed equally to financing something, THEN split it 50/50.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:13 AM
4

bear in mind that in France alimony does not exist Under French law, a spouse has the right during a divorce to ask the other spouse to pay a pension alimentaire, maintenance allowance, to them for the entire duration of the divorce proceedings. While the term "alimony" may not be explicitly used in French law, the concept of financial support during divorce still exists.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:56 AM
12

1) What you said is already the case: women can initiate a divorce without having to prove any fault and they are rewarded for it by receiving stolen money. Women are the ones who get an incentive to leave their husband. In fact, most divorces are initiated by the woman. 2) Most men like their children and wouldn't want to leave them or let them stay in an unstable household. The only reason for a man to leave is because of his insufferable wife. If he was the one providing, he is likely to want…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:52 AM
13

I don’t know. If you feel bad at the idea of a man getting thrown in jail for not wanting to pay extortion and keeping his own money, then you should reconsider your support for child support laws. I guess I kind of assumed that most fathers want their kids to have a reasonable quality of life. But you seem to be making a strong case that many would rather they just have barely enough to survive. As a father, I think most fathers are like me and want to provide. Most fathers want to provide for …
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:34 AM
11

‘Who is going to pay for it’. The same people that were paying for it before the divorce. Obviously. And what if they do not consent to it, what is going to happen to them?
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:24 AM
11

I meant people who are trapped in US or Europe by this system should try to get a job at these places as they don't have any treaties with their home countries. Ah okay, I agree with this, changing jurisdiction is an option when you already got caught in Europe or the US. Also, these places don't have gynocentric laws and therefore, are better to get married Yeah, I wouldn't go as far as saying that a country that has "period days" for women or women-only trains has "no gynocentric laws". All th…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:23 AM
7

You believe children should have a lesser quality of life when parents get divorced? You don’t believe the children should maintain the same standard of living? It would maybe cool if they could, who is going to pay for it, though? I just don't want someone to be forced to pay for it if they didn't consent to it. Wouldn’t that lead to men and women staying in abusive relationships so the kids are better off? It already do happen. Staying in a relationship as long as possible is already the best …
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:18 AM
33

Child support and alimony are both bullshit to begin with. Whether someone should pay it or not should be decided on a voluntary basis. If men didn't consent to pay their own money, which they own, then they shouldn't have to pay child support. Currently, not only are men forced into this child support "agreement" without their consent, but they cannot even opt-out of it!! I would advise men who work in STEM and are currently trapped by this gynocentric system to move to countries like Singapore…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 10:05 AM
9

they just know one side is for traditional families and equal respect of men and women I would love you to show me this side, because I can't find any politician who supports this.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 05:53 PM
0

Let's make our votes count. My vote won't change the outcome of the election. Even if I stumbled upon a good candidate, I wouldn't vote as voting is pointless anyway. I cannot make my vote count.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 05:50 PM
5

I seriously don't. What is the point of maximising the odds of having a partner that you can't rely on and open up to? It's like climbing a ladder to a place one rather would not be. Where is the love? You don't need 99.99% of women, you just need one that loves you for who you are. I would rather stay single then play pretend and waste my life on someone who loves the fake image of me. I understand what you say, and in fact, I 100% agree with everything you said. A man being able to open up to …
/r/MensRights31/10/23 05:23 PM
9

From a biological point of view, a man crying, being sad and showing his insecurities is a big turn off to the majority of women, because this sends a signal that he may not be fit to protect her or provide for her. No matter how much they claim that they may like it, it literally turns them off and they can't help it. It's instinctive. They will have negative feelings about the man. Yes, a tiny minority of women can try to overlook these very annoying emotions and think rationally about the man…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 03:11 PM
2

From a biological perspective, it makes a lot of sense that men like women more than women like men. Most men would choose to save their wife, if they had to choose between their wife or their children. But most women would not choose to save their husband, they would save their children. Why? Because pregnancy depletes a woman's resources. She cannot let the offspring she spent a lot of energy to waste, to the point that she would rather lose her husband than her children. Their reasoning is th…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:46 PM
2

I am not an involuntary celibate man. Otherwise, good luck with your life (no, really).
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:14 PM
2

Systemic sexism means that discrimination and unfair treatment towards people based on their sex or gender is widespread and built into the systems and structures of a society. It is not just individual acts of sexism, but a larger problem that is deeply rooted in how things are set up and how society works. Can this happen to women? Absolutely, it is definitely possible for a government, even in developed western countries, to create laws that disadvantage women. But, we shouldn't stop at this.…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:55 PM
1

I am sorry that your life feels empty without women and that you struggle to imagine someone being happy without women. I am sorry that you can't go back in time with your decision and that you are already stuck with a woman. It's not a big deal, it's not your fault anymore, the past is the past, you can't control it. Make the best out of what you can with your cards. Stay optimistic, rational, and objective. But anyway, I answered your question about why some people are dead serious on the advi…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:33 PM
8

Keying a car is the biggest douche crime to do. No matter how much of an asshole someone is, you never key anyone's car, period. Vandalizing a car is one of the worst crimes someone could ever do in my eyes and make me immediately lose all respect for them.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:16 PM
9

From a men's rights perspective, conservatives can also be criticized for their limited understanding and recognition of the issues and struggles faced by men in society. While conservatives often champion a traditional gender role and emphasize men's responsibility as protectors and providers, their approach can negate the complexities and diverse experiences of men. One issue that highlights this limited understanding is their support for a male-only draft.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:09 PM
3

The interpretation varies depending on your country; however, in general, people who identify as liberals are often associated with the left wing, while those who identify as conservatives are associated with the right wing. On the left side of the spectrum, individuals who identify as liberals tend to prioritize ideas like equality, social justice, and government intervention. They usually advocate for policies that aim to reduce income inequality, provide affordable healthcare, and protect the…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 12:58 PM
2

while maintaining accountability for our actions. The legal system and community are not on your side and won't help you keep her accountable. If she decides to cry to your friends or strangers about how you "abused" her or complain about you, everyone will automatically and intuitively take her side. In the legal system? Same shit. That's why I say that women aren't kept accountable, they can do pretty much whatever they want without consequences. And as I said, trying to interact with an indiv…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 12:30 PM
2

So my question, is the advice "stay single" a real solution for misandry? Absolutely. The legal system and community don't want to keep women accountable. Refusing or liming interactions with individuals who aren't kept accountable makes a lot of sense. "Well, if you stumble upon a good woman, then it is no big deal that she isn't held accountable" is flawed reasoning, btw.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:42 PM
-6

You are hitting a sensitive topic. Trying to criticize the government and black women. You are going to make a lot of people angry. Are there problems with black culture? Every culture has its problems, so, yes, absolutely. There are problems in black culture that are less pronounced than in white culture. There are problems in white culture that are less pronounced than in black culture, as well. What I say may be controversial, but I feel way more connected to a man from a different cultural b…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:27 PM
7

First of all, not all people being involuntarily celibate advocate for these policies. Secondly, most of those who advocate for arranged marriage want it to be done voluntarily. These kinds of marriage have multiple benefits and can make it easier for men and women to find a compatible partner. There is maybe a minority who are arguing for forcing some women to legally marry under the threat of imprisonment. I don't agree with this, it's a violation of bodily autonomy. But seeing as how society …
/r/MensRights30/10/23 03:37 PM
9

Not really. They don't like men being involuntarily celibate for too long because they may get used to celibacy and not want to marry at the end. It's also one potential simp that could have served them who doesn't.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 03:17 PM
19

They are trying to shame you for being involuntary celibate. For them, being in a couple is the ultimate benchmark of a person's worth: they expect a successful man to have a very good-looking wife, in cultures where it isn't taboo it may even be expected of them to have multiple wives. These idiots are trying to imply two things by using celibacy as an insult: 1) They are trying to imply that you can't be truly happy by being single without a woman in your life. They think that you must be mise…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 03:11 PM
3

Of course not, they are bitches for expressing themselves this way and having such dark and hateful thoughts towards shorter men. They deserve no attention.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 03:01 PM
14

Well, if you ask any random woman what makes a man attractive, they will all tell you some bullshit like "being nice and listening to her", or "being emotionally open". Very few of them will go straight to the point and mention height, looks, money and status. They are maybe afraid that it will make them look shallow. And if you ask a man, he won't reply the truth because he may not know it or may be afraid to talk badly of women. This truth definitely seems to be suppressed among mainstream med…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 02:57 PM
52

This is the dilemma when attempting to ignore or suppress issues. When the majority of society feigns ignorance about a preference, those who hold this preference will only voice it underground, and not necessarily with civility. Additionally, shorter men may become frustrated as they question whether their belief that a considerable number of women prefer taller men is irrational or not. Pretending women have no preferences won't do us any good in the long run.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:42 AM
15

It depends. Blatantly false and malicious rape accusations is frowned upon by most of society. Generally speaking, frowned upon behavior tends to only be done by a minority of individuals. But as you said, when the behavior is not frowned upon, it is possible for a significant number of women to partake in it, to not say the majority. Reporting someone for "harassment" is not frowned upon and the majority of women have a warped view of what constitutes as "harassment". This can be a problem in H…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 10:00 AM
24

It's not that ALL of a society believe that they cannot be victims. But a significant number of people think that it was 100% consensual and that he was "lucky", but wouldn't hold the same views if it came to a male offender with a girl. There are many reasons for these beliefs: the belief that guys are always horny, the fact that it's more difficult for men to obtain sex, and the fact that puberty doesn't start at the same time for boys and girls. Due to neoteny traits in their faces, women off…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:29 AM
47

It is a significant concern and a men's rights issue when society believes that young boys cannot be victims of sexual abuse by adults. This problem extends beyond simply discrediting the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:17 AM
7

It's a very good piece of advice. Just remember that even with crystal clear evidence, it's still hard to defend yourself against women legally. Despite possessing indisputable evidence, you will still be required to bear the financial burden of legal fees, while also taking the risk that the judge may rule against you due to various factors or potentially discredit your findings. Additionally, visual recordings have the potential to positively influence public perception. But it is important to…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:12 AM
1

Good post, but I can definitely see the part about risk-taking bringing in some controversy. Some healthy risk-taking can be good, but too much of it can lead to detrimental consequences. It's important to strike a balance between pushing boundaries and exercising caution. One of the main advantages of risk-taking is its potential to bring about innovation and growth. Take the business world for example - entrepreneurs who are willing to take calculated risks are often the ones who disrupt indus…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 08:51 AM
86

Shires was reported to the Columbus Police Department on Sept. 27 by the boy’s mother, who said she saw messages from the suspect to her son asking if the mother “had seen the videos or messages” or if those videos had been deleted. When the mother showed her son’s phone to cops, they allegedly found the videos of illicit sexual contact and texts that Shires didn’t want anyone else to see. she allegedly went to the home of a 13-year-old she’s accused of sexually abusing and threatened to shoot t…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 08:43 AM
1

It is important to remember that chess is not intelligence. It is an intellectual task, but it is not intelligence. There is a difference between the two. If you are better at chess, it does not mean that you are better at decision-making in most facets of everyday life, it only means that you mastered the specific skillsets required by chess, which is different. These are not proofs... chess sees a lot less participation from women. It's easier to find a genius in a group of 10000 players than …
/r/MensRights30/10/23 08:03 AM
8

Well, if black men are able to celebrate their skin color, as it should be, then white men should be able to, as well. Talking about how interesting the history of black people is, is doable. It should the same for white people.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 11:10 PM
5

And women are perfect innocent angels who can never harm you like in anime. If only there were only women in our world, we could finally achieve worldwide peace!
/r/MensRights29/10/23 11:02 PM
22

It was not a "struggle for equality". The majority of men didn't have the right to vote. Only men who were property owners or met certain qualifications, such as having a certain amount of wealth or education, were allowed to vote. This meant that a large portion of the male population, particularly those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, were excluded from the democratic process. Women acting like they were the only ones having problems with suffrage IS A LIE! Secondly, they wanted the righ…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:50 PM
5

We never claimed that men were biologically smarter than women. We just said that the male body was very well adapted at performing certain intellectual tasks, and it being superior to the female body in this context is only a mere possibility. Let's take chess players for example: the strongest chess player is rated at a 2839 FIDE elo, while the strongest female chess player, ranked at #122 is rated at 2628 FIDE elo. You can try to come with various explanations as to why it may be the case, bu…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:31 PM
20

The White Feather movement was a campaign in Britain during World War I. It involved women distributing white feathers, a symbol of cowardice, to able-bodied men who were not serving in the military. Its main goal was to shame these men into joining the armed forces. The movement was primarily led by suffragettes, women who were advocating for women's right to vote. [1] This movement is criticized for its role in pressuring men to join the military and perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:17 PM
2

You are physically stronger and can do things that seem superhuman compared to kids and women. Men being physically stronger than women in average is self-evident. You are also smarter in all areas that don't involve emotion and have a much easier time understanding science and very abstract concepts. See: Isaac newton, Albert Einstein and a lot of the biggest scientists who are men. The biggest chess players? All men. The biggest mathematicians? Most of them are men. The biggest inventors? Domi…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:04 PM
37

When you understand that we are all equal under the eyes of the Universe, that's when you understand that the hate that exists in the world stems from ignorance and fear. Knowing and understanding this is really empowering because it allows you to rise above the negativity and focus on using your powers to better yourself. By recognizing that hate often originates from narrow-mindedness and insecurity, you can cultivate overwhelming strength. They may try to repeat the false narrative and propag…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 04:13 PM
30

saying all women are the same, they dont want to date Nice guys etc Few people claim that all women are the same. Some people are just trying to make statistical observations and understand the behavior of women in average. Like every analysis, some of them are right, while others are less accurate. You have to use your brain and logical reasoning to determine this. 2) It isn't that women want or don't want to date "Nice guys", it's just that being nice doesn't seem to be so valuable compared to…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 10:56 AM
1

I wish. With our poor scientific understanding of the brain, it isn't an easy claim to support. There may be differences in spatial reasoning for example, but are they really significant differences when it comes to memory or logical reasoning for example? There may be, but we would have to verify whether it is due to biology or social constructs as well. Given how women were smart enough to setup a gynocentric society that benefits them and have every man be their servant, I wouldn't call them …
/r/MensRights29/10/23 09:22 AM
1

Even if this direct democracy worked as intended (which is a lot to ask tbh), it wouldn't be great. Most people have less empathy for men than women, if they were truly allowed to be in power, they would still create gynocentric laws that disadvantage men. From a collective point of view, there isn't much we can do as long as we are underfunded and such a minority. From an individual point of view, there are still some things that can allow us to live happily as a lone wolf disconnected from soc…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 08:41 AM
0

It's easy to go to the hospital or clinic and get a rape kit done. This only proves that they had sex, this doesn't prove that it wasn't consensual. It may be enough to prove stranger rape, but these kind of rapes are a minority. When the person is raped by an acquaintance or a significant other, it becomes much harder to prove. The defendant can claim rough sex for any supposed injuries. Without an undoctored video footage, it's pretty much impossible to convict. The only reason why there are s…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 04:19 PM
1

I understand your point about the state usually bearing the cost of police investigations and prosecutions. However, there are still certain indirect costs that an accuser might have to bear, like transportation expenses, loss of income due to court appearances, legal representation, medical examinations, or therapy. These costs can add up and become a burden, especially for individuals with limited financial means. Additionally, simply going to the police doesn't guarantee justice or support fo…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:38 PM
51

Because some rich people haven't decided to fund this movement, yet.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 01:28 PM
3

There were people fired at their work, getting expulsed from school or getting into serious trouble just because of public allegations made without proof, so, no, people don't seem to think that whether to believe them is a "choice" or not and people are gaslighted into believing so-called "survivors". The hashtag #believeallwomen didn't come out of nowhere after all.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 01:00 PM
5

If she lacks evidence and the other party denies the allegations, then the public shouldn't be gaslighted into believing her and she shouldn't be surprised when some people don't believe her or don't want to ostracize the guy.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 12:52 PM
1

really do need to debate in order to change enough hearts and minds for it to matter. It's a beautiful fantasy you are imagining. Changing the minds of people through debate. Good luck with that, Einstein. People nowadays would rather passionately argue over a slice of pizza than engage in civilized discourse. And even when they do listen to you, can you guess what they'll do next? Probably forget everything you just said and go back to scrolling through social media like their lives depend on i…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 12:49 PM
0

I never said that they did the killing themselves, even though they can definitely do it sometimes. I said that they tricked women into viewing the murder of babies as part of their "sexual health" or "reproductive rights", which is ridiculous when you think about it.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 12:29 PM
4

Feminists started a movement where any woman is able to accuse any man of anything publicly without proof and tarnish his reputation. This is a movement that encouraged lynching, vigilante justice, and not caring about the concept of "innocent until proven guilty". Women can speak about their survivor experience publicly, they just shouldn't accuse any specific single man of grave accusations and ruin his life publicly without any proof
/r/MensRights28/10/23 12:26 PM
3

Let's see their "best" real-life actions, should we? Attempting to reinstate roe v wade, even though this law was invalidated not to ban abortion nation-wide, but to let the states decide on this matter. But they mislead everyone into thinking that this unconstitutional bullshit was thrown away because people hate abortion and not for any other reason. Secondly, their crusade for abortion in all situations is quite frankly stupid. If you are not "pro-choice" in all situations you are not with th…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:51 AM
12

There is a lot of positive to the label on paper, less-so from their real-life actions such as passing misandrist laws stating that only men can rape, closing male-only spaces like men's clubs and organizations, and downplaying issues that disproportionately affect men. These actions have generated skepticism and criticism towards the label of feminism. If I take into account the hate speech used by such a movement with terms like "toxic masculinity", male tears", and "mansplaining", it is clear…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:34 AM
2

My point of view is that if people like me don’t make at least 1 child then the world will be f&ked if only regards are running the show. I will only reply to the utilitarian point of view, disregarding any moral considerations. Well, adoption can maybe be an option to achieve this goal. Teaching other people who are already grown-up and want to hear your message may also be a possibility. Additionally, it's important to recognize that having a child doesn't guarantee that they will follow the s…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 09:25 AM
0

It's not a logically consistent critique. Would you say that being against murder is not acceptable "because it targets murderer lives"? Would you say that being against theft is not acceptable "because it targets thieves lives"? I hope not. Similarly, if you were to accept the premises of anti-natalism that creating new biological children is actually immoral, then it's not a "matter of choice" because those people partaking in this activity would be considered to harm others. To understand the…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:56 AM
1

I am one and I 100% agree with it. It is immoral to create new biological children and force them into this world to suffer without their consent. Abortion is murder and not an option. I am not a pro-mortalist. It is immoral to create new life, but once the life is already there for whatever reason, it is immoral to murder them. Unfortunately, most people are too closed-minded to seriously reconsider their moral beliefs, or admit that a majority of people partake in immoral behavior.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:48 AM
1

You are hitting it on the nail when it comes to supporting someone without proof. If they were liars, then you just gave free drinks and attention to a malicious free-rider which may encourage such a behavior from occurring again. On the other hand, I still think that it's the lesser evil compared to going on a witch hunt or ostracizing an innocent guy. When you are helping a free-rider, you are not directly harming anyone, but it's still not great. It's even worse if the accuser won't go to the…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:36 AM
2

You are correct that in criminal proceedings, it is the state that brings charges against the accused. However, the victims of sexual assault are often involved in the legal process as witnesses and can have an impact on the outcome of the case. In some cases, the victim may choose to hire their own legal representation to support them throughout the process, which may be costly. Regardless, it's important to remember that the cost and accessibility of legal resources can still be a barrier for …
/r/MensRights27/10/23 08:59 PM
6

It's even worse than a downgrade, they are also endangering their physical health, while also downgrading their social life and the treatment they receive from others.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 10:45 AM
6

The fact that some men can hold sexist and problematic beliefs make it harder to find likeminded people, indeed. The only thing left to do is to try to focus on yourself and only interact with men in limited circumstances (hobbies, etc.). If you do find a man who happens to hold similar beliefs as you, you can be close friends with them, if you want. Having a smaller social circle of friends is not bad, if you can take advantage of your free time and freedom it brings you.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 07:16 PM
8

Why should you trust women when the legal system and community don't trust you and assume you to be guilty on sight? There is nothing shameful about reducing your interactions with people who hold power over you and can't be kept accountable. You can live a good life without romance, without sex with women, and without having female friends.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:49 PM
1

If these women think that "sexual objectification" by their boyfriends is such a big problem, they should probably think about letting go recreational sex or significantly reducing its frequency. This will hopefully help them weed out men who only come for sex. But are they willing to do so? Is it convenient for them or are they also desiring sex as much as their partner? Some food for thought.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:34 PM
3

TIL, I didn't know that men could get breast cancer, I thought that only women could be affected by it. Nice, another thing to worry about :).
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:26 PM
6

Well, if even staying single isn't a guarantee to not get sued for cs, then there is not much to do besides being spiritually fit, staying optimistic, and hoping for the best. Even if you do win, you won't get your money in lawyer fees back. What you truly need is a legal immunity from getting sued by a woman. Otherwise, any woman who is not happy with you can basically ruin your life. If it's not for child support, it's because you looked at them wrong, "harassed them" or some other bullshit. E…
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:24 PM
3

It's ironic because I actually think that having a girlfriend is a lot less dangerous when you don't have kids. When you can actually execute the threat of leaving when she is acting incorrectly, it creates a healthier dynamic and promotes better communication and understanding within the relationship. Having children adds an entirely new dimension of responsibility and commitment, making it much more challenging to walk away when things aren't going well. The pressure to maintain a stable famil…
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:12 PM
29

when female enrollment is more than 60% then fewer women start applying [...] because that's going to be bad for social life and dating. It's kind of ironic when you really think about it. You would think that they would be happy to be in their "utopic" all-female university, to be "safe from the bad guys". They still need to keep a few simps around to help them, I guess. Shit on men when it suits them and run towards simps when they need it.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:03 PM
19

One of the best ways to avoid accidental pregnancies is to avoid piv sex, regardless of the amount of "protections" used. Unfortunately, it seems that very few people in this day and age are willing to follow this tip, even though there are multiple alternatives for safe intimacy. Besides trying to physically defend yourself, there isn't much you can do against a woman who wants to rape you. Try to not stumble upon "bad women", I guess :/ Women who designate you as the father when you obviously …
/r/MensRights26/10/23 05:56 PM
1

Pretty people. Nice people. People who seem to care about you, and it may seem rude not to return that. It's funny how men are shamed for refusing to interact with so-called "good women", even though It is technically a victimless act: you are not harming anyone by refusing to date, even if she was a "real good woman". It's gaslighting making its way into mainstream society.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 05:12 PM
1

It is no conspiracy, in fact it is well known and established among even mainstream media. The state tries to pass off laws and regulations to block competition and prevent other people from becoming more powerful than them. Look at intellectual property laws, zoning regulation laws, minimum wage laws, etc. All kind of laws designed to limit competition and stay at the top.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:21 PM
1

Hate the game, not the players. Not really. You are still responsible for your acts no matter how shitty the system is and no matter how much good behavior is discouraged. If you are referring to people who wanted to find a romantic partner but couldn't, then they have always been a thing. If you are talking about the people who can hold questionable views but happen to be single, then yeah, a toxic environment doesn't help, but they are still responsible for their acts.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:17 PM
1

It seems that the OP is asking about the connection between a peaceful negotiation during a divorce and the possibility of a man having to give up alimony due to his spouse. By "peaceful negotiation", the OP is probably referring to a divorce where both parties try to resolve resolve their differences and reach agreements without hostility or conflict. In other words, it appears that the OP is seeking clarification from the r/mensrights community regarding whether the man can guarantee that his …
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:59 PM
18

Are you disgusted by women as well or are they innocent angels? Do you think that women are "better" than men in this regard?
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:17 PM
4

Throughout our evolution, men weren't just the providers and protectors at a family level. We provided justice systems where ideal moral law was the benchmark Widespread society-wide moral codes weren't a thing since a very long time, if ever. The legal system was always set up to try to preserve the state itself. Giving scraps of ineffective "justice" here and here was just an added bonus. Religion is the closest we have been to this, but they were too easily corruptible and often got things wr…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 09:11 AM
2

one of the manosphere grifters said about black women and single mothers being bad for black male children Depends on how it was said and what was said. If it's just worry about statistical trends and the challenges inherently linked to single motherhood without singling out black male children in particular, then I am okay with it, otherwise, nope. to say that black women should abort black male fetuses. Nah, this is so wrong on so many levels. If they do not want to create kids, then they shou…
/r/MensRights23/10/23 07:53 AM
4

I will be honest with you as well: who can/do you want to open up to in real life? You could try a family member or a close friend, but as you said, they might judge you for what you said to them. Paid help is suggested by some, but you need to be able to afford it where you are. You also need to be careful because therapists and the likes are legally required to report on any dark thoughts you have to the authorities, they are legally mandatory reporters. You have to come to terms with yourself…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 02:34 PM
3

There are some subs where people struggle with staying single against their own will. I emphasize a lot with these dudes, but unfortunately they really seem to struggle to let go the idea that the ultimate objective goal of their own individual life is not necessarily getting a girlfriend or having kids. They believe that they would have "failed at life" If they failed to get a girlfriend. Such an attachment is dangerous and unhealthy. The worst of all is that there is a legitimate possibility t…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 02:02 PM
7

Even in sports It's the same shit: women are free to play against and with men, but men aren't allowed to play on women's sports. We are just lucky that most women aren't good enough to compete against men at the top. Actually, sex segregation itself isn't bad, the problem is when society tries to create equal pay for women for unequal work, but don't give a damn when men are the ones who happen to be biologically disadvantaged. I don't care about how good women are at sports, If they don't comp…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:50 PM
21

Why do you even want a woman to begin with? This question is important because attachment to your desire will not only make it harder for you to obtain it, but It will also make you feel miserable. You need to truly let it go altogether and find a way to be truly happy and feel complete while single. Is it for sex? Find a way to fulfill your fantaisies and different ways of coping (imagination, sexual dreams, etc.). Is it companionship? Try to find a way to have a solid social circle in real lif…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:36 PM
10

I would wish that we could have more voluntary men-only spaces. But personally, I don't see voluntary segregation, even for a lifetime as a big problem for me. There are already billions of men on the planet, If I need something, odds are good that there is at least a man somewhere that can help me and work with me. It's unlikely for me to come across something that only a woman can fix and not a man, so yeah... I don't care about romantic and sexual encounters as I already don't have them and d…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 11:10 AM
6

The question I ask myself is the following: If I were born as a woman with a similar personality as I currently have: would this hypothetical female version of me truly support men and not be full of hypocrisy? If I were willing to inconvenience myself this is what It would take: attempting to reject most of the privileges, starting with the legal side no more child support or alimony claims, If I wanted to be truly consistent I would have to stay single as well, refraining from using marriage a…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 10:52 AM
2

Massive conflict of interest. Even the most well recognized women who end up being MRA don't really feel authentic when you spend a few seconds looking at them. They have a short term incentive to keep things as they are, as It inflate their value and treatment they receive in society. Notice how few women, If any, are willing to give up some of their privileges and advantages to stand for men. How many women would really be willing to go on a dating strike, and to stay single as a protest for m…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 09:58 AM
75

This mindset will ultimately result in the "good men" choosing to avoid dating altogether. Paradoxically, they will end up experiencing exactly what they feared, as the majority of men in the online dating community will truly be questionable. If all the good men leave, what will remain in the end?
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:41 PM
1

several people around my hometown have grown in support for me because they know I would never do such a thing sounds fake as well. $50,000 dollars, a perfectly round number as well. I'm almost certain that It's fake as well, but what do I know? We have to give the benefit of the doubt, when we are not sure (:
/r/MensRights20/10/23 06:29 PM
28

1) Your wife cheated multiple times on you, but you decided to stay because of the kids 2) You had sex with her and tried to blackmail her with revenge porn. 3) She fought with you physically to try to get your phone 4) You called the police on her. They initially had a warrant of arrest on her, but they decided to arrest you at the end because of allegations of domestic abuse. The detectives charged you with rape. 5) You are out of $50,000 in lawyer fees. Not gonna lie, this doesn't look good f…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 05:39 PM
12

There is evidence suggesting that the earliest species resembling humans were only gatherers and not hunters. There is little evidence to indicate that humans frequently engaged in hunting as their primary food source, even during their early days as hunters in various parts of the world. Women indeed hunted as well, It is factually true. I don't think that anyone tries to seriously claim that women hunted more often than men in most parts of the globe, such an assertion wouldn't make any logica…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 11:09 AM
22

Women come from a privileged position. Women are already sure that the kid is theirs, but they don't care about the fact that the father wants to be sure as well. It's not really about "trusting the wife blindly", It's about trying to equalize the playing field. The kid also has the right to know with certainty who his biological father is.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:37 AM
41

While I'm uncertain about the necessity of making them legally mandatory, I strongly believe that paternity tests should be conducted as a common practice, occurring more frequently than not. As you said, there are multiple reasons for this: a kid knowing their medical history, ensuring fair distribution of parental rights and responsibilities, and promoting transparency and trust within relationships and families.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:15 PM
3

No, I am not the original poster of this thread.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:04 PM
2

1) If we assume that their initial argument that the variations in spatial reasoning skill stem from socialization is valid, it does not logically imply that the gender gap in STEM fields is a result of intentional gender discrimination. There are many things that could explain this: differences in career choices, personal interests, and societal expectations. For example, it is well-documented that women tend to gravitate towards fields that involve more social interaction and nurturing, such a…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:03 PM
-4

Dude that's an offensive weapon and has no place anywhere least of all in a school He isn't morally illegitimate, though. If there are bullies or bad people, what is he supposed to do? Let them have their own way and let them beat him up?
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:41 PM
2

Well, It's still a big deal and will end up affecting average men one way or another. If society deems it acceptable to have zero empathy for criminal men for example, it sets a dangerous precedent that can easily spill over into how average men are treated as well. We start with having zero empathy for murderers. No big deal, will you say. Then, we have zero empathy for thieves and robbers. Still not a big deal, right? But where does it stop? When does society draw the line between who deserves…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 09:22 AM
4

Conscription, war, and aggression are never justified and are always immoral. Conscription is immoral because It is a violation of consent and personal bodily autonomy. Meanwhile war is immoral because it often leads to the loss of innocent lives, destruction of infrastructure, and perpetuates a cycle of violence and suffering. War rarely achieves long-lasting solutions and often intensifies existing conflicts. It brings immense pain and suffering to individuals, families, and entire communities…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 09:04 AM
4

Or even worse, maybe the kid wasn't even yours.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 08:05 PM
49

State r/ChildSupport laws do not care how or why a woman got pregnant. It's also disgusting that a man or even teen still has to pay child support when the baby was conceived through rape and It didn't make huge news. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 07:47 PM
-1

Trying to avoid a legal obligation is illegal in most places, lol. There is unfortunately not much effective legal action you can take in most countries.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 07:44 PM
27

Yup, a lot of people would be like "ThErE iS nO sMoKe WiThOuT fIrE"
/r/MensRights18/10/23 11:16 AM
0

You are the one who truly does not get consent. If I present you with a contract consisting of 1000 lines of text, in which one of the clauses discreetly asserts that you are obligated to engage in sexual activity with me, then such a contract would be deemed invalid. Consent should be clear, friend. Did this guy say clearly to his wife "I consent to giving you half of my money, should we get divorced"? Because otherwise there is no proof that he was aware or agreed with this. If he wasn't aware…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 10:55 AM
1

who gets upset at signing a prenup is telling you up front she doesn't want to get married without a financial payday if she decides to leave Well, she isn't 100% illegitimate in feeling a bit uncomfortable about this. A prenup is unusual and doesn't happen in the majority of relationships. Secondly, paying a lawyer to check everything can sometimes be costly. Being sometimes willing to spend thousands of dollars, just for something "in case" with someone who is supposed to be the closest to you…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 09:33 PM
1

Calm down, dude. Let's try to stay respectful. 1) I already acknowledged that the average man is stronger than the average woman. But some women have more physical force than some men, It's a fact. Some women sprint faster than some men, even though the average man sprint faster than the average woman. Averages are not absolute and don't apply in every case as individual are unique. 2) In an emergency, women and children take priority. [...] A child bearing female is worth more than a man. You m…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 09:16 PM
2

Yeah, I don't know how many prenups are thrown out, but imo even 20-30% is already too much when you did everything correctly for something so important. But as I said I think that we can debate as to whether they can be a useful complement to other methods in attempting to protect your assets. And as u/KPplumbingBob said, women not wanting a prenup or a prenup straining a relationship is annoying. She may think conscioiusly or subconsciously that you don't trust her.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 09:03 PM
9

Alright but personally I do believe women are more empathetic and I do believe empathy has many significant advantages. It's a common stereotype in media, anime and movies to see women acting as a moral harmless, innocent and just angel. Whether It is through the damsel in distress trope or the portrayal of female characters as pure and virtuous beings, this stereotype has persisted for years. You are of course free to believe in what you want (no, really) and If you came across solid, non-flawe…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 05:36 PM
5

It is OK because that’s what both of them agreed to when they got married. Do you have any evidence that showed that this guy truly consented and agreed with the fact that he may lose his money If his wife decided to divorce him for no reason? If there was a pre-nup and some activist judge decided to break it that is a different matter. You are getting it backwards, consent should ethically be opt-in, not opt-out. In the same way that you shouldn't have to sign a paper to not get robbed or raped…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 04:26 PM
10

A prenup can be tossed away and discarded at will by a judge. All she has to do is claim to be under duress, coercion, or fraud when signing the prenuptial agreement. We may try to debate as to whether It's better than nothing or not, but fact is, prenups are unreliable. Don't try to rely too much on them and don't be surprised when they don't work.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 04:20 PM
12

Women and children aren’t as well suited to warfare both physically or mentally as we our nor are they as suited to monotonous labour or physically taxing/crippling work. What the heck, friend? Did you just put women and children on the same level when It comes to labour, emotional and physical abilities?! If you didn't mean to, then you should refrain from stringing the words "women and children" together. The real problem imo in society is that while men’s strengths are easy to see women’s are…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 04:04 PM
13

It has nothing to do with ability. Even if there were some data points proving that men were as performant or even more performant with women on their military fighting team, they wouldn't care. They would still find some kind of excuse as to why men should be drafted into dangerous roles and not women. The problem is that too many people would find it unacceptable, sad, and demoralizing to see a female ally die or get injured on the squad, but a male ally? Who cares, right? Even If women were w…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 08:31 AM
66

"You protect women and children because it's a societal norm. It has nothing to do with being sexist or unequal in any way. The fact is you should always protect people that are weak for themselves" Holy hell, there are so many things wrong with this dude's takes. He is perpetuating the myth that women are some kind of weak vulnerable people who can't fend for themselves. He is promoting female hypoagency and completely disregarding their abilities, achievements, and strengths. He literally want…
/r/MensRights17/10/23 07:55 AM
4

The problem is that the majority of women do not fit the criterias we were talking about. In other areas of life, most people fit my criterias. My soccer buddy will play soccer with me and not do anything strange. If I have a problem with him, society and friends will do their best to help me and not automatically assume that I'm guilty (whereas in divorce courts and relationships, society doesn't care about what happen to men). The issue extends beyond just risk, it also includes a multitude of…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 04:02 PM
4

How can I be sure about the thoughts and ideas present in these women's minds? How can I also be sure that It won't change in the future?
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:29 PM
3

Adding to my already existing reply: In theory, with good coordination between the two people, we are indeed stronger with multiple people than alone. However, If you are not working together with your partner to create a harmonious financial partnership, then it is possible for one person to bear the majority of the financial burden. Between paying for dates, the wedding and other financial responsibilities, you can really be worn down. The fact that men have been expected to be the providers f…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:22 PM
1

In theory, with good coordination between the two people, we are indeed stronger with multiple people than alone. However, If you are not working together with your partner to create a harmonious financial partnership, then it is possible for one person to bear the majority of the financial burden. Between paying for dates, the wedding and other financial responsibilities, you can really be worn down. The fact that men have been expected to be the providers for a while didn't help. It is possibl…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 03:15 PM
7

Which countries are the least disadvantageous in terms of marriage? By eliminating the 54 commonwealth countries and the US, a substantial portion of the world's potential dating options would vanish :P. If I also remove problematic western countries (France, Portugal, etc.) then It's getting even more limited.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 02:58 PM
4

It's technically true, but after spending some time thinking about it and really seeing it for what It is, It is challenging to not cringe at what "romance" currently is. Romance currently consists of two parts: raising kids and/or being close with someone. Wanting to raise kids is a noble desire. Wanting to take care of the next generation of humans and provide them with love, guidance, and a safe environment to grow is an admirable goal. Some people may argue that there are already too many pe…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 02:50 PM
30

The idea of getting in a relationship for 'love' is only a recent idea. That being said, I don't necessarily find close companionship with a person of the opposite gender to be an inherently bad concept in itself. My main problems are the unfair expectations that often come with it. In my opinion, the idea of traditional marriage where the woman remains at home while the man works and supports her can be seen as disadvantageous for the man. From my perspective, it seems more like a one-sided arr…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 02:22 PM
10

What "equality" and "parity" are for feminists in theory: individuals are judged based on their abilities and not their gender. Equal access to education, employment, healthcare, and legal rights for all genders. What "equality" and "parity" are for feminists in practice: 80%+ of female school teachers, 80%+ of female healthcare workers, women almost always getting custody of their children, and affirmative action policies that prioritize women over equally qualified men in certain fields. That'…
/r/MensRights16/10/23 11:36 AM
24

My real problem with trad cons and feminism isn't how they want men to be treated in relationships, which is already very bad. It's how they want to treat single men who don't have any plans to play into the relationship game. I have no issue with men who desire to be submissive to women, if that is their preference. But the guys who want to force our ENTIRE society to dedicate their lives at the feet of women...!?!
/r/MensRights14/10/23 02:38 PM
18

If I initiate a conversation with a woman and it becomes bothersome, she should feel comfortable expressing that she is not interested, busy, or not in the mood to talk. It is important for me to not have to worry about the situation escalating or her silently enduring any discomfort. When It comes to socializing with guys however, I am quite satisfied to be honest. I greatly appreciate the open-mindedness that many men possess. However, I do wish that they would engage in discussions about pers…
/r/MensRights14/10/23 02:26 PM
5

BTW, the existence of copulins gives a strong argument that, when the clothes are strewn, men are actually under female control. Female pheromones do have a significant impact on influencing nearby men. I wouldn't go as far as to say that women can always fully control men remotely, but it is true that pheromones can play a role in attracting and influencing others. Copulins, which are female pheromones, have been found to have an effect on men's behavior, particularly in increasing their testos…
/r/MensRights14/10/23 02:14 PM
20

It's hard to show your emotions when there is a massive empathy gap between men and women. There is an abundance of people who are willing to lend an ear to a girl's tears all day long, whereas there are fewer individuals who would patiently listen to a guy's issues for even a few seconds without getting uncomfortable or dismissing them. If you have some REAL close male friends, this can be a solution, otherwise you are at risk of getting dismissed.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 12:31 PM
1

Yes, I do think there are right and wrong reason to start a relationship, and money is one of them. Relationship is for love, you shouldn’t start a relationship for anything else How would you define 'love'? Is this just butterflies in the stomach? Lol. Most people choose their romantic partner based on a specific list which can include qualities such as physical and sexual attractiveness, wealth, intelligence, sense of humor, open communication, and shared moral values. If too many of these qua…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 07:18 AM
2

And so you blame the people warped by the system for the system itself? I blame the people who commit immoral acts. Abusing the system happens to be an immoral act. I refer again to my previous question: do you abandon your women the moment their fertility drops below peak? I would have no incentive to seek a second wife because women generally aren't expected to provide and no one will pay me for dumping my wife. Their fertility dropping isn't a big deal for me because I can always adopt kids e…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 06:59 AM
1

They are not maliciously 'faking love', they are really feeling emotions and forming relationships (trying to get to know the other person, trying to care somewhat about the other person, etc.). However, It's true that a majority of women want some man to 'provide' for them and help them achieve financial security. I don't find anything evil about this. If she is really grateful for what the man gives him and tries to be as helpful as she can, then there is nothing wrong with wanting to form a r…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:49 PM
-1

Do you seriously think women in general are all manipulative and only search for a free source of income? Yes they exist, but they’re a minority. Seeking for help is not necessarily being 'manipulative'. If I were to be honest, I find more offense with the fact that you automatically associate this desire with malice. Yes, a lot of women, the majority of them, go seek a partner because they want help, how is that evil? The assistance they happen to desire is in the shape of monetary support. You…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 05:48 PM
4

While I acknowledge that his actions lacked strategic wisdom, your comment is based on a number of assumptions: and got wild with a woman without protection The fact that a woman becomes pregnant does not automatically imply that this man did not take precautions to prevent it. Birth control can fail, and It does, all the time. Sounds like he's gotta own up to his actions here. One could contend that engaging in intercourse with a woman without being prepared to have a child is a strategic error…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 05:25 PM
2

Some people may claim that keeping an animal in captivity isn't really 'love' to begin with. But even If I disregard this, your 'love' is still not unconditional, which is okay. True unconditional love means in ALL situations, no matter how dangerous, abusive, or malicious the other becomes to you. There are other requirements you probably had: maybe you wanted your dog to help you fulfill some emotional needs, you wanted some 'cute thing' to keep you company, maybe you wanted security, etc. But…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 04:20 PM
9

It's factually true that women, like men can sometimes ignore their instincts and emotions. However, to do so, we need a society that rewards women who act the ethically correct way and punish women who don't. If a woman desires to switch husbands, she can effortlessly end the relationship while still receiving financial and emotional support from her previous partner, all while being assisted by a second husband. Having two husbands is more advantageous than having just one, as the system essen…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 01:35 PM
3

Most rapes committed against women aren't committed by strangers, but by people the victim knows, often a significant other. When individuals are not prosecuted, it is not due to a deliberate scheme to 'shield rapists', but rather because these crimes are challenging to prove. Proving that sex took place is often straightforward, while establishing lack of consent is considerably more complex. Most societies would absolutely go ballistic on all people who rape women If they could prove the crime…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 12:23 PM
9

I only know one serious and nice guy IRL in Europe who got divorced with kids. Usually women don't bring up these bad reasons in public because It is going to make them look bad and may hurt their chances of getting full custody. She left him because he was apparently 'abusive', but the guy strongly denied her allegations that seemed sketchy. Unfortunately, he lost custody of his children after a long court battle. The guy claims to sincerely 'not know' why she left him. But as I said, no fault …
/r/MensRights12/10/23 10:03 AM
11

"I divorced him because he didn't have the same number of social media followers as I did", "I divorced him because he didn't have a high-paying job", "I divorced him because he didn't dress stylishly enough", "I divorced him because he didn't take enough selfies with me" and so on. Given how rampant infidelity (and thus immaturity and short-term thinking are), It doesn't really surprise me. I mean, look, they could divorce their husbands because they lost at Mario Kart against them for all I ca…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:42 AM
12

Feminism teaching women that they are not always obligated to stay in unhappy relationships is fine. Where it gets sketchy is when kids are involved and they request child support, alimony, and full custody "to sustain their current lifestyle". I don't mind too much their dumbass physical requirements with features like height being put on a pedestal. At least, they don't bother anyone by staying single or choosing to not date someone. But divorcing men for superficial reasons when kids are invo…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:25 AM
28

'Unconditional' love never existed. In relationships, whether they be romantic, familial, or platonic, there are often conditions or expectations that come into play. These conditions can be conscious or subconscious and they can range from emotional needs to physical desires. It is unrealistic to expect that love can exist without any conditions or expectations, as this would require individuals to completely disregard their own needs and desires. Secondly, the mere fact that society still conf…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:10 AM
52

A court of law isn't a court of truth, but rather a battleground where strategies and manipulation reign supreme. I am sorry that you are facing such a challenging situation with your ex-spouse. It is frustrating when your allegations are not believed and the lies she told are believed. You are really in trouble: either spend money in biased and rigged courts or lose access to your kids, either way you lose. If you do decide to continue to go to the legal route, make sure to gather all the evide…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:48 PM
-8

You don't need scientific evidence to believe in the effectiveness of sexual education. However, It's important to remember that sexual education is often compulsory in schools. It's understandable why some people would be concerned about the content and approach used in compulsory sexual education programs, which have not proven themselves scientifically. Nor do I need a German rocket engineer to present me with a PhD dissertation demonstrating that a fat person weighs more than a skinny one. T…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:41 PM
1

In reality, it is highly unlikely that you will ever be able to definitively determine who was the abuser in this situation. Essentially, you are asking us to recount events that took place in our absence, making it difficult to provide concrete evidence. It is important to note that just because someone confesses to a crime does not necessarily mean they actually committed it, and the absence of accusations does not prove innocence. It is possible for video footage and testimonies to be manipul…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:02 PM
-16

Teaching how the baby is made and how to avoid doing so does reduce teen pregnancy rates There are no scientific studies proving that kids who get sexual education at school have less teen pregnancies than kids who don't have any sexual education at all. The only scientific studies we have compare comprehensive sexual education to abstinence-only sexual education: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18346659/ Of course a lack of evidence is not evidence of ineffectiveness, but we should tread carefu…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 11:00 AM
11

Is this real? It really is unbelievable!
/r/MensRights10/10/23 08:20 AM
2

How so? The practice is done in majority by women to other women. However, It would be incorrect to blame women as a group for this because It's only a minority of women doing so. It would be incorrect to blame men as a group too because It is only a minority of men who do it. If you are talking about parents who support sending their daughters there then you could maybe blame parents of this region as a group, but It would have nothing to do with men or women.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:33 PM
3

On the short-term? Sure. I don't deny that they may something to gain. On the long run, It can definitely get problematic even for women. When men decide to limit their interactions with all women, when men stop working and contributing to society, when men stop supporting women financially or emotionally, it will have a significant impact. Women rely on men in many aspects of life, whether they admit it or not. A society that is divided along gender lines, with animosity and distrust between me…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:36 AM
3

Women don't mutilate 'themselves'. It's not because you share the same gender as your criminal that you are complicit in their actions. That's one of the biggest mistakes of modern feminism: they believe that you somehow deserve less empathy If your attacker happens to be the same gender as you. They try to lump criminals with victims. Female genital mutilation is done at a young age without consent and is a violation of human rights. Women who have undergone female genital mutilation are victim…
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:23 AM
8

You are right, feminists don't really care about the well-being of women. All they care about is whether they can find a way to put down men. Notice how they barely seem to care about issues perpetuated by other women like lesbian domestic violence or rape. When they finally decide to address issues caused in majority by other women like female genital mutilation or body shaming, what do they do? They still try to find a way to blame men, never let a crisis go to waste. It's ironic, because this…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 04:48 PM
3

You give everything of yourself at the risk of becoming the 50% of the statistics that get divorced (almost 90% in Spain, for example) and where it is mostly the woman who takes divorce as the end of your exploitation because you are no longer useful. That is the essence of marriage: a fraud. It's even worse than this in some ways: divorce statistics do not account for individuals who get married elsewhere and leave the country, thus potentially deflating the overall numbers. Foreigners who ente…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 02:33 PM
38

To play devil's advocate, It's because they believe that all women are pressured or coerced into sex due to imbalanced power dynamics caused by their so-called 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 02:16 PM
41

I'm not a MGTOW. I don't think avoiding women is the solution. It is definitely possible to find a good woman to marry. People can also be in a relationship without marriage. You do not get the problem. The problem isn't the number of 'bad' women. The problem is the rampant lack of accountability towards women. A lot of people think like this: "Most women are good, therefore It's okay that they aren't kept accountable". People who limit their interactions with women don't do so out of hate or fe…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 02:06 PM
-1

Women have never held a 'true' monopoly when it comes to intimacy. Nowadays, people may be less aware of this due to their disconnection from their environment and their own bodies. However, your body has a built-in mechanism to prevent you from feeling bad about long sexless periods: sexual dreams. Sexual dreams can provide a certain level of release and satisfaction, even without physical intimacy. It is a way for your body to fulfill its natural desires and maintain a healthy balance. So, in …
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:24 PM
1

There are a lot of internally consistent mgtow who really stop simping and will stay single. Some people swore to not have kids for one reason and another and a lot of them are pretty consistent about it. I am not asking anti-feminist women to be consistent with their actions about unrelated areas of life: they could be pro-monarchy for all I care, all I want is just some consistency and that they do not score points against men's rights team. So far, no anti-feminist woman impressed me with her…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:05 PM
1

I have never seen a single anti-feminist woman who is 100% consistent with this belief in her actions. Most of them have a boyfriend, are married and some of them are even divorced!! Is it really anti-feminist to be a woman who still expects a man to be a provider and protector? You do you. Claiming to be an anti-feminist woman while taking advantage of the status quo is not it. A hypothetical anti-feminist woman who flees the war on Ukraine while men are forbidden to leave will never be taken a…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 09:12 AM
3

I understand your frustration. Having to choose between associating yourself between a carnist MRA or a feminist vegan is annoying. And I am not even talking about my libertarian political beliefs or other moral beliefs (antinatalism, pro-life, I respect plants autonomy and sentience, pacifist who believes in self-defense, etc.). It's almost impossible that anyone would agree with me on everything. So, interacting with someone who unconsciously supports immoral behavior is tough. I learned to on…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 08:57 PM
2

While I agree that there are some problematic traditional masculine behaviors that feminists love to point out using derogatory terms, there are also some healthy traditional masculine behaviors. We shouldn't throw out everything. The example I used targeted physical fitness and sports. It's not that women can't teach their sons to play soccer, It's just that we have to be real at some point: the average mom is definitely less good at soccer than the average dad. There are other healthy traditio…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 06:42 PM
4

anti-feminist single mothers as soon as they turn 30 and want a provider and protector An anti-feminist woman is kind of an oxymoron. It's theoretically possible If they had the objectivity of a computer, but in practice, it is too difficult. Why should you fight against a system that currently provides you with benefits? Secondly, even if she really accepted this philosophy against feminism, how does this work? How can she reject the privilege that she is passively receiving from others? (Hint:…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 02:21 PM
3

Warning: Wall of text, Tl;dr at the bottom. When It comes to mandatory reporting, there is a book that talks about it in great detail: The New Informants Betrayal of Confidentiality in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy -- by Christopher Bollas, David Sundelson -- 1996 . You can easily find a cheap ebook (epub or pdf) of it on the web. You can also borrow it on archive.org for free. There are only two cases where I could recommend therapy in good conscience to someone: 1) A rich kid who wants to c…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 11:28 AM
26

Therapy is counterproductive for most men who have serious problems. 1) A therapist is a mandatory reporter, which means they are legally obligated to report any suspected cases of abuse, neglect, or harm to authorities. This system is ripe for abuse. Did you tell your therapist that you had a dream where you felt good or were happy doing "bad things" to yourself? The therapist may report this to the authorities, because they may believe that you may have a plan to act on it in real life. Even v…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:18 PM
3

Mother's absence may have a psychological impact during the early years of a child's development. On the other hand, absence of a father figure may have the most impact during the later years of a child's development, I would say at 7 years old+. Fathers play a significant role in terms of providing guidance, setting boundaries, teaching discipline, and serving as a role model. Without a father figure, children may struggle to develop these important qualities. The absence of a father makes it h…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:27 PM
1

Keeping a sleep journal with your sleeping patterns, duration, dreams you remember and other relevant info could be useful for your appointment. Do you struggle to remember other things in real life too or is it only a problem in exams? If It is only a problem during exams, this may indicate a problem with stress. Finding ways to relax during exams may be helpful in this case.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:52 PM
1

Sadly, this problem is not confined to China alone, although it may be more pronounced in that country. When the vast majority of the population erroneously believes that men are criminals and "historical oppressors", how can we expect people not to feel resentment towards us? When people genuinely think that 99% of the evil and problems in this world are caused by men, It's not a surprise that this leads to worship of women. Moreover, since most people don't show any empathy towards those who d…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:48 AM
3

So long as she doesn't say that, he shouldn't worry tho The risk is still present even If she doesn't accuse him. This power imbalance dynamic may make him uncomfortable, which is understandable. Doesn't matter how likely it is, he would be playing with fire if he ignores his intuition.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:43 PM
3

The problem is that some third party could think that he is doing "creepy" things to her. If she falsely accuses him of doing or saying bad things he could get into trouble as well.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:08 PM
8

True, sexism is obviously a big problem in America, but the flaws in the political and educational system are hard to ignore. It is impossible to take advantage of a system that is not already flawed. People who pass sexist laws are only exploiting the existing flaws in our society.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:26 PM
1

Hypothetically, If most women were proven to commit immoral acts, it would be concerning. However, I don't think that I would be frustrated even in such a scenario. I would be disappointed. I would hold the average woman in lower regards. Being frustrated with everyone who doesn't share your moral compass is impractical. Should vegans be frustrated with carnists? Should advocates of peace and non-violence be frustrated with those who promote aggression? Should advocates of religious freedom be f…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:04 PM
4

Your concerns about possibly getting framed or falsely accused by the girl or a third party are legitimate. You are in a position where she is anonymous, but you are not. It is normal to feel discomfort in such a situation. If you are really worried about it, you can stop interacting with her. You can decide whether or not to send her a private message, explaining that you will no longer interact with her, or block her directly without explanation. If you decide to continue interacting with her,…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:24 PM
1

I believe that some are frustrated with your kind of message because it may imply that a majority of women believe in the system and may also engage in immoral behavior. If true, this could indeed make interactions with women in real life challenging. This could have huge implications not only for deciding whether to marry a woman or not, but also for interacting with women outside the dating sphere. They are also concerned that your message might grow resentment and hatred in the hearts of some…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:56 PM
2

On an individual level, there isn't much you can do. It's unlikely that you will be able to change the minds of millions of people. The best you can do, as u/Vegetable_Ad1732 said, is to focus on your personal life. If you are able to have a few friends who share the same moral beliefs and life vision as you, then that's great. Otherwise, just move forward.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:56 AM
3

Well, in the example you mentioned about DV shelters, there is nothing problematic about a woman having access to one. What is concerning is when men face difficulties in accessing the same service. In your two specific examples, the women didn't commit any unethical acts ― going to school or applying for a job are not immoral actions. It's important to remember that women, like anyone else, can also commit immoral acts that take advantage of biased laws. For instance, a clearly abusive and viol…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter