TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

St-ElliotsSecAscent Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by St-ElliotsSecAscent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Of course not nor would it be a red flag if a woman had no male friends. What is a red flag to me though is finding this a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 06:16 PM
15

Absolutely not.
/r/MGTOW22/08/17 03:14 PM
3

For the high tier men, yes. For the lower tier? Fuck no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 08:59 PM
1

https://labs.la.utexas.edu/langloislab/face-perception/maxims-myths-of-facial-beauty/ This source says it's equally important for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 08:41 PM
2

Nothing. I am the pinnacle of what is a real man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 07:25 PM
2

NAWALT!!1!11!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 06:09 PM
2

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 03:14 PM
4

What the hell? His post is perfectly fine. How can you even quantify circlejerky?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 03:01 PM
2

WHO FUCKING CAAARREESS. Many do care and for various reasons too. It's about your reputation. You don't see me publicly adovating advocating to criminalise fornication.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:51 PM
2

Why are you all so influenced by what "feminists" say it's mindboggling to me Because it hinders what you're allowed to say/complain about in the sense of it being less socially acceptable. They influence political correctness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:41 PM
3

I think what OP means to say is that females having no regard to these issues is tantamount to hypocrisy. Men are fed with feminist opinions on a perpetual basis added with the expectation to put forth understanding and empathy or you'll be quick to be criticised as sexist. Females can simply disregard anything men complain about and they'll be supported for it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:31 PM
6

What you often see with these ridiculed lonely men drawn to particular forums, is that they lack both sex and companionship. I've seen it never happen that complete loners with no friends at all manage to somehow attain a girlfriend so I think it's tied together.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:07 PM
1

I'd say no because complaining you're treated unfairly is quite unmasculine and I'd say even infantile. I'd say if enough men would find this a problem they would start something separate on their own, not invade a predominantly female space and change it to their benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:07 PM
6

but feminism is largely a vocalization of female concerns and interests It's exactly that. Feminism serves as a platform for outing their opinions and they are widely received because there is still this idea that women have it worse, even in western society. I'd say it's less socially acceptable for men to vocalize what they consider gender specific problems because it's seen as wimpy and there's a good chance they'll be demonized for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:57 PM
9

Whether it be nursing, teaching, or social services--males do not typically seem to complain Ah, I'd say this is due to feminism complaining about pretty much anything that doesn't favor women enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:40 PM
1

Females really like to think they are marvelous people from my experience, more so than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:27 PM
14

It's the same for men. I considered yoga once but then I remembered how it's heavily dominated by females, so it became out of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:24 PM
1

Because they are disgusting and entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 10:13 PM
1

It's mostly their own fault for slutting it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 12:18 PM
1

No, it's because girls are more likely to pass on their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 05:11 PM
1

It think it is but I do agree it isn't a good thing. Best is to just view them is inferior filthy creatures up to no good, like cockroaches or ticks for example. That's much healthier for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 12:46 PM
1

Sure, I'm talking the OkCupid thing. I'm not a redpiller.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:15 PM
1

as for the OkCupid rule, how do we know that those 80% of OkCupid males women find unnatractive aren't the bottom 20% of all men? How do we know OkCupid's distribution of men and attractiveness mirrors that of society? Wouldn't it be logical to assume that attractive men don't need OkCupid to get a date so there's an overrepresentation of unnatractive men on OkCupid? Meanwhile those same men have such low standards for women out of desperation, they subjectively would rate women higher than thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:03 PM
1

Because that's literally what the original source from okcupid shows us. Women rated 80% of men as below average. What the redpill concluded from that has nothing to do with this. Why are you always so hung up on what you think is right when it's clearly not?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:47 PM
1

80% of the women are dating 20% of the men Why are arguing about things you don't even know the meaning of? Why are you not looking it up, if you don't know it? Why are you assuming your first idea about it is right? Why so confident? Holy shit. You can't start proof by contradiction if you don't even know what your oppononents position you're taking entails. It means that 80% of the men are considered below average by the women while 20% of the men are considered above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:28 PM
2

I hope you know that arguing with you is very tiresome, I need to keep repeating the same thing over and over again with you because you're thick. I don't really believe that a 5/10 woman is high value at all. However a 6/10 male can certainly be high value especially if he brings a lot more than his looks to the table. See, this is where you're bringing your personal convictions again. In order to have proof by contradiction you must assume my proposition as true which is something you're clear…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:12 PM
2

Why do you keep repeating arguments I have already adressed and debunked? if there are many high value women here who are indeed partnered up, and because we don't see an equal representation of high value women and high value men here, and because of hypergammy, we know there at least exists as many high value men as there are high value women partnered up since women only date up due to hypergammy No, your smooth brain is still very slow at grasping anything. Let me recite it for you: what is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 11:54 AM
1

And what the fuck is the contradiction? My point is still valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 11:25 AM
1

It's open.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 11:04 AM
2

I'm already getting used at you being extremely slow at grasping concepts but let me explain to you this again. If you want me to realise that my conclusions are faulty, you are accepting the premise since you argued in the same context so afterwards saying that you didn't accept the premise in the first place is extremely nonsensical and above all renders any point you made invalid. Like, do you even think before you write something?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 11:03 AM
3

What's the point of trying to disprove anything I've said when you reject the premise?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 03:14 AM
3

Then what the fuck are you arguing for in the first place if that's what you believe? I explicitly stated I made my arguments starting from that assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 02:16 AM
3

I'm going from the 80/20 rule, not from your personal convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 02:10 AM
3

I'm meaning to say that what is higher value for a woman is not always a high value male. If a woman here is 5/10 and she's dating let's say higher value 6/10 male, the woman is still high value because many men will consider her but the man is still just a 6/10 which is not necessarily high value. That's what I meant when I said "no it doesn't mean there are just as many high value men partnered up to the women".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:25 AM
2

Sure, that's your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:11 AM
3

Are you assuming there is an equal balance in value among the genders? Let's say starting from the 80th percentile the value for men starts at "low" and gradually lowers from that point in the eyes of the female. For men this is different, they will consider a much smaller range of females as "low" which logically leads to more options for the female. So, no it doesn't mean there are just as many high value men partnered up to the women. A 5/10 female is of higher value than a 5/10 male if a 7/1…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:07 AM
1

A citation to back up this so called consequence you apparently find so logical because I completely disagree. I don't think you can pull any conclusion like less happiness from pickiness. This sounds entirely personal and not universally applicable unless you have some source to back up the claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:20 AM
1

You pull your conclusions from weak assumptions. How exactly does pickiness lead to being more unhappiness? Because you're presumably more aware of one's flaws (citation pls)? How does being more aware one's flaws lead to unhappiness(citation pls)? This sounds like unbacked speculated bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:08 AM
1

Expand on this implication.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:59 PM
5

And her reasons for why are speculations not holding a single basis while I base this from the 80/20 rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:04 PM
14

Sure, and why do you think they are over represented here? Sheer coincidence? Let me tell you why. There are more low value men than there are low females value due to the gender dynamics i.e higher expectations for men while more men have lower expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 10:12 PM
11

I think the women here are generally higher value than the men. And why do you believe that? I mean, I can believe this if we go from the assumption there are far more high value females in the eyes of men then there are high value males in the eyes of females.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 10:00 PM
4

It does help a lot, you know? Masculinity and attractiveness in males is linked to more orgasms for females. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513811000250
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 09:53 PM
7

I don't see the women here whining that they don't fit basic expectations of men, do you? Most of us here are happily partnered You know, this could very well enforce the idea that women are very advantaged in the sexual market because they have a myriad more options than men granting them the opportuniy to be far more picky than men in a realistic context leading to higher expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 09:47 PM
10

So, you're agreeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 09:44 PM
5

not especially good looking or masculine. I doubt it. Multiple studies show us that women are highly attracted towards good looking men possessing higly masculine features because it indicates good genetic quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 09:41 PM
1

Are you a woman or a man? Because this is some top tier delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 08:39 PM
18

But the women on reddit are wonderful and high quality so their opinion matters more, amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 08:04 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 08:02 PM
1

We have some blackpilled normies in the sub, you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 07:59 PM
7

This is what women want in a man: Must be taller than her Must have had a higher or similar level of education Must be honest Must be funny Must be ambitious Must be laid back Must have a good heart Must be romantic Must be able to sexually satisfy her (in other words, a good looking masculine man) Must be dexterous So, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter