TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StorkKing Archive

View 4 posts and 152 comments by StorkKing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Any idea who and what it is that enables the childlike attitudes of women that you elude to mate? Men.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:57 PM
1

Have you tried their Cesar salad?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:57 PM
0

The fact that women aren't forced to take responsibility for their actions in the same way men are by society Really?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:55 PM
-5

I'm a socialist. I support men AND women. "Don't be a dick". This is a BIG problem. I'm serious. Studies show that when men treat women as equals, both men and women view said treatment as "unequal." So it goes...
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:53 PM
-18

It's a very, very good analogy. I'm being downvoted because you pussies have never engaged in a fight. You're all a bunch of coddled little pussies.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:48 PM
1

My friend, some people have real problems in life. I'm not sure what else to say.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:46 PM
-26

I'm not sure what your point is.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:45 PM
-47

a man pointing out a double standard ever stopped him going to his dirty, dangerous job Sweetheart, remember that those evil MENZ keep you electricity on, and your toilet flushing. Why not thank them for a change? Why not THANK men for keeping you safe and secure?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:33 PM
-3

But that's just the thing, you didn't present any "arguments" except for the same old whining. Do you really think smacking an ass is the same as starving to death? Your argument is just bizarre.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:31 PM
-8

Well, perhaps we should create a new governmental agency to monitor these appalling transgressions. Eg we could create a new "sexual incompetence" bureau. We could even imprison non-sexy men and women for up to ten, maybe even twenty years. What say you? You fucking piece of shit.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:15 PM
12

Interesting. Personally, I think women should grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:54 PM
-11

A silly deflection. It's not silly at all. We would do well to remember that some people have real problems. If some old guy decided to whip out his dick and start jerking off in front of your children Interesting that you chose a male for your horror movie rather than a female. Or are you going to relax and let it slide It depends. When those girls grabbed my balls and smacked my ass -- yes, I will let it slide. Because I'm not a vindictive piece of shit. Now if someone demanded I have sex OR E…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:53 PM
-18

Nah, stop being a pussy. People have real problems.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:29 PM
2

I provided an analogy though: getting punched in the face. That fucking hurts. We're acting like smacking a girl on the ass is akin to atomic bomb. Well, I got smacked on the ass several times, and I didn't fall to pieces. In fact I didn't even care. Get some fucking perspective for Pete's sake. Life goes on. Children are starving in Africa. The NERVE of these silly women whining about a pat on the ass while children in Africa are starving.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:28 PM
31

I agree the hypocrisy is ridiculous. But hopefully men won't become a bunch of damsels in distress. Remember that someone (men) need to do a bunch of dirty and dangerous work just to keep our fucking lights on.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:04 PM
-44

Nah I just think people are being pussies. I'll provide an analogy: drunk girl grabs my balls I get in a fight, and get my ass kicked. Hmmmm...which is worse? Well, as it turns out, I'm a perfect subject to test this question. I was an athlete in highschool, and not terrible looking. So on the one hand I had a few girls grab my "junk" (who came up with that offensive term anyway?), and pat my ass; on the other hand I got in a few fights, and even when I won said fights, which I usually didn't, i…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:56 PM
3

Karen, you're so awesome. You're a freedom fighter. Would you be offended if I said something like, "I just wanna eat you!"
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:34 PM
6

I 99% agree with you.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:24 PM
5

Am I not being courteous? I absolutely respect self-described feminists who acknowledge the importance of the MRM. With the percentage of men in government Ya see, this is one of the biggest problems -- apex fallacy. You have to understand that men in power don't try to privilege other men. They would much prefer to privilege women.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:15 PM
6

Ban Bossy! /s
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:11 PM
825

Ok. So here's a question. Should men become oversensitive little damsels and get in on the outrage action too? I had a girl grab my package when I was...about sixteen? If memory serves, three different girls slapped me on the ass in highschool. Shall I hunt them down and make their lives miserable? MRA's are right to point out the hypocrisy, but let's not sink to their level. The goal should be to reduce female hysteria, not emulate it.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:31 PM
3

You're very welcome :)
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:59 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHVHeot0pL0
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:40 PM
5

As a feminist mainly working on men's rights at the time I felt annoyed and betrayed for my work. You shouldn't have though. It was just one obnoxious dude. And the reality is that women have institutional power while men and boys do not. I would like to think that feminists would recognize this conundrum and say, "wait, I got everything wrong." How do you feel about feminists repeatedly rejecting shared parenting? Study after study after study demonstrates that shared parenting is in the best i…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:03 PM
1

Indeed...
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:57 PM
10

Yeah that's fine. But mother nature also gave women a bunch of weapons. So I stand by my statement that neither sex is actually "superior."
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:56 PM
7

I don't disagree with anything you said. The problem is that we only recognize female power on a subconscious level. Yet you don't need to hold an official position to be powerful. A beautiful woman (or even "daddy's little girl") can manipulate a man like a puppet. Female power tends to be more indirect. There is no doubt in my mind that females have changed the course of history many, many, many times. And I'm not just talking about Queens. The beauty/horror of female power is that it's indire…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:52 PM
9

You're a very angry little man. In all honesty, try a punching bag. It's fun.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:32 PM
6

Another thing: corporate/feminist media like Vice like to trash us. But I bet dollars to donuts that if any particular "journalist" talked to us, they would find that we are perfectly reasonable. Evidently that's why they refuse to talk to us.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:31 PM
8

No. I happen to love women. And women like Karen Straughan are some of the most persuasive MRA's. If you want to hate women go fuck off to some incel* community. *INcels shouldn't be mocked either. It's a form of gynocentrism. But don't hate women just because you can't get laid. Just hire an escort.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:25 PM
22

Feminists have institutional power. MRA's do not. Feminists have consistently opposed gender equality. NOW won't even support shared parenting even when every single study shows it is in the best interests of the child. I have no doubt that many feminists are good people. But you need to start holding your leaders to account. The people who run your movement are man hating bigots.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:04 PM
13

Alas, feminists oppose gender equality, otherwise we would have no problem working with them.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 01:46 PM
30

MRA's are only anti-feminist insofar as feminists oppose gender equality. Most people don't realize that MRA's have been trying to work with feminists for decades (see Warren Farrell). Feminists have consistently rejected every attempt to treat the sexes equally by law.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 01:45 PM
1

unnecessary in this context Yeah I don't agree with that. If men hadn't fought against the robber barons we'd all be living as serfs.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:00 AM
10

Great post. I agree.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:54 AM
1

Yeah you're mostly right. Certainly, bourgeois women/feminists are some of the most privileged people in history. But I don't see any harm in recognizing that SOME women -- and men -- in the third world are virtual slaves, just like people in the today's first world before men created labor unions.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:47 AM
2

Also: you're not oppressed, bitch Some poor women are oppressed, I think we should keep that in mind. Even if the men and boys tend to have it worse. Recently, a bunch of women (and some men and boys) were working in a sweat shop and the ceiling fell on them. "SAVAR, Bangladesh -- A Bangladesh court on Monday gave police 15 days to interrogate the owner of a building that collapsed last week, killing at least 382 people, as rescuers used heavy machinery to cut through the destroyed structure aft…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:33 AM
4

The future is female.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:25 AM
2

That's a really interesting link, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:20 AM
1

Well, I will say one thing. The founder of the feminist movement in the United States, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, wrote in her diary that "we are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." The founder of the first "women's studies" (now gender studies) course, Sally Miller Gearhart, argued with all sincerity that men and boys should be reduced to "ten percent of the population." She coined the phrase "the future is female," recently spouted by Hillary Clinton. I'm not even sure Hitler went that far. N…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 11:04 PM
1

Is this really the kind of guy you want on your side? No. No I don't. But you have to remember a couple of things. A lot of men are angry. Very angry. And not without reason. Especially fathers who are being denied access to their kids. As for the "typical everyman," surely you can recognize how enraging it must be for the average working class bloke when he is declared a "privileged oppressor" by some smarmy gender studies professor when the stats actually look like this? What ever happened to …
/r/MensRights20/11/17 10:35 PM
3

Why do you say that? He handed out plum roles to scores of actresses.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:32 PM
23

Feminism is starting to look suspiciously like a movement to eliminate all responsibilities from women while placing all burdens on men. You could even call it toxic femininity, since this is not so much a rejection of traditional gender roles as an expansion of them. Some feminists are even trying to eliminate female prisons. So we're entering a situation where women have more rights than men, more privileges than men, yet increasingly with the responsibilities of children. And at the same time…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 08:58 PM
1

How do you know they didn't? This question is almost too absurd to be real, but if you insist. We know they didn't because -- originally -- it was only during economic depressions that women were forced to work outside the home. They had to take jobs in what we would now call "sweat shops", especially textile mills. They would have considered the idea that work was a "privilege" absurd beyond belief. It's telling that the poorest women often chose to be prostitutes rather than work in the condit…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:16 PM
15

Men in power love being chivalrous. They most certainly do not try to "privilege" other men. Feminists got everything wrong. Their theories are upside down.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:27 PM
2

I disagree. It was because like the children women were viewed That's due to neoteny, and also the fact that -- in a state of nature -- women are comparatively helpless when compared to men. But ultimately it's because we simply value female life more than male life. Females are the bottlenecks in reproduction. Males are the expendable sex. We understand this on a subconscious level. It's hard-wired into our DNA.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:08 PM
6

She got owned in the last 20 seconds or so when the other woman said, "on the subject of power we have to remember that these are adult women we're talking about, we're not talking about children." It made Jess look like a complete ass.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:04 PM
3

they were essentially seen as property. I don't agree that women were ever viewed as property, excepting female slaves. How could a man view his own mother as property? When the Titanic sunk, they didn't save the tables and chairs before the men -- they saved the women and girls.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:01 PM
8

This ranks right up there with her fellow honey badger Karen Straughan's best imo. Thank you /u/typhonblue
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:51 PM
1

Thanks. If you do manage to find it please send me a PM.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:40 PM
13

It's similar to the way some MRA's exaggerate the suffering of women under Islam while ignoring that men are often treated even worse in those cultures.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:09 PM
14

That was great, though listening to Phillips is like nails on a chalkboard. I loved the way the other woman kept stressing that these are grown women rather than children -- highlighting the way feminists infantilize females. It's ridiculous hearing Phillips talk about "power imbalances" when she's a fucking MP for Christ's sake. The biggest loser was the male conservative MP. He defended the practice of police not telling men what they're accused of -- which is straight out of Kafka.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:59 PM
19

Unfortunately some MRA's on the right are relishing the Franken accusation. They are putting partisan politics before their principles.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:45 PM
1

I was thinking of that document you to linked to where a second wave feminist admits that without the ford foundation they wouldn't have gotten off the ground. Do you still have that? I'd like to bookmark it...
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:39 PM
1

And women did the slaughtering? In the case of Queens, yes. They actually initiated more wars than Kings. (edit: meant to say, were more likely to initiate wars than kings). But the fact that you felt the need to say what you just did shows you're a bigot. You view men as a "collective" rather than as individual human beings. It makes no difference to the person who is slaughtered who did the slaughtering -- they are still dead. You remind of those right wingers who obsess over "black on black c…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:37 PM
1

I like this version
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:45 AM
2

/r/legbeards
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:58 AM
21

Yep. Even in just the last few months I've noticed a huge increase in the number of pro-MRA comments online. Interest in MGTOW is exploding. This has also been noticed by feminists at subs like TrollX. Support for their movement is collapsing even as they achieve more and more institutional power. Meanwhile the MRM is growing exponentially. We may already have reached the point of no return. Men are fed up with being harassed, abused and lied about by feminists. Being labeled "privileged" in the…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:52 AM
3

Uh-huh.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:07 AM
8

Because historically, factually, men have not been oppressed. Absolutely absurd. Look up the word "androcide." Or look at the DNA stats. At every point in civilized history men and boys have been much, much more likely to be slaughtered. If that isn't "oppression" nothing is.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:06 AM
5

You can’t go dismissing people because they’re straight white and male. Not sure why you're directing this at me, since that's exactly the point I was making.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:02 AM
24

Good post. And yes, of course we are. Women aren't being held to any standards at all (that's a little hyperbolic, but it's really not far from the truth).
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:58 AM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:53 AM
3

It was started by women who wanted basic rights and stuff. Nope.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:53 AM
4

women weren't allowed to do much of anything but sweep and cook. Absolute rubbish. There are records of female blacksmiths going back to the middle ages, and women exercised enormous power in their communities and in the home. You're acting like women wanted to go work in coal mines. Read Christina Hoff Sommers, she explains (via historical documents) what actually happened. Females have always been the privileged sex.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:51 AM
2

If they shame those that don't go to war it means they are valuing those going to war. Wow. Just wow. There were a few feminists who stood up for men's rights during the war. Emma Goldman and some other anarchists sued the US government, arguing (rightly) that forcing men to fight was a violation of the 13th Amendment's prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. That you are trying to justify white feather is absolutely sickening. You should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:49 AM
1

its like a peek behind the lefts curtain. lol psychological warfare personnel from the Pentagon were caught working for CNN during the war on Serbia. It's probably run by the CIA. It is in no way "left", unless you reduce the left to feminism and ID politics.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:45 AM
1

Snarky teenage girls. That's what they all sound like.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:08 AM
6

Beautiful.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:05 AM
9

Women are judged for their looks. Men are judged for their looks as well as their bank accounts.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 03:00 AM
2

Second wave feminism was largely financed by the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. This includes the first gender studies class. There's a user named /u/ee4m (?) who can provide you with links. The CIA also sponsored Gloria Steinem Ms. Magazine. Third wave feminism is supported by almost the entire global elite. Not just Soros but the folks at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the UN etc. Even "conservatives" and "Republicans" support feminism though they claim not to. They never challenge feminist legi…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:56 AM
3

I'm trying to teach you something. It has nothing to do with "gender studies." I'm not a feminist. I linked you to the work of an evolutionary biologist. You're acting like a child. I get it, you're enamored with the bald guy, but I'm telling you right now that he would be laughed at by anyone with a modicum of expertise in anthropology. If you wanna remain ignorant that's your business.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 02:52 AM
1

lol imagine actually signing your name to that. This guy will never be able to live this down. He will be forever branded a mega simp.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:54 AM
1

Petitions are lame. They come at the issue from a position of weakness. Keep changing the cultural narratives and eventually corporate leviathans like Google will be forced to adapt.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:50 AM
2

Heh. This guy is simply clueless. He makes so many errors in the first few minutes that it's difficult to know where to begin. He talks about how we "evolved" in "villages", apparently unaware that all human societies were nomadic until very recently). Then he claims that "men competed for resources" so they could get the hot chicks. Not a single ethnology of hunter-gatherer bands supports this contention. You can read a good meta analysis of said societies here. So to reiterate, this guy doesn'…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:29 AM
1

This guy needs to read an introductory anthropology textbook. He hasn't the slightest idea what he's talking about.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:54 AM
11

white man (straight also) It's a good thing you told me you're straight, and white, and male, because that's absolutely crucial information. I would have had to judge your arguments completely differently if you were gay, or East Indian, or a trans woman. That's how you SJW's conceive of reality, right? typical male ignorance ...And a spineless, self hating douche at that. Stop being a doormat. Nobody thinks it's cute, least of all women. if you cannot imagine or empathize with other people, don…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:51 AM
7

Hey, if Google wants to ignore IMD that's fine by me. I can acknowledge their hypocrisy and still not give a shit.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:44 AM
29

3rd guy has it backwards: if he's right the percentage would actually be higher. 2nd guy sounds like a chick. 1st guy is a pseudo tough guy and a moron. See how tough you are when the cops show up and drag you off to prison after your wife hits you in the head with a frying pan.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:22 AM
1

Great sub, thanks.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:18 AM
1

Male stoicism is a good thing for the most part. If we all constantly fell to pieces there'd do be no one to steer the ship. The center wouldn't hold, as it were. But yes, I do acknowledge that "society" (especially women) need to be much more tolerant of males showing vulnerability. One of my mom's best friends was a history teacher at on all girl's private school. Hardcore feminist. My mom relayed that this woman didn't like the tennis player Roger Federer because he broke down after losing a …
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:18 AM
7

I often wonder about this. Are they really able to just filter out most men like that? To the point where they honestly believe what they're saying?
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:11 AM
12

Yep. The key to understanding feminism is that it's all projection. From "patriarchy" theory to "objectification" theory to "privilege" theory to the belief that men hate women. Take whatever a feminist says, turn it around 180 degrees, and you'll have the truth.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:08 AM
6

Vice is gutter trash. It's a good example of how you can take a decent media org and turn it to shit by embracing the SJW cult.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:19 PM
4

Alot of these new atheists are just tradcon white knights. They seem to be woefully ignorant of the any of the recent data on female against male abuse, or the state of men and boys in general. They get paid by attacking Muslims and Christians while ignoring Jews. That's basically their schtick. One of the best ways of getting suckers to rally to your cause (the Pentagon/CIA are acutely aware of this) is to highlight the suffering of women and girls. It doesn't matter if the men and boys are act…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:34 PM
2

This can't be real...
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:30 PM
13

There's nothing "toxic" about my comments. I'm just explaining how men grownups deal with these problems. Your problem is that you think you're the center of the universe. Grow up. Don't expect everybody else to bend over backwards to accommodate your feelings. Also, if you're really so frightened by going to work and being around men, maybe consider another field.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:20 PM
20

Actually in the Scandinavian countries they wasted millions of dollars trying to get women into stem. They eventually abandoned the project because most women simply weren't interested. You can learn about this by watching the documentary "The Gender Equality Paradox." I studied medical transcription when I was younger and was the only male in the class. I also took Jiu Jitsu classes when I was a teenager and was one of only two white guys in the class (it was in Richmond, B.C., which is mostly …
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:07 PM
8

At what point are we going to acknowledge that we live in a profoundly misandric society? Shame on the women who aren't speaking out against this. And shame on the male billionaire pieces of shit who are who allowing these harpies to control the airwaves.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:14 PM
1

Does it allow comments?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:16 PM
8

don’t find themselves trapped in low-paid, part-time jobs Imagine being this disconnected from reality. Feminists live in la-la land.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:15 PM
3

Canada has CAFE, so that's a start. Also, I can't speak for everyone but a lot of Canadian men like to do out-doors shit. So we prefer to get out of the shed and into the wilderness. It's a crime that our boy scouts have been made coed.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:10 PM
1

You have a really fancy way of admitting it doesn't exist. Does a purely free market capitalist system exist? Does that mean capitalism doesn't exist? Do you deny that some societies are more egalitarian than others? Do you deny that a society can move in one direction or the other? So the States which allowed women's suffrage before the 19th expanding is not history? The States which didn't ratify the 19th expanding after it was passed expanding wasn't history? Sure. But the main impetus behind…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:00 PM
1

That's just...sad.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:31 PM
1

(a)You'd have to provide some sources. (b) Are these relationships stable? Or are we talking about a revolving door of new "fathers" for the children?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:28 PM
0

*Yawn
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:02 PM
2

Hahahahahha. I saw this coming a mile away. Where's your loyalty, bitch?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:02 PM
2

Women are just as violent as men if not more so. They're actually more likely to engage in unilateral violence against their partners; they perform more violence against children (especially boys) than biological fathers, which is a major contributing factor to the creation of violent adults; they are more emotionally violent than men; and they commit much more proxy violence (eg through false accusations). It's true that men are more likely to commit homicides, however. The main difference betw…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:57 PM
1

Where is the modern egalitarian society? Egalitarianism exists on a spectrum, meaning that some countries are more egalitarian than others. The United States would rank near the bottom. That helps to explain why everyone is taking anti-depressants. It's not natural to have such massive inequality. There are also different kinds of egalitarianism. As mentioned, widespread monogamy is one kind because there is more equal sexual access for males. But that's really only a temporary fix, as Unwin not…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:00 AM
1

Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:08 AM
13

It's normal to be angry. In fact I would say it's healthy to be angry. Anger is a natural product of injustice. Anyone who could study the injustices facing men and boys and not be angry would have to be deeply disturbed or at least incredibly callous. Krishnamurti wrote, "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." The important thing is keep your sense of perspective. We would do well to remember to that the majority of women have never supported feminism. Not…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:47 AM
1

Good thing we're not chimps and bonobos. As human beings, we'll eventually have to do away with war or it will do away with us.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:50 AM
3

It's something to behold, I agree.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:17 AM
1

Found it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/comments/7dwulv/gender_bias_isnt_important_because_some_men_are/ They may be able to help you.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 03:11 AM
2

Til that Ghana has more gender equality than the West.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:41 AM
3

Dude, just because you're too much of a pussy to stand up for your rights doesn't mean the rest of us are gonna stand by while fathers are separated from their children and boys are taught their they masculinity is "toxic." Fuck right off.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:14 AM
29

A 4chan troll made a funny video about this controversy. It seems appropriate that he used Carmina Burana as the soundtrack given the apocalyptic hysteria emanating from the femosphere over a bloody make up app.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:31 PM
1

I bloody hate the latest trend of misusing the Bonobono analogy as a model for human society. That is the lesson. Pick one. In any case, I was merely providing an analogy, not a model. Primitive societies were egalitarian not only in terms of sharing resources but access to sex.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:15 PM
6

So the solution is to stop living in civilization then we don't have to worry about the 80/20 rule? I didn't say that. I just pointed out that the 80/20 "rule" is misleading because it is portrayed as a constant rather than a product of specific social arrangements. And theoretically at least, egalitarianism is still possible in civilized societies. Indeed monogamy through marriage is itself an example of egalitarianism, since it prevents total alpha male dominance of females. It may also be imp…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:09 PM
4

It's not nearly as bad as the "review" would suggest. Feminists just view everything through their own distorted lens.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 06:04 PM
6

Fuck, that makes me angry. Are we supposed to believe that when Henry Lee Lucas' mother forced him to wear a dress and watch her having sex that this had no effect on his psyche? '“It’s always the mother, isn’t it?” Bill remarks to Holden, noting how many of the killers they have interviewed blame their negligent moms for their fates. I don't think that was Fincher's intent, personally. In any case, Edmond Kemper's mother psychologically tortured him for his entire childhood. She even kept him l…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 06:02 PM
7

If we accept the notion of Pareto principle and hypergamy that the red pill claims (and I do accept it is true). Women will always choose the most attractive males, and the top 20% will have 80% of the sex. This is by no means proven. The DNA stats are heavily skewed because the vast majority of people who have ever lived have lived in civilized societies. Civilized societies (to date) have been hierarchical, and in hierarchal societies women are hypergamous. "Red Pill" DNA stats also fail to ta…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:39 PM
6

Men have an in group preference for women and children, women have an in group preference for women and children. Probably a typo on your part but men have out-group preference toward women.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 04:07 PM
12

The reality is that we have no idea how many rape accusations are false. The majority are never proved one way or the other. More importantly, it wouldn't even matter if 0.00001 percent of accusations were false and the rest true. Due process rights exist (or used to exist) for a reason. Do women lie about rape? Of course they do. Check out the history of lynching for starters. We've seen stories on this sub of women accusing men of sexual assault for reasons as trivial as wanting to get out of …
/r/MensRights18/11/17 04:03 PM
10

I watched it. The reviewer apparently missed the part where most of the serial killers were viciously abused by their (single) mothers. This is discussed at length. At one point one of the FBI agents even says "It's always the mother." Nevertheless there's one scene where the agent is lecturing a group of school kids, and he says it's "mostly" men who become "disturbed." The girls all laugh. About one in five serial killers are female, so while it's true that most serial killers are male, 20 per…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 03:56 PM
2

Pinker is an ideologue. His work "Better Angels" has been completely discredited. See also. In my opinion it qualifies as a work of academic fraud, which is unfortunate, since "Black Slate" offers some decent insights.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:06 AM
1

I assume we're talking about men and women in the context of gender rights? Woman: All of the honey badgers. Karen Straughan in particular. Man: Earnest Belford Bax, Warren Farrell, Paul Nathanson. All were/are liberal or left wing (Bax was a socialist) and challenged feminism even at the risk of becoming outcasts among their tribe. That takes great courage.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:59 PM
13

I'd tell her to deal with it herself or call the police. I'm not a chaperone for every woman on the planet.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:53 PM
41

"Manspreading" is nothing more than a harassment campaign against men and boys for their biology. We are designed to sit that way and 99 percent of us make room for others when they sit down next to us, even at our own discomfort. It's incredible that the campaign even exists. You would think feminists would have consulted a basic textbook about male physiology before claiming it was a "micro aggression". Fucking assholes.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:41 PM
3

True of many male feminists for sure. But the ones at the top -- the men who actually fund this bullshit -- are a different beast. I think their motives are considerably more sinister.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 04:46 PM
6

Clinton was left wing? Lol.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 04:32 PM
40

Yeah this is a sexual fantasy. Mods should remove it.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:22 PM
3

terrorism under the Victory Act. lol. Edit: let's just pretend that this real. "Terrorism" under the "Victory Act". Sounds straight out of Orwell. Are people really this stupid? Edit: also "Patriot Act." Are people really this retarded?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:01 AM
1

;)
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:30 PM
1

Interesting to contrast the non-reaction to this alleged violent gang rape vs. the hysteria over some dude patting a girl's ass ten years ago.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:46 PM
1

I would also be interested in studies on adopted children from gay and lesbian couples. However I suspect that unbiased research on the topic would be virtually impossible to come by. Studies would have to either show certain positive outcomes or would not be published. I seem to recall that the Canadian academic Paul Nathanson, who is himself a gay man, opposes same sex adoption because (to paraphrase) it amounts to a social experiment using children as guinea pigs, and also because the (still …
/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:18 PM
7

Finally a European country does something right in the Gender war. Bravo Italia!
/r/MensRights16/11/17 07:34 PM
15

It's interesting that they have a picture of Malcolm X for their wallpaper. In his early life he was an outright racist toward whites. He literally called them "devils." Malcolm's case is at least understandable. His father was killed by the Klan, his mother ended up in a mental institution and his teachers treated him like a chimpanzee despite his extremely high intelligence. Understandable is not the same thing as justified, however, and this is where SJW's lose the plot. Malcolm X was not jus…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:52 PM
7

Pretty sure India has a thriving men's rights movement. In many ways they put the rest of us to shame.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:40 AM
3

I'm 40 minutes in and it's excellent so far. Highly recommended.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:51 AM
1

Not going to agree or disagree, but you could almost use the same post to argue that women are the most natural picks for managerial positions Except men are not children. GK Chesterton actually predicted all of this a hundred years ago. He argued that mothers were both despots and anarchists -- which works perfectly for raising little kids. In the traditional male sphere? Not so much. Studies also that show women became unhappier in managerial positions, while men become happier.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:36 AM
2

What I find interesting is that if any conservatives actually wanted to bring down Obamacare over the last few years they could have simply sued on the basis that the law is a sexist violation of the 14th amendment. Guess they didn't mind Obamacare all that much after all. Ouch. Yeah it's all a dog and pony show.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 02:32 AM
2

You're right, I did misunderstand.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:56 AM
1

It's a troll and probably a feminist. In one thread it refers to women as "cunts" and suggests there's something weird about a woman being an MRA. Then in the next it he hysterically defends the feminist position. Not sure why the mods haven't banned it yet.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:51 AM
3

It wouldn't surprise me if women were better and reading facial expressions. However, studies also show that psychopaths are better than non-psychopaths at reading facial expressions. So the claim "read facial expressions" = empathy doesn't follow.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:47 AM
4

You're a dense fucking idiot, and that's not a baseless attack. You're attacking me here baselessly you dickhead. Go fuck yourself. I rest my case.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:21 AM
8

I've realized that I need to broaden my topic to include more of the manosphere Why? They have nothing to do with the MRM beyond the fact that involve men.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:05 AM
9

This clown is the most obnoxious troll I've seen on this sub in quite a well. Not sure why he hasn't been banned yet as he's clearly breaking the rules. Almost every one of his posts is simply a baseless attack on another poster.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 01:03 AM
7

That book has been discredited. See also. In my opinion it qualifies as a work of academic fraud, which is unfortunate, since "Black Slate" offers some decent insights. Feminism could have been a legitimate movement, but it never was.
/r/MGTOW16/11/17 12:22 AM
2

I don't think it's quite so cut and dried. Do you really think that men being better chess players is purely a product of socialization? All of that spacial reasoning stuff? One of the problems with a purely constructionist view as that it allows for feminists to claim "discrimination" in any area where men surpass women. This in turn "justifies" discrimination against men. Now, it may be better from a PR point of view to simply say "woman aren't as interested" in X. Which no doubt plays a role …
/r/MensRights15/11/17 11:58 PM
8

You're posts are useless. They consist almost entirely of berating other users.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 10:30 PM
8

Yes fair enough, that was an unfair generalitzation.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:21 PM
195

I'm gonna hijack the top post to add something. The featuring of this blog on "men's rights" will no doubt to be used portray MRA's as tradcons who don't think women belong in the workplace. I don't think that's the point. While feminists oppose shared parenting, or the "cutting in" of men into the traditional female sphere, MRA's are not remotely interested in "sending women back to the kitchen." The whole thing's sort of a myth anyway, since women have throughout history worked outside the hom…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:40 PM
1

I love the new term "sexual misconduct." It sounds like it comes from a dystopian novel about some deranged totalitarian society.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:40 PM
8

Great post. You should indeed "go on" and make it a separate thread.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:38 PM
37

Having briefly flirted with the idea that women are strong and independent and don't need men watching over and protecting them, feminists are now demanding that the entire state be turned into one giant chaperone. The funny thing is I don't think these feminists are nearly as afraid as they claim to be, they're just enamored with demonizing men; the easiest way of doing so is to pretend to be damsels in distress (toxic femininity?). Feminists are effectively engaged in a terrorist campaign agai…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:28 PM
1

Serious scholars Hahahah. Novick to Mommsen to Cesarani Those individuals are all hysterical Zionists. You may as well have quoted the JDL. bromance Do yourself a favor and don't use that word. You sound like you're writing for Buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 01:08 PM
1

both academia and media have mostly written him off as a crackpot Citation? Zionist ideologues don't count.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 09:37 AM
7

This guy went through a hell of an ordeal when he tried to create a men's rights group on campus. Can't remember which one.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:15 AM
6

I see nothing wrong with your post. "Toxic masculinity" is a hateful term designed to demonize men. Though I have to admit you do "sound" like a man. I'm not sure why that is exactly.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:12 AM
2

Finkelstein is a fucking legend. If you're one of those pro-Zionist types be sure to check out his work, or for entertainment watch his debate with Allan Dershowitz.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:31 AM
9

Wow, check out the comment section. This piece of excrement declares that men are trash, but the feminists still aren't happy. This is the highest rated comment: Wait, I think I get it. Calling yourself trash is how men deal with the fact that they actually like patriarchy and misogyny because it benefits them. So they show shame and that covers up for the fact that they still want dominance. If you say “I’m trash” and do a little performative feminism, you can avoid changing the status quo and …
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter