TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Specialist_Load_9953 Archive

View 38 posts and 296 comments by Specialist_Load_9953 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1217

DiscriminationSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:29 AM
535

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights11/11/25 08:33 AM
429

Social IssuesSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights06/09/25 01:51 PM
381

discussionSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 08:34 AM
371

Marriage/ChildrenSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights25/10/25 04:00 AM
355

FeminismSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights24/10/25 05:17 PM
298

articleSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 04:01 AM
280

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights12/10/25 09:34 PM
259

discussionSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/25 09:33 PM
256

legal rightsSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 11:59 PM
233

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights31/10/25 03:26 AM
199

discussionSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/25 05:25 PM
196

healthSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 01:25 PM
180

social mediaSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 07:10 AM
173

discussionSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/25 09:00 PM
165

news/opinion articleSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/25 11:58 PM
155

Legal RightsSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights05/10/25 07:45 AM
145

social mediaSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 11:14 PM
144

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:24 PM
140

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights18/10/25 09:04 AM
124

social mediaSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 03:28 AM
122

social mediaSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 09:05 PM
118

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights05/11/25 06:18 PM
108

social mediaSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry30/10/25 07:17 PM
99

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights12/10/25 04:12 AM
85

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:58 AM
82

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights27/09/25 05:53 PM
79

FeminismSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights23/10/25 09:46 AM
73

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights21/10/25 04:56 AM
54

discussionSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 03:50 PM
50

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights31/10/25 01:42 AM
46

mental healthSpecialist_Load_9953/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 05:10 AM
44

ProgressSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights22/10/25 09:26 AM
43

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:04 AM
39

social mediaSpecialist_Load_9953/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/26 08:55 AM
34

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights28/09/25 10:22 AM
19

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights08/10/25 02:54 AM
0

GeneralSpecialist_Load_9953/r/MensRights23/09/25 09:02 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I’m a few days late to your post and I’m also going to openly admit in advance that I’m making the very conscious decision of not referencing anything beyond your second paragraph until that is addressed first. On the matter of hating women or hating anyone; please may I offer my support by PM if necessary to discuss this and help you get passed it. I can assure you in advance that we’ll likely share many grievances on the matter of men’s suffering; but may I also assure you starting from a posi…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 10:27 AM
8

There is no universal definition of rape, but by some significant margin it’s not legally possible for woman to be a perpetrator of rape. As you quite rightly point out many legal jurisdictions globally define rape as forced penetration by a penis; others take a more gendered take and literally state rape is a non consensual sexual act against a ‘woman only’ and then there’s even some unusual takes such as in India; where should a man had suggested to woman (not recognised in reverse) at any poi…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 07:58 AM
4

The initial article was from the New Yorker written by Jessica Winter but many have gone on to support and advocate this. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/what-did-men-do-to-deserve-this If the article is behind a paywall, let me know and I’ll share.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 11:27 AM
3

The initial article was from the New Yorker written by Jessica Winter but many have gone on to support and advocate this. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/what-did-men-do-to-deserve-this If the article is behind a paywall, let me know and I’ll share.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 11:27 AM
46

When you have women unapologetically calling both Scott Galloway and Richard Reeves raging misogynists; who both identify as male feminists, simply for having presented the most milquetoast of possible narratives for helping boys and men is demonstration enough that to guarantee success in modernity you must be a Kier Starmer or Louis Theroux.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 06:52 PM
9

Men’s rights or in fact the matter of anyone’s rights, are not intrinsically linked to left or right wing politics.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:14 PM
2

Wait wait wait here for just a minute; the position of the OPP from their quote in fact suggests women’s hate is generalised and an inexcusable blanket hate of all men, which is the literal definition of sexism and misandry. Hate is never a healthy position to be; however for a man to personally hate and individual woman as OPP suggests men do, obviously doesn’t arise out of thin air, so he must have his reasons for hating her. The fact he’s recognised his hate is based on her actions and choice…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 10:49 AM
14

She is literally behaving as if she was the description of how women behave in a red pill transcript; she’s speaking purely from a position in consideration of her feelings and how it makes her feel. There is absolutely no consideration to logic at all; to suggest that you’d end a relationship with a man; simply because he would not get down on one knee and propose to you, seconds after suggesting how much you love them and want to spend your life with them, lacks any critical thought or logic, …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 03:19 AM
1

I think anyone being put on the spot and posed this hypothetical and having to quickly respond would instinctively say yes. But when you’re allowed a moment to step back, take a wider view and consider currently available empirical evidence it’s not that straightforward. So when considering currently there is no evidence to suggest an increase is happening at this moment in time, the incel community have continually proven themselves to be nothing more than performative gobshites, that whilst ar…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:12 AM
1

There are literally no other human beings that can be grouped together for whatever particular commonality but for men that can be inserted in Jameela Jamil’s quote even if what she said was true, nevermind a lie, then be shared publicly with utter confidence and so nonchalantly careless, carefree all without any worry of criticism, consequence, accountability or fear of being cancelled. "No, not all <men only space> but if you were offered a box in which two out of every 10 Maltesers was in fac…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 05:19 AM
1

The crazy thing is in the US when you include figures for incarcerated men, more men are raped nationally than women. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/21/us-more-men-raped-than-women Yes that’s a 2012 report, but guess what; it caused so much upset to feminists at the time, who afterwards petitioned against it being ever provided again… and guess what 14 years later and it’s not been reproduced. N.B. before all the comments about who is doing the raping; stop that, a…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 08:49 AM
3

If you’re on TikTok I’d suggest looking up @reformist_masculinism and reaching out to him. He has a comprehensive list to all of this.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 08:34 AM
21

<image> Yes I saw that and thought I’d post it here for reference. She’s just spouting the standard NPC responses that whenever I hear a ‘feminist’ say, I immediately know they’ve read some misleading feminist clickbait hyperbolic headline, and not got past that to read the subsequent article or supporting data; let alone gone beyond that to fact check and find replication from several independent sources. Feminists also do thjs all the time in regards to statistics too. I’m not sure what’s wors…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 08:24 AM
32

<image> I couldn’t put it better myself, so why try. She’s just a grifter who uses dishonest, manipulative and deceptive tactics, to engineer clickbait, manufacture outrage and peddle fake solutions to gain money, influence and attention… all at the expense of good people. It’s abhorrent and without doubt narcissistic.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 06:50 AM
33

MenEngage and such organisations are the mouthpiece of feminism veiled in marketing trickery and feels very underhanded in how they present themselves vs. their intended goals. Before ever considering engaging with them I’ll ask a rhetorical question we need to be posing regularly to ourselves everyone we can. The question is meant in the first instance to have you pause for a moment and realise the incredible gaslighting we’ve all been subjected to and society to this day, in vast majority stil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 12:19 PM
8

They’re so lost now, it truly worries me. She’s pretty much suggested that men and the patriarchy decided that women not men should the be the ones giving her birth because men are all sadists.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 03:47 AM
5

To be fair, now in 2026 the whole opening up to them door is quickly if not already closed as an option for men, let alone women pushing for it as they once did. That era of stoicism in men being criticised as toxic masculinity is being sneakily brought back in by women as a desired trait in the men they want as they’re now labelling themselves as the victims of fragile masculinity because they no longer want that as they’re not their husbands unpaid therapists and that now constitutes man-keepi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 04:43 AM
19

These patriarchal feminists to which you refer are definitely a thing. I’ve noticed a growing trend amongst feminists in general coming to the harsh realisation that all their hard work of treating men like broken women and insisting the male population should view the world through a female lens, then start thinking like women and behaving like them hasn’t actually yielded the results they anticipated… they’ve now realised that they aren’t sexually attracted to the men that have done exactly th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 01:24 PM
1

I think we need to learn from one of the most obvious mistakes feminism made, a mistake beyond simple to rectify in literal seconds; yet feminists are extremely staunch in not changing this for what is nothing more than ideological reasons and to retain a very basic label, to keep one word; at the actual expense of the movement receiving better engagement, an improved shard opinion and an arguably early days putting the movement itself at extreme risk… and that’s by gendering the actual movement…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/26 08:55 AM
1

The ironic thing is there is genuine gatekeeping in female dominated jobs most often based on misandrist viewpoints such as why does that man want to enter early years education, he must be paedophile; which in fact is fast becoming widespread for any employment with children, particularly preteen age children. Where as my local government actually offered to pay young women an extra 30% subsidy to take up female only highly skilled trade apprenticeships, and they didn’t get enough applicants to…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 10:19 AM
13

Honestly, be careful what you wish for… Personally, I really struggle with the idolisation of Simone de Beauvoir within the feminist movement, due to such diplorable things as her being a Nazi collaborator, a pedophile apologist, an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia, an age of consent abolitionist, and her own history of sexual assault and grooming of minors; which of course as a woman, she was a beneficiary of female privilege as she never faced criminal charges for despite there bein…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 07:25 AM
1

I had linked to some instagram slides. but I genuinely challenge anyone to provide evidence of research backed statistics that’s more comprehensive than what the IG OP George of the Tinmen provides behind his slides. I’d genuinely recommend anyone follow him for more than a minute to understand the work he puts in and the fair and balanced outlook he puts out there as a left wing liberal man. I don’t know how many times I can make the point that I’m never ever dismissing or diminishing female vi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 03:23 AM
12

Toxic feminism refuses to acknowledge the existence itself nor toxic femininity, so will never widespread criticise examples likethis. You may get the occasional individual say a sole example is wrong, but without recognition of it being toxic femininity. To flip a feminist slogan back on them, words are violence. Women know better than men that female aggression and toxicity comes in the form of words. They undoubtedly recognise and often secretly revel in the double barrelled nature of these i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 06:56 PM
1

.1. The UN and particularly UN women are a borderline misandrist organisation, founded in sexist radfem ideology. They openly advocate for the lives of adult woman to be prioritised over boys without an exception of any age; so adult women at any cost before the youngest boys, toddlers, infants and babies… and that’s just touching the sides… https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/xZcCEomxXE https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/rp5CwZlcVz .2. The most recent UK government re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/26 10:22 PM
2

I think it’s borderline fraud and the current feminist leadership team now in the place behaviour has been abhorrent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 08:09 AM
8

I must admit that at first glance this is one of best definitions I’ve come across for good vs. bad feminism or using modern feminist definitions, let’s call it what it is, feminism vs. misandry. The unfortunate reality of 2026 however is the vast majority of feminists are partisan and even the minority that claim to be egalitarian, I’d suggest we look at what they actually do more than what they say, because in most instances their actions will be more partisan than they themselves would ever a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 03:23 PM
14

I’ve posted similar to the below in other threads and I’d suggest that anyone moving forward that makes a post on selective service or the draft makes reference to red herring fallacies being unwelcome within their main original post. In fact please feel free to steal and copy/post as much or as little of the foregoing as you want, or to just use it as a guide. I wish “the answer is nobody should be drafted” and the “avoid all wars” crowd, would stop with the sabotaging of any questions around t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 12:52 AM
15

I wish “the answer is nobody should be drafted” and the “avoid all wars” crowd, would stop with the sabotaging of any questions around the military draft with their attempts to derail the discourse with their red herring fallacies. RED HERRING FALLACIES: This fallacy occurs when someone introduces an irrelevant or secondary subject to divert attention from the original topic of the argument. 1.NOBODY SHOULD BE DRAFTED * The Original Topic: Whether the legal obligation for military conscription s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 08:07 AM
21

Anyone with a position on the draft is irrelevant; there hasn’t been a draft since the 1970s is either completely ignorant to World politics, delusional or insane. There’s an active draft in the Ukraine right now and if you haven’t seen the horrific scenes of men being pulled, kicked, dragged off the streets and forced to go to war against their wishes you should check that out. Oh and yes Ukrainian women, shown partying all over and complaining about how hard dating had become… I kid you not… T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 07:35 AM
21

It has to be the UK prisons reform. Women’s and girl’s prisons emptied of female criminals to be used to incarcerate more men and boys. Women and girls can no longer be sent to jail even when committing the same crimes as men and boys. On the matter of men being irrationally disallowed from working in childcare; that is regularly discussed and on mass mutually agreed rhetoric in most women’s and feminist’s forums; just check the ask feminists sub here on Reddit. The matter that more women kill, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 05:16 AM
3

I absolutely hate the statistical manipulation for false accusations that’s thrown around by feminists that so misleading it’s abhorrent. They’re always speaking from both sides of their mouth. On one side the scream blue murder on the fact that only 5% of grape accusations are brought to trial, whilst simultaneously dismissing false allegations as being an issue; because only 5% of the cases brought to trial are adjudicated as being fictitious… I wonder what proportion of that 95% that don’t ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/26 08:21 PM
5

The UN are an incredibly sexist misandrist organisation, who very proudly and openly advocate publicly for adult Women to be prioritised in times of emergency ahead of adolescent, infant and even baby boys. https://endtodv.org/pr/dishonest-un-women-pushes-female-supremacy-gender-propaganda/ In instances of national emergencies such as natural disasters, does the UN and does feminism really think to prioritise and ask first, "Who deserves help more?" instead of "Who needs help now?" The Feminist …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/26 08:11 PM
9

The UN are an incredibly sexist misandrist organisation, who very proudly and openly advocate publicly for adult Women to be prioritised in times of emergency ahead of adolescent, infant and even baby boys. https://endtodv.org/pr/dishonest-un-women-pushes-female-supremacy-gender-propaganda/ In instances of national emergencies such as natural disasters, does the UN and does feminism really think to prioritise and ask first, "Who deserves help more?" instead of "Who needs help now?" The Feminist …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/26 08:11 PM
8

Unfortunately erasing misandry as something that exists or can even exist, is undoubtedly #1 on the feminism agenda currently; and as they’ve always got their way with everything else, I also believe it’s inevitable it will happen again here with this, so it’s a matter of when and not if. The troubling thing for me is there’s a very fair argument to have that in 2026, misandry is more damaging and toxic then misogyny; however this discussion will never be had, because feminists hide behind a pos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/26 01:16 PM
1

Thank you confirming the existence of gamma bias by your comment; I genuinely appreciate you posting.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:17 AM
1

Feminist’s be gaslighting 24/7 <image>
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 01:07 PM
5

This yet again is another example of something deeply engrained in the female psyche as a delusional belief that renders them unable to take even a millisecond to carefully consider the truths, the facts and the logic that dictates the reality of the world in which we live. Unlike men who can better evaluate and manage risk, and logically identify what is genuine risk instead of assessing risk solely one’s own personal thoughts, feelings and fears; thoughts feelings and fears that are absurdly d…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 08:11 AM
4

15 minutes on TikTok is enough evidence for any sane person to realise that women and girls also if not arguably far more need lessons on how to respect men and boys, instead of hating them and disproportionately fearing them, at such a delusional unnecessary level, it can’t be any good for their mental health. Yes men can be dangerous, and men know this more than anyone, because it’s men who are the victims of violence ‘far far’ more frequently than woman, men are in fact twice as likely to be …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 06:34 PM
7

The point I’m getting at is women do this publicly without fear of repercussions, because there’s no accountability for their actions. I’ll accept that some men may do this in private but even that is extremely rare and an exception not the rule. The fact women are so comfortable in sharing things such as this openly on a public platform, has you consider what’s being said in private behind closed doors when gossiping with their girlfriends.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/25 01:00 AM
28

“Can I take ”written by a woman” for £500, please Alex?”
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/25 12:37 AM
7

“… people embarrass their partners…” In modernity it’s almost exclusively wives and girlfriends embarrassing their husbands and boyfriends; the reverse is immediately called out as body shaming and misogyny; even resulting in the cancellation of any male journalists or media personalities expressing such views.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 11:43 PM
1

It was already problematic as women and children, but its evolution into women and girls is all the evidence we need for feminism going far beyond its marketing as equality between the sexes. Feminism and feminist organisations are quite clearly and very openly advocating for the continuation of female privilege and a gynocentric society and for this to be expanded further… at an institutional level. The UN for example are an incredibly sexist misandrist organisation, who very proudly and openly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 11:37 PM
10

The widespread misrepresentation of data in feminist propaganda is feminism 101. I have previously posted here and elsewhere on this topic in the link below and challenged anyone to find me just 3 examples of feminist messaging that doesn’t use this underhanded tactic… I’m yet to receive 1 single example let alone 3. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/XOQU3MQyQf The UN specifically UN Women are an incredibly sexist misandrist organisation who openly advocate publicly for adult Wome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 12:00 AM
5

China's one-child policy ended in 31st December 2015 with a new law allowing all couples to have two children, coming into effect 1st January 2016. The two-child policy was later replaced by a three-child policy and commenced 20th August 2021. However, the three-child policy in all but name actually become unofficially a limitless-child policy; as in addition to implementing the three-child policy in 2021, the Chinese government removed all of the punishments that were previously in place and so…
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:24 PM
7

China's one-child policy ended in 31st December 2015 with a new law allowing all couples to have two children, coming into effect 1st January 2016. The two-child policy was later replaced by a three-child policy and commenced 20th August 2021. However, the three-child policy in all but name actually become unofficially a limitless-child policy; as in addition to implementing the three-child policy in 2021, the Chinese government removed all of the punishments that were previously in place and so…
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:22 PM
5

Modern women are happy to reel off a long list of requirements, that a man must have and how he should behave, but get instantly offended, the moment a man suggests one small preference he has when considering which women he may like to date.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 07:11 AM
1

I fear this is only getting worse, after recently hearing a woman say to a man that it sounded exactly like what Andrew Tate would say, for suggesting what he was looking for in a woman was someone “feminine respectful, and trustworthy” … what an absolutely abhorrent raging misogynist that man was for having such controversial outdated preferences for women he would consider to date. 👀😳🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights27/11/25 06:48 AM
2

You mustn’t have read either of my replies in full or completely misunderstood them. I’ve outlined how women are guilty of objectifying and sexualising black men’s bodies in the same manner, if not worse, than the way they’ve suggested men do with women’s bodies. I’ve not suggested in any reply, a woman’s dating preference for black men is a kink; actually quite the contrary, as I’ve used dating preferences to in some part demonstrate an opposite. The BBC stereotype strips black men of any compl…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:54 AM
8

This is complicated and layered, but the persistent myth that Black men should feel flattered by the world’s obsession with the “BBC” stereotype is just the illusion of a compliment. Some black men may treat it like a badge of honour, but being reduced to a sexual fantasy isn’t something to be proud of… because let’s be clear: this isn’t admiration; it’s dehumanisation. The “Big Black Cock” stereotype isn’t just a harmless fantasy. It’s a racial script that has been forced onto Black men for gen…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:48 AM
5

The OOP obviously missed the irony in their reply "your first response to hearing about this horrible crime is to go ‘um not ALL men’, then you're a dumb fuck…" I think equally as worrying if not more worrying is that the OOP still fails to even acknowledge the victim in the back and forth exchanges, as their so focused on centring men when it supports a narrative and is another example related to gamma bias.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/25 11:20 PM
4

I’ve never understood nor will I ever accept the need for gender specific laws like this, when women can be equally protected against this should this law be defined in a gender neutral format as follows, as where the law simply need to state; the killing of anyone based on their gender:- to repress the exercise of their rights or freedoms - to repress the expression of their personality - through acts of control, possession, or domination toward the victim on the basis of their gender - as a co…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 10:39 PM
22

There is a need for feminism to acknowledge, opppression isn't one-directional and its accountability can’t be blind to any gender, any race or anything else. 👉 All women are not innocent 👉 All women can be oppressors 👉 All women have privilege 👉 Men can be innocent 👉 Men can be oppressed 👉 Men can be victims 1. Female slaveholders: Many women were not just passive beneficiaries of slavery; they owned enslaved people, they beat them, they isolated them, they separated families, they lusted after…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 10:12 PM
1

My comment about men loving lesbians because of the quantity of it in existence and the Pornhub viewing figures whilst somewhat accurate, was still a little tongue in cheek to be honest… wait or should that be tongue in 🐈 in this particular instance 😂 I agree that you’re right about the biased homophobia gap between homosexual men and women; but I stand by my initial suggestion that men don’t inherently “HATE” lesbians, which was her original claim; where as it’s far “more common” for lesbians t…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/25 04:34 AM
8

Claim 1 - Men have hijacked female hobbies False - Men are frequently shamed for demonstrating feminine interests, not by other men, but by women; see this exact post for example. There exists countless sexist hobby and interest groups, that strictly only allow female participants that not only go unchallenged for this practice, they’re openly and proudly praised by women for it empowering women. Mens only hobby and interest groups in modernity are a rarity, and those that do occasionally come i…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/11/25 08:51 PM
5

It’s the age old cliche of them saying feminism isn’t about revenge or reversing oppression… until it is!
/r/MensRights18/11/25 03:01 PM
8

Ironically I don’t think they realise that this killing unborn boys trope doesn’t even align with feminist theology, which to be honest doesn’t surprise me because I’ve seen it several times over on the AskFeminists sub and similar online forums. It’s actually very embarrassing for all of them; to consider that I know more about Feminist ideology than they do, should be humiliating for them. First of all feminism views gender as a social construct and certainly doesn’t advocate for eugenics. It …
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:50 PM
28

If any of these women are British they can be reported anonymously to the police for hate crimes. When you fill in the online report none of the fields are mandatory which allows you to move on to the subsequent pages, providing as little to no personal information, whichever you see fit. Report misandry hate crimes to the UK police with this link…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:06 PM
8

Well if those two meet the raging misogynist threshold, it’s no wonder we’re being told we’re all rape apologist sex offenders in waiting, just biding our time for the perfect opportunity to sexually assault a woman because we think we can get away with it 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:45 PM
33

She lost all credibility the moment she paid homage to Jessica Winter who last week in her New Yorker article unapologetically called both Scott Galloway and Richard Reeves raging misogynists. Winter calling two self identified male feminists, who have presented the most milquetoast of possible narratives for helping boys and men not just misogynists, but raging ones is just baseless in reality. I fear that if some feminists are unwilling to have fair, open-minded, good faith discussions with me…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 01:19 PM
5

Full credit to @this_is_the_ladyj
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/25 12:07 PM
2

Join this group r/realmadrid and tell them that there’s no debate to be had as Lionel Messi is the GOAT and that the best ever Galácticos was indisputably Gareth Bale. … I promise that you’ll make some great new friends in no time 😉
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:58 AM
5

Is crying and complaining very feminine then? Are we all behaving like women? Is that not very masculine? Is that a bad thing? Do we need to grow a pair and just man-up? Should I just be a man? … ok I understand now and thanks for your confirmation; being feminine and a woman is inferior to being masculine and a man 😎
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:48 AM
2

I think there’s a typo or two in her quote… One man's "she's crazy" is another man's "she's perfect… for some freaky hook-up sex"; but one woman's "he's trash" is the man that makes every woman's panties wet!
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 11:00 PM
2

If she’s built up the confidence to act like this regularly, to the point of having a reputation for doing it, she’s obviously been a very lucky woman to date. If I was her, I’d walk away from the table, cash out my chips, call it a win and never play this dangerous game again. If she doesn’t, it’s only going to be a matter of time before she does it to a less charitable man than yourself, with an inevitable outcome that I don’t advocate for; but in all intents and purposes will eventually happe…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:06 PM
2

I think this is just an example of public media sensationalising a story that’s newsworthy, but not as shocking as the emotive language used hyperbolically in the headlines would suggest. It genuinely is some of the finest ye olde melodramatic yellow slam journalism; which when removing all the hyperboles and rewriting as follows, suddenly it becomes a substantially more dispassionate article… “6,400 sex offenders are being offered an opportunity to voluntarily receive additional help and suppor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 01:35 PM
11

I don’t disagree the relationship wouldn’t last, but would you really want to be in relationship with someone that refuses to accept your stated limits and refuses to accept your refusal to consent; it’s even worse if you add in a threatening caveat of, if you don’t consent I’m going to leave you. I think you also have to be extremely careful in determining what you believe is or is not reasonable of your sexual partner to show you. There’s also a need to acknowledge that not everyone will be as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 11:15 AM
16

It can be difficult enough at times without autism with the subtly of female flirting, the constant mixed messaging “don’t approach us; why aren’t men shooting their shot? and the playing hard to get gamesmanship nonsense that women put men through,. Being autistic must be dating on hardcore mode. Women often expect men to be mind readers, they believe they’re being obvious in flirting by such nonsense as a cryptic double take eye glance, or by speaking out of both sides of their mouth simultane…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 08:51 AM
36

The men in question have already said no… … and NO MEANS NO Should any of these women continue asking these men or try to convince them to change their minds, which in turn results in any of the men agreeing; that’s still not consent, because consent through coercion and manipulation is not consent. The only way for these men to ‘truly’ consent now is to bring this matter up themselves unprompted and say they want to do it and consent to do it. Do these women not know how consent works??? 🤦‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 08:05 AM
25

I think in such instances like this, it’s always worthwhile reversing the genders and asking the same or similar question; and then considering how it would be viewed by feminists, or at least women anyway. For example, do you think you would generally get such a charitable response as what you’ve given here from women in general, should the premise be… Man: “We’ll I’ve sent her a dick pic, so she’s obligated now to send pussy pic”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 07:55 AM
1

The post is entirely in reference to a situation of personal choices through free will and bodily autonomy. It does not advocate for traditional gender roles nor for mothers to burden the majority of parenting.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 07:27 AM
6

When there is sufficient empirical evidence in existence to demonstrate a systematic bias portraying “Women Bad, Man Good” maybe we can talk further; right now there quite clearly is not.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:53 AM
3

“… not even a sex-related manipulation tactic…” I’m a little unclear on if your position is: Gamma Bias does effect men; but this doesn’t just happen to effect men negatively over women. It’s a system of bias where examples can be found for religion, race etc too but men are still negative impacted. Or Gamma Bias doesn’t effect men; because this hasn’t/can’t negatively impact men, because it could also effect other group differences such religion, race etc too.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:29 AM
15

I felt that knife to the heart, along with the father in the second story; working 80 hours a week, at a job you hate, to send your daughter to college, for her to come home after her first semester, and call you an oppressor of women as part of the patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 02:18 AM
19

"The world's being gaslit by narratives that twist facts…" ☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️This!☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️ Feminist’s are extremely clever in identifying opportunities to exploit and weaponise language; they’re incredibly good at honing in on emotive speech, using buzz words, and creating slogans; then through circumlocution they nefariously drive their narrative and agenda through disingenuous half truths. They consciously present information powerfully in a manner they’re knowingly aware will be misinterpreted in a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 02:10 AM
5

On average the UK is currently arresting 30 people per day, 12,000 per annum for practicing the basic human right of free speech; there’s your magic wand for reducing prison numbers Mr Lammy and your authoritarian government… 🪄✨
/r/MensRights11/11/25 11:06 PM
14

I’m not solely arguing to allow people to disrespect a trans person, I’m arguing to allow people to disrespect any person. “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” - E.B. Hall, The Friends of Voltaire I’m a free speech absolutist, as one must be to be considering themselves liberal. Free speech is a non-negotiable, foundational and essential tenet of liberalism in all its forms, from classical to modern liberalism. It is central to the core liberal valu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 10:17 PM
12

To be clear, I don’t object to pronouns nor would I ever disrespect someone’s identity. I did purposely include quotation marks around the word ‘make’ as that’s the point being made here. Compelled speech is against the First Amendment and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. So whilst I have chosen to respect another’s identity and use pronouns, I nor should anyone else, be made to use them. It’s the same principle that school children can not be punished for refusing to sa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 09:55 PM
3

This is all explained in the original post. There’s also an example on slide 6.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:22 PM
1

/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:21 PM
21

Feminism is the idea of an obsession with group identity, with a sense victimhood and need for revenge at its core, a revolution where feminism intends to change everything it desires, in order to achieve what feminism self-determines as equity according to group identity; crucially through using any authoritarian means necessary to ultimately achieve its goal as a single narrative dictatorship. Feminism wants to change society to be feminist and to enforce feminist principles on society, regard…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 08:27 PM
3

I’m sorry to hear that you’re having a bad time. I consider myself kind, open minded and caring of everyone, especially those in need. If you want to someone to talk with drop me a PM.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 07:20 PM
36

That reminds me… Did you know that..? “1 in 4 homeless people are women” … which I’ve always thought is a strange way to say 3 in 4 homeless people are men. https://www.instagram.com/p/DN1w6PZYlma/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 07:08 PM
29

All these acts of selflessness, kindness and love that men have always done for the greater good of humanity, have always been taken for granted. Men have always put their own lives on the line, not just for loved ones but strangers too; but men have also had the humility not to seek recognition for these actions. Of course, historically there have been instances where individuals they have saved or even wider society have gone on to show them gratitude and thanks; but this is and always has bee…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 02:47 PM
8

There are evolutionary anthropological reasons on why many women are attracted to men who have dark triad tendencies. Unfortunately when women are ultimately hurt by these bad boys, they often retain negative feelings of that experience and subsequently label all men unfairly toxic.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:59 PM
20

Women Are Wonderful; Men Are Disposable… Our virtuous fairer sex demonstrating their infamous kind and caring nature… https://www.cosmopolitan.com/interactive/a45947489/sex-after-60-kinsey-survey/ For straight ladies over 65, there’s a guy shortage that’s taking a toll on our sex lives; it’s a simple law of supply and demand due to; yes, unfortunately life expectancy trends… how inconsiderate of men dying earlier than women. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/happened-10000-boys-kidnapped-bok…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:40 PM
39

https://www.cdc.gov/nisvs/documentation/nisvsReportonSexualViolence.pdf 1 in 4 women reported experiencing completed or “attempted” rape by being penetrated without consent during her lifetime. 1 in 6 men reported being made to penetrate someone else without consent or being raped by being penetrated without consent during his lifetime. The above CDC reports suggest the above; however it is also recognised that men are vastly underreporting being victims and that these figures do not represent a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 01:36 PM
8

Sorry, I’m not sure I understand what you mean by "… women be naive with men"?
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:15 PM
10

If there’s one thing to learn from feminism it’s the power of language; they’ve definitely used buzz words, catchphrases, slogans etc to great effect.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:08 PM
27

Who remembers the global outcry to BringBackOurGirls… https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/happened-10000-boys-kidnapped-boko-haram BringBackOurGirls - The Islamic terrorist organisation, Boko Haram gained global infamy in 2014 for kidnapping nearly 279 female student in Nigeria; resulting in immediate worldwide Government condemnation, US and Chinese military intelligence sharing for the first time in history, celebrity outage lead by Michelle Obama, vast television and media coverage and soci…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:52 PM
1

Presenting 98% of rape is committed by men when in all but every instance, non-consensual penetration by a penis is required to be considered rape, so only men can commit rape. Presenting domestic violence as a gendered crime by using simple arrest statistics; ignoring gender bias of arresting officers, bilateral violence and the Duluth model. Presenting the uncontrolled gender wage gap as the controlled wage gap. … to name a few.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 08:48 AM
10

… so they do that and keep a straight face as they say that the… … Josee the Tiger and the Fish Movie about a 22 year old man falling in love with a physically disabled wheelchair using fully cognitive older woman; is obviously *Perverted Misogynistic Disability Fetishising Chld Porn, enjoyed by controlling abusive men who toxically create relationships of female dependence, subservience and pray on their disability by advantageously using their lack of agency to grape them. Classic quotes inclu…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 07:30 PM
1

To be honest, I haven’t found a politician that I feel truly speaks for me in a very long time and still don’t see any on the horizon, that does or potentially can, in the near future. The traditional blue collar left no longer exists as it’s been replaced by a feminist upper middle-class woke left. Ironically most of what would have been the traditional blue collar left, have now fallen down the rabbit hole of popularism and moved right; simply by the right offering them some breadcrumbs and ki…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/25 03:08 PM
1

Thanks, that’s much appreciated. There’s clearly some really good reading there.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 08:56 AM
37

Is this by any chance a reactionary decision based on the IPV report that made national headlines in Australia saying 1/3 men admit committing IPV? Which was the same report that failed to highlight that they also discovered 1/3 men were victims of IPV. The report that also included a yes answer to “have you ever made your partner feel anxious?” as an act of admission by men as perpetrating domestic violence. I’m aware that a small independent party with no seats in the House of Representatives …
/r/MensRights06/11/25 01:49 AM
11

Feminism: “Do as I say, not as I do” The foundations of feminism is based on using the extreme parts of a group to define the beliefs of the actual group… “All Men”, “All Men Are Rapists”, “Kill All Men, “It’s Always a Man,”, “It’s All Men”, “All Men Are Rapists and That's All They Are” etc … and of course, All Men’s Rights Advocates are Misogynists. Men are told by feminism that they have a duty to hold other men accountable; so why aren’t feminists holding extreme feminists accountable, why ar…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 01:06 AM
12

OP please can you kindly make comment to this in your post NOVEMBER IS MEN’S HEALTH MONTH PLEASE DON'T STOP CONTRIBUTING BUT CAREFULLY CONSIDER AN ALTERNATIVE LOCAL CHARITY TO THE FEMINIST MOVEMBER CHARITY TO GET YOUR HARD EARNED DONATIONS Link for further details if you’re interested: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/iAfyClOlmp
/r/MensRights05/11/25 06:26 PM
19

It is, you’re right. OP please can you kindly make comment to this in your post NOVEMBER IS MEN’S HEALTH MONTH PLEASE DON'T STOP CONTRIBUTING BUT CAREFULLY CONSIDER AN ALTERNATIVE LOCAL CHARITY TO THE FEMINIST MOVEMBER CHARITY TO GET YOUR HARD EARNED DONATIONS
/r/MensRights05/11/25 06:26 PM
2

The ironic thing is feminism can’t be succeed other than through continuing its current authoritarian practices being used to achieve its goal as a single narrative dictatorship. Feminism is the idea of an obsession with group identity, a cultural revolution where feminism intends to change everything in order to achieve equity according to group identity, but crucially through authoritarian means. Feminism wants to change society to be feminist and to enforce feminist principles on society, whi…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/25 05:14 PM
6

The irony that it’s actually the complete opposite is obviously missed on them. Heterosexual men occasionally mistake compliments particularly from strangers as flirting because not only do men use compliments as part of their own flirting technique, but more importantly it’s because men rarely receive compliments. A man complimenting another man is very rare if at all. When they do it’s most often work related as there’s little risk to be misunderstood; most men don’t feel comfortable giving or…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/25 02:49 PM
31

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) 57.9% of IPV is Bi-directional. 28.3% of IPV is Female on Male. 13.8% of IPV is Male on Female. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/context-unilateral-and-bilateral-abuse/ The Silencing of Murray Straus https://dvaa.com.au/murray-straus/ https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2016/05/18/the-falsity-of-domestic-violence/ Feminist Framing The feminist framing 92% of IPV perpetrators are Men uses uncontrolled data and is extremely misleading. The 92% result is achieved by…
/r/MensRights05/11/25 07:39 AM
2

Thanks for clarifying; I can definitely agree with you on that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 07:30 AM
26

Move on and report the therapist to her licensing body.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 06:49 PM
1

Are your frustrations aimed at OP on the relevance and necessity of the post; or towards the positions of the BBC, Clinton etc?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 02:49 PM
1

To clarify my understanding of your position. Is it that, the effects of war impact both men and women equally; and the original post was only made to downplay the suffering of women, to suggest men win the competition of suffering more?
/r/MensRights04/11/25 02:35 PM
5

You’re 100% correct. Whilst the left have been openly hostile and acted directly towards the imbalances and inequalities experienced by men in modernity; the right are equally culpable in their silence and inaction. Only since Trump have boy’s and men’s issues even been openly acknowledged by the right, and in all fairness that’s all it has been, little more than lip service to date.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 04:01 AM
3

I think you’re extremely oversimplifying the nuances of politics and viewing this as Democrats vs. Republicans. The left as the right, are not a basic cookie cutter monolith of contending hive minds nor are they two objective forces, competing directly equal to and opposite of each other. They are both incredibly massive groups of individuals, each person within said group having their own, political ideology coming in the form of an unimaginably broad varied political viewpoints.; multifaceted …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 01:50 AM
3

You should genuinely create your own post my friend. Today being 1st November is also perfect timing for this too. You’ve honestly provided too much good information and background for this to be wasted as nothing more than a comment on a 9 day old thread. I’ll look out for it to upvote and comment once you have. Please feel free to reference or in fact cut n’ paste all or as much information from my post as you want to use too. My one small ask is that you encourage participation in the Novembe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 11:05 PM
3

The Future is… Male and Female This is what a Men’s Rights Activist Looks Like Men Die… Women Most Affected Women can be Perpetrators, Men can be Victims too… Not all Women are Wonderful Not all Men are Monsters Domestic Violence Is Not Gendered Violence Men’s Issues Matter Equally It’s Not a Zero Sum Game
/r/MensRights01/11/25 05:34 PM
22

<image> When a woman’s narrative, emotion or mood requires option A, she quotes the message in the OP. When a woman’s narrative, emotion or mood requires option B, she quotes the message in my reply. Honestly, there’s no winning 🤦‍♂️
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/25 02:45 PM
49

This is also widespread and evident in media, for example where a cheating female character is often the protagonist the audience is rooting for and is empathising of, despite her infidelity. To achieve this result, there’s normally some questionable back story, that implies blame on her husband being unable to satisfy her sexually, him having little libido or a lesser so incompatible sex drive. Let’s acknowledge then that with roles reversed, any male character who was cheating on his wife for …
/r/MensRights01/11/25 02:24 PM
3

Yes indeed and this too… https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/CrBMzwyH1b
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:48 PM
3

In that case, it’s fair to say that I unquestionably agree with you. Clinton’s way off kilter on this, especially when you consider that her flawed logic would also prescribe... Woman got raped; her husband, her father, her son, and her brother most affected. Men and boys have always been the primary victims of femicide; Men lose their wives, their girlfriends. their mothers, their daughters, their sisters. Men and boys have always been the primary victims of maternal death; Men lose their wives…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/25 12:36 PM
14

I don’t disagree in the most part; but maybe not on Reddit. Having attempted several times over to engage in such open discussion on subs such as 'Ask Feminists' I quickly discovered that there really is no rational conversation to be had on Reddit. Nonetheless, I made the decision to offer an opportunity for rebuttal in my post shared in this sub, as from my own experience there are a great many feminist eyes traversing this sub and similar subs. I’ve frequently received from feminists in post …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 11:19 AM
7

On the flip side, there’s actually been some psychological research done around this which albeit is highly controversial that resulted: 81% of women see unattractive men as inanimate objects. Whilst there’s some widespread agreement that the phenomena does in some part exist; the prevalence that researches have reported at, has been challenged as excessive to that of reality. So personally, I take the stated figure with a massive pinch of salt, but still find the existence of the phenomenon som…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 10:08 AM
29

I posted something similar not so long ago, but more broadly about all feminist literature being misrepresented, misleading or fallacious. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/e2PUiWhkyW I even closed my post by challenging anyone to find 3 examples of this not being the case; it came at no surprise to me that I didn’t receive 1 let alone 3.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 09:58 AM
1

The way you have worded this genuinely suggests or could suggest both criticism and advocacy for Clinton. I can’t actually tell if you’re trolling, being sarcastic, ironic or making a genuine valid suggestion for Hilary’s inclusion.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/11/25 09:46 AM
3

😂 "Ba dum tss” 🥁
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 09:34 AM
1

I don’t think we should have any genuine worries about being labelled as old and stodgy especially compared to the republicans; they’ve only fielded one candidate under 65 years old this millennium and only two under 70 years old. Hilary was no spring chicken, but Biden was an exception to the rule. Biden was only fielded as a win at any cost candidate to remove Trump from office. In 2020 the voting left was more guaranteed than ever, to not only stand firm in unequivocally voting democrat, but …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 01:28 AM
9

Of course not, 3 year old Toxic Timmy is a predator in waiting… in fact I’m surprised he’s not already terrorising all the young girls at pre-school…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 12:26 AM
3

I just don’t think 2028 is her time. I can’t see her winning over enough older voters because of her age.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 12:21 AM
9

Well put and to be honest, I think there’s fair argument to make the exact same claim of Kamala Harris. I do often wonder where the majority of democrats would sit on Harris v Clinton as candidates with the benefits of hindsight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 08:18 PM
5

No she doesn’t say that, she actually advocates for a position that’s far more divisive. The quote “Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has disproportionately affected women” is actually made in the first two links by the BBC and partner. However, since 1998 Hilary has pushed a rhetoric of “Women have always been the Primary Victims of War" Then in October 2000 Clinton successfully advocated for the United Nations to mandate a formal Resolution (1325) in recognition of the Impact of Warfare …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 07:16 PM
9

Sorry my bad; I caught it every other time, but in all fairness, I’ve also had replies making that statement unironically too. So yes, you’re right, femlogic dictates that even when men are killed, women are most affected. Oh and this too…. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/CrBMzwyH1b
/r/MensRights31/10/25 06:31 PM
8

Yes and this too… https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/CrBMzwyH1b
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 05:04 PM
5

🌺 “Lest We Forget” 🌺 Regardless if you call it Remembrance Day or Veterans Day, with us being just over a week away from the significant anniversary of where, at the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of 1918, Armistice ended the Great War. 50 years since Vietnam may feel like a lifetime ago for yourself; but it’s not a long time. “Complacency or self-congratulation can imperil our security as much as the weapons of tyranny. A moment of pause is not a promise of peace." - John F. Kenned…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 05:01 PM
8

I hate to say it but I’m already pessimistic about 2028, because right now I can’t see anything less than a Republican landslide. I just can’t see Newsom nor AOC winning. … but who knows, 3 years is a long time in politics and something could change for these two in the meantime or we find that some unexpected wild card comes into play.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 04:21 PM
10

I take exception to any claim that I’m a right wing political infiltrator in the same way that I would to any claims that I was here with an agenda to push left wing ideology; but nonetheless let me further explain my frustrations with Hilary on this particular issue if it wasn’t already clear from my original post. Ever since 1998 HC has pushed her rhetoric of “Women have always been the Primary Victims of War". She then successfully advocated for the United Nations to mandate a formal Resoluti…
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:02 PM
2

That’s a great idea, I’m all for that and we should do the same for Murray Straus.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 03:22 PM
17

We could be in for a third round in 2028 as Vegas odds has AOC as second the favourite to be the democratic presidential candidate. Personally I’m not sure that the born again Queen of Short-Kings is going to go down well with young men nor in fact the older demographic, because at 39 she’d be the youngest ever president by some margin beating Theodore Roosevelt at age 42 and John F. Kennedy at age 43, as well as the first female, first woman of colour and first Latino President. https://www.ins…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 03:19 PM
19

Exactly… Woman got raped, boyfriend most affected. … I can’t imagine the hassle it’ll be for him trying to find a new girlfriend within the mess that’s the current dating scene. In all honesty, I felt my stomach turn as I was writing that, as it’s disgusting; however I did so ironically because that’s exactly what the New York Times did recently in posting an article about how difficult dating is for women in the Ukraine right now https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/04/world/europe/ukraine-war-datin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:50 PM
2

Thanks for the update. I understand that you’re correct on the dates, however unfortunately I’m also led to believe that this inspirational woman has now passed away. There has been some conflicting information on the actual date; but that’s a trivial matter in consideration of the World losing one of its best 🙏
/r/MensRights31/10/25 02:30 PM
11

🌺 “Lest We Forget” 🌺 Regardless if you call it Remembrance Day or Veterans Day, with us being just over a week away from the significant anniversary of where, at the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of 1918, Armistice ended the Great War. 50 years since Vietnam may feel like a lifetime ago for yourself; but it’s not a long time. “Complacency or self-congratulation can imperil our security as much as the weapons of tyranny. A moment of pause is not a promise of peace." - John F. Kenned…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:21 PM
24

Victims https://kyivindependent.com/un-records-over-370-sexual-violence-cases-related-to-russian-war-against-ukraine/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:53 PM
33

⬇️⬇️⬇️ Sexual Violence Victims Nov.24: Men: 262 —— Women: 114 ⬆️⬆️⬆️ In addition to deaths & casualties Estimated deaths: Men: 400,000 —— Women: 4300 Estimated Casualties: Men: 1,350,000 —— Women: 9500
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 10:55 AM
15

The post is not solely about Hilary. There’s 9 links; which includes a few videos, a number of articles and some data sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 10:12 AM
13

I do recognise that there is class based bias, but the claim in the reply to my post was it was ‘primarily’ class/wealth based oppression more than a gendered one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 08:24 AM
27

I’m sorry but I’m afraid my foreskin has already been bought via the black market for the making of the favourite moisturiser of Oprah Winfrey; coincidentally an individual who has always been a very strong voice against FGM… https://fashionmagazine.com/beauty-grooming/today-in-really-really-weird-beauty-news-oprahs-favourite-moisturizer-is-made-from-human-foreskins/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 07:29 AM
15

Doesn’t the ending of a man’s life affect him quite a lot? I can’t actually think of something that affects an individual more than being dead or alive
/r/MensRights31/10/25 05:39 AM
45

Is it more dangerous for a female passenger to be waiting on the street longer for a female ride share driver or to be picked up sooner by a male driver and taken off the street??? … oh and in fact, as a man I’m significantly more likely to be physically assaulted by a man than a woman is; can I get a female driver because I’m at greater risk???
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:52 AM
27

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is illegal throughout Australia, with specific criminal law provisions in all states and territories. The law prohibits any form of FGM, regardless of the extent of the injury or whether consent was given. Key aspects of the law: Comprehensive Prohibition: The law covers all four types of FGM, including even minor acts like a "ritual nick". Severe Penalties: The penalties for performing or assisting in FGM are severe, with maximum prison sentences varying by juris…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 03:30 AM
57

It does apply to Australia I’m afraid. FGM is illegal and circumcision is legal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:31 AM
25

The draft ‘primarily’ targets poverty… Is this a typo? If not, I’d be more than interested to hear more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:50 AM
63

The disposability of men is something that doesn’t receive enough attention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:50 AM
2

This is not a list of women that have acted inexcusably; it’s a list of feminists that have acted inexcusably who all happen to be women. You may wish to research feminist icon Simone de Beauvoir, the author of the feminist bible ‘the Second Sex’; a Nazi collaborator, a pedophile apologist, an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia, an age of consent abolitionist, guilty of several cases of sexual assault against minors, suspended by the French Ministry of Education for “behavior leading to…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 04:23 PM
1

For me the matter of the feminist movement misrepresenting itself as being about equality for all, whilst a considerable issue, isn’t the biggest problem. The fact that feminism has and continues to proactively push agendas of inequality that promote and defend female privilege and inherent rights over men’s is inexcusable for a movement that claims to be about equality for all.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 07:02 AM
4

This is widespread and evident in media, for example where a cheating female character is often the protagonist the audience is rooting for and is empathising of, despite her infidelity. To achieve this result, there’s normally some questionable back story, that implies blame on her husband being unable to satisfy her sexually, him having little libido or a lesser incompatible sex drive. Let’s acknowledge then that with roles reversed, any male character who was cheating on his wife for the same…
/r/MensRights30/10/25 06:18 AM
1

I had credited the @thetinmen and included a link to his source material at the end of the post. I’m a big fan of his work and spreading his message.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 03:22 AM
6

Undoubtedly there has been a significant net negative on society in the proactive effort of closing or enforcing that women and girls be allowed to access to men and boys spaces. There may be some small argument for girls access to Boy Scouts if there was no equivalent service for them, however there are several such as the Girl Scouts, Girl Guides, Brownies etc that still today are closed to boys. Personally, I’m not against co-ed scouts, but this should’ve been introduced as a third group of m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 08:07 AM
1

The bigger risk with FMS over RMS is if FMS goes undiagnosed the matter of the person being convinced it did, could report as a crime or be a more credible witness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 06:52 PM
1

X
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 06:44 PM
2

The matter of “their truth” is extremely concerning in consideration of “False Memory Syndrome” which is where it people who seemingly remember events that never actually occurred, False Memory Syndrome is typically of memories of a traumatic episode, most commonly of rape and sexual abuse which are objectively false, but in which the person strongly believes These pseudo memories usually arise in the context of adult psychotherapy and are often quite vivid and emotionally charged. Whilst there …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 06:15 PM
3

I look forward to it. Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 05:20 PM
2

The question doesn’t actually stipulate the species of bear, so they must consider that as an option. In all fairness should the question be posed to someone from Alaska, Canada, Scandinavia, Northern Europe or Russia; it may likely become the first type of bear they consider. So let’s expand further on polar bears… The polar bear species are known to treat humans as legitimate prey… Never a threat… Not a curiosity… Actual prey… Like a giant slow-moving seal Polar bears are calculated, they can …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 04:45 PM
1

I’d already done my own research around this some time ago and used AI on this occasion, which I don’t really do to benefit others as a quick fix. I recall information being spread all over the place and I didn’t have any other available time. All honesty, if this was reversed; whatever information is provided me I’d always independently verify before accepting it regardless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 03:55 PM
12

In all honesty dead or alive, it doesn’t even matter. The likelihood of getting any apologies is 0% across the board. … in fact, I’d fancy my chances more with those worms you mentioned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 11:40 AM
14

The more heinous part to this story however is the position I highlighted so critically was successful in being accepted in France who have since introduced legislation completely banning paternity testing and it’s now illegal to use them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 11:13 AM
5

It’s immediately clear to me that it’s important that we consider what’s happened here across several tiers. 1) Any UN report acknowledging discrimination against men should be welcomed with open arms as it’s a rare. 2) Any acknowledgement of discrimination against men due to a military draft is a good thing 3) Thread respondents suggestion that this was a political decision by the UN against a conservative government in Croatia needs further investigation 4) Countries re-introducing draft legis…
/r/MensRights26/10/25 11:05 AM
1

https://neurodivergentinsights.com/feelings-are-not-facts/?srsltid=AfmBOorSYlZFbWzrJtRTYxu6CNbzkUqfjRauS8YSDwgLzfqiXiZwPWAU
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 10:42 AM
3

Tiktok brain 🕰️⏰🧠 Enjoy your Sunday… … doomscrolling 📱😵‍💫
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 08:58 AM
1

Hostile Sexism Score: 2.27 Benevolent Sexism Score: 3.00 I have no idea what that says about me to be honest 😂 The only thing I noticed was my Hostile Sexism Score was close to the average woman’s score where my Benevolent Sexism Score was almost identical to the average man 🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 03:33 AM
1

It was in response to your message suggesting nobody’s going to read my post. It was in reference to it being difficult if not impossible, to help someone who’s unwilling to make an any effort to help themselves. So… it would be difficult if not impossible, for me to help anyone, who’s unwilling to make the minimal effort of reading my post, which in itself was designed to help others help themselves .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 02:48 AM
8

Now this is a very interesting, different, but still very interesting take. It’s definitely not something I’ve ever considered before now, and my initial thoughts are not aligning with it. I think it’s something, I’ll need go take away, research and consider.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 12:52 AM
3

Oh definitely… Whilst someone’s fight-or-flight response can feel emotional but it is actually a primal physiological action; it’s soon afterwards the emotional decision making begins. In high pressure situations like that, it’s where you’re most likely the witness men acting on emotions as you would women. It’s when you find yourself in low pressure situations, to be fair where you’ll witness the greatest difference as men become more analytical and logical, where women are still emotional driv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 12:41 AM
4

I completely agree that this applies to men as well. Let me absolutely clear here, there’s honestly no nefarious undertone or ill-will in what I’m suggesting; it’s genuinely coming from a good place. Nothing outlined is a suggestion of instead of, it’s an as well as; so men still need to their own part too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 12:25 AM
27

It’s certainly not a new turn of phrase but damn it’s something that’s cleverly weaponised and used fluidly to fit the current narrative by feminists. One of my most disdainful examples is when they frame matters of paternity fraud as a fathers acting selfishly in their own interest at the detriment of the women and children … absolutely not, they can go put that misdirection where the sun don’t shine. This is a Men’s & Children’s rights issue as the victims Vs. Women as perpetrators; women who …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 12:12 AM
1

In fact here’s sometime bedtime reading on Simone de Beauvoir for anyone interested…. The following is what I asked ChatGPT and its response. Please feel free to ask ChatGPT or your AI of choice the same questions yourself, should you wish the peace of mind from self verification. Questions asked of ChatGPT Was Simone de Beauvoir; ⁠a pedophile apologist and advocating for the release of imprisoned pedophiles? ⁠an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia? ⁠an age of consent abolitionist? ⁠a si…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 11:57 PM
12

I’d suggest there’s fair argument of those types having always been amongst them. Another not listed is Simone de Beauvoir, the author of the feminist bible ‘The Second Sex’. I really do struggle with the idolisation of Simone de Beauvoir within the feminist movement, due to such diplorable things as her being a Nazi collaborator, a pedophile apologist, an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia, an age of consent abolitionist, and her hatred toward maternity and mothers in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 11:55 PM
4

It’s ok I think we’re used to the low effort by now. Unlike men who’s experience is just do better; women are told to see themselves as immutable in a world that’s mutable; women are taught to accept themselves, don’t change for anyone and to insist on support structures or changes to the society that’s around them. I’m not suggesting that men don’t have work to do around this exact same matter too, but why don’t they look at helping themselves at the same time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 11:46 PM
12

I’m aware of legal position’s already being made to the highest levels of the judiciary, that feelings and emotions are facts and should be considered as facts. One such example was during the Brett Kavanaugh Hearings. The masculine defence was if the accuser is unable to provide any concrete evidence of them being in a same room together her accusations of rape should not be allowed to ruin his life. The feminine position was that the accuser’s self evident emotional response was in itself a ki…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 11:27 PM
11

A handful of examples from endless amounts that’s out there… Women feel a greater fear of being victims of violent crime significantly more that men; where in fact, men are far more likely to be victims of violent crime than women. Man Vs. Bear - a high number of women choose a bear over a man. There’s no rationality in being able to have logically come to this conclusion. It’s unquestionably an irrational emotional feelings made decision that’s borderline delusion and definitely cognitive disso…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 10:41 PM
25

No, I’m not literally saving… “Women only ever use feelings… women never use facts” I’m more so saying… “Women use feelings excessively… women need to use facts more”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 08:33 PM
1

X
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 08:32 PM
10

When you allow this 👉🏻 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/xwpyNonyke. Female Led UK Government … you will get this 👉🏻 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62ln7mzd5ro Restrictions on Freedom of Speech, Because Women Feel Words are Violence … this 👉🏻 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/29dD5refdI Women and Girls will No Longer Face Jail time. Their Former Prisons to be Used to Incarcerate More Men and Boys … and this 👉🏻 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Jn7YEjFlTz Removing the Parental Rig…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 08:02 PM
3

When you allow this 👉🏻 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/xwpyNonyke. Female Led UK Government … you will get this 👉🏻 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62ln7mzd5ro Restrictions on Freedom of Speech, Because Women Feel Words are Violence … this 👉🏻 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/29dD5refdI Women and Girls will No Longer Face Jail time. Their Former Prisons to be Used to Incarcerate More Men and Boys … and this 👉🏻 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Jn7YEjFlTz Removing the Parental Rig…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 07:12 PM
4

Not necessarily; first of all if there’s already a child custody order in place, any new changes would have no bearing on them. It will only apply future cases. Secondly if his mother has a history of sexual violence, abuse or neglect it will never be the case of him being forced into her care instead of his father the clearly safer option. There’s also the consideration of his age, where if old enough, his own choice on where to live may have significant impact on the court’s decision.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 06:12 PM
9

https://www.payscale.com/featured-content/gender-pay-gap#:~:text=This%20is%20unchanged%20from%20last,pay%20gap%20in%20their%20organizations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 04:57 PM
8

If your takeaway from this entire post is to get up in arms over COVID related death reporting, I don’t really know what to say. Regardless, I think you’re significantly missing the context of referencing it. During the middle of the pandemic, the world was told the worst. Regardless of the figures being 0.3% or 30% men were dying at a rate of more than 18% than women. Despite this being evidenced, there was no political action taken nor investment in men’s health, which would’ve been the case i…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 04:13 PM
6

Yes I do and I’m a particular fan of George @theTinMen as his delivery style, which is not rare on a broader scale, but is unique in this space and I believe a very effective way to deliver his messages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 03:51 PM
7

Yes correct and yes the CMS have powers to steal your money directly from your employers payroll and even your own bank account. In almost every child custody agreement in the UK there is an assigned lead parent, almost always mother, who will be eligible to no less than 50% of the maximum amount payable of 12% net income for first child; even if the non-lead parent has their child stay with them more. What’s legally recognised as a ‘true’ 50/50% in the UK is a very rare occurrence and more like…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 03:37 PM
5

How To Start Separating Emotions From Facts Navigating through overwhelming emotions requires a delicate balance. When something feels off, it’s important not to dismiss these feelings but rather to confront them. Ignoring or suppressing emotions seldom leads to resolution, as they tend to persist. Sometimes, understanding and resolving emotional turmoil involves deeply exploring these feelings and considering how your thoughts or actions might be contributing factors. Separating emotions from f…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 03:08 PM
6

What Role Does Anxiety Play? Anxiety significantly influences how we perceive and process our emotions. For those with anxiety disorders, the challenge of separating facts from feelings becomes even more critical. As someone who experiences anxiety, I understand the ease with which one can fall into an ‘anxiety loop’—a relentless cycle of negative thoughts and feelings that seem to play on repeat, clouding the mind. Breaking free from this loop is often difficult, as it can solidify into persist…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 03:08 PM
7

Feelings Are Not Facts: How To Identify Experience From Reality Navigating the intricate landscape of our inner world can be filled with intense emotions, where feelings are plentiful but not always factual. “Feelings are not facts” – this mantra serves as a crucial reminder as we interpret the powerful emotions that both inform and sometimes mislead us through various life scenarios. Emotions act as a barometer, gauging our needs and experiences with remarkable sensitivity. However, it’s essent…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 03:05 PM
25

It’s not a case of neither you nor I, taking them seriously. It’s the matter that there’s almost universal public acceptance to misleading feminist propaganda, should never be downplayed as it has, and continues to be the most influential political ideological movement on policy making and legislative changes in modernity. Such a powerful group that's based on misinformation and intentions to mislead to drive a political agenda should be a concern to everyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 02:35 PM
12

It’s calculated as follows; a father with one child earning a salary £50k pa gross, will pay a 12% net rate; minus any relevant discounts: Child never overnights £480 per month Child overnights 1 night a week £411 per month (1/7th discount) Child overnights 2 nights a week £343 by per month (2/7th discount) Child overnights 3 nights a week £274 per month (3/7th discount) Child overnights 3.5+ nights a week £205 per month (4/7th discount)
/r/MensRights25/10/25 02:28 PM
20

I’m an advocate for mandatory paternity testing and I’m yet to hear a ‘fair and reasonable’ argument against them. The way you’ve framed your question is very important too, because there’s always a presumption around paternity testing that this a selfish Men’s rights Vs. Women & Children rights issue, it’s absolutely not… This is a Men’s & Children’s rights issue as the victims Vs. Women as perpetrators. When correctly outlined like this, there’s unquestionably no rebuttal to mandatory paternit…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 02:07 PM
22

It’s funny how you mention that… … because I’ve found the solution for making women feel safer and improving their mental health… I’m genuinely expecting a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize for Health for my findings. My solution will not only be a widespread benefit to women, it respects female bodily autonomy, it’s provided without any medication, takes them little to no effort on their part to reap the rewards, and importantly requires no input from men for them to be successful. My miracl…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 12:57 PM
10

It’s sickening when you consider… Mothers are significantly more abusive and neglectful of their children… Children are safer with their fathers A study by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on analysis of child maltreatment in 18 states had an almost identical similar breakdown by sex; it found that of 192,321 perpetrators of abuse and/or neglect of children, were more likely to be women than men. Parent Responsible Child Abuse & Neglect 56% mothers responsibility 26% fathers res…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:45 AM
13

You’re right on this and if you haven’t already noticed, the feminist battle-wagon has already started positioning a defence on why women shouldn’t be subject to military draft; but if so, they must not be in front line roles or roles involving any risk of combat. You see it’s no longer about equality, it’s now about equity and it’s not equitable to expect women to be conscripted... so they say. To be honest, should women be subject to selective service, I’m certain we’d suddenly find the birth …
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:43 AM
5

Victims of Intimate Partner Violence 44% lesbian couples 32% straight couples (avg. f35%-m29%) 26% gay couples … it’s as if the instigators of IPV are more likely to be women; but wait a minute doesn’t the feminist narrative say IPV is a gendered problem of men as the perpetrators and women as the victims..? Something doesn’t quite add up here..? Oh wait a minute, of course that was feminist propaganda which never stands up to scrutiny!
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:14 AM
63

Mothers are significantly more abusive and neglectful of their children… Children are safer with their fathers A study by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on analysis of child maltreatment in 18 states had an almost identical similar breakdown by sex; it found that of 192,321 perpetrators of abuse and/or neglect of children, were more likely to be women than men. Parent Responsible Child Abuse & Neglect 56% mothers responsibility 26% fathers responsibility 18% undetermined which…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 07:43 AM
46

The bitterest pill about that particular issue, is that fathers whose access to their own children is restricted will have to pay additional child support for the privilege of seeing them less.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 07:41 AM
6

Mothers are significantly more abusive and neglectful of their children… Children are safer with their fathers A study by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on analysis of child maltreatment in 18 states had an almost identical similar breakdown by sex; it found that of 192,321 perpetrators of abuse and/or neglect of children, were more likely to be women than men. Parent Responsible Child Abuse & Neglect 56% mothers responsibility 26% fathers responsibility 18% undetermined which…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 05:55 AM
12

It’s appalling I agree… A statement issued by Victoria's education department on behalf of college principle Jane Boyle said the assembly had been "well-intentioned" but "inappropriate". Do you think if a male headmaster had a girl apologise in front of an assembly for her gender’s behaviour on paternity fraud it would also be viewed as well-intentioned just a little inappropriate..?
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:53 AM
3

Rational-mind: “I think prostate cancer should have a similar level of funding to breast cancer” Hive-mind: “That’s disgusting! Don’t you have a mother? What about sister? etc… of course men should care more passionately about women’s issues. No wonder 75% of you are sexual predators” Rational-mind: “You lived and grew up with both parents and three brothers right; so which three of your father and brothers are the rapists?” Hive-mind: “Duh… uhm”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 01:48 AM
2

The same old message for men then; be better! In modernity, men are seen as mutable in an immutable world and told to personally adapt and self improve to become the best possible individual whilst just accepting the rules and the environment they’re in. This is why you hear: a)“Men need to do better” and not “What can society do to help men be better” b)“Men need to talk about their problems more” and not “Why do men find it difficult to talk and what we need to change to better accommodate the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 01:26 AM
2

Please can we stop putting leftism/ feminism/wokeism in the same silo. In all fairness, an individual claiming to be left wing says very little about their own personal ideologies, because it’s only half of the story, considering neoliberalism/democratic socialism/progressivism/marxism/anarchism. Even when just considering a democratic socialist could very likely find they are more politically aligned to someone from the centre right than a Marxist; demonstrates the vastness of left wing politic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 01:18 AM
9

I’ve posted with some recent updates but also thought it beneficial for those that may not have known, to receive the full context. The timing of the post was also planned and intentional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/25 12:14 AM
7

I took a quick look at the site and there’s a lot of people on there with an incredible amount of private information I’m not from the US so I’m not on there; have you searched for any of your friends and family member’s? That could be a good place to start investigating if it’s a complete or close to list of US citizens. Regardless, I’d suggest you report it to the relevant law enforcement as it’s an obvious data protection infraction.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 12:07 AM
13

My apologies if I was unclear; I meant please don’t stop contributing to men’s health charities in men’s health month, but please carefully consider an alternative men’s health charitable organisations that better align with your own personal beliefs, values and morals. I initially decided against listing alternative men’s health charities for both to avoid any risk to the suggestion of personal bias and the nature of almost all men’s health charities being national/regional operations or larger…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/25 03:22 PM
4

Considering the continuing success of the Kentucky House Bill 528 - 26th April 2018 and the subsequent appetite for others to follow suit and replicate the model… https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/mkkZ4X7nMQ … the UK government decision to operate independently by legislating for the complete opposite to the Kentucky House Bill should be extremely surprising… however upon reviewing the current UK leadership, this decision becomes more than surprising, it becomes extremely questionable. https…
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:05 AM
6

Being a gay man is not easy and as an outsider looking in, the potential challenges that they experience through homophobia etc, whilst better now than they have ever been, shouldn’t ever be downplayed. Whilst gay men are still men, much of the MRA discourse is on intersexual matters, which has limited relevance to them compared to heterosexual men. Obviously there are some matters that relate equally to both straight and gay men such as selective service; but on a day to day basis the discrimin…
/r/MensRights24/10/25 01:47 AM
14

This is also accurate; they excessively sit on millions of dollars in donations holding them as long term cash reserves which goes against all guidelines and rules for charitable organisations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/25 01:21 AM
16

It’s very common now hearing a woman state that to even consider dating a guy, he must be 6ft, have a 6-pack, and be 6in as the bare minimum… the now coined the 666 rule or even the 6666 rule when you also factor in a six figure salary, as another bare minimum requirement. The 666 rule somewhat disproves the myth that only men value physical appearance in mate selection. Women value physical appearance as much as, if not arguably more than men. The difference lays more in men having less require…
/r/MensRights23/10/25 03:22 AM
3

Wild generalisations? There’s nothing inflammatory nor controversial in what I replied to you. • there’s people advocating for equality of parental leave within both the MRA and feminist movement ✅ • women are not against equality of parental leave, but not at the expense of reduction to their own allowed maternal leave ✅ • women want equality of parental leave to be achieved by increasing a father’s paternal to that of a mother’s maternal leave ✅
/r/MensRights21/10/25 08:54 PM
57

I’ve always found it somewhat incredible that false rape allegations in most part are discussed as a men’s rights issue and rarely if ever form part of any feminism discourse. Considering that a single woman guilty of making a false rape allegation, very likely damages the credibility of thousands of other women, who are genuine victims; should really be a hot topic for feminists, as 'arguably' the ramifications effect a far greater number of women than the one single man or small group men that…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 07:25 PM
3

I see that there’s almost universal agreement from all sides of the political landscape on the need for parity on maternity and paternity leave. Unfortunately however, this then immediately falls apart when women are told the reality of how parity is achieved; and it’s not the idealised view they had imagined when they first proposed it, quite simply because money doesn’t grow on trees. So it wouldn’t be a case of raising fathers to that of mothers. Instead it’s by decreasing women’s maternal le…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 07:05 PM
1

“… do you expect women to know which guys are good and which guys are not?” I’m sure you do leave your home; because if you did live your life using that logic, you’d never leave; women don’t know which drivers are good and which are not do they? … and you’re more likely to be killed in a car accident or from crossing the street than you are of being raped. “…. what are we, some kind of psychics?” No, expecting the opposite sex to read their mind is most certainly a female tendency. What men exp…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:37 PM
1

I’m guessing that you didn’t take the time to read the post in its entirety before jumping to a conclusion. At no point do I dismiss nor bring into question the number of women who are victims and in fact I actually make reference to exactly this in the last but one paragraph, copied below. To close, it is important to highlight that it should be fully recognised that this does not in anyway demonstrate a reduction in the number of actual women that have suffered from these heinous crimes, nor d…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 02:19 PM
4

Chris (OP) please please please reach out to some of your closest friends, family or loved ones today. Failing that, drop me a message if I can help out in anyway, so we can talk. Some of the language you’re using is deeply worrying and let me promise you that life is always worth it.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 11:09 AM
85

I’m not against supporting them as I do consider them victims; and in all fairness, if I was in the same situation as the men of Ukraine, I would insist and want my wife or girlfriend to leave and find safety, wherever this may be. However… I’m completely appalled by institutional and media coverage, that has focused almost solely on the struggles of these women, with complete disregard to the actual main victims of this war; the male conscripts that have been refused any bodily autonomy, then f…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 09:32 AM
11

Unfortunately, wider society, politicians legislators etc do consider women’s feelings… with extremely excessive significance and often even ahead of actual fact. You only have to consider the matter that men are far more likely to be victims of violent crime; yet because women feel unsafe and regularly feel they’re going to be the victim of a violent crime, the focus around this is solely on women.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:28 AM
5

Because you’ve all asked the same question.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:16 AM
3

Some responded no disparity
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:15 AM
10

This is another example of misrepresentation of data to achieve a narrative. Firstly only once did research achieve this result, but even then only with significant data manipulation by feminist bias researchers. At face value the result went against all other data collected worldwide and thus was presented as a US issue; despicably implying the treatment of women in the US was worse than many third world countries. However, the result of 187 women was only achieved by using the following defini…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:11 AM
3

It’s a matter of rights because feminists are advocating for gendered legislation to achieve equality of outcome on the effects of parenthood on career progression, which can only be achieved in a legal rights disparity that would mandate employers to overlook more competent and better suited men for women who may be under qualified or that require unique benefits to be able to fulfil a role, that could likely be against the best interests of the employer and/or at additional expense to them.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:36 AM
4

It’s a matter of rights because feminists are advocating for gendered legislation to achieve equality of outcome on the effects of parenthood on career progression, which can only be achieved in a legal rights disparity that would mandate employers to overlook more competent and better suited men for women who may be under qualified or that require unique benefits to be able to fulfil a role, that could likely be against the best interests of the employer and/or at additional expense to the empl…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:25 AM
21

It’s a matter of rights because feminists are advocating for gendered legislation to achieve equality of outcome on the effects of parenthood on career progression, which can only be achieved in a legal rights disparity that would mandate employers to overlook more competent and better suited men for women who may be under qualified or that require unique benefits to be able to fulfil a role, that could likely be against the best interests of the employer and/or at additional expense to the empl…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:25 AM
1

A consequence of the feminist created gynocentric society of modernity has been 'hoeflation' resulting in men having to work 10x harder than their grandfathers did, to get women 20x worse than their grandmothers were
/r/MensRights21/10/25 01:08 AM
1

TikTok, the 4chan for misandrists… the only difference on TikTok is that women can openly share hate speech without the need anonymity.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 09:04 PM
68

Happy birthday man! Go celebrate your day and put them frustrations aside for now. Today’s about you, so f’ them off; that fight is for another day!!! I would say have a drink on me, but unfortunately despite the country having decided you’re now old enough to kill or be killed in service of the country; they’ve also decided you’re not mature enough to enjoy alcohol responsibly.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 08:44 PM
1

I’ve always been told and I’m still regularly told that; Being a victim is “only for women” Experiencing sexism is “only for women” Misandry isn’t a thing and suffering from gender hate is “only for women” Being raped as in forced into sexual intercourse without my consent is “only for women” Struggling with body dysmorphia is “only for women” Being sexualised is “only for women” Being controlled and abused by your partner is “only for women” Benefitting from affirmative action is “only for wome…
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:44 PM
3

There’s obviously significant cultural differences around the role of marriage in India to that of the West; the implied consent laws are problematic but simultaneously so is the fact a man can be convicted of rape for consensual sex with a woman who held a belief that there was an understanding of marriage in their future, that doesn’t then come to fruition.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:31 AM
3

Remember 2025 as the period in history where a major nation placed a majority female led government in power and the first thing they did was to restrict freedom of speech; and as heavy handedly as given out prison sentences for people’s tweets. "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” https://news.sky.com/story/us-accuses-uk-of-significant-human-rights-issues-and-restricting-free-speech-13410873
/r/MensRights19/10/25 05:38 PM
8

Moxon’s work is quite an interesting read. It was great to discover that Moxon held Straus in very high regard, was grateful for all his hard work and respected Straus significantly, not just as researcher, but also for his unyielding steadfastness, integrity and dogged determination. Straus was undoubtedly a consummate professional. Moxon's work strongly champions the gender symmetry findings of Straus and uses Straus's research as a foundation for his own positions. Moxon also utilises and pro…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 01:46 PM
47

Full article from behind the paywall… Men ‘will exploit hate crime law to accuse women of misandry’ A feminist group says proposals to make sex a protected characteristic will allow men to undermine the work of female organisations. Men will seize upon new legal protections against sexism to “maliciously” target women, a feminist charity funded by the SNP government has warned. The group Engender claimed proposals to make “sex” a protected characteristic under Scottish hate crime laws risked sen…
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:18 AM
4

Thanks. I’ll read into that some more. Simone de Beauvoir, the author of the feminist bible ‘The Second Sex’ is another I really do struggle with understanding the idolisation of within the feminist movement. She was guilty of such diplorable things as being a Nazi collaborator, a pedophile apologist, an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia, an age of consent abolitionist, and her hatred toward maternity and mothers in general.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:38 PM
3

Genuine question as I’m not disagreeing with your reply; under your worldview, are women also capable of oppressing men? If so, are they or have they ever? If not, why do you believe they aren’t able to?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 03:27 PM
4

You’re very much correct sadly. There are many others, but I find Koss extremely troubling considering her sphere of influence and that deplorable claim that a drugged man ridden bare back is nothing more than unwanted contact. I’d be interested in researching any others that you may know of that are in a similar vein to Koss in being extremely powerful, yet simultaneously evil and rotten to the core?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 03:18 PM
17

“Odususi - who is studying Criminology at London” … claimed naivety? “She told the officers she had packed the two suitcases herself” … admission of guilt? “My heart literally dropped in that moment, I panicked as I knew I was going to be arrested. I was like, my life is over” … suspicious mindset for her claim of it just being Tobacco? “She broke down several times in the witness box and told the jury she had been “naive” and “stupid” for agreeing to the venture” … the power of female tears? “I…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 10:43 AM
27

We’re sorry that men’s insecurity is the reason; -That the family court system is systematically sexist against fathers. -That men are for accusations of sexual assault treated guilty until proven innocent, and have their reputation tarnished for life. -That should a man call the police after being physically assaulted by his female spouse; it’s himself not her that’s most likely to be arrested due to the systematically sexist Duluth model. -Need we go on…?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 08:21 AM
33

More concerning for me is the move in modernity towards little girls being given messages to focus on empowerment, self-love, and pursuing dreams; while for boys the messages are around responsibility, behaviour and self restraint. Additionally the indoctrination of young girls to fear boys, such as the cliche “they’re only after one thing”; which is foundational in what later evolves into this crazy irrational belief, that every man is looking to rape them, when in reality it’s only a small of …
/r/MensRights18/10/25 07:21 AM
54

It’s important to also note on this, that the matter of male under reporting is actually a two-tier problem. It’s not solely that men aren’t, it’s also that when they do, the data is very often misrepresented to support feminist ideology. The Legacy of Mary Koss Despite having received significantly widespread criticism, Koss is considered the most influential provider of data around sexual violence in the US. Mary Koss is the woman that started the 1 in 4 American college women is sexually assa…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 10:59 AM
6

Another day, another example of the female privilege that’s the sentencing gap. The Childhood Trauma Effect - Government policies influenced by the Duluth Model and insights from feminist criminology, makes recommendations for more lenient community style sentencing for female perpetrators with a history of trauma, as their trauma should be considered; there are no such recommendations for boys and men with a history of trauma. The sentence of the female judge combined with the Crown Prosecution…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 10:03 AM
31

“Unpaid Emotional Labour”
/r/MensRights13/10/25 09:16 AM
2

As a gesture of no ill faith, I’m not going to engage any further with you after leaving you some thoughts to consider: 1) Men are significantly more likely to be be victims of violent crime and to suffer injuries of greater severity; they are also far more likely to be victims of homicide. We should feel far more afraid than any woman, but our ‘feelings* are proportionate and rational. 2) Consider the narrative of who’s providing any data and check the data for bias, even if it’s coming from yo…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 04:23 AM
1

I made a conscious effort to set out from the beginning, and again to repeat that this wasn’t about downplaying female victims alongside categorically condemnation of all the male perpetrators. I must take exception to any claim that ‘a lot men’ are happy to have friends that are rapists; as it is to claim that ‘a lot men’ would just walk past and ignore a predator assaulting a woman right in front of them. I’m sure you do leave your home; because if you did live your life by the poison in the c…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 01:41 AM
3

Arguing from a position of victimhood is an incredibly powerful psychological dynamic. The behaviour involves portraying oneself as a perpetual victim of circumstances or the actions of others to gain sympathy, avoid responsibility, or manipulate situations. Some of the specific ways this dynamic can appear in arguments include a lack of accountability, selective memory, and the use of emotional manipulation.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 02:38 AM
3

Feel free to check out part 2… https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/FcGhXAqWHF
/r/MensRights09/10/25 04:39 PM
13

Having taken more time to further consider and reflect on this in its entirety, it in fact troubles me now to a significantly greater level than I even originally thought. Shabana Mahmood then The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Senior Cabinet Member who in recent days has made been promoted to one of the four "Great Offices of State” as the Home Secretary. She is the first Muslim in history to hold this position; which is the fourth most senior politician in UK politics; was…
/r/MensRights09/10/25 01:23 AM
68

My favourite quote used so far as reasoning for the justification of the prioritising female only prison reform… "There is a need for an immediate move away from prison towards solely community-based solutions for all women. Females have complex needs, such as from a history of trauma and/or mental health issues. (i) Two thirds of the women incarcerated have convictions for non violent crimes. (ii) Women in general also receive shorter sentencing terms than men (iii) and there has been a high nu…
/r/MensRights08/10/25 03:46 PM
1

I certainly have no idea how you’ve come to any conclusion that I’m in anyway homophobic; as trust me, you genuinely have no idea on why you in fact, couldn’t in any feasible way be any further wide of the mark on this lol
/r/MensRights07/10/25 05:09 AM
2

Professor David M. Buss PhD, has regularly had books published in relation to the science of this matter, 9 in total. 1995, 1996, 2000, 2005(1), 2005(2), 2009, 2017, 2019, 2021. Where is your evidence, supporting your claim of the presence of any social conditioning of men to neglect the pain of other men. To contrary of your baseless claim, it is widely recognised that men are far more likely to risk their own lives to save a strangers. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/out-of-the-ooze/20…
/r/MensRights06/10/25 05:11 PM
1

Professor David M. Buss PhD I think you’ll find does in fact meet your stated requirement of being able to have written 'Real real science'
/r/MensRights06/10/25 08:03 AM
-2

Expanding more on my reply, to cover the two main examples you’ve given in the OP then; it’s undoubtedly the case of evolutionary hard-wiring, that a man will always look to protect a woman who’s imminently at risk of or actually being physically assaulted. The ‘man-up’ comment is only ever going to be used rarely under certain circumstances; it’s not ever going to be said to a man who’s loudly screaming out in agony, visibly demonstrating significant pain, showing limitations caused by severe p…
/r/MensRights06/10/25 07:41 AM
1

It’s just forms part of our evolutionary hard-wiring, that’s been the case for hundreds of thousands of years. If you have a particular interest in exploring this and similar matters further, may I suggest some bedtime reading in the books of Professor David M. Buss PhD around Evolutionary Psychology.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 02:32 AM
8

You’ve very clearly outlined quite a lot of disagreement in your reply, some of which possibly due to some crossed wires. However, before I engage and go into all of that in its entirety; please can we firstly address the claims that I’ve made some ethnic slurs? I would be grateful if you could highlight any and all of these to me, to ensure that I can address each matter appropriately.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 05:44 PM
2

No problem at all, it happens. Thanks for taking the time to clarify.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:42 PM
7

Please read my OP in its entirety 😉 I clearly state and repeat several times over, that I’m a pro-choice advocate and supporter of a woman’s right to bodily autonomy. I haven’t suggested anywhere nor do I believe that a woman should ever be forced to have an abortion against her own will, should ever be refused the right to have an abortion should she so decide, nor ever be made to bring a pregnancy to term against her own wishes.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 02:00 PM
3

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25946466/
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:36 PM
6

Sorry but I’m just wanting to clarify what exactly do you disagree with? Am I correct in consideration of your reply, that you disagree because you’re pro-life advocate or is it something else?
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:22 PM
12

When considering reproductive rights as matter of equality, the closest equivalency would be; — A woman should have the right to a physical abortion within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. — A man should have the right to a 'paper' abortion within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. I don’t think it’s equality if a man’s reproductive rights end at point of the sexual intercourse; unless you suggest that a woman’s rights are also concluded at the same time. To suggest otherwise, such as saying a man…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 12:12 PM
9

When considering reproductive rights as matter of equality, the closest equivalency would be; — A woman should have the right to a physical abortion within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. — A man should have the right to a paper abortion within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. I don’t think it’s equality if a man’s reproductive rights end at point of the sexual intercourse; unless you suggest that a woman’s rights are also concluded at the same time. To suggest otherwise, such as saying a man’s…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 11:25 AM
17

I’ll just clarify and expand on a few things, because I don’t think we’re a million miles apart on our thoughts around this. So in reference to a man’s reproductive rights; I’m not suggesting that should there be any instances where a man wanted the child when the woman doesn’t, that she should be forced to bring the pregnancy to term. That of course would be completely unethical and in fact be against her rights to bodily autonomy. A man’s reproductive rights should however apply in the reverse…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 09:28 AM
3

My post was in reference to the comment that I replied to, about how long ago this happened. Of course the crimes are not even close to being comparable; my apologies if it came across that way, as I wasn’t trying to suggest that they were. Weinstein and Crosby are absolutely vile individuals and despicable human beings, who are truly rotten to the core.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 09:25 PM
9

It was 2013 so 12 years ago; coincidentally the same year as Harvey Weinstein’s most recent crime for which he was convicted, his charges were from instances from 1993 to 2013. If I recall correctly, Bill Cosby’s offences were from the late 1960s to early 1990s.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 03:59 PM
1

This is a very tough question; importantly first and foremost it’s integral that we show compassion to any victims that have suffered from the heinous crime of rape and highlight that asking this difficult question doesn’t or at least shouldn’t downplay their lived experience nor trauma. My heart has and always will go out to them. However, not asking the question at all 'Why would any woman lie about being raped?', would also not be beneficial in achieving justice for all the current and future…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 03:37 PM
0

The feminism movement does. This is thus a response to a societal issue that feminist discourse has highlighted to exist.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:41 AM
1

🤦‍♂️ I didn’t, the feminism movement did. This is thus a response to a societal issue that feminist discourse has highlighted to exist.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:39 AM
2

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3812004/ https://www.redonline.co.uk/wellbeing/sex-relationships/a35560237/calories-burnt-during-sex/ https://bellehealth.co/how-many-calories-do-you-burn-during-sex/ https://nypost.com/2024/08/03/lifestyle/men-burn-more-calories-than-women-during-sex-and-theres-a-simple-reason-why/ https://press-london.com/blogs/squeeze/a-matter-of-size https://www.womenshealthmag.com/uk/fitness/a38984073/how-many-calories-does-sex-burn/ https://www.healthywomen.org/cont…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 12:50 AM
2

🐻😉
/r/MensRights28/09/25 04:47 PM
6

I know you’ve covered some if not most of this in your fantastic and very comprehensive post, but I have just quickly cut and paste what I had previously posted elsewhere, which is a list of common considerations that almost always get overlooked by the respondents to the Man v Bear question, Man • ⁠It is far more likely than not that ‘most men would do absolutely nothing’ and we’re talking here of all but an extremely small fraction of a percentile of men would sexually assault a complete stran…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:08 AM
0

I think that is a great example. Revoking women’s rights to vote is not even a topic that is discussed as a MRA issue. An individual who identifies as a MRA but also believes women should not have the vote, says absolutely nothing about the MRA movement, it is solely that individual’s own political ideology.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 03:15 AM
11

You’re right and for example in many parts of NYC you’re within one square mile of in excess of 60,000 people and 0 wild bears at any given time. In Kowloon, Hong Kong you’re actually within one square mile of 340,000 people and 0 wild bears. Bearing in mind, that is at any given time; so should you ride the subway to commute to work, then again for two AM business meetings across town, again to meet a friend for lunch and twice more for PM meetings, before then using the subway to return to the…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 03:08 AM
2

I think that is a great example. Revoking women’s rights to vote is not even a topic that is discussed as a MRA issue. An individual who identifies as a MRA but also believes women should not have the vote, says absolutely nothing about the MRA movement, it is solely that individual’s own political ideology.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 02:33 AM
17

Slightly off-topic but related, a list of common considerations that almost always get overlooked by the respondents to the Man v Bear question. Man - It is far more likely than not that ‘most men would do absolutely nothing’ and we’re talking here of all but an extremely small fraction of a percentile of men would sexually assault a complete stranger upon randomly meeting them in a chance encounter in the wild. - Even in the immensely unlikely event that the man encountered, in fact did have a …
/r/MensRights28/09/25 01:24 AM
3

It’s an extremely common error to use the ‘red pill’ incorrectly, not only when mistakenly meaning the ‘black pill’ but also as a broader sweeping term for the so called manosphere or even for wider misogyny. The ‘red pill’ proper is all about intersectional dynamics; understanding the evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, anthropology, sociology, psychology, politics and many other sub-fields. The ‘red pill’ is a praxeology of intersectional dynamics, understanding men’s nature and wom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/25 03:44 PM
3

As others have said, it’s politically impossible in the current environment. For example, The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT) has designated the men’s rights movement as a form of right-wing extremist ideology with risks of terrorist attacks; and The United Nations Programme for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women classified the men's rights movements as an "anti-rights movements" in 2024 and are currently pressing for this to be made a formal UN declaration, a legally…
/r/MensRights27/09/25 04:42 AM
9

Take note of the choice of language here; ‘children’ kept confined for 23 hours. It’s very common for media reporting to use children when it’s boys suffering, yet the headlines will use girls when it’s girls suffering.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 04:22 AM
3

When an individual man demonstrates genuine hatred of an individual woman for her being her, not because she’s a woman.
/r/MensRights27/09/25 03:55 AM
3

Well sourcing 6 examples took me all of 10 seconds to debunk another disingenuous feminist fallacy, attempting to frame the narrative of women are wonderful, women can only be victims and the idiotic catchphrase of “Not All Men but somehow always A Man” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjd9vv2nylo.amp https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn08y6785xqo.amp https://www.cbsnews.com/news/48-hours-investigates-sex-abuse-by-women-teachers/ https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0714/1523438-rape-trial/ https:…
/r/MensRights27/09/25 03:43 AM
2

The following is what I asked ChatGPT and its response. Please feel free to ask ChatGPT or your AI of choice the same questions yourself, should you wish the peace of mind from self verification. Questions asked of ChatGPT Was Simone de Beauvoir; ⁠a pedophile apologist and advocating for the release of imprisoned pedophiles? ⁠an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia? ⁠an age of consent abolitionist? ⁠a signatory and advocate of several petitions calling for the decriminalization of consens…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 04:45 PM
2

This is literally the first thing I address and respond to in my opening paragraph.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:06 PM
2

Are you honestly attempting to make a claim that the ‘majority’ of men are making jokes about violence against women, raping women and a profound hatred of women? Are you honestly attempting to make a claim that the ‘majority’ of men talk about women in derogatory ways, using language such as calling them hoes? Are you honestly attempting to make a claim that the ‘majority’ of men view women as objects thus subhuman? Are you honestly attempting to make a claim that the ‘majority’ of men always l…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 06:18 AM
7

At no point do I state the phrase “All feminists” where “All Men” is the literal language used and is openly coming from within the mainstream feminist movement. It’s completely disingenuous to suggest that it’s only misandrists that are using such phrasing; especially now that a number feminists are of the opinion misandry doesn’t even exist. Thank you for highlighting my newly acquired infamy on r/amithedevil sub. Despite most of the replies on there appearing to suggest to the contrary, it is…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:41 AM
2

Well sourcing 6 examples took me all of 10 seconds to debunk another disingenuous feminist fallacy, attempting to frame the narrative of women are wonderful, women can only be victims and the idiotic catchphrase of “Not All Men but somehow always A Man” 😂 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqjd9vv2nylo.amp https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn08y6785xqo.amp https://www.cbsnews.com/news/48-hours-investigates-sex-abuse-by-women-teachers/ https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0714/1523438-rape-trial/ http…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 12:27 AM
5

Thanks for the clarifications, it’s appreciated. To be honest, it was a conscious choice to be extremely liberal and generous in my estimates despite them all being in direct opposition to the case I was outlining. I did so because even when doing this, it still in no way damaged my overall objective of demonstrating the fallacy of the feminist rhetoric that all men are sexual predators. I also didn’t want to give any feminists the opportunity to derail my post by having a micro criticism sugges…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 07:03 PM
12

Math maybe their weakness but feminist’s are extremely clever in identifying opportunities to exploit and weaponise language; they’re incredibly good at honing in on emotive speech, using buzz words, and creating slogans; then through circumlocution they nefariously drive their narrative and agenda through disingenuous half truths. They consciously present information powerfully in a manner they’re knowingly aware will be misinterpreted in a way that’s misleading but supports, strengthens and ju…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 01:14 PM
2

I personally can’t look past Simone de Beauvoir, the author of the feminist bible ‘The Second Sex’. I really do struggle with the idolisation of Simone de Beauvoir within the feminist movement, due to such diplorable things as her being a Nazi collaborator, a pedophile apologist, an activist for the legalisation of pedophilia, an age of consent abolitionist, and her hatred toward maternity and mothers in general.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:57 PM
3

It’s just another example of feminist legislation which drives statistical bias to drive their victim rhetoric. You needn’t look no further than Duluth model that’s used as guidance for law enforcement and the judiciary that doesn’t even acknowledge male victims of domestic violence nor female perpetrators either. The link below outlines all of this in further detail. https://annsilvers.com/blogs/news/the-gender-biased-duluth-model-for-dv-treatment?srsltid=AfmBOoraoVs06-1eMZGAf5e0C08cm-5wuhPNCEJ…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:45 PM
1

That’s legally classified as assault, but can you imagine as a man attempting to report that to the authorities. Not only would it not be pursued by law enforcement, you’d be the talk of the police station and mocked by them behind closed doors as they make you a running joke for not manning up. However, should the shoe be on the other foot, you’d have an officer at your home or workplace with you in handcuffs within the hour.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:37 PM
1

I’ve said this for a long time, what women call misogyny is not a hatred of women, in all but very rare occasions anyway. It is often misunderstood due to a disconnect between gender thinking styles, male logic style and female feelings style. For example, a man will state a literal uncontentious fact, such as men as a whole are stronger than women as a whole; and women will feel that is an attack on them, or belittling them. In addition to this there are very common examples of men demonstratin…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:30 PM
31

It’s worrying as there appears to be no real appetite amongst political leaders worldwide for pursuing paternity fraud reform; our gynocentric society can not bring itself to enact a law where the perpetrators can only be female, as it damages their victim narrative. They are literally protecting the perpetrators instead of the victims… and the victims are not just the men, they are the children too. Not only is a father discovering a child is not his, a child is discovering their dad is not the…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:03 PM
63

The 3% figure is absolute pie in the sky, it’s nothing more than someone licking their finger and placing it in the air to see which way the wind blows. Paternity testing is relatively new technology in all of human history and no country, culture nor vast body of peoples have ever carried out 100% mandatory testing, nor even a significant group testing of a population, to even be able to hazard a guess, let alone fairly evaluate what the actual figure may actually be.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 09:50 AM
1

I actually have very mixed feelings about Richard Reeves. I’ve always considered that Reeves’s message wasn’t for the ears of men and boys; more so his attempt of a softly softly approach, using feminist friendly language and wording, pandering to women to at least consider and empathise in some small part what are some examples of men’s issues. Despite Reeves having outlined most of his work as boy’s issues as in “children’s” issues and pressing his catchphrase of ‘this is not a zero sum game’,…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 01:02 AM
19

Unfortunately this is far worse than just individual or societal assumptions of male guilt and female innocence; it’s systematic sexism against men. The Duluth model that’s used as guidance for law enforcement and the judiciary doesn’t even acknowledge male victims of domestic violence nor female perpetrators either. The link below outlines all of this in further detail. https://annsilvers.com/blogs/news/the-gender-biased-duluth-model-for-dv-treatment?srsltid=AfmBOoraoVs06-1eMZGAf5e0C08cm-5wuhPN…
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:25 AM
15

Feminist’s are extremely clever in identifying opportunities to exploit and weaponise language; they’re incredibly good at honing in on emotive speech, using buzz words, and creating slogans; then through circumlocution they nefariously drive their narrative and agenda through disingenuous half truths. They consciously present information powerfully in a manner they’re knowingly aware will be misinterpreted in a way that’s misleading but supports, strengthens and justifies their ideology. There’…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 12:43 PM
5

Firstly, the best way to respond to a feminist on this in almost all instances, is to never attempt to “dismiss or dispute” anything they claim to be as male privileges. Just accept them and refocus the conversation on examples of female privilege; then wait for their inevitable rebuke and attempt to “dismiss and dispute” these… … then end the conversation, as you hold up a mirror to them by quoting a feminist… "Those who have privilege can not see it… so I’m understanding of course, it’s perfec…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:34 AM
10

Globally the definition of rape does vary between countries and regions; ultimately however there is an inherent gender bias in legislation in almost every instance. So some examples of this when starting with the most gynocentric would be: “Sex with a woman on a false promise of marriage” “If a man has sexual intercourse with a woman who at the time of the intercourse does not consent to it, or at that time he knows that she does not consent to the intercourse or he is reckless as to whether sh…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 04:38 AM
13

I’ve always found the ‘many cases go unreported’ rhetoric when used by feminists to be a very dangerous game for them to be playing; because whilst they are indeed correct, male victims account for a high proportion of these unreported incidents.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 11:40 PM
10

Man: “I don’t do things for you only to expect something in return” Woman: “I am the table”
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:27 AM
5

I’ve seen many examples of men’s rights activists being open to as least explore working together with feminists in finding common ground, only to be instantly rebuffed by them. Unfortunately there is no appetite, nor has there ever been from feminists to engage in men’s rights activism.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:14 AM
3

The most incredibly ‘man bad’ sentence lacking any context of “… 52 percent said they have choked a woman during sex.” is appalling and a conscious choice for her own nefarious agenda.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:51 AM
7

The arguments against are pretty weak and stomach churningly gynocentric
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:22 AM
2

Theoretically yes that’s possible; however empirically it’s not.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 04:54 PM
5

… women abuse with language Verbal abuse can include, gaslighting, name-calling, yelling, making demeaning comments, nagging, cussing, threatening, belittling, constant phone calls, actively undermining their partner’s authority with children, telling them that they are a bad parent, telling them they can’t control their kids, and setting them up to be humiliated in public or in front of family and friends. It is generally considered by healthcare professionals, that this type of abuse is more d…
/r/MensRights04/09/25 12:37 PM
3

On TV. When the wife is not receiving the sex life she deserves, it’s her husband’s fault and her infidelity is female empowerment and justified. When the husband is not the receiving any sex from his wife, he’s a scumbag for cheating.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 02:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter