TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Steampunk_Moustache Archive

View 3 posts and 1,401 comments by Steampunk_Moustache on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,401 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'd like to see her try this in a muslim country.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 11:59 PM
2

I can't imagine how low your ability to empathize with males has to be to be able to write something like this. 'lol, men dying traumatic deaths en mass, only men would care about such a thing!'
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:24 PM
2

Not really.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:21 PM
2

I think you can consult the article for a feminist position on this matter, don't you? I am not a feminist for precisely the reason that I think the Kim regime should be crushed with military force as soon as possible: I am not a moral relativist.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:30 PM
2

'sending kids to their death' ended slavery.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:28 PM
2

If it were up to me, I'd try it with the full force the US, Japanese, and South Korean armies.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 07:58 PM
8

He was indeed fucking stupid and arrogant, but holy fucking shit, how anyone can side with NK is utterly fucking beyond me. I would legitimately fucking execute people who support the kim regime.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:41 PM
1

10 years is a harsh sentence, but if she was a man, I'm sure she'd be looking at 20.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:32 PM
3

in the UK toilet paper is taxed as a luxury, Makes sense. A bidet is certainly cheaper.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:30 PM
6

Sooo.. asian men are awful, run to the first white man you see? Whatever this video is trying to say, it's stupid.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 09:35 PM
2

And that's why I stopped voting Greens.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:17 AM
2

Kimberly, sweetie. You are the absolute last person who should be delivering a speech about such a thing. Unless this is going to be a speech about how great and how obscenely profitable it is, but I doubt it.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 02:13 AM
11

Well, if you expected rational decisions from Pakistani tribal courts...
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:08 PM
5

Ironically, sounds like something a red piller would say.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:08 PM
3

"sexual maturity means social maturity." Oh for fuck sake.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:46 PM
5

Hiding them is one thing. Purchasing huge tracts of land in tschernobyl or fukushima exclusion zones is another. Especially when you leave the deed to that land in the most irradiated hotspot you can find.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:47 PM
9

If it had been me, and I'd decided suicide was the only way out, I would've at least tanked the fortune so that none of the slimy fucks could get it.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:01 PM
2

I agree. I can't fathom how comes to the conclusion that these women are suffering - their lives sound positively idyllic, their children's futures seem certain to be golden, and they need never worry about a thing in the world. They understand how their elite social system works and they know how to stay in it and reap the rewards - rewards which I bet many people would seriously consider murdering for.
/r/RedPillWomen19/05/15 04:33 AM
2

He and the officers handled that situation very well.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/15 04:23 PM
-3

LGBT. The letters are in order of priority.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:41 PM
1

Erm, no. You have to prove someone is guilty, not prove they are innocent. Tell me, can you prove you didn't rape me?
/r/MensRights25/04/15 06:10 PM
4

I did the same thing to about 5 different teachers, although I preferred images of Alan Partridge. No arrest. No trial. Not even detention. What the fuck has happened to the world?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:20 AM
8

0.01 seconds.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:01 AM
6

17 minor DURRRRRRR.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 03:35 AM
3

Fucking moron Judge.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 05:03 AM
33

Men accused of date rape will need to convince police that a woman consented to sex And how exactly is that to be done, might I ask?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:05 PM
6

The fact that there are no societal expectations of them. Men are expected and pressured to succeed. Women are encouraged to succeed as some optional journey of self-betterment. Men who fail are shamed, ridiculed, and kicked to the curb. Women who fail are helped and assisted through life.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:21 AM
3

College is no place for a criminal court, period. Decisions on illegal activity are for real judges and real lawyers, not a bunch of ideologues with sociology degrees.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:55 AM
1

"Life must be made easy for us because we cannot compete on a level playing field."
/r/MensRights17/01/15 09:00 PM
5

Fuck me. They terrified this kid to the point of fucking suicide for the crime being a drunk teenager. Un fucking real.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:48 AM
6

So, false accusations, then?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:39 AM
2

Their reactions will amaze you No they won't.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:03 PM
6

Ezra Klein evinced satisfaction that possibly innocent young men will be expelled for rapes they didn't commit: "Critics worry that colleges will fill with cases in which campus boards convict young men (and, occasionally, young women) of sexual assault for genuinely ambiguous situations. Sadly, that’s necessary for the law’s success. It’s those cases — particularly the ones that feel genuinely unclear and maybe even unfair, the ones that become lore in frats and cautionary tales that fathers e-…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:14 AM
2

There's nothing to explain. She has admitted her abuse. Under the lens of her own politics, she's not just an abuser, but a rapist. She knows this. She said of it; "I think I'm going to be sick". Now stop bringing it up so that the world can forget about her, please.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:14 PM
6

They chose probably the most attractive picture of her they could find, and declared her husband abusive, without mentioning a shred of evidence. Way to glamorize and lionize the perpetrator of a gruesomely premeditated, utterly remorseless killing.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:21 AM
8

Male victims are always erased from public consciousness.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:00 PM
1

they should not feel pressured to attend or participate in class sessions that focus on the law of sexual violence, and which might therefore be traumatic. They should make sexual violence laws the first class of the semester, and kick every student who can't deal with it off the course to make room for someone who can. If you can't act like an adult and discuss the law, you don't need to be studying law. You need to be back in highschool.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:03 PM
1

South Park was more accurate than the news.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 06:05 PM
11

Let her carry on. She will be their death.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 06:00 PM
1

Men gravitate to extremes. They are overrepresented in both the greatest failings and the greatest successes. Risk-taking behavior is essential for both. You don't accomplish great things with taking huge risks that could potentially destroy you. See: Every entrepreneur who lost everything.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:06 AM
6

I'd imagine the child will feel the same way they would if they discovered they were conceived when their father raped their mother.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:42 AM
2

They are going to regret taking that video down - their blood is in the water now. They have shown weakness, and now the feminists will be watching their every move, waiting for a another perceived slip-up to attack them over. Utterly ridiculous. When I saw 'slow motion is 'sexist', I was honestly expecting a shot of a woman jiggling and bouncing hypnotically, but there is nary a bouncing tit in sight. Even the most endowed woman of the three seems to be wearing a well fitting and supportive bra…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:51 AM
2

I hate the Salvation Army. I really do. On the one hand, they do excellent work hundreds of thousands of people. On the other hand, they willfully and heartlessly exclude tens of thousands of others based on their idiotic beliefs. Thanks for giving me a moral dilemma every time you ask for my donations.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:40 AM
21

It's nobody's job to believe anyone. It's the justice system's job to collect all available evidence, take it to court and reach a fair conclusion based on what can be proven - nothing more, and nothing less. Rape cases should not be about 'believing' anyone. This ridiculous 'believe' mantra doesn't pop up in trials for assault, robbery, fraud or murder. Why do people act like rape has to be treated differently?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:35 AM
2

Swap the gender and Piers' career would be instantly, INSTANTLY over. Fucking OUTRAGEOUS double standard.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:08 PM
10

Sadly, I have come to believe that it is the losing response to such threats. Feminists milk them for all they are worth, and it works wonders for them. Men stay silent about them, and as a result of their silence, are walked all over. He should hire a security company to watch over the front of his shop, and the next one of these morons that comes to deliver an unsanitary package or throw something at his windows gets pinned to the ground until the police arrive.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 11:03 PM
2

13? Could have fooled me.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:51 PM
0

Oh dear, Germany. Oh dear.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 09:50 PM
2

gonna be alot of women going to jail with that new law Haha, no there wont. Courts scarcely believe women are truely capable of anything criminal.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 06:24 AM
0

I assume they will be never grant a practicing muslim a visa again, then? Oh right, he's a white guy. He must be held to a higher standard.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 06:22 AM
40

"Alex from Target" boggled my fucking mind. Can you imagine if some guy snapped a surreptitious pic of a 16 year old girl, tweeted it, and then it went viral? First, feminists would flip a shit. Second, the person who took the image would be viewed a pedophile and could face arrest, harassment, violence, firing, etc. Instead, when the victim is male, he is invited onto Ellen DeGeneres' talk show so that he can be paraded before every housewife in America in the specific context of "Look how sexy…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:15 AM
3

That is blatantly illegal.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:29 PM
86

And this is how you trivialise sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:02 AM
3

It's always a voice for men because Elam is prone to getting caught up in his own hyperbole and saying something stupid. Put simply, it's always a voice for men because it's easier to make them look bad.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:05 AM
3

It's pretty gross. Since I stopped being a teenager (which is getting to be quite a while ago now), I honestly don't know anyone who would catcall a stranger. If I was with a friend and shouted or whistled at a passing woman, I would honestly feel obliged to apologize for him, and I would probably avoid being with him in public in future.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:59 AM
1

Some men are too scared of being ripped apart to say anything. Others are too busy trying to prove they respect women. It almost seems like we could be entering a political era in which the only people who are allowed to argue with feminist women are other women.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:36 AM
1

could allow some sex offenders to go free It might also keep some innocent people of jail, but hey, fuck them, right? How many false positives are we comfortable here with? What's the number where we draw the line on how many innocent lives we ruin? 1 in 2000 cases? 1 in 1000? 1 in 500? 1 in 100? 1 in 50? 1 in 10?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:29 AM
1

How many other crimes are there where the defendant is expected to prove they didn't commit a crime?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:23 AM
9

Like I don't have to worry about being beaten and robbed.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:11 AM
11

In any sane world, these people would be laughed off campus.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:37 AM
2

Women are human beings. Men are human doings.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:48 AM
1

woman's inconvenience > man's life
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:48 AM
13

no surprises here.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:48 AM
2

What a fucking cunt.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:45 AM
5

Respect is earned, not given.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:17 PM
19

Good. It is women who will bring down feminism. They're the only ones who can, since male voices are automatically dismissed.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:11 AM
3

Now show it to a feminist and watch her piss and moan.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:05 PM
24

It is, and neither do I. HOWEVER, reverse the genders and this would cause feigned feminist outrage. I think its still worth point out the double standard.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:30 PM
-1

DAE how men are entitled to sex?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:28 PM
3

You are worse than a feminist. Go back to the dark ages, please.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:27 PM
3

You are promoting a binary view of gender. You are not even a feminist, you're a traditionalist troglodyte.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:04 AM
2

The funniest thing is that Zoe Quinn's 'game' is not a game in any way, shape or form. It is a choose your own adventure book, and a short, shoddy one at that.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 12:20 PM
3

Men are defined by being protectors of women and children Fuck off. I'm not defined by my usefulness as your human shield. You disgust me.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:22 PM
-1

How is it a sweeping judgment? I'm talking about whoever who decided to create this and sell it, which is likely less than 5 people.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:53 AM
3

Wrong. I'm a feminist and I'm fucking disgusted by this. I'm pretty sure all feminists don't think alike, as convenient as that would be.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:37 AM
3

A feminist.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 10:08 PM
1

This image doesn't go far enough. Zoe Quinn has admitted to cheating on her boyfriend. Zoe Quinn sex with someone who cannot make informed consent to be rape. I agree with her on this. Zoe Quinn is a rapist, by her own admission.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 09:41 PM
1

Unbelievable to think that that woman will be out in just 5 years or less. I would not feel safe in the same room as her.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:18 PM
2

Male/female differences - Women talk about having fun and spending money, men talk about politics and about saving money. Neurotic people - disportionately high use of "sick of", "shitty", "anxiety", "mental health", "put this as your status"
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:44 PM
1

Guess they're searching for their pussy pass documents.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:36 PM
3

But I thought we lived in culture of and rape apologia!?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:40 AM
2

No only that but 'including those who lacked votes due to being too young or not owning property' can baasically be translated as 'those not worth marrying'.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:58 AM
1

Fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:56 AM
5

Radical We're really not. Elliott Rodger Had absolutely nothing to do with the MRM.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 10:16 PM
5

Fuck. Them.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:14 PM
55

"Russel Brand does what any decent person would do."
/r/MensRights17/08/14 09:05 PM
1

An attractive young woman with high paying job getting away with a crime? You don't say?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:11 AM
1

I don't really give a fuck either way.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:09 AM
3

people that caused the "great recession" aren't facing jail time either, where's the outrage?? You must be reading reddit with your eyes closed if you haven't seen the calls for bankers to be jailed.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:06 AM
1

TIL I have more power than Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 10:57 AM
12

They wouldn't publish this if it was about any other section of the population. Only men are viewed lowly enough to be torn down like this.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 10:01 AM
14

Perhaps he shouldn't have called her the C-word but so wha Nobody would even blink at a man being called a dick. Cunt should be no different.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:59 AM
10

You're at risk if you're male, and you're doubly at risk if you're black and male. It stinks.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:03 PM
4

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:21 AM
3

Rape culture brutally hunts down anyone suspected of rape, even when there is nothing more than hearsay against them.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:54 PM
5

So everyone should just let themselves be bullied and censored, then?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:19 PM
1

"guys, those things we say to silence you whenever you argue with are just IRONIC JOKES. What's that? Someone said 'cunt'? FUCKING MISOGYNIST PIG!"
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:18 PM
9

You're right to be concerned but you're a fool for not applying.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:48 AM
1

A feminist yelling at feminists for not being feminist enough. It's the same radicalizing infighting they've been doing for Decades. Dworkin was exactly like this.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:46 AM
3

Pretty fucking mindblowing considering that ESPN's primetime coverage supposedly has an insane 94% male viewership. You would thing they'd be among the last people to bow to feminists, but apparently they're just as chickenshit as everyone else.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:41 AM
0

They're pandering to feminist pressure and bending over.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:36 AM
3

Fuck their policy.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:35 AM
1

"It's only sexist when men do it"
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:30 AM
2

Hearing your little brother get murdered by grandma in the next room. Fuck. That poor kid is gonna be a mess.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 07:34 PM
3

Aggrieved, the university-educated mother of one resolved to exact some form of "revenge or retribution". University-educated? I'd fucking love to know what her degree is. I've got a feeling I might know.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 09:09 AM
34

'Feminism will have us believe that women want to sit down and get paid huge sums of money, but not take the risks usually needed to get there'. Checks out, imo.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:41 PM
48

Since PR and advertising are basically the art of lying and manipulation, they should really be calling female dominance in this industry a form of misogyny, evident of women being hired based on a negative stereotypes about women! Also, doubly funny is the reminder that the majority of the 'sexist' marketing and advertising feminists spend so much time complaining about is probably put together by women with powerful, high-paid careers.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:40 PM
2

They basically spend half an hour telling her she's too young and stupid to decide anything for herself and that, therefore, they are right. They belittle, undermine, and deny her agency at every turn. Some amusing/interesting quotes: Dr.Phil: "Why is she so devalued that she allows herself to be used in this way?" Value? Used? My my, Dr.Phil. You're talking about her as she's an object! You're framing her decision to have sex not as her decision, but her inability to resist male decisions! Why!…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:28 PM
1

For those unware, this is the video OP is talking about. Everything you do is seems to be to attract a man, yet when a man presumes to express that attraction, you're offended to the core, and you demand that the rest of us be as well. It's the classic case of a woman expecting all men that she doesn't deem to be worthy 'material' to bow their heads and be silent in her presence. They aren't to look at her, they aren't to speak to her, they aren't to be heard speaking to another about her. They …
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:30 AM
1

I cannot believe the courts are still not done with this cunt yet. What a joke. They got through the Trayvon Martin case fast as shit, but people see a female murderer and it's 6 fucking years of umming and ahhing.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:41 AM
2

This is England. Nobody is allowed to be carrying a knife around on the streets.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:24 AM
2

No. You can't just say 'reverse the genders' every time. A man is not a woman. A man does not have breasts that produce milk. As utterly cringeworthy as it is to be breastfeeding a 13 year old, if someone wants to take 'attached parenting' that fucking far, then they can. Also, given that that appears to be some supermarket trashmag, I wouldn't be surprised if the story was complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:13 AM
3

Kitchener's straight-to-the-point, no bullshit finger doesn't bother me in the slightest, but the white feather stuff is seriously vile. Wikipedia has more than enough on it to make your blood boil; In August 1914, at the start of the First World War, Admiral Charles Fitzgerald founded the Order of the White Feather with support from the prominent author Mrs Humphrey Ward. The organization aimed to shame men into enlisting in the British Army by persuading women to present them with a white feat…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:50 AM
15

The male is pretty much automatically assumed to be the problem in all cases until hard evidence (minor wounds do not suffice) shows otherwise. This one of the worst things for male victims of domestic violence, as if the call the police, it is them who will be leaving in the back of a police car.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:26 AM
4

"France ignore 40% of domestic violence victims, ignores 75% of long term homeless people."
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:23 AM
1

Feminists absolving themselves of guilt for gawking at pictures of muscular male torsos whilst villifying men who do the same with pictures of female ones. They're just patting themselves on the back and reasoning away their cognitive dissonance. Quite pathetic.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 07:19 AM
1

when she was too tired and weak to object But still awake enough to remember. You make it sound like she was about to die.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:53 PM
1

So she decided to consciously ignore his dick for 5 minutes?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:30 AM
4

How dare he fear a situation faced by millions of men every year.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:29 PM
5

50 years ago, nobody would have given a shit. There is not an abducting, raping, murdering pedophile lurking beside every playground. There isn't one lurking beside every tenth playground, or even every hundredth. 'Stranger Danger' incidents are the rarest incidents of all. You might as well be arresting parents for putting kids into cars.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:40 PM
1

Or in this woman's case, just couldn't be bothered to answer? Now consider the pressure to 'make the first move' that is utterly heaped on to men when it comes to courting and sex.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:23 AM
1

It's like having a friend walk into your house, who sees a book on your shelf and says "Oh, I've always wanted to read that! Can I have it? Pretty please?", and then you just shrug and walk away. Aaaaand then you call the cops to report a theft the next day. Pretty much everyone would agree that this was not theft, but a misunderstanding caused by the homeowner's failure to communicate.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:26 PM
20

Un. Fucking. Believable. How am I only hearing of this now? What an absolute outrage. Worst of all is that if you swapped Fathers4Justice for any feminist group, this would be massive national news, Yalland would be in prison, and Nokes would be a disgrace, kicked out of the party and forced to resign.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:12 AM
2

'I opened it and then changed my mind'. There is literally no way to prove sex was consensual without a fucking video recording of it. If feminists had their way, that would be the only way out of a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:14 AM
3

“I’m really attracted to strong women.” Wow, thanks for making female empowerment all about what helps you get your rocks off! This is defense against the frequent accusation that men 'cant handle' or are 'afraid of' strong women, or even the whole hog, that they 'only want weak, quiet, subservient women'. What the fuck do you expect them say when they hear that all the fucking time? When talking to feminists, men are damned if they do and damned if they don't. They have to walk on eggshells at …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:05 AM
2

Saudi Sheikh's son They're untouchable even when they beat people to death in London. I don't know whose lies or court verdicts should surprise me more in this case.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:38 AM
2

There are Men's Only Clubs still in existence. Probably somewhere, but pretty much all of the ones I've known of were sued until they agreed to admit women.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:35 AM
1

Meanwhile, men-only clubs were bullied practically out of existence 20 years ago.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:33 AM
6

Hey men, risk your life for a stranger! DAE patriarchy?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:16 AM
3

I agree, there's nothing wrong this this in and of itself. I just don't see how they could possibly prove him guilty. It is literally he says/she says.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:13 AM
14

I have chipped teeth an permanent scars given to me by women. I will not 'take it' and 'be a man'.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:54 AM
6

Doubly hilarious considering that the lion has a mane, and is thus still clearly male. Removing the penis accomplished nothing other than proving a bunch of people to so petty that they are offended by the even the most simplistic depiction of male anatomy. Of a lion.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:41 PM
37

Uhhh... conflict of interest, much?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:34 PM
3

"Men are human beings, according to neuroscience"
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:58 PM
2

Good stuff from Karen, as always.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:44 PM
17

Because of the notion of female hypoagency- something feminists complain about in theory, but in practice, do absolutely everything they can to uphold.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:10 PM
2

Fucking hell. Given a sentence fit a double murderer over possession of a dried up leaf. Truly insane times we live in.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:05 PM
5

I see they had to censor that quick.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:00 PM
5

Pushing someone off that should be seen as attempted murder. Reckless endangerment at the least.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:55 PM
22

No commenting enabled on her site. What a surprise. Par for the feminist course. 1: I think we both know that 'women against feminism' is talking about feminism in the developed world. Stop being disingenuous, you don't fool me. 2: The 'centuries of violence against women' pales in comparison to the violence against men in war. This is not a matter of poor reasoning, but good job calling all those women idiots. You'd cry sexism if a man dismissed you like that. 3: I am pretty sure women don't ne…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:51 PM
1

People expect 4 year olds to be polite now? I think posting this here is quite a stretch, though.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:31 AM
5

I didn't even need to finish reading the title - pretty much everyone knows women earn far more than men in porn. What an absolute liar. Par for the feminist course, I suppose.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:27 AM
11

Good. Funny how they can give a woman a proper sentence when the crime involves the fucking president.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:19 AM
6

It happened when Gloria Steinam and the NOW decided that they'd prefer to make millions and millions of dollars selling fear and hatred than work to make the world a better place as they once intended to.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:21 PM
9

Well if that's what you want, maybe you should stop suspending them from school and sending them to psychiatrists for chewing poptarts into the shape of guns.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:18 PM
1

When will these feminists learn that you can't shame a sociopath?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:57 PM
4

You'd have almost certainly missed.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:55 PM
2

Lawyer up, win, then sue. These universities need to learn that they cannot play pretend police.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:46 PM
3

That's more or less Feminism's goal; To eliminate women's responsibilities. To provide a safety net for women no matter how much their situation is a product of their own decisions. ...And to eliminate that safety net for men, and to heap a woman's responsibilities onto him. They want to live in a world where they have all the power and freedom their grandmothers wanted, and yet none of the risk or responsibility that men must live with.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:02 PM
5

They are not raising money to open shelters for homeless or abused men. They are not starting up suicide hotlines for men. We've tried. Every time, it gets smacked down by millions and millions of dollars of massively funded feminist lobbying. Feminists ARE the establishment now, and they don't even seem to realize it.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:54 PM
1

Double unequal, given that young women make more money than young men. This is one of those things someone will look at in 50 to a hundred years time and think 'how could they possibly have thought that way?'
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:34 PM
14

Do you honestly believe a male attendant would have come up with 'I feel my safety is threatened by a man who has already walked past me and into the plane'?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:31 PM
1

"He tried to pin me down even after he was dead! That just PROVES he was supporting the patriarchy, trying to keep my Inner Goddess down!"
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:28 AM
1

BUT we all ultimately learned that "nigger" is not an acceptable word to use, and thus almost all of us stopped using it - despite our natural childish inclinations to be "naughty". I use it all the time among people I know aren't reactionary fools. To express surprise: "Awwww shit, nigger!" To congratulate: "Mah nigga." To express disbelief: "Nigga, please." And more. I use them daily. Nnnobody cares. Only on the internet do I run into people who claim they do. You seem muddled - the 20s was a …
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:20 PM
20

You should never advocate hitting a woman. TIL it's wrong to hit a woman if she is trying to kill you. You must simply wait until you are dead.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:04 PM
1

Lol what about the "n" word? What about it? I don't think it's a crazy idea to suggest that by stopping children from using gendered insults like "cock", "bitch" etc. I think it's a crazy idea to suggest that you can stop children from using the naughtiest words they know whenever parents and teachers aren't listening. For example, it's a very pervasive idea that males have a certain capacity for aggression that females simply don't have, and part of that may be down to the rationalisation of im…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:35 PM
1

I don't have that much of a desire to tell people what they can and can't say, honestly. Seems kind of, you know, totalitarian.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 08:10 PM
2

Young children learn the two slang meanings of the word dick, namely "penis" and "obnoxious or aggressive person". This reinforces a pre-existing notion that boys are less agreeable (in character) than girls. Hence the use of this word to mean an obnoxious person has a negative effect on their view of men, as it causes them to associate masculinity with obnoxious character (or at least reinforces such an association if it is already present). Now do you see why I don't like playing word police?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:46 PM
3

I can't say I've seen the word used her much at all, but regardless, context is more important than the word itself - as it should always be. When people say 'fag', or 'faggot' these days, they are rarely literally referring to homosexuals. I have literally a dozen gay friends who have outright told me I can say fag infront of them and they don't give a shit. Most of them use it themselves. 90% of the people I hear complaining about the term 'fag' are women, despite the fact that, even in the mo…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:32 PM
3

problematic Oh for fuck sake.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:26 PM
4

She deserved it, just as a man in the same position would. Feminists will, of course, paint this as "MRA's smug over hitting women".
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:25 PM
18

Sorry, but if I lose my livelihood over some lies out of someone's mouth, that someone is getting fucking sued, no matter what. I actually have to eat and keep a roof over my head.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:27 PM
1

And she'll be out in 5 or less.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:26 PM
5

That's the thing, though. No matter what angle you look at this from - whether you think her situation is fair, or whether you think should be fired and sitting in a cell until proven innocent, her treatment clearly differs from that of a male in the same position. There is blatant, female-serving sexism at play here, no matter which way you slice it.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:24 PM
3

If she was a man, she'd not only be fired, but she'd be in jail cell, and looking at 10-20 years in prison.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:21 PM
14

Unlike feminists, we don't devalue people's opinions based solely on their gender.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:18 PM
3

It sounds unbelievable because it is. This is no different to the feminist fabrications that pop up in /r/TwoXChromosomes and the like.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:17 PM
2

Assuming this story isn't a case of /r/thatHappened, you file for divorce and fight tooth and nail for custody of your son. You also make sure your son knows that she absolutely cannot make him go through with anything - no doctor will do it if he refuses to let them, simple as that. Honestly though, I find your story to be utterly incredulous and I don't believe it for a second. If you are lying for the sake of getting responses to hypothetical situation, please never do so again.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:16 PM
-13

'Tits or GTFO' is still retarded in most situations. If you're going to reveal that you're a girl, then you're trying to be an attention whore And that claim is bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 03:49 AM
9

Really disappointed with the responses to this thread - or more accurately, to the fact that they've been downvoted to hell.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:36 AM
-11

/b/ was never good.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:35 AM
4

as he approached me I could hear “mmmm girl” and “I like that,” between drooling noises and licking his lips Honestly, if that's true and not a figment of her imagination, it's pretty rude and honestly downright weird. Who does that? I certainly don't. Never have. However, the fact remains, I do indeed have the right to look at whoever is stood infront of me.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:33 AM
7

Remember when you got your insurance to pay for your condoms? Because I don't.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:19 AM
2

Female pedophiles write their child porn.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:46 PM
5

in a patriarchal society where women’s agency is circumscribed by male supremacy, how meaningful is consent? This woman is arguing that women are incapable of making decisions because most CEO's are men.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:45 PM
11

She's 23-years-old, and she has 15 previous convictions So baiscally, since she became old enough to be criminally responsible, she hasn't gone a year without getting arrested and convicted.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:42 PM
2

And we can all rest assured that absolutely none of these women will be treated like the child raping pedophiles they are.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:38 PM
3

I'd like to say a non Daily Mail version. That said, how is fucking possible that 62% of fifteen year old boys have smartphones? How an working class parents afford this? And only 57% with a father at home? Even ten years ago that sounds unthinkable!
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:52 PM
6

Someone make this kid Prime Minister.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:44 PM
1

Unless you honestly believe some fucking 'handwriting analysis' shit is legit.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:42 AM
1

Just google 'Anita Sarkeesian boyfriend' and you'll probably find a bit about him. The long and short of it is that he seems to be a longer term SJW who attended the same crooked pyramid scheme like 'teleseminar' crap she did. And before someone suggests it, no, I am not advocating doxxing. Where they live is of no interest to me.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 05:58 PM
4

minimal age to 18 Nope, not signing. 16 year olds are not children.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 05:54 AM
5

What a disgustingly biased article. I've read more reasonable pieces on fucking Jezebel for christ's sake.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:18 AM
5

Good.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:17 AM
5

No one can psychological give consent to sex under the age of 18 Not getting my signature.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 01:11 AM
1

Who do you think propagated this 'blame the male' mindset?
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:41 PM
3

And the only explanation offered as to why they think it shouldn't be acceptable? Men have the physical advantage. Well firstly, not all men. And secondly, so fucking what? Just because I'm a bit stronger than my wife, if she punches me in the fucking nose, it will still break. If she stabs me, I will still bleed to death. If she still brains me with a frying pan, I will still be lying on the floor unconscious. No man with any sense of self preservation is going to just stand there and allow a w…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:50 AM
1

I'm pretty sure her boyfriend is the one calling the shots, too, since there's little to no hint of feminist leanings in her past, then she meets him and suddenly she's a fucking crusader. In a way, he's doubly smart, because he's not the one with the well-known name and face. He's more or less still anonymous.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:38 AM
0

Feminist madness.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 09:43 AM
2

"friend"
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:39 PM
5

Seems to be yet another mountain of paper that simply assumes there is a 'rape epidemic' going on in every college campus, and that colleges with few or no investigations into rapes are dangerous places, rather than simply places where no rapes have occurred.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:48 PM
11

Except 50+ years of feminism has shown us that this simply isn't true. Women are free from their gender role, but men aren't. Men are still worthless deadbeats if they're not working full time. Barely a month goes by where one feminist site or another doesn't post an article about career women whining that there's nothing less sexy than a stay at home husband, whining that their man is more like a child that they have to feed and clothe. The end conclusion is always 'Uh.. w-we'll g-get u-used to…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:40 PM
7

If they care about their faith, they will be eager to be circumcised at 18. If not, what exactly is the issue?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:34 PM
2

Meanwhile, wealthy, middle aged white women flock to poor black countries buy sex with young black men and teenaged boys and nobody blinks an eye.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:30 PM
2

So basically, it's now illegal for teenagers to be sexually interested in one another, and of course, it is always the boy's fault.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:27 PM
1

If you think the MRM is not political, I don't know why you're even here and I have nothing more to say to you.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:08 PM
0

So what's the excuse for posting the Daily Mail version, as opposed to those other sources?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:06 PM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:05 PM
13

You should have linked the Independent instead of the Daily Mail, OP. Anyway; ‘If we are going to achieve a real-step change in tackling violence against women, we need our sons growing up as confident feminists too.’ Ah, here we go again. The mythical epidemic of violence against women. Never mind that men are five times more likely to be victims of violent crime. Feminists sweep male victims under the rug. Nobody matters to them other than women. Specifically, middle class women with college e…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:17 PM
11

He is well justified in his contempt for the Daily Mail. They are scumbags with a track record of outright frabication of news stories, they also publish mountains of sleaze, gossip and trash. They don't deserve the pageviews. Are you from outside the UK?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:12 PM
2

It's not politics, it's education. Bullshit, it's a political discussion in a university. The two months definition of 'recent' isn't mentioned in regards to politics.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:08 PM
2

I realised that man-hating feminism was all too real. My first experience of this was on Twitter Puts a smile on my face, that does. The knowledge that yes, these angry SJW bigots are, as research suggested, actively harming their own cause with their extremism. Feminism needs to die, and it needs a name. It needs to stop being about 'patriarchy', abd start being about eliminating society's institutionalized gender roles.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:46 PM
13

Yeah, because if there's anything we need, it's even more women-only services. 90% of homeless are men, but let's pump all of our resources into helping that small fraction of women!
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:41 PM
4

This means men are more likely to die on the job in any given year being employed then women are to die on the job over their entire lifetime. One year as a man is more dangerous than a lifetime as a woman. Holy shit.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:38 PM
1

Rule four of /r/todayilearned Nothing related to recent politics. Seems fair to me.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:36 PM
3

His name was on the sign, and they were unable to contact Steve Frazer, so the BBC probably doesn't know who the women even are. Stop manufacturing phoney outrage - that's what feminists do. The only question we should be asking is 'why is this news?'
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:35 PM
9

Wouldn't want men having an outlet for sexual frustration, right? No, gotta make them totally dependent on women! Porn can ruin our erections with actual women. Prove it. Porn can train our bodies to premature ejaculation. Prove it. I fail to see how anything but the opposite can be true, though. It’s such a waste of time. As opposed to watching 'The X-Factor'? Or... oh, I see. Working. Yeah, fuck you for trying to shame me for taking a break. It creates unrealistic expectations of women. I don'…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:29 PM
29

Men only: Sexist Women only: Progressive
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:13 PM
2

'maintaining their lifestyle' suddenly not as right as feminists thought it was.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:21 AM
9

Stop linking to Daily Mail. Just stop. They are sleazeballs, scumbags, cretins, even criminals. Alternate article.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:18 AM
1

I don't know who is more of an idiot. Him, or the Feminists.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:13 AM
1

Neither do I. He was there to troll and ridicule, nothing more. Fox News are he and Bill O'Reilly are both scumbags.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:12 AM
2

What do you expect? They're a bunch of neocons.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:56 AM
24

they don’t sound like angry white misogynists. They sound like they could be feminists. We would be feminists, if feminists didn't burst into outrage or roll their eyes whenever anyone suggests men are suffering in any way. We would be feminists, if feminism didn't base itself around a concept as ridiculous as 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:45 AM
2

Poor, poor men. Working longer hours than women in more strenuous and more demanding jobs, then getting no respect for it.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:42 AM
1

'The 150 Things the World's Smartest People Are Afraid Of' Men. - Helen Fisher
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:35 AM
1

Lawyer up. You are going to need it.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:32 AM
1

What? That she's afraid of men?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:40 PM
1

Her 1999 book, "THE FIRST SEX: The Natural Talents of Women and How They are Changing the World"
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:45 PM
-1

Helen Fisher is a well known misandrist.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:37 AM
6

One simply cannot teach someone a magic trick in one day that would suddenly make you capable of overwhelming a physically superior opponent. .357 hollow point
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:53 AM
154

girls have to go to a self defense course But that's victim blaming!
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:30 PM
1

She tried and failed. Soooo, where's her autobiography?
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:33 AM
34

"Teach your sons to be doormats".
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:37 AM
8

Wait... a Kindergartner was forced to sign a quasi-legal document with no legal guardian present? Sue them. Christ, when I was 11, a girl pulled her pants down all she got was a letter home. When I as 15, a boy pulled his pants down and mooned the whole class and the teacher, and all he got was an hour in detention. So glad I'm not in the system kids are growing up in now.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:26 PM
6

Oh wow, photographic evidence of some tiny fingernail-shaped scratches. Wow, that fucking proves everything, doesn't it? Look at that picture for as along as you like and try to wrap your mind around a how an attacker's fingernails could occupy those five positions, with that orientation. There's no way. It looks like it had to have been done in two separate attempts. As I again tried to pull away, he gripped tighter, leaving nail marks in my arm. How would you grab someone like that? How? The t…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:17 PM
5

That article reeks of shitthatneverhappened.txt
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:50 PM
46

Legalized slavery.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:46 PM
4

Agreed.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:40 PM
29

Swap the gender of the victim and the whole football team, and the RA, are in court.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:45 AM
17

Is Bill Clinton employed? He's retirement age, he hasn't held any official political office since his presidency. From what I can see, Bill Clinton's job since then is being Bill Clinton - that is, being paid to speak at universities, events and broadcasts. Monica could've made herself a fortune doing pretty much the same thing if she wanted to. Bill was paid $12 million in advance to write his autobiography. Monica has been largely silent for over a decade.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:41 AM
4

Every single one of us at Posthuman Studios stands in support of feminism's basic principle: treating women as people So do MRA's, you indoctrinated fool. God, every time I hear this fucking nonsense I want to scream. Guys, the dictionary says feminism is about equality, so it must be, right? Fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:24 AM
9

I knew there'd be redpill posts on the first page of your history before I even looked. Your views are repugnant and you are not, as you may believe, among your peers. This is not the redpill board.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:13 AM
1

Forgive me if I have the temerity to think that both issues are equally stupid, and equally unwelcome. I don't think it's wrong to look at what aspect of our culture might have motivated one woman to call another a slut because she was breastfeeding in public, and ask how we can go about trying to remove that aspect. I also don't think it's wrong to look at what aspect of our culture might have motivated the target of that word to cry like a baby and, and for a news site to feel the need broadca…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:08 AM
2

Bleagh. Count me out.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:50 PM
0

Why the hell would I even attempt to join such a thing? I don't need to belong to a special club of idiots.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:48 PM
0

you're a feminist masquerading as a MRA. NO U.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:45 PM
22

Who the fuck does this? Like, seriously? Who are the people who get offended by the sight of a baby sucking a tit? Do we call this a men's rights issue because it's example of one woman's minute inconvenience resulting in a “flood of tears” and being "news"? Or do we just stand with the feminists and say "Fuck these idiots"? Can we do both? It's like a whole fucking multifaceted diamond of stupidity.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:24 PM
-4

All greek letter societies should go, honestly. Exclusionary clique bullshit should end with highschool, not be amped up to ten in college.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:14 PM
5

But, but... One in four! ONE IN FOOOOOUR! </ShrillScreeching>
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:06 PM
1

The internet happened.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:04 PM
2

I suppose. I'll point out that it's not that I disbelieved the Daily Mail - even they are capable of repeating someone else's numbers. It's that I don't want to see them getting page views and ad revenue.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:02 PM
1

If he'd said that about female rape victims, that would have been the instant end of his career.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:44 PM
2

I agree. I'm truly fucking saddened to see someone defending them here, and I hope, hope they're not from the UK. If they're from the US, I can understand how they might not be aware of the Daily Mail's long and sordid history of just being the worst kind of 'journalism' there is.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:42 PM
3

No, but it invalidates the claim that I'm criticizing the content.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:37 PM
2

If you're criticising something That something is the study. You implied I was criticizing the study purely because it was posted by the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:36 PM
6

This. They've tried to lump us with racists. They've tried to lump us with homophobes. They've tried to lump us with anti-abortionists. Now because of Elliot Rodger, they try to lump us with the Red Pill. There's a reason that despite being titled 'The Anatomy of a Men's Rights Activist' this article links to /r/TheRedPill and /r/PussyPass, but not /r/MensRights, and that reason is simple - they know that their lies will be seen through if people see what we are actually talking about. Why else …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:21 PM
6

Oh look, another article about MRA's that talks entirely about PUA and The Red Pill. I'm fucking married, not 'friend zoned'. I care about my legal rights as a man and the education prospects of any future son I might have, not the college dating game.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:09 PM
1

If you're criticising something for the source Where did I criticize the study? All I said was post a different site's article on it, or the study itself, because Daily Mail don't deserve the clicks. There are already 2 other articles on this exact same study posted on this sub, and neither of them are from the Daily Mail. That's not 'falling for feminist propaganda', that's avoiding a shitty, sleazy, scumbag tabloid.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:06 PM
2

No, they get criticized because they post garbage celebrity gossip, hack into the phones abducted, murdered children, post fearmongering bullshit, and generally seek to profit from controversy to the point that they will outright invent things if they can't find anything new.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:04 PM
2

This is stupid. You've fell for feminist propaganda. No they're not, and no, I have not fallen for anything. The Daily Mail pretty much never do original journalism unless it involves stalking celebrities. A quick google search turns up multiple articles on the same study, including the actual study itself. The Daily Mail are scumbags. Post an alternative source, it's easy.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:48 AM
14

Daily Mail STOP IIIIIT. Stop giving these fucking fiends clicks!
/r/MensRights25/06/14 11:54 PM
5

Sue that university into the ground. 10 year ban? "That'll be my tuition fees, plus 6 years of the salary my degree could have gotten me. Plus legal expenses. Plus mental anguish. Plus damaged reputation. I'll see you in a real court."
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:58 PM
3

northwest UK. Alcohol and sport related violence? In a working class area? What a surprise! Given the sample size, on a single day, a 40% increase could be a single extra incident.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:35 PM
9

Here's their cited source I find this setence; Second, a tournament trend was apparent, as reported domestic abuse incidents increased in frequency with each new tournament. , and its lack of any numbers, rather interesting. What numbers are they trying to hide? I'm going to call bullshit. Men don't beat women 'when their sports team loses', they beat women when they're drunk. I wonder how the statistics for pub violence are on these days? I bet they're the fucking same. This is an alcohol probl…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:33 PM
7

he had always seemed like a decoration that went along with the room Oof. I know that feeling. When I was growing up in my home city, there was a homeless guy who was always sitting in the same spot near the bus station on a purple rug, with an upturned hat infront of him to accept any coins people tossed his way. He was always there - he really did seem like part of the scenery, such a constant that he was all too easy to ignore, simply because you knew he'd be there. I guess it was a good spot…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:21 PM
1

She argues that surrogacy has become a baby-buying operation that allows wealthy couples to exploit vulnerable women, often those of lesser means. So, just like any other job, then? How is it worse than being a wage slave at Wal-Mart? Just because it's less common?
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:02 PM
1

Rekt.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:45 PM
1

Sad but true.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:42 PM
1

It involves the penalization of harmless play, of a form typically enjoyed by boys.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:41 PM
5

Is anyone surprised? Men are at women's mercy if she decides to be violent. Any attempt to defend himself will see him cast as the aggressor, and he will wind up either in prison, or she will strip him of all he owns in divorce court. Women are more likely to use violence because they know they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:34 PM
4

I didn't do anything to counter because society. If you had called the cops, they would have arrested you.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:32 PM
10

Futrelle is a political idiot who swings from one extreme to another. His words are hyperbolic idealogue pap, no matter what he's arguing for.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:23 AM
1

He's the fucking pope, what do you expect him to say?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:17 AM
4

Her lenient treatment also sends a message to all women, that they can assault men with complete impunity - that they can hit men, but can never be hit back. Every woman already knows this fact by the time they're through middle school.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:14 PM
1

Yes. It's pretty obvious.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:05 PM
2

They need whoever is paying the bills more than anyone else, regardless of that person's gender.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:13 AM
2

complications deaths
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:11 AM
2

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:03 PM
6

It is both a /r/gayrights and /r/mensrights issue. Gay men are men, and ontop of that, men who have it even worse than straight men.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:59 PM
12

Pretty damning statistics indeed. I don't think I could have wished for clearer evidence of what complete and utter bullshit the current policies for dealing with sexual assault on campus are. It should be a police matter, simple as that.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:55 PM
7

Now that definitely wouldn't be be made.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:24 PM
11

There is a room, and it is filled with 1000 baby boys, and then someone pushes a button, and they empty the room and fetch another thousand baby boys. 2 of those boys will develop an infection or other complication that may pose a risk to their genital function, or in extreme circumstances, their life. Having your son placed in the room is voluntary. Are you going to place your son in the room? There are around 117 deaths caused by circumcision every year. In contrast, there are 44 caused by suf…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:16 PM
11

"If one of gets a drunk, we might start raping!" "Don't worry bros, I'll stay sober and help keep your inner rapists sealed away!" Yeah, that's pretty much what this image says - men turn into rapists when drunk. Can you imagine a female version of this? "I'll stay sober and make sure you don't fling yourself at men who take advantage of your drunkenness." "Good idea, if we all got drunk, we might get raped!" That female version would never be made.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:59 PM
5

Men are responsible for knowing when a woman wants sex, and when it's just alcohol talking. Women are not responsible. Explain to me, feminists, how you expect men to respect women as equals if you insist that they treat them like children who are incapable of making decisions or dealing with consequences?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:48 PM
4

Honestly I don't know any man can even dare to work with young kids. One word from a kid, parent or onlooker and you will be under instant and intense scrutiny.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:43 PM
6

he responded to an anonymous tweet claiming he had kissed a young gym teacher at Rogers High School. Subpoena twitter, find out who made that tweet. I fucking guarantee it's same person who reported it. This kid has been set up. ...And if he'd been female, it would never have fucking worked. He probably won't get a penny, but I really, really hope he walks out of that courthouse with 5 figures.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:37 PM
-4

Find me the single dad who does this. Find me the single dad who killed his kid for attention and sympathy. Because I've never heard of such a case. How many are there?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:31 PM
8

No they're not. They can get into college with lower grades and less money. That's pretty much the only thing they have going for them, and it arguably doesn't help them because employers look at black people with degrees and think 'pfft, he's only got it so that they could fill a quota'.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 12:28 PM
10

only eight percent Only? Only!? That's almost 1 in fucking ten! You want to ruin one innocent guy's life for every 10 cases!?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:58 AM
4

Statistically both boys and girls perform better at single sex schools. No idea what effect it has on their social skills with the opposite sex, though.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:54 AM
3

Growing up England, I saw boys pulled aside for violating the dress code far more often than I saw girls pulled aside. Aside form that, the premise of this argument is bullshit. You're not telling a girl that boys are more entitled to an education at all, you're telling a girl that boys are entitled to an environment free of distractions, just as she is. You don't see guys walking into class shirtless, do you?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 09:52 AM
0

I wonder if she was a tumblr feminist?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:14 AM
29

Because we all know how privleged black males are, right? Fuck feminists.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:08 AM
6

because boys are likely the more frequent perpetrators I'm sure they are, but why exactly is shooting a classmate with a finger gun grounds for explusion? This is two kids playing! When I was 7, my friends and I were running around a playground pretending to shoot eachother almost every single day!
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:11 AM
38

We've had a problem at this school. The boys have gone around fake shooting and making paper guns at class. That is not a 'problem', and it is not at 'this school'. That is boys playing cops and robbers, cowboys and indians, soldiers. There is nary a boy in the world who does not play these games. You are absolutely right, OP. This is feminist nanny-state nonsense deliberately designed to crush these boys' spirits, to turn them into quiet, subservient, shut-up-and-listen types.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:07 AM
3

Nope, Ohio age of consent is 16.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:03 AM
24

I don't see any problem. He's not a minor. 15 days in jail is a pretty pointless sentence, but she still has a year of probation and has to register as a sex offender, and has no doubt lost her job over this and every potential employer is going to see 'sex offender' on her background check. I think the real issue is this: Marion County Prosecutor Brent Yager says regardless of the victim's wishes, the offense deserved a felony charge. “Would this be different if this was a male coach and a fema…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:57 PM
5

17 is not a minor in the eyes of any rational person.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:47 PM
7

The youtube monologue about the men on the Costa Concordia was good. Also loved Alison Tieman's "The Princess And The Plow Horse".
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:44 AM
3

And so another government bows before religious groups in fear. Fucking disgrace.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:16 AM
1

Society must acknowledge male victims and stop seeing us as utility appliances instead of people - nothing will improve before this happens. Reproductive rights, aka financial abortion Divorce court/system bias
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:52 AM
11

Maybe some symbolic form of censorship, but there is no way that in this day and age she can gather every single copy and erase it from existence, which was what the older book burnings were all about. Such complete censorship hasn't been possible for a long, long time. It was next to impossible even centuries ago. Do you think the American christians burning copies of Harry Potter honestly thought they could burn every copy in the world? Of course not, but their burnings conveyed that that was …
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:29 AM
8

This guy knows bullshit when he sees it. The world needs more people like him.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:48 AM
11

It's the same smirk girls gave you in school when they kicked you in the shins, and then you got detention for it.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:19 AM
8

Agreed. It is virtually always a tool of the wicked and oppressive.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:17 AM
53

Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings. - Heinrich Heine Censorship, censorship, censorship. They know that they must suppress this writing, because they know that their own claims cannot stand up to it. History has shown it time and time again - those who feel so threatened by words that they must burn them, are those who are wrong. Censoring ideas is a weapon of last resort. I have a special hatred for people who burn books, no matter their content. I don't care if…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:14 AM
3

I suppose 'The View' is 'A bunch of Celebrities in a room, hating men'?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:52 PM
5

I've seen countless men and women well into their 40's who still strike me as immature children, so honestly, I find arguments about who 'matures' first to be stupid.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:22 PM
5

Feminist Biology I'm not sure which is greater - my urge to laugh at the notion of 'feminist biology', or my urge to cry. “We aren’t doing science well if we ignore the ideas and research of people who aren’t male, white, straight, or rich,” YOU. LYING. CUNT. Women are already the majority of biology degree holders. Hoff Sommers is exactly right when she says “this new program is not about getting more women into the field. It’s about promoting women with the right worldview.” Furthermore, scien…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:46 AM
3

Unlike feminists, we don't need to lock our councferences down and forbid recording. We don't need to, because we know what's said at them isn't just unending, easily debunked lies. This isn't an echo chamber in the guise of a 'safe space'.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:20 AM
1

McCarthy wrote that he was gifted, a 'crystal child', and she an 'indigo mom'. Translation: She's a new age whackjob. Autism researcher Mitzi Waltz states that there may be inherent dangers to these beliefs, leading parents to deny the existence of impairments, avoid proven treatments and spend considerable money on unhelpful interventions. Waltz states that "Parents may also transmit belief systems to the child that are self-aggrandizing, confusing, or potentially frightening". Heh. McCarthy tr…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:11 AM
1

She was so ridiculously defensive. Like every comment on how important fathers are was some kind of personal fucking attack attack against her.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:04 AM
1

I sure as shit wouldn't want an Anti-vaxxer nutjob for my mother.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:03 AM
3

Dat Hitchslap at the end.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:48 AM
35

Equality is essential but so is chivalry Oh boy, with a headline like that, you know whe're in for some entitled princess bullshit. She starts of reasonably enough - I don't think most people have an issue with giving up seats for pregnant women and the elderly, or people with physical disabilities, or people with infants. Of course, some have had a harrowing experience with an angry feminist who’s growled at them for what they consider an act of “benevolent sexism”, but that’s not much of an ex…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:37 AM
3

What's even better is the the sentence that immediately follows that; This must of course be without prejudice to a fair and impartial investigation Do tell me, feminists, how it is possible to 'start from a position of believing women' and then be 'without prejudice' and mount an 'impartial investigation'. It isn't. You can't fucking do that. You can't start out believing anyone. That is not how shit works. How many fucking times does this need to be said?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:35 AM
3

Pretty funny, given that most shoplifters are female.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:28 AM
2

Do it, kid.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:10 AM
10

How in the world are female MRAs a thing? Well, firstly, some women actually have men in their lives who they love and care about. I know, shocking, right? Turns out if you're not a bitter feminist, you actually care about the rights of your father, brother, son, husband, etc. Secondly, feminists do more than anyone else to drive women here. The kind of outright falsehoods that are spread about us tempt women to see for themselves what we're about, and many of them quickly see the complete disco…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:19 AM
2

in which users share examples or stories of misogyny and violence against women. Or just outright bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 01:46 AM
-1

Daily Mail I think I trust them even less than I trust Delhi's courts. Honestly, nobody should link to the daily mail, ever. They don't deserve the clicks. This is what an irredeemable piece of shit the Daily Mail is. Watch it. Watch it all.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:44 PM
2

If this is real, it is unbelievably sad, and utterly astounding that your own father would think that way (or cave to others who think that way). I don't know what to tell you, other than to avoid these toxic people. Perhaps you should take it up with the asinine mothers, if you suspect your father isn't acting alone.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:41 PM
5

Yeah, who gives a fuck about the dad she won't let within 200 yards of her kids.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:36 PM
10

Her husband, a bright history major, became profoundly depressed shortly after the birth of their only child, son Louis Augustus 20 years ago. Mr Scollay was on anti-depressant medication, the methadone programme, barely left their house suffering undiagnosed agoraphobia, and was essentially bedridden with scabies - his only release the smoking of cannabis. Seriously depressed and bed-ridden, likely a financial burden. Either they couldn't bare to see him suffering, or they just fucking hated pa…
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 10:34 PM
13

It's clear they wanted him gone, that much is for sure.
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 10:32 PM
24

Smells like jury nullification to me. There's no way they weren't fully aware that she absolutely intended to kill him. Both families were relieved at the verdict. Translation: Both families wanted him dead. Mr Scollay was on anti-depressant medication, the methadone programme, barely left their house suffering undiagnosed agoraphobia, and was essentially bedridden with scabies - his only release the smoking of cannabis. His wife's family encouraged Lulu' to leave her belovedGuido' and "get her …
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 10:30 PM
9

Obviously they perceive it as a threat threat to their revenue.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:13 PM
20

'If I was to have a male child I would circumcise him' I would alter my child's genitals without giving him any say in the matter. My opinions are more important than his rights.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:12 PM
-1

I think a 30 year sentence for such a thing is ludicrous, honestly. Lighter sentences are handed down for murder. A 14-15 year old is not a kid. They have sexual thoughts and fantasies, and they can make decisions. In statutory cases like this, I think they should nail the adult with restraining orders, house arrest or prison depending on the victim's current views, until the kid is 18. Once they're an adult they can decide how they felt or now feel about it, and then they can proceed to debate …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:55 PM
11

A discussion about classism, cronyism and nepotism? No, Amy Weiss-Meyer thinks it should be about feminism. NBC are 'balancing the scale' by giving a Clinton girl $600k! They're not just buying ties to one of the most powerful political families in the country, noooo! None of that matters! All that matters is that there's a woman in a high place now! Who cares how dizzyingly tall her tower of privilege was? All that matters is that she's a woman, and if anyone complains about it? Well, they're j…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:41 PM
1

Let's not turn this place into shit about dating, please. That some woman has yet to figure out city guys in tech jobs don't think like cute hunky farmboys is irrelevant to us.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:31 PM
4

I find the left vs right argument pointless, because an MRA has no horse in the electoral race. If you vote right, you vote for theocratic imbeciles who are against gay marriage, against abortion, think vows of abstinence qualify as sexual education, and want a healthcare system that only the rich can afford. They want traditional gender roles, they want you signing up for the draft, they want you to pay for your wife, and chances are, they'll still view a woman's health and well being as more i…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 09:08 PM
1

There's no need to speak to him like that, though. You can tell a man he's a fool without having to try and humiliate him.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:46 PM
13

N.O.W. was caught between supporting equality versus jeopardizing its base. It chose to not jeopardize its base. Gloria and Betty, while not changing their position rhetorically, looked the other way as NOW intensified its efforts to portray men either as deadbeats or self-interested (“they just want the money”) or prone to domestic violence. Karen was the only other leading feminist who not only spoke differently, but agreed to speak at fathers’ conferences. Karen’s courage marginalized her fro…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:44 PM
2

I see no myths being busted here. All I see is a spewing of the same feminist lies I've heard repeated over and over again throughout my entire life. Alison Saunders, has warned that judges should offer guidance to jurors early on in court proceedings. Translation: Alison saunders wants Judges to feed feminist lies to jurors. Disgusting. Vile. A grotesque affront to the concept of justice. This should be intolerable in any western democracy. But apparently, it is not.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:16 PM
1

Leave the kid alone, he's obviously scared and clueless.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:07 PM
1

There is none. Sign up. You have no choice, and until there actually is a draft, you have nothing to worry about. There hasn't been a draft since Vietnam, and honestly, there's unlikely to be another any time soon. Worry about the draft if it comes - then you either flee the country, pretend to flee the country, shoot yourself in the foot, or make sure you're too unhealthy to be a worthwhile soldier; A few hundred cheeseburgers and diet pepsis should do the trick. You're right to want selective …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:03 PM
1

She's definitely a woman, but I'd still suck a cock.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:16 AM
2

Males are more likely to die than girls at literally any point in their lives.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:48 AM
3

Was it? Well, shit. I never thought something good would come out of /pol/
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:36 AM
6

Doubletree, do yourself a favor and cancel the Men’s Rights Conference. If not, we will shut it down for you, with all the attendant negative publicity you will receive for sponsoring a conference for men who advocate beating, raping and murdering women TIL I advocate beating, raping and murdering women. Can we start taking these people to court for defamation?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:58 PM
2

While again, no man would ever be given this asylum Not necessarily. What she did is perfectly legal in Canada, so there's no legal grounds for them to have declined her. 30 years is a ridiculous amount of time for this. I agree. She could have gotten a lighter sentence for murder.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:55 PM
1

Personally I'd just take a hula hoop to burning man.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:39 PM
34

Oh god this is cringeworthy. less pay for the same job Nope. participating in the movement of villainizing women will only lead to a vagina-free life Which movement is this? You really think I 'villainize' women? Bad news, bud; I'm married. I did not have it easy in highschool, which I'm betting you can guess based on my physical appearance in my 30's You got that right, but the words coming out of your mouth are a far bigger clue than anything else. Good lord. something something meth and guns …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:33 PM
2

I'm not saying that it's not possible the guy raped her. But 'maybe he did it' is not 'he did it'. Crimes are supposed to be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and this incident has heaps of doubt both preceding and following it. The only suggestion that he raped her is that she claimed not recall the vaginal sex that occurred after oral. She could have lied save face, she could have forgotten it afterwards as more of the alcohol she'd consumed filtered into her blood. On top of this, they were lik…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:09 PM
3

Absolutely fine by me. Have fun reproducing with culturally neutered male feminists.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:46 PM
1

Sorry if I think it's a bad idea put oneself in a demonstrably hostile environment without acting accordingly.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:44 PM
5

Being scared is one thing, but after asking him about condoms, after texting a friend that she was going to have sex with him, after telling people she had not been raped? After all this, we're to look at this this case and think 'yep, rape'?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:17 AM
10

He is indeed.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:09 AM
19

Not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, it's hilarious to watch shit swing back and bite them in the ass for pandering to feminists, but on the other hand... I'm of the opinion that this guy is not fit enough for the job. The tone of this seems to imply that the male standard is too high, but that's not the problem. The problem is that the female standard is too low.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:24 AM
11

Seriously. If you want to perv on bikini-clad beach goers, you'd take a camera and a telephoto lens and sit 200 yards away on an overlooking cliff.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:18 AM
31

Sexual harassment by drones a growing concern No. No it isn't. That is literally the least efficient way to sexually harass someone I can think of.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:12 AM
2

Go for it, buddy.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:32 PM
-2

I only suggest it is a precaution until this madness blows over.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:30 PM
1

Would I feel this way if I was a guy? I don’t know, but I probably wouldn’t have gotten that rape comment, either. Someone is in need of a reality check
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:20 PM
1

It's a lot like being murdered in a virtual world. It is of zero relevance to anything or anyone with an ounce of common sense
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:35 PM
9

This is akin to someone going around telling people to not get in an automobile because car crashes happen. I'd say it's more akin to telling someone not get into a car with a drunk driver. You're going to wake up 20 years from now and realize you ruined your life, not by hanging out with girls but, because you we're too scared to live life. I've been married for 5 years.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:24 PM
11

The question is the what sociology professors and title IX officers gain. The answer is power and job security.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:17 PM
2

If she'd gone straight to the cops in the morning, they could have tested her for date rape drugs. That would pretty much prove he had sex with her while was was unconcious. Not sure why this post has to do with men's rights, though.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:14 PM
70

“Your guess is as good as mine. I think it’s a legal issue. Like any legal issue, that goes to court.” Not. Fucking. Good enough. This woman is either a moron, or cast iron bitch with a malicious, hate-filled agenda.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:05 PM
6

She is a straight up SRS material. Her tweets read like those of literally any other mindless SJW bigot.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:57 PM
73

Yep. It's the classic feminist problem where heterosexual sex can be almost always be construed as rape .
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:07 AM
315

That's not even the worst part. Page 5/6: Ms. Jane Doe initially denied that she had been raped or sexually assaulted and did not want to make a formal complaint (Exh. 4, pages 46, 53), but eventually relented a week later because she was told that 90% of rapes are done by repeat offenders and Asst. Professor Dirks told her that "[John Doe] fits the profile of other rapists on campus in that he had a high GPA in high schoole, was his class valedictorian, was on [a sports] team, and was 'from a g…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:27 AM
2

Literally none of them are.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:21 AM
4

The school system is virulently anti male.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:19 AM
1

Absolutely grotesque. The message is literally 'we would rather you fuck off and die of exposure than make our building look ugly'. I almost hope someone falls on them and sues them into the fucking ground.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:58 AM
1

guys aren't dying from steroid use Seriously? The fucking poster boy for this decade's male fitness zeitgeist is Aziz "Zyzz" Shavershian. This guy inspired more young men to take up bodybuilding than any other guy since Schwarzenegger. And he fucking died of a heart attack at 22.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:54 AM
1

I see absolutely no legitimate reason to preserve a lifestye of such grandure. If I were given 16k a month for even 5 years, I would never. Child support settlements like this actively support manipulation and gold-digging, and encourage divorce for profit. Nobody should be paying child support on this level, no matter how rich they are.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:49 AM
3

While it's true that women more often get custody, it's far more complicated than a systematic bias that turns dads into the real victims of custody battles (as opposed to, you know, the children). Someone please think of the children! Code for 'give them to mom'. Not only did women not create these roles, they are precisely what feminists want to dismantle. (As one TIME reporter succinctly puts it, "Let's end the Mommy fetish.") LIE. BLATANT FUCKING LIE. 50 years ago, MEN usually won custody of…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:38 AM
1

Swap the genders. That dude would be a bloody pulp within a minute.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:30 AM
2

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” ― Voltaire
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:24 AM
2

Who knew that American college students are required to surrender the Bill of Rights at the campus gates? Everyone. Everyone knew that. Everyone except a middle-aged feminist who's been asleep at the wheel for 20+ years, blindly supporting whatever piece of moronic, bigoted shit her old buddies have proposed. Finally takes notice when it affects her.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:21 AM
5

It's silencing. Nothing more than 'Shut up until you agree with feminist theory' with an added sting of 'You should be ashamed of yourself for being male'.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:12 AM
2

That's what it's all about. They want MORE rape victims. More rape victims means more money and more power for leading feminists. That's all it is. A power play lead a by a few old gender studies PhD's with nothing else to aim for other than more, more, more.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:06 AM
1

Amazon Feminism is now patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:04 AM
5

As if all of Europe is the 100 mile square of Belgium.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:02 AM
2

The sad thing is, I have heard this disgusting argument more than once. A man's life and future are less important than him checking his privilege in a prison cell.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:59 AM
6

90% of rapes are never reported; I would wager that many, maybe even most of those rapes, aren't considered rape even by the woman it happened to. Some women won't report because they don't want trouble and stress of court. Some women won't report because they don't view drunk sex as rape. up to 45% are no-crimed; So... up to 45% of rape claims are potentially outright fabrications? the conviction rate for reported rape is 6.5 % Well you've just said that almost half of them are determined not t…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:48 AM
7

Oh god, we're pedophiles afterall!
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:36 AM
35

Slitting a cop's throat on camera... Acquitted. ...what? Is there anyone in the world, other than a white woman, who could possibly fucking get away with this? There's no fucking way any man would get away with it. ...Well, not without having 50 million in assets, anyway.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:29 AM
22

and her utter dependence on her then-husband 'A man made me do it!' Female hypoagency.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:25 AM
0

A badass injury and some surgery, looks like.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:59 PM
4

she claimed I was taking close ups of people in bikinis Because if RC copters are good for anything, it's taking close ups. Oh, wait.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:19 PM
-2

Right, because academics in Europe are slaves. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:20 PM
2

But thats still a privilege. If they display an aptitude, sure. But thats still a privilege. That's like saying the ability to walk is a privilege, not a right, and everyone should be in a wheelchair unless they pay the walking tax.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:18 PM
16

higher education isn't a right. It is a privilege. I vehemently disagree. All people able to demonstrate the aptitude for learning should be able to attend college, without any limitation based on their financial situation. That is something that should be a right in a developed country, not a privilege.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:20 AM
5

Seriously. The same stuff is in countless TV channels, comic books, movies.... Why the hell wouldn't a kid draw someone they knew holding a gun?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:16 AM
3

This is a horrifically stupid idea.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:38 AM
2

On a personal note - they did this over fucking slenderman? That would actually be hilarious if it wasn't so sad. On the bright side, their victim has survived.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:46 PM
52

We had every concern, based on this information that children were in danger. A kid draws her dad with a gun, says he kills 'bad guys and monsters'. Yeah, fucking concrete evidence he's a criminal right there, huh? Christ, she probably watched him playing Call of Duty or something.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:39 PM
3

Before I even clicked the link, I knew it was going to be an article about the the red pill. ...But I thought maybe they'd at least find something that was actually part of the MRM to complain about. ...Buuuut no. Apparently even that was giving them too much credit. Literally every single thing is about the dating and pop-psychology claptrap of TRP. PROTIP, to anyone outside the MRM who may be reading this; We do not give a shit about dating advice, or any concept of 'alpha', 'beta' or 'omega' …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:34 PM
43

Why could we not expel a student based on an allegation Why could we not burn a witch based on an allegation? before noting that while 2 to 8 percent of accusations are unfounded (but not necessarily intentionally false) Yeah, who gives a shit about ruining the lives and future prospects of innocent men? It seems to me that we value fair and equitable processes more than we value the safety of our students. AS WE FUCKING SHOULD, YOU UTTER FUCKING MORON. Shit, we want to keep the population safe,…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:19 PM
10

I hope they get sued into the ground by all the guys they've thrown out with their rigged kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:45 PM
1

You have no idea how to write a headline, do you?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:07 AM
9

Doesn't she know some upper-middle class white women said it had to be stopped? She should know her place by now. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:26 PM
1

Canceling it is a victory because that would be done quietly. I'm sure we could still get it to the frontpage.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:29 PM
2

The concepts of "alpha" and "beta" Literally zero to do with the MRM. It's redpill/pua crap, which is about dating, and has nothing to with people's legal rights. Honestly, I don't know what to tell you because I've honestly never encountered that brand of feminist anywhere other than on the internet.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:33 AM
20

If they get it cancelled, the world sees them censoring. If they cause trouble outside it, pull a fire alarm, or cause violence, the world sees them censoring. If they let it go through, ideas are disseminated, information is spread. There is no possible victory for them in this.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:13 AM
2

It's probably an automated ban, OP. Contact twitter.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:11 AM
8

redditor for 11 hours could you be more cowardly? God forbid narrow minded people have their biases pointed out to them, right?
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:09 AM
-2

Please find a different subreddit to poison with your bigotry.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:39 AM
1

You'd think we were the fucking KKK or something.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:18 AM
1

Unless there is drastic change, there will be huge problems in the coming decades. As the baby-boomers retire and die off, there's a whole generation of 30 and and 40 year old men with no meaningful work experience will be forced to look for work. It will be a huge mess.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:53 PM
3

if a senior basketball player ever had consensual sex with a freshman non-athlete, he could be convicted of rape, given their perceived power differentials. TIL being good at basketball makes you a rapist by default.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:16 PM
5

They're just mooching off their compartively wealthy baby-boomer parents. They're not looking for jobs because they don't see an increase in the quality of their life for doing so. When my father was my age, a job straight out of college was enough for him to rent a respectable home, support a non-working wife, and raise two kids. Now, an average job out out college barely covers the rent of a rat-hole and the food for a single person. Every person I know who is my approximate age, who has moved…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:13 PM
3

Oh look, another one of those cases feminists insist don't happen. The man said that he filmed himself having sex with the mother using a security camera and kept the footage because she was threatening him. That tape is probably the only thing that kept him out of jail.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:00 PM
16

Oh no, a tech company hires the most educated engineers it can find. Racism! Fucking 30% asian. Is 30% of the US population asian? No? Then shut the fuck up. Google isn't being racist, they're hiring whoever they can get.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:45 PM
5

Maybe you belong in /r/TheRedPill I'd rather have two mothers or two fathers than a single parent.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:42 PM
31

I am seeing more and more feminists growing annoyed with the movement and finding their way here. Welcome. As to why feminists invalidate men? Victimhood is one of the cornerstones of modern day feminism, and there is, and more or less always has been a massive refusal in society to see men as victims. I don't know whether this is out of simply not caring about men, or some deeper sort of tribal ego-defense mechanism where we refuse to acknowledge male vulnerability because it frightens us to th…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:16 AM
4

A woman talking about double standards. Cute. We'll see how far down a street I get wearing daisy dukes before I get my teeth knocked out, shall we? And I'm sure I wouldn't be allowed to set foot in a university hallway.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:57 AM
4

Feminism stopped being about equality the moment it started being about upper-middle-class white women selling books and blogs. Selling books full fear-mongering that tell women rape and abuse lurk around every corner, that it will happen to them, and there's nothing they can do about it other than buy more books and give more pageviews. Over time, the MRM will probably mutate into the same sad thing, but I hope that the MRM is no longer needed by the time that happens. I hope that feminists sto…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:54 AM
36

I am pretty sure I have been taught not to poison people. Like, I am pretty sure I knew this was bad thing before I was even ten years old.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:39 AM
6

MRA is movement against women Oh look, it's this bullshit again.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:50 PM
0

Unprovable and unfalsifiable claim. Not worth the pixels its displayed on.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:18 AM
1

The true Alpha Male. What those who call themselves the Mens Rights Movement aspire to be. lolwut Fucking hilarious. If he wasn't directing his hate specifically at women, they would correctly be saying he was crazy, he was depressed, that he needed mental health care. Buuut if your depression causes you to lash out against women, suddenly these people throw all the mental health stuff out of the window. Suddenly this guy is sane, and as such, pure evil. An amazing about-face.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:24 PM
24

I assume you just conveniently can't hear us when we demand helplines and shelters for male victims of abuse?
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:10 PM
2

Quote the relevant text. I don't have time to read the whole paper.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:35 PM
5

You tell people the truth. You don't act like a feminist and make up lies.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:16 PM
1

20% felt sexually taken advantage of by their female partners. 'Felt taken advantage of' is not the same as 'raped'. A guy could check the 'I felt sexually taken advantage of' box because his girlfriend cheated on him. It's not an indication of rape, and any academic who uses it as one is setting out deliberately to try and present evidence that helps further their political agenda. This is the exact same crap feminists pull, and we must not let it fly with us as as they do, or we will become ju…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:07 PM
3

It's just a ridiculously, unbelievably high number. It doesn't even begin to match up to my life experience. If it were should know personally at least a dozen men who've been raped, but I don't know any. Of course, some would say 'duh, they just haven't told you about it', but highly doubt that. This 1 in 6 claim is born from the same disingenuous data collecting as the 1 in 4 claim - in which 'I had sex that I later regretted' is counted as rape.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:11 PM
4

I agree. This is the same kind of bullshit statistics that feminists lie through their teeth about. We should not support the dissemination of bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:30 PM
0

1 in 6 male college students reported having been raped. '1 in 4 women' is bullshit and so is this. Nobody should be parroting such a garbage claim.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:28 PM
2

Kindasortanotreallybutyeah. It's not great.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:14 AM
4

Knew which video this would be as soon as I saw the title. It really is amazing how quickly she's able to turn those crocodile tears on and off as and when it suits her. Whenever she wants to play the victim? Bam, they're on! That's not working? Bam, they're off!
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:10 AM
5

While I' struggle to believe a male would have been allowed in, I view that as unfair cruelty to men rather than this being a giving a woman a free ride. She has not broken any Canadian law and I believe a 16 year old is able to make a decision on whether or not he wants to have sex. 30 years in prison for sex with a 16 year old is excessive. She was not in a position of authority over him, and 16 is old enough to make a decision.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:53 AM
2

do we seriously think that a female teacher sleeping with a male pupil is on a par with a male teacher sleeping with a girl pupil? I don't. And neither, I'd wager, would most 15-year-old boys. Swap the genders, receive feminist outrage. Where is feminist outrage about this article? Where is it? Where is the reblogged, rewtweeted shitstorm? The silence is deafening.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:07 AM
6

It really is disturbing that women need to be told that men feel fear.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:01 AM
11

Men and boys are socially instructed to not listen to us. As a generation of schoolkids grows up without seeing a male teacher until they reach college. Pure feminist dogma. Pure fabrication.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 05:59 AM
0

Search online, public records. If that fails, try hiring a PI.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:40 PM
1

the gender segregation was justified to accommodate younger, smaller candidates. Small women's feelings > heavy people's lives
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:34 PM
-1

Anything to back up the idea that that's how it went down? Anything at all? Feudalism. Conscription. Prohibition of women's education. Expectation that males pay for their families.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:42 PM
1

It's like the difference between driving drunk through a well populated area and intentionally mowing down pedestrians. Both of those things can still land you in jail.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:40 PM
2

Tell that to the growing list of men getting thrown out of college and denied their futures by kangaroo courts where men are assumed guilty.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:36 PM
2

Male privilege
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:20 AM
1

And if police were familiar with guy who matched her description who was known for other crimes? A petty thief, perhaps? A local drunkard who sobers up in a cell every weekend? How far would she have let her lie go on? Obviously, we'll never know, but the fact remains that she her actions negatively impact real rape victims, and have wasted police time and taxpayer money.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:19 AM
3

Yep, this is what the fearmongering is all about. Fear is the best tool there is for controlling people. If people are afraid, you barely have to lift a finger. It is absolutely in feminism's interest that women believe rape lurks around every corner. The notorious 1 in 4 women are raped statistic is a feminist wet dream - that's why they invented it! To empower themselves by scaring the shit out of women.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:08 AM
2

"Imleavin77" Yeah, k. You're totally not a feminist on a throwaway pretending to be some guy on the cusp of 'seeing the light'. massive internal debate How on earth is this a bad thing? downplaying rape ...What? Rape is horrible. Who the fuck is downplaying rape? and many other sketchy things Such as...? I'm not planning on using this account again Gee, what a surprise.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:05 AM
2

Once again, men dealt with more harshly than women.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:30 AM
3

Sample size of nine. Of his employees I'm sure he has many more customers. Silly article trying to pander to female victimry. Not really. The tl;dr of the article is this: 'Women are better at search marketing, and women are bigger misogynists than men'.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:28 AM
8

Don't have sex in college. Don't lay a fucking hand on a woman in college. Just don't fucking do it. Ever. No matter how much consent you get. Because all it takes is her word and you are in deep shit. Stay. Away. You cannot risk anything in this ridiculous feminist culture.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:16 AM
3

the wife was the husband's property She was also his responsibility - a mentality that persists even today.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:13 AM
0

Society just kinda fell into place like that because it was more efficient for societies to do so, because societies that didn't operate like that where out-competed by the ones that did. 'Out-competed', yeah. That's a nice euphamism for conquered and culturally wiped out by the superior military capabilities of states whose ruling elite forced their people into roles that better suited that goal. When you look at SouthAmerican or African tribal societies, you see very much the same labor divisi…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:08 AM
3

Feminists prefer to say 'Educate yourself'.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:00 AM
2

Freedom of speech doesn't mean you're guaranteed a platform speak 'You're allowed to say whatever you want so long as nobody is listening! Only people who agree with me are allowed to be heard!' Her views are a totalitarian affront to the last 200 years of western civilization.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:43 AM
2

A feminist professor engaged in ethically dubious conduct? What a surprise.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:52 PM
0

'Waaaah, why is my serious allegation being treated like it requires evidence!?'
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:48 PM
3

'Gender Empowerment Measure' Fucking lol. Why don't they call it what it is? A measure of the level of preferential treatment given to women.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:47 PM
1

NAFALT's, then proceeds to be exactly like that.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:44 PM
4

It's almost like being in a position of power brings out the asshole in everyone, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:35 PM
2

Cue some feminist jumping up with a shrill screech of "WHY CAN'T YOU FUCKING MEN UNDERSTAND HOW CONSENT WORKS!?"
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:32 PM
3

Male Privilege I'll bet half of those men aren't even thirty.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:28 PM
7

Retired women live in poverty because nobody gave enough of a shit to keep their husbands alive past 60.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:26 PM
16

Meanwhile, the equally cost-ineffective Herceptin for breast cancer is still available.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:24 PM
5

That's their goal, bro. They want higher education to be too risky for men. Were I to attend university again today, I would not get involved with any woman there. All it takes is one accusation from an angry ex and you've just wasted tens of thousands of dollars and 4 years of your life.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:03 PM
1

'Women should be completely immune to criticism in sham courts that empower them to destroy men's futures with mere words.' I'd hope she rots in hell, but I don't believe such a place exists :(
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:59 PM
15

They have been oppressed just as men have been oppressed - that is to say, that they have been oppressed in a way that serves ruling elite's needs. Forcing women into domestic roles and men into outdoor labour and warfare was merely what the rich and powerful determined to be the best way to run an economy and build up an army. Now that home chores are largely automated by technology, the establishment has realized that rather than have women raising kids who are are practically babysat by TV an…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:54 PM
30

Goldberg provocatively suggested Jay Z could've hit her back. TIL it's 'provocative' to suggest that men have the right to defend themselves from violent women.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:39 PM
1

You can't address someone as 'Mrs' without putting their name on the end. It sounds stupid to just say Mrs. I had an English teacher who insisted on Ms. That was fine. French teachers went with Madame or Mademoiselle depending on their age.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:28 PM
4

Funny, because that's the exact reason I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:24 PM
21

Woman's feelings > Man's life. Funny that she didn't have a problem with being raped again and again while she was still dating him. They break up and then its a problem? Yeah, that doesn't sound fishy at all, right? Even regardless of whether or not he did it, the university should not be allowed to deal with criminal proceedings. This should be before a US judge, a sham trial in a kangaroo court.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:58 AM
3

Oh look, gender roles crap!
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:03 PM
6

we do know that violence against women by men is the world's largest and most socially tolerated human rights violation. Bull. Shit.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:22 PM
9

To reward women for getting wealthy men to fuck them.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:55 PM
3

More 'men are always the aggressors' crap.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:14 PM
24

More like 'facing up to atheism's critical thinking problem'. Fuck. Off. Feminism is the problem that has recently infected atheism, not the MRM. Rebecca Watson's utterly inconsequential experience in an Elevator is what drove a fucking wedge into the community, not men saying 'I want custody of my child' and 'I want to be innocent until proven guilty'.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:57 PM
9

"Go on girl, get at me." So rapey.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:24 AM
3

I would love someone to explain to me how it's funny to say this and then let women eat FREE in a time when women are out-earning men.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:22 AM
1

Actually it says moms eat free.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:20 AM
17

She has murdered two children and gotten away with it.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:08 AM
3

She sounds like a completely reasonable person. No wonder feminists are angry.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:57 PM
3

Makes me angry because she describes feminism perfectly yet says she isn't a feminist That's just it, though. She can no longer call herself a feminist because the movement has long since been hijacked by by its most extreme proponents.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:56 PM
1

I'll just leave this here. Compare women's 'high scores' with the men's.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:08 PM
1

Think harder, it's not difficult.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:56 PM
1

Erm, it's quite simple. It takes 9 months for a woman to put out a child, but 20 minutes for a man. Yes, a woman is more likely to have a single child, but a man is more likely to have large numbers of children with multiple women than a woman is to have with a single man, or multiple men. A guy who sleeps around can easily father half a dozen children in no time at all. A woman who sleeps around? One child per year. I can't believe I've been downvoted for posting an obvious fact.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:55 PM
45

Would have been a very different story if you'd tried to defend yourself. You were saved by women because no man would have dared.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:09 AM
39

Another victim of the despicable Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:59 AM
-12

And a woman can shit out 5 kids who would produce more than you could ever hope to. False. Men tend to have more children than individual women. [Edit] Wow, downvoted for posting a fact. Well done, guys, really. You're behaving like SRS.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:50 AM
46

Fucking lol. A gay man in a wheelchair would still have to pay more than a woman.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:48 AM
3

I don't. Thanks to the Duluth Model, men are almost always the ones who end up getting arrested in domestic violence calls, regardless who the actual aggressor was.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:46 AM
24

Punched? Looks like she took a chunk out of his face with something. Totally unacceptable. This guy is in jail for being tall.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:21 PM
2

Which is really fucking wrong, when you think about it. It's 'us and them' crap. It's boiling every other race except white Europeans down into a single entity. I think it stems from the 'one drop' racial purity crap where having any of non-white ancestry was seen as no longer being white. Same reason we call Obama the first black president even though he's half fucking white.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:48 PM
1

It rubs me the wrong way too, and the way it encapsulates everyone not white into a single group smacks of 'us and them' mentality.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:44 PM
4

Reverse the genders and nobody would be cheering. A man doing that to a young girl wouldn't even have made it off the train without getting the shit beaten out of him. Aaand wow, it's just been taken down while I was in the middle of writing this. I understand why Youtube would take it down, but at the end of the day all they are doing is helping cover up women's sexual violence.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:37 PM
-2

If you're a feminist she did, yes. If you have an ounce of common sense, no.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:32 PM
2

Who the fuck handcuffs a 7 year old for shouting? Yet another example of a kid learning society's primary statement to men; "Shut up and take it, pussy."
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:32 AM
3

'My preference is the result of female hypoagency. I am a mere woman, so weak minded that I cannot control my own thoughts, and thus my preferences are dictated to me by the all-powerful patriarchal mind-control penis-laser'.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:13 AM
2

Your comment is awaiting moderation. Congratulations, Kate. You’re a sexist who objectifies men as power objects. You are no different from a man who would ‘automatically dismiss’ women taller than himself, women with small breasts, women with flat buttocks, women over 130lbs, women over 30, women with less than perfect teeth. As self-described feminist, I assume you would label such views as mysogynistic, and as degrading women into nothing more than slabs of meat. So, what do your views on men…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:10 AM
6

Wait... so if a guy carries his kid out of the mother's crack den home, because he refuses to wait for a biased family court to see the obvious, he's a sex offender?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:40 AM
41

I find it hilarious that you think the republicans will do anything differently. The latter half of the last century saw just 3 democrat presidents vs 6 republicans, and they did absolutely nothing to stop Feminism's overnight, gynocentric re-writing of social and legal norms. I have said it before on this board and I will say it again; An MRA has no horse in the electoral race. The democrats don't care about you, the republicans don't care about you. You have no voting power, and feminism is a …
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:33 AM
14

No surprise there.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:27 AM
29

We need feminist biology like we need creation science. We don't, and it is actively harmful to all.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:26 AM
2

You tell Charlie. You tell Charlie now.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:43 PM
14

"We're having trouble crushing boys egos' and turning them into quiet, obedient, passive wimps. Obviously they need more feminism."
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:44 PM
29

I can't believe TIME would publish bigoted shit like this. Replace 'Men' with virtually any other demographic. Not all blacks. Not all jews. Not all muslims. Not all christians. Not all women. Say any of these and nobody will complain, because your argument is likely going to be legitimate. ...But say men and suddenly you're some kind of scumbag. Fuck this, and fuck TIME for publishing this.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:06 PM
2

You quoted a post of mine! I feel warm and fuzzy.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:10 AM
1

At first I was in agreement, but the more I read, the more my eyes rolled. If I walked in wearing flip-flops, booty shorts, and a skin-tight noodle-strap top as so many young women do, you can bet your ass people would have something to say about it. "It's hot" is not an excuse. Nobody dresses like that simply because "It's hot". Attractive young women and only attractive young women dress like that, and they do it for social power. I won't walk in barechested with leather chaps and a codpiece a…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:45 AM
9

I have always hated the term 'cis' and this article pretty much explains why. That said, my god it wanders into who-in-their-right-mind-gives-a-shit territory quickly, devolving into a tangental, downward spiral of oppression olympics as the author tries to determine who might be minutely more inconvenienced by one word than someone else. I couldn't bring myself to finish it.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:30 AM
0

Some strike me as odd, because I do not believe we have been teaching girls such things at any point within living memory, but I agree with the vast majority of those statements. The two I disagree with are; trans women are women, period. No, they are not. I will address them as women, but they are not women just as I am not a Vampire no matter how many years I've spent roleplaying as one (like seriously half my fucking life now. Jesus christ.) To state that 'trans women are women, period' is to…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:12 AM
1

Talk to your child about black-danger: Not to scare, but to inform them. Sure, not all blacks are criminals but offenders are predominantly black. I figure it's better to be safe than sorry. RACIAL PROFILING BAD, GENDER PROFILING A-OKAY!
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:44 AM
12

More crocodile tears bullshit from Greer. Fucking sad that you can make a life-long career out of this crap.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:42 AM
3

Oh boy, a wealthy white woman is calling for the end of overtime. If she'd spent a moment of her life in the real working world she'd know that all this would do is impoverish more families, and further mandate the need for both parents to be working full time. I don't want my kid raised by disinterested daycare staff.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:30 AM
8

Sexism that feminism will never, ever address. Because feminism doesn't. Care. About. Men.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:20 AM
2

Am I reading /r/nottheonion?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:42 PM
2

I wonder if she has ruined any innocent men's lives in her own country?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:39 PM
12

Hysteria and paranoia simulator, more like.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:19 PM
53

Not only is it not a reflection of the real world, it's not even a reflection of their garbage '1 in 4' statistic.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:18 PM
3

TIL masks and boobs invalidate opinions.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 05:44 AM
19

More promotion of kangaroo courts. This is how a society commits suicide.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:54 AM
9

Way to trivialize PTSD by comparing it to your self-hypnotic anxiety breakouts.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:21 PM
5

How dare she care to preserve her anonymity, or hook some extra views with her cleavage. Without the cleavage view, people would probably think the mask concealed a man in a wig. Grow up and watch the video.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:39 PM
5

And they're dead right to be. 75% of divorces are initiated by women, and it's men who get fucked over in the proceedings.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:54 PM
2

I am pretty sure every parent in the country has videos and pictures of their young kids without clothes on.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 07:30 PM
24

after the trial concluded It shouldn't even have gone to trial.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 07:26 PM
2

He's a swarve motherfucker for sure.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:56 PM
1

Redpillers often end up in here mistakenly believing that anyone anti-feminist has the same cast-iron views of gender roles that they do.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:50 PM
1

why the hell are all of these guys so pretty? The same reason the women are. Both the men and women this artist has drawn are designed to appeal to the opposite sex. What's wrong with men looking like actual men? ...They do look like actual men. They're clean-shaven with flawless skin, but they're very much men.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:48 PM
2

I agree. The artist is not at fault and has faithfully recreated Disney's style. Overall I feel this a very neutral, and therefore fair and balanced collection of work. Often, female-to-male gender-swaps are done by feminists with the intention of mocking female character design, and male-to-female gender-swaps are done by men looking to masturbate. This artist has exhibited no such bias.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:42 PM
19

She's lucky she's female, or she probably would have been fired. For once, female privilege works in our favour.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:26 PM
2

There are numerous removed comments below that article, but check out this piece of absolute hate speech that the Guardian thought was totally cool to leave there: Equality legislation is a tool for the realgnment of society on a more just and balanced basis, taking power and wealth from those who have an excess (white males, as a general rule) and redistributing it to those they historically stole it from. It is sheerly impossible, given the proven established power imbalance in Western society…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:19 PM
2

Sexual discrimination laws are for everyone – but it still jars me to see men using them Pampered middle-class princess forced to acknowledge men are people too. More at 11. sexual discrimination legislation wasn't brought in just to help women – it was to enforce equality for everybody Uh-huh. Sure. You keep telling yourself that. You know it's not true, because if you really believed your own lies (or at least, the lies of feminist 'academics' that have been drilled into your head all througho…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:11 PM
6

Got to crush those little boys' spirits while they're still young and their heads are still soft! Got to tell them they're evil, that they have millennia of 'patriarchal' oppression to apologize for! Got to indoctrinate them with feminist lies before it's too late! Disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:52 AM
3

Fuck off. Either you are a troll, a bigot, or a complete moron. Get the fuck out of here. You are not worth discussing anything with.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 01:30 PM
34

'Voluntary'.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 01:21 PM
1

...Are you fucking shitting me?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:48 PM
1

And at 17 he was one of luckier ones
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:55 PM
-1

liberal websites (like flagship MSNBC) You Americans are funny.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:33 PM
1

Males are have fallen behind in almost all levels of education, so no.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:30 PM
5

I'll take anything on breitbart.com with a huge pinch of salt.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:39 PM
6

It's funny. In many areas, we've now reached greater levels of disparity between men and women's education than their were in the 70's. Where is all the outrage? Where is the uproar about what the changes to schools are doing to boys' futures? There is none, not in the mainstream. Mainstream political thinking is still alllllll about the women.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:36 AM
7

And this is why it happens.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:15 AM
7

The connection is critical thinking.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:57 AM
22

no filming would be allowed in the auditorium. Oh look, another feminist meeting that they don't want recorded. Why is that? It's because they know that the things they say in those meetings are reprehensible filth, and that if it all got out to everyone, their plans for society would fall apart. I forget the link to the last one someone snuck into, but one feminist literally stood on stage and told the audience how they couldn't 'just make things up anymore' when dealing with the MRM.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 11:59 PM
1

It's nice to see the stats flipped for once, but that doesn't change the fact that '1 in 4' is just as inflated for men as it is for women.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:16 PM
5

Not even China's on that level yet.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:12 PM
139

Australian researcher Brian McNair writes in "Porn Studies", that "pornification" clearly led to lower rates of rape and sexual violence. Less sexual frustration = less sexual violence. Wow, who could've predicted that!? University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf did a 3 year study about 160 city youths, 16 to 19 years. Porn consumption is as normal to them as Coca Cola. Adolescents seem very capable at controlling their own porn consumption. They know how to separate porn from real life relationship…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:54 PM
1

'Hey guys, there's nothing on this guy save for an accusation right now, but here's a possible-rapist-muslim's info, juuuuust in case anyone wants to go murder him! You'll lose your chance if you wait for him to go prison!'
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:39 PM
1

I don't agree with what you say about feminists actively causing harm towards men, as what I have seen at least has shown much the opposite Take a look at the last 40 years of changes to education, divorce law, child custody law, the way manual laborers are now totally disrespected by society, and the way men are still saddled with expectations and responsibilities that women aren't, and that feminism has no interest making sure they are. especially for gay men As I said, gay men have benefitted…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:16 AM
2

You won't find a whole lot way of LGBTQ activism in the MRM, but you won't find opposition either. The MRM has no reason dedicate much of its energy to these fights because we don't particularly have a problem with the way feminism handles them. The MRM takes issue with the way feminism treats men. I would encourage you not to look at the MRM and Feminism as a solely red vs blue situation, as there are many points of agreement that the MRM is happy to allow the already academically and political…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:26 AM
71

Another privileged, middle class woman eager to put a working class man in his place. He lost his livelihood, now she should lose hers.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:09 AM
5

What a ridiculous load of bullshit. Pure opinion based on absolutely nothing but personal views posted to wikipedia in plain violation of Npov.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:32 AM
2

This video needs to be seen by as many people as possible It exposes, the plain, unfiltered, anti-male bias in feminism. The fact that this disgusting woman gets to call herself a professor is unacceptable. The fact that she is cheered and celebrated for saying 'I am a feminist' while Janice Fiamengo is shouted down for simply arguing facts is evidence of a dire, dire situation brewing in academia.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:35 PM
8

It's more and more common that I see people equate MR and redpill Typically feminists, or redpillers themselves, who mistakenly believe we think as little of women as they do.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:35 PM
2

After withdrawing her allegations Brooker confirmed they were false, and admitted that injuries seen by witnesses, including her friends and doctors, were self-inflicted, the court heard. She denies 20 charges of doing an act tending, and intended, to pervert the court of justice between May 2011 and January 2012. 'Yeah, I lied through my teeth and faked the whole thing, but I'm totally not guilty of lying through my teeth and faking the whole thing!' She knows there's still a chance a court wil…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:20 PM
12

Too fucking funny. Swap the gender roles and feminists get pissy without even realizing. Way to prove our point, SRSters.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:37 PM
12

Came to post 'get your redpill shit out of here'. Read article. Roll eyes. Feminism: Saying exactly the same, unsubstantiated shit about men that they'd rightfully hate to be said about women.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:35 PM
29

Better In Bed? What Men Really Think Of Beef Curtains For a lot of American men, the thought of beef curtains is repulsive. (Sorry, girls!) It's not that we're against a vagina that rocks thicker lips than Mick Jagger, but it's just something to which we're not accustomed. You can't be mad at us if we recoil in fear and confusion when face-to-face with an beefy cooter! It's not our fault we're American! ...The shitstorm there would be if men talked about women this way.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:21 PM
13

Swatting. It's basically a deniable murder attempt. I actually know a guy who was swatted by his ex wife, just to get back at him.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:13 PM
10

The more obvious they make their true colours, the better. We should welcome their oppressive tactics with open arms, because acting like that, they will destroy themselves.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:08 PM
14

'Government to continue training women to view men as attackers'
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:50 PM
3

I'm not surprised, honestly. When I was in high school 10 years ago, while 'gay' was a generic term used to express contempt towards anything or anyone you didn't like, nobody actually bullied the gay kids. Not even the lisping one with the purse. We still used 'gay' to mean something negative, but you never said it to someone who was actually gay. It was a word used to jab at people at things, but if you used it against a someone who was actually gay... well, then you'd either look stupid or ex…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:20 PM
11

I hope they have the data to back up their claims. That data is literally everywhere. Google it yourself. As for the link, no idea. I'm wondering whether this is a quick and dirty switcharoo with some of their material and they simply forgot to remove their url.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:48 AM
12

I love it. The statement on that poster, that the majority of child abusers are women, is 100% fact. Fact that backed by study after study after study. ...But to all these feminists, and people who have swallowed the feminist pill, reality is offensive, and informing people of it makes you 'garden variety scum'. Uproar is good. It means more attention, and more attention means more people becoming motivated to seek the facts for themselves, and when they do... Well, that's it for feminism, as fa…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:44 AM
3

Silencing and suppressing the views of an entire demographic is soooo equal! So progressive! Well done, feminism!
/r/MensRights25/03/14 11:39 AM
5

You are correct, but as long as Feminism continues to talk about ridiculous concepts like 'patriarchy' and actively work to harm men, anti-feminism is a requirement. Yes, they have many things right, but they have so much wrong and yet insist that that it is right that they must be publically exposed and denounced, lest we continue to sleepwalk further and further into a world dictated by feminist feelings rather than rational thought.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 10:21 PM
10

because the result looks nice It doesn't even look nice if you're used to the natural look, as most people outside the US are.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:36 AM
2

An increase of my starting salary to $65,000 65k for a new assistant liberal arts prof? Don't make me laugh. People with with liberal arts masters degrees are everywhere, and most of them are making a lot less than 65k. If she wanted more negotiating power with employees she should have studied something that's actually in demand, rather than uselessly devoting those years to becoming a professor of the inane and nebulous.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:31 AM
10

Good. I hope he gets a million or more, because 6 figures might finally be the fucking fucking wake-up call that gets these universities to finally realize that they can't keep playing police with their sham courts.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:15 PM
1

Pretty much everyone is a victim of something. Feminism blames 'Patriarchy' - an absurd concept that completely ignores women's agency in the world. The MRM doesn't come up with a single word to encompass the traditional gender roles of our species, but simply states that, as intelligent as we are, it should be perfectly possible to ignore our primitive or religion-fueled impulses about what we should allow and expect from others in the world around us, and ditch the concept of gender roles. To …
/r/MensRights17/03/14 12:39 PM
4

Given all of the above (tech-friendly early adopters, jacked-up courting habits, rejection-shy geeks), it's no wonder that San Francisco's residents are flocking to the efficiency of dating digitally. But why it has all but replaced a time-tested mating ritual remains a mystery. Oh, I don't know, because it's quicker and more efficient? Who is going to stalk around bar after bar trying to strike up a conversation when there's an easy way to just broadcast yourself to everyone interested in a tou…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 12:29 PM
2

Merriam-Webster online (credible) defines “feminism” as “the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.” Oh wow, that settles it, doesn't it? I suppose the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea is totally a Democratic People's Republic! Fucking idiocy.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 12:18 PM
23

Another case of there being nothing more misogynistic than an even playing field.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 12:16 PM
4

I can't decide which is more ridiculous - being up in arms over page 3, or calling The Sun 'quality'.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:14 AM
11

Stopped reading when he tried to cast the MRM as the source of HR447. Fucking bullshit. That comes from the pro-life christian right, and everybody knows it. I don't want need or want a legal say in whether a woman gets an abortion or not. I want a say in whether or not I'm legally forced on PENALTY OF IMPRISONMENT to part with a third of my income every month to support a child I didn't want whose birth could have been prevented. I want a say in whether or not a woman has the right to LEGALLY, …
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:52 PM
12

Oh joy. Yet more association with the Red Pill guys. Why is AVfM giving this visibility? The MRM is about, you know, rights. The Red Pill movement is a set of strategies of 'winning' the dating game. One is serious, important politics. The other equates to tabloid magazine sex tips.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:41 PM
2

'We must inflate the ego of our girls, and deflate that of our boys, so that they will ready and willing to accept being ground under the heels of their sisters'
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:08 AM
13

As an example of feelings being more important than facts, I think it's very much men's rights related, as it is a symptom of the current female-favoring political climate. Also, keep reading further down that article; There was just another case that happened at the Ashtabula County Technical Campus where a female produced a knife and threatened to slit a child’s throat. She said in the police report that she always carried the knife on her as well. She was not arrested and was only charged wit…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:10 PM
4

he refused and they informed he had no choice And that's the point I would have said 'Not until I see a lawyer.'
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:05 PM
12

Well, that's easy. To stop being creepers, all they have to do is become physically attractive and financially independent!
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:02 PM
3

Canada really is leading the charge with this stuff.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:01 PM
6

It's actually nothing new. It's been documented since 1973.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:59 PM
3

That's not in an environment where there is rank and heirarchy, though. This is about high-status female academics snubbing lower status female academics when men, according to the study, do not. It's nothing new and has been recorded before.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:53 PM
1

So your outrage really is about the ability of the feminist movement to exploit these idiots rape fantasy, to demonstrate their theories about rape and further their political agenda. Why wouldn't I be angry at people for making mountains out of molehills to further their own agenda? These political guys in college were treated exactly like other politicians would be. And yet, they are not politicians. So they were treated like something they are not.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:50 PM
1

if you didn't think it was ok and normal for men to cobble together a rape revenge fantasy I think it is immature hoopla from the mouths of moronic children, worthy of a reprimand, but totally not worthy of being national fucking news. political opponent That 'political opponent' is a fucking college brat. You keep calling them 'men', but pretty much nothing about their lives is likely to meet the expectations of adulthood. They are boys.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:34 PM
2

No, if they predict in their theory that you won't see a problem with it, and then you don't see a problem with it, you are conforming to their theory of how the culture is. UNFALSIFIABLE. CLAIM. Feminist theory predicts that people will disagree with feminist theory. WOW, AMAZING. We are done here.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:08 PM
1

That argument makes no sense whatsoever. It makes perfect sense and you know it. Stop lying. You're a feminist shill. If politicians were publishing fantasies about murdering opponents Politicians are held to vastly higher standards than college kids. College. KIDS. The average 24 year old college student has spent approximately zero time in the adult world, has likely never worked a a meaningful job of any sort, and literally nobody should be surprised by their immature banter to other 24 year …
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:50 PM
5

Meaningless study full of loaded questions, put together by people with an agenda rather than a desire to collect hard data. Sexual 'looks' constitutes harassment to these people. I'm honestly surprised it's only 51%.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:40 PM
6

Women are viewed as sex objects. Men are viewed success objects. The former problem is shouted from the rooftops. The latter problem is denied at every turn.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:32 PM
12

'This doesn't line up with feminist theory.... We'd better hope we can find a way that it does!'
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:18 PM
1

Feminists have manufactured most of their own problems since the 70's, honestly.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:38 AM
5

The idea behind 'rape culture' is that it supposedly teaches people that its okay to rape. ...Except this statement is pure fucking conjecture, and also highly insulting as it insinuates that men are too fucking stupid to seperate a joke from reality. It is EXACTLY THE SAME as saying that we have 'murder culture' just because people say 'I'm gonna kill him!' when they're frustrated or annoyed by someone. The only reason nobody would take 'murder culture' seriously is because it isn't part of dec…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:37 AM
5

Immature babbling is rape culture? I never knew something called 'rape culture' could be so fucking irrelevant.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:26 PM
9

I fuckin' love Reginald. This is probably one the most brutal things I've heard from him. Brutal, but accurate as fuck.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:15 PM
5

Well, at least they're being honest about feminism's goals.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:08 PM
10

4 years for rape and blackmail. Still not good enough.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:36 AM
5

Oh fuck off. Don't act like no woman's rape would ever have been avoided if she had gotten a cab home instead of walking, or if she had drunk a little less. Don't fucking act like it makes no difference what she does. That is fucking bullshit. There is no 'mra misrepresentation' at play here, nothing is being skewed. Admit it, there are opportunistic rapes that could easily have been avoided if the victim had acted differently. This is not 'victim blaming'. It does not absolve the rapist or less…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:39 PM
2

Let's have a look at his supposed worst behavior. 1. It is obvious to fucking anyone that he is not attacking her missing leg, but her lying behavior - or what he perceives as lying, anyway. I have no idea how much of liar she may or may not be because I don't keep up with such nonsense celeb gossip, but it's fucking clear that his comment is an attack on her behavior, not her disability. 2. ...And? He pointed out that his employer rarely puts minorities in prominent roles. Shouldn't people be c…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:12 PM
29

If the next generation has sons that are as repulsed by rape as they should be then we won't need to worry about our daughter's clothing. I am pretty sure 99% of people are repulsed by assault, mugging, theft, abduction and murder, but guess what? All of those things still fucking happen. This is prurient wishful thinking of the worst sort.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:47 PM
4

it makes the comparison that male rapists are as inevitable as theives I'm pretty sure they are. Especially if you go with the feminist definition of 'rape'.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:39 PM
1

Well what the fuck else do they think "I did it for the lulz" meant? Well done Erin, you've put your psychology degree to use in stating the fucking obvious.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:09 PM
1

Almost 40 and she hasn't worked a day in her life. What a pathetic, entitled specimen. Her father should feel ashamed for enabling such a life.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:04 PM
1

Being out of breath near a woman = Rape Psycho-projecting your tulpa to telekinetically penetrate them, however, isn't. Strange world we live in.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 08:45 AM
7

I will go on to be the amazing, independent woman that I am: charming, successful, kind, clever, witty, faithful, talented, and wicked smart…my list of attributes is a mile long. Funny, she calls herself kind as she publicly humiliates a man to the point that he can no longer show his face at work. She's nothing but a narcissist feminist - two traits that I see frequently go hand in hand. I hope he sues her for slander. The 'borderline pedophile line is probably particularly actionable. The ex-g…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:15 AM
3

Not true. This guy got jumped on because every fucking second of those officers' training told them that in a domestic violence call, the male is the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:03 AM
7

WOMEN & CHILDREN are the victims of men in our society No, it's mostly other men.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:30 AM
18

I can't help but laugh every time I see a 'rosie the riveter' pose in feminist media, becuase the real person behind that image quit her job after just two weeks, because she was scared of being injured by the machinery.' She is pretty much the antithesis of feminism, yet she remains one of their favourite icons.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:28 AM
0

Women are just as strong as men! ...Until they want something done for them. Then it's 'Why aren't the men helping MEEEEEEEE!?'
/r/MensRights25/02/14 11:41 AM
3

They do, but it still comes secondary to his status and wealth.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 08:37 AM
2

Ok buddy. Keep telling yourself women choose sexual partners with visual stimuli as the primary qualifying metric.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 08:36 AM
4

If a girl is taller the the guy can have legitimate concerns. His only legitimate concern about a tall/taller woman should be 'is she so fucking shallow that she my height could be a deciding factor in our relationship?', and if the answer to that is yes, then he should consider looking elsewhere. For a woman looking to find a man who isn't insecure about potentially being seen as in some way subordinate to her, I don't think there's anything wrong with turning up to the first couple of dates 6 …
/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:59 PM
6

I thought the first one was fine, but the rest are all the actions of a machiavellian psychopath.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:47 PM
4

I couldn't get past the absurdity of the idea that women would ever, en masse, find men visually stimulating. This flies in the face of literally everything sexologists and neurologists know about male and female sexual behavior.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:44 PM
5

Feminism is about advancing women, screw everyone else. It's not even that. It's about advancing White women, mostly those already in the middle class.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:16 PM
40

The problem is, we can't fight back without being labelled as misogynists and rape-enablers.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 04:01 AM
3

There's no such thing as patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:04 PM
0

Such as? Such as 'gender roles fuck over anyone who is ill suited, for whatever reason, to carry them out'? Derp.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:02 PM
1

If you want men to donate more, maybe you should stop treating them like dogs.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:58 AM
24

So if I ever feel a sudden urge to rape children I'll just remember to target the children of people I have a reason to 'get back at'. Gotcha. Fuck you, doc.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:56 AM
1

You need to learn that Feminism is an ideology, and that it does not mean "Women's Rights". Women's Rights isn't bullshit, but ideologies are. Feminism is a bullshit ideology. I'm pretty sure you are not talking to a feminist. Feminists have many legitimate complaints, many of which any MRA should agree with. The problem is that feminists usually flat-out deny that men are oppressed, and in the instances where they accept that men are oppressed, they say 'well, its part of patriarchy and we're w…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:54 AM
6

When the hell does that happen? And even if they do step in to keep this kid from being relentlessly bullied for for the next 10 years, is that going to be enough? They can't make the other kids socialize with with him. They're setting this kid up for life as the class 'freak'.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 12:42 AM
28

ALL women are BEAUTIFUL. Nobody wants to know what your penis thinks, shitlord. /s
/r/MensRights21/02/14 11:56 PM
6

'Parents raise son to be ridiculed and ostracized by peers' This poor kid is in for a rough life in a couple of years.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 11:54 PM
2

I don't often call underage girls who have sex with adult males perpetrators, but.... Yeah. Entrapment.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 11:48 PM
1

The privilege to attract fists to your face?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:25 PM
2

What phone and what pants do you have? Because I can fit my phone in my goddamn asshole, let alone my pockets.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:29 AM
2

For the of women, yes, they will. For those they don't, womens' pants with pockets are still around, they just refuse to buy them (or, more accurately, to wear them outside their own homes)
/r/MensRights20/02/14 05:28 AM
8

Good luck You don't need good luck at all. It's easy - just buy a pair of cargo pants. Or a jacket with 4 pockets. The reason you almost always see women in super tight clothing with super tiny (or often, no pockets at all) is because most of them will go for those styles and willingly sacrifice practicality for vanity. On top of that, there's no stigma against women if they choose to wear men's clothing - and in the case of pants, a lot of people wouldn't even spot the difference. So no, women …
/r/MensRights20/02/14 03:58 AM
1

Duh, only men can be blamed for things. Did you know that blaming women for anything ever, under any circumstance, is part of patriarchy?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:37 AM
2

You're missing the point. Feminists deny biological differences wherever they can.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:34 AM
37

Chivalry is dead and should be dead. There is no reason to treat a woman like a princess. The only people complaining about this are women who want special treatment.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:32 AM
1

Didn't need a study to tell me this, despite the number of times I've her feminists claim that lesbians have it worse. L. G. B. T. They're listed in order of feminist's priorities.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:30 AM
1

Give her the chair.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:29 AM
1

I'm not an expert on firearms, but I'm not aware of such a things as adjustable grips. No matter what you do to the grip, the rest of the receiver obviously has to be the same size, and I can't imagine any police force deciding that people with smaller hands should carry smaller and less capable weapons rather than simply saying 'if you cant handle the equipment needed for the job, you can't have the job'. Different sized gloves is one thing. Asking for a different gun is quite another. The weap…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:14 AM
2

I don't see a sensible reason for it to be illegal. Making it illegal just drives it underground and makes it the business organized criminals, putting both the prostitutes and and their clients at increased risk. Prohibition doesn't make anything go away. No alcohol, not weed, not cocaine not prostitution. It just makes a shady black market that absolutely nobody should want.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:06 AM
2

He pointed out that the old code of the streets, that thieves don't hurt women and children, is no longer honored. It sure is terrible when women are treated the same as men are! Those poor women. They might have to keep their money in wallets and pockets like men do!
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:39 PM
2

It certainly should be. If she's serious about that statement, she should be out on her ass within the week.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 09:30 AM
1

"Why could we not expel a student based on an allegation?" Either she is an out and out lunatic, or she is an MRA operating in deep cover, trying make feminism look as insane as possible. As for the former... Oh, I don't know? Maybe because it would essentially give female students ABSOLUTE POWER AND CONTROL over the male students? Male? Want to get through college? You better make sure you don't so much as get in the wrong girl's way walking to class, or boom! No future for you!
/r/MensRights15/02/14 09:28 AM
2

Psychology is full of shit? Gosh, what a surprise. Who would have thought that an area of academia filled to the brim with feminists would just make things up!?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:53 AM
6

And if dad dies...? And if mom goes broke...? Or, you know, spends all that money on high heels and handbags instead of saving for the kid's college fund? What kind of argument do these women think they're making? Because all I hear is an idealistic, emotional plea that is simply untenable. Dire consequences for dad. Dire consequences for the kid. No consequences for mom.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:13 AM
3

I think is the first time I've seen a TEDx talk that wasn't some feminist spouting the same old lies again and again.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:24 PM
3

coerced psychologically So any form of negotiation is rape?
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:25 AM
18

"Study shows men have feelings." Fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:55 AM
11

"Hey honey, wanna do it tonight?" "Oh c'mon, you've been holding out on me all week! And I even bought you chocolate home from the gas station tonight!" "...Oh, alright then." Apparently that's rape now.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 12:53 AM
2

they are under-represented anywhere you look Except education, health care, life expectancy, women's only facilities, women's only discounts, etc... Also fucking hilarious to hear coca-cola paraphrasing Mao. At least we know their PR guys are paid fairly.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 08:12 PM
2

And where did I say it was not awful? I merely said that is clearly nowhere near as common as people are lead to believe. I'm fully aware that just because only a small number of people people who are victims of domestic violence die because of it, but that's the same for all the other things listed here too. You really think more than a fraction of a percent of all the people who fell out of bed died because of it? Of course not.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:45 PM
48

Oh look, the whole 'men aren't organizing marches so they're not oppressed' argument. Ever thought we're busy at work because as men, we don't have families willing to pay for our existence? That instead, we're expected to be support ourselves regardless of whether we're capable?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:17 PM
3

Where on earth did I say it should be ignored?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:10 PM
2

Clearly not obvious to courts, though, and they're who matters.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:09 PM
8

Yet the evidence is clear - those businesses with diverse senior management make better decisions and that is reflected on the bottom line. Please point me to this evidence because I have yet to see a drop of it.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:31 AM
8

Wow... that really is context, isn't it? A tiny handful of people, yet its treated as if it's a massive epidemic.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:28 AM
1

if you vote for a politician who has a long track record of lying That'd be just about all of them, then.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:24 AM
4

No, we'll have an example that shows women are willing to exploit the battered wife defense in order to get away with murder - which of course should be fucking obvious, but it isn't.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:23 AM
1

Reverse the genders and there would be outrage. But nobody cares about males in today's proxy gynarchy
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:21 AM
3

I wouldn't trust a man who said he'd taken it. I can just imagine the legions of guys eager to provide a woman with a legal means to take a third of their wages for the next 18 years. ...Oh, wait. No I can't.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:35 AM
2

Feminism is like religion. The closer you study it, the more obvious it becomes that its public message is not the same as its private, internal one. Yes, on the surface feminism is about equality for men as well as women, but second you look at the litreature of feminist organizations, of feminist academia, at the policies enacted at the behest of feminist political power, it becomes abundantly clear that only the interests of women (specifically, white middle class women) are being actively se…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:28 AM
2

This has been known for a long time, but every study that shows it, (and it is shown time and time again) is simply ignored when it comes to policy and litigation. It'll be ignored by mainstream media, it'll be ignored by politicians and lawmakers, and it'll be ignored by feminists, if not outright denied.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:11 AM
18

Perceived female hypoagency - the refusal to acknowledge female agency, to view female misdeeds as the proxy deeds of males.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:08 AM
1

I have masqueraded as female online countless times in my life, long before the concepts of feminism or mens' rights were ever at the front of my mind. I can say that the level of trolling my various personas receive varies very little, and that gender, while it often effected the type or content of the trolling, never once effected the severity.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:04 AM
6

"Men will benefit from doing to same work feminists say is demeaning drudgery, and from putting women in greater control of their sexuality."
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:56 AM
6

What's doubly hilarious is that many feminists believe that that if young boys aren't taught 'not to rape', they will all become rapists. So his analogy's points of failure are actually totally in line with many feminists views about men.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:50 AM
2

If you do these things you can to lessen the chance you get raped, is that whoever is waiting for a victim then finds someone else. This only applies in cases where the rapist was someone who was literally saying to themselves 'Tonight, I'm gonna rape a bitch and I don't care who it is'. ...Which is a tiny minority of the worst rapists. it would evolve into an arms race whereby girls stayed at home more often, would wear more and more clothing and in general limits the freedom they've fought for…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 06:16 AM
3

only abusive fathers/husbands would want custody of their children Disgusting and absurd. The best way a dad can be a good father is by providing support to the mother of his children, including both financial and emotional support. Holy fuck, that is actually written on their site. Jesus christ. It's even worse than I thought.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:26 AM
6

On the bright side, if a judge looks at her appeal, sees the obvious truth and declares 'bullshit, that's not what you said the first time', we'll have a solid example to point to and say 'this is why the battered wife defense is bullshit'.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:24 AM
2

If you're a woman, you can murder three people and -still- be seen as a victim! Hooray for feminism!
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:02 PM
2

So she is basically admitting what feminists have denied for 50 years? That men have stronger sex drives and, therefore, that men and women cannot be expected to behave in identical ways?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:57 PM
1

Male victims, nobody cares. Female victims, national news.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:18 PM
2

She belongs in prison. There is NO reason to grab a kid's balls like that other than pure malice. From an evolutionary standpoint, rendering someone infertile is identical to murdering them. If it had happened to me, I would tolerate nothing less than 15 years in prison, and if I didn't get it, I'd seriously consider killing the bitch.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:16 PM
2

You gave a woman your sperm? You are now her legal slave.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:14 PM
2

'Man, last night...' 'Yeah?' 'Me and this gurrrl...' 'Oh man, really?' 'Yeah man, we totally cuddled up watching futurama while she picked the wax out of my ears.' 'O-oh. Right. Uh... cute, I guess?'
/r/MensRights17/01/14 11:04 PM
2

I can't wait for all the rape porn sites called things like fluffykittens.com
/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:14 PM
3

statistics show children do better in life without fathers The Big Lie. Outright, blatant polar inversion of reality. Children raised by single mothers have been shown time and time again to statisically be the bottom of the barrel. I cannot think of a single metric in which these kids do not fail in comparison to those raised in 2-parent households. The claim that being raised by single mother is anything but one of the biggest destroyers of a child's life prospects is provably false, and the c…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:01 PM
0

"No offense to men, but I don't know any man who just wants to snuggle. Men with erectile dysfunction? The modern effeminate metro types? Shy guys?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:50 PM
14

Remind me again, white women, how hard your life is and how easy men have it.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:46 PM
11

They're dumped onto reservations of wholly undesirable land, and many of them are trapped by family/relgious ties. Tribal leaders and courts basically hold them down, keep them from fully integrating with the "white man's" society out of a stubborn conservative desire to cling to the paper-thin illusion of autonomy that the US government has left them with. Those of them smart enough to realize that living the tribal life has nothing to offer them can break free of it if they're lucky, but most …
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:46 PM
10

That accounts for the majority of vicitims being male, but not for the majority of offenders being female.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:39 PM
6

But don't forget! It's men who are the pedophiles! ...Right?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:38 PM
3

Six stat rapes, paltry sentence (not even a month per crime), and no need to register as a sex offender... And she's surprised she was punished at all. Oh, the privilege of being an attractive white woman. Please introduce me to the 30 year old man who can fuck 16 year olds, appear before a judge for it, and avoid the sex offenders register. Because I don't believe he exists.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:37 PM
29

Men are NOT the victims of what is meant by Domestic Violence and Abuse Tell that to my dad, cunt.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:36 PM
2

Boys - ridiculed as immature, dumb, ugly, stupid. ...And yet held to higher standards of behavior than girls.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:35 PM
1

Not a men's rights issue, but certainly an issue. The pace at which the freedom of the internet is being eroded is accelerating at an ever-greater pace. In 30 years we will weep that we allowed it to happen.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:33 PM
-4

Please don't post stories from 4chan as if they have even an ounce of credibility.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:11 AM
3

"Liberal Obama managed to increase our debt (in ONE term) more than any other one or two term president in history" Essentially impossible for him not to given the mess things were in at the end of 2008. I have far better complaints with Obama than that.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:48 PM
1

Essay for what? If it will have any effect on your educational career, I recommend you bite your tongue, lie through your teeth and march like a good little feminist-indoctrinated soldier. Save your bravery for after you have your grades.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:09 PM
1

Male pedophiles are barely human, scum of the earth. Female pedophile need 'understanding'. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:07 PM
1

I dedicated my book to my son because he is one of those boys who gets in trouble a lot, who thinks the institutions are rigged against him. They are rigged against him. You would have to be blind or willfully malicious not to see it.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:03 PM
1

Your request seems extremely broad, and I don't understand how you expect us to discuss your theories without telling us what they are.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:59 AM
2

If a guy said that he would ripped apart by the media.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:54 AM
2

Hardly surprising, given that interest in feminism is practically bolted to college timetables.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:52 AM
-1

Hillary Clinton is quite possibly the only thing in the world that could ever make me vote republican.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 11:46 AM
6

FtM's are actually nowhere as common as MtF's Well of course not. Who the fuck would want to be a man!?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 08:53 PM
3

I can't think of many words that have ever come out of Paglia's mouth that aren't accurate (I can't think of any at this particular moment). She is the thinking man's feminist - a rare bird indeed. She is what feminism was supposed to be, and what two generations of pampered middle class white women made sure it didn't become because they saw an opportunity for themselves to live the high life without actually having to work for it. I have said again and again that feminism is by middle class wh…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 12:57 PM
2

As usual, it's MtF's who get all the scrutiny. FtM's? Not mentioned even once. Gotta control and restrain those penises, at all costs! Think of how the vaginas might feel! And feminists have the nerve to call -me- transphobic.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 11:55 AM
5

My mind boggled at the very same thing. Classic "always the man's fault" shit, really.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 11:26 AM
1

I refuse to believe this is real. That there is anyone this fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 10:51 PM
2

Pretty fucking hilarious statement given that it was Thatcher who put those men where they are now.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 10:41 PM
1

Didn't want anyone to misinterpret the comment as attack on that particular woman.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 11:09 AM
-1

Let's not act like feminists who think the word 'female' is an insult, please.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:36 AM
5

Sometimes I think 'radical feminists' who claim that a woman who remains in a relationship with a man is feeding into the patriarchy has just never had a decent dicking Female privilege - only a woman can say that without getting mobbed. /s
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:19 PM
1

Hmmm... fight exclusively with tasers/pepper spray, and you forego any advantage strength might have given you. Sounds fair! ...Good luck getting a court to see it that way, though.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:29 AM
6

No surprise whatsoever. Young women are earning more than men. Older men are marrying young women.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:27 AM
1

When I worked in data entry, literally every keystroke I made was being used to train a computer to do my job. Everything that was scanned, the computer tried to read automatically. If it wasn't completely certain, it passed it to me, and I typed it in. ...And then the computer would used what I typed to alter how it read future scans. I did that job for 3 years, and the team of people needed to process it was smaller every month. It used to take 1200 people working 8-hour shifts around the cloc…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 11:22 AM
5

Many women find it greatly unsettling when men have a means of satisfying their sex drive that doesn't involve them having to jump through their hoops.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:27 AM
3

Google image search should help you.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 06:57 AM
13

Just glue some gears on it.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 06:07 AM
26

And yet none of them are about men getting revenge against women.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:53 AM
74

This isn't real, is it? There isn't high budget, mainstream media production glamourizing violence against husbands, is there? Oh god, there is. Watch the trailer for some truly despicable, rage inducing levels of misandry. Flip the genders in this movie and this wouldn't be considered a comedy, it would be considered exactly what it is; torture porn and violent fantasy.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:27 AM
3

Yep, that's the pussy pass alright.
/r/PussyPass22/12/13 03:08 AM
1

I've never seen a single women employed as one. Truly the jobs women don't want to, or can't do. What amazes me is that there even jobs literally any able-bodied person can do with no training - like painting walls and ceilings, for instance, are STILL done almost exclusively by men. Nothing stops a woman buying a van and and a bunch of paint rollers and saying 'alright, I'll offer my services as a decorator'. Nothing. But do they do it? Nope. I've never had a room pained, a carpet fitted, a fen…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:25 PM
7

"I don't really want survivors to have to tell their story over and over again." I fucking hate that term. "survivor". Because "victim" is not enough. As far as I concerned you are only a survivor if you had credible reason to believe someone might try to kill you. Using it for anything less smacks of professional victimhood.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:58 AM
5

It's really, really sad that this is even an issue, isn't it? You're right to be careful. Just try not to be alone with her and you should be fine. That said, calm down. Millions upon millions kids have crushes on their teachers all. the. fucking. time. 99.99% of them are completely and utterly uneventful.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:50 AM
3

academic feminism The head of the feminist snake. It serves to indoctrinate, but, most importantly of all, to finance - to make 'feminist' a job title.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:40 AM
25

I think it's worse than that. They phrase it as 'taking rights away from women' because they know that they absolutely must not admit that men have no rights of their own. They can't talk about how men should have the right to something, because to do so would be to admit that men are not the privileged patriarchs they pretend they are.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:30 AM
-1

'but thats racist' 'stereotypes aren't reality' The saddest thing is that nothing is destroying black fathers faster than feminism, and almost nobody realizes it.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:25 AM
1

How many men have complained about it, though? That's an important question too, given how we're pressured from birth to sit down, shut up and take whatever's thrown at us unless it's thrown at us by another man we can harm without too much consequence.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:22 AM
6

When I was 9, one female teacher would observe us in the changing rooms after swimming classes. Whenever we questioned her about this she was just snort and laugh "Don't worry, I've seen it all before." No fucking way on earth would a male teacher EVER be permitted to do this in changing room full of 9 year old girls. He would be fired on the fucking spot.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:10 AM
3

Hardly surprising given that that is what they will be told again and again from the very moment they start their education, and all the way through high-school and now even into college too. I am 26 years old and all through my entire education, girls were treated as if they could do no wrong, and as if they were absolutely guaranteed to be smarter. Many teachers actively provided girls with the best seating, and the discipline handed down to them was basically non-existent. If a girl was being…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:08 AM
8

LOL at 'ModernLeftist' who thinks the UK police are going to arrest people for upvoting a joke about feminists.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 10:58 AM
6

The funniest thing is that 'mostly white dudes, some females' accurately discribes any average slice of the english-speaking coding community.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 10:56 AM
2

1 in 3 for black men... holy shit. Statistically, that's like, one man in prison in every black family. How can that even be real!? And then black women, still less likely to ever be in jail than white men. And then white women. Not even 1%. My, how oppressed they are!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 10:48 AM
6

The activists' response to these absurd tales of woe was to complain that Yale was still treating sexual misconduct too leniently 'We want wymyn to be given absolute authority over whether any male is allowed to be in university. Evidence, and presumption of innocence should mean nothing in the face of the all-powerful word of womyn'.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:10 AM
4

What a disgusting human being she is. What a perfect face for feminism she is.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:44 PM
3

So the question is, is violence actually increasing, or is it just the rate of reporting?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:42 PM
18

She slowly tortured him to death in 'self defense'. Right.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:40 PM
8

She wouldn't argue that battered husbands should be allowed to murder their wives, so she shouldn't be arguing this either. Pure misandry.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 07:37 PM
1

If she was a man, that officer would've probably trashed her right there. Also, reverse the genders, and that's probably enough to get you on the sex offender's register.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:43 AM
5

I would have thought that this was obvious to anyone, honestly. If you eat and live like shit, you're going to produce shit.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:40 AM
2

Go dressed in women's clothes. If they try to refuse, tell them you're trans. Interesting to see what happens.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:39 AM
2

You know something is ridiculous when even TYT agree with you - they're often guzzling the feminist kool aid as fast as they can.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:37 AM
11

Society fetishizing girls at younger and younger ages I always laugh when I hear this, because up until 200 years ago, 13 year olds were considered ready for sex - indeed, they still are in many parts of the world. It's only the modern developed world that views young teens as children. The idea that there's some pedophillic slide toward something abnormal taking place is ridiculous - the exact opposite has occurred.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:23 AM
13

I think they're just pissed that the bottom 80% of guys dare to stare at them. Basically what it comes down to, imo. 'Waaaah, I can't control which men are attracted to meeeee!'
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:55 AM
9

If the boys are old enough to notice (and pretty much any kid over 10 years old is), then the girls are old enough to know that the way they present themselves is going to influence the way people act toward them. Feminism's favourite fallacy rears its ugly head again; Female hypoagency. It absolutely boggles my mind how feminists can blame 'the patriarchy' for infantilizing women when they themselves come up with shit like this, where they base entire arguments on the notion of women as being t…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:54 AM
29

you want to change something, and the reason you can't is because you're a woman Look at that victimhood complex. The reason she can't change anything is because she's a fool presenting a business based out ideology rather than, you know, business. It was amusing, how quickly they identified the classic feminist arrogance and dismissal of any possibility that they could be even slightly wrong.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 10:31 PM
8

Welcome to fatherhood. Doctors, nurses, courts and official paperwork now consider you a second class citizen. You're essentially your spouse's legal property now, as she can demand monthly payment from you on pain of imprisonment.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 09:20 PM
102

This woman gets to call herself a professor of law? Vile. If a man in her position suggested battered husbands were morally entitled to murder their sleeping wives, feminists would be marching through the university's doors within the week and burning his effigy in the street.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 09:17 PM
5

He said she consented to it beforehand and asked him to film it. This is not an outlandish story by any means.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:59 PM
15

you don't suffer when you are dead Wow, great! Better kill everyone, for their own good! This is a stupid fucking argument. People don't want to be dead. Ask most people, and being killed is about the worst thing they can think of having happen to them. Would you rather be broke and unemployed, or dead? I know which I'd choose.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 06:38 PM
9

Man's name: Published. Woman's name: Not published. It's an iffy he-says-she-says case, but there's literally no way to prove whether consent was or was not given, and proof that the two of them had a sexual relationship that involved filming their activities. How anyone would expect his guy to be convicted is beyond me, there is no proof. You do not convict someone without proof. All of the evidence points towards his fuckbuddy getting embarrassed about her sexual behavior and deciding that the…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 06:33 PM
0

we are not nearly as often victims of sexual crimes I call bullshit on this. We are not nearly as often victims of rape since for many men, overpowering the average woman is trivial. It's hard to get raped by someone you can lift off you at any moment, after all. ...But groping? Stalking? Sexual harassment? I've experienced two of those myself, and I know countless other men who've experienced some combination, or even all three. My experience is an anecdote, of course, but I find it hard to bel…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:38 PM
1

I scored 40.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:32 PM
46

That quote is the reason Hillary will never, ever get my vote.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:28 PM
31

Oh, think of the poor, poor women! They have no money and life is hard! Never mind their husbands lying in bloody pieces strewn across the streets - they don't matter.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:27 PM
4

A perfect example of the anti-male brutality that is modern feminism.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:25 PM
6

It's the same in almost everything in life, sadly. Nobody gives shit about suffering or even dead males, but the second a female's feeling the strain of a shitty system, well, then whole armies will march to make a change as fast as they can. Boys commit suicide at 5 times the rate of girls. They are victims of violence at 5 times the rate of girls. They are enslaved by alimony payments for children they never wanted, children they never knew about, children they can't visit, children they aren'…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:23 PM
7

Female violence is often by proxy.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:17 PM
2

'I had unrealistic expectations of marriage and I wasn't happy so I just decided to murder him'. Where are the men who murder people for non-reasons like this? Not she doesn't even claim to have hated the guy. Just 'I wasn't happy'. What put the thought in her head that a man's life was such a trivial, disposable thing that she could just push him off a fucking cliff because she was in a bit of a sulk? What, I wonder? 25 to life sounds good to me, but I'm sure she'll be out in 10.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:15 PM
6

Feminism: Where pampered middle class white girls qualify for massive financial assistance. Where's the checking of that privlege, hm?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:29 AM
24

Zingarelli’s accuser, whose name the Collegian is withholding The name of the falsely accused is dragged through the mud and made a matter of public record. The name of the false accuser is kept secret. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:27 AM
10

I'm sure that if she was a guy, they'd have shoved her face into the concrete within the first 30 seconds.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:17 AM
1

$2000 theft. ....Why are they not in jail?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:50 PM
3

Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:48 PM
4

Roads that keep the economy running, the shelves stocked, and the power stations on are now 'male' roads? Kindergartens and bus stops are now 'female' roads? Please explain to me how this is fighting the concept of gender roles, because to me, it seems like it is making them ever more segregated. Also, lol at the implication women don't have jobs and can't drive. So progressive!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:46 PM
3

Good luck to them getting around binary.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 11:04 AM
2

I accept all the anecdotes. The over-arching MRM view is that there are shitty aspects of life for both genders (and anyone inbetween), that those that negatively effect men are overlooked and ignored, and those that positively are ignored. This is the crux of the MRM fight with feminism - demanding that male problems and female privileges be acknowledged. And no, 'benevolent sexism' and 'its part of patriarchy, help dismantle the patriarchy and the problem will be solved' aren't good enough. Yo…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:49 AM
2

...Yes it is. It's saying that anecdotes work both ways.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:01 AM
3

A large part of your acceptance as a trans person hinges on how well you pass as a born member of your new gender. A trans male who's short with narrow shoulders and a high voice is obviously going to have a rough time as a man, and a trans woman's 6"2 with broad shoulders, a square jaw and a deep voice is obviously going to have a rough time as a woman.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:10 PM
11

She did say that she thought women wanted a sensitive, caring man and being a woman in a mans body knew how to act. This backfired because most women wanted a strong, manly man. The funniest thing is that this is almost verbatim redpill stuff.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:01 PM
13

Except men do share their problems. They just don't go on and on about them at length. They give short summary of what's wrong and then their friends offer them possible solutions, or, if they have none, say the equivalent of 'shit sucks'. This woman has no idea how male friendship works.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:17 PM
0

Sorry, I'll remember to explicitly ask my wife for permission to kiss her next time. If I don't ask her I'm obviously raping her, right?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:13 PM
6

I wouldn't hold this belief AND be married if I hated women for being women.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:05 AM
-1

the girl did not object to being kissed. Not even her lack of objection was enough to save him. Once again, a girl being viewed as a victim, a boy being viewed as a rapist. Once again, the supposition of female hypoagency, and male hyperagency.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 11:49 PM
2

Dr.Smith knows what's up.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:05 PM
4

I'm going to disagree with your disagreement - or at least partially. Literally checking ones privilege - that is, taking a moment to stop and think about the the benefits you have over other people is not a bad thing. It is a healthy thing to do and it will make you a better person. Example, an incident that occurred just a few days ago. I was walking into walmart with my wife. Walmart is a place we generally go out of our way to avoid shopping at because of attitude toward their workers, but s…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:06 PM
9

It is not evolved. The aboriginal hunter-gatherer societies that form the basis for our evolution (pre-agrarian) the women gathered roots and berries That still leaves males doing the majority of the away-from-home work. Even monkeys live like this.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:37 PM
11

Why this is a surprise to anyone boggles my mind. It takes a certain kind of woman to accept a house-husband, just as it takes a certain kind of man to accept being a house-husband. Both of these people exist - I'm one of them, after all, but I have no delusions about my normalcy in this aspect of life; I'm an outlier. That it could be the norm flies in the face of millions of years of evolution; it's pure feminist fantasy. I do not believe that a society where a majority or even half of the fem…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:27 PM
3

"If we can get a man on the moon, certainly we can figure out a way to protect children from unwanted porn," You wouldn't let your child wander around a city unsupervised, so why are you letting them wander around the internet unsupervised? There's much worse for a child online than mere porn, after all. Laziness is what boils down to. They're too fucking lazy to monitor their child's activities themselves so they want a machine to do it for them. They don't care that what they're asking for is …
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:19 PM
9

I feel there's intellectual dishonesty as long as you're still using the word 'patriarchy' to describe the traditional set of gender roles we live under. By using that word, you're implicitly blaming men, and ignoring all the ways in which women benefit from the traditional system. Thinking like this is what's responsible for the unfalsifiable claim of 'benevolent sexism' - whereby any argument regarding a female privilege in the traditional system can still be viewed as another means of oppress…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:09 PM
9

Yellow pissed me right off.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:59 PM
2

Silent treatment. Too funny. I've had this from women countless times.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:41 AM
1

The look on that guy's face never ceases to make me laugh.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:38 AM
17

I had the same spiel once from a woman with dwarfism. I was less than 10 feet infront of her and I stopped to hold the door open, and all I got was a look of contempt and a bitter snarl of "I don't need your help!" Never mind that I would have held the door open for her even if she'd been a 6"5 male football player with biceps the size of my waist, because it's the FUCKING POLITE THING TO DO.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:36 AM
6

Came here to post exactly this.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:32 AM
2

If you think feminists are idiots, you are underestimating them. They are willfully malicious. This is a group that has repeatedly spawned elements that call for nothing less than a genocide of men. Granted, it's never been taken seriously by more than a handful, but its there, and the reason its there is because of this malicious dehumanizing of men. It is a deliberate attempt to cast men as the enemy. It is a selfish power-play.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:31 AM
3

It's intersectionality, moron. An oppressed class can say and do anything to their oppressors because they're the oppressed class and so whatever they do is justified because their oppressors hold all the power. Oppressors can't be oppressed, so it's all ok and not the same. Feminism 101, you uneducated fool. You need to attend a gender studies class before you can talk about this. /s I literally have this argument with feminists every single day. I never get a reason why an 'oppressed' class is…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:27 AM
1

She got a bruising in fight she initiated. He got a 3 month suspended sentence. Seems fair enough to me. I'm not bothered by it because he got pretty much what he deserved. I'm angry that she suffers no legal recourse for utterly deplorable behavior.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:15 AM
1

I agree, the sentencing doesn't sound heavy handed or unjust. I just find it enraging that this woman will face no reprimand, that the law gives her carte blanche go ahead and destroy another man's future - she can go out and do the exact same thing to another poor sap, living the high life safe in knowledge that it will be him who foots the bill for her, no matter how many years or decades of his salary it takes. Provocation as a defence only applies (iirc) in murder, and can reduce murder to m…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:47 PM
7

That's pretty much what it is. A great big fuck you to anyone under 30, and an even bigger one to anyone who happens to also be male. It is a stealth-tax on youth and maleness.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:37 PM
0

Fox news We can do better than this garbage.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:34 PM
0

Christ... she played him like a fiddle, bled him dry, took him to the cleaners, and has left him in deep financial shit. What makes women think this is acceptable behavior? What even makes this legal behavior? I'm not so much annoyed by his sentencing, but by the fact that she gets off scott free, as if she had no had in it, as if what she did wasn't EXTREME provocation.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:33 PM
10

Oh no it doesn't, lol Trust me, you are still expected to pay.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:22 AM
37

So it's time to insist that young men be paid more now, right?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:00 PM
3

reverse the genders and these charges would never be bought.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:26 AM
1

It's a system that favours young, attractive women and old, successful men. It can work very, very well for you if you are one of these two kinds of people, and for everyone else, it's shit. Feminists will view this oppressing women for the benefit of men's sex drives, but that the less beautiful women are cast aside by this system is not the system's true intention - its true intention is to turn men in wage slaves whilst a wealthy few live a life of luxury and, all the sex they could want with…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:16 AM
9

A quarter of your life in jail because a fucking toddler made up a story. Jesus christ.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:03 AM
14

I don't often side with church types, but damn. It's hard not to in this case.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:11 PM
1

The would be interesting, wouldn't it? Doubt we'll ever get such a metric, though.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:07 PM
4

No, the dude's still in his 20's. Cougar typically means over 30.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 12:06 PM
4

28 is not what I mean when I say 'older man'.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:43 AM
1

online dating sites I wouldn't waste my time. Silly as it sounds you would honestly have better luck hooking up with your female WoW guildmembers or whatever. You'll be judged a lot less strictly if it's not immediately obvious you're looking for a lover.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:39 AM
9

And feminists will just blame 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:35 AM
6

Even thinking about getting married is enough to have tens of thousands of dollars grabbed from you by a woman? Jesus christ. I wish I was gay.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:33 AM
-2

'The elimination of violence against women' No plans to eliminate violence against men.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:31 AM
-1

Men are more ok generally with random sex with strangers. Who the fuck do you think they're having sex with?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:22 PM
1

I was going to say 'Sugar daddy', but yeah, it basically means the same thing. The only way an older man is getting any is if he's substantially wealthier than the woman he's trying to bed.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:19 PM
5

10 years of that man's life wasted in prison, all because a woman said 3 little words to get some attention and possibly cash. Still waiting for feminists to acknowledge that false rape accusations happen, and that they destroy innocent men's lives. I have a feeling I'll be waiting for a long, long time. I hope that guy gets back on his feet, but god. Employers are going to see his past and freak out. He'll probably be stuck on minimum wage forever.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:16 PM
0

It proves we're not just sitting here complaining on the internet, as feminists continually try to say we are in a dishonest effort discredit us.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:29 PM
0

There were literally a dozen fucking threads on here a few weeks ago about raising awareness and donating. There were literally a dozen fucking threads on here a few weeks ago about raising awareness and donating. There were literally a dozen fucking threads on here a few weeks ago about raising awareness and donating.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:23 PM
3

By the female ticket, go in a women's suit, tell them you're trans. See what they say.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:06 PM
2

I really want to know who is downvoting this. Are there really that many shitheads thinking this movement is for them, or are we inundated with lurking feminists trying get as many downvotes as possible on it so that they can take a screenshot? It is a disgusting statement to hear from anyone claiming to be assosciated with mens' rights, and the individual who said it should be ashamed. I sincerely hope it is the words of a feminist troll posing as an MRA, because it's so cataclysmically awful t…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:05 PM
1

I'm amazed nobody's complained about it, then.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:59 PM
1

There were literally a dozen fucking threads on here a few weeks ago about raising awareness and donating. Who is behind (I neither know nor truly care) it is fucking irrelevant. Who is donating and what it is going to is what matters.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:57 PM
1

"Hair dye, because men prefer blondes." You haven't seen that ad, because no brunette wants to be told she's second class. See? I'm not drawing a false equivalence at all, the product is not what I'm arguing about at all, it's the statement that the product will increase your attractiveness to the opposite sex. You see this -all the fucking time- in products advertised to men, but to women, you only ever get the wishy-washy "look great with product A" or the common "release your inner goddess wi…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:52 PM
1

There's a billboard near me for breast enhancements Does it say "Men like them bigger" on it? I can't think of many beauty products these days that are advertised to women with the theme of 'Hey, men like this so you should do it!' The theme of the ads I see is almost always 'You should want to look like this for -yourself-!'
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:38 PM
0

Prove they were 'silencing' feminists. Prove their stances were the same as the current day version.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:35 PM
5

Ah, you're a troll. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:50 PM
7

second, don't you think feminists in the early 20th century faced any kind of opposition? or black people in the 60's? yet they protested all the time. We're talking about the mens rights movement here. Nobody in the mens rights movement was silencing feminists 50-100 years ago. As for Movember, I don't believe it started out of a mens rights group, but it was certainly given exposure and attention here on this board.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:29 PM
18

cliche Of course they're cliche. What else do you expect a recurring pattern to be?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:38 PM
13

An MRA is bound to be more aware that he, as a man, will always be viewed more negatively if acts aggressively toward a woman than if she would for acting aggressively toward him. No woman has ever lived in in an evironment where aggression against the opposite gender are punished with extreme prejudice. Instead, they grow up in an environment where their aggression against the opposite gender is either ignored, or viewed as entertaining. Women do grow up being told "Don't hit boys. Be nice to b…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:18 PM
50

Notice how the mother blamed him even though she was the one beating the shit out her son and turning him into a psychopath and a real misogynist - not the kind of man feminists call a misogynist, a real misogynist. "'I had too much free time on my hands and not enough cunt under my fists." No normal man says that. Those are the words of a disturbed individual, one that you cannot teach 'not to rape'.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:00 PM
6

God, it's like something from the 50's, isn't it? Can you imagine and ad like that for breast enhancements or something? The outrage would be instantaneous. It's interesting, though, isn't it? Men have little issue with being told how to improve themselves in the eyes of others. Todays woman, however, sees being told she is anything less than intrinsically perfect the way she is as misogyny.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:53 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:50 PM
17

I don't expect to be given preferential treatment in divorce and child custody cases. I don't expect to be able to avoid doing physically strenuous, dangerous, or disgusting tasks. I don't expect to be rescued first from a burning building. I don't expect my date to pay for me. I don't expect a partner to financially support me. I don't expect to be placed in higher trust around children. These are things women both expect and receive, and that's just limited to the statistically demonstrable th…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:48 PM
15

Ah, the sound of pure, unadulterated ignorance. She hasn't even read the (Wikipedia Article)[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement]. I'm amazed that she brought up prostate cancer - is her memory so short that she's forgotten Movember already? It's been over for all of four days! What they actually do, when they’re not simply carping in comments online, is target and harass women—from feminist writers and professors to activists—in an attempt to silence them. Really, now? Because …
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:25 PM
2

He's not being headbutted because he's male, so I fail to see the problem with it, other than that they would never display a man headbutting a woman.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:17 PM
5

Seriously. It blows my mind how feminists an spew something that infantilizes women and projects them all as clueless, hapless victims who had no means of influence or control on their situation. How people with this view can keep a straight face when they accuse me of misogyny is beyond me. Are they really just that bold and bare-faced a bunch of liars, or are they really that oblivious to the self-contradictions in their stance?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:15 PM
8

It's written by a guy.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:28 PM
27

Does this mean we can bleed feminists dry by donating to charities they support to force them to donate double instead?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:18 PM
7

People doing less work and living easier lives live longer? You don't say!?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:17 PM
3

How dare men tell women how to reduce their chances of becoming victims. Yes, lets all focus our efforts on telling sociopaths what they can't do. Oh, wait. They're sociopaths. Right. When will feminists learn that there are people in this world who are utterly uncaring about others, who cannot be shamed or guilted into changing their ways? Also, that guy was intimidatingly attractive. I wonder how much effort they put into finding the most good looking guy a fifty mile radius, doing his shaving…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:06 PM
10

Strong Independent Women - until a man tells them what to do, then they're suddenly victims with no independent will of their own, manipulated by the all powerful but supposedly only equal male. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:02 PM
0

And that'll be a 50/50 divorce settlement, thank you very much!
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:00 PM
4

I would honestly expect gold to fall into the lap of a white, genderqueer, coercively assigned female at birth who just happens to live with a white, genderqueer, coercively assigned male at birth. You know? A straight white woman with straight white guy who just happen to identify themselves with a bunch of cool and trendy labels. God, I've described Andrea Dworkin, haven't I?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:30 PM
1

Funny how she mentions columbine and such - incidents of boys falling apart because a feminist-run psychiatric health system thinks that that the best way to deal with their behavior is fill them full of pills whenever they exhibit too much 'male' behavior. I have no doubt the grandson she mentions will end up medicated too, and I have a feeling that deep down, she now realizes that this mess is, in part, her doing.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:07 PM
3

Because thunderf00t is neeeeever trolled and harassed at all, right?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:58 PM
2

Not a mens' rights issue, but a disgusting example of selfishness all the same.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:54 PM
161

male-bodied men I'm a scrawny shortass who, were it not for my facial hair, would look like a 14 year old girl. Internalised misogyny Oh look, it's this bullshit again. The idea that any woman who sees a problematic pattern in the behavior of her peers, or holds an opinion that is also held by large numbers of men, is 'suffering' from 'internalized misogyny'. This whole argument can basically be summed up as "Hey, you! Get with the program and and think like the rest of us! Conform! Become part …
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:45 PM
1

Their husbands spending all day obsessively plunging through the darkest regions of the internet for graphic sexual images of rape, abuse, perversion, exploitation and other forms of filthy depravity previously unknown to mankind? First of all... 'Previously unknown to mankind'? What planet is this guy living on? When does he think the Karma Sutra was written? Sorry, but this shit's been around since the beginning of time - the only difference now is that it's easier to see. Next, why, why oh wh…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:17 PM
7

Oh man. I can't wait to tear this apart tomorow. Now if you'll excuse me I'm going to go look at porn. With my wife.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:43 AM
1

Nope little girls were all taught light textiles (spinning, tapestry, weaving etc) from a young age and little boys were not This hasn't been true in 30+ years.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:21 PM
1

Woman does something wrong? A man made her do it. This is the mentality of almost every woman in prison.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:15 PM
-1

Not mens rights related, but she's a feminist poster-child if I ever saw one. Not a fucking thought in her head about how it might not be a good idea to keep having baby after baby after baby. Just an expectation for everyone else to shut up and pay for her kids.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:11 PM
2

You only have to look at history's female rulers to know that the idea that a world ruled by women would be any more peaceful than a world ruled by men is nothing more than fantasy. That genocide of the native americans? That slave trade? You can thank Elizabeth I for helping get that shit going.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:58 PM
2

Thatcher made many mistakes, but defending the Falklands wasn't one of them.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:49 PM
6

I am the most pro-choice atheist their is, and this is disgusting behavior even to me. They're lucky they're women, or a lot of them would have left that confrontation in an ambulance.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:46 PM
4

Be veeeeeery careful, man. Or that woman is going to be your murderer.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:44 PM
5

The feminist answer to your question would be that society only encourages men to pursue the education and jobs that lead to such things, and that society actively discourages women from doing the same. On the childhood toys level, this is correct. On the schooling level, it's absolute bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:42 PM
0

Doesn't surprise me, given that this is The Guardian we're talking about. They would never dare blatantly say that men are better at anything than women.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:22 PM
2

I'd say him being black certainly increased the likelihood of what happened mostly because it made it instantly obvious that he wasn't her father. I think you're exactly right that it wouldn't have happened had the instructor been a black woman, and that's what makes this a men's rights issue just as much as it's a racial one.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:19 PM
5

Driving while black. Accompanying a child while male. Can't say I'm surprised someone freaked out.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:10 PM
2

Unbelievable. Let's picture some male CEO shouting 'Vagina!' whenever he wants a female subordinate's attention. Their would be absolute outrage, and rightly so. How humilating for the staff. I wonder how many years they've put up with it? Funny how her defense come straight out of the feminist think-tank of 'oppressors cannot be oppressed' and still doesn't make any sense because she's the fucking CEO.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:04 PM
7

Aggression by proxy is the standard feminist M.O. Censorship, blacklisting and shunning are the order of the day.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:11 AM
2

We won't 'get rid of' Dowd. We'll keep her around - but she'll be more ornamental.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:06 AM
28

It's basically code for 'not sexually attractive'.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 02:49 AM
3

The idea that a woman has nothing but her sexuality to rely on as a money maker is disgusting, outdated, and depressing. I wasn't aware that saying 'its just as legitimate to be a stripper as it is to be an engineer' was the same as saying 'women have nothing to offer but sex'. That implication comes from the mouths of feminists, and literally nobody else. One of feminism's biggest self-contradictions is that it claims to be all about giving women choice and independence, but it spews bitter con…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 02:38 AM
1

I'm not sure whether this was more disgusting to read than the article we're commenting on, but yeah - thanks for illustrating the point. ...I think.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:01 PM
2

I will never forget the comment my openly feminist, sociology degree holding baby-boomer mother made when I asked her why she wasn't helping dad redo the cement around the chimney stack, 40 feet from the ground. "That's a man's job." Funny, isn't it? Feminists are so eager to claim housework as a real job, but nobody says a damn thing about the men taking out the trash, keeping the car running, re-pointing the walls, replacing creaky floorboards, redoing the roof, fitting a new a kitchen, unbloc…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 02:34 PM
3

Given that women account for 60% of consumer spending in the US, are more likely to work part time than men are, and get maternity leave, I think it's safe to say that those claims on hours and property are absolute bullshit. Unfortunately, bullshit stats are almost unkillable, because it takes but a second for someone to copy them, and instead, actual research for anyone to see for them for the truth-distortions, or in the case of this one, out right lies that they are. Worse still, in true Big…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 02:13 PM
4

This included being shouted and whistled at, sexual graffiti and pornography, sexual jokes and taunts as well as unwanted sexual attention, unwanted touching and stalking. I am pretty sure at least one of these things will be experienced by literally anyone of any gender.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 02:01 PM
10

Write a date rape guide as 'satire' and see how far that claim gets you. This is not satire, it's a crash course in how to get the biggest divorce settlement you can.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 03:08 AM
1

This argument — that waning feminist self-identification is a byproduct of a successful campaign by conservatives to turn it into a four-letter word — is buttressed by the fact that overwhelming majorities of Americans are feminist by the Merriam-Webster definition of the word: Over 80 percent of men and women, Democrats and Republicans, tell pollsters they agree that “men and women should be social, political and economic equals.” Yes, because feminism is alllllll about equality, right? It's to…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:49 PM
5

This woman is a ticking timebomb. It will likely only be a matter of time before someone ends up dead, and that blood will be on the hands of a legal system that turns a blind eye to female criminals. She's been sentenced to 2 years and one month. A man would be looking at 5 years, without a doubt. Now she's going to go to a women's prison full of more women who blame men for all their problems, and be out before the misery of being there sets in. She will probably start her harassment back up a…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:41 PM
2

...'subsistence prostitution'? Is that like 'subsistence coal-mining' or 'subsistence truck-driving' or 'subsistence steelworking?' This form of prostitution takes place in a region where local economy is based mostly on salt mining, fishing or construction Ah, I see. So, jobs women refuse to or are outright unable to do. It's the same old case of feminists demanding that they get the same pay for sitting behind a grocery store checkout as men get for back-breaking hard labour in deadly environm…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:35 PM
1

Sooo.... being a bored young boy, locked in a feminized classroom where he's expected to shut up, sit still, and listen? In my opinion the autism and adhd 'epidemic' is the 21st century equivalent of hysteria - male behaviour and thinking patterns being viewed as wrong. I would wager that most if not all of the rise in prevalency of these conditions since the 70's can be attributed to political bias, concious or otherwise, in the minds of psychologists trained in an ever more feminist-leaning ed…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:24 PM
6

When women are ahead, it's called equal. When they are at parity with men, it's called misogyny. Nothing seems more unfair to a woman than being treated like a man.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:18 PM
3

I was forced to borrow money You know something is wrong when even a man in his position is driven into debt just trying to get access to his children.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:14 PM
5

I've pointed this out to feminists again and again. Black women are not 'below' black men, they are above them. In the west, women of all races are held above their male counterparts, without exception. Male suffering is viewed as an unavoidable fact of life, while female suffering is viewed as a dire problem that must be addressed.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:11 PM
21

Flip the genders and this article would be full of cheering and praise for two brave young women putting a filthy, lecherous man in his place.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:06 PM
215

It's about fucking time.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:03 PM
2

Nice try, but it honestly doesn't matter how consensual your sex was or how much evidence you've got to back it up - the fact is that all a woman has to do is say 'he raped me' and you're in for a hell of a time. It won't even matter if you prove yourself innocent, though, because you'll have probably still lost your job, your scholarship, your reputation and your livelihood. A woman's word is enough to destroy a man's life.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:02 PM
5

Good luck teaching a psychopath 'not to rape'.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 12:48 PM
1

I'm not grasping at straws, I'm simply pointing something out.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:19 PM
1

I was raised in the Italian working-class way, which is “watch out!” The world is a dangerous place. It’s up to you to protect yourself, not just from rape, but from anything. This explains so much - not just about her, but about the mindset of predominantly white, middle-class feminists who've been coddled and sheltered since birth.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 01:38 PM
1

This is how feminine power works on all levels - by the control of that certain type of man who is all too willing to jump on string for the slightest, most infinitesimal chance of getting laid. Hope she rots in jail, for she is no better than a murderer.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 01:25 PM
0

Isn't it funny how laws like this are always named after a woman? Nobody gives a shit about male victims.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 01:22 PM
1

Fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 01:21 PM
1

'Gender studies' is a family of university courses that teach feminist theory as if it were real science. It is, of course, institutionalized political indoctrination.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 06:13 AM
3

Absolutely it is. MGTOW is just the western term for what the Japanese call 'grass-eating men'. Western leaders should be terrified by this, because it is a demographic and economic collapse from which there will be no way to recover from for 25 years. I think there's strong chance that we're going to see some truly dark economic times within our lives. Weimar Republic dark.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:21 AM
1

Article starts off strong, but by the half way point she's dropping increasingly weak shit into it. Repealing don't ask don't tell is damaging? Bullshit. And then the appeal to emotion with the story about the autistic boy's mother getting wounded? What if she'd been killed? Well, that's just straight up 'fathers don't matter as much as mothers'. It's a shame the latter half of the article seems to be nothing more than conservative shit, because the first half of it was on the ball, no bullshit,…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:12 AM
5

You got it. If all your political knowledge consists of is your gender studies course, everything looks like patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:02 AM
14

It's the same argument I give to white supremacists when they tell me how the Jews are controlling us and that we should be on top because we're the best. How do you rationalize a combined belief in both Jewish inferiority, and Jewish control of the world?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:00 AM
2

She might as well just copy/paste redpill stuff, because every single conclusion she's come to is exactly what they've been saying for years.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 08:15 AM
9

this guy is being targeted for some reason - likely political. My first thought too.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:26 AM
5

"I'm not hiring a woman who looks better than I do." Fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:24 AM
-6

BUT FALSE RAPE CLAIMS DON'T REAL
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:20 AM
4

Feminists have a time-honored tradition of censoring everything that unmasks their bullshit for what it is. They are terrified of reality so much that they cannot allow it to be talked about it, lest people notice it and act accordingly and stop privileging women with their imaginary victim status and the special treatment that goes with it.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 12:40 PM
1

And to think this moron has a 'degree' and soon a 'doctorate'. Professor of the imaginary.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:11 AM
1

The primary school I attended did not have any changing rooms for PE. I've no idea why, it just didn't. All the students under 11 changed in the same classroom, boys and girls together. None of us thought anything of it at all. I am quite certain that had we continued to change in the same room through puberty, we would have also continued to think nothing of it.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:02 AM
1

Seems like a good way to get your name on a list of 'trouble causers'.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:53 AM
2

We don't need more fucking lingo. Let's not act like feminists. It is a certain path to self-hypnotizing ourselves into bigots.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:08 PM
0

social I have few friends and I've been bullied by others pretty much all my life. political No party represents my views. No candidate I agree with would ever even win a local office. economic power I'm broke.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:03 PM
1

Adrian Peterson is apparently a white guy now. Also, by this logic, marching in protest is now ableist because not everyone can walk.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:40 AM
22

In my experience, when women use the term 'creep' what it actually means is 'a guy who shows any form of sexual attraction toward me who I have determined is unattractive based on physical appearance and/or socio-economic status'.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:35 AM
23

Female prisoners will not have to wear a uniform. Wouldn't want them to lose their sense of style, right?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:28 AM
9

Marx would be proud. This kind of alteration of reality through the alteration perception is straight from his book.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:57 AM
9

Oh look, another disgusting, morally reprehensible, "My precious little feels are more important than my son's body autonomy" argument from an entitled misandric woman.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:52 AM
1

Turn Boys Into Readers When I was 11 I had the second highest reading level in my entire school, and I couldn't fucking stand to read any of the sanitized tripe they stocked the library with. The very best book I ever found in there was a copy of Biggles Sweeps the Desert that was probably the oldest fucking book in the whole building - its cover was falling apart and its pages weren't white, or even beige, but practically orange, and it smelled of mold. A war story of guns and planes and espion…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 11:10 AM
103

Amazing. They end the article by basically calling her a slut, hungry for male attention. They end the article by slut-shaming her, and link her facebook in account in an obvious encouragement for people to go and attack her there. Jezebel just keeps getting more and more vile.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:55 AM
0

I've read plenty of Elam's work and he says plenty of stupid shit from time to time. He can call it satire and shock factor all he likes, but the fact is that it will be used against him, therefore, saying it is stupid.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:10 PM
4

Somewhat refreshing. I see that he still got off worse, though.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:11 PM
17

What makes the MRAs particularly insidious 'Insidious'. They love that word. It lets them fool people (even themselves) into thinking they can see what others can't, when in fact, they are actually just seeing things that aren't there. I do, however, feel it was right to call out Elam on his more hyperbolic statements - such comments are no different to the man-hating trash spewed by Dworkin and only serve to give detractors a weak spot to latch onto and try to focus everyone's attention on, lea…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:01 PM
14

As it should be. I imagine a guy would have been fired on the spot, though, and there would have likely been a police investigation to try and determine intent. I still don't really see a need for this to be posted, however.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 06:02 PM
5

Anyone else notice how it was the two girls who were at the front, and the one guy at the back? Why wasn't the 'violent male' at the front, intimidating the victim with the other two? Could it possibly be that, being male, he is aware that there will be greater consequences for him if he gets physically involved?
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:58 PM
4

Fuck you.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:57 PM
3

I just don't see how anyone could see someone that old being assaulted and not do anything. There's 3 of them. Any individual who attempted to assist the guy could have been attacked too, and worse. But, someone is doing something; Someone recorded this video and handed it to the police.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:52 PM
5

This. It's not a fucking movie trailer, people.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:48 PM
1

If this article was about women's appearance, feminists would be howling on blogs everywhere.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:41 PM
8

'permanent alimony' What the FUCK is the justification for this? Seriously. Good god.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:39 PM
1

'I didn't actually think the video was real'. Riiiiiiight.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:36 PM
4

35 years... Another man's chances in life utterly destroyed by the words 'he raped me', and nothing more.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:34 PM
5

"most abductions are by men" Are they? Because I'm pretty sure divorced/estranged wives abduct children all the fucking time.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:28 PM
4

They know, they just don't care. People say 'Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned' for a reason.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:42 AM
2

It is unbelievably vile. Feminism is reprehensible.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:39 AM
1

Cis privilege keeping you down.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:34 AM
4

A woman claiming rape to cover up consensual sex she regrets having? Noooo... never! I've never seen this before! Oh wait, I see it almost every fucking day.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:30 AM
11

I love how we have a link to an article on a case like this almost every day, but if you mention things like this to feminists, they act as if this is so rare as to be virtually unheard of.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:26 AM
5

Meanwhile, the last 50 years of sitcoms have centered around intelligent, capable women with moronic, buffoon husbands, and everyone thought it was was a-ok. Just look at the Flintstones, The Simpsons, even South Park. Women are stable and sensible. Men are idiots getting into trouble.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:18 AM
1

I knew I was going to like what I read as soon as saw Paglia's name.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:13 AM
2

‘Could it ruin someone’s night if it is played? Yes’ Good god, how can anyone take these people seriously?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:59 AM
2

I wonder how long this'll last!
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:20 AM
3

John McCain has proven plenty of times that he just says whatever he thinks will keep him in his position. I'm not surprised in the slightest that he is eager to lick the boots of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:17 AM
1

I know tons of awkward or shy people; I only know a few on the spectrum. You mean you only know a few whose parents took them to a doctor for it.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:11 AM
1

you are exploiting autistic people. You're pretty arrogant to try and tell me you know whether or not I'm exploiting something. I'd have thought I'd have known for myself. A lot of disorders have gender differences in frequency. I know this, but as I posted above, cases of autism where there is something objectively, provably abnormal in brain activity are twice as common in males, and cases without hard clinical evidence are 5.5 times more common. 5.5 times! No objectively provable abnormality.…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:07 PM
10

Call the police and find a lawyer. She has abducted your children. She's not your wife anymore and the marriage is over. Do not let her manipulate you or cut her any slack based on your past feelings for her. Treat her as you would a total stranger who came into your home and dragged your children away in a van. That is how hard you need to come down on this if you want to see your kids again.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:45 PM
2

Please don't exploit autistic people to support your conspiracy theory against men. Right, skyrocketing diagnosis rates are totally not indicative of any problem anywhere, right? I never claimed to have all the answers. I merely noticed a potential connection between Ms. Patterson's autism diagnosis, and the 'stop acting like a guy' comments she reports receiving. I'm not 'exploiting autistic people'. I'm saying that some of them may be being exploited, largely unintentionally, through series of…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:38 PM
3

It is estimated that 40% of all child soldiers are girls. So we don't care about the other 60%, then? Why is this statistic, true or not, worth pointing out?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:06 AM
2

Autism diagnosis rates by year. College enrollment by gender and year. Degrees by gender and year. The prevalence of autism diagnoses has risen constantly and exponentially since 1970. What could be the course? An unprecedented change in the lifestyles of children, or an unprecedented change in the decisions of psychologists? In the same period, women have powered ahead of men in education and men are now well behind. I would not go as far as to say there's a direct correlation, but I imagine it…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 12:57 AM
1

Women have the right to govern their own bodies and make their own choices. ...Except when they make a choice that feminists don't like.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:28 PM
3

Despicable.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:21 PM
8

Real autism is detectable via brain scans. Many "autistic spectrum" people cannot be detected via a brain scan, which leads me to similar conclusions to yours: many (not all, but many) diagnoses of autistic spectrum disorders are really just pathologizations of a rational temperment. I've posted this further down in the comments, but I feel it's highly relevant to what you've said here; Wikipedia Source The sex ratio averages 4.3:1 and is greatly modified by cognitive impairment: it may be close…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:02 PM
7

Wikipedia Source The sex ratio averages 4.3:1 and is greatly modified by cognitive impairment: it may be close to 2:1 with intellectual disability and more than 5.5:1 without. So, in cases of autism among people with legitimate cognitive disability, Autism is roughly twice as common in boys, but in cases where there is no cognitive disability, it skyrockets to being more than five times as common. If this is not exactly what you would expect to find in the numbers on a condition being exploited …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 05:00 PM
2

You know times are bad when you're agreeing with an article from a shit stain as dark and foul as the daily mail is. Only a woman can get away with such complete and utter refusal to see herself as responsible for anything.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:51 PM
5

In males it’s done for medical reasons There is no medical reason for circumcision. Learn the history of circumcision, and you will see it is primarily a religious act done to diminish the pleasure received from masturbation. to ensure cleanliness. You live in the 21st century, in the first world. If you want cleanliness, you can shower whenever the hell you want. There is no 5 mile walk to your nearest source of water. You are not waiting for the rain to come and fill your collectors. You have …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:39 PM
3

I've seen cases where crack addict mothers get to keep their children. Think about that for a moment.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:41 PM
1

Ohhh, you didn't win the popularity contest? Must be misogyny, right? Never mind that plenty of women also didn't vote for you. ...But let me guess, they're just brainwashed tools of the patriarchy, right? Thank god she lost. The last thing we need is more victim-mentality idiots like her in positions of power.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:40 PM
5

Lads' mag bans. Internet porn filters. Watch as society sleepwalks back into the 1950's.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:32 PM
8

You have no idea how many times I've considered this.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:17 PM
33

Thus, we have feminists basically gender-policing her. You took the words right out of my mouth. She's being chastised and attacked for not acting 'like a woman'. She even links to an article with this unbelievable hypocrisy in it; Women in tech have, or so they may believe, much to gain in being perceived as “one of the bros.” Much of the critical networking, decision-making and team bonding important to career growth occurs in male-dominated spaces, cemented by heteronormative male bonding. Ga…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:15 PM
9

Nail on the fucking head. Trying preserve their advantage is exactly what it's about. They're no longer fit for the center stage roles and perceive it as oppression. Oppression! These pampered multi-millionairess women who've spent the better part of their lives with an entourage of servants and yes-men spoiling them and attending to their every whim perceive even the slightest step down on the totem pole as oppression. Of all things. It is all about denying opportunity to younger women. It's a …
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:40 PM
3

Female privilege at work.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:28 PM
7

The orders will be granted if a court agrees that an individual has engaged in an act of a sexual nature that could pose a sexual risk to the public. You looked at BDSM porn? You are not allowed to purchase chains, ropes, or duct tape You attended a furry convention? You are not allowed to own animals. You attended an anime convention? You are not allowed near schools. Reminds me of the Anti-Social Behavior Orders - started out being used to keep misbehaving teens in check and hopefully out of j…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:11 AM
2

Would American men have had the balls to do this, I wonder?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:46 AM
1

At least she got arrested.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:44 AM
8

I became physically uncomfortable any time those were included in my schooling. I didn't have a problem with competitive activities - it was better than the dreaded 'group work' that I was always doomed to fail at before we even started, but anything that involved being physically active, I despised - largely because, like group work, I knew I was absolutely shit at it. But I was by far the minority. 1 in 15 at most, I'd guess. Most of the other boys couldn't wait to get outside and play footbal…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:47 PM
4

you are being judged on how well you sit down, shut up and take directions in matters you have no interest in Reading this gave me something of an epiphany: You are being judged on your ability to act like a subordinate woman. Feminists have instigated this change in the education system to benefit girls, but it only benefits their ability to learn things that don't require critical thinking - just the ability to remember what they're told and then do it, like a good little housewife. It's like …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:37 PM
2

As an intact male, this was pretty painful to read.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:19 PM
3

But fathers are unnecessary and not needed! And they're abusive! Squawk squawk hisssss!
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:16 PM
5

So, precisely in what way do children ‘need’ fathers - or is it, in fact, fathers who need children? ... The plain fact is that now that women are allowed to financially provide for themselves, we no longer need husbands to raise children effectively, if, indeed, we ever did. Yep, man-hater. She is called exactly what she is.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:15 PM
1

Could it be their increasing participation in the workforce, I wonder? Could it be that it's now increasingly acceptable for them have the slobbish eating, drinking, and drug-using habits formerly associated with men? Feminism: Slowly turning women into used and abused wage slaves just like men.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:05 PM
17

If it was me I would be suing both the university and the slanderous lying bitch.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:52 PM
2

patriarchy implies that men are responsible, almost maliciously so. Indeed it does, but as soon as you change that word for 'tradition', and take subtract the blaming of men and denial of oppression against men and you are left with largely agreeable base of complaints against binary gender roles.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:07 PM
6

We cannot accept patriarchy theory Except we do accept the bulk of it - we just don't call it patriarchy because we don't blame men for it. We call it 'tradition' and other such phrases. We recognize that 'patriarchy' is a misnomer, because it only benefits the rich and powerful, but we have little argument with a lot of what feminists claim 'patriarchy' does. We just understand that that's not a system held in place by men, for men. It's a system held in place by the rich, for the rich. Feminis…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 07:21 PM
2

I fail to see how a group that thinks traditional gender roles that force men into being providers and workers, and objectify them based on their economic value are wrong is 'right wing'. Contrary to feminist propaganda, I'm pretty sure damn near everyone in the MRM is in favour of gay marriage and the rights of anyone who doesn't conform to the traditionally accepted/enforced role of their biological sex. Does that sound right wing to you? It's funny, really. We agree with feminists on probably…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:16 PM
1

Why not both? Whoever society places on top is ultimately who society exists to protect. Monarchs, artistocrats, the wealthy elite, politicians? Society exists to protect them. ...And their wives. There exists protection for the common woman, but none for the common man.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:06 PM
3

educate yourself You always here this little phrase from feminists. It doesn't actually mean 'educate yourself' at all. What it really means is 'read feminist theory and literature and agree with it.' What it really means is 'shut up, you're dumb because you don't think like I do.' Feminism has dug its heels deep into Academia so they love to throw the 'education' claims around and act like their gender studies degree means anything other than that they've demonstrated their ability regurgitate …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:24 AM
6

because what it's ultimately saying is that women aren't as dangerous as men I disagree. What it's ultimately saying is that women are above men. That women are allowed to control, discipline and train men.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:05 AM
61

An outright admission that feminists outright lie push their agenda!? No fucking wonder they didn't want to be recorded! This soundbyte needs to go viral. Also, I like how she called us 'right wing' just because we don't agree with them on the way men are treated by society.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:57 AM
1

Married men should be doing everything in their power to become the stay at home parent. Turn this shit on its head.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:00 AM
4

Labour workers are the most invisible class of people in the country. I have a friend who works in international marketing and makes 100k a year. Plus company benefits. He's 27. In ten years he could be on double that. His father and brother, meanwhile, break their backs, working outdoors in all weathers, year round, for just 30 and 40k, while he sits in an air-conditioned office doing maybe 3 hours of real work every day. ...But he's the guy that gets the paycheck, because supposedly its his ma…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:48 AM
2

...Felony for streaking? Seriously? In no sane world would this be more than a Summary Offense.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:39 AM
4

You'd hit a girl? Even if she kicked you in the testicles, that does not warrant hitting a girl, in my opinion. What can I say? I react strongly when people do things that my ability to reproduce.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:31 AM
2

Am I to do this before or after the "don't murder people" conversation?
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:27 AM
5

I am 90% certain that this is a troll account. Every post on there is utterly absurd.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:23 AM
5

And they wonder why men are so often driven to murder-suicide.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:56 AM
2

Playing 'boy' games? Suspended.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:24 AM
1

Would you agree that this is one of the things that Warren Farrell says in Why Men Are the Way They Are? Yes, I would. do you agree with Farrell? I haven't read the whole thing, but if the synopsis on wikipedia does it justice, then yes, but only partially. I feel there is far more to it than just that.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:23 PM
3

Well, it is online misogyny, but really, it's just general online hate. It doesn't matter what your gender is, or what opinion you're expressing. If you draw the attention of enough people who strongly disagree with you, you will get rape threats, death threats, stalking, harassment, and everything else directed at you by shitheads from all around the world. This something feminists are either truly oblivious of, or love to actively deny because it doesn't fit their narrative. Is it misogyny? Ye…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:04 AM
0

How is this even possible? I can only assume that the figure is grossly inflated by stay at home housewives who take care of the grocery shopping - by far the biggest chunk of consumer spending - whilst husbands handle the household bills.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:56 PM
3

Of course they are - they know their husbands earn enough to support them.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:35 AM
5

I find it more silly than anything else. The idea that grown fucking women can't deal being in the same room as men is just fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:33 AM
4

They cover their faces because they know their words are indefensible. I'd say that it should say 'These faggots ARE fascists', but I'd feel bad about potentially lumping in other homosexuals with with them.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 10:32 AM
1

Why does anyone do anything? There are countless reasons, of course.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:40 AM
3

Sounds like you're studying bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:36 AM
1

Indeed, nobody is going to be scared out of college by an anti date-rape seminar. I don't think this is going to effect men - instead, I think this going to make women paranoid and distrusting of men. Because that's soooo what we need, isn't it? More people coming along and scaring young women, convincing them that rape lurks around every corner, telling them to view every male as a potential attacker (no mention of female rapists, of course). THAT is the real travesty of this fear-mongering. Th…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:16 AM
3

That this comment was removed by the independent outs them as nothing more that yet another media outlet in the back pocket of feminists, incapable objectivity of or even pretending not to be biased. They can go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:43 AM
13

Don't know about you, but every woman I've ever known, including those in my own family, has been primarily concerned with making sure they're wearing the 'right' clothes and having their make up done before they leave the house. My mother, my wife, every woman in my life does this. They absolutely will not leave the house without preening themselves beforehand. None of them carry pepper spray.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:31 AM
1

The OP, sorry.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:04 AM
3

I agree. Along with the strong hint of PUA bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:29 PM
4

You got downvoted into oblivion because you posted pretentious, long winded, insulting version of 'why is it that what women say they want and what they actually go for again and again seem to be the exact opposites?'
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:28 PM
1

makes sure he doesn't stay over to many nights a week cause that would fuck up her spousal support if they knew another man has moved. Isn't it funny? Feminism has created a system that actively encourages female dependence on men.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:24 PM
12

Well, no shit.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:19 PM
1

a bit pointless with the post removed.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:18 PM
14

"We are the movement that feminism promised but never delivered!" This needs to be said more. Maybe it will help people realize that no, we are not trying to go back to 1950's gender roles, since that's what we're continually accused of.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:15 PM
7

Racist, Sexist, Anti-Gay Let's see now... Racist Pretty sure black men are still men. Also pretty sure that they more perhaps than anyone else are suffering at the hands of feminism and its promotion of single motherhood despite the mountain of evidence that it damages children's chances of success in life. Sexist I feel this is going to be a subjective argument, and thus pointless, so let's just look at this; Our symbol is an equals sign. Theirs is a clenched fist. Anti-Gay Really interesting c…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:14 PM
19

she would quickly realize that her tantrums aren't a valid social strategy Except they are, because she's a woman. She can just go to another until they wise up to her bullshit, and then it's alimony payments to keep her propped up until she finds a new sucker, if not to continue to line her pockets even after she's got one. Like anyone, she's a product of society. Specifically, she's the product of outdated gender roles that pressure men to be providers and absolve women of any responsibility f…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:51 AM
11

At what point did he make this 'extremely poor judgement'? 'Going near a child while male'. It's the new 'driving while black'.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:46 AM
37

"we can and should do more make sure women face no consequences for their actions, and educate men to completely ignore their own sexual desires." Good luck teaching teenage boys not to masturbate to his classmates sexy bikini pictures.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 10:43 AM
1

If they are calling it patriarchy, then they are misidentifying the cause and nature of the problem entirely. Calling it patriarchy is inherently blaming men. 'It' is not patriarchy. 'It' is the sum total of our biology, our evolutionary, political, cultural and economic histories prior to the modern era.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:10 AM
20

They've been anti-boy for a good 20 years at least.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:40 AM
1

Better bulldoze every pair of hills that look like boobs.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:15 PM
2

First they ignored us. Now they're fighting us. This is great news.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:31 PM
1

The sentiment comes straight from the feminist camp.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:09 PM
1

Why Men Cheat investigates the truth behind the murky motivations of powerful men who endanger marriages, reputations, and careers in their quest for illicit moments of sexual pleasure. It looks at why men of great influence who ‘have it all’ are drawn moth-like to risky affairs, and how they come to believe that they’re immune to the rules of normal human mores. Isn't it fucking obvious to everyone? If you're rich and powerful, you can have any woman you want. It's absolute given. You can be ol…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:17 AM
3

As a feminist, these men's rights problems also relate to society's warped notions about women: that they can't be aggressors, that they are always better at childcare than men, etc. Feminism: The belief that all sexism is focused against women, even when benefits women and is to the detriment of women. Why does this viewpoint exists? Because feminism talks entirely from the female view. It is not the gender equality campaign it claims to be, and cannot be as long it continues to discredit the m…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:07 AM
7

Feminism: The belief that women are oppressed by the opposite gender, but are actually superior to the opposite gender. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:55 AM
88

It's only unfair when women are underrepresented. /s
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:49 AM
6

In the few areas where boys are ahead, they are ahead by an inch. In the many areas where girls are ahead, they are ahead by a mile. Yet all we will ever hear about is how there aren't enough female STEM graduates.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:24 AM
4

The bit about women owning the whole house and men being confined to garages, sheds, attics, basements and closets really hit home for me; I'm sat in the closet, and damn near every single thing I own is in this 8x10 space with me.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:08 AM
0

I do believe this is the first time I've ever seen a feminist spend more than half a sentence on the subject of male rape. I don't know how 'feminist' this sight is, but its an interesting thing to see, and it makes me wonder what kind of effect we're having on feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:59 AM
7

barricading the entrance Criminal. No better.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:04 AM
9

You know, I believe you may actually be right. ...Good god.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:23 PM
38

50:35 Militant organized resistance. Police presence. Ah yes. Violence. So progressive. Also, it brings a smile to my face to learn that feminists are now having conferences that are almost entirely about us.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:13 PM
17

A woman does something of her own free will that isn't in line with feminist theory? She's a brainwashed tool of the patriarchy! Feminism: The radical belief that women have no minds of their own.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:04 PM
1

Nearly two months elapsed between Graham's July 16 confession and her arrest on Monday by authorities, indicating that the U.S. government "did not believe Graham posed a significant danger to the community," the judge said. Of course they don't believe she's a danger - she's a woman, and women can do wrong. Reverse the genders. A man would have been under intense police interrogation within hours of the death being known. He would questioned again and again, hour after hour. Putting him behind …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:17 AM
2

That's the promo shot? Sheesh. I'm going to assume it's the sum total of the last 30+ years of sitcoms centered around genius rational-thinking wives and bumbling idiot husbands.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:10 AM
3

I agree. If we simply reversed the genders, This kind of behavior could definitely land a man in jail, or with a restraining order against them.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:03 AM
3

Disdain for homosexuals Because women are incapable of homophobia /s
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:56 AM
3

A self-published 25 year old writing a book about... her life. A book called 'Type A'. Is this some kind of viral marketing campaign for a romantic comedy? Because I can barely believe that such a hilariously blatant and cartoonish case of narcissistic personality disorder could truly exist.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:51 AM
1

The highlight of her life. Not his. He was to be her whipping boy, but her attempt to enslave him failed, and now he must be punished. Her words are the sound of a screaming infant, throwing its toys out of the pram. Her accusation that he is 'female-infantilizing' is straight up projection of her own (apparently justified) insecurities.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:31 AM
14

I wouldn't go on her little goose chase. I would just immediately call the police and report everything stolen.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:17 AM
4

This is what it comes down to. Society has this warped view where only men are viewed as sexual predators, and only women are viewed as victims. Indeed, women are actively encouraged to see themselves as victims. The fact is, even if that female therapist did start acting inappropriately, chances are, a 16 year old boy is going to enjoy every second of it, because he hasn't been the target of a lifetime of messages about the dangers of creepy older women touching him the way a 16 year old girl h…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 11:41 PM
2

The oppressed can't be guilty of hate speech, duh! /s
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:53 PM
3

Feminism: The radical belief that women should have no responsibilities whatsoever.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:37 PM
3

The sad thing is, the reason they didn't accept is likely because those same feminists who complain about the lack of women at such events spend all their time between them bleating outright lies about how hostile the environment is to women and how rampant sexual harassment is at such events, despite all evidence pointing to the exact fucking opposite. We can thank professional victims like Rebecca Watson and the 'Atheism+' crowd for this, and know that that they will surely try to paint the la…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:33 AM
3

They do, but that doesn't mean they don't know he's right.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:21 AM
4

"You shouldn't wear shirts I can easily rip off - it's basically your fault if I can't control myself." Feminists would fucking explode if the genders were swapped. This would be national fucking news.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:07 AM
1

You got that right.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:03 AM
7

Men don't need to google the location of all the rough spots of town, because they've already been mugged in them.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:52 PM
21

Wow. You can really see how uncomfortable she made him. But after he composes himself again, his response is perfect; immediately pointing out the double standard of how women are allowed to do things men get jailed for. Reverse the roles and this would have been national news, and his career would be over. Unacceptable behavior, but the 'oppressed' woman is free to indulge in her urges whenever she pleases.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:22 PM
1

According to Gallup and Burch, “examples include, group sex, gang rape, promiscuity, prostitution, and resident male insistence on sex in response to suspected infidelity.” Nice to know you didn't read past the first page.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:14 PM
0

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=secrets-of-the-phallus Three page article. Literally the first result on google for 'shape penis evolution'
/r/MensRights22/09/13 04:28 AM
2

Women: Beyond criticism.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:52 PM
82

Just how they blame men for being 'afraid of commitment' when women initiate the majority of divorces.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:44 PM
0

Saying you support patriarchy is saying you support traditional gender roles, which is not what the MRM is about. On top of that, what feminists call the patriarchy does not exist, and has never existed.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:37 AM
3

The usual feminist tactic as defining rape as anything but a 100% sober woman literally screaming 'fuck me'.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:33 AM
3

Any decision women make that ultimately results in them earning less money in life is a decision forced upon them by the patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:26 AM
24

Feminism cannot survive in an environment of objectivity and science, so it must resort to censorship and reality-suppression.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:21 AM
-2

scientists have no proof of that there is no evidence Actually, the evolved shape of the penis is evidence that gang rape was a large part of reproduction at some point - it is shaped to scoop out the semen of the previous male. But as we all know, any science that contradicts the feminist view of the world and its history ist verboten.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:17 AM
8

5 times higher rate of violence against men. circumcision
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:22 AM
6

Women: They can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:35 PM
4

After an eight month long investigation TIL someone being called 'fag' warrants an 8 month investigation. What fucking planet are these people living on? There are murders (usually of men) that don't get that kind of attention.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:33 PM
14

Congratulations, it's a boy! He's a got a 100% chance of being physically abused!
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter