TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Stewart_Smith Archive

View 3 posts and 27 comments by Stewart_Smith on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Edu./Occu.Stewart_Smith/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:10 PM
0

Stewart_Smith/r/MGTOW02/09/18 11:42 AM
0

Anti-MRMStewart_Smith/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A tumor in not an illness. You said bodily integrity is only important when it comes to females, just because their are laws against FGM and not MGM does not mean it is not seen as unimportant. I don't understand why you don't get that. I have answered the question, FGM is far more extreme and cause Females to be in pain for the rest of their lives unlike MGM; I don't understand why you have a mentality that both need the same amount of laws purely for the sake of your ego. They are different th…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:14 PM
1

A fact is a thing that has been proven to be true, which you haven't done for me yet.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:09 PM
-1

Legally no, but a 14 year old can agree to sex therefor less traumatic on his half.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:29 PM
1

I compared the two, to highlight your argument of it being a body part is meaningless. As stated I never knew bodily integrity was only important when it comes to female children, I still don't know as there is no evidence that the government of America agrees with that, meaning that is an opinion of your's as there is no facts to support it.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:28 PM
0

Consent does matter in the context of this argument, they agreed to have sex although legally it's rape. It would be different if the Women forcefully had sex with him; therefor less traumatic on the 14 year old. I'm defending my opinion that because they may have agreed to consent and the condition that sexually boys react differently to girls in sexual situations that it would have been less traumatic for the boy. ' also I do know if it was a man he would be punished because it’s happened befo…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:18 PM
1

I clearly stated what I meant.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:11 PM
-2

Perhaps. In caveman days where we walked around naked: http://www.circinfo.net/why_are_human_males_born_with_a_foreskin.html Sure it's a piece of the human body, so is a tumor, so is the excess skin after weight loss, so what? 'Why is bodily integrity only important when it comes to female children?' I didn't know that was the case. You almost say it as if I agree, yet I have not wrote such a thing.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:09 PM
0

Laws are formed from opinions from what is right and wrong. I'm not telling you I have not made bad decisions when I was not 14 but what I am saying is 14 year old's have the conscious ability to make correct decisions.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:58 AM
-3

You don't know that, 'took advantage' makes it sound like he did not give consent which you don't know. Also you don't know if you took a Male counterpart he would have a worse punishment. Facts > Opinions.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:48 AM
0

How? All I said is Men's rights is not that big of a deal in first world countries, there is no link between that and abolishing Women's rights. 'Women in western culture are the most protected class in the world.' is an opinion and not a fact.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:44 AM
-6

That's a very biased view, the surgically remove an unnecessary part of the penis which has no purpose. That's why I say it isn't that big of a deal as it's done usually young meaning they remember none of the event and I don't see why anyone would really care, it has no purpose; therefor I doubt the person would even care if it was on their or not. Whereas compared to Female mutilation they are removing necessary parts for normal function which often leaves them in pain for the rest of their li…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:41 AM
1

It's an opinion whether they have the ability to make correct decisions, of course I agree with very young children. We don't know if the teacher 'took advantage' because that makes it sound like it was forced, he may have given total consent.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:37 AM
-9

Men sexually are different and it's very common for that to be a reaction. If you study biology in humans you would understand the need for this, unfortunately we no longer live in the wilderness.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:35 AM
-11

You don't know what trauma he went through so you can't say that. And yes that is the definition of rape, like I said a Woman cannot rape a Man (now I've learnt at least not naturally.)
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:32 AM
1

I know they have separate issues, but that still does not explain why specifically Men, every race and gender has specific problems. So why men?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:27 AM
-1

If they died in the workplace that doesn't prove their life prior to that was brutal. Sure as stated somewhere else in some cases Men are worse off, if I said 93.6% if CEOs were men? It doesn't prove they are more privileged nor do your facts.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:25 AM
2

I never said legally, but biologically, physically, somewhat mentally in terms of confidence and ambition which leads to Men being better financially then Women.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:20 AM
-2

You can. I have personally and all folk around me applauded me for thinking equally, I think the videos on YouTube really highlight worse case scenarios. If it is truly self-defense in most cases People will not mind. I think people are shocked when a Man hits a Woman in any circumstance because naturally we are superior, I get what you're saying but unfortunately it's not true.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:18 AM
-10

Legally none of those are official rights, they are opinions.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:14 AM
-13

Not all rights work for everyone, female genital mutilation is far more of an action than Male genital mutilation. They are different things and therefor with different consequences and therefor different rights protecting individuals against those sort of things, having a circumcised penis isn't that big of a deal compared to having your external vagina removed. Give me evidence supporting your second point. Rape is not forced sex, it is unlawful sexual penetration of the vagina, anus or mouth.…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:11 AM
1

But specifically Men, I don't see why it's specifically Men.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:58 AM
-2

Men don't have far shorter lifespans than Women, it's a few years off. Men in first world countries don't live that brutal of a life compared to the rest of the world, healthcare, an economy, a house, a loving family etc. Furthermore I don't feel only Women get empathy, they're treated like garbage in poor countries and in first world ones I'd say they're equal. In most cases Men and Women would get the same amount of empathy.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:58 AM
0

Sure in some cases Men have the disadvantage, the same with Women. But it still does not answer my question; why do you care so much?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:54 AM
0

But why specifically men?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:52 AM
-31

It's not rape, by definition a Woman cannot rape a Man. Therefor legally it's not.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 08:51 AM
1

One Question - what evidence do you have for Men not functioning as well as Women in a normal classroom based on the fact they are Men? Everyone has a desire for activity; so what? It isn't necessary for learning to be a game for Men to be able to comprehend it, everyone would like that but it isn't the best way to learn - it requires less motivation learning that way but if they are taken through School this way when they reach the real world doing real work they will be confronted directly wit…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:06 PM
2

I get what she is saying, young boy's when going through School and further education do tend to be slower and less able; but not less intelligent. We often see Boy's seem to care less, staying up late, eating unhealthy, watching pornography etc. which all has an effect on their ability to understand thing's, so if she said Boy's earlier in life and somewhat later in life are less able in terms of comprehension then she would be correct, but by saying they're 'more stupid' is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter